skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Also, ZuccNet is using RSA-2048-OAEP to encrypt each message: https://github.com/tomquirk/zuccnet/blob/master/src/util/cry...

This is not forward secure. It will also only work for messages under 256 bytes. I don't know what happens in this code if you exceed that message length.

You want to use ephemeral session keys here. Read the Secret Conversations whitepaper as an example.
I write posts in an editor (presently nvim), generate the site, and have a git hook that basically publishes it to neocities along with pushing it to my repository. It's very much a tiny hobby blog so I haven't put much effort into the whole process.
Its not like pwsh can't do strings ffs. It just can do objects on top of that. You can totally go bash-like-crazy in it and parse strings if you like that.
How Should Investors Prepare for Inflation?
Announcing Staat: An automated tracking inbox for engineering managers
I don't feel that there is a meaningful TSMC alternative today. Samsung, Intel and GlobalFoundries are not suitable replacements for TSMC with regards to throughput or technology.

The world does need some meaningful fabs outside of Taiwan/South Korea. All of the <10nm semiconductor and most of the >10nm semiconductor fabrication takes place within a 750km/460mile radius circle today. That is risky.

Israel, Mexico, Germany, Canada, Japan (not that it would grow the circle much...) are all viable places to run a foundry. The fact that Intel is one of the few outside that circle doesn't inspire confidence in the security of the global supply chain.
moar coars
My commute was only about 20 minutes, so it was actually kind of a pleasant transition between each part of my day. I'd just use it to read and meditate. My previous one though was one of those 1-2 hour commutes by car that was just a complete nightmare. I can't imagine that is sustainable. It certainly wasn't for me.
What loophole? “Twitter took the first step, so now it’s safe for us to” isn’t collusion anymore than when someone joins Parler/Gab because it’s the “hip new thing”. If you want to talk about the insane power these platforms have, that’s one thing, but to claim that they’re “conspiring” (I’m assuming you mean to deplatform conservative views) isn’t arguing in good faith.
That would be interesting, if it was possible to do it in a minimal way!
Don't Sign a CLA
> Rebellion is bad

Not always. Not saying it is here, but I think it depends on the context. Arab Spring, for instance.
There's a nice wiki where you can look up more detailed specs on the processes of each contender, e.g. 5nm: https://en.wikichip.org/wiki/5_nm_lithography_process
Yeah makes sense. Adding SAM support is on our roadmap.

Looking forward to hearing your feedback when you give it a try! I should've clarified in the post, we support all the runtimes, not just Node.
Yeah. My father in law had the same experience. He once took an enforcement person into his house and insisted they go through the house together and conduct an exhaustive search of all the places a TV could be. "Perhaps it's in the cistern of the toilet? Let's look!...Not there? Perhaps it's in the bread bin..." etc etc

It is really bad the way they do this, and having seen the threatening letters they send out they could be very frightening. The letters were on the lines of "Our detectors have found that you have a TV and you have to pay the license fee or we'll send bailiffs around, take you to court etc", and the one I received once (when i too didn't have a TV) was printed on red paper.
And if anyone thinks the answer is clear, many of the same people saying we need to blacklist anyone claiming election fraud were saying Trump was trying to steal the election in October.

If we can be ban false claims of election fraud, we can ban true claims too.
Russia believes in free speech when that speech incites social unrest in the US. When it incites social unrest in Russia? Not so much.
Since when is protecting privacy shady? There are a lot of confidential relationships that previously relied on meetings behind closed doors that now rely on teleconferencing: therapists, healthcare, courts, lawyers, students, etc. Those who are exposing their private information in confidence absolutely deserve to be protected.
Ring up your friends and have quiz nights over Zoom. Takes time to organize, but works out OK.
In my experience, passers by don't care. I've heard many car alarms continuously going off and everyone else just going about their business.
What exactly is a "police-style handset"? Definitions are important because soon we'll have journalist breathlessly writing about people arrested with police-style communication gear, military-style radios, and assault radios.
Lispsyntax.jl: A Clojure-like Lisp syntax for julia
>Russia is putting Parler back online - at least they believe in free speech.

