skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
>To do TLS inspection at that level you need to MitM all HTTPS traffic going everywhere, as you need to read all HTTPS traffic to any possible host, as any of them may be a DoH resolver or relay. Q.E.D.

Yep. And corporate/enterprise environments should (not nearly enough do) do exactly that with devices owned and managed by the enterprise.

Any personal devices or those owned by contractors, clients and other external actors should not be allowed access to internal corporate networks. This is neither a particularly new or controversial idea either. Most large (or even medium-sized) organizations have separate "guest" networks for external resources which aren't secured or monitored.

However, internal networks are (and should be) a very different story.
Not cryptocurrency (seriously). From an investment (my) perspective from day one of its introduction cryptocurrency has been inevitable. The world is better off with a currency that can't be manipulated and printed on a whim. Its amazing to me that this one sure bet is being treated so unfairly as a gamble.
3,400-Year-Old Ancient Egyptian Painting Palette Contains Remnants of Pigments
I kick in a few dollars a month, and recommend you do the same.
This is much more detailed than what I've seen available for other high performance modern microprocessors.
These are neither of these things, if anything they're publishers - like booksellers or newspapers; on the web anyone can be a publisher in minutes at almost zero cost.

common carriers and public accommodations have to do with limited access in the physical world - none of those constrains apply to the digital one.
> rural people and some others will not consent to giving up 2A or being disarmed, full stop.

I read some “gun people” discussing this. An argument was that they were not single issue voters, but rather they were a foundational issue voters.

That all rights (to him/them) are supported by the idea the public is a counter force to the government. Fundamental before all other issues because is the prevention of the gov backtracking or infringing on anything “down stream”. So...

That if a politician supported the disarming of civilians that was indeed a full stop to other thoughts on abortion or the foreign trade or etc.

It was a good read really, because calling them a single issue voter may give the wrong impression, which is good for no one coming to the table on other issues.
Thank You!

I'm a huge rail nerd, and fascinated about the history of the rail industry.
Having a "home baked server" in no way means it is "janky". There are some pretty clear and correct ways to setup a secure server these days.

Using an OS such a RHEL gives some guarantees about auditing for vulns being done already for you. You don't have to take on the responsibility for analyzing everything yourself. CentOS historically gives some of the same benefits.

What do you think Amazon uses internally for Amazon.com? They use a variant of RHEL. ( albeit a really old "jankified" version )

I'm not suggesting you run the server over home networking. ( which is against TOS by the way ) You can own your own server and place it in a good Colo facility who are already handling the power, routing, etc.

I previously wrote the management software for a major company that handles configuration and setup of all their data centers. I know a thing or two about what is necessary.

Redundant power and networking with monitoring of both is essential, and also common and easily available in a decent colo. You can of course use a bottom dollar colo that just throws some shit together, but you will, as you say, risk there being vulns in the stack outside your server.

That said, it isn't hard either to setup your own data center from nothing. You need multi-phase power, redundancy, and a number of components that are somewhat costly for an individual, but there are reasonably affordable options these days. You can get 220 in the home if you pay for it. I'd recommend having a commercial location pre-setup with it though of course. Preferably you'd want your data center near a major internet hub and/or with connections to multiple major internet providers...

And yes. I have guards from someone walking away with my equipment. I have a gun and I'm happy to shoot any intruder in the face with it. All my drives are encrypted as well and if there was a breakin they will auto-shutdown...

I own enterprise level tape backup equipment and hundreds of tapes. So yes: offsite backup that is encrypted. The keys are backed up and encrypted themselves.

You can go down the rabbit hole as far as you like. My setup is still more secure than Amazon and the like.
That's been tried before with intensely-debated political issues in the United States; didn't turn out too well:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gag_rule_(United_States)
He is not the only highly qualified navy pilot who saw these crafts. [1]

And the 2004 event is not the only time the US Navy has seen these crafts. There was another event in 2014. [2]

[1] https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/12/tic-tac-ufo-video-q-...

[2} https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/26/us/politics/ufo-sightings...
All those strange lights in the desert around that Area 51 place ...https://www.otherhand.org/home-page/area-51-and-other-strang...
I cannot recommend the combination of NewPipe and VLC enough. Have to get NewPipe on your own, because it disables youtube ads as well so it's not on the Play Store.

It's been the only offline youtube solution I've found.
> Would that explain why Catholics, who, ah, generally don't support abortion, are split ~50/50 between blue and red?

American Catholics support legal abortion at pretty similar rates to the general population. [0] The Church heirarchy may not, but that’s not the population of interest.

