skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
According to Forbes [1], it's much less:

> In 2010, out of the million most popular (most trafficked) websites in the world, 42,337 were sex-related sites. That's about 4% of sites.

> From July 2009 to July 2010, about 13% of Web searches were for erotic content.

Granted, that's number of sites and not content/traffic, but streaming has exploded in the past decade, so I doubt it's gone up.

They also specifically call out the "50%" claim, and say it's an outdated one from the early days of the web, from when it was more niche and had a more male-dominated culture.

Side note, the most interesting part of the article, and relevant here:

> So what’s the most popular porn site on the planet?

> The single most popular adult site in the world is LiveJasmin.com, a webcam site which gets around 32 million visitors a month, or almost 2.5% of all Internet users!

> You’re telling me a webcam site is more popular than PornHub?

But once again, ten-year-old data.

[1] https://www.forbes.com/sites/julieruvolo/2011/09/07/how-much...
> People sometimes discuss tech/business details in front of porn scenes as well because you have to

Now I am picturing an open office plan with a porn set one one end of it. Surely the studios are separated from the software departments?
The attack surface of the government is incredibly, extremely massive. It's pretty much impossible to stop every single intrusion attempt. When combined with nation-state backing, it's nearly impossible to stop widespread compromise as it's currently structured.

Personally, I assume that MAD applies to this system to ensure that no rational nation would leverage this access for anything beyond intelligence-gathering.
Just that the majority of politicians, especially in the Senate, are older white men.
45 here. Here's what I've noticed since the 80s:

- More wealth and more choices now.
- More eating out now. Meals are bigger, sweeter, richer, etc.
- Less activity now. When I was a kid, video games were just getting started and most folks didn't own computers. TV & media was less engaging.

Food addiction seems more... refined these days. There is a lot less fat shaming too, although I'm not suggesting we bring it back. I think it did have an effect on reducing obesity though.

I grew up on fast food and TV dinners, so I don't see food being significantly more refined now, but I am aware there are newer ingredients(thickeners, texture modifiers, preservatives, etc).
I'm not fully versed on all the things that would be needed, but at the bare minimum it would seem like you would need a bunch of automated processes for just the building
- Import src packages, making sure that you copy in changes/patches when RHEL does.
- Replace the RH trademarks in every package
- Build every package and run verification tests for each arch
- Build ISOs

You would also need I said if infrastructure servers that can scale to a large number of users for Yum/RPMs, etc.

Then you also need a set of servers for issue tracking and a way to break it out per package.

I wouldn't imagine that it is anything which can't be done, it just seems like there's a lot of little pieces that you would need to set up, and infrastructure you need to run.
He must hate Wikipedia's style guide.
I’m building a MVP to show off and validate some ideas. I’m using Firebase and set up auth with my react app in about 10 minutes. I’d never spend a week on auth for a MVP.
It's a strange transition because early on one of the things that made Amazon amazing was their extreme focus on making customers happy. Maybe they've just discovered that fake reviews and counterfeit items don't actually result in unhappy customers.
I haven't seen a lot of repercussions, if any actually. I would've figured something big would've happened right now with the antics that are up, but here we are - necessary to download an _opt-out_ extension for Google Analytics. This couldn't be a more blatant disregard for the EU laws than I could imagine.
And at the same time here in the Netherlands we have the party responsible for enforing laws handing out one, almost disproportionally large fine, to a small organisation each year. Like a 800k fine to a tennis unity because they were too aggressive in their data grievance, while all the big guys are still going at it and then some. Sorry for the rant but it's hard to stay optimistic, so seeing something like Github making a good move in the right direction, and seeing the post of plausible.io on the front page, this seems like a good day on the front of privacy.
Ive been thinking about creating a VCS that uses file system snapshots ...
I can't speak for Github, but I can speak for my team in [tech giant]: if I wanted to do analytics on end users I'd have to go through a review to confirm that I would not be violating privacy laws. I literally couldn't query them if I wanted to without jumping through technical hoops with audit processes and paper trails.

