skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
>Which is why I was extremely worried about Intel. (Half of) The lucrative Server market is basically gone.

Right. I suspect in time we'll look back to this time, and realize that it was already too late for Intel to right the ship, despite ARM having a tiny share of PC and server sales.

Their PC business is in grave danger as well. Within a few years, we're going to see ARM-powered Windows PCs that are competitive with Intel's offerings in several metrics, but most critically, in power efficiency.

These ARM PCs will have tiny market share (<5%) for the first few years, because the manufacturing capacity to supplant Intel simply does not exist. But despite their small marketshare, these ARM PCs will have a devastating impact on Intel's future.

Assuming these ARM PCs can emulate x86 with sufficient performance (as Apple does with Rosetta), consumers and OEMs will realize that ARM PCs work just as well as x86 Intel PCs. At that point, the x86 "moat" will have been broken, and we'll see ARM PCs grow in market share in lockstep with the improvements in ARM manufacturing capacity (TSMC, etc...).

Intel is in a downward spiral, and I've seen no indication that they know how to solve it. Their best "plan" appears to be to just hope that their manufacturing issues get sorted out quickly enough that they can right the ship. But given their track record, nobody would bet on that happening. Intel better pray that Windows x86 emulation is garbage.

Intel does not have the luxury of time to sort out their issues. They need more competitive products to fend off ARM, today. Within a year or two, ARM will have a tiny but critical foothold in the PC and server market that will crack open the x86 moat, and invite ever increasing competition from ARM.
But facebook doesn't just moderate. They control algorithms that decide what posts are presented to users. I think they should loose their common carrier status because of that editorial control. It's like if the phone company prioritized evil phone calls and delayed non-evil phone calls, it is a horrible influence on the conversations they are supposedly not involved in.
Stratechery on M1
SO many people and companies make money off of ("take") open source projects like apache httpd, postgresql, or even linux itself, without "giving back". So many companies have stacks based on these software, stacks they make money from, who never would even consider sending a patch back to postgresql or apache httpd or what have you.

Is this considered against typical open source norms and values?

If not, what makes this situation different?

So one difference people talk about is that your stack might be based on postgresql and you might sell a service, but you aren't actually selling postgresql as a service. OK... but I suspect there are people selling (especially) postgresql or mysql as a service, without ever sending patches back; say, a traditional kind of PHP web host, right? This hasn't to my knowledge led to much controversy; or the idea that their entire webhosting/dashboard/management layer has to be open source if they provide postgresql. What's the difference?

I am not saying there can't be a difference, there are all sorts of differences always. But in elucidating what the pertinent/meaningful difference is, we actually are clear about what we think, instead of just a gut-reaction "I don't like amazon and I don't think they should be able to profit off of elasticsearch" -- cause that IMO doesn't have anything to do with "opensource values and norms".

I think, again, is that the real problem is that the traditional models of open source, the traditional norms and vlaues of open source, are becoming less and less capable of supporting sustainability and proper income for open source development. (Which reminds me of the OpenSSL problem of course. Is everyone who uses OpenSSL, which means like everyone, violating "norms and values" if they don't send patches back? Obviously not).
> The central philosophy is capitalism sure isn't competition. It's the accumulation of wealth.

Exactly. And I believe that the fact i have to explain this constantly is due to the very good PR of capitalism. "Capitalism is just free markets". No, it is not. Markets are not free, and capitalism needs more than "reasonably free markets", they need protection of wealth, no matter how much.
I would like to think there are other definitions for a successful business than it being a single vendor.
Sony also owns Aniplex, which owns A-1 Pictures, CloverWorks, and Aniplex of America. Soon Sony Pictures will own Crunchyroll, too.
> And it's very hard to make money when you give away your product for free. Cloud hosting was a way out of that conundrum.

But surely it's only a conundrum if the primary goal of a software project is for a single company that has the same name as the software project to exclusively make money by selling hosting and/or support for that software while still using an open source license to attract a community of developers to work for you for free. I'd argue that this conundrum is easily resolvable: either have an open source software project for which anyone can sell support and hosting, or have a software company that develops proprietary software and sells it and related services.
First look at Tesla’s new structural battery pack
Presumably that's a much easier for videos than for software.
The benefit is the rest of the pure text toolchain. Like being able to use Git. I can confirm, for example, how long a typo has existed in my book by looking at the Git history. Maybe that's a bit academic, but you get the point. I have the complete history of everything I've ever written.

Another example: because formatting is reified in Markdown, I can grep for it. Did I misuse italics? With one command I can find every single place where I used italics in my entire book. I don't think you can even do that in Word. Good luck reading a multi-hundred page manuscript to find all of the places you may have made the same mistake.

