skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I think you misunderstand. You can write very restricted queries that mirror REST routes 1:1. No need for persisted queries.

Persisted queries enter the game when you define a query that potentially can become very complex and deep and then want to restrict the complexity in specific ways. But that is not required if you just want to mirror a RESTful API.
Tin foil on the head of the AI :D
Also, I don’t believe you don’t have 15 minutes per day to switch off the conversational party of your mind and as you say enjoy yourself in front of the piano, away from a screen.
Show HN: Deep Email Validator
Robert Miles, YT Channel on AI Safety
You do. You just won’t even consider moving on to a different wife.
"Without evidence" is state of fact, that is not manipulative. Also, if something was debunked multiple times already and is in fact conspiracy theory, it is perfectly appropriate to call it "debunked conspiracy theory".

What calling these manipulative and refusing these as statements does is that it biases writing towards claims without evidence and towards conspiracy theories. Because you dont allow writer to call them what they are.

> It prejudices the reader without giving the reader a chance to even consider the claims or theory.

Note that many without evidence behind them and conspiracy theories have claims that in isolation sounds ok. It is only when you check evidence and find that there is none you know to reject that.
You need to embrace and containerize more paragraphs of the navy seal copy-pasta to represent arch linux effectively. ;)
I wonder if that also applies to legal writings. When I'm reading legal agreements, my mind tends to be in programming mode as well: I see lots of defined variables, if-else boolean statements, and error handling (quite literally).
Im not just talking about Charity organizations. Any large people operation of any nature is like this.

It's one of those default things that large people organizations have. Political parties and charities just happen to be a subset of this. Wait till you hear even armies, or even organized religions work the same way.
Can human rights survive the digital age?
> That is exactly the thought process that leads to non-standard mess that we see numerous examples of.

I didn't suggest people should apply this thought process in arbitrary cases. I said it should be applied in this case. You can take any thought process that gives a good outcome in one situation and obtain a bad outcome by applying it to the wrong situation. That's not an indictment of the thought process. It's just an indictment of the person failing to correctly judge its applicability.

That said, by all means, do try and go fix the standard; I wasn't trying to imply you shouldn't do that.
That is such an interesting and...low-level way to think of it.

To me it feels a little deeper than just there being a "maze of rules". Your earlier mention of "everything's connected to everything else" resonated with me more.

In a sense, the expressive power of programming languages, and mathematical notation, feels very small. I liked the board game metaphor brought up in the top comment: programming languages and mathematical notation merely feel like arrangements of board game pieces (from an infinite box, and the rules of how they can be arranged are "context-free"). They don't have meaning except what we impose (ideally, assisted by comments).

A metaphor I brought up in another comment is that it feels "easy" to systematically translate an arbitrary program into an equivalent diagram, such that the diagram would contain 100% of the operational information in the program, and could be runnable as-is. (Would be cumbersome to input into the computer, ofc.) Whereas the idea of systematically translating an arbitrary natural sentence into a diagram just seems...nonsensical to me. I wouldn't even know where to begin.

Does that resonate with you?
Face shields are to protect eyes. Face shields without masks are useless.
deep inside waterlogged limestone (or better yet, saltwater? I have access to facilities in the former, but not the latter).

optical connects between subystems, for the truly paranoid?
How to Design Sustainable Growth
Congrats, neat idea. I think Yahoo has a similar feature.
Do you forward emails to the "real" email or you have your own Email server service?
> Allow me to question the "almost" in "almost nothing". Java generics are famously unreified, at runtime it's exactly the same.

On the other hand, decaying <T> to Object (rather than monomorphizing as C++ templates do) somewhat reduces the viable attack surface for optimizations.