This is not a given conclusion, they could just be interested in speech that negatively affects a geopolitical rival.
The big problem here is that writing a regulation that decides what's okay / not okay on a platform (either by the platform itself or by a govt) is basically impossible.

Any sort of you-shalt-not-serve-this-content type of rulebook won't stand up to real world use and you need a team of lawyers to exercise judgement on if content is allowed or not allowed on a platform.

A couple of examples to de-politicize this:

- FB says gore / violence is not allowed. There was a Facebook post on how one of Mexico's most violet cartel members was killed that circulated on FB [1], received a lot of attention, and popped up in people's feeds leading to cries to take down the post (won't someone think of the kids!). They did take it down and then the Boston marathon bombing happened. Similar pictures of blood / gore circulated but this time FB was forced to keep the pictures up in "public interest".

- Nudity is not allowed on the platform. As part of their nudity filtering, they kicked off a group on breastfeeding from FB which again lead to protest and FB allowing it and modifying their policy to specifically make an exception for breastfeeding. YT and Amazon suffer from this as well (though we haven't had a big PR bust up yet). Amazon algorithms for instance recommend "adult" fiction (with provocative cover art) along with children's books. Beyond just playing whack-a-mole with these products, and some half assed attempts to detect nudity in book covers, I don't think a lot of progress has been made.

So yeah, I think Zuck will be more than happy to say, please tell us what to allow on the platform and we'll follow it to the letter and deflect the blame to the regulators.

It's not even clear that there's a solution here beyond let the platforms exercise their best judgement and sort of muddle along.

[1] https://www.theverge.com/2014/4/1/5569878/the-dark-side-of-t...
> In my country Sweden the state media is very biased and paints my points of views in a bad light - but I am forced to fund them.

I understand that that's frustrating for you, my objection with your post is merely your claim that this constitutes forced speech. It does not, unless you believe that money=speech. Some people hold that belief, but I suspect very few of them will be consistent about accepting the logical consequences of that belief (therefore they don't really hold the belief, they just reasoned backwards to justify a belief they _do_ hold).

There's nothing in the belief that speech should be free and unforced that prohibits state-owned media (as long as other speech is not suppressed), or even outright state propaganda. That doesn't mean you can't be against these things, merely that being against these things doesn't automatically follow from believing in that free and unforced speech is a fundamental right.

If you want to make the case that state-owned media are immoral (which, just to be clear, I don't currently believe), you need to refer to different rights. I've heard some people on the internet make the claim, for instance, that all taxes constitute theft, and that taxes are fundamentally immoral. I don't believe this at all, but that would give you a moral basis to renounce state media.

But really, sometimes the state is just going to do something that you don't like, perhaps even hate with a passion, without violating a fundamental right. I know I'd be furious if the state broadcaster started propagandizing a religion, for instance, but as long as they don't infringe on my freedom to believe what I want, they're not violating any of my rights (I could, at most, argue that it's a slippery slope to violating my rights, which may be a convincing argument by itself).
The answer to dangerous lies is the truth, not censorship. We have a marketplace of ideas where bad ideas die and good ideas spread. Unfortunately, I see a trend towards restricting free speech, which will only harm the country in the long term.
Fine - let's run with this.

We set up a system where certain ideas are not tolerated. There is a preferential system for use of mass communication platforms. Only officially sanctioned speakers or patterns of thought are allowed to be broadcast to the mass.

A step further: Who decides what is acceptable? And on what grounds shall we suspend the speech of others? What stops this from becoming suppression of political speech?
Honestly, it's a weird quirk I developed as I started writing more publicly. Hadn't thought too much of it!
Do you insist that a news channel or entertainment channel pickup every news item or program that is pitched to them? Do you expect the magazine to carry every article written and sent to them?

