skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
All three of Nuvia's founders were ex-Apple silicon designers in some way or other (though not all immediately before founding Nuvia).
Thanks - I forgot to specify that I'm looking for a standalone unit. The equivalent top-of-the-line standalone Siemens microwave requires one extra button press. And it doesn't have the inverter tech. (I think Bosch/Siemens merged their business units in this area.)
Yes. I’ve never thought of that! Feels like it might be a lot of work compared to just “letting my brain keep a map”, though.
The author himself said his book was panned on Reddit:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11631424

The larger point is that the audience he chose to market to, rejected his ideas. Whether or not his audience was acting in "good faith" is irrelevant to his failure to communicate.
Making $8K/Mo by Solving the Information Problem in Politics
Heart comes from the same place, but a separate effort :) We're focusing on writing technical resumes for free, which is a different business than TLC.
The curta is really a crazy device. You should visit some museum which holds one and get in your hand. It is about the weight of a few iPhones (at maximum) and probably similarly revolutionary at its time.
You can think of it as an API. If your API is called, should it work differently depending on whether the request came from a browser or from a terminal curl? Probably not.

Similarly, if you have a message that, calls for your model to be changed (for instance, adding a product to the cart). That message describes cart logic. The product could be added directly from the product page, or the frontpage, or from a suggestion in another product page. It is probably not relevant to the cart how exactly the product came to be added.

Not all the model is like that. There is a subset of the model which exists only to describe the state of the view. But, usually, a significant part of the model is dedicated to page-independent data.

> I want to be able to look at a small part of the app

In my app, the small part of the app I'm going to look at is a single feature which may be used in multiple pages. It is easier for me to keep a consistent behaviour if that feature is independent from the view.
Maybe, new technology makes things much cheaper, but competitors are locked into some older tech can can't follow fast enough.

It's always worth a try.
Whether something is or isn't acceptable is completely separate from whether it is done well.

Guns can be well engineered, but that does in no way answer whether it is or isn't acceptable to own one.
Types in Haskell are not just restriction, they're also used to generate code automatically for you using typeclasses. Something like [traversable](https://wiki.haskell.org/Foldable_and_Traversable) provides behavior just based on types, and is far too powerful to be expressible in Go (or in most typed languages anyway).
That's really cool, and yes, Windows' BC is really something. The engineering effort to keep everything working so well across versions must be staggering.
The biggest grab for Discord is anonymous accounts. You can put in a username (even a conflicting one due to their #number system) and get going straight away.

Sign-up is a metric that your marketing team loves to track, but is a crazy user bottleneck.

Even if you only do it for, e.g. 6 months-1 year (spam concerns), let people chat with no account/sign-up. Let me give people a link that will let them chat with me, with no sign-up.
Do they not sell LG where you are?
OP here. If you're in the 1% of developers than can consistently produce quality content in blogs, videos, and other formats, this can absolutely be a superior way to demonstrate your command of your field and the subject matter.

To state the obvious, the time, care, attention and effort involved in producing superior content such as yours Umar, is a lot more than getting a free technical resume rewrite from MeetLeet :)
I kinda had that problem with my former KitchenAide. You need tools to disassemble my VitaMix's pitcher, so i've never done so.
Agreed, the ESP32 ecosystem is a stellar example of what MCU vendors could offer.
There is certainly less war now than before, but from the standpoint of "should a society be prepared for thinking about use of force", the reduction is basically immaterial, ESPECIALLY for America. America weighs the question of "what force should be used, where, when and for what purpose" constantly.

America also has a "warrior class" in a few different ways of looking at it.

A) If you look at how America is, rather than America's goal, there is a warrior class of sorts (https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/10/us/military-enlistment.ht...). 30% of recruits have parents who served, 70% have a relative who served.

B) While the body of America military is nominally grafted from the same stock of the rest of the populace (see above for distortion), a significant portion the leadership of the military is absolutely a distinct beast. While yes, they are nominally just another citizen, they have part of a distinct culture (how could you not if you spent 10+ years in service of an institution) with a distinct way of seeing the world.

In both senses, it is worthwhile to consider that something "like a warrior class" exists, and that we should take its presence, its way of thinking and acting, and its implications seriously.
Many of us considered this to be a forgone conclusion. But it's nice to have a proof in hand to convince the overly credulous.
IME, flatulence is 90% attributable to eating more than the digestive system can comfortably handle at a time, also some questionable food combos and gut flora may be involved, but mostly the former. Glossing over specifics, a conservative well digestible meal size would be up to 300g or 1/3 l, no less than 3h apart, no fruit, sugary drinks or milk. Gradually relax constraints and monitor side effects.

Of course, YMMV.
Most "alarmist" articles have two points you cannot really ignore, not if you don't want to end up living in interesting times one day.

