skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
...but they were close; it seems the primary limitations are:

1. The inscrutable nature of the Nvidia proprietary drivers (which wouldn't compile on ARM32, and had an initialization error with no extra helpful output on ARM64).

2. The lack of IO BAR address space on the BCM2711 (SoC) used in the CM4/Pi 4.
I'm pretty out of the loop when it comes to Svelte/Sapper. I've looked at it, but never used it. However I did recently spot that they're already working on a successor to Sapper called Svelte Kit. So maybe that's why Sapper isn't at 1.0, and maybe never will be.

https://github.com/sveltejs/sapper/issues/1429
Intel got their 3D/2.5D stacking tech from Altera, the FPGA in Xeon sockets also is doing as well as it can considering the niche market.
LIDAR alone isn't the best choice. Neither are cameras alone. They each excel at different things.

That's why everyone else in the industry use both types of sensors.
I'm always using the "phone keys cigarettes money" mantra together with patting on my pockets before opening any outside door.
And..?

It doesn't IPO in Western countries anyway.
looking forward to this. =)
Good thing someone is teaching Hollywood's next batch of writers how to churn out boring sequels with de-risked financial prospects for the investors.

What I want to hear about is, how will the medium of uncertain-life multi-year serials get beyond the 4th/5th season disapointments of GOT, Lost, BG(reboot)?

I spend an inordinate amount of time investing in these endless storylines, only to have them 1) get canceled after Season 3 or 2) start sucking in season 4 or 5 (Might get lucky with a Dexter and not suck until year 6 or 7, but still...)

This is an important cultural issue, what with the pandemic and whatnot
Yep, true; how you get the iCalendar file to the user could affect the requirements and experience a lot.

Web could work well for pull-based retrieval, and email's probably a good push option when you have a defined set of recipients.
I've thought the same thing. I also wish SET came after where. I've done "UPDATE table_x SET something = true"; and then forgot the WHERE clause.
Moving Forward (Abuse.ch)
This article is behind paywall. I wonder what is medium's business plan in the vast plain of so much interesting content to read for free.
I suggest you work backwards: have a read about the expected distribution of VC returns from the companies invested and back-project your expected gain. This is a great start: https://techcrunch.com/2017/06/01/the-meeting-that-showed-me... (although it severely overestimates the returns: over 75% of VC funds fail to make enough, and many funds have negative returns).

From link “Five startups fail and do $0, three exit at $25 million, one exits at $200 million and our superstar does $1 billion”. The three exits at $25 generate zero for employee shares (liquidation preferences). Discount a lot of the $200MM due to participating shit etcetera.

Make some guesses for dilution (likely severe as you don’t get to participate in further rounds), and make a decision about whether rolling a 1D10 die and getting a 1 is worthwhile.

In my opinion, you need to ensure you have ways to get plenty of value out of the 80% expectation that your equity will be worth nothing. E.g. good $, expected value of what you learn, joy from job, etcetera.

The equations shift somewhat for non-VC equity, where other severe risks and other rewards become relevant.

For ycombinator companies, the numbers are probably skewed different again. Interestingly enough HN should be able to estimate returns for early employees for YC companies, since we know numbers of intake companies and maybe employee counts, and could do an estimate of returns per employee per intake. YC themselves could do population samples per intake and give realistic historical figures.

PS: do not fall for the fallacy that you can pick a future unicorn to be an employee of. VC experts and others with decades of experience fail to pick unicorns, and to believe you can do better than them would be a conceit.
What's going on here is you're misusing the word genocide. See the comment in the other thread.

Genocide is mass killings, not mass sterilizations. If you get very technical you can call a sterilization a killing but that's just a deliberate misuse of the term.

