skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
So she used to do collages, and now she builds dream homes in Roblox and makes Tik-Toks?

Spends less time dreaming, and more time hanging out with her friends in virtual environments?

Congratulations, your creative child is now a budding creative teenager. She'll be fine.

You're cruising to do damage to your relationship with her with all this pearl-clutching, though. Might keep an eye on that.
for tailwind 3.0 i would love for you to bring your rock/metal passion into the video!
> There are a lot of obscure books which is great.

This is my biggest issue: discoverability.

The site has an index which shows 12 books at a time, and it looks like 36 pages. So roughly 430 books.

This is not actually a gigantic number of books, one that is small enough that it would be great to look through all the books, and yet I'm never going to do that if I have to page through 12 results at a time.

It would be great to get a simple list view of the collection.
I used a Windows laptop with touchscreen for a while. While the touchscreen was never the primary input method it was nice to have it for some operations where more interactivity was called for or just to give my hands a break from the mouse or keyboard. It’s nice just to have options.
Seen many dive bar regulars 40s to 60s, seeking relief from reality 4 nights a week. Drinking is how they coalesce a social life, but it's created with other problem drinkers. Their drama, commiserating and complaints were really depressing.
The render time point is misleading. It can be slower but even on low end devices, CSS is so insanely fast, you would need an HTML source in the tens of MB's range to cause noticeable performance problems. Also, CSS classes do make that even less of a problem. Inline styles are fast enough, and classes are faster by default, so Tailwind wins there.

Page load times are interesting, but again, unless you're loading an insane amount of data from the server, it will never be a real issue.

Some sort of component architecture solves the problem you bring up w/ duplication. You should never be writing the same thing 100x over. JS frameworks all render 100's of the same component with the same attributes and performance is fine for 99% of real use cases.

The downsides for Tailwind all revolve around personal preference and how your team organizes a project. There is no performance hit (unless you ship the entire un-purged CSS file to production, even then, it's minimal).
Isn't this very study an example of one that shows that masks do not offer significant protection for the wearer?

Whether or not masks protect others seems much harder to isolate but there does seem to be lower R^2 values for countries and areas with more normalized mask wearing. Perhaps it is just a correlation (just seeing masks reminds people of the risk and they modify their behavior).
Lord, if you tapped out even 5 years ago you still skipped the worst of it. It's relentless, I feel like clean software is hard to find in web development. Web apps are so often written with 5+ different technologies and frameworks all jammed together, and everyone picks a different combination.
Yeah its a total mess, most health systems I work with have 30-50 different vendors all with some various forms of integration with the EMR... It's always a mess, with no end in sights.
Rural-Urban Divide Has Grown Since 2016
Can someone tl;dr this mad man's around a bottle of red wine ramble?
This is the big paper in The Lancet from a few years back that basically dispelled the "drinking is healthy" myths.

Drink to relax or drink for fun, but don't expect anyone to tell you to drink for your health.

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6...
I use the same non-destructive editor, Darktable, on my JPG originals as for RAW. Make non-destructive edits and export. My workflow is the same though JPG requires a less pixel pipeline during post processing.

To put it another way the only difference is that my “archived negative” is a JPG rather than a RAW. But in 300 years I would only bet, and not very much, on physical prints. I’d give JPG a reasonable chance thirty years from now. Proprietary RAW files will probably be readily accessible in fifteen years for the most part.

Most of what JPG does is free me from a “raw+jpg just in case.” I don’t think defensively like that anymore...I don’t burden myself with a lot of “a serious photographer would.” What I am making is a picture. There are tradeoffs and the actual pictures I make (not the ones I might possibly make) are how I think about cost and benefit.

Disk space is cheap and so I use it write only. The time I spend on file management is expensive, so again write only. RAW + JPG requires much more file management than either alone. Should the JPG and RAW receive the same number of stars? The same tags? Always? I don’t want to spend time thinking about that.

