skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Per Vanguard, when your asset allocation is ±5% out of whack: 80/20 -> 85/15 or 75/25.

* https://www.vanguardcanada.ca/documents/best-practices-for-p...

Or perhaps once a year if you happen to throw in a lump sum year-end or year-beginning.

If you're using a tax-sheltered account (US: 401(k), IRA), the some of the capital gains considerations they mention are not relevant.

If there's a lot of market turmoil then it may be worth checking your account quarterly: equities tank mid-March 2020, and so if you checked Q2 2020 (April), there's a good chance things would have been unbalanced, so rebalancing at that point would have resulted in a good starting point for the equities take-off that happened shortly after. Though generally the less you check your account, the better it probably is for your mental health.
Interesting point I hadn't considered, but in the face of it, Occam's razor makes me more inclined to believe this isn't a cross-Big Tech conspiracy and more in reaction to the bad press following the Capitol events.
> @grzm, sorry can't reply to you

For future reference, when that happens just do one of these:

1. Wait a few minutes. HN does not allow immediate replies to new comments. This is the preferred solution.

2. Click the timestamp on the comment to get that comment on a separate page. On that view you can reply even if the comment is in the "no replies yet" window from #1. (I'm not sure if this is a bug or a feature).
> They might be the latter, but I wouldn't consider it obvious

Stripe and Twitter are not utilities. Some may want them to be. But I don’t think anyone says they currently have utility obligations under the law.
Yes, they were. In the UK, there was fairly consistent opposition to fighting the Nazis. Even after France was overrun, there was a fairly large minority in the UK saying that the UK should surrender and ally with Germany (some of these were right-wing, some of them were not). In the US, unsurprisingly given the huge number of German migrants to the US, there was fairly unanimous opposition which is why the US joined so late. The connection with Britain and France was only really present in the elites of US society, isolationism was the default.

Also, it is worth remembering that what we know about the Nazis today is not necessarily what people knew about the Nazis then.

I think myths about WW2 are quite damaging. Everyone today appears to think that they are in a good vs evil battle. Not only is this quite clearly not justified by the facts today (for example, comparing the Capitol with Kristallnacht, as Schwarznegger did, is a chilling inaccuracy...particularly from someone who hails from Austria), it wasn't the situation then...no-one in WW2 in the US regarded it as a good vs evil battle (only Churchill did, and he was lambasted for it).
> are you under the impression that the hollywood studios published an actual blacklist and openly admitted to collusion?

Neither publication not open admission are necessary for a combination in restraint of trade to be illegal, and you'd usually want to avoid them since they make it much easier to prove.
This is the sort of thing I've been thinking about in building Bucket Brigade (https://echo.jefftk.com). It's video chat, but you can switch into a mode for singing. Each person is in a bucket, and you can hear the people in earlier buckets and be heard by the people in later buckets.
It seems it still is: https://sqlite.org/codeofethics.html
Bad idea IMO, the Internet doesn't forget. Why would anyone choose Stripe over another payment processor now when Stripe comes with the additional risk of being banned at a whim for whatever political/ideological/opportunistic virtue-signalling reason? It's not like they have a monopoly like Apple and Google with their respective App Stores. The same goes for AWS, it's just irresponsible to use it now.
Setting aside for a moment the multiple orders of magnitude difference in lethality per participant, the key distinction for me is this: what happened in the Capitol is about usurping the monopoly on violence possessed by the government. BLM is not about overthrowing the government, and has never posed a credible threat to it. Even if BLM overthrew the government, no one has been talking about mass executions. By contrast, 6MWNE was on full display at the Capitol attack, as were calls to execute legally appointed representatives. I have been half expecting Trump to declare on Twitter that anyone who kills a democrat gets a pardon.

With the current state of the right wing in the US, there is a clear and present danger of us losing our democracy. When you look at the statements about the election from last _June_, or the purges at the Defense Department last fall, it is clear that this nonsense (and it is nonsense, 59 court cases and counting) about election fraud was premeditated, and so was this coup attempt. This is the Beer Hall Putsch, and it’s a mistake to see how lucky we got and say there is an equivalence to protests against police violence.

Assuming you’re arguing in good faith, what you’re missing is that the outrage from this event isn’t about the five dead people, tragic though that is. It’s about the fact that armed protesters just walked into the Capitol Building while Congress was in session. We are very, very lucky we don’t have dead congresspeople. What do you think the mob that beat a police officer to death with a fire extinguisher in the Capitol building would have done to AOC if they’d gotten to her?

We cannot afford to make the mistake Weimar Germany did. We cannot assume that because this failed the problem is gone. We cannot appease these people, we cannot treat them as benign. They must all be identified and prosecuted, and their enablers in Congress must be expelled from our governing bodies.
Keto Actives products weight loss
Chapter 4 is great.