Another example: Word provides styles, but honestly, who has discipline to use them? Most people I know manually insert page breaks, centered text, and X number blank spaces at the top of a page to make a new chapter. In Markdown, all of my markup gets converted into Word styles automatically and then I can create a reference doc to apply the style I want. I'm writing semantically correct styles in my documents all the time with no additional effort.
Thank you very much for your feedback! I appreciate it a lot because at the end of the day that's what keeps me motivated!
The Venn Diagram of people who know about Malbolge and people who watch General Hospital has to have little to no overlap. Was this reference made for exactly one guy or something?
Interesting; I wasn't familiar with the various players in big advertising (other than Sterling Cooper).
Open Position: Cryptography Engineer
This is a disingenuous false equivalence. Local protests that turn violent based on political grievances regarding police violence are not the same as storming the nation's capitol with the goal of overturning a democratic election.
They want to block Github entirely because Github allows for the free flow of information (politically sensitive information, not just code) and they don't have a way of doing currently without just blocking all of Github... Which would be bad for business, and China also seems to be entering the software business in a bigger way.

Actually, if you want to send large amounts of text information to users in China right now, Github is probably one of the better ways. Unfortunately probably not for long!
> Elastic is a 14 billion dollar company

I believe this is the real driver of this decision. $ESTC's PE is -100 and PC is -2500, they need to drive a lot of business to their hosted cloud or sell many more licenses to support their valuation [^1], and they're not getting the subscriptions they need from the platform add-ons like Machine Learning, APM, and SIEM (43% YoY revenue growth is great, but I don't believe it's sustainable, and this licensing decision suggests neither does Elastic).

Base Elasticsearch and Kibana are sufficient for a large portion of use cases, including mine. Many other of the "ecosystem" tools they sell have other, established commercial or open-source options (e.g. Splunk vs SIEM, Jaeger/OpenTracing vs APM), and these options won't tie you into the Elastic environment.

> I think that this attempt to take a popular open-source project proprietary is going to blow up in their faces. Users will flock to OpenDistro and this will be the beginning of the end of Elastic unless they reverse this decision.

100% agree. We're going to see an open-source fork, whether from Open Distro (which may have too much baggage) or a new, rebranded project, and many users who don't need Elastic's value-adds will flock there.

^1: Admittedly everything tech is severely overpriced right now.
> Encrypted radios. Any radio store will sell those, IDK why the rioters skimped on that.

Key distribution.

Encrypted radios are useless if no one knows what key to use, and equally useless if everyone knows what key to use. Sharing encryption keys with people you've never met on an open forum is equivalent to giving everyone the keys, just like sharing encryption keys with random people you've never met at public riot is equally equivalent to giving everyone the keys. One of those people you share with will be on the other side, at which point it's game over for your encryption. That said, given the brain trust that invaded the capitol building, I guess you're right, it is surprising they didn't have that added layer of security theater in the form of useless encryption everyone in DC could have been listening to.
Sitecore Embarks on $1.2B Investment Plan to Accelerate Growth
Antifa is a very minor left wing subculture centered around protests.
Note also the "cocktail putsch" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_Plot)---one of the few times you get to say "Smedley" with a straight face.
Previous discussion:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22077019
I don't think a Chinese git provider would be a good alternative in a long run.
The real WTF here is why a torrent site is hosting its source on a site like github in the first place. We all know that societies like the MPA flagrantly abuse the law because there are little repercussions. The codebase really should have been selfhosted.
Quantum effects haven't been relevant for a while now. The "nanometer" numbers are marketing around different transistor topologies like FinFET and GAA (Gate-all-around). There's a published roadmap out to "0.7 eq nm). Note how the "measurements" all have quotes around them:

https://www.extremetech.com/computing/309889-tsmc-starts-dev...
You could read the Senate report: https://fm.cnbc.com/applications/cnbc.com/resources/editoria...
Every nation needs something that unites it, a sense of identity and purpose.

The French, for example, were united by the King and the Church, until they were not. After the revolution they became very united by their nationalism, in the original sense of the word - shared language, values, traditions, symbols, customs, as well as by the ideals of republican democratic governance.

Historically most nations were united in Monarchy and/or Religion. Over time some switched over to either nationalism or an ideology like communism, and some even switched back to Monarchy later on.

A country that lost its uniting force can easily disappear into a fiery flash of a civil war or sink into a suffocating simmering of gradual societal disintegration. One might conclude that any attack on the Uniting Symbol is a heinous crime and needs to be stamped out as quickly as possible.

