skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I don't see it any more crazy than that you can legally agree to something by clicking.
Why would these things remain on sourcehut if they get a DMCA filing? If you do not take the offending material offline, you open yourself to a lawsuit and if you do, new contributors have no way of accessing this data.

Open issues and similar will likely also get lost unless restores, unless you count "exists in someone's inbox/archive" as "the issues and pull requests continue to exist". Because in my opinion, that's barely better than having no backup as all relational data in regards to these things is lost.
Some next level censorship by local Apple employees, probably don't want to get caught in crosshairs after it blows up
So he think twitter didn't have any influence on the people?

It's such a bad thing to say, and perplexing given the reason they exist.

Any platform that used for information and ideas sharing should have some influence on people knowledge and opinions, and so also the election. Influence is not necessarily a bad thing.
Japan Radio Law and Japan Telec Certification
When wireless products launch Japan market, will be encounter a compulsory certification called Japan Radio Law certification, commonly known as telec certification or called R certification.

In addition, there are names such as Japan MIC certification, giteki certification, JRL certification. Japan JRL certification is mainly used to control the radio frequency of the product.

Mainly testing items:

frequency error, antenna power density, channel bandwidth, dwell time, etc.

Most of the testing items of WiFi and Bluetooth products are similar to the EN 300 328, but the testing items are simpler and less than the EN 300 328.

After successful application for Japan Radio Law certification, The certification authority RCB will issue a Japan Radio Law certificate that include ID number.The manufacturer needs to mark the Japan Radio Law certification logo and ID number together on the product,so that the product to be legally sold in the Japanese market.

Post image
To apply for Japan Radio Law certification, the required files list are as follows:

Block Diagram, BOM, product photos,

User Manual, Circuit Diagram, PCB layout,

Antenna Specifications, Quality System declaration or certificate (Declaration of Quality Management System or ISO certificate).

Deeplight Technology has many years of experience in assisting customers to apply for a series of certifications in Japan, not only the Japanese Radio Law, but also the Japanese Telecommunications Law certification, and the Japanese PSE certification. Welcome to consult us about certifications related to Japan.

Email：sin@dlcer.com WeChat：dlcert

Mobile：+86-18038042309 Tel：+86-755-8920 2795
I heard this from someone who swore it worked for her too, but it has never worked for me. It must be a superpower! :)
I am also not surprise that when other company does this same thing the comments and votes/flags are much different.
> That’s why C# has that little caveat. You can avoid the pain of async in C# by using threads.

This is the first time I've seen threads referred to as a way to avoid pain.
So do you have any thoughts on how to get to a place without intellectual property?
Plasma coat spraying predates the space era, though it was rapidly refined in the 1950s for aerospace use.
I think the public perception of teachers varies a lot between societies. In breaking bad it was clear that Americans don't think much of a guy who ends up teaching chemistry. If you go to other countries it's very different, eg in Switzerland it seemed totally legit to aspire to teaching. Salary was 120k according to the kid who told me.
True, but the key difference in the lock-free approach is that the "lock" is basically a pointer-swizzling or timestamp-swizzling operation, and so the lock duration is strictly bounded; it is determined by the application or the thread-scheduler.
That's not a firewall, the brain just denies outside information in conflict with internal biases unless it's formed in a way that changes internal biases subtly, which will very quietly switch your bias. There is no firewall in the brain, not even scepticism and critical thinking.
> Also it isn’t particularly fast afaik

What exactly "isn't particularly fast"? :)

In any real-world application the cost of STM machinery itself is, at a first approximation, 0.

There is a cost to immutable data structures, but I don't think that's what you were talking about.
No idea. Sadly, history seems to suggest that changes this big only come after some kind of considerable pain. Maybe it's possible to slowly evolve away from it, but I doubt I'll live to see that. As I said, I'm a terrible activist. :-)

The best I've got is to just slowly try to normalize copyright subversion. I try to do that by using the UNLICENSE in the hope that others are exposed to the idea and repeat it if they like it.
I'm not quite sure I follow your comment. If the program never terminates then it will loop forever and potentially freeze the machine depending from where it is invoked in the kernel. Example of loops that can be detected to terminate:

int nested_loops(volatile struct pt_regs* ctx)
{
int i, j, sum = 0, m;

for (j = 0; j < 300; j++)
for (i = 0; i < j; i++) {
if (j & 1)
m = ctx->rax;
else
m = j;
sum += i * m;
}

return sum;
}

Or for example another one that is also part of selftests with induction variable i:

int while_true(volatile struct pt_regs* ctx)
{
int i = 0;

while (true) {
if (ctx->rax & 1)
i += 3;
else
i += 7;
if (i > 40)
break;
}

return i;
}

Overall this is very useful to avoid unrolling loops & keeping the code dense and icache friendly, and to parse (e.g.) IPv6 extension headers and such.
And then, your projects start to scale hand your bill goes up exponentially. Firebase start to become 70% of your total business cost. You look for alternatives but soon realise that it would be an immense effort to move away since you have everything interconnected in Firebase. So you take it. Until one day, something changes: a policy, a feature, maybe your gmail account gets banned and your firebase closed. And you still have all the eggs in the same basket and can't move them.

