skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Or they do, are rare, and haven't yet been reliably identified: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31640707/

The fact that the "new name" (IEI) seems to ignore/discredit the primary claims of the sufferers at the outset, and that a multi-billion (trillion?) dollar industry would somewhat prefer these people don't exist, I remain skeptical of recent studies. (A view no doubt also biased by personal experience.)

That older studies show the effect, and newer ones don't isn't a smoking gun, but it is a cause for skepticism.

At least, one thing almost all studies agree on is "more research is required".
No, it has nothing to do with star power or celebrity.

It's because the studios are willing to spend lots of money and implement extremely strict protocols so that they can keep filming, because if they don't they will literally go bankrupt and die. And because the studios and the crew depend on filming for their economic survival, everyone involved is willing to do what it takes.

I have friends who work in Hollywood. They're not allowed to socialize when they're working on set, nor for the two week period before they start working on set. They can't use public transportation. They can't visit friends or families for Thanksgiving or Christmas. They must get tested multiple times a week: a rapid test nearly every day (or every day for some sets), and the regular test at least every two weeks. The stricter sets won't even let crew go to the groceries when they're off set; they must use Instacart or limit themselves to eating at the crew stations on set. When traveling, they must stay in lodging provided by the studios, usually AirBnbs because hotels are too risky.
I am not vested in AI research at all. But I am horrified by the possibility that 'data' and 'science' need to be ignored by AI so that false equality among the races could be realized. Timnit was refining this unethical approach IMO by using extortion against her own employer. Just the thought that someone who is basically an unethical emotional terrorist would be programming AI to ignore actual data and science in favor of their own race is chilling.
Plus it’s fun. We’re talking 20 ft high flames you can feel from 50 ft away.
Hmm. Let’s look at the definitions of those words.

Odd = evenly divisible without remainder only by itself and 1.

Even = evenly divisible without remainder by 2.

Well, zero is not divisible by itself. So, it can’t be odd.

But zero can be evenly divided by all other integers, including 2.

So, therefore, zero must be even.

Yes?
You are comparing apples and oranges. This is a CSS Stylesheet. Your html generator either brings its own css or relies on the browser default.
Everyone gotta sleep, they get exposed to whoever they're sleeping with. If everyone stays home, not just indoors, their extra exposure is very small.
Similar project (albeit not production-ready): https://gnunet.org
No, that phrasing would break the guidelines even worse.

You weren't being kind. Kindness isn't relative to how bad another comment is or you feel it is. It's a quality of what you yourself respond with.

The rest of your comment was great, but if you begin by tweaking people, it's not reasonable to expect them to learn from the rest of what you write. They're just going to smart from the slap, and respond as badly or (probably) worse.

Would you mind reviewing https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and taking the intended spirit of this site more to heart? We'd appreciate it. The idea is curious conversation, rather than the sniping and fault-finding (and worse) that dominates most of the internet.
That depends on the test. It's specifically antibody tests that lag, PCR and antigen tests do indicate a lot earlier, and have a good chance of catching an infection early, because they directly detect presence of the virus. cf: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-02661-2
The entertainment industry cannot let people realize we would live happily without its products. They have to keep the stream of shows and films coming so people don't realize that.
I've thought about this a fair bit. Nothing can prevent you from plainly stating what your device does. You can claim interoperability with USB if your device works for the advertised use. You don't need to pay the USB consortium for licensing, but you can't use their branding.

If you don't make a claim about power draw, then I suspect your consumers can't complain unless the power draw is unexpectedly large. And even then, what are the actual damages you need to compensate them for?
Restaurants with open air outdoor seating as depicted in the linked video?
You can't draw too much current from the 3.3V pin.
I don't know what current this fan needs but it is safer to connect to 5V as it has some more room to safely draw current.
> You are using politeness as a manipulative tactic to get your way.

That's a very cynical view and not what I'm talking about at all.

Yes, people manipulate other people using politeness sometimes. Being polite does not in general make a person manipulative.

> Regardless the outcome. If someone messes up your order you just say “Looks like we have the wrong order. We ordered X”

But... your example is a polite response, albeit impersonal. This is more or less what I would say. Do we have a different definition of politeness?

> I’m saying you don’t need to be polite as much as you need to not hurt people

I agree that trying not to hurt people is the right thing to do - but using the right language can be important in achieving that. Gentle language can reduce the pressure the other person is feeling if there is a problem to resolve. That's not manipulation, it's empathy.

