skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I know the Tailwind guys are working on a project called Headless UI[1]. It's a component library without the styling. There is also Tailwind UI[2], which is more like Bootstrap. Both are official Tailwind projects.

1. https://blog.tailwindcss.com/headless-ui-unstyled-accessible...

2. https://tailwindui.com/components
Which is exactly what would happen if there were third party app stores.

It would be a race to the bottom where they all ended up with zero margins but where your data is sold to third parties.
At least in the first year you exceed 1mil, it’s more like:

999k --[-15%] --> 849k
1000k --[-15%x1000k] [-30%x0] --> 850k
1213k --[-15%x1000k] [-30%x213k]--> 999k
Google to offer checking accounts with banks in U.S. as part of Pay app revamp
I agree with your argument that the policies on iOS app development are similar to the policies enforced by console manufacturers. I think any regulation pushed onto Apple to open up the App Store will actually affect the home console market, too.

I'm just struggling to figure out why the PERCEPTION is very different between iOS and the home console market. It feels like many iPhone users do not believe their smartphone can be substituted with one from another manufacturer. Those same users also complain that they're locked into the App Store. (I think there's a few people in the comments here that have done exactly that.)

At the same time, the majority of mobile app revenue is coming from iOS, which is pushing app developers to the platform, even though they dislike the terms of the App Store.

I'm not sure what the solution is here, but an ecosystem with a large number of members who are unhappy with the status quo doesn't seem very sustainable.
Anything after '73 is highly suspicious to me
Be mindful of how Outlook displays messages. Subject should be the topic, and the first line should be the ask. That way busy people see everything they need in the preview, without ever opening the email.
Right, but that is using a semi-classical calculation, whereas we know that ultimately any process (evolution of a closed system like the universe) compatible with quantum mechanics needs to be unitary/reversible.

That mismatch is what sets up the BH information “paradox”.
To me this point never makes much sense, do you really believe that a change as small as a naming convention switch means that we can't focus on real problems? It doesn't make sense and is a non-sequitur argument
> Once it is fully evaporated, you still need to account for the information that was contained within (or accept information loss).

One way to escape this is:

* You accept that the Hawkin radiation contains the original information.

* But it is scrambled in a reversible way, but so hard that you cannot reverse it with the energie available in the universe.

There are nice talk by Scott Aaronson about this, e.g.:
https://simons.berkeley.edu/events/theoretically-speaking-se...
as a matter of principle, I don't like to be told how/what to think.
I am in a similar position. Turned 41 years old. New "tech" that goes away in a few years is getting tiresome. I moved from Dev to DevOps for a change of pace, but it made things worse in a way.

I've debated management, but being in meetings all day sounds worse...
Ok... Is there a law somewhere that says that you have a right to have a Walmart?

As an anarchist - why are people not willing to start a co-op?
Where America Rates in the Latest Leading Supercomputer Rankings
I’ve just watched this lecture and I can’t thank you enough. It was one of the most useful talks I’ve ever seen.
Social media like Reddit has stumbled upon the perfect way to censor unprofitable or anti-state content.

Superficially give moderation to users, then continually ban users when other users complain about them.

In this way with just a few dozen accounts anyone can control the narrative in their niche while Reddit claims they have no control.

Recently an independent chinese reporter has been banned from reddit using this technique.(0)

(0) https://www.google.com/search?q=the+china+theu+dont+want+yoi...
TOP500 List – November 2020
Ah, well, I read it as the opposite of a backhanded compliment, if there's a name for such a thing. It's a complement disguised as criticism.
Or, perhaps, they want to make a difference by raising the bar.
The TL;DR is that around 200 content moderators, location unspecified, are protesting decisions to move them back into the office.

It's not immediately clear from the letter that this was Facebook's decision. In fact, it appears that Facebook subcontracts content moderation to Accenture and CPL, both of which are named in this letter.

The letter also takes shots at Mark Zuckerberg's growing wealth and attacks Facebook's attempts to augment the human content moderators with AI pre-filters to remove the worst content. The latter claim is strange, as the content moderators are the ones most likely to benefit from AI pre-filtering. They try to claim that Facebook "failed" to create a workable AI, but I seriously doubt that Facebook has given up on the project. More likely that they're still iterating. I suspect these people feel they need to attack the AI angle to protect their jobs.

The letter goes on to demand 50% higher hazard pay, demands that the subcontracted content moderators be hired directly into Facebook as full employees, out of their contracting jobs under consulting firms.
> It's such a shame to me that the article ends with a note about how the parent will try to convince themselves that creating tiktok videos is creative. What?!? Creating videos isn't creative?? Of course it is! You should be encouraging and reveling in this sort of behavior!

My seven year old runs around with my old iPhone 5. We've locked it down to essentially be nothing more than a camera, but she'll still make videos for her whole screen time allotment for the day. I used to wonder if this was a "good" use of her time.

