skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Thank you for the suggestion, That would not work in this situation though as static files implies static generators. (I hope they would be adding more content as time passes). It would be too much for the lay person. I hope to be out of the loop once I get the site going and the basics setup.
Yes, if that mythical container full of iPhones full of bitcoins got tossed first everybody else would be screwed. If that was common the next step might be clients with particularly cheap wares bribing the captain to sacrifice their containers first.
A buddy worked for a company that shipped many thousands of containers around the world each month. He said right around 10% of the containers are never seen again. Lost, stolen, overboard, whatever.

That being said I've shipped my vehicles are few times and always just taken the risk. Most recently (in early 2019) I shipped from Egypt to Canada was quoted 1.5% of the value for insurance.
How much did NPM sell to GitHub for?

Was this number released?
A flu virus shut down the US economy in 1872 by infecting horses
By such a metric people who write the final implementation on the first commit are complete slackers.
Oh sorry, my bad, you mean fact, not face. Yes, I agree.
I did some game testing when I was a teenager (paid in free software). A couple nights playing a game that either sucked or just wasn't my cup of tea was enough to show me that playing games was a lot better than working on games.

Anytime I hear a young person say they want to be a game developer I want to grab them by the shoulders and try to shakes some sense into them. If you're smart enough to do game development, you're probably smart enough to go make twice as much to work half as hard somewhere else. You can go work your 8 hour day, and play whatever game you want the rest of the night. Or do something completely different.
Yes, I am leaning towards wordpress.com hosting but I hoped to see if there is anything new in the market that is more usable.
Retvals, terrible teaching, and admitting we have a problem
Interesting, but seems to only work on static cartoon images where regions to uncensor have been manually identified.
The article refers to p about 30 times, including in a diagram, so I can understand why they'd pick a shorter name.
I wouldn't have written anything if dockerless was opt-in for when you wanted to experiment with dropping `dnf install docker-ce`.

There's a difference between infra orgs promoting new tech as an alternative vs. blocking their competitors. Infra co's are paid to be reliable neutral providers & advisors - instead, it seems corporate greed here has folks actively breaking enterprise userland and misleading decisions makers in sensitive areas like gov, utilities, world-scale services, etc.

Like I said, I found the technical goal interesting and have been following. However, working through the year+ papertrail of RH doublespeak here makes me dread having to interact with them as an active OSS dev and in my dayjob working with big businesses / govs. RHEL often has policy lock-in in these orgs, so I know it'll keep happening unless the community stops it. As is, the stewards are needlessly risking putting podman and friends into a politically contentious category similar to urbit, oracle, etc., and are costing a lot of time & $$$ from people who are already stretched thin.
That is something I would go for :)

Yet, this solution is for a doctor who has not used anything beyond a few apps on the phone. So I am looking a very userfriendly solution.
Solutions that feature extra levels of pointing naturally arise in many cases. E.g. you search some data structure for an element. Initially you may do this so that the search returns the element itself or NULL if it's not found, but then you realize you'll also need to use the same searching logic to insert and delete elements. In this light you rewrite the search to return a pointer to the location instead; this way you can use it as a subroutine for all the operations.
No I am linking to an article with quotes from the judge presiding over the case and a factual summary. The author is not giving their understanding of the legalities and merits of the case.

OP's statement, "Epic had to do this to be able to legally challenge Apple in court" is worthless if they are not a lawyer and don't have some reputable source.
10%!? That seems excessive. Were these containers packed with diamonds or something?

PS. Love http://theroadchoseme.com :)
This is not specific to ransomware. The title of the paper is

Phantom Malware: Conceal Malicious Actions From Malware Detection Techniques by Imitating User Activity
Publisher
> Please don't keep using RTMP. ... You might consider accepting an alternative modern protocol.

What would you recommend as an alternative modern protocol to RTMP for shipping video between a broadcast endpoint and transcoding/distribution infra?
They have to charge more than the average or they couldn’t be in business.
In the olden days they used to measure performance by SLOC, Source Lines of Code.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Source_lines_of_code
If three people died trying to save your MacBook Pro, that'd be bad. Which is why the idea is based around not caring what's in a given container.
Complaints about Apple’s censorship shouldn’t be limited to just foreign governments, which is a myopic and self-serving stance I often see in posts like this. It’s important to demand transparent free speech policies across the board for everyone. Like other big tech companies, Apple also censors content that doesn’t align with their progressive biases. They’ve banned numerous conservative apps from their App Store, and have threatened to ban others (example: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/06/tech-tyranny-apple-...). They’ve also engaged in the cultural wars more directly by doing things like replacing the gun emoji with the squirt gun emoji (https://blog.emojipedia.org/apple-and-the-gun-emoji/). At this rate I will be unsurprised when Apple decides to start blocking certain websites across their devices for wrongspeak.
Whoaa horsey! We don't want some vc guy to wet himself looking at this thread
I wonder why they are calling this a record number of containers lost. Did some quick googling and that doesn't seem to be true at all. The current record holder is the [MOL Comfort](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MOL_Comfort#Shipwreck) which lost its full compliment of 4.3k containers.
> People who actually want to make something happen will do the small thing in their power to accomplish today.

