skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
(1) Tesla actually used to pay below market rate (bay area) and had incredibly demanding working conditions (see drive from Elon carries through the company and that it was a mission based company) for a good period of time. I'm not saying thats good or bad just that they weren't paying above-market. Not sure what the calculus is now that the equity value has gone right off the charts.
(2) No you get additional benefits for being in-state manufacturers. (I think its 10% vs 30% in state off capital costs). Referring to in-state policies not the federal ITC tax credit.
(3) Not that he would want to spend that money on himself but he would want to put that capital to good use elsewhere. If he doesn't believe the state to be a good deployer of capital he probably doesn't want to give them a large portion of capital at his expense. Less about himself spending lavishly then putting his hard earned capital to waste (one way of looking at it).
To add, I believe that's caused by rate limiting in Nginx.
Odd, isn't it, that nobody feels the need to ask what your opinion of Oracle is - it's just (with good reason) assumed.
God is an absolute, the source of all. The concept includes being responsible for the death of people in unfortunate circumstances. I don't see the idea that you are somehow above God because you identified that some people died in unfortunate circumstances.

I don't "forgive her". I say there is a truth you have thrown under a bus. She didn't self promote, she was serving a purpose under a larger story. People suffering and someone being unable to fix it, doesn't make them a sociopath for trying to give some meaning to inevitable deaths.

You and Hitchens are just grand-standing off the back of religion.
Pointless distinction, only meant to muddy the waters.
I'm also surprised at how doordash does as a stock, because as a customer I've lost packages, got packages in bad shape, etc. I'm a serious detractor for doordash.

I wonder what their NPS is but it can't be very high.
Squire (YC S16) triples its valuation to $250M with its software for barbershops
>Their Mali Bifrost and Valhall GPU architectures are mainly developed in Scandinavia by former Falanx Microsystems of Norway

Sidenote: Norway is not a part of the EU.
Sorry, “can” was misleading there since you can obviously get information elsewhere. What I’m wondering is: If a company chooses not to publish something, how is that different than deciding what people are allowed to see?
It takes more than 4 minutes to see the article there, read it, come back to HN and write/submit a comment.
Does Autism Hold the Key to What Makes Humans Special?
BDDs are simple and predictable provided you know that the variable ordering that you're using will compactly encode your problem. A SAT solver might not be as predictable (though I don't have the experience to say how big this issue is in practice).

A BDD can also efficiently answer questions like "how many ways can you satisfy this formula?" (subject to the same caveat about problem suitability).
That's a good example of a post that probably wouldn't do well on such a site...you're right, time doesn't add much context to that topic.
Presumably, not by cutting down on old cruft but by cutting down on new cruft. I would think that requiring the post to stand some kind of "test of time" would cut down on quick-trending but shallow content in a lot of cases.
And before you bash Texas...

The problem is that most people on HN, and elsewhere on the internet, got everything they know about Texas from watching cartoons on TV. (Same for their knowledge of religion.)

They enjoy repeating half-century-old stereotypes while turning a blind eye to their own region's failings. It's geographic fanboyism.

/Lived in Texas for five years. Also lived in 13 other states. Would return to Texas if the opportunity arose.
That's... strange. SF's black population has definitely been on the decline (but they're certainly here, all over!), but you must have been actively hiding if your only exposure to brown people was people "kept back in the kitchen".

I'm not going to claim that SF is some amazingly perfect bastion of racial diversity, but if you're mainly only seeing and interacting with white and Asian people here, that speaks more to the circles you spend your time in than the city's diversity.
If you liked this article and want to learn more about the games played in corporate finance, I would strongly recommend a book a colleague of mine recommended, "The Quest For Value". This single book had completely changed my view of the business world more than any other, and it gives one a much clearer understanding of the massive debt load that the United States operates under. I grew up and lived through the 08 financial crisis, losing a home in the process, and hated debt of any sort. Now that I've read this book cover to cover multiple times, my view has completely shifted, and my understanding of stock valuation and cash flow analysis has done nothing but improved.
While in theory this is true, in practice we have seen in recent years that misinformation has as much weight (if not more) as true information in our fragmented global media landscape.

I see it more as doing their part to reduce the noise rather than contribute to the problem. And it’s a big problem.
I've long thought that a Hacker Canon adjunct to HN — including only posts that have stood the test of time — would be an interesting thing to have.
It doesn't change the fact that the courts have decided that there was no fraud over dozens and dozens of lawsuits. The proponent of the Russia collusion wanted it investigated, and there was very little talk about it after (the honestly poorly handled) Mueller report.

