skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Both video and transcrpt exist at the link.
3-4x faster observed promises in Node.js coming
He already looks like the Madame Toussaud’s statue of himself. Whatever he’s doing is not working, at all.

In a decade that boy is going to look like Christopher Walken. In two, Willem Defoe. By the time he’s 65 he’s going to look like Nosferatu.
Paris has parks too.

edit: the Bois de Vincenne is roughly three times the size of Central Park (10km^2 vs. 3.4km^2).
Omie Is a Nigger
My name is Rithvik Bharath, I was admitted to your University in 2016 for Computer Science and Machine Learning, however due to mental health issues I couldn�t resume studies despite returning to campus multiple times.
I was very confused by the popular "Schiesser" brand of underwear when living in Germany until I noticed that "Scheisser" had the e and i in a different order.
This tweet is on point.
The entire AS is full of hot garbage, B2, Servermania, Colocrossing, all the related groups.

https://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/listings/colocrossing.com

I get so much spam and bruteforce from their entire network.
The people making the ads are only responding to what their bosses want them to do. If the latter have no clue, the ads will be equally clueless.

Plus, the Presidential Limo is just a truck platform with a Cadillac logo on it. I'm sure they can switch to Lincoln, or no badge at all.
One more bug: not using vimwiki.
Raspberry Pi Compute Module 4 PCIe SATA Raid
Take all my upvotes please, this is a wonderful response.
John Snow was able to disprove the miasma theory with "small data" (via analysis of people using a public water pump). This is how the germ theory of disease came about and helped save countless lives from cholera.

This is also how the science of (modern) epidemiology began.

It is a fascinating story.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Snow#Cholera
A strange choice that possibly explains so many of the stories of peoples lost balances over the years. Even recently (in the past two weeks) Coinbase is still having periodic outages where they cannot process orders and where orders get executed silently and fail to show up in the balances and failures to be able to withdraw funds. While of course their status page shows no outages (or in this recent one blames Amazon connectivity for your orders executing in the background and withdrawal page spewing errors). Several years on you’d think they’d have fixed this.
That certainly hasn't been my experience, and I have a quite extensive history with opiates. They feel fucking awesome. But obviously the pleasure received is different for different ingestion methods, and also different types of opiates.
The future of 32-bit Linux
Wow, that's wild. My first cell phone had brand-new (at the time) EVDO support. It was awesome, you could download songs, use WAP, etc. I can't believe I've actually seen the beginning and end of a full generation :)

I also still can't believe the iPhone launched without 3G support!
Hmm, would be really cool to hook this up with Tensorflow Posenet https://github.com/tensorflow/tfjs-models/tree/master/posene...
In my life, the only car dealership I've been to that wasn't adjacent to at least a US highway, if not an interstate, was some fancy Porsche-Audi combo. (No purchase was made there.)
Well there are a few factors which make this situation different. If the ultimatum had been made in person, I'd think there might be room for negotiation, depending on the relationship between manager and subordinate.

Putting the ultimatum in e-mail form really raises the stakes, because there may be other people CC-ed or BCC-ed, and any response could later be weaponized.

If the relationship was already troubled, anything like an ultimatum is an opportunity for the manager to be rid of all their troubles.

The level of the threat also comes into play, and more severe threats increase the risk/tension. If the guardian had threatened to disown the child rather than send them to bed, we would read the situation differently.
The Bell paradox shows there's no local collapse theory (colloquially “single universe”, even though all quantum interpretations are single universe so it's a misnomer). The relative state formulation is consistent with the Bell “paradox”; in fact, the only thing it fails to explain is where the Born rule comes from (which, to be fair, is a pretty massive hole).
OK. By that definition leverage is a wonderful thing everyone should use!
If dealers really have that negotiation edge they should be able to stay relevant with market dynamics alone, instead of lobbying to prevent direct sales.
I don't think the approval process is being used to enforce rigor in general, the (claimed) problem is the paper lacks rigor specifically in regards to claims about google's behavior.

Publishing a paper with a lack of rigor about some obscure mathematical technique isn't a problem for google (beyond some possible but unlikely mild reputation damage). Publishing a paper with a lack of rigor that says google is doing unethical things, when those things are questionably accurate, that is something google would (and should) have a problem with.

Whether the paper actually lacks rigor in a relevant way is not something I can comment on.
Agreed. It is heartbreaking this happened, but something we can learn from. The silence due to the stigma of addiction and mental illness only serves to worsen it. Thousands die from these conditions every day. Why should we not talk about it?
I see some F# praising in here. any good learning resources one can recommend to me (Ik I can "google it" or whatever. I mean something you had experience with and would recommend)
Yep. It is incredibly polarized. I would say at this point the democrats only get a pass because they are "marginally better than republicans" according to reddit.

