skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Fast Fit Keto for weight reduction is that in the event that you deny the assemblage of glucose—the principle wellspring of energy for all phones in the body, which is acquired by eating starch nourishments—an elective fuel called ketones is created from put away fat (consequently, the expression "keto"- genic). The mind requests the most glucose in a consistent flexibly, around 120 grams day by day, since it can't store glucose. During fasting, or when next to no starch is eaten, the body first pulls put away glucose from the liver and incidentally separates muscle to deliver glucose. On the off chance that this proceeds for 3-4 days and put away glucose is completely drained, blood levels of a hormone called insulin decline, and the body starts to utilize fat as its essential fuel. The liver produces ketone bodies from fat, which can be utilized without glucose. Click here https://apnews.com/press-release/ts-newswire/lifestyle-nutri...

https://sites.google.com/site/fastfitketopiils/

https://zenodo.org/record/4093840#.X4kv_CPhXIU

https://myunbiasedreview.com/fast-fit-keto/
It won't take long until OSI heads come in and tell you that sort of licensing isn't "Open Source" (a commonly used term they bogusly claim exclusive control over). Who's financing OSI again?
Speeding up static regexes in C using re2r and ragel
By law you need to pay for accepted work at least the minimum wage. My question is whether AWS is breaking the law by appropriating someone else work without payment? Or do you think something like this should be regulated?
I see this as a loophole, where companies can gain useful projects without having to pay wages.
I had the same issue and bisecting it helped to find the culprit (although I don't remember which one it was right now)
With Micropython you need to flash only once. Thereafter you can do reprogramming via de internets from anyplace. https://github.com/timonoko/Webserver-for-ESP8266-4-ch-relay
fuck off with your spam. Flagged.
TLDR, just like every technology, it got smaller and cheaper.

That's why cheap robovacs can afford to include lidar
Huh? SoundHound still works, I have it installed on my phone.
> There are some replies in this thread that misunderstood the content of Tim Nolet's twitter post.

> [...] (reasons)

Well, then why go on something as big and public like Twitter and HN to post about it in the first place? Send a mail to the team of AWS and get in touch. I don't get the point of this tweet, either.
Depends on which office, and whose home we're talking about.

It's not my goal to shoot your anecdote with my own.

My post above is more about the tendency to focus on WFH as a mental health tragedy, while WFO is never held under this scrutiny. Is it possible that herding millions into offices [of various quality] had no major impact on mental health? Yet it's called an apocalypse when opposite becomes a trend.

One's "mental health apocalypse" is another's relief from pressure. If you often hear one angle maybe it's now becoming a chant rather than rational discourse.

Maybe we can do better than approaching this from that one specific angle, and consider both as valid options. Leave the people with choice, and let them pick whatever is best for them. [1]

[1] My anecdata shows most people given the choice pick their homes or places they like over the office, and offices nowadays are almost empty. But obviously it's anecdata, doesn't mean "everyone" wants it that way (they don't) and YMMV.
Summary of the article is in this paragraph:

> This is actually quite impressive! Although 9 out of 25 is only a 36% accuracy rate, I still remember when reading The Singularity is Near for the first time that almost all of the predictions seemed wildly optimistic and sort of crazy. It seemed a bit unlikely that it would be possible to have a high speed internet connection from a touchscreen super-computer everyone has in their pocket that can also act as a personal assistant that you can speak to in natural language and it will usually understand and respond appropriately, albeit unable to have a full conversation at this point.

So his best record is in making predictions about the internet and ubiquity of portable computers (smartphones), but he's been less successful in his optimistic predictions for full-immersion virtual reality, and the jury is still out on the singularity.
no? why would they? they are complying with everything dude asked for and mind reading is not in mandatory training as of yet.

if you want a nod if used as a part of a software, just add it!
Next time, slap AGPL. Maybe offer an alternative license to companies for GitHub sponsorship alongside.

I really hate this happens to people. :(
Long interview.

