skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
But there would still be a period of time where the spike protein was present in the body.

Are you saying introducing other markers as well would make the presence of the spike protein less risky? Why would that be the case?
That is definitely different, yes.
Even though Walmart also has a marketplace full of mystery sellers, at least they still offer a simple filter at the outset to limit your results to only things they sell directly. At Amazon, you have to have already put another filter on your search results to see that option.
I understand your point. My perspective on having easily accessible firearms for self defense is different indeed, and is also related to the law where I live : weapons must be stored in an approved safe that is bolted to the house.

I think the main issue with firearms and suicide is the easyness and effectiveness. For sure someone very sick and determined may find other methods. I don't know if it's easy to compare suicide rates and weapons usage among various countries. Perhaps with fewer guns USA would get a lower suicide rate among males. Perhaps not.

So yes it's your choice. From my perspective, having a easily accessible gun is not worth the risk for me and my family considering the data and the likelyhood of needing a gun for self defense.
> Keep in mind I'm at 'stayed at the Holiday Inn' levels of competence here

OT, but what does this mean or refer to? I'm curious :)
there's been a legal rom marketplace on the consoles most likely since before you were born
Neat page but pages are not universally better than apps. Each serves a different use case. When done well, an app can enrich possibilities in ways a page simply cannot.
this is quite an academic exercise since a decade of intensive research hasn't brought us close to working self-driving cars, much less 1x safe self-driving cars, much less 5x safe, nor is there any clear path to resolving this open research problem.
The Fed Unleashed a Mega Bullish Force for These Stocks
*Linux on the phone
You think we're doing something better than pattern matching?

That seems to be what I do most of the time. :-)
So Sweden banned gatherings of 50 or more people, while countries that banned order of magnitude smaller groups did an order of magnitude better. Allowing groups up to 50 isn't anything like a lockdown as understood in many other countries. Also I think it was never practically feasible to isolate vulnerable people as you describe. As far as I know, no country has successfully kept society open in this way yet also protected vulnerable people and it was reckless and irresponsible to try to do so.
For sure, and maybe he didn't give a toss in his later years, but for someone who spent a lifetime developing a reputation for style having his name become synonymous with crap, my guess is he had some regrets.
The preferred style for the title of these kind of submissions is something like "Paperless: create, customize and send documents to get them filled and signed". Post with weird titles usually get flagged.

It is nice that you add a comment like you did, explaining that you are the owner and are available to answer questions.
huh? ms making money on android. shocker
That might be their current stated preference, but I don't think it will be most people's actual choices. Imagine if self driving was available on every car right now with the press of a button and it was as safe or twice as safe as a normal driver. How many people would press that button, start texting, and just continuing to progress to paying less and less attention ?
People already don't pay the attention they should when driving or when using a driver assistant system.
I am unsure why you are supporting the irrationality of concepts like "milk is racist," or trying to convince me or anyone else reading that it is racist and that this stance is not utterly irrational, as you have no way of supporting it. Either you enjoy struggling over mintuae or you have given your mind over to people who will program you with headlines ("... and why that's a problem."). Remember, you replied to me. You have conceded that you do not have a reasonable stance, but you will stubbornly hold onto it based on some nebulous tautology that it is that way because someone said it is that way ... which is irrational enough for me to reject it.

Only witches support the idea that there are no witches, and we know what to do with witches, don't we? That's the historical precedent for the thought process you're trying to foist upon me. I recollect only a paraphrasing of a routine on how bad propaganda is laughably bad on its surface. It's purpose is not to convince, but to make you admit to yourself you have no reason to believe it, but also realize that you will repeat the propaganda anyway ... or else.

Having asserted to me that milk is racist, you will not be drinking it in the future, or purchasing it, I suppose.
Google increased their map-prices by 1400% in one night and Firebase-prices were also massively increased... Google also deprecated 223 of their services... Many other bad things happen. I don't trust them and will not give them a penny.
The future of iPhone charging is wireless. The current iPhone12 with MagSafe is the first of the new system. I predict future iPhones will have no physical ports at all, 100% wireless.
From a guy who learned, in high school, to set type and print pages the old fashioned way, with metal type. It was retro even back then. But what an art!

From my perspective the very concept of a typewriter-style space is an abomination wrought upon printing by the typewriter. Of course, typewriters were tremendously useful devices. I have no quarrel with them other than that.

Spaces in the retro printer world: There's this concept of the "em" or quad space. It is a square hunk of metal the same height as the letters in the typeface. We still have it in &emsp; and css rules like line-height: 1.25em;

We had five kinds of space in the lower case of the typeface. The "case" was a tray with dividers. If I remember right, they were

-- em (quad) &emsp;

-- en (half a quad) &ensp;

-- thick ( ~ 1/4 of a quad) the ordinary space and &nbsp; in most fonts.

