skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I meant that someone can't assert copyright over your live performance of your own compositions as it occurs. Copyright can be asserted over a recording of course. Someone might try to assert copyright over portions of the music I suppose. In this context though there's no way for copyright to be valid unless he's assigned the copyright to someone else which doesn't seem to be the case barring any further information.
Accessing pasteboard metadata doesn’t trigger the pill, though.
The blurred lines between vlogger / live-tweeter and protest participant are responsible for a lot of this.

Police have arrested journalists and camera crews before... but they generally avoid this because of the terrible optics, and there's a pretty firm line between "observing the protest" and "egging on the protest".

But if an independent journalist now doesn't need a team, just a cell phone and a twitter account, I think it's very easy for (1) far, far more people to self-identify as journalists, and (2) the police to not believe or care about the distinction between casual tweeter and casual journalist.
A lot of comments here about the name, it's probably a reference to Neil Gaiman's (excellent) fantasy novel Neverwhere.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neverwhere_(novel)
Showrunner: "Let's take this piece of art, well loved by adult sci-fi fans, get a whole new cast, change it at its eyebrow-raising core to make it suitable for pre-teens, reducing it to unseasoned pablum, and see if it sticks to the wall."

Executive: "Ship it!"
Sorry, I meant that the behaviour is guaranteed, not that the destructor is guaranteed to be called. So in the Rc cycle example the guarantee is that the destructor won’t be called.
This sort of unthinking, reflexive cynical glibness encourages the public indifference that allows things like this to happen:

> The numbers are staggering. Arrests of journalists skyrocketed by more than 1200% in comparison to 2019.

This is in fact new.
Hmm, is Whedon involved w/creative team? Seems like he's challenging to work with.
Yeah I believe that essentially all of the actors in that article (private or public) should be legally required to explain all reasoning for decisions made and provide redress for mistakes. This should be done quickly. It all should be transparent. If any of these requirements means the current business models or contracts are untenable, so be it. Efficiency isn't everything. It definitely isn't worth leaving random victims at the wayside.
Your response is to the typing nature of GraphQL, but this isn't the only strong reason for GraphQL. GraphQL reduces both response payload size to only what is necessary for the client, but also reduces round-trips.

Unless you are writing custom REST endpoints for every aspect of your UI, most formulation of what data a consumer needs will usually resolve in multiple trips to the server. So, you either scale out by having custom REST endpoints to handle each case of this (which both feels odd and presumably won't scale very well), or you take advantage of GraphQL doing this natively.
Why not? Theaters have been hurting for a while, and if launching movies simultaneously on HBO Max is successful enough to stick, it could easily draw enough customers to kill the entire model.

Two tickets and a popcorn - for a single movie - is more than a monthly subscription to HBO Max.
>> Wow, I wonder how would you ever attract anyone to that job then

Most jobs these days are disposable, attracts plenty of people. Just pay a regular average salary and people will be lining up.

>> Why would it be impossible? It's pretty easy in fact - diplomats have immunity in order to carry on their jobs.

Clearly it's not. It's a slippery slope. For example, even corporations today have more rights than people, they can move to a new country and not have to apply for citizenship like people do. Corporations also pay lower taxes in many countries, also they can commit crimes and get away with only small fines; they are never jailed or terminated. By extension, corporate executives often get better treatment than regular people when it comes to certain crimes. It's also well know that rich people pay much lower % taxes on average. Nobody is equal under the law because we've allowed ourselves to diverge from this simple principle.
14 cents per "query processing minute" sounds like it could add up very fast. Prom queries can get somewhat complex and it's not rare at all IME to have a dashboard making several multi-second queries per load (whether that falls into "you're using Prometheus wrong" being a separate discussion of course)

Edit: The example from their pricing page:

> We will assume you have 1 end user monitoring a dashboard for an average of 2 hours per day refreshing it every 60 seconds with 20 chart widgets per dashboard (assuming 1 PromQL query per widget)... assuming 18ms per query for this example.