I do believe Github is legitimately trying not to use that data for analytics. But whether some PM in there is querying that data for analytics purposes: at that point we're just speculating based on how cynical you or I want to be. I don't think that's a meaningful point.

Also: I'm not saying I don't think they do analytics. I'm saying I don't think they are using users' personal data for analytics. That's an important difference with respect to GDPR.
I wonder if Amazon Managed Workflows for Apache Airflow will support this new version.

https://aws.amazon.com/managed-workflows-for-apache-airflow/
Most of them are not recognized as standard English, so be careful…
VCs Who Want to Invest in Women, Black and Latinx, and LGBTQ+ Founders
Brotli has a static dictionary (contents of which can be seen here[1]) which was created from a web corpus. It’s part of the spec[2]. A derivative implementation of zstd could make use of this as a static dictionary.

[1] https://gist.github.com/klauspost/2900d5ba6f9b65d69c8e

[2] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7932#appendix-A
The pandemic should've been enough but... meh.
Agreed. Done right it's a huge time suck.
No it's just some videos played in a TV in meeting room. It was for looking at Chrome dev tools I believe. Studios are not even in Montreal AFAIK but I could be wrong.
> People just never learn the fundamentals of economics

Maybe. Or they know if they buy today and make it hard to build, they can go somewhere new with a big pile of money later. They got theirs, and they don't care about the others.

In actually, it's a big and heterogeneous group of people. I expect some never learned, as you say. Some are jerks, as I described. Some just don't think deeply enough about their policy choices, and some think there are post-Econ 101 reasons why the Econ 101 dynamics (while important) aren't what dominate.

And of course there are some of us Californians, staying and leaving, who do think it should be easier to build.
But the EU law is not just about cookies. It's also about e.g. fingerprinting your browser which is very hard to effectively block in practice.

It's a common misconception that it's about cookies. It's about data processing, i.e. tracking. There is a different law then GDPR which is about storing data on user PC's but that is also not about cookies but about any browser storage and more or less got superseded(1) by GDPR.

(1): Ok, that is quite a oversimplification, but most popups are now about GDPR and having them also covers the other law.
While serious, this should come as no surprise to anyone who has had the "pleasure" of using a government IT system. The OPM hack a few years ago demonstrated this and the current SolarWinds crisis just reminds us of it.

You could liken the security issue to climate change – our entire global economy appears to depend on consumption, which appears to be accelerating climate change. But are we going to actually change anything significantly to address the problem? Uh no, not now, maybe later. Most people barely understand the problem and, even if they care, are powerless to change it. Furthermore, we are now completely reliant on the status-quo and seemingly incapable of imagining a different world. In the same manner, these software systems which now underlie every part of our day-to-day lives are taken as a given. They are now simply too convenient and ingrained in our lives to ever go away.

How do we overcome the inertia of change? Most likely, from what I can see, we will simply change our expectations – it is impossible to build a completely secure software system, so we should instead change how we use it/what we expect it to do.

We also feel pressure to constantly modernize the infrastructure without having a parallel discussion about the security impact of these innovations. As we get further and further from the bare metal with newer and more convenient abstractions, our engineers understand less and less about the realities of the systems they are constructing. And, arguably, as software becomes easier for users to use, they too lose sight of what the system is actually doing and how something can go wrong.
Nothing, except it doesn't look to be doing additive composition on top of images and it doesn't look familiar if you were targeting pods in a k8s style deployment. As a thing in itself? Its fine.

If you have 5+ years investment in docker, the missing, parts here are going to hurt.

Mainly, what's missing is helpful evidence of transition.

