skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I use ProtonMail and overall it works pretty good and the value is great. The product is focused on security first so I think user experience suffers a bit. It's works fine but if you previously used a mail client like Spark on your phone you'll definitely miss it.

The mobile app is okay, it's good enough for reading and sending short replies. The web interface is alright. I like to use the bridge application from ProtonMail on my desktop and use a mail client like Thunderbird or Apple Mail.
I think this is another good model. Purdue is one relatively well-known university that offers this. What's crucial about an ISA (especially an ISA that only collects on income beyond a threshold) is that the university then has a direct incentive to actually improve students' employment prospects.

Then again, the Lambda school ISA selling issue demonstrates the potential to eliminate this alignment of incentives. In universities, there's also the issue that colleges might only accept ISAs with students interested in majors with good employment prospects. But if we view university as an investment where the return is better employment, then this is working as intended.
This guy made one.

https://www.chrisfenton.com/homebrew-cray-1a/
Awesome; this is great to hear.

An idea you might consider is to display some kind of warning symbol or message if the input contains digits or operands which are not interpreted as part of the calculation that produces the output. This would have made the semantic meaning of the syntax highlighting immediately more evident.
You can get non-recourse financing to cover exercise costs and taxes. I.e. you can offload the risk of early exercise for a share of the potential upside.

Source: I work at Secfi (https://secfi.com) and our equity and tax advisors are amazing.
At my first UNIX IT job, my team lead told me:

Listen when you break something tell us. Explain what you did and we can get it fixed. You will make mistakes, we all still make mistakes.

That is what i always do and expect my coworkers to do. Yeah we talk a little smack afterwards (only jokingly), but were able to resolve most self inflicted wounds quickly. Nowadays what scares me more is a coworker who hides mistakes rather than one who confesses to them.
Thank you, that's what I meant.
Apple has a strict set of supplier responsibility standards [1], but is even more strict in controlling PR and the Apple brand. So even if the conditions that led to this destruction were not within existing guidelines, I would imagine reporting or accounting audit requirements will become more strict as a result of this.

[1] https://www.apple.com/supplier-responsibility/
Smoothie: Type Faster on Any Website
A better example of what OP probably meant would be $200 iPhone vs $500 Librem 5 USA.
Elon Musk extends another company into Texas amid feud with California
That's not true. Medicare can and does negotiate the cost of procedures and doctor's services. What the law says is that Medicare can't negotiate prescription drug prices. That's because Medicare doesn't directly pay for drugs, except what's used incidentally in the course of covered hospital stays.

Medicare didn't provide coverage for prescription drugs until the adoption of Part D. That is structured differently than other parts of Medicare. Instead of the government serving as the insurer directly, the government subsidizes premiums for a private Part D insurer. The private insurer can and does negotiate drug prices.

The fact that Medicare can't negotiate prescript drug prices is often invoked as a talking point, but Medicare prescription drug spending accounts for a relatively small proportion of. overall Medicare spending: https://www.heritage.org/medicare/commentary/good-and-bad-id... ("Consumer choice and competition have made Part D the rarest of government programs: one in which spending hasn’t spiraled out of control. In fact, government actuaries report that federal general revenue spending on the program was $67.8 billion in 2018—that’s less than what it spent in 2015 ($68.4 billion).").
Vimeo Releases Opus Support
The out of network care at an in-network hospital, is the absolute worst. In a similar vein, my wife's insurance was supposed to cover "out-of-network" ER visits. So one night that we had to go the ER we went to an out-of-network hospital ER because there wasn't an in-network one close by. Turns out that the coverage of the out-of-network ER visit basically just covers the cost of the bed in the ER, every treatment that you get (IV, vitals check, medication) is considered out-of-network treatment. This resulted in an absolutely insane bill with charges like $250 for administering oxygen monitor (you know the things you can buy at Wallgreens for $30) or $300 for ibuprofen.
I only skimmed the paper past the abstract, but for what it is worth.

