skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> Because tickets aren't just monetary

And the only monetary aspect is not the fine, it is the also the increased insurance premiums. The latter can be much more punishing than the former.
I also find web pages like this unreadable. I'd recommend using a browser extension, such as "Dark Reader", to solve this problem. It even lets you adjust contrast/brightness on a per-site basis. It's available for Firefox, Chrome, Edge and Safari. https://darkreader.org
These figures don’t change my advice at all. Punishment and procedure are two separate subjects. If you think the punishments the US imposes are severe, that’s an even greater incentive not to commit crimes you can’t afford to defend yourself against.

And the vast majority of prisoners aren’t being convicted and sentenced due to parallel construction or other such trickery. In most cases, they’re the result of a garden-variety guilty plea, often to crimes of lesser severity or magnitude than the original charges.
It does at least parallelize the work across available cores.
Would love to see more company HRDs providing rss feeds to their open positions.
Yes as it turns out malloc is much faster if free doesn’t exist.
If a mob trashed a neighborhood and destroyed stuff, yea I’d call it a violent mob.
Citizens United was based on the Court interpreting the statute as imposing restrictions on political speech (prosecuting a non-profit for distribution of a movie about Hilary Clinton) that are invalid under the first amendment. That’s not a situation where the court is saying what the law should be; they’re saying what kinds of laws are allowed under the constitution and which aren’t.

Here, the argument isn’t about the constitution. It’s about what “appropriate relief” means in the statute.
The Supreme Court issues opinions. That's the actual word they use to describe what they write. You can either form an opinion or you can discover a truth. The Supreme Court does not discover whether it is true or not that a law is constitutional or unconstitutional. Each member forms an opinion, and whichever consensus opinion includes the majority of justices, that becomes the opinion by which other courts proceed to interpret the law.

You might want to mask "discover the truth" with "finding a provision", but the Supreme Court does not "find provisions that conflict with other provisions", they interpret things to form opinions. In this case 5 of them interpreted a provision to be in conflict with the way they interpreted a provision of the constitution. 4 of them did not share either or both of those interpretations.
You can buy the DVSI codec wrapped up in a USB stick from NW Digital Radio. They call it the "ThumbDV". It looks like a serial port to your machine, and you can just poke it with the right commands and it'll turn raw codec data into raw audio data (and vice-versa).

I used it for decoding the AMBE+2 stuff on newer P25 systems. It wasn't great but it did mean I didn't run afoul of any patent issues if I wanted to sell the system to someone else. OP25 is great but I didn't want to take the risk.
I didn't know this was a thing in the US until a few months ago - apparently the local police notify insurance companies (somehow) of speeding violations and thus give the insurance reason to increase your premiums.
an enzyme called reverse transcriptase or its equivalent is required, the HIV virus and a number of other retrovirii do this, and implant thier code into the host DNA.

eukaryotes use splicing mechanisms that copy/delete/replicate DNA from one locus to another, this is more reliable as mRNA are unstable and become damaged quickly. cytoplasmic mRNA is not of fidelity and does not reverse compile into the dna sourcecode, or it would produce massive errors and corrupt the DNA.
A reference to a 2 minute conversation from an episode of top gear from 10 years ago, beautiful work.
Same to some extent, is happening with Google, just more overtly.
How about Republicans stop holding onto "evidence", which turns out to be manufactured, right before the elections and then expect everyone to take their evidence seriously when even the conservative-stacked courts tell them they are delusional.
Even better: in Germany, the cameras black out the passenger's side of the car automatically for privacy reasons, so that only the driver is identified.

This was a problem in 2008 when a car with steering wheel on the right systematically got caught speeding. The driver knew full well what was going on an placed a muppet in the passeger's seat. The picture is fantastic:

https://gizmodo.com/the-muppets-animal-caught-speeding-drivi...
Yes, Twitter and Slack are proprietary.
"Good listeners do often reflect words back—but not because they read it in a book somewhere. Rather, it’s cargo cult advice: it teaches you to imitate the surface appearance of good listening, but misses what’s actually important, the thing that’s generating that surface appearance. The generator is curiosity."

Interesting. What are other examples where the commonplace advice is just a symptom of the root behavior/attitude you want to cultivate?
Any resources/recommendations for truly learning SQL? I feel pretty comfortable with the basics, but could certainly stand to improve my SQL toolkit!
Without knowing which auto-immune disease its hard to give more information (which is fine, this is not medical advice).

> So if I understand you correctly, the self-recognition system is something built-in

Yes. before immune cells are released and "primed" they go through a selection process where the receptors they have for (unknown) antigens are tested against a vast array of proteins the body normally produces, if they bind, they are killed off. Sometimes this doesn't work and if they are activated and bind their (self-)antigen when the immune system is activated (i.e. during an infection) they can attack uninfected cells. Which as a one off event is not problematic, the problem comes from the fact that those immune cells stick around when they contact their antigen, and if it is produced by the body this is a lot, and continue to kill healthy cells and cause inflammation.

