skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Thanks for sharing, I have added it to the issue, maybe you want to join the discussion there :) https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/273618#note_43...

Just so that I can follow - URLs posted by non-admins should not render as HTML URLs at all? Wouldn't that be quite limiting for OSS project members for example?
The issue is the low supply of healthcare. The way to lower prices is to increase supply or decrease demand.
(A) I don't think that's empirically true; it's easy to rattle off high-quality Netflix content, which is why so many people subscribe to it.

(B) I don't think that's theoretically true either, in that Netflix and "Hollywood" both get content the same way: by buying it from production companies.
Everyone expected this for all big tech. Google's came as a surprise as last quarter numbers weren't that good. I am assuming it will start moving now considerably.
I dunno if it'd be worth the effort, either it would miss a ton of stuff, be complaining all the time, or require a massive whitelist.
What ridiculous conspiracy theory are you referring to?
“Fascism “ means basically “really bad” the same way “Hitler” means “really bad”. I really hate it that most groups have their favorite bad words, be it “racist”, “socialist”, “fascist” or “neocon” without having even a basic understanding of their meaning or history. They all just mean “so bad that it can’t be even discussed or questioned”.
There is lots of room at the bottom.
There was a constant string of boats going back to England and many people did so. What kept people in the America’s was they where better off there than Europe not the inability to leave.
Quick Summary:

* Good writing tells a story. Use characters and actions.

* String together cohesive prose using consistent topic strings at the beginning of a sentence.

* Put emphasis of new ideas at the end of the sentence.

* Be concise and with fewer words. Unnecessary to state with reader can infer.
s/universe/universe observable to humans/
I wish I'd had this post a couple years ago. I got into my current job by starting as a contractor, helping a friend out in an emergency situation. I've done PHP for over a decade, but had never written Ruby beyond some basic CLI scripts! I spent a few days learning how Rails works, and then how Heroku works (ephemeral filesystems were a new idea to me at the time), and finally got it all together. I also wish I'd put something like this together based on what I went through, but I'm glad this exists for others.
It also takes time and money to test.
A Microservices Success Story
Yes, Sweden ~1990. There was an agency responsible for adapting housing availability after need. If there was a shortage, it was acted upon. Then the whole homeownership wave, markets etc came.
Most importantly, this behavior (by social media and news outlets) is very damaging for USA.

What if 8 years from now there is much more censorship, information control AND authoritarian maniac (from either party) at the helm? All of this, as we see can and did happen. Will the country survive this happening simultaneously with single party/leader in control?
Some things are just better to me on DVD to be honest, and The Office is definitely one of those. The extras, the commentary tracks, it's just been a better experience for me than on netflix.
Unlike with cable, we don't have natural monopolies keeping competition away. So now we have competition: if you don't want Netflix, you have a choice in YouTube TV, Hulu, HBO, Disney, CBS All Access, Amazon Prime Video, and more.
Not if the supply of healthcare was increased (more doctors). Then they would be willing to sell their services for a lower price, and the insurance companies would be able to offer lower premiums, winning business from other insurance companies offering higher premiums.
I like these resources. The most general are first, more specific toward the end.

https://pragprog.com/titles/tpdsl/language-implementation-pa...
Language Implementation Patterns
Create Your Own Domain-Specific and General Programming Languages
by Terence Parr (Antlr)

https://craftinginterpreters.com/
by Bob Nystrom

https://interpreterbook.com/
Writing An Interpreter In Go
by Thorsten Ball (also has a compiler book)

The Implementation of Lua 5.0 (short)
https://www.lua.org/doc/jucs05.pdf

A Deep Introduction to JIT Compilers: JITs are not very Just-in-time
https://carolchen.me/blog/jits-intro/
by Carol Chen

video series: JIT programming language development in C
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k3gDvF-Fbpw&list=PLvdK1vRmp8...
by Dmitriy Kubyshkin
New Insights into Mysterious Soviet ‘Dome of Light’ Phenomenon
Can't say anything more than: it depends.

