skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I agree, but there are those who insist that Intel will be fine designing ARM chips and that they will beat Apple because they have such strong experience.

And has elaborated in the article, I think that easily becomes a replay of what we have seen in the car industry. Everybody say the big automakers would crush Tesla with their electric vehicles, but it hasn't happened yet.
Well, it's unorthodox because it's a wee bit racist
> I don't see VCs pouring billions in investments into new restaurants.

Serious investors play in their niche: Restaurant investors don't invest in tech either.

If your statement outlines a problem, how would you go about solving it?
FYI for point 1 this is not true, in the US, pornographic images are only restricted when they document someone being abused, drawing, animation, and even role play are legal.

When talking about freedom of speech, we use the US as a gold standard simply because we aren't talking about what is legal, we are talking about what should be legal, and the US has the least restrictions on speech anywhere in the world (my above paragraph serves as an example of this).

Otherwise I'm just enjoying this back and forth, you're both making coherent points and it is a productive discussion.
Last I checked, Android had a 16 character limit on password. Pretty frustrating when I went to set my phone up.
As a Roman I thank you for the recognition :)

I don't think Brexit will change it, the amount of content consumed in original language has exploded in the past 15 years and most of it is in English.

Also young people have been exposed to English much more than I did when I was a kid, but I think that, sadly for me, British English accent will be less common as the years pass.

I might be wrong but I think that Brexit could force UK to adapt to the "new English" spoken in Europe when they communicate with non native English speakers, much like of the 200 million Italians in the World, only 55 millions are in Italy and speak the official language and most of the times communicating in Italian is very hard.
See, that's illegal.

But creating cash-settled bridge derivatives and selling those, now that's perfectly fine.
Agree with this. It also must be taken at least 24 hours afterwards in order to ensure that you've finished metabolizing the MDMA or else the newly available serotonin will make the drugs effect more continuous.
There's a terminally Online neo-fascist who goes around interviewing other terminally Online personalities. Of interest only to maybe a few thousand people globally who spend all their time following schizophrenic racists on twitter.
> Especially so since I have a mission to replace all my dropdown & modal boilerplate with <details><summary> and <dialog> elements, and I like to build services that still work if JS is disabled.

Can you elaborate on why `<details><summary>` is specifically exciting to you?
It's obviously psychosomatic (which is why I brought it up) but it's different from a garden-variety panic attack:

- Blood pressure tends to shoot up, rather than down, during a panic attack.

- Four hours would be incredibly long; they're usually more like 20 minutes
In the light of what you said, the size is definitely reasonable. Thank you.
Yeah I'm not sure this is a great example of inequality either. Most independent restaurants fail, I don't recall the exact stats off the top of my head but very very few last >5 years and the majority fail within the first year (this was before DD or any similar services) and yes maybe tech pressures have exacerbated that, but I'm not sure the stats on that are conclusive.

Anecdotally apps are how I and a lot of people I know have come to discover or order from many independent restaurants for the first time. Even with a 25% cut, without knowing the exact numbers of how many new customers these services introduce, its not that easy to say that big tech boogey monsters are destroying independent restaurants, especially since its a fairly risky venture to start with.
Then you have Tesla....
split it between social and advertising and setup a transparent market to buy and sell personal data then let the market decide.
"More than 1,000 lawsuits have been filed against Tesla and Musk, a number of them alleging defamation"

It will be nice if the article provided a reference to other specific employee defamation cases, by not lumping them altogether.

Ex: https://money.cnn.com/2018/08/11/news/companies/tesla-elon-m...

https://www.theverge.com/2020/9/19/21446587/judge-dismiss-de...

But who knows, in the US lawsuits are easy to make up, just expensive (lawyers getting the last laugh). Short sellers might just be doing that...The article could as well be fraud...or bad journalism (not checking sources), which sadly, happens more often than not.

Who is telling the truth? The short sellers and whistleblowers or Tesla and their fans/stockholders?