Now I wrote this as an answer to you, but it's in reality just speculation and the reason why I avoid Google (and Amazon) services like the plague. They are competitive but just the possibility of the above scenario happening would keep me up at night.
> What if they just stopped the free version entirely and became paid-only like Netflix, Disney+, etc.?

Those are cheaper than Youtube Premium, for more exclusive content.
It makes complete sense to me to not be honest with your opinion on economic predictions. It would be insider trading light. And if you could broadcast misinformation to a broader public of traders...
> I had a really big problem with acid reflux a while back after I stopped drinking alcohol.

Are you implying that cutting back on alcohol can cause acid reflux? That doesn't seem right.
My take is that this is the effect of the requirements of the companies producing hardware and is entirely unrelated to the CPU architecture. On desktop and server consumers have a very strong demand that off-the-shelf OSes Just Work (so they can install stock RedHat or Windows) and so there is pressure on hw manufacturers to create and follow standards. Breaking away from the consensus standards is penalized, not rewarded. You can see this happening as Arm moved into the server space, too -- server Arm is much less heterogenous than embedded Arm. Conversely, in embedded devices there is little or no pressure to standardize, because often the system software will be a custom build for that device anyway, and end-users aren't expected to try to install a new OS on it. In this world, differences in hardware tend to be rewarded rather than penalized -- the funky nonstandard feature in your SoC may be what persuades the h/w designer to pick you rather than a competitor, implementing something in a weird way can shave a bit off power consumption or just save time in the design process, and so on. And because there's no requirement to have the end user install a new OS the temptation to save time in development by not trying to upstream kernel changes is often overwhelming.

The difficulty with 'dev boards' like the RPi is that for economic reasons they're made with SoCs from the high-volume markets of the embedded world but sold to people who want to use them like the standardized hw of the server world. This mismatch tends to be annoying and inconvenient.

Anyway, my take is that for RISC-V the dynamics will be exactly the same -- in the embedded world there will be a profusion of different hardware and a lot of binary blobs and non-upstreamed drivers; in the server world things will be nicer; and dev boards will be more like the embedded world than you would like.

(Also, x86 is really unusual in having such a uniform every-machine-looks-the-same ecosystem; this has happened by historical accident as much as anything else. Of course most people only have experience with x86, but it might help to try to not think of absolute-x86-monoculture as 'normal' and wider-variety as 'weird', when it's the other way around :-))
> The point is that it's not scarce. That is, I can use a copy of the software without inhibiting your simultaneous use of it.

That depends. You could view the idea in it's abstract, intangible form; and then the manifestation of that idea in the real word, as symbols (letters, numbers, drawings, notes,...) which reflect that idea. When you download code, you ultimately make a copy of manifestation represented as electromagnetic signals encoded as digital symbols.

The process of having a novel idea consists of assembling mental constructs together as a thought proces and then expressing that through shared social constructs (language, art, symbols,...). What is protected by IP is your claim to be the first person - the original author - having had the idea. Not the idea itself.

The opposite of that is not making that distinction, collapsing the process of making copies of the manifestation of an idea, and having the idea itself into one. This would imply that being the first to have constructed a novel idea is no argument for a claim to intellectual ownership.

The real problem with copyright, though, isn't making that first claim. It's the abstract notion that rights to claim IP can be extended and transferred. Which creates a very different can of worms.
No Greenwald - no Intercept. It will be forgotten within year, as soon as Glenn opens a new thing.
The blog title doesn't fit the content. Were it changed to "it's dangerous to think humans will leave earth" it would be more fitting and at the same time less divisive (and less wrong, in my view).

Arguments in these comments are great defenders of space exploration in the now, but even in the distant future we should realise that a destiny among the stars and space travel doesn't mean leaving earth behind.
I was thinking of buying a new iPad, I'm pretty turned off now.

Disgusted really.
Where is the demo? Why isnt the demo at top?
For the trigger in the last 200 years, it is just fossile fuels. Having all this energy provides us with enough food and comfort to survive, thus lot's of spare time and spare manpower dedicated to research and improving tech. It also feeds all these machines we are making.

Going back to renewable will be tough (but is mandatory). We are a species that has been high on cocaine for a couple of centuries and we just realized that it slowly killing us, and it is running out anyway. Our only option is to sober up.
Yup, have experienced it personally. I usually wake up few mins before the alarm goes off. Though not proven through science you know something is there.