Visit the sick, bury the dead, and console the sorrowing.
I recall mips being pretty different, including being both-endian.

But there seems to be quite a number of mips emulators:

https://www.linux-mips.org/wiki/Emulators

but I can't seem to find any perf numbers or capabilities (for example QEMU probably does just in time emulation, does mame/mess?)
The larger problem is that the United States Congress was, just four days ago, invaded by a violent mob and forced into hiding for hours. People are going to be a lot more radicalized if they think they can get away with that! It would be like refusing to cut business ties with a mafia don because you're afraid of radicalizing his soldiers - maybe there's some short-term benefit, but in the long term all you accomplish that way is legitimizing the violence.
This does fit the definition of terrorism though: violent action, or threats of violent action, for political purposes.

I think it would be very difficult to argue that last week's invasion of the Capitol Building was neither violent nor politically motivated.
"Yes, that's them over there officer"
My desktop user experience with Mint Cinnamon was as close to delightful as I've ever had on Linux. All the GUI stuff worked without me having to fiddle around in the terminal like a "hacker", the UX was generally high-quality, and the default theming was pretty and consistent.

My overall impression was that it was definitely and surprisingly usable for non-technical people like my mom, grandma, etc. who don't use their computer for anything sophisticated but also don't have the time/energy/wherewithal to debug and configure things.

I can't speak highly enough about the Mint Cinnamon experience, and I recommend that everyone involved in the "Desktop Linux" world try it (at least in a VM) so they can get a sense of what "good defaults" actually look and feel like.
That's a good theory, but it doesn't always work that way. I was working on the most profitable product the company had, but was laid off anyway. The new 6 month CTO had a new idea for how software development should be done and I wasn't part of it. Meanwhile at my prior job in IT my boss begged me to stay, I think because I made him look good.
I can agree with that. But I could say that about things in Windows and MacOS too. It's not like Gnome is unique in this regard. In some regards Linux is more advanced than Windows or MacOS, does that mean Windows and MacOS users are "used to mediocrity" as the article says?

As for not wanting to upload the wrong one, doesn't the file picker show a preview of the selected file? Sure, not as good as thumbnails, but it should be enough to avoid the problem.
How do they enforce the code of conduct on E2E encrypted rooms?
Anki can be a supercharger, if you have notes that are clear and concise.
I love Axios. It also looks like they might even try to be more than a news outlet, but more of a tech company. I signed up to access this tool, would love to try it out for our clients.

https://www.axios.com/hq
First off, you keep saying that this problem was "caused by capitalism". It isn't / wasn't. You might've missed it, but the USSR wasn't exactly a bastion of environmental conscientiousness. This problem is caused by people wanting better lives and / or more stuff. This is not a unique property of capitalism, this is a result of humanity at scale. You are confusing correlation with causation. Of course every problem is correlated with capitalism, almost every society on earth is now capitalistic so any problem is "capitalism's fault" – except it's not, because the problems would still exist with any other economic system we've tried, as is clearly demonstrated by every non-capitalist society that has ever existed which invariably used lots of fossil fuels if they had anywhere near a decent standard of living.

You rightly point out this is an energy problem. That is why we need to go full tilt on nuclear. Nuclear can generate vast amounts of energy with near zero CO2 emission and also without requiring vast swaths of land (solar), localized geological features (hydro), etc.

Finally, I haven't proposed we "solve this with capitalism". Please go back and re-read my first comment, where I say we need to solve this with:

1. Electrify everything.

2. Lots of nuclear (fission), with fusion sooner rather than later.

3. Carbon capture.

Nowhere is capitalism stipulated. Of course, I do actually think capitalism is the way to go, because it is the best system we've ever invented for promoting efficiency, which is obviously a good thing in this discussion. But that was not the point I was making.
I'm not even in the US, but all of this banning makes me really curious about what's being banned and why.

Something that some of you may have missed: This banning thing already moved into the infrastructure/cloud services layer (AWS):

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25707959
And on the flip side, the Democrats have been clutching pearls about the monopoly of big tech, but once big tech starts silencing their political opponents they come rushing to big tech's defense and talk about how much they believe in free markets.

It's entertaining as hell.
Anybody know whether a EU national living outside of the EU can sign this? Not obvious from page
First they banned those they deemed to have wrong think from Social Media, crying Build your own Social media, it is a private company...

So they did, but the totalitarians were not satisfied, so then they banned them from app stores users used to connect and find the new service... crying Build your own service it is a private company

So they did, but the totalitarian were not satisfied so they banned them from the network infrastructure used to connect them to the service... crying build your own network infrastructure it is private company

So they did, but the totalitarians were not satisfied so they banned from the payment services used to generate revenue for the service... crying build your own payment service it is private company

So they did, but totalitarians were still not satisfied, still hiding behind the "but its a private company" the totalitarians continue to demand anyone that disagrees with them be banned from all services everywhere all the while screaming that they are not in fact totalitarian, no they are upholding freedom for all...

see in 1984 war is peace, freedom is slavery, ignorance is strength
Quite. This is not a political debate. This is about enforcing TOS which explicitly ban use for criminal acts.

