skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Their "facts" include gems like pedophilia rings run out of nonexistent basements below pizza shops, the Q-anon conspiracy (Trump's going to take down the evil cabal any day now!), and millions of illegal voters and criminals around every corner. Zero evidence for any of it. These aren't fringe views as many of us can attest to - this is crap millions have to listen to every day coming from their closest friends and family.

Two decades ago the Republican party acted as a bulwark against rapid change and as the yin in the yin-yang of individual vs collective. Not no more; we don't have another two decades for our education system to bring us back from the brink.
It is very smooth to watch.

I am curious though. It seems as though this makes an RDP server in a VM and then connects to it. How secure is it?
An inefficient system will waste more money. You know that.
> to destroy the open web

Except this rule doesn't prohibit anybody from putting anything on the internet. TFA is only about putting a streaming service on the App Store. Not to say that's not problematic, but Apple's not holding the web back in any way with this rule.
Most commercial switchmode amps are fully analog. The large power amps with built in DSP tend to process the audio signal before it reaches the power amp circuit. Artifacts such as harmonics can be driven down way below any credible threshold of audibility, with conventional techniques.

Especially in big amps, the power amp already has some rather heavy responsibilities, just to be stable when driving odd loads, and generally not blowing up. This tends to discourage putting a lot of weird stuff inside the feedback loop.
The question needs to be "why on earth would you want to do that with let, when you should just make it a const?"
So, expanding suffrage is just so terrible that it disqualifies Sanders? Unbelievable.
The people that think everyone is (and should be!) just like them are the most delusional and insulting.
And once more literally no democrats count even a little bit as socialists. That notwithstanding it’s utterly disingenuous to equate social democrats with Maduro. The kind of “socialism” espoused by democrats is further right than substantially all of Europe, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. Far from failed, folks there enjoy a general higher standard of living than Americans.
My alternative is you didn't understanding it. Throwing out block quotes does suggest you read the first two paragraphs. If you made your point using your own words instead of throwing titles and quotes out I'd have a better chance of understanding it, whatever it is.

Again, when she says race she means "human race". And she's arguing for perfectly reasonable outcomes. Adjust for the fact that the language is 100 years old and context changes over time.

Her argument is that people should have access to birth control. People, in the current era, now have access to birth control. The world is a better place for it. That is one of the best parts of eugenics - people should be able to plan their families.
In many ways I echo your sentiment. One thing I can’t stop thinking about though is how utterly hopeless we are at creating good regulations. The regulations seem to have good intentions but end up doing more harm than good, often ending up giving even more of an advantage to the big tech companies.

Look at GDPR, it’s resulted in a tidal wave of horrible pop ups across the entire web that create the worst user experience ever. Apple probably loves this, it makes their Apple News product look amazing because in comparison it’s so slick and smooth, but it’s not at all web-like since you can’t link to articles. So the open web takes a massive hit.

Same with content filters, only the big guys can afford to have them, so they gain a massive advantage. There doesn’t appear to be a way to make good regulation, so why bother at all?
Regarding common ground, I believe so. Just as several people were shy to admit voting for [candidate name redacted] those are the same willing to seek common ground.

I worry more about those for whom politics is a team sport, and who ignore whom they marginalize in their quest for ideals.
Not a good look for sure. I’ll wait and judge him by what he does in the next four years though.

That kind of ignorance is nothing compared to literally forcing migrant women to have hysterectomies along the southern border. That’s a different kind of racism. [1]

[1] https://www.npr.org/2020/09/16/913398383/whistleblower-alleg...
That’s be pretty advantageous for the sitting president. Unless there is a preference system.
Yeah, I think they just have big fans blowing from the ceiling down there...at least that's what it's like here in summer in Texas
>but I looked at his policy, words, and his actions. I still voted for him because I felt he aligned with the policies I wanted to move towards.

You mean like actively refusing and convincing ~half the country NOT to wear masks? Even though the worst case scenario is.. you are wearing the mask and it doesn't help?

Trump himself said he thinks wearing a mask looks weak. And that's why he didn't want to do it.

So, instead of being a LEADER and leading by example- wearing a mask. He made it into a political issue because he thinks people looks weak doing it. And has no doubt cost peoples lives by CONVINCING others not to wear masks. To this day (in his recent rallies) it's the same damn thing.

I mean, I can go on and on about the CHARACTER of Trump, but let's leave it at one.

You sound like someone who is like "eh I like his policies so he can act however the hell he wants and that's OK".

