skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
There's also the "protect-my-pie-ism" that skilled labor unions engage in. We have cheap alternatives to heavy metal pipes, but they're outlawed in a lot of places because of the pipefitters' lobbies. Same goes for a lot of other building codes under the guise of safety - the system is deliberately made inefficient to protect jobs.

Personally, I blame the system of incentives created by late-stage capitalism. It's more beneficial to litigate your job to a safe place than to learn a new or more efficient method of accomplishing the same job.
Greenwald doesn't work for Fox and there are multiple copies of the documents, I don't see your point?
Er, Mueller straight up said "if we could exonerate the President for obstruction of justice, we would. But we can't." So Mueller has admitted that Trump obstructed his investigation, and several members in Trump's circle have gone to jail for _lying to the FBI_.

Not to mention the fact that Mueller's investigation clearly found that Trump's campaign was in contact with Russian agents, knew they favored Trump's campaign, and "welcomed" their help (i.e., foreign interference). This is what the public understands as "collusion". However, "collusion" is not a legal term, "conspiracy" is and has a higher bar of proof. So yes, Trump colluded with Russia, we just couldn't prove that they explicitly conspired since Trump's circle lied for him.
Yea, you can also see from the linked dashboards that it's writing way more stuff at the end of the build. I was watching the log just now and it looks like it's linking some things. I hope someone with more Bazel and LLVM knowledge can give this a go. I just wanted to toss something up as a "what would it be like if I just compiled this project" perspective.

This is absolutely not a definitive "X is better than Y" since X and Y are completely different things.
You seem to be intentionally misunderstanding and/or misrepresenting things, including context. GrubHub is a food delivery company.
fyi, UPS found the missing mail. So we are waiting with bated breath for Tucker to blow our minds with the critical documents...
In my mind, a media organization censoring a story that could aid Trump just days before the election is acting for the greater social good. I don't feel that optimizing for Greenwald's personal value system at this particular time would be the right tradeoff for America as a whole. Greenwald having the satisfaction of doing the right thing while the rest of us endure the rule of a strong man hell-bent on becoming America's Putin is not a fair trade.

It sucks that we don't live in a society where "The Truth" - if it could only be exposed to sunlight - would stand taller and brighter than everything else around it. If Greenwald wants to cosplay Walter Cronkite, and who wouldn't, he has to understand the impossibility of that in our current context. Everything is turned into spin for the disinformation machine. Everything is distorted, filtered, weaponized, super concentrated, and targeted directly to those it will anger the most. Truth has no power and no legitimacy in this context. Have we not learned anything from watching Trump these past four years?

We have to solve that problem before we can enjoy the benefits of truthful journalism. A problem for which we have to take some responsibility, since our technology is being abused to create this wretched hellscape.

It sucks and it isn't the world in which I want to live. I have young children myself. They will grow up with no Walter Cronkite, no trusted source of information. They will grow up in a world where truth is disconnected from reality. It's broken, and we can't ignore that, no matter how much it hurts us personally.
I agree we need both. I still think it is many many magnitudes harder for us to get to Mars or build a sustained presence on the Moon than to solve some of the energy or other problems we have on Earth. We have almost endless resources here but (largely) politically we aren't interested in solving them. I'm all for exploration and learning. The question is about the goal. Is our goal to learn about the Moon and our solar system or to have a significant human settlement (not involved in research) on the Moon? I'm pro-space and pro-exploration but not pro "we've killed the Earth but we'll do better on Mars".
> I could have been shot and killed by a mugger...

Don't get excited yet. Roving bands of raiders is still a potential outcome of climate change.
There's no candida or thrush risk from a mask if you don't wear it more than a day at a time.

You wouldn't wear the same set of underwear day after day, don't do it with a mask, either.
> Better community building: At the moment, MDN content edits are published instantly, and then reverted if they are not suitable. This is really bad for community relations. With a PR model, we can review edits and provide feedback, actually having conversations with contributors, building relationships with them, and helping them learn.

This is a longstanding debate in wiki/collaboratively written content, but it it interesting to note that Wikipedia and the other WMF projects have been pretty successful with the anyone can edit, revert or fix after. The review first model is used on specific pages, where it is called pending changes protection, although this is not really like a PR in that there is no comment functionality, and the standard for acceptance is lower--I don't remember the exact wording but it is closer to "this is not vandalism/not obviously wrong" rather than "I personally endorse this" much less "this is the community consensus." These edits have no special endorsement once approved and can still be changed by other editors freely. One benefit of the PR model is finality, once an issue/PR is decided no one else is supposed to open another one with virtually the same change. Wikipedia sort of has that via article talk pages, but there is of course no centralized "maintainer" to adjudicate each and every controversy. Also, many editors just don't check or even understand them.
No its not..the amount of Trumpers on Hacker News is surprising to me. this Biden scandal is a straight up republican talking point, promoted by Russia and trumpers to try and shift eyes from a collapsing, insane, administration. The lengths of corruption involved in even pursuing this story by trump and Giuliani has already caused Trump to be impeached a short while back.