The fact that the criminal is the President of the United States and his enablers is incidental to the principle.

No one wants to ban any reasonable political views. But when a political party organises public mass violence, subversion, insurrection, murder, intimidation of public officers, the attempted overthrow of a legitimate election, among other crimes, that party - and especially its leaders - loses all claims on the patience of the public and on the tolerance of private sector service providers.

Attempts to turn this into a debate about political censorship are not being made in good faith. The reality is that criminal acts took place on a scale that was truly shocking.

Anyone who provides goods and services of any kind to the individuals and organisations responsible has a moral and legal duty to stop doing so - immediately.
Yeah ok.

I think the OP was talking in the context of saving, where searching during the "save" process seems a much less frequent occurrence than giving the name to the file you are trying to save (which presumably you have to do 100% of the time).
This is not Reddit. Flagged for rules violation, no politics.
You've subtly avoided answering the question I asked. As far as I know, there was one (abandoned) police precinct burned. Was the burning of an abandoned building avocation for violence against police officers?
This is an insane bug (or feature?), drives me crazy every single time
I buy this argument as the law currently stands, but this is also such a moral double standard (Colorado bakery for instance).

Also, how far do we go with this reasoning? Stripe and PayPal refuse service so they're supposed to "Go build their own" (it costs billions to create a new service like stripe or PayPal that can compare). AWS shut you down? Build your own data center... (Again, costs millions or billions). What if next Intel or AMD decides to not sell you processors? Go build your own fab and develop your own hardware? What if the silicon miners won't sell you silicon, are you now supposed to go build your own mine?

The issue isn't that companies have a right to do it, it's that there are no viables alternatives to these large duopolies, and that "creating your own" is not an alternative.

What happens if the party in power next decides to attack religious organizations who congregate during that pandemic with the same type of concerted de-platforming? What if it's people who advocate against raising taxes who are next as deemed "morally corrupt"?

It's not hard to imagine this type of anti competitive, semi-concerted effort to de platform a new company being targeted at other things in the future. We need laws to catch up to our modern society and either break up the monopolies or put a lot more protections around the types of discrimination that are illegal, which should include political affiliation (this is law in California for employment discrimination so it's not that far fetched of an idea).
Amazon, Walmart Tell Consumers to Skip Returns of Unwanted Items
And yet Apple and Google have never taken any action against twitter despite similar content over the past four years threatening or organizing violence on twitter - content which is still there to this day.

America has fallen into an Orwellian society. Would have never thought that possible, but to see the number of people supportive of such a society is mind boggling.
Those statements, one from William Barr and one from trump, turned out to be false.

The pigs in blankets quote is from a peaceful 2015 protest. Trump lied about it in a Presidential debate.

The officers sight returned.

Edit: in response to this, you provided a video that doesn't include

> throwing IEDs at cops while hundreds of people chant "pigs in a blanket fry em' like bacon" and try to set fire to the building the police are in violent?

As far as I can tell, it's someone throwing a firework at the side of a stone building, which while not a great idea isn't endangering anyone. And "fry em like bacon" no where to be found.

Please don't spread lies.
I don’t think this is really headline newsworthy anymore. It’s like reading a headline saying the sky’s blue.

The problem is that the Capitol Riots represent the extreme 1/2 of ALL America. Not just the ones below the mason Dixon. ALL America. That suggests 1/2 the capitol police (and seemingly the few in prominent leadership roles) saw this as that rowdy kin coming over for dinner. Obnoxious, but they’re kin and harmless.

I think it shocked them when they realized the “movement” they believed in contained the same flaws they where belligerently screaming was wrong with the “other side”. No one wants to see that touchy feely uncle Larry is actually the same monster as the Larry guy that’s now in jail for rape.

They had blinders on and they where rudely awakened.
I would advise holding off judgement on specific individuals unless you have worked with them closely and you have a deep understanding of why certain decisions were made.

Again, if you are a developer and you disagree with someone's choices, you are free to take it in your own direction. You do not have to work on anybody else's stuff if you don't want.
The videos of massive numbers of bricks being thrown at the Chicago cops, the expose on Rose City Antifa, and the murder of antifa opponents complete with film crews and diversions say otherwise.
If that does happen, if they were to abandon oversight of Big Tech over this, that would be soulless and wrong. I just don’t see how you know this will happen.
Since what grandparent is actually encoding in there statement is the implication that the Black hires aren't deserving of their hire rather than desirable Black hires aren't selected for
I encourage everyone to enable “showdead” in this thread to see which standards are being applied for flagging.
The FBI says one the biggest threats is domestic terrorism.

