skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Nowhere in my comment did I say American.

The point is that urbanization and industrialization encouraged individualism. Today, the market itself does so.
I'm no fan of Levandowski's, but it did always seem to me that criminal penalties (including incarceration) for corporate espionage was a co-option of the criminal machinery of government for what should always have been a civil court affair.

That having been said, the law is the law and I'm no fan of using the pardon to free some corporate spies while others with fewer political connections are bound by it.
That's not how common law systems work. Things like executive privilege, qualified immunity, the fighting words doctrine, are all essentially just made up by judges.
Yeah, I wouldn't expect it to work on flatscreens, since they don't have the high voltage components wrt the CRT.

That said- it doesn't really have to do with being built better, just completely different.
No better way to create positive sentiments about yourself than to generate a swath of people indebted to you for their unexpected amnesty.
So that only the tiny fraction of the world that are part of co-ops can use them, and thus only that tiny fraction of the population will have an interest in contributing to/maintaining such software?

RMS wrote an article years ago explaining why such licenses are ultimately detrimental to software freedom:

https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/programs-must-not-limit-freed...

Some key arguments from the article:

>I've stated some of my views about other political issues, about activities that are or aren't unjust. Your views might differ, and that's precisely the point. If we accepted programs with usage restrictions as part of a free operating system such as GNU, people would come up with lots of different usage restrictions. There would be programs banned for use in meat processing, programs banned only for pigs, programs banned only for cows, and programs limited to kosher foods. Someone who hates spinach might write a program allowing use for processing any vegetable except spinach, while a Popeye fan might allow use only for spinach. There would be music programs allowed only for rap music, and others allowed only for classical music.

>The result would be a system that you could not count on for any purpose. For each task you wish to do, you'd have to check lots of licenses to see which parts of your system are off limits for that task.

>How would users respond to that? I think most of them would use proprietary systems. Allowing any usage restrictions whatsoever in free software would mainly push users towards nonfree software. Trying to stop users from doing something through usage restrictions in free software is as ineffective as pushing on an object through a long, soft, straight piece of spaghetti.
Internet Explorer was only replaced by automatic updates after its usage felt enough that sites stopped supporting it.
I wish I had this capability on my Android phone. There are utilities like SuperFreezZ to force background apps to close, but the fact that one is necessary is an indicator that the OS itself is not designed for a user to control what is happening in the background.
It isn’t just an Amazon web series under fire from Hindutva groups
Ah, I guess should've tried before saying. Just excited there's a way.
The only problem with this, is that its fairly well-known by industry insiders that Apple has TSMC's entire 5nm production locked up for a significant portion of this year, maybe even the entire year. M1 is just the beginning. New Axx chips are going 5nm too.

I would trust Charlie over at SemiAccurate before I trust TrendForce.

I'm not saying this isn't true or accurate, I'm saying that Apple's manufacturing demands are enormous just for iPhone / iPad chips, and now M1 has invigorated demand for desktop / laptop Mac products, at least amongst nerdier types like us, but wherever we go, the mainstream inevitably follows. Once "normal" people start using MacBook Pros and realize they now have 2-4 day battery life (or even longer for light users), then its only a matter of time until demand rises. I think Apple has anticipated this to some degree.

Not to mention, 2021 is supposed to be the Year of the Mx iMac / Mac Pro.

Ultimately, this is just a terrible time to be Intel. They're at least 2-3 years away from any worthwhile new product on their own nodes. 10nm is still a shitshow and 7nm isn't faring much better.
> ES has always been a commercial enterprise

Doesn’t seem to be true.

> Shay Banon released the first version of Elasticsearch in February 2010.

> Elastic NV was founded in 2012 to provide commercial services and products around Elasticsearch and related software.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elasticsearch
> I have never found anyone who found 0-based indexing natural or intuitive.

