skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It would never achieve its performance if it would wrap something. .NET on Linux is as native on Linux as is Java, Python or Go. Also priority in Microsoft has completely changed. Most .NET runs on Linux nowadays (dockerized or not).

It actually does the opposite: it is able to expose memory-alike resources (from e.g. the network interfaces) deep into its consuming programs by using abstractions like Span<T>. And while that sounds like a wrapper, it is actually (depending on the "alike") just a typed and safe pointer.
How Academia Resembles a Drug Gang (2013)
> What bothers me is rather Tim Cook and his super coordinated and carefully planned movements

I'd also prefer a more casual approach.

> He seems extremely tense and probably would freak out at someone having a bad day or even making a bad joke in the same room

This statement seems unfair to me. Not everyone who looks tense would lash out at innocent people.
Thank you for asking. There is an Opensource version and Enterprise version available. Please visit our features page : https://kafkawize.com/features
A glitch in the Matrix?
DV is generally a pattern of varied abusive behaviour ranging from physical, physiological, controlling, coercion etc.. not a one off bar fight.
Filters and ozone generators are not necesarily a same thing.

Ozone, in relatively low concentrations, is an irritant, and in higher concentration is actually toxic, some related notes are on a recent thread here:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25026567

I would say that it all depends on the amount/concentration of ozone, i.e. it is dependant on the generator and size of rooms/flow of air treated, etc..
Absolutely no problem, you just need a serial cable.
I was thinking about this last night, that's actually not at all true.

A 'new' C# programmer doesn't. You have to be advanced enough at C# to know you can do that (i.e. not a junior or outsider)

It's also not clear how the config works at first glance or the implications of using a POCO on the app lifecycle.

An experienced coder will have to ask themselves questions like, if I store the IOptions object, will it automatically update? If I assign the POCO in startup, will it be a single object, or does startup get called for every new request? Or maybe it will get called for every thread? Or maybe if there are no requests for 10 minutes it automatically shuts down?
How do other hackers survive WiFi client isolation?
Google just replaced my Fiber Router with Google Wifi (I moved residences) and the new gear will not allow regular connections between peers. Google will not support regular LAN operation on the private side of the NAT. This also happened to my parents when their neighborhood upgraded to fiber and new routers were deployed. I ended helping them talk to AT&T support for AN HOUR before they admitted to client isolation and offered to remove it.

This frustrates regular servers (starting with the Home Assistant instance I used to use) and requires I build a second network or buy different gear. Google's response was something vague about "cloud enabled." Thanks, I can reach the cloud hundreds of miles away but I'm isolated from devices across the room.

I'm writing to HN in case anyone has a verified solution (e.g. will double-NAT work or do I have to masquerade a public IP to it?) and other useful discussion. I've already started shopping Ubiquiti but would probably just as happy or happier going back to an iptables based router on my own hardware.
There's a difference between the appearance of randomness across multiple companies from employers and employees having different priorities (and levels of need, and mistakes, and luck) and actual randomness as a selection heuristic.
Actual randomness as a policy gives the company the worst of both worlds: the roll of the dice is likely to often give a good recruit an offer they won't possibly accept but also ensures they can follow it up with a significantly higher offer to a worse employee.
Lots of companies sacrifice more productive employees to keep salaries to a budget or consciously pay above market to improve their staff pool, but not many firms aim to both keep many promising recruits' salaries below an arbitrary figure and are willing to offer well above that figure to some obviously weaker candidates within the same time frame.
This is what happens in my country, public notices from the county get 2-4 pages in the free door-to-door newspaper.

I don't like it myself, I'd rather they send me a letter instead, or use the fancy new digital messaging system. But that system is dead in the water I think, because the company that was set up to build it gets to charge for every single message they process; I just looked it up [0], they charge 40 cents per message, about half the cost of a postage stamp. But it means that if the county wants to send a message to all inhabitants of my city, they have to pay €60.000.

