skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Yes but those shortcuts are inconsistent. Cmd 1 does not bring back Messages for example. I have to press tab several times in Mail to figure out where I am in Big Sur where in Catalina the selection is always highlighted. You can’t use the keyboard to change mailboxes in Big Sur as far as I can tell. There’s no clear “language” to the shortcuts.

You’d have more usable space with Catalina on that 13” screen. It was a noticeable loss of space upgrading from Catalina to Big Sur on a 16” RMBP. I used to have space for three partially overlayed windows on my 16” screen. Now I am lucky to get two. Usable space on a 16” Big Sur MacBook is similar to a 13” Catalina MacBook. I have both. My workflows changed. There is no benefit to me as a user.

Take a look at this visual comparison: https://www.andrewdenty.com/blog/2020/07/01/a-visual-compari...

Look at the “traffic light” buttons. Note how much thicker the top bar is in Big Sur. It’s 50% taller! That’s a lost row of text.
Will the passengers require a class-3 flight physical? High-G's can be risky to some people. blood pressure, risk of stroke, etc... Examples would be the number of medical issues that arise at roller coasters and the related posted warnings on them.
Show HN: TheSeoLabs – 1081 handpicked websites that accept guest post
For Hannah Arendt, totalitarianism is rooted in loneliness
Maybe it should require a supermajority, like it does to override a veto. That way its only in more extreme cases that congress can interfere.
If I remember the book correctly, Sapolsky goes further and claims that Testosterone regulates pro-social behavior. But, “pro-social” is culturally dependent. For example, in one culture, it may mean being more nurturing. In another, being more aggressive and violent. But, it’s always about “climbing the ladder”.
Thanks for this! I've been using this extension for a long time and just removed it today. Honestly, with Macbook Air M1 there is no need for suspending tabs any more because the battery life is amazing, so that also helps.
Who in their right mind would work for him?
> drawing parallels between humans in general (as a single group) and different species of animal

The problem with this comparison is that it's been used a lot in racism to justify some races as being "more animal" and by implication "less human" and less deserving of human rights. It's OK to selectively breed and mass euthanize animals.

> look at what most mammals do, and why we think they do it - wait, all humans do that also!

Do they? Have we checked? We do some things that are similar to animal behavior, but ours is .. considerably more complicated.

I mean, yes obviously we are animals in the sense of being of the same substance and biological processes, and that has theological implications; this is why Darwin pointing that out was so disruptive. However, there's a long tradition of using analogies (not actual research) drawn from the animal kingdom to make wrong and harmful conclusions about humans, usually for the purposes of finding a moral justification for inhuman treatment.

Something that took me a long time to realize about the Scopes Monkey Trial was that, not only was it theologicallly problematic for humans to have derived from animals, it was even more problematic to the public of the time for white humans to share a common ancestor with black humans, since there was demand to make this illegal.

Tennessee 1925: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scopes_Trial

Seven years later: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Jim_Crow_law_examples_... "Classified "Negro" as any person with any Negro blood".
Well they've nuked consumer Optane (https://www.tomshardware.com/news/intel-kills-off-all-optane...) and sold their NAND business (https://blocksandfiles.com/2020/10/26/intel-sk-hynix-nand-sa...) so that should free up some of their own capacity, right?
Ah, so this is a, "I don't like lobbying" complaint?

Fair enough, lobbying has gotten weird and pay-to-play, though if you don't like what's happening here, I recommend you don't look at what folks are doing about every other major policy initiative throughout Congress.
> Not to "both sides" this too much

So not "both siding" too little or too much, but both siding a just right amount?
> A new compiler or GC optimisation often requires years of work. With GraalVM that work does not need to be replicated for every language.

Isn't this only true for GCC code that operates above the GENERIC form level?
Is this humor?
I wouldn't take the term so strongly.

