skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Yeah, without style it might have this issue.

I've added a couple of props in the script, you can set the same values present in the dropdown menu in Play tool. Fullscreen can be activating by pressing 'f' on a specific presentation.
Btw I might add a more explicit UI, though.

Out of curiosity, does MkDoc parse correctly the whole content without actually parsing the chunk for Presenta?
Dualistic Way of Thinking
You can get pretty decent at vim in a week, and given it’s installed by default on most *nix’s it ends up paying dividends.
Having taken this class in person, I can attest that Duckietown is an outstanding introduction to autonomous vehicles. It covers many advanced topics from perception, filtering, and localization, to planning and vehicle locomotion - thousands of hours went into the technical content, and the platform has some great documentation, infrastructure and tools. The best part is the hands-on approach, participants contribute to the Duckietown platform and compete in a semi-annual miniature DARPA-style challenge. If you’re looking for a practical introduction to self-driving, there really is none better IMHO.
Some would argue that the git UI falls into the same category.
You can learn the basics of fitness and a healthy diet in a week. These are things that will improve your life in every way (mentally, physically, and financially). However, it is one of those things that is easier to learn than to apply.
Agree. In some cases, a conspiracy can also occur when an act is not illegal, per se, but becomes unlawful when committed by a group of people. The main difference between a civil conspiracy and a criminal conspiracy is that in a criminal conspiracy, the actors are intending to commit an act that is punishable under criminal laws. A civil conspiracy can occur when two or more people conspire to commit an act that is not criminal, but still unlawful, and another person is injured by the act.
The trouble you describe is definitely your own fault. For companies with a healthy structure and culture, good distributed team communication materialised within the first two months.

If I had to guess at a root cause, I'd say it is evidenced by your first paragraph: Headstrong and willfully exclusive of a working paradigm that has greatly benefited some of your colleagues. You callously dismiss them and appear to celebrate they will be worse off when you go back to your office because you won't take the time to cement a process that helps everyone.
How many layers of my BERT model should I freeze?
Totally agree, we even applied to YC 5 years ago with an excel replacement specifically because of this limitation.
I'd love to setup gaming VMs like that on a powerful server.

Do you have a link on how to setup something like that?
The final note in the documentation on this software is a quote very fitting of a project re-thinking digital typesetting:

“A way of doing something original is by trying something so painstaking that nobody else has ever bothered with it.” — Brian Eno
Ah ok fair enough! Thanks for the explanation.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forced_labor_of_Germans_after_...
I don't think that fact that Threadripper is capable of running games makes it a "chip for gaming PCs", at least if that term is going to mean anything useful.
There is just conveniently space next to the box for him to get out of the box? Would think cargo holds are generally pretty stuffed full.
Come on. We all know the playbook:

1. Hide useful feature behind a hidden menu.

2. Remove feature for lack of use.

3. Claim to be responsive to users.

A default setting plus an option behind a right-click menu is basically a mark of death. Just a matter of time.

The next step will be a per-page option that resets every time you navigate. I.e., you can see the full address for the current page but have to do it manually every time.
Design Patterns vs. Design Principles
From the whitepaper where the terms and conditions attempt to eliminate any jurisdiction by the SEC:

Restricted Persons. The sale of EFFORCE tokens is not directed at, and each purchaser of EFFORCE tokens will be required to represent, among other things, that they are not: (a) a citizen, resident (tax or otherwise) of, a person located or domiciled in, or any entity organized in or owned by certain persons in (i) the United States (including any U.S. Person pursuant to the U.S. Securities Act of 1933 (as amended)),
. . . In addition, each purchaser of EFFORCE tokens will be required to represent that such purchaser is outside of the United States at the time of agreeing to purchase the tokens, was outside of the United States at the time any offers to sell or any offers to buy the token were reviewed, and will be outside of the United States at any time that such purchaser performs its obligations under the Token Purchase Agreement.
Purchaser Sophistication.
EFFORCE tokens are speculative and involve a high degree of risk and uncertainty . . .

