skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Let's all just come to a common agreement: there's no planet on which the US military allows Intel to die. Period. End of story.

Having a US based company with fabrication facilities on US soil is vital to national security and will be for the entirety of my lifetime and likely my grandchildren's lifetime (if I ever have any). For all the bluster of the investors wanting to chop Intel up: they will find a swift and full rejection from the government unless their plan includes selling the assets to another US firm.

TSMC building a fab in the US won't be "good enough" - the US military will not allow the security of our country to be in the hands of a foreign corporation.

Now whether Intel remains a dominant player? Who knows, but they aren't going anywhere. I wouldn't be even a little bit surprised if for instance the 3-letter agencies cloud contracts suddenly included a clause that all of their infrastructure must run on Intel CPUs.

I'm not saying it's right, I'm not saying it's fair, but I don't see any other outcome.
Maybe? I don't know what it was like when Gelsinger started. But it's the least credential-driven high-status professional market in the country, and maybe the world. It's hard to start your career with a first job at Google without a top 10 CS degree, but that might be the only example; it can be your second job without one.
I agree. I feel many talks are selling their books, adding a lot of fluff around the core point and making it a TED Talk. Would be great to have a blog that's entirely TLDW of Ted Talks
Interview with Linux graphics drivers developer Daniel Vetter
Here in Hong Kong, some years, flat payments are made to every legal permanent resident. It's kind of UBI, with flat payments and no means testing, but it fluctuates a lot. When it's payment scheme time, my bank puts up posters near ATMs reminding people to go to the government website and register their accounts to receive the wire transfer.

That being said, we have a very high wealth gap here. My understanding is that social programs are generally very lacking.
I have but only at competent ones. Nothing this flagrantly bad.
I caught that, I assumed the throwing out of a CAD amount is where we all got confused.
If you restrict yourself to only the set of AWS functionality that is common to all hosting providers, you can do that.

But not only is that very hard to do, it basically negates the premise of AWS in general. There are also lots of areas that you can’t do this, such as IAM and network rules, so you have to build an abstraction on top of it that’ll work with open source tools on a separate host.
That statement is future tense. Is there any indication that Twitter, any of it, was hosted on AWS as of January 7th of this year?
> any other terms that specifically evolved in Earth societies and cultures

That's true (pretty much by definition) of literally every word in English, though. (Yes, "katana" is a english word; the fact that it's derived from a japanese word (namely "刀" aka "かたな") doesn't change that, any more than "pizza" (italian) or "beef" (french, a long time ago).)
Worth it if you're installing something like a Raspberry Pi in a ceiling mount screen that's a pain to access.
Hindu fanatics already here down voting me, but this is their minister admitting to it:

https://www.indiatoday.in/auto/latest-auto-news/story/govt-s...
I’m willing to do without the blackjack but that’s my final offer
Does the BDSM have a subset who are into chemical castration? I mean... if they'd do that, I have to guess there could be some.
So I guess Tether is ‘on that path’ — if it ever goes bankrupt it’s perfectly situated to knight itself crypto-inflation czar.
As a college senior working toward a software engineering degree, I’ve had a handful of users reach out and offer their time to video chat and discuss the industry. It’s been extremely valuable for me.
The Core Architecture in the mid 2000's was such an incredible shot back to the top. I remember seeing the benchmarks absolutely dominate AMD on every level, power, performance, TDP, Cost, etc. etc. This is almost immediately after Athlon 64 and the Athlon 64X2 started to gain market share, spanking Intel's Pentium 4 at the time. IIRC Intel ended up dropping the Prescott architecture, moving to the Pentium M architecture for development of the Core CPU's. Moving away from chasing max frequencies, and instead looking at IPC. Then Nehalem Dropped, (The first Core i CPU's) making the gap even larger. Q6600, Quad Core, Low power, decent cost. That was the CPU to have at the time. I miss the days reading about all of this.
I think they're referring to each line as a new fab, rather than the complex of buildings they're in, which is pretty fair.
I've been a professional Mac software engineer for 15 years.

I've also lived my entire life in the North (which for some reason is called the Midwest).
> Indeed, a similar situation happened in the mid 2000's before Intel moved to the Core architecture. I wouldn't be surprised if something like this happened again.

Though that may have been a bit easier for them to solve, because the main thing they had to do was scrap NetBurst (Pentium 4) and return to a derivative their old architecture (which they were still using for the notebook market).
I'm curious about how Apple "killed Intel's smartphone ambitions"?

Otellini on the iPhone:

"We ended up not winning it or passing on it, depending on how you want to view it."

