skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
What parts of the world are you referring to? In general if you have people with automatic weapons attacking the police, you are basically in a civil war and the army takes over. The police is supposed to be a numerous local presence, not a fighting force.

When police has been equipped with automatic weapons, things usually end badly, particularly in those other parts of the world where police pay is nothing and alternative sources of revenue are very tempting when you are armed like a soldier. Having a corrupt cop is a thing, but a corrupt military armed cop is even worse.
Because the down voters agree that "risky areas" aka communities full of minorities like black and hispanic people, deserve military style occupation and tactics.

If you think that's not true, ask yourself why analysis of that term is not welcome.

There is a long proud tradition of terrible anti-human bullshit being hidden behind neat euphemisms like that.

Because it sounds reasonable, and civil.

It isn't.
It’s regulation that’s stopping the sale of nuclear weapons to the general populace. If there where several thousand of the thing in random peoples hands globally you can expect one of them to have been stolen and used. Or just purchased with the intent to make a statement.
Also, there is no price in math, which might add to the confusion as well.
So CNCs are great, but there is some benefits to the powdered printing. Better oil galleries that you can not accomplish with CNC machines.
Is measuring optimum utility for say a car or guest bedroom really about total usage time 24/7 ?

I'm not likely at all to reach anywhere near 50% even...

I wish I lived / worked places that were more walking friendly and etc but that's just not the case.
>
So - if that is true, why not buy the heavily weighted stocks directly and do your own financial analysis on them? For instance, I look at past 5 year sales growth. Then I look at yoy sales growth. Then I look at P/S over the last 5 years (to see if it is out of whack). Then I look at PEG over the last 5 years (to see if it is out of whack). Then I look at gross margins. Then I look at dividend yield. All of this data is available for free.

I'm not really sure how to do all those things, and I'd rather spend that learning how to make database things work.

Also, it sounds like all you're doing is looking at (very recent)past performance (not a predictor of future performance), and putting all your eggs in one basket (big tech).
Well, it's a 2-step process. It's hard to find a car without remote-unlock. From there, you have access to OBD.

OBD port is +12, GND, TX and RX pin if you just want to connect to 1 bus. Shouldn't be too hard MITM that if you have physical access.
Build numbers is engineering. Version numbers is marketing.

I'd love to know how semver, git-flow, and other zombie ideas get established, despite decades of effective battle proven lore. Uncle Bob's theory is that population grows faster than they can be taught (onboarded), so that cone of ignorance expands faster than adoption rate of best practices.
Best cloud storage services: From Google Drive to Dropbox, Top Business options
Failure modes and effect analysis [1] or let me do a computer security analogy: threat model.

A desert should be considered for a Toyota Landcruiser, for a Ferrari it would be a low probability cell of the matrix. Stuck in a tunnel underground? More likely to happen.
In a concrete building with people tampering the car? Even more likely.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Failure_mode_and_effects_analy...
Did you just read what you wrote? The kid in the crib survived. How does that not stop you in your tracks? What prompts a SWAT team to do a night raid on a potential family home? Please tell me how any other point in the day where the potential of a family not being there, isn't a better option? Then if you could please explain if this was the case, that any other time is/was plausible, what you think the reason to throw the flash grenade is or was at the time? Actually interested how you divest your self from being human under the guise of being analytical and miss such an obvious analytical point.
> driving through an unpopulated desert where there are no cell towers or other people

These kind of cars can and do fail for many other reasons, basically parts reliability is not a top priority.

Being in a desert with no possible assistance is just a situation you'll want to avoid, anti-theft system or not.
> This is an encroachment on free speech

As a strong-form First Amendment supporter and free speech advocate, this sort of fundamentalism is the greatest threat to free speech across the world.

Nobody is arresting the groups fomenting outright violence against their fellow Americans. We aren’t even saying they can’t use the banking system to collect resources or our public spaces to share their ideas. We’re literally saying they’re limited from using a mob-inducing micro targeting tool.

When that gets lumped in with vilifying speech, it gets easy to curtail both.
You're missing the point. "Censorship" is an abridgement of freedom of speech. Whether it's legal censorship or illegal or even government mandated, it's still censorship. You're trying to change the meaning of well-defined terms because you're uncomfortable with what the implications of them might be. If you're pro-censorship, just say so, don't try to change what freedom of speech means.

There's no one who would advocate complete and total freedom of speech in every arena. Whether it's social, legal or self censorship, the question isn't about whether a line exists, it's where we place it.
Technologists, including what seems to be a large portion of HN, believe that those they view as beneath them are too stupid to evaluate arguments, so they've accepted the idea of having a ministry of truth. Rather than elevate their "untermensch", their egos drive them to exercise control.