No wonder it only seems to be used to send me annual bills.

https://www.logius.nl/onze-organisatie/zakendoen-met-logius/...
Behind the monitor just above eye level.
Both you two and the article itself have broken the Prime Directive.
Uhm. Adding 16GB RAM instead of 8GB costs almost nothing and which by far and large, is useful to all users. The only reason why they ship 8 GBs is because they want to sell you upgrades, similar to why Apple products come with miniscule SSD hard drives. Certainly, only professionals would need something like 512GBs right?
It is part of the CEO's job to put positive spins on things and to boost the stock price.

All CEOs are given stock-based compensation and incentives, and virtually all of them setup these sale plans in order to be able to sell legally and above board.

So again this is a non story.
More like 3-4 months salary. He made $18M last year.

https://www.fiercepharma.com/pharma/pfizer-new-boss-bourla-n...
I think that’s the point? They want to show that M1 decimates comparable Intel chips even at lower price points.

This release is entirely within Apples control, why would they risk damaging their brand releasing a chip with lower performance than the current Intel chips they are shipping. They would only do this at a time when they would completely dominate the competition.
My sister and I grew up without separate kid rooms, and the whole apartment size was 650 sqm. Tell your wife that size doesn't matter!

On a serious note, did you day to day work changed in the last couple of years?

If not, you could be stuck, and you should talk to manager about getting a different set of responsibilities. Part of what's fun in IT jobs is learning new stuff.
Arch's policy is to minimize patches. I think the linux kernel runs on about 2-3 patches on average per release, most other packages aren't much more either. The policy "minimal patches & close-to-default" is in my experience usually a great one to avoid package maintainer issues.
> Apple has always been an outlier: they never had a Developer Relations team at all.

Not sure if that is accurate, I just did a quick search for “Apple Developer Relations” on LinkedIn and found a bunch of people who’ve been in Developer Relations or Worldwide Developer Relations at Apple for 5 or 10 years or even longer.
I wish it were built in too but at the moment I'm using a program called Camo. https://reincubate.com/camo/
I'd wait for actual benchmarks just judging by the amount of parachute clauses in the disclosures. Power consumption numbers should be great but I'm guessing it falls flat on some compute tasks that can't leverage custom instructions.
I think it's the same with us developers and app stores, or with indie games in general.

You always hear about the top performers, and you always hear the average (skewed by high-earning outliers). But you never hear the median, because that's what would honestly tell you how much revenue you could expect.
This interim analysis was made in agreement with the FDA. Interim analyses are released all the time.
"hero point" :-)
True, I should've said the Province of Liège. We usually biked to Visé or took the old train to Liège city. It depended a bit on where police would have checks. They were always on the lookout for kids crossing the border by them selves in November/December.

As children no one listened to the rules about when fireworks were allowed, but I don't remember it being as bad as today.

I, too, think it's the most normal thing ever to be concerned for your children. And the fact that you worry about this stuff already makes you a good parent. :)
A distribution is by definition distributing something that already exists, so I think distributions that stick close to upstream are more in the spirit of the concept. I also think Debian's approach has shown itself to produce something less reliable on the whole. Of course if you prefer the Debian approach, knock yourself out.
All "lived experience" means is "anecdotal evidence, but I'll call you a racist if you disagree."
Charles Darwin’s hunch about early life was probably right
Not op, but my main laptop is a 2013 MacBook Air with 8GB of RAM. It’s old enough to have developed dead pixels, the backlight is now noticeably uneven, the USB ports have become loose, several keys now only work unreliability, and it now does an emergency low power shutdown when the battery reports 55%.

(Naturally this means it is now permanently plugged into mains power and an external monitor, keyboard, and mouse).

Yet the RAM is still sufficient for my use of macOS, dozens of Chrome and Safari tabs, Xcode, TextWrangler, iTunes, etc.
Fully agree. Also, quite a lot of those streamers that later become successful are starting out with expensive specialized equipment and/or a house that looks like a movie set.