1) Even plain access logs — basically what a HTTP request, or a TCP connection can tell you — is a lot. Gather those for a couple of days, and you have a good map of the user. More so if you have an ID of machine and the actual executable hash.

2) "But we are the good guys" is a non-defense. Good guys can turn bad, they can be coerced by the bad guys, and

3) since the requests fly out in plain text, there is an unknown number of questionably-aligned guys in between capable of sniff your data. You only need one bad enough guy to get into serious trouble if that's what they want.

This is not alarmist. It's just common sense. The same common sense that you use to avoid certain neighborhoods at certain times of night.
But ... that 200 years of data has nothing to do with what is going to happen in the future...
I keep my toolchains for embedded development on Linux VMs. Basically: one project === one VM. I know I cane bring it up after couple of years and be able to fix a bug or add a feature.
if you have have 100% margin and the market falls 50%, the broker will close out all your positions at a large loss to protect its own assets (often well before the 50% target), at which point it will not matter how much the market rebounds after that
> It's also the case that, in practice, we regulate and politicize much - maybe all - of the free market.

Do we? Perhaps you do in the US. Where I live, Australia, it's true most of the noise from the echo chamber is about what sort of regulations to impose on markets. But if you stop and look, they are invariably markets that aren't functioning well. The classic things that we appear to be always arguing about are things like power, landline internet, and water. But that isn't a surprise - they are the things that tend towards monopoly, so the market for those things is always broken or teetering on the edge of broken. We are now seeing the same effect for internet search and social media, where again network effects drive the markets towards monopoly.

At the other end of the scale, here in Australia we've toyed with creating market's to solve political problems. One perennial problem in the driest continent on the planet is water. So they created a market based on virtual water, so rather go and haggling with your local pollie for water access right you have to buy it. It's been pretty successful from what I can tell, but now there are political stouches over how much virtual water there is. I guess that the water market could be viewed as yet more rules imposed by a central authority, as indeed could rules about regulating monopolies, and rules about truth in advertising and honouring warranties and the like. But I think that's miss leading. Rules about truth in advertising are really about setting up the conditions a market needs to flourish - equal access to information from the buyer and seller.

While politicking on those rules is indeed a discussion about rules being imposed by a central authority, the purpose of those rules is to enable efficient decentralised decision making, not about "how much centralization is appropriate"
PEMDAS. 1. Done.
It's the opposite angle of attack, coming aggressively down from the high end. Same thing Tesla is doing.
Interesting insight!
it is something they're currently actively working on building!
>Austria is the most West of all the Eastern EU countries so a lot of things that are not normal in Western Europe are so in Austria

What the hell are you talking about? Austria is squarely Central European. It was never part of the East in any way.

And the Green party is most definitely not fishing for right-wing voters. Not to mention that Eva Glawischnig isn't even in the party anymore.
There's not a great alternative, however.

I don’t think waging ideological war on Apple is doing anything to help us get one, especially not if you dismiss the real security benefits of their approach as part of some conspiracy to undermine the concept of ownership.

What would help is some analysis of how technically to achieve both security and openness. Nobody has achieved this yet.

Apple’s security strategy does place them as a trusted party in the system. I don’t see them changing this any time soon, since it’s an unsolved research problem, and they need to keep shipping.

I am curious what a system with no centrally trusted authority would actually look like.
yep. it's a negative suggesting multiple potential issues: political/misdirecting, lacking positives that they could have instead highlighted, awareness+communication issues where they didn't realize the mistake, etc. none of those may be true, and even some they are, not matter for the role, so you're right, can be fine.

but in a startup scenario.. there's less room for hiring mistakes than in a bigco, so I wouldn't just ignore. I've definitely passed on folks after catching lies in their CV - trust is a pretty basic ingredient before asking someone to own something. overclaiming here isn't a 100% lie, but it is a warning sign on issues like the above that are worth understanding.
They do, but unfortunately it seems like household products that the global manufacturers offer are very different region to region. I guess the Americas and Asia get the high-end microwave ovens... (but they're also quite different, I'm sure.)
A beginner friendly interface I can teach my parents to use, with audio editing as an equal citizen. The options for doing simple multimedia are really lacking right now, and I'm tired of loaning my Adobe login info to friends and family so they can use Premiere which is complete overkill.
Irony that this shares the front page with Apple's firewall sploit today.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25095972
Historically speaking, OCSP was invented in a world where almost all DNS requests were also in cleartext. So if an attacker can observe DNS requests, then it's already "game over", and the cleartext of the OCSP request is almost redundant at that point.

It's worth noting a couple differences between HTTPS OCSP and Developer ID OCSP. First, with Developer ID, the only DNS request is for ocsp.apple.com, so the DNS request by itself doesn't expose any information about the Mac app being launched, unlike with HTTPS.