For me, RAW represents an obligation to future work. The picture is never done when it is made. Not ready upon download.

JPG frees up energy for making more pictures. YMMV.
This website is being served from said setup, no? I think that constitutes “trying it out”.
The attack presented in the paper replace only the software without hardware intervention. It requires someone to MITM the robot update service, and that's not impossibile considering that someone still delivery software updates via HTTP.
While medium term (days/months) quantitative equity has done quite poorly (especially market neutral funds it seems), quantitative market makers (which some call HFT firms) have made a killing with the high volumes and staggering volatility. The shorter your time horizon (seconds or maybe hours instead of days or years) and less historical data you use (maybe you don't use any at all), the less exposed you are to paradigm shifts in the market. For the most part you don't hear about these kinds of firms in the media (except when the disaster of a book Flash Boys was published), making a casual observer think that all of "quant finance" is in disarray when the quant hedge funds perform poorly.

Not exactly sure where I'm going with this, but I think I just wanted to impress upon people that there's an entire separate class of quantitative finance firms: trading/market making firms. They often have no outside investors and are often capacity constrained such that their returns don't compound. But let me tell you, their (maybe uncompoundable) returns can be absolutely staggering. Better than RenTec type staggering. And they are certainly doing well right now.
I was "ringleader" (many diverse groups have been involved over the years) of the OpenEMR project in 2003-2005 and went on to create the open source ClearHealth and HealthCloud EMR (electronic medical record) systems. OpenEMR has a lot of dedicated folks in it and has been a project of some sort of another for ~25 years at this point.

You can read quite a bit about open source in healthcare in my book, Hacking Healthcare. A bit dated but still in print.

Unfortunately there are massive headwinds against open source in US healthcare settings. Regulation requires certifications that cost upwards of $100K first time, $10K with each release, just in fees. Licensed data sets also make for real difficulties in licensing. Required 3rd parties like SureScripts are openly hostile to open source. Most largest buyers of systems are institutional and most current interpretations of law make it so that open source systems cannot be sold as "sole source" which makes life very hard to close and keep those deals. Finally, until a business model emerges that favors open source and patient health, everyone makes more money with lock-in and so that perpetuates.

Ask me anything.

Can confirm, a little concerningly, that code I wrote 17 years ago is still widely present in the OpenEMR codebase including my old office number for test patients, lol.
> Each patient was placed in a hyperbaric chamber for 90 minutes for five days a week over three months while breathing 100 per cent oxygen through a mask.
The pressurised chamber allows more oxygen to be dissolved into the tissues and mimics a state of "hypoxia", or oxygen shortage, which is known to have regenerating effects.

If your breathing oxygen at a higher intra pulmonary pressure you have both higher concentration and higher absorption of oxygen, so how can it create a state of hypoxia?

Is it a typo and they mean hyperoxia? Or is it a typo and they mean a hypobaric chamber?

I also couldn't find an actual link to the paper?
The fastest supercomputer is now even more absurdly powerful than before
> If only 50% of the population tested themselves in this way every 4 days, we can achieve vaccine-like “herd effects” (which is when onward transmission of the virus across the population cannot sustain itself—like taking fuel from a fire—and the outbreak collapses).

This is absolutely true, however, I'm skeptical that most Americans, and in particular the socializing superspreaders, would participate.
I showed someone from the Allscripts innovation group what I could do in an Elixir repl once, and his jaw hit the floor. Then I showed him how we wrote parsers. He said we'd never make it because we turned around new features too fast for anyone to trust us.
That might be one of the best landing pages I've seen.

I'm sold.
It's super cool how the result of any evaluated expression is also itself an evaluable expression.
I had already addressed your comment in the post you replied to:

> and yes, you can point to a small handful of digital games which were highly financially successful without primarily selling through Steam, but those are the hyper-viral one-in-a-million exceptions, not representative business cases that you should be betting your business on replicating
Recommendation: when inserting the results of the evaluation, add it to the selection so "reverting" the inserted text is as easy as hitting Backspace or Delete.
How many people in the control group wore masks? It's not like they were told not to wear masks, they just weren't told to.