To its essence, an ID allows interested parties to track something over time.

If you add additional meanings to an ID - e.g. the parent project as Jira does, or the kind as in ServiceNow - these can become outdated over time, and deceiving.

I'd say it's ok to change the "external name" as this other metadata changes over time (project name, bug, task, story, whatever...) but make the obsolete synonyms redirect to the currently active name.
I read the entire draft and I’m going to disagree with you. Rather than write a lengthy diatribe, I’ll start with my main point. This is all very neat and tidy and while it may all be true, we live in a political climate where foreign governments interfere in elections by spreading disinformation. In that case, an editor is absolutely correct to push back, make suggestions and ensure their otherwise respectable publication is not used as a tool to spread more disinformation the week before an election.
NASA finds rare metal asteroid worth more than global economy
If you're going to pretend yelling that people thinking the world will end by 2030 is reasonable, the burden of proof is on you to prove that credible organizations are actually saying that. Otherwise, you're just putting up a strawman of "lots of crazy people saying the world will end by 2030".
getting a javascript error in brave browser on mac. says option not defined.
> Well, your browser also has a history of all the sites you've been to in the past, and people tend not to go to a lot of random sites. It would be pretty simple to display something when you go to a site you've never been to before. Just an unobtrusive, but not too unobtrusive, "this is your first visit to this site.".

Whoa, that seems like a shockingly good idea! It could look similar to what happens when you enter data into a password field on a non-https website. The browser can pop up a little box under the input when you start typing, which says something like "this is your first time visiting this website. Only enter passwords on websites you trust."

Are there any major downsides I'm missing? Signing up for accounts on new sites would certainly create false-positives, but if the warning is properly coded that doesn't seem like such a problem.
> There's a pretty big excluded middle between "We can say with authority that X obstructed" and "We can exonerate X of obstructing".

Mueller was following Justice Department policy - he can't even say he thought a crime was committed, despite mountains of evidence, because the department's policy is it will never prosecute the president, so they can't indict, and thus won't ever accuse.

The president could murder someone on live television and department policy would be to say "Doesn't look like anything to me."
No, you're both incorrect.

Tesla's own legal filings shows that Autopilot is 2-3x more likely to get into accidents that Teslas without Autopilot engaged. (The 2x for Autopilot disabled but other advanced driving features engaged; 3x for all advanced driving functions disabled.) https://www.forbes.com/sites/bradtempleton/2020/10/28/new-te...

Their marketing claims are just that: marketing.
Efficient GPU Path Rendering Using Scanline Rasterization
> The last thing I watched that was truly wonderful on Netflix was Mindhunter -- which I heard was canceled by Netflix because it's too expensive.

Nnnnnooooo!

https://www.wired.com/story/why-netflix-keeps-canceling-show...

I honestly consider this the same as Google. They're so focused on insane metrics they don't realize that by killing everything new - good and bad, people are just going to give up on the company entirely because their reputations sour over time.

I mean why am I going to try something new from Google just to find out they're cancelling it in 2 years? Likewise, why would I invest my time in a new Netflix series just to find out it's cancelled after 2 seasons?

The true problem is it's a self-fulfilling prophecy at this point.
Mindhunter, the one about serial killers, was cancelled?
That’s so sad, it was a great show.
It’s also possible that people use iPads and laptops more and phones less with the ongoing pandemic. I suspect that more given Samsung’s forecasts for Q4. It can be some combination of both forces.
Anybody else hit this bug with Netflix:

You have a perfectly valid Credit Card, you try to re-start your account (or maybe create a new account), and you get a "payment form not valid". Your bank says Netflix isn't even trying to authorize the payment, netflix support says they know there is no issue with your card, the issue is on their side, but they cannot fix it, the only proposed solution is to buy a netflix gift card...

https://twitter.com/dorfsmay/status/1315402870661902336

This totally puzzles me.