On the gripping hand, Java is traced/JITted, so it should pick up many of these opportunities (and more) anyway.
Bsdimp/FreeBSD-Git-docs: Draft copies of the FreeBSD Git trandition documents
They're not suggesting getting rid of the freemium model, but to raise prices of the paid plan.
Are you saying No Man's Sky is a bad game? It's the greatest comeback the gaming world has ever seen. I've clocked hundreds of hours by now. Absolutely amazing game.
I don't know why leaving a class package protected is such an eyebrow raising thing.
Even code analysis tools flag it with a warning.
Most classes shoud not be accessible outside their package.
That would raise some questions with guys who advocate lots of interfaces -- where and who exactly is going to need this interface?
Does it make it any better?
Looks like they are banned now. I think submissions are less likely to get you banned than comments, probably I am guessing because submissions are more ignorable whereas a comment is in someone’s face by default, so gets more scrutiny
So then we need to airgap the computers and fill the bands with noise inside of the buildings. good to know, problem solved.
Yes, sorry, sloppy of me.
You can also put a DuckDuckGo search box, works well for website search and supports DDG instead of Alphabet.

EDIT: Shameless plug if it gets the author to go with a non-google option https://www.gkbrk.com/wiki/DuckDuckGoSearchBox/
That's a very strange statement, since Chinese and Japanese are not at all similar languages. There are some loanwords, the shared writing system and a lot of historical and cultural, err, interchange, but they have no shared linguistic ancestor and grammatically are just about as different as languages can be. Linguistically, Japanese and Chinese have about as much in common as English and Navajo.
I consider myself sophisticated enough, but my Bitwarden has 700 accounts, of which ~30% old ones are registered with a gmail address, and the rest are handled behind g suite. Granted that last bit might be partly my fault, even though I paid for it. But even for a "sophisticated" user, I have no easy way of knowing if any of these accounts have silently failed to function now, other than by the passage of time and eventually finding out.
I don't understand your analogy. Using OSS is not like fishing because there isn't a finite number of times a project can be depended on downstream. When I use a lib I don't "take a fish out of the lake".
> obsessing over grammar is almost detrimental to making progress with a new language

If you skip over the hard parts, then you're not exactly learning a language. You might as well just learn from one of those "Hello, my name is Bob, where's the toilet ? " cartoon books.

Its a bit like those people who learn programming informally. Most of them end up writing spaghetti code for the rest of their lives.

Its the same with languages. Skip the hard bits and your attempt fluency will hit a wall at some point relatively early on. Grammar is tough, but stick at it, it will eventually become second nature. Don't be lazy.
In my vision experiments with buttons and titles are more efficient. But I'm afraid that it doesn't correlate with reality.
This is unsurprising given that abstract algebra/type theory/category theory are often viewed through the philosophical lens of Srtucturalism.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Structuralism_(philosophy_of_m...
did a websearch for omiossec, apparently [redacted]

start complaining here too.

https://github.com/omiossec
BSD Valuable News – 2020/12/14
I'm probably a bit of an outlier, but I do find it more readable to use type parameters instead of concrete types. If the type is opaque, I know the only ways to get or use values of that type are whatever explicit means the specifier of that type provides.

This is less valuable the more specialized the type you're looking at -- generifying everything is just as much an antipattern as anything else -- but String is so widespread and abusable that it really is helpful to abstract over it in many circumstances.
300% traffic increase in a week with $0 budget
An Internal Medicine Doctor on Red Flags in the Pfizer Vaccine Study
> I think you misunderstand.

I don't

> You can write very restricted queries that mirror REST routes 1:1. No need for persisted queries.

What stops a frontend developer writing an ad-hoc query?

> Persisted queries enter the game when you define a query that potentially can become very complex and deep

That... That is exactly what I wrote.

---

Honestly, I'm baffled at GraphQL defenders. It's like they never even read the documentation to the tools they defend.

- How is GraphQL different from REST?