I take your point, but I want to say a little more. You may agree?

To accomplish big things, sometimes you have to change many minds just a little bit. Sometimes you start by asking people to notice something. Then maybe you ask them to wonder if it could be different. Then maybe you convince people that it should be different. Then maybe you convince people that it must be different; that the status quo is not ok. This can be hard work; think about the organizing for civil rights in the US.

This process involves big ideas. Sure, asking people to give $5 for the cause can help, and you also need people willing to do more than give. You need them to agree deeply, because you need their support over time.
As a society we should vote for car insurance work this way too instead of feeding fraudulent car insurance industry.
What's more scary is the half-submerged invisible containers floating around, waiting to hit some unsuspecting sailboat in the middle of the night.
I just skimmed the paper but I don't see what's novel here. Engineers design clips all the time. My company produces off the shelf software to help them to this - modelling the geometry, friction and elasticity.

It looks like this is just a fun investigation into something that's novel to the author but not to the world. Shouldn't it be a blog and not something with a DOI?
Don't want to sound harsh and insinuate anything but did Zappos make any profit? I think the merits of 'Holacracy' that Zappos and Hsieh vehemently propagated can only be validated if it made any impact on the bottomline.

The reason I am saying this is because I worked in a startup which tried posturing like Zappos- flat hierarchy, no cabins, boozing, chilling et al, while being run by a cynic CEO. The startup failed badly so this cool culture never got the limelight but my hunch is that if they had raised enough money and survived another 5 years somebody would have included them in their book or dissertation.
Anyone insuring containers in sea transport probably can't wake up for less than a 1000 pound premium.
> I don't believe in piece below to be true, because one had to be in academia, science facility or government to connect: "For a very long time, no one paid for Internet access because Internet access was not something that was sold. It was like a public beachfront at the ocean. If you were near it, you could jump in, no credit card required.".

When the author says "if you were near it, you could jump it", they meant "near it" == "in academia, defense, or government".
Folks that like this might like CNC joinery and compliant mechanisms.

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=cnc+joinery&t=ffab&iax=images&ia=i...

Why Machines That Bend Are Better https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=97t7Xj_iBv0
> Because what Apple is doing is not immoral or unethical

Prohibiting anti-censorship apps and content-based censorship of apps at the behest of undemocratic governments is not immoral or unethical?

> Every company who runs a marketplace sets its terms and distorts competition to benefit them.

Not every company monopolizes the distribution of a third party product to an identifiable discrete set of customers.

> In this case the author et al are arguing that Apple should be regulated differently and forced to operate a "level playing field" marketplace.

That would be a valid way to remove the moral issue by taking the ability to impose censorship out of the corporation's hands.
Learn how to make a difference through Human-Centered Design
Not if they spend so long moving aside your laptops to find the clothing that the entire ship sinks. With General Average they can sort out the problem ASAP and then do the math later to repay you so that you and the clothing manufacturer both only lose 10% of your cargo’s respective values.
Agree entirely - Android is an appalling environment for programming, or for using a computer. It shows an almost complete lack of thought and consideration.

I resorted to the "graphical language" MIT App Inventor. App Inventor might be clumsy and awkward, but nothing is as bad the Android environment and "tool set".
Which is great in theory, as everyone’s incentives align.
Can you describe what exactly is wrong about the current car insurance industry? It sounds like this is exactly how car insurance currently works and it's a very regulated industry, perhaps only behind the financial industry and car manufacturing itself.
> Premise 2) The only evidence of a pedophile conspiracy comes from a single completely discredited witness.

This is an artifact of selective perception and contradicted by both evidence and the public record.
As of the September release of Compose version 1.27.0 https://github.com/docker/compose/releases/tag/1.27.0 the config format versions 2 and 3 are merged and "depends_on" – and "extends"! – are back.
Thought it was nice 12 years ago to land my first job abroad and get my foot into the door but now it's just spam from recruitment agencies that I've just muted all notifications entirely.

I do still recommend it to others who are job searching though.
>And now I'm thinking of a syscall-chirp generator to get an even better feel for the pulse of the machine :-)

Nullsoft (the winamp people) made something like this back in the day. I encourage you you to write your own :)
I'm not sure if you've seen it already, but here's an essay-length elaboration of some of these ideas:

https://aeon.co/essays/why-repetition-can-turn-almost-anythi...