Edit: it actually looks like the study doesn't include that statistic at all, which is appallingly poor design.
I would 100% be able to use Tailwind only. And in fact, that would be my preference.

In the past, a lot of projects I've seen started with Bootstrap + maybe some theme. Then they slowly add custom stuff that ended up being horribly bloated and impossible to refactor well. With Tailwind, so long as you're using @apply properly, or a decent component system (I prefer Svelte), then it's very easy to keep things in a nicely updated, non-custom design.
There is a common theme among people who argue over abortion; they choose particular words that are either unscientific or misleading, in a disingenuous way, to promote their side as being more rational. My initial assumption is that you were doing this, and you may still be, I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt. I feel it is very important that when we discuss abortion, we do so in a way that is scientific, rational, and consistent.

Your choice of words is particularly egregious, in my opinion. Killing is not the same as homicide. Human is not the same as person. A fetus is not a clump of cells, or a baby.

A "human being" is just a human (a common usage scientific term), and human is just a species of animal. So yes, a "human fetus" is a "human being". "Person" is a legal/philosophical term, not necessarily a scientific one. "Killing" simply refers to ending the life of a living thing. "Homicide" (the mention of which you removed?) is a legal term for killing a person. To drive this point home further, we have concepts for non-human persons, and non-person humans. They aren't interchangeable in all contexts.

The scientific reality and proper usage of the English language is abortion is killing humans (human fetuses). This is not up for debate. The debate is whether these humans are "persons", which entitles them to rights, or if they are not, if they deserve rights in some other capacity (e.g. my dog isn't a person but has rights).

Again, when people say "it's not killing" or "it's not a human", or tangentially, "it's a clump of cells" or "it's a baby" they are factually wrong and are deliberately misusing those words in an attempt to strengthen their argument, when in reality it makes them look either dishonest or ignorant.

To me, your posts are either dishonest, or ignorant. That was my entire point.
Apple backtracking on network filter whitelist
Watch Netflix to Support Charities For Free
I'm a senior engineering student at CU Boulder and for my final capstone project I created a Chrome Extension to support charities by streaming Netflix, Hulu, and Amazon Prime. Just stream your favorite shows to donate for free! Check out my project and help us support those in need. #streamforgood
Honestly in Europe we have the same quota system for milk.

Quality here is not a function of the market being more free.

It's a function of a better food production chain

Instead of competing on prices many food products in Europe compete on quality and locality (small areas that produce some unique product of extremely high and renowned quality: Champagne in France, Parmigiano Reggiano in Italy, jamon serrano in Spain, etc. etc.)
> I do very clearly see how it increases discord and contention in tech communities (see: this thread, previous threads on the topic, Code of Conduct threads, etc).

> And I think that increased discord and contention in communities is not worth increased inclusivity (however you measure that).

One measure of inclusivity might be hiring, retention, and promotion within the tech industry (and the developer subset of that) relative to the general population. Looking at the Stack Overflow 2020 survey results as one (admittedly biased) indicator, it's pretty clear that the tech industry does abysmally. As two quick examples: <5% of developers surveyed were Black, and <12% were women and non-binary. Source: https://insights.stackoverflow.com/survey/2020#developer-pro...

Speaking from personal experience as one of those minorities, I don't think people who are outside of these underrepresented groups understand just how many small reminders a day we get that the "default" is for us not to be welcome.

Something like changing language that is rooted in ownership of people is not a huge change, admittedly, but the fact that so many people within the industry complain and fight it definitely serves as a reminder to me that I'm tolerated more than welcomed here.

