skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
They have to buy the shares on the open market, and have to raise their bids until sellers appear. The ramp up in price -- and the consequences for the shorts -- is known as a "short squeeze".
No, no one thinks that. What point are you trying to make?
My items of observation are mostly based on what I do when I eat out (actually notice the price of a meal) and also for 'snacks' and 'beverages'.
I think webrtc's success for video will be hugely dependant on which codecs can be used with it.

The gap between webm and zoom proprietary scalable codec still makes or breaks a call.

I've seen news of av1 working in real time up to 720p but I haven't tried it myself yet.

That could make a difference for the open web.
In my 2002 rav4 I have a tape deck audio cable so i can listen to spotify while driving.
They released a story that said that Melvin Capital AND Citron both covered their massive short position (in a company with > 100% shared shorted), in one day, including AH? I don't buy it. AH volume was 4M in premarket, and even though there was ridiculous volume the day before, I'm willing to bet that most of it was fuelled by Blackrock, Chamath and Elon.
Go internals: invariance and memory layout of slices
Ask HN: What the heck is happening with GameStop?
I'm sure there are a ton of people asking themselves:

> What the heck is happening right now with GameStop?

So if someone could provide a straightforward explanation, I'm sure a lot of people would be grateful.
> only a certain percentage of the most dedicated users follow to the next iteration.

And they become the seed around which the new community crystallizes.

As the social media and tech oligarchies get emboldened to attack less extreme groups, the people who find themselves deplatformed end up taking refuge in the only sites that are prepared to stand against the ratcheting up of restrictions on speech.

Don't be surprised if, as a result of pressure on WSB, a lot of casual traders find themselves mixing and sympathizing with violent extremists on Gab and other platforms.
Can you give few examples of those other companies? Thanks.
I think Omega 6 fats contribute to heart disease and may also contribute to diabetes. It is one of the biggest changes in the Western diet over the past 100 years, we now eat 4x as many Omega 6s as Omega 3s and it used to be the exact opposite ratio. I notice when I'm on a keto diet (primarily sat fats and omega 3s), even my stool seems healthier. Many other benefits too.
Those are MAO-B inhibitors; i think the thread was referring to MAO-A inhibitors, which are the mechanism for depression.
I mean, they can still charge the owners of non-Tesla cars. They should be operating the charging stations to sell charging, not to have an anti-competitive edge on the market.
Really? Am I somehow worth more by not knowing React?
I've built this as well! I won an internal hackathon with this and so I ran up against many of the issues you'll find here.

1. There is unlimited flexibility in the prompt.

Seemingly irrelevant changes to the prompt can change whether you get out correct SQL or not. Sometimes you can just repeat things in the prompt and get different and better results. "Write correct SQL. Write correct SQL"

For any one input question you may be able to tweak the prompt to get the correct answer out. But you need to do this tweaking for each question (and know the correct answer you need). Tweaking one prompt may break all other input-output pairs.

2. Real questions involve multiple large schemas.

I deal with tables with thousands or tens of thousands of columns. There is no way you can get GPT-3 to deal with that scale with a simple input as shown here. And of course you want to join across many tables etc.

3. Syntax

Natural language is more robust than SQL, you can get close and get the point across. Most language models trained on general corpora are fundamentally not suited to the symbolic manipulation of languages like SQL.

This isn't to say that GPT-3 couldn't be part of a solution to this problem, but please restrain your exuberance, it's not going to solve this problem out of the box.
I do not think that a watermark would be a good idea, though I understand the desire for an expanded free plan.

The example I have in mind is the Unity game engine, where free users have a splash screen in their exported games. Since most users who aren't paying are also not making great games, Unity's name and reputation is now attached to solely those bad games.