[0] https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/10/20/8-key-findi...
Why would it need to do that? To protect others from the same url, the same hash checking method should work.
My bad for having an idea on how to modernize. Assholes.
Usually people use a zip file with the password "malware".
It's the difference between a social network decicated to exchange in a bubble and a truly universal communication service like post, phone system or email where anyone can reach anyone without subscribe to same/any service, without being "friend" or trusted.
After a decade, NASA’s big rocket fails its first real test
The top HN story earlier today was a tale of how Google can effectively cripple a company that doesn't even use any of its services:

https://gomox.medium.com/google-safe-browsing-can-kill-your-...
> As a catholic, I would say that the catholic church has done a pretty decent job of not taking sides in politics.

Have you not seen the current Pope? Far more injecting in politics than the previous. Obvious in a historical perspective, this is still very hands off for the church.
What generally happens is people who don’t understand or know effectively become random “noise” and cancel each other out. Then those who are informed/care become the “signal” and you get a pretty good representative decision in the end. Better than with politician I’d say. It’s kind of like “ask the audience” in who wants to be a millionaire..
California has some pieces of political affiliation carved out as a protected class.

It feels risky to me. Coupled to the protection of freedom of religion in the US is both the interpretation of the First Amendment and the political custom that there be a "high wall" between religion and politics. In practice, this isn't always true, but the principle serves as a counterweight to people's faith not being formally, structurally questionable.

For obvious reasons, no such high wall can exist between people's politics and politics, so making political affiliation a protected class risks giving protection of the law to things that society will greatly suffer under if they are protected (imagine if he SPLC couldn't fire a staffer who's an active Klansman).
No they are not. But if every restaurant in town refuses to serve a group of society does that warrant government intervention. It appeared to during the civil rights movement. I'd like to know what is different about this?
You really hit the nail on the head. I've had issues even outside of politics. For whatever reason, if you don't conform to certain beliefs in a group, other members will sooner or later think you're the nail and they're the hammer.
> This is because the party will ostracize you if you don't conform.

Is it? When I debate some partisans, I can't find bedrock logic under their opinions. It's like the opinions are pointers to beliefs they receive from an authority figure.

They are unconvinceable--because the decision maker isn't in the room.
You missed the part about basing everything on SELinux4. That would mean drop Windows. I'm all onboard for that.
Yeah, especially since the effect is only 15%. It also seems possible that public sentiment was already shifting, which caused the party to shift, which influenced the undecided 15%.

For example, if you look back now in the US, you could probably find that some Democrats started supporting gay marriage after the party changed its stance. It's also the case that the party changed its stance in the middle of a large scale shift in public opinion that was occurring.
Nobody (ed: I mean, "few people", as of course there are non-zero people who believe this) believes abortion is literal murder. They might say they do, but if there were buildings where actual literal murder were happening it wouldn't be long before people would destroy those places. Folks would lynch abortion providers -- not one or two, but en masse. Plenty of conservative women get abortions. If it were the type of thing that led to social ostracization as a general rule, you'd see articles being written about it. It doesn't.

That's actually kind of the point of this article, as I read it: political opinions are very malleable. Tribal identification is one mechanism by which they can be changed. If the tribe decides we're cutting taxes, we change our opinion to favor cutting taxes. If the tribe decides that trans identity is extremely important, we do too. Not because of any overt pressure but simply because of natural herd and instincts.

But self-interest is an even stronger hammer with which to shape political opinions. If it is strongly in my economic best interest to get an abortion, there's a pretty decent chance I'm gonna finagle my way to believing it's OK -- at least for me -- even if I "thought it was literal murder" before. It's easy enough to do because abortion has none of the physical hallmarks of literal murder (you know, struggling, screaming victims, blood everywhere, etc.) and society clearly treats it as a different thing, no matter where in the U.S. you live. I have noticed a similar pattern whereby rich liberal friends are slightly less in favor of eating the rich than poor liberal friends, even though the Twitter crowd has pretty much decided where they stand on this issue. Self-interest is a powerful motivator! Us rich folks like to talk about all the entitlements we support but we get a little less comfortable when it comes time to talk about who pays for them.

This is just a general rule, it doesn't apply universally by any means. Even this article suggested that there's just a 15% shift in personal opinion directly after a tribe opinion change. But I guess the change grows over time too. I hadn't heard a damn thing about illegal immigrants from my conservative father until about 2016. Now sometimes it seems like every third article he sends me is on that subject.

