skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Then I'll just click the link, read some memes on reddit, then come back once the timer runs out.
The words "man" and "woman" can refer both to assumed gender and biological gender. Since the context involves menstruation, assumed gender makes no sense in the sentence.
Isn't that basically what the Allegory of the cave is advocating for?

If you are uneducated (and almost certainly poor), you do not see reality for how it is, but instead you see shadows against the wall. Only through the process of a dialectical education can you begin to see reality for how it is. As a result, only the educated enlightened individuals should become kings or the guardians of a state.

Any system which agrees with this allegory (and most of Western Philosophy implicity agrees with it) also results in the notion that poor people should not be enfranchised at the same level as wealthier people because they cannot be trusted to govern.

If you reject this allegory, than the fundamental justification for hierarchy (some are more fit to rule than others) and correspondingly the state is shattered
Just opened up a one item store for my surfing shower product!! Super cool concept.

https://oneitem.store/pomo

Couldn't find the repo so added a feature request here: https://twitter.com/mixcocam/status/1329201542411538441?s=20
No, we don't agree.

He literally coined the term when talking about his movement. If anyone has claim to what the definition was, it's him.

But history is written by the winners and I'm sure modern day fascists would like to distance themselves from that history as much as possible...and thus the term gets narrowed and redefined.
Alexis Ohanian is hiring new VC voices for Seven Seven Six
I'm not sure, but they might be talking about one of Vice's other founders, Gavin McInnes, who is known as a far-right provocateur: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gavin_McInnes#Views
Balance with missed heart bypasses, cancer screenings, emergency stroke interventions, and increased stress, and interrupted vaccine programs, and alcoholism, drug abuse, suicide, and that list goes on too.
Probably. After reading the paper I'm pretty sure they messed up their testing.

The problem is that they blow it up HUGE both in the paper and the article without cursory checking. That is as bad as lie. Maybe even worse.

From The paper 7.1.2:
"Censored Planet data reveals extremely aggressive DNS blocking of many domains in Norway, with many blocks being consistent in all of our vantage points. During the four month period of increased censorship, 25 ASes observed blocking of more than 10 domains in at least six categories. We observed the most rigorous activity in AS 2116 (CATCHCOM) where more than 50 domains were blocked."

Blocking more than 10 domains in 25 ASes I have no reason to doubt. As I said there is extensive DNS blocking. So they write in a way that makes it sound like all the ASes are blocking hrw.org and match. But it's probably only on CATCHCOM. This is a ISP for mostly huge corporate environments where blocking may be by customer demand. So they take one single source of "anomaly" and blow it up. Pretty much a lie.
If thats your litteral definition of fascism I suggest you get yourself a dictionary. Please dont make blanket statements to describe complex phenomenons.
Hacking Healthcare (HC specific) and The DevOps Handbook (general) are the books I buy for everyone joining the team.

I recommend Eric Topol's books as well, including The Creative Destruction of Medicine and Deep Medicine. Lots of food for thought.
I've found the opposite. Google promotes stalking sites[0] to the very top of results for their targets in a way that no other search engine does. Not Bing, no Yandex, not any of the little indie engines. You have to go dozens of pages into results to find them, but they're always on the very first page with Google despite being tiny sites compared to the results they displace.

[0] also not going to name them and give them promotion
Several people have pointed out the redundancy, even hypocrisy, with `@apply` and compositional classes. I like to think of `@apply` and componentization as competing solutions. Just like "composition over inheritance" I believe in "componentization over @apply / composite classes".

Ideally, you don't have composite `.btn` classes. You simply have a `<btn>` component which encapsulates appropriate Tailwind CSS classes in the component (no external CSS, `@apply` required).

With this framing, `@apply` is the less preferred of 2 approaches. It's good, even necessary, in some situations, but generally you should seek ways to componentize vs. abstracting compositional classes.
Took 10min to setup including payments. Could be an alternative to ebay at this pace!
Exactly, and your responses both apply to Sabine's criticism as well.

