skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
There are still things people care about outside that window, but it has the effect of giving people time to sort out evidence and write things that can be cited. You'll find that there are many posts taking apart those issues.
Even if Hyundai weren't a diverse conglomerate as several other commenters have pointed out, car manufacturing and robotics have plenty of overlap.

Robots are used to make cars. Robots and cars both require precision engineering at a macro scale. Both have lots of electronics and control systems, even leaving out self-driving or autonomous capabilities.

For 5% of Hyundai's market cap, I think you can make a case for BD being valuable to Hyundai just as a car manufacturer, or having synergies with its core business.
It doesn't really matter how fast an uncached page load is for Facebook. Why would they optimize it? A user will only see that a few times a decade when they get a new computer. It would be like trying to shave seconds off of a native app install time.
Certainly, a quick search can show you that the overwhelming majority of video views occur on a small number of platforms, and that you are an outlier. If I am someone who has a message to share, far and away the most effective place to share that as a video would be YT, hands down. And that doesn't even begin to address the fact that all of these platforms are converging on the same definitions of safe speech anyhow, so the diversity is nominal.
Plus no one says you have to be 100% conservative.

I do dumb stock purchases but I also own shares of indexes. There is nothing wrong with a "YOLO" into a stock or option you believe in as long as you can afford losing it.
In an ideal world, I'd like both. Mandated interoperability would help a great deal—but I also don't believe Facebook should ever have been allowed to buy Whatsapp, and it's worth undoing that.
This dogmatic/fundamentalist interpretation of freedom doesn’t make you objective, it makes you an ideologue. There are well-known and widely accepted exceptions to freedom such as curbs on freedom of speech e.g. not yelling “fire” in a crowded space and inciting violence. There are trade-offs between freedom and curbs on freedoms (policies) that benefit the greater good of society. This is the so-called “social contract” between individuals and those that govern them. I highly recommend reading about this (e.g. even Wikipedia has a great explanation) and I don’t mean that as a condescending remark, I think it’s a fascinating topic. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_contract

Edit: link
You can't really compete with FAANG. They are too big. They just destroy or buy all competitors. Especially Facebook.
The thing is, technically it's actually far more difficult to integrate than it is to separate.

Facebook has been trying to make it appear that integration will make separation impossible.

But the reality is, you simply duplicate the databases and whatever shared services they depend on, and create a "stub" FB backend for IG, and a "stub" IG backend for FB for the shared services to work... and they go on their merry independent ways, while engineers remove things that depend on the stubs at their leisure.

Obviously it's not trivial (and involves the inherent complexities of any datacenter migration), and doing it without downtime is a whole separate beast, but it's not impossible or so wildly difficult it can't be carried out. In other words, there's zero reason it should be a factor in the legal outcome.

At most, there would be an IP issue -- e.g. would the spun-out IG be permitted to have a stubbed FB backend, and vice-versa -- but that's easily solved by providing those permissions as part of the separation agreement, with a timeline to remove them (e.g. 2 years).
1. You are not giving up any freedom for not being able to sexually abuse children. Jesus, dont be obtuse just to gain fake Internet points. When I talk about Freedom are things inherent to the dignity of human condition, usually written in documents like the universal declaration of human rights or the constitution.

2. You can, people do it all the time. You cannot publish it if you dont own the rights same way you cannot enter my house if you are not invited. What supposed freedom you are renouncing to?

3. Same as 2

4. Same as 2

5. I dont have any idea what is that supposed to mean.

6. In TV, I supposed you are not, at your home oh yes you can. In the street unless you are being a prick that is rarely if ever enforced.

Human freedom does not mean,"I will treat the universe like my personal minecraft game" it means, "These rights are universally agreed to be indispensable for the human condition and we will agree to gran them universally"
You're not necessarily wrong. It's a long held truism that the market can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent.
Of course it's false. Old residents don't pay "nothing", they pay "next to nothing". Look up any house that changes hands after 40 years. The old owners were paying a tax liability an order of magnitude less than the new one.
I'm not sure why that's so amusing. The justice system only requires the judiciary to be impartial in order to serve the public good effectively. Plaintiffs and defendants can be as biased as they want.

Terry Bollea (Hulk Hogan) successfully sued Gawker with the backing of investor Peter Thiel, who had a well-known grudge against them. That doesn't take away from the fact that Gawker grossly invaded people's privacy in order to turn a profit on harmful gossip.
I used to think that, but Cloudflare de-platforming Daily Stormer[0] is a counter example to your claim. I still maintain twitter mobs can pressure any private company to de-platform speech they don't like.