The way I see it in the way my grandparent meant it, exploitation is a capitalistic word and frame/narrative. For example, all companies are exploiting employees (by gaining a profit on them) and certain business opportunities in some shape or form. That doesn't mean it's necessarily bad as "giving back" might be part of that exploitation. Many businesses have incentives to keep the exploitation sustainable.

If you have an issue with this, then you have an issue with capitalism, IMO. And that's fine, but I wouldn't frame it as having an issue against exploitation.
I've just heard that TSMC requires strict isolation for a period of years for any team that gets the detailed design specs that can lead to process knowledge, and that this now prevents several fabless companies from second sourcing without a second design team. I would think it would be even stricter with a non fabless client competitor like Intel.
Understanding Rendering in Next.js
Do you need a book for that?
Why not just be nice and trustworthy to your existing friends and strangers?

The books like How to Win Friends and Influence People: Dale Carnegie and 7 Habits of Highly Effective People: Stephen Covey show you how to be nice.

In Covey's book, he explain about habits 4, 5, 6 which are think win-win, seek first to understand, than to be understood, and synergize. These are interpersonal habits that can be applied to most of common situations.
Before trying these courses , Please try vimtutor that comes bundled with vim . After practicing with vimtutor , you can try these additional courses.
I lived in the house 5 years and never received one, only showed up about a week after I ordered a new TV on Amazon and IIRC specifically mentioned the purchase.

Funnily enough I had actually been paying a licence for those 5 years but for the address I moved out of, cancelled it after that and never paid since. The fact the BBC pretends to be a kind of official legal authority under a different brand and actually sends bayliff style thugs around to juicier targets like shared student housing is disgusting, I'll never pay again.
So I assume you also advocate prohibiting mothers giving their children up for adoption in the US?

Meanwhile, we literally sell babies with impunity which we euphemistically call "surrogacy."
Because they have not found the bookmarks feature yet.
I believe that we passed a controversial discourse, when a certain group of people decided to ignore all reasonable arguments, to ignore sience.

This is not about shutting down all controversial discourse.
It is about "defend[ing] a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant".
Surpression shall only happen if there is no other way to defend a tolerant society cause the intolerant are working with (massiv, wide spread) violence.

I don't know who is in the position to decide when that point has come.
But one could argue that people invading the capitol is that point.(I don't think so)

What I am really worried about, is that it seems like tech companies will have to make those decisions.
In the end there will be individual persons, who make that decisons and that is very dangerous.
This is totally off-topic, but I really feel like slapping the designer of the font with a tuna or something. Is it intentionally designed to be provocative? Apparently, the font is called Libre Baskerville, but when I viewed it on Google Fonts it didn't have that annoying X-height.
Africa's deadly 1000C fire lake
I recently switched to Auto Tab Discard.[1] It uses the browser's built-in tab suspending. It doesn't have all the features of TGS, though.

Edit: OneTab[2] is also pretty good when you have lots of tabs open for research or work.

[1]: https://github.com/rNeomy/auto-tab-discard

[2]: https://www.one-tab.com/
In fact tab suspending/discarding has been built into Chrome for some time now and Great Suspender does optionally make use of the built-in functionality.

I still sometimes use extensions like Great Suspender to give more control over the process (e.g. to suspend more aggressively on RAM-constrained machines or where the user uses a lot of tabs).

Since this news came out I have switched to "Auto Tab Discard".
Twitter was wrong to ban Trump
Some thoughts on a tricky subject. We debated this last week at a community event. Here's the tl;dr:

1. The argument goes that the slight potential damage to the norm of free speech is worthwhile to avoid damage to the norm of peaceful democracy, law and order. Besides Twitter are a private company, up to them. This seems prudent and justifiable.

2. However, there are two issues we must consider, Big Tech and Race.

3. Big Tech:
If you control information distribution the way they do, you control society. An ad based business model, reliant purely on engagement, optimises for posts about the sort of conspiracy theories and hate mongering that created the mob outside the Capitol. Dems have talked about regulation for some time. There have been hearings. Deplatforming Trump was about cosying up to the Biden administration, not defending freedom. We should be wary of their motives.

