skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
>The researchers found that some body tissues regenerate much better than others. They studied the lining of the small intestine, which turns over roughly every four days, because it’s designed to absorb and distribute nutrients to other parts of the body. Drs. Karp and Langer saw the molecular pathways that signal the lining’s cells to turn over quickly and form new tissues.

>Around the same time, another scientific group found very similar cells in the cochlea – but with one big difference: in the cochlea, these cells weren’t active. They saw that the cochlea’s cells didn’t regenerate and form new sensory hair cells. “So that was the formation of Frequency,” LeBel explains. “And Frequency was asking, why is that the case? Why is it that the cochlea isn’t regenerating cells and the small intestine is?”

>This led to the discovery of two small molecules that make up FX-322, which targets these cells, called progenitor cells. Essentially, this process is meant to drive hair cell regeneration: The drug targets pathways to those cochlear cells, and when activated, they divide and form a new cell of themselves, called daughter cells. “And then most importantly, they form a new sensory hair cell,” LeBel says.

That sounds incredible. If it really can reliably do what they claim with no significant negative side effects, that'd seem like one of the most "miraculous" treatments I've heard of in a while, both in terms of the technique and what it could accomplish.
Too bad the data center version is incredibly expensive, and going up again.
It's the fact that these so-called rules have exceptions, and exceptions to exceptions.

Weird. Foreign. Neither. Keith. None of those are sounded as an 'a'.

That's why we can't realistically generalise and say these rules are actual rules - they're more rule of thumb. If you're lucky.
that looks like a killing blow.
I was expecting those Churchill quotes to be more long the lines of

"I hate indians! They are a beastly people with a beastly religion"

Or "the Hindus are a foul race"

It's highly believable that quoting Churchill can be considered hate speach. There's a lot of races he did not like
> Telematics systems contain car data that is stored outside the vehicle and may include information that relates to navigation, GPS, and mobile internet.

> Question 1 goes well beyond what is necessary to perform this work, and it potentially jeopardizes vehicle and data security.

IMO they don’t want people to see how much data they’re collecting. How does reading telemetry style data jeopardize the vehicle?
Remdesivir is crap. From the very beginning, the Russian protocol included interferon, nasal application 3x per day. Then, coincidentally, a week or so ago the American medical establishment wakes up and concludes that covid19 has a propensity to deactivate inteferon production or usefulness in the human body. As always, American medicine has a "conflict of interest" in keeping hospital patients as long as possible, as sick as possible to maximize billing. Go Figure.
My short answer: there aren't any. Every source has shown itself willing to set truth aside in the interest of some political or ideological agenda.

If your response is "well, that sucks", yes, I agree. It sucks to live in a world where people and institutions whose sole job is supposed to be making sure true information gets to the public, every time, no exceptions, are either unwilling or unable to do that job right.
I have been using these at least twice a month since high-school (20+ years) after having multiple dramatic ear infections that rendered me temporally unable to hear due to clogging. I was just at the ENT doc last week and he confirmed that my ears 1) look and function great and 2) there is no damage, at all, from using these mini turkey baster like devices when they are used correctly. I highly recommend them, but your own experience may differ and you should probably check with an ENT doc just to be sure.
There is no way for Lewis to assume that much responsibility even if he wanted to though, to continue this example. I'd go as far as to argue with constant rule changes it's not even the same sport anymore, especially the gap between Fangio and Lewis etc.

I agree, cross-generation driver comparisons are really hard.
If the person you responded to had said "monopoly," your comment would only be pedantic (and maybe bad faith), but they didn't say that - it's easy to argue with a straw man. Don't demean yourself.
I think this is a really good example actually.

When I was at school (I turned 8 in 2002, I'm a brit in case it matters :) ) it was just "'i' before 'e' except after 'c'".

Thats actually already bad, why swap 2 letters around based on a third if the word sounds the same anyway?

Then we had to add two more caveats to the rule.

And English spelling still doesn't fit this rule, even with the extra bits bolted on. At best it's a guideline (Frequencies or any other pluralised -cy word seems to break it)

Before we learnt 1000 different spellings. Now we learn a rule, but it's quite complex, and then we learn 200 exceptions to this rule.

But for what?

From now on, it's always "ie". Done. Wouldn't that be simpler? We could eliminate the I all together. There is no "I" sound in neighbour or weigh. They should be neybor and way (or if you really need to distinguish all the other Way words, "wey").

Then instead of 1000 hours of frustration, little kids can all spell correctly on day one and get on and do 1000 hours of maths or reading or art or something.
Can also use the javascript .sup() function for post-html bloggers.
Whenever any of the 'old folks' of F1 are interviewed (Lauda, Stewart, Williams), they talk about Fangio and Clark.

It's not surprising to me that they're at the top.