[0] https://blog.cloudflare.com/why-we-terminated-daily-stormer/
I was very close to moving to Austin this winter. I decided to double down in SoCal instead and buy property. I've spent a decent amount of time in Austin for work and have family nearby, but the weather and cultural opportunities won me over in California. I like that I can go to running on beach path, cycle in the mountains, carve canyons on a motorcycle, eat stellar sushi, sit in traffic :(, and walk down any downtown all in one day.

I've been very grateful to have non-extreme weather throughout the year. I am looking outside at a sunny sky right now and I will go walking on a path shortly to clear my mind. For someone with high allergies, I found that I am not allergic to trees, pollen, and grass in LA. I've had several nasal surgeries in the past to fix issues from allergies. I didn't want to risk it in Austin with different plant landscape.
It seems its no competition because people like it not because there are no other options, because there are plenty
I am an individual who has been following SCOTUS cases for some time; most of my information is roughly tertiary source quality, in that I'm gathering it from people who are reading and summarizing the legal arguments (I highly recommend scotusblog in this respect). That said, I do actually read the briefs and opinions myself in interesting cases--such as Google v Oracle, or the election related Kelly v PA and now TX v PA.

I don't know who Ron Coleman is, but doing a brief internet search, I would say that you should trust my judgement more only in the regards that I actually give explanations behind my beliefs that can be compared with other explanations to judge if I'm accurately representing the state of affairs, and to decide for yourself which explanation is more persuasive.
If you don’t build luxury housing, affordable housing becomes luxury housing. San Francisco is a perfect example of NIMBY extremism and the damage it does to communities.
Statement Regarding Cyber Attack on European Medicines Agency
Many properties I’m looking at are assessed at a value in the $50-200k range but sell around $1mm. Long time residents in such cases Pay less than 1/5 the property taxes new residents pay.
as the nazi minister of propaganda once said, "truth is the foundation of the press, and all we ask of it!"
> I would genuinely like to know why you are so confident about what claims are and aren’t baseless.

I'm confident that no good explanations have been offered for certain claims, and my epistemology is that the truth value of claims depends on having good explanations for those claims. Someone might have a different epistemology which admits claims of the form "X is true despite there being no good explanation of X being true," but note that such an epistemology effectively allows for all claims being true (the existence of unicorns, the claim that the Universe's existence began 1 millisecond ago and will end in the next 1 millisecond, etc.).
Scientists Beamed Shapes and Motion Directly into Monkeys' Brains Using Light
I don't see it mentioned in the comments thus far, but the Papa John's near me (Austin) appears to have farmed out its delivery completely to DoorDash.

Aside from significantly worse service (my last pizza was over 20 minutes late and barely lukewarm), they have also made zero effort to "white box" DoorDash under the Papa John's brand, which makes for a very confusing customer experience ("Hi this is John, I have your DoorDash order", "Huh? I didn't order anything from DoorDash...").

I'm also surprised that this move apparently made financial sense.
https://www.npr.org/2020/12/08/944230517/supreme-court-rejec...
Tax dodging? Tax drain?

I don't see what's all this fuss about, it's just simple tax "planning" as exercised by the wealthy. I guess the extra billions will make him happier, but it's weird we get attached to such things as money when you have already amassed it so much it doesn't really make a difference.
It's so common that it doesn't normally make the news. This is just news because Tesla is involved.
What reason would there be to disallow it?
I think the FTC will deal with that as it comes. Including that in this case would be speculating the future of the Oculus business.
You need 501 karma.
Not really. This kind of thinking is an attempt to tear down and discredit people who are capable of challenging a brainwashed narrative. Clearly elon musk has an incredibly strong grasp on reality. Just because his political leanings go against yours doesn't mean you can discredit him.
Those aren't far-left. Especially the "haters of every western thing" lol.

Far-left is the complete abolition of private property, abolition of police and prisons, in some cases the abolition of monies period.

There are literally zero far-left people in elected or appointed positions within the US government today.

Your worldview is much smaller than reality and the dog-whistles you lean on are obvious. Educate yourself before choosing to expound your limited views.
US states file brief in support of disenfranchising PA, WI, MI, GA [pdf]
Generating realtime weather-data in Python
I'd replace mongo with redis in your comment. Redis truly is open core, but mongo no longer is. Now it's source available, and has been removed from the repos of many distros.

Calling mongo open source now just dilutes what "open source" actually means. The organization even removed the submission of its license for approval by the OSI.

It's source available, and it's up to each person to decide whether that's good or bad.
I want Facebook to stop tracking me, not enable more of it. Which does this enable?
> she was let go

That's a very "euphemistic" way of putting it. Kind of like putting someone in a wheel chair could be described as "allowing them to tackle different challenges".

She was more than just let go, she was bullied, humiliated, demoted, threatened, retaliated against, and blackmailed among others. Evidence was tampered with, destroyed, or manufactured, along with quite the list of irregularities even judges observed.

