skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
God these explanations suck. Reminds me of the "two boats meet in an ocean" explanation of IRC.

A CLI (command line interface) just uses the streams to show and take in data.

A TUI uses escape codes or proprietary console commands (the latter on Windows, the former on most other things) to take control of the entire console window and display a user interface (hence Text User Interface or TUI). Usually mouse input is handled on modern systems too.
I think you are misunderstanding, which part of a print-out receiving QR code is insecure?
Can you point to examples or evidence for the third or is that just a prediciton?
It can be used for exactly the same purpose: checking the environment before doing the action.

E.g. force yourself to read the “production” part of your prompt before running the command. Point at the user name before deleting its record. Read aloud the version name before sending it to deploy.

It really makes a different between just glancing at the info, and having to parse it as part of an action.
Um... oops. No wonder I was being downvoted.

In fairness, the context was uploading the brain, and whether the whole body was needed, so it was a semi-reasonable misread.

Still... there's a large distance from "I can have a heart transplant and still be considered the same person (even though 1% of my body now has different DNA)" to "I can have no body at all and still be the same person". The claim was that a body is a significant part of who we are as people, which is not a claim that a heart transplant addresses at all.
After Going All-In on Amazon, a Merchant Says He Lost Everything
I'd like to hear GPT-3's rebuttal..
Writing for Product Managers
Personally I don't find hooks vs. classes much of a context switch. The mental model for the component lifecycle is more or less the same, it's mostly just a different surface syntax (there are a few extra rules for hooks like not putting them in conditionals, but you'd have those in a pure-hooks setup too).
Ok that's fair. To add an opposing viewpoint, I've never noticed any slowdown with figma for the stuff I do. Then again, I don't use keybindings.
Ninja hasn't been created for small one-liners like in this blog post, but for massive C++ builds with tens- or hundreds-of-thousands of source files arranged in a complex dependency tree.

Figuring out quickly what needs to be rebuilt for massive builds like this isn't trivial, but that's essentially the one important thing that ninja does.

Also see:

https://ninja-build.org/manual.html#_design_goals
I'm not sure why the author thinks this particular issue is so politically important. It seems to me that a far more important fact, that seems to be getting little media attention, is that the number of excess deaths from all causes in 2020 currently EXCEEDS the number officially attributed to covid-19 (about 200000) by about 100000.

Source: https://news3lv.com/news/coronavirus/cdc-reports-almost-3000...
Looks kinda like a Kangaroo to me.
What I think he misses is that with a massive corpus and top tier specialist researchers, sure you can definitely do better, but the point of a plain-text-programmed few shot learner as a product is that it’s better than your average startup’s ML team can confidently produce. If nothing else then because of the training money dumped into it.

Jury’s out on whether the things it’s better at matter much in the marketplace. If I want to know George Washington’s birthday I’ll ask google.
Source code: https://github.com/vercel/commerce

Looks like it's still largely a work in progress
The real problem of this "security" nonsense isn't even existing use cases like screenshot or xdotool but rather the cost it imposes on any future power tool that someone might think of but can't implement witout getting every compositor on board.
You are not mistaken; DNSSEC doesn't encrypt records, and DoH does. DoH also authenticates the channel between you and your name server. It's likely that DoH will ultimately obviate the need for DNSSEC anywhere.
It is what I mean, but might not be as dangerous as I initially assumed. If it is just for identifying contacts and the AI is just generating information instead of acting on it.
"...Instead of a two-hour window at the start and end of each day, I’m at home _all the time_. This gives me more opportunities to use my voice speaker. Correspondingly, it gives more opportunities for Alexa to fail to meet my expectations..."

Us being home more may lead to people reaching conclusions that a great many items are expensive gimmicks.
This looks super cool and I'd love to switch from instapaper... BUT, Chrome is the one browser I really don't use very much.

