skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Adscend | Dollarade
LeadBolt's content unlocking technologies are simple, easy to install. provides technology to monetise your website for Publishers. To know markerting statergies like Affiliate marketing,Online marketing for more details please visit us.
The whole thing presumably, otherwise he'd have qualified that statement further. How about you try something more constructive. Tell us what you think, and I'm sure bdhe will jump in and elaborate further if they feel the need.
Not just once, but in other variations too (e.g. "prn hub" and "orn hub")
I like NSD as an authoritative server.
For a recursor, I would go with either Bind or Unbound.
مشاهدة مباراة مانشستر يونايتد وبرشلونة بث مباشر 28/5/2011
Recent developments in the 'Google Platform' front (new App Engine price structure, API shutdowns, crippled Google Apps Standard offering, etc) severely dented my belief on a "full cloud" future. Perhaps we shouldn't outsource (== depend) too much to cloud vendors.
"My dad loved routine. He rolled his sleeves up exactly the same way every morning. He went to work at exactly the same time every day. It was what gave him the freedom to think."

Wow, I've never thought about routine this way.
In the "Techstars book" (Do More Faster), they write:

> We often talk about the Number One startup killer at TechStars—making a product for which there is no interesting market. TechStars accepts just 10 of more than 600 startups that apply and presumably they are among the best. But still, we find that at least one-third of those startups are attempting to build a product that they want, or that no one wants, instead of what the market wants

So it seems the ability to select a good idea is by no means something to discount. Lots of people can code "pretty well", but it appears that it's more difficult to come up with even a "pretty good" idea.
Who claims to be the "facebook of porn"? reminds me of an xkcd comic ...

Edit: http://xkcd.com/624/
Indian Wedding Planners 
Planning is very essential to achieve grand success for any event. We can do proper rehearsal and quality arrangements for our dream occasion. Every one think of each and every aspect to make that most awaited events whether it is birthday celebration , wedding or even Date with someone .
What matters is whether or not the new version is a realistic option for new projects. It is not. That can't be the goal and if it is, the goal is crap.
The article talks about how Western Union telegraph was taken over by essentially one person, which in turn thoroughly destroyed the credibility and trust in the system. I can imagine something similar happening to the internet, and some people are already wary of this (that is why we have so many projects along the lines of Tor/Freenet).

There's also a troubling story of how freedom of press was stifled despite the technology. Doesn't this sound familiar in context of Youtube videos of demonstrators being taken down, recently, in England?

And finally, as mentioned in the article, this is a concrete instance where freedom was not essentially a zero-sum game, which meant, regulation by the government was not necessarily a bad thing. This squarely addresses some arguments made today about Net Neutrality among other things by people who favor a more laissez-faire approach.
Unfortunately for all involved, the poor are people too and to decide to make their lives as uncomfortable as possible in order to force them to get a job is maybe logical but certainly not a kindhearted thing to do.

Furthermore, it is likely that in many cases the very poor don't work because they are unable to -- mental illness is a commonly cited factor, but these days it's hard for anyone to get work -- particularly those lacking high school degrees, for instance. If someone cannot work for such a reason, then by attempting to punish them for not working you simply reduce their already-slim ability to contribute to society.

Edit: removed rudeness
rich is not measured as a percentile! If you take rich as a percentile, then yes 250k is rich.

If you take an absolute measure of rich and compare cost of living, 250K is really not that much. Especially after taxes and the ilk.
Bowtrol Reviews
Before You Buy Bowtrol or Any Colon Cleanse Product, Read This Exclusive Review Of Bowtrol Colon Cleanse First. It Will Save You Time And Money! Check it out http://herbal-remedies-reviews.com
Highlighting Bare Essentials with Minimalist Design Brochures
With the aid of desktop publishing software and the now commercially available high-end printers, virtually anyone can design and print out his own marketing materials. It’s such an ingenious invention that even the not so skilled can also do things with these tools like magic, isn’t it? But there is just this one little danger that the small business owner should be wary of: an over-the-top and costly design.
I guess "Nibbleonmy____likearatdoescheese.com" was already taken.
See how does the Chinese government treat its people [video]
>There were certainly outlaws, but most people were there to farm or mine or provide goods and services to farmers and miners. Those businesses needed clear laws about who owned a piece of land, so a complete set of laws evolved.

