skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I am not the OP, but they might have meant this: https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2018/09/12/leaked-video-googl...

Also, as
Moway linked to in this thread¹: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FRf9UxsM-NE

1. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25359710
It completed the high altitude flight test
Their behaviour endangers other. Why is it a false equivalence?
There's a section on the topic of racism towards the end.

CTRL-F for "logomachia"
That was amazing. I don't normally watch SpaceX launches but I'm glad I watched this one. They did all their orientations perfectly. I've never seen a rocket take fall damage while vertical before. Thanks for the heads up, HN.
ICA people wanted Hillary to win. A total attempt at a cue.

What happens when the wolf be in charge of who ate the sheep.
I've read about 1/3rd of this, and so far it is just someone who trucks in broad stereotypes and edge-lordiness. I haven't really read an original thought yet. Maybe there is one lodged in there somewhere, but I don't feel too compelled to go searching for it.
Looks like a success! Almost nailed the landing as well!

May have ran out of fuel towards the end.. but amazing to watch.
I prefer sites like this. Also give me plain links that I can middle click on to open new tabs.

Let my browser manage my workspace, please don't make a window manager inside my browser window.
> As a practical matter, how is this different from copyright enforcement?

Child porn has victims and harms society
Unfortunately people are going to focus on the explosive ending. But the high altitude test went well.
The OP has:

"Yesterday was the safe harbor deadline for
the U.S. Presidential election and enough
states have certified their election
results to determine a President-elect.
Given that, we will start removing any
piece of content uploaded today (or
anytime after) that misleads people by
alleging that widespread fraud or errors
changed the outcome of the 2020 U.S.
Presidential election, in line with our
approach towards historical U.S.
Presidential elections."

I've paid fairly close attention to the
claims of fraud, and nowhere have I seen
claims of "widespread fraud".

It is simply that, just from some simple
arithmetic, "widespread fraud" was not
necessary to have "changed the outcome of
the 2020 U.S. Presidential election".

Instead it was quite sufficient to have
fraud in one or two cities in just the six
swing states PA, MI, WI, AZ, NV, and GA.
Just 10 cities is enough, and that is not
"widespread".

For

"Yesterday was the safe harbor deadline
for the U.S. Presidential election and
enough states have certified their
election results to determine a
President-elect."

That statement is not the most important
possible: Instead, what the states do to
"certify" is not the last word. Instead
there is in the Constitution:

"Each State shall appoint, in such Manner
as the Legislature thereof may direct, a
Number of Electors, ..."

So, in each state, the legislature STILL
has the final authority. Supposedly this
point was tested in the SCOTUS in 1892 and
2000 or some such.

Mayor Giuliani claims to have lots of
solid evidence of fraud in the form of
hundreds of signed affidavits in each of
several of the six states and with enough
fraud to have converted a Trump win to an
apparent Biden win. By now legislatures
in several of the six states have seen at
least an overview of Giuliani's evidence.
Still, AFAIK, no legislature has taken the
Constitutional power to "direct" and
"appoint" their state's electors. Some of
those legislatures still could "direct"
and "appoint".

It appears that going directly to the
state legislatures, that is, just
f'getting about all the courts except
possibly the SCOTUS, could be sufficient.

The way I read the Constitution, each
state legislature can take the power to
"direct" and "appoint" without regard for
the state constitution, the state laws,
the state governor, secretary of state,
AG, or board of elections and without need
for the governor to *call the legislature
into session". Net, anytime before the
Electoral College votes, some states
legislatures could still "appoint"
electors that could cause Trump to win.

If there was fraud that threw the
election, then as citizens we darned
better well get to the bottom of it before
1/20/2021.

Some of the alleged fraud is just old
fashioned ballot box stuffing. We really
SHOULD be able to settle such claims
solidly, for or against.

Fraud that changes an election for POTUS
is a threat to our rule of law,
Constitution, democracy, and country. We
need a solid answer.