If you can't educate people to separate fact from fiction, that is ultimately the fault of intellectuals. It's one thing to teach facts in school and leave out the nonsense, but deplatforming unpopular ideas is a form of control over individuals. Where does it stop? Do we create a standard where web hosts, ISPs, deplatform ideas outside the overton window? What kind of precedent is that?
And a lot of 65W rated tagged cables tend to melt under full load, and one of which was bundled by one quite major hardware brand whose name starts with "A."

This is why a lot of charger makers went for "workarounds" for 5A cables rather than risk being blamed for setting mismarked cables on fire.

Their cable marked "65W" did not actually work on 5A 15V, but on 3A 20V where it is not the issue, but will melt when used by actual 5A 15V.
Quick request: Can you make the question a link?

“Oh perfect, how to append an array in Java is what I’m looking for. Tap. nothing. question rotated out already. Ok.. Do I have to type the whole thing in search to find it now?“
Ah, okay. Thanks! I'll update and thank you in the post. But packing would still be tricky to deal with.
It's the other side that's being "intolerant" for not tolerating the holocaust deniers.
Cancel culture is very often concerted petitioning of someone's employer into terminating someone's employment (harassment) or the threat of the same (recall the Hispanic utility company employee who was terminated for making the 'ok' sign inadvertently or the data scientist who was terminated for Tweeting a prominent black academic's research on the efficacy of nonviolent protests or the journalist who was harassed by coworkers and nearly terminated for interviewing a black man who expressed concern about crime in his neighborhood). It's also frequently walking into a venue and disrupting the speaker such that their message can't reach the crowd. It may also look like forming a dangerous mob outside of a venue such that the venue can't cover the security costs for hosting a speaker.
No one is saying that this is un-constitutional, because the gov would need to be involved for that to be the case. But it is still censorship.
(you need foo.insert, but yes)
This thread is very Hacker News.
If you require a firearm, and you can buy a military surplus weapon which is cheaper than a new "civilian" firearm, wouldn't you?
Thank you, it's dead now.
Tesla to launch Full Self Driving beta to select drivers next week
Seems there is actually a direct link between the knee-on-the-neck technique and military tactics, i.e., that the Minneapolis police had learned that through IDF training (and that that technique is used against Palestinians) [0].

[0] https://morningstaronline.co.uk/article/minnesota-cops-train...
To add to this: it is way less than 100 years since we learned to use fission and fusion.

Until the two first bombs were dropped it was either unknown or, to those who realized the potential: considered impossible with the technology available at the time.

I wonder what is just out of reach for us today, or what scientists are secretly working on today.

Also, one step ahead, like you I also think what we are capable of seeing and understanding might be very limited compared to other beings.
Rich people do have babies, just not as many. And they can afford a reasonable car to put a carseat in. In addition to the Ferrari.
The Forbes Investigation: How the SAT Failed America
People point to the Paradox of Tolerance like is a gospel straight from your preferred deity, something absolute and self-evident and universally true and universally applicable.

I personally think the thesis of the Paradox of Tolerance has merit, but far too often I see it used as a blunt object to bludgeon dissenting opinions, with people telling themselves they are doing good and are protecting society.

(And no, I dn NOT deny the Holocaust, and yes, I do think Holocaust denial is a big problem which got only bigger recently and needs addressing)
I'll be honest I don't understand your usage of the term "free speech" here. The way I define that term is that it's a political concept expressing the desire for people to be allowed to express themselves however they want to the largest extent possible/ethical. An example of law embodying free speech would be the 1st amendment of the US Constitution.

Based on context, I think you are using free speech to mean "speech that is protected by the doctrine of free speech" in the vocabulary I described above. Though that's ambiguous, because to be able to talk concretely about whether speech is protected or not you would need to say what it is covered under. So do you mean speech that is protected under the 1st Amendment, or some other law?

Presuming you mean the 1st amendment, it isn't necessarily true that threats and harassment are not protected, depending on the specifics.
You're over-fitting to a specific example in this post. It's not about that; it's about the principle.

If you either determine that you use that car a ton, or you do the math, work out exactly how often you'd need that car, and what the costs are for the nearest viable alternative solution, and the car's TCO is cheaper - great. You did what this post is trying to tell you to do: Stop thinking about an unattainable hypothetical 'I shall be using this at maximum usage all the time', and start thinking about what you actually need, and how often you'd need it.
Figma DIY: Building a color system plugin
Who puts a child’s carseat in a Ferrari?
> This may mean that gun control simply fails in non-authoritarian countries, and they either go authoritarian or increasing live without effective controls on guns.

Yes! This isn't limited to gun control either. It's a politico-technological arms race.