Second, the caching of Developer ID OCSP responses tends to be much much shorter than for HTTPS. Prior to Thursday's outage, the standard cache length for Developer ID OCSP responses seemed to be 5 minutes. (Apple seems to have raised it to 12 hours now.) In contrast, I just checked the latest response in my OCSP cache, which was for http://ocsp.digicert.com, and its validity is 7 days. So the rate at which Developer ID OCSP requests are made seems to be much higher than for HTTPS, and thus there's greater chance of exposure.
IBM Z890: When an 18 Year Old Buys a Mainframe (2016)
>So he doesn’t need to worry about the future. The future is fine. Him and his classmates were never the future, except for the future of extracting large fees from high net worth individuals and companies.

Excellent insight
"Generally, our actions are subject to a speed-accuracy trade-off: the faster you do something, the less accurate you tend to be"

And interesting edge-case where that isn't true are professional athletes.

Maybe in the plant world the equivalent would be kudzu [0]. It has the speed thing down without issue, and as for accuracy... well, you grow like it does, you're hitting every target. It's about as close to a sci-fi gray goo scenario as we get, or the monster movie "The Blob", and one of the the prescribed methods of dealing with it is actually "kill it with fire!"

[0] https://www.appalachiabare.com/when-stephen-king-turned-into...
Notarization was IMO the first big step towards this. To this day I have not heard anyone, neither devs nor users, wanting this feature. And to devs it has only costed misery and money.
If you are someone who wants and understands how to use a machine with disabled security features, it obviously doesn’t help to have the defaults be unchangable.

For everyone else, it is a very important safeguard against social engineering attacks.
> Even Airpods and the Macbook chargers might be getting close these days.

I simply can't agree with these logical gymnastics.
A big "Yes!" to your first paragraph. And a remarkably clear observation that holds and is worth investigation in many other regions of the world (e.g., the Levant prior to the existence of the modern state of Israel).

But I am unclear what you're trying to say in your second paragraph.
I've been using Zephyr with Nordic chips for all of my personal projects lately, and it's been fantastic. (Zephyr's the upstream for the mentioned "equally excellent nRF-Connect-SDK")

Unlike most of the other options, Zephyr's run as an actual open source project and not just as a closed box you can peer into every once in a while, and Nordic seem to have gone all in on it.
Hey, thanks for that.

Just confirmed this does seem to stop the annoying login popups from Medium, etc.

I tried to figure out how to disable that a few months ago but my google-fu was weak and it seemed like nobody knew how to do it.
How would that be better than all the freedom but with good
default settings? You're not forced to tinker with all controls,
and if you don't agree with a default you can actually do
something about it instead of saying "well, that multi-billion
dollar company probably knows better what I need".
I agree that 99% of people are not going to use all these fancy functions, but wattage and volume still matter.

The one you linked seems a little bit too small for me (I use a 1200W one).
Can you post a link to any benchmark that would prove that?
Except the empirical data does not really back Clay's thesis in The Innovator’s Dilemma. Jill Lepore had an excellent analysis of the track record in a famous new yorker article (1) which caused pmarca to melt down on twitter. In his defense, I think the disruption thesis holds when the industry is fragmented. When a disrupter goes up against a monopoly/duopoly or oligopoly, it fails. Just a conjecture.

Even more generally, in business there are few hard and fast rules and even the ones that work lose their efficacy as the participants learn and adjust to them. Which is a good thing for the system as a whole. I would speculate that entrepreneurs should now look beyond disruption.

(1). http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2014/06/23/the-disruption-...
> I don't follow the "browsers and loops" argument.

To log in to my banking account, I need the correct password. No problem, I keep it in a password manager. To open the password manager, I need the correct password. No problem, I keep it in a password manager. To open the password manager, I need the correct password. No problem, I keep it in a password manager. To open the password manager, I need the correct password. No problem, I keep it in a password manager. And so on.

Imagine that, but for “verifying the HTTPS connection”.
This take is stale. Some people will pay for less freedom on their machines and some developers will gladly take their money. That’s not force, that’s capitalism.
I'd probably be nervous about TSMC opening a fab in AZ then
Sourced from the WSJ at https://www.wsj.com/articles/parler-backed-by-mercer-family-...
Should I make the "potatoes have eyes" comment? Hmm, guess I just did.
Check server certificate OCSP first, send subsequent queries via SSL.
During the pandemic this project posted a new startup idea every day for a year
It's not clear from the tweet and video: How is his exfiltrator piggybacking on an excluded Apple process? Is nsurlsessiond in the exclude list?
Hi, I'm a Redux maintainer.

If you haven't looked at Redux recently, you should look again. "Modern Redux" code is drastically simpler than the Redux code you've probably seen before. In particular, our official Redux Toolkit package [0] and the React-Redux hooks API [1] make it much simpler to write Redux code, by auto-generating action creators, writing reducers as object lookup tables instead of switch statements, letting you write "mutating" immutable updates in reducers, and providing good defaults out of the box and utilities that handle common use cases.