- Ad-hoc queries of unlimited complexity

- But you write restricted queries

- No. The whole point of GraphQL is ad-hoc queries

- Persisted queries enter the game when you define a query that potentially can become very complex and deep

- That is exactly what I'm saying

And elsewhere, you can see it in other replies, it's the same story with N+1:

- GraphQL is great!

- Except the issues on the server and trying to handle N+1 queries

- What's N+1?

- It's.... It's a prominent part of the documentation for the frigging tool you use. And the reason for the things you advocate like dataloaders and persisted queries
Webinar – The Sysadmin’s Guide to ZFS – Klara Inc
‘Tis the Season: Fraudsters Have All the (Re)Fun(d)
Dupe: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25433933
I think we’re just teasing at the notion that “permanent failure” isn’t a hard and fast distinction. I think some polite retry policy is not unreasonable even for the most explicit “permanent failure” response from a remote server. Imagine the most extreme example: hackers take over the remote server and make it respond with “permanent failure.” After a day, the legit owners regain control of the system. You can’t really argue that “the remote server never should have delivered that response unless the failure truly was permanent,” because clearly there was a mismatch between the apparent intent behind the response and the actual intent.
Its not only about legal. I have like 3 nearly done projects that are waiting for a change in this sector because right now i can't charge anything.

For example anything related to prositituion. Perfectly legal here and any neighboor countries. Yet the only payment processors available basically refuse to work with startups (i.e. companies that not already charge 100000+ via credit card)

I may be missing something, but right now these few grandfathered sites that exist have the full monopoloy just because nobody else can realistically charge for the service.
Mailgun send a warning mail about increased bounces from our account. Sure, they know what's going on... but we send 4-5 digit mails per hour - it's a lot of bounces

That means I can't just resend the the emails blindly, because I'm too scared to trigger some sort of automatic suspension...

(I don't do this regularly, so I'm not familiar with all features... additional mail verification could help probably ....)
Another part of the driving equation is that we judge others by their actions and ourselves by our intentions.

"I barely swerved when I got distracted by my child"

vs

"That asshole almost ran me off the road. On purpose!"
Bicycles are also an excellent means of going from point A to point B, and they're quite a bit simpler than a car.

Internal combustion engines are useful for other tasks, such as powering a generator.

We shouldn't confuse the task with the tool.
"Databases are overblown" and "everything is a database" are both true statements.
Wouldn't this apply to any social media site? Any of them might have illegal activity / content, and they certainly do.
Cool, thanks I signed up and set up a custom domain so hopefully I won't get caught by the disposable email blacklist that other commenters were talking about.

the only other issue I'm seeing is that the website isn't really great on mobile, my wife mostly does stuff on her phone (despite us having like 10 computers lol) and that might be a small barrier, though after sending a test email I see that it can be managed inside w/e email client you use, so that shouldn't be too much of an impediment for her.
I see there are many here who work for or follow Mozilla / Firefox closely.

Could someone share:

- is there any progress on fixing the extensions API (it doesn't have to be exactly equal to the old, but for example some way to disable tabs on top would be highly appreciated as I always use Sidebery or TST in one or more browsers.) (I generally don't complain much about ux/ui, but this is a real mess).

- Are management aware that many of us badly wanted to support the Firefox / Servo teams while we just as badly don't want to support the people who fired lots of them, agreed to shady extension deals etc? (Personally I would accept a heartfelt apology and a change in direction.)
In the 80s we had a serial line in our test lab set up with a chain of paperclips on the TX and RX lines.

Made it easy to insert comms errors and failures.
#1 Trending product 2021 (Includes Report)
In my professional career I've worked mostly with C++, PHP and Python and these are probably ones I'm most fluent with. But also done tone of Perl, Delphi, VB and C# back in the day. Strange mix.

However I also think that how you look at the language greatly depends on what actual projects you have been working on and with whom plus personal taste. I've been mostly in finance and accounting and personally love code that is very easy to "read" (definition of readable code seems to vary per person).