The MOND favouring group is a fringe of the cosmology community. The vast majority feel that there is enough evidence to rule it out.

I mostly mention this because I don't like that fact that popular science magazines (or at least their content that I see posted here!) has a bias towards "new and possibly exciting" or "controversial" research. Which I understand - revolution is more interesting that "physicist reduces error bars by 50%. Big picture unchanged". But, if all you read is these articles, you will get a very skewed idea of what the consensus is.

Just so there is no confusion, modified gravity as an explanation for Dark Energy is very possible, as an explanation for Dark Matter, the consensus is that it is ruled out.

Edit: I clarified my point below but will do it here too so everyone see it. I don't have a problem with this paper, I'm glad people are writing papers with alternate explanations to the consensus, that is how science is done. But, your conclusion from reading this article shouldn't be, "ahh damn, I guess MOND is right and LCDM is wrong" and I think that is how pop-sci articles tend to frame these things.
The Kremlin bots are on overtime here

How is the weather in Lubyanka Square comrades?
I also thought of using the 
 tag, but I didn’t use it because it is considered to be an outdated tag

But yes that is totally possible
this may be a bit OT but for some reason, that recent book "blockchain chicken farm" or something like that popped into my head, where a chicken can be cryptographically verified to be organic, etc, in every stage of its "production".

I realize this isn't the whole solution - part of this is Apple's heavy handed way of squeezing margins, but for at least the "supply chain labor compliance" part, could blockchain be a useful tool for labor unions and workers' rights to ensure that workers are paid their fair share?
First Year of Fortran-Lang
Stock options are a poor proxy for company value. Instead, a company should allocate an interest in any in-the-money exit towards a pool that is distributed to employees on a rata share depending on duration of employment and period of employment. I've been working on an interesting formula for this that even rewards those who have left the company.

Most employees don't need or want a share of the company. They want a share of the profits or proceeds from an exit.

For example, a company can allocate 20% of all in-the-money proceeds from an exit to the Employee Exit Share pool. An employee's share of that Exit pool will be based on their employee-months worked divided by the total employee-months worked in the company, with every one year of employee months worked counting an additional time for the purposes of calculation. This thus rewards early employees and those who have worked for longer durations with a larger share.
In my home country (India) the academic job hierarchy used to be "Lecturer" --> "Reader" --> "Professor"

Somewhere in the last decade or so this nomenclature was revised to "Assistant Professor", "Associate Professor", and "Professor". I can't speak to the rationale for this, but it brings it in line with the naming convention in the US.

While the minimum requirement for an Assistant Professor job in India is a Masters, in practice now you really need at least 2+ years of Postdoc experience. To move up to an Associate Prof. position, the minimum requirement is at least 5+ years of post PhD experience, to have guided at least one PhD student, and n number of publications with x Impact Factor. A Professor requires at least 10 years of post PhD experience, and at least 3 PhD students. Of course, these are minimum requirements, and I know of several people who far exceed those qualifications and still waiting to move up the ladder. For example, a senior from my graduate lab has been an Assistant Prof for about 14 years now, has 15+ publications, and 3 PhD students who've gained their degrees.
There's no great way to know that your emails are private when they're hosted by a SaaS email provider. It's easy to get around third-party audits if you want to.

The most private solution by far is to self-host, but that's also very challenging these days.

And any email you send to a non-private service (Gmail, Yahoo, anyone's work account) is instantly going to be just as insecure as if you yourself used that other person's service.

What I'm getting at is that email is inherently a not-very-private communication method and you should try to avoid it. The amount of time required to make it more private is not going to have much benefit for most people (whose contacts will be using Google, Microsoft, Yahoo, etc.)

You also can't easily or meaningfully get E2E encryption with email, so there's a lot of surface area to lose your privacy.
Corollary: When a suspect or defendant is freed because there is no actual proof (technical evidence), or above all when evidence is disallowed because their rights have been violated, that's called “a (mere) technicality”.