Similarly with the generated images, adding a watermark to (some of the) free ones will mean that the images you have your name on are the ones that are being generated by users who aren't paying; either because they're not making enough to justify it, or they're making bad content that you don't really want to be the main thing with your name on it out there.
Individuals selling call options into any stock is risky. Doing it into one of the most volatile stocks of the past few decades is insane. Bragging about it being "easy money" is just sheer lunacy.

You got lucky - you have nothing to brag about. Your actions are 100x worse than anything i've seen in WSB.
If people think the big players in wall street are sitting back thinking, "oh no, a bunch of retail traders defeated us, lets pack our bags and go home" then its pure naivety.

They are already 3 steps ahead and will extract most of the gains and benefit from the losses of these retail traders over the next few weeks. They have the resources to destroy this hubris and make $$$
It's not about whether it would have thrived without AWS, it's about 1) Would it have thrived at all under a more restrictive license that could have reduced adoption; 2) During it's old license, did it thrive more than it would have without AWS adoption.

Counterfactuals like this are difficult to answer. However, more permissively licensed software does seem to reach widespread adoption more easily. Elastic's download rates seem to have approached hockey stick growth trend around the time of AWS adoption, and Elastic's revenue significantly increased afterwards as well. It might have been on track for that anyway, but 5 years of linear growth did turn sharply upwards around AWS.

It seems like Elastic as a company has a decent probability of faster growth and more revenue due to market penetration and name recognition assisted by AWS usage.

Had Elastic been restrictive.from the start, it's entirely possible that the industry would have focussed on and driven improvements in something like solr instead. As you said, elastic solved problems people had, it's not unreasonable to think they would have solved them some other way without elastic.
Good point...thought about doing a typeahead for nearer zip codes if the zip code searched doesn't show up results. Counties are interesting idea, but the bucketing needs to be simplified to lat/lng for data ingestion, which is why zip codes were chosen, arguably the most intuitive thing that's "close enough" to a lat/lng coord.
I've heard Freestyle Libre, and most portable models, is not very accurate.

Freestyle Libre has the additional feature of continuity, which IMO, is likely to be more inaccurate (generally portable models take a blood drop and give one reading, i.e., are not continuous monitors).

Any thoughts on this?
> But if we make people pay the full costs for routine checkups and standard screenings, they won't bother getting them.

Alas, those checkups and screenings still cost the same, regardless of who is paying for them. So when you decouple payment from benefit, you create adverse incentives.
I just mean that my A1c is at 5.3% and fasting blood glucose around 85 mg/dL, below the prediabetic range. Yes, that's because of daily decisions. If I ate one pizza I'd get symptoms again.
Doesn't that risk someone buying the land behind your strip and developing it?

But assuming your scenario is the right one:

Buying only the border land is a strict improvement in efficiency over my plan. Instead of paying X million for land and Y million for security to protect a huge swath of rainforest, you only have to pay X/50 for land and Y million for security. Who cares about what percent goes to what, you're saving tons of rainforest for even less money.

In the extreme you might realize you don't even need to buy any land, you're just paying for security to protect the rainforest. Instead of paying 100 billion to own and never visit, you pay 1 billion a year to protect land you don't own. Which... sounds fine to me!
First they came for the Trumpists, and I did not speak out— Because I was not a Trumpist.

Then they came for the British socialists, and I did not speak out— Because I was not a British socialist.

Then they came for some Redditors, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not like those Redditors.

(Obviously will be continued - this has progressed faster than expected, but it's not surprising at all. See earlier comment here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25880239)
I don't think this passes the smell test.
As far as I know GME has not executed on any ATM sale which is very puzzling. Compare this to AMC which basically tripled its shares since last year. This leads me to believe that this is not all kosher. GME counsel is probably advising them to not go through with it. Frankly, I think Ryan Cohen bit off more than he can chew. His ideas to revive Gamestop is mostly half baked and there are way too many big players to compete against. Any money they raised from here will only delay the inevitable.
Its terribly sad, and equally confusing has to how we got here.

