skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
They'll slowly begin to realize it all and the well will further dry up for "bottom" 80% men. I do not discount the lower prioritisation of logical reasoning by most women.

In any event, the top 20% is where they really want to be and they'd just settle there if they could. To the extreme they'd rather share one (ie, get cheated on) than be caught dead elsewhere. Look at the extremes they go to, bypassing all logic and sensibility. On the other hand, they get old or are seeking someone to help raise their child.

The main means of imprisonment/trapping of women in prior generations was financial dependence and being seen with scorn (mostly by other women, as they had the same happen to them) if not married (, a teacher, or nurse) by 21.

As women grow more financially independent, they are less dependent on males. That leaves only/mainly the top 20%. For play and impregnation. The bottom 2/3rds of women have a harder time grabbing a top 20% male. Older women have the same experience. On the other hand, the pool that does not have a problem is the same as the pool most men desire. That is, all viable women are increasingly out of reach with time.

Keep trusting or even hearing what a woman says. Even if they aren't trying to be misleading, what they are saying is unusable and is to be ignored.

Men that are a part of the top 20% have the same experience as women.

If you're married/involved and she is attractive to you, great! Most don't get that far, especially after the first 2-3 years.
There's tag completion in the free-to-try version! Just start typing in the Tags field and Pins will offer you the 3 most used tags that matches it above the keyboard.
That's a solution to staying cold, not a solution to avoid getting severely damaged by the freezing process, already being weak/sick/dead at the time of freezing, and there being no realistic outcome other than being reduced to a sad meat popsicle.
"Please don't just say hello in chat": order of words is everything. I have never said "just hello" in chat.
The seaplanes in Seattle and Kirkland, launching from lakes shared by thousands of civilians and ringed by homes, are mostly spewing lead.
A perspicacious and incisive criticism, if ever I saw one. You should write for the NYT.
Yep. At Fly.io, we run customer containers on our own hardware around the world --- the normal workflow just pushes Docker containers to our registry --- by converting them into root filesystems and running them as Firecracker instances.
The US government has publicly admitted that they assassinate people based solely on metadata.

https://www.justsecurity.org/10318/video-clip-director-nsa-c...

https://www.nybooks.com/daily/2014/05/10/we-kill-people-base...

The state collecting this information is a public hazard, especially considering the relatively recent development of the assassination of US citizens without trial.
Or maybe, nomoregoogle.xyz and get your domain taken away?
Plants take a season to grow. Rain clouds blocking the sunlight is not a real objection.

Transportation is solved, in bulk, with trains and trucks. It costs pennies a ton. Also not a real objection. Not at scale, which is hopefully what we're talking about.

The local argument is a good one, but certainly not for the OP topic. It's useful for just-in-time locally-grown specialty crops. Just not livestock feed.
Can someone give me a TL;DR 30,000ft view of why Teleguard is better than what are arguably the "market leading" Swiss alternatives, namely Threema and Wire ?
You can see a number of these here https://archive.org/search.php?query=creator%3A%22Brian+Spri...
Hey, author of siuba here, I totally agree that subclassing would be a natural choice in python. One challenge there is that users will often get a DataFrame back (e.g. from pd.read_csv), so it requires a lot of casting to the child class.

Right now, a compromise I've been exploring is just attaching siuba's DF functions to a pandas DataFrame, e.g. df.siu_mutate(...). This seems to be what pandas wants people to do [1]! One obstacle here is that the DataFrame has 300+ methods, which can be overwhelming to learners.

I've spent a lot of time wondering whether the piping syntax feels like too much vs chaining. It's still an open question in my mind, so it's really helpful to hear what feels most natural!

https://pandas.pydata.org/pandas-docs/stable/development/ext...
The current GitHub Sponsors costs do still appear to be free for individuals. It looks like they are going to take 10% from sponsorships from organizations, which is also currently waived due to beta status.
Apparently in a way that the author of the article, and probably the authors of bolt, do not really understand.
Pretty sure you have veered into being a bit more than just a grammar nazi.
I think it is reasonable to argue that there were a number of people in the crowd that had ill intent. Not sure which crime fits the facts though (sedition, attempted murder, etc.) That will depend on actual facts, which is why we have trials, etc.

I don't think it is reasonable to think that everyone on the Capitol grounds had that same ill intent. More likely that the organized minority instigated the crowd and used them as cover for their shameful and ridiculous efforts.

Needless to say, the predominent narrative seems to be that anyone in the crowd was an "insurrectionist". That goes too far IMHO.
My RPi4 can handle 256MB blocks on BCH's scalenet, just fine.

There never was a scaling issue.
Not necessarily. The context of the presentation and/or the sender could be enough to determine that.
Many religions are all about not fearing death as a goal. If your immediate reaction to hearing someone doesn't fear death is talk to a professional you have an interesting take on what professionals are for.
Depends on the people involved.