People develop technology that subverts the government. New laws are eventually created, allowing the government to adapt to the new technology. With each cycle, the government must become increasingly tyrannical and totalitarian in order to maintain its own power over the governed population. We'll end up with either an uncontrollable population or an absolute state.
Serious question: what alternative would you recommend for access to NAS volumes from unix-like OSes (Linux, *BSD, MacOS) over LAN? Other than doing discrete file transfers over a channel like SSH, I'm at a loss for alternatives here to NFS and SMB. Given the two, if Windows is not involved on the LAN, I don't see why SMB makes any more sense than NFS. What other options am I missing?
It hasn’t rolled out to all users yet
It's always fascinating to me to see who will step up to carry water for Holocaust deniers being able to spread their nonsense on someone else's computer servers as if nobody can figure out how to make a new website.

Holocaust deniers can---and do!---make their own fora all the time. Their freedom of speech is not abridged. Nor their freedom of the press.

On the other hand, forcing Facebook to host content against the owner's wishes is abridgment of their freedom of the press.

People seem to forget the public responsibility to support media you trust. If you don't like that Facebook blocked holocaust denial, then stop using it. Use media you support. The whole point of the First Amendment is to support a marketplace of ideas, free from government interference.

And if there is a slippery slope and Facebook bans, I dunno, trans support groups tomorrow, then we can talk about not using Facebook because banning that content is anti-trans and that's bad by itself, not because they have no right to shape the communications ecosystem they pay for hosting on their servers.

It's the Internet. If you don't like the rules on someone else's BBS, stop expecting them to solve your problems for you and host your own.
> the car has an anti-theft device that was triggered by the installation of seats. There is a remote system to override the anti-theft device, but that doesn't work because it requires mobile reception.

I’ve been following the thread on Reddit and there’s an added piece you’re missing. The mechanic triggered the anti-theft device so the car went into an initial lock down, that can be disabled remotely by Ferrari. The mechanic contacts Ferrari who can’t override the anti-theft because the car is without signal. At this stage the anti-theft mechanism is also attempting to contact Ferrari, probably with location data to help recover the car, still thinking it has been stolen. But due to the fact that it can’t get a signal out, it assumes the worst and enters full lock down mode that requires some sort of fix that can only be performed by Ferrari themselves.
Facebook could do better than removing the content, they could burst the Holocaust denial bubble that some people find themselves in.

We have video archives of the liberation of the camps and testimonies from survivors. Every Holocaust denial post could have one of the many evidence of the Holocaust just next to it.

It probably won't change the mind of everyone, but it would hijack the virality of the denial posts and use their targeting to reach precisely the people that need to be reminded of the real history of the Holocaust.
> The fact that the manufacturer can remote into their cars, does not automatically mean that the car is vulnerable to remote hacking.

I'm pretty sure that that's exactly what it means. What happens when someone steals the manufacturer's authentication keys, or gets on to the manufacturer's VPN?
In my case it was my strict grandmother. Everytime she found GOTO in my code, she spanked my hands with a stick.
Perhaps the 95% in your situation would be more like getting a smaller car instead of, e.g. a minivan? I'm not saying you own a minivan, just that his general advice is not "don't get a car," it's don't get a car that based on some vision of what you want to do with it that only ends up actually happening 5% of the time. The insight is that it's usually cheaper to rent for the long tail use cases than to buy outright and leave idle for the vast majority of the time.
F6 - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractionated_spacecraft

What has changed since then would be scale of alternative launch options as well as progress in satellite/radio tech and a bit smaller or lighter, sure does scale in savings.

Perhaps with those factors it may well prove viable to revisit that. That an antenna's and phased arrays, been much progress even in the last ten years and might be that such visions need another ten years, but certainly seems a sound goal overall.
Even if the only allowable connection is the legitimate manufacturer's, the manufacturer itself could be compromised one day (if not already), allowing malicious commands to be sent on the trusted downlink. Or an "oops I found a bug in the code you just pushed to 100,000 cars" could happen accodentally.
Amy Coney Barrett and the fate of Native adoption law
Because that is a common thing for holocaust deniers. The majority of them is smart enough to not deny its very existence outright. Being more subtle, they decrease numbers, sometimes a lot, deny certain atrocities. Quite often they end with comparing these new, and totally false, numbers with Stalin's atrocities. All to come to the conclusion, that the holocaust wasn't even half as bad as everyone believes. Ah yeah, and that the Wehrmacht was totally not involved in this non-existent and despicable crime against humanity.
Someone trying to show off their money by driving their Ferrari to the grocery store.
In America.
Just get some popcorn and watch fb bleed itself dry before it realizes that trying to create a 'safe space' is completely counter productive.
Well for small quantity production there are exceptions. Like Pagani and Koenigsegg have a ridiculous high Co2/km brand average because of low quantity. So it's possible.
I am quite sure he is not talking about your situation. If you saturate the capacity of that car, then it seems warranted to buy it.