There's nothing to justify that except an incredibly toxic company culture coming straight from a brilliant but extremely toxic leader. But people like him don't have to worry about any court. They can always buy their escape from a court of law with money, and buy their escape from the court of public opinion with charisma, PR, and their loyal following.
Yeah absolutely, as I said in a another branch of this thread, it's all just (plaintext even) 1s & 0s at the end of the day, you can flip some; I do understand that.

It's just that our starting point here was something like 'what can a software engineer do in an hour or so one evening to get their home DNS traffic going through a Raspberry Pi on the LAN'.

I happened to have, er, exactly this experience recently with my (OpenWRT) router(+...) and with that tooling, I couldn't make it work. I settled for DNAT for v4 & DROP^ for v6 because that's what I could get done that evening and it didn't (and hasn't) seem(ed) to be a problem.

^(as in, anything trying to use a different IP, if it's already destined for my DNS that's fine. The hope being that it falls back on v4 at least, even if not the provided DNS over v6.)
Well there must be something that I’m failing to understand then. His example of what he got when switching to msripub is obviously broken; just look at the run-on bibliographic entries. But it’s been a few days and I admit I didn’t read the article with great care in the first place, so I’ll take another look. But if there were actual errors in his document, that’s another reason he should not have been drawing conclusions about LaTeX.

Personally, I’ve had much better luck when switching styles. I think, though, that plain TeX is greatly underused, especially as, when there are problems, they are often conflicts among LaTeX packages. What do you do about cross references and bibliographies? (That’s the selling point of LaTeX for me, not the formatting stuff.)
As a maintainer of a a relatively tiny "open source" project, I've been going through the same thing over the last few months. People relied on the project, ok let's go open-core 99% is free, a few obscure features require a license key.

Now I'm seeing cloud providers built on top of my project with almost no significant changes (other than I guess bypassing my licensing mechanism) and they contribute nothing in terms of support or code.

Now I'm building out the cloud service and am slowly moving away from this being an open source project to more like a project that has some code that you can see and a public issue tracker.

I have several pitch decks/one pagers ready to go and written up for VCs but have been hesitant due the reasoning in this article.

But there is soon coming a time when I will have to pull the trigger and send those emails.
I disagree. This still happens today. I am a latex user but occasionally have to work in a word document and these kind of problems keep occurring.
I'm curious to see what Microsoft will do with Edge. That could give them a clear advantage.
Politics are binary.
> If a company really wants you gone, they'll make it happen one way or another.

Well they usually do it by compensating the employee quite heavily. Psychologically torturing an employee isn't that good for team morale, even if the employee was underperforming. I also don't think it's as culturally prevalent as you imply.
> Why does this matter so much when there is affordable healthcare, lots of social programs to save you in case things don't go so well?

Because when things are going well it means you lose out on a lot of economic opportunity and not everyone feels the same way about the probability of things not going well, or who has the responsibility to cover them in the case that things don't go well. As I said in another comment, increased medical costs which impact uninsured or underinsured people in the US basically don't exist for tech workers who have high-quality employer-paid medical benefits in the US. So those factors don't detract people from moving here if they see other benefits to go along with the economic benefits.

Certainly, it is the case that this has it's trade-offs. I'm not making any value judgement on what the correct decision is for anyone but myself, but just trying to share some of the reasoning I've heard (from a probably biased subset of people).
Even politically it’s just ... weird. Most of the top content on Facebook each month is sympathetic to the current administration. Facebook has arguably played the most ball with them in comparison to other tech companies.
E.g. you cannot yell "Fire!" in a theater and expect "Freedom of Speech" to protect you from any repurcussions.
> the Mueller report stated "while the investigation identified numerous links between individuals with ties to the Russian government and individuals associated with the Trump Campaign, the evidence was not sufficient to support criminal charges."

That covers a very large range of possible realities. It also describes the expected relationship between every US president and the Russians - diplomacy doesn't happen by telepathy. If there is a point there, it needs to be made more explicitly.
Also supplements are mandatory to prevent a really large comedown period - the most important being alpha-liproic acid, to avoid neurotoxicity.
If DNS over HTTPS becomes standard, and Manifest V3 lands in Chromium-based browsers, Safari, and Firefox, how are we supposed to block ads?
That trick only goes so far though. I personally like to resume YT videos or gaming sessions when I switch devices.
It is like saying that for an airplane to fly level, the force of gravity must be precisely counteracted by the lift generated by the wings.

Scientifically true, but in order to successfully pilot the plane, not very helpful. Keeping the plane in air and keeping your body fit requires knowledge of its mechanisms, not just the physical principles of operation.
Clinton gave her concession speech the day after the election. She said in it "We owe Donald Trump an open mind and a chance to lead."[1] She approved of Obama starting the transition process as soon as possible.