And while there was no clear evidence of Trump himself colluding, many were indicted and even admitted guilt. How many people have gone to jail for fraud in the 2020 election? Is there the equivalent to the Jr. email and the Trump Tower meeting when it comes to election fraud? Has there been a single real evidence of fraud shown in courts (not on News or social media where there are no consequences for lying)?
I don't think many people are attempting to raise children in SF proper, where this anecdote takes place, but walking into a safeway parking lot and having to dodge used needles is not what I would call high quality of life.

Although in all fairness, I am not aware of the drug situation in other parts of the country.
> Pay for the hosting if you want to project controversial content on the internet that people don't want to host for free.

But what's to stop the private company that's hosting me from de-platforming me if a twitter mob pressures them to do so? It's private companies all the way down. Free speech is impossible on the private company controlled internet.
These particular constraints may not be ideal, but AskHistorians has a similar restriction called the 20 years rule where discussion of events from the past two decades is verboten. It doesn't automatically make conversation thoughtful, but it's an easily enforced rule that largely precludes modern politics without sacrificing too many topics of interest.
In PA at least, they could have not kicked out GOP observers, literally cheering as they were thrown out. In other counties, observers had to stand far away for "COVID" reasons, while dozens or counters of DEM observers were crammed together at tables.

In Georgia, observers were told to go home, and then people continued to count behind closed doors, unobserved. There is video and no matter how many news sources yell "debunked" ... there is no reasonable explanation for it. There was no water pipe burst. It was a lie and it LOOKS TERRIBLE.

If you want an honest election, then people have to not make up this shit. But everyone sees every single GOP/Republican as some evil racist Nazi, so some of these things could have been totally on the books, but people threw out observers due to media fueled hate. The trouble is ... it's impossible to tell. The percentage of rejected mail-in ballots due to signatures is far far below what is has been before.

It looks bad. It stinks. Anyone who is in the center and is truly looking at everything is likely going to make the judgement, even if their party won, the election was shady as fuck.
Google does not have operational control over humans' bodies.
That neutral money and banking system exists today. It's Bitcoin. There are caveats but fundamentally if fulfills this purpose.
It also disproportionately impacts mid-tier earners. Ie, those who earn enough to own their home, but still have it make up a significant portion of their net worth.

Someone making 100k/year, and making 1M/year, both living in 400k houses (not uncommon in the Austin area), will be paying the dollar-amount in tax.

Ie, a high property tax and low income tax is very regressive.
Oh no... I got hacked and all my bank accounts are empty. Watamuhgunnado?!
I disagree with your assessment that Texas has wide acceptance for opposing viewpoints, at least out in the suburbs where I grew up.

The Texas you grew up in is not the same as Texas today. Places change. People change. Look at a county-by-county map of the election results.
Anaphylactoid reactions can kill you just as well as anaphylaxis.

"Anaphylactoid reactions are defined as those reactions that produce the same clinical picture with anaphylaxis but are not IgE mediated, occur through a direct nonimmune-mediated release of mediators from mast cells and/or basophils or result from direct complement activation"

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3209676/
Note that the Pfizer trial at least (and IIRC Moderna as well) excluded people with a history of severe allergies. Which IMO makes sense: why put those people at risk of a relatively common complication when you don't even know yet if the vaccine is effective? Testing for allergy safety in that small population is something you can do later.
> Having the sitting president make completely baseless claims in an effort to delegitimize the results of an election

The whole point is that this is a biased assumption. You can't prevent people from making counterpoints, and then say "completely baseless claims." For the conversation to be fair, you need to allow the claims to be made, and then disprove them.

This way of thinking is part of the problem.
The current Ariane V is interesting.

It was designed to launch a crewed vehicle that never materialized and is too big and too costly for most commercial applications.
When you're the ONLY* alternative for videos online you have a moral obligation of being impartial.

* Vimeo, Daily Motion, Lbry or whatever else have even less shares than desktop Linuxes vs Windows. YouTube is the only game in town.
> The death rate is roughly 1 in 28 for those who caught it.

You are confusing IFR and CFR.
> We know from the very extensive clinical trials that this wasn't a feature...

Not a feature, no kidding!?! The latter portion of that read like something for devs to understand...I had never heard of language like that in the medical/pharma world...then again, I've been removed from that industry for almost 14 years now. My dark sense of humor wants to really laugh at this, if it didn't deal with such somber subject matter.
That is correct. It was a one man show for a long time (I don't think it was his only job, just a side project), then when tablets happened a full team was ramped up behind it.
> why wouldn't Democrats do everything in their power to get him removed from office?

Because they believe in the process, the integrity of our country and our Constitution, the voice of the people and the validity of the election. (That doesn't mean Democrats are knights in shining armor, but with many politicians following the President's lead on fighting the integrity of our own country, many find it preferable that Democratic politicians refrain from taking that same low road. Sometimes the high road works. Often it doesn't.)
I'm going to reply with a comment I made an hour ago.