You highlighted the phrase I used: "the latter is more effective at getting the best outcome, regardless of who is nominally at fault" - here I think we're just using language differently to each other. When I talk about getting the best outcome, I'm not talking about trying to trick someone into doing something for me. If I raise an objection, I have a specific outcome in mind - e.g. I would like my order to be fixed (and yes, this is a trivial example - in reality I would probably just eat what I'm given unless I don't like it, but in any case this is just a thought experiment). Having an outcome in mind and hoping for it to be a good outcome are not about manipulation; it's about understanding that some conversations involve transactions, and they can be concluded pleasantly and positively for all involved, or not. Manipulating someone in fact aims to achieve maximum benefit for one party at the expense of the other party, and even if it wears a "polite face" it is in fact the opposite of genuine politeness.

I feel like you and I probably actually agree but are just talking about slightly different thing. Otherwise I still don't understand what you're saying.
I think restaurant, retail ( non food), and hotel owners would feel like 2 weeks of harsh lockdown followed by complete masked opennings would be better than the current situation of months of non-stop partial measures.

Most of China has not had any lockdowns since July. I wish I could travel.
We don't have it yet.

What we do have is 3,000 dead Americans a day. That's easy to measure.

We know how the virus spreads, so it makes sense to try and prevent it as best as we can with the information we have available.
In Ireland they are shredded for mulch.
I've tried finding my way through that Atlas Ripe website but it's very confusing. I don't know how others are able to pinpoint that problem so well.
Alright, thank you. I don't think that this is right at all, but I will give it a further thought when I have the time. Nice talking to you.
Interesting, it makes sense. Do you know what are the involved timescales here? How long before the buried wood is decomposed and has released most of its carbon back? Is it 50 years or 5000? Maybe it depends a lot on the type of soil?

EDIT: as the sibling comment observes, burning the tree cannot be "awful", as all the carbon from that tree came from the atmosphere. Growing and burning a tree is the epitome of carbon-neutral thing to do. Now, burying a tree may have a positive (non-neutral) effect.
"Completely abandoned" here being used to mean still much more permissive than most western countries.
> Let people die, that will solve the situation; the fewer people alive, the fewer people will get COVID.

Outstanding thinking by the Swedish government! /s
Available for free until Cloudflare decides that you are in violation of your their terms of service because you wore a MAGA hat (seriously lame) or expressed doubt about vaccines, after which it won't be available to you for love or for money.
Racket is great, and is now able to run on Chez Scheme as the backend. But as far as using it for production code, it's a bit problematic as the folks in charge are focused on it as a research and education tool first and foremost, meaning they are not shy about changing things a lot. Chicken compiles down to C and has a really friendly community with great docs and examples for "real world cases"
I visited Zappos HQ with a university group in 2016. As part of the tour, we visited the executive area, where they all sat in cubicles/rows like anyone else's. They even pointed out Tony's desk, though he wasn't around at the time.

I came away from that tour with two distinct impressions:
1 - Zappos had an amazing company culture; everyone seemed to get along and really enjoy their work.
2 - Tony Hsieh had a surprisingly large collection of half-empty liquor bottles at his desk.

Tony's death is certainly a tragedy for his family and the communities he helped build. I hope even during this pandemic we can all maintain those key relationships in life that keep us in check.
You mean the Establishment allowed its own police to investigate crimes by members of the Establishment and it turned out that accusers against the Establishment are the real bad ones and Establishment figures are all just innocent old war heroes?

My word, who could have predicted that twist?

It's the easiest, and most obvious, thing in the world for a regime to kill a scandal or exposure of a conspiracy by poisoning the well with outrageous and easily exposed claims by easily discredited accusers.
I have half a dozen Pi4s running in heat sink cases (various brands), as HTPCs streaming from a NAS, Octoprint server, Home Assistant server, and various heavier load purposes. Since the earlier firmware updates I’ve never had any overheating issues at all, even after sustained heavy loads.

Outside over-clocking or extreme edge-case stuff I think the “Pi’s NEED a fan” stuff is mostly leftover from the early days pre-update and just stuck around.
And if you were fired or retaliated against for having failed to file an expense report on time, when that isn't normally a requirement, I'd be criticising leadership for that too.

Fwiw, I'm not sure what you mean by legalistic. I see Jeff's interpretation as more legalistic: this is the policy, while mine is based on practice: the policy isn't enforced, and here's what people actually do. And like I said, it brings me no joy to see that Jeff is lying to justify this. I have a deep respect for his technical achievements, and prior to this my understanding was that he was an above average executive. Perhaps he still is. But that's not an excuse for me to not levy criticism at him when I see him do something wrong.

In practice, Google doesn't require two weeks for pub approvals. I'd be more than happy to provide the underlying date I'm basing that statement on, but obviously not here. Granted, if you want you can find the data for yourself and if encourage you to do so!

