skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Not a pro but I recently started learning some poker. Two texts that absolutely opened the game up to me were The Grinders Manual (fundamentals) and The Mathematics of Poker (where your stats/math background will be useful). The way I started was by dedicating 2 hours per day (1 hour studying, one hour playing online micro stakes). Next I will start learning and memorizing output from Solvers, that seems to be key to success at higher levels. Good luck on your journey if you get into it!
Or just make this a feature of any ebook reader...
> To blame the hedge funds for this you would first have to assume they planned to take down the global economy

No, you absolutely don't. Consider criminal charges - they differentiate between intentional harm, reckless harm and negligent harm, but they all blame the guy being charged.
You could take the example as-is with the new requirement that the remote end point may require up front authentication. How the authentication works depends on the service, and it needs to be done on a per-URL basis. The authentication protocol may return some kind of token or key needed to use with future requests. However what this is and exactly how it is used is service dependent (for example, it might be supplied verbatim in an auth header or it might be a signing key and it might even be salted with some credentials etc).

So challenge that is introduced is that you now have hidden state that is dependent on the public state but which cannot be computed by users of the client or the parent class. In fact, code in the parent class can't even know ahead of time what state might be needed to be retained.

I am guessing you will probably be able to propose that authentication be supported by some kind of pluggable authentication interface, but it will still be difficult to deal with the hidden state without introducing assumptions about the auth protocol or the type / nature of the state retained and without having that protrude into the parent interfaces.
Im confused why there was any question of wether it supported HDR or not. Apple has had it listed for a while: https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT210980
“Thankfully the stormtroopers are lousy shots” ;)

I’m very happy they failed. I’m still scandalized they tried.

Where I’m unsure is whether or not there is a good reason for doing this that I’m unaware of. This feels like the kind of outrage where I might be wrong.
No, it doesn't. Colloquial definitions of monopoly do not matter when it comes to antitrust laws[1]:

> Courts do not require a literal monopoly before applying rules for single firm conduct; that term is used as shorthand for a firm with significant and durable market power — that is, the long term ability to raise price or exclude competitors. That is how that term is used here: a "monopolist" is a firm with significant and durable market power.

[1] https://www.ftc.gov/tips-advice/competition-guidance/guide-a...
Times have changed. I’ll take those chances against unchecked spread of hate propaganda on the internet. Besides, nations like Germany have already codified this into law, it wouldn’t be a first foray.
MurniQQ: Agen Domino Online Terbaik

http://180.215.15.109/
I thought there only was 4. I guess I got paywalled.
You can literally just look at the P/E ratio and the yield on google finance. 50 years ago that was all you needed to know.
This takes a too limited a view of the situation. These decisions were likely made on far more more factors than one of purely material.

Geopolitically Germany had the the advantage of singular national focus, it had no allies to coordinate with either strategically or tactically (at this stage). The UK and France were two very separate and independent states, who were not necessarily strongly aligned, there would have been a deep rooted sense of mistrust (which has existed for centuries).

Another aspect is military doctrine; France had a decidedly defensive doctrine at the time, based of the perceived success of WW1 (the victor always fighting the previous war and all that). The UK military was also very much geared for holding onto an empire and not necessarily fighting large scale military operations across Europe. A decisive military strike was just not in the nature of the nations at the time, they lacked the necessary aggressiveness and sense of purpose to carry it out.

All up the French and British were a little too risk adverse, rightly so I suppose because they had a lot to lose. Unfortunately taking no action was a decision as well and one that would cost them in the long run far more dearly than they might have imagined at the time.
MurniQQ: Agen Domino Online Terbaik

http://180.215.15.107/
Of course you can. There is no substance to this line of reasoning except that PL publishes both.

It's like saying speculating on py-umbral (a standalone open source project) because we use it to build NuCypher (a blockchain-dependent open source project).
At today's interest rates it seems like you're probably going to lose a lot of money to inflation. At the very least why not buy government bonds?

Alternatively based on your posts it seems like maybe you would like investing in a ESG fund.

https://www.investopedia.com/terms/e/environmental-social-an...
Claiming that there are ‘far more side effects’ is more than a little disingenuous, and smacks of either ignorance or willful misrepresentation of the facts here.
Real-Time Attack-Scheme Visualization for Complex Exploit Technique Comprehensi [pdf]
That's why you differentiate so you can charge more.
I wonder if this will become a watershed moment for the EU.

I've always been an ardent believer in the European program, both for historical reasons (I have French and German grand parents), but also because for all its warts, I believed the EU had a competent bureaucracy, able to go above the pettyness of national politics. French politicians of all side love scapegoating EU for their own failures.

To say that the current situation shattered that conviction would be an understatement. I have no admiration for the Trump administration, but they objectively did almost everything better.

