skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
hitting mjt.xss.ht returns this:

/*
THIS SUBDOMAIN HAS BEEN BANNED FROM THE XSS HUNTER SERVICE.

WE DO NOT ALLOW ABUSE OF OUR SERVICE, ALL SECURITY TESTING MUST BE AUTHORIZED.

Please use our contact form if you believe this ban was a mistake: https://xsshunter.com/contact
*/
This is HTML injection, not SQL.
Understanding GAN Loss Functions
Not obvious why #3 is impossible. You can forecast revenue changes from a carbon tax and revenue losses from an income tax, set rates accordingly, and adjust as you go. This is especially feasible if you have a 50 year timeframe.

Should be quite feasible to make it revenue neutral and this rob no politician of their project.

Nuclear would have been great 50 years ago! My argument is that the project I outlined above would have given market based incentive to make nuclear competitive.

If level headed people of all stripes had focussed on the problem it would have been solveable.

(Since I can’t edit my comment above, I should add for posterity: obviously not all environmentalists are bad at math or systems thinking, and some of them had sensible solutions. But we would have had better solutions if others joined too)
Weasel words about "functionality" instead of cars.

We've had self-driving train and airplane functionality for years. Meanwhile self-driving trains and planes are not closer.
> but its performance still doesn't come anywhere close to C++ for many tasks

Like what?
40 years ago it would have been:

* How often did you read articles in newspapers this week?
* What was the last article before the last article that you read?
* What is the last newspaper article that you read, top to bottom?

Or, for tech people:

* How often did you read manpages this week?
* What was the last manpage before the last manpage that you read?
* What is the last manpage that you read, top to bottom?

We remember things differently depending on what the purpose of the information is, and that hasn't changed. There's absolutely no reason to shame people into "looking at their feet" over it. Throughout the ages, countless people have read the tragedy of Romeo and Juliet, but very few people beyond actors who have actually performed it would know who said this, or even in what act it was said:

Both by myself and many other friends:
But he, his own affections' counsellor,
Is to himself--I will not say how true--
But to himself so secret and so close,
So far from sounding and discovery,
As is the bud bit with an envious worm,
Ere he can spread his sweet leaves to the air,
Or dedicate his beauty to the sun.
Could we but learn from whence his sorrows grow.
We would as willingly give cure as know.
Thanks for the reply!

I think I must be missing something, but it seems like the big difference between Tempo and a traditional tracing system is the storage indexing & database (ES/C* vs object store and index all fields vs key/value lookup by ID). I vaguely remember reading something that latency even from EC2 -> S3 can be around 200-300ms. Wouldn't this cause the overhead to rise?

Feel free to point me to any documentation that clear this up!
Having food shipped in still requires it to be created somewhere to be shipped out.

It’s very possible for some percentage of the population to starve even during a food surplus, but starving people will bid up the cost of food to the point where you can’t get a 40% of the population to have a surplus in a famine in any society that we know about.

Here is the official definition for the minimum to qualify as a famine:

“At least 20% of households in an area face extreme food shortages with a limited ability to cope
The prevalence of acute malnutrition in children exceeds 30%
The death rate exceeds two people per 10,000 people per day“

That’s killing off over 7% of the population per year.
You can look at the pybind11 (https://github.com/pybind/pybind11) codebase. It is a library for generating python bindings for C++ code. It uses latest C++17 and does quite a lot of template metaprogramming to generate the bindings.
I can find Wayland equivalents for my compositor for all of these tools:

https://github.com/swaywm/sway/wiki/i3-Migration-Guide#commo...
Anyone thinking of moving to their own Gitlab instance with Gitlab CE-- either stay on Github or prepare to waste your time dealing with user spam bots that pollute your site's search results.

