skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Because sexual abuse is a visceral trauma real to many people, by some estimates 1 in 3 women and 1 in 6 men have experienced sexual abuse. Those who have experienced sexual abuse also face higher risks of PTSD, drug abuse, suicide, and many other challenges. They also often never report their abuse, never discuss it with others, and suffer lifelong emotional distress at higher rates than for any other violent crime.

Consequently, sexual violence is not treated lightly in most public discourse. In that sense, it is simply a common courtesy.
Thanks for the support!

As for sites not working, if there isn't an issue about them yet, please report them! Often all that's needed is either a faked user-agent or a small JavaScript snippet:

https://github.com/qutebrowser/qutebrowser/blob/v2.0.1/quteb...
https://github.com/qutebrowser/qutebrowser/tree/v2.0.1/quteb...
Are you certain? I haven’t seen a single racial slur on r/wsb. I’m sure there are plenty of r/f-s but I have seen any n bombs.
Data Trends for CDOs to Watch Out for in 2021
About that... https://twitter.com/AOC/status/1354848253729234944
Because ctrl-z will stop the current command, and when you run "fg" it resumes that one process. However, the loop you were in has been abandoned, and it will not continue to execute.

For example, try it with this:

for N in $(seq 10); do echo $N; sleep 1; echo $N; done

You'll see something like this:

$ for N in $(seq 10); do echo $N; sleep 1; echo $N; done
1
1
2
^Z
[1]+ Stopped sleep 1
$ fg
sleep 1
$
I'd have a hard time believing that the first time Tesla considered the safety aspect of this steering wheel was when customers brought it up. It's likely that if they choose to communicate on the matter, they can explain how they went through the analysis and how they mitigated any issues.

(no snark need reply, please)
hedge funds are a group of people all giving their money to act together.

how is this any different?
I'd guess that basic income would encourage entrepreneurship in individuals with a high degree of self-actualization but not individuals with a low degree of self-actualization.

Whether or not basic income itself would increase the degree of self-actualization people have is not an easy question. It is in fact a complicated question deeply integrated with culture. I'd guess peoples opinion on this question mostly reflects their political ideology and/or support for basic income.
This. If your business is to provide a trading platform, you can't forbid your clients of doing the business they want, with their money. You step in the middle of the process, you're liable for your interference.
what if you combine encryption with steganography? How can they even prove you have been using encryption ?
In the data, I've seen companies marking jobs that are remote only during the pandemic as "onsite", "COVID remote", "remote until COVID is over". I've classified those type of posts as NOT remote in this analysis. For example, I'd assume if you are a NYC based company, and want everyone to be onsite after the pandemic, you wouldn't hire someone from Alaska without sharing the onsite expectation upfront (i.e. marking your job post as "onsite").
Don't know how to feel about it...
It's really upsetting how Wire was managed honestly. The bones were great (even built with Rust), but it really seemed like it just stalled out and then switched to being a Corporate app instead of a Consumer app in a last ditch effort to be sustainable.

Wire might still be around, not sure, but I could read the writing on the wall. I got out when "mentions only notifications" was deemed a "pro" feature and not table stakes.
Do they realistically stand a chance given that what Robinhood did is technically covered by their TOS? Are we finally going to get answers on how legally binding TOSses are?
I have barely any knowledge when it comes to the stock market. But what Robinhood did here at least sounds highly illegal already to me.

Question: Is there any way Robinhood could phrase this decision that makes it OK to selectively prevent their users from buying certain stocks during an arbitrary time period?
Does she or doesn't she say that the retail services allowing sales but freezing purchases are especially worth of investigation, compared to the general category of retail services freezing stock purchases?

Of course, in reality, the only services freezing stock purchases are those allowing sales but freezing purchases. Because freezing sales in addtion to purchases would be much more problematic, not less.
I logged in with a throw-away account just to refute the down vote. However, it already looks "neutralised" after my login. Assuming it is true, why would anyone done vote this comment? Makes no sense lah.

Less controversial: High level, this comment seems believable. It seems reasonable and possible. Has this be written about? If yes, please kindly provide some links. I would like to read more about it. This high school was really something special!
At the junior programmer levels yes that can be true. At the principal engineer levels it’s not true. At that level you have to invent new ways of doing things when existing ways don’t cut it. Looking into the past is super charging.
Lasers and virtual reality to revolutionize watch-crystal engraving
Android will allow one to edit the host file via debug mode, but I don't think it can be done on apple without a jailbreak.

If this is a home network, your router might allow one to set DNS records for your local network

It seems reasonable that there could also be firewall apps that you could run to block outbound traffic to reddit but I have no experience with them.
I think one of the original messages of HN was "start a business" partly because investing in those new businesses was what Pg wanted to do for a living. why don't you embrace that message? it seems healthier than complaining about the stock market being rigged
I'm just not really sure I understand the narratives being thrown around right now, and I'd like to think I understand the economy somewhat

Melvin Capital closed out their short position yesterday with a large loss - and Citadel helped cover that loss.

