skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Generalizing things because you've never experienced them on an individual level seems like a bit of a stretch. Anyway, it may not be asked in interviews but I've interviewed ~300 engineers for a FAANG company and its something I cover in interviews for the reasons described.
Have you used an email with no spam filter?
You are making an unwarranted assumption here. “Individual #1” follows the norm for unindicted co-conspirators. Now, it's true that an individual subject of sealed indictments related to the crime in question would (because the indictment is nonpublic) be treated the same, but you can't conclude the existence of a sealed indictment from this usage.

Further, none of his “Individual #1” references are related to Russia collusion, even though they arose from things that spun out of that investigation.
Shameless plug to my much simpler (simplistic?) view of things. In this case, I think Data Engineers are the people building systems that solely focus on the data, all the data and nothing but the data.

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/mapping-data-science-professi...
They sure do like to tell everyone that it's what they're "preparing for" though.
Nothing worse than working for a shitlord.

I hope things are better now.
A Podcast on Critical Moments of Life Transition
The problem of "who will guard the guards themselves".

It's "common practice" because it gives unrestricted ability to fabricate any kind of narration without repercussions as nobody can verify it.
No, they pulled their white privilege get out of jail card.
Mosquitoes Stab Animals with a Syringelike Proboscis
I need a user account to watch Netflix. Same for banking.

A user account is not the primary criteria of being a "social" application.
Nonsense. It'll be forgotten a month from now.

More people are shot to death on a peaceful weekend in Chicago, and nobody even talks about it.
Only the server, actually serves the graphics to the user.

Within the context of the X Window System, the server is the body of code responsible for delivering the display to the user viewing it.
Open Letter to Linode About Parler
Can’t you still access a Unifi video server locally? What’s so hard about setting up a reverse proxy or VPN?
The other virus that worries Asia
If you want to see what he is talking about in terms of how delta and gamma are affected by time to expiration ("spikey"), you can take a look at the apps here: https://www.5minutefinance.org/concepts/the-greeks

The code is here: https://github.com/FinancialMarkets/5MinuteFinance/tree/mast...
Second miracle: less than 1h after posting on HN I received the reset email.
> My take is that Ron Paul is probably one of the most reasonable people in politics.

My take is that he optimistically might almost break into the top 525 most reasonable people in Congress.
Yeah, I was thinking younger as in not geriatric. Im middle aged anybody my parents age and younger hasnt witnessed first hand the hell pathogens can bring.
The only reason you can even post here is because HN stops spam and DDOS attacks. Your entire post is only possible because there are limits on free speech.
Create a free account on optionsalpha.com, watch all their free videos.
I would. Despite of what people say here on HN, large part of that is false (especially because there's a lot I _know_ about Facebook for real), and despite the fact I disagree with certain company policies, Facebook is net positive for the world. And a lot of people in the real world think the same.

But people don't usually harass me, they usually pick someone younger and geekier.
Same here but with opnsense instead of pfsense. It would be great to have all of the info in the controller's dashboard, but I wasn't thrilled with what ui had available over the last year and figured I'd punt buying a usg or similar down the road a few years.
Apple's approach still makes sense in that scenario since the phones in general will be easier to make more durable. There are far many more phones that are exposed to water than there are people who regularly repair/upgrade their phones. Openable phones are going to be nearly impossible to waterproof, or will make them far larger and more expensive.
I'm trying this myself and i'm already feeling much better, less stressed, sleeping better, and have more a natural feeling energy.
People say "Oh you've been deplatformed? They are a private corporation, they have a right to do that. Go start your own platform." Well, that's exactly what Parler was trying to do. It was an alternative for people who got kicked off of twitter. That argument only works when there is no monopoly. Amazon is really digging their own grave here because Parler's argument is highly persuasive
here is a quote:

> designers of Streebog and Kuznyechik purposefully hid a structure in this component. This structure is very strong, very uncommon and interacts in a non-trivial way with the other
main component of Streebog.

> In light of these results, we urge security professionals to avoid these algorithms.

It's like this: imagine some government released plans for super-secure safe, and for some reason, deep in those plans, there is an instruction to make an 1/4" hole in the door, at the specific exact position. There is no justification or explanation for this hole, just a mention that it must be present or the safe is not going to be certified.

So people wonder why it was placed on the plan. If there were a good reason, why not tell it? Perhaps NSA/FSB has some new method to crack safes, and this hole is needed for it? Better be careful, and avoid using that specific safe model.
Is this just a demo? This site is dubious at best and the usability is questionable. Many of the accounts are “test”, and there’s no email verification, all while assigning me a random picture of a man as a profile picture leads me to question how many users are actually real.

