skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
You seem to think that teams of economists don't cherry pick metrics that suit their perspective.
I don't mean this as a stink to Finmark but it's also a motivating factor to move on to something that better fits your needs as you get bigger instead of trying to squeeze everything out of a service designed for helping startups.
My patient-facing colleagues are required to get a heck of a lot more vaccines than just the flu.
> I think a lot of people are more interesting in helping the half of the country that supported Trump and QAnon walk itself back from the crazy positions they've talked themselves into

It's not just the right that has walked itself into crazy positions. The country is in need of some serious regression to the mean on both sides.
ARM: maybe. Intel would be smart to make an ARM CPU. M1: probably not. Apple never really knew how to sell servers, and having a premium brand means they can't sell low-end laptops, so the market for something between a Chromebook, iPad mini, and low-end Macbook Air will still be x86 (maybe Intel, maybe AMD, whichever's cheapest) until ARM Windows is a thing.

ARM in the datacenter should be Intel's main fear.
> No, certainly not just excel.

Indeed, let's not forget LibreOffice
Ok, so you're just explaining this badly. The problem is not that "manual tasks" exist, but that they can be created with (false) dependencies on other tasks that have flexible scheduling. The way you originally explained Manual Tasks naturally leads to a perfectly valid use case, but apparently MS Project also allows for an invalid usage of that feature.
Ryan Peterson: Shipping Costs from Shanghai to LA/Rotterdam
Airliner Pilot Says Jet Pack Guy over Los Angeles Looked Just Like This Drone
Ugh, this is something that friends of mine have to deal with. Thankfully my current employer sent me a new MBP with nothing on it but the core OS. It does annoy me they didn't get the 32GB version, like it was ~$400 to bump that up but no. I've easily spent more than $400 worth of time watching a beachball spin while I find what is eating all my memory.
Private cars are a horribly inefficient way to move people. A lane of traffic can move about 1500 people per hour at most (traffic at full speed, every car totally full), in real life its more like 800 people per hour. Compare that to 10,000-25,000 people per hour on a commuter train. By focusing development around cars, American cities actually decrease the practical size of the metropolitan area.
I agree, but isn't that already long established? One could argue now whether the original Raspberry Pi did so or the OLPC a number of years earlier.
I’ve seen low margins small businesses destroyed by litigation. The exact probability of low wage workers taking legal action is irrelevant, but it’s above zero and scammy lawyers don’t mind initiating claims in hopes of settlements.

I’m not commenting about whether or not business should or shouldn’t be shielded from covid liability. I just wanted to make it known that liability of legal costs, from low paid and high paid employees, and poor and rich customers, is a material risk to a business, especially ones that don’t already have lawyers on staff.
It's not bad leadership to hold down the costs of your key inputs. It's bad leadership to do that if doing so undermines the position of your company in the market.

The handful of Apple engineers I know are incredibly happy and devoted to their work at Apple and being paid 50% more to work for Google would feel like a step backward to them.

That, in combination with their business results is, to me, evidence of excellent leadership at Apple.
SuperExpressive()
.anythingButString('aeiou')
.toRegex();
// ->
/(?:[^a][^e][^i][^o][^u])/

There's got to be a better way to express that in Regex, right?
I am arguing just that, with a reasonably large and varied sample-size, although heavily biased towards macs over windows-powered machines. I get a lot of machines from clients.

Now, a mac on its own tends to work quite well out of the box, but this does not hold for peripherals, and I feel like the machines always end up developing... quirks.

I always felt that the path you picked just gives you the sum of all problems with few of the benefits. I could maybe do the other way around for compat, but the laptop wouldn't be able to stay on this side of the balcony railing for long if I did it the way suggested... :|
I moved my family from California to Austin, Texas, and regretted it
Ok, now I'd like to update a dependency.

In docker world, I create an MR that updates the dev container and deploy container dockerfiles at the same time, check that it runs tests, and merge it in. I push a new version of the dev dockerfile, and have the .vscode/devcontainer.json reference that new tag. Next time all the devs open up this repo, they'll get notified they need an update. You just updated a dev dependency across the whole group in a source-controlled way.

What's your way to do it? Email everybody?
This is a good distinction. The Japanese tradition might serve as an example of different aging paradigms (also present in other areas of the world).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/East_Asian_age_reckoning
If the new talent isn't performing, this isn't necessarily a bad thing. And for those who stay, they'll get to learn and work with the people who have a track record of being great.
This is a little out of date. Device tree exists explicitly to avoid needing a machine file for your board. Bootloaders like uboot will load your kernel and dtb together, and the kernel uses the dtb to enumerate the hardware on the system.

Again, the problem isn't that the mainline kernel _couldnt_ support these boards, is that no one wants to put in the work to bring their implementations up to the standards of the mainline kernel.
Salvation is not individual business, but personal responsibility.
> Sure why not!