> and doesn't change in response to foreign antigens?

By the time the immune cells bind to foreign agents they have already gone through the selection process.

Necessarily a vaccine will produce an immune response (or otherwise it won't have the intended effect), this could cause an autoimmune response because the atuoresponsive cells, presumably, have their antigen around.

> but this shouldn't affect the production (or culling) of T-cells that are super-sensitive to host's own self-antigens?

new ones, no. In fact if you're not a child, you aren't producing many new (unique) T-cells at all. Old ones however may proliferate if their antigen is present and an immune response is triggered (to the vaccine or the virus).

If you want real advice, don't take it from some random on the internet with only a minor in biomed, talk to your doctor or immunologist.
It's a pity that it really is that bad. It didn't have any glitches during normal usage but it quickly fell apart when challenged, obviously. So it's probably still too early and we need more distros picking Wayland up and help stabilise.

What didn't help was probably the desire to force myself into liking GNOME, when normally, I fall naturally into the KDE camp, because it is beautiful without having to make things too simple, like GNOME does. Even though I agree with many of the things GNOME stands for, there is lots of stuff you wouldn't NEED to customise, or use.

Will consider KDE on my next attempt!
In case you weren't aware, this is a common enough technique for it to actually have a name: bump allocation. It's very useful in short lived programs with bounded allocations, for the exact reason you outlined.
The federalist itself has spread a lot fake news over the years so you may want a better source to debunk the republicans in the state who literally ran the election who are saying it wasn't fraudulent.
Yes. Michael David Crawford[0]. RIP MDC[1].

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19489570

[1] https://static1.squarespace.com/static/51d72b41e4b0f798b53a3...
Reminds me of a similar news in China recently.

A guy's car had issues and pulled over on a high way, police remotely helped him dialing the tow truck company, via speed cameras and a loud speaker.

The best part? The police was able to look at his phone screen clearly and yield over the speaker "no dude you got the third digit wrong with the phone number!!!"

https://m.weibo.cn/detail/4558925167075110
If the goal is to charge people who take actions that result in higher probability of losses, then it makes sense. Otherwise, drivers that have less probability to cause losses are subsidizing those that do.

Also, in the US as far as I know, you can “fight” the ticket in court and pay the local government more to reduce the level of speeding ticket and hence points you get, so that the insurance company doesn’t see any speeding (or sees less severe speeding).
Imagine trying to play this without previous experience. Myst is hard enough in full detail!
I reached out to learn more about the patent mentioned on this site. Per Damgaard Husted responded by linking to https://www.dkpto.dk/media/7607/patent-aarsregister-2017.pdf

Patent title: "A method for automatically presenting to a user
online content based on the user's preferences
as derived from the user's online activity"

Reading into the patent it seems to be a user tracking algorithm for content suggestion. The description seems overly-broad and generic.

He also added: "Also because we have not started in implement out AI yet So the focus should not be on that part now,"

So this is a patent that is not being used yet although it is included prominently on Cognifirm marketing material.

More info: https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO20...
Don't like seeing grandma and grandpa get scammed to make some guy's stock price go up? Should have bought the stock yourself! (??)
In Russia this is already the thing, private parties are setting their own licensed and verified speed traps.I don't know their revenue numbers, though
It seems to me like this is only true if you assume space is perfectly transparent, which seems like by far the weakest assumption.

Introducing any tiny amount of absorption in space would fix this, even in an infinite size, infinitely old universe.
They are made by https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thymic_epithelial_cell (see the section on Positive and negative selection) as part of the selection process.
There are some newer cars with AEB that have pedestrian detection, though. You can watch videos of IIHS testing those features [0]. It's not a perfect solution but will automatically brake if a collision with a pedestrian (or other VRU) is predicted and the driver is not braking.

[0] https://youtu.be/TJgUiZgX5rE?t=109
If I'm interpreting your comment right, you are saying that the US had the capability to crack this message easily, but for some reason the FBI just didn't bother? or they did it, but they didn't want everyone to know they could? Is this correct?
In most countries that don’t try to just fill coffers through speeding tickets, enforcement happens at 10% or so above legal speed limit.

If the two cameras are more than 1km apart, that makes your point moot.
No. Those are the very definition of publishers, not communications providers masquerading as publishers when it's politically convenient for them (recall the dance around Section 230 protections).

