skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
So if you don't want ads on your video you just need to include violence now?
Pretty sure in this instance it's just supposed to imply the word "fleet", which isn't used standalone all that often in 2020, but is more common when you stick an "ing" to the end of it.
Ansible is nice but I like to build my systems the way I like them. Under the hood ansible is just a Python paramiko wrapper anyway. What I like about bash is it’s just there, no need to install anything if you are managing legacy systems
What other browsers can you guys recommend that support Linux and have cloud sync capabilities?
I'm currently eyeing Opera and brave but wanted to see if I have more options. Thanks.
There are a few reasons, but since you worded that question ambiguously, I'm not sure if you know that HTTPS doesn't protect privacy. It can verify data in-transit is not tampered (maybe--see NSA note below), but nothing is anonymous (both sides of the connection, and everyone in the middle, know who they're talking to). Maybe the URL is private, but that's a very low bar for privacy.

There's also a problem with how certificate authorities are run which I strongly disagree with. People trust them because corporations trust them, which is already bad, because those same corporations are in-bed with NSA and probably other "security" agencies (which are hard to tell apart from criminal syndicates). If we moved to an HTTPS-only world (Universe, please forbid) there would be an absolute CA racket, and any website could be censored by having the CA revoking its certificate. I fear very much for that possibility, and I completely disagree with the direction that corporate browsers are taking by moving towards HTTPS-only, and especially false messaging like when Chrome reports websites as "non-secure". Firefox, which along with Mozilla is almost entirely funded with Google dollars, is going the same direction.

Another problem is if an ISP is tampering with a customer's connection, that is a social problem and not a technical one. Sure, some technical measures may mitigate that from happening, but ultimately the problem is social and users of that network should stop using it, or start tunneling their traffic some other way.

I provide HTTPS as a convenience for people downloading my software who otherwise wouldn't check my PGP sigs. Browsers like Chrome have false messaging claiming sites are "not secure" and techno-illiterate users don't understand what that really means, and they complained, so I listened but still advise everyone to check the signatures anyway.

Another major reason is that I don't care to support HTTPS for the rest of my life on my personal website. If I were to start supporting it, then everyone will start linking to the HTTPS version, then I could never get rid of that because redirecting back to HTTP requires HTTPS. I never collect any kind of data through my website--there are no form submissions, it's read-only and purely serves .html pages (not even server-side rendering). There's not really a purpose to a secure connection for that.

This only scratches the surface of these problems. I won't even get into how certificate authorities assign, then revoke, bogus certificates all the time--but that happens more than they will ever admit to. If you do a search for that, even just on Ars Technica, you'll find a lot of examples.

My biggest complaints may be summarized as, "we need completely distributed human-to-human trust without any corporate authorities."
When I spoke at the Open Source Conference Albania[1], I met a dozen Albanian young adults for whom OSM was an important bridge to developing professional technology skills. Kudos to OSM for providing a wonderful platform for personal growth in communities where it is desperately needed.

[1] https://oscal.openlabs.cc
Relationship Hero (YC S17) Is Hiring Full-Time Virtual Relationship Coaches
Yup, this is a good answer.

Note there is some correlation between virulence and severity. For something with a longer incubation time, increased viral load tends to mean both increased virulence and transmissibility. This relationship is far from universal, though.
A take exception to the repeated use of the pejorative term "junkie". Apparently people suffering from addiction is the last group we are allowed to be prejudiced against.

Spoiler alert, the phone didn't break your daughter. You and society did.

The major issue this brings to light is the complete ignorance around addiction. It is not caused by the substance or the activity, but rather other underlying issues (trauma, unmet needs). This mom sounds overbearing. This poor kid has probably been on the Ivy League track since preschool. School until 6:30PM, I can't imagine what is wrong.

Addiction problem? Find the needs that aren't being met. We have such a lack of knowledge about mental health, as a society, that most people don't even know where to start.

The end of the article brings no reprieve. The mom basically throws her hands in the air and we can only assume that she will double-down on her overbearing, unhelpful approach.

You can ban phones and vaping, but it won't do anything to address the underlying issues. Until we learn to proactively address mental health, it will only get worse. This article gives me zero hope.

Although it may not sound like it, I have a ton of compassion for the mom and the daughter. I used to have severe addiction issues, I was a real mess. I had to figure this stuff out by evaluating available information and (dis)proving it to my satisfaction through trial and error. With a lot of support, I managed to unfuck myself. I think I'm just frustrated with society in general. So many issues, so many simple ways to make headway on them, so little action or even understanding of the problem space. I can tell you one thing for sure, this lone autist is not going to save the world.
SMS and MMS are completely integrated here in the US, you have no visibility into wether it's an MMS or SMS you're sending/receiving - it's just "messages" in my experience.

So if you take a smartphone photo, and send it to a phone number contact in a message, boom, you just sent an MMS.