For multiple reasons

> It was utterly worthless at the time

If you read what Satoshi wrote, he didn't think it would be worthless in the future at all.

> (and today in my opinion)

Your opinion is contradicted by reality

> we know plenty of people who lost multi tens of thousands of bitcoins.

They weren't the creators
We are updating our website this month to give more detail about the solution and showcase more of the product.

In the meantime, happy to provide screenshots:

https://f.hubspotusercontent20.net/hubfs/8057672/Scenario%20...

https://f.hubspotusercontent20.net/hubfs/8057672/Scenario%20...

https://finmark.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Scenario-Plan...
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Gideon_(2020)

https://www.mintpressnews.com/juan-guidos-latest-coup-attemp...

https://www.vox.com/2020/5/11/21249203/venezuela-coup-jordan...
I've never heard of any theories that earth like conditions are new or unique, in fact half of all stars like ours are over 9 billion years old. And the universe has almost stopped making new stars.

If you believe it takes, on average 9 billion years X 100 billion star systems to create 1 civilization, then you believe in some kind of 'filter' that stops life almost completely. A filter that we have passed to be the first.

And by the time any other life statistically emerges we will have colonized the galaxy many times over.
I don't know why you are downvoted - this is absolutely true. Again, this is not because Chrome ships by default for Mac's or PC's, but because it's a great development target for corp environment and there is a feeling there that security is better on chrome than it was for IE (corps are slow / but have longer memories and IE has had some miserable bugs). Where I work the switch to gsuite and chrome seemed to knock down spam / malware amazingly (if you turn on the delayed delivery / strong malware protection) This does result in I think chrome uploading code or hashes of code you download to google or something as part of advanced monitoring.
I'd expect that most places where emoji are accepted and reliably preserved, you could also use things like Han ideographs, which would give you a much larger symbol set to work with.
What's curious is that CSP started with named ports as well, but evolved to become anonymous.

> Programs in the original CSP were written as a parallel composition of a fixed number of sequential processes communicating with each other strictly through synchronous message-passing. In contrast to later versions of CSP, each process was assigned an explicit name, and the source or destination of a message was defined by specifying the name of the intended sending or receiving process

I wonder what gives? Why this return to an older form?
> belying the practical expectation of security Apple users get from iCloud and iMessage.

What practical expectation of security? iCloud backups are not E2E encrypted.

If you're expecting that it should be impossible for anyone else to read your messages, then don't use iCloud. If you don't trust the people you're messaging, then don't message them. Trying to build a platform that guarantees security regardless of who you message is a fallacy, that system doesn't exist and people shouldn't think about security in those terms. If you send someone information, you can not guarantee with any messaging system that they won't copy that information and send it to someone else. Recipient trust is part of the equation.

Any one of your friends can just copy and paste text out of iMessage, you have no technical guarantee that your messages are going to stay in Apple's ecosystem. If you send a message to someone with an Android phone, it gets sent in plaintext over SMS. If they're in a group chat, boom, no more encryption. Apple themselves can't keep your data in the iMessage environment, they exfiltrate it for you whenever you text someone who's not on iOS.

And even if you don't have any friends on Android, all of the data that you're worried about leaking gets stored non-E2E encrypted to Apple's servers whenever anyone in your messaging pool turns on backups -- and I guarantee most of your contacts on iOS have backups turned on.

But you're worried about security flaws in the Matrix protocol? Based on what?

If you actually need E2E encryption, you shouldn't be using iMessage in the first place, you should be using something like Signal, a program where the default settings for you and your contacts aren't going to leak your messages and break their encryption. And at least Signal warns you in advance if a contact isn't on the same platform. At least it works on multiple operating systems so you aren't virtually guaranteed that it'll be impossible to do E2E chat with some of your friends.
Money matters to happiness–perhaps more than previously thought
How to “Co-Live” with a Natural Hazard
How does a test get standardized? Is there something like drug trials where you need to show accuracy instead of efficacy?
Isn't all of modern healthcare an example of civilization being in active conflict with evolution? If "weaker" genes are not eliminated as often, we have effectively ruled out natural selection of survivalist traits.
An I'm suggesting that a population that dies out before accomplishing any intellectual achievements wasn't all that intelligent or make sense as a species. How a species would appear that decides to forego its basic needs in favor of making art is beyond me.

A species that spends its time making birdsongs is effectively just a dumber version of birds.

> Evolution doesn't look ahead to avoid dead ends.

It does though, by many metrics. Many steps of evolution are not just the outright outcomes, but traits that make it easier for competitive adaptations to develop later on. That is, natural selection works on multiple levels of derivatives of fitness scores. Humanity's intelligence is built on top of everything else, and is often overruled, by base survival instincts.
I’m talking about dynamic dispatch and the languages that depend on it for performance.
Not a big AWS fan or anything, but...