Example: C++ has so many things crammed into it that I don't see the value of it for doing stuff that are not high frequency trading. It is like using a sledgehammer to drive a nail in the wood.
Google's user service should be able to tell the difference between a user's data not being available and a user that has been deleted or never existed in the first place. This issue is Google sending the wrong error code because of a problem on their end.

Mailing lists believing what an email provider tells them and acting in an overly cautious way is a separate issue.
11 Steps To 12 Million Downloads: The Nathan Latka Podcast
I've been using Gmail since the invite only beta. In the past year I've had several occasions where important messages get somehow "lost" in the UI. The ones I've noticed are messages I've been waiting for, so I've gone and dug them out of "all mail" in most cases. They just wouldn't show in the normal inbox despite not being flagged as spam.

This outage has now convinced me I need a new email provider.
You are right. I don't know why I wrote rate; what I meant is that the lower assessment can be inherited. That, I suspect, is the selfish reason many in this thread are asking "why do you want my parents out of their house"?
I re-read this section. The "Note" makes sense, but the whole description on Apple's website is weird, especially if you consider that Apple allows you to collect an email address that apparently isn't linked to the user. How is this possible? Apple does have categories of data, such as contact info. If contact info is considered "linked to the user", why offer this granularity in the first place? Read this section, fill in "email address" where it talks about data in general and try to make sense of it:

https://developer.apple.com/app-store/app-privacy-details/#l...

Anyways, I wasn't intentionally obtuse here, because I mostly think in terms of GDPR compliance, but you're right. I apparently thought of this in a more complicated way than necessary.
Being based in EU and having nothing in common with US, my only option for debit and credit cards are VISA and MasterCard. I'm really tired that they trade my transaction data. I don't think they offer cashback in any of the EU countries - it would make the consumers think why they're receiving money for conducting transactions.
Visual low-code programming sounds good until you try to express actually non-trivial stuff in it, and you start appreciating text-based flow control again.
I don't think it's best but the healthcare company should recommend no-AI camera app rather than laptop camera (or build your own).
From what I am reading it certainly does crash often on PS4.
The other one failed to gain traction. What’s the problem with reposting?
Secret renditions shed light on MI6's licence to kill and torture (2012)
But then why would Google's mailserver not know that it once delivered email to that mailbox?

If the protocol is stateful, why the state should be kept by the "sender" and not by the "receiver"? Being stateless removes this ambiguity in my opinion.

Also we should remember how bad is for spam reputation sending emails to a non-existent address and thus I would not blame it on the mailing list for being "overly cautious".
Prostitution payment processing being blocked everywhere because of american ethics is just one example. Even a shop for sex toys has a hard time finding a payment processor these days.
8 million of preorders, how could they not be happy?
Spoken like someone who hasn't read much Jack London and knows nothing of his life.
An Analogy for the State of AI
I would be ok with something like this if conversions were traced back to me and I got the "commission"
This is patently wrong.

Compare the big cities to the small well off cities in the Bay Area. Go see how much oversight is in the big cities versus the small cities. Then look at the level of corruption.

Now compare the amount corruption in the military industrial complex to the state governments.
Times Mewing Worked
> You provided no evidence at all

Evidence: "one reddit post about a single product, cars, deffo not cherry-picked"

No evidence at all: "8 links, including an economics professor and an article form an economic journal in a self-evident subject"

Gotcha.

> What you're exhibiting now is the hubris characteristic of the over-confident and under-informed, whether it's flat-earthers, Moon-landing denialists, anti-vaxxers, or socialists.

Pretty on point for a free market fundamentalist to add socialists to that list.
> What stops a frontend developer writing an ad-hoc query?

What stops them is that the "ad-hoc" query can only look like this:

articlesWithComments($id) {
title
contents
comment {
author
text
}
}

That's all. Now the only way to change this query is to remove fields but there is no way to make anything more complex. The only way to do more is to repeat the query. I.e. literally:

article1: articlesWithComment(1) {
title
contents
comment {
author
text
}
}
article2: articlesWithComment(2) {
title
contents
comment {
author
text
}
}

That will create two queries in the backend - that is the equivalent of just making two requests against the same REST route.