At least they'll have a firm understanding of just how sexist light speed is.
They didn't even ban the people. They literally banned the server because individuals used inappropriate language on the server. That makes absolutely no sense.
The scheme was already well underway when Elon tweeted.
While I don't really know anything about Qanon. I guess it provides a sense exclusive group membership, similar to flat-Earthism. Not just anybody can join for the same reason not just anybody can suddenly believe a goddess molded a living child from the dirt she scraped off her body.
Can you buy one without a prescription?
The larger point I was making with my comment -- which seems to have been insufficiently clear -- was precisely that making extreme statements to trigger deliberately contentious argument is a style of interaction I prefer to avoid. Per the HN rules of conduct, I assumed good faith and interpreted the parent in the most favorable light I could, given it bordered on trolling. What is there to argue? The idea that there's a simple binary split between The Establishment and Nihilists?
1. Not banned, posted 5 hours ago (stop spreading innocuous misinformation): https://mobile.twitter.com/fdrlst

2. What misinformation was spread?

Was it something like masks work or don’t work or something like Black Lives are more important than stopping the spread or outdoor activities are safe?

Ok, first search result says:

* The article, titled “How Medical ‘Chickenpox Parties’ Could Turn The Tide Of The Wuhan Virus,” argued that a “controlled voluntary infection” program could allow young people to return to work after contracting and recovering from the virus.*

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/25/us/chickenpox-parties-fed...

The Times quotes the MD whose conjecture published by The Federalist caused so much twit-concern and then goes on to quote criticism of two not-MDs (using their title of “Dr.” but not establishing that they are academics and not medical doctors). [1,2]

To keep things fair the do cite an academic who is also an MD who “said he would not endorse intentionally infecting people, but added that it was worth considering ways to increase herd immunity while protecting vulnerable patients.” [3]

How is it you can claim that “they spread misinformation that would get people killed?” Something controversial, sure. “Would get people killed?” Thats silly.

1 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_Caplan

2 https://www.umass.edu/sphhs/person/faculty/andrew-lover

3 https://www.medschool.umaryland.edu/profiles/Morgan-Daniel/
Isn't it the opposite of what parent is saying, that market makers are allowed to do naked short selling for "liquidity purposes" but hedge funds I'm not so sure
custards last stand...except billionaire hedge funds are the injuns.
True story: I was giving a talk on ZeroTier (I'm the original author/founder) at a university. After explaining some of the networking, a student raised his hand and asked me how it could transfer data between devices without a "cloud."

This student didn't understand that it was possible for one device to talk to another device directly.
I don't count Plug-In Hybrids.
Its an imgur link I know, but this is the most succinct run-down I've seen so far: https://imgur.com/a/DCCpuZA
What makes no sense to me as a layman is how can you sell something you don’t own legally? If I borrow your cow and sell it that’s illegal without consent, if you give me consent to sell the cow, there is still only one cow and ownership changes hands, there are not now two cows.
The Truth About the EV Revolution – HotCars
Shorts aren't "due". You can hold them as long as you pay the interest and have the margin requirement.
Easy to explain.

Capitalism/socialism are opposite sides of the communist coin.

Capitalism funded the bolshevik revolution.

There is, ofc, a connection between these ideologies...
How supportive is the company of unionization efforts?
So the purpose is to run an Ethereum application at scale to advance crypto development. At first I was wondering why not build their points system on their single platform, but Eth use is the goal not any aspect of the community points.

Makes sense I guess, but what I'd really like to know about is the development of points algorithms that are a good proxy for subjective quality regardless of the storage tech--like PageRank for 'interesting and significant' within a topic area.
All those still need someone to ultimately buy a cow at some point, when everyone knows the value is zero.