Comes out to over $3 per month in query costs. Replace this 1 person with a TV showing the dashboard all day, and the cost jumps to $36, for just one dashboard and (again IME) overly fast query estimates... o.O
> While Signal is pretty awful on desktop

Weird. I find the desktop app pretty good.

I see people complaining about it being slow, but that's not been my experience.

My main complaint with the desktop app is that I really want it to sync message history with the phone app. If you, for example, don't use your laptop for a while, you'll have to re-authorize it and it won't have any messages from when it was off. I realize all of that is a trade-off for their security design, but having access to all my messages and being able to search them is important to me.
that worked out great for him
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQW209m...

silly religions
I have a hard time seeing how it's justifiable for a third party to tell someone what's better or worse for them.
The only reason this is a story is so that the show can get another buyer. Honestly good for Tim Cook to shut this Gawker crap down. They were garbage when they were around and we don't need rose colored glasses looking back over their history to live on in TV show format. Also the executive who cleared this probably should have thought a little bit more about it.
If you can't compete, better slap successful companies with regulations, more red tape and arbitrary fines!

That creates good unionized civil servant jobs to work out all these new compliance regulations! Good for reelection I assume.
I don’t see why that Airbnb example is problematic — enforcement of local laws using information not stored locally. The other option is requiring data to be stored within whichever jurisdiction the data concerns, which could be done but seems contrary to the point of the single market (not a huge difficulty if they can afford local translators and content moderators, but still against the point of the single market).

Can you give a better example of how this could be abused?
AWS IoT EduKit
It seems like the policy has an exception for infrequent data collection with user consent that’s not core to the functionality of your app (c.f. “Optional Disclosure”): https://developer.apple.com/app-store/app-privacy-details/
They are so good, and so humble. Virtually every update talks about tons of issues, and yet they are best in class.
By that I mean not just the means of production but the means of consumption. It used to be that the means of production was the hard problem (capital costs to create a new print publication were high). But now perhaps the more difficult problem is disrupting the way that people are used to consuming news and persuading them that quality journalism is worth paying for (or at least persuading them that if nobody pays for journalism, quality is going to suffer).
nice hopefully they die in jail.
It doesn't lose it - it just doesn't remain an advantage over the alternative.

It's not like if there is a schema with a REST API, the GraphQL alternative becomes un-typed.
> Really would love a clear answer

It's astonishing that you don't understand this, but I'll assume your question is in good faith.

It's because "Silicon Valley" doesn't actually produce etched silicon anymore, or really anything of actual value to humanity, at all. In fact, it's become a net negative for the rest of humanity.

It spends the most valuable IQ points this planet has on endless ad click optimization, addictive social media experiences that induce mass depression, and finding novel ways to censor non-mainstream opinions.

There is no value-add, and there hasn't been for two decades. I suppose Cupertino can lay some small claim to actually advancing humanity with their silicon design, but at the cost of the rest of the company inventing ways to ensure that humans are passive consumers of Apple Credit Cards and Apple TV instead of actually advancing us somewhere other than Idiocracy or Wall-E.

Meanwhile, there are very real and very tangible risks to our very existence that SV ignores because of mathematically flawed assumptions about the actual physical limits to photovoltaics, energy storage, or absurd notions such as "vertical farming". If Wired or The Atlantic prints a glowing story on a 19 year old who will solve resource constraints and climate change, well then, by God they're going to do it. Faith is all you need. Math and reality can GTFO.

What's really hilarious is that HN, at least monthly, gets an article posted and upvoted about how toxic and infantile and terrible SV is, but lessons are never learned because anything that interferes with the income stream necessary to maintain the narrative bubble is mere curiosity.

You even asking this question is indicative of a problem: specifically the problem that you are NOT actually ignorant of the answer. You read the answer on your own echo chamber regularly. Rather, you choose to disregard it and instead regard the people earnestly answering it as trolls, or proles, or some other ignoble fool whose response can be easily forgotten.

