skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Since when is intent to manipulate the stock price illegal by itself?

If that were true the hedge funds that shorted GME and then released their reports on why they thought it was going to go down would have been operating illegally already.

Or, more generally, any CEO making public statements about their company performance.

Pretty sure you need some extra spice to make it illegal, such as falsifying information.
It has. It used to be T+5 [business day] settlement until 2004, then T+3 until 2017, and is now T+2.
I’m a proponent of using Intel NUCs as headless servers. I’d be happier if the psu brick was incorporated and there was another nic, but they quiet, small and powerful in the NUC8 and NUC10 flavours. They can fit 2 drives when in the larger sized case, and so a NAS or similar is probably needed.

They can be stacked, are readily available and seem very reliable.
These are just circumstances that present themselves to you. They are no more or less lucky than waking up in the morning, seeing the sun shine, or having clean water to drink. It's a matter of perspective.
No. You can do that much easier in docker swarm.

In my case I just take the 5-10 second downtime in between container restarts.
The margin accounts seem to be a small part of it but they do tie up RH's cash further thus limiting what they have available for collateral.
National security team reviewing startups with China investors
Thank you!

Racket gives me error messages, which I can learn to understand, and doesn't take me into Emacs like portacle does.

The tutorial helps too... more thanks!
They had to access money for 3-4 days due to (1) surge in turnover in regards to GME including weekly option rollovers which by Wednesday had ballooned, and (2) influx of new accounts opened with instant access to buy meme stocks.

It was a liquidity issue but if he had come on TV and stated that, there would have been market collapse and utter chaos. I can’t understate how close we got to having a big liquidation event on the entire market, which we still may depending on how this week goes.
Even low-resolution movement tracking built into shopping carts and baskets would give 80% of what would be useful to a store here. They have the brand information when you buy, and paired with movement, it'd seem easy to infer deliberation.
You talk as if selling directly is so easy - how will they do that without a middle-man for distribution? It's not like every neighbourhood in India has a farm next door! And the farmers can't afford to waste time selling a few kilos to many, when they produce 100's of kilos of produce!

What Modi's government has done is to cleverly replace the brokers with corporates as the middle-man, in the guise of "reforms".
Of course they are allowed to use it to _settle_, but not for the clearing fund deposit.
That seems a bit unfair to jump to thinking about bots, as he noted he had a lot of engaged visitors that commented and sent him emails.

While the marketplace is more crowded, the number of markets has shrink. To continue your analogy, each marketplace vender used to be its own market, so you had a lot of options. Now there were really only 2-4 giant marketplaces, and vendors with a good location have made it really difficult to set up shop.
I imagine they have some function determining this, that correlates number of shares available per user, number of users, and RH’s own capital buffer.

When combined with the massive influx of users all wanting to buy the same stocks, their newly raised $1B capital buffer is getting diluted across a larger and larger pool of traders.

/r/wallstreetbets jumped from 1.7 million users to 6 million users in just a few days. Some portion of those either joined RH to buy GME, or already had a RH account and started using it to buy GME.

https://www.reddit.com/r/wallstreetbets/comments/l7u8h5/remi...

And GME only has 65 million shares outstanding in the first place, so max available shares per WSB trader alone is ~11.5. Factor in the broader market and it's less.

https://www.reddit.com/r/wallstreetbets/comments/l83va0/gme_...
Test Your JavaScript Skills
Uh, didn't we figure out a long time ago that Mensa is a scam?
>IMO, it should be illegal to facilitate only selling or only buying. Brokers should be forced to offer both or neither.

Just because you shut down trading at one brokerage doesn't mean the price is frozen. It could still drop like a rock, and you'd still end up with a bunch of pissed off customers saying that they couldn't exit in time.
The reasons are a combination of human factors. Technologically it is possible for atomic transactions to be completed far earlier, but commerce is a web of interactions between mostly real humans.
So? You can argue that this form of distraction doesn't bring net-happiness but what is wrong with pointless distractions that make people happy? Before this we had TV and before that Radio and before that Books and so on and so on.
> What it is instead is a forum for trying to identify, discuss and address where existing pratices are unwittingly biased.
For example, do the statistics of progression and departure in our organisation show any areas in which we're failing certain subgroups? Does our publicity reach everyone we want it to and carry the message that we intend? Do our processes inadvertently cause physical or mental difficulty to anyone?