(Also quite a long title. I tried to cut it down but please do a better job than I did if you can.)
I'd actually support a license that said "it's OSS except Google/Amazon can't take my thing, launch as a service and charge for it".
Assuming the paper is right and the title is wrong:

Of course? Insulin is the hormone that regulates uptake of sugars and mastication releases simpler sugars by literally cracking bigger ones? Weve known that the digestion of carbs begins in the mouth.

Processed foods are notorious for higher glycemic index numbers and in many cases they are simply externally pre-masticated by grinding, thereby skipping a step that might have some sort of feedback mechanism
Some Creative Commons by Attribution license? Maybe it's not an OSS license (I didn't check) but it should work.
A credit-to-author clause has been tried before by the tech community, and IMO it's up to the community and not an individual author to develop a license which fits. The reason is because any modification to a well-known agreement makes your license very expensive to understand, even if it's a trivial modification.

Open source licenses only work because the community adopts them as a standard.
The CAN bus is shared by a number of devices, each with its own microprocessor and thus (in principle) potentially subject to exploits that cause it to run malicious code. Some of the devices on the bus interact with the outside world via cellular, Wifi, Bluetooth and USB. The disturbing idea here is that your car is basically an internally-unfirewalled network of computers that can kill you if they malfunction.
Here's another example of AWS interactions with OSS: instead of contributing a perfectly good and non-AWS dependant feature to an upstream project (PGBouncer, for a strictly PostgreSQL-level useful feature) they decided to rather stretch it and publish their changes as a _patch_ to the upstream project instead, with a different, restrictive license that only allows its usage on AWS services, together with examples on how to use it on RDS/Redshift:

https://github.com/awslabs/pgbouncer-rr-patch/

https://github.com/awslabs/pgbouncer-rr-patch/issues/3
hard braking or swerving for clear false positives is not very assistive...

it seems to be the opposite of assistive. How can a person know all the weird things that will make a computer vision system badly fail. It shouldn't be used at all if that is the case
How to manage productive teams (without Slack or email) – RadReads
Forgive my limited knowledge of biochemistry but isn’t the gist of it that nucleotides code for and combine to form amino acids which when put in certain sequences form enzymes and proteins whose structure then enables some function so it is much like the paper tape model of a computer except instead of paper with holes in it you have a polymer with a few types of “hooks” that allows it to fold into an origami machine that can manipulate or join with other bits of paper to do things? This is different from programming a computer which relies on reading instructions from such a tape but only in that the computer and its functions/actuators are made of tape. It may be a strained metaphor but it is how I conceptualize it. Please correct me if I’m wrong.
An excerpt on how it works from the article [0] on medRxiv:

"[W]e developed a novel diagnostic method that relies on the detection of intact virus particles using wide-field fluorescence imaging. Our method starts with near-instantaneous labeling of enveloped viruses via cation-mediated binding of short fluorescent DNAs to the surface of virus particles; we subsequently surface-immobilise labelled particles, collect diffraction-limited images containing thousands of labelled particles, and finally use image analysis and machine-learning to identify different viruses in biological and clinical samples [...]. Our approach exploits the fact that distinct virus types and strains have differences in surface chemistry, size, and shape, which in turn affects the fluorophore distribution over the surface of different viruses."

[0] https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.10.13.20212035v...
Looks like they did give some attribution in the NOTICES.txt

https://twitter.com/maxibanki/status/1317071448322789376
Thank you for the reference. I stand corrected. I wasn't aware that its quality problems are that bad.

What's the best argument against PCG?
> 18F or whatever publishes a lot of stuff like this. Markdown policy documents. I think it’s profoundly wasteful

I think you’re under-estimating the value of publishing a good policy from a respectable source within the Federal government.

Many of the government’s technology problems are actually self-inflicted policy problems. Publishing a good policy gives internal reformers a place to start. When the lawyers and security people start telling you no, it’s much more effective to say “actually this language comes directly from GSA, who approved it for X, which has the same compliance requirement you’re concerned about” than to simply protest that it’s industry best practice.