As it is that this response will be forgotten. Because introspection is inconvenient, and flyover rubes are beneath you.
Neat! I had no idea. Thanks for sharing!
If Josh Wheedon is involved it could be great.

Getting Filoni involved in the
Mandalorian was great.
CORS solves much of this - servers have to opt in to allowing these requests, just like any other cross-origin requests. Badwebsite.com in general cannot send a POST to bank.com/send-money from inside your browser, and similarly it cannot POST to localhost:631.

There's caveats and of course servers can be configured insecurely, but this isn't a general risk by default.
Deploy Microsoft Active Directory Infrastructure on EC2 Using AWS Launch Wizard
Lombok is used in a lot of places.

A way to look at Graal is, "better Java compiler plugins."

Some stuff, like using checked exceptions as a function type system, is fragile.

Code weaving was always sort of the future. Look at the Javascript ecosystem. It's unavoidable. Not necessarily bad.

Anyway ObjectiveSQL should probably use an annotationProcessor to achieve the code weaving goals. Similar to Dagger.
A lot of them have $20k / week gambling addictions and a lot of their investments really weren't very good. I don't think a bit of London real estate and a share of uber is going to keep them on top forever, especially when western governments realize that there's no need to be nice to them any more and keeping them out of prison and giving them western visas is a bigger headache than it is worth.

I expect it's probably going to get a lot worse before it gets better though. The Saudi Royal family is not going to let itself be drained of wealth slowly and go peacefully into the night. They are going to claw each others' eyes out to maintain their status and privilege. MBS will probably get his comeuppance at some point at the hands of one of his relatives or via some Iranian proxy.
I must admit, I find the idea of the origin here (invented by coders) unlikely; it seems far too generic and likely to go back considerably further.

The suggestion of a WW2 soldiers origin (a la foo bar) in the article is more believable, though really I don't see why it should have not predated that as well.
I think you're missing my point. I'm only talking about the users. If something could in theory effect the same result in their brains that normal love does, then I personally would be all for it. Maybe we're not there yet, but I'm talking about the principle rather than any specific implementation.
How to purchase SaaS products for less
https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/opensource/how-aws-and-grafana-...

Down in the Conclusion section at the bottom:

"AWS, working with Grafana Labs, will be contributing licensing revenue and code to help make Grafana even better, not just for the AWS service, but also for open source users and Grafana Cloud customers."
It's not that difficult to understand. Some people really are unaware of the risks of handing their child an iPad to play a Sonic game. They're unaware of features like family accounts or app store controls to prevent payments.

An argument to this I keep seeing is "well if the parent doesn't understand it then the kid shouldn't be using it." Heck, if my parents only allowed me to play with things they understood, I'd never be in a software engineering career. Parents should be able to make a mistake with a video game an not have to pay _16 thousand dollars_ to recover from it.
pointless thread , pointless comment
This particular room was used to prepare for https://cppcon.org/.
>This completely changes the game on all kinds of fraud, not just ad fraud.

As someone alt-tabbing in from real fraud investigation work, no, it doesn't. Banning burner phones and reducing banking privacy regulations would move the needle there, but those aren't even on the radar.

"Someone's script opened a page" isn't fraud. Someone built a script specifically to spam click a competitor's ads, by contrast, is.
As long as there's still an adorable coverall-wearing female spaceship mechanic I'll give it a chance.
Another counterpoint to readability: the benefit is diluted if the reader isn’t familiar with the dependencies. I know this goes both ways, though in some circles (say, devops) there’s more familiarity with Unix tools than Python. So the cognitive overhead of getting familiar with something you’re not IMO outweighs readability in either case.
I started working through the ISLR book then found someone else to do it with.

http://faculty.marshall.usc.edu/gareth-james/ISL/

You can download the PDF and there are videos too:

https://www.r-bloggers.com/2014/09/in-depth-introduction-to-...