A majority of random american public wouldn't recognize the MMS acronym, despite likely using it regularly.
Imagine having to contact their customer support if something goes wrong.
He may not own the copyright, but if he has a contractual royalty agreement then he certainly retains legal claims on use of the copyright.

Whomever owns the copyright is entitled to do whatever their control of it allows them to do, but they are obligated to fulfill any claims others have on the revenue derived from those uses.
Think of the last hundred years, the countries that supported some form of free expression and discourse are now the most progressive rational societies on the planet. And the ones that enforced moral standards and 'ministries of truth', usually religious, are the most regressive.

It doesn't matter whether you can change someones mind on the spot, it matters that your argument is superior and the public tend to repeat and re-argue the superior argument. And yes, things like election fraud, that might be possible, and has happened before, is harder to argued against than a flat earth. But these positions are also the ones where we might be wrong.
Have a mosfet between the 5 volt regulator and the device. At 20 milliohm, drawing .1 amp, that's only 2 millivolt drop. Or, since it's a low volume design, just throw a relay in there.
Does she have ways to socialize with peers outside of the phone? It seems like her peers are all on social media and she's interacting with them the only way she can.
I guess Disney is saying there are two separate things: the works that were produced, and separately an annuity pegged to some % of sales that Alan was given in return for the works.

So they bought the work but didn’t take on the liability.

Sorta messed up.

In theory, I think that’d make Alan a creditor for whoever owns the remaining parts of the business Disney didn’t buy. There had to be a remaining but if it owns the liability! Not sure it has assets though. Corporations can go bankrupt.

I’d hope a court would frown on this (as the court of public opinion will)
Don't know, but probably there's some arbitrary legal complications associated to personal accounts so their lawyers simply decided to put those accounts into the "enterprise" category to avoid all the messes and now we're seeing collateral damages from this short-sighted decision.
This is so foreign to me that I have have to ask this at the risk of appearing very rude, but from my perspective this question makes total sense.

Do you have a memory problem? My weekly have always been 30-70% the same recordings of songs I have already listened to at least ten times. And it's always been this way.
Show HN: Apple-Ocsp-Noiser, Noise Machine for Apple Developer ID OCSP
Agree this sounds so beyond believable - will be interesting to hear Disney’s response
There's a pretty good library that helps parse those bluebutton documents:

https://github.com/amida-tech/blue-button
Requesting Feedback Virtual Meetings In-Person
I'm pretty sure they ran an exchange program for affected models of the 6s: https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/2016/12/06/apple-says-ip...

There's only so much you can do to make lithium batteries last forever. These days the phone tries to figure out when you need it charged by in the morning so it's not sitting on the charger at 100% for eight hours overnight, and this is supposed to help.
>This reads like an assumption that the article is about tech companies in the United States and their effects to combat election misinformation.

I completely disagree with this. The parent didn't mention companies once. This must be some kind of 'blue-black or white-gold' thing because the rest of your post reads like nonsense to me. I'm sorry that I haven't got anything substantial to add to this, but I'm just very confused by the fact that your comment is the highest response right now.
There are lots of factors in choosing between Android and iOS. Besides, two choices don’t make a competitive market.
For someone on the fence, how concerned should they be about app capabilities? So general phone use for things like social media and banking are going through the web apps in a browser. Many of these like Instagram and Reddit are intentionally handicapped outside of a native app.
Mobian is as fast-moving as any OS on the PinePhone. Every week I see substantial improvements.

It's not my daily driver yet. Soon. Probably before I get my Librem 5, which I have already waited 2 years for, and expect will like less than the PP.
I agree with this. I published the first edition of my book [1] through O'Reilly and had much of the same experiences. I would add, though, that their expertise in publishing was useful. They took care of copyediting, an ISBN, printing, redrawing my hand-sketched figures, etc. All stuff I could theoretically do or hire out on my own, but have zero interest in managing.

For the second edition, which I'm working on now, I had serious second thoughts about going with O'Reilly again. Ultimately, I decided that I would, mostly because I knew O'Reilly would be able to spread the word a lot further than I would. I've got a decent network, but not an amazing one.

The reasoning was that I'm a consultant, and the cachet, reach, and resulting leads I'll get from publishing through a known publisher are much more valuable than the theoretical profits I'm missing out on. That was certainly true for the first edition.

Having made that decision, I'm glad that I did. O'Reilly's provided a lot more support with the second edition than they did with the first. My production editor has been fantastic; heavily involved with reviewing draft chapters and very supportive. I also managed to swing a better royalty deal (but still far less than minimum wage) and we've had some great conversations about co-marketing the book.

[1] The Art of Agile Development (2007). I'm writing the second edition in the open; you can find it here: https://www.jamesshore.com/v2/books/aoad2
Thanks. Appreciate taking the effort to answer. What I'm trying to do is to gain an intuition of what kind of objects GA manipulates, then stash it for whenever I'll need that kind of manipulation, which, sadly, can be never.

