skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I hate Facebook and WhatsApp as much as anyone else who cares about privacy.

But there's nothing wrong in this particular change. It happens when you report someone as spam, and you get a clear notification about what's going on.

There's a "cancel" button as big as the "report" button, so you can bail out if you disagree.
>There's no reason the meat industry couldn't....

>But that would be inefficient by market measures.

>No reason

>Gives reason
This is a nice API. It seems to get right up to the edge of becoming a parser combinator library.

Is it actually improving performance to use the regular expressions internally to evaluate matches?
We have a lot of this (Big Ag) in Germany. But we also have many small-ish farms being able to provide for their owners. What I find from looking at agriculture is, that regional partnerships (from field to table) esp. in the organic sector help a lot stabilizing the situation.

Also forms like Community-supported agriculture seem to be working for some.

But - they are not focused and do not produce a specific crop. So not sure how this could work for a marijuana farm like yours.

None the less - being a proponent of localized farming and seasonal living, I would love to see some things working out for the likes of you and ensuring a free form of ownership and the ability to provide for you and your family.

Others proposed, that "winner takes it all" is a natural law. This would lead me to slavery is a natural law, as the winner would dictate the living conditions of the rest.

Absolut freedom (leading to winner takes it all situations) in the beginning (at least for me) necessarily leads to un-freedom for most in the end.
This is actually what prompted me to think about different forms of freedom (individual freedom vs. collective freedom, positive freedom (freedom to ...) vs. negative freedom (freedom from ...)).

For me this leads to some form of democratic end of freedom. The idea that my freedom ends were yours begins. Something like this. I did a longer post on this - but sadly in German, so it probably does not make too much sense here:

https://schriftrolle.de/freiheit-versuch-einer-begriffsklaer...
I'm talking about the process of turning sunlight into food. If you want to make that process use as few resources as possible (especially fossil fuels) then you need big fields with large machinery. Distribution of wealth is a different topic.
If you’re going to claim Schneier is wrong on crypto stuff, you’ll want to bring a suitcase of evidence along if you want people to take your claim seriously.
It's privately owned - the firm trades the executives' (partners) capital. Wlb depends on the role. As a quant you won't have a life in any firm, as an SWE I heard it's decent for the pay.
Slack’s stock climbs on possible Salesforce acquisition
And there was the Hand of God in the '86 World Cup.
Ask HN: Can we have a parallel Internet?
On the World Wide Web, is it time the create another parallel universe?

Why: the internet of today is very different from the internet of the 80s/early 90s.

In other words, the space that was wild and free for the hackers, creatives and artists and dreamers is now owned by commerce and regulation and censorship.

Maybe there is space on the www for many nations. With different rules and freedoms.

I just started listening to Edward Snowden/Glenn Greenwald internet today and it came to me in a flash...that the internet has changed and it can’t be One World Wide Web. But. We can have many nations under one world.

This censorship and privacy hijacks can’t keep going on. Certainly The Internet has evolved to democratize the tech to all as well as has given us prosperity due to its commercialization, but it has also made it an unwelcome place for a minority who were more alike the earlier wanderers of the web than the majority today.

By creating utility, we have killed the creatives. This is normal in any system. It’s time to make space for all. Why not layer ‘world wide webs’? Each a parallel universe of its own.

Thoughts?
I guess it can read the messages by the reported user that the reporting user has received, and chooses to transmit. Which makes sense.
Maybe you should look at visualizations like Regex Railroad Diagrams. This is what helps me most.
I'd like to see more people do small scale farming anyways, mainly to support themselves, not in the first place as a business to get rich from.

Big farms tend to focus on a few crops (cash crops). Small farms that are meant to support a family would do better by having a great variety of crops. It's also nice to support a local community this way, by selling some extra produce to local markets or people in the local community.