PS: this piece was initially flagged by HN users and since (thankfully) unflagged by moderator.
States tell Supreme Court they support Texas bid to reverse Biden win
> emerge as leaders and are seen as charismatic but, when it comes to getting the job done, they tend to achieve less

That's a bit funny -- achieve less, according to who?

They might be satisfied with having gotten promoted, and higher salaries, status -- whilst looking at getting the actual work done, as off topic.

They've achieved success, from their perspective, but not from the researchers perspective?

Why would the researchers opinions matter more
On the Security of Homomorphic Encryption on Approximate Numbers [pdf]
It could be easily faked. But if you come down with yellow fever in a place where you claimed immunity, all they have to do is contact the doctor that stamped it. They are regulated by the WHO and won’t lie for you.

Suddenly you have a case of international fraud while bedridden in a country that takes yellow fever very seriously.
The headline is false (“WhatsApp Backdoor allows Hackers to Intercept and Read Your Encrypted Messages”), in the sense that hackers can’t actually read and intercept WhatsApp messages. Normally the reporting of a security vulnerability includes a POC of an exploit. There isn’t one here, because hackers haven’t been able to exploit it. If an activist saw this story, got scared of WhatsApp, and decided to use SMS or Telegram instead (especially if they didn’t use the opt-in secret chats feature, which most people don’t), their security got weaker.
I ran into this on FreeBSD. I do have gnu sed and other gnu utilities installed on my Mac to help me feel more at home.
Google can do bad things to you. Significantly less-bad things to you than imprisonment/asset seizure/execution, BUT they are not required to follow due process and are not answerable to anyone but themselves if they do something bad to you. They can also provide substantial amounts of incriminating evidence to the government (the ones who can execute you) and technically a warrant is not required. If the cops go to Google and ask for info about you that is stored on Google's computers, and Google gives it to them without a warrant, your rights as a US citizen have not been violated.
That isn’t my original claim.

It’s also not my job to disprove your unsupported claim by scouring sources you’ve just googled. Even if I stipulated that your sources are credible and true, which they may be, you are making massive leaps in logic in order to support your claim and not even attempting to explain how you got there or addressing my very direct criticisms.

That I am “uncomfortable” talking about this is just a lazy and ironic ad hominem argument. I’ve been talking about it. You’ve been avoiding that conversation. I’m fine talking about it. I’m just not willing to talk to you anymore.
> It will obviously fail on the ballot due to NIMBYism but I’m not sure why would that even need to be on ballot.

Translation: The people who live there won't vote for a thing they don't want.
Don't forget, not only do they only care about the battleground states Trump lost, but also the congressional victories which were on the same ballot are not similarly being questioned.

Republicans picked up seats in the House. They did better in the Senate than expected. No one is questioning the results of those races.

Why?
> Many, many billionaires live, have lived, and thrive in CA

That's probably owing to the fact that California's economy is just that large. We're the 5th largest economy in the world.. there's bound to be a higher number of billionaires here.

> The grievance rhetoric has gone too far

I live here, and I disagree. The civil situation in California has done nothing but slowly get worse for the past 3 years, and it has obviously started accelerating in the last 9 months.

> the premise that taxes on wealthy people are nearly criminal theft

That may be the argument.. it may be that for our high taxes in CA, we've been seeing less of it's impact in this state recently. I also have even been wondering if it's still "worth it" to live in CA over the past few months.

> AFAIK, taxes on wealthy people are at historic lows.

Federal personal and business income taxes are. State taxes are not. California in particular is not. Sales taxes are the highest in the nation, and personal income taxes are as well. The state spent the last 8 years going from running a few million in deficit to having several billion in surplus.

Unfortunately, due to corona, that surplus is entirely wiped out and now we're facing several billion in deficit again.

