skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Exactly -- it is that "something in between"

The nice thing with zero-tier is that it is literally two commands to get your network up and connected.

hide your eyes if curl|bash makes you cringe...

curl https://install.zerotier.com|bash

Then zerotier-cli join <your_network>

Go into the Zerotier web admin, check the box, and boom, that machine is on the network, securely.

Now I can spin up a bunch of containers for exploration/testing/or non-essential like grafana, prometheus, various exporters, metabase, etc.

I try to keep traefik clean and only serving secure traffic to "live" and customer-facing things on 80/443.
The UPS and Downs of Being a Writer with ADHD
Uses built in android/iOS features
and doesn't have access to the biometric data directly.

Required to open the Web view for added security?

Seems weird for it to be required though, if my device is already unlocked that should be good enough
Wow! That cite has a lot of numbers! They even explain what a short is! It's like one-stop shopping for misinfo on how to devastate your finances.
Every day I become more and more of the opinion that Fedora/RHEL are the only distros that are actually worth using. I recently installed ubuntu server to see what it was like compared to fedora server and was shocked to see that the python package still links to python 2 (!) despite it already being officially discontinued.

Fedora Silverblue/CoreOS look like a massive step in the right direction which no other mainstream distros are working on.

Fedora also seems to be the only distro willing to set sane defaults for everything (SELinux, Wayland, CGroupsV2, soon to be pipewire, python 3) while every other distro waits around for someone else to make the first move.
Every “fact” contains an element of subjective interpretation. It is literally not possible to present a fact in a way that is unbiased by subjective reasoning. Or if it is possible, we certainly have discovered a way to do it.
> solving the TCP ossification issues by decoupling protocol upgrades from OS upgrades

QUIC explicitly addresses "network middlebox ossification" of TCP, by encrypting almost everything about the protocol. This type of ossification is where the network blocks or corrupts any deviations that it doesn't recognise but thinks it does.

TCP "OS ossification" is a different kind. By itself, this could have been overcome by streaming TCP-in-UDP and amending it from there. Even that is only because of OS APIs. If OSes allowed applications to bind to a TCP port and process the raw packets, applications that want to could implement TCP themselves.

If that kind of dual-binding seems strange, I think it's actually more or less what we'll end up with with QUIC in the end: The OS providing QUIC sockets (socket(AF_INET,SOCK_QUIC,...)) to applications that don't care to implement the QUIC stack themselves, while allowing other applications to bind to UDP in the usual way and implement their own application-level QUIC.

I think current QUIC solves application vs. OS ossification issues in the short term, allowing things to evolve beyond TCP, but it's a temporary benefit.

In time I think we will see QUIC ossify when it's implemented in many applications that don't get updated.

Most browsers are updated often. But I'm seeing more obscure applications starting to include QUIC and depend on it (without any TCP fallback even) - leading eventually to hundreds of "hand-written quality" QUIC implementations, all destined to get out of date. Various languages are implementing their own QUIC libraries, and these aren't all going to be maintained the same way. Shipped applications ossify too.

That's why I think it'll end up in the OS kernels eventually.
This is not mutually exclusive. We need both.

Responsive package maintainers do not help in any way with Firefox zero days, vulnerable codec parsers in MPV, a weird LibreOffice extensions scanning all my files and sending it to a server, or a VS code extension downloading and running random binaries.

I want to get my packages from a trusted central repository. AND I want most of applications to be sandboxed and have restricted access permissions to the filesystem and network.

There is no reason why repos can't package desktop applications in a way that runs them inside a sandbox by default, whatever the concrete implementation is, with me also having the ability to run randomly downloaded binaries with the same security guarantees.
Well, I guess it's subjective - but if you didn't have docker-compose I would have a whole lot more questions about how you are managing all the running services, storing configuration, defining networks, monitoring health of containers, defining volumes, port mappings etc etc. It may be "just a python package" but so is Django and docker is "just a go package" :-)
Who exactly am I conspiring with?
Some of the language is a bit intense/combative, especially in the beginning, but I do understand where he's coming from.

I've done 5 or 6 solo sessions in the past year since reading this book, sometimes mixing a tab of LSD as well to go a bit deeper. They have all been different but have largely gone as described in the book. I've done a lot of therapy in my life and personal growth is a priority in my life.

As a result of these sessions I've overcome some serious challenges that I had previously assumed were static aspects of my personality. It has been challenging to be sure, but much better to deal with things head-on for a short time, than to deal with them low-key forever.

Thought the community here would appreciate this given the mild interest/openness to psychedelics.

I'd be happy to answer any questions about my experience so far, ask whatever you'd like!