They have a bug that I am sure technical people would jump in and solve in a matters of hours, they have tech support people who understand the issue, but the company has provided no way to connect the two!
I think we should have a mechanism to keep a list of "sites that need extra trust". Browser should warn about all sites whose url seems to be mimicking them.

These would be all the sites on which you think you need extra amount of trust. Say all sites where you do financial transactions, and ones like gmail which are used for identity verification.
Those will be ok, I’m thinking of R packages I use which build FORTRAN code on installation.
Netflix has underpriced its service forever, it really should be more expensive than it always has been. They've anchored expectations to a low number now, so it's hard to change.
Reality TV is cheap and engaging. The same reason it worked on broadcast/cable. It’s all about numbers now since Netflix is a large company.

I hope companies like HBO keep trying to win with quality over junk.
Interesting and related: how 3D printing may be leveraged

https://www.usace.army.mil/Media/News-Archive/Story-Article-...
I really always wondered why people thought this wasn't going to happen, because at the end of the day all the institutions that produced the dynamics of cable television exist on the internet, nothing has changed.

It doesn't really matter whether you send information over an ethernet cabel or a satellite dish.
Apple demoed Docker and Parallels at the Developer State of the Union, and has written a new Hypervisor.framework for the new Macs. I think it'll be fine (I'll be sure once VirtualBox gets working on it, with the amount of trouble they've had with the new Windows Hypervisor I hope it'll be faster).
Actually the Mac sales aren’t that surprising to me; lousy keyboards were preventing everyone I knew (including me) from upgrading. They finally shipped something reasonable that would sell. Now if they just get rid of Touch Bar they’ll make up the rest.
My point is that we can survive a Biden or Trump. But once you start suppressing points of view, in the end, the election outcome won't matter. And if they think they are doing it "just this once" to save the country, they will do it again, as soon as its convenient for them. These are not the signs of a healthy free press.
I find shows like Deadwind are the only shows that are worth watching. A few other nordic noir shows are good too. I think the average person probably likes horrible shows like Riverdale. And Netflix is going to have a lot of success because of that.
How much is office and how much Azure? I presume that’s a big part of the difference.

Regarding YT, it’s a different service than Netflix so not as comparable IMO.
Full stack means a specific kind of developer, though. I would never call myself "full stack", even though the "stack" I work on goes from the kernel all the way to UI code.
This is not a uniquely fascist thing. Every dictatorship suppresses different ideas, censors etc.

Otherwise you could argue that giving speeches or writing pamphlets and books is a fascist thing.
are pg extensions supported?

-j
Checkout "The Midnight Gospel" on Netflix -- it's one of a kind.
> canceled by Netflix because it's too expensive.

I'm sad to hear that. Their reason makes no sense to me; that show is mostly dialogue.
Microsoft has a strong foothold in corporate services. Google will need decades to build something similar, if ever.
An EV cert basically screams you have no idea what you are doing in the security realm. "We can't make our site secure, but we can make it look secure.". Like when people put those little "security seal" gifs all over the place.
The post describes how Fexprs were designed in a way that was tightly coupled to implementation choices around eval, in ways which were later limiting. Did you experience this? Were there things you might have wanted to change about your lisp which were inhibited by the use of Fexprs?

> FEXPRs and FSUBRs were ... meta-implementation
operators that relied on the meta-circular definition of EVAL

> The problem with FEXPRs is that they are far too powerful and place too many constraints on the implementation.

> FEXPRs were designed
around the fact that the language had a meta-circular definition that was
implemented via recursive descent of list structure.

> A FEXPR, on the other hand, is a program that is deliberately
not abstracted away from the concrete representation.

> A FEXPR manipulates objects on both sides
of the isomorphism (yuck), so Big-P and Big-P^-1 cannot be factored out
of the semantics.
> According to the response by the Intercept he's actually flipping out against basic edit suggestions as censorship

Source? Your link doesn't say anything about basic edit suggestions.