Some are likely to be sharing screen in a presentation at any given time, then it is the expected way of starting a chat.

Others would be unlikely to be in meetings often, then it is plain unnecessary (and even pretentious).
CNN is not really “left-wing” in a broad ideological sense. It’s the unofficial mouthpiece of the Democratic Party and the “liberal” side of the US culture war. Note for example how poorly they treated Sanders who was further left than any of the other mainstream candidates.
Learn Clojure by Example: Cljfx
Um, yes, of course. Isn't it obvious what the context is?
And there were zero, because who would wear the same clothes for 3 years.
I think the "swiss made" plays onto two ideas in this context: on the one side, Switzerland having a very advanced industry when it comes to precision technology / on the other side Switzerland being a neutral country of high diplomatic esteem.

But both of those tropes might very well be a little stuck in the last century imho.
Relevant data points:

- Open Carry is always illegal in DC.

- DC does issue concealed carry permits but doesn't honor them from other states (called reciprocity).

- This was talked about far and wide in advance on Twitter, Facebook, and elsewhere framed as "don't bring guns to DC! You will go to jail!" and supported by flyers posted throughout DC. (You can still find pictures of them online.)
mmap is great for rapid prototyping. For anything I/O-heavy, it's a mess. You have zero control over how large your I/Os are (you're very much at the mercy of heuristics that are optimized for loading executables), readahead is spotty at best (practical madvise implementation is a mess), async I/O doesn't exist, you can't interleave compression in the page cache, there's no way of handling errors (I/O error = SIGBUS/SIGSEGV), and write ordering is largely inaccessible. Also, you get issues such as page table overhead for very large files, and address space limitations for 32-bit systems.

In short, it's a solution that looks so enticing at first, but rapidly costs much more than it's worth. As systems grow more complex, they almost inevitably have to throw out mmap.
> but the claim is that the buffer you should remove is the OS's one

I was not trying to minimize O_DIRECT, I was trying to emphasize the key advantage succinctly and also explain the Apache Arrow use case of mmap which the article does not discuss.
There is something about the power of having a word to identify something, that makes it easier to see. I have not heard the word "chickenize" before, but as soon as I read it I knew that I had seen it before.
Sure, and I can think up means down, but but when trying to communicate a point or giving directions, people should be aware of what the common understanding is

In this case, the post is just noise, without meaning.
Im not sure what point they were trying to make beyond "I don't like this thing", even substituting some of the other definitions.

IF it made sense, perhaps you can clarify.
> Does it? I've worked in React, at enterprise levels, for close to 3 years now. Except for the addition of hooks, there hasn't been a whole lot of churn. React today is still the react of yesteryear, but with extras.

I have been using it since you could only track state in class components, and I personally think it looks drastically different with the evolution of hooks. I interpret components differently than before. The patterns for doing most things has changed, such as the inherent deprecation of the higher order component and render props pattern. I'm not implying that it's bad there have been changes (some are absolutely warranted), but rather explaining how I do believe the library looks different than it did before hooks.
Went down a bit of a rabbit hole trying to fact-check myself on this, and I'm still unclear. What does seem clear though is that the releases were timed to cause as much damage Trump's enemies as possible, which would still leave open the useful idiot theory, as well as the actively complicit one. I guess neither is a good look.
Glad to know it works out for you! Pins should be able to handle even 100,000K+ bookmarks so you're good to go.

Share extension comes with tag suggestion and tag autocompletion, so give it a try.
Thanks, I might, eventually.

J. Poniachik, BTW, was a mathematician from Uruguay, very active in the field of Recreational Math, having published quite a few magazines and books about this during his life, and also created several puzzles and games that are know worldwide, for example, this one - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battleship_(puzzle)

About him: https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jaime_Poniachik (also in Spanish - I don't think there is an entry for him in English)
> I’m always amazed that a $500 console can run games better than a $1500 PC.

It'd be amazing if true (because it doesn't make sense), but it's not. "[The PS5] is about equivalent to a mid to high end gaming PC from five years ago" [1]

[1] https://youtu.be/HCvE4JGJujk?t=1953
I've been curious about this for a while- I've got a modest CNC (X-carve) with steppers. If I wanted to upgrade my machine to feedback servos, how simple could it be?

I already have a CNC controller with stepper drivers. Do servos have a stepper interface, and internalize all the servo logic and feedback? IE, can I just buy "servos" that have internal feedback, and send them the same step and dir signals, or SPI signals, needed to drive steppers?

