skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Hmmm,

Ryzen 7 4800U has eight large cores vs 4 large plus 4 small in the M1 and even with your (hypothetical) 20% uplift multicore is just about matching M1. Single core is nowhere near as good.

'Architecture is basically irrelevant' not the biggest factor but not irrelevant - x64 still has to support all those legacy modes and has more complex front end.

You're working very hard to try to deny that Apple has passed AMD and Intel in this bit of the market. We'll have to see what happens at higher TDPs but they clearly have the architecture and process access to do very well.

No idea what Qualcomm has to do with this.
Pretty well given how it is now part of GDPR.
Is this speculation, or the comprehensive, objective explanation?
Well, they did speed it up, or so they claim. OTOH, the Finder windows look tidier, at least in the article's screen shots.
Wow, that would increase my monthly bill for a phone 5x if I was still not using a dumb phone.
>'genius beyond your comprehension' is still a human

For now. Aliens and AGI might complicate that.
> But you do own the domain.

Be careful not to overstate here -- this is only true for restricted definitions of "own".

However, your point remains valid. Control of a domain name is much more predictable and defensible than control of a Google/etc account.

Choose the TLD and the registrar carefully, and do not fail to pay registration fees.
Maps with live traffic is going to be the tough one; at least it is for me.
Humans are pretty good at taking our own perspectives. If everyone did that instead of empathizing with others, our conversations would all run in circles and we would be an even more polarized society.
I don't enjoy the superficiality of a sleezeball who took courses in 'pretending to care.' But for each their own I suppose.
Send in the Senolytics – Nature Biotechnology
If you want to delve into that particular rathole, I recommend Carroll Smith's Nuts, Bolts, Fasteners and Plumbing Handbook. More than you ever need to know about the subject.

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/710357.Carroll_Smith_s_N...
Company selling phone should by law be required to hand over any keys to the user. User should be able to change any aspect of the os or even delete it if they wish. We need to end the abuse of Google and Apple.
Obfuscating Complexity Considered Harmful
Ketamine is only used to prevent the use of more force or injury in scenarios where there is potential for higher levels of force or injury to be occur. It is a mitigating agent for higher levels of force.
FWIW, both Vodafone and EE offer good deals for Canada roaming. EE includes Canada roaming in many of their plans (or its £10/month extra to add it). Vodafone also includes it in some of their plans or it's £6/day if not.
I'm not convinced that empathy is developed in adulthood.
I had to goto the second page to find someone asking this same question I had, and now when I come back to reply to it I find it's been downvoted even further into grey.

What is actually going on @dang ? He asked a legit question and even the OP isn't sure what's up.
But thats like saying legs aren't related to human behaviour patterns. Without the DNA for legs, I proposition, humans would act very differently.
3 doesn't have free roaming in Canada. They do in US but not Canada.
Logseq is impossible without isomorphic-git, such a great project!
No thanks, I prefer convenience over paranoia.
Well, apart from in the Elijah McCain case; or do you mean that ketamine mitigates the willingness of the responders to use lethal force?
Are you thinking of Émilie du Châtelet? (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%89milie_du_Ch%C3%A2telet) I don’t think she counts as a “trendy” student of the Principia. She translated the whole thing into French and wrote her own commentary on it. Certainly understood it at a much deeper mathematical level than Voltaire himself did!

That said, it was certainly a trendy topic of conversation in Enlightenment salons, even if few people actually read it for themselves.
The first part of this is kinda funny. The problem is that you’re squinting too hard to try to make out the problem and now everything is fuzzy. The real value of empathy — why we’ve been using this social tool for thousands of years — is that you don’t have to become the actor to gain understanding. This tool also has a learning aspect, usually you try to empathize with people who you’re gonna be around a bit, so while you may not be able to check an empathy box right away, you could use empathy to further understand genius than you could without it.
Same with the Empress Tree.
Obsession with content stats is killing your productivity
Haskell has fully-featured generics and Go does not. In this sense Haskell is more powerful than Go. However, Go has mutability and (mostly) Haskell does not. In this other sense, Go is more powerful than Haskell.
As the saying goes, a thief thinks every man steals. I am very wary of people who are deeply pessimistic in the what they believe about everybody else.
CoviDesign: The Covid-19 R number
Lets not play semantics, shall we?

And "car culture" is a misnomer. There's no movement or force that enforces cars on everyone to call it culture. Cars are exceptionally convenient things that arose from the need to have them and the only way to abandon them is to come up with star trek teleportation. Good luck with that.
You can call the relevant agency directly. Similar to calling the police station for non-emergency calls instead of 911. Of course it depends on the specifics of any given scenario.
> given how it is now part of GDPR

Does GDPR try to assert extraterritoriality?