This is questionable from the modern western perspective, but I can see how one could make this argument in good faith from the other parts of the world. Especially from the countries where they do not (yet) have a different Uniting Symbol.
Or, you write anti-trust legislation to make their predatory behavior illegal. They can certainly afford to buy off politicians.
How would that improve matters, exactly?
> more so than ever before

This is ahistorical. In many societies throughout history, an accusation of heresy was a mortal threat, or worse.
You’re in a public place, have no reasonable expectation to privacy, and the recording is not intrusive, so perfectly legal.
Surprised you're not being heavily downvoted already. (I don't agree with that, just surprised.)

I do however think extreme hate speech is a real thing, it's just misapplied to the point where anything anyone disagrees with is labeled hate speech.

Because at the end of the day, all negativity is based on hate, right? If you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all (which is a nice convenient bromide for eliminating real critical thought.)
Both Facebook and Parler ultimately have the same goals - make money out of people while bearing none of the consequences.

Parler is just very explicit about this intention, where as Facebook wants you to believe something different but actually only behaves differently as little as needs to maintain the illusion.

In this case, I respect Parler slightly more because at least they're upfront about it. Both are scum and both should go, but at least one is honest about their intentions.

Parler also happens to cater to a common enemy with no political ties or PR appeal, where as Facebook gives you the illusion of being the good guy, all while making money off the same people Parler wants to cater to.
Yes, lots of anti-regulation people have taken a specific brand of free-market capitalism (arguably even an extremist brand of laissez-faire free-market capitalism) and tried to make that the only "real" market economy.

Free market socialism isn't a contradiction, despite what many would have you believe (think: worker owned co-operatives and nonprofits that compete in the broader market).

Similarly, market economies need not be wholly unregulated to be good. And indeed, I think you'd be hard pressed to find mainstream economists who claim that worker safety regulations are bad (like, they might be able to point to particular regulations that are dumb, but there are many that are not).
It is true that "hate speech laws" are limits on free speech. It is perfectly reasonable to consider any limitation on free speech to be unethical, but pretending that "hate speech" is not well defined is willful ignorance. No country has absolute protection of absolute free speech.
This is only true if you consider information that can be used to pirate works as "infringing material" that falls under the DMCA (in particular its safe harbour provision).

Which would effectively give any copyright holder carte blanche to censor any information that can be used to infringe their copyright.
Working with Multiple Kubernetes Clusters in Mirantis Container Cloud and Lens
I think the key distinction here is that Muzzey used ContentID responsibly. What bothers a lot of people is when ContentID is hooked to a nastygrambot. It helps that Muzzey is in a position to make enforcement decisions and is doing his best to do so responsibly.

It's partly the tool that people object to, but also I think many object to the widespread abuse of it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dos8fRzBH24
> There is a reason why "see what subscriptions you're actually using" is a frequent first step in programs to rein in your personal finance.

Oh yeah, absolutely. What I do for anything supposed to be temporary, is cancelling after subscribing.
Cultured Meat Could Make Industrial Animal Farming Obsolete
Operation Warp Speed Created Vaccination Chaos
when I first started with AWS I made this mistake. I was building an MVP to test out some idea and forgot to remove the hardcoded secret key when I pushed to github.

AWS quickly shut it down and informed me. I came back to find millions of queues created and somebody execute 100 million lambda queries.

AWS refunded me and I have been with them since. This is a very different experience to what happened with Google. They ignored my email and basically I learned that if I did a chargeback, they would shut down my other services too.
https://web.archive.org/web/20201105144800/https://codeload....

Have at 'em.

.docker/es_sync_config.json
.docker/nyaa-config-partial.py
config.example.py
migrations/versions/2bceb2cb4d7c_add_comment_count_to_torrent.py
nyaa/api_handler.py
nyaa/static/search-sukebei.xml
nyaa/templates/home.html
nyaa/torrents.py
utils/api_info.py
utils/api_uploader_v2.py
With enough distribution of power, true, un-hijacked-by-lobby, democracy is possible and this will not happen.
I mean this only constructively, but why share if you're not ready for or expecting a strong response? You only get one chance to make a first impression. If this is simply a concept or beta product, you should indicate that. If you're looking for customers, put your best foot forward. Best of luck.
It’s also about efficiency my friend. I don’t grammar check every message I send to a colleague during the day. I think you’re thinking of lawyers rather than software engineers.
Is that why games have gotten shorter? I'm from the NES - PS1 era of gaming where games would regularly take 60+ hours to play through.