"At the end of the day, there was a chip that they were interested in that they wanted to pay a certain price for and not a nickel more and that price was below our forecasted cost. I couldn't see it. It wasn't one of these things you can make up on volume. And in hindsight, the forecasted cost was wrong and the volume was 100x what anyone thought."
... like this website? ;P I honestly don't see anything wrong with that design: permissions should be honored--and Parler did something really wrong here that caused people to be able to gain admin status from them--but, past that, if someone wants to download the whole site why not let them?
Jim Keller's apparent rage quit has me questioning that.

I was bullish on Intel until quite recently. I was able to convince myself that they were taking the L on 10nm to focus completely on a full, true EUV transition, in order to be at the top of the game just everyone else was hitting that wall in order to dominate again. That turned out to be overly optimistic.
Exactly. We learnt in school that banana stems are actually underground, but man are they hardy.
This all hinges on exchanges reporting USDT trades as if they are USD trades. This is only plausible if the spot price of Tether remains at $1. They will need to regularly inject money to keep the spot price of Tether at $1, but as you say the fees and ponzi can allow this as long as the number goes up.

The problem would come if the number stops going up and there isn't enough money to cover all the people dumping the Tether IOUs simultaneously. I assume they cannot cover $25 billion dollars of worthless IOUs. Even more if their assets are also simply bitcoin, which in such a scenario would also be collapsing in price.
That's how Crew Dragon works, I wish Elon would apply that process to his cars.
Not sure how Dale Carnegie's book "How to Win Friends and Influence People" is received on HN, but a point that always stuck with me is: People like to talk about themselves.
Everything else is ruled by backwards compatibility

That's one of the biggest reasons to choose them. If Intel's "x86" stops being x86, they'll lose one of their biggest competitive advantages.

See the first comment here, for example:
http://www.os2museum.com/wp/vme-broken-on-amd-ryzen/
This kind of protectionism will only worsen Intels efficiency and will drain taxpayers pockets. Why can’t people learn from all the instances where a government tried to micromanage and horribly failed in the mid/long run?
Not sure why this was flagged dead, but it seems somewhat interesting, the https://repowcha.com/how_it_works page is at least thought provoking.
See other comment re: realizing who I was responding to. Also I spent last winter up there (Saint Paul).
Why are they ignoring /etc/hosts if this is good behavior?
We just need to get the Antimimetics Division[1] involved.

"An antimeme is an idea with self-censoring properties; an idea which, by its intrinsic nature, discourages or prevents people from spreading it."

1. http://www.scpwiki.com/antimemetics-division-hub
sounds like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashley_Madison_data_breach
init-p01st.push.apple.com and *-courier.push.apple.com requests come from apsd(8), the Apple Push Notification service daemon. It's attempting to get push notifications, rather than some sort of phone home telemetry thing.

Now, I do have an issue with apsd specifically on Big Sur, but "sending phone home packets" isn't it.
I actually just made a little app yesterday that converts share urls into direct HTTP download URLs that are usable by cURL, etc. Not sure if this solves your problem:

https://apitman.com/apps/droplink/
Sure, Tether may become worthless but I doubt Bitcoin will. Bitcoin gained a lot of value before Tether existed. Tether could disappear and Bitcoin may still continue to strengthen.
Dollar General plans to pay employees to get Covid-19 vaccination
Large companies can hide inefficiencies and incompetence of staggering proportion. Often there's little incentive to really improve things, but tons of bureaucracy that helps maintain the status quo or let it slide ever worse. People can only judge how good something is against their experience, so if you've only ever worked at that bigco and only known incompetence then you might not even realize anything is wrong. Meanwhile the proverbial frog slowly boils...
"I feel happy because we don't have to struggle as much as before"

I know I speak this from a place of privilege, but it's positively heartbreaking when a child has to even be aware of their parents' financial insecurity.

Quite a wonderful story nevertheless.
It seems like they basically just exposed a lot of data directly, as apparently most of their APIs didn’t enforce any authentication or hide records that had been soft deleted.

Apparently the records were strictly sequential, which I don’t believe is true for Mongo which IIRC includes the node ID in part of it.
I agree, and when I rent a car with a touchscreen it feels unusable and unsafe. I don't want to have to look at the screen every time I use it.

What's even crazier to me is the way futuristic movies depict interfaces that float in the air. Has anyone thought that through? Your arms would get tired so fast. There's a reason our best input methods have our arms resting on a surface.
If you proxy macOS connections overnight with no apps running and the computer idle you get about 15 hosts from 7-8 Apple processes phoning home, a handful of them resort last to IPv6 after ignoring your DNS and /etc/hosts

The screenshot is an example of traffic to Apple unsolicited by the user.
Evidence suggests the site was actively moderated. They actively encourage, organized, an participated in the forming radical cells, their plans, and execution. Its purpose was to attack our democracy. To replace it with something lacking the freedoms we take for granted every day.