The in-car footage of Fangio is breathtaking.
Unfortunately it blocks Twitch ads while others don't. Did the Firefox version suffer the same fate?

Since a Twitch update ~1 month ago uMatrix did not have a working solution except for the first few days, but maybe things have changed.
As @CitizenKane pointed out, reusing statcharts between backend and frontend is a growingly popular use case.

Another benefit is you could use any visual tool (preferably web-based with collaborative capabilities so that all stackholders could work togehter) for state modeling to encapsulate business logics completely in statechart then export SCXML to any language you might be using.
I don't understand why people get upset about this. It's called open source for a reason. If you want recognition when someone uses your open source project, pick a license that has an advertising clause.

This is similar to other open source projects which GPL their project instead of AGPL, and then get angry when people and companies (like Amazon), literally abide by the terms of your license but you don't like the outcome. Then they act all offended like someone did something wrong. If you don't like it, switch your project to AGPL and stop trying to act like someone did anything but honor the license you released your code under.

People like this do damage to open source because they blindly pick their licenses rather than understanding what they mean.
Every firm has its own specific way of doing it, but the short version is that non-partner workers at a firm are normal employees with a normal salary, benefits, etc. But they do not own any equity/stake/shares in the firm.

Once you are promoted to partner, you are no longer an employee of the firm and in some cases you no longer earn a salary. Instead when you are promoted to partner, you are allowed to "buy in" by purchasing a certain number of shares of the company. Once you own those shares you are then part-owner of the firm (rather than an employee) and enjoy profit-sharing.
Finding the Four Month Bug (2015)
Anyone know of groups gathering used devices? I’m sure that the number of older laptops just sitting around exceeds 5 million.

Ideally someone would create a boot stick to wipe them, install Linux and Chrome, and easily pass them off to schools.

Start a charity and you could even give people a tax credit for their old machine. I’m sure that $30 would get people to give up a lot of them.
A direct URL in case anyone wants it: https://willowpatchgames.com#about
This entire argument is simply because Hamilton is black. He sets records and all of a sudden he can't shine by himself. Of course the team is important and very good but also so is Hamilton as is evident by his teammate who has the same car unless you truly believe Mercedes is giving his teammate a handicapped car.
Does SAG have rigid role definitions?
Those questions are all too open-ended to lead to specific answers, but in general, if you don't actually need a serious OS in your project, I'd suggest getting your feet wet with Arduino and then moving on to ARM-based platforms such as Teensy when you need more power (which you eventually will.)

The advantage of Arduino is that it will give you a good introduction to embedded development and I/O principles. Working with Arduino, you'll find that the CPU is reasonably capable but that the programming abstractions are clunky, and that'll give you the excuse you need to get comfortable with direct I/O port access. What you learn along the way will apply on more sophisticated platforms.

As for the temperature sensor, it's most likely digital (I2C or similar interface). Without the part number it may be difficult to get it working. If you don't have the part number, it's best to chuck it and order one from Adafruit or Sparkfun that comes with the necessary documentation and support code. Reusing salvaged parts isn't the cost/productivity win that it used to be.

If you need more horsepower for your project than an Arduino or Teensy-class board can provide, then you would want to look at Raspberry Pi or Beaglebone Black. If you aren't already comfortable with *nix development, you have a massive learning curve ahead, for better or worse, and you're going to be spending a lot of time in Professor Google's classroom.
The Best, Worst, & Most Interesting Moments from doing 60 interviews in 30 days
They built big monuments, had big rituals. I guess it'd be cool to learn that they had ball games, but I don't think it would be shocking.
Some of the richest people in the world - I'm thinking Bezos, Gates and Buffett - are pretty rational even if they don't blog much.
MEGA65: Pulling out the big guns for improving compatibility with HDMI monitors
Tech is more like "reverse ageist" instead of being egalitarian.
i think op may be hinting that learning basic chords and scales (which is not difficult) makes it much more fun to play things (and thus more productive) rather than trying to follow each note on a pentagram.
Why do you consider gender inflections to be refined? Genderized things are essentially arbitrary and just something else that needs to be memorized. Even for people it gets tedious at times, hence why english has has the singular they for quite a while for referring to positions or unspecified people.
You keep harping on Facebook et al but you're ignoring everyone pointing out that Section 230 protects everyone at all scales. Without Section 230 exceptions there's no protection for any type of user generated content.

That means no user reviews of anything. No user contributed information so no more Wikipedia or OpenStreetMaps. No Wikis of any kind in fact. No hosting of public data sets for ML research. Forums would be a liability nightmare so they would go away.

Not only would current/new instances of user generated content make sites liable but hosting any historical co rent as well. So to avoid liability the web would have to be scraped clean of user generated content.