As far as I know, Citadel and Melvin Capital no longer are holding any short positions in Gamestop. So what do they have to gain, by your narrative, from suppressing the price?

Citadel is probably making bank off of this actually, like a lot of other sell-side firms.
Potentially dumb question: How do you do hand over hand or shuffle steering with a partial wheel like this?

Edit: Missed that the article mentions that. Apparently the answer is that you can't. So I guess the next question is whether there's a good alternative?
Well I think we're in such uncharted territory here that it would be difficult to trust any risk model, so just increasing the margin may be hard to get right.
Do you have a source to the "ushered into the buildings" thing? Like, are you saying they didn't intend into storming the Capitol but were guided/leaded there by the security staff?

Also I think you're being unfair by ignoring the causes of both of the protests, as (IMO, feel free to disagree) one of them was directly supporting democratic and liberal interests and the other was directly against them. I don't think you can discuss the protests without taking into account what they were protesting.
That was a slightly squared steering wheel, allowing all the positions of the hands on it. The one in the article pictures look like they allow a single position of the hands, being basically 2 handles. A sharp turn implies taking one hand off the corresponding handle and crossing it with the other hand to grab the bottom of the yoke. So hand over hand or shuffle steering aren't convenient at all, if even possible, on such a yoke.

Finding yourself in an emergency situation grasping at thin air because there's no continuous wheel to grab seems dangerous.

P.S. Seems like all the stalks are "touch buttons on the yoke". Which is unfortunate.
I suspect the main difference between the US and UK this way is the honesty of the process. In the US a ton of money an energy is spent on social signalling and class definition, but also on maintaining a fiction that "class" isn't really a thing.

I do think the US class system is easier to fake, as it relies a bit more on superficial signifiers than institutions and history than the UK. The myth of the "self made man" is also held dear, so you can do ok if you play to that story; you'll still may never really belong but your kids probably will.
Analysis of 100 Weeks of Curated AI News
> There is a fundamental problem, in that open source makes it easy to take and not give.

The GPL licenses address this problem. It's just a shame that the trend nowadays is towards BSD-like licenses.
Largely the former. The efforts to make Gecko easily embeddable, started some 15 years ago, have long floundered.
Here in the US, I think we seriously need to capitalize on the 2A crowd. Encryption is a purely defensive weapon, like a shield. It can't actively damage or harm anyone else, but it is a critical means of protection in the modern world. We need the 2A people to understand that it both protects the privacy and security of our digital homes and lives, as well as serving as a check on the power of abusive governments, which are both of the purposes that traditional weapons under the 2A protect.
That's interesting because Ken Griffin started Citadel and has made huge investments in Melvin. Feels sketchy.
> For every entrepreneur or community volunteer that makes a difference, I fear 9 others will set their sights on being gaming streamers or will just sit around writing blogposts.

Providing entertainment and insight has no value to society?
Also, Steve Jobs is biologically half-Arab. Making him kind of a weird pick for such a claim.
Having a tablet instead of air-conditioning and radio volume nobs is also a safety risk.
Most kids still don't have reliable internet access and computers at home. So I would say that is still the biggest tech head start.
I talk about this more in my blog post [0], but I think that the only viable way out of this mess if anti-trust laws ensure that social network companies who have more than X users need to use open and decentralized protocols. This would be much easier to achieve than trying to break up companies (not saying we shouldn't break them up).

0: https://canolcer.com/post/social-media-decentralized-by-law/
I'd love to see what your clothes look like. I assume either none of your clothes has any adaptations for fashion over function OR you're gullible and moronic?
Regarding the OP's specific question, I actually had the a similar thought a few months ago and tracked down the book used in Andrew Lo's finance class at MIT Sloan (via OpenCourseWare). It's the "standard" investments textbook by Bodie, Kane, and Marcus.
1. Jack Ma's share is not significant is known several years ago, because a. he was generous in given shares to people and that works better for BABA b. BABA hasn't been profitable for long time and has taken several rounds of VC money. These were the days without now common A / B class share structure. That was why BABA chose to use the innovative "partnership" structure to retain control (and also getting rid of Yahoo Japan's controlling shares) when IPOing.

2. private ownership != currency reserves. IF CCP is running low on currency reserves (which they don't at the moment, it was a few years back, since then they strengthened capital control), they can force the companies to pulling money back to the mainland, i.e. pumping up USD reserve and given out CNY to these companies. They don't need ownership. In fact, this happened to Wanda and Hainai Airlines a few years ago, when they invested aggressively overseas, and has since then pulled back the capital (sold these oversea assets) to mainland.