In other words, it's apparent they are not wasting their time or money registering with the SEC. Expect the SEC to respond with something to the effect that "regardless of all your terms and conditions if ANY US based person buys your Efforce token you are now subject to our rules and we will litigate" . . . same result as if anyone offshore sells anything unsuspectingly/unknowingly to a US citizen the US authorities immediately claim jurisdiction and ability to litigate/arrest/prosecute.

. . . and the private placement listed at 45% - - these are the investors/creators taking their very sizeable cut of the deal, not a particularly altruistic percentage.

Appears a bunch of Italians went seeking a world famous personality to be the frontman "image" for their token deal . . . . and booked the Woz. Wonder what his cut of the deal is ?
Because we have big, high resolutions screens and we don't "list" (i.e. print) our source code anymore?
I’ve been a luatex advocate in the past¹, but I use xetex instead, unless I need the Lua integration. The memory handling is the reason. I find that for documents with a lot of fonts, luatex eats all the memory available and then crashes, taking a huge amount of time to do so, whereas xetex just breezes through the same document.

[1]https://lwn.net/Articles/731581/
Listen to 35 Hours of Podcasts Every Week. Is That Bad?
No, that's your assumption.

A company should deal with the problems they create.

They could reduce their user base, get crushed by lawsuits and regulations resulting from their reckless endangerment, gross negligence, incompetence, and/or unfettered greed. There's Also the American option of buying politicians and legislation but that's a short sighted and ethically bankrupt decision.
I wonder how the extent of this problem could be attributed to patents that are awarded not on the basis of genuine invention but rather letting profit whoever filed their findings first.
It's one reason why manufacturing of anything from furniture to electronics is hardly done in the west anymore; because shipping is relatively cheap compared to the wage difference, it's much cheaper to have things built in china and shipped here.

I do believe that long-term, probably in our lifetime, this balance will shift; China's economy (and with it, wages and cost of living) is and has been booming for decades, and the US's wages (slash minimum wage) have been static for just as long. I suspect this is why China is investing a lot in infrastructure internationally; I think we'll see Africa become a big player in manufacturing, sponsored and financed by China.

To me it seems to be an er, interesting kind of economic / capitalist colonialism, something not done by force but by incentives (loans to pay for it, people to build it, forfeiture of the infrastructure if the loan cannot be paid back).
Federation prioritizes a different trust model vs peer-to-peer systems. For instance, you still need to trust the admin / server provider.

Also forgefed has been around for a while and I haven't seen any progress since two years ago when I last checked on the project.
The article details numerous situations where the Soviets were not the rationale, merely the scapegoat. That's what led me to respond, I don't see how the fake rationale changes anything.
On the other hand, without Apple pushing this innovation there was next to no chance we’d ever see anything like the M1 come from another company. Think of the standard laptop display from 10 years ago. They nearly all came with extremely low resolution screens until Apple expanded high res displays from the iPhone and iPad to its own laptops in 2012. Shortly after, all other brands followed suit. I anticipate competitors will do the same and roll out Arm-based laptops in the next few years.
where people argue whether Wozniak really qualifies as a successful entrepreneur or not

OK, I'll bite.

First of all nobody is denying that he/Apple was extremely successful. The argument is if entrepreneurship was his strong point, and I think most people would agree that it isn't. Nobody is denying that he was probably one of the greatest programmers of his generation and that is engineering genius was fundamental to kickstarting one of the most successful tech companies in the world.

You can absolutely found an extremely successful company without being a great entrepreneur if other things align, like having a co-founder who is a great entrepreneur and having a truly groundbreaking product.
I should have said Slack.
yup. i remember reading about something called ‘optimal brain damage’ which aims at pruning non-essential weights from the network for faster training etc.
Alternatively, maybe a neutral-appearing comment is indeed neutral, and doesn't contain "dog-whistles" just because you disagree with it. By saying it contains such things you are assigning a sinister motive to the comment without requiring evidence, because it's a "dog-whistle", so we have to trust you that 'liberal' is being used as an epithet, or that using 'ordinary citizens' to distinguish the homeless is something sinister.

