skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Funnily enough, a lot of the work I've interacted with has been in the Lit RPG genre - which needs a lot more, since they're often including tables of "character data", not to mention "system" fonts. It's surprisingly challenging to typeset and make it broadly readable across devices.
It's interesting that they phrased it like that. If they were confident about this, they would easily be able to prove this in court and it would be a very simple case of copyright infringement right?
Usually you would have some number of enclosed aisles of racks make up a deployment pod.

You can usually customize machine configuration within a deployment pod while staying within the electrical and thermal envelope of the aisle and without changing the number of core-spine to pod-spine network links.

You could potentially build out a data hall but not fully fill it with aisles. As demand starts to trend up you can forecast two quarters into future and do the build-outs with just one quarter lead time.

I would expect very large operators to have perfected this supply chain song and dance very well.
You should check out Makie. Getting it set up can be a bit frustrating if things don’t go right, and there is a small learning curve for using `@lift`, but it is an absolute joy to use once you ramp up.

I use it for my research by default. You can pan, zoom, etc. The subplot/layout system is frankly a lot better than Matlab (and I enjoyed Matlab for plotting!). The best part is that I can insert sliders and drop downs into my plot easily, which means I don’t need to waste time figuring out the best static, 2D plot for my experiment. I just dump all the data into some custom logging struct and use sliders to index into the correct 2D plot (e.g. a heat map changing over time, I just save all the matrices and use the slider to get the heat map at time t).
Then you just end up with bash commands again, such as "pwd" and "cat"
The biggest issue is really the app stores. If hosting keeps consolidating the way it is, it will be on par in future years. And the reason Parler didn't build its own servers is because its massively expensive to do so. So expensive that its a non-starter rather than an inconvenience. Giving preferential treatment to some startups but not others to cut the corner on hosting by dominant players which determines winners and losers is still not a free market.
I mean, you could just open up your favorite web browser and go to any website you'd like. Why is the lack of an app on the App Store or Play such a major hindrance? Well, I know why it is, because most people have been conditioned to associate every service with an app. But really, it shouldn't be a major roadblock.

Also, not totally related this this article, but I also don't understand why Parler didn't have a backup DR plan. All of the major cloud platforms have outages. What is stopping them from renting a few racks, or cages of racks, in a datacenter with multiple Tier1 peers? Sounds like they didn't plan very well honestly.
Which is why antitrust enforcement is important.
Intel needs to change the way it does business. Simply lowering prices won't achieve that. Becoming the cheap option is likely the beginning of a death spiral the company will never recover from -- it will give the company an excuse to double down on a failing strategy.

Furthermore, AMD is not the biggest threat to Intel. The biggest threat is cloud providers like Amazon designing their own chips, which is already happening. If those succeed, who would build them? Certainly not Intel, if they continue to manufacture only their own designs -- that business, like so much other fab business, will go to TSMC.
I'm just explaining the diffusion mechanic. Still, one four digit number that is only a single digit that repeats is not hard to remember at all
Reusing code is not freeloading in the Open Source (capitalized) movement -- at least, not the kind of freeloading that we'd like to discourage.

I don't know what else I can do as an Open Source developer in my projects and my terminology to imply that when I say, "you can reuse my code for any reason" I actually mean it. I guess traditional Open Source advocates could abandon the entire term and go off and create a brand new movement where we try to make that even more explicit, but people are just going to follow us there and then try to coopt the term again.

> people with the temerity to offer source-available licenses get treated like shit anyway because they aren't giving away the farm

I will call out people who are doing that.

But really, the only comments I have about source available products are:

A) they don't offer all of the advantages of Open Source (although they offer many more benefits than fully closed-source software), and I think that pointing that out is not a moral judgement, just a statement of fact about what the licenses do and do not allow.

B) people who offer source available licenses need to stop saying that they're basically the same as Open Source, or that they're just a subset of Open Source, or that they exist because Open Source has lost its way.

Because the licenses are not the same. All other debates aside, both us at this point in the conversation recognize this, right? You and I are disagreeing about a fundamental philosophy on what rights and moral responsibilities people have around code. You fundamentally disagree with me about whether or not large companies have the right to completely freely reuse permissive code, or whether they have an obligation to pay for it. That disagreement is so large that it affects our attitudes about whether offering large-scale commercial hosting of an Open Source product is moral.