FFVII is still one of my all time favorites and is a good example of that. I think the first real fast game I played through was Metal Gear Solid. I'd rent, then buy if I liked it back then, and I played through all of Metal Gear Solid in something like 2 or 3 days. It was the first game I enjoyed that I did not buy, because I beat it while renting it.
As an avid hater of Bitcoin and lover of copyright infringement, I am all for that! It would be great if we could get the MPA and RIAA to kill Bitcoin for us. People would still gamble away their life's savings on other scams, like Amway, slot machines, or Tesla stock, but at least they wouldn't waste gigawatts of electrical power doing it.
I'm anxiously waiting for a quit-GitHub movement. I hold my source code there because of its popularity and "defaultish" nature. Of course I can go someplace else right now, but then people won't find my software.
that's the reason why should always use aws:kms encryption on s3.
Its also worth saying, at least in Mongo's case, AWS's managed offering (DocumentDB) is not, in any way except the API, MongoDB. Internally its based on Aurora. But, by my understanding, the SSPL also covers MongoDB's API, so this is why DocumentDB has not attained anything higher than 3.6 compatibility (and even its 3.6 compatibility is ish, but that's not for legal reasons by my understanding).

Amazon definitely doesn't want to open source Aurora. Not only is it a massive moat for their cloud, its an extremely powerful database, but there's enough evidence to conclude that its so internal-AWS-reliant that it would be almost useless to anyone not running on AWS.
isn't 0x80 the syscall opcode on x86?
Some of it is holdover from various economic depressions that are holding on tight to our collective habits.

My wife and I both favor bulk shopping for a majority of our household goods, and when we pondered why, it came down to our families having done the same and followed that thread to our grand/great-grand parents that lived through the great depression.

Having bulk food/household goods means that at any point, if income halts for any reason, we still have X number of meals/tp rolls/litter changes before we enter the danger zone. That was reassuring when we were living paycheck to paycheck.

I do agree on urban planning being a part of it as well. It's a 15min drive to my closest grocery store, and 10 minutes of that is driving out of my neighborhood. Walking to the store is nearly impractical, and generally not safe due to the lack of sidewalks for a fair stretch of the main road.
NASA SLS: Data and Inspections Indicate Core Stage in Good Condition
The second phrase is far more accurate than the first!
I was wondering -- does anyone else develop something about java (jre/jdk or whatever) outside Oracle ?
But what if far more wacked content is on facebook than on parler and gab, because it is so much bigger?
The problem is that this organic startup is now a enterprise behemoth that can be trusted as much as CCP: Microsoft.
When writing you want a tool focused specifically on writing an organizing text. Programs like word is too focused on formatting and visual aspects.

Markdown would be much better for authors. Just because they have become accustomed to something else doesn’t mean that something else is better.

Just watching the mess my dad makes when writing books in Word makes me convinced that anybody who claims Word is superior for an author simply have never watched and author in action.
Git and other resources are subject to US sanctions just like anyone else. They are the logical next step since the started making a fuss over mobile phone makers, networks providers, chip makers etc.
And by the other hand it is more lax on what must be open source in case of non-ElasticSearch-as-aService usage.

So from my PoV it is overall more lax than AGPL. (Definitely more lax for non ElasticSearch-as-a-Service providers)
In lieu of a separate actual space, a separate conceptual space can help too. Recently I started making an active effort to shut work down. Write down closing thoughts for the day, close all tabs and open processes, shut it all down. Block off time in my calendar, and even if I have to stay online for something important, I still go through the "shtudown" routine with everything that isn't the urgent situation. That whay when the urgency resolves, I am ready to just drop it and walk away. Its not since I approached this more mindfully that I realized just how much I was letting it weigh on me.
MIT developed NLP models that help make better vaccine targets
Not only that, but Sony Corporation, which owns Sony Pictures, is itself a Japanese company.
The case in point was a single speaker being suppressed, not a "class", though. I don't understand why people keep trying to argue as if conservatives as a whole are being "suppressed". Most of them are still on Twitter (or here, or reddit, or...).

Parler was specific community with a specific set of inadequate moderation policies and became a center of thought for a violent community that ended up engaged in political violence. And that site, and only that site, thus became a target for broad suppression by other actors in the market.
Why Recruiters Don’t Respond to Your LinkedIn Messages
At least in terms of the capital markets we know this isn't really unique to our times. The roaring 20s bubble was in part attributable to the invention of radio and the ticker tape - those things are mass media as well. The scale may be unique, let's take account after it's over :)
For small or independent developers Gitea is really nice. The thing with GitHub and (especially) GitLab is they’re really focused on enterprise customers, so, if you’re a small developer, you get forced into using all the bloat that only makes sense once you need a ton of collaboration.

I hope Cloudflare pages ends up being as good as the sales pitch. It looks promising if it does.
Ark Announces Partnership with Gala Games
You say this as if people shouldn’t be able to resell information, as packaged in a disc. Does this extend to other things, would you want to prohibit used book sales for example, or cars from being resold?

The ability to resell books didn’t lead to only works the size of war and peace being sold...
> this could be something you could disable via app/ODB dongle

Ol' Dirty Bastard sure knows his way around cars, I tell ya.