skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> Euro-critical countries in eastern Europe profit hugely from the EU and would never seriously consider going back to the previous state of things.

The elites of those countries benefit way more from the influx of euros, some breadcrumbs are given to the people and then everyone stays under the illusion they are better off. The central bank keeps pushing money, Brussels and Berlin get happy about it until some external crisis show that the periphery countries never actually changed their ways and now are even more fragile to external shocks and even more dependent on the EU.

Sounds familiar? If you know anything about Greece besides Santorini and Mykonos, it should strike a note.

> if the EU had a centralized fiscal&monetary policy, things would have looked much less bleak for southern parts of the Union.

Sorry for the stereotyping, but this is such a German comment and so short-sighted that if I get into a long response to it my blood will boil a little. Instead, let me refer you to https://nntaleb.medium.com/lebanon-from-ponzi-to-antifragili... who maybe can get the point across better than me.
You should consider opening an issue on their github [0]?

AWS, from what I know, takes security seriously, and given they themselves use OpenDistro internally, this should become a top priority for them.

[0] https://github.com/opendistro-for-elasticsearch/opendistro-b...
https://www.reddit.com/r/mathbooks/ is a good place to find free titles.
Find me one lawyer who is going to be convinced by this blog post. There is a blanket no for using SSPL software at every company I know.
If you cross state lines, you escalate the situation, allowing the Feds to step in.

There are other ways to do this of course, but driving is the one you can control the most.
The US decided that it didn't like all the political disorder that came with managing a large proletariat. Instead, it decided to outsource the management of that proletariat to Asia and the 'global south.' Our proletariat instead was mostly liquidated and shifted itself into the service industry (not that amenable to labor organization) and the welfare/workfare rolls.

There are so many things that the US would have to reform to become more competitive again, but we are so invested into the FIRE economy that it's not unlike the position of the southern states before the Civil War: they were completely invested into the infrastructure of slavery and could not contemplate an alternative economic system because of that. The US is wedded to an economy based on FIRE and Intellectual Property production, with the rest of the economy just in a support role.

I'm not really a pro-organized-labor person, but I think that as a matter of national security we have to figure out a way to reform and compromise to get to the point to which we develop industry even if it is redundant due to globalization. The left needs to compromise on environmental protection, the rich need to compromise on NIMBYism, and the right needs to compromise on labor relations. Unfortunately none of this is on the table even as a point of discussion. Our politics is almost entirely consumed by insane gibberish babbling.

This became very clear when COVID hit and there was no realistic prospect of spinning up significant industrial capacity to make in-demand goods like masks and filters. In the future, hostile countries will challenge and overtake the US in IP production (which is quite nebulous and based on legal control of markets anyway) and in finance as well. The US will be in a very weak negotiating position at that point.
>People are hard-wired to form tribes and self segregate into groups. I don't think we're going to grow out of that behavior anytime in the next 1000 years.

Into classes.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Class_conflict

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classless_society

Marx and communism has everything do to with classes. That is to say in order for communism to work you must have a classless society. Soon as you have inequality based on anything, 2 classes form. Those with and those without.

It comes down to even a surplus of production.

We could theoretically have the same job but I work 40 hours/week and you work 20 hours/week. I will therefore be in a class higher than you. If I am not in a higher class, then I won't work those 40 hours and I'll go down to those 20 hours. OR I try to force you to work 40 hours.

>There is an entire spectrum of organizational bodies and humans need not (and probably cannot) abolish all of them to form some sort of universal civilization. Surely there are ways we can retain regional cultural uniqueness and small group identities while gaining the ability to cooperate and share values?

That adds a significant level of complexity.
There are literally words you can say in so called 'Western Liberal' countries that can get you arrested or charged with hate speech.

Those are our version of 'Blasphemy' laws.

It's basically very disrespectful what Charlie Hebdo does, but shouldn't be illegal, and I guess, there should be 'someone somewhere' who is pushing the boundaries. Similarly, there are a lot of very rude things you can say to people, but none of it should be illegal, and frankly I don't care if there's a website somewhere that people say nasty things. So long as none of it gets out of hand.