There's not a lot of optimism in CA right now.
I'm not really sure what problem this is supposed to solve. Hysteria is not a new phenomenon (Satanic Panic, witch trials). Disagreements and politics are not new; what if someone posts about the start of the Iraq War? Ignoring the present doesn't do anyone any good.
Probably because there's too much of an inferential gap between anarchy-libertarians (who have discussed this extensively) and the rest of the hn userbase (who seem to have forgotten that section 230 of the CDA has been criticized for allowing companies to legally select which viewpoints to promote while shielding them from liability for promoting harmful messages).

There's also the notion that in a free society, companies shouldn't have the freedom to discriminate on the basis of someone's politics. People who oppose discrimination on the basis of certain protected categories have the opportunity to explain why political views are not one of those categories.

So yes there's a discussion to be had but its not easy to get off the ground floor on politically charged issues unless people have a well grounded and mutual understanding of the basics and demonstrate that understanding.
Yes, and large doses are not recommended. 150mg every few hours while under effect of MDMA.

https://rollsafe.org/mdma-supplements/#alpha-lipoic-acid-ala

Yes, the above is a "community" site but there are not better sources as it has schedule-1 and not extensively studied. The sources for studies they use are the same that therapists working in MDMA therapy use to create their treatment plans. The entire point is harm reduction here.
Managers are literally responsible for managing people who report to them. If you don't have time for that, maybe you just don't get the job.
That's how I read your post too. I don't see why we should not talk about the problem because we haven't experienced it ourselves. If anything, what we share might develop our empathy for the people who are affected. Would you rather we just turn a blind eye to it?
lost interest once I read the gartner quote. Not interested in punch lines and sales quotes...articles/publications by gartner are good reads when having number 2s only...and I tend to forget about just like what I flushed down if you get my meaning
Minneapolis has had it's waves of pricing over the years. The hay day of build happened starting in 2005 and ran for the last 15 years leading up to where it is now. I lived in the Northloop on the front of the trendiness (pre-Target Stadium) and Uptown was still the land of said "hipsters" (such an unfortunate moniker). I can tell you that in 2010 I was paying more than $2000/month for a 2 bedroom there because supply was much more constrained. Now there's easily 20x availability of options. The downside is it's become much more crowded, the upside is it draws a lot of new food/entertainment options. Ultimately I'm glad I don't live downtown anymore. I think prices in Minneapolis will drop again as people spread back out if large organizations continue to dry up in the city. Don't get me wrong, I love Minneapolis and very much my time living in the city. But - things have definitely changed a lot in the last few years and I wouldn't say for much, if any, gain.
Do you know any cyclists? All the ones I know have had accidents ranging from bone-breaking to fatal.
This attempt to reframe speech that you dislike (that you feel "crowds out" speech that you see as more important) as censorship, in an attempt to justify actual censorship of that speech, is just what I call orwellian. It's like saying that "words are violence" to justify actual violence.

To crowd something out means "to push, move, or force (something or someone) out of a place or situation by filling its space". Youtube videos do not crowd out other youtube videos, there's enough space on youtube for everyone.
So? That just means Musk has enemies. That doesn't say anything about the truth of her claims.
> (...) my programming language.

https://www.unisonweb.org/ ?
R2D2, watching on from the sidelines...
Is Jordan Peterson white supremacism? What about Christopher Hitchens? Is Nigel Farage white supremacism? Trump? Marie Le Pen? Geert Wilders? Bolsonaro? Voyage a bout de la nuit from Celine? Lovecraft? How about Teddy Roosevelt? Churchill? Columbus? Music about the crusades? Nordic rock? Midsommer?

Thanks god you and google will take all those decisions for me.Thinking is hard , paraphrasing Barbie(oops more white supremacism).
The bellyflop and subsequent RUD is one of the most spectacular things I think I've ever seen.
Trump didn't "demonise" mail-in voting. He stated that it enabled voter fraud by eliminating chain of custody. I have yet to hear a single advocate of mail-in voting explain how chain of custody can be preserved and ballot harvesting prevented. There is clear evidence of harvesting, e.g. 100K ballots 99% for Biden, dropped off at a polling station in Philadelphia with no chain of custody, no Republican poll watchers allowed in the room, nothing downballot i.e. only Biden was selected on the ballots - this is ballot harvesting, at a very minimum.
So many inaccuracies in this.