-- middle ( ~ 1/5 of a quad) &thinsp;

-- thin ( ~ 1/6 of a quad in most typefaces)

-- numberspace (the same width as the numerals in the typeface, an early nod to <pre> for tables.

Notice that the precise widths of the thicks, middles, and thins are determined by the typeface's designer. Then and now.

Our teacher told us to set up body copy with thicks between words.

We then justified each line manually by putting two thins in place of a middle to add space, or one thin to remove space. Choosing where to adjust the space was an art. It was good to avoid rivers of space running down the page. (Adobe InDesign gives enough control to do this; I don't think other programs do.)

AFTER SENTENCES, we used ens for most copy, and ems for poetry and that sort of thing. I am pretty sure the two-space typewriter convention grew out of printers' ens or ems after sentences.

In the 21st century digital typefaces have contextual glyphs. That makes it easy for the FONT DESIGNER to choose the default spacing between sentences. That's as it should be. The rest of us should pass dot space to the font. The font designer "owns" legibility.

I, for one, have had a heck of a time unlearning the dot space space sequence I learned in high-school typing class.
It’s pretty poor if you wear glasses :(
What is buying khakis a reference to? Seems oddly specific
Apple Silicon (as you know) is AArch64. Given that OpenJDK already had AArch64 support (e.g. through years of Linux AArch64 support, but also OpenJDK for iOS) and macOS support, I would bet that it is mostly a matter of making the build infrastructure aware of the macOS + AArch64 combo. It's not like JIT, AOT, etc. need full new ports to Apple Silicon (in fact, the Azul builds were available pretty much immediately after the release of M1).
You are correct.

However, how many people get hurt is not the only thing that needs to be considered. It's very likely that when a self-driving car would be equally safe as a human driver, the people who die in accidents caused by the car would be different than those who would die in accidents caused by human drivers, and so you'd end up with situations where individual next-of-kin could make entirely legitimate claims after accidents that their loved ones would be alive if not for the hellspawn car.

Trying to convince juries that it's alright because for every person who die in the cars, two other people who would have otherwise died got to live would probably be tough. Especially as the accidents that the self-driving cars are most apt to prevent are ones that could at least partially be considered caused directly by bad choices made by the driver (DUI, distracted driving, falling asleep at the wheel).

Once the data gets good enough that you don't need to do statistics on it[0], it becomes a lot easier to sell the idea to the public.

[0]: Relevant xkcd: https://xkcd.com/2400/
Probably not. 2020.48.26.
What so many autonomous car advocates seem to miss is that it is nearly impossible to meaningfully compare relative safety with current self driving cars, because we don't have level 5 autonomy yet.

In order to compare them with current technology, you'd have to be able to answer the question: how safe would human drivers actually be if they didn't have to perform their most difficult tasks? Because that is what current autonomy does.

I'm willing to believe that current tech is capable of being safer than human drivers, simply because they do so many things way better than humans do, like stopping for pedestrians and safely navigating around cyclists. But to compare them in general, that is left to be proven. You can't just compare incidents per mile driven, because autonomous vehicles can conveniently opt out of driving whenever the task gets too hard.
I bought magnetic tiles for my kids for christmas, and in the box was a card promising me money if I left a 5 star review and forwarded proof that I left a 5 star review to the company's email.
A little, but not much:
https://phys.org/news/2014-01-discovery-quantum-vibrations-m...

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/01/140116085105.h...
For sure it is good to seek a measurable criterion. The question is whether laboratory subjects' views on the right level should have normative force. An alternative take is: these are just not-very-informed people, and unless they can give reasons for their views, we shouldn't take them seriously as inputs into the policy-making process.
I was disappointed that Mardi Gras Doubloons only date back to 1960 and don't link all the way back to these: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mardi_Gras_Doubloons
thanks for the link :)
I will check that. I certainly will try this using processing. There is already a video on youtube which details how to do this.
Weird that our experiences are so different. Do you mean Korean/Asian immigrants, or Asian-American?
Well I guess I will consider myself lucky. I learned my lesson with an amazon power cord for my Lenovo laptop. It charges fine but the casing around the electronics melted due to it getting so hot. It is my kids laptop and could have literally started a fire on him. I bought a new one from Staples and now won’t buy any electronics like that from amazon.
The last time I bought a "new" phone "Sold by: Amazon.com Services LLC" it arrived several weeks late, with a burned in screen, scuff marks, and randomly rebooting.

My impression is they did not have the item they were selling, and were relying on some presumably "trusted" reseller to provide it.