My girlfriend has a small 3 rai (~5000 m2) farm. Originally she only grew rice ... or rather some Myanmar people grew rice on her farm for a small amount of money. In the past 1.5 year my girlfriend transformed the farm to support our family. Now about 1 rai is used for rice (enough for our family) and the remainder is used for growing fish, fruits (bananas, coconuts, mangos, ...) and vegetables (Thai aubergines, long beans, cauliflower, spring unions, ...).

Having a greater variety of crops also protects a bit from bad harvests or bad market prices. It makes one more anti-fragile.

In the future we should probably buy some land to grow the farm to about 5 rai and from then on we should be able to fully support ourselves with fish, fruit and veggies.

I think Jon Jandai has some nice ideas on setting up a small scale farm [0].

---

[0]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b2eoQyYoUww
Nice to see that there are some genuinely bread-pilled Americans out there.
From the NIF website,

> The facility is funded by the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) and is a key element of NNSA’s science-based Stockpile Stewardship Program to maintain the reliability and safety of the U.S. nuclear deterrent without full-scale testing.

Most of the Department of Energy budget goes towards nuclear weapons, although they also do some work on civilian nuclear power and pure science. The name was always a bit of a euphemism.
Security and privacy are not parallel concerns, they’re orthogonal. Strong security absolutely does not imply utmost privacy. I find this to be the most dangerous misconception of the late privacy trend. You can’t just turn security and privacy dials to 11. They’re actually two ends of the same dial, or opposing poles of the same sphere. To increase privacy you must move away from perfect security.

Why? Because security is all about who you trust (and who you don’t). Privacy is about concealing things from people you trust (and especially from those you don’t). Security is best served with strong identity and periodic integrity checks/monitoring. Privacy is best served via anonymity and opacity. If something is private, by definition there lacks the transparency to audit its integrity.

So what I lament is not that a company is trying to achieve both, but rather that as a consumer I’m not educated on the topic and able to make a choice as to where I want to set the dial.

You will continue to see “headlines” like this so long as socially we’re obsessed with trying to implement both security and privacy and fall subject to marketing suggesting some service provides the maximum of both.

If you trust Apple to verify the integrity of apps on your devices and secure your system from unwanted software, then you trust Apple to maintain the privacy around the data needed to achieve such. That’s the whole value prop of their platform and ecosystem. It’s a walled garden with abundant privacy koolaid fountains.

The only reason this is news is because people don’t understand the privacy vs security dichotomy. And because Apple does not provide a way for consumers to choose just how much security they’re comfortable with.

If you don’t trust Apple then stop pretending you do by using their hardware/ecosystem.
I believe that altcoins are the reason people don't trust it. They don't see the difference between BTC and altcoins -- they're all altcoins.

Maybe the system will stabilize on those top 10 coins, and the others will fade out or become irrelevant. But I don't see any particular reason why they would. Most of those 10 ten coins were created in the last three years, and could easily be displaced.

BTC is the granddaddy and could yet be the foundation of a stable basis. But it has enough problems that competitors keep arising, and that makes me skeptical.
> What has been puzzling me ever since is that these OCSP checks have been well-known for a couple of years,

This is where you’re wrong. It was known, but not well-known. Users do not expect an HTTP request to be blocking their application executions.

Personally, I don’t see why CRL is not sufficient. Yes I want malicious signatures blacklisted, but can’t I just get a list instead? Some of the reasons CRL is no longer used do not apply to code signatures.
This is also affecting Fargate (at least EKS) in that its scheduling system is broken. No way to get new pods.
Do you happen to know of a tool that does a comprehensive check of your email configuration? I can find individual tools for SPF, DKIM, etc., but it’d be great if there were one that just have me a big green check mark or something.
Thats quite an achievement! Personally, I prefer Krita these days though. Seems much more usable and has better pen integration and touchscreen usability
I'm German and been to US many times. Some of my best friends lives there. I've partied and bbq'd in the various cities there and have never remotely encountered such thing like the one cited in the linked article. Do they exist? Definitely. What is your point?
lol I dig it!
He was 60? I thought he was a lot older. RIP
The power of WFM and Zoom classrooms. If there is one thing people will pay extra for, it's their employment and especially their kids' schooling. When a school tells a parent that they need high speed internet for their kids's Zoom classroom, they'll pay for it.