It is also amusing and tragic to see all the core countries (France, Germany, Netherlands, etc.) all doing badly. They cannot frame this as a "cultural" or national failure of specific country like in 2011 at the peak of "Greek" crisis. And 2021 may well be worse than 2020 in number of life affected as populations are tired of various movement constraints, new virus strains coming up, etc.

[edit] my comment comparing US vs the EU was about vaccines, not about the COVID handling in general. For the latter, comparing policies and impact is much harder.

[edit 2] On #deaths, most countries in the EU and Europe in general did not do that much better than the US: France, Spain, Italy, Belgium, the Netherlands all have around ~0.08 - 0.12 % of their population that died from the disease (quite worse for Belgium). And Germany will likely reach that range as well.
UX was never about the user to begin with.

It was about giving companies competitive advantage. That is essentially the ROI of UX, and it was since the term was first coined.
Sure the collateral holders pay up. But if they need to get liquidated to service the debt, watch out.
Yes indeed. The stock market has dropped to levels not seen since...early January. The economy is truly crippled!
More Dublin than Belfast?
HOLLYWOOD COULD SHOOT AN EPIC AMAZING MOVIE OUT OF THIS STORY
Came here to mention this but happy to've been beaten to it.

However I'd also like to say "reading that entire thread from the linked comment down is fascinating and I'd recommend it".
I think humanity (as a species) is able to overcome situations like this, but not without large loss of life (and potentially setback in culture, technology, society). So I wouldn't be too concerned about humanity, just about our current civilization.
From what I've gathered (unfortunately mostly on Reddit, before this article), Ursula von der Leyen wasn't exactly fondly thought of in Germany before this and somehow keeps managing to fail upwards. Is that accurate?

The utterly bonkers u-turn today was a bit of a shocker. For those that haven't seen the news, the European Commission managed to say they were effectively going to establish border controls between the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland. Which was a pretty big surprise to both the ROI and the UK. The first not being consulted on the decision, and the UK somehow being blamed for a contractual dispute between the EU and AstraZeneca. They've now backed out of this decision: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/jan/29/eu-controls-on...

Even if the UK was somehow being duplicitous here, and had somehow undermined the EU vaccine program, the EC/EU has made themselves look like total amateurs by whining about it in public and trying to shift the blame and conflating the UK & AstraZeneca. I think they really need to sit a bunch of the big names down together and actually plan their public strategy; Macron's been out today going in a completely different direction but somehow also circling back to blame the UK and simultaneously claiming (falsely) that the Oxford vaccine has a less than 10% success rate in over 65s, which probably isn't going to boost vaccine adoption: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/jan/29/emmanuel-macro...

It has been an...odd day, as someone who is a very pro-EU, remain-voting, UK citizen. God knows we deserve plenty of blame as a nation but I don't really feel like it's altogether deserved this time.
> ...far worse for their customers.

Doubt that, because given the overall politically charged sentiment around the squeeze, they would have declared Robinhood's demise a victory as well.
We all intrinsically knew what to expect from and how to react to a pandemic. I honestly believe intentional misinformation from the Trump administration caused the massive bifurcation in dealing with this problem with a united front. Asian countries did not have this problem, and look at how much better they are faring.
> I'm sure Facebook would absolutely love to open up their own Ad-supported App Store which tracks everyone to their hearts content.

Facebook appears not to have attempted this yet on Android, where it would be technically possible, though it would likely require sideloading. Perhaps the steps to sideload an app on Android would create too much friction for a Facebook app store to gain traction?

However, Facebook's "internet.org Free Basics" initiative [1], which is available in countries where internet access is generally more costly, has some similarities to an app store. Facebook approves or denies the inclusion of various websites, sets technical and content requirements, and operates the proxy through which these websites are accessed.

[1]: https://developers.facebook.com/docs/internet-org/gettingsta...
There are two crucial differences. The first one is where the money goes. If they would cover the short, they buy the stocks for a large price on the open market and give the stocks back to the people who loaned them the stock in the first place - so the money goes to people who are currently holding that stock and would be willing to sell at that high price.

On the other hand, if they go bankrupt, then their assets are used to compensate (as much as possible) to everyone they owe in cash - not (as previously expected) in that stock. So the expected huge future purchase of the shorted stocks never happens, and all the WSB people who are holding the stock get to keep it or sell it to each other, as all that compensation money does not flow to the market for GME stocks as it would be if the shorts were actually covered. The brokers would be liable, and they might have insurance that might be liable, but all that liability would be cash-denominated and (as far as I understand - if I'm mistaken, please correct me) would not obligate anyone to buy any GME stocks.

