skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
OpenAI use well-know linguistics tricks relying on conjunctions(joining words) to separate the text from which they plagiarize on clusters from 5-7 words, exactly the capacity of human short-term memory is. They also use the Google search engine for custom queries, with date restriction which helps them to plagiarize from different texts written on a particular topic so they to be sure that when they copy, paste and concatenate clusters of words in new text, all these phrases of 5-7 words should be related to one topic. This creates the illusion of meaningfulness at first glance.

GPT-3 on Progress. “Civilization rose on the exponential curve. We shouldn’t expect progress to follow a straight line.”

Google with date restriction before 1 April 2020: "progress to follow a straight line".

Do you see only one result that come :-)

https://chrismukiibi.com/2019/11/26/the-valley-of-disappoint...

"We shouldn’t expect progress to follow a straight line." and "we expect our progress to follow a straight line"

Do you understand now, how they use conjunctions(joining words) to insert or to delete insignificant words as "shouldn't" and "our" to plagiarize so that they are not caught.
Instead of lying and then apologizing once you get what you want, it would be better to just not lie in the first place.
Kind of cool to know the bits are from the OG media.
no, read the link before posting, it's about seemingly a replaceable parts being tied to each devices and not being transferable
> According to his account, he was told that he had been convicted.

The apology states that this was a "crucial miscommunication that we take responsibility for"

OTOH, from Jeremy Howard's account it really does sound like the committee doubled down on that miscommunication so often that it seems hard to believe that's all it was.
Plenty of leftists don't like communism.
grpc.io is great to start learning.

Also the blog posts on grpc.io are interesting, but I find them harder to discover whilst reading the documentation. But here they are: https://grpc.io/blog/

Grasping the concept of a context/deadlines is quite helpful:

https://grpc.io/blog/deadlines/

You could also find related information in the Google SRE Handbook (Service Level Objectives): https://landing.google.com/sre/sre-book/chapters/service-lev...

If you are familiar with Go, the article about "Context" might also be helpful: https://blog.golang.org/context

But in any case, gRPC is language agnostic and has nothing to do with Go.

To get an idea how to create an api-repository with protobuf defintions to be shared by multiple services/clients, one can look at: https://github.com/googleapis/googleapis
The y axis is labeled "megabits per second".
I would assume that there usually isn't an immediate economic benefit of doing so. Fortunately, we live in a society that is much more inclusive than it used to be. As Tim Cook said, "When we work on making our devices accessible by the blind, I don't consider the bloody ROI".

Aside from the monetary benefits (or lack thereof), if one product focuses on accessibility and another doesn't, the small subset of users who need those features may encourage or force a larger number of users to use the more accessible product. So long-term, I think there is a benefit, even aside from helping make society more inclusive.
Trek (1985)?

https://www.mobygames.com/game/dos/trek
http://exodos.the-eye.us/public/eXoDOS/Games/Trek%20%281985%...
The evidence is the rear-end collisions cited by OP.
Software developers, who are intimately familiar with the idea that software needs constant attention and maintenance, seem to often balk at the idea that communities also need constant attention and maintenance. The idea that a code of conduct is "never ending" does not seem like a bad thing to me.

As an example, the mozilla community participation guidelines (currently at version 3.1) are quite short and readable and many sections are essentially your "dress appropriately" example (i.e. "Be Respectful"), with quick a paragraph to clarify the idea.

https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/about/governance/policies/part...
But what deterministic order do you use? Any order seems problematic to me, once loops are involved. Certainly if you just pick a naive order like "lowest entity ID runs first", then you end up with a lot of items not moving when they should, since the cell in front of them is still full even though it'll empty later this tick.

And what would you do if you want the entirely full loop to not jam? It sounds possible, probably even simple, but I haven't seen how. A solution to this problem is orthogonal to the points you've raised.
I'm getting this response when I try to log in:

{"status":422,"error":"Unprocessable Entity"}
In my city you can have video evidence of someone driving up to your house, license plate visible, stealing you property, and driving away and they will take a report, pass it along to the prosecutor, and he or she will proceed to do absolutely nothing.

In Seattle my car was stolen on camera and was later found with a million identifying pieces of information in it, including the thief's security guard uniform complete with name badge, along with receipts at local pot shops with their name and phone number and... nothing happened.

It's hard for me to imagine they're going to running around trying to ticket people for abrupt lane changes.
I worked in the culinary world for a long time and we called this our “oh shit!” timer — being caught up in some task to suddenly remember to open the oven at the perfect moment before something burns.
This is an incredibly petty complaint.
PostgreSQL isn't exciting. It's boring, with roots in the Berkeley Ingress project from the mid 80s. Which is why 10 years ago, so many HNers went with trendy NoSQL data stores instead, even though they lost data. Data loss is very exciting, and PostgreSQL is very boring. This preference for what's exciting and trendy over what's old and proven is a large reason why so much software today sucks.
We've talked about this, and may build a track that officially targets this in the future. That said, with the exception of two pieces of content that talk about applying to YC, one piece about understanding SAFE financing, and perhaps part of our video about pitching your startup, really everything else we talk about is the right advice whether you're planning on bootstrapping or raising VC.