4. Race:
Nativism was around before Trump.
Trumpism is the last stand of those who feel that America is the birthright of whites. Their argument holds no logic and was long ago defeated. To create conditions on what persons may say online gives too much credit to the ridiculous ideas being espoused by dinosaurs of American society. Dinosaurs who already find themselves staring up at the meteor heading straight for them.

5. The right moral approach was to ban trump temporarily (to scold him for being a naughty boy), and to make sure people are imprisoned for the violence. Conspiracies like QAnon (and voter fraud) thrive on collective belief. Collective belief vanishes pretty quickly when it is met with hard realities. You can convince people not to believe in gravity, but their belief will quickly disappear when they're standing at the top of a cliff

6. Big tech should openly admit they helped create the monstrosity that is Trump, not just do what they think will keep the Biden administration off their back.
I wouldn't compare them to sharks either since that puts AWS into a fixed frame that I don't think it always is.

However, there has been a perspectives of seeing organizations as a form of AI (I read it on HN somewhere), and if you look at it from that perspective the ethics become bureaucratic which opens a whole can of worms of what that means :)
It's marketing copy, not some sacred text they are desecrating. Their goal is to be a little silly and maybe elicit an emotional reaction, judging by your reaction it seems like it worked well.
Perhaps the hotdog is slightly cheaper than it otherwise would have been, because the hotdog manufacturing company used a bit of open source software to save on production costs. "Wealth" is more than just raw cash.

But yeah, the total wealth generated for the software's author personally is probably minuscule.
I don't understand. You don't want to work for companies?
that's a really good point! your comment reminded me that that is what we used to do in the lab at university, a long time ago. switching to a different terminal, then locking that, was much more fool proof. perhaps not for security, but rather because X11 was so damned buggy and crashy, that you might need to have access to that terminal to get back into your workstation without forcing a reboot.
And Lewandowski hurt Google, which makes him a good guy according to Trump.
Accusations of racism are the first tool used to respond to anyone they disagree with, it seems.
This does not seem to be needed in any other western democracy.
Grey Hair Oil Preparation at Home – DIY
Hmmm. I think somebody is following this thread because I got testies using ff on linux by clicking the bitly links above.
On the Photoshop marketing page it's advertised as a monthly fee (no *, no †, no footnote). Not even a "from $X", it just says the price.

Clicking "Buy now" takes you to the product selection page. On this page each plan has the exact price. It's the same as the price on the previous page. No footnotes, asterisks, or anything else. There is an asterisk next to the free month of stock photo access, which implies that they do use footnotes where necessary. Again the price is not "from $X", it's just $X.

Click "Buy Now" and you're in the checkout flow. The call-to-action is entering your email address. The summary shows the total as being the exact price. No footnotes, no asterisks, no fine print. However, the price is only now listed as not a per-month price (as it has been on the previous 2 pages), but as an annual price paid monthly. You can change this to monthly price, but it's 50% more expensive, proving that the "$X per month" advertisement is incorrect.

In the UK I think this would probably be classed as false advertising, and I think any refund complaint would be upheld in court or by the trading standards authority, which is probably why they gave me a refund when I pushed them.
> and non-negligible

This is probably a matter of discretion. Considering the overall performance of Go applications compared to other languages, 4 to 10% is quite low. The measurement error might also be a few percent.
I think you're assuming they are more competent/smarter than they really are.
Where am I? Where is Bezos? What are the additional hypothetical details of this scenario? Do I know how to use a gun in this scenario (I do not IRL)?

I've only met one billionaire, but he was definitely not guarded by anyone, and had I the inclination, skills, and firepower, I could have easily taken him at gunpoint.