This doesn’t seem like a useable implementation of your app. Do you have any other instance examples of the app?
A physicist once blew my mind with the following observation. "Mathematicians always get it wrong when you talk about the relationship between position and velocity. You say that velocity is the derivative of position, acceleration the derivative of velocity, etc. And that's all fine, down to 16 decimal places, give or take. Past that, quantum effects become significant. You don't have a clean mathematical identity: perhaps velocity is approximately the derivative of position, acceleration is approximately the derivative of velocity, but below the Planck scale, these quantities aren't even continuous!"
Their business has grown a lot due to The Queen's Gambit. It's pretty cool when an outsized force grows your business like this!
> We want a small government! Let the markets decide!

> Wait, not like that!
If the site admins just want an excuse to get rid of a sub that doesn’t align with their political ideology, it’d be pretty easy to not bother investigating.
Have you ever heard of the term "disposable income"? There's a reason it's a separate concept from non-disposable income.
This is in the twitter post in the article

>I am now crawling URLs of all videos uploaded to Parler. Sequentially from latest to oldest. VIDXXX.txt files coming up, 50k chunks, there will be 1.1M URLs total: https://donk.sh/06d639b2-0252-4b1e-883b-f275eff7e792/

>This may include things from deleted/private posts.
If you can't define consciousness beyond self awareness and self reference I don't see how I can prove that a computer can't have it.
Of course he does.

I do too and I've always said that in comments here. That's how I racked up 100 plus downvotes from socialists.
This is very misguided - anyone in serious remote area operates renewables with FF backup, because FF is expensive and delivery difficult and unreliable. If you ever been to remote lighthouse or similar, youd realise logitistics in delivering tonns of FF is not something you can take for grantes.

Those 200 KG of solar panels will save you many metric tons of oil over their lifetime
"Without NAT the only 2 parties that need to know anything about a TCP connection are client and server."

Even without NAT there may be multiple devices between a client and server which need to know about the TCP connection. Stateful firewalls, WAN accelerators, and load balancers are some examples.
In one German town, 1k people killed themselves in 72 hours (WWII)
Trump is quiet because he is busy preparing to leave office and for the onslaught of lawsuits that will come with it. He doesn’t care about his supporters or the country.
> The average news consumer knows it, even if they're not able to articulate it.

Are you sure about this? Did you spend a lot of time interacting with average news consumers or is this based on other data?
Thank you for saying this. It is rare in urban/educated/elite circles to have empathy and try to understand this particular group of our fellow humans.
Ibn Sina (Avicenna) wrote in his medical encyclopedia published in 1025 to isolate for 40 days (Al-Arba'iniyah in Arabic) to prevent the spread of certain diseases. According to some this is where the Italian word was translated from.
Experts do exist but I think many alleged experts often give into the temptation to use the expertise in their field to represent expertise in a field in which they cannot claim the same level of expertise.

This is my opinion because I’ve experienced the temptation to do just that many times and I’ve witnessed instances where that has happened as well.

I don’t think this behavior is limited to people who have expertise in any field but it might be most damaging when experts do commit that logical fallacy.
> That argument only works when there is no monopoly.

It is possible to host things online without using a cloud vendor like AWS. In fact, I'm hearing all the time on HN on how it's a better idea than using public cloud.
So neutrons aren't countable ? one detects them (for counting purposes) with the combination of nuclear forces and EM anyway.
Don't get me wrong I am probably missing the point of the discussion.
It has been thought? By who?
NACTO standards for protected intersections provide insufficient visibility for the cyclist and motorist on approach to the intersection [1]. For example they claim that for 25 mph traffic, the total clear sight distance should be 50 feet for a cyclist approaching the intersection where the turning car is ahead of the cyclist.

They're making several assumptions:

1. The cyclist will be looking to their left for traffic to the front rather than paying attention to what's directly in front of them

2. The cyclist assumes that the motorist cannot see them and will not yield

For the first item, there may be slower traffic in front of them they need to watch out for, taking their attention away from the street beside them. Same thing for surface hazards. For the second item, the cyclist may believe that since they can see the motorist, the motorist can see them and they can go ahead and proceed through the intersection.

From the motorist point of view, they're assuming that the motorist is lookinat the bikeway rather than at the road (checking the color of the traffic light, verifying that a car making a left turn is going to yield, pedestrians, etc). A motorist traveling between 15 to 25 mph is going to cover the clear sight distance of 50 feet in a second or two, meaning they don't have much time at all to assess the situation on the bikeway.