"The far-left managed to create an "amazing" (and terrifying) perspective.

If you're a leftist but not as leftist as them, you're a centrist, maybe even center-right which makes everybody on the right to be automatically far-right."
FTC Sues Facebook for Illegal Monopolization
Just wondering if in the light of this announcement and the China's attempts at taking over the TMSC control, wouldn't it be better if TMSC relocated their HQ to Europe?

Not saying they should move completely, but to strategize to limit their operational risks. I am sure they'd receive some nice grants from EU.
Welfare plays a big role as well.
But that's a third party entity (country) and not the country where one is living in.
Ask HN: Bypass YouTube age-restricttion without login?
I always manually changed

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RdIB6UUs7aI

to

https://www.youtube.com/embed/RdIB6UUs7aI

because I dont wanna login to google services.

Some days or weeks ago google disabled this. So now I'm looking for a new way to bypass.

Login or installing software like youtube-dl is not an option because I really only watch a few age-restricted videos per year.
That is the difference between a county and a business. Countries have the legal authority to deny passage through their borders with limited exception. Businesses have the right to reserve service in some cases but not others.
Even if you support the President and his policies, I don't see how you could be surprised at his rather large loss in 2020.

He lost the popular vote in 2016 by around 3 million votes. And he was running against someone very unpopular.

He ran in 2020 against someone who is much more popular than his 2016 opponent.

His approval rating never touched 50%, IIRC.

The economy is terrible right now. Never a great sign for an incumbent.

And that's all to say nothing about the fervor of the people who oppose him.

There's absolutely no reason to believe that he wouldn't have lost by >3 million this time around.
P.S. Wouldn't read book the ghost of Steve Jobs put together either.
Thanks! I hadn't seen the FTB guidance for example 5. I think the tricky bit comes when you plan to live in another country for an indefinite period of at least several years, but not forever (and without any specific return state in mind), and keep a storage unit (in California) with some stuff that you want to keep, but don't want to move to another country because of the expense.

FTB can use 'has a storage unit in California' as a factor; and maybe combined with California banks and California voting, and maybe a California mailing address, if you use friends/family to forward your mail, could be enough to tip the scales for them. It's rather opaque.
Microsoft: We do not plan to evolve Visual Basic as a language
Your IP address and associated shadow profile are recorded by multiple nation-state intelligence agencies, most likely. Or else by private groups who are interested in compiling an army of impressionable and easily-duped folks to continue using them as a weapon to subvert democracy.

This is not a far-fetched claim. If I was Russia, for example, I would do something exactly like this for exactly that reason. Not to mention that stuff exactly like this has happened and was later shown to be run by exactly the groups I'm referencing. It's Occam's razor.
If there is a truth to be gleamed here, it's that U.S. elections as they're presently conducted are a train wreck. Even the parties seeking to prove a fair election took place are being thwarted by incompetence.
> familiar with the version terminology

That's probably because I was using the wrong word. I should've said "variant".
> We need more of this, and yesterday.

But only where there would appear to be a benefit.

Fusion power generation will almost certainly operate like fission, in that it will need steam turbines, generators, elaborate cooling systems, and water treatment plants for the turbines and cooling.

The operation and maintenance on these alone is higher than that for wind or solar--never mind the operation of the reactor itself. The capital costs just for these modules are almost certainly higher too.

The project risk as seen by investors (delay, cancellation for social or undiscovered geotechnical reasons) is higher too.

So: generating electricity is not a use for fusion.

Fusion may have uses in scientific discovery. But a putative fusion power plant would operate well inside the limits of our knowledge, for reliability and safety reasons, so it would be no help there.
I don't think they're purporting that, but merely stating that's how many believe it. It's a significant problem, especially when it's meritless.
So far, the vast majority of court cases are getting tossed out due to lack of evidence. The courts are asking for more evidence but there is none.

At what point would you be agree that the claims are baseless? Like, what has to happen for you are confident about it?

Texas' lawsuit is frivolous and will get denied.
Unpopular opinion: it is much better to have a leader hated by the media and who's every move is scrutinized by the press than to have a leader cowtowed by the press and given a free pass on anything.

How do I know? I'm from Russia. Authoritatism begins with tight control of news sources.
Interesting, I order to work every once in a while, and I once ordered to the wrong jobsite. A coworker took my meal and customer support refunded the whole thing. I was under the impression they were very generous with customer support
I agree that humans and "the public" are not perfectly rational people. BUT, I don't know that any system that does not treat them as such is any better. Then systems put in place by people who think they DO know better are never sustainable and are corruptible by all influences that corrupt any form of power
>Stargazers

Ha! I haven't seen that before. That's clever.