> they rely on bad math capabilities of their clients

No, they don't. Showing hourly prices makes sense for hourly services.

They also provide a detailed cost estimator, because the arithmetic gets pretty detailed: https://calculator.aws

> compared to a root server for $10 that easily outperforms a $60 EC2 instance that's really overpriced.

Let's say a developer costs $75/hr. If AWS saves my dev team 10 hrs/mo., then I'm willing to pay a $750 premium for it.

Developer costs are also unpredictable. Turnover will cause spikes in my costs, for example.

Server costs are predictable. If I need to pay AWS more to save my developers time, I can always do that. I can't always just throw another developer onto my team when I need one.

The only people who are optimizing for three-figure costs every month are either: 1) paying very, very low salaries to their developers, or 2) not thinking about their biggest cost, which is developer time.

> When hosting a simple one-node Kubernetes cluster

Who would do this and why? Why would you have a load balancer in front of a single server?
Google suspends second AI ethics researcher: union
NOAA Projects 30 Percent Average Great Lakes Ice Cover for 2021 Winter
> there's a reason we're not still using BeOS today for example (Haiku aside).

You're blaming BeOS's failure on the BeBox? Every release of BeOS that was marked as a "full release" (as opposed to a developer preview or a "preview release") could run on Intel hardware, and the BeBox itself was discontinued long before then.

This is a tangent, but I don't understand people who think BeOS was the heir-apparent to consumer/home/personal OSes. It had super half baked networking support and absolutely no concept of multi-user or privilege separation. Similar home OSes didn't enforce privilege separation or multiple users, but at least had the framework -- BeOS essentially just runs everything as root.

It had some neat tricks, but was a pretty underdeveloped OS in some key areas. The fact it never took off isn't that surprising to me, and it's not just because Be was a small company or that it's hard for an underdog to get market share in a crowded space (both of which are also true). It just wasn't really well suited for "general purpose computing" in the same way that e.g. Linux, WinNT, or Darwin are.
A while ago he (this Craig Wright fraud) actually sat with one of the first people behind bitcoin development Gavin Andresen. Gavin was the main developer in the beginning chatting with satoshi in the forum. There was a video of Gavin saying that Craig proved to him that he was satoshi. But later seemed to have been part of some kind of social engineering - wasn't totally clear how he proved he could sign the keys.

Regardless the guys's behavior doesn't at all match Satoshi's behavior from the initial days in the forum (before he disappeared that is).

edit: video of Gavin saying Wright is satoshi https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pNZyRMG2CjA
Amazon at SLT: The fusion of speech and language understanding
And that's how the Demo scene came back to life in 2022...
Andreas Antonopoulos Live Stream on Bitcoin “Double Spend” News
I agree and have been doing some similar analysis on the backblaze dataset. I suppose you can use this for prediction but I'm personally just interested in post-hoc analysis and (1) getting better AFR estimates when failure counts are low + (2) exploring time-dependence of hazard functions with different priors (GP priors, etc.). This post and your comment have motivated me to make a post this weekend! Thanks!
Why do we assume extraterrestrials can visit us? As far as we know there is no way to travel even close to the speed of light, much less faster. It simply takes too long to get anywhere.
Currently about $80 of electricity and goes into each transaction, which is socialized across all holders as inflation. It’s this incentive which keeps miners mining. Once the reward drops to zero, transaction fees will be born directly by parties to the transaction and will have to be high enough to stave off a 51% attack directly.
What is the function of a middleman between musicians and streaming services?

Traditional record labels do a fair bit of legwork -- maybe not enough to justify the very high take they get, but I do at least know about the promotion, marketing, production, distribution, and other services they provide.

What is your middleman doing for 15%? I'd have (naively) expected that you would work directly with the streamer: "here is my audio file, send the money to XXX".
If a project management app is the hardest code you've ever written, this sounds like overengineering**2. Just use lists of lists like every other project management app.
The legal system isn't perfect.
It's in my favorites. Great resource, thanks!
React: It's Just a Philosophy!
It's just a philosophy!
And even let's you do web development, at times.
As opposed to the last 4 years of... what exactly?
With all due respect, I'm not a Trump supporter but I am the most conservative person in my family, and I'm not the one who was talking about guillotining people I don't like at the dinner table last year.

I would prefer the left wing people in my family not be enabled to shift the blame for all their shitty behavior the last 4 years onto Trump thanks.
Yeah. This doesn't seem to have to potential to go as badly wrong as a lot of other high-profile examples of selective enforcement. The fact that events can play out this way and seem exceptional (ie. happening only due to political motive) pretty much implies that IPv4 addresses are not really scarce yet and remain cheap enough that hardly anyone bothers to root out this kind of misbehavior. Which also means it should be easy to acquire replacement IP addresses from a more appropriate registrar.
That's technically correct, but ultimately useless, information
Not without look-ahead/look-behind
Removing a statue is a low hanging fruit.
PC fan port of early Sonic games lets you zoom the camera way, way out
can you do that on windows? every single exe, every process?
Here is what I see.