Learning to build something people want, which is the core of the Startup School curriculum, really doesn't depend on where your funding comes from!
As a person with a disability, I’d rather not be treated as a problem that needs to be optimized away.
Their own communication to him said that they were discussing the results of the investigation with him, without talking to him during the investigation. They're not being honest.
I'm here for the Zoolander meme. Even if it was an accident.
Results:

15.96% [kernel] [k] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore
12.81% [kernel] [k] mmiocpy
6.26% [kernel] [k] __copy_to_user_memcpy
6.02% [kernel] [k] __local_bh_enable_ip
5.13% [igb] [k] igb_poll

When it hit full blast, I started getting "Events are being lost, check IO/CPU overload!"
Nature is finally showing us some of her real treasures! There's no telling what wonders we will discover when all of this permafrost finally melts for good and mankind is able to access these inaccessible and rich terrains!
Hey, please email us a screenshot of the page right before you get that error to startupschool@ycombinator.com and I'll take a look ASAP.
"Only" 74,000 miles in driverless mode.

That is less than I expected.

Executive Summary

https://storage.googleapis.com/sdc-prod/v1/safety-report/Way...
Yes but in that case it would be in the interest of the leaser to make the product be as easily maintainable as possible.
How does it decide whether two JSON values are equal? e.g. 1 vs 1.00 vs 1e0. (https://preserves.gitlab.io/preserves/why-not-json.html)
Again, none of those things have become noticeably worse under the current presidential administration than any other in the last couple decades, except as related to COVID, which again, is skewing every nation on earth's stats, not just the US. Have you looked at the COVID / unemployment / life expectancy stats for other countries?

For everything else, are we looking at the same stats?

Deficit: higher under Obama than it was under Bush / has been under Trump.

Incarceration rates: continuing to decrease during Trump's term.

Education: yeah, America's is pretty terrible. But that's been a trend for a long time, Trump has nothing to do with it.

The news is making you think things are worse than they actually are. Take a break from it.
Hundreds of Recommended Links
For anybody interested the following equipment works the best:
1) Oticon hearing aids + TV streaming device connected to iMac via audio interface.
It streams the audio from the computer to the hearing aids .
2) Teams + captioning. In order the person needing to see the captioning to see it he has to initiate the meeting and sharing the link. The link never expires and could be saved in Notes from all members of the group. The members of the group needs to share the meeting time via other means for example email , text message.
Compared to Zoom, Google meetups Team has superior video, audio and captioning capabilities.
There are desktop and iOS versions of Teams. No way to use Otter reliably with hearing aid device because it requires Chrome browser and needs physical sound from the speakers to work. Internal networking the sound is not working.
3) Phone calls - CaptionCall. It is free service paid by the FEDeral government. You sign up and receive dedicated phone number which you enter in settings for call forwarding. When you are calling or somebody is calling you CaptionCall is intercepting the call and forwards it for machine learning+ person transcriber. This is the best combination.
4) Messaging across devices -WhastApp. No video or audio captioning in iOS so - using only messaging. Used for announcing Teams meeting.

All other solutions do not do anything to accommodate-WebEx, BlueJeans, etc.

Microsoft is having the best accommodation service - there is dedicated web site with free 24/7 support for people needing accommodation. One Teams account is just $5/month and the support is responding within several hours.
The C# compiler roslyn, the dotnet runtime (Jit compiler, ...), and ASP NET Core are all MIT or Apache licensed and run officially supported on mac os, linux and windows.
I don't think this especially changes the underlying point: anyone using tools which were based on libxml2 or xerces is basically stuck in 1999. Having to find and install custom extensions adds a regular frictional cost which encourages you to just do more work in a full programming language since you know you'll be able to satisfy any requirement that way.

I saw so many developers sour on XML after hitting the “This would be easy if we used XPath 2 but instead it's hard” wall that I wonder if anyone on the relevant standards committees ever thought about how much libxml2 would make their work relevant.
I wonder how long this lasts in its current state before people start abusing it.

*Edit, looks like he's already disabled submissions due to NSFW entries. That didn't take long!
Took a quick look. If you want my take, your basic tutorials are, well... too basic. They describe fundamental language principles in a well-established programming language for which there's already a wealth of material available. Frankly, there's already a million articles and books that cover that.

IMHO, you need to write about some cool hot or esoteric feature that solves a specific problem in a new way. Or about how a particular crash bug ended being based on something that everyone else thinks works one way when in fact it works the other way.