> it uses its access to their sales data to come up with its own competing products.

Every retail chain has data on what gets sold inside and where it was kept, how it was promoted etc. They can very well use this data and most probably are using it.

> Thus, it is irrelevant to the manufacturer whether the supermarket promotes their store-brand product or the name brand product;

Only till the time when their store brand starts selling much better and consumers develop a relationship with that.

> But in the case of Amazon, the third-party sellers on Amazon's website get screwed, and that is where the antitrust concern lies.

Isn't this very similar to the third party sellers having their own Shopify store and someone discovering it through Google Search/FB Shop instead of Amazon Search. The only argument that makes sense here is the usage of data.
There are millions of Americans working to help others, pushing for more socialist policies. But not everyone agrees, and in our country, you have the right to disagree and vote for who you want.

I find the holier than thou attitude based on European insecurity quite entertaining. Europe is great - you don't have to denigrate other places. But don't doubt for a second how Europe got there - through colonial genocide.
Machine Learning Up-to-Date #26
#26 of the weekly newsletter from lifewithdata.org
If the password is ever exposed via a breach, generally smart people can pick up on that pattern and then all of your passwords are cracked.

There are ways you could alter the pattern, maybe a separate short salt for each site in addition to the domain, so all you need to remember is the salt, like "dog" for pets dot com, that could make it a bit more secure. Or vary how you combine the master PW and the domain (i.e. count the number of letters in the domain and insert the domain starting with that number, or each letter of the domain that many characters appart embedded into the master PW.)

Or...just use random passwords, a password manager, and make sure you both trust the provider of the password manager (or use one you control) and use a super high security password as your master password in addition to other forms of authentication. And never let it allow you to stay logged in to your password manager.
I hear net-neutrality is a common position around here. If you agree prima facia that Comcast should not be allowed to block simply or censor YouTube (they're a private company, its their own equipment, etc, etc), then why doesn't the same argument apply to Google?

>Censorship is going around to all the platforms and forcing them to remove content which has already been or is on the way to being displayed to the public.

That is your own personal definition. What happened to meeting people where they are?
This is the inevitable ruckus as more people realize that USA is a rigged democracy, and lose trust in the electoral system.

A plain and transparent democracy would be "everybody votes, the candidate with more votes wins". Instead USA has the electoral college (what for? it has to vote the same as its citizens), winning by districts (what for? districts only exist to allow gerrymandering), and vote by mail without strict controls.

I bet fewer people would complain if the system wasn't so evidently made for gaming numbers.
I think SALT deduction is an overlooked factor. It is unlikely that CA taxes or will tax capital gain more than the amount taxed by federal government. Before the 2017 tax act from, CA residents could have unlimited deduction on their state tax. This means that Musk would pay the same amount of total taxes whether he lived in CA or Texas or almost anywhere in the US.
Deno 1.6 supports compiling TypeScript to a single executable
What legal argument? Texas has no standing to sue Pennsylvania over what is an internal matter to Pennsylvania.

Let's not pretend that this absurd lawsuit has any merit -- it's one in a long line of losing lawsuits (what are they up to, 50 out of 51 lost now?) by the current president to overturn an election result he didn't like.
Fast enough and good idea to showcase Typesense. Well done !
On a UX perspective, I would add a link from the recipe title to the recipe page.
Consequences. Maybe they get more spare time, if they work less, and can pursue other interests?

And they can order light pattern people stay in the office and work late to cover up for them?