This is a fantastic statement of what a program should be. And I'm totally going to us it to describe ours.
Part of why GRC is computationally expensive is multiple reasons...

1. GRC is really just a python front-end. You can see that by generating the .py script for any flow
2. sample mismatch

Note about the sample mismatch... "man rtl_fm defaults to 24Ksps" , whereas the flowgraph for retrieving all the sideband data is set to 2.4Msps. The Gnuradio flow is crunching 100x the data as rtl_fm does.

Now, if detection of each pilot tone is done across 2.4MHz of the total sample on the rtl-sdr, then you could retrieve all the stations in view. However, this is centering on a single channel (106.7MHz), and therefore effectively 'wasting' all the extra retrieved IQ data.

Tl;dr. GRC isn't inherently CPU intensive - chewing through 100x the data IS computationally expensive.
They're just playing catch-up with Amazon that has been able to monitor all the same behaviors to their hearts' content. If consumers give it up there, why not in person?
I thought minifiers were supposed to keep licenses (they can detect the license header). I suppose this could get turned off or messed up by accident with the gigantic custom webpack bundlers even stuff like create-react-app ship with.
And this is actually the deeper point to my commentary. People, all people, behave this way. They have their priors and seek evidence supporting said priors and work to discredit evidence that contradicts their belief.

And this phenomena is just as pervasive on the left as the right. The WSB phenomena is a perfect example because it crosses ideological boundaries and doesn’t fit within the current political polarization. It’s not right vs. left; it’s elite vs. the masses.
Have read some - it's not a panacea for sure. It did recently renew some interest in the subject for me, but yes, take it with some caution, certainly. It did make me re-evaluate some of the things I was doing re: sleep, and I've generally had somewhat better results since making adjustments.
Thanks for sharing. I found it much more logical to believe it is illegal manipulation given history.
Modern fortran has classes, too! I've occasionally joked that fortran 25 and python 4 are to be the same language...
Should not be much of a problem in US with only 2 land borders.
A correction - all the core Java developers are paid by Oracle to develop Java. I doubt that Oracle would win anything, by abandoning OpenJDK.

And now - they can't. Companies that are able to maintain Java are X times larger than Oracle and the core team would easily be rehired by IBM, Google, Aamazon, Facebook, Apple, etc...
Communism is s not very liberal :D
Elon Musk warned about AI in a similar tone before all these problems came up. So far only Zuckerberg and Thiel were politically vocal that I know of.
>Trillions of dollars are moved in these markets

...and they jammed when a single subreddit decided to buy GameStop shares. Just think about what that means.
This is also standard feature for qmk based keyboards (ergodox, dactyl etc):

https://beta.docs.qmk.fm/using-qmk/advanced-keycodes/feature...

It doesn't require any special support and works in every OS.

Here is how it looks in ZSA visual configuratior, for example: https://configure.ergodox-ez.com/moonlander/layouts/ZrQev/Eo...
A lot of noise in the press about how awful this was for people buying in late.

I don’t recall quite as much concern during the last Bitcoin bubble. At least GME is actually worth something($5, $10, whatever)

If people want to play the lotto or burn a billion dollars to send a message, I’m not sure why billionaires would go on cnbc angrily shouting it’s a “way of attacking wealthy people” if they weren’t really angry about something.
What are the “whole shit ton of reasons” why shorter settlement periods are so difficult?

In particular, I’m curious why we didn’t jump straight from T+3 to T+1. Even if T+0 is especially challenging, what would make T+1 substantially harder than T+2?
Lawyers often get involved, and it’s better to be cautious. I’ll be leaving the insurance industry (which is NOT your friend even if you are a client) advice aside here.

