skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
After burning blasphemous 5G cell towers at the stake and setting traps for cell-site technician priests, anti-5G believers try proselytizing directly to the heathen.
Dark, Light, and the open-source microscope
he tool a loan to register trademark, he is speaking personally.
From Idea to First Order in 3 Weeks
"Seattle". tried it, couldn't meet perf targets, canned it.
If you want to write an article about how your article website has matured, maybe start with proofreading the first sentence.
A second opinion is a mainly a thing because different people have different approaches. And they can be both correct.
How Does CSS Work?
Have you ever asked yourself what defined the default behavior of CSS? How can you change and control them?

My new article on "How Does CSS Works?" is just for you.
YVYAN: [looking at watch] Hey! Turn on the telly!

MIKE: Good thinking, Vyv! We need information! [they run to the sofa]

VYVYAN: No! I'm just in time for Afternoon Plus!
[leaps on couch between Mike and Neil. Rick turns on a the TV. We see a test picture and soft music.]
Well turn it over then! [Rick changes the channel. Test picture and soft music]

VYVYAN: Well, you might as well try the other one!

RICK: Alright! Alright! [Rick changes the channel. Test pictue and soft music. The boys groan, Rick turns off the TV]

RICK: Absolutely pathetic! There's nothing on at all! Humph! Don't know why we bother to pay our license!

MIKE: We don't.

RICK: But, haven't we got a license?

MIKE: No.

RICK: But that makes me a criminal! [thinks about it] Right on! Yeah, this will shake them up at the Anarchists Society! Occupying the refectories!
So what? This is the real stuff! I'm a fugitive! A desperado! I'm going to form a new union society, right?
With me as president! 'People Who Don't Pay Their TV Licenses Against the Nazis!' [takes out pad and pen and starts writing] This is only the beginning!
You're way overthinking this. If I say "it's takes surprisingly little" it's because I'm emphasizing that it does not take a lot and instead a small amount is sufficient.

Saying "it takes a surprisingly small number of emotionally stable adults to help kids " is emphasizing that it does not require a large number of stable adults and therefore a small number is sufficient. How many does it take? Surprisingly few. A few suffice. How else can you read this? You're surprised that a necessary number is small? But it's always necessary to have at least 0 stable adults and that's as small as possible - you can't get surprised that it's small! Instead you must be surprised that the sufficient number is small.
> But you can't have your cake and eat it too, and say "well these are the terms you chose so why be mad at someone following them" and then ALSO say "hey, you can't change your terms!".

I haven't said that. And as far as I know, Amazon hasn't either. Have I missed something from them?

You seem to be the only person passing value judgements:

> Amazon hinders that, period. I don't think Elastic is in the wrong here, I think Amazon is.

This is incorrect: Amazon used Elastic per terms of the license. Elastic didn't care for an infringement on their business, so they've relicensed. No one is in the wrong here.
emotion / hurt
I don't understand how the SSPL is substantially different enough from AGPL to warrant being called "non-OSS" as has been done multiple times in this thread.

It is literally the AGPL, with even stronger copyleft provisions. It is anti-proprietary in the strongest conceivable way. How is that not open source? It does not infringe upon, and goes out of its way to protect, the four freedoms.
I never understood why its so hard for Corporations (specifically, US Corporations) to just give back to these projects via corporate charity contributions. I know, this takes away from other worthy causes too in some ways, however, I think we could get massive boosts that help all tides in the long run.

After all, US corporate giving, from a cursory search, in 2019 alone was 21.09 billion USD[0] if even 1% of that made it toward open source, that would fund an overwhelming amount of projects overnight. Just 1%. And it would be extremely effective per dollar in terms of what society gets back in return.

I don't know why tech companies don't see it this way in particular.

[0]: https://www.nptrust.org/philanthropic-resources/charitable-g....
Wordiness for some interesting reason makes it HARDER for me to remember stuff.

Kind of like I struggled with PMP exam and memorization because "Integrated Change Control Management" became "Controlled Management Change Integration" or "Managed Variation Integration" or whatever in my mind,

"Retrieve-Child-Item" vs "Get-ChildItem" or "Send-Command" vs "Invoke-Command" "Remove-Tiingamajiggy" vs "Delete-Whatchamacallit"... my mind is seemingly better equipped to memorize "obscure but unique" gobbledygook rather than "meaningful-but-generic" verbiage :|
One of the "dangers" presented in the article is the greater density of masts but that means rather than having high energy masts blasting radio waves broadly over the population, we can have lots of low power ones. That seems like a better situation to me.
I will define freeloading by those with the capacity to do otherwise as immoral any day of the week (and AWS functionally does a lot of that), yes, and I will define it in those moral terms regardless of the legal letter of a license. There is an implicit social contract that open source software absolutely and without question relies upon--and yes, large actors owe more in response than small ones in that calculus. When the social contract is abrogated by an actor who is beyond the capacity for shame or for criticism to change their ways--that's absolutely a problem. This shift of what open source means away from "Amazon, please co-opt and strangle at your leisure" is inevitable, and I don't really think it's wrong.

