skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I'm not sure which language did you mean there, but in Python those classes can be extended.

Also, the main reasons for special cases are historical; also, they predate PEP8 by a long time.
Applying for jobs can rekindle your passion for coding
Perhaps they forgot to disable 2G on their servers /s
New eBook Content and Video Course on Ionic Framework VueJS Mobile Development
Interview with Imperfect Foods sustainability manager
CloudFunding – revenue sharing between SaaSS providers and open source projects
The SEC spiked Hertz's attempt to sell stocks into a similar rally, so even if they try it's unlikely IMO that they would succeed.
If we look in `collections`, we can see `defaultdict` sitting side-by-side with `OrderedDict` and `Counter`. I've long since resigned myself to the fact that naming consistency is not Python's strong suit :)
We can fix a lot about with a few small changes that don't even require raising taxes. The #1 and easiest change is for the government to just pass a law mandating reference based pricing. This is not M4A, the government just says you can't charge more than Medicare plus 20% (e.g.) and cash gets your Medicare flat. This gets rid of brokers, negotiations, out of network and any of the other nonsense. Probably removes 20% of the national healthcare spend. The other changes are straightforward too and again require no new taxes and are not single payer.
I agree. Just look at the guy's twitter lately. He was hyping up some "huge" potential SAAS company and stringing people along. You could tell because in the comments you could see people speculating about which SPAC that information was associated with. It caused about 5 SPACs he is associated with to rocket up and then when he finally releases the information it is a smart lock company (latch) and not associated with any of his SPACs...which later sold off.

I was on reddit watching this speculation frenzy unfold. These idiots follow this guy's words and then spin rumors off of them....then those rumors circulate in this echo chamber until everyone is saying the same thing.

Then you have stuff like GME and AMC. I'm not surprised at all what is happening because there are so many people that just see the next big trend and just pile in.
How to Do Mixed Methods Research Without Being a Quant Expert
> You can't short sell most early stage startups. If you don't believe in them you just don't invest in them. It's that simple.

I'm not sure the world would have been a worse place for it to have been profitable to point out the failings of say, Theranos.

And the unlimited downside means that shorting startups that are merely unlikely to succeed wouldn't be worth the effort.

Shorting public companies that can survive COVID perfectly well by raising additional funds would be a terrible strategy too: their ability to raise funds won't really be dependent on their share price (they'll be raising debt funding instead) but every time they find a lender the share price will rebound.
Indeed, treating for cost of liability (insurance) vs best outcomes. Doctor's conflict of interest built into the system.
I had to get medical attention in Thailand and it was wonderful. I walked into the hospital, explained my symptoms to the nurse, got wheeled to a private waiting room, met with a specialist 10 minutes later, got some scans done on state of the art equipment (newer than what you would find in an American hospital), had a consultation, prescription, settled up for ~$90 and I was out of there in just under an hour.

I plan to go back if I ever need a major medical procedure.
I don't think we should set the political precedent that the oil industry should be allowed to abandon infrastructure in place and let it decay naturally. Ever. For any purpose.

Look at the history of the open pit mining industry, and underground mining industry abandoning things in place and the environmental havoc it has caused.

Resource extraction industries have proven time and time again that they cannot be trusted as responsible environmental stewards without aggressive oversight.

recent example on abandoned things in oil/gas industry:

https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=alberta+a...
It really depends what for. For CRUD apps or static content, Rails still has an edge. For something else, like rich apps? Sure, JS beats it.
I think I would prefer to code for the first half of the day, and market for the last half as my concentration wanes.
It's also something to see a lot of left wing twitter types carry water for a message board that, for all intents and purposes, is 4chan.

Enemy of my enemy or bemused spectator to the carnage?
Used git lab for the first time today and was shocked at how closely the ui resembled github’s - seemed like the exact same layout with the same buttons and content in the same places

I don’t see that level of carbon copying in Saas very often
Here is the standard discussion how to limit IP exposure:

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtcweb-mdns-ice-candi...