Or are the ones holding the cow the last ones that assumed they would be able to still sell a cow?
Ugh at this rate California will never open up.
But it doesn't quack the same as defined-benefits.
If 401k tanks no amount of calling it a pension is going to feed you.
Overview of the M5Paper eInk development board
There are many bloggers trying to find something to write about on Product Hunt. They may try your SaaS and write free blog posts about your SaaS to their audience.
So WSB's Discord guild gets banned for racism right as this entire fiasco is going on, yet the r/conservative Discord guild has had direct racism in it involving hundreds of users and moderator participation and that server is not touched. Makes sense.
Tesla Model S refreshed with a radically redesigned interior and 520-mile range
Based on what do you think SEC can order random social media companies to shut down forums?
Cannot upvote this one enough, I once worked for a company where not only did you not have root, you had to remote desktop to a jump box, to remote desktop to your in-datacenter workstation (which so happened to be a standard image that every developer got so no deviation) They did this under the misguided notion that this limited the chance of software IP theft. Best part they wrote antiquated CBTware for college campuses.

A tangential question would be, if I need a piece of hardware or software what is the process from purchase procurement to it being installed on my machine? This can sniff out several red flags, from there is a lot of bureaucracy to get software on your machine, to we are the type of company that will pay a person a decent developers salary and then just let them sit there because we will not buy a $100/$500/$1000 tool to make them more productive.
Wallstreet does it all time at their private meetings in the Hampton’s.
Yes, assumed that was in the title :)

the article does start with "Andreessen Horowitz is going direct"
I guess so. It's not as if there's anything morally wrong with playing the game of hide-and-seek that Facebook created. No laws are being broken and nobody's being harmed.
Add this to the mix. The major brokerage firms go down. When users are able to login they receive messages they can no longer make call options on GME and are only allowed to sell.
28yo female app developer declares 14M USD revenue in Hanoi
> There has never been either a legal or moral right in any tradition of freedom of speech throughout history, including the US tradition, to insist that other private parties who disagree with your speech continue to do business with you.

I don't care - there bloody well should be.
Only 2 top level comments on the first comment page[1]...

1. https://i.imgur.com/w9zkfCM.png

If you are having troubles scaling up, maybe you could collapse all comments by default and load the child comments only when the user expand them?
Unless you have a better source, that claim has been debunked. It still persists though because it's incredibly catchy:

https://archive.is/WGoir
> We're suffering from success and our Discord was the first casualty. You know as well as I do that if you gather 250k people in one spot someone is going to say something that makes you look bad. That room was golden and the people that run it are awesome. We blocked all bad words with a bot, which should be enough, but apparently if someone can say a bad word with weird unicode icelandic characters and someone can screenshot it you don't get to hang out with your friends anymore. Discord did us dirty...

> That is why I'm throwing my support behind the Twitter handle in general.

This won’t end well
I'm honestly dissapointed by the amount of wall street bootlickers over here on HN. You of all people should know that unlike in the past, information is freely available. Hedge funds have some amazing smart people who can think so hard they float, but they're limited.
I volunteered to be infected with 50 parasitic worms (hookworm) for a year
Just a simple one when needed. cp, downloader, etc. Nothing too complicated.
Obamacare actually increases the cost of drugs. Here is a study showing the comparison adjusted for inflation.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28224469/
We're in the midst of inflation right now. The inflation's just concentrated in financial markets: Stocks, bonds, and (some) real estate markets.
Given that's the same culture obsessed with traps, it's pretty clear that it hates fags, not gays.

They're not 'pro-LGBT' because that language is stultified, boring, soul-rending mainstream corporate-speak. Speaking that way is beneath human dignity.
"Are you pro-LGBT?" "Do I have a problem with gays, you mean?"

Better to be a human wallowing in the filth than a socially correct bugman standing clean, sterile, toothless to attention when the commisars come by.
Exercise tends to reduce my baseline glucose, but on the next day. I do best on a very low carb diet, getting most of my energy from fat. It's obvious to me that not everyone is like this. That's why a CGM helps so much. There is no good one-size-fits-all advice, but the CGM lets you develop a bespoke profile.
Flexbox is by no means necessary to make a responsive web page. Media queries have been supported by mobile browsers for over a decade as has the viewport meta tag. Between the two it should be straightforward to make most page designs responsive.

