skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I definitely think some people have it easier or harder.
I score pretty high in conscientiousness (as in the Big Five, you can test yourself on https://openpsychometrics.org/) and I never had problems working myself off to unhealthy levels.

Because this is what you're looking into doing. If I were you I'd take the signal from your body as a message to stop doing what you're doing, work normal hours, renegotiate your contract to work less for your employer and more for yourself.

If you're still willing to do that and trying to diagnose: Could it be age / family related?
I used to work 12-16hrs a day when trying to start my startup. When I went contracting I had to check my hours not to work too much and I was very active on my side projects.

I all changed when I had kids. 5 years of bad sleeping and stress took their toll: I started having health problems and I barely have the energy to work.

The point being: maybe you need to fix some other parts of your life in order to have more energy?

Check your sleep, amount of physical activity, happiness.
Bolster AI Models Using Facebook’s Dynabench Benchmarking
> They could copy and paste laws that are used for illegal drugs enforcement

Given how well it worked, I'm not sure it's a great path to follow…

> then force other countries to support that.

Well, that's where it becomes interesting. Where are those countries supposed to get their Android phones from? Samsung cannot double their Android phone production.

And what if China responded by not allowing the China-made iPhones to be shipped abroad?

Geopolitics is a tough topic, and even as powerful as they are, the US can't just control everything directly. And on most actions, they can only pull the trigger once.
President Joe Biden’s Inauguration Speech
You're just repeating something you heard somewhere without any critical thinking.

If you have 6x as many shoes each pair lasts 6x longer because you use each 1/6th as much. That's not beneficial in any way.
Datomic uses a similar approach by default. They called it squuid: https://docs.datomic.com/on-prem/identity.html#squuids
Not all, but most of it. Ideally anything that isn't "pull" and opt-in from the customer POV.

I summarized my justification here: http://jacek.zlydach.pl/blog/2019-07-31-ads-as-cancer.html.
Nah, materialize is basically interactive SQL bindings for DD. There is some loss of optimization potential compared to running everything through the rust compiler but it's still decent.
> Edit: a lot of people talking about the license forget that there's an entire spirit to open source.

Richard Stallman, Bruce Perens, and Eric S. Raymond, the people who invented Free Software and Open Source, all specifically said, at the very creation of the god damn licenses, that this would happen, and was perfectly fine. They specifically wrote their licenses to allow this. It's not an accident or exploitation, it's a fundamental part of what they exist to serve, which is the user's rights.

The Open Source Initiative, Debian, and Fedora, have all banned licenses like SSPI which exist solely to punish cloud service providers. If that's not the open source spirit telling you where you can stick it, I don't know what is.

You are trying to twist things here. If the people who invented the thing said this is to be expected, then it's part of the spirit.
Well, if you subscribe to the idea that at least some of those jobs could be done remotely then it would not be that far from the truth.
System76 also use coreboot on their machines (I have a Lemur Pro).
AI will never reach human ingeniosity
The excerpt is a cutesy tacit approval of violence against journalists.
as others mentioned you cannot really compare a concept (differential dataflow) with a product like Flink. I did not look in to differential dataflow so far, but my impression is that it would not handle all the problems Flink can handle. Such as handling late data, complex event processing with state and still getting correct results. E.g. if you scale and some of your node fails, how do you ensure correctness? This is a rather hard problem which for example Flink solves. If you do not solve that problem then basically you cannot scale to as many nodes (might not be necessary for some use cases) as for example Flink does
There's probably a nicer way (or more performant at least), but I created a function that uses the built-in `uuid_generate_v1mc` and then reverse the order of the time component so that high values come first.
Just to clarify here, Deep Mind in no way replaces Brain. The AI space, like any other space, isn't a single unified landscape. There are areas where Deep Mind is a true standard setter--particularly deep reinforcement learning (AlphaGo, for example)--and areas where Brain has been one of the standard setters--natural language processing springs to mind, where Brain has historically pushed the field forward with projects like word2vec, BERT, and the Transformer architecture generally.

