skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
In this case, down-voting without commenting is ok - your comment didn't contain any rationale so no rationale is required to dismiss it - consider e.g. if you had said "I like Firefox better than Chrome" instead of that you liked government funded enterprises better than privately funded enterprises. Without an explanation why, it's basically just noise.

We also live in a society where private relationships (both personal and business) are the default. When arguing for something other than the default, your burden to provide a rationale is greater. So the omission is especially glaring.
Funny story but the public defender jumped at the chance to "go out back and fight". And the judge got first sanctioned then lost his job.

And I rather doubt the 85 percent is dominated by innocent people accused of first degree murder pleading it down to 1-5.
I have plenty of compiler design experience and I don't know that. What I have seen is in line with my comment.

But I'd be happy to discover something new.

Care to show me a real-world, working example of compiler-optimisable assembly inlines with something that isn't using the GCC extension?

If by DMD you mean the Digital Mars D compiler (which is called DMD), then:

No. I checked the online documentation just now for DMD x86 just to be sure. According to that documentation, its inline assembly doesn't provide any of the flexibility that I listed.

You can see that easily by the way DMD requires you to name the exact registers in the inline asm, and the way the operands syntax is fixed as either a register, memory, memory with base and offset etc (the usual Intel things).

But DMD doesn't let you say "pick any suitable operand type". With GCC the compiler will select among possible operand types according to what fits best with the surrounding code. This way it avoids unnecessary loads, stores, register transfers etc. when interleaving C with asm, intrinsics with asm, or even asm with other asm from different inline functions.

You certainly can't do any of the fancy stuff the Linux kernel relies on, with asm directives like '.pushsection/.popsection', memory fault fixup tables, asm goto, inline lock hot paths and cold paths, etc.
I think that goes too far. Google does have an agenda for the web but at least it includes the web. Apple would like nothing better for the entire internet to be locked down and controlled inside its app store. We're better off with Android and Chrome than we would be without them.
(non american here) so what was the problem ACA was designed to solve? I assume there must have been another group of people who are not poor enough but not middle class enough? Or something else? I care about your unpopular opinion since the popular ones are easier to find
Well actually a lot of people think about this kind of thing all the time. There is an entire market and industry dedicated to power grids. Sure, that price is not a complete picture. But does any price completely encapsulate externalities? But that low price is extremely positive.
Yeah! And another thing they should have let Derek Chauvin out of jail without bail too.
Knative project gets open governance (finally)
Please provide a citation for that number.
Yeah AMD/NV typically do 2-3 chips per year. That complexity adds up pretty quickly when backwards/forwards compatibility is fairly strict and the inputs/abstractions not particularly well defined or behaved.
I have a question about the English language here? Is “anything but pleasant” a positive? Doesn’t it mean anything else (like unpleasant, horrible etc), but pleasant?
If you absolutely need to share one server's filesystem, Samba tends to have more reasonable failure modes. If you absolutely need a truly distributed filesystem then AFS is your only real option. But really a filesystem is almost certainly not the right interface; you're almost certainly better off using something higher-level - maybe HDFS if you need to store file-like data, maybe a key-value store or a distributed queuing system if you're doing something more structured.
> You could reduce some of the downsides by reducing the amount required for bail by day and by adding limits for how long someone could be required to stay

Either the amount is sufficient to prevent the accused from hopping on a plane to Bali, or it isn't. If a lesser amount would have sufficied than that should have been the amount in the first place.

Bail isn't meant as a punishment, its meant as a way to ensure you don't leave town. If you could just wait it out, everyone who wanted to run would just wait it out, and you would end up bssically creating a system that just hinders "good" people while not serving its purpose of preventing people from skipping out.
A follow up to Coinbase being mission focused
> by being displaced by someone like you who presumably has less expertise

Can you see how this presumption could be problematic?