It is a trade off as this would also prevent applications like snapdrop.net working in the local network.
Yeah, no, that's pretty much it.
I was really happy with the delivery service here in Spain actually! They brought it all the way up to the apartment and they were quick and careful.

But yeah N=1 :)
Software scales extremely well. Healthcare suffers the same baumol's cost disease as education and any other labor intensive industry including construction.
I wouldn't be opposed to trying out a normal arm based laptop down the line when more software gets distributed and run on arm natively, but if you want battery life then you're better of with a Dell 9510. Dell claim 37 battery life but some tests put it at 17 hrs where the M1 gets 12 at the same load. And that is with a i7 or 9 which should use even more power than the m1?
Id love a site that connects people capable of making good subtitles for movies and series, with people willing to pay for it.

I guess making sure the quality is high would be tricky. I imagine somehow pledging a certain amount, say $5 or $10 (or the whole amount if you want) towards the job, then the money is paid to the person who does the job, when they complete it.

It could even be a community effort. I helped translate some things on viki.com years ago, there was a huge community effort, it was great..but it seems all that work disappeared.
Discord bans r/WallStreetBets server, subreddit went private for a while
Chrome and FF mobile as well.
If you're running a Web etc app, you can always run a STUN server too. It's not perfect but it's a step in the right direction.

I'd love to see a pool of STUN servers available for this, with some randomization.
True, when I was a consultant on the road I'd eat there all the time. Quick, cheap and much better than McDonalds. And also near the highway most of the time.

Usually I'd try to walk out through the entrance after :) Most of the time this worked fine.
You still have to reach the fuel’s ignition T and to do that you’re going to have to heat it above 100C, which means you’ll have to spend heat drying it out.

Even if the peat moss is “dry” it still has water and if the T is -50, you also have to melt it
Txl – A Language for Source Transformation by Example
For about 6 years of that past decade it has been a major offering of AWS. You can't claim it would be as popular without AWS by just pointing to it's popularity during the period of time that AWS has used it. A significant amount of it's current popularity occured after AWS began offering it.

Even without that, how many would have adopted it without it's permissive licenses? Probably none of the major cloud offerings, which would have severely limited growth given the continuing sig ificant shift from on-prem to cloud during that period of time.
Yes. It was a huge driver of my anticipation for a sequel (which sadly didn't deliver).
It’s legal and to be completely honest was a pretty damn smart thing to do.

I don’t think it’s David and Goliath. I feel like it’s Goliath using millions of Davids to do his bidding. Retail is getting used.
They refused to even confirm if they were using salts!
Thats exactly my point, somebody will be left holding the bag. Holding GME worth 20-40 that they bought for 400-1000.
My argument isn't really "they said these things were bad and they're not," it's more like "these things are actually kinda bad in some circumstances, but mostly we all turned out ok anyway, and things wouldn't really be much different or better if rock music were more heavily regulated when we were kids."
A new 787 is 200 million and carries up to 300 people and has a working life of 44,000 flights, for a total of 13 million people trips.

A new MRI costs ~3 million, has an operational life of 10 years, performs 5000 scans per year, for a total 50,000 people trips.

The people operating the MRI machine are probably payed more than anyone working on the airplane and take vastly more time per passenger.
Collection of ridiculously awesome classic movies
You cannot compare those though. Rails is entirely different from plain Ruby. If you want to compare you need to take something like NestJS, which approaches Django in immediate useability.
A friend of mine sold his first generation Leaf and purchased a used Prius instead. He is an EV fanatic and that was his first car.

There is a private network of charging stations in our area. He has a few stories about them.

One time he arrives at a station that disconnects him after 5 seconds. He calls them. Customer service says it's functional and nothing is wrong with it. He asks them to look up the previous charges. They all disconnected after 5 seconds. Coincidence!