It is pretty intuitive when thinking about natural numbers as steps along a path. Then, zero is the number that means "you are already there".
Buying a mac after complaining about how you can't replace ram seems a bit odd.
It’s worth noting that Musk quoted 30-60 minutes rocket trip time for any pair of source/destination in the world, so there is a lot of room for time wasted around the launch while still being way faster.

That said, they probably have to run hundreds of thousands or millions of non-crewed launches before they can demonstrate it’s safe enough for civilian use. Current tech must be in the range of 3-4 orders of magnitude more dangerous?
Yeah. I have issues with Markdown but this is worse.

Personally - I'm always blindsided by paragraph and newline behaviour - and bullet/numbered lists seem to never work intuitively. I know the internal logic is consistent but it's never made sense to me and I can never recall it.
>This is a load of bullshit. If that was their plan they would have announced both of these changes together. It's not like they were under time pressure to get the announcement out.

I work for Red Hat, opinions are my own, etc. I don't know why they decided to announce the CentOS plans before announcing at least some of the expanded RHEL offerings, and many people are just as confused as myself. However, whatever the reason was, it's absolutely true that expanding access to no-cost and low-cost RHEL was always the plan, and the original announcement effectively stated as much.
"But in order to make individuals susceptible to ideology, you must first ruin their relationship to themselves and others by making them sceptical and cynical, so that they can no longer rely upon their own judgment"

As much as I am sure this does happen quite a lot, something that does not get enough emphasis is how much people's relationships to themselves erode under the very ordinary conditions of quotidian life with its stresses, indignities, and disappointments. Nothing so deliberate as a propaganda campaign is needed for this first step to already take hold of people through the subtle misery of their personal relationships. This is not to say that institutions and ideologies are not involved with this process, but I think the unconscious subtleties of this all too easily get overlooked when we culturally take a normative view of what it means to be mentally healthy as successfully living a normal life.

Arendt, in the same book, also argued that personal resentments fueled the rise of fascist regimes. I think in general, if, as a society, we want to curtail the rise of totalitarian politics, we have to really address the very personal individual antagonisms that arise in people's everyday lives; loneliness among them, but not alone as the sole culprit by a longshot.
If that where true everything would be sold at minimal profit margins. In reality, established competitors avoid price-competition in favour of competing on brand/product/location etc.

The competition argument fails to take into account significant business overheads that allow the largest of corps to compete only among themselves.
This is a terrible security practice.

Switch to Chromium and use a package manager to stay up to date. Don't freeze updates, especially on your browser.
Or just add permissions and ask the user when the extension asks for new ones? e.g. permission to talk to the outside world that something like TGS shouldn't need to just do its job.
> it's TSMC with all the power in this situation, not Intel. TSMC selling their services to the highest bidder

That's Intel's legacy at work. They got the cash (but nothing else) to do this. So Intel _is playing its market position.

Of course TSMC is the real winner, but in AMD vs Intel, they are just another resource.
As Smithers told Burns when asked if Homer and Richard Nixon were related, “I don’t think so sir. They spell and pronounce their names differently.”
> As long as they act in good faith and reasonably, they should be protected.

I agree 100%.
Agreed, but the ownership of the physical games has its own satisfaction. I'm in the process of selling about 300 retro console games mostly because when I play an old game I'm likely to emulate it on my phone than hook up the real thing. I'll miss having my collection, it's nice just to go through it from time to time. I took detailed photographs before selling, those will have to do now.
Users need to be motivated to upgrade. If their current software works sufficiently on the sites they care about, then they have no need to upgrade. If the sites themselves are enabling this behavior, by bending over backwards to work on with old browsers, then they are part of the “problem”.

I don’t like automatic updates and generally keep them disabled. Software upgrades tend to reduce functionality and instead force unnecessary UX redesigns on users, so I’d rather avoid them. I wish developers had the [EDIT: incentive] to release security patches independently from functionality changes, but few do that anymore, sadly.
You're in for a great ride! Enjoy!
The point of Go's convention isn't really relevant to the question of its relative cost compared to exceptions, is it? I don't see that they so much missed it as didn't evaluate it.
Hello deadlock! Come on down!
First, they should have announced this when they killed CentOS.