I'd say by now, Instagram and YouTube are more like hobbies for bored kids of rich parents.
CTOR hierarchy in this case refers to a rigid structure in which you are not allowed to have any circular dependencies. E.g.: If UserService and AccountService eventually evolve into needing to talk to each other, you can wind up in this situation. Most would argue you should refactor both services, create a 3rd service or slam the 2 together into 1. I argue that both have independent persistence layers and it makes a lot of sense from a business perspective to have these modeled separately.

So, the implication is that IServiceProvider is a way to "cheat" the system by not requiring you perform an impossible circular CTOR setup where UserService requires AccountService and vice versa. DI cannot resolve dependencies which require each other. In terms of actual harms, I do not really think there are any substantial ones to note. This is technically reflection but only slightly and I haven't been able to notice any performance impact, but we don't do IServiceProvider lookups in tight loops either.
Truckloads of Hard Disks (2009)
It is the first time I hear about "Michaelmas" and "Lent" terms [1]. Why not using simple ordinal names?

1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Academic_term#United_Kingdom
It would take the first two year term to learn how the system works.
I'd be more interesting in alternate histories where, for example, western Europe never rose to power (it was pretty much a backwater during the Roman age and only crept forward slowly during the Middle Ages; it was colonialism that made it insanely rich and influential).
side topic:
could you elaborate how FIDO1 (not FIDO2) yubikeys do 'ykman fido reset' ?

my question is (in domain of U2F/FIDO1 and non resident keys), what exactly is resetted, and if RP (websites) will provide the same initial data on enrollment, will the second enrollment end in the same keys EVEN after reset? If not, what exactly is storred and resetted on yubikey (again, OLD ones with only U2F)
Option Hacking the Tektronix TDS 420A
> If people had been saying it was definitely real then a skeptical warning that there wasn't any evidence to prove that might not have been a bad idea.

You're completely wrong on this one. Not only did physicists believe in the existence of Higgs boson, they built upon the premise that it existed for all those years.

Sometimes evidence is not always possible to present or just not practical. Also, there are various degrees of what kind of evidence is acceptable. The evidence required to publish a paper in a scientific journal is different from what is required to make a legal case or report in a magazine. So, with a premise of "requiring evidence", you can be very flexible in terms of what you allow and don't... which is what Twitter seems to be doing.
>This is a related, but separate problem.

I think they're both side effects of how sexual injustice and rape is managed and treated by the justice system, and they concern violations of the same laws. However, the fact that to my knowledge false accusations are dealt with under other laws (relating to perjury, lying to law enforcement, fabrication of evidence), it's a lot easier to see why falsa accusations are prosecuted as they are, and why the law in this area focuses more on the justice system more than it does the effects on the accused. Compare to libel and slander cases which occupy the other end of the spectrum.

>specifically referring to false accusations against men which, granted, are asymmetrically punished

The person who has been accused has no choice but to go through the legal system to fight it. I'm not sure how we can compare the pre-judicial offences when, for example, an instance of rape may never reach the courts at all. And this is all on the assumption that rape laws both fulfill and properly execute their intenitions, with an appropriate meaning of consent, which I no longer believe to be true.

In terms of frequency of the acts themselves, rape may be equally or less frequently punished (speaking proportionally) than false accusations are. This is because many rapes (rape defined according to how the law defines it) never reach the justice system. Almost all false accusations must go through the justice system, because the accusations are almost always reported to through the legal system (this is how they have their social effect). The accuser will be prompted to go through the justice system at every turn to prove their case.

>vs. the punishment a woman receives when she is discovered to have falsely accused someone (again, both societally and legally).

Firstly I want to question if this is empirically true or only folk observation/intuition. Are people judged to have falsely accused in a court of law treated so much better? How do we know how people respond to it?