> governing institution that interns individuals based on being different, or not morially aligned, of not thinking the correct thoughts

You are talking about what? apartheid? communist regimes?

Homeless people aren't being treated differently for "not thinking the correct thoughts", or "not being morally aligned". They are treated differently from ordinary people, but if any ordinary person did the same they would be treated that way too. Being treated differently based on behaviour is not necessarily wrong.
That doesn't make it a CPU for gaming, though.
Thanks - and wow!
Flagged. This is an equity that happens to have a coin, not a real cryptocoin.

Seemingly novel ideas like binding medical or scientific research with cryptocoins means extending trust. Which means that the cryptocoin is just along for the ride and to hype the investment. It's not decentralized and trustless.

With very rare exceptions: primecoin was designed to help uncover specific chains of primes.
You've misunderstood me if you think I'm arguing philosophy has no value. I'm only arguing that studying it will not help someone develop a personal philosophy.

I will make this one concession on reflection. It may help immunize one from simplistic explanations and just-so stories. It will not give one truth, but perhaps it will reveal the lie. The study of philosophy is a great way, for example, to disabuse someone of religious faith.
On the other "Lahore ranks the most polluted city in the world," according to air pollution data released by the US Air Quality Index on Monday. According to the index, Lahore reported a particulate matter (PM) rating of 423. Pakistan's financial capital Karachi ranked at 7 on the AQI.
> Bloomberg are full of shit when it comes to tech news.

Actually this article is from Mark Gurman who has arguably the best track record of any journalist when getting the inside scoop on future Apple products. He has worked for Bloomberg for a couple years now.
In education they use the acronym OER (Open Educational Resource) and there are a number of textbooks that are released as OER. I was using one but was "asked" to use the same one as everyone else.
> Doesn't matter if you have the money upfront and guaranteed

What kind of guarantee is provided?
You are right in the strictest sense, but I think blockchain is still interesting here. With a blockchain, there is a tamper-proof public record of who submitted what, and that can make disputes through a good old fashioned legal process more streamlined later on.
It is if you can sucker Woz on board.
Can you write a counter article?

Unfortunately, I'm incredibly handsome, charismatic, and just generally awesome, and as a result this keeps happening to me.

There's always lots of drama when I just want to remain co-workers, and I've had to move on often.

Help appreciated.
Pakistan wasn't part of the Arab World proper, even in those times. My comment specifically pertained to Arabic in the Arab World in those times. Pakistan wasn't even Muslim at the time, save for Western Sindh, and rule was largely relegated to Brahmin administrators.
That's a factor but they have also been more willing to coordinate to stop outside challengers, like when everyone (including the frontrunner!) stepped aside to make way for Biden.

Base aside, I think Sanders isn't influential because the party insiders are strongly opposed to him. By way of contrast, despite a disastrous primary run, look at Kamala Harris.
Given IAC’s strong DIY home repair and cooking properties, I’d say they’ll continue to be strong through lockdowns.
What is scary that it is technically quite possible to develop such a gun even for an individual. The most complex part is probably mount and motors, but that is a manageable problem.
While true, sitting down and reading your code in the review tool as opposed to your editor or git client does help; shifting your mindset from author to reviewer also helps.

Back when I was still in a project that did code reviews, it really helped for me.

Similarly / a tip: `git add -p`, to view and review your changes one at a time. You can split up changes into separate commits as well using that technique.
Yes, modern chemistry starts with Lavoisier's "Traité Élémentaire de Chimie" (1789) and development of chemistry as a science took a lot of time: only in 20th century the existence of atoms was finally proven. Up to then there were still some scientists who denied the existence of atoms, one of the last of the famous ones: Ernst Mach: "he famously declared, after an 1897 lecture by Ludwig Boltzmann at the Imperial Academy of Science in Vienna: "I don't believe that atoms exist!""