In other words-- if you want the common use case for a FOSS project:

1. publicly viewable main repository with publicly viewable issue tracker

2. requirement to log in to view all snippets, user profiles, perhaps even other repos as enforced by administrator settings (otherwise SEO bots will leverage these features to eat your search results)

3. anyone with an email can sign up to post issues to the main repo's issue tracker

There is no combination of settings in Gitlab CE to achieve this. Any sane approach has to leave out step #2. That means that your Gitlab instance gets hammered with user spam from bots which then get indexed in Google search results for your site.

Worse, Gitlab has no tools to make it easy to remove the user spam (and obviously no tools to prevent it from happening).

Just run a public-facing Gitlab CE instance for a few days. Search for one of the spam snippets you collect, and you'll find results for all the FOSS projects out there running their own Gitlab instances.

I've never seen any solutions offered by Gitlab for this, nor frankly any interest in the myriad bug reports about them addressing this at all.

Edit: typo
Sender of False DMCA Takedown Notices Ordered to Pay $370K in Damages
I'm sorry, but I can't connect the outcomes with your list of countries. Maybe we can rule out IED possibility in Russia, but that's a maybe.
True of pretty much all "big tent" languages, I suspect.
The price of wind and solar is coming down so fast that what didn't work in 2015 is perfectly feasible in 2020. My town's sustainability plan was developed in 2014, passed in 2020 and it's already obsolete. Many organizations are planning today based on data that is already out of date.
> This must be more than an illusion because for instance right now I am writing about it so that "sense" is affecting my actions.

No, it could be that (c) is an illusion of the fact that you are doing the writing, which I guess is the result of enough (a). There is some scientific evidence that (c) is 'constructed' afterwards by (a) and (b). For example (c) looks to lag about half a second behind the actual sensed reality.
You can self host GitHub too
$2/month for iCloud. Comes with search.
I would respond that replacing a battery on a modern iPhone is similarly easy. The tools are plastic, cheap, and as others have noted, are often bundled with the battery. The only price delta here is the cost of the battery itself.
I'm not so concerned about memory any more than calculators made us unable to add.

I am concerned that people seem increasingly unable to draw coherent conclusions.
So Pine64 is itself giving away 1000 pcs of the board? Assuming 5$ for each board, this challenge costs them 5k...
Oh right yeah pressure from China, like what got youtube-dl entirely removed... Oh wait no that was the US government.
I wonder what this “only what is current may exist” culture is, whether it’s manifestation of survival of the fittest, a baby step towards the machine uprising of 2037; whether it acknowledges a notion, that an environment, where what without a change may sustain, cannot host a life.
Seems like something that could spread like wildfire via word of mouth with people where word of mouth actually matters most and works the best.
I think the comma.ai approach of trying to solve the problem incrementally while producing a profitable company at each step of the way is much smarter.

Waymo is just throwing money at the problem without a clear path to return on investment. We all know how patient Google is with that kind of project. It's asking to get the whole thing cancelled. It runs very much counter to the typical Silicon Valley model.
This is what users have been saying since the dawn of time. Developers don't get it, they think everybody is using their platform and their software is so much better, so it must beat out the problems of multiplatform software.

Reality is if your average user can't click and install, very few are going to use your GUI software. They don't care how it's made. This is the great divide between engineer and user that's examples every day here on HN.
We're a fully Rust shop now (we write code for secure enclaves up to and including implementing a custom malloc from scratch). I actually don't see any reason to learn C anymore unless you are interfacing with older systems or doing stuff where you need to drop out of Rust's guardrails (if you're new to systems programming you're gonna wanna avoid unsafe code as much as possible).

It's just a lot harder to write broken programs because of how screamy the compiler is in Rust. You will spend more time getting your code to compile but it will have fewer errors (and be multi-threaded+memory safe by default).

I think most production software that is written de novo today will be in Rust over C/C++. It's just not comparable in my opinion. Like, when we implement stuff we can have logic errors but eliminating the entire class of buffer/array/pointer failures is extremely useful.
The Problem is that it might not be significant safety outside of well suited situations.