He goes to another broken station. He calls them. Apparently they're not aware of it being down right now, but tell him it's a recurrent problem with this one. Nothing else is done.

He breaks his own rules and takes his chances on a charging station without having enough charge to go to another one in case this one fails. Sure enough, it's broken. He call them. He has to get towed to the next station, and they will pay for it, but that doesn't include his own transport. He has to pay for a cab himself.

He gets to another non-functional charging station. He calls them. They tell him it's a compatibility issue with his car despite him having used the same ones for the past 5 years. There is nothing else they can do for him. He asks to speak to someone higher up and to pass on his complaint. He never hears back.

He wasn't even discouraged by the long recharge times. In the end, it's because he was tired of being late to appointments and having to worry about this crap all the time.
> Just because you can find CNN(or even MSNBC) on your TV or go to their website, doesn't address the role of FB and Google in dissemination of news.

Of course it's true that FB and Google play a role in news dissemination, but it's also irrelevant to the argument the news outlets are making. They are basically saying that they should be considered the "official" news, and should get a piece of the revenue from any other organization that has a role in disseminating news. And I think that claim is nonsense. It is up to individual people to decide where they want to get their news from. If they would rather get it from Google and Facebook than the NYT or CNN, that is the NYT's and CNN's problem; they either need to up their game or go into a different business. It is not a problem that needs to be "fixed" by law.

> when you name call people who disagree with you (very stupid or disingenuous), it's a good indicator, your argument doesn't have a very solid foundation

It wasn't name calling, it was calling a spade a spade. I am saying that the news organizations are not actually fighting for "equality" or "fact-based journalism" in news dissemination. They are fighting to preserve the privileged position they had before the Internet destroyed it. Sorry, but I don't care.

The Internet destroyed a lot of old business models and created a lot of new ones. That's how it works in the big leagues. You either adapt or you go out of business. And in any case I don't see either the NYT or CNN in any danger of going out of business, which just makes all of their complaining seem even more disingenous--it's just obvious that they aren't fighting for principle, they're just arguing that they should be allowed to siphon more money from other people's pockets into theirs, and they already have plenty of money, so I have no sympathy for them, and I certainly don't want the law to be forcing other companies to pay them money because they are supposed to be "news" outlets.

To be clear, I don't have any sympathy for Google or Facebook either. I am certainly not a fan of the ad-supported business model. But that just means that none of the sides in this brouhaha are the good guys.

> it does make a much more serious effort to report facts than the non-fact based media

I know the NYT claims this, but I don't agree with it. As I said, the NYT is pushing a point of view just like every other media outlet. That means I can't take anything they say at face value any more than I take anything Breitbart or Fox News says at face value. So, again, I don't see them as fighting for any kind of principle of "responsible journalism". There are no responsible journalists in today's world. It's not clear that there ever have been. We just couldn't see behind their facade before. Now we can.
BMW takes first steps into the quantum computing revolution
>How is that legal?

It doesn't particularly matter. The SEC is not some omniscient all powerful entity. The rate of prosecution for financial crimes is shockingly low.
> My message to the people here: /r/wallstreetbets is not a gameshark. You are still playing their game. You are still playing a rigged game and you are still losing.

I understand your sentiment but that's a pretty overbroad assessment. There are obviously non-pro traders people killing it, and a lot more than a blip, tons of people have bought and sold out of their positions, average schmoes. There will be a ton of bagholders and losers, and expired options "Loss Porn". But to say that EVERYONE is a loser in a rigged game is too bold a statement. Maybe, Most will be losers in the rigged game.
Is it a new position or are you replacing someone? If the former, are there other people being hired and what's the plan for onboarding all those people. If the latter, what's the churn rate.