THAT is what you and I can never agree on.
Good fellow, are you really going to say the mail in ballot ratio is the same in a pandemic and not in a pandemic?

That fact is selective on a national scale — if you looked at states, the mail in vs in person ratio is standard deviations away from the norm.
> It's been a constant stream of catastrophizing from them for the last four years.

I've looked at a few definitions, and I don't see how it's an accurate description of what's happening here.

For example: “Catastrophizing is a cognitive distortion that prompts people to jump to the worst possible conclusion, usually with very limited information or objective reason to despair. When a situation is upsetting, but not necessarily catastrophic, they still feel like they are in the midst of a crisis.” (https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/basics/catastrophizing)

We have experienced “great damage or suffering” (i.e., catastrophes), not merely upsetting situations. The media hasn't been catastrophizing; they've been reporting about catastrophes.
> On the other hand, multi-party systems have a tendency to build less stable governments,

That's the popular myth, based largely on a combination of conflation of parliamentary and multiparty systems (the two have no essential connection) and the fact that parliamentary systems tend to use different language around a government/administration than presidential systems do.

Measured by either cabinet or head of government turnover rates, multiparty parliamentary systems among established democracies are more stable than the US.

> which was one of the reasons for the downfall of the Weimacher Republik and the rise of the NSDAP.

Two party systems have at least as much problem (really, more) forming moderate-to-opposing extreme coalitions against extremists from one side, which is how extremists of the Right have progressively hijacked a major party in the US, with nothing like the level of externally-imposed stress that produced the NSDAP in Germany. [0] At least in a multiparty system, forming a coalition across tribal identity boundaries formed by party labels is expected.

[0] see, https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2020/10/31/the-repu...
Trump's separation policies were put into place to punish and hurt immigrants, not protect children. Hypotheticals are not reality.
Memory is hazy, but from what I've read most people that call Chrome the new IE is because it likes to incorporate non-standard aspects that other browsers don't (because they're not standard) which causes apps to lose functionality (or outright break) outside of Chrome.

I can kind of see it both ways. I appreciate that Chromium browsers may have little extras you can tap into as it'll make for neat features (Project Stream and I imagine later Stadia is because of that sort of thing), but it does break browser compatibility so it runs the risk of replicating that "works in IE" experience from way back when.

The IE I don't specifically miss though was needing to support older releases of it at work, personally. But I could see disliking the "what do you mean it doesn't work in Safari/Firefox/etc.?" discussions that may happen.
Equinix used to offer this map as a cool poster to customers (and maybe everyone?). I'd love a not-beat-up replacement, but I don't see an order link like there used to be. I did find the 2019 one for $250(!!), which is a little more than I want to pay.
That English does not make it easier to understand.
I think you would model that as a type of green card, rather than a temporary work visa
Sony, Microsoft etc sell their hardware at a loss and recoup through software licensing.

Which is not possible if you going to force them to do things like have alternative app stores or to allow any content to be used.
>fabricates fake evidence

Source? Sounds like conspiratorial nonsense.
>Democrat cities

Large cities usually lean Democratic. This is like saying "cities run by male mayors." It's the statistical reality, but not necessarily related.
> They also stopped Ebola from spreading, which is at least an order of magnitude worse than COVID.

Pure unmitigated ignorance.
Gmail seems to offer this a link to unsubscribe by the way.

A really cool service would be to trawl your inbox and unsubscribe from everything!
> Just because someone's conclusion seems ridiculous or wrong doesn't mean there aren't underlying facts that, when seen from a certain perspective, and with a certain context, make that conclusion seem reasonable.

What about things like taxes where it’s all cold hard math? There’s no nuance when a poor or middle class person thinks they need to worry about (for example) an inheritance tax.
Or maybe you didn’t understand my argument. All the best.
Variables and Correlation
"The absolute fact is this: the human eye is unable to see these sculptures," he continued. "All you see is a small mirror with ... nothing on it. The only way to perceive these works is on the screen of powerful scanning electron microscope. So how can you ever know that this sculpture really exists

I know artists like to be grandiose about their works, but consider that you are probably reading this article on a machine whose function depends on it containing billions of truly nano-scale "sculptures" that are mass-produced, and have to be perfect to work. Look at MEMS devices for even more interesting microstructures.
Le gasp! Maybe the whole point was to import cheap labor and force them to work for you for decades before gaining citizenship.
This is true, I probably should have specified "Republicans" in the second half. Edited.
Your answer shows a lack of imagination in regards to how fraud might be perpetuated in this situation.