Within that context, just grokking R^2 or R^3 would be great progress. To be fair, the article does present the fundamental identity, uv = u.v + u /\ v, where u.v is the usual dot product (scalar denoting relative projective size) and u /\ v = |u||v|sinθi (something related to area and the plane induced by u and v). Even if the article does exemplify with R^2 by defining i = xy, and then dropping the ball: "i is interpreted to mean the plane generated by x and y". I can't grok this part :(

* This looks like (almost) a circular definition, defining uv in terms of the specific xy, where x and y are the two orthonormal R^2 vectors forming the basis. What is xy? Is it a scalar? A vector? A normal vector? How does a normal vector work in R^2?. A tensor of some dimensions? For example, assuming x = (1,0) and y = (0,1), how does one compute i = xy?

* Plane generated how? a u + b v, given any two scalars a and b?

* When moving to R^3, i'd think uv / xy define a plane. What does uvw / xyz mean?

* Minor quibble, is it sin(θ * i) or sin(θ) * i?
Arguably they're learning the most useful skill in the modern attention economy: online marketing.
Why does Google pay has a much smaller international availability than apple pay?
I think its a gateway drug as well. Its just odd that it really doesn’t get much better from beginner -> expert. Expertise in the front end world is largely knowing how not to shoot yourself in the foot.

The unnecessary complexity holds back a lot of people as well. I know plenty of incredibly talented back end people who don’t have the confidence to develop web UIs when comparatively its a simple task (if you remove the always changing complexities of front-end tooling).

I feel like there should be a solution where you can codify this knowledge and share it with others, kind of like a storybook JS for the masses.
i don't necessarily disagree with you overall, but your comparisons at the end aren't appropriate because alcohol is an addictive substance
TikTok is all about creating media as well as consuming media though.
If you needed to serve petabytes of data, you'd be throwing a lot of money away on storage and traffic costs using AWS over other solutions.
> Are companies that provide one-to-one communications services, like cell phone companies, complicit in drug dealing, insider trading, and all the others nefarious acts that are no doubt organized using their networks? I think most people would say they're not.

Unfortunately this same logic isn’t used when discussing the PLCAA or gun manufacturers in general.
Is there a tl;dr? This article is far too meandering.
Cells phones are not comparable to an online service.

Property rights are a thing and those who own the servers can determine what they will store and present to other users.

Conservative groups that don't spread misinformation and hatred are thriving on FB and Twitter. Change the law to make them store and publish anything not already illegal will turn them into cesspools like the various *chan sites inside of a month and advertisers will leave as will people with a conscience.
The issue is they are trying to make 15% seem reasonable. 1.5% is unreasonable. They provide developers negative value, it's just a tax on all transactions.
The US gov really cares about the US market. Apple owns half the mobile US market (possibly even more in revenues and way more in profits)
Can you elaborate on why you think in 10 years it won’t be a viable career or remunerated accordingly?

I don’t think we will be needing as many lower-skill positions like building CRUD apps, but I don’t see the hard software engineering jobs becoming as common as a cashier position and driving salaries down.
> if a high load were to be applied, the last 20% would be inaccessible

you are saying that they don't know how to calculate battery percentage left?
I never envisioned a web dev tool would have trailer music like that lol.
Wages are the price of labor, and like all prices they are dictated by supply and demand. If there were fewer people both capable & willing to do the job, wages would rise.

People choose these jobs because they are the best options available to them. This is true for many undesirable occupations (such as janitorial services).
Yes, if researchers had really reversed human ageing, do you really think yahoo.com would be breaking the news?
I did this with my previous car, a 2016 Subaru BRZ.

I e-mailed three dealerships in town. I said I wanted a BRZ, Limited trim, Black, with a manual transmission, and asked what their lowest price was. MSRP for this configuration I believe was $29K. One dealership didn't answer at all, the second offered $29K, the third offered $26K and included all the dealer-installed options like the cargo mat for the drunk, auto-dimming mirror with HomeLink, and wheel locks.

I definitely went with the third dealer. Didn't even feel the need to haggle any more than that.
The choices are extremely limited if you want a small handset. I don’t even know if there is a Google phone as small as iPhone minis.
> When are you changing every single instance of "lg:text-7xl"

I'm not, I'm changing some 7xl-sized text in multiple places. But I don't want to change every element that is .lg:text-7xl already.

> If you're doing an entire site design refresh

I'm not

> You will inevitably have some layer of abstraction anyway, something like components

I already do, they're in JS, and much more powerful and extensible than HTML attributes.
Any negotiations were completed ages back when the original contracts were signed. He's simply trying to enforce their obligations and collect his entitlements. There's no reason to sign an NDA and constrain your rights just to do this.