Hey, you know another interesting thing about this: everyone hates literal murder, but somehow murderers families often -- not always, but often -- come around to forgiving them. Sometimes they forgive the murderer so hard that they come to court to support them before they're even convicted, pay for lawyers, etc. You'd almost never do that for someone who wasn't family. Self-interest, family, and tribe are extremely powerful mutators of political and even moral opinion!
Strangely enough, this outage is what made me curious enough to switch to Signal. I want to see what the next outage will be like.
I for one I am very favor of dumping and really enjoyed that wave with Uber, lyft and a plethora of food services with the same approach.
It only wastes various people's time to patent something that can't be built. (The authors, regulators, and on-lookers.) However to speculatively patent something that later turns out to be viable could mean that some other party may have been prevented from taking the idea beyond speculation, since they can't capitalize on it, right? It hurts the incentive to really innovate when the patent system is clogged with speculative junk, nevermind the obvious patents. Speculating by itself isn't innovating and shouldn't be rewarded as such.
This is technically correct (the best kind of correct! ;) ).

In practice, there's a wide gulf between what the Church formally establishes as dogma and the adherence of individual Catholics. It's generally resolved as the Church holding the door open for forgiveness through a person's entire life, as long as penitence is a possibility. It's rare for the Church to excommunicate an individual Catholic (or even deprive them of communion) even for very public statements regarding their support of abortion.

Sometimes, the door is held open so long the Church's view on the topic changes and forgiveness is no longer needed to align the practitioner with the Church's stance.
You don't even have to go to church to be culturally a catholic.
White House Accelerates Development of Mini Nuclear Reactors
No cross-platform tool like Flutter or RN is going to be "one codebase". That has never been true for anything but the simplest of apps.

Overall, they are a waste of time. Once you wanna do anything complicated (3rd party auth, UI, hardware, etc) you have to learn the native stuff. Stay far away.

Also, Flutter will most likely be discontinued in 2 years.
I agree, it’s a fun idea.

Entirely entirely unrealistic and would go nowhere. Both sides love their wedges. They campaign on they both saber rattle with, they make their careers on them. When they have a chance to make movement, they usually don’t, if they fixed the issue it wouldn’t raise money anymore.

Look how many people already say there is a UniParty when looking at pretty shitty things like both sides voting for Iraq war, Patriot Act, meager amounts of citizen Covid relief compared to corporate interests... so take away the wedge issues and the two parties may look far more similar.

I’d like to see viable third and fourth party options. No decent person can be entirely red or blue.
> It is painfully obvious that humans have an internal dialog

This is the most common way for humans to experience thought but it is by no means necessary. [1] Weirder still, we know that only half of a brain is needed to operate a human body + consciousness since people with hemispherectomies exist and basically the same as before their operations.

I think you could roughly characterize capsule networks [2] as approaching something like the communication between sub networks you described.

Honestly I don't think you're wrong wrt token passing, but I think it probably looks like those tokens are actually compressions of sub network data rather than expressions themselves.

[1] https://www.dazeddigital.com/science-tech/article/44494/1/li...

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capsule_neural_network
You can't really have direct democracy, specially not in a country with millions of people.

I'm from Switzerland and we have probably the most direct democracy in the world and we do have parties (many in fact) and representatives.

The direct democracy aspect however is a very important check on what the government does and it allows for grass root initiatives to get national discussion.

We are not part of the EU because of population went against the parliament on that issue. Something most other countries in Europe didn't get the option to do.

It also has some negative sides as well.

In general I would say having more parties, would help a lot. If your social circle is full of people who have slightly different parties switching party is a lot easier.

In the US the most important system is the get away from First Past the Post single election for congress and presidency. Remove primaries, use either larger districts with representative representation of some kind, or smaller districts with ranged/score/star voting. Ban the president primary and have people use range/score/star voting to select an actually popular president. This I think would eventually destroy the two party system in the US.
When are we getting that in Windows? It needs to start with a formally verified OS (and firmware), then build a provably-correct protocol/driver/app/etc stack on top.

MS was working on Singularity [1] a while back, but its webpage speaks of it in past tense, so it doesn't appear to be an ongoing project.

[1]:https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/project/singularity...
For a Catholic, supporting abortion by knowingly voting for it is "formal cooperation"[1] with the taking of innocent human being's lives. This is why by Canon law, not that it's always followed, politicians who support abortion should not be given communion: they are manifestly in a state of mortal sin and giving them communion is desecrating the Eucharist and causing scandal[2]. Because of this, well catechized Catholics will oppose abortion. That said, it's unproductive to be a jerk about it and the correct response for those who don't have pastoral responsibility for the individuals in question is just to pray that they realize their error and repent.

