skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I tried using Anki but found it far too boring to sustain my interest. Staring at fact flashcards for hours on end just felt like a waste of time.

In my experience it was much more useful and engaging to learn by doing things (creating, writing, experimenting) that the facts were related to - then the most necessary facts would become deeply embedded in my memory, with others at just the right level of vagueness necessary to look up the details if needed.
High school was 5 years in some parts of Canada for a while. Then it was truncated to 4 with the same material being delivered, just compressed.
To be clear: that's a republican pollster giving a message to republican-dominated media which was quite clearly intended to be encouraging to the overwhelmingly republican audience.

Luntz is a data guy. He believes polls, they're what he does. If he didn't believe the polls he would have said so. Instead he said that if they were wrong then polling must not work, which is what his audience wants to hear.
A hydrogen atom is generally two up quarks and one down quark, making up a proton, and one electron. The force carriers and occasionally neutrinos show up for interactions, but most of the rest only appear on earth in particle accelerators.
Assuming a 50,000^2 pixel image at 600 dpi it’s just under 7 foot by 7 foot. You can likely play around with the DPI to fit most any wall, but I don’t know the aspect ratio.
Politics are creeping into movies and TV and becoming quite toxic as well.
Maybe I'm mistaken, but I think recursion in J allows one to blow up the stack even when using $:

I agree that tacit control flow primitives can lead to confusing situations, but on the other hand they're faster and conceptually closer to the rest of the language.
While I agree with the other comments about the implications of your "quackery" phrasing, I want to chime in and say that overall, I really appreciate that you wrote that page.

I think it's unusual to see a company basically say "here's why you might not want to use our product". The ones that do often come across as "here are our issues, but here's why they don't really matter and you should use us anyway". While some parts of the page do maybe seem to do a little of the latter (the "quackery" sections are a good example), the overall tone I get is "here is why we might not be a good fit for you", and I find that rather refreshing.

I'm sure some people will see your "take it or leave it" approach as user-hostile. And perhaps on some level it is. But in my opinion, it's far less user-hostile than hiding those choices/limitations in order to get signups, with the user then finding out about them later and having buyer's remorse.

So kudos for being up-front about it.
Youtube you suck! You spy cheat and lie... Sell privacy of users to 3rd party.. Just like buggy Facebook.
This is going to be difficult to find the authors' comments if there are any. I am still curious where will the development continue because downloading from YouTube often breaks and requires some fixing, i.e. update youtube-dl and it works! :/
It's true.

Too much population, too little work. Everyone has just stared coming online. They are discovering infinite porn, TikTok and youtube.
Also, hydrogen can be mixed into natural gas, without changing much infrastructure. This is of course only a transitional measure, not an end goal, but doable now and a very cheap one.
> Cars, TV, home appliances, and the whole lot of today's energy-hungry living isn't sustainable

It seems like you're gunning for some weird primitivist angle that just isn't realistic. These problems are solvable with good public transit infrastructure and a few thousand hectares of solar panels. Obviously there's no escaping some impact on our lifestyle, but "hey, destitution isn't so bad when you have family" is a bizarre leap out of left field. No climate scientists are realistically suggesting that we "end home appliances."
You haven't done a complete clone until you have included Latin, by the way.

* https://unix.stackexchange.com/q/572653/5132
Bus Factor 1
I find it doubly ironic that you linked to this subreddit about rage over a inferior GPM-replacement of a streaming service, and you did so with a link which was specifically hard-coded to use the old Reddit UI, instead of this new inferior one.
Very interesting. I am actually working for a few days now on something very related: Generate syntax tree data structures (in Swift) from a grammar (which is the actual grammar used for parsing). What I found very useful is to distinguish between hidden, auxiliary and visible symbols. Hidden symbols don't appear in the tree, visible symbols appear as normal, and for auxiliary symbols only their children appear in the syntax tree. Seems to work very nicely so far. This way, left oder right recursion for example doesn't matter if your recursion symbol is auxiliary, because it will just be flattened into a list anyway. Therefore I can use regular expressions in a grammar by desugaring them via auxiliary symbols in the usual way via context-free rules, and have a sensible syntax tree generated for that.
I'd like to add the one that bothers me most:

6 - listen to public talks, presentations and soundscapes while doing something else with my mobile device, or letting the screen sleep in my pocket. YouTube requires the video to be on-screen or it stops playing, which makes it completely useless for listening to things. Other video sites are much better for this.