They should be federally investigated on these grounds. Don't act like it was some innocent people putting together a social media site just because it wasn't allowed to bear fruit.

Your argument is week. I don't think any startups on here are activity trying to destabilize the American government in favor of racist authoritarians? That is pretty fucking high bar to qualify for.

And why doesn't everyone at Amazon get a say in how there work is used in the world? Should we actively work for people and causes that go against our beliefs?

It is a simple matter. They are such assholes no one with a brain is wants to help them. And thankfully, they are allowed to refuse them service over because of their actions.

And finally, freedom of speech? Really? Have you ever seen content policies? Or do disagree with those as well? And any moderation (although like I said above the site was actively moderated to conform to particular content and social graphs).
So...why are they trying to run a platform when they don't have the employees or volunteers to actually run it?

Personally I think the idea that people deserve to be in business even if they're not equipped or qualified to do so to be very strange. If you can't provide the product (whether that's quality physical goods or more abstract things like adequate moderation) then you fold and go out of business - that's the understanding of markets that I grew up with.
What’s the alternative to using an eMMC? Straight up SSD?
You remind me of an absolutely wonderful George Carlin bit i love https://youtu.be/EjmtSkl53h4
It is mostly a matter of taste, but Elixir has pipes, decent string primitives, a bit less boilerplate, probably some edges nicer in tooling or standard library, i would say thats about it, both run on the BEAM VM and compile to similar BEAM bytecode.

The killer feature is approachability of syntax. Every single developer i talked to complained about erlang syntax unless they did prolog before or already were an erlang developer. I prefer it but me and OP seem to be the few people who do these days.
In some industries 6 months from initial report to consumer deployment would sound almost irresponsibly fast.
Read the article carefully. American horseshoe crabs are about 217% more productive than the indolent European horseshoe crabs.
I think the confusion stems from the fact that most people speak through or on private property—both digital and physical.

But they're taught in school that there is a general "freedom of speech" which doesn't really exist. This sentiment is echoed in mass American media to adults.

There's very little "public" speech in a legal sense. The most populated speech structures are privately owned. Censorship is built into those structures. America, as a whole, does not have "free speech" except for property owners. Unless you're on public property, behaving lawfully, such as in court, or "speaking truth" next to the post office, etc. etc. you don't have free speech.

So, when people hold a good portion of their discourse through private structures, those structures seem public. The host companies seem like governments through terms of services.
They see the first amendment as applying there by default.
"Individual contributor", i.e. not a manager
My car has a very nice compromise: the center screen is surrounded by physical buttons, with a mini-screen on the surface of each button. The buttons display different, relevant functions based on the context being displayed on the center screen. Even the rotary dial switches context.
>>> Fab has lifetime of 2-3(?) years

>> Many Intel fabs are from the early 2000s. Some are from the 90s. What do you mean 2-3 years?

> I think they're referring to each line as a new fab, rather than the complex of buildings they're in, which is pretty fair.

Even so, wouldn't the 2-3 year number only apply to CPUs? Couldn't they keep the lines running making things that don't require top of the line processes, like USB controllers, etc.
Except the dip is coming sooner rather than later. History has always taught us BTC to come down after Dec/Jan.

Gotta have the engines of the market ecosystem churning somehow. Also like you I plan on adding more when it dips low so I can cash out later this year when it historically moons again.
His point was to learn the weird nuances and other "pointless" quirks of foreign cultures.

It's worth it, because you get judged for not knowing trivial, cultural-specific rules and knowledge.

Like, hypothetically, how popular a foreign TV show really was in the 90's.
Yeah, I don't see Yang as a leftist at all. He may be liberal, but not a leftist (who are often too dogmatic).
3 million dollars might be the cost of one FOSB (carries some 18-24 wafers) if you dropped it :)
I can’t explain it to you, and from my first hand observation this is exactly what it creates.

Without going into details, people know how to get every type of aid from the government and live under virtual welfare for extended periods of time (well before retirement age). The total aid amounts to well over 10-30k easily.

I know people that take advantage of it and honestly I can’t believe we all foot the tax bill for it. It’s free money, people will find a way to get it, the same way corporations find tax havens.

The incentives aren’t right, and the loopholes too many. We cannot pay for freaking everything as there really is a moral hazard argument to be made here, especially when it’s obvious it’s misallocated.
So what should Phoenix use instead of a using macro to accomplish this?