[1] https://www.consciencelaws.org/religion/religion002.aspx

[2] In this context, by scandal Catholics mean action that invites others to sin.
Want to add one more thing:

6. Whenever coming up with a new spying/data collection scheme, ask yourself "in the light of public outcry in the past, how would this new thing be perceived?" Be honest about it, and not hand wavy "the public will be okay as long as we catch bad guys".
> Free speech used to be popular.

Still is with us rebels. How the hell free speech became counter culture I have no idea, but I’m 90% sure it has to do with almost all media in the USA being run by 6 corporations.
> You can be culturally catholic and support abortion

You can be religiously Catholic and support legal abortion, and do so without dissenting on any essential doctrine (though you’d be in tension with how the heirarchy tends to apply certain important doctrines.)

If you morally support abortion, you'd be in dissent, but doctrinal dissent isn't really unheard of among Catholics (even within the heirarchy.)
China’s Post-Pandemic Era: Winning Against All Odds| アフターコロナ時代逆転勝利の法則
(d) Apple is trying to spare developers who haven't yet addressed the bugs that arise when running their apps, written for a different platform with a completely different user interface idiom, from being inundated with support requests and unhappy reviews.

I think the answer is a little from each column, but (c) has the strongest weight: some apps, say Cultured Code's Things and The Omni Group's OmniGraffle, are sold as separate Mac and iOS SKUs. Apple would damage their businesses if they allowed the iPad app run on the Mac without the developer approving it. I hope it becomes the norm soon, but we're in an early stage of the transition.

It wouldn't surprise me if someone figures out that they simply need to re-sign the binaries to run them, though.
> making time to review your notes frequently enough that the knowledge captured actually sticks.

Strictly inferior to a spaced repetition system.

> Zettlekasten is a system layered on top of that and basically serves as a database for things you already know.

Things you already understand. If you already knew it in a deep sense it would be redundant. In reality zettelkasten enable you to think better by giving you a lightweight prosthetic expansion to working memory. You can get the same benefits by elaborative expansion but writing a ton of loosely related notecards is a lot less demanding than writing an article or book.
> Nobody believes abortion is literal murder

Sure people do. There are plenty of us. Even those of us who are atheist and/or pro-LGBT. It doesn’t strictly align with parties; for instance my own views are rather liberal except for this particular issue.

> Folks would lynch abortion providers -- not one or two, but en masse

This did not happen for a lot of other viewpoints throughout history that we now consider illegal and unthinkable. Those of us who are anti-abortion consider abortion to be much the same—it will take a long time to change society’s opinion but violence is not the answer to solving the problem.
>They might say they do, but if there were buildings where actual literal murder were happening it wouldn't be long before people would destroy those places.

What if it's state sanctioned? Where were all the people destroying nazi concentration camps?
I don’t mean to diminish the importance of “wedge” issues—but the terminology is useful for thinking about the nature of the polity. There is a center of political gravity in the country that’s somewhat left of center on economic issues, and somewhat right of center on social issues (I.e., as you say, populist): https://s.wsj.net/public/resources/images/BN-UO873_BUCKLE_8H...
digital frontiers fold ever inward. gemini is a little secret nook carved out behind the clubhouse in the corner of a hidden cul-de-sac of a massive global labyrinth. there's no wall, it's just hard to find unless you know the way. there's no tragedy, it's just not everybody chooses to walk the paths you chose to walk.

we're all running away from everyone forever. it's okay. that's the point. when we get out here we find the people like us.
>Because "more security" is hard to argue against. The huge corporations who ultimately want to take control of the population have realised that, and are using that excuse to get in bit by bit.

But in reality, DoH doesn't really provide "more security."

All it does is obfuscate DNS queries. If you're concerned about ISP tracking, DoH doesn't really help with that at all since the ISP can see where you're going just by looking at packet headers anyway.

And the Googles and Facebooks of the world love DoH because it bypasses PiHole style ad/tracking blockers.

The appropriate solution is to use PiHole (or PiHole style blocklists) in concert with a local recursive resolver (or an external resolver that supports DNS-Crypt), not to obfuscate your DNS requests, allowing all the ads/tracking/spying connections to proliferate.

It's not a perfect solution, but it's a much better solution than needing to implement one or more ad/tracker blocking solutions on every single device on your network.
None of them have tanks, it's not a foundational issue, it's identity politics.
The time-value still comes into play in the form of eth transaction fee. If you're flash loaning to take advantage of an open arbitrage opportunity there will be other parties trying to take advantage of it, so you will pay more to get your transaction in before theirs.

For a lot of transactions like this its actually miners who can detect and rewrite these transactions to take advantage of the arbitrage opportunities first, for this reason this cost is called "miner extractable value" or MEV.

However, note this fee doesn't accrue to the lender!
Related from 2019: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20245672