The second big difference is in the timing. The current price is driven by short-term expectations, a hope that somebody is going to (or would be forced to) buy large quantities of that stock soon. If one of the shorting hedge funds goes bankrupt, then any settlement for that will take many months, and that money won't influence the market for that time.
Your GPU is usually basically completely idle in regular desktop applications, it would have to do a lot before it negatively affected performance.
Night-Club Map of Harlem (1933)
Technically not. Shorts have a borrow fee, and if you trust the wsb guys on this number, the current borrow fee on gme is 80 percent per annum. So if I'm not getting anything wrong here, short sellers do have a bit of a clock.
Not too hard. You should build it !
Do you think that something like "Elon Musk tweets the word 'bitcoin'" can/should actually be charged as market manipulation?
What about people selling their newsletter of stock tips?
What about printing an article in Bloomberg suggesting that XYZ is undervalued/overvalued for $reasons?
What about some nobody on reddit posting to wsb to say let's go to $321!
What about being paid to tell clients what you think they should invest in?
What about telling other users on reddit for free what you think they should invest in?

I'm not sure I see a clear line in there to call any of it illegal.
Free IPV All Channels Fast Servers of the day 30-1-2021
Not sure what you're on about. CentOS 6 doesn't receive updates anymore. It's EOL.
Why go through all that effort if nothing will ever replace the package I compiled from source and installed?
From https://onlineexhibits.library.yale.edu/s/gatheroutofstardus...:

> Many of Harlem’s luminaries appear: Cab Calloway, whose band succeeded Duke Ellington’s orchestra at The Cotton Club in 1931, sings his famous “ho-de-hi-de-ho”; Bill “Bojangles” Robinson performs his famous stair dance; and Gladys Bentley “tickles the ivories” with her infamous double-entendres. Over at the Savoy Ballroom, Earl “Snake-Hips” Tucker defies anatomy. Meanwhile, the gags abound: a crush of taxis carries lavishly attired downtowners to Connie’s. A man lends his top-hat to a friend by tossing it out the window. Pairs in every part ask each other, “What’s the number?”—including the police playing cards at the new station—in reference to racketeer-run lottery games.
Check out Wendell Wilson, of Level1Techs on YouTube (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCOWcZ6Wicl-1N34H0zZe38w or https://www.youtube.com/user/teksyndicate), and https://forum.level1techs.com
Maybe I’ll create my website using it!!
Meh, I’m not convinced it’s such a disaster it’s being portayed.

Serbia is/was heavily hit by Covid, yet only 12% more people died in 2020 than 5 year average before that. Again, meh.
I've been excited about GNUnet in theory for a very long time, and they have some great ideas... but despite that, I've very rarely been able to run any of their actual software and have it work reliably.

And that's understandable, given that their website states prominently: "GNUnet is still undergoing major development. It is largely not yet ready for usage beyond developers." But it started around two decades ago; at a certain point I stopped expecting that I'd be able to use it anytime in the near future.
SpaceX violated its launch license, triggering an FAA probe
The interesting parts:

Capabilities describe both uniqueness and read-write ability. `iso` is fully unique and hence sendable, `trn` and `val` are write-unique (but `val` is also sendable since it isn't writable). The `tag` capability allows identity/message sending and is fully sendable

Recover blocks and automatic receiver recovery allow creation/usage of isolated data if only sendables are used from the external environment.

Only sendables can be included in messages.

Actors have `ref` access to themselves but `tag` access to other actors.
"Gamestop" is a string of letters. Unless it has a pile of unrestructurable liabilities, what's forcing it to become bankrupt vs. being a startup?
> The EU negotiating team, according to people familiar with the talks, was intent on pushing down the price.

In the middle of a pandemic that is literally costing trillions, this seems like the EU negotiators lost sight of the big picture.
> Any modern person could save a bunch of lives in almost any period if they can convince people to wash their hands, boil suspect water, separate wells and sewage by a wide margin, etc. And yes, definitely still relevant today.

The hard part here is probably convincing people. Something to prepare for before you go back in time or post-apocolyptic.
That's why most people should just stick to index funds.
haha, whenever I see sour grapes on this subject I wonder how red the author's portfolio is.
One strategy, which wouldn't be applicable to most places in the United States right now, is to target a couple levels of potential contacts of every case. So when a person tests positive, you vaccinate all their contacts, and then all those people's contacts, and you can be pretty sure to have broken that line of transmission.
Here's what the Retro.hlsl[0] looks like: https://www.bleepstatic.com/images/news/Microsoft/Windows-10... [1]

[0]: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/samples/Pixe...
[1]: https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/microsoft/windows-term...
> If PHP wants to become more respectable as a PL

Oh boy... That ship has sailed a long time ago...
This isn't surprising, and isn't that big a deal. Most modern high-end laptops have HDR support and/or 10-bit output. Similarly, most modern CPUs and GPUs can accelerate 10-bit video decoding in hardware.
There must be some reason, then, that classical music labels producing surround-sound SACDs recommend full-size speakers at all 5.0 positions, and call a subwoofer a compromise for those unable to have full-size surround speakers.
Yeah, 100-200ms are quite fine in fact.