This systems expect the user to shim in fastly if something goes wrong, which just can't work reliable given how human brains work.

Furthermore the situations which can make a self driving car crash are not the same which make a human driver crash.

Such crashes can be pretty arbitrary. Random things like advertisement on a bus has the potential to trick of the self driving car. Similar at least some systems are not very good at handling situations where the lanes are unexpected changed e.g. around a construction site. I had been in more than one situation where the lanes markings what completely messed up and only common sense was left to prevent a potential dangerous situation. This systems don't have common sense.

There already was at least on deadly incident where a Tesla crashed for no apparent reason (blaming the dead driver for not taking over fast enough which again isn't realistic at all, through legal maybe valid).

Tesla is supposedly the leader wrt. self driving cars, but people where easily able to trick that car to drive into the lane for the opposite direction and it has since a while one of the worst emergency brake assistants.

The problem boils down to self driving cars not being good at "unusual" situations but situations which are unusual for the self driving car are in practice pretty common given how much people drive cars and they are not necessary recognizable as such by humans.

Another problem is that traffic's in different countries have different rules and dynamics a self driving system working well for idk. the US might not at all be safe to use in idk. insert arbitrary EU country here even if trained for that country.

Humans can normally adapt to a degree in the fly, which makes them not have a crash, or less bad crashes in some situations. But the self driving car has no such common sense and might not even realize it's in a situation it's not trained for.

I see a lot of potential to make traffic more safe.(non stuff driving but assistant systems, self driving in traffic jams, slow self driving buses in car reduced inner cities, on highway self driving truck convoys, etc.).

But at least on the close future I'm not convinced "general purpose"/"everywhere any speed" self driving cars are more safe.

I mean we also shouldn't forget that a lot of deadly accidents happen because of negligence, so while self driving cars still require a driver hand over, they still all happen because the driver is as negligent (or might intentionally not use the self driving feature to get faster to work etc.).

Edit: Swipy keyboard mess ups.
> There's a word for people who complain about free things.

The post and comments are free, yet here you are complaining. Consider why you think that's okay, and you'll understand.
> using saner (i.e. binary) protocols

For some reason that I fail to understand, it seems that most computer protocols and most computer file formats are designed under the unstated assumption that those using them will not have access to a computer.
paper is a technology
It's depressing how git tooling has to squish out all the flexibility that makes git attractive in the name of being unsurprising to someone who doesn't understand git.

I was excited to finally bring in git as we start ramping down on a legacy project onto something new. Then I started thinking about the developers that have never touched git and I need to support. I looked at the tools available and what workflows they dictate. Then there's the drive to do something similar to the rest of the company, autonomy only goes so far without a good reason.

Fuck me. I'm going to pick GitLab and hate it.
I believe being lenient in accepting input is what leads to SSRF attacks (HTTP request smuggling via disagreeing `transfer-encoding` and `content-length` headers).
Footprints mark a toddler's perilous prehistoric journey
Simple Steps to Root Realme C1
After reviewing some tools we went with Phabricator ourselves; it's not ideal, but it's open source (read: free, we can't afford a $x / seat license) and self-hosted.
You know, I've heard so many variations of those "USB drives in the parking lot" stories, I wonder if that isn't a cover for something else. Or maybe just someone covering their asses and not willing to take blame for something else.

"USB drives in the parking lot" could be the tech industry's Korean fan death.
You're right, but it's a lot harder to account for emission reduction, and offsets based on those are often illusory. For example, you might award carbon offsets for replacing a coal plant with solar, when that would have happened anyway just because the economics worked out better. If you're actually removing carbon from the atmosphere, that's not an issue.