Facebook and other large sites would be the only ones to survive because they could afford a moderator army. Your extremely short sighted position would basically leave only large content producers. The Internet would regress to the curated Online Service model but worse because user communication would need to be disallowed over heavily moderated.

You're advocating for the Internet to turn into broadcast television. It's sad that you either can't or won't accept that implication.
Reading the first line:

> Our statistical model finds that neither Lewis Hamilton nor Michael Schumacher is Formula 1’s greatest driver

So its lame to play the racist card here.
I don't think regulations can get rid of systemic risk, but maybe that's because of how I see systemic risk issues. Most of those huge market corrections seem to be due to massive mistakes made simultaneously by a lot of people. The 2006 crisis is a great example, where investors thought real estate markets in different states were independent of each other, which turned out to be incorrect.
The problem is that the pronunciation differs far more than the orthography between dialects. Standardizing means blessing one subpopulation and marking all the others as wrong.

You also make it much much harder for future generations to
read the vast wealth of historical literature.

Clearly rather than orthographic reform, we need pronunciation reform. No one seems to give this proper consideration whenever I suggest it though...
An Archaeology of Marijuana
> In other words, I'm not aware of a permissive license that's the same as BSD/Apache with the only difference in that also says "use it as you wish but you must mention my name when you're a commercial enterprise making a splashy product announcement".

That's called the old BSD 4 clause license. Now you know.

https://spdx.org/licenses/BSD-4-Clause.html
What order are those in? The top left (first one) is the best UI IMO. Lol.
Depends on the motorsport. Take drag racing. top fuel driver after reaction time is mostly along for the ride, depends on quality of engineering to win/lose. Alcohol FC is immensely complicated to drive, also pro stock which is pure driving skill.

MotoGP motor cycle racing is highly skilled and is IMO far, far more exciting than Formula One which used to be the fastest/most expensive formula amongst multiple divisions and is now largely an inventors/engineers domain.

As others have noted different eras of racing cars (late 60's early 70's formula one for example) required very different skills and bravery levels.

David Coulthard drives Jim Clark's Lotus 25
https://youtu.be/_L1tHavnd9w
lovely bit of informative film
leak information = exist
There's no reason to assume that an operator would be liable for libel spam, since they lack mens rea intent. Libel would only be in play if they intentionally refused to take down content or tried to extort people with it.
The Dev version of uBlock Origin has been updated recently to fix that
Strange as it may seem, I still disagree with you.
Why aren't those people interested in working on that today?
I feel like shit sitting on so many perfectly good computers that I don't use regularly. I'd happily give them away and I've asked my educator friends if they know anyone in need.

The response I got just now was that most of their students have laptops, but often internet/Wi-Fi is an issue. I live in a very affluent city, so I suspect the situation is far more dire a few districts away.
If we go down this path we’ll watch autopilots racing soon. Not fun
It’s like genetics in other sports. You need the best car to win, that’s a given.

But if you can’t drive at the car’s max, you won’t win.

Just like a poorly trained athlete with perfect genetics won’t win. But comparing great athletes, the one with best genetics wins.
Meeting Bill Gates (2008)
> If you dismiss these liability rules you are effectively removing everything from chatrooms to comment sections from the internet, effectively making the internet into a snailmail/bulletin board service.

Yes, I am pondering exactly this. How much of the Internet do I consider valuable that would be lost? I mean, lost in the sense it would be completely irreplaceable without Section 230 protection. To be fair to my position, the vacuum of unmoderated spaces would be filled one way or another.

Maybe people are surprised by such a position, but I don't actually see enough inherent value in unmoderated comment sections on private blogs or even all of the 1990's era phpbb forums to worry about their loss. In fact, when I consider the negative effects of the massive companies hiding behind Section 230 they really seem to heavily outweigh whatever positive effect comments on my personal blog could ever bring.

It seems these things keep coming up: public comments on personal blogs and anonymous forums. I want people to deeply think about whether or not these things are really valuable and even more so whether or not the are irreplaceable without Section 230.
This just makes me extremely sad.

Server products is what made us purchase Atlassian software. There are numerous reasons why our company (and a lot of other companies I presume) would like to avoid cloud. And if we really had to go cloud, I simply don't see why we would choose Atlassian over alternatives.
yes, for all the reason that everyone has already listed.
Installing Linux on old laptops can be a real challenge sometimes. I've done it with 10+ old computers and driver inconsistencies can be a huge time sink.
Isn't SAP the WorkDay of Europe? Some of the other companies you've mentioned are also in spaces that likely have European (or non-SV) players. Auth0 is based in Seattle, for instance.
I'd like to suggest that, if one helps others naturally, the "word will get back to them" part isn't a consideration.
Updating a game 10 years after being released is a sign to me that they care.
Very true! I was also fascinated to find that it wasn't uncommon in the fossil record to have evolutionary lineages of species branch and later recombine. See: https://theconversation.com/dna-dating-how-molecular-clocks-...