IMHO, Youtube should encourage full debate
of these points. As it is, it appears
that Youtube doesn't want videos of Trump,
Giuliani, or Justices of the SCOTUS -- not
so good.
As far as the cross-site tracking goes, they'd actually need to get all the other websites to update the facebook JS code they include, and it would only work until the tracking blockers updated their lists again.

I agree that tech is the wrong place to be solving this problem, but it can work in a rather cludgy way.
> The existence of Flash Projector softens the blow somewhat, but there will be some content that must be viewed within a web browser.

FWIW, Ruffle appears to be able to play Flash content within a web browser: https://ruffle.rs/demo/
Yeah, a few seconds too late to re-ignite is what it looked like. Great test though!
I wasn't sure if the ascent looked OK - no idea if it was supposed to be running on two, then one engine. But that was a moment that I'll remember for the rest of my life. Amazing stuff, even with what obviously meant the complete demise of SN8.

I'm sure they'll learn an immense amount from it, and it was amazing to see it nearly pull off the landing. Given the way that Falcon 9 early landing attempts went, it'll go the same way with Starship, and it'll be landing soon.
I will be really surprised if this succeeds. FB can just point to Tiktok and show that an upstart can succeed as there is nothing tying someone to FB properties just by virtue of them being together.
Minnesota isn't "cheap". I'd say - depending on where you want to live in the city can influence your results. Ultimately it's what you're after. I think, today, you can live there very reasonably. We have better than average access to health care, but taxes are also an impediment in Hennepin county (Minneapolis metro). The metro is very conveniently laid out - so if you're looking to move there you should broaden your search as commuting isn't horrible, public transport is decent and there's a lot of option for reasonably priced rentals - but definitely not "cheap" compared to other metro areas. The area does have a lot to offer, however.
> This suborbital flight is designed to test a number of objectives, from how the vehicle’s three Raptor engines perform, and the overall aerodynamic entry capabilities of the vehicle, including its body flaps, to how the vehicle manages propellant transition. SN8 will also attempt to perform a landing flip maneuver, which would be a first for a vehicle of this size.

> With a test such as this, success is not measured by completion of specific objectives but rather how much we can learn as a whole, which will inform and improve the probability of success in the future as SpaceX rapidly advances development of Starship.
Viewpoints are fine.

Advocating violence is not.
But it's fucking hilarious
It's impossible to say what would have happened in a different timeline, but Tesla made electric cars cool. Yes, there were EVs before, they were half-assed token efforts by the big automakers to pretend that they were trying. Tesla forced them to be competitive.
Update, Interrupted
Awesome! The landing was almost there but the test was most definitely a success. Great work SpaceX.
It's funny to pretend that 2016 election interference from the Russians didn't happen, even though every single intelligence agency (under Trump, by the way) agreed that it did.
>For instance, FB has invested massively in trust and safety people operations and AI. What happens to that investment when IG is spun off?

If what's being said is that those investments are important and necessary, then we should be looking for reasons to sustain them that aren't just about validating the continued existence of a monopoly.
UBI is a popularly-discussed policy in tech circles.
I think the OP meant, how is it different from an enforcement/mitigation standpoint.
Can you name a way in which Trump has exercised any power which could be characterized as 'proudly authoritarian'? The man has honestly done very little in office. He says outrageous things of course, but he has not praised 'summary executions' (he condemned the jacob blake killing) nor does he celebrate violence against the press. I understand not liking the man's policies, but the hyperbole surrounding him is just as bad as the stuff he says.

> Does your "no 'buts' regarding freedom" go so far as to tear down democracy in favor of a would-be dictator's "freedom" to commit treason?

The United States is not a democracy. It is a constitutionally limited republic, where the federal government is supposed to be highly constrained to protect the rights of the people, including nominally the right to disestablish it (see the declaration of independence). From the American perspective, tearing down a democracy that violates people's individual rights would be acceptable. Indeed, that is the American revolution in a nutshell if you ask the British, isn't it?
My Udemy Course Went Viral Now What?
Yes, but its compatibility is very far from 100%. It will likely get better with time; it is unlikely to ever be perfect.
A MITM-attack which starts from DNS could be narrow targeted, forged DNS responses could be sent to a single person or an organization.
Certificate Transparency monitors are futile here.