As our election systems come to depend on electronic solutions the attack surface increases significantly.
This. I'm more alarmed and afraid that investigation into all of the allegations his campaign is bringing up will be handled lightly or handwaved as a waste of time, where nothing less than a full blown addressing and running down of every accusation should be done. I don't care who wins in the end. I care that the processes integrity is maintained at all cost. Doubt with regards to the voting process is not something any Republic can afford.
> all the pooled power of the tech companies

Here's a start. It's not an advantage to have these criminals try to tell everyone what to think.

Anybody with half a brain wants to see them in jail, rather than in a position to curate our realities.
This is just petty on their part.
I'm not sure if it was, really. What's the baseline? If Biden was President, how many people would have died instead? More than 0, right?

The United States has structural issues, many of them features and not bugs, that make a coordinated effort to suppress a contagious virus basically impossible. Biden never made the case for what he would have done different; he didn't really have to.

That's the thing about a crisis. When your opponent is in charge during a crisis, you can always say he was incompetent, and no one can prove that you're wrong.
If it's not forgiven you fight and accomplish nothing and divide further. That's what we have seen the last 4 years.

That's why being a politician takes some skill.
Yes, but denying competing engines with competitive features does. All browsers on iOS have to use Safari's backend.
538 does make adjustments based on what they think are biases in individual polls. So they can't blame it all on their sources. They've taken on some responsibility to evaluate those sources and adjust their model accordingly. The polls had significant bias, and 538 failed to fully adjust for it.
That’s not how it works unless you’re sharing a key between them somehow and one of them reveals the key. Otherwise an attacker could take something encrypted with a good algorithm and encrypt the cipher text with a bad algorithm to make it easier to crack themselves.
Trump has been true to his word, the important things he promised in the matters of policy, the important things he’s done for the economy, diplomatic relations between Israel and Arab countries, cancelling critical race theory indoctrination in government, standing up for police being scapegoated by raging mobs.

His actions speak louder than words. He closed the border with China when everyone was accusing him of xenophobia, he did it just in time to flatten the curve. He helped millions of people with stimulus package, saved countless businesses and jobs via fed corporate bonds, I can go on and on. These are not opinions but facts.

You see it’s not about what or whom you believe but what you and them actually do.

The left accuse the president of being racist without any basis, by misinterpreting or intentionally misrepresenting his sayings. Building their whole campaign around massive 'racism' conspiracy. Many people vote Trump just because they are tired of this bullshit.

That whole BLM summer of protests? Gone, no longer in fashion. Dems don’t really care about black lives, they cynically exploit race politics to grab power. It worked marvels for them in these elections.
This is under the assumption that the voters will have an informed opinion on the issues. With how much the internet have created echo chambers, I highly doubt this will be possible. In reality, I think the results will be determined by whichever interest groups that can mobilize more supporters through clickbait propaganda. Even if they eventually get caught, does it matter after the policies get passed?

I'd rather see changes to the system to allow/incentivize good-faith leaders to prosper. All I want is for my leaders to make decisions based on science and taking into account of _every_ stakeholder instead of just their corporate donators. Right now, too many politicians (at least the ones that affect me) get away with "undemocratic" decisions for personal gain without repercussions.
By slow do you mean high capacitance between base and emitter? I’m under the impression that even high power BJTs will be good out to 100 kHz. FETs are even better I believe. Adding more components to the signal path degrades the signal slightly at best and introduces additional non-linearities at worst.
The end run is to chuck “ads” in transactional emails. Including “important service announcements”. And make it obtuse to change your settings.
Good question. Because it will increase the probability of Electoral Votes going to third parties. That decreases the probability of any candidate reaching an outright majority of Electoral Votes. A plurality of Electoral Votes is not enough; it has to be a majority.

Without a majority, the election is decided by the House of Representatives, where each state delegation gets one vote, where each vote is determined by a majority of that state's delegation.

And there, the Republicans have a built-in advantage similar to their Senate advantage, as every state is guaranteed at least one representative regardless of population. Even after the Democratic House victory in 2018, Republicans still had the majority of 26 state federal delegations.
Except that is a false equivalency, every Republican voter backed a candidate who ran on that platform and policy.

Yes, there will always be a few people at the extremes of any movement. It is very different when they control the movement.