E.g. I have a docker image i got from git which works as a one-shot execution chain to run xml2rfc and I got a version for cramdown which worked mostly the same way to do rfc/drafts from markdown. Where's the BastilleBSD equivalent? How do I translate a Dockerfile to a Bastille script?
I think sensical would have been more apt.
thanks. I was able to get the basics stuff out of the way:

https://victorribeiro.com/3Dsphere/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w13Q_KL1I9A

I just need to focus a little bit more in order to get more complex stuff done.

for instance: I don't know jack about animations / bones / skin deformation. =(
States report confusion as feds slash vaccine shipments, Pfizer says it has
I got to chat with Ivan after he gave a talk about Fleet at the University of Washington a bunch of years ago.

He strikes me as down to earth and intellectually honest in ways that most people are not.

A similar architecture at the software level is to have thread per core and queues to move data between threads as in Seastar, Glommio, etc.

https://github.com/scylladb/seastar/blob/master/doc/tutorial...

https://www.datadoghq.com/blog/engineering/introducing-glomm...
Can confirm. Just built out a little react MVP using firebase. Auth took mere minutes.
Well, here's the initial commit of RESTful Authentication library from 2006: https://github.com/technoweenie/restful-authentication/commi.... FYI, still using in production like a charm!
States report confusion as feds slash vaccine shipments, and Pfizer says it has ‘millions’ of unclaimed doses.

>> FedEx and UPS are distributing the Pfizer vaccine, while Moderna’s product will be moved by McKesson, a major medical distributor. Both vaccines are two-dose regimens, and the Trump administration has elected to hold back shipments of the second dose in an effort, it says, to ensure that everyone gets a booster shot.

Some state officials said the delayed shipment of the second dose complicated their planning, while a person familiar with Pfizer’s supply, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive details, said there were many more doses available that are not being shipped than simply the batches being held back for booster shots. <<

------------------------------------------

i have yet to see if any particular states are short on distribution. It would be quite concerning if Demographic of a state was correlated to disparities in distribution.
Put this stine state into https://rot13.com/

BTW Never noticed before, but because 13*2 = 26, rot13 is both encoder and decoder.
This problem is called "the incidence of taxation" and it is well-studied. A great deal of debate about tradeoffs between various sorts of tax rest on how they distribute the incidence of taxation.

The larger point is: sometimes a tax increase gets passed on, sometimes it isn't.
Do you understand how this second post you have made, which is more substantive, has absolutely nothing in common, and in many ways is diametrically opposite to your initial advice of "follow apples strategy for marketing", since apple has done literally all the things you say not to do, "all software must be rewritten" (sometimes in alien languages to boot), "don't require another OS" oh I seem to remember apple having a different operating system from what everyone else does...
The product review is for the product, not the seller. Seller reviews are for the seller, not the product. Not rocket science.

The post title seems needlessly inflammatory and definitive. The content of the blog really is a whinge about an isolated incident, not any real assertions convincing me that Amazon is silencing anything on purpose in the reviews section.

No doubt Amazon has much to answer for, but not this. When half the reviews are something like "I don't know what this is" because of Amazon's confusing email language, it seems to me that properly enforcing the use of a review section would be ideal, no?
Yes, mostly this. I think its targeting a different deployment model.
> We'd have Linux on the desktop in 2020 if any of those projects had some Torvalds-like figure ranting on a mailing list about why the user is always right, shame on you on redesigning the menubar yet again breaking any UI convention for no real purpose, and no, Canonical/Red Hat/whoever, we will not accept this patch that undermines the goals of this project.

I don't think a Torvalds like BDFL would save Linux desktop. With the Linux kernel, there is a massive incentive for everyone to circle their wagons around one kernel. By having a single Linux kernel, it makes it much easier for vendors to create drivers and services against. With the desktop, the incentive to stick with "one" desktop solution drops off quickly.

If I want a tabbed window manager and one doesn't exist, I create it. This is great for me and the people who want a tabbed window manager, but for the other 95%+ of the population, it's essentially worthless. Multiply that effect by thousands of decision points and you have the Linux desktop: An abundance of fairly mediocre to good options with few really great ones.
I think MPLv2 with or without xGPL compatibility clause (or EPLv2) are a good midway between xGPL and Apache / MIT.