[edit: missed a word]
Seems like a good reason that their accreditation board should let them now that this would result in them losing accreditation for all STEM degrees.
This review doesn't say all that much. I just took another look at it and it merely reports what % of the studies mention those effects without effect sizes or anything of the sort.

Also they clump psychotomimetic and dissociation effects together which is really weird as ketamine is a dissociative.
It's literally the highest number in their analysis (72%) because dissociation is to be expected from a dissociative.
It's also paywalled for me, despite all the usual blocking addons.

Opening in a private tab works.
I tried looking up more information about this:

https://psychology.wikia.org/wiki/Mommy_and_I_are_one

"According to studies that determine the subconscious mind's ability to absorb subliminal messages, the subliminal phrase "Mommy and I are one" is considered the most effective subliminal message to aid in self motivation."

How do you test if a subliminal message is effective?

This part is interesting:

In a game of darts, researchers found the the phrase "It's OK to beat dad" improved scores.
What's the Django/Rails equivalent in Go? The value from Python isn't Python itself (though it might be easier to write in - trading off reliability for ease of use compared to a compiled language) but the ecosystem.

Fully-featured frameworks such as Django, Rails, etc give you lots of functionality out of the box which is very valuable especially at the early stages of the project where performance isn't a concern yet.
It's more Django than Python specifically.

Does Go (genuinely) have something to match?
This is called validation, and it's much harder epistemically than verification.

Is it possible to check at runtime that the model is accurate?

Do you have a sensible thing to do if the model isn't accurate (e.g., fallback into "failsafe" mode, let an on-call engineer know that an assumption was violated, etc.)?

If yes & yes, well, there's your answer :)
Default configurations – without tampering by corporate admins – are of course immune.

Application layer developers are fighting corporate TLS interception with things like certificate pinning, not using the OS certificate store, making it harder to modify the app's certificate store. The goal is to heavily discourage corporations from breaking end-to-end security to spy on their employees.
> I wonder if there's a way to marry "efficient market hypothesis" with "reflexivity on the edges" somehow.

The key to this synthesis is that there is sometimes genuine, fundamental value to be had in creating a Schelling point for a resource or a certain kind of transaction. This is (part of) why online marketplaces are valuable and defensible businesses, for example.

"Reflexivity" is simply what it looks like when a Schelling point is in the process of forming. There are some very rare but very real cases in which a bubble really does create its own reality, and that reality sticks around because a shared delusion turns out to create enough real value to justify its existence. There is an art to identifying those cases, and that art is as well-compensated as one might imagine. (Most of the time, though, a Ponzi is just a Ponzi.)
> So I didn’t want to give the company name because it’s just an anecdote, but it’s from a company that is usually in the top off people’s minds when asked about car manufacturers who are synonymous with quality.

I'll take this as a non answer then.
It was so easy to draw simple graphics in pascal, right?

I have this snippet burned in my head and I used it all the time in MS-DOS' on Turbo Pascal 6 or 7 to get to the tasty 320x200 palleted graphics mode:

asm
mov ax,13h
int 10h
end

iirc, after that you could simply directly access video memory using something like "mem[$A000:x+200*y] = color;" and that was it.

Fun times.
I think you misunderstood the intent. Constantly optimizing your toolset instead of building a startup with what you already know is a very common form of bike shedding and is one of the hardest things for some developer-founders to get past.
If you only mean that you believe in the right to speak without going to jail, and no protections of speech beyond that, then ok. I mean, I strongly disagree, but I acknowledge your position of not supporting protections beyond that.

But you should know that that isn't what other people generally mean when they say "free speech". For example, most people would also say that freedom of speech also requires that people aren't fined money for saying things that they believe, or things like that.

If by saying this you are trying to shift the public understanding of the term in a direction of such minimal applicability, I would oppose this shift.
EDIT: closed parenthesis

Well, it still failed to compile because you didn't have a trailing ";" and the rest of your comment wasn't even in programming code.
It's all regulatory capture, lobbying money from big pharma industrial complex - likely tied to the prison industrial complex who are happy to fill prisons, along with a few other complexes.
This post can explain why you only need smaller percentage to squeeze short sellers.

https://wallstreetplayboys.com/amc-gamestop-and-nokia-why-it...