Brain is also a much more general organization. They do things like develop Tensorflow, which is one of two most popular ML frameworks in the world (and until recently was far and away the most popular), and TPUs, which are ML-dedicated ASICs that have a huge impact on training and inference.

Both orgs are world class and historically important, and they certainly overlap, but they aren't replacements for one another.
We built an (internal) product back in March, based around vmix and webrtc, for doing interviews for braoadcast purposes.

Guest(s) get a link, interviewer gets a link, producer can watch the whole thing and provide comms to the right people at the right time, combined and ISO feed recorded separately and dropped into package, fairly reliable although occasionally get issues with some guests being unable to click "Allow camera" or whatever in chrome.

Wouldn't have even considered using it for interviews, but I guess that's because our minds tend to work on a "see problem, build solution" rather than "build solution, expand market"
> comparable to the burning of the library of Alexandria

While I will be the first to agree with you that paintings and other visual art is precious and worth keeping, it is not on the same level as books and knowledge. Comparing these is not doing justice to either one.
I understand the sentiment you are trying to express and to some degree I agree but I would argue that the AK is a really bad example that actually is probably the greatest example of the Soviet simple utilitarian technology. Out of all of the battle rifles designed (The big three being the AR, AK and FAL/SCAR) the AK has gone under the least amount of revisions, the biggest revision being the AK-74 where the Soviets decided to go to a smaller caliber to compete with the introduction of the AR and more importantly, really the only revision functionally was the 74 went to a short stroke vs the 47's long stroke. The AK platform has not only survive the test of time, but is probably the most reliable battle rifle built, it is a testament to the genius of Kalashnikov that the AK produced today is functionally the same design as built in 1947. It is also very emblematic of the Soviet thought process in design.
it seems super-unreasonable to go back. i do not understand that guy.
You don't have to move to the US to make 200. That's easily available for remote people. For the big bucks, moving maybe helps but it's unlikely you make it from driving Uber to 1k/hr unless you run your own business.
Promoted Add-ons Pilot Wrap-up
One idea I’ve chewed on: Make it a law to have to pay people for their private data. Ie charged by the minute (second would be best) to the tune of minimum wage or an organizations WTP as a salary for 24/7 access. The idea is to price and legislate it at the point where it makes sense for the average citizen/user. Creating the notion of private property and reinforcing it is a fundamental purpose of government.
GPL doesn't require you to give back to the community, only to your users. That's a huge difference and that's why GPL is generally ok for internal projects.
> Copper melts at 1084 C, so you're good there for springs

Would you really be able to make a spring out of copper? It is my understanding that copper work hardens very quickly, which is a big no-no if you're making a spring, I guess
Programming – Everything2.com
He will not threaten it. But he sure isn't doing a damn thing to condemn it, and seems positively giddy about having the support of those who apparently do want to threaten journalists.
Did they bring it on themselves? Or where they forced to adapt to the loss of revenue? As you say it's harder to skim content behind a paywall or in a video, it's also harder to scrape it.

For every user like you that visited more sites because of Google News, there are likely plenty more who stopped visiting any sites because what Google News surfaced was all they felt they needed.
I don't want a more thinner Macbook. What's the case of something so thin?
There's no need for the nasty first sentence. The second sentence is fine.
No, he's just the kind of person who is happy to be associated with those who do.
The legal system cannot keep up with the complexity rapid change of software. You will end up with one regulation that says you cannot track users, and another regulation that says you have to prove that you are effectively blocking Iran users from using your product. If you log IPs connecting to your severs you'll be accused of tracking users, and if you don't log IPs you'll be accused of not doing your due diligence in confirming you blocked foreign users.
Nothing wrong with shirts looking quite worn on a regular workday if you aren't in sales.
Shoes are very unique, for me the shoes tend to become worn quickly because I have pronation. They start to slant inwards very quickly, and the inner cushion cracks because of same reason. Also if you do any outdoor sports like running, hiking or orienteering, you need a more shoes. I wouldn't be able to do with two pair of shoes.