Exactly. It's not just businesses, but it's also everyday people who aren't HN readers who want the Internet to work in a stable and predictable fashion. They didn't grow up developing services at the edges of the network; they are the people who use email and play Farmville and are just fine with that. They want their GMail to work without spam, they want viruses to stop, and they don't want to be spied on. These are not unreasonable demands. It's just that they happen to clash with the people who read HN and want the network to be free to grow around the edges rather than from the center.

The book Wild West 2.0 (http://wildwest2.com) talks a lot about this evolution. When we wrote it, we didn't realize that we were going to make the idea of naming worse -- we just thought it was a useful metaphor for the self-reliance and self-defense angles of the Internet. [Full disclosure, I am a co-author]

Zittrain's "The Future of the Internet and How to Stop It" (http://futureoftheinternet.org/) is also a great resource for this culture clash between open and closed frontier models of the Internet and how reasonable demands ("stop spam") lead to solutions that clash with the HN view of the Internet.
Where's Waldo: Matching People in Images of Crowds
All the machinery of functional programming languages that's creeping into non-FP languages is great. I actually think that FP one-liners are usually _more_ transparent than the corresponding non-FP loop.

However if I'm not mistaken an important point of FPLs was to eliminate side-effects and that the ultimate goal was program verification (not validation). I.e. you could prove a program correct in the mathematical sense. That seems still a long way off.
Know the Home Market Price
This is a very helpful topic making potential buyers/sellers & investors understand the techniques to find the exact worth of the ready property that is under consideration for selling/buying.
What is market price?
In short words it is a price that buyer pay to seller of the property who owns it.
Property price affecting points
Rough condition of home, inappropriate size, old design, sanitation problem, and don’t have its own road etc.
73-622 exam,Microsoft PRO 73-622 braindumps training materials - exam1pass
73-622 exam,Microsoft PRO 73-622 braindumps training materials - exam1pass
The concept may turn out to be a game-changer: group/daily discounts.

I think Groupon is too generic; you could easily focus on verticals like food, hit the big pain spots for retailers and deliver a better fit than Groupon.

The reason Groupon won't counter is that takes them too far off their generic script. Plus the food focus means all the sales contacts are foodies, too.

A great idea, and deeper discounts too! $10 for $20 content is not nearly as appealing as "free donut today" (upsell on milk or 2nd donut).
Doubtful. It is more likely they don't feel they're ready to strategically invest the capital (going IPO is to gain capital for the company mainly).
Designer Eyeglasses Arlington Virginia
Avisualaffair specialized in provide the selection of color contact lenses for light and dark eyes, Ophthalmologist Arlington Virginia, Optometrist Washington DC and many more for the best price.
One problem with this framing is that almost any idea interesting enough to base a company around will almost certainly change during the execution. The original idea for Twitter wasn't anywhere near what it became, and you can say the same thing about Facebook, Youtube, or pretty much any of the other Big Things to happen recently (some exceptions of course: PageRank was and is still mostly just PageRank).

Thus, the execution is a central part of the "idea" process. Being an "idea" person without being an "execution" person leaves you open to a bunch of dangers - the biggest one being a sense of inadequacy. If all that you bring to the table is your idea baby, it will be really hard to kill it off and go with something else, even if it's the best decision. So either be good at "adapting" your idea, at times to the point of complete transformation, or start learning to execute.
How to handle 1000s of concurrent users on a 360MB VPS
I have 3 stations. 2x (2 24") and 27". One 2 24" is landscape portrait where the the other is dual portrait. I think I prefer having two monitors. It is really nice to have a terminal window, docs and IDE open all at the same time. Having the code on the vertical portrait monitor is nice (140+ lines visible at a time).