Second, this is only of value to the teeny tiny companies and individual users with a single server in their home. Small companies with any expectation of growth should probably just use Rocky instead from the get go.

I have a single server in my home running CentOS 7. I gain nothing by using RHEL over Rocky in the future, except with RHEL I have to accept ToS, do some subscription checks, and run the risk that Red Hat cancels this programme down the road. I only see this of value for someone who actually runs real RHEL in prod, and needs to test/validate hardware/software. For anyone just wanting 'free' RHEL, they should just use Rocky.
For a scientist who uses computers but not to write software, it's probably forgivable. It seems even more forgivable for a journalist.
You've obviously made the choice to hate, but for anyone else reading this comment, the CentOS announcement specifically mentioned at the time that an announcement like this was coming regarding expanded RHEL options. Not sure what more evidence is needed that it was the plan. If you're a conspiracy person go look at archive.org's version. If you believe archive.org is in on the conspiracy, well, I'm not sure what to tell you.
Sounds like this might be what you want if you only want screenshots + timestamps and nothing else:

archivebox oneshot --extract=screenshot 'https://example.com'

or

archivebox add --extract=screenshot < ~/Desktop/browser_bookmarks.html
> no inherent additional security mechanisms in place to prevent cross-group contamination/access

Are you saying the biggest advertiser on the planet likely doesn't want to add functionality that could potentially hinder tracking for advertising purposes...?

I am shocked, shocked and appalled. /s
I was caught completely by surprise when the huge mask resistance in the US emerged. I found it absurd, here you are making an ordeal of holding doors for people, like it makes you a great person, a useless gesture, and meanwhile the singular act of goodwill we have needed from others in 100 years is a freaking mask, and it is "robbing you of your freedoms".

I am biased though. I've always had a huge admiration of Japan and resentment that I couldn't wear a mask when sick, because it is illegal in many jurisdictions in the US for anyone over 18 to wear a mask as well as those under when it's not halloween.

I highly doubt after the pandemic masks are going to suddenly be legalized. Cops appear to just be ignoring the law right now, which is absurd.
I watched around 20 minutes till now. Seems like a professionally prepared documentary targeting younger Russian generation. Reminds me of a similar documentary by BBC some years ago. For sure a lot of effort has been put into the making of this.

I am not a Russian, but it looks to me even if all these allegations were to be true, still Putin remains the person that re-build modern Russia. This documentary can only make people in Russia like Putin even more. I will try to watch the rest next out of curiosity, but I doubt it will change my mind.

It is also heroic this guy takes a few months to recover and finds the energy to present so much well-researched evidence. I wounder because, I have seen the pattern in this documentary in some other documentaries before - last in one about Syria's Assad I watched - show some facts that are maybe true, then follow by a conclusion that me as someone who has no idea on those details cannot verify but is supposed to trust in context. Maybe these works on weak minds as they say in Star Wars. This is subtle propaganda in the making.

Not sure what is expected audience for such level of international manipulative politics here.
Interesting this is trending on hackernews when a few days ago an article on using Tulpas to alleviate loneliness was trending. Hackernews zeitgeist - are you alright?
Alternate headline: Ten ways computing helped to transform science
Ballooning spiders as well.
Just forbid them to read Principia Mathematica.

All of them.
Oh I see. That's, weird, but thanks for letting me know.
Futuristic Helmet Has Its Own HEPA Filter and Fan
I wonder how many of those tracking websites or even the extensions themselves are owned by the same entity. That's a pretty common practice.
Express a slice of length 0, backed by a buffer of length 1024 elements.
IMHO nobody (including and especially members of the establishment) seriously believes Snowden or Assange are actually Russian spies, really. Snowden just had to flee to Russia because that was the only counterpart to the US which is sufficiently powerful and interested to possibly hide him and also just enough civilized&westernized to tolerate.
When we prefer human (vs machine) recommendations
Even some spiders
Elastic changes open-source license to monetize cloud-service use
Looks like a good reason to avoid it and stick to other platforms like Signal.
I'm not the author of the list below, but it's a nice TLDR.