Maybe I got spoiled by Rust and OCaml that start in the matter of 3-8ms. :D But these Ruby and Node startup times are good.
The Trump administration spewed misinformation from day one that caused massive dissonance in dealing with the problem. Saying they did better when they had literally no plan and let 400,000 people die is incredible dissembling and most likely a political statement than a logical one. They literally dissuaded people from using masks.
“Merits”

The stock is worth what people think it’s worth. If people keep buying and holding, then it is worth what it is worth.
If a company creates better kitchen equipment that allows one shop to make better food, isn't that the same thing? Is it now rent-seeking that anyone who can provide an advantage can potentially sell that to all the shops so they all remain competitive and not lose market share?

All competition is a coordination problem.
The correct way to phrase this question in wsb parlance is ‘How did his wife’s boyfriend feel about all of this?’.
> I've spent this afternoon working on a patio at a little cafe in the downtown area of a small town

This sounds like hell to me. My joy is being on a small team in a room with 6-10 other people where we collaborate with each other, calling out, asking for advice on solutions, designing together, getting lunch together, and being in each other presence.

Sitting an a cafe staring at a screen and ignoring all the strangers around me sounds like a dystopia from being around friends and working together.

I've worked from cafes for 3 of the last 4 years (because the last year was covid so no cafes). It's better than being isolated at home but it was 10% of what I get from being physically with teammates.

If you enjoy the solitude good for you.

For me the difference between remote work and office work is like the difference between a real social meetup and a zoom meetup. The zoom meetup doesn't come close the real thing. Similarly, remote working doesn't compare to working physically together. All the things missing from the zoom meetup vs the a physical meetup are also missing from remote work.
> but they objectively did almost everything better.

Sure, if you ignore everything else they didn't. Even restricting the discussion to COVID, the reason why a lot more people have, are and will be getting infected (and die) is because for most of the year Trump didn't treat it as a pandemic. All those stupid things he said on Twitter and to the press throughout the year about the pandemic, all of that have real life consequences, consequences that we will still be dealing with at least for the rest of 2021. It's hard enough to convince most of the population to follow pandemic procedures without having the leader of the country constantly say stupid things. Now it seems impossible.
This was exactly my thinking, why wouldn't they utilize these days of extreme volume trading to their advantage. It's their bread and butter, no?
I don’t think the author is trying to make the point that the UK and France were right or wrong to pursue appeasement. Rather he is trying to debunk a very specific argument that they went with that strategy in order to buy themselves time to mobilize. In fact, they were not significantly more prepared for war in 1939 than in 1938 and ended up on worse footing, according to his argument.

So I think your point stands, but we can also question when someone justifies the appeasement strategy by saying that UK/France needed more time to mobilize. In fact, they were probably more taking a gamble to see how things would play out.
Basically unaliasing distinguishes the cases:

* I have `iso^` because consumed the last reference to an `iso`, so this value can be sent anywhere or renamed

* I have `iso` because I've just evaluated a living reference to an `iso` object, so I can access fields and methods (with automatic receiver recovery) but can't move it anywhere

Unaliasing with `consume` is what produces `iso^`
I'd argue Fox News is worse for capitalism and democracy -- why single out Facebook? Also why do they have to be broken up to be regulated by the government? Laws shouldn't apply to extremely specific situations or single entities. If you are really worried about scale and power, you actually have a long list of companies to go through before you even get to Facebook.

So break it up, how? In what way? And if you've broken Facebook up, how have you ensured that you've actually solved the problem you intend to solve.
Retail traders with directionality can drive the market even with small volume, because non-directional volume will amplify them.
That was due to the lessons from SARS-Cov1 in 2003. Asian countries that did not suffer from SARS-Cov1 did very badly with covid-19. e.g. India. In India the misinformation was uniquely Indian - first they said that vegetarians will not get Covid, it came from bushmeat (ignoring the fact that human-to-human transmission was through cough droplets), then they said that Yoga fights Covid, then they blamed it on a minority gathering (ignoring the fact that people were streaming in unchecked through international airports through all of January and February 2020).

One of the lessons taught in "crisis management", it seems, is to downplay an emergency so that the people do not panic. Death due to ignorance is much preferable?
All parties up north responded in the same way to Dublin?
Oh bonus is when a recipe is partially translated from metric in youtube captions.

So you have 500ml of something, then 1 cup of something, and temperatures in Fahrenheit and you have to guess if it is US cups, or whatever cups the origin country of the video uses.