When someone hears the word genocide they hear slaughter. They don't hear oh that population was sterilized. Let's not be stupid about this.
GM, Ford knew about climate change 50 years ago
The pointing and calling performed by Japanese train drivers is very much about expected events. "Green signal" would be one of the most common call-outs. For example:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=afjPmN0GT04

Green signals are pointed at at 2:58 and 3:29.
Gender (still) matters in business school [pdf]
I guess the idealists would say "Waymo will be so wildly profitable that its holding company will opt not to pursue secondary revenue streams such as advertising and data resale".
It went onto a company Slack. These are not sales athletes. An athlete is easily intelligent, in this case would have a private whatsapp group or similar. These are sales dumb jocks.

Which doesn’t alter your point at all.
Mixed feelings on this. On the one hand, I'm against Facebook censorship, especially of academics. On the other hand, the researchers (and journalists) are going to use this research to browbeat Facebook into more censorship (and specifically censorship of the right, though some non-mainstream progressives will be caught up in the dragnet as well) as they have already done with a ton of hit pieces [1].

What to do, what to do.

[1] Brings to mind the hit-piece:
"The Making of a YouTube Radical - The New York Times" article. But there is an ongoing effort to continue pushing Facebook, Twitter and YouTube into more and more censorship of anyone deemed on the right and the Overton window keeps getting smaller and smaller. The situation with the Hunter Biden laptop story and NYPost is absolutely bonkers. Not only do journalists at mainstream center/center-left news outfits not care that Twitter and Facebook outright decided that the story is false and therefore shouldn't be shared by anyone and banned the account of their colleagues at NYPost .. but worse, actually applaud it and justify it.
Here's my counter-offer: Just unban me and I won't make another account. You've already banned me dozens of times. This account had a good run, but if it's time to drop it, that's fine with me.

Either way, I'll keep posting the way I want to, because I want to measure reactions. I can't do that without overstepping potential boundaries sometimes. If I actually followed your guidelines, commenting on HN would be pointless to me.
I have the theory that they do this on purpose so more people opt to install their mobile apps, to which I strongly refuse.
They might be willing to partner if NYU is willing to indemnify Facebook against any and all liabilities which may result. How likely is NYU to take on that risk? Why should we expect Facebook to take on the risk for NYU?
Pulling resources in from other places still has to solve the same problems as git-lfs. What specifically makes resources stored elsewhere less of a bad-habit enabler?
Don’t Believe the Hype: Shining a Light on the Dark Triad
He did that before to non-disabled people: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CsaB3ynIZH4. It's obvious media manipulation by the left.
Perhaps the clowns at Mozilla should fix their failing software rather than spend budget on fighting for a corrupt, CCP-linked candidate.
In important ways yes, and in important ways no. Yes: can deal with dynamic spatial environments, can act towards a goal (intentionality), some almost certainly can plan how to reache these goals. No: Use of symbols and recursive language.
Impact of new immigration rule changes on the computing research community
Not according to FTC.
If your aim is to misrepresent what was plainly written, maybe one could force those words into someone else's mouth.

I dare say that's less effort than trying to make something be successful.
Please, God, no.

The surface area for security vulnerabilities is already impossibly high. Do we really want to add "firmware running on a DIMM exfiltrating key material" to that list?
....willing to work for peanuts.

ftfy
Hi! Take a look at Wooey.
Yep. The Icestorm toolchain for Lattice FPGAs is a real breath of fresh air -- fast compile times, multiple sets of interoperable tools, open file formats, development in the open... it's great. I just wish something like this was available for more than just Lattice parts.
Evolving Reddit’s Workforce
Good luck DeepMind.
Google rivals call on EU to take further antitrust action
Ecosia's open letter to the EU commission: https://blog.ecosia.org/eu-open-letter-google/
Reminds me of a study done where a test was given with questions that weren't difficult but likely to make a silly error. Around 85% of participants got at least one question wrong, but when they repeated the same test with a difficult-to-read font, that number dropped to ~25% or so. That's another way to make your brain work, use a terrible font.
> GP rightly pointed out that 1201 prohibits tools "primarily" designed for prohibited circumvention. That's a perfectly coherent thing to prohibit, and that has the perfectly clear, logical implications that GP described.