Anyone older people with kids know if schools subsidized parents for high internet connections?
I worked for an org that tried to modernize, again, their mainframe legacy code, and failed.

I always thought it'd be easier to use an emulator and keep using the old stuff. Then over time whittle the code base down to just the business logic.
Lol look this thread so ignorant, why would any country want it's population to get subverted by globalists ??? Just look at the history, don't make the same mistakes.
M1 Mac Workaround to run 6 displays simultaneously
> You bought a device from a third-party (Amazon in this case), which intentionally listens to audio in your home [...]

Perhaps I am missing something, but isn't Amazon the second party to this transaction?
Unprotected s3 bucket. Classic.
> In general, if you want people to have confidence in an election, you need to take seriously claims of fraud

If you want people to have confidence in an election, you need to take serious claims of fraud seriously.
Client-side PGP tool based on OpenPGP.js – Generate keys, encrypt and decrypt
I can't help you if you choose to read things that pedantically. Maybe get a job as a lawyer. I guess I need to edit and insert "no technical reason" or "no non-price sensitive reason" in for you?
He played in a time where Soccer was almost amateur. See the criminal fouls to Maradona in the 80's. In comparison Pele was treated like a sweet flower.
Custom UIStackView Spacing
>The requests contain only app hashes.

No, application hashes are never sent. People are confusing OCSP and notarization. The requests sent via OCSP check the developer certificate. Notarization checks are done over HTTPS.
I don't think the answer is for Apple to force people into buying custom server hardware any more than it is to force them into making janky rack setups for Mac Minis.

The answer that most people would like to see would be a stripped down, non-GUI macOS that's installable at no cost in virtualization environments, or maybe with some evaluation scheme like Windows Server has, which effectively makes it free for throwaway environments like build agents.
> evangelical Christianity has been one of the primary tools used to advance and justify segregation and slavery throughout western history

This is right if you say "America" instead of "the west". And then you're talking about a timescale of maybe 200 years, tops.

But when you say "the west" you're talking about a longer history of Christianity in Europe. You're talking about the Catholic Church, the Protestant Reformation, all that.

And on long historical timescales, Christianity's record is quite a bit more complicated than that. You can certainly associate it with various sins -- it suppressed the pagans, it launched the crusades, in Spain it justified conquest in the New World, and (though it was its own team) it often sided with royalty and aristocracy. And yet it was not an essentially "pro-slavery" religion. That would be to project relatively recent American evangelicalism backwards onto the rest of Christianity in a totally ahistorical way.

> There was notable involvement in the abolitionist movement among northern Protestants, and civil rights activism among catholics, Jews, and northern Protestants - but acting as though that is in any way representative of American religion is missing 99% of the history.

There used to be a phrase, "mainline Protestant", used to distinguish "normal" Protestants from evangelicals. They're dying now, but those churches used to have huge membership. The kind of Christianity that was "centered" in the past in America (at least in the North) was //not at all// the southern Evangelical variety that so often claims the word "Christian" these days. You're missing the amount of change that has occurred. The Evangelicals were "weird".

Your discussion of "Catholics and Jews" in the context of "abolitionism" is also confused. Catholics and Jews were not //totally absent// from America at that time, but it really wasn't until later that they came over in large numbers. Like, Irish were just arriving around the time of the Civil War (and hadn't even won respect for themselves yet, let alone taking up the political cause of others), and Jews started to really show up later around the turn of the century. You're ignoring the timeline of immigration.