Edit: fixed grammar
If we quantize to one second, then either:

1) it still matters when in that second my order came in, and there's still a race, or

2) it doesn't matter when in that second my order came in, and there's an incentive to delay my order in case we learn something in that second.

In either case, the details will differ quite a bit, but having the fastest connection and best tech is still an advantage.
> Poor people get medicaid, which is actually pretty decent insurance since it's private (non government) insurance, paid for by the government.

Medicaid isn't consistently private insurance paid for by the government; though “managed risk” through outside (sometimes still publicly operated; several of them in California are county-run) plans is an increasingly popular model, though many states continue to have traditional fee-for-service model as well (California has a mix of managed care and fee-for-service.)

> (I know this is an unpopular opinion, but things were better before Obamacare - deductibles were much much lower.)

It's not the most popular opinion, by it remains extremely widespread, and lots of money, effort, and propaganda has expended to generate and maintain this opinion over the last decade.

Also, premiums and deductibles were often lower because the combination of lifetime limits, preexisting condition exclusions and the associated recission practice [0], and the cancel-and-refund practice [1], all of which the ACA banned, made it possible for insurance companies to collect premiums and then find an excuse to leave people who thought they were insured uninsured when they actually needed the insurance most.

[0] whereby insurance companies would investigate for anything they could characterize as evidence of an undisclosed preexistinf condition as a pretext for cancelling the policy once someone started to look like an expensive case.

[1] whereby, lacking even the pretext of an undisclosed preexisting condition, when someone looked to become too expensive, the insurance company would just cancel their policy and refund all past premiums (and eat the cost of any previous benefits received.)
Why do we need to wait a year? There are already millions of people who have recovered from acute infections. If a large percentage are continuing to experience severe symptoms then where is the data?
Decent color e-ink tech is finally here:

https://gizmodo.com/the-first-color-e-ink-devices-are-finall...

It's just a matter of time before a major brand (Amazon, Microsoft, etc.) decides to take a chance and use it to make a big multipurpose tablet.
A system that doesn't "cater" to people having and raising kids has trouble coming up about 20 years down the road.

If the general solution to career advancement is just to work more hours, we'll be a bunch of unhealthy, overworked burnouts.
Why is journalism inundated with drama more so than any other profession I know of?
But a chef?

The only (sous) chef I know hates cooking outside of work.
My takeaway corollary was more like “why bother doing anything? you’re here anyway, find your own bloody purpose”. It’s quite the empowering statement, given the right accent.
Typical CCP tactic.
Looks like the system has been designed in ancient times when society was quite different
The owner of the computer is an individual with root access to it. iPhone users doesn't own their computers, please stop calling them so.
It's still not link layer encrypted, IIRC?
There are quite a few people who get caught in the system for whom any amount of bail would be an unreasonable financial hardship. Seems that if they really means-tested bail, they'd come up with "zero" for a lot people, and would likely just require they stay jailed pre-trial.
> You only have to look at the multitude of society that have survived until now to see that that kind of thought is not valid

Thinking longer term, it could also be that not enough time has elapsed or that there was/is too little social interaction between all players for one dominant behavior to emerge.

It might also be that there is no one dominant emergent behavior, but several, all contributing to the overarching goal of survival (think Nash equilibrium).
Good to hear that things have gotten better! Will be watching the oct 27 reveal of the new cards :)
Wikipedia says v4 came out in 2000 and a search for encryption on the page shows no results.

sftp gives you really good key based authentication and encryption over the network. I wouldn't trust NFS for anything other than a highly secure internal network.
The US Constitution does protect Americans from the federal government, though, far more than almost any Western nation. States' rights are still very real. In fact, states' rights are the whole reason why that case went to the Supreme Court in the first place.

What hope does the world have? Give it a few months yet.
Bon Dimanche ! (am I late for last sunday or just early for next?)
Seconded, I snarf up new Ezra Klein episodes as soon as they come out. Do you have any other policy or related shows you enjoy? I’m looking to beef up my subscriptions a little.
Someones, somewheres has done a better job of handling the accused pre-trial.