Then she discovered iMovie and now edits videos, adds transitions and music, makes her little sister an actor in movies... and I remembered when my parents worried about me spending hours in QBasic making little sine-wave art with music playing in the background.
Yes, one resolution of the paradox is that there is no Hawking radiation, which is what the author almost said

> Another option is that the black holes do not entirely evaporate and the information is kept in what’s left, usually called a black hole remnant.
There are deadlines, and they helped, but a lot of it was about having someone I "owed" something to.

Another thing I did was plot my word count per commit. Once per week I would post it to an internal channel at work and add a sentence or two summarising my week. The most interesting thing is that while my output could fluctuate a lot per week, the overall trend was fairly stable.
Practically, GPU is still way more generalized than TPU. For that reason, optimizing an algorithm on TPU is usually much trickier than GPUs. There are much more nuances because of the way TPU is designed.

On the other hand, Google has good reason to hold back TPUs from general public, and instead only offer them on Cloud. That also contributes its limited use.
> It's a theory that is almost uniquely derived from a pre-existing set of assumptions that do have a large body of empirical support.

What additional assumptions (on top of the ones Hawking made) does the new calculation use that don't have a large body of empirical support?
This US election and the US media have been an absolute shit show (said as someone who isn't American (I'm British)).

I thought our media was biased. There are real concerns especially around the dominion voting system with the alleged glitches and shady updates just before polling day in some states.
Processing power is just a proxy for money+energy which equals power.
"The side I identify with is lying and acting disingenuously, but it's the fault of the side I don't identify with, who I am sure do bad stuff like the behavior I admit we're doing."
> Does that mean that there was no electoral interference? Surely not.

There is plenty of 'rigged election' fear to go around, for sure. Donald Trump overperformed expectations in both 2016 and 2020, so it would be just as rational for Democratic voters to wonder if someone had their thumb on the scale as it is for Republican voters to feel that way because he lost.

Personally I don't think it's very easy to meddle with our elections and I think any discrepancies are likely to be innocent mistakes. I don't doubt that foreign governments play games with us, but I expect they limit themselves to social media manipulation and not actually trying to muck with the voting process.
A tool to see someone's Instagram profile picture full size and HD
This looks really cool, it's nice to see an open-source product like this come to fruition. I think it would make an excellent phone for people who aren't heavily invested in the app / social network ecosystem, or as a work phone.

Does anyone know whether there's some expectation that at some point we'd see first-party apps for common social networks on PureOS? Like, are they going after it at all, or is it intended as a web-first play?
The focus is on Tensor Cores[0], which are pretty NN specific. https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/data-center/tensor-cores/
Mandated unions, union bans and laws undermining union contracts - are all infringements on freedom of association.
It is extremely dangerous to our democracy to have unlimited free speech.

1. Freedom of speech isn't freedom from consequences.

2. Corporations aren't the government, so the first amendment doesn't apply.

3. Haven't your heard of "fire in a movie theater"?

4. Hate speech IS violence.

5. Reading disinformation from un-check-marked, non-fact-checked sources is anti scientific. Since all scientists have check marks, we should only listen to check marks.

6. Do you really want to be disturbed by Plumpdfth tweets from his prison cell?

Before you respond in anger, first consider that:

1. You are a bigot

2. It isn't my job to educate you

3. Venmo me for my labor
Food science findings (which tend to be unreliable) aside, eating food is something that’s hard to fault someone else for doing. The fact that most people eat meat alone is something that makes it more of a reasonable thing to do, even more so that we typically don’t find out about the conditions of cows, chickens, etc. until we are already mostly grown and hooked on the stuff.

Morality is a complicated thing to define[citation needed] but I would posit we actually generally have a high moral standard for each other in the west. We expect each other to not lie pathologically, push others away when they take advantage of those around them (e.g. scammers, con artists) enforce the rules of monogamous relationships (for the vast majority), return lost belongings to each other, encourage food safety, and so on.

And you can find secular explanations for all of those, but most people are just taught that those are the right things and stick to it. Sure, some of the integrity of those areas are eroding over time, but generally speaking society is still held together with morals.
> Make actionable suggestions

This is key. I had a manager one whose document review comments inevitably descended into snark, and often included a "this is wrong, do it again". This was frustrating and sometimes insulting. I am actually quite good at report writing, and I hate to think what their reviews would have been like if I was a junior, still learning or not a native English speaker.

Another good way of doing reviews is to have a formal checklist supported by an agreed style guide. My last company had good, usable templates (e.g. for bid and document reviews), with an objective scoring system based on a red-amber-green traffic-light system. The size / complexity of the checklist obviously varied depending on the size of the project or deliverable. Using these largely depersonalised the review, and also helped avoid reviewers projecting their own personal preferences.