Accident it is. I won’t be language policed by an insurance industry mouthpiece like AAA, that’s for sure.
I know 2 persons who "willingly hand over their grocery shopping information for very transparent discounts". But I live in Germany where a significant amount of people have a healthy relationship to their data and have learned their lesson from history.
sorry, can you detail this a bit more or give an example? if you get a week’s worth of work done in a day and send a pull request, surely they would see that you completed the task much faster.
I think it is, and it's also a useful conversational marker.

As soon as someone starts complaining about "woke" and "SJWs" and "cancel culture" and so on, I know I can just switch off and disengage, as anything they have to say on the topic will be some reactionary bullshit they're parroting at me.
Twitter is right wing Twitter, Gab is decidedly a far right website.

Just take a quick look at the comments on the top stories in the “Gab trends” section:

https://trends.gab.com/item/60163b8f144291532b8bccb0 Bill gates conspiracy theorists

https://trends.gab.com/item/601682466beb1e3de3156fe1 “Pence is a traitor!”

https://trends.gab.com/item/6016992e144291532b8d5986 “Socialists are murderers!”

Are these normal right wing talking points?
The actual posts I saw were on Parler, and she wasn't posting anything even remotely connected to white supremacy, just normal things you would post on Twitter. She was banned for having an account, as best I can tell. This shouldn't surprise anyone. (And your comment obviously provides further evidence for why this shouldn't surprise anyone.)
I get where you're coming from and you didn't offend me at all. I'd just been looking at the top comments of a bunch of HN threads and thinking "why does this place seem so unfriendly". Your comment isn't anywhere close to being the worst, it just happened to be the one I responded to.

And being direct isn't a bad thing either, my point here wasn't "don't be direct or concise, you'll offend people" but "assuming everyone here is reasonable, disagreements are likely due to differences in experience and you'll have a more productive discussion by figuring out the differences than simply stating opinions".
I think it is legacy thinking more than systems. If we wanted to we could have a system more like European one, but for whatever reasons we don't care enough. The behavioral side of this is far more interesting than the superficial technical issues.
Not a book, but I like to look at very niche reddit communities and imagine if their tech was adopted by the entire market. For example, years ago video game streamers were a thing, but a small niche was streaming "irl" - just walking down the street/etc. Now this is a huge section on twitch.

A current example is vtubers (and hololive). Its just youtubers/streamers, but their using very sophisticated live motion capture, so instead of a video of a person you're watching a 3d real-time animated person. Body capture, face capture, advanced 3d modeling, etc. Take this niche and imagine it exists in the mainstream - does every person have a digital version of themselves? etc.
The first thing that comes to mind is a mindless "let's factor out the cruft" approach somewhere, in the form `getToken() { return "secret-token:" + getMySecret() }`.
No one should have an 'app store', the entire concept is user hostile. A general purpose computer should be able to execute what I wish it to execute and it's inexcusable that a company would think they know better.
People are not loyal to any service

If there is a better service they will switch to it, and like I said google can target enterprise users with their own open chat service
Not if the interest is lower than inflation.
Over a trash can, bury it in a hole in a park, carry a small bag with me to throw away, in a bucket, at a library or other public building, in a park toilet, at a Target..

Literally anywhere other than the public thoroughfare or someone’s stoop.
I don't think it would be a terribly great obstacle to a malware author to statically bundle glibc.
>And their business model is a disgrace. As many say, PFOF should be illegal.

You get equal or better prices than on the open exchanges (NBBO), and they kick back money to the brokers making commissions-free trading possible. What's not to love?
Or breaks due to executions that are nonconforming
But you're borrowing a fixed amount of money that has already been effectively taken from you. My understanding of RH (I am not a user) is that you are not allowed to spend above the amount that is already incoming to your account, via ACH transfer or via sold stock that hasn't yet settled. It wouldn't make sense for RH to margin call you because at any one time, whatever money they would ask for would already be incoming to your account. There would be no point in them liquidating your position because it would clear even later than the previous trades, which already cover any margin. And you can't sell options or anything.