Austria requiring information be scrubbed from the Austrian Google is one thing. Austria censoring America’s search results is another.
Seeems like the problem is when it's misapplied - I don't doubt what you're saying, but it has seemed like *nix got pretty far with the 'everything is a file' paradigm.
Is math the result of a process or is it the framework of the processes themselves.
Prevent span on who, though? Generally (~99.99% of the time), providing an e-mail address is an invitation to getting spam.
I think this "highly polished" visual first - usability second approach has cognitive overload for the user. In my view desktop interface must be designed around mouse pointer interaction which is precise and demands clear separation of UI. Here we have clear focus on content area which is in harmony with touch based interaction. There are two options in my mind: 1. Design team follows marketing brief - do it like iDevices ASAP. 2. Apple will introduce touch as a part of desktop experience in near future. Personally I don't find this design appealing or easy on the eyes, but I am interface designer and obviously I have personal bias.
Cap Twelve Years Later: How the “Rules” Have Changed (2012)
These things could easily end up in ECHR, because a "fascist", just like an "idiot", could be considered an opinion, judgement, not a fact and so it cannot be false, unless it means something very specific in Austria.
We can cross that road when we come to it.
Since ddg uses bing's api, I wonder if the disappearance on ddg is due to bing censoring.
Regarding point 3, the trend is in the direction of making your devices a lot less "yours", and a lot more hooked into 3rd (4th, etc) party services.
As an org-mode user, I was searching for a way to access my notes outside emacs, in browser and phone. There are a few solutions that can manage org files outside emacs, but none of them goes beyond basic functionalities. I find logseq promising. I think there is already an effort to make it compatible with org-roam. It would be awesome if they support citation packages like org-roam-bibtex and org-ref as well, in future. I would like to hear the author's opinion on this, if they are reading this comment.
So (assuming a similar mechanism in humans) when you are taught, it primes memory formation, but it's only when you are tested that the memory forms.

This is, "tests", far from being merely evaluative or diagnostic, are educative.

This effect is well-known, but I feel it's easier to act on with a physical model.

If you work hard to learn something but don't then test (or use/recall) it, then all that priming was wasted.

The mechanism sounds like it's struggling to form memories, but it may also play a role in only remembering what's needed (not filling your head with useless learning, hence the need for the contrived "use" of tests) It could even be a separately evolved filter.

(pre-emptive qualification: there's some learning before the test else you couldn't recall it.)

PS I've just finished Spivak's Calculus chapter 1 problems (about one a day), and he introduces more new material there than in the body. There is tremendous reuse of previous problems (at times to a ridiculous extent, see 6(d) in the answer book) - I noticed that this consolidated my memory of them, but the physical model additionally tells me I'd best "test" myself on all the problems - especially the later ones which haven't yet been reused.
I don't know much about Greenwald, but Taibbi routinely distorts the truth to fit his narrative. I'm not sure if that makes him a troll, but it definitely means he's not a journalist (or at least a good one).
Read whats inside links without clicking on them
You can always throw more nuclear reactors this problem :) . The only thing that practically stands in the way is the elusive battery that can be charged quickly without becoming a galaxy note 7 grenade.
At the user's preference, if they don't mind the data use, pre-loading content could improve the user experience.

That kinda supposes it's content the user wants. But what if it's data, like ads, that the user doesn't exactly want but they're going to get anyway? I don't know where the lawsuit will end up, but I can see this ending up as a buried, default-on, setting that most users will never change.
(Update: yes, by design, the paragraph I quoted was meant to confirm that, but guess I should’ve been explicit)

From the intro...

> DOS and Windows .exe files both start with a common header (the DOS "MZ" header), which might suggest that you can run programs for one OS on the other one. However, this is complicated by a few facts: DOS support was dropped in Windows a long time ago (DOS binaries don't load on Windows 10, for example), and DOS programs use a completely different execution environment.

> This repo builds a single .exe file with a "polyglot" MZ header which allows it to load one program (the original DOOM) when running inside DOS, and a different program (a custom static build of Chocolate DOOM) when running on Windows.
You wind up with the same thing: Antibodies. And way safer than getting the actual disease. It isn't "unnatural", it just isn't from getting the disease.

I'm gonna trust the health professionals here.
I love hiew as well for Windows. Do you know of a tool that is comparable for *nix?
Ask HN: What is your best native song that is unknown due to language barrier?
Sometimes I wished more people could know some of my amazing childhood songs which are unknown due to the language they are sang at and the country in which they became popular. I wonder are there songs like that in your country. Here are some of my personal favorites:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1mieEeD0Kfk
(Brit Olam/ Matti Caspi)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bE5cHysMf5o
(Hine Hine/Matti Caspi)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VV2rGPHvB8g
(Lakahta et Yadi/ Yehudit Ravitz)
I guess what people want when they say they want a "Linux phone" is a phone that allows them to hack, mix and match their system the way they can on a desktop Linux system.
Let's assume you're right and there isn't a different definition. Still: by focusing on the use of the term, you're driving the conversation away from the substance of what the other person is saying and toward a linguistic discussion.