I don't accept the notion that Jack Ma is guarded 100% of the time, that's movie fiction.
What is moral is in the eye of the beholder. If we are nation of law we follow the law and update it when necessary through Legislative branch. As to your example, Obama pardoned few minor drug offenders but it was a drop in a bucket, one time deal. People who voted for decriminalization of of Marijuana had much larger impact. Presidential pardon is a power given to POTUS that is not needed for functioning of a democratic society. It's a power royalty used to have and should be just used for pardoning the turkeys.
I think it's really important for society as a whole that there exists the rule of law and not the rule of law for the poor only.

This is just another blatant example of where being rich and having connections puts you above the law. Sadly this isn't an isolated case.

Take Michael Cohen and Paul Manafort. Both plead guilty and both were somehow granted home detention due to the pandemic

What Levandowski did was egregious. You walk out the door of a company. You take nothing. That's it. You don't own nor are you entitled to any of that work product. It's pretty simple.

I'm not surprised to see Peter Thiel on that list. His politics are pretty appealing. I don't know most of the other names on that list who supported the pardon but that's not a list I'd want to be associated with, personally.
> What if the president pardoned literally... everybody

Or worse, had someone murder his political opponent and then pardoned him? This sort of thing was unthinkable a few years ago, but no longer.
On a related note, Steven Rinella's book "American Buffalo: In Search of a Lost Icon" is mandatory reading for anyone interested in the history of these magnificent beasts.
Did you mean Facebook or something in real life? (Then what, if i may ask)
Another parallel: the Arab Spring revolts were hijacked by Islamists everywhere but Tunisia, and whatever legitimate complaints ("anti-hyperglobalization"?) galvanized the Trump movement in its early days were ultimately drowned out by the much louder voices of white nationalists (QAnon/PB) and apocalypse-seekers[1] who wanted to use the movement to gain power.

1: https://newrepublic.com/article/160922/capitol-riot-revealed...
Well the left wingers have already successfully bombed the Capitol building in 1983, so it's prudent for law enforcement to be wary when they protest near it.
We have "to" and "through" in English to distinguish them. Unfortunately "to" isn't always as strict as I'd like...

"Until" I'd think of as being the strict "to", except something about it feels off like it couldn't just be dropped in every place to/through can be used.
What you call "goring its own ox" is the author pointing out that there is an inconsistency in, on the one hand, wanting to influence how your software is used, and on the other, releasing it as FOSS. Elastic's license change is a consequence of it realizing that, in its case, these two things are not compatible, and preferring the former.
I don't mean to defend Amazon here (or in general), but Elastic is the one that is trying to be monopolistic.
> It really takes a saint to pour one’s heart and soul into a piece software, for free, and then have the commercial benefits go to huge public companies like Google.

If anything, a "saint" should be writing software to benefit end users and especially for people in need or other social good.

It's hard to claim sanctity when doing unpaid labor for a FAANG (making some billionaire wealthier and therefore increasing inequality).

> This would all be fine if we lived in a socialist world, but we don’t.

Most of breakthrough technological R&D has been paid with tax money: semiconductors, computers, satellites, GPS, GSM, radar, laser, fiber optics, telephones, batteries, Internet, airplanes.

The same goes for the bulk of scientific research in the last 100 years. Not to mention funding practical needs like building roads.

> What are the best alternatives to this model?

One option is to demand public code for public money. In the meantime, AGPL helps a lot to keep some FAANGs at bay.
See the response to the sibling reply which notes that the DUI incident occurred a month after the pardon.

Also, DUI is a state charge. The pardon was for a federal conviction. Do prior federal convictions affect state sentencing?
Interesting perspective. What else besides cash would you suspect to be influential?
But patches have already been submitted upstream

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20210120132717.3958...
That brings me to the problem with links as well as with e-books: you don't usually see them. When you have an open tab, you see it all day long until you get rid of it. When you have a printed book, you bump in it on a daily basis (unless you hide it in more books).
> And humans are pretty good at negotiating context.