(I don't need advice on how to get around this thanks, I already know how to. But that's another of YouTube's crappy standard behaviours.)
Savings account, CD account, IRA, Roth IRA, 401(k) and MSA account are all smoke and mirrors. Finance traps our smartest people for what? What we should really do is boycott inflation and invest in bitcoin.
Seems like this tweet was also taken down.
Sure, there are tons of fundamental concepts. Even in what you mentioned - what are the types of taxes that exist and whom do they impact? How are taxes levied, how is tax burden calculated, and within each society, how is that changed? What's regressive, proportional, or progressive taxation - for bonus points, what is the historical impact of these changes?

Bigger picture for underlying concepts - what is money? What are the historical monetary systems that have been developed? What is debt? How does fiat currency work and how does this system work globally? A basic discussion of inflation/deflation, monetary theory and practice. How does fractional-reserve banking work (relation to liquidity, money supply, and velocity of money).

I'd add that there are a number of non-intuitive fundamental concepts for investing: the time value of money, compound rates (bonus: calculating differences in growth from tax-advantaged accounts), what is rebalancing and why does it work (related, how does correlation work in improving yield), or even understanding the basics of "capitalism" (specifically the theoretical and practical implications of rent-seeking and accumulation of capital).
Already at number 4 on all-time list:
http://www.hntoplinks.com/all
The phone as a device appears to definitely be biased towards consumption rather than production. Another message to add about creativity: don't forget about building real physical things. It is great to have digital wealth, but we also need physical stuff and society seems more and more detached from the creation of this physical stuff, which strikes me as a worrying trend.
>Phones have value. That’s why people use them

Now try the same line but with heroin, or fast food, or whatever people use to their detriment...

Besides, anything that has value also has an opportunity cost, which can be much more important than the value inherent in the thing...

>Here’s an example: I want to take public transport to a grocery store. I walk out the door. I don’t have my phone. First of all, if I don’t check the opening hours of the store before leaving, I now have no idea. The whole trip may be for nothing.

Yeah, it's a wonder how people managed to live and visit the grocery store in the dark ages of the 90s and early 00s... All these people going out of their homes at 02:00am only to find the grocery store closed...
I'm the Founder of BackHub and that's one of the reasons why we offer backups for GitHub repositories, incl. the metadata! Reach out for a discount.
We are always expecting more of the same, until it isn't. We are constantly observing unexpected things. Both with regards to life (on Earth, obviously, since we didn't find life anywhere else) and with regards to celestial bodies and physics.

And this is to be expected. We are building models to match our observations. "More of the same" is the basic assumption, but it doesn't mean it is true. That's why we experiment: to verify our models and if found wrong, to update them.
The more things our model takes into account, the more we can expect it to explain everything, meaning the more we can expect to find "more of the same", but it is never a given.

I mean, we thought we had the universe almost completely figured out in the early 1900s, with just a few details remaining. The "details" turned out to be quantum physics and general relativity...
Hydrogen cannot be better than hydrocarbons, because the efficiency of the cycle can reach very close values for both, while storage tanks and associated devices are much smaller and cheaper for hydrocarbons.

Converting the energy stored in hydrocarbons back to electrical energy can be done with the current technology at efficiencies well over 50% using Diesel engines.

Higher efficiencies can be reached with fuel cells. It is true that for now, especially for room-temperature fuel cells, much more research has been done for fuel cells with hydrogen.

However room-temperature fuel cells are handicapped anyway by the need for expensive catalysts. High temperature fuel cells can be made to work almost as well with hydrocarbons as with hydrogen. Their lifetime needs improvement, but it is likely that better results could have already been obtained if the research efforts in energy conversion would not have so dispersed over a very large number of directions, most of which were obviously wrong since the beginning.

Right now it is indeed possible to obtain hydrogen from water with a higher efficiency than hydrocarbons, because it can be done in a single simpler step, the electrolysis.

Nevertheless, in an optimized synthesis, the efficiency of obtaining hydrocarbons instead of hydrogen, also sequestering carbon dioxide as an added benefit, should have a very close efficiency, as proven by the countless bacteria that do a similar job.

It is possible right now to capture carbon dioxide and store energy in synthetic hydrocarbons, then generate electrical energy from the stored hydrocarbons.

However the cost and efficiency of doing that would be much less than desirable and possible.

That is why I said that this would require much more R&D than now, but this would be a certain solution for the long term storage problem.

For short term storage, high-efficiency solutions, e.g. flow batteries, pumped water, compressed air and so on, are better solutions.
One example: there are phone apps which simulate a piano keyboard, so you can create and record music (or at least jot down chord/melody ideas) while out and about.
Good observation. I assume that's because it's "overexposed" to bring out the nebulas etc.?