It was also recommended to get a peer review before submitting a doc for formal review. This was put in place because some authors didn't do any checking at all before submitting and those of us who did formal reviews were swamped by trivial errors. Often just before a doc was due to be submitted.

In cases where work includes an element of novelty, the reviewer should be involved as early as possible (almost as soon as bidding starts, ideally) so that the types of review (and their costs) can be factored into project costs. There is nothing worse for a project than a reviewer who arbitrarily changes the review goal posts after a project has started.

Ideally, the reviewer shouldn't be the person who formally authorises an artefact for release. They instead present a recommendation for release and / or rework to management, who then decide what to actually do. This allows the reviewers to maintain independence and leaves the blame with management if a risk that was predicted by the reviewer but discounted by management actually manifests. This of course requires a suitable corporate culture.
I'm on the same boat. No one here really tells how to avoid the ease of getting tens of classes added across many tags. Tailwind requires a lot of self-discipline and that is very easy to omit in some projects. I can't imagine maintaining a project with tailwind on board.
I still don't trust the black box e-voting machines. This was probably the most secure US election ever due to the sheer number of mail-in paper ballots. I hope mail-in ballots are here to stay because unlike our insecure voting machines, paper voting ballots are far easier to verify.
> Which means that now to protect democracy, reasonable-minded people find themselves proclaiming that the Election was the most secure in history and all discussion of fraud is a conspiracy theory.

There's much screaming about fraud, with no evidence for it, and a large helping of misinformation. (People complaining about dead people voting is a great example of this. Someone casting an early ballot, and dying before November 3rd is an example of a dead person voting... But not of election fraud.)

If we're going to blame the Russian boogieman for the milk going sour, have you considered that maybe their election interference mostly consists of casting doubt on the election's results? Or of the 2016 playbook of spreading alt-right propaganda?

Sure, anything is possible, and maybe Santa Claus is real, but if you want right-thinking people to listen to you, you need to find evidence. So far, the evidence for wide-spread, systemic fraud has ranged from 'non-existent' to 'withdrawn when asked to swear on it under oath' to 'completely rubbish'. That doesn't stop the losing party from throwing a temper tantrum, and refusing to accept the results.
Where does the line between blocking illegal content vs censorship go?

In the western world we would probably allow ISPs to block sites that promote traditions that we do not see as normal. For example; in some east asian countries they eat dogs during festival. Websites selling dog meat shipping to western countries would be blocked in my country.

Why can't India censor websites than promote values they dont agree with? Or Russia?

Every country and people are unique and they have different values. We shouldnt try to assimilate those.
> We lack experimental data. We lack a way to get experimental data

Sounds like pseudoscience to me.

I wonder what happens if a particle is in early orbit in a black hole and another black hole gets close by and changes the net force. Is that impossible somehow? Can't you grab that particle with a spoon and bail if you are quick?
I mean, ECC is going to mean lower yields from the fab and a higher TDP. Will it be worth it?
I didn't think anything could amaze me anymore, but when the same people who shop talk day to day about how SHA1 is broken or some NIST curves look suspicious are mostly A-OK with unauthenticated plaintext voting by snailmail, I finally figured that humanity has went fully off the rails.

And of course "there is no evidence that any large scale voting fraud took place". Uttered to me by multiple people who I know understand that there can't be any evidence.
If your Father is capable of answering these questions (mine wasn't, due to vascular dementia) then I'd strongly advocate this approach.
The web has a wide variety of payment processors, but that doesn't seem to slow down online purchasing.
I absolutely love this service and have downloaded the books and uploaded and synced them on my Google Books iOS app. Some books I'd like to recommend: Meditations, Dialogues,
The Enchiridion, Discourses, and Siddhartha.
That's a great argument for reducing government's power.
What do you imagine boiling water looks like, if stuff as small as this is "close to boiling"?

What is the boiling point that we should be so afraid of? I'm genuinely curious to hear what you think we are hurtling towards
> Hate speech IS violence.

speech is not violence, no matter how many times this lie is repeated.
(I have little experience with Tailwind, but I can still make the following argument)

I think you're making a mistake in assuming that the example shows how you should actually use Tailwind in a project.

The creator himself has said that Tailwind should be combined with whatever component-system your framework provides. That's how you can get your semantic tags.

...and it's also how you should write Websites anyways - this has little to do with Tailwind. Tailwind can be seen as just a more powerful way of writing inline styles.

If you rely on CSS for reusable components, you may be in for a bad time as soon as you need to make even a tiny change in your design.
Casimir effect prediction had a good theoretical grounding and testable prediction (force between parallel conducting planes). It was clear the effect (not the theory behind it) was is in principle testable in a lab.
Of course you can still use your current system but with windows 10, most of ie11 users switched to never browsers and current use of ie11 is under %1.5 right now. https://www.w3counter.com/globalstats.php?year=2020&month=10
They decimate bird populations.
Almost had me.
When did it call the liger a "lion" when it acts like a tiger?