It's not just 'pot calling kettle black'..both sides are bad logic here. Let assume the biden scandal is true: Complaining about Biden's son getting a lucrative contract because of his last name, is like complaining about the splash from a puddle during a tsunami, ie, It's small potatoes of the worst sort, and the willingness of the right wing to use it as a counter scandal does not bode well for Greenwald's points when he is used a pawn for right wing interests (Tucker Carlson really..)

A more nuanced consideration of Greenwald's actions and willingness to speak against Biden in context of Trump can be found here: https://www.counterpunch.org/2020/06/19/lesser-of-two-evils-chomsky-vs-greenwald-and-the-ignored-factor/ Greenwald is an Idealist and more power to him, But Is idealism better than a pragmatism in 2020 of all years? We are in the middle of a raging pandemic and society torn apart by ethnic strife. In this case between Trump a racist, ignorant failed casino owner, and overt con man (trump u) who directly caused the deaths of thousands of people because he ignored basic scientific truths, or Biden, a lukewarm status quo (and somewhat corrupt career politician) the answer is clear for survival: Biden.
The website mentions in the pricing popup:

>We are working on functionality for teams that provides visibility and predictability in product development. Features may include automation around sprints and multi-team workflows. This will be part of our premium plan, and is where the AI comes into play.

I've also been hurt by free tools that disappear after we commit to them but since Tara did AI stuff for PM in the past maybe they already have it in the roadmap.
This seems like an odd argument. One can be angry about... well anything. Not just things owed or not owed.

GP is venting some anger here at a relevant moment and the perspective is obviously valuable.
You can't just waive it through on the strength of his reputation, you have to check the sources.
Oh my....well I certainly deserve that one!!! Sadly, I have but one upvote to award you, and of course my respect for your keen eye!

Although, considering the content of the conversations in this thread, could I not simply invoke evidence-by-mind-reading? Is what's good for the goose not also good for the gander?

Regardless, while I have your attention....I'm curious if you have any thoughts on the ideas (specifically, "ESP" and "sea-lioning" nuances) in my previous comment? I think these sorts of things are quite interesting ideas.
I agree with the sentiment. But, it should not be illegal to lie about your inventory. As long as you are receiving what is promised by them at a price that you both agree, its all fair game.
Excel makes a good user interface for quick scientific apps... it used and extended a fairly complex radiometric analysis program at NASA/JPL that was built in Excel and used VB scripts for most of the calculations.

I made the same app in both Matlab and Python/Qt and it took far more time in both of those than it did in Excel.
Time is money...
I have a problem with anyone who takes my money and uses it to drop bombs and deceitful leaflets on me. I fail to see how that is naive.
I’ll love to see the next decade battle between arm and risc-v
Mozilla never promised them any pay in the first place
Will the way to fix CSV be to make small adjustments or will it be to replace it with something that isn’t about the worst format ever created?
My big thing was that the AMD drivers support all of the Linux kernel graphics features. Things like DRM (direct rendering manager) and KMS. One of the neat things about the former is allowing interprocess graphics buffer sharing. One example of where they're super useful is in all of the browsers that run their rendering process separate of their window process. Chrome and Firefox for example. You can just send a handle to the graphics buffer across a unix socket rather than having to use something like Angle (Chrome) and actually send the graphics commands across some IPC mechanism.

this is also one of the mechanisms that Wayland is built on top of.
He did: https://www.politico.com/story/2019/05/29/robert-mueller-wil...
The SiFive HiFive Unmatched comes in the mini-ITX standard form factor to make it easy to build a RISC-V PC. For the first time, standard industry connectors such as ATX power supplies, PCI-Express(r) expansion, Gigabit Ethernet, and USB ports are present on a single-board RISC-V development system.

Cost aside, I think using the PC ecosystem has a lot of advantages over the pi ecosystem.
I doubt that it did get out of his control. He probably has the authority to override his editor and publish it under The Intercept regardless of their comments, but he's choosing to respect the editorial process and protect the institution by not crossing that red line.
but if this change happens on the order of 100 years, that seems enough time to respond
How the hell is a 10% survival rate "not optimism?" Try a trillionth of a percent. It makes an astronomical time difference.
Are you insinuating that these ships are a driving force in inhibiting the formation of ice, that the lack of ice will be beneficial to these routes, or some other thought that I'm not seeing?
You say it’s reasonably well researched. What long running randomized trials in humans have shown it to be healthy? I’m legitimately curious.
The pushed story is that those emails implicate Joe Biden or otherwise call into question his involvement with foreign interests.