And it's fine that you and I disagree on that point, but we can look at that disagreement and say that clearly your goals when licensing software are different than mine. So to me, it seems pretty reasonable that people who have this fundamental disagreement with the OSI should acknowledge that instead of acting like the Open Source movement is broken. It's not broken, it disagrees with you about the goals are in making code available to other people.

It's not people being stubborn, it's not that the OSI doesn't understand the consequences of Open Source, it's that it does understand the consequences of Open Source and it disagrees with you about what consequences are desirable. The Open Source movement doesn't need shared source advocates to 'save' us, we need them to acknowledge that their goals are different than ours.
pandoc is pretty handy. It's pretty much plain text anyway, whatever format is used.
Or we need to stop using words like fascism, tyranny, racist just because someone disagrees with us. That shift to cooler more informative language is just as difficult for educated people. Even on HN, so many threads devolve into Godwin’s law. I will say that one exception is education about human cognition. Trying to reason without a strong grasp of our own psychology and good ways of framing epistemological problems is like writing software without regard to hardware. Useful to some extent but prone to unforseen gotchas.
The grey area here is more about what the "market" is defined as here. It's not entirely clear that the existing dominance that AWS has is different enough from "hosted search services" to be considered a different market (from an anti-trust point of view)
Modern process node designations (5nm, 3nm...) are not measurements any more, they are marketing terms. The actual measure of shrinking is a lot smaller than the name would mean to indicate, and not approaching the quantum limits as fast as it may seem.
>If you look at interviews with writers, you'll find a whole lot of obsession over the process, and things like how it feels to write with a pen vs. a typewriter vs. a word processor, and very, very little about what their drafts look like. It's far down the list of considerations you'll find novelists care about.

This.

I chose emacs because I'm a programmer who uses emacs frequently. And its just damn text and I don't have to get all fiddly with everything. And like I don't want to have to fiddle around with Word, I don't want to fiddle around with some complicated markup langage like rst either. I just want to write.

I wrote my thesis is Word, I know what it can be like.
Are there any due process?
Is the power checked and balanced?
it says it can exporting to ODF, but without much formatting requiring additional editing after conversion. instead it recommends exporting to HTML, and then importing that into writer or word for better results.

but i could not tell from the docs how to get the end result into something like standard manuscript format without manual processing.
Encryption can be used for bad things too I hope they ban it.
Ah, that's interesting, thanks for sharing. Their github README does a nice job of showing how it doesn't add a lot of work: https://github.com/Juniper/libxo
Right, this also aligns with the our testing. Number of queues available seem to also be playing a role. But you're right RSS should spread traffic quite nicely when using 5-10 flows.
Python 3's F-Strings: An Improved String Formatting Syntax
Infeasible is maybe a stretch. However you will need to have a multi-step "Export for Publish" workflow which is definitely a hurdle. However assuming that 95% of the time is spent writing it may be worth it if you like the tool.
The author being a non-expert in the field is useful to know. It doesn't have to be proof of something to be useful information in creating a more whole image. Even if that weren't the case, another point the parent made was that, in their opinion, the quality and tone of the article degrades conversation rather than contributing to it, which is another form of non-proof that is perfectly reasonable to express as an opinion. The parent may have spoken with a disrespectful tone, but "You haven't addressed a single point", is equally flippant and antagonistic. In fact, it's worse, since you're addressing it directly to a participant in the conversation.
> If you want to broadcast to state level, you must have education, journalism rigor, and standup to scrutiny, have to explain inconsistencies or your role is revoked.

And make no mistake, what they mean in reality by the above is always the same, namely that "free speech" will mean you are freely allowed to repeat the talking points of the Party.
Building better digital public spaces
Keep your home mouse-free with an AI powered cat flap
I'm not looking to change your political beliefs, but if you assign an infinite value ("killing our democracy!" comes close) to one problem you'll be unable to weigh the coming dilemmas. Not "properly weigh", weigh at all.

I'm well aware that the MAGA thing was well beyond a vandalizing mob. But that wasn't an organized coup either.

If you let this become an "existential risk" that overrides all other concerns, you'll find yourself agreeing to some things a previous iteration of yourself would find unpalatable. Worse yet, you may come to regret it in 10 or 20 years.
but won't get you all the way there, unfortunately, since novel format is pretty specific.
Is This a Branch?
Show HN: Runson.cloud
Yes, thats all this comes down to in the end.

Open source works fine, and does quite well as a business model (use it as free advertising).

What has happened here is a plain old case of monopoly.

Once markets are no longer efficient, the model breaks down. Amazon can use its resources to extinguish competition with their own product.