If you're really worried about copycats or leechers, you might want to consider either close sourcing / restrictively licensing [0] the very important bits of the stack that matter to paying customers (like GitLab does with their "buyer-based open core model" [1]).

Note though, open source has always been about commoditizing loss leaders [2] or commoditizing a product's complement [3]... never quite has been a good business model in and of its own.

[0] https://polyformproject.org/licenses/

[1] https://www.heavybit.com/library/video/commercial-open-sourc...

[2] http://dtrace.org/blogs/bmc/2018/12/14/open-source-confronts...

[3] https://www.joelonsoftware.com/2002/06/12/strategy-letter-v/
Tbf I find infix operators much more straightforward and readable. E.g.:

let file = file |? raise Some_error

or

let parse_result = parse <$> file

For the last two examples respectively.

EDIT: For completeness, the operators are

let (|?) opt y =
match opt with
| Some x -> x
| None -> y

let (<$>) f opt =
match opt with
| Some x -> Some (f x)
| None -> None
Sorry to hear. Sadly, like a typical American I also had my days of weight gain, junk food, mcdonald's, etc in my childhood, but I also grew up having mostly home-cooked food, so that's where my curiosity comes from.
If a project wants to hold up a bad merge as an example why they are better. They need to do better than just a list of letters. They need an actual example of real code.
They are vastly different creatures as you know, but in my experience on long-lived-but-must-keep-running services, fat-jails are a MUST.

OS package mismatches will bite you in the ass years down the road if you try to maintain thin-jails.

I manage alot of sites that Management refuses to invest any dev-time to upgrade old Python2.7 infrastructure. Having fat-Jails allows me to keep everything else upgraded.

pf is a fantastic firewall, but the syntax in OpenBSD is different then in FreeBSD.

VNET is worth it's weight in gold. Each jails has it's own network stack. That let's you avoid funky localhost workarounds.

iocage is a great framework for jails management (but it isn't necessary) you can do everything from jail.conf. Personally I prefer it for it's ZFS integration.
Even though I knew everything about the internal structure already, reading this post was worth it for learning about `git range-diff`, which I'd never heard of before. This sounds exactly like a tool I've always wished Git had.
My immediate thought was it was someone that looks at the clock at 11:30 and goes "alright, it's time to go to bed" and goes to bed, even if they're really enjoying that video game or whatever and that they think it's that easy to sleep, afterward.
> Is it crazy if I think that first example is the most readable of the three?

No. That's simply the difference between imperative and functional code. If you don't know the latter you could never understand this.

For the most part, the last example is equivalent to `let result = file && parse(file);`, but there are important differences to consider in JavaScript at runtime.
But what are numbers for network traffic (percentage of petabytes transmitted)?
I mostly agree on that. How do you feel about current estate taxes, which, in effect, mean the third person has paid more tax than the first two?
I wasn't diagnosed with this but I had the symptoms and the consequences you mentioned.

It took a long time to fix. Here's some things I tried. Some may have helped or none may have helped.

* I bought blackout blinds and use a sleeping mask (sometimes earplugs)

* I bought a bright light (https://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B07FFJYMVS) and a smart plug. 15 mins before I wanted to wake up I would have a timer turn on the light.

* I eat healthier in all regards

* I started working out

* I started walking a lot more

* I stop drinking coffee at 11am (and drink tea after that)

* I stopped some doing some things late at night (after 23:30) (gaming, programming, eating, using my phone)

* I started listening to audiobooks
The study looked at many countries, not just the USA.
And Home Depot / Lowes. Every small tool I look for is cheaper there than on Amazon. Often by 1/3 or more. Same brand or better in most cases. And also with free shipping.
Alright, thanks. My other question was about culture.