> In recent years, federal authorities have described American extremists as the most urgent terror threat to the country and beefed up resources against them, carrying out a wave of prosecutions this year to head off potential violence as the presidential election approached.

https://www.propublica.org/article/domestic-terrorism-a-more...
I understand your viewpoint, but I'm asking where you draw the line for who counts as the intolerant?

If the risk is society's destruction as you say, then I'd imagine you'd be motivated to cast a pretty wide net for who counts as intolerant (who thus should be sanctioned and not given equal access to services until they fall in line). After all, anything can be justified to save our society from destruction, correct? It seems like it'd be better to be safe than sorry, with the stakes so high as you mention.

Are there any conservatives/republicans and their associated organizations that you think should maintain their equal access to services, and shouldn't face some sort of penalty for either directly/indirectly supporting an ideology that led to the events of January 6th?
What mob? The one what wants to hang Mike Pence? I'm not a Trump supporter but as a Christian I admire Mike Pence as a person, even before he supported Trump.
can you link to any content on Twitter where people are organizing violence?
> Freedom of speech has nothing to do with newspapers or news, and never has done.

If somebody speaks in the woods, and there's nobody there to hear it, do they make a sound?

Yes, they technically have free speech, but in reality not really.

The purpose of speech is that you might persuade somebody else. If there's nobody to talk to, you might as well not speak at all.
There's a lot of discussion around the motivating example but the thesis is as follows:

"This is why Free desktop operating systems are a joke and haven’t been popularly adopted. It’s little things like this that add up. Why was there a Windows monopoly? I think it’s a stretch to just blame it on OEM bundling. No, it’s legit because there isn’t anything else."

The thesis is incorrect. There was Mac, OS/2, BeOS, Amiga, DEC, Solaris. It was the OEM bundling and the illegal anti competitive behaviour for which Microsoft was found guilty. This was quite plainly the reason why Microsoft became dominant on the desktop.

If it were about quality, surely everyone's favourite UX would have been dominant. But it isn't; it sits around the same usage stats as Linux.

And while bugs exist in GNOME and Gtk, I'm not personally moved by a chan board user's gripes about being unable to quickly find their favourite anime memes to post since all their images are `[1-9][0-9]*.png`
I’m genuinely interested in hearing about any examples of such businesses you might have.
So many posts are getting brigaded this weekend. Removing this one now too.
Interesting. The G502 has the middle-click on the scroll wheel and the wheel-mode is a separate one. Presumably like in your G703.
Where was the "we love you, we know how you feel, please go home peacefully" rhetoric in June? Imagine the inroads that could have been made if Trump actually cared about injustice against Americans! Instead he stoked the fire, and saved his adoration for his cronies to throw them under the bus when they failed to secure him his position as unelected president.
That's what I'm saying. Where was the outrage when Pornhub was banned? If they're not a utility when they kick off Pornhub, how can they possibly be a utility when they kick off Trump? You don't get to have it both ways.
I don't think it is a totalitarian issue. One problem is that the SEC and FTC have sat on their hands in the 21st century. There is no competition anymore. At worst this leads to party supporting companies in each market who will still allow it.
The problem is those people are already radicalized, and if you give them what they want out of fear, then they’ve already won
Catholics have no problem with drinking, so yes. The monks who brew also drink.
Mistrust is already there. It is too late. Force is the only way forward. Even they agree with this notion, otherwise they wouldn't storm the capitol. Everyone is just playing according to the rules.
I hope these are things which remain in place when Biden gets in, and aren't bargaining chips for low hanging fruit.
Chinese study: Most patients still show signs of 'long Covid’ 6 months later
> This is pretty clearly anti competitive.

No more than a Ford dealer buying a billboard outside a Chevy dealership. It's not anti-competitive to advertise in the same place your competition advertises.
I would wait for intergalactic filesystem support before adopting.

:)

Actually - I think this is pretty cool because it doesn't point to docker inc for the registry.

On the other hand, what I've always really wanted was a personal registry I could bootstrap and NOT go to the cloud (or the solar system or whatever) for binary images I run on my machine.

In other words - It would be nice to have a source-based docker, based on Dockerfiles not on docker images.
Does GNOME really bring in much paid support momey? In the past I have worked at a company that did have RHEL5 workstations with GNOME by default, but everybody I knew treated that as a joke and sshed into the workstations from their (Windows) Thinkpads or Macbooks. The desktop software on those workstations was unwanted and unused.
By that same definition the antifa riots are terrorism too then? Politically motivated violence - throwing explosives, setting buildings on fire, etc.

Yet I haven't heard that word used at all.
Interesting, could you point us to this definition? The Capitol attackers caused three to four orders of magnitude less damage than last summer’s racial reckoners, and I’m assured the latter’s actions were not terrorism.