Zooming in all the way, the pure "black" areas between stars also seem to have a fair bit of sensor noise that probably plays a part too.
The Workman Keyboard Layout
Backslash got added at the end. Can't edit now. Sorry
The article also states "So far the year 2020 has been the third least deadly year per capita ever in the country, despite the tragic and global Covid-19 pandemic.", so no.
Thanks very much; this clarity helped!
Atoms consist of a nucleus made from protons and neutrons, and a hull made from electrons.

Protons and neutrons in turn are made from up and down quarks (uud for the proton and udd for the neutron).

Add the electron neutrino to fix up some nuclear reactions, and you're good to go as far as most things you see around you is concerned (excluding the 'force carrier' part of the particle spectrum). Hence the quip "Who ordered that?" attributed to I.I. Rabi on the discovery of the muon.
> you circumvented the technical copy protection mechanism (no matter how ridiculously trivial it was)

They can't do ridiculously trivial copy protection legally, depending on the country they might be required to do at least authentication and authorization with disabled access to the sources and maybe even hardware DRM garbage, which neither Google nor publishers want to do because it will significantly reduce ad views. Basically there is no copy protection mechanism at all in this case.
I think you are absolutely right about mass social networking, where people/pages can have millions of followers and advertisers have access to extremely granular filters. This form of the internet is not good for us. It's too big, too impersonal, and too public.

I would be fine if Facebook and co. continued to exist - but the whole thing is maybe a little bit too connected. I really hope that the future of social media can focus on smaller and more intimate groups that (mostly) know each other IRL. For example I love my family's group chat, my little fitness group, etc. and all of those things happen on social media. Social media just needs to be scaled down to be a more human-friendly environment.
Milk and honey in Czech Republic. I grew up in Ukraine and Romania and to be fair nobody earned any money after informatics high-school, we had to finish university and leave our families for UK and USA to earn a good income. My group of friends knew that if we stayed in Europe we will end up mostly on outsourced projects. Didn't know Czechia is an incubator of Rockefellers.
Slack does this, but you need to click on someone's name to bring up their profile. This then has local time.

Presumably it's not easier because everyone important lives in San Francisco. \s
This happens in Spain as well. About how did it pass, I assume it's because lobbying.
What's this Malthusianism doing in the 21st century? Can you cite some data suggesting that Earth is incapable of feeding and housing a population of ten billion at least? We have a surplus of food and a surplus of living space, and despite the ongoing energy crisis, there's every indication that renewables will be able to support our entire society once we've pumped enough money into them.
In Poland, a study from 2017 found that:

* 58% of population thinks they don't pay the VAT tax
* 21% of population thinks they pay no taxes at all

https://www.bankier.pl/wiadomosc/21-proc-Polakow-uwaza-ze-ni...
I was excited about the catalog until I tried to add Electric Lady Land, and they didnt have a legit version, just a fan made amalgamation of differntly mastered singles from the album. Honestly disappointing.
You don't need a phone for any of the activities you described.

Stores are pretty much open business hours, or 24 hours, they follow the same pattern. Or just show up and it is closed. Go somewhere else.

Public transport runs to a schedule. Just show up and transport will show up within n minutes anyway, whether you know the time or nor. Or just use the timetable at the station.

Yes, no music, just your thoughts. but take a book if you want.

Write down your shopping list on paper.

All I have just described is why it is so liberating.
You’ve never got to a store only to realize they are closed on Mondays or something?
(the title was changed, it used to be "You can no longer join any Google Meet session without a Google account")
I wonder what caused growth of mortality from ca 1960 to ca 1990?
I saw from people related to Mozilla on Twitter that when they had their most recent major layoff, they canned the entire research department except for the Hubs team, and that Mozilla was planning on turning Hubs into a revenue stream. So you might say they have pivoted to this, or have dropped everything else in pursuit of this.
The mods changed the title.

Btw, I didn't mention GSuite. I tested with personal accounts. Which is why I posted 'You can no longer join any Google Meet session without a Google account'
How about Shopify suck up to me so that I can develop on their platform or buy their packages? I will pass on anyway.
Looks like just the clients are OSS: https://github.com/stingle
FYI for Mac users: I can see footnotes when I look at the raw source for the RTFs, but on macOS Catalina neither TextEdit nor Pages show them.
Well, I do Python for decades :-)

But I would be OK with

(a) shell programs that talk to each other through pipes with something structured -- e.g. depending on the program with something like a pandas dataframe(binary) a parsable tree (e.g. json-like) or csv output and input -- as opposed to random text people try to parse with cut -f, regexes and so on.