Except that it isn't, as already discussed, because the code doesn't change based on the design intent. The technical operation of the tool is identical whether it's used for interoperability or fair use or to rip songs for The Pirate Bay. The technical operation of the tool is identical whether it's produced by a university researcher or the developer of a media player app or a literal sea-faring pirate with a parrot and a peg leg who is the founder of a political movement to abolish copyright and promote civil disobedience.

But prohibiting a specific person (who may have had a particular intent) from distributing it is incoherent (or at least futile) if it means you can just get some other person with some other intent to distribute the exact same thing. And it's also incoherent to say that the other person can't distribute it even if they genuinely do have a different intent, if the intent is supposed to be what matters.

None of which depends on what you judge a give person's intent to be after the fact, because it's a defect in the legislation, not the judgment in any particular case.
I pay for Starbucks on my phone while ordering also. No QR code scanning involved.
The neurons, chemicals and electrons flowing through them are the electromagnetic field too (and the other 3 fields). Its a useless definition, we could literally say everything is the interaction of the em field, that would be correct but doesnt give us any information.
Mind Management, Not Time Management (Design for Hackers Author)
^This...exactly.

This seems all kinds of testable. Construct apparatus to significantly interfere with the fields, turn it one, then look for changes...if it's really something fundamental to consciousness, that should be discernible one way or another.
Because Wall Street sells junk like this to suck, er, retail investors and tells them financials don’t matter.
To the people that say that true No-Code will never happen:
It has always been possible to create software without writing code, it's just that historically it has been expensive.
No. People have said this about every web framework since PHP5 and its not true. Web development does tend to favor fast iteration which can lead to problems if the tech debt compounds but that doesn’t mean the people aren’t developers, at all.
The Danger in Listening to Experts
Depend on jurisdiction. In many countries there is no at-will employment and you need a legally valid reason and procedure to terminate someone's employment.
Stronger anti-circumvention laws than the US too.

As they're written into international treaties every functional Western democracy has them.

Pretty much the only exemption is Israel.
> Often a custom micro-framework better suits the needs of a particular project.

Fitting the needs of a particular project is frequently a local optimum however. Often, it's much more optimal to focus on the needs of a whole team or even whole company. You can hire people who already know React/Vue/whatever, but there is no one in the world who knows your micro-framework.
> ... a sclerotic, moribund empire is probably a better place to live for the majority of people in it than not an empire, assuming there is trade and general stability.

Is it? It took a plague to launch a revolution in agriculture in Europe, leading to an increase in calories production, an expansion of human life span, and opening up an expansion in trade (which reflects an increased amount of consumption of goods beyond simple survival). The preceding periods of semi-stasis were ones of no expansion in human quality of life and punctured by the opposite when you happened to be in the wrong place during a struggle between elites.

In our concrete world: had Apple not been able to blow up the oligopoly where the phone carriers controlled what phones were available and what they could do, would we have the current explosion of software, tools, etc? In the US in particular the sclerotic phone oligopolies kept the mobile phone market at least a decade behind Europe and Japan.
> As you move down the triangle, your audience shrinks.

That hasn't been true in years. In fact, it's exactly the opposite. All of the non-classical approaches are on cable and streaming, and have larger audiences than ever before. Note, this article is dated 2003, before streaming outpaced Hollywood in 2007.
The key bit in the article

....To help drive the idea home (pun intended), we’ve reimagined our approach to compensation in the US. To support employees to live where they want to and do their best work, we are eliminating geographic compensation zones in the US. It means that our US compensation will be tied to pay ranges of high-cost areas such as SF and NY, regardless of where employees live. We believe this is the right balance of flexibility and support for employees, recognizing the varied tradeoffs people consider when deciding where to live. Internationally, we have had one pay range per country, and now the US will be consistent with this approach.....
According to the one law in this link (German law §90 StGB), offending the president of Germany carries a penalty of anywhere from 3 months to 5 years prison. This can even apply in private matters.