Here is a list of harmful nonsense [1] Pai and his FCC did over the last four years:

- Killed net neutrality

- Approved T-Mobile / Sprint merger

- Repeatedly released reports that claimed U.S. broadband is fine

- Defended murder of net neutrality in court

- Flubbed Puerto Rico hurricane disaster response

- Slow-walked and obstructed investigation into telecom company sale of your location data

- Said FTC would protect net neutrality (it didn’t, and couldn’t)

- Falsely claimed killing net neutrality was good for broadband access (it wasn’t)

- Refused to brief Congress about telecom companies’ sale of their customers’ phone location data

- Helped Comcast and other major telecom companies in their pursuit of monopolistic power

- Oversaw America’s falling rank in an annual “Internet Freedom” index

- Allowed Verizon to throttle California firefighters’ data while they were fighting unprecedented wildfires

- Invented a DDoS attack that shut down the FCC’s net neutrality comment system

- Lied to public about that fake DDoS attack that shut down the agency’s net neutrality comment system

- Lied to Congress about that fake DDoS attack

- Didn’t detect that dead people were leaving comments on net neutrality comment system

- Refused to change the definition of ‘broadband’

- Demanded $200 to release emails about his giant mug

- Allowed scammers to submit fake comments about net neutrality under the names of two sitting senators

- Did that dumbass Harlem Shake thing with a pizzagate conspiracy theorist

- Became a rubber stamp for Sinclair Media and

- Tried to kill a broadband assistance program that subsidized internet connections for the economically unstable and poor

- Got a literal gun from the NRA for his “courage” in killing net neutrality

- Was investigated by his own agency for alleged corruption as he pushed to dismantle media consolidation rules

- Published report claiming broadband market was magically fixed by repealing net neutrality

- Ignored 22 million comments supporting net neutrality

- Tried to reclassify cell phone data service as “broadband internet”

- Allowed phone call rates for incarcerated people to skyrocket

[1]: https://www.vice.com/en/topic/ajit-pai
There are also rocks that do this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sailing_stones
I am not arguing against double standard at all. I am saying there is no evidence that riots were planned on parler and Aws never said they were
I get instantly turned off with these solutions where I need an account somewhere just to set up a secure connections between two things.

Am I too grumpy?
Nikon’s camera business is on the brink
I'm not sure I want to live in a world where Markdown requires more dumbing down.
Flying Squirrels?
You've blasted a talking point in response to an assertion that I did not make. There is a significant distinction between a platform choosing to censor, and acting like all platforms have some duty to censor. There are many such calls for the latter in this thread.

FWIW I have previously argued that platforms have a moral obligation to carry less popular speech, but I'm done arguing that after the "stop the steal" propaganda campaign. What's happening now is inevitable, and the real solutions for Freedom are mandated interop (mitigating Metcalfe's law), and/or p2p communications (which has always been the correct answer before AJAX was even a term, albeit economically non-lucrative)

> I'm also happy that they've set up shop in a place that is fair game for the entire law enforcement and intelligence apparatus in case they try to plan more insurrections.

There's that authoritarianism peeking out - "they can go their own way, but we'll hit them with a bigger stick". From a technical perspective, being outside the US seems harder to surveil. US users will continue to use HTTPS and post public comments, so nothing changes there. Meanwhile the session traffic from foreign troll farms becomes invisible. Pushing social media away from domestic firms is actually a national security misstep, IMO.
I think the comment was poorly worded with “people” and should be “life” which is still an interesting thought.
Exactly. The title sounds like CPU instructions; but the article reads as "pieces of software".
Tsmcs r&d spend has been equivalent to Intel's for the last decade. TSMC did a great job, most particularly on EUV introduction.