FWIW, we've just completely rewritten the official tutorials in our docs to show how much simpler "modern Redux" code is, as well as better explain the fundamentals and why many of these patterns exist:

- The "Redux Essentials" tutorial [2] teaches "how to use Redux, the right way", by building a real-world app using Redux Toolkit

- The "Redux Fundamentals" tutorial [3] teaches "how Redux works, from the bottom up", by showing how to write Redux code by hand and why standard usage patterns exist, and how Redux Toolkit simplifies those patterns

In addition, we've added a "Style Guide" docs page [4] that lists our recommended patterns and best practices, which help you write Redux logic that is simpler, easier to understand, and easier to maintain. That includes things like "write Redux logic as single file 'slices'", "put as much logic as possible in reducers", "model actions as 'events', not 'setters'", and so on.

We've gotten a lot of great feedback telling us that RTK and the docs improvements have really made it a lot easier for people to learn and use Redux effectively.

[0] https://redux-toolkit.js.org

[1] https://react-redux.js.org/api/hooks

[2] https://redux.js.org/tutorials/essentials/part-1-overview-co...

[3] https://redux.js.org/tutorials/fundamentals/part-1-overview

[4] https://redux.js.org/style-guide/style-guide
A lot of people here rooting for their preexisting beliefs to be confirmed, rather than being happy that a city is experimenting and evaluating new ways of doing things.

NYC didn't dig in and defend the status quo. They also didn't flip over the table and change everything across the city because of a new idea that sounded nice. They're testing it.
At least for Facebook it’s actually the opposite. FB’s UX flow and design works better for conservative media.

From a political perspective, there are a billion stories about how FB leadership actively reaches out to conservative media to try and keep the platform friendly to them (including things like allowing the Daily Caller to be a “fact checker” on their platform). Many stories of “oh this feature to prevent trending of outright false shit would flag half of conservative media. Let’s not”

The naive reading is they are afraid of conservative backlash. But I’m personally a bit done with giving them the benefit of the doubt. I think they are actively courting conservatives (sacrificing only the tiniest slice of the far right on certain high profile bans)
I have been using PlatformIO as of late, which has the option of selecting frameworks when the project is created. While that doesn't really solve the problem of having a universal abstraction layer, it does ease the burden of installing frameworks since it handles that automatically and it provides a more consistent development environment. As for that universal abstraction layer, I doubt that it is practical. There is too much variation across features offered by MCUs. Ultimately some features would end up unsupported on some products unless every vendor decided to put their weight behind it (and agree upon how everything should be implemented).
What about the people who project themselves as being experts in a very believable fashion but are actually not experts? Human nature would tend to cause these people to double down on their own self delusion rather than admit they don’t actually know what they are talking about. How do we guard against that?
I guess this article is specifically hating on the Crispr method of physically cutting and joining DNA sequences and not the myriad of software tools built around this technology?

My knowledge of Crispr is very limited but it was my understanding that by lowering the cost and time needed to preform gene editing it opened up or democratized the ability to experiment to the masses rather than just the corporate giants, who may bury innovations in order to ensure their investment in drug and health research remains profitable.

I also hoped we might see some cool new flower colors and patterns but maybe that is totally different tech using gene guns.

The argument that everything has been done before is kind of like the "reinventing the wheel" argument, yet every year there is new wheel technology.
As someone who doesn't know much about it, would a malicious homeserver have any way to break the end to end encryption, save for putting massive amounts of men in the middle between each conversation which would be busted the second anyone decides to compare public keys?
They’ll never do it.

They just keep making stuff not private so you have to choose between security versus privacy.

A well thought system would be able to provide both.
Thanks for the correction, I didn't know that in the UK kettles commonly have a power rating of up to 3KW. Looks like the EU tried to ban such high power appliances in 2014, but I don't think they did. MediaMarkt in Germany has many kettles with power rating of 2400W. This would be doable in the US (barely), but only with 20A wiring and NEMA 5-20 sockets, which are not very popular.
> Isn't TSMC building a fab in AZ?

Yes, but the planned chips are an older generation right now and they'll be even older when the fab actually starts production. TSMC would never move cutting edge production outside of Taiwan.
IKR.

I loved my Magefesa pressure cooker. So easy to clean. Its design is very nearly the pinnacle of human achievement. I damaged the valve and that tiny plastic insert cost almost as much as a whole new unit, so I decided to try the InstaPot that everyone was crazy about.

I cannot fathom how someone ends up designing the InstaPot. They must have started with a CrockPot.

I do like the timer. Next time I'll upgrade my stove and stick with the dumb pot.
Well, this basically confirms my decision to not purchase a macbook for my next laptop.