Should have seen some of the stuff they were saying about Biden before he won the primaries. Lot of racism, lot of hatred behind it. I was shocked.
isn't that more because PHP is one of the few languages that announces itself in the HTTP headers?
You're probably right, a good leader wouldn't have hired such an useless person in the first place.
Here's a thought: Open source project contributions can function as a Veblen good. Made to display or assert status and to communicate that you produce intellectual property in such bulk that you can afford to give it away.

Surely open source contributions occur for many reasons but I'm inclined that the above is an important one.
Thankfully, plugins like Lombok partially solve this issue - while we still have unnecessary accessors, atleast they don't pollute the source code and make it hard to read and navigate.
Buried as in not in the title of the article? That info was in the 3rd paragraph
First party analytics should also meet the standards of informed consent.
Also, the description of the official process (much less what is typically done in practice) seems to be in dispute:

https://twitter.com/timnitGebru/status/1335017524937756672?s...
A lot of attention gets spent on the violent end of modern culture: incels, white-fragility, MGTOWs, etc. Academics suggest that a lot of these come from feelings of a lost place in society.

I get the feeling that the emotional spectrum there is much broader than these individual issues imply: That many modern people who feel lonely, lost, or nostalgic for a time that never existed. I wonder if liking City Pop and these related genres implies some level of dissatisfaction with your life.
Tampering with the environment is going to affect the entire planet. Air and ocean currents get affected. This kind of tampering will be harmful to China as well. I hope they understand that they are part of the planet as well. What goes around comes around.
Then what's the point of hiring her and people like her to work for Google in the first place? So that Google could claim that they have Ethical AI researchers and Google's AI research is indeed ethical?
I had to update my keyboard firmware to get functions to work right. Maybe that's your issue?
headline could have said "dealerships spending more money to sell Cadillacs than they make opt to quit selling Cadillacs."
The point of the comment is that in many minds there is a cutoff where "create value" looks like hoarding. One could argue that the Tzar and other monarchies created value by providing stable governance, organizing the nation, preventing the tyranny of the majority, as well as keeping out the invaders.

At some point, when the wealth gap is extreme enough and the circumstances of enough people is sufficiently degraded -these arguments stop holding weight.
> Has protein folding been solved? Yes.

No. Look a the actual competition results.

> As a practitioner, what I want to be able to do is pull a sequence that I've retrieved from DNA, drop it into a computer, and get the structure out. Intuitive insight can FOLLOW from those results.

According to the competition results, you cannot do that using AlphaFold2.
PETAL is a good name! I was calling it TAPE (Tailwind, Alpine.js, Phoenix, and Elixir) http://tapestack.party
While this is true as the default experience you can very very very easily only subscribe to content relevant to you. The article attached to this post it literally telling you there are 52M daily users visiting the platform yet you claim "I would say it needs to die, but it's already pretty dead in terms of its utility to most people I know." Perhaps try visiting the platform again and spend some time customizing the platform to your needs and gauge your opinion of it from there.
The Significance Filter, the Winner's Curse and the Need to Shrink
Just a cursory search on Google for the 'heritability of lifetime income' leads me to this from a study in Finland:

> For example, Björklund and Jäntti (2012) estimated using Swedish data that shared environmental and genetic factors explain 40–60% of inequality in a number of productive traits, including cognitive and non-cognitive skills, schooling and long-run earnings.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333090512_Heritabil...

Assuming that this paper holds up, then at around half of lifetime earnings would be attributable to environment.

Also, speaking purely of heritability factors is a little reductive. Two parents that lack a particular phenotype that, say, is fit for wage growth in our contemporary economy, may have offspring that does. Similarly those fit to succeed in the economy today, may not be in the future if the stressors change.
Vim is not a gui aka no user interface. I know you are joking though: vim > emacs > any IDE!
The E2E stuff would be at your end. Before anything fancier it would probably be good if the gov became technologically advanced enough to be able to send email to your public key and publish their own keys.
Interesting, do people who put their 'badge on the table' actually quit when they lose, or is it just a saying that's used to show emphasis?
Well, they let you read the first few paragraphs for free which is what everyone seems to be commenting on.

No idea if the rest of the article says anything interesting.
They're paid in victory, which costs nothing and which you can't eat. That is fundamental to operating something like Amazon, which is designed to avoid switching into the 'rake in money' stage of capitalism as long as possible, in order to compete more harshly with other organizations that DO try to rake in money as soon as they can.

Amazon understands that in the context of organizations it stands to benefit from being seen as the meanest competitor, and that it can get public investment at scale by making this case. The argument isn't that it will hand more money to investors directly, it's that it will attack other things one can invest in, and make those things lose, and therefore it's the safe bet.