The second thing they claim [2] is that a bikeway setback increases visibility. Yet the pictures they use at the bottom of the page are the same picture cropped differently. One would think that they would have tried to use an actual example of this in their guide, but they did not. The other fundamental problem is that cyclists move between 15 to 30 feet per second. That means that a car driver needs to be able to see 30 to 60 feet down the bikeway in order to see an approaching cyclist in order to have enough time to yield to them. And they need to do this while moving through the turn at 10 to 15 feet per second.

[1] https://nacto.org/publication/dont-give-up-at-the-intersecti...

[2] https://nacto.org/publication/dont-give-up-at-the-intersecti...
They are still saving fuel, and with weather forecasts they are not 'anomalies', they are planned handovers. You just need to work out the financials.
I’d call 2 and 3 data engineers and 1 either a data analyst or BI developer/engineer depending on technical proficiency.
Is it better to have the right framework but come to the wrong conclusion (for now), or is it better to reach the true conclusion with the wrong framework or basis? I guess it depends on timeline.
> Their tactics usually involve posting in those subreddits from sockpuppet accounts, using hateful or threatening messages.

Any evidence for this?
Dormant viruses activate during spaceflight (2019)
I agree this may be why they did it.

However a better approach to this problem is to not rely on shared secrets. Use public key signature tech to stop worrying about mistakenly logging a secret. If you never had it, you can't lose it.

If you were to log literally every byte of the plaintext traffic when I sign into GitHub (e.g. maybe you're a GitHub ops person), you don't get the ability to sign into GitHub as me. There's a WebAuthn signature step, my signature is authentic, and you can even verify that from your log if you want, but you'd need to make a new signature to sign in, and you can't do that because the key needed to make my signature never left my hands.

Even better, GitHub defuses their liability because as well as a (presumably hashed) password that could be broken by a hypothetical attacker they've got a public key for me, and learning that public key doesn't help the attacker do anything, at their site or anywhere else. Even - unlike with the SSH public keys GitHub holds - to identify people, since WebAuthn public keys are deliberately uncorrelated you can't match my GitHub key against a Facebook key for example.
Proud xeyes user here.

Have you tried duc for disk usage? It's minimal and has a nice visualizer.
I remember reading on wikipedia that an accelerating charged particle radiates em field, but an observer falling onto the ground doesn't see em field from a motionless particle and that this puzzle has no explanation today.

In the doubleslit experiment, can it be that the two slits set up magnetic or gravitational field that creates the interference pattern and photons are just a method to observe that pattern? Just like iron dust is used to see the magnetic lines that would exist regardless.
Eh, a trademark doesn't mean you own a word. You only own the exclusive right to use that word within a few explicitly defined contexts.
>If physicists adopt this humble mindset, and resist their craving for certitude, they are more likely to seek and hence to find more even more effective theories, perhaps ones that work even better than quantum mechanics.

I don't believe that most modern physicists dispute that the equations we use are anything more than models. For example, you won't go to a seminar on microrheology and have a physicists point out in disgust that the presented derivation is "wrong" because it used Newton's second law without the relativistic component. While this is perhaps an extreme example, it is the case that we often have to ignore certain effects/make certain assumptions to make equations solvable and interpretable. If we believed that our physics equations represented some "absolute truth," then we would never allow ourselves to make these sort of assumptions in the formulas we derive.
Perhaps it makes sense to speak of intelligence density.
> One of the issues with using a z-score for count data is it assumes the data are normally distributed

A z-score is just the number of standard deviations away from the mean a data point lies. It doesn't require any assumption about the distribution of the data.

If you wanted to make
some inference, like maybe about the likelihood of observing some z-score given a hypothesis, then you would need to assume a distribution.

But, nothing the author does assumes a distribution, normal or otherwise. It doesn't mention probability at all as far as I can see.
Strange, I found the Unifi Controller web UI to be really poorly architected.

1) You start a .app that sits for a few seconds then requires you to launch the browser by clicking a button. While using the browser, you can't close the extra window for the controller.

2) On the browser, you go to a localhost website that has an invalid TLS certificate (you can a "Not Secure" warning) and have to click through to the unsafe website (and it's still like that in my current Unifi version).

3) The login page doesn't let you use the Chrome password manager, so you have to type it all in each time to access a local program.

4) In the web UI, the icons are not intuitive, and some combination of circles and rounded rectangles.

5) The new UI makes it seem like you can configure things that can't actually be configured outside your router.

6) Speaking of your router, Ubiquity's own EdgeRouter routers aren't supported in the Controller UI. They require a completely different interface.

In case anyone thinks the problem with the certificate is something to do with my own setup, it's not. It's a universal problem [https://help.ui.com/hc/en-us/articles/212500127-UniFi-SSL-Ce...]
I think you should watch/read Sabine Hossenfelder.