The art of dictatorship is strange, and requires much better understanding than just "evil takes over private ownership".
A TOS doesn't write law
So the hypothetical broker that had frozen both would be less worth of investigation?
Wow. Just wow. As RH user myself, I did not have a clue I was actually doing business (indirectly) with Citadel.

I'll be closing my RH account soon. For now, I'll be holding the line on GME.
One issue is a lot of retail people bought GME options. If those expire in the money, these people will be on the hook to buy 100s of shares of GME and likely don't have the cash on hand to purchase the shares (which leave RH holding the bag).

On one hand, you could say RH shouldn't let people buy options if RH doesn't believe those people can pay up when the option expires. On the other hand, you have people buying options who maybe don't understand that you need cash to buy the shares if the option expires in the money.
WSB certainly seems to have been pumped up by RH business and vice versa.
I'm skeptical that this is a big factor. I think companies support open source where it aligns with their own strategic incentives.

Oldie but goodie: https://www.joelonsoftware.com/2002/06/12/strategy-letter-v/
I am agreeing with you that there is not much merit to a conspiracy that Citadel asked Robinhood to pull out.

In particular, I believe Citadel would gain more from continued trading on Robinhood than they would lose from their hedge fund positions.
> caused by financial firms selling a lot of crazy mortgages to people who could not afford them unless housing prices went up forever. When the crisis hit, the firms got the blame, not their customers.

This is not totally correct.

2008 was caused by banks giving out extremely risky mortgages (the banks knew they were risky mortgages) and then packaging them up into giant bundles and magically calling them AAA stable real estate investments and selling them forward to other banks/pensions/401ks.

Banks are responsible for assessing the risk on a mortgage, not the customer.
I think they are allowing you to sell, not buy
Putting in effort unfortunately doesn't mean creating positive value (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Mythical_Man-Month).

The good thing with FOSS is that the effort isn't _wasted_ since that code is still around in a fork, if not in upstream.
I don't even understand why anyone would want that. The round steering wheel looks good and works nicely. This doesn't look good and I imagine it's going to perform as badly as any of the other F1-style steering wheels do in real life.

And why get rid of the stalks? BMW had those annoying turn signal stalks that would always be in the neutral position even if you had the turn signal on. I'm not sure if anyone liked them. I know at least a couple of BMW owners who didn't know how you were supposed to cancel the signal without being explicitly told about it by someone. I think BMW already returned to more sensible turn signal stalks now. I can't fathom at all why you would trade the steering wheel stalk for two buttons on the steering wheel.
Social media, as search engines and maybe other handful of things, became basic social infrastructure such as roads, goverments will have to pay for the servers where these "open protcols" run and they should be moderated from The Constitution itself.
RobinHood had to of known this was a potential outcome or they actually have the most inept management possible. I don't know how they plan on weathering this storm given how much of a public enemy they've made themselves into overnight.
Which values would those be? Everything used to be proprietary. It's the younger generation that expects things to be open source.
My technique: most have bookstore integrations. Use their bookstore website by plugging in each course code and it should spit out the corresponding books when applicable.
> literally ushered into the buildings by security

Are you serious?

The fact that some cops eventually decided that 20 cops could not stand against 1000 violent protestors smashing through windows and doors, after at least one cop had been dragged out of his position and beaten senseless by the mob, and another cop killed, and so decided that the safest thing to do was open the doors, doesn't mean that all of a sudden they were peaceful protestors. Give me a fucking break.
/r/nosurf might be of interest. Would be interesting if anyone has come across a methadone of social media.
Hi - I'm coming from the Confluence team working on Performance, but I can say that we (all of Atlassian) are aware of performance is an area needing improvement, and we're working on it. Customer feedback (including logs, recordings, and exports of slow pages) is always very helpful to us. If you're open for followup over email to provide specific information, please let me know.
RH are victims of their successful business model!
Citadel the hedge fund and Citadel the market maker are separate companies.
The thing is ... If you don't step in, you could be liable. Let's not pretend that US financial regulation is fairly, evenly, or even logically applied.
> Now those aren't self employed, but

This is probably key. If GP's comment is accurate, I suspect it has more to do with "small business owner" than "tradesman". Of course they may just have a inaccurate view of real net, also. I know a few guys who would brag about "I made X last year" as a self-employed sub, but on a little interrogation it became clear they were very handwavy between company gross revenue and "I made".
Exchanges halt trading, is Robinhood an exchange?

>But the crazy part is that they only halted one side of the trade... the buy orders. That is manipulation.

Exactly, I mean you could make the argument to stop selling:
"The current price is being manipulated and is too high so we stopped our customers from selling if they mistime the market. We will resume selling when prices return to normal."

Edit to add from /wsb:"If you try to sell you will get fucked because who are you going to sell it to if nobody can buy it?"