While the top commenters bit about Thai, local law and 'face saving' is fine, it's also obviously unjust. Justice takes many forms but there is some degree of universality to it.
The price of creating the fabs for a new node increases exponentially with every node. I remember when there were over 20 top node players. Now there are 3 if you aren't counting Intel out. If AMD had remained in the game there's no way they could have won.
Sort of but there were also 6 cities of refuge where the accused could flee for safety. If I remember correctly, there may have been a period of years after which they could no longer be pursued? It’s been a while since I read about it though.
clearly you never watch TV in turkey. there are critics everyday on very political TV programmes. and usually they try to get a representative from each political party to make it as fair as possible. except HDP, which has substential ties with terror organisations and very bad reputation in turkey. west think there is blockade against anti-government political fractions but in reality there is blockade against western puppets. that's drives western countries crazy due to not have any soft power on turkey.
Yeah, there's definitely a wide spectrum. I just kind of lump them in as makers. Most of the people I've met at my local makerspace fit this bill - they're just tinkering with something or taking up a hobby. But as I mentioned, most of these people I've met are/were engineers professionally. I think it's just that on their personal projects they were more relaxed about "process" than they would be at work.

When I was in doing my Engineering degree in college, one of my professors once tried to make a spectrum of technical ability. One the low end he put "tinkerers" and on the high end he put "engineers." I think that's where a lot of my perceptions of technical ability are coming from. Like I said, it's just my opinion
Imagine that the police force had robots that took pictures through your windows and then employed sophisticated object recognition and semantic inference engines to determine what is happening inside, matching it agains a database of known crimes. Then explain to me how that's different from the police officer who looks through your window to establish probable cause for a "search warrant".

If your society is principled enough to require warrants to execute "searches", then it should be principled enough to recognize that this principle, by default, excludes any activity which has no measurable impact on society from criminalization.

The first piece of evidence in any investigation should come without a search.
Meanwhile, over on the amateur radio boards, the old dudes are saying this is all a conspiracy theory to take hams off the air, in preparation for... something. Something nefarious the Biden administration is planning.

And they wonder why the kids aren't going into amateur radio.
Combining security with accessibility is what’s hard. -- Whoever solves this first has the best change of winning in this race.
Don't disagree, yet last paragraph seems to claim a thesis:

>Daisy is this man’s objective, but she’s the wrong fantasy. It was never her he wanted. Not really. It was America.

Trouble is, the reviewer is dead wrong on Gatsby's psychology. Gatsby, like the protagonist of Tender, and various characters from his short stories, is a working-out of the central tragedy of Fitzgerald's own life, his failure to find a soul-mate. This is hinted at in Hemingway's Moveable Feast, and laid out fairly plainly in some of his letters.

Gatsby in particular fails because he fixes his desire on an unworthy object, who does not return his love. With mirror symmetry, Gatsby himself is unworthy of the love of a decent woman, being a grifter. The dramatic resolution can only be death for Gatsby.
An oligopoly is not an example of the "Free Market". It's the opposite.
You can make something secure and not be compliant and vice versa. When both happen that is the driver for adoption ceteris paribus.
Other than that, both of these companies excel at PR and damage control. Unless you are technical and a critical thinker they simply brainwash you.
> in a single-process (roughly) operating system.

Containers don't (generally) run in their own operating system, just their own userland. It can actually be a source of security vulnerabilities to assume that containers are completely isolated from each other, such as running a root user container in production, assuming it can't get privileged access to the host. It's less similar to a bare-metal MS DOS application than it is a glorified chroot jail
Why do enterprises make it difficult to add a new vendor? Because they are careful with their data and legal obligations. Regulatory and auditing obligations are no joke and onboarding a new vendor is a nontrivial problem to do in a compliant fashion. The only aspect of this which is "detrimental to society" arguably is the legal requirements, but even then you might argue its better for a large organization to pay attention to other companies' licenses instead of stepping on them.
> if OSS is not a good fit for software entrepreneurship, then it puts a really severe cap on how advanced, polished, easy to use, or well supported OSS can be, because pushing really hard on software development and implementing tens of thousands of hours of fine-grained polish is far beyond what the vast majority of people can afford to (or are willing to) volunteer for free.

Even if they start out as labors of love, OSS that gets beyond the niche stage tends not to have most work done “for free”, it's done (or paid for) by people/firms who are using the software in their business, but where the software is supporting, not the thing being sold. (Whether the OSS is infrastructure that is invisible to customers, or whether what is being sold is support and professional services tied to the OSS software.)
I guess their editor can just cut and paste to Word if he really wants to make corrections.
But he didn't say: businesses use open source because they can find compatible binaries from multiple entities. He said it commodified support. CentOS and WhiteBox never promised or offered enterprise support agreements that I'm aware of. And if they did, I can't say I ever ran across anyone utilizing it in the wild.
“messages encoded for the purpose of obscuring their meaning.”

The language is troubling, but the laws on the books in US are already ridiculously broad and overbearing. Usually, the question is more along the lines of what stick you want to use. Just in case you never had a chance, "Three felonies a day" gives will give you an idea where US is now.
Yes!