I don't think wall street cares about outsourcing, except as a potential savings. The hollowing out is real, but it is fixable.

It will take a really different approach, though.
Knurden Style: Trees (Part 4)
I had the impression Markdown already is the dumb alternative to AsciiDoc.
Yea, construction companies also occasionally use similar baskets from a crane. Ex: https://www.lifttech.com/crane-suspended-man-baskets

The general public is going to get something looks like elevators, even if their all just baskets suspended from a wire. Honestly saving ~17 hours NYC to Auckland is going to be worth some inconvenience. However, a bigger issue is how calm the weather needs to be before their going to launch rockets, though that means people aren’t going to go out to the launch platform in bad weather.
The best college courses I took were ones where the professor frontloaded all the hard assignments towards the first month of the semester. Every slacker dropped out, and for most of the semester we just had great discussions because everyone was doing the readings.

Just like DRM, make it a little harder to skate on by and you actually filter a lot of casual/non-serious people.
Super fun podcast with Sean Heiney of SignalWire on effective product management
Sure, but that doesn't require a van full of equipment. (If we're talking about historically.)

Looking for light would also only work until people found out about it, and violators covered their windows.
It may be the other way around...

An Intel Core i7-6700K has almost two billion transistors while a GTX 1080 has 7.2 billion transistors.

Of course you may be referring to Intel's integrated GPU's, but they are still very complex. They are not merely number CPU's -- their design is very different.
I appreciate the goal of this project, but I expect that I will still forget at least some of the words and will still have to look at the docs. I actually think it would be harder for me to remember the words than symbols but that's just me!
Do extensions require any permissions to make requests? It seems like a strict sandbox that prevents data from flowing out of a page via an extension would help, if the extension is something like a JSON renderer.
I have fairly recent XPS and indeed it is a shame how poorly it runs in terms of throttling and getting hot. On Linux when you launch Teams, forget about being able to keep it on your lap for too long. Teams eats the CPU for breakfast and probably you could fry an egg on it if you closed the lid. Of course it has to be plugged in at all times as battery life is a joke after few months.
You can at least put something in its way and if it nopes around it to avoid a collision that’s pretty freaking interesting.
Crazy. Can I ask what extension this is? Wish I had the problem of tens of thousands of new users wanting my product weekly :)
Refusing to do so reads to me like it could be conflict with the CA/B rules for certificates, but I'm not too familiar with the interpretation of these clauses. Could be an interesting question to post on the CA/B mailing list at least.

referencing Section 4.9.1.1 Reasons for Revoking a Subscriber Certificate

If CF sees OP as the subscriber of the certificate,

> The CA SHALL revoke a Certificate within 24 hours if one or more of the following occurs:

> 1.The Subscriber requests in writing that the CA revoke the Certificate

If CF considers itself the subscriber (since they are getting the certificate for their servers, this seems more likely):

> The CA SHOULD revoke a certificate within 24 hours and MUST revoke a Certificate within 5 days if one or more of the following occurs

> [...]

> 4. The CA is made aware of any circumstance indicating that use of a Fully-Qualified Domain Name or IP address in the Certificate is no longer legally permitted (e.g.a court or arbitrator has revoked a Domain Name Registrant’s right to use the Domain Name, --> a relevant licensing or services agreement between the Domain Name Registrant and the Applicant has terminated, <-- or the Domain Name Registrant has failed to renew the Domain Name);
I think you might be interested in Qubes OS [0], which provides secure and user-friendly hardware virtualization for all your VMs, including Windows.

[0] https://qubes-os.org
I liked the first exercise, then I had to use the mouse to dismiss my success dialog! I thought the whole point of vim was ...

(That's up there with Haskell package management depending on "global variables" in a fixed settings file.)
Ann, the episode about Commander Data being asked to be dissected for the study of his body? Jean Luc brilliantly relates this idea of cloning the entire android to serve human as a tread toward slavery. They are way ahead of us in time.