skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> Absolutely false. This is simply not how copyright works!

How so? Here's what section 5 of the AGPL says[0]:

> You may convey a work based on the Program, or the modifications to produce it from the Program, in the form of source code under the terms of section 4, provided that you also meet all of these conditions:

> c) You must license the entire work, as a whole, under this License to anyone who comes into possession of a copy. This License will therefore apply, along with any applicable section 7 additional terms, to the whole of the work, and all its parts, regardless of how they are packaged. This License gives no permission to license the work in any other way, but it does not invalidate such permission if you have separately received it.

As for patents which is covered in section 11:

> If you convey a covered work, knowingly relying on a patent license, and the Corresponding Source of the work is not available for anyone to copy, free of charge and under the terms of this License, through a publicly available network server or other readily accessible means, then you must either (1) cause the Corresponding Source to be so available, or (2) arrange to deprive yourself of the benefit of the patent license for this particular work, or (3) arrange, in a manner consistent with the requirements of this License, to extend the patent license to downstream recipients.

[0] https://www.gnu.org/licenses/agpl-3.0.en.html
I truly don't understand why everybody keeps referencing the Mick West debunking video of the UFO footage. I actually corresponded on the guy about inconsistencies in his own debunking claims and he gave no satisfactory justification for his extremely superficial arguments, which essentially focus on his own perceptions of inconsistencies in the footage itself and simply disregard weeks of repeated sightings, radar tracking and up-close eye-witness encounters between trained, professional pilots and the objects themselves in the air. These are pilots who on at least a couple of these occasions observed the objects from fairly close range, in broad daylight and had their observations at least partially confirmed at the same time by also professional operators of sophisticated tracking systems (radar etc) onboard the Navy's ships. In the case of the Nimitz "tic-tac" UFO events from late 2014 this happened especially, during weeks leading up to the brief video that was finally captured.

Mick West simply disregards all of this and in an email I wrote to him even claims that the weeks of incidents previous to the video being captured were "separate" events from the video because they didn't concretely, confirmably show the same thing.... What? An absurd conclusion.

Debunking with a critical eye is good and necessary but sometimes one gets the feeling that certain internet debunkers feel a need to debunk at all costs because that's their label, even if their own "rational" interpretations make leaps of logic much worse than simply admitting that something inexplicable was observed.
Well then, you should try this Iranian dessert made with... Lamb neck meat: https://www.tasteatlas.com/khoresht-mast :)

From what I've heard the meat just blends into the dish and gives it richness without really giving it a 'meaty' flavor. I'm just trying to find some restaurant near me that serves it.
How is it abuse when you're using the service as advertised? Google didn't call it "a reasonably large amount of storage, sufficient for most people", they called it unlimited.
It might not have been required, but imo it helps a lot with something that is somewhat similar to earlier events.

For example, if there was another tariff placed on some exports from China tomorrow, listing a year and month next to the article title would have definitely helped. Mostly because there have been quite many news articles referencing similar events earlier, so if there was no year/month listed, I would have thought it is just another discussion on a tariff passed earlier this year.

I don't have a strong feeling on it either way, but the default rule of "no year in the title if the article is from this year" actually makes sense and feels appropriate, as it definitely helps with keeping things a bit more standardized and easier to parse.
Huh? Seriously? Maybe the little Sonos One isn't, but they make some hardware that rather clearly outperforms the Homepod.
This is a correct statement, which I have proven to you before. What's more, your earlier quibble about anonymizing the data doesn't even negate the statements I have made. Apple always sends your location to Apple, while Google and Amazon do not if you don't want them to.

Just as you did then, you continue to ignore the even more egregious practice of not only tracking everything you install but tying it to your identity.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24585353

Due to people downvoting my comments to the point that I cannot reply, I will explain why askafriend is wrong right here (though I already explained why they are wrong in my GP post, which they also ignored in their response to that post). Disabling Apple Maps from getting your location does not stop Apple from getting your location. When any app gets your location on iOS, Apple also gets your location. This is explained clearly in the link contained in this comment, which askafriend ignored. Both Amazon and Google allow you to get your location without telling anybody.
Hard to say.

But you get the idea, wireframes and user stories are a good starting point.
Sitemaps are great too.

For tiny projects, I use Sketch to get a prototype.
The client may easily stumble upon something unexpected.
This exactly. Apple is consistently releasing products that I would absolutely buy if they didn't do everything they could to get a horizontal monopoly of microprocessor devices in my house.
I've lived in the inner city my entire life so maybe your right. Truthfully i have little understanding of the appeal of non-urban areas.
No the difficulty, in English, is that gender originally meant one's biological sex. There has been a concerted effort to assert that perceived gender and gender are the same. The confusion is deliberate.