Intentional or not, very very likely to condition the audience into regarding civil rights and rules of evidence as “mere” anything. Goes back to at least _Hill Street Blues_ and _Baretta,_ probably _Kojak_ too. Likely much farther than that. (Though _Columbo_ didn't display this attitude, at least not as flagrantly, IIRC?)
I want a comprehensible restaurant-like menu.

Likely not going to happen purely out of complexity if nothing else. Look at the list of ICD procedure codes[1] and imagine all of these with a price attached. Comprehensive, sure, but comprehensible? Ehhh.. pushing it.

[1]: https://www.icd10data.com/ICD10PCS/Codes
School Shooting Drills Have Gone Virtual
Ironically, I'm actually on a VPN already... just not one into the EU! I suppose this is how EU users must feel when new tech products launch and they're only available in the US.
there are around 200 times more gas stations currently than fast chargers so absolutely. The question that matters is if you replaced all of those with fast chargers would the accidents at fast chargers be worse than gas station accidents. I am not saying that is not the case and also like gas stations they will get safer over time.
eVTOL Lilium reportedly seeking public investment via SPAC
Singlelink – A single link for everything, 100% free
Here's a start, each and every one of these is batshit crazy https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2019/03/pure-ten-poi...
For those using note-taking apps, I've found that OneNote has a similar very useful feature. If you type 1+2= into a note and then press the space bar, it'll insert the answer. It can understand thousand separators and large expressions with brackets etc.
Edit: this is a somewhat OT rant.

Netflix’s recommender system is hands down the worst I have ever seen. Every single thing I watch, it suggests The Queen’s Gambit and two other random Netflix productions.

Even if I watch the first of a trilogy (LotR, for example). How can they be so terrible at this?

The categories in the main browsing view are also hysterically arbitrary. It kind of looks like a topic model with back-constructed titles for the topics.

Finally, they replaced the ratings with “% matching”. I guess so they can recommend their subpar productions even if they get low ratings.
However, if you're only there to exercise your hobby and get paid for it, you may get bored by the other parts of the career.

Endless meetings, managing the client, managing the budget, thinking about deadlines, training new hires, working with a team, etc., are all part of the job. Yet, they don't involve writing a single line of code.

We often see articles on HN of passionate programmers leaving the industry behind. The reason is rarely the code itself.
Are you talking about employees being paid a wage?

If so, what you describe isn't what happens for the vast majority of people. We need income to pay for rent (or mortgage), food, utilities, and other essentials. With a bit saved over, where we can. There's no scope for estimating the profitability of the business or anything like that, we just need money to live. I'm sure it's the same for Apple's factory workers in the article.
Ho, Ho Ow Identifying Holiday Hazards with Topic Modeling
Google sure loves free employees...
>If this doesn't describe evil, I don't know what else could.

Private prisons seem awfully close to slavery/indentured workers.
This is wishful thinking. There is no collateral for a school loan. Banks have to make up for that risk somewhere. Students will have nothing to lose by staging bankruptcy, and banks will stop giving out loans.
I don't understand this.

Almost every other developed country has a system that works for healthcare. It's almost always single payer or something where you definitely don't go shopping around for hospitals.

Doesn't it start to feel a bit like indoctrination when arguing for a "free market" when no other developed country has a free market for healthcare?

Is everyone else stupid? What aren't they seeing? Especially in the age of the internet?

I just can't follow this logic.

I would love to get someone who argues from the "free market" point of view do some introspection and explain the logic in a way that doesn't feel like repeating the same 2-3-4 ideas which as far as I can see, are common talking points in the US.

So, repeating the question, what is every other developed country missing?

Why aren't they all doing this, if it's obviously superior?
After using the AirPods Max for around a week so far, I really like them. They are super comfortable, the noise canceling is really solid and seems better than my Bose QC35, and the microphone sounds really good in calls.
The CA law is kind of BS. My partner went to see doc, they ran a few tests, told her it would probably be covered by insurance and then we got a bill for $1700. They said it wasn't "surprise" bill because it wasn't out of network. I told them "it is a surprise to us!"