A safari extension, or at least a Firefox one, would have me pulling out my credit card on the spot.
GitHub actions seems to be the new cool kid, if you are hosting on GitHub. Sadly to depend more on GitHub, though...
Might be something as simple as the average engineer/maker/hacker has access to a car to play with but not a truck.
I was going to say, sounds like Jupyter. Is there much of an advantage I'm missing out on as someone who prefers GUIs over the terminal and vim/emacs?
> By better I mean grading based on whether there is any nonsense in the output or any internal contradictions, or similar criteria

Sounds like you want a hard ai to determine whether a language model generates nonsense.
Yes, if I notice it I can undo obviously! The problem is when I realize the mistake a few edits later...
Just curious: Is it possible to do rendering with QRhi inside QWidget in a similar way as one would do with QOpenGLWidget?

Actually, the post also stated that using `QQuickWidget` will force OpenGL composition, so if an application uses QML inside QWidget it looks like QRhi will not be usable at all. It would seem that QWidget composition does not support QRhi.
I just wish they'd stop making us all work for free to improve their self-driving system via ReCAPTCHA.

Better yet, I wish web developers stopped using ReCAPTCHA for anti-bot protection. In most cases it's overkill anyway.
Really? What function did it serve the iPhone?
> you can either race with the program and hope that you read its memory to get the function stack before it changes what function it's running (and you're likely to win the race, because C is faster than Python), or you can pause the program briefly while taking a sample.

Py-spy defaults to blocking because the results can be pretty wrong otherwise: https://github.com/benfred/py-spy/issues/56 . You can see this problem profiling a program like https://github.com/benfred/py-spy/blob/master/tests/scripts/... with or without the nonblocking flag in py-spy - the nonblocking version produces garbage output.

Somewhat interestingly, this problem doesn't seem to occur with Ruby - and rbspy can get away without pausing the target program with only minor errors seen when profiling a similar function. I suspect this is because of differences between how the Ruby and Python interpreters store call stack information, but haven't had a chance to dig into the specifics.
None of this speaks to whether or not SF has more to offer you than other less dense cities in the US, so many of which have excellent restaurants and, indeed, better restaurants. I was very impressed with the food in Austin on a recent visit, for example. Perhaps if SF had continued on the high density curve while maintaining affordability (as Tōkyō has done) it would be a different story.

Quality food has more to do with agriculture and supply chains than money or density per se -- good salad is not something you can buy if no one is growing it -- and more and more areas in the US have made the transition to that kind of farming and production.

Now challenging SF on grocery stores -- that's another matter. They are drawing on deep roots, there.
Just hype I’d guess. Tesla fans love to equate it’s self driving efforts with Waymo’s, when in reality they are years behind even with the new FSD update.
A bad sales team can create huge opportunity costs as well.

Quarter million dollar contracts that promised functionality our system wasn't designed to support? Let's just drop everything for three months and butcher our architecture so that you get your bonus. I'm sure this won't have any negative consequences.
The icing on the cake: https://www.theguardian.com/science/2020/oct/27/sleeping-gia...

Edit: Trying hard to not say something snippy about climate change deniers, with great difficulty. Let me simply suggest possible correlations between climate change denial, coronavirus denial and anti-vaccination.
Do you have an idea why they are doing that?

Why would you maintain 2 targets doing the same thing for an OS?
Winston Privacy Version 1.5.4 Disclosure
> You are just a fancy and efficient autocomplete too.

We don't know enough about human cognition to say this.

Scott Aaronson has something interesting to say about this in a conversation with Lex Fridman, actually:
https://youtu.be/G_-BBniFFCM?t=419

Quick copy and paste of part of the transcript:

> Humans have a lot of predictive processing a lot of just filling in the blanks but we also have these other mechanisms that we can couple to or that we can sort of call the subroutines when we need to and that maybe maybe you know to go further that one would want to integrate other forms of reasoning.
Firebase summit live stream (2020)
Yann is a consistently sober voice in this world of AI hype. I find it quite refreshing.