She is cold, methodical, and notably critical of the search for mathematical beauty.
She is pretty clear about the fact that reality is what we observe, and equations are just a tool we use to make models.
Good. Glad to see anti trust attention being brought to megacorps that are abusing their position or just immune to competition even otherwise.
Okay this seems like a compelling reason to switch to OPNsense https://docs.opnsense.org/history/thefork.html#transparency
It's not one that exists yet for sure. It's one we will need to get to, but in the meantime subsidies are most definitely needed.
To be honest, my goals used to be to convince other people.

As I get closer to 60, I'm swinging more towards simply acquiring and exercising power on behalf of things I believe in.

I say this despite an ironic awareness of how much I despise a movement with opposite ideals to my own for appearing to do the same thing over the last 3-4 decades.
You clearly are an expert on SIMD instructions, but your comments smell like you just want to hate on Linus.

For example, I think very few people would agree with: “And then suddenly he [Linus] talks about AVX512 and I wonder if he knows anything about low-level programming or optimization.”

And “But Linus is talking about power-budget”. No, you are hyper-focusing on that strawman, but his argument stands without that point. He is making a broader point based on his experience of Intel extensions over many years and he specifically alludes to that. He is saying he believes that AVX512 doesn’t add enough benefit for the costs.

You say “Linus is pretty much saying that Deep Learning / Tensorflow / etc. etc. isn't important.” but he says “I'd much rather see that transistor budget used on other things that are much more relevant. Even if it's still FP math (in the GPU, rather than AVX512)”.

You are the leaf on every comment on this thread, which is usually a bad sign of arguing a point regardless of the validity of what others say. As I read it, your arguments seem to argue about anything except for the core thesis of what Linus wrote, or you misrepresent his argument IMHO.

Edit: also, Linus is stating his opinion, an opinion which written loosely enough that you as an expert clearly can’t actually pin down as “wrong”. To make your point about the article, you would perhaps be better looking for a different example.
> I never heard of rumble...

I wonder why
Two Worlds: So Much Prosperity, So Much Skepticism
Sell to close before expiration, it's usually never worth getting assigned shares.
> his report said it for him. "[The report] did not find that the Trump campaign, or anyone associated with it, conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in these efforts, despite multiple efforts from Russian-affiliated individuals to assist the Trump campaign."

This sentence is not from the Mueller report, but is from Bill Barr's summary of the Mueller report, which a federal judge characterized as "misleading" and "substantively at odds with the redacted version of the Mueller Report". https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6796353-barr-ruling....

As myself and others have noted, you need to read the actual Mueller report and the Senate Intel Committee report before engaging on this topic further.

For example, the idea that no one in the Trump campaign coordinated with the Russians flies in the face of the finding in the (Republican lead) Senate Intel report which shows that Trump's campaign chair was transmitting internal campaign data to a Russian intelligence officer.
If you somehow know BB numbers, you know the size of finite memory, which is sufficient to run corresponding busy-beaver. Limiting mathematics to what is physically possible is not useful. We don't know what is ultimately physically possible.
Lockdowns have been rejected by modern epidemiology for around a hundred years. The problem is that fast spreading contagions hop any bounds, so what you need are methods of minimizing infection while allowing people go to about their business. Social media driven ignorance is no excuse for embracing anti science methodologies.

Now we know that Vitamin D is critical to immune system function and that mucus membranes can be extremely effective barriers as long as they are kept moist, but people would rather bicker about masks than think about the full range of methods for countering contagion.
Good,,,
Your product is great; I just purchased a commercial license to replace Hotjar last week. Being able to obtain similar levels of analytics whilst self-hosting means we can improve our privacy policy, yet continue to collect useful visitor data to improve our (.gov website) service, as well as avoid being caught in visitor's adblockers, since it is hosted on a subdomain.
You need to read my comment again. The clients are behind either a bridged AP or a switch, i.e. all on the same subnet, all getting their DHCP addresses from the UDM-Pro, all in the UDM-Pro's ARP table. There is NO double NAT happening here.

Furthermore I didn't say they were invincible. I just said they were invisible to the UDM-Pro's UI. Unless you have a blanket ban on outgoing LAN traffic, which would be absurd, there's no way to block access for a particular client or a particular destination address for that client.

In the case I gave, a Chinese robot vacuum with no on-device interface, please tell me how to find the IP of this robot, then block outgoing traffic from it, without SSH'ing into the UDM and running scripts. That's right, you can't, because the UDM-Pro doesn't support it.
It's an absolute lunacy to think that because a group of people lives nearby a place where something bad is going on, it is certain that among them are people helping with it.
But it's cheaper.

You can buy two for the price of one Pfizer vaccine and get ahead that way. 20% gain.