Start there. Give me a name. Show me a role model to emulate.

Then tell me how we get from here to there.

But even better, just tell me what you want. Give me action steps, some talking points.

Because you had me at "Hello." I really don't need a PhD thesis relitigating western philosophy since Plato.

(Ditto each and every other progressive policy issue.)
The way you exceed 10-20+ gb a month is by being so used to having such a high cap if any that you don’t even bother to turn on the WiFi when you’re at home.

I too live in Singapore and the internet infrastructure is excellent. Currently I’m sitting at about 10gb/month on 4g without YouTube/Netflix/social media. I do use a fair amount of Reddit though. I don’t really want to go back to having to care about how much data I’m using.
The ACA addressed numerous issues, some of the more notable ones:

(1) it included a very significant expansion of Medicaid eligibility.

(2) for people just outside of Medicaid eligibility, it includes public subsidies for exchange-listed plans.

(3) it banned a number of practices which made insurance either inaccessible or illusory, most notably preexisting condition exclusions (and the associated practice of looking for an indicator of preexisting condition and using it as pretext to cancel the policy when someone was diagnosed with an expensive-to-care-for condition), but also cancel-and-refund practices, and lifetime benefit limits.
I originally wrote ADSL in the comment, then realised that was misleading because it wasn't old-school ADSL to the exchange. There's a fibre component and it's still worse than 4G for my needs :-)

So I edited the comment to FTTC for clarification. When sold it was probably just "Superfast Broadband".

Looking at marketing now, I see "Faster Broadband", "Fibre Broadband", "Superfast Fibre", "Ultrafast Fibre", "Fibre Optic Broadband"... It's impossible to tell from marketing whether it's FTTC, FTTP or something else.
You know, systems were established for a reason. It's not like the cash bail system was some ridiculous fanciful notion that someone created to torture the poor.

We have arrested people pay cash bail so that we have some forcing function to ensure that they don't flee. And maybe a little bit to provide people the incentive not to commit crime in the first place. I don't know why, but that seems to be considered discriminatory these days. Maybe if people are experiencing hardship from being held in jail, they should try not to commit crimes?

What I fear about all the social justice movements is that when you get into nitty-gritty details, the symbols that activists want to believe in (eliminating discrimination) do not actually improve the lives of people experiencing disadvantage in society very much when the actual plan of what to do materializes from the advocates of change.

Dismantle the police? I think the people worst served by this idea are the poor and powerless being victimized by crime every day. They need more police presence and enforcement of law and order for their neighborhoods, not less.

Think about the side effects of the symbols you want fulfilled. And if all your involvement is sitting in your white neighborhood and not having to deal with the effects of your advocacy, maybe you shouldn't be so opinionated to say how things should be changed.
There's also the Microsoft probe/beacon extension that exists.

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/drivers/mo...

I don't know what iOS is doing, as they still didn't have proper data metering and limiting the last time I checked.
I think the TeX and METAFONT versioning system is my favorite versioning system. It's just wonderful.

For those of us working on things not worthy of a mathematical constant, I prefer plain old major.minor. If it breaks something, increment major and reset minor to 0. Anything else doesn't really matter.
The point is Rust has those features without a VM and no performance sacrifices. Its purpose is a C/C++ replacement.
Google removed The Great Barrington Declaration from search results?
> the left was the party of freedom.

Could you provide some kind of support for that? I've never heard anyone in the US or in any Western country claim the left was particularly focused on "freedom".
After SB10 was passed by the legislature, the opposition (mostly bail bond companies?) gathered enough signatures to force a "veto referendum", i.e. a referendum on whether SB10 should be adopted as the legislature had voted, or should be dropped. That referendum is Prop 25.