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ernst_Mach

Newton died in 1727. He followed however not only unscientific paths in alchemy, but also in his analysis of the ancient texts. Both reflect the time he lived and his own beliefs, which influenced these endeavors. With hindsight, we know that these investigations didn't advance humanity's knowledge, but are interesting for history. It can be that he even discovered something scientifically interesting while doing alchemy, but he had his reasons to try to hide that work and apparently some of these papers never survived to this day. And what survived wasn't public until 20th century, contrary to the principles of science.
Fossil does what you are asking already as well as projects like git-bug.

What Radicle adds to the mix is a gossip / social layer around git, which is an interesting idea.
A man who wants to help you out of debt – at any cost
I suspect PC's containing AMD, and maybe even Intel, chips will be crushing Apple in terms of performance a few years from now, even with the legacy that is the x86 ISA.

Just because Apple currently have a (for the sake of argument) 20 watt part, that can outperform an Intel 45 watt part, it doesn't mean this advantage is inherent to ARM or sustainable once the tech cycle evens out.

The bottleneck right now for essentially all chip performance in mobile devices is heat. If you bypass the power throttling and fan control on my 10th gen 6 core Dell XPS 9500 and let it slurp 80-90 watts (and it will), and sit at 100 degrees centigrade (and it will) it will handily beat an M1 multithreaded score in Cinebench.
Clothes, plastics, roads, toothpaste, paint, tires &c.

Chances are wherever you are most of of what you have in your direct sightline contains petroleum in a way or another. Try living without products containing petroleum and you're basically back in 1800s.

Once we run out of it we're truly fucked because we have yet to find viable alternative for most of its use cases.
Per the New York Times [0]:

> According to a document viewed by The New York Times, Apple’s suggested edits to the bill included extending some deadlines for compliance, releasing certain information about supply chains to congressional committees rather than to the public, and requiring Chinese entities to be “designated by the United States government” as helping to surveil or detain Muslim minority groups in Xinjiang.

It’s definitely suspicious that lobbying is being done in secret, but I can’t think of many cases where any lobbying is done in the open.

[0]: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/29/business/economy/nike-coc...
Which is the most efficient fan for Raspberry Pi 4?
I did some analysis of the hardware requirements of replacing my YouTube account with files hosted at home. https://russell.ballestrini.net/dreaming-of-unlimited-home-c...

I'm also interested, details on my contact page. I have a lab and hardware and a decent internet connection.
Great list, but I'd argue that point 6 is more often indicative of tooling failure. Why is it hard to review something that changes both formatting and the code? In the example it is because the tooling is visualizing both kinds of changes in the same way. But there is no fundamental reason for why that needs to be the case.

The same applies to refactoring. It seems perfectly doable for a code review tool to detect code motion, and have differet treatment of the code that moved unchanged vs. the parts that were modified.
You are right. But is not Apple's fault, the long line of chip and computer makers long gone (DEC, Sun, also IBM in the PC Market, etc.) All crushed by the Wintel duopoly. Everybody trusted on x86 and specially Intel, to bring us forward, but they stopped innovating at least a decade ago.

I'm happy that Apple is showing that the king is naked, I hope that a new wave of ARM based devices (not just from Apple) will influx new life on the PC Market.
It’s a very common term of art when contrasting regulatory approaches in the environmental space.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Command_and_control_regulati...
Exactly. Why do software engineers (myself included) so often confuse what is possible with what is practical?
By the time Cyberpunk gets released(2077), you will.
I love this engine, sadly it got stuck in MP-only land, making SP games with it is just too hard.

When I was in college I did one of my projects using it, to great results (also I went overboard with the easy to use engine and made even the furniture inside rooms inside buildings... so the FPS tanked whenever you were outdoors and looked at the city buildings, thankfully the demo for presentation was entirely indoors, so my extreme detail was visible only through windows, where it worked fine, excellent culling system the engine has).