Therefore I don't understand what the risk to the customer is over and above a cash-only account. I guess there's a risk that your bank transfer won't go through, or your stock sale will be withdrawn or not settle? Is that likely?
Fire risk? I don't think it's a good idea to put high power electronics in a highly combustible dry compressed wood frame.
Absolutely brilliant. Ever since taking ML classes in MSc and then again in PhD I have wondered why no machine learning approach ever applies such an obvious technique. And most real world datasets are probably adequately addressed with this approach, and everyone regardless of technical background can understand it. ML no longer has to be an inscrutable black box mystery! My hat is off to you sir!
Traefik handle websockets just fine. You just need to make sure Traefik can talk to all the backend services on the right ports.
Mine is really simple: 1. favor fundamentals over specific technologies; 2. Study model systems; 3. Make work fun by always diving deep and pushing further; 4. Study regularly

For instance, study relational algebra instead of Hibernate In Action; study Jim Gray instead of Mastering MongoDB, study probability and papers instead of Keras in 21 Days. You get the idea
Of all those kinds of chance, the kind that you can really prepare for is really only Chance-type III.

Chance I is truly deus-ex-machina stuff you can't foresee nor plan for.

Chance II encourages randomness and serendipity, but those who lack the ability of discernment and proper focus risk being ADHD never focusing enough on anything to capture any opportunity, should it even emerge.

Chance III rewards those who have deepened their knowledge and have stubborn persistence to weather the inevitable rough patches. Because if it's not rough, then it's too obvious, and if it's too obvious, there's no real upside opportunity. You can plan for Chance III and prepare yourself for this.

Chance IV is black swan. It is the rarest of conditions where an eccentric hobby results in significant upside. You can't plan for this, and if you do pursue an eccentric hobby you should do it out of pure personal interest rather than planning for a black swan upside opportunity.

I have a feeling Marc Andreesen would consider himself to be Chance II or Chance III. And I question if his "luck" can truly be attributable to Chance II but rather his ability to "will" his fortune into being by virtue of being in Chance III.
Your site sounds like keybase. While I parked my name there, I have no use for it, because it relies on network adoption. I mean both my friends (for messages) and for other organizations (Sonatype doesn't consider it a gpg key host for signing artifacts). Good luck with your deal.
The Complex Path for a Simple Portable Python Interpreter (2019)
I don't apply Hanlon's Razor when there are billions of insider dollars at stake.
This really is a generational divide, those of US that were around for the 90's and early 00's Microsoft crap still have a bad taste for the "new Microsoft" that claims to love FLOSS (while still showing many signs of EEE.. )

During that time Google was very friendly to FLOSS, and open protocols (remember when GChat was just a XMPP client)

Today MS and Google seems to have flipped, Google now is fully embracing Embrace, Extend, Extinguish, where MS seems to be attempting to wind that back though with mixed success
Who, specifically, do you claim is conspiring? And to what end?

These collateral requirements were implemented to reduce systemic risk of the system failing under extreme volatility. It was designed to prevent collapse, requiring government bailouts. It wasn’t designed to break a consumer-facing investment app that didn’t even exist yet.
Nope, I’ve got it forwards. I carry a little card with me that says “always do the opposite of what industry groups and bodies tell you to do” and this attitude works out great for me, most of the time. I’ll just keep doing what I’m doing, it will be interesting to see if the insurers and their mouthpieces and friends can bully the public into complying.
Not quite. All engineers are professional engineers. The term engineer is protected and you are not an engineer unless you also are a professional engineer. No P.Eng. then you're not allowed to advertise yourself as an engineer.
Looking at you, outlook.com. Why can't I see headers on sent messages?
Why does everyone seem to think 'damage to the environment' is some scale with intensity that can be mitigated by simply removing or lowering some kind of damage.

This ignores the kind of damage being caused. In the case of the article, they're talking about chemical runoff from lithium mines into waterways.

