skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The UDM is discontinued? I couldn't find anything on this, do you have a source?
Pasting as a reference as it came up deeper in the thread. https://www.thefactual.com/news
>freedom of expression is in fact a human right under the Universal Declaration of Human Rights

What are some other human rights?
Presumably for smartphones, 'reuse' would mean devices that get software updates for long enough they can go through 2 or 3 users.
Again, this is exactly the behavior I mentioned in the above post. When the general public raises the important question of how much extractive behavior there is in HFT and asks whether the benefits outweigh the value lost by disadvantaged parties, they get brushed off and told that they’re ignorant. Your response focuses on one specific technical allegation while casually admitting that yeah, maybe there’s another type of extractive behavior that happens but “don’t you know the difference between one technical definition of extractive behavior and another?” At the same time no actual answer is given to the core question — presumably the assumption being that unless you are in the HFT world you’re not qualified to have the question answered, even if it affects you and you’re paying for it.
We shouldn’t assume that human level intelligence implies human motives.

Most of our motives are arguably not the result of intelligence at all, but come from and are shared by our animal ancestors.

What motives an AI might have is an interesting question.
Same, the difference I had in my implementation was an added an 8 week moving average. This worked for most of the year and I think even holidays. What was considered normal for the week of Thanksgiving would not be considered normal for a summer week. This was relatively easy using SQL CTEs and windowing functions.

I also separately used a package in R called bsts (Bayesian Structural Time Series) for a different way of projecting seasonality on a trend to find an acceptable normal range. If the actual fell out of range then it was an anomaly. Great write up on the technique by Kim Larsen here: https://multithreaded.stitchfix.com/blog/2016/04/21/forget-a...
> There are also plenty of laptops that advertise high current phone charging while off, some of which do negotiation, some of which don't.

The laptop I had with an always-on charging port actually charged things faster in standby, because that turned off the negotiation.
Ah, I didn't know that! But it makes sense; their network is certainly large enough.
Although the questions posed here are thought-provoking, the notation of + and - feels a bit reductionist. In the vein of lambda calculus, it would be more interesting to determine the smallest, most atomic patterns with which you can compose plot lines that are broader in scope, but in a way that will maintain clarity as you compose more and more patterns together.

Additionally, categorizing events in a plot in terms of good or bad makes it difficult to apply this in general without very specific definitions. I know it may seem obvious that the boy getting the girl is a positive, but that is from the perspectives of the boy and girl. Stories are usually made of many characters whom all respond and feel differently about a given event, and the audience relates with that array of characters in a variety of ways based on their own life experience, identity, etc. that informs their idea of what is good or bad. When you are analyzing the structure of a plot, ideally this should be done in a way that focuses on aspects of the story that will not vary from person to person.
The page seems to have been updated recently to say 1000 instead of 150, definitely less than a month based on archive.org
My apartment looks like shit
Sorry, I whooshed.
The masses are asses.
Once but a refresh from an older save (and doing things in proper order) worked the second time.
live action is one well known one

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Live_Action_(organization)#S...
Although it isn't OSS, it's based on Linux and therefore semantically comprehensible by someone familiar with iptables, iptraf, etc. Unlike say IOS which will explode your brain.
They were before net neutrality was killed
Maybe there's a hobby in receiving their trading data and having software react to it — following milliseconds behind their trade.
I think I’d rather be banned by one company than the government, as a general rule.
> No that is wrong. "The investigation found there were over 100 contacts between Trump campaign advisors and individuals affiliated with the Russian government, before and after the election, but the evidence was insufficient to show an illegal conspiracy"

The fact that presidential advisers, among the US Senators, former diplomats, and foreign advisors, had contact with foreigners is not surprising in the least. I'd be happy to discuss any specific contacts that you find to be troublesome, though.

> Many of you also believed that Hillary was responsible for Benghazi and Republicans wasted millions of dollars and time on that investigation and yet she was not guilty.

The Benghazi investigation was undeniably an attempt, in part, to damage Hillary Clinton politically. The question of who was "responsible" for Benghazi is a matter of opinion. The question of whether there is evidence for Trump-Russia collusion is one of fact. That's an important difference.

Another important difference is the fact that the the lie-de-jour of the right--that the 2016 election was stolen--is currently being panned as anti-democratic, fascist, a danger to the very fabric of our nation, etc, etc., and we're told that his is because it is undermining our sacred institutions. Well if that's the case, it's odd that nobody seemed to give a shit that the Democrats did the exact same thing four years ago. After all, the lie that Trump colluded with the Russians is effectively the same lie--it's simply a different side of the same coin. This is very different from the Benghazi issue, which is, at worst, a run-of-the-mill political hatchet job.

