>To clarify, I said "to me, it is unquestionable".

All you've proven is that you're "unquestioning", which is why you're parroting disproven lies. But not one shred of proof for your claims about election fraud. The only widespread instances of fraud are the claims you're parroting.

You mean the "widely scorned" Texas election lawsuit? That's bullshit. But you wouldn't know that, being so unquestioning and gullible.

Funny how Texas, which has historically been so concerned about "States Rights" (a euphemistic dog whistle for the right to own slaves), is suddenly so busy sticking their nose into other state's rights.

https://www.npr.org/2020/12/09/944744105/trump-asks-supreme-...

Trump Asks Supreme Court To Let Him Join Widely Scorned Texas Election Lawsuit

Election experts scoffed this week when Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton announced he would be filing a lawsuit in the Supreme Court against four key states in an attempt to block presidential electors from finalizing Joe Biden's election victory.

But now President Trump and 17 states he carried are joining that effort.

Officials in the states targeted in the suit — Georgia, Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania — derided it as nothing more than an unfounded publicity stunt.

The lawsuit may be a typically adept Trump move to get attention, but election law experts said he has little chance of getting the Supreme Court to support his move.

As election law expert Richard Hasen put it about the Texas filing, "This is a press release masquerading as a lawsuit. ... What utter garbage. Dangerous garbage, but garbage."

Just how little legal support there is for the lawsuit is evidenced by who signed the briefs asking the high court to intervene. Trump's brief was not signed by acting Solicitor General Jeffrey Wall or any other Justice Department official. Rather, the brief was signed by John Eastman, a conservative law professor at Chapman University. (A Trump campaign statement said the president intervened "in his personal capacity as candidate for re-election.")

The Texas brief was not signed by the state's solicitor general, Kyle Hawkins. Paxton, who signed the Texas brief, remains under indictment over securities fraud and is also facing an FBI investigation on bribery and abuse of office allegations.

All of the briefs filed so far are in the form of a motion seeking permission to sue the states in the Supreme Court. As legal experts have noted, it is unclear what legal standing Trump, Texas or the 17 states supporting their move have for challenging the results of elections in other states.

Moreover, with the Electoral College slated to meet next week, this legal action amounts to little more than an eleventh hour Hail Mary pass. It is more like trying to stop the game clock from ticking when all the players are walking off the field.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DZmyFid7FRg&ab_channel=LateN...

Trump and Texas File New Election Lawsuit After Supreme Court Rejection: A Closer Look

Seth takes a closer look at the Supreme Court rejecting a lawsuit seeking to block Pennsylvania from certifying its electoral votes for Joe Biden and the GOP attempting another Hail Mary pass to overturn the election results.