I like the tenor of your second argument, it reminds me of Pascal's wager. That said, you're not really addressing the problem of induction. We have no reason why you'd assign a higher probability to the "law of physics remain constant" to the "laws of physics are flipped in the next second", outside of gut reasoning.

If we can use gut reasoning about induction, no reason we can when we assume that quarks are a real thing, or think about this solution to the BHIP.
The parent comment is talking about phones.
On a fairly unrelated note, the link shortener situation at Google is all over the place. When you refer people to Google Pay, the link is shortened to "g.co/payinvite/<code>", google images sharing goes to "images.app.goo.gl", google search is "g.co/kgs", and Google Pay profile sharing is "gpay.app.goo.gl".
>Chemistry isn't a sub-field of Physics either.

Chemistry is just applied Physics.

And yes, for all you mathematicians out there, Physics is just applied math. :)
I strongly agree with the parent post that having a simple list of books somewhere on the site is a necessity to enable browsing. If I have to search by interest, it is quite unlikely I would search here no matter how much I like the work that you do.
I mean look at the market - we’re at all time highs. It’s more the trillions the Fed pumped into the markets than stimulus.
Have been on the other side of that call and those questions. I had straight answers for each of them.

But if I worked in a bank, I wouldn't use an ML behavioral security tool to stop bad guys, I'd use it to identify, model, and detect top traders so I could double down on their bets. Seriously, if the model actually worked, why would you waste it catching hackers? Arguably, if the underlying tech is not useful for that, it's not useful for anything.

What it comes down to is, "the confusion matrix is the product." The mistake ML tech companies seem to make is thinking that their product applies to a given vertical (banking, health, govt, etc) , but in fact the balance of that confusion matrix applies to companies whose growth stage defines their needs, imo.
if i have to break it down:

1. smart perimeter(outside lighting, garden watering, reminders for garden maint, boundaries, pest alerts, security cams, gate alarm if applicable.)
2. smart kitchen(smart fridge, smart pantry that auto orders, smart cooking unit)
3. smart bathrooms/spa/gym/grooming areas(self cleaning toilet, shower stall, floors etc.)
4. smart housekeeping(floors, laundry reminders, dusting, mopping, ceilings, windows)
5. smart maint. schedule (quarterly check ups on plumbing, electricity, wiring, connections, gutters etc.)
6. smart winterisation scheduling(where applicable)
7. smart security(cameras, alarm system, visitor logging)
8. utility tracking(lights, water, gas etc)
ITT: people who don't have children telling people who do have children that this is not a problem.
I was thrilled when I read the part about not ignoring dashes. So I was a bit disappointed when I saw the "Rich & detailed metadata" screenshot had the dreaded double hyphen. Even acabal's replies on this thread use a double hyphen.

I guess I shouldn't complain too much, even the New York Times misuses the double hyphen.
>The part that gets me is that they didn't decide to instead allow folks to set a max battery charge to extend their battery life.

That's a fairly unusual feature to have for a consumer device. Support for it is spotty on laptops, and on androids the only way of doing it (I'm aware of) involves rooting your phone.
Evil Apple. No doubt attorneys will get 99% of the $113 M and users will get offered a silly coupon . . .
While we're at it, we can also just stop paying credit card swipe fees too by paying cash as well and avoid artificial preservatives by growing our own food, and while we're at it we can bicycle everywhere in order not to exhaust Carbon into the air.

Or as a democratic country, we can debate the laws and rules in which we would like businesses to follow for the privilege of selling products in the market and so they do not unhealthily, dominate the market.
Propaganda is vulnerable to open discourse, promoters of false information are handicapped by the flaws in their arguments. The only way it can flourish is censored away into manipulative misdirection and secretive groups.

There is also the immunity to bad ideas aspect; Its important that the propaganda is heard openly and argued against in public, as this makes people immune to these arguments. Censor these bad ideas and we make the next generation vulnerable to them.