Doing the the questions and labs is helpful with a partner.

Machine Language Tokyo has several good sessions. Not many times that work for me, unfortunately.

https://www.meetup.com/Machine-Learning-Tokyo
Project names with a random word taken from another language always felt a bit cheesy to me.
The first party apps not on App Store seem to have them linked through here: https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT211970
Ok first of all I am not saying that third parties without access to first party data will compete with google's search ad business.

I think after removal of IDFA, smaller ad networks will steal some of big players mobile market share. And mobile advertising will not move to search based advertisement as much as you think. Maybe some revenue will shift there, but I think lose on mobile side will be bigger.
Sure, there's often going to be some centralized source one needs to trust. The issue with a digital escrow vendor is kind of like the issue with cryptocurrency exchanges - one single breach and you immediately walk out with an unfathomably huge treasure trove.

A rogue notary employee can do some damage and notarize things in exchange for bribes, and a rogue bank employee could help siphon some money away, but a rogue digital escrow employee could be bribed to hand over terabytes of extremely sensitive data on lots of big customers, and a rogue cryptocurrency exchange employee could possibly help someone steal hundreds of millions of dollars pretty easily. It's a huge house of cards.
This article seems to point out why TikTok is widly successful:

* Doesn't need your social graph (Facebook) or third-party discovery (Snapchat) to get you engaged and keep you enganged.

* Your immediate audience are strangers doing the same thing as you are when you open the app, just add appropriate tags to your post and you're off to connecting with new people
> Disney ruins everything:

I think they turn everything to wholesome family entertainment.
I live in Portland and watched many of these press people via Twitter. The reality is that many of these “press” are activists who document their activism and the activism of their comrades. They call themselves press, but they are press+activist. As a result they are often in the crowd of people throwing stuff at police, while screaming “hey you fucking fascist, aren’t you embarassed to be an authoritarian?”

I am not saying that they are better or worse than traditional press, which I have a strong aversion to, I am just saying they are not impartial and are very often just Twitter journalists who are protesting at the same time they are working, and as such these numbers don’t tell the full story. I happily follow them to see on the ground footage, but you have to take their editorial viewpoint with a huge grain of salt.

*Edited to add "many" in describing press, since my original statement implied all, which is obviously not true.
Yes, it's possible localhost servers can have security issues, but:

* This only affects servers that do indeed serve the "anybody can talk to me" CORS headers. For anything else, standard cross-origin restrictions apply. A simple localhost server that has ignored this issue and isn't aware of CORS at all is generally not vulnerable.

* This change doesn't actually increase this risk, it decreases it! Localhost requests from pages were already allowed, CORS notwithstanding, it was just not possible from HTTPS sites as it was mixed content.

* This is a pretty common pattern for lots of popular software that has a desktop component - e.g. Spotify, Zoom - so there's a clear use case for it.

* There's ongoing work to restrict this further, see https://web.dev/cors-rfc1918-feedback/, proposed by the Chrome team. In short, HTTPS will be required, and a new `Access-Control-Request-Private-Network: true` header will be sent (and an `Access-Control-Allow-Private-Network: true` response required) to force servers to opt in to any requests that cross from public origins to private ones.
The site 42papers.com that serving this link is build with Super Graph a GraphQL to SQL compiler. Tech like this makes GraphQL clearly the easier, faster and better option. I built Super Graph since I wanted something better than REST while building apps and did not want to go down the rabbit hole of GraphQL frameworks where I would still need to write and maintain all the database query code for the app.

I started out not liking GraphQL cause it didn't really reduce the code I needed to write but on digging deeper it seemed to be the best way to represent a data query from an app now only if something could convert that into SQL automagically. This was the motivation for Super Graph.

https://github.com/dosco/super-graph
Does this actually pass as an academic study? It is presented in the format of a study (it looks like one) but to suggest GraphQL is better than REST based on the expenditure of effort for building out the first iteration of code for cherry picked scenarios is a first-year undergraduate CS101 study at best. Also, who funded this study?