Also, if the reputation risks is the only thing which could prevent them from doing so... it is not the security we expect from the cryptographic protocols. A subpoena/warrant could be a more "colossal" threat to their business.
Genuine question, is XM4 ANC that much different from XM3? I always assumed, for some reason, that it was an incremental upgrade in sound+ANC, but more of a major upgrade in hardware dept. Never tried XM4 myself though, so that is purely from hearing people talking about it, not actually testing the device myself.

If you confirm that ANC is actually significantly better than on XM3 (which I already liked a lot anyway), then now I know what I will be upgrading to, in case Airpods Max end up not delivering on their promise :)
The difference might not be as large as you think: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/06/14/opinion/bluet...
Crash landing not withstanding but as any other rocket launch provider or space-faring nation, I'd be scared shitless now. SpaceX is in a league by itself.
I think you're missing the forest for all the trees. This isn't a tactical debate, it's a philosophical and foundational one. Until we all defend the right of people we despise to voice their opinion, everything else is playing at the margin.

People have forgotten that it's not just good for the people we detest, it's good for us to be able to listen to bad ideas and form rational and compelling counterarguments and defences against them. And since none of us is perfect, there will be times when it is _us_ that is espousing the bad idea, and it will be damn good for everyone that people are able to speak up and correct us.

There are indeed growing pains as the world comes online and starts being able to talk to each other. We're really in our adolescence as it pertains to life online. But we're making the most naive and expedient appraisals and supposed remedies to the discomfort its causing. My hope is that we're able to turn a corner and wrest control away from the reactionaries who currently control the narrative and the agenda.
http://helicraft.ca/kxt/aud-v-chi-cl1.html
http://helicraft.ca/kxt/aud-v-chi-cl2.html
http://helicraft.ca/kxt/aud-v-chi-cl3.html
http://helicraft.ca/kxt/video-aud-v-chi-tv01.html
http://helicraft.ca/kxt/video-aud-v-chi-tv02.html
http://helicraft.ca/kxt/video-aud-v-chi-tv03.html
http://helicraft.ca/kxt/video-aud-v-chi-tv04.html
http://helicraft.ca/kxt/Audax-Itali-dad-de-Chile-AB01.html
http://helicraft.ca/kxt/Audax-Itali-dad-de-Chile-AB02.html
http://helicraft.ca/kxt/a-v-u1.html
http://helicraft.ca/kxt/a-v-u2.html
http://helicraft.ca/kxt/a-v-u3.html
http://helicraft.ca/kxt/a-v-u4.html
http://helicraft.ca/kxt/v-ideos-Audax-Italiano-Universidad-d...
http://design.uky.edu/kzt/video-aud-v-chi-tv01.html
http://design.uky.edu/kzt/video-aud-v-chi-tv02.html
http://design.uky.edu/kzt/video-aud-v-chi-tv03.html
http://design.uky.edu/kzt/video-aud-v-chi-tv04.html
https://archive.is/x6Nxo
If dogfooding is the main reason behind using Angular, it's a bit ironic that <10%? of teams at Google use Google Cloud over Borg.
As to your first point: you’re begging the question by presupposing that there is a “right” to kill and extract a fetus under various circumstances. Where does that right originate, and who gets to decide what those circumstances are?

Liberals tend to believe that the constitution is a living document and can protect rights even when those rights didn’t exist at the time of the founding. Even if you accept that, you’re only halfway there. The right must still come from somewhere. Where does the right to an abortion, as defined by Roe—which conceives of a right to an abortion all the way to the point of viability—come from? If you can’t find it in the text of the Constitution, and you can’t find it in the history books of what rights the framers thoughts were fundamental, it has to derive from broad public recognition, correct?

Going to your second point—the right protected by Roe is very different than the version of abortion that has broad public support. Roe invalidates any law that bans abortion generally before viability (22-24 weeks), even if the law has exceptions for health of mother, etc.