From then on, we always ask the cost of every single test/procedure. (In fairness to the hospital, they did give us a $50/month, interest free payment plan.)
The source is Anandtech running SPEC on them, already given above.

SPEC is not a microbenchmark. It's been the industry standard for comparing completely dissimilar CPU architectures for decades.
Ah, I see. Never having been there, I missed the significance of the "liquidity event".
"Not my problem" is a funny expression, because there's an implied "to solve" at the end there. Yes, it is your problem to solve. But you do have a problem if you want a transparent and reasonably priced social media service: nobody in the market is willing to sell that, because doing it the shady way instead is more profitable. You've just got an unsolvable problem.
> A side effect of this is that the motions of objects would depend not just on their own mass, but all other masses in their neighborhood.

Isn't this always true, dark matter or MOND? There are two masses in F = G M1 M2 / d^2
Nah, being evil implies there being a higher moral cause to one's actions. This is worse than evil, it's only pure uncaring avarice.
To be fair to other DSLRs, the Rebel XSi's autofocus was considered one of its weakest parts when the camera was new. There are lots of other autofocus systems which are much faster and more accurate.
"A series of futuristic pictures by Jean-Marc Côté and other artists issued in France in 1899, 1900, 1901 and 1910. Originally in the form of paper cards enclosed in cigarette/cigar boxes and, later, as postcards, the images depicted the world as it was imagined to be like in the then distant year of 2000. As is so often the case their predictions fell some way off the mark, failing to go far enough in thinking outside the confines of their current technological milieu (hence the ubiquity of propellors, not to mention the distinctly 19th-century dress)."
He’s being hit by the AMT due to the value of the options. If you’re hit by the AMT, you’ll owe taxes on the spread between the strike and FMV on exercise, even though you haven’t sold them.
What humans will evolve into in the next century
Hiding Covert Messages in Marine Mammal Sounds
http://archive.is/AcAeq
Use technology to protect users from walking down streets populated by people negatively impacted by socioeconomic conditions (poverty, mental health, food insecurity), or use technology to bring awareness and compassion to the most vulnerable.
C is no easier to write a compiler for than Modula 2 or any such C alternative that was relevant in the 80s.
> I wonder whether a naming convention would solve the problem? If all coroutine functions and methods have names like fire-arc* and move* , then your synchronous call to fire-arc* would stick out like a sore thumb.

That'd be fine as long it's simple to write a wrapper of a different color. If I change fire-arc to fire-arcSTAR, but I can do a quick (def fire-arc (to-sync fire-arcSTAR)) then I don't have to visit call-sites. If it's not possible to make a wrapper, then that would be a major pain point.

Edit: Can't get HN to print the asterisks.
I think you are woefully ill informed in how even in the most abundant ecosystem humans use technology. Look up the fish traps in the pacific north west of the us. Or the use of fire to flush game in paleolithic time. Just because it's not a shiny iphone does not mean that ecological management is not a sophisticated technology that has been developed concurrently with human evolution.
This really looks great.. props to you.

just a nitpick.. changing the theme resizes the panels automatically to adjust to the first panel's width
The Cray Computers felt like magic back in the day.

A guy is making a replica.
He had some issues finding the operating system and systems software but he overcame it

Persistence pays off.

I am sure it would be fun to part doom to it. Easier too since the new versions draws Considerable less power.

https://gigaom.com/2014/01/14/the-search-for-the-lost-cray-s...
Not quite true - ISOs can incur AMT at time of exercise, which is kind of complicated and doesn't always create a tax burden. In the $100k range, it probably will, but they'd have to do the calculation to find out.

https://www.esofund.com/blog/amt-tax

Regardless, they'll still have to front the $ to exercise and be left with illiquid stock. It's not a good situation.
Under that scenario, philosophically, OS-design-wise, what are the responsibilties of the kernel?