Generally, we all lie, and sometimes to get our own way. I'm not justifying egregious and life-ruining lies at all, and they should be punished - but lying is seen as a whole lot less serious, or at least sufficiently qualitatively different, for people to react in different ways to the matter. A rape may be seen as pathological, while a lie may only be seen as extreme.

There are quite a few injustices (including ones I think are not dealt with correctly, or there shouldn't be a law at all), but some are greater than others (or perceived to be), as a matter of quality or scale. Rape is both more frequent, even though there is some disagreement if it is more serious (at least in all cases). Generally, we protect more against higher probability lower penalty events than we do against much lower probability debatably higher penalty events - and the legal system reflects that.
Could you explain why you find it so funny? Are you proposing their flag should be spherical instead of a flat sheet?
The sources and advice linked below are helpful. Given that we have no idea what level "from scratch" means, or your preferred learning style, I'm upvoting Khan academy on the basis of their map/pathway/dependency graph. Shows how topics build on each other and gives you a framework.

The other piece of general advice is to define what it means to learn math. You only learn math by solving problems with it. Do the exercises. The theory is only there to enable you to do the exercises/problem sets.

preferably on paper and pencil (yes even for sets of differential equations where you have to track 14 complex variables over multiple steps and you fuck up your answer because you mis-copied an exponent on line 12 of 35 lines. It is slow and difficult on paper, and that is an advantage when you are learning).
We need fewer lawyers in politics in my opinion
Almost nothing if you buy a PC. Look at the markups for a RAM upgrade in Macs, it’s gut wrenchingly greedy.
Yep, had a bug very recently caused by splitting libllvm-dev and libclang-dev... guess what, libllvm-dev's CMake files depend on clang libs as they are all built together so if you only install libllvm-dev, find_package(clang) in CMake will error without any way to fix it from your code.
Maybe he's just tense on camera. Lots of people lock up when reading from a script, for a video that's going to be seen by millions of people.
Ahhh interesting - so the designer was just having a bit of fun with the name I think :-)
Lmao wow. Yeah I heard some of this earlier. Didn’t know it was THAT egregious though.

I wonder if anyone will even notice though as it would require putting energy into criticizing anything other than the election
In this case, it was the FDA, who delayed the announcement (and the study itself) until well after it had met the data thresholds it was preregistered to use.

https://www.statnews.com/2020/11/09/covid-19-vaccine-from-pf...
I don't know. It would be news if they found out he had actually BOUGHT stocks or stock options just before the announcements, because that would be a clear case of insider trading.

But selling AFTER an announcement when the stocks are up is... what any shareholder would do and would be allowed to do.
What specifically do you like about the USMCA vs NAFTA? Do you feel it was worth the alienation of Canada as an ally? What advantages do you feel have been gained in trade with China? Wouldn't it have been more productive to work with allies on that front, rather than launching a unilateral trade war? Are these really the reasons you like him, or are they justifications?

I agree that not starting wars is good (except potentially when it's the only way to stop a terrible human rights abuse, like a genocide), and Trump certainly has a better record than Bush there. He does also seem to have made progress with middle east treaties. So I am with you there.

What on earth do you like about his style though? His style is to lie about everything, making up whatever supposed fact suits him at the moment, launch ridiculous ad hominem attacks at anyone he views as an enemy, and just basically stir up anger and discord. The way he "pushes back" is that of a childhood bully. He has ramped up partisan division and anger to an unprecedented level in modern history, and is in the process of undermining confidence in the democratic process itself. He's also alienated the rest of the world with his narcissism, incivility and pettiness. These do not seem like good qualities in a person, and especially not in a president.