I think the way the world is today is that the smart phone as a product is like this magazine or tv channel and the mobile network is the underlying common neutral infra. And the apps are like the news items or articles or serial programs in this analogy.
> If we step back to 2018 - No BLM, no capitol riots -- no one would even imagine a AWS pulling the plug.

There has always been content which you cannot host on Amazon. Prior to Parler, Amazon booted Wikileaks, Amazon also doesn't host pornography, there are other carve-outs as well.

You are highly indexed on this one event, but it's not unique or particularly eye opening. 8chan suffered a similar fate for exactly the same reason as Parler.

If your business relies on hosting certain types of content, your options are greatly limited (and have been for almost from the start). This kind of speech is more toxic than pornography and it's treated as such. Business owners are capable of making this kind of distinction, or they can hire legal to help with it.
Managing React Dependencies
There are the ways to do it for every platform and commercial apps that have features like Deskreen prove that. But they don't disclose their solutions. It is beyond of my current knowledge at the moment how they made it.

The goal of Deskreen is to bring more attention to this problem from open-source community, so then we can all come together and build a really cool stuff!

Of course I wanted to make Deskreen an HDMI Dummy plug FREE solution from very beginning but could not find out how.
> The memory usage is ridiculous for a shell.

I can bring 10 - 30 instances any day in parallel without a glitch and still consuming low amount of mem. Its higher then bash, but again, bash sux and when you have 0 features compared to pwsh you can use lower amount of memory I guess. Bash is ancient, memory was much bigger problem then. Its funny that in age in electron apps we talk about memory when your todo app takes more then anything else.

> The killer though is a disregard for economy of expression.

?

> the rich object data model - isn’t actually that useful in practice day to day.

Its most useful every day feature for me.
The answer seems to be from nearly everyone: "It's obvious, whatever my side agrees is acceptable of course." (Which does not help of course.)
Government set the rules in free markets. A free market is a competitive market with even rules for all participants.
The best part about this article is the pearl clutching downvote brigade in the comments here.
Trump will hand off the 'nuclear football' to Biden
> We can be ban false claims of election fraud, we can bad true claims too.

I think the terms "shun" and "ostracize" fit the current situation better than "ban."
>The Government did not shut down Parler, the free market did

Amazon's been receiving cia, military and other US government contracts for years now.

https://theatlantic.com/article/374632/

https://www.technologyreview.com/2019/10/08/75349/meet-ameri...

https://aws.amazon.com/contract-center/#federal

Amazon took a website off their services critical of the government and incoming administration.

If amazon did this to a company critical of one of their private contract companies, this would be anti-trust behaviour.
tormach doesn't seem to have a problem with it. it's only recently they started offering servo upgrades.
Yes, but only for ElasticSearch as a service so having ElasticSearch on your backend won't generally require the distribution of the linked source code.
Show HN: My serverless Flask guide is now free
This design seems like it'd be sort of easily replicated with a 3D printer and some 8020. I wonder if anyone has open sourced a clone.

Edit: it is open source, and easily replicated by design! https://sienci.com/dmx-longmill/open-source-and-modification...
> as opposed to pragmatic FOSS

Call it whatever you like, but it's not "pragmatic FOSS", it's not "FOSS" at all. It is neither free (by the FSF's definition, which goes back to at least 1986), nor open source (by the definition first published in 1998, derived from the DFSG published in 1997).

> for the real world

The "real world" in which Elastic's revenues, as the article points out, were $427 million last year. And please don't use this cheap rhetorical trick wherein anyone with different priorities must get back to the "real world" (defined loosely as "whatever I say it is").
Docx might be an appropriate format to communicate with a publisher. But to my very limited knowledge Markdown is a good choice for the initial authoring process. As it can easily be converted. These days publishing happens on all sorts of platforms and the end product needs to be prepared for the press, ePub, Kindle, PDF, audiobooks, etc.

Until the distribution is decided my intuition is that Markdown provides this needed flexiblity.
I have a young child and working from home has given me more time with him and allows me to give my wife breaks throughout the day.