> So [Manafort] and many other broke the law and went to jail for that, why is that a bad thing. Why did Trump pardon them though?

I never said that it was. Criminals should, of course, be punished. But this has no bearing on my point about Trump-Russia collusion, which is why I specifically mentioned it as a distraction. As for the pardons, who can say why Trump does what he does?

> How many people in the US went to jail because of the Benghazi investigations?

No idea...?

> Mueller did not say that Trump was innocent, why didn't he say that?

Who cares whether Mueller himself said Trump was innocent? In a system where the accused are innocent until proven guilty, his report said it for him. "[The report] did not find that the Trump campaign, or anyone associated with it, conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in these efforts, despite multiple efforts from Russian-affiliated individuals to assist the Trump campaign."

I'd be interested to hear your thoughts on the fact that almost 90% of Democrats were still convinced of the lie that Trump colluded with the Russians, and how that differs from the current right-wing mania about the 2016 election, which affects a much smaller proportion of the country.
This is the best short description of what the US and other Western governments are today. My only thing that puzzles me is why traditional authoritarian governments haven't copied them yet
> In the case of raining/not-raining, this is clearly (to me) absurd. One of the POV's is right and one is wrong. There's no need to say "some people say <wrong thing>". It's just wrong.

That depends on what your goals are.

Let's continue with the above metaphor, and assume "rain skeptics" make up half of the population.

If you want a chance of convincing them that things are more moist than would appear so -- then you get to invite their most credible voices to a stage which they agree is fairly moderated.

Not which you declare to be fair and as-unbiased-as-is-possible.

One which they agree is such. And, yes, that means both sides get to sacrifice in equal number several sacred barnyard animals.

Because if not, it doesn't matter what is true or not true. Those rain skeptics will increasingly polarize against you, to the point where you simply can not reach them at all.

If you are fine with this, then you are presumably okay with green-lighting extreme measures to "solve" the "rain skeptic problem", because that's the road the United States is on right now.
I bought in when it was $400, and sold it at $1,800 to use as a down payment on a motorcycle. :-)
That doesn't really help when transfering a file. That was one of the user cases where the author had problem with.
Quantified life was the rage here right before “mindfulness for profit”
Huh. What's the experience like? Eg are there any driver issues, or edge cases with unimplemented/missing bits of functionality?
> And it's a much nicer experience.

Well apparently the designers disagree! I guess we've just got a difference of opinion!
I think at this point anti-trust + regulation is inevitable for FANG.

this is good for Microsoft who has most to gain from their loss.
> fmap renderPost postList

for(var post: postList) renderPost(post);

Or

postList.stream().map(renderPost)
>Presumably if someone's viewpoint isn't represented in a debate, but rather outright maligned, then that person isn't going to trust the moderator and is going to feel free to find his own moderator. If rejecting neutrality is the cause, then it stands to reason that we can cure the problem in part or in full by embracing neutrality again.

I don’t fully understand your point here as it relates to the other poster’s comment. Are you saying that “we should embrace neutrality” in this context by entertaining the idea that it’s not raining outside when it clearly is? I don’t think that’s a solution.
Yeah I originally bought their hardware after being recommended it here. Really regret that now, as I realize it was just marketing doing work.

We are just as susceptible to the stuff haha.
Look at Ruckus
Google Sued by YouTube Rival Rumble over Search Rankings
Top Achievable New Year's Resolutions for Healthier and Happier Living
Conflating multi decade long concerns with the remaining few days of a presidential term is hardly a useful comparison.

A tech company banning a user isn’t equivalent to a new law on the statute either.
Xfce is stable, lightning fast, and best of all, its users never have to learn a new interface layout every other year.
Didn't weev serve time for the same 'crime' of iterating a URL and downloading the contents?
After having worked intensely with Ubiquiti Edge devices (their routers specifically), I'd recommend them time and again. Their Debian derivative EdgeOS is great to work with, both as an enabler for advanced administration, but also an approachable web ui (plausible to offload many issues to support desk without requiring insane amounts of dedication to the Craft).

For mad scientists though, the very open software stack is a good friend to have when 11th hour Requirements® dictate you must produce a rabbit without a hat, or rewrite your own domain-specific implementation to replace the Avahi service.

No experience with Mikrotic.

_On topic_:
With cloud news like this, it's nice to know about the availability of Ubiquitis' Network Management System[1] which you can host and run wherever.

[1]: https://unms.com/
> Now Republicans are the devil for not accepting this election?