This is why we need antitrust law.

It's not a failure of capitalism, its not a failure of the businesses involved its just what happens when you run a freeish market. That is, things get out of whack to the point we the people feel it is unjust, it would eventually right itself but this would take a long time and likely do more interim damage than its work allowing, so we fiddle with it, hopefully not breaking anything in the process.
I don't have any personal experience with foster children yet.

My partner and I are planning to become foster parents, so I've spent the last two years or so reading a lot about fostering, and we also took a course to prepare us.

My impression is that many cases aren't quite as clear, and it's often hard to say if removing the kids was really the best course of action. I don't think social workers are careless, but they do have to make decisions based on limited information, and they often don't have sufficient alternatives to taking kids away.

But of course, I'm just a random dude commenting on the internet, and maybe I'm wrong. I also live in Austria, so maybe the situation is totally different to the US (the system does work differently). I've also tried to find statistics about foster kids, and it's surprisingly hard to find them.
On the flip side that post illustrates just how things can go wrong, too: Windows RT was a flop.
"Hello, my name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die."
> It seems like what's being described

yes this was exactly what I wanted to say. the local norms have over time become illegal and many regions still have a combination of both.
Say ... if a local person was just arriving on the island, without any reference (would be an odd thing to do but for the sake of argument[1]) this person then (hypothetically) gets robbed at the pier, his next stop isn't the police who might end up beating him or finding ways to extort him, but they would visit whoever ran the village. They would beg for work, and they'll chat about who they might know in common, and find an arrangement (maybe even find the offender and get their stuff back). The police would be the last place they'd go to not only because they're corrupt but because it would potentially make the village elder who is actually in power lose a little face.

[1] it's risky traveling being both without reference AND poor. especially poor folk would do everything in their power to arrange with people at their destination about their visit. so a job seeker turning up at the police saying they've been robbed would raise a lot of questions. (the person might be a good shoe-in for case they have open since a while and are still looking for a suspect).
Radio users reminded not to use radios in crimes
It would take a large stroke of global authoritarian action to get what you want. There are 2 stores because that's about what the market can support right now. Any more and you divide the development base too thin, companies cut budgets, and you end up with... two stores.
The recent 180 with Google Photos was the straw that broke the camel's back for me.

I've seen them abandon products in the past, and have always been wary about their use of my data, albeit never enough to make the effort to use another service or pay for one.

This was such a bold reversal of their promise to offer free photo storage "forever" that I felt like it's only a matter of time before I get seriously impacted in other ways.

So I switched up everything:

- Google Photos -> Apple Photos (and local backups)

- Google Maps -> Apple Maps (luckily recent improvements have made it usable for my region)

- Gmail -> Fastmail

- Google Search -> Duck Duck Go (still relying on !g for most programming related searches)

- Google Chomre -> Safari (switched a year ago)

On the plus side, it feels good moving away from Google and not giving them my data. On the downside I'm now paying for services that I had for free, and in some ways getting more tied to Apple.
Ah, I swear I looked at the list three times until I finally found it. It's not listed under "Shift+H", it's under "H" (capital H = Shift+H). If they had a shortcut "Shift+1", they would probably rather look up the keyboard mapping to find out what character that is rather than writing "Shift+1". I still think htop is a great little tool, but sometimes it's really too clever for its own good...
I'm burnt out too. I've just set up a habit tracker for to keep me motivated.

I'm focusing on food, sleep, and exercise to get me through this.

If you're feeling down, look into what kind of food you're eating. I've cut down sugar just to avoid the highs and the lows.
It doesn't have to, can just serve anything - if the client code doesn't check certificates...
Which is hard to do when a cartel greases our representatives in direct and indirect bribery (record setting campaign donations and banning their political opposition).
Politicians do bad things, too.
Because visually the people in my country look the same as me, we share a similar history for many thousands of years, we have mostly very similar world view, etc. A person from India for example is going to look different, have a different religion, different history, and different world view.
You don't find it ironic that a company in a "free" country has to go to a "not free" country to get hosting that won't cancel them for promoting freedom?
What's the alternative - the government which a large portion of our country wants to see less of? Not to mention if it were the government's responsibility that any new president can just strip the budget making it ineffective.
The problem is its GPU was always poorly documented or not at all since Broadcom considered it proprietary IP and never provided any detailed low-level documentation.
From the looks of it, their plan seem to be to institute enough political repression that they won't have to worry about any next government/president/administration.
Probably a dumb question - what makes it not suitable for writing technical books?
Integrating ReCAPTCHA with Next.js
> I mean, you could just open up your favorite web browser and go to any website you'd like.