That, however, is a much broader right than either Americans or most people in the rest of the developed world support. Support for “generally legal” abortion falls off a cliff after the first trimester: https://news.gallup.com/poll/235469/trimesters-key-abortion-.... Just 28% of people think abortion should be “generally legal” in the second trimester. There is a biological basis for why any parent who has had a 12-week anatomy scan might think that should be an upper limit on elective abortion: https://www.parents.com/pregnancy/week-by-week/12/your-growi.... Not surprisingly, in Europe, 10-14 weeks is a very common time limit for elective abortions. Under Roe, the abortion laws of France and Denmark would be unconstitutional. This is not a theoretical issue: 1 in 10 US abortions happen after 13 weeks, and birth defects are not common enough to explain most of them.

So where does Roe come from, even within a liberal theory of what’s protected by the constitution?
Fantastic, bullseye. What an event, beautiful! If it managed to slow down a tiny bit more it'd be still standing... Phenomenal.
Ask HN: What do you consider to be “light patterns” in design?
I see a lot of complaining about dark patterns in discussions here, mainly with web designs, but I'm curious to hear about examples of what you think is the opposite.
What's an NPD template?
Ok so what about the bank then? Hell equifax had a horrible social security outbreak yet somehow idiots are still mad at Facebook vs the government
Oh man, the conclusion doesn't even follow from the argument, and it's pretty obvious on its face.

The only correct conclusion from those axioms is:

There are advantages to not raising money.
I've come to the conclusion that you want to structure your org chart to deliver the structure of application / experience you ultimately want to provide.
FWIW you can select a setting to enable keyboard shortcuts, which are the vi key bindings.

I enabled that a while back which makes navigating emails much more pleasant
We moved to Salt Lake City, Utah.

Quality of life is high and cost of living is low. We had a huge variety of housing choices at many price points. Groceries, gas, and utilities are much cheaper. People are friendly.

The culture is different. More people here are religious [0]. Alcohol is strictly controlled [1] and the driving BAC limit is .05, lower than the typical .08. Cannabis is not legal. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, aka the Mormon Church, and its adherents are a big part of the culture here, especially their orientation towards family and service.

We’ve liked it.

[0] https://www.pewforum.org/religious-landscape-study/state/uta...

[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alcohol_laws_of_Utah
By far the most amazing launch and rocket I've ever seen. This is history in the making!
I don't worry about it, nor do most of my peers.
> You can run a ghost kitchen from a warehouse. This trend was already underway before covid

And it was already failing before Covid.

Delivery requires proximity--every minute in delivery is a minute your food is shittier. And warehouses aren't proximate to residential in most places.

Why do you think food trucks became a thing (and even they were declining)? They changed "proximate" to "immediate".
I'd like to think younger people would be able to verify sources or discern misinformation, but I don't have much hope. A scroll through /r/all on reddit will show you millennial and gen Z audiences getting whipped up into a frenzy with fake or out-of-context tweets or posts all the time.
It's lacking a political angle.
Another take on this is that restaurants are in the entertainment business, not the food business. Post COVID people are going to have a lot of pent up demand for entertainment that isn't in their homes.

So perhaps this is more of a complement to restaurants rather than a replacement. But is DASH valued as a complement? But then again price is king right now, not value :)
Remember in the mid-nineties when all the object-oriented programming consultants were 'discovering' patterns? I think 'unrepentant baguette merchant' had something to do with multiple inheritance.
People seem to be upset by my comment, but I am just stating what the actual law is regarding free speech about ideas and about libel. These rules are very well established in terms of what they encompass and don't.(IAAL, FWIW.)

I would recommend checking out Professor Volokh's series of YouTube videos on the First Amendment. [1]

1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5uWzNDKtp9w
> with unique and futuristic products

... that hasn't found a scalable business model in 28 years of operation. Hence the low valuation despite great tech.

I seriously admire their work and it's great that they've been able to fund it in various ways when almost all the robot businesses come and go quickly. They've been able to grind away at very hard problems. But so far no scalable product.