In so doing, the adoption of a crazy, aggressive, Spartan attitude among all its workers and management is beneficial, because the easiest way to convince the world you're a psycho axe murderer of a capitalist is to actually be one. In other words, 'making massive profits' isn't the end goal: 'killing other companies' is. And so, the workers do need to be paid that little and treated that harshly because every worker must be first a warrior, willing and able to trade away their health and well-being for the betterment of the company, and this goes all the way to Bezos, whom I'm convinced is going to live a shorter life than a billionaire might otherwise expect, from stress related damage. It's that or go soft and see his company go soft, and I think if he could do that there wouldn't be an Amazon as we know it: people will not follow a leader who doesn't at least pretend to represent what he is leading people towards, and Bezos is leading Amazonians to be warriors and throw themselves into the wood-chipper in order to destroy all competition.

They're paid more than they would be at easier, more civilized jobs. Part of the compensation is this emotional compensation intimately tied up in the American attitude, the cost-less, intangible compensation of knowing you are on the winning team. That is inherent to what Amazon is.
Figure 1: The distribution of more than one million z-values from Medline (1976–2019).
https://twitter.com/fmg_twtr/status/1334884184675012609/phot...
Wonder if a VR headset with a custom interpupillary distance (IPD) would work for you? eg set it to a distance that's not physically correct, but er... more correct for how your eyes operate.

If it's works, you'd be able to read text again. You'd just need to do it from inside VR. ;)
MS is making a conscious effort to push into the ML space with libraries such as ML.NET https://dotnet.microsoft.com/apps/machinelearning-ai/ml-dotn... . IMO, the combination of a strongly-typed language with features such as type inference, data providers and discriminated unions/pattern matching make F# a perfect fit for this space. It's just unfortunate that they had to go through the .NET Framework -> .NET Core journey before focusing on the ML ecosystem...

But, the F# PM has recently given talks recognizing that they want to go into the space that Python is dominating, so it's a clear goal of the F# team (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_QnbV6CAWXc). I hope they're successful!
That's a good point - it should probably include exploiting "lack of regulation" which digital privacy could fall under broadly. I was generally thinking of "tech" in the semiconductor, computing aspect which while perhaps has some negative environmental impact and can develop monopolies; generally doesn't exploit other humans, etc..
That is usually a sign of functionality bloat, not a problem with man pages as such.
I can believe you've never met them, but there they are. And they don't outright say they "like walled gardens" or something like that, they just love everything about the walled garden experience the iPhone provides them. You can even spot some of them in this thread, they want Apple to decide how much privacy they have, they want Apple to control and vet every app they install, they want Apple to limit what other software can do on their devices in ways that you can't limit in open platforms.

And it only matters when it's backed by a purchasing decision. Someone can swear up and down that they hate walled gardens a lot but words mean nothing; if they turn around and purchase an iPhone over the plenty of open alternatives, it only signals that either they don't know what a walled garden is or they care about other stuff far more. Actually paying money for something cuts through all the bullshit consumers say to their friends or the internet about what they really want and what their priorities are.

Markets don't give each individual consumer precisely what they want, they give large groups of consumers what they want weighted by consumer priorities. In that way, most consumers get what they really want. Obviously that means some consumers don't get what they want and perhaps that's you, I don't always get what I want either. But sorry, if most consumers really wanted a device without a walled garden, they wouldn't have willingly and repetitively bought iPhones over more open devices. If there were a large consumer group of people that really want a good device without a walled garden and are willing back up their desires by paying for one, businesses will be aching to take their money. In fact, there already are many open alternatives that serve these people well. According to you your iPhone has issues even though you own one, but evidently these issues are so minor that you won't even give alternatives your money to avoid them. "But I really don't like it" is worth as much as it cost to say that, which is absolutely nothing.
>This comes from a devout Marxist whose family was in the comunist party ranks right from its inception.

And Xi was a princeling with a much stronger party pedigree, who survived work camps with ostensibly a renewed faith in the party. Wikileaks / CIA dossier on him by former politburo member and family friend of Xi summarized Xi as basically not too smart, but a believer. Not too smart comports with lines in this article, but labelling Xi as not a believer reads more like purity test from disgruntled ideological rival with a bone to pick. Like any political system, there are factions, CCP reformist like Cai Xia and Ren Zhiqiang were understandingly upset over Xi's direction for the country, but their analysis should be interpreted as partisan pieces like political writing elsewhere. Cai herself supported Rens essay denouncing Xi's covid response early in the outbreak, they subscribed to the idea that democratically reforms would have been in a much better position to handle the the epidemic - they believed covid was China chernobyl. There are many pro-reformers who felt the same way at the time. They were spectacularly wrong.