Speaking of Austria, blasphemy laws still apply there and were upheld by an EU court when challenged two years ago [1].

[1] https://humanism.org.uk/2018/10/29/european-court-of-human-r...
I think GP meant in the sense that reconfiguration time is large. FPGAs cannot be effectively time-division multiplexed, as a full reconfiguration can take up to tens of seconds.

GP is also correct that DSP/SRAM blocks are critical to performance. FPGAs are not very efficient at raw compute if you have to synthesize everything out of LEs.

The performance benefit of FPGAs, which PIMs also share (in theory, there aren't any PIMs ready for real-world deployment AFAIK) is that they can leverage much larger memory bandwidths than general purpose CPUs can. An FPGA might run at a lower clock rate (low 100s of MHz), but be able to operate on several kb per clock cycle. This can work really well when paired with off-chip logic to convert high rate serial interfaces to lower clock rate parallel interfaces, then back after the FPGA is done processing.

There is also a lot of work going on in the space of time-division multiplexing FPGAs effectively. The two main approaches are overlay architectures and partial reconfiguration. The former implements another high-level fabric on top of the FPGA which will be less general-purpose, but can be reconfigured faster. The latter is a feature vendors have added to some high-end chips where specific regions of the FPGA can be reconfigured without affecting other regions.
This is a topic near and dear to my heart, as I'm often that person arguing to make some slightly less automated because the small trade-off in time is insurance against some of the worst mistakes you can have. Automation to the point of removing humans leads to stupid problems that a human wouldn't make if they looked at what was going on. So we automate tot he point where we minimize human contact, presenting a summary of actions that as humans we can apply our wonderful brains to and prevent those problems. Except some percentage of the time we don't actually pay attention, and depending on how the human interaction was introduced instead of complete automation, some percentage (or multiple!) of errors still sneak through.

Automation to the point of minimal human contact where you assume the human will read the presented information and make an informed decision doesn't work. The point is that we want a human to understand what is being asked, so taking some step to ensure they do understand is warranted. It will never be perfect, but adding steps like she proposes are definitely a step in the right direction, IMO.
That's great news.

Less taxation and government encroachment. What's not to like?
This is a good point. But realistically, that choice is not an option. Therefore, I'm at a disadvantage if I don't use the most "rewardy" type of card available. The cost of these points/rewards are priced in. So the only way to recapture that is to use a high reward card. It's a sucky model, but we're all caught in it and the folks paying with alternatives like cash are the ones holding the bag.
FPGAs use SRAM to store their program, while CPLDs (complex programmable logic devices) use flash. Some clever marketeers here & there will stretch this distinction but it's an established convention. The internal architecture between FPGAs and CPLDs is typically different, based on cost of memory vs. logic and typical use cases. FPGAs tend to be used for higher-capacity computations but require more life support; CPLDs tend to serve smaller, true glue logic applications, where the low config overhead (just apply power) and quicker & simpler power-up is a strong pull.

So CPLDs will have some kind of NVRAM wear-out concern, and this is almost always specified as a number of maximum erase & program cycles.
I think you took my argument the other way around I meant it. The butter knifes was sarcasm and personally suspect they found real weapons but I don’t have any info on that so can’t be certain. I also think some of these radicalised youth are extremely dangerous and the rule of law is sometimes incapable of tackling the phenomena but I still believe it should be the rule of law and not some adhoc citizen militia to come to rescue
Chu shogi and Tenjiku shogi are other larger (not so ridiculously large) variants of shogi that are quite playable and enjoyable.