Edit: Parent is right, the link is to a different issue.
It would be interesting to see data on how many charges are dropped. You are correct that cases are submitted to the DA, they look at all the evidence and decide whether or not they will prosecute. A big part of that is "can I even get a conviction?"

So you'd expect a relatively high conviction rate just based on the fact that cases where conviction is unlikely are filtered out before they ever get to trial.
Let's do a front end and UX review – YR redesign
Desperation to remain relevant.
Looks like that posting year is 2014.

This was discussed on 2014-07-31: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8247877

This matches “[Node.js] version 0.12 having been in the works for over a year”, since 0.10 was released on 2013-03-11 (per https://nodejs.org/en/blog/release/v0.10.0/) and 0.12 was finally released on 2015-02-06 (per https://nodejs.org/en/blog/release/v0.12.0/).
Love the design, though I think the noise it makes when updating the display would drive me crazy if I had to listen to it once a minute.
Buy a Radeon. I'm not seeing the problem. You have options? Nobody is forcing you to buy Nvidia hardware.
> Its better that a few innocent people sit around for a few days than one guilty person getting out and killing someone.

Considering the comparatively tiny number of murders committed in such a way that an individual determination of the denial of any bail cannot be made, relative to the massive impact of just leaving “a few innocent people” in jail for “a few days”, I disagree.

For the people most likely to not be bailed out almost immediately—as in, people who have the fewest resources—sitting in jail for a few days can be (and usually is, hence the point of this article) absolutely catastrophic. Life-ruining, all out of the fear that one person might slip through the cracks.

That’s unacceptable. We can do better.
Yes you used to pay for incoming calls as well. Now most plans are unlimited.

I guess the rationale was that there is no difference in the numbering plan in North America between cell phones and land lines. Calls to a cell phone cost more but the caller has no way to tell they’re calling one. So the caller pays the same to call a cell or a landline and the callee pays to receive the call too so that overall carriers get more money for completing allegedly more expensive cell minutes.
Livestock require care 7 days a week, even by the frum.
> Our responsibility is to empower all of those watchdogs, and to listen to them...

Naturally they had to block critics like nyttypos on Twitter. Watchdogs for copyediting is obviously going too far.
I was being kind of sarcastic with the 1-5 -> 20+, but the point still stands, you can look at being home to see your child finish high school, or be a grandfather to a teenager when you are released.
> Its better that a few innocent people sit around for a few days than one guilty person getting out and killing someone.

A suspect jailed and awaiting trial for murder would likely not have bail as an option. Eliminating cash bail doesn't mean eliminating the ability to hold people who are an extreme flight risk or who are likely a danger to others.

"Sit around for a few days" has more consequences than your dismissive attitude implies. Many people who land in jail like this will lose their job if they "sit around for a few days". If they're people who are already living on the margins of society, it's pretty likely that losing their job might, just might, make them turn to crime to make ends meet, even if they hadn't committed one in the first place.
the NYT has always been pretty self-reflective and public in its self criticism.

The most famous recentish (2004) example was their problematic reporting and editorial stance around the second Iraq war: https://www.nytimes.com/2004/05/26/world/from-the-editors-th...
>Maybe if people are experiencing hardship from being held in jail, they shouldn't commit crimes?

However people held in jail may not have committed a crime, in fact should be presumed to be innocent even if they have committed a crime.

Also at a bail hearing a judge will determine the person's risk of flight, and if they did in fact have means and motivation to flee they will be held without bail.
Not really the same, you pay your ISP the same regardless of how much (or even if) you use email.
The over way around is also annoying: what if you have a limited connection but you are on WiFi? Say, you share from another phone using hotspot feature.

Some tools allow to control this, but others will update the shit out of your mobile plan as soon as it can see wifi.