Now? You do realize that the current president is the ringleader of birtherism, right?
Stop crying and grow your own stack. I beg you. I don’t want you to be shut down. I just want to stop hearing you whine about other people not using their resources on your behalf against their judgment. Go, build your safe space where no one can take it away. You have nothing to lose but your whimper.
You talked about giving people "air time", implying the context of an interview or debate.

you can either host the debate, or participate in it, but not both. I think there is leeway for a host to chase participants who give inadequate or evasive answers, for a variety of reasons, but there is a limit.

At the end of the day, you can't make anyone say what they don't want to, but you can make it obvious when they refuse to do so.

Consider the role of the host in BBC Question Time, for example.
> Would an outlet that dispassionately reported the fact that Trump lost the election

It would only need to reports the facts, WP-style, about what various election officials/authorities say.
New Year Resolution: Weight Loss Program with Natural and Healthy Holiday
Wireguard will help you work around this. Just tunnel ssh through it. You will still have nat failures but wg will reconnect and things will look stable to ssh.
I totally agree. Their situation looks untenable.

I'd love to know the risk-scenarios they considered. Could they imagine getting booted off AWS?
> Was going to respond that I recall the F-35 uses C++

AFAIK its critical flight systems are still in Ada, but it's a beast of a software platform. My company joined the effort last year and found that even our tiny area was an incredible mess of different technologies.

> Regarding choice of language, I've reached a level of general competence where I don't really find any intractable problems that I can't handle with my toolset. So part of this may be just personal preference where there's no justification for slogging through the cost of learning yet another language, especially if I don't find it fun to program in. I used to invest a lot of time in learning new languages but I no longer find this a good use of my time.

Personally I wouldn't learn new tools unless your existing toolset proved inadequate. But I'm pretty jaded at this point. Learning new techniques, on the other hand, I would never stop doing. Everything from design patterns to compiler design, from dynamic programming to category theory - it all has made me a better programmer regardless of the tools I have at my disposal.

> !) & 2)

I agree on 1, to a certain extent. The trouble with that approach is the development time of solutions is pretty excessive. Ironically probabilistic programming suffers from this same issue. I would be satisfied is software engineering was just actual engineering, which it isn't.

I don't think we'll achieve the transition of software into an engineering discipline until we have better methods of communicating to both the human and computer in parallel. My guess is we might be 50 to 100 years away still.
>But I'm seeing a bunch of articles about how the number of players one steam has fallen by X% and lots of others stuff not typically reported about on a game.

Guess you missed coverage of flops like Battleborn and Evolve. Loss of player count is a pretty common stat in articles about games with a popular, if not prevailing, negative perception.

Note that that's not to say that CP2077 is a flop or mostly disliked.
Harvard cracks DNA storage, crams 700 terabytes of data into a single gram (2012)
RDRAND is not the problem. The design failure is in assuming collisions don't exist. That's a poor design decision made by the developer that is directly the responsibility of the developer.

If this was a one-off bug in systemd, it could get a pass, but it isn't a one-off. Try to boot a Linux system using systemd when something is just slightly off, like one block device that's normally available is missing or when networking doesn't come up. systemd does not handle failures well, and it doesn't handle them because the main developer makes no effort to test failure modes. This incident is yet another example of this pattern of development style. When I write code, I have to make an effort to test what happens during unexpected failures. I expect the developer of the most critical component to booting a modern Linux system to do the same.
Don’t expect numbers to make sense when your state is far left.
This status quo is US companies gets to decide wait is fair speech. Obviously this is untenable for all other nations as it should be in the US as well.
Right there with you. Didn't sign up to watch a video of someone mutilating a corpse, and I didn't read your comment until it was too late. A content warning in general would be nice for these situations, as I'd probably click on "NSFW." May be a while before this catches on, unfortunately.
Almost every comment here is an attempt to distract from the real issue. One can only imagine the comments had HN existed when Marsh v. Alabama was decided. What if some racist wants to hold a meeting in my living room? So a company makes available a free space and then has to allow people to use that in a way they don't like? Kind of insane. Plus long lists of accusations against various US politicians, ways in which the US doesn't live up to the first amendment, etc.. And of course the utterly bizarre argument (but at least one that actually relates to the real issue) that forcing a company to allow speech on their property constitutes forced speech.
PyCaret 2.2: Efficient Pipelines for Model Development
You understand that r/politics has people from all over the world subscribed to it, and the viewpoints outside the US encompass a wild and untamed jungle of ideas that Americans cannot even fathom, let alone wrestle with on equal terms.