Another thing I would like to add is that scientific community should be more open to test conventional wisdom.
Plenty of medicine IP is created by taxpayer-funded university researchers and then patented by companies. If we eliminated drug patents, it doesn't eliminate medicine research because that's happening independently of profit motive (though still not necessarily independent of funding motive). It just eliminates the monopolization of medicine. Pharmaceutical companies could still make a profit because they'd still be important for manufacturing the drugs and could charge a markup for it. And since they wouldn't be paying for the patents and any pharmaceutical company could compete with any other, it could lower the cost to the consumer.
How to Find Best Diagnostic Lab – Gdax Laboratory in California
If you are finding the best diagnostic Lab for a blood test and full body check-ups then Gdax is the good platform where you can get multiple tests services. Now connect Gdax login and get multiple information related to coin base also. Here Gdax provides home services also with cheap prices. For more info or any query visit the site.
Why Is Optimal Life Keto the Answer?
As a result, you may lose ten kilos or extra with the ketogenic eating regimen and those most excellent drugs. So, hold analyzing our Optimal Life Keto Review to discover how this top notch ketogenic weight reduction formulation allow you to narrow down quicker than ever with ketosis! Otherwise, click on the banner underneath to look if you may declare a FREE TRIAL OFFER of the pinnacle promoting drugs earlier than the provide expires and also you omit your hazard to optimize your weight reduction results!Click Here https://apnews.com/press-release/ts-newswire/lifestyle-nutri...

https://sites.google.com/view/latestreview/Optimal-Life-Keto

https://angel.co/company/optimal-life-keto-cost
There’s no guarantee that you’re not calling unsafePerformIO in Haskell, which a lot of outwardly pure libraries do. In fact, wouldn’t STM be doing this under the hood? Even the FFI in Haskell allows you to import a function without the return type being in IO as long as you pinky promise that it is pure.

The idea in the end is to provide a language for working on memory concurrently. You either choose speak it or not.
That is really a stretch. Need a sense of proportion.

At that point, we should all first be protesting Microsoft Excel and Windows software, Ford Motors, all of our Wyoming coal producing mines, Boeing, and more, for providing products that much more directly enable China to do what it's doing, than someone's inability to write a word on a pencil.
Not everyone, this is likely going to be my new phone: https://www.fairphone.com/en/

I was also thinking of an iPhone 12, I don't think I'll bother now.
Which people? A percentage of people?

Those extremes are only extreme for people wanting a bell curve.

They had more quality in their data but they where incapable of using it because they like to take averages and so they blame the users.
Technically it's not "friction" because "friction" has to be between two solids. But arguably that's just being pedantic. The air gets in the way of the object moving through it and slows it down, but energy is conserved, as always, so the energy ends up as heat. Knowing that the correct term is "air resistance" rather than "friction" doesn't seem to provide any insight into what's happening, so I don't understand the obsession with correcting people online who call it "friction".

I've been told you can bring water to the boil with a food mixer and a bit of patience. That's not friction either. It's water getting in the way of and slowing down the blades.
In case you log back into this throw away.
Can you point me to reproduce experiments of phenomenas that challenge the current mainstream model of physics?
An extra one: addresses won't look like dates.

The typical way of writing my address starts in the format 1/2 X Street to indicate house number and flat number. Some text processor altered this to the format 1 February X Street. Not surprisingly that got misdelivered.
If you're on desktop you can just install a couple of browser extensions (uBlock and Sponsorblock).
But you won't be able to download it - youtube-dl is not with us anymore.
Anecdotally I don’t think so, but I don’t have any numbers. I’ve had quite a few jobs in 40 years working as a programmer. I believe around half of the people I’ve worked with got their job through the side door rather than through a formal application process. Sometimes the side door was a connected recruiter, but more often it was through a past work relationship or friend-of-a-friend. I can’t remember ever getting a job myself by sending in applications, though I have gone through interviews.

I suppose a lot depends on where you want to work.

Regardless, my main point is not to overlook contacts and former colleagues. I think going through the front door with applications is the last resort, not the first or best approach. There’s a book called Who’s Hiring Who? that I found useful a long time ago.
In the case of intellectual property, it often means a "right to exclude". The right to exclude others from doing something is a property right. Using force to empower some to exclude others from doing something, is itself an idea that may or may not have pragmatic value.

The point is that there are useful views on property that do not require the object or thing to be scarce. For example in the US property is legally the bundle of rights people have in relation to an object or thing (including ideas).

Edit: And you're right, there's nothing "natural" about IP. It's just a tool that may or may not be useful.
I would guess 64bit floating point (double) Vs 128bit floating point. Eg f32 and f128
This is a great metaphor because you will often see people with a technical background arguing copyright law is if it was purely about the bits. Because for us, the bits are the only real thing. But the law does not see it like that.
Lots of people here weighing in with their 2c about the authenticity of the data, but why is everyone arguing about this?