On the other hand I mostly like how roaming was solved in Android phones I had. It allowed me to choose which apps can use it and constantly monitored current usage of each.
How do you reconcile this with the presumption of innocence? Is it ok to make an innocent person pay a burdensome amount until they are exonerated?
For some people that's important, sure. But a lot of the people getting excited about Rust seem not to need those things at all; the person I replied to was talking about Python of all things.
...regardless of the severity of your crime, your ability to go home and see your family is determined by your financial status...

Are you f'ing kidding me? Regardless of what crime you commit, you should be able to go home and see your family?

What ridiculous world are you advocating for here? Do you even think about the implications of your ideas?
>Suffering is on a scale. Its better that a few innocent people sit around for a few days than one guilty person getting out and killing someone.

Firstly, pretrial detention averages 50-200 days, with some sitting in jail for years without trial. Secondly, the vast majority of those in pretrial detention are there for non-violent crimes. Thirdly, about 60% of the population of jails in the US are in pretrial detention.[0]

Remember, these are people who have not been convicted of any crime.

Calculate how long could you keep your job, your house and/or custody of your children if you were sitting in jail? Two months? Six? A year?

After you do that, consider that a large segment of Americans would have a hard time scraping up $400 for any sort of emergency -- especially if they can't work because they're in jail.

If there is a genuine flight risk (much more likely for those who can afford bail) or evidence that the accused may be a danger to the community, they should be held until trial without the opportunity to be released. But only if there is actual evidence that this is so.

Otherwise, you're essentially criminalizing poverty.

[0] https://www.pretrial.org/get-involved/learn-more/why-we-need...

Edit: Reorganized for clarity.
> Maybe if people are experiencing hardship from being held in jail, they should try not to commit crimes?

So you're just gonna assume everyone that's arrested is guilty even before the trial?

You are also misrepresenting or misunderstanding dismantling of the police. It's not necessarily about using less resources in the neighborhoods, but about using them correctly. If someone is needing a welfare check, maybe send in a person trained for this and not cops with guns blazing, for instance.
Symptoma – Digital health assistant and symptom checker
One interesting idea I have seen is getting a smartwatch with 4g and then leaving the phone at home. The watch is good enough to send an important text or take a phone call but its not good enough to scroll social media.
Ah, I see. Those are pretty radical stances. You just compared Marxists to terrorists, which is pretty far out there.

Are folks like David Harvey, Cornell West, Noam Chomsky, Howard Zinn, etc., unwelcome in your hypothetical country?

Sounds like you are equally interested in "cancelling" ideologies, you just have a different set you'd disallow.
Let's look at PJM:

Gas (39%, 490gCO2eq/kWhr), nuclear (36%, 12gCO2/kWhr), coal (16%, 820gCO2eq/hr), wind (6%, 11gCO2eq/hr). So that's ~327. So despite coal being 16% of the energy production, it is 40% of the emissions and gas is 58% of the emissions.

Looking at NYISO we see a different story. Currently there is a lot grayed out in the gas area. Right now gas is 28% of the total electricity generation while peak of the day it is 39%.

If you look at CISO (California) you'll see the opposite happen. Mid day solar takes over and emissions drop. The famous Duck Curve. They go from 150gCO2eq/kWhr in the morning to more than double that at night. You'll also see wind die down at times. Interesting thing is how hydro changes.

So a lot comes down to how you're providing your base load and what energy sources you are using at what times in the day. If you look around the map a lot you'll see that a lot of countries/areas that have very consistent loads (and hence emissions) export a lot of their energy at those different times. While a lot of people like looking at averages the problem here is substantially complex because there's temporal components (hourly, weekly, seasonly) as well as a lot of environmental factors.
Wow, that brings back memories. Like "why not mount with intr?" Because NO. (wait, or was it soft mounts?)
The "dome" portion is cast metal under the white plastic (iow: there is a case metal dome that all the electronics sit inside), which serves as a heat sink for the chips (cpu has a rather long heat pipe to one of the 4 screw posts that hold the bottom to the dome part) and ballast to keep the monitor upright