Edit: Added some clarifying language
To really get the show, it helps to have worked abroad. There are clash of cultures and integrating isn't for everyone.
> so I just left and stopped taking psychiatric medications altogether

Wow, for some conditions that sounds like not at all an outcome a psychiatrist would like to be responsible for.
Thanks for the suggestion, I didn't not need to install a driver to connect the synthesizer to a computer and use the editor, so maybe that's the case. Where do you think I should get started with that, or how can I find out it that's the case? Any resources about the topic are welcome.
I would urge you to drop this program both for ethical and legal reasons.

Unpaid internships are deeply unethical and unjust. Not just because everyone deserves to be paid, but more importantly, because they cause massive social inequality. Students who are well-off can afford to take unpaid internships. They get many opportunities riding on their wealth, resulting in students who are not well-off, who cannot afford to work for free, missing out.

Programs like these cause massive social inequality. They are how the old boys network continues to live.

Also, you totally need a labor lawyer. That page clearly shows that lambdaschool fails the test for an unpaid internship. Not only are you exposing yourself to a lawsuit, you are exposing anyone who participates in this program too. And this page will be used as an exhibit that the program is not about training, it is about displacing existing work onto students.

We all know what you're trying to do. Get experience for you students. As a fellow educator, I appreciate that and also understand how hard it is to arrange. But this is not the way.
It's a zero sum game, no matter how much money you put into it, the result is always gonna be the same.
> My biggest question is whether cloud providers could achieve a scale where they are able to offer the most optimal infrastructure costs for specific businesses. Maybe this is the case for smaller or mid-size companies, but I'd be interested to see where the inflection point lies.

Disclosure: I work at Microsoft on Azure, but I’m on the product/dev tool side not on infra.

I think this is already happening to a certain extent and will happen more in more verticals as time goes on. There are massive government use cases for the cloud and it isn’t as if governments and agencies haven’t been maintaining their own datacenters and servers before. Clouds optimized for healthcare are also a thing and are only becoming bigger — again, industries that have long maintained their own infra.

You also have the private cloud model, which OpenStack pioneered but Azure Stack and AWS Outpost have put their own spin on, which essentially lets you host specific cloud services and tools on your own infrastructure.

There are always going to be some businesses that reach a size and scale where it doesn’t make sense to offload to the cloud, where paying for people to do maintenance and support, build out monitoring, handle everything soup to nuts makes sense. I think Dropbox, which is a storage provider, is a key example of that.

I talked with the then CTO of Dropbox right after it finished moving from AWS to it’s own datacenters and the process was extraordinary and really impressive. For what Dropbox is doing, it makes sense that it owns and operates its own infrastructure and storage and tooling.

Of course, you can also have the inverse. Zynga famously moved off AWS as its demand peaked and it saw the cost savings, and then had to move back to it, after demand died down and the numbers of owning and maintaining its own infrastructure no longer made sense.

Netflix has moved much of its stuff in-house, but still relies on AWS and likely will for quite some time.

But on the whole, yes, I absolutely see cloud providers moving to offer specific business and business vertical centric solutions with pricing that is lower than what those businesses could achieve on their own, even if you take some of the “services” stuff out of it snd are just looking at raw infrastructure costs.
But then the black hole evaporates...
Cool, I commented to the same effect, but your food-based metaphor brings to mind the notion that we have less lead in the water today, better health care, a handle on air pollution etc. p. p. I am doubting that as I write it, thinking of the hopelessness of CO2 reduction and all the things to come after we have already passed the point of no return.

And I wouldn't want to grow up be a giraf either,if climbing a tree works as well, or just shake it up.

Oh boy, these metaphors are useless.

Let's put it another way. Picking the low hanging fruit has just become either, and it is still necessary to get there. As you mention Terry Tao, to imply at the same time that we had never heard of him is rather disingenious. What is the point?

It has been noted that science, for lack of a better word, is becoming increasingly specialized on the individual level and that we have no polymaths today as it were. Maybe you are still correct insofar as we from in the midst of it cannot yet really tell what combination of skill will take the crown.