She didn't initiate a single court-case that tried to reverse the results of the election, or throw out votes. She didn't call up individual state electors to talk them into changing their vote.

There's a big difference in saying "my opponent may have broken the law/a foreign government tried to interfere in our election" vs. actually claiming that 7 million votes were fraudulently added and suing to overturn the results of a democratic election. I'm sorry if you can't see that the matter of scale is a serious distinction.

1. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/hillary-clinton-concession-spee...
Did you have to wait 5 years to launch this?
Data can prevent pandemic-related homelessness
Careful how? Do you typically "stand out" as in being overtly gay, or wearing anti-relgious clothing?

I'm a white man and I suppose I would be a bit wary if I had a huge Bernie sticker on my car, I otherwise don't feel unsafe in the middle of nowhere TX. I just don't like that they're all rah rah GOP.
The only reason I didn't have examples was because I am lazy. Your argument about laziness convinced me, so I added some: https://github.com/felixfbecker/svg-screenshots#examples
The value of a dramatically improved relationship can be equivalent to several years of life. Ask anyone who's been in a failing marriage. So the value of a therapy that helps fix relationships would rank among the great breakthroughs of modern medicine.

It's a shame that research has been hampered by the war on drugs. Some day our descendants will look back on the prohibition on research towards such therapies as one of the great own-goals of our species.
Regardless of where you stand, this is _blatant_ political bias (democrats) towards an equally valid opposing viewpoint (republican)

This is literally definition of a slippery slope where Google is going and would have caused an absolute outrage had it happened with the whole Russian election meddling 4 years ago. Let the freedom of expression take course, trying to control the narrative is exact opposite of democracy that Google screams they are trying to protect.
More fuel for the fire:

https://www.lawfareblog.com/republican-senators-misrepresent...

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/08/19/marco-rub...
>https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/press/senate-intel-relea...

>The ICA correctly found the Russians interfered in our 2016 election to hurt Secretary Clinton and help the candidacy of Donald Trump

>The Committee finds the Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) presents a coherent and well-constructed intelligence basis for the case that Russia engaged in an attempt to interfere with the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

I'm not sure why people go around saying that Russian interference was not a real thing? The REPUBLICAN senate confirmed this.
Added! https://github.com/felixfbecker/svg-screenshots#examples
This is odd. This is my version and OS too. What error is showing to you?
IMHO, free + non-free can be fine, e.g. AGPL + commercial cloud license.
You're mistaken. The health (or lack of health) of a dialogue is completely orthogonal to agreement (I would have thought this was obvious, but I guess not). I could agree with someone, but their discourse could be completely toxic (e.g., I can love Linux but nevertheless it would be toxic if someone were just shouting "I LOVE LINUX ITS THE BEST LA LA LA LA LA I CANT HEAR YOU!"). I could (and frequently do) also find myself civily disagreeing with someone, but understanding their arguments (and my own) better as a result--this is an example of healthy dialogue. In this particular case, I happen to disagree with conspiratorialists and also object to their discourse, but again, those are two distinct concerns.
Is it enough to have competing social networks to Facebook?
What's the point of competition, isn't it that if one product is bad, someone can make a better one so that people can use that one instead?
If I think Facebook is bad, can I use another product to communicate with people on Facebook?
The problem is that the network is the product.
If we want real competition we need to make sure that competing products can exist within the network.
Look at how email works.
That's the only way we can have real competition.
California would've had to make that responsibility known up front. They chose not to do that.

And California directly benefitted from the money they spent. That benefit is electric vehicles in the hands of its population, which improves the state's pollution levels long-term.
Cutting edge research is ultra-high risk-to-reward.

Some of the scientist and engineers working there might invent/discover what could be the most significant thing in human history for the next hundred years. Leading to a fabulous amount of wealth creation. But there's no guarantee the company financing all of this will be able to capitalize on that invention.

That's a lot of ifs. If people there invent something important; if the company sees the true value of the invention; if it is marketed in a way that makes money; if etc...
Anyone else hoping for rideable robot horses?
Funnily enough, the co-founder of Onavo (Guy Rosen) is now Facebook's "VP of Integrity," which probably speaks to FB's (lack of) commitment to integrity.
Yes, unfortunately; the Chromecast audio is among my favorite products Google has ever made. I was happy to see Amazon produce something similar in the Echo Link, and I've thought about "migrating my Home" to Amazon/Echo just because of that, though I'm no happier about giving Amazon unfettered microphones around my home than I would be to give it to Google. One of the few reasons why I think the HomePod is such a fantastic, unique device; for all the wrong Apple does, at least they demonstrate a care for privacy.