skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Please don't do regional flamewar on HN. We're trying for something else here.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Edit: you've unfortunately been breaking the site guidelines so much that I think we have to ban this account. If you don't want to be banned, you're welcome to email hn@ycombinator.com and give us reason to believe that you'll follow the rules in the future.
Or follow the license and provide their changes for maintainers to merge upstream, making the original project better. Isn't that the point of GPL licenses to begin with?
Thanks for your anecdote. Just came here to say that I'm enjoying similar benefits in the relationship with myself, so to speak. I go strictly by the book (the book being "Trust, Surrender, Receive" in this case) with exact dosages, a trusted and sober friend/attendant, and the intention to learn and grow from the experience. It's helped a ton with behavioral patterns that I needed to leave behind, a victim mindset that turned out to be the sole cause of my depression, and has really helped turn my existential curiosity into a source of fulfillment rather than panic.

YMMV as well, but +1 to the comments here wondering how this medicine can be illegal for therapeutic use.

Two caveats: always test your stuff (DanceSafe sells test kits), and remember that the drug is just some extra help/horsepower behind whatever therapy you do and the intention to treat yourself right.
> This isn't a company deciding, this is censorship urged by the government.

Which is not new, the exactly same happened a couple of years ago to force Social Media companies to moderate more strongly on "extremist/jihadist", "foreign interference" and "child nudity" content.

During Senate hearings Google, Facebook and Twitter were faced with the choice to either do it themselves, or be forced to do it trough regulation, those were bipartisan efforts [0].

But even back then it was pretty evident how that whole thing would end up as a slippery slope.

[0] https://www.fastcompany.com/40489793/senators-grill-facebook...
There are multiple pages of comments, accessible via the 'More' link at the bottom of the page, or click here:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25359144&p=2

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25359144&p=3

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25359144&p=4

(This message will eventually self-destruct.)
Try writing a digital asset exchange to interface with numerous, rapidly evolving settlement systems and asset types as well as all the conventional banking issues, then make it cross-jurisdiction and throw in some rewinds / split chains / client forks and motivated attackers for extra fun. That was the situation starting Kraken. More thoughts at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/globalcitizen/ifex-protoco...
We need Windows support as well
All the other retail brokers except interactive brokers also take payment for order flow
Affidavits are evidence.

Are you simply implying the affidavits are all lying and want to cut short the ruling?
Adama Maneuver.
Then we have to dispense away with the whole privacy nonsense that runs rampant on HN concerning things such as ad tracking, location tracking and other data metrics. Because in that case, instead of the friend giving away our data, it's a 3rd party with whom we have a voluntary relationship with who is giving away THEIR data that we generate.
SQLite still has a workaround for locking on Win95. That could be adapted for wasm.

https://github.com/sqlite/sqlite/blob/610f11de25993960ff616e...
Perhaps the key to success truely is "over promise under deliver"

He's picked a target of Mars! It's going to be _decades_ of failure until it happens. The current status: successful steps of key component test required for sustainable future price.

Building the hype train for a 20 year goal is hard I don't know many companies that can sell "it takes a year".

Humanity has already sent an object to Mars. The next goal is "human on Mars", and golly if we can we'll bring them back!

The secondary goal "cheaply"

At my current weight i cost 1,700,000 minimum to get into space. Getting that down to 170,000 means I could actually afford it (and written into my marriage is the understanding that if I ever get the chance to go Mars I'm willing to divorce to make that happen)

Or: It's not the ship. It's the mission. The ship is just an visible process towards that goal.

>people are assuming that this is the vehicle itself

>Yet, they've explicitly shaped it like the final version, and hyped it.

It is the vehicle, it's just not finished.

There's work to be done. Let's get to it
Where as I can't get it to run at all with proton 13.4 and nvidia-450

Where's proton experimental?
I know people who have worked on drone targeting software that has killed civilians. No one cares.
We're also hard at work over at the Bridgetown project to make Ruby a first-class citizen on the Jamstack. A static Bridgetown site combined with a Rails API is a killer combo for some pretty interesting use cases. Anyway, you're absolutely right—what a time to be a Rubyist! =)
Next one should have heat shields for them to try for a real re-entry attempt but the terminal velocity was surprisingly slow with that geometry so I’m not sure it’s really going to change much.
probably depends on the game, for things like this, probably less of a detriment.
CentOS Is Dead
Over the past 4 years, MSNBC spread conspiracy theories that the Russians "hacked" the 2016 election. Will their content also be taken down?
Nice player BTW never heard of it!
Of course you do (GP is wrong) at least for media which you create that clears the threshold for copyright.