I ended up purchasing a used one in much better condition on eBay for several hundred dollars less where the condition at least matched the sale entry.
This should be calibrated to the risk the top X% of cautious/safe drivers, and exclude reckless, inexperienced, or intoxicated drivers. As a safe driver, you shouldn't have to accept risk calibrated to "average" (i.e. drunk, reckless) driver.
Congrats on having an idea, coding it up and releasing it as a library! You should be proud.

Now I'd like to respectfully offer a bit of constructive criticism. Your idea is fine, but I think the API needs some polishing.

1) The 3 letter names have to go. 'vec' is somewhat is established in graphics libraries, so you might get away with that, but 'lst' - seriously? Just use 'list', 'queue', 'map', etc. Don't invent your own terms for well-known concepts. It's ok if combined data types are a bit longer. 'list_queue' is fine and very readable, 'lst_que' is less so.

2) "#define P" is clunky for several reasons: a) why do we have to care about POD vs non-POD? is it impossible to get rid of that? b) for the same reason that just using "int p" is clunky; and c) imagine lots of developers actually using your library. It would be great if each one of them didn't have to look up what "define P" is (what would google results be?). My suggestion would be to do away with having to define it

3) multiple #define in front of an #include is verbose imo. It works, but it's not perfect. I'd shoot for perfect, but that's just me. I suspect this would require significant API change so I don't have a good suggestion at the moment, I just know that I personally would not prefer multiple #define calls before I include the list. I get that you're using X-includes, but a single #define is my limit before I groan, but other people's tolerance level might be different.

Cheers!
> The "will be exploited by few against the many" could be applied to any and all technologies.

Some technologies have a low barrier of entry and can be widely distributed. The long bow could pierce armor, and was cheaper (and I imagine easier to make) than armor. So technology can equalize, though more broadly, what sorts of technologies a society develops seems bounded by things like economy and warfare.

Penrose believes intelligence depends on understanding, and that understanding is essentially not computational, and I was persuaded by his writing. But that doesn't mean that the techniques we label as AI can't be pernicious or used in an exploitative way.
Eh? Just buying a CD wont give you commercial rights though?

EDIT: It seems the thing you need is a "Public performance license"
How do they classify something like this as safe for the long term if long term experiments are not conducted? Is there any substitute for time trials for drugs other than these new vaccines? These are the questions my relatives are asking me and my answers are I don't know, I don't. The scientific community needs to do a better job of communication. Why are we confident that a trial of only three months is sufficient when the only efficacy test for long term effects is long term trials?
Sensationalism will win out quite a bit. And responsibility. Its just a tough problem.

- People developing Bell's Palsy at the same rate with vaccine than not. But suddenly only those with the vaccine show up in the social media feeds. Because nobody just posts "I just got bell's palsy" but now they do because people are paying attention. Same will happen with AVs. "I just got into an AV accident" will make headlines, while "I just dozed off and hit a kid" will barely circulate.

- People inherently trust humans over technology. Just because. So they will be quick to distrust autonomous vehicles. I already had convos about the fact that yes, teslas do kill, but on the whole self-driving teslas do kill far less than non.

- When a human drives, the liability is on the human. When a car self-drives, the liability might be on the manufacturer.
> I can say, no, ... my definition of AI is "things that looked incredibly hard in 1990

So, magic?

"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."

— Clarke
Is it based on logseq?
It's interesting that many games show violence but not many show suffering and pain. People just drop dead when shot. Quake 2 had very painful death animations for the weakest enemies. Games that want a PG16 rating need to remove blood splashes.

In most game, your shots don't hurt bystanders. There are no ricochets and usually no civilians. No one's running away, putting out fires, crying over dead bodies.
"We arbitrarily chose a number so we could feel like we were making improvements. Nothing justifies 5 over, say, 3, or 10. When cars are in fact 3x safer, all those saved lives won't be saved, because our arbitrary 5 has yet to be reached."

This is meaningless and bad.
Theseus: An Experiment in Operating System Structure and State Management
Argentina Senate votes to legalize abortion
Source code at https://github.com/theseus-os/Theseus
Without meaning to comment on how possible it would be to carry out on a policy level, replacing the worst human drivers with robot drivers that match average human drivers should be an improvement for everyone.

It also potentially opens up policy options, or at least makes them easier to choose.
>Imagine if we rolled out robot policemen who only executed black people for no reason at the same rate as humans do.

Human cops still have to do the killing for now, but that's called predictive policing
We tried the same thing, in Canada, with the yellow fever vaccine. There were shortages about 6? 7? years ago, and 1/5th dosage was consider a stop-gap, by conveying some immunity.