In politics? I think people are pretty bad at understanding context about people they see as having different values. The way you handle uncertainty is to fill in the blanks with prior knowledge, also known as bias. When someone has a bias against the person, that turns quite ugly.
Why do you insist and insult the people who are agaisnt the racist people who call out the symbol. If the symbol is so important to you then your fight should be with the actual white supremacists who have co-opted the symbol and not the people who don't let racists get away with recruitment/trolling/owning the libs by flashing their co-opted gang sign.

It's like you being furious at black people because your great grandparents used to always win their Halloween contest with their pointy hat ghost costume and you're not going to let stupid guillable people keep you from wearing it at parties.
See also https://www.openvim.com/
Meh, I'm not convinced that other systems will be fundamentally better

Humans are flawed, the systems they build will be flawed, flaws will wax and wane with circumstances, possibly waxing to the point of intolerability and then they break and are replaced with something else.

Paradise remains fundamentally always out of reach.

And yet there are good moments, good relationships, little pieces of life that are priceless. So I think it makes sense to carve out little niches in life where things work nicely or to try to make things work better on small issues.
If I arbitrarily save lives, that's still saved lives. If I arbitrarily reduce the risk of causing harm, that's still reduced risk of harm. Those are good. I value results over consistency. I definitely value results over analysis paralysis, over waiting for a perfection of clarity not available this side of the grave.

And as best I know, I do "do this" with all potentially fatal communicable diseases. I get the flu shot every year. I even do it with non-fatal diseases as best I can. When I'm sick, I stay the hell home. I exercise good hygiene and good food safety.

And I have no idea why people don't do otherwise. All it takes is valuing others' health and survival.
Assange has a knack for getting his hands on a lot of dirt. Trump is arrogant and short-sighted enough to believe it will never be dirt on him?
The funny thing all about AWS/ES drama is AWS Elasticsearch is 1.5x price. It puts a stupid ELB-load balancer that cannot detect timely if the backend services are unhealthy. Updates don't provide rolling update capability, its always blue green. Updates takes hours depending on your data size. And during this shuffle, your CPU usages are top. The nodes get down for inexplicable reasons and not replaced for many minutes. Your retries don't cut it because of that non-smart load balancer. It limits the disk size by instance types so you have no option but to scale horizontally.I just want bigger disks, you don't know my indicies, how I use them, don't put arbitrary limits.

It's just a convenience for procurement and VPCs, nothing more.
Here's the list.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/statement-pr...

Just browsing the names and convictions it looks like a pretty decent mix of people genuinely deserving and people who have very powerful people advocating for them. Looks like most of the crimes in the list are drug or fraud related.

I haven't gone down the whole thing but the guy who got LWOP for weed (presumably huge quantities of it) caught my eye.
If the majority of the FBI staff were replaced all at once, perhaps, but a gradual ship-of-theseus style replacement leaves it the same organization. I doubt that individual modern FBI staffers have the same views as their forebears, but the institution still bears the legacy of its past actions.
Try Feedforward Instead of Feedback
Not true in the slightest. You can disable (the sane IMO) defaults and run anything on macOS to your hearts desire.

macOS is nothing like iOS WRT apps you can install and run.

Turning off Gatekeeper is literally a single terminal command. (sudo spctl --master-disable)
Can you always truly count between the objects? Are you in between or are you at some object at any given time? What if you count molecules?

With memory slots is the pointer in between or at a slot?

Should pages in books also start at 0? If you are saying show me page 4 should you look between 3 and 4?
They don't need to be concerned about insider trading if they don't do insider trading.
Why do people not understand why I have 100s of tabs open? I get irritated when asked this question.
I look at it this way: Which is a better world to live in? A world where a number of commercial entities make their software "open" but with commercial restrictions like Mongo, etc., or where these companies simply close source their products completely to avoid the consternation of the open source community for being "open" but not "free" for all use cases. Clearly the former is the better world to live in.

If we only allow a super narrow definition of open source to be considered open source, we are doing a disservice to the software community at large.
You're preaching to the choir my friend. :)
Premature mortality due to air pollution in European cities