And the worst case scenarios happened when my body was tired and wanted to stop, but my brain was high on Red Bull and didn't let me fall sleep.
Low-carbon generation is becoming cost competitive NEA and IEA say in new report
Show HN: An online JavaScript code editor that using ES module
> It's just if you try to sell ES as a service, then you gotta provide your changes to the public.

Doesn't this sound a bit like AGPL?
That's only because the word "intelligence" is subjective and ill defined. The problem is our usage of the word intelligence as a primary entity. Instead iq should be the primary benchmark for mental performance and intelligence is just one subjective aspect of it.
> * add a column showing the number of threads a process has

FYI the column exists already, but it's not enabled by deault. It's called NLWP, which I assume is short for Number of LightWeight Processes.

As for my own UI suggestions, I would hide threads by default, and stop displaying anything in all the columns of a thread where it's impossible for the cell to be different to its parent.

Maybe in tree mode, have all of a process's threads grouped under an expandable [threads] pseudo-process as well.
This is false. License [0] clearly states the conditions under which you can do it and they seem pretty reasonable. Nothing that a normal user, faced with an issue they want to fix, wouldn't accept. I imagine Amazon would have trouble accepting those and other terms, but that's the whole idea.

[0] https://www.mongodb.com/licensing/server-side-public-license
This sounds more like an issue with the licensing world itself than with this license, which by itself is pretty simple and won't affect you except in the case you offer your products containing Elastic as a service to third parties.
The Spectator in the UK published an article about him as well. It wasn't very positive as you may be able to guess from the URL:

https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/the-depraved-rule-of-tha...
Then pay for it with taxes on sales of television sets themselves.
It's not always so cut and dry; some content websites are very interactive.
>Over the summer, some were waxing poetic about how "riots are the language of the oppressed" and arguing that burning someone's business to the ground isn't violence but rather "just property damage".

When you put violence against property and literal murder on the same moral footing you are being an apologist for more severe violence. Property can be replaced. Businesses can have insurance. The murdered police officer and the 4 other dead people aren't coming back.

People really need to stop equating BLM with what happened on 1/6. Not all violence is created equal. 1/6 was much more egregious.
Were those who used ham bands while storming capitol even licensed? Right message, but maybe addressed to the wrong audience.

I’ll bet most of these people use Baofengs purchased on Amazon. It’d be great if Amazon could echo this warning on the relevant product page(s).
The post feels very self-entitled and needlessly inflammatory.

Elastic's changing their license. No contributions are being stripped of their open source license. You always have the last open source licensed version to go back to and fork if you like.

What this author is upset about is that Elastic are no longer providing updates under a license the author feels they are entitled to.

Maybe the author should fork the project and maintain it under an open license themselves?
Anti-Virus: The Covid-19 FAQ
I bet Facebook gets a lot more value out of tracking you across services and locations than from the actual contents of your messages.

This doesn't address it; if you're willing to go to these lengths, just switch to another platform that encrypts E2E.
Windows only. Bummer. Completely understandable, but bummer. A lot of tools can output .docx files.
to/from json
I don't think that I think "like a computer", but rather I think about the design of systems/processes more. As I would expect, say, a visual artist to think about the visual design and aspects of things more than a non-artist. Or a musician (as evidenced by music-centric friends) to notice acoustics and other properties of spaces and media more than non-musicians. But artists don't "think like a painting" and musicians don't "think like an instrument".

Computers, themselves, don't "think" about efficiency and maximizing, they think literally (and I do know some people who take everything too literally, I would say they "think like computers" in the sense that they lack humor and imagination and creativity). Instead I'd say I think like a computer scientist/systems thinker. I think about what collection of actions and conditions would achieve a goal most effectively. This can be in several regards:

- Most efficient

- Most repeatable

- Most sustainable

These are the same kinds of things that I think about in developing/designing software systems. But I'm not thinking like a computer.
Yes, but GlobalFoundries have given up development on leading edge process nodes.
We actually have a lot of insight in that Intel still doesn't have a good grasp on the problem. Their 10nm was supposed to enter volume production in mid 2018, and they still haven't truly entered volume production today. Additionally Intel announced in July 2020 that their 7nm is delayed by at least a year which means they figured out their node delay problem.
I actually see that as an option (ODrive) in the featured article :). I am really curious to play with them myself as I’m about to start building the MPCNC.
This smells to me like puritanical, idealized FOSS for a perfectable world, as opposed to pragmatic FOSS for the real world.
In basic training, drill sergeants used to yell the phrase "Are you hurt, or are you injured?". If you said injured, you went to the medical facility to get checked out, if you said "hurt", expect some fashion of hazing(and you wouldn't repeat "hurt" in the future most likely).
Instead they literally grow trunks as long as the physical laws allow.