Ren got purged, Cai's in exile now, just another dissident writing for a new audience. Her words should be interpreted accordingly. This entire essays is basically, look CCP under Xi is full of theatre and politics... like politics everywhere, through all time. It's entertaining but not particularly illuminating. I wasn't a big fan of Xi, I knew he was a believer, he's not charismatic, he didn't seem very smart, certainly not paramount leader material, but in retrospect he has delivered much more than what I thought he was capable of. And now that inevitable great powers competition is heating up, I don't think anyone else's reforms and priorities would have postured China to address this rivalry as comprehensively as Xi. Particularly, Xi's military restructuring and modernization would not have occurred under Bo Xilai who was good friends with the corrupt and ineffective military old guard, enough that there were rumors of a coup over his purging. That alone makes Xi the best timeline for long term Chinese interests considering US containment efforts against China predates Xi. He's probably not the best man for the job, but out of all available options in the politburo, and there weren't many, he was the right one.
Yes! When you look at the price per square meters for housing in Paris, it's madness to allow people to leave their car overnight to sleep for free in the street!
> that's incredible to consider, 1.6 pounds of feed turns into 1 pound of chicken!

I find that hard to believe. Corn is 86kcal/100g while chicken breast is 165kcal/100g (according to a quick Google search). So you're saying that a chicken is a machine that converts 137kcal from corn to 165kcal of meat, while ... living?
ThredUp had some juice in the media. Heard about them on Marketplace. Checked it out: they give you as low as 3% for the value of your stuff. https://www.thredup.com/cleanout/payouts
http://fsharpforfunandprofit.com

The one true way (his book is also very good)
> notably, that you can't start with a thing you want to prove, which is in fact step 2 of the elementary-school scientific method.

On the contrary, I totally agree with you on this, researcher needs to pick a particular part of the combinatorially explosive knowledge space to explore, in that they get to be opinionated on what hypothesis they want to prove. What they can't do is however to ignore opponent research that conflict with their propositions. This is precisely what Jeff Dean is talking about in his second letter, you need opponent processing to overcome self-deception and bullshitting.

You can't have opponent processing when you omit relevant research, try to steamroll the review process, throw a tantrum when your paper is found lacking, and ask names to further your agenda through social engineering.

It is not onto me to prove if and why I disagree with the conclusions, it is onto the paper to prove that their assumptions and methods were sound to begin with, if they want their conclusions to be taken seriously. And they were not.

> but this renders any future research from them irrevocably tainted -- from now on, it's no more than Google PR.

On the contrary, this move increases trust in Google research and it would have lessened if they were to buckle under activist strong-arming.

If folks think this was a sign of broken research machinery, they are free to ignore all future Google research, at their own risk for competitive disadvantage.
Speaking as another manager, it sounds like you just can't handle a hard conversation.
We know it holds up to scrutiny, because the epigenetics excuse, constructed without the information supply needed to support it, doesn't hold up to scrutiny.
A former employer of mine employed people with that title. However they were far, far removed from product. They were essentially HR or bookkeepers. I never really figured out what they did but it had nothing to do with our products.
The restriction on supply is less about the number of medical school places and more about the number of residency training slots available post graduation from medical school.

Simply increasing the number of medical school places would result in many people spending years of their life (and in the US, 100s of thousands of dollars in debt) without then being able to then start their career.

Some degree of central planning seems reasonable here.
Isn’t that technically impossible?
I have (twice). Good riddance to traditional dealers.
Oof, so true. Dealer software is stuck in the 90s.
Android Studio Slow? Tweak these settings
Looking at both, your link seems to go to a much less readable version of the article?
It annoys me that these conversations are always focused on people from the Forbes list

Which explicitly excludes dictators and royal families

It's super easy to defend the actions of "industrious" businessmen if you're even a little bit to the right

Is it so easy to defend dictators who are even richer?
Simply replacing gas stations with chargers is a step back in electric's flexiblity. They don't need large underground storage tanks and special zoning. I think gas stations will simply vanish, and chargers will stay next to useful places like businesses, grocery stores restraurants, malls, etc.
Maybe this is in the part of the article behind the paywall, but what about GM's other brands? Wouldn't dealerships that sell other electric cars like Chevy Volts require the same sort of equipment? Is there something special about the Cadillac equipment that's more expensive or different than what's needed to service any other GM electric car?
Webster defines a legislature as a body of persons having the power to legislate

the EU parliament cannot, so it's not a legislature
Once there's enough comments reading the actual article becomes pointless
Makes sense. People already struggling or on the way out take the deal and exit the game.
The problem with this is deep, intellectual work on the level of programming typically needs to be surrounded by communication loops. Minimum of six ours a day seems about as reasonable as it gets...

It would have to be actual work though. Do we all honestly think the average developer would genuinely be able to set aside all the internet distractions and put their 6 hours in (2 hours communication + 4 hours development)?
Is this so controversial?