(b) shell programs that share the same flags for the same things (not e.g. -o/--output for output in one program and -w/--write-file in another) and only specialize in the behavior they need...

and several other things besides...
Linux kernel is developed[0] nicely without GitHub. All that’s really needed is a mailing list and someone (who doesn’t fear Google or RIAA suing them personally) willing to host the DVCS server.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_kernel#Source_code_manag...
Let’s agree that both forms exist. There are definitely people with very little financial literacy living paycheck to paycheck, in constant fear of an unexpected cost, that could have adjusted their lifestyle to save a small amount over time into a meaningful nest egg. There are also people who just make less money than even a spartan life costs.

It’s ignorant to assume that all poverty is the result of poor decisions and an unwillingness to save, but equally ignorant to pretend that doesn’t exist at all.
One solution would be to load those links from environment variables, similar to how it's done with API access keys and other sensitive data. This would mildly inconvenience the devs by having to copy the links to those types of content by hand and set the vars before running the tests, but none of the "infringing" links would be present in the repo itself.
This is exactly the kind of absurd, completely surreal type of argumentation I’m talking about. You’re literally comparing a smartphone to one of the most dangerous and addictive opioids available, responsible for 15 000 overdose deaths annually in the US alone.

And in case you perhaps didn’t actually read my comment, I pointed out the fact that I was one of those people who visited grocery stores in the 90s, which is why I know that doing it today is easier than it was back then. That’s the whole point. Falling back on childish exaggeration like “oh I wonder how ANYONE managed to do this before” obviously doesn’t disprove the fact that what was possible before is now still possible but easier.
Be careful with the combination of a ruthless pursuit of objectives, no explicit time tracking, and Peopleware-flavored advice not to interrupt people who are in maker-mode (which can easily be misunderstood as advice not to communicate). You have the makings of a culture where people bust their balls for 18 hours a day in order to meet their objectives and don't tell you that they're spending 18 hours and not 8 hours, because they don't want to rock the boat.

Yes, meeting objectives matter. But setting the right objectives is a conversation between the business's wish list and the constraints of the resources that the business actually has. Trust is a two-way street; too many managers talk about trusting their workers but they don't talk about what they do to earn their workers' trust.
FOSS projects with a very few, part time, developers (usually only 1), have very limited time to handle bug/feature requests. Half the time I'm spending on my projects involves fixing bugs introduced by changing tools (e.g. the project no longer compiles because somebody changed the C compiler, or the Ubuntu linux libraries no longer match the RedHat ones).

Imagine how much grief was caused by the requirement to ASK people about cookies, which we see everywhere. Or the grief about http vs https, encryption, IP4 vs IP6, accessibility, host vs mobile page sizes, Apple developer fees, copyright and trademark issues, bandwidth requirements, timezone and country-specific issues, font issues (e.g. cyrillic), social grief (master vs main), etc. Note that almost none of these have anything to do with the application but require developer time and attention.

Oh, and don't forget, if your project is used everywhere then people will develop attacks against it. If there is a security issue with your application you might get sued and lose everything. Legal issues alone are a nightmare. Do you know the copyright law differences between EU and US law? Even large companies like Facebook seem to be struggling:

Facebook said it might stop operating in Europe if the EU suspends all data transfers to the US.

https://www.businessinsider.com/facebook-eu-us-data-transfer...
Of course they are but they are meant for more sophisticated purposes, (i.e. install, update, reinstall, remove app or even purge program with user data, etc.) and all of that logic is usually covered with signature checking with other security-oriented algorithms. I agree, I find apt/dnf/pacman/apk/xbps are great, but...

In case of Ubuntu, in order to install some deb-based software you usually have to bring your own script (this is what I call "copy & paste installation script") to add third-party repository that contains given package.
Sibling comments have described the structure of atoms already, so here is a different thing:

What you see in the article is a way to organize the types of particles and interactions that occur in the standard model according to their properties. It is not a way to visualize atoms or molecules that you might be familiar with from chemistry if this is what you meant.

The following comparison might be flawed but imagine like it an overview sheet for screws [0].
One type is listed with philips head, one with torx, one type might have a thread with this angle and that pitch, the threads being right-handed or left-handed ...

You can then look at this sheet, see the different screws and tell which one you e.g. might replace with another, depending on the tools or requirements you have. It is not blueprint for any particular object, though.

To go back to the article: because of the similarity of their properties, you could substitute an electron with a muon for example. Read more about this here: [1] [2]

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Screw

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muon#Muonic_atoms

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exotic_atom
I’d argue this could embedded into an existing math curriculum instead. Most people could use this more than an advanced algebra class.