Bezels were never a problem for me.
> Why couldn't they reuse the same resolution operator for all three, even if it's not the period character?

It may have been possible to do that when the language was originally designed but PHP has taking the long road to getting real OOP. PHP3 had objects but no inheritance; they were really just structs with functions. PHP4 added a lot more ability but, for reasons of compatibility, left a few things unchanged that should have been changed. PHP5 fixed most of those remaining issues and continues to add more features with every release. PHP wasn't designed all at once and things were added as developers demanded them. It was just supposed to be a procedural languages like ASP/VBScript but as a mix of C and Perl; all this object oriented stuff wasn't in the original plan. It now has namespaces and exceptions and all kinds of things that nobody imagined it would ever have. So they can't use one operator for all because each operation compiles down to something different (each from a different time) and that difference needs to be known at compile time without the benefit of knowing what the symbols resolve to.

> Other people -- who probably use and enjoy other languages -- raise issues with PHP that point at poor design.

This is a poor argument. I use and enjoy many other languages. In fact, I'm hardly doing any PHP development right now but I've got half-completed side project I'd like to finish. There's no argument: PHP has a poor design. But if you put things in the context of history, there is reason for that poor design.

> Then you respond with a rationale for why the well-designed thing couldn't be done.

I'm just stating the facts. In this case, it's not like they're going out of the way to be difficult but they have to work with what they have. If you have a time machine we could solve this once and for all.

> that doesn't make it a good decision in retrospect.

Of course, but hindsight is always 20/20. Perhaps Python should have had unicode to start with and should have never made print a statement instead of a function. Perhaps templates were not the best way to add generics to C++. See, we can play this game all night.

> Do you mean that other languages can be compiled to PHP more easily? Because I have never heard this rationalization before.

Yes. That rationalization was one of the reasons for adding it although more in the context of targeting parser generators (like lexx and yacc) to PHP. Even Dijkstra didn't think that goto should been banished from all languages forever.
I have just read the post and have to say that I would appreciate the post containing a more accurate description of the testing methodology. Some of the techniques described are known in interpreter optimization and his description of "threaded code" intepreter is actually not consistent with what it usually means (viz. threaded code interpreters have nothing to do with "threading" the decode for the successor instruction into the operation implementation of the current instruction, but just moving instruction decode and dispatch into the operation implementation.)

Aside of that, there have been papers detailing the software pipelining approach (cf. Hoogerbrugge et al.: "A code compression system based on pipelined interpreters", 1999), but I cannot for the love of god imagine that the loop shown in there is faster than a JIT compiler for a very simple reason: each of the interpreter operations is invoked via a function pointer, which means that the compiler emits an indirect branch instruction for implementing this. Now, these indirect branch instructions are very costly, and a simple JIT compiler could just take the actual values (callee target addresses) of the input program and generate direct call instructions instead. (And I am not even talking about inlining the function bodies of the operation implementation.)
feedback for my start up in making
A rentable space of semantically related knowledge objects with shorter noise/signal ratio ,learning curve while problem solving by reference.
Most articles which argue over ideas vs execution really are about equity. They are about business people who have no interest in technology attempting to do business in technology.

Does the 'idea guy' deserve no equity or less equity? Thats the question to be answered.

The problem I have with something like 'ideas don't matter' is I think it misleads some people to over value their contributions. And when someone puts the additional weight of Paul Graham behind it, its difficult to negotiate.

(One may argue that the odds of a startup succeeding are really low and people should not worry about equity etc. But really thats the first step unless you are starting up with buddies. Don't you think?)
Software Bootstrapper's FAQ, episode 1
Why would Munch On Me take publicity so early in the game when they don't even have the volume to defend against copycats?
"And so Mozilla has to compete with IE6 which will eventually make Firefox better and in the end the web wins"

That is exactly what happened. That's how Firefox was born if you remember. IE6 was dominant and Firefox rose from Netscape's ashes to challenge it and it turned out to be a very good thing.
Great Documentary on Microsoft Kinect
Intuniv Review
Intuniv (guanfacine) extended-release pill was approved by FDA (Food and Drug Administration) for the use as stimulants to adjunctive therapy for the treatment of ADHD in children.
> The fix for this is that foreach should create a new iterator variable which overwrites the existing one.