This might feel unfair to you, but perhaps it's not anyones fault, it's just that you're not very insightful to people who have been exposed to a broader tapestry of ideas.
I assumed the intention is to alert a driver who really needs to take a break. I don't see what other use it has, other than to annoy me when overtaking a cyclist.
I was talking about norms, not government action, FWIW. That's exactly what we used to have. There have been nutjob conspiracy theories throughout history, but what we used to have is expert consensus that told it was wrong. Somewhere along the line the experts (largely, but not exclusively, picked by the media) got neutered by the social media bubbles.

Again, there isn't any actual censorship happening. If you're a conservative you can say whatever you want about any conservative policy you want on any platform you want. The only people having trouble right now are the ones who want to talk about violent overthrow of the government.
I’m reminded of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communication_with_submarines#... where there’s just enough of a channel through the ocean to send a few symbols that mean something prearranged like “make contact ASAP.”
I believe there was a charger that would negotiate a higher voltage, but didn't notice when you unplugged the far end of the cable and kept the near end plugged in. Then you could attach a new device and possibly fry it. I'd file that under "poor implementation".
> It will be smart, but contain no infinities.

We think we can say that from physics, but we don't know what we don't know.
Yeah - a private company. Before them people found ways to communicate that didn't prey on the weak parts of human psychology. Why not use those methods now? Why is a private service provider beholden to any crackpot? Is the argument being made that the government should be in charge of how private companies moderate their content? Or just that you disagree with Facebook's choice? If it's the latter, that's fine, we can disagree. If it's the former you're getting into some awfully murky logical territory.
Courageous or not, politicians are never rewarded for admitting mistakes.
Aid agencies fear impact in Yemen after US terror decision
Well in your case with the New Yorker, they actually review and actively publish the information. Where is the peer reviewed check from Facebook? Where do these status' imply that Facebook supports and endorses them?

And what is the social difference between a publisher and a platform in terms of expected social responsibility? This distinction only now exists because people attempted to use a legal definition that isn't real. So, again, I think this entire line of thinking falls flat upon inception.

> But too often do we give Facebook a pass since it doesn't make the content, it only curates it.

But that is true, no? Do we honestly believe that between ML and a real person Facebook is validating and approving every comment on Facebook? I sure don't. Do we believe that Google is publisher because mailing lists can exist or because they allow an email to be sent while blocking perceived malicious emails? Is that not some form of validation that happens that we could imply makes Google a publisher of every email sent from GSuite?

I just don't agree that an algorithm is undeniably curation in the same sense as a newspaper. The process isn't the same, the intended outcome isn't the same, and the inherent approval of the content isn't the same. So while they may be like conceptually, they aren't the same functionally whether you measure it by the spirit or letter of the systems.

The idea of user moderation vs service based moderation is purely a feature set. If we don't like that feature set or it doesn't meet the needs of the way we use the service, the service sucks at it's job. The correct solution isn't to try and have all these convoluted/philosophical discussion around where to draw the line. The solution is to have a service that does it better get the userbase. Today people like Facebook because it already achieved a wide enough userbase, which lead to default integration into other services. It seems we are willing to trade convenience for expectations, which is an issue for the user, not the service.

Now, if we want to say that they practice anti-competitive market strategies and are monopolies, I can entertain that argument. It still does not require this discussion at all.
Some providers do this to force you to upgrade to business plans. Comcast business though, at least a while back, still had a limit too low for the office I worked. We switched to ATT business fiber and used our own GW.
Actually neither involves protected classes. At the time of the case, sexual orientation wasn’t protected. Fortunately, it was added as a protected class.

But even if it was a protected class at the time of the suite, I think the opinion was that religious rights (another protected class) come into play.

For me, this seems to expose that some people aren’t arguing from first principles but kind of change their position based on a pre-conceived notion.

So just like people now bringing up that looting isn’t so bad after the capital riot/insurrection were against rioting in situations over the summer.

It seems odd to me, or at least irrational, that someone could be against rioting for BLM purposes but for rioting for conspiracy theories. Or that someone could be against a baker’s ability to not serve a gay couple, but for a hosting company not serving an asshole megaphone company.

So just as people, rightly I think, were arguing that discrimination against sexual orientation should be a protected class and thus illegal; people now are arguing that net neutrality/free speech should have regulation, change in rights.

It’s not “ironic” in either sense.
On the other hand, you're 100% convinced that the FBI report is false.
So what you’re saying is if you know what you’re doing and you don’t log any clear text passwords it’s fine to not double encrypt?
no, because this example was site->site data transfer across the disconnecting link
Assuming the same tower height at both ends, and ignoring refraction due to the atmosphere, I get that you would need 1500 mile tall towers for Chicago to Tokyo. (I did miles rather than meters because my Google for the distance between them came back in miles and I was too lazy to convert).

For Chicago to London I get 560 mile tall towers.