Let's be clear: The NDA is PR-motivated insulation to dissuade him from doing exactly what he's doing now. I wouldn't sign it either.
No I mean abolish the police.

> The obvious answer is that you need a police force

Yes, you've been conditioned by society to assume that's the only answer to this. Again this is what I mean by people are uneducated about policing and state power.
I've actually studied this, and I agree with you. I see a notable difference between "less disease of a very specific sort" and "reversed aging" although the end result is remarkably similar (without the age digression, of course). The article treats them as the same. Unless your sole definition of aging is in re how far down the chain your telomerase shows up.

To me, reversing aging would be more like the Benjamin Button story. But that's not the story being told here.

Depending on how you are looking at it, they're either very similar things, or completely different things. I see them as being very different.
Why is this a letter and not a lawsuit?
Side topic: anyone else finding that font hard to read? Those swooshie serifs are really disruptive for me.
> However, maybe I'm just unlucky, but I have a number of family members who are predisposed to believing anything they see on the internet. I can see the need for social distancing when it comes to viral content too.

So censor what they see to ensure they only receive the information you approve of correct?
The point is that this is analogous to Microsoft shipping Internet Explorer with Windows to try and kill Netscape. Apple does the same thing with their app store. Except this goes a step further: imagine how the Microsoft antitrust suit would have gone if in addition to shipping a free competing product, Microsoft had built something into Windows so that Netscape wouldn't run at all and demanded Netscape only sell their browser through Microsoft Internet Explorer with Microsoft taking a 30% commission.
That is why you never say cash or commit to financing until the deal is close. Also a dark hack, all car lot have a disclaimer that there is surveillance video and audio equipment on premise. This means you have been notified of surveillance, they can and do bug the cubicle. When they go back to talk it over with their manager many times they are reading you by your conversations going on in the cube and your body language.

I worked in counterintel for a while, so I have had a lot of fun with car dealers over the years. I won't buy a new car (still drive an 87 Suburban Diesel) but from time to time my wife let's me know it's time for her to get a new car. Anyways knowing that they can and do run surveillance can actually be used to your advantage.

Try it one time, when they go back to the manager, say to the person with you, let's leave, I am not going to get what I want here and restate what you know the car is worth based on research. Leave enough meat on the bone for a decent commision and profit, but cut it close to a good deal. Get up and watch them be on the other side of the cube before you can even fully stand up. Manager will have miraculously come back 10-15% over the amount you stated. If you are not willing to walk from the deal, you are not getting a deal.
Instagram photos and TikTok videos are certainly artwork though.
I'll ask again. WHO is guilty of "destroying evidence" in that case? Unless you can articulate that, you have no argument whatsoever that a criminal act has occurred.

Period.

End of discussion.

>You're not very bright. Concede that.

At least I understand that for a crime to be committed there has to be an entity (organization or person) who committed it. That only requires a grade school level of legal understanding. But given your insults, I'm beginning to understand that maybe that's just about the upper limit of your intellect.
I don't know, I haven't been on facebook since ages, because I got sick of constantly being banned for discussing politics.
Yup, I don't understand why this isn't standard best-practice in most places.

When I ran a development shop, every year the senior staff spent a week physically working in their client's department eating their own dog-food (i.e. using the apps they built/supported). Once this was implemented it cut down on the post-implementation change requests by over half.
President Clinton was CIA informant as a student, book claims (1996)
Doesn't really matter: if you are making a phone app or service (especially one that has any sort of network effect), you need to support both ecosystem which means you must submit to Apple's ukases.
Except we can’t deploy apps without a dev account. Corporate fanboys are the grossest.
Presenting RemoteMeow the ultimate computer remote control
Early adoption -> early cultural incumbency.

e.g. Mexico had cellphone penetration so low until recently that it got to skip the SMS/MMS era entirely.

You would have needed a certain critical cultural mass using MMS to still be using it in 2020.
> All of that can (and should if you actually paid attention at the CSS Zen Garden) stay outside of the HTML.

Yes, I've paid lot of attention to CSS Zen Garden. No, I don't think it should stay out of HTML.

You don't have to like it, it doesn't have to fit the way you like to work. But don't try to paint it as if people who prefer having utility classes inside HTML are just somehow not familiar with idea that they should be kept out. That's been the default view for the past 15-20 years, you know?
This is a good thing! It shouldn't be too easy, just easily possible for someone who knows what they're doing (What we used to call "power users", what happened to those?)
I think the missing part is generating your own key inside the secure boot mechanism, and the disk encryption being tied to that. Evil maid re-unlocks it -> encrypted data is lost.
The movie Jurassic Park has impressive visuals but is almost completely lacking the social commentary the book has about [bio]tech startups evading regulators and 'moving fast and breaking things.' The movie also turns the park's operator, John Hammond, into a sympathetic character.