That would be very strange behavior though that has no equivalence in any other part of the language. I'm sure if it did that, somebody would put on the list of things that PHP does weirdly!

> That would preserve expected behavior.

I'm afraid the behavior it has is the expected behavior. The problem isn't the language in this case.

> Just the volume of it makes me incredulous that you don't think PHP == FAIL (or perhaps === if you like).

Clearly you haven't been paying attention to my posts. I might be rationalizing some of these sort of ridiculous ones but I certainly don't think PHP is full of win. I'm just pragmatic. These problems just aren't that bad.
Specifically, it doesn't work with Comcast's DNSSEC-enabled recursive nameservers, which Comcast will eventually move all of its customers to:

% dig +noall +comments +stats pzxc.com.
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: SERVFAIL, id: 14316
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0

;; Query time: 161 msec
;; SERVER: 75.75.75.75#53(75.75.75.75)
;; WHEN: Sat May 28 02:38:43 2011
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 26

joyeur.com, Joyent's blog, has the same problem:

% dig +noall +comments +stats joyeur.com.
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: SERVFAIL, id: 57255
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0

;; Query time: 133 msec
;; SERVER: 75.75.75.75#53(75.75.75.75)
;; WHEN: Sat May 28 02:40:38 2011
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 28

Both pzxc.com and joyeur.com have CNAME records.

So, yeah, using CNAMEs on your domains works great, except for all those times it doesn't work at all, like with the largest residential ISP in the United States.
Green Home Builder
In our brand new green house an average monthly savings on energy, water, lawn maintenance and homeowners’ insurance is about $200. This means that you can save an average of $2,400 per year, or $48,000 in 20 years.
Beyond Badges: 3 Smart Ways to Gamify Your Startup
Seo companies chandigarh 
Get guaranted huge amount of traffic on your website with some latest and skillfull seo services of mywebdesignz.com at an affordable prices.
Only if you're listening to Top 40 hacks.
This article disgusts me. The internet really doesn't need its brightest minds spending their free time creating spam. How can you even suggest that's a good thing?
Spring 06 ?Isn't too old?
This stuff never gets old. Those who don't know history are destined to reinvent it.
That was not a replacement but a completely different product with superficial simalarities and the same name.
The path was not a migration path but a runaway path.
Quite an interesting set of reading list. As I browsed through the list, it seems like ideas in the paper "The Case for Co-Operative Networking" might be relevant now, especially in the light of Internet Censorship.
Patent troll Lodsys also threatening Android devs
The above goes for me as well. You might not have meant for it to be that way, but you just happened to use a pattern of sentences used by people with hidden criticism quite frequently.
I'm not saying that anyone here used it with racial intent. I'm saying that I believe the word originates from an intent to disparage people who live in ghettos, i.e. certain minorities.

I'm talking about what it what the connotations of something being ghetto are -- especially when I someone is being accused of ghetto behavior.

In some parts of the country, "Aunt Jemima" (and "Canadian", I've heard) are used as slurs against black Americans. The dictionary definition standard would permit this, since Aunt Jemima is only the name of a brand of maple syrup.

The notion that the dictionary defines what is an isn't racist is wrong. Dictionary definitions trail modern usage, they don't lead it.
But it does stop them from poisoning (if not from blocking) results we get from DNS servers that are still trustworthy.
OK,
thanks for the link :).
Do you have any other good resource to learn P2P?
I will argue that simple text editor does not usually equal simple + powerful. Most "simple" text editors (think Notepad) are just plain simple.

Emacs seems quite simple to me, actually. Intimidating at first, sure. Complex to master, but simple to use.