This has been a massive improvement in my entire families quality of life. I can’t imagine going back to an office now.
> it was an improvement and ... enabled coverage for a lot of people

This is kind of my point. The ACA was designed to benefit the middle class and non-vulnerable. At which point the middle class and non-vulnerable (and the press) stopped caring about who had healthcare.

To drive home that point: A few years ago I ran ACA quotes for typical income levels (typical for non-wealthy regions, 12k-32k) and found that premium cost steeply dropped for each 10k rise in income.

My primary issue isn't that this happened, it's that we weren't told. It's that ACA supporters + the entirety of press compulsively gloss over ACA realities.

> I wish the Dems could just own up to that and push for something more.

I suggest that uncovered Americans don't need something more. They need something.

> The problem is that both sides are so deep in the industry’s pockets, that I don’t think real reform is even possible.

Pols trading law/power for campaign cash is the other thing that news orgs have ~0 interest in.
Okay, now do McCarthyism!
> A Song of Ice and Fire was not written with Word.

When startups haven't even started up yet but are worrying about how they can scale to billion-dollar unicorn level, a common refrain on Hacker News has been "you are not Google."

Allow me to give you the fiction writers' equivalent: you are not George R.R. Martin.
Also, digging deeper in for example the Ontario section of your source about licencing:

> Licence “Professional Engineer”, “Engineer” or “ingénieur” “P.Eng.”

This is exactly what I was referring to. They consider all of these monikers to to be in a "Professional Engineer" context. To interpret: not all engineers are professional engineers, but all professional engineers are engineers, and they will fight tooth and nail for the P.Eng protection. Hence my question about "Professional Engineer" status.
*Also more widely known as the paperclip computer, but I know HN frowns upon title changes.
Great thoughts !
Qualcomm Announces Snapdragon 870
bad ideas may eventually die by they may also cause harm before dying out.
Passersby won’t deter the criminal. In places like the USA or Latin America where criminals are believed to possess guns, passersby wouldn’t want to risk getting shot for the sake of some stranger’s vehicle.

Even in Europe, if passersby in the big cities saw e.g. a bike thief taking an angle grinder to a bike lock, they are unlikely to intervene. It would just be asking for trouble.
If a judge can rule that Donald Trump cannot block people from his twitter because it's a violation of the first amendment, shouldn't that mean Twitter cannot block elected government officials?

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/09/us/politics/trump-twitter...
Don't you need permission to advertise your product with Coca Cola™?

Or in this case, would Amazon not need Elastic's permission to say "we use Elastic" to advertise AWS?
I wouldn't use software like that. Imagine you build a company using some software, and it was free until you hit $X in revenue. One day far down the road, your company is doing well and you start to get close to $X. You realize you have to acquire a license, ask them for one, and now... you just have to pay whatever they ask for? You're locked in to someone who could quote you whatever price they want. Unless it's really easy to rip out this software, it seems like a huge pain.
Radio stations regularly have live interviews with listeners, and my local NPR station ends those segments with "the views expressed in this segment may not reflect those of the station, underwriters, or management".
Because it was founded by a techbro dude who just happened to fall in love with random Russian girl visiting Vegas cough Butina cough, and proceeded to move to Russia where they got married?
The article is about a woman sent to jail for 43 years. The worst thing a corporation can do is stop giving you money. You can then join a worker cooperative if you wish.

Users are also free to downvote what they want. There's a good chance you'll be downvoted for defending corporations on Reddit, for example.
Mostly because my kids are home too.
Parler's CEO freely admitted that they were monitoring "antifa sites" and would ban anyone who appeared affiliated.

There are also many comments from Parler moderators, and staff, and examples of left-wing positive commentary being deleted.

So it seems that there's definitely a suitability to the "right" label, if not "far right".

Let's be very clear, Parler is not a free-speech site.
ARM instructions are also much easier to decode than x86 instructions which allowed the M1 designers to have more instruction decoders and this, IIRC, is one of the important contributors to the M1's high performance.
Yes, a private company can decide people who wear orange shirts are wrong and ban access from people wearing orange shirts.
> People are absolutely terrified by the idea of others belonging to a family that knows it's roots since 300+ years with an also non-local footprint and reach.