> . A literal intrepretation has you claiming that all Google researchers only allow 24 hours of review of their papers before submitting them for publication.

Given your experiences with Google reimbursement policy, why would you expect adherence to the written publication approval process to be different?

That's why I'd much prefer to have this conversation on corp. I can show you raw data and you can draw your own conclusions no need to listen to me or my interpretation whatsoever.
Microwaves have much lower energy than gamma radiation, and brain damage requires much cruder fidelity than brain surgery.

The experience described by targets seems to indicate room-scale effects.
You can’t get vitamin D from the sun in much of north america right now. And people generally don’t socialize outside of their household when watching TV.

Sunlight is great! But socializing indoors is what spreads the virus. America is not reknowned for being a land where everyone was outdoors in the sunshine in normal times: vitamin D deficiency was already rampant.

And going for a walk is not exclusionary to TV. In places where it is present you can get enough vitamin D with 30-60 min sun exposure.
What is all this research you are talking about you doing? I don't see it. You've provided two links in response to two of your many points. You've made claims like "this is Germany+" without actually supporting that claim. The burden of proof is on you to prove this is Germany+ (as the one making the claim), not me.

I have no interest in winning the argument, I have an interest in the truth and sound fiscal and social policies that result in a good balance of strong economy + innovation + lack of exploitation.

For all the things in the discussion that you claim Germany does that make its economy stronger, you need to demonstrate that. For all the things in the discussion that Germany is not doing, you need to justify why they are good, as the one making the claim that they are good ideas. You have not done so. You made a list, and are now claiming everyone else is arguing in bad faith when they ask you to justify that list. My response was not very high effort because I was not actually responded to a thoroughly sourced list. It was just a list.

You accurately stated that I was incorrect about co-determination in Germany. I read your point as "majority representation on boards", when what you actually said was "significant" – an error on my part. Germany does indeed do that, and as such the policy would indeed fall under "Germany+". However, I maintain that amongst all your other bullet points, the only other point that 1. Germany does 2. US does not is living wage. And one (good) argument for why the federal minimum wage is not particularly looked after / updated is because the US is a federation of strong states, so minimum wage is better handled by states individually (which they currently do). Cost of living in Montana is very different from NYC.
Do you really need all those tools or just a subset? Of those that you need and don’t work yet, have you considered reaching out to the developers for an ETA or priority of the port? People can reply however they want but if the developers of the tools you happen to need don’t write the code, a forum comment won’t amount to much.
You might like S7, it has a lot of the high level features of Clojure in a scheme. (hashmaps, keywords, environments, Clojure/CL style macros.) This is what I am using these days.
The time span in question is 2.5 years. "Over night" is only mentioned by you.
I never submitted anything to a conference unless I was willing to have that version published.
You've misunderstood what the concept of jailbreaking means.

Jailbreaking in the sense it is used for breaking out of the Apple defined jail/walled garden.

Darwin does not have jails as FreeBSD does. And the software they have for limiting what an application can do is not in any way similar to what a jail is.
Rudy Giuliani Tests Positive for Coronavirus, Trump Says
Ah, interesting! I had just assumed that most departments wouldn't have a process for handling this kind of stuff or that it would be considered more costly in terms of getting a signed agreement, coordinating etc etc
And as soon as there is the slightest bit of traction, the same companies would own it!
A number of databases uses the Business Source License (and its variants, usually including a non-compete clause). It acts as an option which vests (switches to a non-copyleft libre license) after n months. There is also the Polyform project but adoption has been low and their licenses are extremely controversial and unpopular.
Quite different. Stellar facilitates pinning to foreign currencies, a different problem from moving money between countries.
They hint at something like this coming in the comments.

Do you have plans in foreseeable future to bring those features? Formula formatting, debugging (at least with F9), code navigation (jump to function definition, etc) and so on.

I completely hear you on this one! I can't share more about what we are doing in the future but I will say that I definitely share your sentiment. I would love to see us add much needed tools for debugging and authoring formulas. Akin to what you get with great IDEs.
Thank you.

I am aiming to help make Common Lisp (or a close descendant) a top 5 programming language by 2040.

I believe this is eminently achievable given proper approaches, and funding me would certainly help towards that goal.

https://twitter.com/HexstreamSoft/status/1213964177657794577
The op has posted in this thread that they are no longer at Red Hat... so your comment is wrong.
In the simple case, yes it is, but it scales poorly; consider ex. https://github.com/docker-library/postgres/blob/b9c080857b88... which is 112 lines run together like that to keep things in a single layer. This is pretty bad for readability. Also, as sibling comment notes, that only works for RUN commands, not other or mixed groups of commands.
I’m talking about the lwn article. The post is by an ex-RH employee and clearly influenced by their experience at RH.
“NTFS isn't that bad” – Robert Collins (LCA 2020) [video]
Intriguing concept but I couldn’t tell from a quick glance where this website falls on the scale of say “BBC/NPR affiliated” down to “Ted in his garage has a cool idea and knows how to website”.