If a local newspaper ever somehow became the central point of communication for a significant fraction of the population, posting nearly everything they received by default with very little to no curation, then it would be reasonable to reexamine the expectations placed upon them by society.
What doesn't make sense to me is why can most cars go so much faster than any speed limits?

Why not just have the manufacturers build slower cars, or at least limit them somehow. Then make it ilegal for people to tamper with their cars to make them faster.

Is there any other reason than playing this game in which law enforcement/governments get to make additional money through tickets?
Textualism outside of law is fun. Enjoy. In the context of law, and this entire thread, it's nonsense used by people to make themselves think they are smart, or trick other people into thinking they must be smart. In law, everything is textualism, and therefore anyone who claims textualist jurisprudence as a distinct thing they practice are simply attempting to classify anyone else as not smart enough to form valid opinions about what words and phrases mean.
> Someone else was eating aluminum soda cans

Huh?
It's because it was pretty obviously a giant lie due to the complete lack of evidence and just plain didn't make sense to begin with. Why would Hunter Biden fly hours to go get his computer repaired. Even if that was true, there would be serious questions about the chain of custody for this supposed evidence. Many stages for things to be fabricated with big incentive to do so.
Nintendo made a DS with one screen
It works like this in Sweden also, and in Latvia as far as I could tell.
I think it's kinda sus that Google doesn't provide any sort of instructions or script to uninstall Keystone. Why not?
If they went that route, they would just require a plate on the roof too.
Could somebody summarize the answer please? I'm trying to decide if it's interesting enough to read, and the first 20 paragraphs suggest not.
Oh, definitely. I’d love to see those become mandatory just like seatbelts, airbags, etc. have because it’s a multi decade process to upgrade the national vehicle fleet.
That's not what Noether's theorem means! The "symmetries" referred to here are operations which leave invariant the action of the physical system (heuristically, the physical laws governing the system). To the extent that one can (at least in principle) write down the action of composite systems as the sum of their actions + interactions, these are taken to mean (again heuristically) the laws of physics writ large. Likewise, "conservation law" here means not specifically the particular result of an experiment (like the work integral you describe), but a more general notion of conservation, in the sense of there being universally invariant conserved quantities (i.e. things that cannot be created or destroyed).

To get a feel for it (and why it may not necessarily be intuitive) consider the following pairs of symmetries and conservation laws:

- The laws of physics are invariant under time translation (i.e. repeating an experiment at different times gives you the same result ceteris paribus). The corresponding conserved quantity is energy.

- The laws of physics are invariant under spatial translation (i.e. repeating an experiment at two different places gives you the same result ceteris paribus). The corresponding conserved quantity is momentum (this is a vector: one component of momentum for each possible direction of translation).

- The laws of physics are invariant under rotation (i.e. repeating an experiment under different orientations gives you the same result ceteris paribus). The corresponding conserved quantity is angular momentum (again a vector, since the rotation group SO(3) has three generators).

- Electromagnetism, constructed as a classical field, exhibits an internal symmetry in the field quantities. The corresponding conserved quantity is the electrostatic charge (actually a 4-vector current).

It is not a priori obvious from from the kind of arguments you've supplied why these should be the case. Demonstrating these would require access to the Lagrangian formalism (i.e. action principles) and how it behaves under these symmetry operations. I would say that, as you suspect, you are fundamentally misunderstanding the situation.
In every allocator there has to be a way to get “the memory” that is available for you to hand out. When a normal OS is present, system calls are used to get this in the form of pages. On embedded environments you don’t need to do this because “the memory” is just something like “addresses from 0x2000000 to 0x8000000” and you don’t have to ask for it, it’s just there for you to use.
One example I can think of is emergencies. I’d be okay paying a fine but speeding so I can drive someone to the hospital.
I think the OP's write up misses one very important piece of the puzzle: Politics.

Newt Gingrich who was Speaker of the House at the time got embroiled in an incident that was recorded from a cell phone conversation.
https://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1997/01/13/tape/index.shtml

Now fast forward to a few years later with the Patriot Act and metadata controvery that Edward Snowden exposed... same shit, different day...
Yes, a few pages deep and I still don't know where the rubber meets the road on this besides some generalities about risk and starting projects with it's analysis. As a stand alone concept I suppose that's fine, but as a software development method I need something more than that without having to dig through an oddly structured set of pages.
I sold my office to buy it. Dream come true! Just 5 minutes away from my house!
"Let's see, my crystal radio only has this one diode but it can only receive AM. I bet if I cut it I can hear everything!"
Either way, regulation is the answer.
The Pirate Who Penned the First English-Language Guacamole Recipe (2019)
Road and driving conditions can change.

Snow; rain: darkness; traffic.