Then again, there's an obvious difference between something that is difficult to learn and something that is difficult to use. In fact most tools require training at first to use them, and Emacs is not any different.
> This is a poor argument. I use and enjoy many other languages.

Not suggesting that you don't use good languages (unless you use and enjoy PHP). Just saying where other people are coming from.

> Of course, but hindsight is always 20/20. Perhaps Python should have had unicode to start with and should have never made print a statement instead of a function. Perhaps templates were not the best way to add generics to C++. See, we can play this game all night.

The only response I really have to this is that, when some other language teams realize they need to change, they have a better process for setting the future direction of their language.

Much of the fail you describe as being the result of accumulation is really, in my mind, a failure to set or predict the direction of the language.
Eventbyrå | event göteborg | Konferens västkusten
Ocean Group är en eventbyrå med bas i Göteborg. Vi arbetar med att hjälpa våra kunder att stärka sina relationer med kunder och även med den egna personalen. Våra medel är att arrangera konferens, företags kickoff, events, upplevelser och teambuilding. Vi har arbetat med Västkusten och Bohuslän under många år och anser att detta är en unik arena för konferenser och events.
What about the middle ground of structured probabilistic/statistical models? By introducing strong assumptions and prior information you create models that still have great flexibility, but have meaningful parameters which can be interpreted theoretically. These appear to me to solve both Chomsky's apparent non-interpretive model complaint and the technical problem of training a model with a large number of parameters.

On one end of the continuum, n-gram models for large n with infinite training data estimate the empirical distribution of language and thus are the best you can possibly do. On the other end, rule based grammars directly transcribe intelligible "rules" of language generation and comprehension. Both ends are clearly fraught with problems.

In the middle we have topic models, recursive grammars, decision trees, various ad-hoc smoothing methods, each of which both allowing for more tractable training and introducing more meaning to the parameters of the trained model.

I feel like effort here provides (somewhat unsatisfactory) answers to both criticisms. I think it's fair to say that probabilistic/statistical models deserve more attention in a lot of fields in order to overcome a history of neglect, however.
What makes me sad is that even though I feel affronted by PHP's crudeness, inelegance and inconsistencies… I keep using it for a lack of another language that suits me personally.

I hate PHP's runtime and core libraries. But I really like the C-inspired syntax. I use Objective-C as my main other language, and something about Ruby and Python's syntaxes seem to rub me the wrong way. I'm giving Node.JS a whirl these days—and while I might be able to get used to closures everywhere, I don't know how to feel about the lack of true object orientation.
How Facebook pushes updates to the site
Here is a nice course by rtm: http://pdos.csail.mit.edu/6.824/schedule.html

Also you might want to know about Kademlia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kademlia and Tonika: http://pdos.csail.mit.edu/~petar/5ttt.org/ (both by petar)
"The laws about tobacco, food and drugs, to name some glaring examples, are not well aligned with the public interest."

Indeed. And now that you mention it, all those lobbyists headquartered up and down K Street represent a far more lawless situation that anything I know of online.
I suspect Sony thinks otherwise.
Twitter Acquires TweetDeck
Micro-blogging service provider Twitter has purchased third-party Adobe-Air-based tweeting application TweetDeck – a software, that ...
I can't even read the headline without thinking of a couple yakuza bosses reviewing Yakuza 3: http://boingboing.net/2010/08/10/yakuza-3-review.html
Very funny comic!

So you reckon the correlation is based on Porn Hub's tag line? If this is the case, Porn Hub has done an amazing promotional job to get such a strong correlation.
Not to be completely pessimistic, but if my phone is on the dryer...where do I receive the SMS? And is my phone even there when I come back?
How Twitter and a community put a smackdown on Urban Outfitters
At the end of the article, why is apache even being used anymore?

Just use nginx and php-fpm (or php-cgi/fcgi).
Not the point being made here.
You might be surprised at how hard a sell web presence is in some areas...sigh
I use nginx exclusively as my server and I run node instances and wordpress behind it. Why even use apache?