Looking at the emails [0], this appears to be strong editorializing (much of it far from clearcut) for what (I believe) is an opinion piece.

[0]: https://greenwald.substack.com/p/emails-with-intercept-edito...?
Yes, I am talking about Keith Packard, but as I do not personally know anyone involved I didn't feel like dropping names.

Spurred by this discussion I read this old email thread linked by Wikipedia: https://web.archive.org/web/20030821073445/http://xfree86.or...

This is a year before the license change I think?

You will note that Keith is directly blamed for the fork and undermining XFree86. It sounds like there is also resentment for how XRENDER was done, also driven by Keith, but it would seem with more cooperation within the project. We know that the fork was the victor in history and XFree86 looks unreasonable to most observers but I was merely trying to accurately convey the other side in the dispute, without taking their side.

It does seem like there were a bit of tensions between "Linux on the desktop" types (driven by end user visible features and represented by the fork) and more conservative "old hand at X" types present in the thread, resisting such changes, maybe sometimes for good reasons and sometimes for bad. Though when I google around, it seems Keith and others were active in X before the rise of Linux.
Not to mention the boost they will get from Apple One subscriptions. The $30 plan is almost a no brainer for families if they're already paying for iCloud and music.
Are you claiming that Glenn Greenwald, one of the most respected journalists, is publishing a garbage article?
Then prior to that you'll have to encourage users to subscribe to non-cable internet connections that have some amount of upstream bandwidth so that they can publish via machines they control.
I wonder if we've come to a point where people will watch what's promoted at the top of the streaming services they subscribe to, with the exception of virally popular shows or shows recommended to them by friends and family. A good chunk of TV watching is just watching to pass the time. Whatever's trending on Netflix is good enough, coupled with a few shows you and your family are rotating through. Some exceptional shows do drive subscriptions for a particular service. But I think Game of Thrones and The Mandalorian are the exception. More common is watching Friends reruns or the new comedy that pops up on the front page of your streaming service.
I'm sure they'll tout some new "Rosetta" feature like they had for the switch from PowerPC to Intel last time
The most shocking part of this whole fiasco is the way The Intercept's editors blatantly play favorites, allowing disinformation that helps Biden while censoring a legitimate story that hurts him:

> 4) Finally, I have to note what I find to be the incredible irony that The Intercept -- which has published more articles than I can count that contain factually dubious claims if not outright falsehoods that are designed to undermine Trump's candidacy or protect Joe Biden -- is now telling me, someone who has never had an article retracted or even seriously corrected in 15 years, that my journalism doesn't meet the editorial requirements to be published at the Intercept.

> It was The Intercept that took the lead in falsely claiming that publication by the NY Post was part of a campaign of "Russian disinformation" -- and did so by (a) uncritically citing the allegations of ex-CIA officials as truth, and (b) so much worse: omitting the sentence in the letter from the ex-CIA officials admitting they had no evidence for that claim. In other words, the Intercept -- in the only article that it bothered to publish that makes passing reference to these documents -- did so only by mindlessly repeating what CIA operatives say. And it turned out to be completely false. This -- CIA stenography -- is what meets the Intercept's rigorous editorial standards:

> "The U.S. intelligence community had previously warned the White House that Giuliani has been the target of a Russian intelligence operation to disseminate disinformation about Biden, and the FBI has been investigating whether the strange story about the Biden laptop is part of a Russian disinformation campaign. This week, a group of former intelligence officials issued a letter saying that the Giuliani laptop story has the classic trademarks of Russian disinformation."

> The Intercept deleted from that quotation of the CIA's claims this rather significant statement: "we do not have evidence of Russian involvement."