(I also don't like Elastic as a company, to be clear, and wouldn't shed many tears if they disappeared tomorrow, there's just a hierarchy of dirtbags and they're not near the top.)

As far as encouraging those source-available licenses--that sounds great, except that, in my experience, people with the temerity to offer source-available licenses get treated like shit anyway because they aren't giving away the farm. So I don't know where we go there, either.
> The days when Intel could single handedly successfully introduce a new (incompatible) ISA are long gone (if it ever could).

Given itanium, I'd say they never could (although that could have been a fluke of that specific design)
> From the point of view of the FOSS world, the issue here is not a problem; creators having an exclusive ability to monetize software as a service isn't a purpose open source is intended to serve; in fact, avoiding the lock-in that results from such exclusivity is a big part of the point.

If the creators get nothing, then why bother? Why slave away to make software just to give free labor to billion dollar companies while you get nothing? Is free labor for Amazon what open source is about?

If open source refuses to adapt to the realities of today's software ecosystem, it will die out... or at least "serious" open source projects will die out and all that will remain is hobbyist level stuff, abandonware, and half-done academic projects.

Personally I do think FOSS in its present form is going to die for most major projects. You'll still see FOSS libraries, building blocks, academic projects, and some major projects that really are large and old enough to have enough real grassroots contributors to keep them going. For major projects in the future you're going to have something more like a shareware model but with source-available.

Nobody creating a new large-scale project today is going to give it a license that they know will result in somebody else productizing it, making a fortune, and giving them nothing. At least Amazon acknowledges where things came from... in some cases the productizers even rename the project and don't even give the author credit.

FOSS and its gift culture ethos just isn't working in today's world. The software market of today is a dark forest.
I still can't believe 4chan actually managed to make the OK hand sign into a white power hand sign. Pretty impressive.
"free market" aka 2 coordinating app stores with complete dominance. Server hosting is a step down in oligopoly behavior but its consolidating fast.
I finally got a 5G signal near my home. The mast is further away than the 4G mast but I'm getting ~250Mbps down, and 60 Mbps up. Pings could be better though.

I can't wait for the closer 4G mast to be upgraded.

Stop this roll out over my dead body.
Enough means if we distribute evenly, there won't be societal collapse we depended on people who got above their share to be able to do special things.

(e.g. Newton needed to not be farming all day to be Newton.)
Update 2: appears this was actually a bug in my code that applies a text penalty :blush:

These blocks of color weren't scoring highly for the prompt... they were scoring really low for similarity to text... which ended up giving them a sort of anti-text bonus relative to other submissions. The fix should be up shortly.

Update 3: leaderboard should be mostly fixed!

Update 4: leaderboard fix fully implemented. And they're looking good! There are some artists amongst you. https://paint.wtf/leaderboard
The point is Intel can't compete as a fab or as a design house.

It's doubtful if Intel would have been able to design an equivalent to the M1, even with access to TSMC's 5nm process and an ARM license.

Which suggests there's no point in throwing money at Intel because the management culture ("management debt") itself is no longer competitive.

It would take a genius CEO to fix this, and it's not obvious that CEO exists anywhere in the industry.
how do you convert from markdown to standard manuscript format which is often required for submissions?
Current plans for Entity Framework Core 6 include SQL JSON columns
...Didn't Monty Python?
Its precisely this level of discourse we need when such topics are raised. Thanks for the link!
Just because you didn't have 30 years of learning doesn't mean you know better.
> Amazon simply out-competes ElasticSearch with their own product when it comes to consultancy, services

You're kind of right about this, but it's the issue that AWS just has a massive head-start with any client that already uses AWS. They don't really out-compete, they just use their existing vendor lock-in to gain an advantage. And really, by using your dominance in one "market" to gain an advantage elsewhere ends up feeling like a bit of a grey area.

> To add insult to injury, Amazon made the mistake of leveraging the ElasticSearch brand a few times too many in ways that just rub the ElasticSearch people the wrong way.

You're phrasing this in a way like Amazon "leveraging the ElasticSearch brand" isn't a trademark issue. Is "leveraging the trademarks of another company" suddenly okay (as long as you don't do it 'a few times too many') as long as you're Amazon? What if Amazon started selling smart thermostats by "leveraging" the Nest brand?
When I was in Thailand a few years ago, I went to see a movie.

Before the movie there was a montage about the king and everyone had to stand up out of respect. It showed pictures of the king throughout his life.

Then I read up on the king and found out he's real bad news. He's basically an overgrown spoiled rich kid who doesn't do much other than throws birthdays for his dog.
A nationality is always connected to a (system of) government, representing a set of shared values in any democratic system.