(And, better outcomes overall, too)

Not sure how all of that wound up, but:

https://www.who.int/emergencies/yellow-fever/mediacentre/qa-...

edit: For clarity, there wasn't an outbreak in Canada, but just shortages if you wanted to travel, and needed the vaccine.
On the contrary, you can argue that button saves lives by doing a better job than the reckless drivers who aren’t going to pay attention in the first place.
I too use it on an older (2014) mbp, and it is fine for Rubymine.

I highly suspect the performance problems some people experience are due to plugins. When I was doing some Elixir/Phoenix work, the Elixir plugin made it unusable sometimes. Clearly that plugin had some serious issues which would appear at times. I have not had the same performance problems in Rubymine or in vanilla IDEA.
Behaving as a human would is often more important than staying strictly in line with absolute and relative positioning with a road.

The semi-permanent snow cover on many roads in 1/3 of the USA that lasts weeks if not months in duration. Humans driving on these snow covered roads form emergent lanes having little to do with absolute positioning or even relative positioning of the curb. They form lanes based on what other humans do.

Self-driving cars that depend on knowing absolutely where they are and relatively where they are simply don't and won't function. We need self-driving cars that can behave as a human will for that. And that is a long way off.

No autonomous car has shown it can handle these common situations. Until then self-driving cars should not be approved nationally and probably be restricted to the arid and warm states that do not have winter.
Anyone would know stripe's plan for cryptocurrencies?

They've invested in stellar[1] in 2014, a blockchain network that facilitate to move money more easily. And then stopped bitcoin support in 2018[2]. Then no news. I'm wondering if the efforts were only pushed by @gdb[3], then when he left (now openAI's CTO), they've somehow lost interest ? I'm really curious about what they think internally.

[1] https://stripe.com/blog/stellar

[2] https://stripe.com/blog/ending-bitcoin-support

[3] https://twitter.com/search?q=bitcoin%20OR%20stellar(from%3Ag...
It appears that he lives in the EU (Belgium).
I had to clean the lightning socket on my iPhone XS as it had some pocket fluff inside that prevented the cable from filling clicking in. Cleaning it was trivial, just some cardboard and a well positioned light source.

On the flip side, cleaning out USB-C sockets from the same types of fluff is a pain because the data pins are in an island in the middle of the socket. Which gives you both less room (is requiring you to use a thinner implement) but also a greater risk of damaging the socket.

USB micro had the same problems as well.

I really with USB would address this because, with the best will in the world, devices sometimes get dirty.
So far yes! I have to seek out the tables from each country's respective statistics aggregator. Hoping to add a few more in the coming weeks.
How is it hard to argue with that approach? I get that a lot of people LOVE Nintendo and their products but this is insanely shady. What would be your reaction if Apple hired private firms to stalk iFixit founders? Would it still be "hard to argue"?
But how false is that impression that we are safer than average? I don't drive drunk, drugged, tired or distracted. I avoid driving in bad weather. I make sure I have good tires and brakes. I don't intentionally speed. I bet most accidents are caused by the above. I'm not interested in a self-driving car that drives like it's checking its cellphone after 3 beers.
I can assure you that many lawyers worked on some boilerplate Ts&Cs that were applied here or that many lawyers reviewed the language on this specific page rather than a “random web guy”.
I appreciate you checking it out and for the comment!
Create a Website or Blog with Notion
Don't Use Protobuf for Telemetry
Sorry for the delay. I actually appreciate most art but pragmatically I’m most interested in art that software incorporates into its UX. Typically this is usually vector art or digital art, but a good example is what you might find on Dribbble but honestly most stuff on Dribbble is mediocre and derivative. So what I’m saying is that I’m interested in seminal art curations.

I signed up btw ;)
The dot symbol has ambiguity without extra spaces.

... Andrew W. Kent ...
... Andrew W. Kent ...

Mean different things. It’s rarely an issue, and not necessarily used correctly, but it is still a valuable tool.
Other bait-and-switch problems on Amazon are manufacturers and "brands" launching a product with high production standards, then switching them out with cheap, low-grade junk made with inferior components or materials later on. This is often coupled with rampant paid review scams, as discussed on HN (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25459434)

A twist on bait and switch is another manufacturer or reseller taking over the "buy box". This is how pirated items or used items sold as new get dumped on customers, with Amazon's full encouragement (lower prices for customers!) and non-enforcement/honor system for sellers. Legitimate manufacturers and brands can scream to the high heavens that they and customers are being ripped off, but Amazon does next to nothing to stop the bad guys let alone compensate customers and brands who were cheated.

Case in point: Bill Pollock's experience having his Python books repeatedly pirated (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19199135)
gah. Why not multiple physical displays?

A dashboard in front of the driver providing status is better in every way. (immersion, safety, security, ergonomics, etc)

Put it on the performance models only or charge $5k or both. People will pay it.
On a different note, some research must be done to investigate such low prevalence and fatality ratio in countries like India and Pakistan.