Also see my siblings reply (sibling to your reply)
> But FB, IG and WhatsApp are clearly separate products, all very much monopolies in their markets

What is the "market"? Things people do on their phones? What are they precisely monopolizing?
File this right along with Apple pulling older versions of iOS from the App Store. If you look at it sideways, it makes sense from a security perspective. But at the same time you are closing off entire chapters of computing history.
We don't know if Russia made Trump win, we only know that they helped him.

Likewise, we don't know if Trump himself worked with Russians, we only know his campaign chairman Paul Manafort did.

These are both facts that have been verified by the Republican controlled Senate Intel Committee.

You are free to read their report yourself.

https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/docu...
It is (unfortunately) more efficient for those of limited means to buy lifetime annuities than hold Treasuries. (Those will, in turn invest in bonds, but typically not exclusively government bonds.)

It is much more efficient for those who will leave an inheritance to invest primarily in equities (meaning they will invest relatively little, perhaps 0-30% in government/municipal bonds).
Despite the myriad of caveats I still like these attempts to rein in big tech, probably against my own interest as well. Well, let's see how it pans out.
The flip side of debt is leverage. That is, you get stuff that you "normally" couldn't afford, or can't afford right now. For a smaller investment (maybe all you can afford..) you can achieve bigger outcomes.

Usually in software, this would be shipping "magical" features (that are done in a crappy way behind the scenes) or shipping faster (because you are foregoing some maintenance).

The common business advice is that debt is OK if you're using it for growth (building capital) and I think that analogy loosely holds for software. Obviously it's possible to get dragged down by debt if you overdo it.
That was absolutely incredible.

It looked like most of the flight went just as planned except for the engine relight at the end.
r/pcm uses irony to defend racism and anti-semitism... it's a garbage subreddit
"As a user, I want to be opted out of this 'feature' by default"
Looked perfect right until the end, appeared to lose an engine, hit the landing pad and exploded. Instant replay: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gBELXjq_X-M&t=17585

Incredible test! The "bellyflop" maneuver was the main test objective I think, and it appeared to work. They need to figure out the causes of the engine failures now.
Ka-boom! Spectacular fail!
Also they didn't solve the floormat issue.

The floormats are stupid.

Each floormat has 4 round smooth patches about 3" in diameter underneath near each corner. Then 4 adhesive velcro patches 3" in diameter are stuck to them.

Then, there are 4 velcro hockey-puck things with screw threads that are screwed into the base carpet in the passenger footwell.

You put the removable carpet in place and the hockey puck velcro sticks to the under carpet velcro and it stays in place.

Except in a hot car the velcro to carpet adhesive gets soft and the carpet comes loose.
That was epic, it felt like an eternity before engine shutdown, and then the freefall took just as long.
90% of the time "Managing an underperformer" = you're a bad manager.

"Managing an underperformer who thinks they're doing great" = you really suck at managing but have no idea, and you're missing out on the irony.

This is up there with teachers who cant teach and tell their students "50% will fail the class".
It landed, just not in one piece.
This is true. Even in big cities with large gay populations the reason why gay villages aros is because of safety. Now gay areas are disappearing from big cities because satefy is less of an issue and acceptance is much more widespread in society.
The democrats impeached him. You were saying?
You're being toxic.
The keys incident was a good example of one general weakness that I'd want to vet: how easy is it for an arbitrary one of the numerous Debian package maintainer to introduce a change (accidentally or intentionally) that compromises the system? Before that incident, I'd already had mixed feelings about Debian-specific changes to upstream, and one of those turned out to be a whopper.

One thing that's reassuring: both of us thought immediately of the same incident, from years ago, so there's not like there's a stream of known defects discovered frequently, like in some other other areas of this general kind of system.

Another thing that's reassuring about Debian is that some of their principles or policies align with security. For example, in the past I reported an instance in which upstream code of a package was effectively phoning-home to upstream unnecessarily, and Debian took it seriously, and fixed it. I like that the intent is there, so hopefully they'll catch many problems before I have to, and not introduce new problems on top of upstream.