From Webster's Dictionary (1828):

> 1. Properly, kind; sort.

> 2. A sex, male or female. Hence,

> 3. In grammar, a difference in words to express distinction of sex; usually a difference of termination in nouns, adjectives and participles, to express the distinction of male and female. But although this was the original design of different terminations, yet in the progress of language, other words having no relation to one sex or the other, came to have genders assigned them by custom. Words expressing males are said to be of the masculine gender; those expressing females, of the feminine gender; and in some languages, words expressing things having no sex, are of the neuter or neither gender

Nowadays, the political effort is to tie people in mental knots over how a person feels about their gender, how a person presents themselves, and how a person prefers to be addressed.
I'm pretty sure all t-mobile customers automatically have access to 5G, even prepaid.
Every problem looks daunting until you have the right incentives to solve it.
Government Attack on Diversity Training has Chilling Effect
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/13/us/politics/trump-diversity-training-race.html
bandaid is a strong word to describe a feature I love

I actually consider individual app designs the problem

iOS navigation is such that you shouldnt need to use the top portion of the screen, to go back you can swipe from the left edge to right, except some apps override that default behavior
It gets stored on the device and sent when you are back online. On an Amazon or Google Android device, you can use a truly offline mapping app that doesn't send data to anybody. Even better, you can set that as your default map provider if you like.

To sibling commenter: my comment is based on a correct understanding of Location Services, not on anything to do with Find My Device. You don't have to put words in my mouth, especially when I have already explained it using my own words elsewhere in the thread.
People's Republic of Walmart
A third of an inch is definitely enough to affect one-handed reach/operation (ask anyone who's played typical electric vs classical guitars), but it is nice that the mini's part of the lineup, and I might even replace my trusty 5SE with the 12 mini in a year or so, depending on how much performance issues are starting to show for the SE and how annoying/easy audio and other interconnectivity is on the port-handicapped phones.

(Yes, I know, airpod/bluetooth connectivity works well for your use case. No, that doesn't mean it's not inconvenient and maybe even product-choice-driving for other people.)
I think that this is correct and a consequence of Gödel's incompleteness theorems, although my knowledge about this is quite sketchy.

What I was referring to more (and should have clarified better) was that there are models of arithmetic that can characterise the natural numbers uniquely (up to isomorphism) - translated to type theory, it is possible in languages like Coq and Lean to fully define what a natural number is without including any extra objects - even if you won't be able to prove all theorems about them. Notably, though, first order theories are not sufficient to define the natural numbers, for every set of first-order axioms about the natural numbers, there are "non-standard models" that can look quite weird. You need second-order logic or something equivalent in power to prevent that (the difficult axiom here is the axiom of induction which needs to be able to quantify over predicates).
Apart from that, it’s just not an aesthetically pleasing photo. Some dude in crocs?
Just noting that it is not a new study - it was discussed previously in 2017: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15867918
Yes, but Siri
StackSort in Python
There should be more than just a single link to the datacenter.
What inflation rate? These two sources of data show not much difference

1. https://www.statista.com/statistics/244983/projected-inflati...

2. https://www.usinflationcalculator.com/inflation/current-infl...
I honestly was waiting for them to say Fortnite to surprise the industry but yes thought that was really funny too.
I'm going to guess Poland? Since I'm pretty much a regular on r/europe :D

But yeah, it's a standard tactic of dehumanizing people. Except in this case, it's applied to AI. Which we don't really have yet. It's rather strange.
This seems like a perfect example of why labor organization is important. Despite their (as i've seen on this site) extremely good bargaining position, workers in this company lack the collective ability to contest these changes (despite the fact that the value of their labor has not changed whatsoever.)
Let’s talk about the return of MagSafe!

It seems...kinda dumb. Instead of plugging in a lightning cable, I can now stick a hockey puck to the back of my phone?

The “safe” in MagSafe came from its “yankability” without sending your device flying. But if my phone is laying on top of a hockey puck...it’s gonna go flying if I trip on the cable.

Why couldn’t we fill in the lightning port and use flush surface contacts, like the MagSafe of yesteryear?

I’m also not sure why my case needs to magnetize to my device, getting rid of the lip around the screen that made it less cringe to lay my phone face down.

Am I missing something? I really don’t understand this feature.

EDIT: did I see an AirPower reboot in there or am I dreaming?
Fiber cut shuts down Virginia's online voter registration
I'm sure their canteen buys lettuce, and as it happens they've been getting quite adventurous with what else they're prepared to buy recently.
On explanation of AI as a philosophy:

> "AI" is best understood as a political and social ideology rather than as a basket of algorithms. The core of the ideology is that a suite of technologies, designed by a small technical elite, can and should become autonomous from and eventually replace, rather than complement, not just individual humans but much of humanity.