It doesn't necessarily raise a red flag, but it tells you a lot about the dynamic of the team/company.
More Than a Hobby: Vlogging Can Boost Your Music Career
So to summarize – large, fully private financial institutions are so entrenched in the economy that them going under would be catastrophic for everyone. They also occasionally take massive risks with their money to make larger profits, and when those backfire the government has to bail them out with public money.

And all this is totally not a gambling operation with a public safety net?
I attempted a startup in a similar space.

One big opportunity for us was the flexibility and more relaxed work-style. Working in hospital is stressful and it just burns a lot of people out. For example, in the nursing population, there are a lot of semi-retired nurses who actively maintain their licensing, but do not want to work full time in a hospital.
No. Those companies were making bank selling picks and shovels because picks and shovels are great for digging for gold, regardless of whether you actually find any.

Tired analogies and ridiculous strawman arguments aside, Facebook and Google are valuable because they have a valuable product in their advertising technology. What and how you use it is an entirely different issue.
Serious but maybe a dumb question. I know only Tesla’s can use the Supercharger network at this time. Is this because other EV cars would be damaged by the power of these Superchargers? Are they designed to be charged at such a high rate? I know the V3 pushes 1000 mi/hr. A recent v2 I used was pushing in the 300 mi/hr range.
Got it from the first part

> Using React or whatever does not prevent you from doing this, and in fact makes it less obvious to anyone doing a cursory review

Sure. From that level it might not be apparent, but within that component the mistake would be immediately obvious, on a cursory glance. Again, I don’t think React or whatever makes this less obvious.

But really, this just isn’t a problem I’ve seen in practice. Because of good tooling, and the ease of doing things the right way, I think the majority do it well. Those that don’t were going to fuck it up regardless of the framework or paradigm.
Another thing that wasn't super clear was that this is the total tax relief for all oil rig decommissions for every company, not per oil rig.
It looks like the short sellers made a mistake though. Short interest for Gamestop was 140% 12/31. Institutions did that.

It's just too much for institutions to get so arrogant and greedy that they think that's worth a return but on the other hand talk down to small retail investors.
> For example, in 2011 in America, the average charge for an office visit for an established patient, level 3, requiring approximately 15 minutes with a doctor, was $104. The average total paid was $69. Some more examples: a cholesterol test has an average submitted charge of $72; and a glucose tolerant test (GTT) has a submitted charge of $60.

Seems pretty similar to the vet. But that's just an office visit. The expensive stuff is at a hospital when the CYA care shows up.
There is a middle ground (this is how most dental care in Germany works):
Regular cleanings are not covered by your insurance, giving an incentive for price competition. However, if you need major dental work your insurance might not cover it if you skipped the regular cleaning.
Speaking of fucking around on a cosmic scale, I wonder if someone hid something in one of the galactic voids.
Oh my, good ol' memories of $AMD and $MU. They did pan out!
I've never seen this issue in 15 years of Mac OS X/macOS use. Is this via the browser (which?) or the command line or some other tool? When I download something, it shows up in the filesystem immediately, or as near to it as to be "immediately" in human terms.
> "I don't think any other auto manufacturer will become a true competitor to Tesla until similarly extensive networks are built out by Ford, GM, etc."

Given Tesla's success with the Supercharger network, it's tempting to think that this is a model that other manufacturers should follow.

But in reality, it would be a hugely inefficient for every car maker to build their own charging network. Can you imagine how inconvenient it would be if Ford's gas vehicles could only be refuelled at Ford gas stations?

Charging networks that are as extensive as Teslas will be built much faster if they're shared by all brands of vehicles. Manufacturers seem to understand this, and that's exactly what they're doing - investing in networks like Ionity (Europe) and EA (USA).

As for ease of use, yes, Tesla sets the standard here. But other manufacturers will eventually catch up, with technology like CCS Plug & Charge.
Citadel invested in Melvin this week on the cheap.

Citadel is the main internalizer for Robinhood.