I hope there is some meaningful action by the SEC. It would be interesting to have all the trades reversed to the point when buying was stopped.
> The only major hedge fund affiliated with a market maker is Citadel.

How many shares of Melvin Capital were bought by Citadel when they injected $2.75B? Is there a way to know how exposed they are?

Isn't there a conflict of interest in them floating a hedge fund losing money due to flow orders they are buying (or, potentially, not buying anymore)?
Robinhood Hit with Class Action After Blocking GameStop Trades
>imagine what people with real resources and power and influence could do.

You mean what they already have been doing for decades? Are you seriously in favor of clamping down on retail investors??
This is why every major project I work on has a ".archive/oneshot/" folder for anything complicated that was used to quickly put out a fire. Not only will I inevitably need to remember months later what happened, but I'll also want to reuse certain bits later.

That ".archive" folder itself is then a personal git repo. Sometimes you just have to put that fire out or get that question answered and its not worth a "proper" solution, but keeping a history is worth it.

Resist the urge to keep it as part of the main project's repo at all costs. It's far too easy for it to be come standardized (e.g. by other devs, perhaps) and breath life into them they should never have.
But why do you save it in bookmarks? With tabs it’s right there where I left it. Same scroll state, same visual content. Why go through the hassle of bookmarking if tabs are already built in and work well?

With bookmarks you lose so much important context. Our minds just don’t work well on lists of links

As I said it’s important the OS works the same way. I always have on the left most space my utility window for example with messengers and mail tabs open

I always have localhost for development for each project on the left most tab followed by the most common docs and tickets I need throughout the project. And then over time I build up tabs to the right. And naturally the ones in the far right are the latest ones so when I come back to the project that often helps recalling what was done last

And if it becomes too much and the tabs are still relevant then I just extract the middle part between localhost+docs on the one side and the latest research on the right and out it in its own window in the background

So essentially I use all the dimensions there are:

- within the tabs there is an order

- within the space there is an order (left half, right half on 34” wide screen)

- in depth there is an order (windows all the way to the back are the oldest and will be culled from time to time)

- and then there is the spaces themselves which are mainly for different projects
Who wins from a more limited market? It seems to me suspending trades locks people from selling as much as it locks them from buying, and short sellers should be happy to have a more liquid market,not less.
You can't, and that's why it's a safety hazard when turning.
> Citadel also bailed out Melvin fund for their short position in GME. So, Citadel has an interest in not letting the price go up any further.

Citadel bailed out Melvin Capital. Not its position. Melvin doesn't have a short position anymore.

Melvin made a stupid bet. Citadel bailed them out. Private sector bailouts aren't free: Citadel got its pound of flesh. Even if they bought the entire portfolio, that portfolio no longer includes GameStop shorts.

If Citadel's asset management and market making arms are colluding, that is illegal. But it's the most complicated and stupid explanation of the bunch. Market makers stop quoting for all kinds of reasons. If I were still on my options market making desk, I'd be pulling the plug on this. My traders would yell at me. This is what you make money on in market making! But the risks of loss go up with volatility, and the costs of gamma getting away can be nasty.

The chances that a fund the size of Citadel has any strong opinion on the direction of GameStop stock is vanishingly low. The chances that they stopped quoting in the name, as did almost every other market maker, and thereby broke Robinhood's system, which doesn't--to my knowledge--directly interface with exchanges to any significant degree, is high.
>It does feel like a watershed moment regarding hedge funds.

Agree. I think we're all seeing that hedge success for many is more about market influence than actual market prediction.
Even though robinhood is claiming to allow people to close their open positions, I have been trying for hours to close two options contracts and continue to get error messages saying that I "don't have enough buying power", which is insane since I am just trying to sell my already owned contracts! I was up over 300% earlier this morning when I wanted to sell, but now overall down ~15% in large part due to Robinhood's either incompetence, neglect, malice, or some combination of the three.

EDIT: By the off chance anyone from Robinhood is reading this, it would be great to get back to one of my multiple support emails or request for phone support. While I am understanding of the fact that Robinhood is probably being bombarded at the moment and I am sympathetic to whoever is handling the support line, this is a self inflected wound by Robinhood that has resulted in a lot of their customers losing money and now despising them.
Class action complaint against Robinhood
How do you handle consistency between nodes within a "cluster"? If I have nodes: A, B, and C and node A goes down triggering a failover to B or C how do you guarantee B & C are up-to-date?
Toyota must be the prestige brand in India. I live in a small town dominated by a Fortune 250 who employs thousands of H1-B's, mostly from India. About 90% of them drive Toyotas. The pattern is easily noticeable.

It's also home to Toyota forklifts (TIEM), and, of course, lots of people at that company drive one.

Me? I own 4 Hondas. ;-)