On economical and social damage: The article mentions that less than 10 percent of the US workforce is counted as employed by the technology sector, that essential contributions of others aren't counted as "work" or compensated, that this has "hollowed out" the economy and contributed to the concentration of wealth in an elite, and that this has contributed to concentrating power, as well.

On mutual exclusivity: The article proposes paying people for contributions, rather than writing them off as non-work. It also mentions humans with "AI resources" outperforming AI alone.
So, then, this still strikes me as bad in a different way, it contributes to the Windows-esque habit of presuming to know whats best for the user -- even when the user is an "administrator."

It seems as if the Linux approach is more honest. "You're root? Okay, you can have access to your SSH-keys. Be careful."
If you were watching on YouTube and Safari, you were limited to 1080p. The Apple site and ATV were in 4k.
This helps put a bit more nuance on the two questions I wish we'd see answered from this in thirty days:

What percentage of dollars issued in bank loans, whose issuance depended on this increase in Fed reserves, are expected to be issued to individual citizens who make $72,900 or less (the AMT threshold for 2020, iirc)?

What percentage of dollars are expected to be issued to businesses with gross revenue of $1mil/year or less?
But how would you get the audio from an HDMI cable into the HomePod? Does Apple TV offer some sort of HDMI passthrough? I don't know since I've never had one.
Usually I can live with it; I don't see myself switching to Android anytime soon. But the story is different when it's a communal device for everyone in the household.
You don’t have to work with a sales rep to switch to enterprise: it’s not one of those “call for a price” tiers (at least it wasn’t a few months ago when I switched an account to it).
Instagram and YouTube are examples of algorithms optimizing the wrong thing. Whatever you like, it gives you more of it. More moreness, to the point people find themselves in dark echo chambers. Eventually you stop seeing contrary opinions or viewpoints. You stop growing.
Url changed from http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/leaverou/~3/HD-MDYAgQ8w/, which redirects to this. That domain is banned on HN so please do the macroexpansion before submitting!
Well maybe not the ~$400 Homepod, but who knows how it will stack up against the $99 one.
Show HN: Isomorphic sites, Hydration and Prism compiler
I'm not a fan of products that pretend to be unlimited (because nothing is infinite, so no one can actually offer you unlimited anything), but it's kinda obvious that there's gonna be a long tail of users who's usage is orders of magnitude higher than average which make the offering unviable.
Sure. Do you think what the President actually said - not my paraphrasing of it - was responsible and appropriate under the circumstances?

Did he demonstrate good judgement?

Also, again, I think you’re constructing an issue where none exists. Everyone in this discussion seems to have understood perfectly well what I was referring to.

I do not think what I said is really the issue here.

The issue is a number of irresponsible politicians actively and knowingly undermining public-health efforts during a pandemic.

That’s what we should be talking about.

And I find it frustrating that folks seem to want to shy away from this unpleasant truth when it’s raised.

It’s like if a truck is going to hit you and someone yells “watch out for that damned truck”, and you yell back “can’t you tell me that without cursing?”

Or if you said “you know I worry the way you said that might make it difficult for someone else to understand your message of the impending truck.”

While the truck is hurtling towards you.

Focus on the truck.
So what do you think, the norwegian intelligence service is doing? Twisting thumbs?

Spying is their craft.

And spying nowdays mostly involves breaching into computersystems, aka cyberattack.

The problem is the ambiguity of the word cyberattack.
Because it covers passive reading of classified content (which is classic spycraft and sadly very normal in the realm of politics) as well as offensive disruptive cyberattacks, from slowing a service to physically damaging infrastructure.
> Ok, so you accept that people do in fact have different interpretations about what constitutes free speech. But somehow you believe that your specific, personal interpretation is the absolutely correct one? Why?

It's not correct, it's just "standard" in the context that I'm using it. But whether or not it's "standard" is largely irrelevant--the question is whether the concept that I'm labeling "free speech" is consistent in my framework with the other concepts (which I've labeled, "harassment" and "criticism"--which are also labeled according to standard definitions, for convenience). Let's stay away from semantic arguments--they're tedious, pointless, and boring.