The bottom line, everyone knows they can sell to short sellers at ANY price, because the short sellers have to buy at ANY price. Why would anyone sell to short sellers at less than ANY price?
No doubt their excellent move for efficiency will result in higher tuition fees.
Fair enough. But Laravel is apparently cut from similar cloth so you'd be in agreement with the general philosophy here?
Aren't we in a bubble since march 2020, if not sometime in 2018?
Maps.org founder Rick Doblin's recommendation if someone is having a bad experience with Ayahuasca [or other psychedelic] is to give them a half therapeutic dose of MDMA; therapeutic dose is 100-125mg.
Django drives the choice here. Batteries included, huge community support, and AMAZING documentation. Half the software I write is from stackoverflow. LOL

I dont see dockerizing as a problem. Once copied out from my template I never think about it. I do admit that familarity with the underlying Image OS (Debian in this case) makes debugging / fussing about a non-issue.
There's been a fair bit of research on "depressive realism", the hypothesis that depressed people's view of reality is actually more accurate and it's "normal" people who have a system of thinking which is efficient, but wrong:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Depressive_realism

I think that this may be an example of the tension between what's accurate vs. what's adaptive. There are a number of other social phenomena - like lying, exaggeration, overconfidence, risk-taking, perceptual bias, etc. - where individuals espouse views that are wrong because being wrong is more effective (in the sense of better social status or reproductive success) than being correct. Depression is likely the inverse of that: depressed people see the world accurately, but all of the mechanisms biasing toward survival involve distorting our perception of the world.
Truly disgusting. Why is it normal to be able to sign up for a service (such as internet service) completely self-service, with no human interaction, but as soon as I want to cancel the service, I have to call a 1-800 number and interact with a human? Comcast/Xfinity does this. Anti-consumer at best.
> This was discussed at length years ago and it was decided that passing a fractional scale value to the client is not what you want, makes the code much more complicated and doesn't really solve the blurriness.

From your link:

"""

> While rendering at rational factor can't be of better quality, it can

> however be done at a much higher quality than downscaling, faster and with

> less memory usage.

Perhaps, but that benefit diminishes compared to the cons.

"""

Being blurry and losing performance was deemed acceptable for other benefits. Maybe I'm discounting those benefits but the penalties are very real. 2x performance penalties in performance sensitive code and blurry scalable content like fonts are real downsides.

Looking further down the thread what I think would be the ideal solution is what is being proposed and doesn't get any response:

https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/wayland-devel/2013-Ma...

The current solution actually seems much more complex than this as the protocol needs to actually know about scaling instead of the scaling factor being just some metadata about how things should be and have been rendered and everything else would be within the client and compositor code.

> How do you render a 20px tall font at scale 1 2/3 without being blurry or without rounding errors?

Fonts are not sized in pixels for the most part. Modern fonts are resolution independent and the renderers try hard to fit it to however many pixels you have. By faking them out and telling them "here's a 200x200 box to do your work" and then later scaling down that box to 150x150 prevents that code from working properly.

> What happens when you try to stretch this window across multiple screens?

For this case your render at the maximum of the two fractional scales and scale down in the lowest one. It's no worse than the current solution for that screen and better for the one that matches.
You are entirely wrong on this. Mathematics and logic are the core of science.
Caffeine before noon or sticking to a last call at 2pm kind of help me. Medication wise I tried CBD which seem to help sleep a little better. YMMV.
If the short position’s larger than the float, the squeeze will get sqouze.
TCC 0.9.27 can build GCC 2.95.3. You can build TCC using GNU Mes, which itself can be built using M2-Planet, which is written in a subset of C.

https://www.gnu.org/software/mes/
Ha, I was wondering why there was so much California hate from businesses. This explains some of it.
But why is the situation bad? has student population dropped off?
There are less known causes of depression, where medications won't help - for example, if I ask you did you ever have ear infections as a child and were any of them painful - if your answer is yes, then I'd direct you to a specific therapy and a book that explains how that can lead to blocks in development and a depressed nervous system.

Ayahuasca has helped me, MDMA as well, and a sound therapy I did in my early 20s dramatically shifted my life - as to what I'm referring to in my previous paragraph; prior to the sound therapy, which you can actually do a diagnostic audiogram to check for imbalances in hearing to confirm an issue, I would have been considered to have Aspergers - though never formally diagnosed, after the sound therapy I connected to emotion and my body again that I didn't know I was partially to fully disconnected/blocked from, which had an effect of hypersensitivities as well.
Man, you just put another 5 things on my list to write up! thank you
> I would hate to not even have this one tiny little advantage from all this

How is what you describe an advantage? Based on what you've said it does not sound to me, a third party reader, that this advantage is bearing any fruit.

This is talking in the abstract of course. If one were in an oppressive authoritarian regime bent on murdering you, one would be both sad and right, but one should also be mad too. So there must exist correct yet sad understandings of the world. But surely if you see people in the exact same situation as you, and you think them fools for being happy. That sounds wrong? Are they missing an immediate danger which your sadness is allowing you to take advantage of or escape?