I do agree that this lawyers-first way of doing things kinda sucks. It’s certainly not the way to maximize tech success. But it’s the system/culture we’ve got. I’d love to hear ideas for changing it, especially if you can figure out a way to accomplish the privacy, security, integrity, and fairness objectives that the current system prioritizes.

A government agency struggling to serve the public good because it’s hobbled by obsolete tech is better than an agency enabled by cutting edge tech unshackled from the public interest and democratic legitimacy.
Most of the time they're not even influencers, they're "influencers"

If you've only got a few thousand followers, most of whom would also be begging for free stuff, or don't live near the restaurant you're claiming to advertise, then you're not an influencer.
[edit: let's rephrase]

On the word "use" in federal statutes, see:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watson_v._United_States

and

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smith_v._United_States_(1993)
It is the same code - Someone on Twitter noticed that if you download the Chrome extension and look in the notices.txt file of that bundle, the first line reads puppeteer-recorder v0.7.2
> I'm 100% atheist but I've considered reading the bible because it's culturally significant. But isn't just a bunch of boring and inconsistent tales? is there really anything to be learned from the bible?

I went to a school that taught ancient Latin, Greek, and Hebrew. With that came loads of bible passages to translate. Having grown up a non-believer (many people tried to literally "cure" that during my lifetime, I'm sure they'd be thrilled to know there is a simple drug I could take to make me normal) I can honestly say it's about what you'd expect from religious texts of those time periods. I found it less relatable than, say, Greek mythology.

What I found interesting is how many parts modern Christians habitually ignore, either because they'd be arrested if they'd follow them, or because those parts don't fit in with their personal beliefs. Of course, the entire corpus of text has also seen numerous redactions, in an effort to streamline it and make it more coherent (with mixed results).

Is it culturally significant? Honestly, I'm not sure. The Bible as an idea sure is, and certain famous passages are. But a given group's or individual's interpretation of it seems more informative, and that's often only losely based on those ancient texts.

Needless to say, I don't think there is anything in there to convince a non-believer of the existence of dieties, much less that one specific pantheon. And to be fair I don't think that's what the authors had in mind. It was probably intended as a shared folklore for groups that already strongly believe. Conversion, I suspect, comes through missionaries, not through the text.
> So Microsoft should just throw away decades of work on DX

DX12 is mostly a clean slate, just like Vulkan.

> Show me examples of Microsoft using coercive practices to make game developers use DX.

Xbox
Windows Store

Both prevent you from using open graphics APIs.
It's in the third or fourth tweet that the link to his website is in the extensions

https://twitter.com/maxibanki/status/1317071448322789376?s=1...
Visualizing memory management in V8 Engine
I'm extremely disappointed to see how many comments on here focus on the very narrow legal questions and amount to: "Your license didn't say they couldn't."

Open source software is more than a license and code. It is a community and the digital public square.

And the Tragedy of the Commons is just as applicable to our public square as it is to William Forster Lloyd's common land.

Either we as a community hold ourselves and others within our community to a higher standard than the text of a license, or licenses will inevitably become increasingly restrictive in the future, to the detriment of all.
I don't think I've ever seen a blog, perhaps besides Dan Luu or Paul Graham's, so regularly hit the front page of HN. And it's not about high tech, but low tech! Kudos to Bret Devereaux.
Yes I remember there was a similar scenario with Microsoft as well.

> In other words, I'm not aware of a permissive license that's the same as BSD/Apache with the only difference in that also says "use it as you wish but you must mention my name when you're a commercial enterprise making a splashy product announcement".