The inclusion of a donate button, an empty dead section titled something like “who is talking about us” with no content and above that “who is supporting us” which had a few names that didn’t carry recognition with me.

Anyone know how serious this project is from an industry adoption point of view not so much from the people involved in setting it up view.

Again the tilt of my comment is a bit negative which isn’t my intention so I would like to point out again how cool the website looks and how interesting the concept is.
But notice there is a difference between following orders and staying in a role but using what power you have to enact change. There is a third route.
While this is true JVM disadvantages are only a problem in very niche domains like embedded or kernel development. (and where you are forced to use JS like web ofc)

Overall it's definitely in contention for "universal" runtime and Kotlin/Java are definitely close to fully general purpose languages that do all things sufficiently well.

IMO the reason why they win the general purpose category is because they have the least hard limitations.

CLR is in a similar quality class to JVM, C# is a very good language. I think if you are not on the JVM that is where you should be for general purpose programming.

JS/Ruby/Python/etc are all single threaded, this is a hard limitation that I can't look past. It's a needlessly painful constraint when you just need something CPU intensive to be done quickly. Additionally lack of static typing isn't something I am willing to compromise on anymore. I'm older now, I don't have time for the sort of defensive programming required to make these languages produce programs with as few bugs as a statically typed equivalent.
I still use Ruby for scripts but it's not a tool I pick up for anything but the quickest of hacks anymore.

C/C++ are too unsafe to use without too much brain space dedicated to making sure you are managing memory correctly.
Also lacking centralised repository and package management ala Maven.

Functional languages are too polarising, I can use them and appreciate them but rallying a team around them is too hard.
Haskell and it's ecosystem taught me a great many things and it's definitely what most good languages steal from these days.
Bright spot of JVM/CLR is you can mix a bit of them in when you need to with compatibility with the rest of your code with F# and Clojure/Scala.

Rust is getting there but isn't there yet. I think it's the most promising besides JVM/CLR. Really high quality type system, tooling is coming along, great quality ecosystem, async getting worked out. As it's borrow checker gets smarter and perhaps an easy GC library is introduced (atleast easier than Rc/Arc/Cell/friends) then it's got great things in it's future.

For me it's Kotlin for now. It's the right mixture of modern, easy to learn and built on solid proven tech without any severe limitations.
As someone who sends .xlsx files back and forth with clients often, I’m most concerned about compatibility if I start integrating this into my worksheets. It sounds like those clients that haven’t updated to the latest Excel will receive a mess of #CALC errors.

Otherwise an exciting development.
> I believe it's because politicians get star-struck

Maybe that's part of it, but I believe it's because they know these filmmakers have incredible power to influence.

Remember "Sideways"? A fictional character in a fictional movie said one negative line about merlot and wiped out the market for that varietal[1]. People who liked the wine suddenly didn't like it, because a character in a movie didn't like it.

Now consider all of the semi-fictional movies that are made, like Citizen Kane was about Hearst (which destroyed Marion Davies' reputation as collateral damage). Or all of the movies glamorizing war, soldiers, FBI/CIA/police or politicians. This is something our government has needed and continues to need people to embrace.

[1] - I asked some winemakers about this and they said merlot in Napa "was being ripped up like crazy" after the movie came out. And that merlot often ends up in red blends because selling it as a single varietal still doesn't fly. It's only coming back in the last few years.
There's sort of a catch-22 going on in the example given. you might want to give users a handy tool to find that data and fix it, but you also don't want to give the person that hacked the account a handy tool to find that data and exfiltrate it. I'm actually inclined to believe they aren't showing you specific files by design, for this reason.

The real owner may be able to search for a few things,like the last 4 of their credit cards, or prescription names, or their social, and find and remove things, while an attacker would have a much harder time sorting through the data.

It doesn't really affect your main point though. Bad regexes and the fight to correctly classify items is always a tug of war between correct and pretty.
It’s not a cafeteria — it’s literally a set of tents that were erected fifty feet from this restaurant owners own outdoor tent.

It’s not logical at all.
It might be the biggest ocean, but the mighty Pacific is in peril
> You can’t get vitamin D from the sun in much of north america right now.

Not even in LA?

> And going for a walk is not exclusionary to TV.

No, it's not. But the argument was that TV encourages people to stay inside, which it does. If it's ok for people to go for walks, maybe it is not vitally important that we produce new TV shows right now.