Finally -- your whole dichotomy of "American religion" vs... atheism(?) is confused. In the past, atheism was taboo -- "everyone" was religious to some extent -- and //even so// things like the Civil War happened. Why? Because it was religion that //animated// those movements, particularly within the emerging "white" ethnic group (whose material interests they did not necessarily serve in an obvious way).

Mostly, American history has not been "religious people vs nonreligious people". It's been different kinds of religious people fighting over the contents of their religions. Mostly, the battle lines have been drawn right //through// Christianity in America.
The recent roller coaster should lead you to seriously question Bitcoin as a "store of value". A "store of value" whose value fluctuates by 50% may be many things, but it's pretty lousy as a lousy store of value.
Verbose does not ‘easier to read’ make; especially when you don’t know whether ‘anythingBut’ means (?!...) or [^...].

Type safety is nice, sure, but it’s a rather small benefit in this case. It doesn’t mean abandoning commonly-understood syntax is worth it. Most regular expressions are short enough to make errors visible with the naked (or IDE-assisted) eye.

This library at best looks like a crutch for a deficient language (which Java admittedly is), and at worst an unnecessary obfuscation layer.
Thank you for applying your skills to make the world a better place! If everyone did that, we'd all be better off.
In the same way I can take a screenshot of a conversation with you and post it online without your permission.
There is a whole lot of citation needed on this reply, not to mention you’re talking about consciousness as something that can be clearly defined and measured.

This is not physics. If you think it’s ok to breed beings that clearly look to avoid suffering and care for their offspring with the sole purpose of exploiting them, and that’s fine because life > death, there you have it. Just don’t try to push a pseudoscientific scale to vegans just to prove their fallacy.
I always have to google this when I see translated Hindi articles, but 1 lakh = 1 hundred thousand
Already discussed here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25211069
And salesforce dives
There's a causal relationship between the things you're calling "personally-avoidable" and the class wealth gap. People are emotionally predictive; if they don't see an ideal prosperous future outcome, they settle for prosperity where they can get it because it beats a lifetime of suffering, even if the end result is additional suffering.
Check the sibling comment linking to a 9-day-old chicken embryo: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25211285
> the line between egg and birth is a clear line

> (depending on how close to hatching it is)

Not so clear a line then.
sounds like strategy used in past

[1] Collectivisation and the Ukrainian Famine - History Matters (Short Animated Documentary) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lLlp-LmXm3s
I wonder if the push to divert funding away from clean energy and toward more nukes will continue under the Biden administration.

The article says the White House has recently been pushing to reallocate the funds, but that congress keeps blocking it. Is “recently” just the Trump administration, or were they pushing for the change under Obama?
Personally I prefer to read an IMDb sheet at my own pace. That said, I wish Amazon had a feature similar to Amazon Prime Video's X-ray, it's so much easier to find an actor that way and especially if they only starred in one episode.
Is there any news on what percent of the collection has been recovered? What a sickening crime...
Top Shopify Agencies in the UK and EU
There's a really lovely Dover book which collects some of the source papers read by Einstein's group.

http://doverpublications.ecomm-search.com/mdetail?auth_id=&d...
> And you have to pay the fines? That's nuts.

Yes, conveniently there's a second group of lawyers that focuses on getting people out of these fines...for a fee that's not so much lower. Unfortunately it's a bit of a business model in some countries.
I think it's a great idea... if you already know regex. Effectively it's just a different syntax for the same construct after all, it doesn't simplify anything, it just makes it more readable. Oh and it makes escaping a non-issue, which already almost sells me on the idea completely, since it seems that 50% of the time I spend writing regex is figuring out what needs escaping and how.

Writing regexes is not much of an issue usually (although the many dialects in common use are always a source of frustration) but reading them is always a pain, for me at least. For quick and dirty shell scripts or vim editing it's great, for stuff that's supposed to be long lived and actively maintained in a codebase I think this verbal approach is a great idea, at least in theory.

Regarding the optimization of the intermediate result it should only be a problem if you actually need to output these regexes for other uses or if you need to compile many of them at runtime with performance constraints. If your regexes are pre-compiled then the resulting DFA should look the same as far as I can tell.