Yes. What we need is ABSD, AMIT or AAPL where the first A stands for appreciation / Attribution
The model where company makes money off of someone else's work without paying them should be illegal. Currently you cannot hire someone as an apprentice and don't pay them - you need to give at least the minimum wage. OSS is sort of a loophole where companies can obtain work without payment. I think this practice should be illegal and regardless of the license company adopting OSS solution should pay its contributors market rates - that is the amount of money it would take AWS to pay to create such product.
How to aggregate multiple data with the help of GODS?
I think it comes back to politeness, somewhere in amazon there is product manager that saw or was shown Tim's repo and saw an opportunity(nothing wrong with that). It would have been a nice thing to do to give him a shoutout just like it was a nice thing to do of Tim's to release his code under a permissive license. There must be a mountain of code forked by large companies that if given some sort of recognition would be of benefit to the original author even if its only internet points.
This is strawman. If you phrase like this...

"Make your code more testable by moving things that are cumbersome/expensive to test but extremely unlikely to break into functions you don't test. Instead focusing your efforts on making the items that are likely to break easy to test"

Phrased honestly it becomes more interesting discussion.

I have worked on projects that had static analysis and high code coverage standards where code quality was abysmal, the product was barely functional, and development was paralyzed. I have also worked on projects that had none of those things but managed to have happy customers and quality product.

What does this mean?

It means that writing lots of tests is not enough to guarantee good outcomes. 1 great test is an asset, 400 bad tests are a liability. What does guarantee good outcomes is focusing on "equity". Does writing this test improve my equity position? If the answer is no or if you can't qauntitatively demonstrate the value in terms of opportunity cost then the answer is obvious...don't write the test.

The current state of software quality at the development level closely parallels the plot of Moneyball. Consider this quote...

"Okay, people who run ball clubs, they think in terms of buying players. Your goal shouldn’t be to buy players. Your goal should be to buy wins and in order to buy wins, you need to buy runs. You’re trying to replace Johnny Damon. The Boston Red Sox see Johnny Damon and they see a star who’s worth seven and a half million dollars a year. When I see Johnny Damon, what I see is an imperfect understanding of where runs come from”
― Michael Lewis, Moneyball: The Art of Winning an Unfair Game

Many people try to buy quality with an imperfect understanding of where quality comes from.
this type of bridge is common throughout Europe.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_medieval_bridges_in_Fr...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_medieval_stone_bridges...

since antiquity https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_bridge
So much of todays social web is built on men spending a lot of time and resources on women, what happens when that stops?

Quite simply, change happens.

This is not a bad thing. Change happens all the time. You can't be scared of it, or try to stop it, because it is inevitable. You can only embrace it.

But also, somewhat more rationally, taking a pill is a choice. Not everyone would take it, and certainly not enough people to significantly impact society in any way.
> Our goals throughout the effort, when articulated at all, have

> always concerned themselves with building a comfortable relationship

> with the machine and with exploring ideas and inventions in

> operating systems. We have not been faced with the need to satisfy

> someone else's requirements, and for this freedom we are grateful.

>

> Dennis M. Ritchie and Ken Thompson (1974)
Technically, it detects SARS-CoV-2 virus particles but since they do that on swabs from patients, one can argue that it does test indeed test for Covid-19.
They’ll do it too.

If I look through the menus of my oldish (not smart) Panasonic flatscreen tv, there is a menu option that displays all the licenses of the open source software used.
The human brain has actually been shrinking since about 40k years ago. There is some correlation between brain size and intelligence, but admittedly it isn't too strong.
Mobile google app only, no web
^This is the real takeaway. Why is this getting so much traction if it’s so bad/over-written/directionless/hypocritical/etc.? My theory is that many HN users quietly consider themselves to be polymaths, and so were baited into reading it to look for either (a) reasons they don’t fall under the author’s umbrella of “casual”, or (b) holes in the author’s argument.
Are you using Firefox? There's been a bug affecting Twitter the past few days.

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1665368
Is it possible to have a license that have different requirements for human beings and non-human beings(organizations, corporations, bots, etc). It feel like the author is upset because AWS is not a human being.
Maintainer here, it's meant to be a visual representation of a 2-tuple of natural numbers.