Personally I see little evidence that this "just scale a transformer until sentience" hype-train is going to take us anywhere interesting or particularly useful.

And for the people who claim it is super useful already, can you actually trust its outputs without any manual inspection in a production setting? If not it's probably not as useful as you think it might be.
Easy to say on an internet forum, harder to do when it could be your boss making a joke.
My own prediction based on the fact that almost all other AV programs are using LIDAR, costs are decreasing with scale /R&D, and Teslas localization looks shotty at best. As costs continue to drop, its going to be tough for the company to continue rationalize sticking with cameras only just to keep Elon's ego in tact.
Debian already does this, it asks you to type something like "yes do as I asked" if you want to remove a package that is considered to be part of the core.
GPUs on a Raspberry Pi Compute Module 4
I kind of got that feeling. Regarding:

>Today’s new workers know how to dive into systems, pipe different programs together using no-code platforms

I was thinking, not the ones I know. Maybe they are out there somewhere? The only people I know who can dive into systems and pipe programs together are people with programing experience.
Better IDEs have saved countless hours. Saving hours is equivalent to replacing jobs, unless demand is elastic enough to fill that time. Most of the time we are lucky enough that demand at a given price point is much larger than supply, but this won't last forever.
Mozilla to fix the years-old issue (massive CPU usage and battery drain) using it on macOS with a high DPI display.
A 2 datacenter configuration doesn't give you much if you want to survive a temporary outage of said datacenters. Observe that if you wanted to survive the loss of the dc with the minority of nodes you could place all nodes in the other dc. This is one of the reasons aws tries to have three availability zones per region. In practice things are messier than this because dcs don't always fail as a unit.
Raskin talks about the futility of this in his book The Humane Interface.

Basically, what happens is the brain switches operating context from "I want to do something" to "resolve this interruption (confirmation box)" and you don't relate the one to the other - you're so focused on getting rid of the interruption that the original task is forgotten until after the interruption is gone.

Then you switch back to the original task that had been interrupted by the confirmation box and then you realize you made a mistake.

It's much better to engineer "undo" ability into systems - like delaying commands (GMail's "Undo Send" does this), or caching previous state, etc.
If you don't know it, CMake can use ninja instead of make for compilation so instead of "mkdir build && cd build && cmake .. && make" you can run "mkdir build && cd build && cmake -GNinja && ninja".

It feels faster on my side projects (haven't benchmarked it really), but most importantly, when running a parallel build it does not interleave the output of the different steps, making it much easier to read warnings and errors.
Presumably the economic incentives are much greater for trucking than for consumers (as is typically the case). If we can accept that, then investors shouldn't be swayed by regulatory questions (regulations change easily when wealthy investors and corporations want them to change) nor by some marginal upfront insurance cost (the hypothesis is that driverless trucks will be much less fallible and thus insurance costs will go down quickly as driverless tech proves itself).

The interestion questions are "is the 'greater economic incentive for trucking' assumption correct in the first place" and if so, why were we still bothering with consumer automotive in the first place?
Every single business on the planet has a circumstance in which a single ill considered remark is cause for immediate dismissal. I can construct examples where nobody would expect the relevant parties not to be fired. eg calling the CEO a stupid [racially denigrating whatever]

So the argument you're really making is about whether what they did was sufficient to pass the bar for "should be immediately fired". Because it wasn't that bad? Because a little casual comic sexism never hurt anyone?
Would you apply for a job posting at $600+ per month?
CircleCI was pretty good last I used them, but that's been a while, maybe someone else can chime in with more recent experiences?
Why are there 3 Next.js stories at the top of the front page with no comments? Just seems weird
I've seen around the internet an illustration from a history textbook that had vikings loading their drakkar, and a burning village in the background, with a mocking caption added: "Vikings rescuing the women and valuables from the burning buildings after all the men in the village have suddenly and mysteriously died". Hey, it could've happened like this, right?
There is an online Next.js conference right now: https://nextjs.org/conf/stage/n
I would need an example project (the final product and template inside the tool) to give this a try.