Just because you stop burning fossil fuels, doesn't mean those waterways are going to magically stop being polluted, or that the pollution in those waterways won't have drastic effects on ecosystems.

Every time we damage the planet, we damage it. Polluting waterways on one side of the world won't be mitigated by curbing fossil fuel addiction elsewhere.
Do you mean this one?

https://www.cnbc.com/2021/01/27/hedge-fund-targeted-by-reddi...

"the hedge fund’s manager told CNBC’s Andrew Ross Sorkin."

So this is completely based on a phone call and Melvin Capital can just claim that Andrew Sorkin misunderstood them.

There's no public statement from Melvin Capital, which makes me suspect that they were indeed just trying to manipulate public perception, they could have just not talked to journalists about their positions, which is their official policy.
Quite a brush to put all wsb "accolades" in the same bucket. I could say some very nasty things about some ycombinator "accolades" as well.
I like the visual of a surface area. It adds to how I think about it... The equation for luck similar as luck being the compounding interest component and over time, compounding itself with consistent doing. Compounding applies to many things, but take a business, years in business and word of mouth/experience is a form of compounding customers/revenue. Same for luck and doing something consistently with enthusiasm.
BYO resources for CI sounds good in theory, but considering costs it's almost always a worse proposition:

- 10 hours / month of maintenance + 200 hours of setup @ $60/hr = $13k in the first year, not including any infrastructure costs.

If you just redirected that money to a hosted offering you'd get significantly more powerful servers without needing to allocate engineering / management resources - it also makes it significantly easier to push updates & monitor uptime on the host's end.

Even traditionally hosted tools like Atlassian's suite are moving to cloud for the same reason: https://www.atlassian.com/migration/journey-to-cloud
GDPR doesn't mean that you can't use cameras at all. I only regulates what you can do with it and as long as your automatic car isn't using and selling face recognition data to Facebook, you'll be ok...
> B-school psychologist

Here's a link to the author's Wiki page [0]. I leave it to the readers to make decision on the author's "B-school" credentials. The NYT opinion piece also cites a lot of psychology research like [1, 2]. The readers may decide if this is "bunkum".

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_Grant

[1] https://psycnet.apa.org/buy/2018-03974-001

[2] https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2012-06398-001
I'm looking at your docs, and the RUN REPEATABLE command seems really powerful. But if the state is broken after a run, like if you have some pods stuck at Terminating, how would you recover things?

Another question I have is how would you handle state that sometimes needs to update and sometimes doesn't? For example, it would be ideal to have a staging database that can keep having migrations and data added to it when new features are added, but we only want to checkpoint the changes to it from testing when the PR is actually merged.
I'll define it to be anyone who either explicitly or implicitly buys into the core elements of the doctrine slash religion of pseudo-postmodern Theory.

One of the common patterns of this is the assumption that guilt-by-extra-vague-association (such as having a Parler account) or silence-is-complicity are reasonable ways to motivate extra-judicial justice against people, such as getting them fired, as was done here. These are fundamentally illiberal philosophies, both in their content and their explicit rejection of liberalism as a force for good in society.

I wasn't couching what I was saying in any way. I was saying that if you do not think the kinds of behavior we are seeing where people's lives are being ruined by mob justice are anything other than "bogeymen", you ought to write down where the line is for you to honestly reconsider your position. In any situation where society slips slowly into madness, a lack of self-recognition where ones breaking points are contributes greatly to that slide.
The parent union is basically the mob/mafia. Once you join you cant unjoin and they will extort the union till they bankrupt it or the company. Ours is terrible too.
For MacOS folks, I made a hammerspoon plugin which works similarly: https://github.com/msolomon/griddle
My local public radio station boasts "no rant, no slant."

Such is clearly not the case for this PBS website.

"Without apology or remorse..."

Really? I happen to agree with the sentiment, but unless this is an editorial, such wording is journalistically inappropriate.
I wish you linked out to other retailers as well, besides Amazon. Perhaps something like boook.link would be useful.