It has been completely debunked - the emails do not contain any suggestion, evidence or information that in any way implicates Joe Biden in activity that even might have impropriety, let alone actual impropriety.

Nobody’s saying the emails don’t exist. They appear to have been up for sale in Ukraine for at least a year, suggesting that the Giuliani “found it in Delaware” story is possibly a lie, but the emails exist nonetheless.

Their content has no bearing or connection to Joe Biden. Drawing that line would be deliberate misinformation purely for election destabilization.
Not having reached enough developers and leading adopters means no market available except developers doing fundamental porting and experimentation.

Targeted at developers doing fundamental porting means no volume.

No volume means high prices. Low volume ASIC runs aren't cheap. Amortizing NRE costs of a complicated motherboard over dozens or hundreds of units ain't cheap either.

It will sort itself out eventually, but the whole ecosystem has a big mountain to climb to get to where ARM is.
> Those issues could be addressed in the article. In open debate.

We learned this doesn't work all that well with the Comey letter eleven days before the 2016 election. "We've reopened the Hillary investigation" turned into "oops, nothing new" a few days after the election.

"A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes."
What of astronomy, then? I think it is possible, but certainly more difficult, to infer causality from observation.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synthetic_oil
xournal has builds available for windows. I just showed my wife how to sign a pdf her laptop last night (the only windows machine in the house).
Can you say with a straight face that the NY Times or WaPo has done that with liberals or Democratic candidates? Outside of tearing down Bernie Sanders I'd say it's a firm no.

Prominent liberals like Alan Dershowitz say they're being socially blacklisted for not taking part in a pile on against Trump: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/03/us/alan-dershowitz-martha...

Even being "neutral" is apparently not enough. It's easy to see why journalists and editors would succumb to that social pressure.
You are nto following the story, cleary. Not only some texts have been verified, they have a former business partner going on record, verifying the messages along the way. What else do you want? People involved in the threads are claiming the messages to be true. What else do you want?

And, by the way, I could care less for the video and photographic content of that laptop, to me that content is irrelevant --actually, I feel sorry for Joe Biden and I can't imagine how hard it must be to have a son who is a drug addict and a man child. But shouldn't that also corroborate the validity of the laptop content? Why isn't the media all over it?

And, please, let's not pretend that several Trump stories came from anonymous sources with no audio or text evidence. And the mainstream media danced all over it. For instance, the (supposedly) anonymous senior administration who was part of the resistance. Not only did the NYT run stories on his unverified accounts (no audio/text/video to back it up), they also wrote a book with his accounts. And we just learned that this senior admin wasn't senior after all. How can you really read thsoe stories and not come way perplexed by the blatant bias? I understand why people hate Trump, but is it worth to abandon journalism standards? Where do we go from here?
Might want to update Wikipedia if you can substantiate "bullshit" in some way:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_bounty_program

And we still don't have a President that can keep up with intelligence briefings, apparently.
Has anyone demonstrated manufacturing non-trivial centrifuges in space yet? Or mining and refining in space, given we can’t possibly afford to launch that much mass from the ground? Or fully modelled the lifecycle of that sort of megastructure to find out how, why, and when the chemistry of the occupants/internal farms/etc. causes fatal problems?

I’m eager to live in one of these, but I don’t think we actually know enough to build one at all yet, never mind safely.
Is the shady person you’re referring to Tony Bobulinski?

If so, he is the documented primary business partner in the suspected deals who has provided verified emails, he’s a US citizen with a history of military service who put his real name on the line.

It doesn’t get less shady than that. Unless you’re referring to someone else.
I can’t believe anybody is talking about plain text email without verified cryptographic signatures in 2020. The technology is over 30 years old at this point. Anybody telling you different is a fraud — guaranteed.
ah, yes. men are the real victims here. Won't someone think of the poor men without any control over themselves!?
The use of terms like "the fascist left" makes it harder to appreciate the merits of statements like this. Also, the phrase is a bit oxymoronic as fascism is, specifically, a conservative ideology.
It would be an improvement if it'd at least be a level playing field with a consistent set of rules.

Being principled only when it suits your favored cause isn't being principled at all.
Lockdowns did hurt women more then they did hurt males, yes, but women still supported measures and I litterally seen no one blaming patriarchy for them.
The UK's Competition and Markets Authority had a clamp-down on exactly this last year.