In other words, if you recognize that someone is using a term incorrectly, first take the time to understand what they're trying to communicate. Maybe start talking about that concept using words you think are a better fit, but stay on the territory. Responding that "powerful" isn't the right word doesn't address their claim that Haskell is more <whatever they mean by powerful>.

This charitable approach shifts the conversation away from scoring points (as would leaving out asides like "(if you reply at all)") and toward collaborating on developing each other's understanding, which is more valuable for everyone involved.
Martin Gardner and Recreational Mathematics
Well for Elijah McClain it was either given after police suffocated him or directly contributed to his cardiac arrest. He apparently was restrained when it was delivered. This does not seem to jive with what you're saying. Were they planning to extra kill him if the Ketamine wasn't there?
> The guards, the cameras,

People who don't know much about suicide prevention think these are important points, but anyone who works in suicide prevention can tell you that observations don't work; staff don't pay attention to the cctv monitors; staff lie about what they've done; people attach ligatures in ligature-point free rooms etc etc.

People kill themselves all the time, even when supposedly on 1:1 obs and in special wards.
If someone doesn't get ketamine, the alternatives are:

- they get tased, pepper sprayed, and thrown around by law enforcement officers

- they get a less safe drug like midazolam, lorazepam, or haloperidol

- they get restrained and fight against the restraints which puts them at risk of sudden death and rhabdomyolysis
To be charitable to the article: people who are not security-minded often make password decisions that "don't matter". You advise your grandpa to do better than "password" and he might move to "Password1!". You advise him to not reuse passwords...and that's really hard without a password manager, so he reuses passwords.

But yeah, your password choices very much matter and those choices can foil {credential stuffing, password spray, brute force}, which is admitted but downplayed in the article.

Considering that most people reading the article will be security-minded, a far better title would have been "Your Users' Password Choices Often Don't Matter".
Off-topic, but legitimately purchased Kindle ebooks can still be quickly and easily liberated for the purposes of DRM-free personal backups of owned content. I won't comment on whether Amazon find this acceptable, or if it is legal in any given jurisdiction, but it is definitely possible.
There is some ongoing work on threading https://github.com/vector-im/element-web/issues/2349

Apparently it's already in the protocol, just needs UI support from the clients. Not sure if they use Slack model though
I've had a recruitment consultant suggest I use a gmail e-mail address on my CV, because it looks weird to have an address at a domain (my own, and not anything strange btw) that people haven't heard of. Sounds crazy. But try dictating an e-mail address over the phone to a hotel or whatever and see that if you say 'Fred Bloggs seventy six at gmail dot com' or whatever, you never have to repeat yourself, whereas anything less usual you'll be spelling it out all day.

On the technical side, one hears about individuals' domains being marked (blamelessly) as possible-spammers by the big e-mail services, and finding it hard to get messages through. There is effectively some scarcity in legible, desirable gmail addresses.
I'm mixed here --

- Historically, OSS seems to be free product dev for big cloud (... cue AWS's paid PR people to say otherwise ... ). Their integration, advertising, and procurement advantages makes it MUCH easier to win contracts before the OSS devs may even know it is being used and without
a bid process. For a fraction of the effort and contribution, they are switching it to a model of monopoly channel owners vs content producers and and driving the sw margins to 0 on the content side. That's why anti-big-cloud LGPL-when-SaaS style licenses are emerging. There are always exceptions, but it's not the axis to compete on unless you do such a license..

- I agree about the community aspect, indirectly. If the software, in addition to being OSS, relies somehow on community and its steward -- not just source code -- and participation in it is somehow what's paying for the OSS dev, yes. For example, maybe the community is also a social network (Slack/Teams across orgs), or generating threat intel -- the software (post-scale) matters less post-scale, so forking is ok.
I guess people that each Chili pepper are also more careful when crossing the street
Good luck getting a software patent.
Do some more research on the topic. From the legal system to land use, transportation funding, and corporate handouts the United States undeniably has an active car culture.

Receipts? Here's one after a second of Google searching: https://usa.streetsblog.org/2019/03/06/heres-how-driving-is-...
Usually I'm a sceptic about Linux taking over the world, but this is actually the one situation where I could believe substantial progress might be made. If someone developed a slick UI for the basic phone functionality and a genuinely open Linux-based platform, provided compatibility with the major APIs needed to write Android apps so portability was easy, and maybe even funded the whole thing using an app store that took a fraction of the cut that Google and Apple demand, I could see that sort of model gaining enough traction to be viable.