Sure, we the technologically savvy people have the means to verify the digital authenticity of these files/emails/documents. But we don't have access to them (and likely won't). So we can't actually claim one way or the other for sure until we do.
Mockoon is the easiest and quickest way to run mock APIs locally
After I failed to find the code and an accompanying license, I reached the same conclusion:

This is basically an ad.
If that's the case there is no way to save the US. Everyone will keep screaming at each other based on the propaganda they buy into until the guns come out.

There has to be a way to present alternate ways of interpreting facts without immediately getting accused of partisan censorship. US media can't even agree on what the facts are without the partisan accusation coming out.

How to rebuild institutional trust once it's gone?
Representative Product Design, According to Google’s Head of Product Inclusion
> What is protected by IP is your claim to be the first person - the original author - having had the idea. Not the idea itself.

I think it's just a manner of speaking. In order to create this protection, you have to elevate ideas to some kind of property by creating an artificial scarcity. Or at least, that's the result produced by a system of intellectual property. That artificial scarcity, introduced by a coercive state, is what I'm opposed to.

> The real problem with copyright, though, isn't making that first claim. It's the abstract notion that rights to claim IP can be extended and transferred. Which creates a very different can of worms.

Yes, removing the latter while keeping the former would be a HUGE improvement on the status quo I think. But I still see the former as problematic. :-)
I respect BurntSushi's stance and I think it is a valid one. However, the disapproval of the use of copyright as a hack against itself is ideological in nature and is therefore somewhat contrary to deep practicality.
GenZ tells how to optimize virtual event ads
Annotate a Website using this Chrome Extension
The stress and frustration of finding out you are a token hire
In Cowboy Beebop, People mostly live off earth because of constant collision by asteroids. They never explain why but maybe a corporation decided to mess with the celestial mechanics and humanity paid the price.
Yeah that's what I do.

Next question.... overriding reply-on-top for mailing list replies? :)
AI has cracked a key mathematical puzzle for understanding our world
I would second huel. its made my shift to veganism much, much more pleasant and practical and has allowed me to hit my macros for hypertrophy in a more manageable way
Even more edgy: None of us are "real", and it is not a simulation.

(To be pedantic, it doesn't matter if it's a simulation or not. The important part is that we are not what we think we are.)
I would not disagree that your teachers failed you or vice-versa. But making grand pronouncements about people ("everyone else") and their problems as you see them ("without doing any critical thinking or experimentation of their own") and teachers too - and apparently based solely upon your personal experience
in school and your thoughts on one church that just happens to be physically nearby you - isn't gonna convince anyone. Your comment is ignorant and offensive to teachers.
I've run server machines in my home on my private connection since 2001, and I recommend this. Not only do you learn a lot, but you help keep the Internet what is's supposed to be: An global network of computers talking with each other.

I think this is a good time to plug the webring for geeks, just what you should join if you're running your website on your home connection! http://geekring.net/
Everyone got it, what difference does that make regarding the censorship by local employees?
The Netherlands are such fine farmland that people spent enormous effort to keep the sea and rivers away. I was nearby recently and went for some bicycle trip. One pleasant little creek, perhaps 50cm deep and 1m wide, used to rise by 6m every so often. That area was settled eight hundred years ago, because the farmland was worth the effort required to keep the flooding under control.

It's hardly surprising that such fine land becomes a breadbasket, and it's not proof that it can be done anywhere.

And you're not capital-rich if your capital is a home in an area people want to leave, and your country isn't capital-rich if people there see no future. The fine infrastructure of your former home is worthless in the eyes of the visa applicants in the country you want to move to, because they, like you, don't want to live there.
Password managers help prevent phishing
But, I also explained why the hack (in this case, copyleft) is, in practice, contrary to my goal of sharing my code with others. So it's not just ideological.
A letter to Steven Pinker about global poverty (2019)
I think the Rogen interview opened his eyes up to the possibilities in the world of podcasting (more so than maybe talking with Matt Taibbi who's just getting started).

I honestly think that interview gave him the courage to take the leap - and was not at all surprised to hear he resigned today.
Just because property can be used to artificially create scarcity, due to laws that were piled on by centuries of history and common use, does not change the nature of property.

You are not contradicting his idea of property, what you say only has an impact on how to use the current system. It's not relevant to the conversation.

The idea is to define property, to get the first principles before deciding how the Law should be to protect those principles.

To put it another way: that the current laws can be used to create a perversion of property that allows artificial scarcity, does not say anything about the nature of property itself.

> property—the legal exclusive privilege

There is a concept of property that predates and transcends your legal system, so this definition is insufficient.