As it stands you just get dumped into the builder with no guidance whatsoever. I wanted to evaluate the tool, but there's no way I could dedicate that kind of time to something I didn't know existed 5 minutes ago without even knowing what it's capable of building.

Surely you have made something complex and impressive with it, right?
The cat one is 120 feet across. It doesn't seem as if it would be that difficult to achieve the result they did with a little practice and winging it. Marching band formations, for example.
Oh. I see. It's an english language problem. Someone doesn't know an english word and is misusing it all over the place. Look up the definition of the word genocide:

https://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/oi/authority.20...

Look, mass sterilization is bad. But genocide? Under that logic anyone who ever got an abortion is a killer. Or maybe anyone who wanted to have a baby but changed their mind...

Colloquially when people use the word genocide they use it in place of mass slaughter, that is the intuition behind the word and that's how people use it. If you use the word genocide in place of mass sterilization, you and the organization who decides to use/define the word in that way are manipulating the perspective of the situation because Everyone is well aware of the intuitive meaning of the word "genocide". When people hear "genocide" they hear "slaughter" and "killing"... mass sterilization is the last thing they think about.

Here's a thought. Rather than use the word "genocide" why don't you just say "mass sterilization." Don't throw down a word that can be mistaken for slaughter for your own manipulative gain. You could have easily, very easily clarified your intent earlier, but you didn't because you are manipulative, or you don't know common colloquial English.

I vote that you're just being manipulative. The rest of your English grammar seems fine, you just want to start something rather than be level headed.
Just for context HughesNet Satellite Internet is 25 Mbps and costs between $60-150/month (10-50 GB data caps).

If this price ($99 for unlimited data, 50 Mbps minimum) went live after beta, then it would wipe out everyone else in the Satellite internet space, and only really be competing with 5G cellular in certain circumstances.

I suspect we'll see more price discrimination, they have a really competitive product, but also one that is incredibly expensive to develop: So they'll need to recoup their capital investment ($1m-$250K per Starlink satellite, 1400+ total satellites). There may be a $99 plan forever, but the details could change (e.g. Data caps? Different speeds? Etc).

The email itself explains why it is the price it is (unreliable/beta testing). Until there's more direct competition at these speeds/coverage, I'd be extremely surprised if they didn't leverage their market position to the maximum. Keep in mind that Western markets are where they'll make back most of their investment, even if poor nations benefit.
> all around him there are biological living proofs that neural networks are probably a pretty good bet for AI...

100 years ago you would have been arguing that all around you are living proofs that ornithopters are probably a pretty good bet for artificial flight. You would have been wrong about that too.
It's nice to see that Next has Typescript support.

No matter how nice a framework looks, it's a deal breaker when there's no TS support. It's just too hard dealing with a large Javascript code base.
Have a read of Blindsight by Peter Watts, it has an interesting take on this very idea. An alien species with advanced intelligence but not consciousness takes our attempts to communicate with it as an attack, intended to cause it to waste valuable resources on decoding our low information chatter. The implication is that consciousness is empty of content, merely supposed to be the relay from my subconscious processes that do the driving to other individuals corresponding processes. Our over-developed conscious behaviors are thus viewed as a kind of computer virus by other lifeforms.
Using Graphback to develop production-ready GraphQL applications
Wat. The mongols failed the invasion due to succession crisis. The Mongols were flattening Europe and were pretty much considered a punishment from God.
I quite literally laughed out loud.

Well done.
For low volume (sub 100k units?) they're often the only good way to do configurable* SERDES in any environment that is latency sensitive.

Configurable as in one SKU is in several products, but not necessarily reconfigurable by the end user.
I think self-driving cars are a PR problem as much as they are a technology one, and that's definitely something waymo is working on - remember their cute little round bubble car?