>But now that you ask: The LiveView Idea to use websockets in general purpose web applications to achieve "reactivity" is an abomination, we have SSE and HTTP2 and also SPAs for that matter, which are from an operational and reasoning standpoint 1000% simpler and actually made for this kind of thing.

SPAs are hugely complicated though. Have you worked on a production React app? It's another order of complexity above anything existing in BEAM world, and the JavaScript tooling ecosystem is atrocious in comparison. Not to mention, you will quickly end up having button clicks that require network requests if you are not careful with your SPAs as well.

The whole point of LiveView is that you can develop an app with a similar amount of interactivity as a React app without having to go into the split-universe world that SPAs live in and all the attendant complexity that brings with it.

>Websockets are for things like multiplayer shooters or collaborative drawing, why would someone think it is appropriate to use it to react to clicking a button.

People said JavaScript was just for making ad banners flash 20 years ago and now it's the most popular language on the planet. I don't think a technology's current uses are a good predictor of what it is most useful for. See also: the web itself becoming an application platform, while it started off as a hyperlinked document retrieval system.
It is not my experience that their chosen field makes them miserable. Would you mind illuminating your point? My experience is anecdotal and not very helpful.
At this point I'd be willing to put money on knowing where you worked, so if you have any worry about being outed for that, well yeah.

I do kinda hope you're not just bullshitting though, because those assholes definitely had it coming and this just makes it all the more deliciously vengeful.
Sure but you'd think there would be at least some safeguards, what if the battery dies? Or perhaps there's a weakness in the mechanism that can be exploited? Or perhaps just a bolt cutter?
Once again I find myself recommending Bullshit Jobs.

But beyond that, I'd add Bertrand Russell's In Praise of Idleness and Emmanuel Le Roy Ladurie's Montaillou: Cathars and Catholics in a French Village 1294-1324.

While all of them are tremendous food for thought, the third was the most stunning for me: it is remarkable to see the degree to which a medieval peasant, while having less access to technology than we do today, enjoyed in many ways a better lifestyle than we do in terms of holidays, working hours that meshed with actual human rythyms. As Russell spells out, the industrial revolution, which provided many material advancement, could have done so with a great improvement in everyone's lifestyle, but instead most of its benefits have been captured upwards.
Only an ideologue would buy that. So many threats, plots, doxxings, stalkings left unmoderated on Facebook and Twitter--and that's only summer of 2020!

This is clearly retaliation for the H1-B caps / S230 threats of the outgoing administration, rather than corporate concern for the stability of the republic. How many people here can even say "corporate concern" with a straight face?

Business is war, alliances change. What they do to the MAGA grannies today might not be so amusing when the targets change.
* Trump and former Senate Majority leader McConnell talk about rolling back Section 230

* Companies that could be held liable enforce Terms of Service after warning offenders

* Senators draft legislation to "prohibit social media censorship." (https://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/state-p...)

Ironically, if legislation like that was passed, Parler would be facing the same issues as any online forum that moderates content: https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20200627/23551144803/as-pr...
With respect, web sockets are a tool. If you think it is inappropriate to use a tool a certain way then your are obviously free to feel that way, but it seems a little “get off my lawn” to be upset with other folks finding creative uses for it.

My team is using live view and accomplishing incredible things with far less time and effort than we would need using other SPA technologies.

I have no idea how you can assert SSE, HTTP2 and SPAs are 1000% simpler when my experience over the last two years has been the exact opposite. Live view is exceedingly simple to work with.
"The rediscovered material reminds us that Malcolm sought a politics that was collective, and not solely reliant on his—or anyone’s—leadership"

This is what a true leader does, too many leaders start off right but become victims of their own success. The few who can transcend their own success, know that they cannot make the movement about them, it will collapse like a pack of cards if they are not around. Unfortunately we all believe too much in the hero myth - the hero as savior, when there is one deep inside, probably too fearful to come out.
Literally everyone finds concrete reasoning (block of wood) more intuitive than abstract reasoning. Some people have a relative (often cultivated) skill for abstract reasoning, but they improve that skill in very much the same way you do.

I invite you to read some peer-reviewed literature on the subject. If you prefer a non-peer reviewed book by an accomplished researcher, I would recommend Stanislas Dehaene’s “How we Learn”.

In any case: there is no evidence for “learning styles”.
1:20 is pretty realistic. Seen with my own eyes and ears. I wasn’t the 1, I was part of the 20. Didn’t do shit all day mainly because incentives were not aligned to motivate me. I get the same salary if I put in the extra effort. So why. Knew one guy who had a vision and the stamina to push through with PowerPoint precision. He was the 1.