Practically speaking, none. The responsibility of the kernel (in Linux terms, but I think it's the same across all Unixen) is to start the init system (PID 1), and that's where it ends. Should PID 1 ever terminate, the kernel is in an undefined state. The VFS semantics ensure that even when the init binary is removed from the filesystem, it is not actually unlinked until its reference count is zero -- and since the kernel holds a reference to it, the kernel and init are "safe" from harm through deletion.

Well, we might start by designing our future OS with a tiny shell inside of the kernel, for emergency use only.

While not in-kernel, systemd is ahead of you, as it offers a shutdown-time ramfs to use as root filesystem so the real root filesystem can be safely unmounted. Previously, Linux didn't really unmount the root filesystem (it couldn't, because the kernel still had an open handle to the init binary), but mounted it read-only before shutdown.

we might consider using a file system that doesn't actually delete files when they're deleted, but rather flags the disk space as "empty"

This is already the case. "removing" a file in Unix only removes its name from the directory listing, the inode isn't reused until it's been cleared. And even when it's been cleared, only the inode entry is zeroed -- not the data contents. That's why tools like "shred" exist -- to make sure a file's contents are removed along with the file.

a very interesting topic for future OS designers to think about

I think transactional filesystems, snapshots, and log filesystems already do most of what you're asking for.
Experiences like this and a bit of imagination are why I try to be not-root as quickly as possible, and sometimes consciously physically remove my hands from the keyboard instead of having them “idling” at their home position.
It wasn't so much that they were made up or anything, but my issue with Murray's contrarianism is that he has no insider knowledge on the case. IIRC he took issue over the procedure regarding the roof of their house, for example.

I don't doubt that the British secret services have adjusted the official story, but the idea that there is something genuinely fishy going on requires real evidence. His waffle-ing about Bellingcat being warmongers (if I recall his wording correctly) is similarly uninspiring.
I agree it doesn't make sense to blame bankers for exploiting the legal system that allows them to enrich the rich at the expense of the poor for a commission, other than the revolving doors between government and industry and lobbying efforts to maintain our broken society the way it is.

There are numerous financial products and services available to only the wealthy that reduce tax burden and increase wealth and income that are inaccessible to anyone else, create little value, and are predicated on the concentration of wealth in the hands of a few.

Just a random example, if you can afford to buy a home in cash, you shouldn't because the mortgage terms the banks will offer you are too good to pass up - you'll come out ahead just by taking on low interest debt and accounting for the rise in the home's value plus the more lucrative investments you can make with the cash.

In other words, the people who get the most help are the ones who need it the least. That is the travesty of contemporary finance.

When the critique of the financial system is made its not in place of supply and demand for labor but the fact it creates very little besides disparity. The god of liquidity should not be worshipped so much.
Increasingly, negotiating a job offer at a startup feels like buying a used car. There’s an obvious information asymmetry, and it’s hard to escape the feeling that you’re getting screwed.
It would be in your grant letter explaining the number of options and the strike price.
This almost reads like satire.
Hi, thanks for your feedback.

Javascript-only packages are not currently supported but Typescript packages or @types packages are.

For example check the faastjs[1] package, you can see plenty of information about its API.

[1]: https://www.jsdocs.io/package/faastjs/v/5.3.8
The way FB tracks non-users is one of the parts that bothers me the most. One old article I read talked about a "shadow profile" that would track you across sites, ready and waiting for the day you signed up. That way they would have profile data on you from before you ever consented.
Watch the captivating Tesla Model 3 vs. Audi RS 6 drag race battle
Sorry, allowed to? I'm trying not to read this as some paternalistic take on what people should be allowed do read but failing. Please explain?
Yes, although not specifically as the specific dispersal mechanism is immaterial. A wage is one of many ways payout of the futures contact can be structured.
Top Books I’ve Read in 2020