The difference is that Disney grants license to its content after (potentially drawn out) negotiations and payments, while the typical Facebook users "Agrees and accepts to grant Facebook a worldwide license"

BTW it doesn't confer a license (mostly) to anybody else but normal users do not sue.
Comments in op seem to indicate some are able to run on NV cards.
To me it’s interesting that you’re disregarding all data as being completely tainted because its not done from a lab. You’re not also responding to the actual studies I posted from a lab. I’m not trying to be flippant here and I see your argument as being that until studied we “just don’t know”. Your characterization of all people using MDMA outside a therapeutic setting as singularly a party/recreational drug and irresponsibly is just rather ignorant to me.

I want more studies, certainly. IMO it has huge amounts of promise for getting people to emotionally open up and reconcile with themselves in a way therapy alone can be less effective.

Also to repeat myself, I did not say that people suffer from depression afterwards. Feeling “drained” is part and parcel of the experience of MDMA and supplementation absolutely reduces that negative side effect.
20 years from now. Sony acquires Kissanime.
> 5-HTP is a precursor to serotonin and taking it for about a week before your experience allows your body to synthesize more to replace all the serotonin that gets used during the experience

This is not true at all.

Serotonin turnover in the brain is measured in hours, not days or weeks (Reference: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S10543... ) 5-HTP also has a half-life of around 4 hours, so you're not going to have any 5-HTP or Serotonin build-up.

The rebound from drugs like MDMA isn't simply about "using up" your serotonin. When you take a drug and induce a huge spike of activity, the brain's negative feedback loops are put into overdrive in an attempt to steer things back to normal. When the drug leaves your system, it takes some time for these feedback loops to move back toward a more normal state. It's basically "paying back" the highs with some rebound lows.

It's possible that taking 5-HTP in the days after the drug could maybe counteract some of the lows, but it's not a magic bullet.
Is Elon Musk Wrong About Lithium?
Corporations also have the first amendment right to include or exclude whatever they want on their own websites.

Section 230 just stops people from suing services for the speech of their users, ie you can't sue twitter for anything donald trump tweets even if it's illegal/defamatory/etc.

If section 230 didn't exist, then services would become liable for every action their users take on their platforms. I don't understand why people think this would reduce censorship, it'd be the exact opposite. If section 230 wasn't a thing, services would mitigate legal risk by censoring to an unprecedented degree.
> You're conflating free speech (government) with a business's decision to monitor their platform (private).

No, he specifically did not conflate those two things. Read his comment again. He said that he understands that Google can censor whatever they like, but doesn't understand why they choose to do so. I'd have to agree, I'm inclined to not trust YouTube as much anymore, even if I believe the content they are censoring is completely crazy in this case.

The argument that people conflate state censorship and private censorship has become overused to the point being disingenuous. There are some people who truly don't understand the difference between state and private censorship. But the more intellectually serious argument involves thinking about why we forbid the government from regulating speech. The first reason is that the government is ill-equipped to regulate speech; it's hard for the government to determine which speech is socially beneficial. The second is that it is often better in general to challenge incorrect ideas through rebuttal and education rather than censorship. This harkens back to Mill's argument for free speech. Importantly, the second idea doesn't just argue against government censorship, but private censorship as well.

As soon as someone argues that YouTube is wrong to take this action, people start parroting the argument that free speech only applies to government action. But that completely ignores the idea that censorship is just fundamentally the wrong way to combat wrong ideas or ideas you disagree with. And to make matters worse, many commenters also ignore the idea that you are allowed to disagree with a company's actions even if you don't think the government should compel them to act differently.

And another problem I see is we're trending toward there being two different groups of social media sites in the U.S., conservative social media and liberal social media sites, and I don't think that portends well to the future of American political discourse.

Whether all these ideas are rightly classified as "free speech" issues is a matter of terminology. Perhaps "open discourse" is a more accurate term. I just read an interesting article[1] that discusses this debate and argues it does not involve a fundamental threat to free expression, but nonetheless that it is important.

[1] https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2020/7/22/21325942/f...
Bitcoin is a non-sovereign, hard-capped supply, global, immutable, decentralized digital store of value. It’s an insurance policy against monetary and fiscal policy irresponsibility from central banks and governments globally.
And yet, 1000's of devs around the world are likely to start cheering.

There is a natural tension between stable and "has libraries built this century".

The problem is, the older the system, the harder it is to develop on, because, there is such a wide variance of library versions on them.

I see "we use Redhat on the servers, and you will be developing on Centos" as a warning sign when I look at doing Dev work for a place.

It explains so much about what you are walking into. I'm sure you could have centos on a dev box in a place where you have architects which have actually done Dev work in the last 20 years, but I've never seen one.

Yes, I am sure you are unhappy being dragged kicking and screaming into a more modern environment, but, if you look at the article it is pretty telling.