Trucks are big, heavy, and human-driven ones already scare enough people on the road. If you launch with trucks first, you risk a backlash from people who are afraid of them. If you start with an autonomous taxi service people can sit in the cars themselves, feel safe, see that there's a "safety driver" present, and even if they aren't in the vehicle they still get to interact with them on the roads. you can make people comfortable with the idea before you launch the trucks. and everything that goes into the self-driving taxis is still valuable development work for the trucks. I wouldn't be surprised if self-driving trucks actually are the first real commercial launch target for waymo, and the taxi thing is just PR.
Where in the PNW are you located? Given the border closure it's no longer feasible to organize international meetups.
Nice anecdote. Want mine that contrast with yours?
Prediction: Google buys Vercel, kills Angular, steps further into e-commerce
Totally agree.. We want to have a Safari and Firefox one and are working on having that resolved quickly.

The code actually is written to be portable as a 'web extension' as both Safari and Firefox use the same general API.

I'll try to get some time and see if it works on Firefox. The biggest issue we have is testing. If something breaks on FF I want to know and we don't have a testing environment there.
>It has no understanding of the world

What does this mean? The world with countries, borders, celebrities, hypes, newsletters and ideologies?

Because that world is as virtual and not grounded in reality as the world of data points fed into this model. Culture is made up. Language is made up. It may express itself in reality but so do the algorithms of social network sites.

If something can only live in a reality of data points on the internet this thing would live mostly in the same reality as we do.
Looks cool, but the docs link is broken on this page.

Is this self-hostable or does it rely on vercel hosting?
Viking was a profession, not a culture group, so forgive me if I take the rest of your historical expertise with a giant grain of salt.
Neither has Waymo or Daimler ever demonstrated such a system with a truck on a highway. My point was about strategy.

And who will win general driving is yet open, and just assuming it Waymo is foolish. I think is funny how on HN people dismiss Tesla when there are actually tons of people who already do their commute on the highway almost without intervention literally all over the world.

They have trucks that will have this same feature and they have already talked about the idea of platooning.

Just downvoting me because you don't think Tesla approach is as good as Waymo/Daimler approach doesn't make what I said wrong.
We could actually run a generic clock synchronization protocol to synchronize clocks over a partially synchronous network. I guess paxos kind of builds that in, which adds to its complexity.

Safety in particular doesn't require any timing assumption.

(Note that messages can still be delayed arbitrarily in both protocols)
Politicians target you: 3K data points on every voter, including phone no
I think Elon Musk makes some good points why Lidar isn’t the best choice.

https://youtu.be/HM23sjhtk4Q

Waymo taxi looks incredible but how can they scale it.
I absolutely agree with all that. (For "three-season"; winter/snow hiking and, especially, camping definitely takes more.) But so long as you don't care how it looks, are fine with coated nylon rather than something like Gore-tex, and are OK with somewhat heavier gear, you can get started for very little money between thrift stores/eBay, Walmart, cast-offs from friends, military surplus, etc. Even hiking boots, you could probably at least consider work boots from a discount store.
Most of the responses to your comment are a bit off here.

The challenge of autonomous trucks isn't that they're "more dangerous," it's a matter of physics and current LIDAR technology. The weight of the truck means there is a minimal safe stopping distance at a given speed. Frankly, the quality and distance of current LIDAR tech falls short of the distance required for safe stopping at the average highway speed for a truck.

Put another way, the autonomous driving stack has difficulty seeing far enough ahead of a truck to successfully stop in time to not cause an accident in highway environments. You'll need better fusion of perception stack (LIDAR + imaging + neural nets) or better LIDAR ranges to be able to deploy autonomous trucking sooner.
The new iPhone has LIDAR.
Solid state LIDAR continues to improve and get cheaper.
There is no reason you can't sandbox X11 clients - no need to break the protocol for that.