I don't think we can offset this with education, as with drugs, we never give the kids the very best bad idea - argument when we try to teach the dangers of drugs, this is why so many are vulnerable to the dealers quiet persuasion. I really feel like the more we silence movements like the alt right, the more vulnerable our society becomes to their bad ideas.
I would argue that no-one is - the welding goggles analogy is a very apt one. Nobody's born able to withstand straight high-energy ultraviolet.
This is hardly new. "60 Minutes" was infamous in the 1960s for the egregious slanting of their segments. It was so bad that the smarter people being interviewed by them would demand that the interview be simultaneously filmed by their own people.

As for riots, my dad remarked to me that the TV media would represent the crowds as large or small simply by where they pointed the camera and the zoom level used. And they would, depending on their agenda.

Mass media has always been heavily agenda based.
Of course you will, but the point is that many people like you will find such a process more of a hassle than it's worth. My solution would reduce the amount of this happening significantly, even if it won't stop every do-badder...
Does Affirm carry the credit risk on its books?
Apple didn't lose much by reducing commission to 15%, when they are top heavy, anyways. Based on one of the articles (not sure about how trustable data was, though), while the new commission effects 98% of developers, the net revenue impact would be on the order of a percent or two.
> Wonder if anyone ever tried to scan entire ipv6

ZMap can scan IPv4 on a 10Gb uplink in ~ 5 minutes. Some napkin math, then: (2^128 / 2^32) × 5 minute ≈ 7.5×10^23 years. So my guess would be: probably not.
Sagas are a great power tool, but most Redux apps don't need them. That's why we opted to include thunks out of the box as part of our official Redux Toolkit package:

https://blog.isquaredsoftware.com/2020/02/blogged-answers-wh...

(You can still customize the middleware when using RTK to set up your store, same as always, so if you want to use sagas you still can.)

That said, there's a lot of things thunks _can't_ do, and for those use cases it makes sense to use sagas or observables.
Thanks. Edited to reflect.
It might get further optimizations, but the fact that it's intended for a WASM JIT does mean that it's going to have to be optimizing towards compile speed, and avoiding regressions there-of. It might not ever completely and only target compile speed but you probably wouldn't want it to either, instead you'd want it to be a reasonably low-latency compiler back-end that does some optimizations so that the resulting code can actually run at a reasonable speed.
Year vs. Month, you are mostly talking past each other.
Not sure why the writer inaccurately lumps many of these shows into the ambient tv category just because they're "slow" or too simple (maybe because they're somewhat popular right now).

Streaming services like Netflix have yet to really plunge into legit ambient tv which is still primarily living on YouTube. If you want to watch a person walk around Tokyo for 2 hours or watch the Olso to Bergen train ride the article mentions is still only something YouTube has available. I think COVID forcing so many people to stay at home has definitely popularized the genre.
It doesn't really add anything to this conversation. "Blame Capitalism" is all the rave, but it doesn't really fit with this argument. There is a lot going on here. One, this is a letter to Facebook when it really seems to be the contracting agency that's at issue. FB may just order their contractors to be like "stop this shit" and they comply, or they buy out the contract and move people in-house.

People only have so much time and capacities. A software engineer isn't going to spend a lot of time on the sales room floor, but they might have started off in help-desk support. A CEO might not know what goes on in the warehouse, but he or she may have worked at a McDonalds growing up. If someone hasn't worked entry level jobs elsewhere, would working on the factory really develop empathy? Would that change policy? Probably not.

It's so easy to make two boxes, one for the oppressor and the other for the oppressed, and place everyone into those two boxes. If each oppressor works a day in the shoes of the other box, does that make a difference? If the workers throw their wrenches into the gears and seize the means of production, what if they're completely unprepared to keep that machine moving and end up with famine?

The issues are complex, much more complex than "Before you get your license, you should have to ride a bike on the streets for two weeks."
It is relatively well known. The attribution is imperfect in some places, lacking in other places.