The best attempt at denationalization right now is the EU and their intent on creating a European superstate, not unlike the USA. Even still, I share a great deal of values with most of the EU citizens and will oppose the formation of an actual unified European state until at least values like "democracy" and the trias politica are shared across the country.

Perhaps total denationalization is a nice end goal for humanity, but it's unattainable as long as there are still significant groups in the world who don't believe in things like "women are equal to men".

I agree that connecting a nationality to words like "true" or "proud to be a" is often problematic, but you cannot ignore that there are differences between regions. You can pretty clearly see the border of Scotland on a Brexit vote map, for example; all of Scotland was, on average, anti-Brexit, and most of England was, on average, pro-Brexit. Does that mean that all Scots are inherently pro-EU? Of course not. But erasing borders will change very little about the attachment and emotions people feel toward the bit of land they were born in.
For such a tendentious article, the citations to opposing viewpoints are fairly lacking.

> A review of both the psychology literature and anthropological research on societies ranging from the ethnolinguistic groups of hunter-gatherers to tribes, chiefdoms, and states (less formally, “nations”),3 reveal that a universal society is unattainable.

Big if true!

The key supposition here is that the concept of a "nation", and thus an analysis of "nationalism" applies across human history (even pre-history!) and in all different localities.

Contrast this with the view that what we think of as nationalism is a distinctly modern phenomena, an outgrowth of the rise of capitalist social relations and print as a mass medium. On this view, nationalism is initially a curiously European phenomena and later spreads outward with the march of "print-capitalism". I find this analysis much easier to square with the early modern history of Japan or China, for example.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imagined_community
On Fiction.live https://fiction.live (twitch for webfiction) we use straight up HTML through a WYSIWYG editor. If there's an easily extensible markdown-like with full features for stuff common in webfiction like spoiler tags we would like to adopt it.
I've been interested in upgrading to his newer boards, but I'm not sure I want the added complexity at the moment. Have you used the generic modular one? If so, how does it compare to the older one I linked to?
4G doesn't do anything weird compared to older mobile/cellular radio technology.
5G includes an order of magnitude higher frequencies, with far less penetration depth into humans. Thus the power is dumped into less volume. While the power levels involved seem very safe, we don't have the vast research body of cm waves.
ok, sure, but I am going to be very surprised if anyone can find a high up precedent saying if you murder people in a tricky way it's ok.

So to clarify further, assuming no precedent had ever been recorded on this or a similar matter, the common law interpretation would probably be that you were expected not to murder people in this situation even though literal interpretation of the law would seem to state it was allowed.
History suggests that the people on the survivable side of the border might not like large numbers of migrants coming across from the other side.

Exhibit A: Europe and the problem of migrants from Africa.
> Its inherent fragility means that transmission boosting ‘cell’ antennae are generally required every 100–300 m—which is far more spatially dense than the transmission masts required for older 2G, 3G and 4G technology, using lower frequency waves

I can see that it's necessary to place 5G masts more densely in order to deliver the promised transmission rates and coverage but it seems like a bad solution to a greater problem. Assuming the trend continues one would need even more cells to deliver 6G, 7G etc. Are there no other ways of increasing the bandwidth without placing a mast at every city corner?
they'll still be depreciating the newer fabs.
So I don't remember anything of the book itself, but I do remember my opinion of it when we read it back in highschool being very similar to your "meandering and going nowhere". Maybe the article's author is such a fan because they see themselves in the book's writing style.
What’s the difference between what Amazon does with Elasticsearch vs what someone like Redhat does with the Linux kernel? Or what every hosting provider including AWS does with the Linux kernel, sell access to a service that is running that software.

I get that Elasticsearch wants to run their own company, but I really have no sympathy for their arguments here. They released open source software and now are mad that it is taking on a life of its own that they don’t 100% control. That’s the whole point of open source as far as I’m concerned, other people can do stuff you might not have expected with your code.

Now they’re making it more closed going forward, which is fine and is certainly their right to do. But this argument is so bizarre, instead of saying that we tried to do this open source but unfortunately it makes it too difficult for us as a business so we’re closing things off, they’re trying to spin it as they are the true, good defenders of open source fighting against the forces of evil by closing off their licensing further.
I’m surprised an RPI can’t be optimized to run the CNN classifier. It has up to 8 GB of ram and a pretty decent integrated GPU.
"Accepting" the belief of a religion is far less friction than moving to a place. Not even comparable to having been born there. :D
> a federal subsidy program should operate as a purchase guarantee: the U.S. will buy A amount of U.S.-produced 5nm processors for B price; C amount of U.S. produced 3nm processors for D price; E amount of U.S. produced 2nm processors for F price; etc.