> What makes your answer correct and the other 100 answers incorrect? You refer to "widely accepted definition", as if a dictionary definition could somehow be applied to real world situations to judge whether an expression is harassment or not. Maybe it can be in _extreme_ cases, like if someone said "gays should be killed" we could easily judge that as harassment

That's not harassment. It's an abhorrent idea, but "abhorrence" is different from "harassment". If you're shouting your abhorrent idea while burning a cross in someone's yard, that's harassment. If you're following someone around shouting your abhorrent idea, that's also harassment. Abhorrent ideas tend to be accompanied by harassment (and if you think about it, we consider these ideas abhorrent because they're very likely to lead to harassment and violence); however, they aren't equivalent to harassment. This is true even for a very broad definition of "harassment" like what you would find in a dictionary and even more so for very precise definitions such as a legal definition or probably all philosophical definitions.

> But there's a huge gray area where expressions can be interpreted either way and it's up to each individual to assess whether they feel like an expression is harassment or not.

I think we can reasonably define harassment as "an action based on an intent to intimidate or pressure someone". I think that definition is very precise and there isn't much gray area; however, litigating the intent to determine whether any given action is harassment is difficult. We can devise increasingly better tests for assessing intent (e.g., "we assume intent is to intimidate if a significant majority of people would feel intimidated under similar circumstances"), but difficulty of assessing intent is different than the precision of the definition.
And as it happens everything is regulated by bank capital and the Basel framework these days, rather than the old gold standard of asset reserves.

OP gave the correct textbook description - but that description has been superceded by changes in bank regulation since the 1980's.
A lot of your statements are either misleading or false but I don't have the energy to engage so I'll let someone else do it.

As a start, I'll paste some information from Apple and TechCrunch around when they rebuilt maps from the ground up in 2018:

---

“We specifically don’t collect data, even from point A to point B,” notes Cue. “We collect data — when we do it — in an anonymous fashion, in subsections of the whole, so we couldn’t even say that there is a person that went from point A to point B. We’re collecting the segments of it. As you can imagine, that’s always been a key part of doing this. Honestly, we don’t think it buys us anything [to collect more]. We’re not losing any features or capabilities by doing this.”

The segments that he is referring to are sliced out of any given person’s navigation session. Neither the beginning or the end of any trip is ever transmitted to Apple. Rotating identifiers, not personal information, are assigned to any data or requests sent to Apple and it augments the “ground truth” data provided by its own mapping vehicles with this “probe data” sent back from iPhones.

Because only random segments of any person’s drive is ever sent and that data is completely anonymized, there is never a way to tell if any trip was ever a single individual. The local system signs the IDs and only it knows to whom that ID refers. Apple is working very hard here to not know anything about its users. This kind of privacy can’t be added on at the end, it has to be woven in at the ground level.

The secret sauce here is what Apple calls probe data. Essentially little slices of vector data that represent direction and speed transmitted back to Apple completely anonymized with no way to tie it to a specific user or even any given trip. It’s reaching in and sipping a tiny amount of data from millions of users instead, giving it a holistic, real-time picture without compromising user privacy.

All of this, of course, is governed by whether you opted into location services, and can be toggled off using the maps location toggle in the Privacy section of settings.

Apple says that this will have a near zero effect on battery life or data usage, because you’re already using the ‘maps’ features when any probe data is shared and it’s a fraction of what power is being drawn by those activities.

----
Do you have an Echo or Google Home for comparison?
Url changed from http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/webrtcHacks/~3/ahrzrRlCgSg/, which points to this.

That domain is banned on HN so please do the macroexpansion before submitting!
> On TouchID phones, it was always fiddly, double-touching (but not pressing) the home button

As someone with a touch ID phone who didn’t know about this feature - thank you! This will change how I use my phone.
Why is no such intelligence or convincing evidence ever shared?

I really find it hard to believe that it's always Russia that's responsible for every ill in the whole flat world.

We've already had the evidence declassified that the whole 2016 Russiagate hoax was entirely invented by his opponent for political purposes, and then spin out by the media out of control. But, yeah, let's still believe each nation accusing Russia of all evil!
I don't often write meta-comments, but it's interesting to see the two large threads here.

One of them is about whether the Fed is printing money.

The other one is about what inflation is, or how it ought to be measured.

I find it fascinating that there's so much confusion about all these economic terms. I don't have a simple answer to either, but it's thought provoking that there isn't an established theory that everyone can point to from which people can comfortably say what different things mean. If you had a physics debate about black holes or whatever, it would normally be quite clear if someone had misunderstood something. At least when the threads got deeper, it would become clearer and some authoritative comment would appear.

I have an economics degree from a well known university, and I'm still not entirely sure what to think of those threads. They are so meandering, each new commentator rectifying an old definition or seeking to add yet another concept.

That should say something about how confidently we can make economic decisions.
Supreme Court Lets Trump Administration End Census Count Early