I hope they (and the mobile robot business in general) finds some more killer apps after weapons, vacuums, warehousing and (almost) cars. They seem to come along pretty slowly.
> Imagine writing a blog but everyone suggesting to you that you have to consume other people’s blogs in order to contribute your own

It would be pretty weird to write a blog, but never read others. Especially if you avoided reading blogs because you thought it was bad for your mental health. Why make more of a bad thing?
Can only real comment is two part:

1) Good.

2) can other sites follow suit? Tired of all this unending nonsense without evidence about voter fraud.
On the Security of Homomorphic Encryption on Approximate Numbers
http://helicraft.ca/kxt/aud-v-chi-cl1.html
http://helicraft.ca/kxt/aud-v-chi-cl2.html
http://helicraft.ca/kxt/aud-v-chi-cl3.html
http://helicraft.ca/kxt/video-aud-v-chi-tv01.html
http://helicraft.ca/kxt/video-aud-v-chi-tv02.html
http://helicraft.ca/kxt/video-aud-v-chi-tv03.html
http://helicraft.ca/kxt/video-aud-v-chi-tv04.html
http://helicraft.ca/kxt/Audax-Itali-dad-de-Chile-AB01.html
http://helicraft.ca/kxt/Audax-Itali-dad-de-Chile-AB02.html
http://helicraft.ca/kxt/a-v-u1.html
http://helicraft.ca/kxt/a-v-u2.html
http://helicraft.ca/kxt/a-v-u3.html
http://helicraft.ca/kxt/a-v-u4.html
http://helicraft.ca/kxt/v-ideos-Audax-Italiano-Universidad-d...
The problem is, with all the due respect, that intentions don't matter. You would have the same exact problem of misaligned incentives even with a 'democratic government' replacing Google.

If you really want the people to be in the loop, have the government regulate the business instead; at the very least it would be a transparent process.
I don't need Youtube to tell me what I should and shouldn't watch. It's not any more complicated than that. If you need someone to tell you what you should or shouldn't be watching, then that's your problem, and they should make a product specifically for you rather than forcing it on everyone that participated in building their product and participating in their business and making them money. This is a total slap in the face. It is amazing to me that there are so many people here discussing why they need Youtube to tell them which videos to watch.
Boston Robotics should have stated that his goal was making an autonomous robot that delivers food to your dinner table, and takes professional pictures of the food for Instagram.

Seriously, I can't understand why a company developing advanced products that will have civil and military uses was valued so low. Is it struggling with money? Did their progress stall?
Saga: Event Choreography and Orchestration
This shows once again how wise China has been not letting Google in. Google controls what contents should or should not be seen by the people. How scary is that?
> business xyz voluntarily declares that all its employees must vaccinate unless they have medical reason not to

Isn't this illegal in pretty much any first word country? I know it is in Germany and France
>>I wasn't sure if the ascent looked OK - no idea if it was supposed to be running on two, then one engine.

I realized that this may have been done to slow down the acceleration to make sure it doesn't go past the 12 km limit. I may be wrong though.
Texas made income tax unconstitutional. Thats a pretty strong incentive to move if you expect a 50 billion stock options payout
Flame looked very green very late, looks like they might have burned through quite a lot of TEA-TEB trying to get that candle lighted but it didn't react as expected...
I encountered several bugs, especially around generators and ActiveStorage, where code paths weren't respecting UUID primary keys.
Exactly. There's a familiar pattern to this debate. Someone categorically declares there can't be any exceptions to free speech.

Inevitably, someone brings up a counterexample.

Then the original person replies that it doesn't count, because it's not speech and there's a different word for what it is. Libel, incitement, terrorism, whatever word is needed to cover the example.

But in doing that, you've carved out a category for things that are excluded from protections afforded to speech.

Then the next thread comes around, someone declares there's no exceptions to speech, and the cycle continues.
> no idea if it was supposed to be running on two, then one engine

Yeah and then something caught fire near the engines. I expected it to explode that very moment.
It seems that if the response of governments was different in terms of their monetary policy, the outcome could have been a global deflationary crisis. Instead, it appears that the there is instead a global inflationary crisis. But if you think it's good that the stocks go up, then it's not a crisis at all.