I really like this concept, though I’d advocate for a straight subsidy (sales of American-made chips to a U.S.-registered and based buyer get $ credit, paid directly to the supplier and buyer, on proof of sale and proof of purchase) given the logistical issues of the U.S. government having a stockpile of cutting-edge chips it can’t dump on the market.
> He who controls the money, controls the world. The control is slipping and the roaches are starting to run around in panic.

Well considering that FBI, State of Bulgaria and a guy nobody ever saw (his alleged initials are SN) are 3 largest bitcoin holders I'd say that it's pretty clear who will have the control of the world!

Also, world population is around 8 billion. Number of bitcoin wallets is around 65 million, or a whopping 0.8% (not counting probably myriads of people having more than 1 wallet).
Are they actually enforced, or is it simply that they're still on the books? There are a lot of laws in the USA that are on the books, but would be struck down as unconstitutional if anyone ever tried to enforce them.
I would assume that any workload which decouple compute from storage.

Most of the new data systems (e.g. Snowflake) are build on top of a data lake (E.g. S3 bucket) and a scale out JIT compute nodes.

By using such tool, you can read the data from S3 once, and avoid loading the data into memory when you add nodes.

A specific use case that I am working on now is Auto ML. Imagine training 100's of models on the same data.
I'm sympathic, but it would be very easy to fix the reason why people feel compelled to emigrate in the first place. Silly "America First"ers don't realize that Nativism and (actually good, perhaps a rarity in practice) foreign aid go hand-in-hand.
Why Learning Stoicism Helped Me in the Age of Anxiety
I like this as an example of how compilers cause bugs. This code looks reasonable and concise, but it shouldn’t. If you were writing microcode for a non-superscalar processor, you would do two separate memory to register loads and then three xors and then two register to memory stores. But the compiler teaches us to use shorthand and it will fill in the details. In this case the resulting code is ridiculous with loads and stores on each xor because the compiler can’t guarantee that i!=j, and it would normally perform terribly, but we’ve architected CPUs around compilers to use caches that make up for these problems, and they are so prevalent that it’s worth it to dedicate most of the CPU die area to branch prediction based on conventions of the C compiler, and most of the compiler code to conventions of the CPU branch predictor. It’s getting quite ridiculous, and maybe it’s time to move to architectures and languages that make everything explicit.

Edit: also, there is an xchg instruction that you have to pull out of intrinsics to use in C (good luck in most other HLL). It seems like a language should be more about how to use vocabulary than restricting it.
openstax.org
I never said forking is abusing. But if you fork it, position it as an official product with the same name on your platform and lie on twitter saying that your foobar was a collaboration with the original foobar author then yes, you are definitely abusing your power.

On the other point: "the GPL is working as intented" yes but not as the authors want, hence the change of license! Nothing wrong with that IMHO.
The idea of escaping from whatever is currently a dirty hellhole to the magical land of X where everything is better, is exactly the same kind of backward thinking, what you're describing with the 0.1% is no different than all other migration towards greener pastures, and it shows why we can't continue like this..

More or less the entire world is going to turn into a trashfire unless we unite and fix it, so that everywhere is a nice place to live, nationalism won't fix it, it prevents it from being fixed, because we've divided the globe into more and less desirable geometric shapes, it didn't work, next.
The third option is coexistence, though this too is something writers seem to be bearish on (Egan's Diaspora gives it a bit of consideration before simply killing off most organic life with a gamma ray burst, which I found somewhat cynical and or even spiteful, given the timing).
General Motors soars after Microsoft partnership on driverless cars
Separation, divorce may fuel fear of abandonment in kids, study says
During renegotiation, sure Parliament can opt not to renew. But for the duration of the charter, the BBC has an uninterrupted period of collections beyond the fiscal year of the government, which cannot be raided to fund the new social program of the day.
A major incentive for the US government to get involved is touched on. Not only is Taiwan 'just off the coast' from China, China is coming for it and intends to assimilate Taiwan back into China just as Hong Kong and Macau have been.

At that point, the only sustainable leverage the rest of the world would have in chip technology would be ASML.
This is actually a good question (rather than argument) for one reason: it's extremely simple to measure and debunk.

Go to a few places with good 5G and 4G coverage, measure EMF, compare, see nothing interesting and call it a day.
So, all social media companies must have representative in all countries that allow local govs to remove any content? Or get all of their info such as IP address?

Where is the line here? If I live in US and Tweet in Turkish, if Turkish gov ask for removal of that content should it be removed? Or should companies be required to share information about this user?

If I write that in another language, that local gov don't like, does it give Turkish gov right to get that removed?
true - but that's exactly how it out-competes. It's a repeating pattern. Setting up an agreement with a 3rd party provider has friction. The bigger the client, the higher the friction. If $BIGCO has an enterprise agreement with $BIGCLOUD, then $SERVICE hosted on $BIGCLOUD is nearly always going to win against $SERVICE's own commercial offering.