What is the demographic? Are there a lot of women, gender minorities, etc.? Are things like harassment complaints taken seriously? In short, is it a "locker room" culture or more similar to what you find elsewhere at web agencies in MTL?
Randazzo's is currently my favorite! Though I pre-ordered a Dong Phong's this morning as I was unable to get one last year.

Local Data Science prospects are low to non-existent. I work remotely and remote prior to Covid. Companies reach out and don't seemed concerned about my location so I don't foresee being remote an issue.
>I do this all the time with Clojure at work. I will have my application running (web app) with two repls in emacs. One is connected to the ClojureScript repl and one to the Clojure repl. I am able to make changes to both front end code and back end code on the fly by changing a function and then evaluating the function into the repl

But since you can't arbitrarily inspect and restart any start frame, you don't really get the interactive programming experience.

On CL, for example, when you hit a runtime bug that is uncaught, you get the debugger window which shows not just the "stack trace" but the complete stack FRAMES that you can inspect. So let's say deep down you find where the error originated and the states of the variables.

You can then jump to the definition of the offending function, edit the function, recompile it, (optionally) change any variable on that stackframe, and then continue the execution by restarting specifically at that stack frame.

In this way, the feature of "modify a function while the code is running" becomes way more meaningful. The program evolves as it runs, as if it were a lifeform.
Yes, you're right. I admit I had completely forgotten about that.
Which you'd never write in practice since `expect` exists
Bartiromo: Intel source told me President Trump did, in fact, win the election
AirBNB! Do a search for Review and along those lines.
You're right but I think what you're describing the absolute bare minimum of version control. Yes, people want to ostensibly see the different versions/states. But for anything past the simplest setups, they immediately want to see changes, since you're actually after change management, not version control. Viewing different versions scales very poorly. Even regular user oriented tools such Word offer "Track changes", which is a diff view. Wikipedia also has a "Compare versions" button quite prominently on the page you mention.

If anything, most users I've exposed even to simple diff tools immediately appreciate the value. It's just that mainstream tools rarely support diffing since it's very complex from a technical point of view (end user tools and apps rarely work with plain text, they use binary formats, marked up text, etc), so it's not a mainstream paradigm as a result, and people are less familiar with it.
Or could just be impulse buyers on eBay.
Because they'll remove product ratings for a particular seller if enough people complain. That's a secondary use.
I think there are more clockless designs out there but they are "secret sauce".

From a previous discussion on clockless silicon https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18146750

The Intel exec who left to form a clockless startup looks like they are doing AI accelerators with 1000x less power https://etacompute.com/
The FDA’s Deadly “Caution”
> It can use ponies

This I would like to see. :-) Particularly the part about defining a protocol for sending messages over the Internet using ponies (there already is one for pigeons...)
One way to interpret the 'simpler' requirement is to suggest Luigi. Its a python framework. Its way simpler if you are a programmer.

Of course a lot of people think of Airflow as 'simpler' than Luigi, because Airflow is all graphical. YMMV.
Yes, you have do this reckfully. Personally, I’m gusted by all the examples here.
Airflow 2.0 :)
I don’t know what this means.
I disagree. The rich are interested in the premium segment of goods. The general public would have no benefit from Rolls Roys, Bugatti cars, from private luxury jets.
Interesting, okay, makes sense. Thanks for the explanation.
'personal relationship with the brand'

Personal relationships with a social construct indicate the need for proffesional help. Amd imaginary friends.
"Punching up" only goes so far. It's not an unlimited license. The idea is that it counters prevailing culture, and is funny because of that. It's almost self-deprecating.

But there isn't much of a pop culture of Christian values today. All positive messges about Christians are supressed in pop culture. The elite are largely secular or keep their religion very quiet and personal (except for politicians from districts where Christianity is a political advantage).

I don't think punching up really applies in this context. Laughs about Christians feel more exclusionary and negative... more like "let's laugh at that idiot" than a positive "I see some of that character in myself, haha".