I want to know the actual costs of GraphQL. What are the tradeoffs with REST? What are the limitations? We're not going to hear from managers who are damage controlling their decisions, but maybe the developers paying for GraphQL adoption wouldn't mind sharing grievances? Now that money and reputations are at stake, I think that unfortunately it will be a while before the tech community starts admitting to mistakes, just as was done with adopting ORMs.

The typical pitch about GraphQL is that it is intended to alleviate the pain of updating ORM dsl every time a change to an endpoint needs to be made to satisfy frontend requirements. Aren't updates to the GraphQL DSL replacing those made to the ORM? The problem hasn't been eliminated but replaced. One problem was replaced by another problem.

If the worst part about working with a REST api with raw sql calls is that you have to make a few straightforward changes, while maintaining complete control of your sql, you're doing great.
While you are probably right, as far as ebooks go, Amazon keeps a higher percentage of the ebook price than a lot of their competitors do, so I would not be surprised if some publishers charge more on Amazon to cover the Amazon take.
Does "Lenix" seem like an unfortunate name, or is it just me?
I see your point, but there are 2 key differences here that I see.

1. Your product is integrating multiple tools and data sources to provide value beyond "just grafana".

2. You're are not Amazon, and I think that is actually a big point here. It's unlikely that someone will choose your product over Grafana if they are just looking for a hosted Grafana. I don't think that's really the case with an AWS alternative.
I did.

But using your link, at Travis county (2.2267), once again, it'd need to 3.6% to be equivalent levels of absolute tax paid as SF.

It's effectively 2.2267/3.6 (62%). It doesn't matter really how you slice this, because it's not subtle. People in Austin pay way less property tax than people in SF on equivalent housing, even before other taxes (only in SF) are taken into account.
Those large ones are large and important enough to receive substantial rewrites/overhauls when necessary. Those rewrites can be very expensive, and are completely infeasible for most software projects that don't have huge backing behind them. For small and medium projects, (code) complexity is a leading factor in maintenance, and a huge amount of unmaintainable software gets abandoned regularly, or simply falls behind and is abandoned over time.

The maintenance of giants is tied to their importance rather than the complexity of their codebases. SQLite is no less likely to be around in the future because it is simple.

Codebase complexity also isn't just about size. A huge, well-written codebase is still more likely to stick around in its current form without requiring a total overhaul.
That's still not enough. Devices like iPads and iPhones aren't multi-user. So, if Mom or Dad are going to be using it, they're not going to set it up as a kids account.
I see some folks (and many journalists) astounded that folks wearing press badges and press helmets were arrested, which I believe to be a dangerous viewpoint. We don't want journalists to get special treatment for the same reason that we don't want politicians or judges to get special treatment and also for the same reason we dogfood our systems. Journalists need to have a representative experience in order to be able to report well.

If the populace loses some right, it's not enough to just restore it for just a select few.
https://myhealthysleep.com/blog/f/sleep-deprivation-increase...

https://www.nia.nih.gov/news/sleep-loss-encourages-spread-to...

https://www.alzheimers.org.uk/about-dementia/risk-factors-an...

https://www.nih.gov/news-events/nih-research-matters/sleep-d...
Quiplash, Use Your Words, Drawful.
Hi do you know when legacy groups will be converted? Would love to use the new features but I have legacy groups with lots of history I want to keep.
> "stories of substance such as police violence were actively suppressed by the state through intimidation."

Maybe we're thinking of different events, but there was a tremendous amount of news coverage about police violence this past year.
Japan's space agency shows off samples collected from asteroid Ryugu
Does it put any limits on cardinality of metrics? Grafana cloud's offering was absolutely awful for my use cases. They charge per-series so if you have metrics with a "pod=..." label your prices go through the roof.