But then let's drop a few names, Peter Shor, Noam Chomsky, Frederik Kortlandt. Oh that's right, you never heard of Kortlandt, probably my favorite Indo-Europeanist.
I thought that these vaccines were targeting the spike protein which seems to be unique to these viruses. Hopefully that would make them easier to vaccinate against.
The black hole is not eternal. Once it is fully evaporated, you still need to account for the information that was contained within (or accept information loss).
They will unfortunately vaccinate the placebo arm as soon as they get the EUA. At this point the study would be mostly unblinded, so far as I can tell, there will also be a much smaller, if any control group.

“If our potential vaccine receives an EUA, we would propose amending the study protocol to create a process so that interested, eligible participants who received the placebo could ‘cross-over’ to the vaccine arm of the study,”
Not true. All you have to do is launch Matthew McConaughey into a black hole and he'll solve it.
Based on publicly available numbers, the 95% Bayesian credible interval is roughly 90.5% to 97.6%.
Picking a suppler based on the probability they'll be able to keep the supply chain full doesn't seem like something AMD wouldn't have concidered.
Ahhahah, yes I completely agree, the moment my opinions are even plausibly associated to my name and people are watching, then I become the politest person possible
Point 1 is familiar; of expecting nothing from the publisher, only extend that to nothing at all. A relative of mine wrote a technical book, got nothing from the publisher in terms of support, advice or feedback, and when published they did absolutely zero marketing.

Other than putting ink on paper, absolutely nothing.
Apple releases forked version of TensorFlow optimized for macOS Big Sur
Ramanujan's Easiest Formula [pdf]
Right now it's reported by Linus Tech Tips[1], but I don't think I've seen anyone in the /r/VFIO community tried it yet (partly due to availability). I'm very curious about this as well and might as well get one and try it myself...

[1]: https://youtu.be/oUzCn-ITJ_o?t=642
as well as linkedin, skillshare, dailymotion, etc. i keep a running thread of major IE11 drops here https://twitter.com/swyx/status/1260627626739130369?s=20
So the biggest advantage of tailwind in my opinion is that it enforces some structure in CSS. I work on small, highly custom designed/branded websites (like marketing product sites) often times with bunch of freelancers of differing skill levels that i might have never worked with before. We also often pass the site to someone else to maintain and upgrade after its finished. For my usecase Tailwind has been simply revelation.

If you look at CSS methodologies like BEM, ITCSS, CubeCSS they require developers to learn them and be very disciplined to follow them. These methodologies are probably very effective in orgs where employees work long term. In my case it's always just matter of time before they start to break down. It just takes too much time to onboard devs.

Maybe it's not so much about Tailwind being better or the "right way" but about it making very clear how you should structure CSS (put it in html and tailwind.cofing). Other frameworks like bootstrap also enforced something but Tailwind is not UI kit. It infinitely more customizable it can have any look.

Tailwind creates less technical debt? Maybe that's how to describe it? For others it will be the exact opossite.
This is when you tell them to gfy. Another problem in the UK is that anyone can claim they can do glazing, they can show you fake portfolios and use tactics like above to get you to sign a contract. Then consumer rights will let them to try to "fix" the job until you give up and if you report fraud to police they'll say it's not a crime to do that. Being a poor glazer is not a crime.
That's covered in the article. It's a lack of AMD ARM drivers.
Seems like it's easier to save up that amount of money if you're working at a position that is high enough to personally tell the CEO of Google to GFY.
Delays? We’re going from proof of efficacy to roll out within a few weeks. This is insanely quick.
My 12-year-old daughter is also obsessed with her devices!

She spends at least 3 hours a day writing on her laptop (she's on her 7th 150-page+ fantasy book), drawing and making comics on her ipad (taking full advantage of layers and other techniques), and animating on her phone ("Gacha" characters).