"It is a betrayal, because for more than two decades IT executives and DevOps engineers in the industry kept using and recommending CentOS for others because of the compatibility it offers with Red Hat, and the stable 10-year updates cycle."

I get you want a 10 year update cycle. But, that implies so much about the ability for the software you are developing on to be containerised or being written in a way to be abstracted away from a particular OS.

You go to a place, you see Centos, and you know it is old Oracle databases as far as the eye can see, and disconnected architectural cycles where people don't understand the choices they make any more.

What windows boxes they have will be ladened with group policies within an inch of their lives, and you would have to fight to get IE 11 as an upgrade.

You connect over Citrix systems to servers never built for load they were going to have on day one, let alone what they have now.

You will have a big turnover of developers who know what they are doing, and keep on the most soulless, but they are not good.

So you put more process in place to cover the inadequacies of what you can keep, over and over again.

You have had the rug pulled out from under you. But, it is not a betrayal, it is a wakeup call.
People who stay at programming jobs for 'social validation' are some of the worst programmers - but generally look good on paper and do well in interviews. The type of people who want to be perceived as smart, etc. Don't enjoy it intrinsically. Of course they make other moronic decisions like stay at a job. The job was the first moronic decision. I know a guy like this who's dream is to have a yoga studio, but that's perceived very differently than a Director of Software Engineering. He totally has enough money (and passion) to do it well. You can't force people to be happy.
I'm a big fan of long-term therapy, but the reality is that not everyone can afford it in either time, money, or (frankly) interest.

We live in a world that demands quick fixes, and insurance companies rarely want to pay for long-term therapy. That's the reality.

To my eyes some therapy is better than no therapy, and MDMA-assisted therapy is likely to be much more effective than therapy alone.
> You get rid of bad ideas by engaging with them

‘Never feed a troll’
All of those are very important points, and exactly why I chose the word "perceived".

Let's say multiple people observed a pattern of suspicious acts over a period of time from this boss. Maybe it's a big company, and you have hundreds of accusers, and hundreds of defenders of the accused.

So, you naturally have some people with flimsy testimony and inherent bias, and others who clearly don't know the law or policy. Then you have a few with valid testimony that the defenders of the accused are able to convincingly refute.

But you're still left with a core group of people with legit questions, hopefully trying to determine wrongdoing in honest, good faith, and they received flimsy evidence and inaccurate testimony in response from the defense. This core group still has questions unanswered... muddied, by the obviously false testimonies from those with bias, but still their core questions remain.

Deciding, at that point, that all discussion is to be silenced, does nothing to prove either side.

My point, though, really was not to draw a direct analogy, but to try, perhaps unsuccessfully, to get you to put yourself in the shoes of someone who, in good faith, has genuine questions. And to then imagine being told that your questions are so fundamentally offensive on their face, that you shouldn't even be allowed to further ask or discuss them, and that any explanation, regardless of how thorough or how flimsy, should be accepted without further scrutiny.

I think anyone who is being honest would admit that this would do nothing to satisfy you of no wrongdoing, but instead would probably convince you there was wrongdoing. Which, frankly, is a terrible way for cases of illegality to be decided, no matter which side you're on.
Yes, but there are claims it is slower
https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/a6pna3/comment/ebzpzl...
BTW, I'm directly in the center of the country wrt most of "my views". I have a few economic views that are center-left. So I'm certainly not in any "extreme", the delusions of the left aside.
Monopoly = Lack of innovations. Isn’t Facebook the proof of that? What did Zuckerberg do since IPO? He bought a bunch of toys on shareholders’ dime. Including VR and crypto that was DOA. That said China will never catch up and it has everything to do with their political system.
I've been looking for an Algolia-style alternative (in terms of result quality/fuzziness) and this is great. Definitely going to use this on a project soon.
Covid-19 vaccine: Allergy warning
I've prepared a lengthy presentation outlining my arguments that you're a lizard person who drinks human blood.

I'll be by your house tonight around 2am local time to read the entire presentation in your living room with a bullhorn.

Don't shut down my speech. The "rational and scientific" approach is obviously to let me use your property to say what I want, right?

In other words, YouTube can control what is on their platform.

I mean, you couldn't even make your post without a blatant lie (Trump was impeached because he asked Ukraine to investigate Hunter Biden, not because he or any of his underlings investigated Hunter Biden). YouTube is well within their rights to keep certain lies off their servers. And you're within yours to publish those lies on yours, viva America!
This is actually a very interesting take on this phenomena I haven't come across before, cheers.
In Steam, in the Steam > Settings menu, go to Steam Play and select "Run other titles with: Proton Experimental"
>Contracts have negotiated terms

Is that a mandatory requirement for a contract? There's this, for instance: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_form_contract#Contrac...
If you want a full system (that can play music from a NAS (SMB or NFS) check out [moOde](http://moodeaudio.org/)
Oh don't try and weasel out of it. America's respect for freedom of speech is codified in the constitution, but goes far beyond that and is a core tenant of our social contract.