As a matter of government policy, we definitely need to focus on reducing emissions, and a simple way to do that is with a carbon fee. But for voluntary contributions right now, it's not so clearcut.
Can you expand on that? I'm having trouble understanding what you're arguing here: Is "self driving" the safety feature?
For the downvotes:

https://scotch.io/tutorials/building-the-new-scotchio-animat...
Wow, really touching story :). It sounds like your kids are on a really great path with a great father.
How An Algorithm Blocked Kidney Transplants to Black Patients
Hey - I really appreciate the sentiments on the swing we are taking. Regarding your on point concerns — I gotta share that we felt the very much the same before launching beyond friends and family.

Thus far (and, admittedly, it's early days), we are growing organically. When people are interview guests for an Artifact or listen to Artifacts involving, friends, family, or colleagues, they are becoming customers.

In this way, people are telling us that they can see a "constellation" of Artifacts around them and the people in their lives — and that they'll add to it over time. So, we might do an annual Artifact interview with your child from age 9 to 18, capturing their voice and their thoughts, and then you might sit for an Artifact with colleagues as a send off before leaving for a job, capturing that work together. You also might use Artifact to capture family heritage - with parents, aunts/uncles, and grandparents, and do so incrementally over time, etc.

So yeah, early days but this is what we are seeing. We'll be keeping our heads down, focused on providing quality service day in and day out.
Automating Society Report 2020 – Algorithm watch
Perhaps define "systems programming language".
Do you think the existence of these small efforts makes the larger efforts harder or easier? More or less likely?
That also seems reasonable, although city driving will be biased toward more accidents, but fewer fatalities.
I don't use Github much, but Gitlab allows for multiple threads in a merge request. These threads may reference diffs/commits, but can also be directed at the merge request in general. Each thread has to be explicitly resolved before merging.
At $175 for one podcast, I guess that's a pretty health number even if you mostly have people ordering them as birthday presents and for family reunions.
experienced in front-end as well. but not looking for jobs. tired of front-end switched to data. there's plenty of data jobs out there. I'm trying to set up a data consultancy instead of finding a job.
For someone not familiar with this world, what is X Server and xfree86? What problem does it solve?
“Welp, you broke production. Pack your things, you’re fired.” Ugh, when was this humour ever funny? I'm a manager, I like to joke around with my team. There's a lot of comedic ground to cover before you start joking about people being fired.
It's not dangerous -- it's a mistake. It's like putting strawberries in with salmon on a salad: ostensibly it's good, but it's wrong. :D

C and C++ are really different languages these days. They share some syntax, but the ABIs and underpinnings of each are radically different. Their relationship these days is that of an estranged cousin: you are familiar with how it looks, but it is really not at all what it looks like anymore. Once the two languages shared dressing styles, but now, C++ has all these rebel < and > in places it should'nt. :)
I am surprised to see that there is one in stock at my local Micro Center.
Open Source Drive-Thru Contributors
‘I’m Expecting Him to Do Something Weird’: How Trump Could End
I think it's clear that they are out of control, from the examples you list among others. The harder argument is that they're not doing it in our best interest. Without good visibility into their activities (which could very well inhibit those activities), it's hard to tell which of their activities are a net benefit to our country.

My guess is that most Americans would expect that they sometimes do things that aren't legal, but that generally they are at least intending to do it with the best interest of our country in mind. That second part is the primary reason why they aren't being wholesale shut down, and why they're able to get away with things like lying to congress.
No, it's the year of Linux on mobile already!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pinephone

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Librem_5
Yes, that's true. If it's cheap enough and more private/predictable than uber pool, there will be market demand.

Can they accomplish that before the project gets cancelled? Because at the rate they're burning money there is a finite time that alphabet will continue to back it.
If anyone is interested in this, or wanna refresh your memory, you should watch the docufilm Zero Days (2016) by Alex Gibney (most of his ‘movies’ are quite interesting)

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt5446858/
I think you completely missed the point of the question.

If I have a computer and an internet connection, I can download, for free, everything I need in order to write, say, an Android app. And put it on the app store, and start making money (if it sells). That doesn't let me do SaaS or become the next Google, but it lets me go into business as a "producer".