You want an automated tool to build a regular expression for people who don't understand regular expressions. There is no shortage of ways that this is going to lead to disasters. Starting with the fact that far too many developers do not understand the difference between pattern matching and parsing, and will reach for the wrong tool with no idea what it is doing and why they can't get it to do what they want.

See https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1732348/regex-match-open... for more.
That depends on if developers can be convinced to actually use multiple threads...
That's a useful technique. Thanks.
Attacking the capitol building got LOTS of attention by a lot of people. It was an extremely conspicuous, highly publicized crime. So yeah, folks are looking into the people involved, and their associates. Much of enforcement relies on the public to notice and report wrongdoing.
Have all companies schedule all of their meetings based on their employee's housemates' meeting schedules in a different company? That doesn't sound very easy.
KEXP had some good background jams to her reading last night. I forgot to go look at their playlist, see what it was. Anyone perhaps run across it?
>In principle, it would be like police enforcing certain traffic laws (say, about changing lanes or making a turn without signaling) much more strictly against black people than against white people.

This is easily reconciled if you distinguish between the public officials doing the selective enforcing, and private citizens selectively deciding who to do research on. Let's say 20% of waiters at a restaurant under-report their tips to the IRS. It would be objectionable if the IRS decided to target one guy in particular because the agent had a grudge on him, but it's far less objectionable if the IRS acted on an anonymous report that the guy was evading taxes. If anything, it would be more objectionable if the IRS didn't act, and said "well 20% of waiters are evaders as well, so it would be unfair to investigate that guy because we don't investigate the rest".
My problem is that this is a decision for the state department, not a blogging platform to make.
Why would half the planet die from a vaccine?
Yea fair enough. My main point is that the media will now cover it as everything Biden says being "unifying" rather than every word Trump ever uttered, which was "divisive". Even when they say the same thing.
Carbon Design System – From IBM
How to Measure Enterprise WiFi Speeds
I disagree that Aliens even if we share the exact same building blocks would look similar to us. For example even for planets that would be habitable for us would have minor differences in atmospheric pressure, gravity, the types of radiation their star produces would result in drastically different evolutionary paths. Also even if there was a clone of our solar system evolution would be random and the life would look different from each other, I mean look at Australia, or even look at Earth's history the fauna during the Jurassic looks way different than what we have today.
It looks like Russians send him stuff. Nothing really classified, but things like the photos of desktop models seem to come from people visiting various offices or agencies. Some Russian military facilities also run unofficial tours (whatever pays the bills) resulting in photos of stuff that would normally be behind locked doors/gates. His satellite imagery is all unclassified, mostly stuff available via google. You just have to know what you are looking at.

Covert Shores has such a reputation in the maritime community that he could probably just knock on the door and get a tour of their non-classified material. Old/scrapped subs are often just sitting on bases forgotten.
> I thought the Novikov conjecture postulated that time-travel would change nothing at all

Not exactly, from the wiki article:

> The simplest way to impose the principle of self-consistency in quantum mechanics (in a classical space-time) is by a sum-over-histories formulation in which one includes all those, and only those, histories that are self-consistent.

So it is possible to change the past, but only in ways that are self-consistent and don't give rise to paradoxes.

Regarding the ramifications for free will:

> Novikov supports this point of view with another argument: physics already restricts your free will every day. You may will yourself to fly or to walk through a concrete wall, but gravity and condensed-matter physics dictate that you cannot. Why, Novikov asks, is the consistency restriction placed on a time traveler any different?
I'm not sure if the B dimension affects exercise choice. If it does, it could be covered by providing a short list of exercises to try for activating each muscle group A. That way the user doesn't have to figure out which muscle(s) B are compensating, which could be challenging for a lot of people who need this information. In my case, I'm still not sure exactly how my body was compensating for the muscles in my back that weren't being utilized.
Good point, that does actually sound quite useful.
Well, I see that stats for es-dev-server/@web/dev-server and prisma/prisma-2 are completely different. Bundle size is different, languages is different.
I think it's fair enough to treat them as different packages.
For example, AngularJS and Angular are also totally different frameworks. And it can be also useful for example to check stats for the old package, because it might be in use for a long time and people might be interested in tracking its stats.

>maybe “trendiness” is a nice metric
Good suggestion, thanks! I will look into it
Corellium was founded by some veterans from the iOS jailbreak community: https://www.reddit.com/r/jailbreak/comments/8rmpqt/question_...
EU is going to do a great work.
I feel that /r/btc lunacy has made it's way to HN
The Body as Totem in the Asexual Revolution