> DNA holds the story of our ancestry – how we’re related to the familiar faces at family reunions as well as more ancient affairs: how we’re related to our closest nonhuman relatives, chimpanzees; how Homo sapiens mated with Neanderthals; and how people migrated out of Africa, adapting to new environments and lifestyles along the way. And our DNA also holds clues about the timing of these key events in human evolution.
What is their payrate?
I don't even use vi anymore, and haven't for a long time, and never was fluent in it, but this was still a joy to read.
For me Vim productivity gains have more to do with never leaving the shell. Desktop environments are maddeningly rife with distractions
> For example, the web industry approach that front-end development should go through JSON, where the server side is just responsible for generating an API and then the API returns a JSON, is a bad detour. We should go back to embracing HTML. Have HTML at the center of what we do, send HTML over the wire so we’re returning fully formed web documents on the first load, and then do subsequent hydration or updates through HTML as well.

This is such a crazy statement that I can't believe it's not a joke. JSON APIs are the clear winner here. Separating web and native UI from data is a clean and practical separation of concerns. It's easy to understand and can be opened up to third parties. I like DHH but I swear he gets off on being contrarian.
I don’t see how the information revealed by these hackers backs up any of the accusations you just made. This whole thing (along with your reaction to it) reminds me of 2016’s “but her emails!”
Super interesting. K3s requires at least 1GB of RAM to run optimally. If this can run on a smaller footprint, this is my new local k8s test cluster solution.
And yet you don't seem to accept that common carriers perform moderation too. Nor have you acknowledged that ISPs aren't common carriers and the current FCC made it that way. Nor have you acknowledged the hypocrisy of this.
A type with no values is not any less straightforward.

ISO C already provides a mathematical model, and one in which void is a type with no value.

Neither concept extends well to functions that return multiple values. The proper generalization which covers that case is that a function has an ordered list of return types. A function returning nothing has an empty such list: a zero-length list of return types.

Under this model, we don't require any unit type or bottom type or anything of the sort in connection with functions that don't return anything.

Note that this is similar to a parameter list: an empty return value list is similar to an empty parameter list, in which there are no parameters and hence no parameter types at all.

This model can be applied to single-value return languages like C, if we pretend that functions return multiple values, restricted to the zero or one plurality.
I have accepted your terms and I am using your software in a manner that is compliant with your terms. Yet you are trying to burden me with some extra ethereal terms that you're coming up with after the fact and justifying through weird collectivist statements like "the greater good."

Use an open source license that contains ALL of the terms you want involved. You don't get to back out of the open source deal or heap guilt on others because you have regrets about other people literally complying with your terms.
I think you have a point. But there does seem to be a difference between say using FLOSS project X as a dependency in my app vs AWS tweaking it, introducing it as a direct competitor to X, and leveraging their huge marketshare to sell it. Seems like not illegal, not even sure if it's ethically shaky, but there does seem to be a difference right?
At the same time, a lot of CMSes specifically block HTML input for security purposes - the article author may have had access to stripped down markdown or possibly a docx => html converter built into the CMS.
Thanks, I wasn't aware there was a more targeted review for medical devices, and updated my comment with a note to that effect.

However it does not seem comparable to a fairly rigorous FDA double-blind experimental process requirements, it only requires the manufacturer to provide a clinical evaluation that appears to be just a little more than a literature review [0][1]

[0]https://www.emergobyul.com/services/europe/ce-certification

[1]https://www.emergobyul.com/sites/default/files/eu-meddev-2_7...
Omg that was a ride. I'm so glad it ended back in a place of sanity.

I was like, wtf, remapping all this stuff?!! argh!
> If it was yours, you would be able to sell it in exchange
for something else.

Where can I sell my information in the US? Oh wait, I can't, tech companies see it as a harvestable resource that they expect to get for free.

With GDPR's consent framework, I now could genuinely sell my data if I wanted to do so.
> We'll need to dig into it further, though

Fundamentally, the reason this got banned and then ignored is that that need is SUPPOSED to be supplied by the journalists doing the research, not random conspiracy nerds on the internet.

> I've heard rumors that Hunter was allegedly hacked to get them, but I have yet to see media reports of this

Exactly! Which is the level of rigor you should expect to see from your sources. Which makes it doubly frustrating that you seem not to be applying that same logic to the original story.

FWIW: I'll bet you anything that no headers ever appear for those emails anywhere (at least none from western domains -- I'll admit to the possibility that the Kremlin could forge a DKIM signature for a Burisma address). They're almost certainly forgeries, which is why they're being distributed in the crazy obfuscated way they are.