It references the same speech-to-song illusion you have described.

I found this essay, and its ideas, to be really helpful in understanding in why my brain likes certain types of music -- some compositions really trigger this particular part of my perception.
Cracking the meat-allergy mystery with the tick-bite link
All it might take is for customers to say: "Okay, I don't need it for Christmas, I can wait until March, or maybe even June, for a real good game".

Not very realistic, unfortunately.
I'm just trying to imagine what being in this ship must have been line when this thing collapsed. It must have been insane for quite some time. The initial collapse, then likely for some time after the sound and tremors as the unstable mass of containers continued to settle and slide off the deck. What a crazy life.
Given the extreme conditions being imposed in certain states, it certainly is not being factored into these decisions uniformly by all governors. There are states that are using reason and common sense. But look at California for example. When you have Sheriffs in virtually every major county directly and publicly refusing to enforce your orders, perhaps you have gone too far [1].

[1] https://ktla.com/news/local-news/riverside-county-sheriff-sl...
Given the discussion here seems to stray into conventional kernels and SVMs instead of the generalized version dubbed "path kernel", it seems a lot of comments or observations here on vanilla SVM may not be applicable to whats being described in the paper.

It would be neat if this paper was accompanied by minimalist code to demonstrate the approximate equivalence on some toy "deep" networks, so any misconceptions could be avoided in the peanut gallery here (like every inference / evaluation requiring to integrate the path kernel from scratch, which is clearly not proposed, it just describes how training the original deep network is in some sense equivalent to integrating the path kernel)
> to be at the top of your field, explicit knowledge is almost always required.

This is technically true. However the only thing separating someone at the top of the field from an average expert is intuition. Both has access to exactly the same explicit knowledge and any expert with years of experience will know most of it already.

For example, what is "good code"? Nobody has written a program that programmers agree can tell if your code is good or not. Yet "good code" is extremely important, making things composable and scaling up means we can make larger and less bug prone programs. It is one of the key things of a top programmer, yet the only way we can identify it is ask experts whether a piece of code is good or not, and they wont even agree. We know for a fact that different programmers writes code of vastly different quality, we just can't pinpoint what that quality is.

The problem with Paul Graham isn't that he rely too much on his intuition, the problem is that his intuition for programming language design isn't as good as his intuition for making programs or startups. Lisp isn't as great as he claims, Java is much greater than he thinks, he just has created a mental blocker keeping him from seeing this and therefore ensuring that he will never be great at designing languages, since that blocker keeps his intuition from doing its job.
Lol, when I worked at a unicorn one of my buddies got an award for "most testing code commits"

He confided after drinks it was because he didn't know how to squash/amend his commits.

So I'm not so sure about that metric....
Paid LinkedIn Membership Levels:

- Premium Career: $29.99/month.

- Premium Business: $59.99/month.

- Sales Navigator Professional: $79.99/month.

- Recruiter Lite: $119.99/month.
Read the CNN report your article links to. It says the same thing I said:

> Epic's attorneys acknowledged that the company breached its agreement with Apple but claimed Epic was simply refusing to comply with an anti-competitive contract, and that forcing a legal battle was part of Epic's plan.

You might disagree about whether it should've been part of their plan (evidently their lawyers disagree, and I have yet to see either your article or yourself mention an alternative approach), but either way, everything I've seen is consistent with their intention having been to force this into court than to covertly breach the contract.
This article and the article to which the author is responding seems to miss the point entirely.

There's nothing wrong with "solutionism" if people are making actual solutions to problems that they understand well.

The derogatory term of solutionism was coined because of a trend where people built cool but gimmicky superficial "solutions" for perceived "problems" that in no way addressed the root cause of the problems. They were salves for symptoms by people who drastically underestimated the scope of the problem. They also seemed to have no idea how to engineer lasting solutions (because those are expensive and boring).

Vaccines are an actual solution, though. They, in part with huge amounts of boring, un-sexy political action, can end the pandemic.

So no, vaccines aren't solutionism, because they actually solve the problem, in a big, expensive and boring way
People are afraid of being labeled a bigot and having their careers ruined because they have a nuanced opinion about an issue related to identity politics.
I wonder if insurance companies bribe captains on occasions to throw overboard couple of uninsured containers to "make an example" out of people who think they don't need insurance and to "spread the word".
Spenczar might know better but SRT seems very interesting for modern protocols. RTMP is very old as a protocol.
According news title photo, I guess the topic is clicks of LEGO® Duplo™ bricks, not a "classic" bricks.
That picture is nuts. Strange that the container stacks seem to have fallen in both directions, almost alternating. Why would they do that?
> The authors obviously decided these explanations didn't fit the clinical observations, and I suspect they're thorough enough to consider that they're looking at nothing.