Do a search on a topic. Are there already thousands of pages that cover the same thing? If so, write on something else.

Trust me. It's possible to do a lot better than $1.50 an article.
One of my friends joined a foreign multinational and basically survives by the captions as well. Good guy Microsoft
Yup, CotL was uniquely well done.
Really excited for this!
Clickable link https://github.com/soundshader/soundshader.github.io
Now make Google Search again with date restriction before 1 April 2020.

"After two days of intense debate"
"the United Methodist Church has agreed to"
"one that is expected to end"
"in the creation of a new denomination"

You will find and sources of GPT-3 text:

After two days of intense debate, the United Methodist Church has agreed to a historic split – one that is expected to end in the creation of a new denomination, one that will be “theologically and socially conservative,” according to The Washington Post. The majority of delegates attending the church’s annual General Conference in May voted to strengthen a ban on the ordination of LGBTQ clergy and to write new rules that will “discipline” clergy who officiate at same-sex weddings. But those who opposed these measures have a new plan: They say they will form a separate denomination by 2020, calling their church the Christian Methodist denomination. The Post notes that the denomination, which claims 12.5 million members, was in the early 20th century the “largest Protestant denomination in the U.S.,” but that it has been shrinking in recent decades. The new split will be the second in the church’s history. The first occurred in 1968, when roughly 10 percent of the denomination left to form the Evangelical United Brethren Church. The Post notes that the proposed split “comes at a critical time for the church, which has been losing members for years,” which has been “pushed toward the brink of a schism over the role of LGBTQ people in the church.” Gay marriage is not the only issue that has divided the church. In 2016, the denomination was split over ordination of transgender clergy, with the North Pacific regional conference voting to ban them from serving as clergy, and the South Pacific regional conference voting to allow them.
I don’t think they meant one precludes the other, and “modeling concurrency” definitely is a “sharing data” problem. In other words, you would have to build a nicer concurrency abstraction out of a lower level primitive at some point.
> -> This doesn't surprise me really, but is still pretty sad. Many drivers are just assholes and AVs are going to be an easy target for such people.

I would cheerfully bet good money that the Venn diagram of "people fucking with Waymo cars" and "people who run cyclists off the road" is close to a circle.
What are you talking about, and how does it relate at all to what you are replying to? I didn't even use the word slavery , and I was talking about Rome and cultural attitudes of Europeans and their colonists.

Then you go on about your 300 years of complete family opposition to slavery in the US which has only existed for 244 of those years... and you're speaking for ... eh thousands to tens of thousands of people? Calm down.
Impossible List
A CENTER FOR ANTS???
As an aside, I took a History of Logic course from Krzysztof Apt (https://inference-review.com/author/krzysztof-apt/) while I was an undergrad and he was briefly at UT Austin. He is an excellent teacher and a very nice man.

(He loaned me a copy of a book on Frege's logic during the course---it had been signed and given to him by the person who let him stay on their floor when he first came to the US.)
I respectfully disagree with the stance you are taking. I did not post their names in an attempt to provide "ammunition in an argument or to rile up a public posse against them", I did it because they refused to sign their names and I saved people the step of having to dig into it themselves. I simply copy-pasted their (public) information, this is not "personal details" these are numbers and emails associated with their organization. Should all of the other comments that link to the same page (with the information I copy-pasted) be removed as well? I'm genuinely confused by this. Is tim@apple.com also considered "personal details" in a thread about an unpopular move by Apple? I'm trying to figure out where the line is here.
The usual definition of event horizon is from the perspective of the external observer—the falling astronaut can calculate the threshold at which no amount of thrust can ever move them away from the singularity (in fact, this is what is meant that a time and space coordinate switch places—you can now only move 'down' in space, just like you can only move forward in time).
It’s been a practice of mine for years and several coworkers are only learning about it for the first time:

I either decline meetings with no agenda or nothing in the body, or leave them tentative and reply back with nothing but a question mark to the sender. Mostly decline.
It would be awesome to have the old Sierra games like King's Quest, Police Quest, Space Quest, etc. re-born as first-person adventures with photorealistic graphics.
That's 656,400 people you are talking about not bothering to accommodate.
I don't want to personal-brand much :) but here are some fediverse and itch links, roughly corresponding to small and big news:

https://vulpine.club/@Triplefox
https://triplefox.itch.io/

At minimum I will be putting up a downloadable on itch in a few days or so.
How big of a game changer is RISC-V in the direction of full open source electronics/computing devices?
Technically it's not a lie—there are 5x1 Gbps of interfaces here. But I wanted to acknowledge that I used a technicality to get the title how I wanted it, because if I didn't do that, a lot of people wouldn't read it, and then we wouldn't get to have this enlightening discussion ;)
I think Haskell enforcing a separation between the "color" (or monad) of functions is generally good.
Amazon were a god send here in the UK. You couldn't buy basic essentials like light bulbs as brick and morter retailers deemed them non essential (while still selling timber and loft ladders). I'd have spent 3months sitting in the dark without them...
I'm glad you brought this up, because ~RCV~IRV does not actually satisfy these conditions (it is a personal point of frustration how Fair Vote is misleading, even by using the term RCV). IRV doesn't pass the favorite betrayal criteria. IRV also causes a weaker definition of what it means to be a spoiler[1]. Specifically you should look at monotonicity[2].