Same with making and selling music. Same with writing (hello, Amazon self publishing). Same with some services - audio and video production, software contracting, editorial assistance, and I'm sure many more that I can't think of at the moment.

So, how do Marxists deal with that? Is a computer part of "the means of production"? Or does that only mean "big industry"? If it only means big industry, the Marxists are talking to those who live in the past. In the present, big industry employs a much smaller fraction of the population than it used to.
A few things to note here are that Foodgeek's bread is 80% hydration and still a bit dense, and that einkorn has a much lower gluten content than common wheat. The differences in hydration and gluten content will yield a denser loaf.
Microsoft earnings: Revenue up 12% YoY. Net Income up 30% YoY
Source? I don't think that's true. Github has on-premises enterprise solutions but one should not confuse that with running free and open software on your own machines - https://enterprise.github.com/faq
Until liability switches away from the driver to the manufacturer, no driving system should be considered "safe"
Agreed, it’s not an insurmountable problem, but it’s still a hassle that gets in the way. Something that should be one click becomes 2 or 3 clicks and only works 85% of the time. For example, there might be one real implementation and one (or more) test stubs and that slows you down.
If you pay the enterprise fee, which is likely an X amount per seat. They MIGHT give it out for free to Wikimedia as a favor / goodwill, but there will be strings attached.

(I'm not saying Gitlab doesn't have strings attached)
I don’t think anything is “clear” - there are even indications that people exposed to the original SARS virus have their immune systems primed to more quickly respond to SARS-CoV-2.
I've been hearing forms of this argument on HN for a decade (usually, it's Star Wars we're "locked out of"). If your "shared culture" is confined to Olaf the Snowman and the Avengers, then, respectfully, you're the one with the problem, not Disney. Read a book! There are zillions of them.

Meanwhile, if you're a parent that wants to put Olaf the Snowman on the TV, it has never, ever been easier or less expensive to do that.
Well planes maybe. You've been able to get on a driverless train for nearly 40 years now eg https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Port_Island_Line
Personally I'd like to use the one that is less likely to kill me. So I think a focus on safety is appropriate.
>You must have missed their #1 requirement for these systems: safety.

Not really surprising from CR. They've always emphasized safety--along with maintenance, cost, etc. The target audience for CR is mostly a conventional middle-class suburban family (understanding that Cadillac is still a relatively high-end car). They don't really care about car enthusiasts who are prioritizing other types of capabilities.
Not an expert, but I hear that one of the effects has been to slow down innovation.

Because a newly designed plane (with a rescue parachute, and a modern engine) is so much more expensive than one from the 1950s (leaded gas, possibly with grandfathered certification) everyone keeps flying the old ones. Cars have had many iterations on safety since the '55 Chevy, but planes not so many.
Well, it can easily be displaced at low market penetration for wind/solar. At high levels, like well over 50%, storage cost starts to be a serious issue.
Step to Incentivize Stars and Forks on GitHub
I think drivers can improve over time as well, especially with assistive technology such as lane departure warning, blind spot detectors, etc becoming more prevalent. Luckily self driving isn't an all or nothing deal!
This is what happens when the losing player is humble enough to say GG because this was just a game. Nice RE at the end there.

That said- Wayland might be the only future but I'm not convinced it is the present. It still misses a specified way to handle shortcut keys and screenshots.
With the new generation of cards from Nvidia being significantly worse for GPGPU scientific compute I hope AMD moves into that market and is truly an Nvidia killer. The new Nvidia cards not only consume far more power and space making 4-GPU workstations on normal power supplies and household power impractical but they are also far worse for memory constrained processes. Clearly they are trying to force researchers to buy much more expensive "enterprise" cards for no good reason.
I can definitely see the value. Definitely not trying to shoot at your business, just honestly curious.
Gitlab is worse on almost every angle compared to Github

It simply lacks the attention to detail...you can tell that Github walks the extra mile to get the UX right.

We used Gitlab for a year and then migrated to Github...it’s a joy!