Unlike on the desktop, most important phone apps aren't so large and complicated that they couldn't be ported to or reimplemented on a new platform with a realistic amount of effort. You could offer a significantly better developer experience than either of the dominant platforms today, which would be essential to supporting the apps users expect to find available on any mobile platform today but also potentially attracting some unique and better apps over the longer term.

From the user's side, they'd be genuinely in control of their own device. There could be real security, stability and privacy benefits as a result, and you could do away with a lot of the things that annoy users of current mobile platforms.

As ever, the problem is how to bootstrap a two-sided market. It would probably have to be extremely easy for developers to port their existing Android apps. You might also have to convince one of the major phone manufacturers who can make good hardware at competitive prices to support your platform as an option, or possibly make it easy to install it as a replacement on existing phones. But with the right promotional strategy even these things don't seem totally out of the question. It's a huge potential market, on a scale where one or more well-capitalised big players in the industry could potentially take an interest.
Yes, it also loads forever, hides half the comments, constant pop-ups telling you to use the app instead, cannot read some (non-quarantined) subs without logging in, no NSFW without logging in, back button is broken, frequent error in loading pages...

On the desktop it still usable with old.reddit.com.

But honestly it's probably for the best, less time wasted.
My personal (unsubstantiated) theory is that people don't vote with their economic interests. They vote with their social interests (is the narrative that this candidate selling cause my relative social position to rise or decline?)

This can explain why affluent urban professionals, whose economic and social position is relatively secure might vote for liberal economic and social policies. They live in a world where their marriage is more likely to be stable, their opinion is more likely to be taken seriously, and their values are more likely to be validated by movies/TV/media. More immigration is not going to diminish his/her relative position in society. It might even make it higher as a lot of these immigrants aspire to be in that professionals' position.

On the other hand, it can also explain why some working class white and Hispanic voters might vote for candidates/policies that sell a narrative of traditional values (anti abortion, church + family in place of a gov't social safety net, etc). They live in a world where their families are less likely to be stable, and where their values are increasingly looked down upon in movies/tv/media. Greater immigration might diminish their relative position in society (even if it makes them slightly richer .... ). There might even be greater competition for admission for their children into T25 schools (which are lately seen as gatekeepers into the "affluent urban professional" class).
The Tactical Edge p.349
This reminded me that I learned DuckDNS[1] recently removed the option for local auth through their site.
It’s only 3rd party auth now. I was mildly triggered.
[1] www.duckdns.org
> For example it is nearly impossible to say, put a box 2/3 of the width of a container of unknown width. Just the simple task of centering an element has pages dedicated to it and to my knowledge, only CSS3 has a reasonably workable solution.

It's been a few years since you used CSS :) Both of these things are trivial to do now

But to be clear: while I think my CSS experience would give me a grasp of what needs to be expressed and some ideas for how to express it, there is a whole other layer of actually applying that, and reconciling it with the content, which would be a challenge (and is done for you by the browser in CSS' case)

> As far as LaTeX's abilities as a programming language go, I have an interpreter for a reasonable subset of C written in TeX (it was an academic exercise but this is just to show what is possible). So it is much more than a mere markup language.

I believe you, but I also question whether that level of power is actually being used by people making documents with it, or whether it just adds complexity. I genuinely don't know. But those are the kinds of places one might find improvements to be made.
Correct! Likewise, without the DNA for a brain, humans would act very differently.

Please give an example of a human without the DNA for a brain.
> Arkani-Hamed, a leader of the effort, called quantum fields “a convenient fiction.” “In physics very often we slip into a mistake of reifying a formalism,” he said. “We start slipping into the language of saying that it’s the quantum fields that are real, and particles are excitations. We talk about virtual particles, all this stuff — but it doesn’t go click, click, click in anyone’s detector.”

There you go. Anytime someone insists on HN that virtual particles are real, you can just tell them that Arkani-Hamed disagrees with you and that he is also smarter than you.
A thing which I try to practice since I switched to DDG a year ago is to not say “google” but instead “search”. They don’t deserve their own verb, let’s take it back!
> Democrats have an ascendant progressive wing that rejects corporate influence wholesale

Who mostly organise and communicate on giant social media platforms, who they campaign to fact-check things. Not exactly wholesale rejection.
The buttons do highlight when you move over them, so it's entirely clear if you hit them if you would click. Or is that not what you mean by the 'affordances' of these buttons?
Kind of weird they decided to test with a 4 year old Samsung phone but I guess its popular.

I'm curious about the exact breakdown of data. How much of this is because it was a brand new phone?
Trading is hazardous to your wealth (2000) [pdf]
It’s not black or white. How we behave is obviously heavily influenced by our initial DNA but there’s clearly a heavy influence on “mind” from external factors. It has been shown (proven?) that we can grow beyond things like “identity politics.”