What I find odd in this article is the amount of T-Shirts that gets worn off. Maybe because I tend to wear "technical" T-Shirts they don't .
To be fair, it has the benefit of having the choice between six pairs each morning (assuming they are not 100% identical). The disadvantage of course is that you might discard them earlier because fashion has moved on.
"Platforms covered
...the Treasurer makes a determination specifying that the code would apply to them. The Government has announced that the code would initially apply only to Facebook and Google. Other digital platforms may be added to the code if they hold a significant bargaining power imbalance with Australian news media businesses in the future."

from here https://www.accc.gov.au/focus-areas/digital-platforms/draft-...
Your argument illustrates the hard fact revealed by the Parler ban. No, Amazon isn't a monopoly (I'm using an Elastic cluster on Azure), but they wield influence as though they were.
The spring constant/youngs modulus probably changes with temperature. Making a relay work reliably over that kind of range sounds difficult.
At best it is symbiotic. But the imbalance in power makes it parasitic as Google will absolutely leverage its power to make sure they receive the most out of the arrangement. I think parasite fits better since the content creator can exist without google, but google cannot exist without the content creator.
That's what I thought recently about the MacBook Camera. I have switched to Mac Mini M1 and bought Logitech StreamCam for ~£150. It sucks in every possible way: focus does not work properly in any conditions except natural daylight, CPU expensive, additional meaningless software for basic features, etc.
Now, I miss the MacBook camera. Yes, it is 720p, but do I need more for my meetings? Nope. It just works. The quality is acceptable, no problems with any applications/web-tools, plays well with system resources, etc. If we are talking about "Zoom me" cameras, I would prefer the MacBook's one. If we are talking about YouTube streamers, etc., then it is a bit different area, and yes, MacBook's camera will not help with this.
I have way too much clothing even though I periodically give a bag or two away. The past nine months are obviously not typical but during normal times, I travel for maybe a third of the year and pack very lightly so I basically have a very compact set of travel specialty clothes. And most of the rest of the time I work from home. Plus I get a ton of swag given to me--t-shirts but also nice fleeces, jackets, etc. I do turn of it down but a lot I can't really do so and it is nice at the time. But how much can one realistically use.

Just about the only thing I buy these days is underwear, socks, replacement shoes, and the odd article of either travel or outdoor-related clothing.
It is not the case for most country-specific TLD's that you need to have a significant presence in those countries to get such a TLD. If anything, that is the exception.
> The choice given to Google is either you link news and pay Aussie firms, or you offer zero news at all.

Well then, bundle all news site indexing into a standalone Google News ( not available in .au ) product and declutter the standard search engine.

Everyone would benefit from cleaner search results and if they want to search trending news they'd just have to click the news tab.
I found that rotating among 2 or 3 pairs of sneakers, they never get smelly where daily worn shoes would within a 8-10 week span. In my case, 2-3 pair of shoes would last 10x as long in total.
No exact location, no description of the package, and the picture is cropped to remove any surroundings. What is the law enforcement reason why they would offer a reward but keep this information from the public?
Freeports figure quite prominently in Christopher Nolan's 'Tenet'.
FWIW I always had performance problems running nextcloud on cheap VPSes while owncloud behaves more smoothly. Anecdata though.
Thank you Braddx. Do you mind sharing the parts that require polishing? Thank you.
Site Interventions and Automated Testing
https://imgur.com/RHiYWBg
That's current view on things, which has shifted quite a bit over the decades.