If you'd like an example, examine the map on https://m.facebook.com/Stekerlapatte

Facebook is, in all fairness, contributing to the OSMF's efforts to come up with new, better, clear attribution guidelines, and they are understandably waiting for them to be approved before overhauling things. The current draft would require the actual text to be shown in the example I've shared above.
When businesses realize people actually use OSM and updates are 10x easier, they will make sure to keep it up to date, for the same reasons. OSM actually needs less popularity to stay up to date, it's just not there (yet).
Feel a bit sorry for the authors of Plex Media streaming software who woke up today to discover that their SEO is now ruined, and trademarks worthless.
Looks like they're taking a page from Revolut's (and/or N26, whatever others) playbook.
Is it possible to launch two ICBM missiles simultaneously, where both are side by side, so that it looks like only one missile on radar. Or three missiles.

Then, the United States launches one missile defense to knock out one ICBM, but only to discover that there was another hidden missile flying next to it.

Boom. Secondary missile hits its target. Mission Accomplished.

Also, most ICBM are MIRV. So this defense missile must hit the ICBM before it splits up into 10 different warheads.

Ask a friend: ICBM physicist
OpenCL is supported via ROCm on the new consumer GPUs now, so if the stars align HIP support might come too. The lack of announcements doesn't inspire much confidence though, especially compared to NVIDIA's always-on PR machine.
This was exactly what happened to me. My phone slowed down drastically after an update, and so I took it in. They confirmed to me that it was this update that throttled everything if the battery health was degraded "in order to prevent further battery degradation". But when I pointed out to them that my phone was less than a year old and still under warranty, they tested it again and told me my battery didn't meet the threshold for warranty replacement.

I pointed out the absurdity of their double standard, and resolved to never buy an apple device ever again.
How is that a fair point. Developers don't WANT bespoke frameworks that lock you into a single ecosystem. We would obviously prefer open standards and specifications supported by multiple vendors. The popularity of frameworks such as Flutter and QT or APIs such as OpenGL and Vulkan prove that. The SDKs Apple chooses to provide are entirely elective on their part and we shouldn't pretend that as developers, they deserve to charge us for this.
Cost I think is negligible, or at least affordable, what I wouldn't like in this scenario is the _responsibility_. The part where uptime depends on you, bugs creep into the system and they become your fault, you bork something and lose some data, and you have to keep everything up to date and interoperable and compatible with whatever current tech everyone uses for access.
The cat is out of the bag. Countries know they can apply censorship now and they will. I think this article has it's pen in the right place. This is a trend within the world's freest democracies.

Direct censorship has been pretty limited so far, but a permanent structure for internet censorship has been put in place.
Use the following links instead:
https://useparsr.com/notes/note-hkwmif
https://useparsr.com/notes/note-46vedx
https://useparsr.com/notes/note-i30k1n
https://useparsr.com/notes/note-civpuq
Nobody is forcing you to buy an iPhone. All of the other examples are in fact increasingly popular things to do.

Sure - we are debating it here. It just doesn’t seem like there is any real argument being made why people are forced to choose Apple.
> should be forced to work

Falling back to social engineering and forced labor (hopefully) won't win you many points in the "let's re-architect the system" debate. If the Waltons never stopped stocking shelves and started scaling, we'd never have Walmart. It's possible you think that's a good decision for the world, but it's clearly not the worlds decision for itself.
And in some cases, you might not even be in a condition to give the smart-cards (eg. coma, stroke)
Why not start your own thing on the side then? From any digital business, to a website /app /micro-saas whatever you like?

Being your own boss is a pretty awesome motivator.
Why are you so opposed to reading something before commenting on it?
One of my coworkers did that with his son. He had his carrier's tracking app installed on his son's phone so he could see where he was. The son figured out how to disable it.

So he wrote an android service that'll send him the location whenever he needs it and installed it on the phone. His son doesn't know about it... yet.

He fully understands this is an "arms race" of sorts and I think he feels like if his son is smart enough to outsmart his dad, he's probably smart enough to handle himself with a little less supervision. (I think the kid was in about 8th grade at the time.)
I don't think it's that easy. The dopamine-traps of today can hardly be compared to the ones from twenty years ago.