But I get your point, there was another commentator here who expressed similar frustrations. When I find some time, I'll see about picking a clearer example for the README
It's possible. The combination shrooms/weed definitely turned me around on the spot, and while I can't say if the trips changed me, or if I just learned more about myself, or if I just got lucky, but the result was clear; I went from being on my way back into a deep depression with occasional suicidal thoughts, and into a more positive person with a bright outlook on life.

Or it might just have been me trying to do something about it, and it was all placebo. Regardless, I'm happy it worked.
If you print this angled so the curved side is down and the two sides are at 45 degrees to horizontal, it should print more or less fine without any support whatsoever.
I am baffled by the comments as well.
The two vaccines are called Ambush and Triumph. Are we at war?
Maybe:

OneZero interviews Tristan Harris on ‘The Social Dilemma’
I wanted to be a milkman, because I wanted to only work in the morning and have the rest of the day off.

Child me had no concept that milkmen don't earn as much money as engineers
You missed a T there.
It's an open system. You don't have to fool it in that case. Just disable the distraction detection.
If that's what he wanted what stopped him from adding one more paragraph to the licence saying something similar to:

"The USER is required to publicly thank AUTHOR, and make the thanking reproducible in every copy of the derived work that uses this software."

You don't need a lawyer for that. And if someone wants to use his work without attribution, they are free to negotiate a copy with different licence terms directly with the author and provide a compensation.
This is less to do with chewing and more about how most people don't have gut microbes that can handle the fiber or produce necessary quantities of phytases to break it down.
Please correct me if i'm way off base, but at the mental model level, it seems like the key difference between this and Zenaton is:

* Support for multiple languages (Zenaton used to, but doubled-down on Node)

* It runs on your own infrastructure (with Zenaton the code runs on your own machines, but the scheduler runs in their systems)

* A deeper focus on resilience (hard to quantify whether Zenaton has this, but it's definitely not emphasised as heavily)
The solution I have implemented in my case is to move the problem to the application by designing the writes a little bit better. Instead of writing into dumb stream the application writes buffers of data or stream of data but each time indicating if there is more data that will immediately follow.

In any case, TCP_NODELAY is enabled and all writes are immediately flushed unless the application clearly indicates it has a queue of data that will immediately follow.
Nice writeup with some interesting insights into how to create a pan/zoom effect in a React component.

I do feel a little let down after the read - the title had me hoping that you would be creating the effect using a <canvas> element.
Ryse Son of Rome used CryEngine. Holds up to this day. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LgdFa7wT2ZE, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=znYxqt4lUXc
> Life experiences like tragedies (i.e. Covid-19) can have a big impact.

I didn’t think about the impact it might have on the metaphysics opinions. Do you know some studies on this point?
You're free to say what you want- but not from the secret police hauling you off to a gulag for it.
Chess’s Cheating Crisis
Perhaps that's why such a clause wasn't added to the license?
The Computer Science of Human Decisions
Did the author thank the Vim or Visual Studio Code Devs or Linux Torvalds for all the tools he used for making his library?
I appreciate the underlying sentiment, but I disagree. When I contribute to OSS it's my choice to and I want the right to let anyone do whatever they want with code even if I never exercise that right.

Personally, I think OSS licences should be changed to prohibit unpaid use by any entity that has a single stakeholder worth more than a billion dollars. That way the startups and medium sized businesses around the world can benefit and the tech lottery winners pay something reasonable ($1m a year, say) to support OSS.
Creative Commons recommend against using the cc licenses for code. Recommending using the gnu licenses instead.
> which has been a net win for gamers

Has it? What do you know about the alternate universe in which Windows and Xbox did not have a proprietary grpahics API.
He Married a Sociopath: Me
Most FOSS licenses require attribution, including the one used here. The issue is that attribution doesn't have to be very prominent.