They may have seen it as the "least-bad" option rather than actively wanting what Trump was offering, but honestly that distinction doesn't matter if they are willing to support that level of harm. You don't get to vote for Trump and claim you aren't in that group. If you enabled him, you own his policy.
If only Safari on iOS fully supported it, which it doesn't.
Multitudes of lost bitcoin wallets crying out in the darkness.
I do also appreciate the so-called experiments by the Chrome team, but my gripe is that they are implemented directly instead of hiding it in flags. Other people do want to comment on the specific implementation and probably change the API so that for example it is less destructive when there are new subfeatures in the specification. I personally hate how they handled the Polymer specification: thry are still using their draft instead of the standardized version in YouTube for example.
I thought the new wage rule would basically ruin the indian consultancy business model, and benefit H1B applicants as they would be payed a competitive wage and actually getting a visa.
Wouldn't the typical bay area salary exceed the minimum requirements?

I can't read the article due to the paywall.
Game consoles aren't computers. They're much cheaper and last longer than phones. You can also buy and sell your games.
That’s literally only because Amazon worked with them to introduce the needed features so they could launch Luna. Controller support was shoddy before iOS14, for example, so the web app approach wasn’t viable for xCloud or Stadia.
Yeah, that was my immediate thought. It's interesting there is an opportunity for a third-party company to do for Nordic what ST gives you for free.
Republicans just elected a congressman who addressed the world after the election by saying "Cry more, lib." [1] I question whether Democrats elected anyone advocating sending Republicans to reeducation camps.

[1] https://www.citizen-times.com/story/news/local/2020/11/04/cr...
Came for ERW, was not disappointed.
How do you feel about the fact that this kind of thinking basically rules out the possibility of Puerto Rico from ever becoming a state? Or California splitting into two states?
> If per-state error isn't normally distributed, that's evidence of bias, or bad polling.

No!

Assuming the per-state error would be normally distributed in some neutral world is making huge assumptions about the nature of the electorate, polling, and the correlations of errors between states, you can't do that! You would specifically /not/ expect per-state error to be evenly distributed because the nature of the error would have similar impacts on similar populations and there are similar populations of people that live in different states in differing numbers.

You should review the literature about the nature of the (fairly small) polling misses that impacted the swing states and thus disproportionately the outcome in the 2016 election. You will probably find it interesting.
Liquid-liquid phase separation drives conversion of protein to spider web fiber
> Apple's not holding the web back in any way with this rule.

Yeah, not with this rule. They are holding the web back by refusing to run 3rd party browsers or modernize their one.
You’re going to think less of people because of the extremely uncharitable rationale you imagine they must have. Great.

Your own mother notwithstanding,it’s almost certainly the case that not everybody who voted for Trump did it because of “a fear of the future” at least not anymore than anybody else who votes against any other candidate.
if this is insanely the case, then both their parents and their teachers have failed them ( the children that is ) but also they have failed themselves, well educated enquiring minds self educate after the age of 2 or 3..
I'm sure that ramping up illegal and H1B immigration will be the first order of business for the Kamala administration.
I'm not sure what you are referring to as the mainstream media. There were weeks of articles about USPS and how there were problems. There were years of reporting about collusion and corruption with regard to Russia and other scandals. Whether you were looking at Fox or at NY Times or WaPo or CNN or whatever, whether it was for or against, there was neverending coverage about the Trump scandal of the week, and that Trump's explanations were BS. The problem wasn't lack or reporting or criticizing Trump, it was that there was always a new scandal every week that needed coverage.
But I mean I could probably make a similar raspberry pi build for around the same money and have a more powerful machine capable of doing much the same things and would have the experience of a hacking out a build.
Umm, Unicode decoding/encoding REQUIRES bitwise operators to work...

Not including that in the core ISA is a monumental mistake.
How to Deploy Azure Function Apps with Powershell
Web 3.0 is probably meant bundled metamask plugin.
Nope.

It's a pretty famous instruction, FMA Fused Multiply-Add
Maybe I can help you. Please email me.
After fighting takedowns from Apple for years.
Her argument is that we use birth control to eliminate "undesirables" and it's basically a dog whistle for certain races.

And you call that "perfectly reasonable outcomes"? Holy shit.
> If you define "criminal" as "any person who has committed a crime", and "crime" as "any illegal act that can be punished by law", then yes.

A criminal is a person who commits a crime.

It is possible, by ceasing to commit crimes and making restitution to society, to return to a state of non-criminality. But while one is still committing a crime, no amount of hand-waving or pearl clutching can make a non-criminal out of someone who is actively committing a crime.

For an illegal immigrant, this would mean either lawful settlement or deportation. Until an illegal immigrant either earns the right to settle or leaves the country, that person is still a criminal.
And those phone and laptop advancements are courtesy of the Taiwanese.