If somebody makes a Rust crate with a similar concept I'll be sure to try it out next time I have to write regexes in a codebase.
And there was the Best Goal in the Soccer History in the same match... to the country which invented the Soccer, I think England still cry for this, they never recovered.
> If the option was a mac with privacy vs a mac without privacy but $10 cheaper

OP was comparing the Kindle with ads discount to an imaginary Mac without privacy discount.
Its a little strange that an article mentioning funding running out a few times never gets around to mentioning just how much funding this experiment has gotten over the years. Feels like a key piece of data that could help inform the reader.
In any case, hope they eventually get this to be net energy-positive.
> Only a tiny, tiny percent of percent of people are served by public transit.

US urbanized population is 5x its rural population. NY metro area alone is >5% of US population. In fact a significant percentage of Americans are served by public transit.

They often choose not to use it for a number of reasons, including poor physical fitness and train/bus being de facto homeless shelters/mental hospitals.
Show HN: I made a Chrome extension that explains the Low FODMAP diet as you shop
They aren't difficult. Amazon has no interest in having a working status page. Amazon would prefer the appearance of always green checkmarks over actually having a status page.
The challenge there is that SPF/DKIM are a lot harder for bigger companies with thousands of legacy servers that might be sending email.

That's specifically why I wish registrars would do this because it's not a big deal for new domains with no existing real mail traffic.

DMARC enforcement is getting a lot more recent momentum toward becoming an expectation, it's just a long play.

The moment that Google or Microsoft decide to send any mail that doesn't pass DMARC to spam will be the moment where it's a defacto requirement.
Is the implied contention that `regex().capt().digit().oneOrMore().endCapt().tab()` is easier to read than `([0-9]+)`?

If so, maybe this isn't for everyone :)
Oil-filled Casio F91W survives 984.5m submersion (2015)
It was too dangerous to include in the title even!
Attribition much?
There are several responses to the "plants have senses" rebuttal:

If you care about the well being of plants, you should still prefer to eat plants rather than animals. The trophic level of animals in the food chain necessitates that they will eat more calories of plant matter than would provide calories of food upon being eaten.

Secondly, you should look at the sorts of plants being consumed and where they fall in the plant's life cycle. Fruits and nuts have been evolved to be eaten by animals. Staple crops such as grains and pulses are generally harvested from plants that have already lived to maturity and died off. Really it's only fresh greens and tubers that require the damage or destruction of a living plant.

Lastly, it's important to recognize the evolutionary purpose of sensing pain and suffering from it. Animals use pain and suffering to detect harmful situations and learn how to avoid them in the future. This process consists of sensations, memory and adaptive behavior. Plants may have "reflexive" responses to stimulus, but these responses aren't adaptive and aren't affected by previous experience (mostly... there are some exceptions). There would be no evolutionary purpose for plants to develop a sense of suffering if they have no practical use for that sensation.
I've always considered language just another form of logic (a very fuzzy one of course). To say something sensical in any language requires (almost by definition) some logical consistency. Otherwise you get non-sequiturs and insane ramblings. The greater the coherency of a narrative (e.g. paragraph-to-paragraph like GPT-3, vs. just word-to-word like a Markov chain), the greater degree of consistent logical underpinnings are needed. So that a tool trained to produce coherent human writing by necessity has embedded in itself a tool for logical reasoning is not too surprising (not to say it isn't impressive!).
Why does everyone always suggest coding as an alternative career path? Why not laying floor tiles???

I have more than 5 years of experience as a developer and am unemployed, so I'm currently finishing my degree, which will take at least another 6 months.

Some day I will smack someone who says that they can't find developers, honest to God.
Imagine if we had this silly VAR technology in the 80s. Then one of the most iconic moments in football history (hand of god) would have been reviewed and dismissed.

RIP Diegito