> Repeatedly over the past several months, I've brought to Betsy's attention false claims that were published by The Intercept in articles that were designed to protect Biden and malign Trump. Some have been corrected or quietly deleted, while others were just left standing.

https://greenwald.substack.com/p/emails-with-intercept-edito...
He's not wrong. But, it seems the American public is completely obsessed with the October Surprise. Everyone is waiting for that last minute piece of information that will flip the entire election on its head. And why not? Social and mass media have been training us to trawl for the "bug scoop" for decades now.

The truth is, news doesn't happen overnight. If anything sufficiently important is to be determined true, it needs to happen over a course of weeks or months, as people process the information, debate with each other, and come to a consensus on what it means for the country. Just because we can have this conversation with smaller and more rapid steps due to technology doesn't mean that we can get to the destination any faster.

So, in my opinion, burying this story is wrong. Amplifying it is also wrong. If Trump truly believes this is corruption, he should open an investigation, one that will be widely mocked as a political hit job and will still not finish until well into the next term. But, if you care about your country, you do it anyway. Not to win an election but because it's the right thing to do. I guess we'll see what happens.
Happy to help! :)

mg@WorkOS.com
Use a standard power supply, put it in a case and maybe develop on it. and pci-express opens up possibilities the pi (not compute) doesn't really have access to.

I have many pis that I love, but you have to admit, there are a few compromises made for a lower bom cost. That is not a requirement for a $600+ board.
While this is a legitimate problem, the article seems to be a disguised advertisement for NordVPN and 1Password, who Troy Hunt is partnered with [1] [2]. There is a clear bias towards suggesting that the solution to the problem is that everyone signs up and pays for these services.

[1] https://www.troyhunt.com/im-partnering-with-nord-as-a-strate...

[2] https://www.troyhunt.com/have-i-been-pwned-is-now-partnering...
On top of everything else, rate matters.

An example of a climate effect that nobody mentioned is ocean acidification. It turned out that if you add CO2 to water, you get carbonic acid. This melts calcium carbonate at the bottom of the sea. The buffering makes the pH of the oceans relatively constant no matter what CO2 levels happen to be.

Unfortunately that buffering takes place on the order of thousands of years. Which is fine when CO2 slowly increases in level. But when it rises suddenly, as it is doing right now, the oceans turn into a mild acid. Mild, that is, except for corals and shellfish whose shells dissolve. And anything that depends on them. Which, given how ecosystems connect, is pretty much everything in the ocean.

Already, 3/4 of coral reefs in the world have experienced bleaching event. Similarly mass die-offs of shellfish have been widely reported in fisheries. Future projections are..bleak.

All of this from a level of change that would have been fine if it was spread over 10,000 years rather than 100.
There is no limit as long as the $ printer goes brrrr.

Stonks only go up.
Jimmy is funny

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bfn83YmKSKc&ab_channel=TheJi...
the theory works for many kind of surpluses. if there are too many engineers and scientists and not enough jobs for them it's a problem. this also applies to any kind of elites: someone who considers himself above the general population: medieval nobles, roman senators, programmers. too many of them and it's a problem. you can read turchin's scientific articles, he uses data from different societies (widely different) and his equations seem to work to predict instability
I put more trust in him. He has shown more reason to trust him given the Snowden disclosures.
Mind if I ask why?

It will take quite some time for everything to be ported. And there will always be the longtail that never will be.
Netflix strategy seems to be hook you with a big budget new show, then slash the budget for season 2 and see if it still sticks(interestingly that didn't seem to be the case with Lost in Space, and Dark Crystal was just outright cancelled).

Also watching a lot more Amazon+HBO these days.
That's fascinating! Is there anything I could read about this? I would love to hear more about a rich first-world country being able to meet literally everyone's housing needs fully and in a timely manner without using a market economy.
Yay! More massive destruction of Mother Earth for throwaway toys!
the monopoly is on the content, now
>Companies like Grubhub list restaurants on their site/app, but put the wrong phone number on it- one that goes to their own people instead.

Slice does something similar. They set up fraudulent websites for local pizzerias, so they can direct people to order through their app:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23346971