Or, do I have to replace my controller/drivers with a servo-specific driver? The reason I ask is that I have an extremely inexpensive stepper system (grblesp32 6-pack controller with external drivers) and cheap steppers, and definitely am hitting the point where I have to dial back all my parameters to finish cuts without dropping steps.
I was just thinking about this and I agree. It would be nice if these settings could apply to the other sections of a repo: Wiki, discussions, issues. Let the software be free but give the devs a way to make cash off people using their software professionally.
Yes, it will. But it's owned by Penske Media Corporation, who seem to prefer to milk the brand for all it's worth before its inevitable demise.
Yes, a crewed fuel tank was one of the designs considered, as was three shuttles (2 crewed tanks + 1 ship) in a triangle. Visit the Udvar-Hazy Air & Space Museum Annex in Virginia if you ever get a chance, there’s an exhibit on all the proposed designs. We got the worst possible one.
I don't see how putting everyone in a huge radius, journalists and those otherwise uninvolved included, under investigative suspicion and location surveillance to respond to what is only charitably described as an insurrection (the group was almost entirely unarmed) is in any way reasonable.

Huh?

Don't get me wrong, I actually agree with you on overreach. But this action is completely reasonable because it's standard operating procedure for many law enforcement departments around the nation. Most of us simply do not reside in the neighborhoods where these tactics are employed. None of what we are discussing today is even Patriot Act type stuff. It's just standard law enforcement investigative technique. Worse, our law enforcement infrastructure already took the exact same actions during the BLM riots. None of the people complaining now, uttered a peep at the time.

I said all of that to say this, as a privacy activist, I learned decades ago that the best method of protecting my rights is to protect the rights of others. The issue today, is that most who complain are called out as hypocritical. With good reason. We can't go back now. Law enforcement would be accused of racism. Whatever tactics we used on others, we have to use now. And law enforcement gets to use them because people were not forward thinking enough to protest these methods when they were designed and employed during the latest stages of the drug war. Or even just a few scant weeks ago during the BLM riots.

I'd just encourage everyone to be more forward thinking on these issues. Sometimes complaining only when the issue affects you creates more problems than it solves. It makes it more difficult to get legislative changes made because certain key organizations, and people, whose cooperation we need have to double down on their positions so as not be called out as hypocritical themselves. AS a consequence, we come into headwinds trying to get the changes necessary to outlaw these practices.
Unless the matter has an ephemerality requirement, in which case I message seeking immediate availability and then transition to a phone call.

A signal call if the matter needs to be both ephemeral and confidential.

Insisting on asynchronous communication for All The Things™ concerns me in that it shows that a person isn't adaptable to varying criticalities and sensitivities. The same goes for insisting on synchronous communication.

TL;DR they both have their place, and they will always both have their place regardless of any one person's preference.
> What has historically happened is just that the company goes bankrupt, the bodies defrost in random warehouses and is finally disposed of in less-than-respectable fashion.

Source? Based on my research, no cryonic institution has failed in this manner to date.
> Yeah, but the same problem occurs in normal memory when the OS has swapped out the page.

I'd argue that swapping is an orthogonal problem which can be solved in a number of ways: disable swap at the OS level, mlock() in the application, maybe others.

mmap is really a bad API for IO — it hides synchronous IO and doesn't produce useful error statuses at access.

> So perhaps non-blocking I/O (and cooperative multitasking) is the problem here.

I'm not sure how non-blocking IO is "the problem." It's something Windows has had forever, and unix-y platforms have wanted for quite a long time. (Long history of poll, epoll, kqueue, aio, and now io_uring.)
Interesting! I and several on my team feel the opposite. This extended remote work has been a breathe of fresh air - no longer so burdened by unnecessary social conventions like small talk, except at predetermined times such as "virtual happy hour".
I think part of the problem at FB's scale is getting any level of consistency across human moderation.

If you ask 10 good, experienced, human moderators whether a controversial post is allowed, you'll probably get at least 15 different answers and justifications.

FB would probably find it harder to train from this, as each moderator will be using different justifications, and reaching different decisions.

At FB's scale, they want something cheap and straightforward which they can implement automatically and go Kafka on the lack of appeals. The reality people need to wake up to is that when a business is at FB scale, people who fall through the cracks due to a broken algorithm simply don't matter. Google doesn't care if you get locked out of your Gmail, in the same way FB doesn't care if you get spuriously banned.

When users place more value on a service than the service places on them as a customer, it feels like a market failure scenario that leads to these kinds of outcomes. When the go-to price is $0 though, it isn't clear how you resolve this.
Imo, this is the single biggest argument that can still be validly made to prevent the mass adoption of EVs.

People, for the most part, are easy to convince when it comes to buying expensive products that promise to reduce the amount of stress in their lives. Not so much for products that they are told will do the opposite though.
Yes, this. Unfortunately the general public has stopped looking elsewhere to discover things, and if you're not on Facebook you're going to take a huge hit. Hell, people don't even look left and right when they drive around town anymore, they just have Google route them to their destination that they discovered on Facebook, or get an Uber driver to take them there as they spend the ride staring down at their phone looking on Facebook for destinations for the next time.