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2019/feb/06/hotel-booki...
is adapting our food production out of the question? it seems that might be a bit easier than fixing global warming
This is not (and has never been) the behavior of Phabricator.

See <https://secure.phabricator.com/T7447> for discussion of why this feature can never work the way you think it should work in the general case and why I believe other implementations, particularly GitHub's implementation, make the wrong tradeoffs (GitHub simply discards comments it can't find an exact matching line for).

If you believe this feature is possible to implement the way you imagine, I invite you to suggest an implementation. I am confident I can easily provide a counterexample which your implementation gets wrong (by either porting the inline forward to a line a human user would not choose, or by failing to port an inline which is still relevant forward).
He is more concerned with upholding the principle of the first amendment than supporting the ideology of the moment. Supressing information because its not convenient at the moment is the very definition of hack journalism. Something he wants no part of.

You'd think the democratic party would have learned after 2016 by nominating another clinton. The seem to feel that supressing negative stories is just easier than answering them. Nominating someone like Sanders would have at least allowed the issues to be discussed.
If I'm vaccinated I'm going right back to what I was doing before. I don't care if the train is sardines again if I'm immune. Everything hinges on vaccination. I'm pretty confident my employer will innoculate me not long after the vaccine is available, probably months before the general public.
Ignoring the mischaracterization of the two points, what are you trying to say? That those two thoughts are not allowed to exist in the same "group" of people, for some definition of "group"?
> Even Fox News actual News division refuses to run these Hunter Biden stories.

Where do you find fox news's news division? Every part of fox news I see is running it.
> Glen Greenwald is one of the most respected journalists on the planet.

I don't think that's all that true. Glenn Greenwald is extremely popular with a particular political faction, which is itself particularly unpopular.

> his character is beyond the pale

Probably not what you intend:

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/beyond_the_pale
From cloud to device: The future of AI and machine learning on the Edge
Err, sorry I meant publication. What other large real publication has been willing to back up NYP?
Tanzania has shut down the internet ahead of elections
And he says that they're threatening litigation if he publishes it anywhere else because it could make them look bad.
>Affiliate links work the same way. Are those also fraud?

IIUC, Affiliate marketing is when an online retailer pays you a commission for traffic or sales generated from your referrals.

That's not fraud or misrepresentation.

In the case of Grubhub, et. al, fake phone numbers, they aren't recommending a restaurant. They are claiming that the phone number is the restaurant. Those who call that number aren't clicking an ad because the "affiliate" promoted it. They are calling that number because they'd already decided to contact that particular restaurant, but were redirected to another entity -- with a monetary interest that harms the restaurant -- that doesn't disclose their third-party status.

And that's certainly at least unethical, if not outright fraud.
You may find this shocking, but the Mueller report supports none of the substantive claims about Trump's campaign conspiring with Russians and actually contradicts many of them: https://theintercept.com/2019/04/18/robert-mueller-did-not-m...

> Mueller, in addition to concluding that evidence was insufficient to charge any American with crimes relating to Russian election interference, also stated emphatically in numerous instances that there was no evidence – not merely that there was insufficient evidence to obtain a criminal conviction – that key prongs of this three-year-old conspiracy theory actually happened. As Mueller himself put it: “in some instances, the report points out the absence of evidence or conflicts in the evidence about a particular fact or event.”
They published the Steele dossier with ZERO evidence. It's now been completely discredited as a Russian plant the Obama administration knew was from a Russian asset.

The US government has officially said there's no Russian involvement in the recent Biden leak and it's been vouched for by Tony Bobulinski who definitely has close ties to the Biden family, yet it's not publishable?

That's as partisan as it gets and deserves to be called out.

EDIT: Do the downvoters have a reason other than ideology, tribalism, and conspiracy theories?
Hm I'm wasn't able to find any definitive sources to explain what GDPR does / does not allow in this case. Most of the articles I could find seem to think that GDPR would have prevented CA because it requires explicit user consent to access personal data. However it is unclear to me whether that consent needs to be from the user or from the users friends?
You cannot do continuous computation with discrete components.
Have you read manufacturing dissent? It’s a useful lens to read any mainstream news through.
Like most econ-101 reasoning, the "eventually" is doing a lot of work here.

From a policy point of view, it's easy to see why the picture is a bit trickier. Allowed to proceed unchecked, the underlying mechanism you describe will displace a pretty large fraction of the current population, especially as the offshore money fundamentally doesn't bring in much local economic activity after the new construction. These are the people you represent as a government, not the putative future immigrants and speculators.

"Surely it would be wasteful for a while" here represents a multigenerational disruption to a large fraction of your voting public, the majority of whom will see little or no benefit from the incoming money, and the overwhelming majority of whom will see negative impacts.