The report stated that they were lacking too much data to determine it was a mass psychogenic illness, and could not make a conclusion on the subject. It would still fit the available data though.
My question is, with Modern Technology, Satellite imagery and Weather forecast, how far are we from completely removing the risk of containers ship hitting a storm and lost containers?

While someone has pointed out It's 99.99875% reliability in a yearly basis. 10K Containers lost per year is still a staggering amount. Or more like 6 - 10 incidents like this per year.

We cant make ship travel any faster due to law of physics. Surely we could make it travel safer?
National academy of sciences report pulsed radio frequency illness
Interesting article, does anyone know how these weapons work? I thought stuff like this needs to be close range, walls and trees block the weapon.

Can somebody explain?
I am quite saddened by the article's tone: "technical debt of docker" ouch that's hurtful to Solomon and Sam...

I personally always take the view that docker, by all accounts, blew off a potential once in decade chance of becoming the next VMware, because of its own arrogance and incompetence.

But, I am very much disgusted by the community's misplaced hate towards docker, and the equally misguided euphemism towards the big corps, particularly Google. After all, the whole container community own it's creation to docker. One can always claim that container exits long before docker, but that's like claim there were always operating system before Unix, etc.
I think the argument is that if tracked it should not be done on a website using the branding of the original campaign because doing so dilutes the original brand?
It refers to an old American comicstrip with a little kid that didn’t know much. (I think anyways)

It just sort of means any below-average person.
Assuming this is the real notklaatu... Hi!

Just so you know, I really enjoy listening to you talk about the programs in the Slackware a\ package. Love the podcast. Been listening to it since the beginning. Good stuff!
Yes, the idea is that everyone loses the same percentage of what they had (including the ship owner—the value of the ship before and after the incident is also included in the calculation). General Average long predates modern containerized shipping, so doing it by container count wouldn’t have been a thing anyway.
Well, just for starters, millions of people haven't died of the virus. At last count, the death toll so far is just over 1.5 million. A terrible number, to be sure, but if you claim to not be engaging in hyperbole or misstatement of facts, it would be good to back that by not making your very first statement completely non-factual.
So the downside is that it's not fully compatible with inferior systems? :)
> No I am linking to an article with quotes from the judge presiding over the case and a factual summary. The author is not giving their understanding of the legalities and merits of the case.

The article is written by a layman and includes a contextless quote from the judge which doesn't appear relevant to the point you're trying to make.

> OP's statement, "Epic had to do this to be able to legally challenge Apple in court" is worthless if they are not a lawyer and don't have some reputable source.

Accusing someone of not being a lawyer is not a counterargument, it's an ad hominem attack. If they're right, they're right. If they're wrong, where's your evidence?
China suggests Australian beef exports may have first introduced coronavirus
>That's true, but it doesn't mean your beef is only with the governments, in exactly the same way that IBM's collusion during WWII can't be pinned solely on the German government. They can choose not to do business in that country, or to be as subversive as they can until they get kicked out. Not doing so is a choice.

Same with South Africa and IBM during apartheid.
Oh wow. I never realized if I clicked into a comment I could favorite it. Thank you!
I'm assuming weight factors heavily into loading arrangement, and they probably mostly want to avoid other factors complicating how they stack containers aboard.
Check out our project: https://noteworthy.tech/overview
>The state is at last in process of choosing a vendor to replace its antiquated technology but doesn’t expect to complete the work until 2025.

Call me cynical, but knowing how enterprise software vendors fool big corporations, I'm left wondering how bad the software is they manage to sell to state IT departments.

Whether this new software will even an improvement on the status quo is questionable at best.

I'm always thinking the state should instead spend money on open source solutions. They at least could be vetted by interested parties. And with the money the state hands to vendors they could finance some great development.
In the true market "ship" model you'd pay 1/10 of what you're paying now. In the government enforced model you're overpaying 10x+ fold.
I would like to add for the folks saying this is an ad-hominem that using Paul Graham’s own “hierarchy of disagreement” pyramid [1], this is at least at the level of Refutation, putting it 4 solid rungs above Ad-Hominem.

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Graham_(programmer)#/medi...
Yah, that's exactly it.

Supply and demand curves describe the supply and demand at given prices.

We thought the number of units of oil supplied was going to eventually permanently fall primarily from the supply curve shifting up and to the left.

But then the fracking revolution happened, and it looked like maybe introduction of artificial measures to shift the supply curve upwards (carbon taxes) might be required-- to purposely reach peak oil.

But now we have this situation where instead the demand curve has shifted rightwards instead... Permanently? Temporarily? Who knows.
Plants? Over an international border? :)