Pre-ICANN, back in in 1994 when Postel wrote RFC 1591 [0], there were only 5 domains used for global use (.com, .net, .org, .edu, .int), two special US-only domains (.gov, .mil) and the rest were ccTLDs. InterNic has been the primary registry these days, and it also operated the gTLDs of .com, .net, .edu directly, so it had commercial interest for the country-code delegations to stay local - this perceived conflict was one of the reasons why ICANN was eventually formed to take over the general oversight, and the first topic it had to tackle - before even being properly funded! - was the emergence of some countries that did sell their ccTLDs to other parties, especially as WIPO had some words to say in 'concern' over the bidding war around .tv and insisted that ccTLDs that operate as "open" should apply the same global rules as gTLDs [1] and some purchasers in the simlar sales proved "not to have local community support" and/or "not operated [ccTLD] in public interest" [2]

Even after the ICANN was formed, in the transition period the some of the MOU documents ccTLD registrar sent to ICANN used to contain a phrase which was clearly copied from an earlier era (phrase bears a little differences in spelling, but always using something like "meet the needs of the Local Internet Community"):

[ccTLD manager] supports the concept of industry self regulation in the internet and therefore is also supportive of ICANN as the organization that performs the IANA function and consequently assures that this concept can work for benefit of all Internet stakeholders. At the same time to preserve this concept we believe that the policy and structure of the [ccTLD], *as any ccTLD, should be operated at a local level, to meet the needs of the Local Internet Community* within the framework of the relevant local laws.

Check out e.g. UK exchange of letters from 2006 [3] for an example.

That being said - all of the above is only a bit of historical interest, as by now it is accepted that it is ok to operate ccTLD which accepts registrations from anywhere should your country wish it, as long as global rules are adhered to (to prevent stuff like "cocacola.cx") and there has been some clarification on the policies to make custom gTLDs a possibility.

[0] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1591

[1] https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/processes/process1/report/finalr...

[2] https://archive.icann.org/en/cctlds/gac-statements-concernin...

[3] https://www.icann.org/en/about/agreements/cctlds/uk/nominet-...
I have never managed to get a step through debugger working with Pycharm. I know it's possible, but things like this are why devs won't be able to "start using it in no time". Docker solves one set of problems and introduces others.
This is article's understanding of post-truth is faulty. Cognitive bias is completely normal, post-truth comes when society does not broadly have the same cognitive biases, meaning each person comes to radically different conclusions about just about everything.
Leather needs to dry and air thoroughly, for that it needs a whole day (overnight is not good enough). For a while, I was a bespoke shoemaker, so I know this first-hand from material experience and from knowledge passed by teachers and others.
These are artifacts are on all photos going back at least 6 months, but not before that. They are always in the same part of the image, and it can be seen on the screen when trying to take new photos (once I've noticed it).
Agreed. But I'll also keep wearing shoes with holes in their soles for a couple years
And you're just guessing, based on never having tried it. Rotating shoes seems to extend their lifespan, I suspect because gives them extra time to dry out.
Why would you be doing development as root?

Personally I would use virtualenvs with Python to solve that problem you described.
This so reminds me of the Battlestat Galatica prequel Caprica, where Daniel Graystone brings back his dead daughter as a V-space bot, thereby leading to the creation of the first Cylon.

I cannot see this as being helpful to the grieving process. I do see it being useful for businesses: create a chat or VR bot of a founder or shrewd executive to tap their take on things on demand. This is similar to the ghost AIs in Cyberpunk 2020, and to the corporate ghosts in the Cat series by Joan D. Vinge.
For me besides the variety of fashion, I also found that if I wear the same shoes every day they can get pretty smelly and degrade faster. If I switch between a few pairs then so long as they were fundamentally good quality their individual lifetimes will still be at least the same, but I wear them for a longer period and they consistently don’t smell bad or get super weather damaged.
My dad set me up with the equivalent feature to this on Dashlane. But it involved downloading their desktop app, which has all the usual anti-user behaviour - automatically adding to startup list, minimising to taskbar on quit, self updating without request, etc. So I ended up uninstalling it.