I can understand people who vote for him because they're staunchly pro life. I'm not, but I can understand their ethical position. And I can understand those who have fallen for conspiracy theories. But if you're existing in the same reality I am, reading the things the man writes, and listening to the things he says, I honestly can't imagine how you can support him. I'm not one of these that thinks all Trump supporters are racists, or conspiracy theorists, or Russian bots, but I do find that any I've met who seem reasonable, once I dig deeper, believe things about the world that I don't just disagree with but know to be factually untrue. I've also met some who see the world the way I do, but aren't reasonable - basically those who just enjoy the fact that he makes the other side angry. I would truly like to understand what, besides a genuine belief that abortion is murder, could bring a reasonable, knowledgeable person to vote for Trump.
> What is a distribution if not a collection of software that obey the same standard?

why would that definition make any sense ?
When your code depend on stuff not migrated yet, it will no longer happen. From a .NET Framework position, .NET 5 is a huge breaking change by loosing capabilities and using different base libraries (which will not be recovered later). From a .NET Core 3.1 perspective, it is a minor update.

.NET 5 reality is: They ported 90% of their app models (e.g. wpf, winforms, ...) and dropped some other (e.g. WCF, WWF, AppDomains, ...). That is not going to change.

.NET ecoysystem reality is: What is not ported until now, will not be ported. .NET Core is now 6 years old (2014?) and everything new is currently .NET Core. Someone who wants to stay in business, has ported already 2-3 years ago.
The program only temporarily drops privileges while reading the user-supplied file. The rest of the time, it would have all uids as 0 and full capabilities.
Try convincing the RIAA of your (perfectly valid IMO) argument...
I had my provider create a DMZ on there router as they would not give me access(!) the I use Ubiquiti for everything.
Because it shouldn't be legal?
>I don't want to bother with making sure all the unix user ids

A Directory Server + Kerberos + NFSv4 is maybe what you want?

Something like https://www.freeipa.org
Free Technical Interview Practice
Apple engineers don’t have specific mandate to make devices harder to repair, the are tasked to make devices cheaper to produce. It so happens that it also affects ease of repair.

For extreme example of this look at the Kindle - obviously it’s glued so it’s cheaper to make, but it makes it completely unrepairable.
> The sortition mechanism is a robust anti-gerrymandering, anti-corruption, anti-just-about-everything-we-don't-like-in-government mechanism.

I'd argue that the worst aspect of the US political system is the fine margins between two fiercely partisan factions which random members of the public tend to strongly identify with. Making which faction with ~45% hardcore supporters [in swing states] has control a matter of dumb luck as opposed to whether their conduct impresses or appals the few people able to see merit in both political philosophies doesn't sound like an improvement.

Also, the incentive to be corrupt certainly isn't weakened by removing any incentive to present oneself as clean for future re-election from the equation.
Running Fedora since I-don't-even-remember-when (around 2008?) and I was never annoyed (unless I try to run CUDA and the like, because they rely on e.g. an ancient GCC etc.).

In particularly it was a significant improvement over the annoyances of Ubuntu, and I am still angry when thinking about the brief period I was maintaining a bunch of servers running Debian. Really unnecessarily difficult - particularly updating/upgrading and trying to clear the mess their systemd approach caused, in particular missing unit files for popular services (I think it was the isc-dhcp-server).
I think this will be a patch release soonish. ARM is well supported already and the toolchain on macOS is also present already.

And they need it to support the development of .NET 6.
I tend to agree. In Norway the paid subscription model is proving to be more sustainable than the advertisement model. This seems to be the case in other niche markets as well. The subscription model doesn't require many subscribers to outweight the advertisment model. I wrote a linkedin article on the subject a year ago https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/thousandth-subscribers-outwei...
We don't have any policy. Sticking with upstream is a shared value between the packagers but it's important to note that we generally don't enforce any policy. Most packages has no patches. Usually it's regressions or security patches if there is anything.

Current linux release has one patch changing one default:
https://github.com/archlinux/linux/commits/v5.9.8-arch1
It's just as likely that we're in a simulation. Or that God is a potato.

Without evidence, it's just not worth the time.

We have evidence of evolution. Every observation fits the model. If you can refute it, you'll win a Nobel prize.