Similarly in China if you're not on WeChat your business is effectively dead.

I very much also disagree with this monopolization over peoples' lives but its starting to become a worldwide phenomenon on at least a per-country basis.
I would pay for specific features or bug fixes in software, as a user that's more important, than the lerson implementing it, though people are still very important.

There are so many tiny things that bug me when I'm using my devices, it would be great to pay to improve some of them.
How to download an offline copy of your Facebook data: https://www.facebook.com/help/212802592074644
youtube is infested with bots
While I love writing and trying different pens the quality of my handwriting has degraded as I get older and is occasionally illegible. Has anyone found a good method for improving their handwriting?
The author notices that Bolt doesn't use mmap for writes. The reason is surprisingly simple, once you know how it works. Say you want to overwrite a page at some locations that isn't present in memory. You'd write to it and you'd think that is that. But when this happens the CPU triggers a page fault, the OS steps in and reads the underlying page into memory. It then relinquishes control back to the application. The application then continues to overwrite that page.

So for each write that isn't mapped into memory you'll trigger a read. Bad.

Early versions of Varnish Cache struggled with this and this was the reason they made a malloc-based backend instead. mmaps are great for reads, but you really shouldn't write through them.
Wait what, Turbines are suck-squeeze-bang-blow, albiet without the monkey motion.
I gave a presentation on bytecode and class loaders if you’re interested. The deck is at speaker deck and there’s a link from there to a recording I did for the LJC if you prefer me narrating it:

https://speakerdeck.com/alblue/bite-sized-bytecode-and-class...
A fair point.

Ideally we can build ways to make
it easier to learn how tech works.

God knows it took me decades to figure it out.
I mean, sure, game dev in general is very expensive. But in the grand scheme of a game's budget, server infra is a very small part relative to the others. In addition, the per-user cost is miniscule (which is probably what I should have said, considering we're discussion companies which charge per-user for 'server infrastructure').

Obviously P2P has many advantages apart from being free for the publisher - such as lower latency.
What's HN take on short messages vs long messages in slack/signal/whatsapp ? I was recently asked to make longer messages rather than short sentences when exposing ideas in the flow of the conversation (I think the manager was annoyed by incessant notifications on his phone but he could either keep the screen on or turn them off instead of telling me I could use shift-enter :D).

I don't intend to change my style though, chat isn't email.
Can you just “git push” to aws and make it running?
Since we’re all bitching about communication annoyances, let me ask this:

Which is worse?

- Naked ‘Hello’/‘Are you there’ messages?

Or

- Having your “DND/In a meeting/On Vacation” status indicator completely ignored by “Are you there?” Messages?
I don't think much of such fingerprint visualisations because it doesn't really help to remember the hash.

I think for humans, something like https://robohash.org/ would be much better. An ASCII-style port for the console should be possible.
Yeah and now extend this idea to start a bounty of 100$ for the maintainer of a library/framework to merge your pull request, completely new ways for open sources projects to be paid for their hard work.
> And that AI has feelings

Damn, are we really gonna anthropomorphize AI when it's the cause of so much misery already? [1]

[1] https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/34964830-automating-ineq...
> There is zero antisemitism expressed.

I believe qqj was saying it’s ammo for anti semites that hits those 3 accusations, not that Larry King was expressing anti semitism.
Mods: This should probably be merged with the discussion several hours ago [1] based on the Twitter thread (where this blog post was linked).

[1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25879376
It could just as easily mean "serve" as in your administration-- in a cabinet position for example.
I doubt it. The only place where I see blockchains in significant practical use is in very low-trust cases. But supply-chain relationships already involve a fair bit of trust. Cryptocurrencies are also attempts to solve problems of financial interaction, but these people already have financial relationships.

Moreover, I think one of the big problems with "blockchain [jazz hands]" is what you're doing here: a solution looking for a problem. The right way to build something is to start with actual problems actual people have and then find the most economically efficient technology that best fits the solution. When approached from that perspective, I still haven't heard of a case where a blockchain turned out to be the right answer.
Tag autocompletion is available in the free-to-try version as well. When you start typing in the Tags fields, 3 most used tags matching that query will show up above the keyboard.

The Mac app is based on Catalyst and 99% feature equivalent to the iOS version. More options to view how tags are used in your account is coming in later versions.
Linking to patio11's now 5 year old post [0]

Has anyone solved this yet? Why is it not stupid simple to get a "support invoice" from an open source project to make it expense-able?

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10863939
> Mundane, that is even more amazing.

What's amazing about the mundane?