I hope that I get an email notification, or I find out through other offline means, if the feature ever gets activated. I hate that something which could have a significant impact on my life, potentially at a difficult time, appears to require running crapware on my own computer.
I find that wearing a rotation of shoes helps them dry out between usages, but then again I have particularly sweaty feet!
Try rotating through 2 or 3 pairs of shoes such that you let every pair completely dry out for at least a full day before wearing them again. You might notice that they actually do take longer to physically deteriorate, and probably also longer to start smelling: the longer and more thoroughly you dry your shoes between wears, the better. To reference your rather ironic username, that's common sense (and verifiable by you if you're willing to do the experiment).
In companies such as these there is an absolute mountain of abuse to dig through, so as a researcher it is pretty normal to have all sorts of different reasons to devote more or less attention to a subject. Very routine things will see less scrutiny, whereas very objectionable things (think child porn, organisations responsible for bombings, ethnofascist rings, etc) will see a little more.

I don't necessarily see this as a bad thing, it's more or less inevitable so the focus should be to have the "very objectionable things" actually confined to a set that is sort of agreed upon.
An early mitigation strategy has been to use different brands of ssd so that failure rates get more spread out. For raid 6 we have started out with max 2 drives of a single brand.

The result for us was 2 drives that failed within the same month, of the same brand, and from there it seems to be single failures rather than clusters.
I don't disagree. Google is synonymous with privacy invasion. The fastest way to convince me not to use a product is to put the word Google on it.

What I do disagree with is the Australian approach.

For instance, privacy is ignored. If I understand correctly, privacy issues are not addresses in any way, shape or form and would remain as-is under their proposal.

So what we're left with looks more like a good old-fashioned, heavy handed, targeted, mafia style shakedown of a foreign company that would hand Rupert Murdock a slice of Google profits without him having to compete for it.

This is not free trade or free enterprise and just begs for similar protectionist retaliation against Australian interests. Fair enough if they never plan to conduct commerce with foreign entities. Otherwise, they are just shooting themselves in the foot in the long run.
Can someone please tell me what is an 'indie hacker' ?
There's one benefit I can think of, being able to wear your favorite pair of shoes for longer.

Twice I've found myself shopping for new shoes and said to myself, "None of these new styles are better than my old shoes. Actually they are worse. I wish they still sold the old ones."

If I find shoes better than my current ones, I am very tempted to buy two pairs to prevent that disappointment again when they wear out.
> Being black is a protected class. Being an asshole is not.

So you're fine with employers doing criminal background checks against Democrats but not Republicans? Or just investigating which one you are and then making the hiring decision directly based on it?

We're talking about the principle, not the law. The law can be changed. What constitutes a "protected class" isn't in the constitution.
I love the graphic on the article, it brings me back to playing solitaire on windows 95!
Agreed. Especially if you are wearing something on top of them (like a hoodie) most of the time.
I'm more talking the 1.4 billion people in China that need CPUs when you try to tell them they can't use ARM or RISC or etc. not the 330 million in the US that want something manufactured. We've already import restricted Android devices from e.g. Huawei, it has had no impact to their need for CPU
designs for them though.
True, bad idea, anyway there's many metals for that including steel, etc.
It becomes tiresome to always phrase things with "I believe" or "my opinion".
It’s really simple. I can decide to do business with you or decide not to do business with you. Also I don’t understand what is preventing Parler from simply hosting a forum? Unless it is because none of the hosting companies want them? So that is it. Let’s stop regurgitating on this forever. Let’s move on.
>> You could limit the initial torque in software, but that’d kill the joy of the EV.

All electric cars are torque-limited. They simply have to be. A static electric motor, of the type needed for higher speeds, given full voltage would not only snap bits of the drivetrain but rip apart its own mounts. So they are all limited to various degrees.

The limiting factor on low-speed power for EVs isn't the motor. It's the strength of the drivetrain and ability of the battery system to provide the necessary current/voltage without cooking something.