Compared to the effort of creating, there's some seriously low hanging fruit these days.
We’re doing it with a Montessori school in a state with low cost of living. It’s a significant cost, but the generational impact massively outweighs the impact to our retirement.
That's a good question - it's a while ago and the only one that really jumps out is The History of Psychology by Leahy because understanding psychology is as much about understanding how we understand the mind in the context of society, and to do that you need to know the history. Not what you were expecting ...

I highly recommend reading up on Hans Selye's biological model of stress and the HPA axis. Also worth checking out Freudelberger for the seminal article on burnout and Maslach for the formal treatment.

Organisational psychology is great but so contentious an area it's helpful to have a good teacher.

I highly recommend looking into Biopsychology, which is essentially the interplay between our mind and body and even how our mind distributed through the body.
This line: "I think I do, but I'm afraid you don't. "

PS. I appreciate you reaching out and making an effort to understand why the comment seems snarky to me.
Maybe. My teenage years were spent reading and being creative. I spent more time creating artwork during those years than in all the subsequent decades put together. But if I had had a smartphone back then? I doubt I would have read a single book or created any artwork. Would that made me a better or worse person than I am now? Well, that's impossible to say. I don't regret how I spent my teenage years. Will those who are growing up fully engrossed in their phones every feel regret? We probably won't know for about 30 more years when they have enough life experience to look back and reflect. It will be interesting to see what people have to say around 2050. Then again, what do they have to compare it with? They can't compare a life lived constantly on a phone with a life not lived constantly on one. So... maybe it is impossible for any person to say which way is better. Maybe it is just the aggregate of all of society over many decades that we can determine whether this experiment has a positive or negative (or neutral) outcome.
I experienced it as well and this isn’t true either. The throttling was significant (40%, rough ballpark) but the phones were usable. A game that played that poorly would not have run well at full power. Maps and messaging was functional.

They should have communicated the change, in case that qualification is needed.
BMW not supporting Android is not Apple’s problem.

iMessage is for Apple devices. You are free to choose from SMS, What’s app, and all the others.

You should be able to transfer files by plugging in your Android to the MacBook via USB. Something that you can’t do with an iPhone in the same way.

The rest are all Apple products in Apple’s ecosystem.

I pay to use Apple because the ecosystem is closed.
Here are some, published just a couple weeks ago: https://www.businessinsider.com/google-users-locked-out-afte...

Several of these stories have appeared on HN just over the past year or so as well.

Edit: The amount of downvoting on this and my original comment is puzzling to me. If someone who takes issue with it would care to explain what the problem is, I'd sincerely like to hear about it.
My point is not that law enforcement won't allow moderation outside certain environments. It's that law enforcement specifically forbids possession of, or even access to, these materials by anyone. FB likely has some kind of working agreement with law enforcement which allows them to do the business of moderating and reporting. Does that agreement extend to allowing FB contractors to access child porn from home? I'm in no position to say since I'm not privy to the details of the arrangement.

I'm saying as a contractor, as the low man on the totem pole, there is no way I would want any of that content touching my home network without an iron-clad assurance from every level of law enforcement that I would not be prosecuted. An assurance from your local prosecutor probably means nothing to the guys at the US Attorney's office. (And sometimes even vice-versa.) Accessing those materials in a secure environment that is audited and recorded, in direct partnership with every level of law enforcement, avoids issues of that content touching your router altogether.

I can't imagine that any person who understands criminal liability would actually want to do this kind of work from their own home networks.
Here is an example off the top of my head, while on iphone:

.card {
@apply flex flex-row shadow rounded-md p-4;
@screen md {
@apply flex-col p-6;
}
yada... yada...
}

then in tailwind config, point the purge path to your html file(s) to purge.

End result is css file with no more and no less than what you need, and in the web inspector you see clean HTML markup and clean CSS declarations.

edit: typo