(sorry, I have no comment on the project itself - I don't do plotting-related work much at all)
Most of America’s dirty power plants will be ready to retire by 2035
On the internet everything can appear equally legitimate. Breitbart looks as legit as the BBC.
Sacha Baron Cohen
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ymaWq5yZIYM

Excerpts:

Voltaire was right when he said "Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." And social media lets authoritarians push absurdities to millions of people. President Trump using Twitter has spread conspiracy theories more than 1700 times to his 67 million followers.

Freedom of speech is not freedom of reach. Sadly There will always be racists, misogynists, anti-Semites, and child abusers. We should not be giving bigots and pedophiles a free platform to amplify their views and target their victims.

Zuckerberg says people should decide what's credible, not tech companies. When 2/3rds of millennials have not heard of Auschwitz how are they supposed to know what's true? There is such a thing as objective truth. Facts do exist.
Do you think the mailed in votes favored democrats because of some property of mail in voting, or because republicans had been discouraging their voters from using it for much of the preceding year?
Dash-видание, doordash.
Interesting, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25363022 claims that Texas has less inequality between schools.
I really don't understand your position at all, but it seems like you're more upset than I would expect given the context.

In good faith I will refrain from joking about expense reports in the future.

I did not intend to cause offense, I just saw room for a joke I thought would lighten the mood of the post a bit by making it seem more childish. I'm not trying to demean people who file expense reports or something.
The Supreme Court isn't going to hear Texas's suit. They've already strongly signaled that by rejecting the Pennsylvania suit without any dissents; Texas is basically trying to sue Pennsylvania for the same things, again.
> Also, seekers of alternate Bay Areas: fuck off, we’re full: the last thing any functioning society needs is your contributions.

That's the sort of insightful, tolerant viewpoint that helps elevate discussions.
Genuine question: how do states like Texas, Florida, etc. get by without taxing income? Do they not need that money for their operations? What is the difference between their government and California's?

I figure Florida makes it up with their tourism industry but Texas decidedly does not have that.
Have you ever looked through the content on YouTube?
San Francisco Puts Another Nail in Its Own Coffin
> It is the same as if one is using code formatting rules and enforces them by configuration of linting tools.

Feature request: some sort of ML in Word that detects when someone is using spaces to line text up between lines, stops them, and pops up a tutorial on using the ruler.
My concern is that you as an individual have used your personal judgement to come to the conclusion that these cases are batshit (as have I incidentally), and in this specific case you are most likely correct. But had Google prevented you from seeing this information, you would not have been able to form any view at all. And that is the direction all these platforms are moving in.

I also have absolutely zero trust in Random Googlers being capable of determining truth and falsity in the general case (which is where this is heading), or in managing this power in such a way that is a net benefit to society. If they didn't have monopolies on information consumption I would be a little less concerned.

A different example: Google could have stopped people seeing "false" information about COVID earlier this year. Twitter and other platforms labelled this "misinformation", and Google could have censored it from YouTube, searches, etc. The tech companies anointed the WHO as the arbiter of truth, yet the WHO was wrong for quite a while about several important things. I would prefer to live in a world where individuals are allowed to see all the contested facts and arguments, and decide for themselves.

One last example: Ignaz Semmelweis would have been censored as "misinformation". Ditto Galileo and many others.

I suppose the real solution is to break up the information monopolies, then let them do all the censoring they want.
The could have impeached Trump on N things, where N is way more than one. They impeached him on one thing. Yes, I would say they were not trying hard at all.
Whenever I see a new piece of technology, my first question is always why is this better than <insert standard tech>?

Now, I'm not super familiar with other configuration management systems, but I really have to dig through the docs/blog posts to figure out what the core differences are. Would be nice if the differences were more clearly delineated.
I don't understand the comparison you are making. How are those equivalent to QAnon?
> I just don't know how it's even legal to bill me for something and then not provide it

I don't know either, but the airline industry is the living proof that this is legal.
> And the product as a whole is chasing feature parity, not speed of UI.

I thought google was actively avoiding parity-chasing, opting to "do their own thing, which will be better" instead. Or have I just been drinking the kool-aid?
How about using GPT-3 to waste telemarketers' time when the give you spam phone calls?
What do you mean by synchrony?
Wireless anything is a hard no for me

So why are you even posting in a topic about a pair of wireless headphones? You're not the market. You have no recent experience with similar products. What was your point?
Let's hope that they catch all those who did this.

In germany, they are also going to vote a law before christmas that the crime can still be followed up after 10 years in order to bring all of them to court who did this in germany.
Modernize Your AppSec Program with OWASP ASVS