It _is_ possible to allow a user to change the query like this:

articlesWithComments($id) {
title
contents
comment {
author {
name,
age,
articles {
...
}
}
text
}
}

But that is totally optional - you don't have to give your users this power.
GraphQL is great to iterate with once you have built up the schema. However, after some time your queries will stop evolving and at that point you are better off with a REST API for the security and performance benefits.
The range is only a few meters. The bigger problem is people bringing compromised devices within range. Limestone won’t stop that.
But here’s the thing: the standard (like all standards) is obviously not robust enough to physically prevent responses which incorrectly indicate permanent failure.

These incorrect responses could be caused by mistakes which the remote server admins could reasonably avoid, like software bugs. I understand not having much sympathy for that case, especially from an organization with no shortage of resources. But they could also be caused by, for example, hackers or governments exerting control over the remote server temporarily.

A standard which explicitly refuses to acknowledge these possibilities is not what I would describe as “robust.” An obvious better alternative would be to set some standards around what constitutes a polite retry policy.
> They censors things in the world by US citizen's ethics.

They censor things by the landscape created by litigative US citizens who have money. Now why should any EU citizen have anything in common with this?
> cognitive

I just mean any system of inference over propositions, or anything which looks like it .

We are told our frontal lobe is the most unique aspect of our brains: not true! Our motor cortex is.

We are the only animal which learns almost all skills after-birth, via our significant and adaptable motor cortex.

> Try using it to explain it to someone

Yes, concepts need to be converted/reduced to propositional (and then linguistic) forms in order to be cognized and then to be communicated.

You can't really acquire a novel basic concept via communication, but you can acquire metaconcepts (like criteria for things) which are just combinations of basic concepts you have already learnt (ie., motor concepts).

I'm not saying that there is no propositional content to concepts, ie., that they fail in being instances of some abstract Form.

I am saying, rather, what they are; and how we acquire them.

I have significant doubts that the world can be conceptualised by mere cognition, ie., that the contents of an inferential process can be arrived at via an inferential process.

I think this is an illusion: and it is apparent with machines. There is no mechanism for their understanding what they are processing.

We aren't aware, i'd say, at all, of how we actually conceptualise the world. All we're aware of, as far as our intelligence goes, is inference(/cognition). (Though many greats have attributed mysterious immediate insights to the divine: rather it is just their actual intelligence).

I think that sets us up for a highly misleading paradigm of intelligence (cf. Cartesian dualism, etc. )
I'm playing on a PS4 slim and the game is fine, I really don't understand all the negativity (v 1.0.4). I had 2-3 crashes and saw some bugs like objects hanging in the air or the weapon not being visible.

Performance is fine. Bought the game a couple of days after launch and after reading the reports about horrible performance while downloading, I disabled everything under graphics, but then after a crash it reset its settings (yeah, I know) and it seems to work fine even with all settings on.
But you didn't come up with the name Diskette, IBM did when they created the floppy disk :-)

That's highly relevant if the question is "what's the non-'ette' disk referring to".
Imagine bragging about buying sex.
Context-free grammars were originally invented by linguists for analyzing natural language. You can see examples of phrase structure and dependency diagrams e.g. here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dependency_grammar

For what it's worth, I agree with OP, and have a very "language-oriented" thinking style. I certainly don't visualize anything while programming or doing math (except for geometry and the like). My thinking feels like it's more based on constraint solving and seeing analogies between domains.
Or perhaps encase the computer in a faraday cage.
Per several people's request, just added in an email login. Please try it out and let me know if you run into any issues.

Also many thanks to all of you who tried out Nano Page. I'm a bit surprised at how strong the response was to the product!