Old browsers (old IE especially) that don't handle those features aren't a problem because they'll just fall through to the screen style. Trying to use JavaScript to help old browsers is a worse solution as you're more likely to run into JavaScript incompatibility problems than CSS.
"if someone were to make the simplest of all SDR's that could turn ordinary WiFi cards and devices into SDR"

I dont think you said what you think you said.
They also have had a few stories about how this is "Trumpism". They're desperate for eyes. It think it's great and the fact that discord dropped the WSB channel because of bad users (which could easily have been infiltrated users) falls right into the same issues we were having a couple weeks back.

All of this makes it clear that people are frustrated and upset. My only concern is people that can't take the squeeze jumping in on the train and losing in the end.
> You'll notice I put @dataclasss in the refactored code, these are fine - they're just record types. Python 5 will only have these, not 'normal' classes.

What is Python 5? Or is that supposed to be some inside joke?
520 mile or 800+ km range is the kind of capacity that when available in cheaper vehicles will really push EV into the mainstream. At that point road trips are a non issue as you need a longer break at least every 500 km or so anyway.

Charging for an hour every 200 km feels much different than charging every 600.
I'm going to respond because the conceit bears it. The people participating in perhaps this first known popular short squeeze have skin in the game. They don't care if they lose their bets.

As they say, we've seen who you cheer for, your disapproval means nothing.
> what's routine to you might be catastrophic (or at least seriously detrimental) to someone else,

Whether a cost is insurable is not subjective. The gp observed that insurance only works to manage risk. Insurance against a risk of 100% certainty costs more than managing the risk itself. Insurance that covers doctor’s visits takes a certain expense and runs it through a system designed for uncertain expenses, thereby adding essentially parasitic loss.

> missing routine care often leads to catastrophic outcomes.

As a sibling comment observed, this is already something that insurance companies deal with. Failure to obtain regular and preventative care makes one more likely to need intervention, which means the cost of insuring the patient is more. Therefore people who are actually paying for catastrophic insurance can save money by going to checkups. This would decrease costs, rather than cause them to baloon like insuring high probability events.
"Their" clients are a bunch of rich people who control media companies, donate to politicians, etc.

The Secretary of State of Massachusetts was on TV pushing a 30-day trading halt on GME. That doesn't strike me as something that particularly falls within his ambit, and I genuinely wonder what motivated his appearance there.
> I'd almost argue that if someone were to make the simplest of all SDR's that could turn ordinary WiFi cards and devices into SDR

SDR became wildly popular (well, relatively, amongst geeks) when someone worked out a ~$10 usb dtv tuner could be used easily as an SDR receiver. There are very few (but not zero) rules around recieving radio signals.

Once you start transmitting though, things get way moire complicated very quickly. Some of those radio protocols you listed (Bluetooth/WiFi/ZigBee) typically use "ISM" radio bands, where the rules are less stringent (but there are still rules), some of the protocols you mention (EDGE/EVDO/LTE) will very quickly get you found/shutdown/fined if you start transmitting on them. Telco's pay millions for the licenses to those bands, and strongly protect their exclusive use of them.

If you "just use" your wifi/bluetooth radios as they were designed, you'll be complying with all the regulations (including things like ensuring you abide by geographically different available channels, 2.4GHz channel 14 and sometime 13 and 12 are not available depending on where in the world you are: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_WLAN_channels#2.4_GHz_... )

If you start screwing around at a low enough level to be controlling the radios without the higher level drivers - you become responsible for all the global regulatory shitstorms you might bump into. While that would be a fun thing to play with (and I say this as someone who's used a USB VGA dongle as an "SDR Transmitter" in ways that are _totally_ not legal where I live), it's not really a sensible path to go down if your goal is widely usable decentralised non-internet connected messaging.