Only if you're willing to hit Russian servers...
I feel like this argument is setting up a false dichotomy between saying it's the platforms' legal right and just throwing up your hands up and declaring "who care?"

Plenty of activities are legal, but censured by cultural norms. Prohibiting your users from participating in a discussion, because you don't like their political views should at least be recognized as a shitty thing to do. That doesn't mean there's a simple legal solution. But at the very least the users, from any part of the political spectrum, should be pissed off that the overlords in Mountain View have decided that certain ideas are too dangerous for their little brains.
The opposite of this is to declare everyone has the right to be featured #1 on these private platform? Nobody has that right.
Self-immolation is only a path to growth if you're a magical bird -- it's not a reasonable strategy for a healthy public company. AMD went through seven years of pain and humiliation between that spinoff and its 2015 glow-up. I understand that sometimes the optimal solution involves a short-term hit, but you don't just sell your organs on a lark (nor because some finance bros at Third Point said so). There are obvious strategic reasons to remain an IDM, and AMD would never have gone fabless if the company hadn't been in an existential crisis. Intel is nowhere near that kind of crisis; it may have some egg on its face but the company still dominates market share in its core businesses and is making profits hand over fist.

> Maybe there is a way for Intel to open up its fab business to other customers and make it more independent, without splitting it off into another company.

Intel Custom Foundry. They have several years of experience doing exactly what you describe, and that's how their relationship with Altera (which they later acquired) began. I see AMD's subsequent bid for Xilinx as a copycat acquisition that demonstrates one of the competitive advantages of Intel's position as an IDM: information.
They have perfected it, just not in the manner that you are suggesting.
Three.js Journey
Thank you for writing this up.

It kind of hit home for me because I recently had an issue with an unrelated company that has gotten 100 million+ in funding take advantage of my work by removing my name from the content, openly discredit my work under false claims and attempted to steal money from me multiple times while I've done nothing but help grow their business and ask for nothing in return other than our agreed upon compensation.

What I got from this write up is there's always going to be people and corporations out there who do their best to take advantage of you for the sake of profiting off your work using whatever means necessary, even if it's maybe illegal. I pity companies like this, especially the people who are making the decisions because that's the legacy they are leaving behind and if they happen to have children, they are probably forcing that mindset onto them as well.
Not the person you replied to but I have seen an echo of this sentiment multiple times on HN in the past few weeks. In the end, if you believe that the population at large has to be shielded from what is now a large volume and range of types of speech, it means that you implicitly don't trust them to make the right choices on their own. And if you don't trust them to do that, then it never was about democracy to begin with. If you consider opinions you disapprove of to be illegitimate in democratic terms but opinions you approve of to be the result of the proper process of the exchange of ideas, then you implicitly recognize that it is about technocratic management of that exchange of ideas and the influence of the population rather than the actual exchange among free individuals.

It has little to do with absolutes but actually the basic underlying concepts. For the record, I agree that technocracy is generally a better idea. But the word democratic ought to be employed to actually mean something.
It also doesn't help that by default (at least in my experience), Powershell's tab completion is slow and annoying to use. I don't know if it's technically inferior, but it feels terrible.

It does the thing where you get to cycle through various options instead of completing to the longest common prefix, which is really hard to get used to after years and years of interfaces that do the other thing.

It's also difficult to form a repertoire of common shortcuts over time because so many commands share a prefix, so most often the shortest you will be typing is 5-6 characters before you get to anything unique.
It would be a much stronger restriction than they're looking for. If no developer at Amazon, Google, etc. is allowed to even use Elasticsearch, that severely impairs the viability of the project. (Depending on the revenue threshold, it could end up being a problem for Elastic too - they're not exactly a small company.)
Which is why Capitol Police Officer Michael Fanone, who was pinned to the ground by the crowd, had to beg for his life to the crowd where members were shouting, "Kill him with his own gun". Seems pretty clear intent to me.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/jan/15/police-offic...
I run untested, viewer-submitted code on my 500-LED Christmas tree [video]
I don't know the laws of every country, but I don't think it's illegal to jailbreak your phone or create/use an alternate app store in the United States. Your phone just won't be supported any more.

Circumventing digital rights management to violate copyright protection is illegal, but that wouldn't be relevant to the Parler situation.