In some cases this was literally true, as fast food franchises would keep raising their logo signs higher and higher until municipalities set height limits.
How will you define that heuristic? In some sense that’s what they did. Having clean heuristic in a complicated world is impossible. For example, are Kashmiri separatists terrorists or freedom fighters ?
I am just tired of all that shitshow in Germany. No masks at very beginning, then normal masks, then ffp2 in Bavaria. Vaccination goes really slow, I don’t believe, that as a young graybeard will be vaccinated earlier than mid 2022. Travel restrictions make real vacation impossible, I spend them basically in my home office. Home office was forbidden before pandemic, so I see positivity in it.
This is how Adam Smith described free markets, potentially influenced by regulation to ensure monopolies and rent seeking didn't exist.

In that framing, the market is free from economic privilege, and individual actors are free to compete on equal footing.
Amazon illegally uses the ElasticSearch trademark. Amazon illegally uses and distributes proprietary Elastic's code. Why do people in the thread keeps repeating that it's OK while it's very obviously abuse by a too-powerful company?

More generally I can't understand (and can't stand either) why people keep defending monopolists on HN. Monopolies are bad, morally, economically, in all sort of ways. They fuel abuse and everyone loses in the end but the handful of plutocrats that control Amazon, Google, Facebook, Microsoft etc.
That's not necessarily true, it all depends on what your desired outcome is. Stepper systems can be open loop as long as you're aware of what the torque threshold is and make sure you don't exceed that. Obviously a crash would exceed that, but there's ways to detect that (e.g., stallguard on Trinamics stuff) without adding an encoder. The whole point of open-loop stepper systems is that you make sure you stay under the torque limit by a margin (say, 30% or so) and you are fine. A properly designed system should never lose steps ever, besides in a crash event. Or if you load it up with too much side force, but you can get that on any machine.
Top Paying Tech Companies of 2020
Hmm. Operating on thin margins to gain market share and drive competitors out of business, then making up the difference by creating sales in related businesses in their ecosystem doesn't sound much like Amazon...
KFC Mascot Col. Sanders Talks Malbolge Programming on General Hospital
>“stripped-down tools for mere mortals”, the latter being a design paradigm made popular by certain companies and unfortunately copied by so many OSS GUI projects

Shots fired at GNOME
Right, but the fact that you can parse out something that didn't have a contract is a strength.

Someone had to write the Get-NetAdapter cmdlet to give you a contract, and Linux has those too, so a fairer comparison would be something like:

addr=$(</sys/class/net/ens33/address)

I think that's just as readable as your example.

The question is how does powershell handle extracting something without a contract, and is that more readable than bash? I'm skeptical :)
This comment, and your many replies to the other comments below, are wonderfully insightful; thank you for sharing.

I'm actually in the middle of reading the Nebula-winning novel The Windup Girl, which takes place in 2200s Thailand, and the insights you've provided add great context to what I'm reading.

Thanks for sharing!
> I think in that case the maintainer needs a different view of the bug tracker; for example, in GitHub that would be their projects view, or if you don't like that, label the issues as stale (without closing) and using a search that excludes those results.

But it’s a lot quicker and easier to use the default view (and default search).

> I believe the important thing is to make the default search return the issues that the maintainers are not working on, so that known issues are still tracked (but possibly out of the maintainer's hair).

What would be an example where this kind of tracking is useful?

> The important thing is that new users would be able to find them

Users can find them either by full-text search or by browsing all issues.
She's correct. Only a programmer may entertain the idea that editing markdown is superior to any visual editor.
There's lots of issues regarding burden of proof. I doubt the FCC has enough evidence to identify these people, much less enough to arrest or convict them.
This is the paper behind the UK headlines "One-in-eight 'recovered' Covid patients DIE within 140 days".
I wouldn't assume Elastic-style licenses to be a solution going forward. Elastic can use this license model now that they've already achieved considerable popularity and success - but I doubt that they would have gotten to where they are, had they started out with this license.
I think it’s a case of different strokes for different folks.

Those “three letter agencies” may offer resources and projects that one would struggle to find elsewhere.

To some people, being a Marine is a dream job. To others, that lifestyle would be soul-crushing.
Yes. I was able to convince my full-time employer to switch to contract. If you work in the right company (size, team, projects, etc), maybe you can create enough leverage where you are valuable enough to convince them to keep you on as contract.
I think we'd need to get more specific to talk about what kind of response is warranted. I'm certainly not saying violent acts should be ignored. What I am saying is that it's important to prosecute criminals, not members of a radical group. That needs to be a clear message. Law enforcement is targeted at criminals, not groups of people. The radicals will try to paint any government action as unfair oppression, so it's important that the reactions do not overreach, or you get the dynamic I described above.