How can an advantage exist which does not lead to action but rather self-harming inaction?
This may be beside the point, but I don't think there is any alien lift out there. I am going to make up number N_life_universes which is the number of universes needed in order for an instance of intelligent life to evolve. Many people seem to assume this much less than one. I think it is much greater than one, meaning most universes you look at will be void of life. I'd also say there are many universes, one source being the rules of quantum mechanics. But I know some people believe in wave function collapse, and if that is true I am not sure what this means for having mulitple universe.

There is a related number, N_hamlet_universes. This is the number of universes needed in order for monkeys to type Hamlet typing as fast as they can, covering every planet spaced 6' feet apart (in case one gets sick). I think this is also a very large number but I haven't figured it out.
US congressional commission hears China may force Taiwan crisis in 2021
This is true in America as well, though nobody cares. DVD's and bluray are protected with DRM, and you can only legally circumvent that DRM to use a short chunk as a critic or to develop accessibility features.

I am unaware of anyone prosecuted for ripping though, only several for developing/spreading the DRM circumvention.

Though, the other poster is right, that's a separate thing to what is being discussed.
That's really clever to tie taxes to the declared scope of IP rights. Would be good to get this idea seen by Sanders. RIAA would do just about anything to stop this law. Right now they claim that a downloaded song (without their permission) or a movie makes them lose 10k usd a some fantasy amount in that range. But then IRS could multiply this amount by the number of songs they own and demand 2% - in line with property taxes. Better 3%, since IP rights, unlike houses, are active assets that bring royalties.
Reselling, lending or giving away books is legal in my country and, as far as I know, most countries in Latin America. Nobody is turning a blind eye, it's actually legal.

I wouldn't want to live in a world where I cannot lend my book to whoever the hell I want. Or give it away.
This article leaves out that fact that new White House orders now also "require masks in places under federal jurisdiction — namely airports, ships, buses between cities, trains, federal courthouses and federal lands."

https://www.chicagotribune.com/suburbs/post-tribune/ct-ptb-b...
No they're not. There's a very clear 2 year maintenance cycle.
For exemple Robinhood mostly getting out of the GME trading business because it was too hot and they ran out of credit with their clearing house, preventing their users from participating in the market.
> Does Go (genuinely) have something to match?

To the extent of django or rail's maturity and features, likely not, although I don't know what features you use django for. I guess this answers my question to an extent.

Last time I worked with golang I used gin and xorm, but there were some things I had to manually do. That being said, I find rails to be an enormous beast that provides a lot of things that one may or may not need.

In my experience, working with golang and rust, which are compiled and statically/strongly typed have saved me headaches and time even with having to hand-roll some features.
I find moonlight unbearable to setup and parsec tends to be limited by my low upload speed so that it looks like a blurry mess for my friends. In one top down racing game, it got so bad that my brother literally couldn't find his car onscreen.

After trying out Stadia and GeForce Now, what I personally want is a high performance data center like what they have, but with much more control for the user. There's no reason why I should be limited to only play games in their catalogue. Because that denies me pretty much all indie games.
No single entity owns or controls any of those things, perhaps with the exception of search.

But more importantly - can you explain what you mean by a power imbalance?

Don’t all companies have a power imbalance of some kind with their users?
Bah! For some reason, GitHub had “an issue processing your payment method”. I’ll try again tomorrow.
The argument in the first half of this article seems kinda reasonable: Tesla is vastly overrated, because they are not making money on selling cars and great performance will not cause the stock to move even more.

That’s a somewhat reasonable argument. I mean, you can have an argument around that point.

The second half has an absolutely absurd argument: “This company says there are 10 stocks that are better than Tesla.”

So what? That’s not an argument for Tesla not being able to give you return on your investment. That there exists 10 stocks that are the best investment doesn’t mean that everything else is negative ROI.
And if no one wants to do the job for the given price then it becomes more worthwhile to invest in additional automation.
Huh? I have a 4k TV I've been using connected to my gaming computer for awhile running windows 10. I've had no end of issues with various programs becoming horribly confused by display scaling. Some applications ignore the display scaling entirely and end up tiny, and other applications (particularly some games) end up with 4x size on UI elements - which looks utterly awful. Its pretty clear lots of game developers never test with HiDPI displays.

In comparison I've never had a problem on macos. All macos applications I run seem to render correctly no matter what resolution and dpi settings my various displays use. And I can move most applications between displays just fine - with no pop-in or strange behaviour as the resolution of the containing monitor changes. (Except for some web browsers - which detect the transition and re-render content at the new resolution).
Check out some of Peter Zeihan's work for some original geopolitical thinking re: US/China
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xyICg5OYXvM