Yes, Google is entirely within their right to censor whatever they want on their platform. Does it make them look like anti-free speech goons? Yeah, it does.
Could an ethical vegan weigh in on this? Separate this from health considerations for the moment. Would you feel that it is morally acceptable to eat meat cultured voluntarily from the cells of another competent adult human ... or from yourself?

I can't think why not.

Does it make a difference if the meat is cultured from a non-consenting cow, who is only briefly inconvenienced?
Poom – A Doom clone made in Pico-8
[EDIT: I choose to use strong language because it's important to speak the truth. Simplicity and clarity, combined with honesty, always are friends of truth. Sometimes you gotta say that the emperor has no clothes, and that shit does indeed stink. And this is shit that stinks.]

> In fact, there is a case brought to the Supreme Court by Texas and 17 other states ...

How do I put this delicately?

That case is bullshit.

Texas knows it, those 17 states know it, the Supreme Court knows it, and every single lawyer in the United States knows it.

And now you know it.

The Supreme Court will probably, like it did to the Pennsylvania Republicans, issue an order consisting of a single sentence rejecting their application:

"The application for injunctive relief presented to Justice Alito and by him referred to the Court is denied."

https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/120820zr_bq7...
Great piece
copper gets used because it conducts heat very well and so assists in cooling. In one of the first test stand videos of a raptor run you can see a little bit of green and I think Musk even tweeted it was running "a little engine rich". the first time I watched a night flight of a falcon9 there was a green glow right at ignition which caused me to hold my breath but that was the hypergolic ignition fluids which also burn green. Raptor uses a torch ignition so any green from a Raptor is very bad news.
I’m asking as sincerely as I can, I wish no one harm or to lose their right to vote —

How do we have a higher mail in ballot rejection rate in non-pandemic times than we do in pandemic times?

And then follow up, if we assume incredible voter turnout, how do many of these first time mail in ballots follow the process so correctly that the ballot rejection rate is lower?

Were the standards altered? That’s fine with me. Just say it.

Can we see all the ballot signatures side by side with the rolls? I don’t think that’s too much to ask really — I mean it’s a part of the process (we already check voter rolls in state and local elections).

These questions could really begin a true discussion to build a shared world views. It’s what I imagine a forthright and true partner would do for someone with slight reservations... or at least I’d hope.

Shutting it down with Orwellian tactics rather than hard verifiable data is what feels a bit disingenuous that we are all on the same team.
They certainly don't haha. Chrome hasn't even allowed running flash for years without changing default settings.
SendOwl – platform that cares about conversion rates, ease of use and owls
Well sure PFOF alone is not that much of a competitive gain, though it will put you above most investors to have it that is why hedge funds like Citadel, Virtu, and Wolverine buy this info. Those guys are doing things with that data for sure because Robinhood has scale/volume in lower skilled investors. It isn't cheap, funds has to have a massive cash to even afford the data.

Robinhood has PFOF AND low skill investors in volume, so the amount of prediction of moves is a combination of data and their users. They also recommend stocks and market these to users that are less skilled, this is in unison with online forums like wallstreetbets and more. Robinhood can move the market on stocks they want and compare volume/direction they are pushing and predict the volume/direction from others with that. Robinhood's name seems small fish, but they are a whale that other whales feed off of and those whales bring schools of small fish in uniform to them to play off of and eat.

Robinhood buyers/partners make moves based on all of those data points and the result is almost like stealing candy from kids. This is especially true on stocks they themselves push/recommend or are pushing funding to, partner companies or companies also funded by who funded them. It seems like "democratic" markets but is actually so choreographed it is a more authoritarian/fixed market due to the sheer volume and type of investor.

Since Robinhood only sells data, and so many competitors are popping up, it has to be massively lucrative in more ways than just the first step, but supporting deeper investments is probably a key aspect of the plan.
What’s ludicrous about “Flash Boys”?
Open source developers say securing their code is a soul-withering waste of time
Forget it, Jake. It's Reddit-town.
So here’s what will happen. Ban the “fake news” from Google, FB etc. You will have a pristine, non-offensive safe space bubble. All the banned folks will create their own safe space bubble on Parler or some other yet to be created platform. This won’t be a fringe group. It could be 30-40% of the populous. Comity and public discourse is extinct and then we really do have problems.

I think we are much better off with the misinformation and lies out in the sunlight for all to see and refute.
Wow, thanks for that link, clarifies what happened. I never thought I'd see a "flash gordon" shaped space ship actually fly, and no here we are.
Except the revenue that they potentially would have been losing out on had they not acquired their competitor.