Speed limits are intended to an upper bound, not a target.
To that buddhists would answer that there is no self.
i'd go further and say humans do not exist without technology. From fire to stone tools the relationship between human mind and technology as object and social construct is what humans are to the same degree as termites are their mounds.
Thank you for clarifying. It's unfortunate it took so long for their trials to start.
Not just that: malloc is faster if you don’t have to care about thread safety, or support interposing, or hooks, or if security is not a concern. It is easy to “beat malloc” in a specific usecase if you know what it will be beforehand. Doing this in general is what is hard.
I believe it's possible to be very interested in business and money and still end up with an ethically credible result.

The problem is that we(in the broader sense of the working world) don't treat those concepts as an "artistic medium" to which additional principles and ideas are needed to structure and shape the outcomes, rather, we just use them as scorekeeping for a nebulous measure of life success, which results in founders laboring hard over the business equivalent of a fart joke, because they're only aiming to min-max response for effort.

The measure of what's an "impactful" business is socially constructed within the arbitrage of what we could potentially strive for against what societal conditions currently allow. Entrepreneurs, as a group, are always testing the boundaries of that arbitrage. That's not a bad thing in and of itself, but it's hard to find balance in the arrangement because they aren't able to do their study in private: part of the deal is that they demand access to significant resources to make it happen, and that occasional violations get overlooked in the name of progress. In a time like now when the population is mostly asking for relief measures, it looks indulgent, and sometimes it is.
I’ve been waiting for someone to build an RTL-SDR detector for those. They draw fun loops over the highway because highway speeds are a little too close to stall speed.

Reality is it’s just an expensive enforcement stunt.
Twitching
In at least parts of the US, it is not an upper bound. You can exceed the posted limit to pass.
no, it is not, it is required for a vaccine to be economicaly efficient, and to maximize benefit with minimized expenditure

without adjuvent many vaccines would need much greater concentration of the antigen producing component.

by inducing an attenuated response, using an adjuvent, you can manufacture many more doses of the vaccine using less mRNA in each dose.
You already have TPMS sensors in most cars... not sure how long it takes to read them.
> If the goal is to charge people who take actions that result in higher probability of losses, then it makes sense. Otherwise, drivers that have less probability to cause losses are subsidizing those that do.

It's a noisy and weak signal.
It normally applies to NFA material, but my bet is this tips in to constructive possession territory. In short its the control of the materials required to create or assemble a firearm or other regulated component. Typical examples would be possessing a < 16” barrel, a collapsible stock, and an appropriate receiver. They dont need to demonstrate that you did assemble an SBR without a tax stamp, merely that you could assemble them to an SBR. Similarly here theyre not selling just an unfinished receiver. Its all of the components necessary to assemble (not manufacture) a regulated firearm.

Edit: see also sibling comments are pistol braces, or “baffles” on the sig MPX. The ATF has never been know for consistency even in cases where they issue a letter.
That's a fair point. We can say that there are differing and equally valid definitions of violent crime, with some including and some excluding property crimes.
As I've said elsewhere I fear that it's actually worse then a lack of economic incentives, even in a Communist utopia it won't work because knowledge can not be encoded through semantic predicates.
What unique abilities does homomorphic encryption provide here?

Ciphertext can be used for keys or values in a normal key-value store...
3D Interactive Earth Globe
> you absolutely imply physical harm

What about anyone that would constantly belittle or insult someone else, make fun of him and so on. Isn't that a form a violence ? Even if never comes to anything physical ? You can really do damage that way.

Given the replies above, it looks like your understanding of the word "violence" is narrowed down and only considers "physical harm made to people". It really encompass more than that. It is a powerful word that express the idea of harm being made, regardless of the target or the form.
Yea, it's very difficult to tell what anything is if you haven't played the game. At first I thought he may have just automated converting all the assets, but no .. there' is a video of the conversation process. Looks like he's doing at least some, if not all of it, by hand.

The stoneship age video looks better/playable, but I guess the developer is just hitting the hard limits of that platform.
In a first world country, the first port of call is not violence...
Minnijean Brown-Trickey: the teenager who needed an armed guard to go to school
OSM Opening Hours Integration in KDE Itinerary
This! So very much, this! He’s not tweeting from the Twitter officially recognized @potus account; he’s doing so from the same account he registered as a regular citizen years ago.

This account should receive no special privileges. It’s asinine that Twitter ignores their own rules just to appease this man.
God, I just _love_ how out of touch the American tech industry is from the rest of the world.
Religious institutions generally received less restrictions than the secular equivalents. If anything it would be the theatres, stadiums, etc, etc suing.
"inadvertently took action" what the hell does that mean?
I enjoyed it but if you're 20 paragraphs in and bored I doubt you'd find the rest interesting.
Why is this new worthy? More inspiration for future serial killers? Your pseudo intellectual nonsense lives forever?