I'd encourage you to dig a bit into electionscience.org (they have some good YouTube videos as well) as they do a deeper dive on some of these topics. There's a reason Arrow himself was a fan or cardinal systems. The other part is that we need to consider factors other than VSE and spoilers. A lot of people get hyper focused on VSE (typically Condorcet supporters) and while it is an important factor 0.5% isn't a big deal (really a few percent isn't). Also you might want to check out our (HN) resident voting expert's[3] comments, because he links to a lot more information. I'd call myself a hobbyist where Clay is an expert.

[0] https://electowiki.org/wiki/Favorite_betrayal_criterion

[1] https://electionscience.org/library/the-spoiler-effect/

[2] https://electionscience.org/library/monotonicity/

[3] https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=ClayShentrup
Lobe manager here. It is targeted at all sort of users. Anyone can build a model, but it might take an engineer to integrate the model into an app.
Again weird slavery denial responding to a comment that doesn't mention slavery.
Yeah, I had some issues with that. Simplest sites getting broken on updates. Nothing in the changelogs about breaking changes and no fucks given when reported. Still a good generator though.
That's another thing that C# (or, rather, .NET) handles really well. I can't remember the exact syntax, but the Task API has a way of declaring a background task as "long-running". The key difference is, long-running tasks get a dedicated thread; short-running tasks execute on the thread pool.
My gut reaction if I were Jeremy would be to say that "This is absolutely absurd; there is no way that claiming 'X's opinion is wrong' is in itself a CoC violation, and if it somehow is, then the CoC is ridiculous. The fact that such an accusation was even able to be made under the CoC and not immediately dismissed makes CoCs look ridiculous. Why are you wasting everyone's time?"

He goes a very, very different route. I think that different route gave him a better outcome. I think it is worth thinking about why that is. We are not talking about an accusation of sexual harassment or assault here, we are talking about an almost textbook case of how CoC accusations can be overextended to absurdity. Yet he chooses to defend CoCs.

One possible explanation of this is that he is trying to draw a distinction between things that should be "legitimate" CoC violations, and his case. Another possible explanation is that he is trying to say that "Look, I strongly believe that <murder should be illegal>, really strongly. That makes me one of the good guys. Would a good guy commit murder?" The latter take is more cynical, but I think it would be more effective than my gut reaction.
> It's very unclear to me if they meant to say Jeremey was not guilty when they talked to him at a certain point in time or if he is still not guilty.

It's clear to me that they're trying to not express an opinion there. I read this as them recusing themselves from the situation and doing their best to not express an opinion about a ruling which may or may not have been made (the murkiness about this also seems deliberate)
Here you go! https://pastebin.com/A8gsGz3t
IFTTT was a helper for users given slow smartphones 10 years ago.

Not so much now.
You're missing the attack in exactly the same way as the author does.

The same person doesn't distribute both of the files. Two different people distribute two different files. One of them is totally innocent and the party distributing that file doesn't even have to be in on it or have any relationship with the other person, but there is no way to tell which one it is.

The legal system is forced into either punishing and taking down the innocent file or not doing so for the infringing one. There is no other option when you can't distinguish between them.

But it isn't supposed to do that to the one which is just an ordinary use of a one-time pad by an innocent independent third party who has e.g. posted it in a public place for the intended recipient of the non-infringing message to receive it without there being a direct one-to-one communication between sender and the recipient. Or because there are multiple intended recipients and only those with the correct pad can read the original message so it's safe to publish widely.

The fact that some totally different person has come along and used your published file to encode an infringing one is not supposed to affect your legal status. But if nobody can tell which one is the original, the legal system has to choose between punishing the innocent and not punishing the guilty.

It isn't an algorithmic problem, it's an evidentiary problem. There are two different sets of bits and one is supposed to have a different "Colour" but the legal system has no information as to which one it is.

It's like someone discovering that the flashlight on certain phones is bright enough to blind surveillance cameras, and when someone points out that criminals could use this to prevent surveillance cameras from capturing their faces while they're committing their crimes, you respond that the legal system doesn't work like that because having an effective way to avoid being identified doesn't make your conduct legal. But that wasn't the original claim.
This is wrong; 1 Gbps Ethernet is 125 MB/s (including headers/trailer and inter-packet gap so you only get ~117 in practice). Infiniband, SATA, and Fibre Channel cheat but Ethernet doesn't.