Also, people do play crazy games these days, look up "monster wargames". For example "Advanced European Theater of Operations" has 2200 pieces played on 2 poster-sized maps...
People talk a lot about the UK's strict defamation laws, but the German concept of "Beleidigung" goes much much further. It's against the law to give someone the middle finger, for example.
A brief history of Vision: unraveling the parallels between Biology and Machines
After reading this account, I felt somewhat sorry for his father.
Hopefully this fails...
Out of curiosity, how difficult did you find the migration process? Especially in terms of having to restructure the project.

I have no direct experience, but from what I've heard Bazel is very opinionated about structure. Which makes it particularly challenging to migrate pre-existing projects that may not conform to its view. But again this all hearsay, so I'd like to hear from someone with direct experience.
Well then, "all you need to do" is convert your non constructive proof into a constructive one - et, voila :-)
I don't know, but I been told... AMD margins aren't great. AMD is making phenomenal products lately but if they're giving them away to gain market share then they may never be as profitable as investors would like.

If Intel gets their house in order in a couple years, AMD won't have much time to gain market and raise prices. I've rooted for AMD since the K6 days but I think there's a risk that they'll always be #2(or less).
A third of the websites in the world use wordpress which can certainly be configured using "no-code" and yet it's being sold as something brand new. Excel is everywhere and allows for "no-code" automation. No-code has been around forever and for some reason incremental improvements to something utterly pervasive is a revolution that will be embraced by the next generation.

All I can think of is how Windows used to be administered almost entirely through the GUI but eventually PowerShell was invented and its popularity grows year over year. How is that even possible when the "no-code" way to administer Windows must clearly be better and more accessible and user friendly and coding is old fashioned and borderline obsolete? Every company with their heads on straight would fire anybody who uses PowerShell and replace all their admins with unskilled high school graduates. There is not enough room in town for both no-code and code solutions, so I expect Microsoft to remove PowerShell in it's next update.
Tesla's model has difficulty generating depth data.

This has been demonstrated many times by Teslas crashing into stationary or large obstacle in front of the cars that would have been immediately apparent to a human driver or a car with LIDAR.
> Because it allows lower wage workers to implement half baked solutions, and manipulate data in away that executives want regardless if it accurate, true, or reliable?

Or to phrase it more generously: It allowed people to create the tools they needed to make their lives easier without engaging the services of a professional programmer.

I know that to the professional programmer this is a high-crime worthy significant prison time, but to me it is basically the point of personal computing.
What you need is a zillion representative miles. If Waymo mostly drives in easy conditions, or autopilot is mostly only on in easy conditions, then even 100 billion miles won’t let you extrapolate on how safe it is in a full regular person end to end commute scenario.

It’s clearer by hours instead of by miles. If a normal car gets into an accident every 1 zillion hours, and I’ve driven my research car for 20 minutes and then had it parked for 100 zillion hours and it only had one accident accident, I don’t get to claim it’s 100x safer. (100x fewer accidents per hour!) It has to be apples to apples.
The Tuatara Is the World's Fastest Production Car
Is it possible your wife googled it? That may have flagged your household to receive those ads
Keeping your wealth as money is also gambling (you're betting against high inflation rate).
Apparently modern housing uses PEX water pipes, but my house has a mix of PEX, iron, and copper pipes. The water flows just fine. I'll probably rip out the iron and copper eventually when I do a major remodel, but I'm not stressing about it.
One of the main benefits is explicitly acknowledging relevant context. Timestamps don't provide additional relevant context
This pattern is not even limited to no-code. You could just substitute "No Code" for mongodb (or coffeescript, or AngularJS, or pretty much any of the short-lived tech that we used or watched people use over the last several decades). Some new hotness catches on and some doesn't. It's really too early to tell for No-Code, but proclaiming its arrival is also premature. Not that the media/marketing machine has any problem beating the drums about unproven tech. But yeah, I feel like I've seen this cycle dozens of times in the last decade of auditing failed software projects that someone is looking to salvage.
Deep Mind have already beat this game with AlphaZero.