It could also be buying that DSLR camera for going photographing twice a year instead of renting for these occasions, or buying that 3000$ workstation to play games that require that power once a month instead of going to a net cafe (or using Stadia or whatever).
DDOS is really a fundamental weakness in the design of the Internet. I really fear that in the long term proprietary meta-networks like Cloudflare are going to eat the public Internet and replace it with something that fixes these issues but is proprietary.
Scott Adams, Rand Paul, Ron Paul, Sean Hannity, Ted Cruz, Mark Levin, The Daily Mail, a number of other conservative politicians I'm not particularly familiar with - That's just from a quick scan of the recommended people to follow.
While I could see steer-by-wire driven by lowered production costs (easier to share parts between LHD and RHD models), I could also see it indirectly driven by weight savings to meet fuel economy regulations.

No pinion shaft required. No pinion shaft cutout through the firewall means the body can be made with less steel.

Belt-driven pumps are moving to electric-drive for efficiency, but when you're switching from hydraulic assist to motor-assist, making the whole thing 'by-wire' and motor driven reduces complexity.
>>If your case is correct, "in fact", it should be defensible in the context of a non-simplified representation of reality.

The problem is that it is much easier to spread lies and misinformation than to contest and correct them. Mark Twain once said that a lie can travel halfway around the world before the truth can even put on its shoes. This is especially true in this day and age where all it takes for something to reach massive audiences is a button click.
CubeSats are like the Raspberry Pis of engineering departments- fun to play with, but by the time you overcome their limitations (power, antenna size, heat) you've basically proved that small things can do small things.
You're wrong. The differences between "attempted murder" and "actual murder" are just codified laws which were enacted by a legislature. People decided. And it's certainly okay in this situation to debate those decisions. If you're just arguing that definitions matter, don't hide it under something that it's not.
In reality, the jobs share almost nothing in common

That's right, the military has rules of engagement and no mirrored sunglasses. With cops it's opposite. Imagine, standing in formation with half of the men wearing cool sunglasses. It would be unthinkable.
This is not bricking. And really has nothing to do with smart devices. I assume this device could be recovered through the usual wired diagnostic port means, so the reception issue is an annoying situation but not anything close to “bricking”
> code optimization starts to look a little more appealing

If you are on a cloud, you should always consider using cloud native functions and services. Keeping your toe out of the lock-in is expensive :(
Yes, you add a magnet in the middle of the coil and actuate the coil with opposite polarity to cancel the magnetic field
Under the 1033 program, police departments pay for shipment and storage of the materials they request, but they do not pay for the equipment itself. While the military may purchase more equipment then it actually needs to lower per unit price, the acquisitions as a whole are not made any cheaper and the weapons developers make no more profit. In fact, given that this material is specifically diverted from what would be sold as surplus, the military would have more money to purchase weapons with if it didn't give these supplies to police forces. It's also worth noting that, while military vehicles like MRAPs are very visible, most of the requested property is more mundane: bulk ammunition is the most requested category, followed by office supplies.

It's pretty obviously just a way for the federal government to subsidize domestic police forces with money nominally intended for the defense budget.
I think a better canary would be if Microsoft start buying Linux-based companies that have already solved these problems.
You're making several leaps of logic there.

The people capable and interested in building them have no interest in such, regardless of regulation. There also don't seem to be buyers on the other end to motivate anyone with money. If you did build such a thing for cash, you can't assume it won't be used on you or your loved ones.

Your argument is assuming a market that is not there. It's also a disgustingly cynical view of humanity that I care not to entertain.
Donald Trump is Literally Hitler and we should take away freedom of speech from all his supporters!
Hey, great idea! I will definitely do that
Does military vet status / deployment history impact officer involved shootings?
Someone who has both a child, and a Ferrari.
I would say there's a difference between tolerance of facts, and tolerance of lies. There's no need to tolerate people trying to hide facts with lies, which is the case holocaust denial.
If petitioning your employer to fire you for something you said works, maybe you said something that your employer would fire you over?

That's, again, not harassment and threats, it's your employer using freedom of association to deny guilt by proxy for spreading someone else's lies, threats, and harassments.
Yes. I use a line editor but an advanced one. I'd prefer emacs but tend to us vim because it works better over poor Internet connectivity. I can (and have) used ed, nano, pico, and the like, but find that a little context helps.

The mental model needed for line editing and the one needed for visual editing is different. The former requires a mental model of the document being edited where the latter just requires that you can read. There is a world of difference.
I think people arguing against the fallacy clearly didn't read it or aren't arguing in good faith.

There is an important line, where it only applies to ideas or arguments that can't be addressed logically. If you have an intolerant idea that can't be addressed logically then it should be censored. If you ignore facts, you can't be argued with based on logic. Your intolerant opinion should be censored. This idea isn't that sinister.