And, you know, organized crime.
Wow thank you! Really appreciate your support!
> We have a marketplace of ideas where bad ideas die and good ideas spread

That is the ideal. The actual marketplace seems to operate in the opposite fashion.
Show HN: Virtual breadboard in the browser, inspired by Ben Eater's 6502
Ah that's a good point. The only think that need not be tolerated is intolerance itself. Sadly, tolerance easily can stem from the lack of backbone than from the abundance of it.
This blog post reminded me of the post [1] I wrote about 7 years ago o_O

[1] https://cybernetist.com/2013/11/19/lxc-networking/
The State of State Machines
I was focused on the etymology; the actual usage of "ultrasonic" is generally confined to high pitches, not low.

Worthwhile point still, though I wouldn't have responded had the commenter not stated a specific incorrect definition. How does this connect to OPSEC though?
And what remedy do they have to a copyright license infringement? The same glacial pace legal system.
Synthetic cornea helped a legally blind man regain his sight
That is an unacceptable risk for almost any business so GPL software doesn’t get used.

Plenty of companies use Linux... this seems like something people worried about in the 90's but have now generally accepted.
I'm not sure I believe this. If it was months in the making on Facebook, why did Facebook not do more to stop it? Reading this it actually gives weight that Facebook was just as responsible for the insurrection as Parler.
> Those are our version of 'Blasphemy' laws.

There's a difference in a racial epithet, which is aimed at a person in hostility, and a religious mockery, which is aimed at something people believe in - not people directly. Attacking a person vs attacking something someone believes in.

Saying "Christians are stupid" is different than saying "Christ is stupid".

We should all be able to tolerate having our ideals and beliefs criticized and mocked. But we should stand up for anyone of a race or group being attacked or marginalized. Black, white, gay, straight, religious, atheist, educated or not, whatever.

A belief doesn't have feelings and doesn't feel pain. People do.

> can get you arrested or charged with hate speech.

Maybe in some democracies, but in America we allow it. Free speech is one of the core foundations of our democracy. If you want to put your foot in your mouth and say something stupid or hateful, be my guest. I'll even defend your right to do it. But it doesn't free you from being judged by your peers.
Indeed.

I have been on HN since it launched, and I have never had a comment garner this many responses. I've had to stop reading them because I just can't keep up. But from the ones I have read, I am even more dismayed than I was before. The most disturbing thing to me is the number of people who are just shrugging off the capitol riot as just another cost of doing business in a free society. If the riot were an isolated incident that might be a valid position, but it wasn't. It was the culmination of years of a very deliberate propaganda strategy designed to get people to discount facts. And it worked. That is what scares me, because once you succeed in getting people to ignore facts, you are truly gazing into the abyss.

We seem to have dodged the worst of the potential fallout for the time being. Next time we might not be so lucky.
This reply cannot possibly be a good faith addition to the discussion.
Fuzzy boundaries are still boundaries. Everything isn't a uniform blob. I don't understand how people can both glorify differences and pretend they don't exist.
When I worked at Facebook, the wide-audience internal feeds were kind of dominated by very um.. progressive, enthusiastic messaging that I’d even call activism. And it was considered cool to participate and be in that.. well, ‘clique’ may not be exactly the word but it’s close.

I actually did think it was cool! However, if there were any right wing folks there, naturally they kept quiet.

Also, there are a huge number of conservatives and moderates using Facebook. The main point I’m trying to make is that it is misguided to believe that these companies do not have their very own conscience / worldview / quite strongly held political values.
You can silence alerts, your phone could be dead. The point of the alarm is to alarm you at the exact moment something is happening.
I'm sorry, remind me again what inherent right you have to a third party paying to ensure you have bright lights and big signs on your front door?
But honestly, thank you. What you built makes my life better.