I don’t think it changes much about your post but the connection between HFT and Melvin is public and directly financially relevant.
My point is that NGOs, non-profits, unions, and other voluntary groups aren’t primarily about lobbying but may want to increase their members’ voice by lobbying, e.g. environmental groups.
I don't think the OP makes very good points, but one thing to point out is that Python only has access-control by convention. This creates a wrinkle for any argument based on using "protected data structures"
Research prove that high school is a toxic environment?

Shocking.
The churn rate is an effective question. In places with revolving door cultures interviewers get rather uncomfortable when asked such a question.
Tesla just announced they were profitable for the full year of 2020. What's the compliant about top line income? They make money from sales and from credits because governments want to incentivize the sale of electric cars.

My point is that the relevant thing seems to be unit economics. They seem to make a profit on most models, and the ones that aren't profitable at the point of sale, seem to have the price of the credits factored in. What value would anyone get from looking at profitability ex-credits?
Every once in a while when I see an example of an absurdity that wouldn't happen, I head off to Google to see what I can find.

> Nobody will asks for their BMW to transport a cow

How about a cow transporting a BMW?

https://carnewschina.com/2013/02/22/bmw-owner-in-china-is-an...
Lying is a crime, but as we all know the punishment from the SEC and other regulatory agencies is usually a small "fine" that actually never prevents bad behavior. For many Wall street types, paying fines is literally part of the cost of doing business.

Its better for a business to be in court and pay fines then to be broke and bankrupt.
I know that's the cliche, but I don't think that something like VSOP87 would be noticeably faster compiled with Fortran vs. C, in the early 90s. If there even was a Fortran compiler available for Mac or Amiga, it was probably priced obscenely, too.
Even scarier when you realize most of the stuff they do they didn't even learn in med school.
Ironically, in Python you can use interfaces without ever resorting to inheritance. :)
Yeah where I work product people tend to deploy UAT or QA environments. They do it in jenkins, because a stack consists of multiple services, and they may want to choose which branch to deploy. It would be cumbersome to type a combination of branch names in chat.

However, if your UAT is a manual refresh with no branch names, for example, that seems perfectly reasonable (so long as it's triggering a pipeline like you mentioned).

However if I worked where you worked and you wanted slack to deploy prod, I'd probably try to talk you out of it.
But in the real world, it is the choice of lens that determines the level of distortion. Nobody's digitally cropping their photos to 1/16th the size.
Boosting user conversion with UX performance wins
57% rise in sales in China. It escapes me how Apple escapes criticism operating in that country when it's a PR nightmare for all of its peers.
This is commonly termed the "curb cut effect".
An human ACL surgery is $20-$50k, 10x the price for dogs.
> The industry setting the standards is the problem, which is why Tesla had to create Superchargers as a proprietary standard ..

For one, there is now n+1 standards. For the more important point, tesla could have made their standard free instead of proprietary.

They are in it for the money. Not any "greater good" or "advancement of humanity" or any other such bullshit. Money. And it's obvious if you look and not listen to them (this includes apple and such).

Tesla is a part of "the industry".
This went away. Here is an archive thanks to the ARRL http://www.arrl.org/files/file/In%20remote%20U_P_%20ham%20ra...
There are other reasons as well. It provides a backup in case of a memory card failure. I also sometimes shoot events where I like to have raw photos but I need to pass off JPEGs to editors to use right away. JPEGs are also quicker/easier to work with in general but it's nice to have the raw photos for some images that you want to have some more latitude to work with at length.
I highly doubt that an individual using software personally with their own API keys is against their policies. If that is the case, then why do they offer the API keys for "personal use" to begin with?

It reads to me like they're saying that him telling his users about it would be against the policy.
I've never seen a charging station with a place to swipe or dip a card. Maybe they can tap to pay, but I've never tried. (I drive a PHEV, so if it's hard or costs a lot of money to charge, I'll just use gas)
Yeah looks wrong on my mobile Chrome.
RCE and Privilege Escalation on iOS 14