In my mind it's acting like a liger, but the lion bits are fundamental to the problem, and hence why the tiger is showing.
IBM acquires application observability startup Instana
Then you extract components. https://tailwindcss.com/docs/extracting-components
I wonder what the cognitive load of reading the byline and the first line of the article is.
Let the laws and courts determine that. Not Mark Zuckerberg or Jack Dorsey.
Russia Russia Russia, Anyone asking the question why not China? They have far far far more to gain from having Trump out the Whitehouse and are a superior adversary in Cyber.
Neato was never acquired by irobot. The current Neato line is actually really good.
I haven‘t even tried the interactive parts but I want to say that just the messaging and presentation flow is spot on.

I‘m 50/50 between tailwind and theme-ui style tools (which are really more similar than not). Just how well you can articulate your vision is honestly convincing me to just fully embrace tailwind. It‘s something every developer from every framework or guard of web development can get on board with.

I‘m happy you are putting the recommendation to use components or partials front and center over @apply. In my experience @apply has the power to negate the wins from tailwind. Maybe v3 can drop it?

One small thing: maybe you already discussed it but I would just drop the word gag reflex from the landing page. It‘s just... unpleasant.
Tailwind released 2.0, but it is a result of constant work releasing new versions gradually and listening to the users. This is a very active project and it is good to keep an eye on new things https://newreleases.io/npm/tailwindcss. Actually, 2.0.1 is out already. :)
Another way to evaluate would be what would have been allowed in private organization or published in a book or pamphlet?

If the answer is "you can't do anything on the internet that you couldn't do before" then that changes the headline.
Also, "If I had more time, I would have made it shorter"
The DJ’s and the Chef’s Mindsets
Did you read the article?

>> Censored Planet, however, uncovered that ISPs in Norway are imposing what the study calls “extremely aggressive” blocking across a broader range of content, including human rights websites like Human Rights Watch and online dating sites like Match.com.

Downvoting off-topic.
So what you’re saying is that Tailwind is css-in-js with pure css? I can get behind that, design systems and component libraries have completely revolutionized how I think about these things.
for what it counts, at age 10 i had no internet... i read physics books, dabbled in analog electronics, carpentry, drawing and other things.. But one day i got internet, then I spent next 10 years playing video games, and watching youtube. So there is certainly an opportunity that was lost somewhere. It helped me learn programming for sure. But could I have watched 5000 hours fewer of youtube videos and spent 9000 hours less on multiplayers games and instead focused on something else? who knows, but i can't rule it out.
Is there a more informed comparison blog post than this one? This one doesn't clearly address the business value questions of one framework over the other. A startup that needs to build and sell a product shouldn't care if a project is backed by Facebook (and if they do, seriously, what are they doing?). And some of the arguments are shallow and off base, like "everything being JS," that wouldn't be useful to any company actually wanting to make this comparison.

This is NOT a blog post I would use to assess these two libraries for a startup.
you can search by your interests for example "philosophy" would bring ancient books on Stoicism etc.
Politicians look at Xi Jinping, the guy that has complete control over China for life, and say: "man, I want to have as much power as that guy".
Forget partisan BS for a second, shouldn't we as a technical community be demanding for these voting machine software companies to release all metadata associated with the elections? We all know the data combined with the metadata can paint a pretty accurate picture.

Why are they so afraid to release the data if there wasn't any shady business going on?
Gilfoyle in Silicon Valley Uses VSCode
> Well, the guy who said that just got fired for saying it so...

Which of these two has (1) the expertise to evaluate the facts on the issue of security of election systems, and (2) the absence of a strong motivation to misrepresent them in the direction of their public claims:

(A) Chris Krebs, JD, former Senior Advisor to the Assistant Secretary of Homeland Security for Infrastructure Protection, former Director of Cybersecurity Policy for Microsoft, former Assistant Secretary of Homeland Security for Infrastructure Protection, and most recently Director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, or

(B) Donald J. Trump, BS (Econ), former brand marketing kingpin, former reality television star, and, unless he succeeds somehow in discrediting the results of the recent public voting, imminently-outgoing President of the United States.

Also, if you are still undecided, recall that Chris Krebs didn't just say it on his own, he was relaying the conclusion reported in the joint declaration [0] of the two coordinating councils working on election security for the CISA, which included both industry representatives and representatives of the secretaries of state and election directors of the states, as well as experts from CISA.

[0] https://www.cisa.gov/news/2020/11/12/joint-statement-electio...
> unauthenticated plaintext voting by snailmail

You needed to provide your signature which was matched against voting records.

Also no-one has said that mail voting isn't full proof only that it's very difficult to exploit it in the volumes you need to swing an election.