Also I wanted to join the Wouter's course in SMU at Guildhall, but too expensive for me :( (also in another country entirely, making things more complicated), this was after tinkering with Sauer source, and wanting to be that good at coding :)
If you are expected to add 2-3 features daily, first, look for a new job.

If they stick to it though, you're basically forced to reduce the feature's scope to the bare minimum. So instead of a "implement this form", you'd have tasks in the form of "implement this form field".

I don't know what situation you're in, but to me it sounds like they're steering towards giving little commitment and cheating the system to meet some arbitrary counter-productive productivity goal.
The algorithm has absolutely no way of knowing what I want. It can only guess by looking at what I've viewed, and the real motive is always to keep me on the site and maximize engagement.

As I said: negativity maximizes engagement.

Let me give you a simple example. Lets say I walk past you on the sidewalk and say hi. Not much engagement. Now lets say I walk up to you and punch you. I have just maximized engagement. Which is a better interaction?
Just to emphasize your point, 30% take is relatively small in the retail world. A store like Amazon or Walmart or Target or Best Buy generally wants a cut of 40-50%, if not more. And that doesn’t include the cut many distributors want to take for being the middle person.

(Source: I’ve been on the executive team at startups with products sold in retail stores)
Thanks! True that I can't say what it is doing when talking to the cloud since the traffic is encrypted...but I do still think a lot of people would be interested in knowing when it is talking to the cloud.
You’re not supposed to save money you’re supposed to use it to buy assets with value and save them. You keep a small amount liquid in the bank as a rainy day fund and the rest goes into assets of your choosing.

> Also are you sure? 90 years ago US was on the gold standard. Are you sure you can still get the gold that was promised 90 years ago?

If I wanted gold I’d buy it. My comment was about bank failures — dollars - not their redemption capabilities. It is true fact. What you’re describing is a default, external to the banking system that did happen and would not affect you if you used money like you’re supposed to, as a temporary store of value to buy assets with.

> If you see the amount of debt being created and not payed back, it’s just a system designed for risk takers.

None of this matters at all if you buy assets with it like I said. Which is what you were doing. The system works.
Wear a wedding ring?

I had a similar thing in my early 20s despite the wedding ring, now in my 30s everyone looks for it.
You're right, but checking for null is not terribly expensive compared to iterating over a linked list.
> I think the market should be more modular so that any company can build cool stuff with top of the line CPUs, not just Apple.

What exactly is stopping, say, Qualcomm, to introduce "top of the line CPU"? Apart from engineering merit?
Cisco Acquires Slido
https://mathiashueber.com/pci-passthrough-ubuntu-2004-virtua...

I use NVidia video cards for VMs, AMD cards (other than BigNavi) have VM reboot issues.
Basically, skimmed it and judged it on the basis of its word-cloud. How are we to escape tribal discussion-rails if nuance isn't allowed for?
Has nothing to do with Intel, I guess? PC = Windows for most people, I heard them complaining about ads running in their OS. But what are you gonna do? Switch to Ubuntu?
SEO expert has bought Nigel Farage's old domain name which was not renewed
Let's ponder on one example where programming was fundamentally improved in the last 10 years.
Git
Some developers adopted immediately.
Others were dragged into it kicking and screaming.
Some ignored it (managers).
In my humble opinion improvements on a given tool latch
on the esoteric definition of what is considered "better".
Better for me?
Better for the company?
Better for the machine?
In the case of Git, the case is base on the "me" (Linus Torvalds).
In the dev-world we had the joke that goes: If you don't
like the tool/language go ahead and write your own.
My take away is that improving programming languages and tools,
can happen if we take the joke above at heart.
> Computers have been invented to surprise us... If we knew what computers do, we would not use them, and we would not have built any.

This is just trying to sound clever for the sake of sounding clever. The first bit is factually wrong in any non-trivial way, and the counter argument for the second bit is the very next slide.
Andhra Pradesh: 'Mystery' illness puts hundreds in hospital