skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I'm sure the earring wearers would appreciate this but the way their shop is handled screams "If you have to ask, you can't afford it".

Also, I hope the actual BT headphone part is made by someone who knows what they're doing, or they'll be more trouble than they're worth.
Yes, well, that is partly due to precisely the heritage you mention: when you think of the Netherlands you think of canal-interspersed fields with cows and a few traditional windmills here and there. That view would be ruined if a few 90m high wind turbines were to dominate the landscape. Also, being as flat as a pancake those turbines are visible until they disappear under the horizon, leading to a very large backyard full of NIMBYs.
RBAC is paid for, but "Enterprise SSO" is different than the SSO supported in the Community Edition - it's described on their site as: "SSO with Enterprise Identity". They list: Okta, Sailpoint, Active Directory, OneLogin, G Suite, and Auth0 as examples. But, you still get SSO in Community Edition.
The majority of things on Twitter and Facebook are bullshit. How many politicians and "pundits" are allowed to blatantly lie on Twitter? Not sure why this is different.
HTTP supports range requests, which can be used to resume partial downloads.
> Is anyone screaming at printing presses for printing the NY Post?

You...you mean screaming at the NY post for printing itself? Yes, people do that constantly.
AFAIK they actually played in the world as a tabletop RPG.
They probably expected it would go over like the Alex Jones thing or the warning messages on Trump's tweets, with a brief burst of interest followed by adjustment to the new consensus that some censorship is justified for the sake of social harmony. (And they may yet be right - there were headlines about those two things too.)
Play on his conspiratorial side to convince him to engage the medical establishment. After all the NFL his info from the players.

Unfortunately it’s an ugly idea. But it may work.
Justin here, co-founder and CTO of strongDM. The policy and audit functions of our product are hosted by us, but all the sensitive data transit - the proxies themselves - are hosted by you. Hope that helps!
Just step back a little and consider the alternatives here. NYP is pretty obviously smearing for a major civil event here, a civil event that has the potential of causing serious harm to the second largest democracy in the world. If the social media companies would just allow this smearing to go unhindered, they are basically saying: “We don’t care if bad actors use our platform to undermine our democracy,” which is nuts.
HIV was much more deadly for certain groups (IV drug users and homosexual men) during the late 80's through early 90's than COVID is to the general public.

10% of self-identifying gay men in America born in the baby boomer generation died from AIDS by 1995. Nobody locked them in their houses for 6 months.

HIV treatments were a miracle that saved a lot of lives.
“Full” init systems tend to need to do things that are hard to secure in a container.

Many must run as root, and the reasons not to do that are discussed in the article this HN thread is discussing.

Systemd is particularly tricky because it needs to be able to control the cgroups of its child processes, which means the container needs to be granted that capability. See https://developers.redhat.com/blog/2019/04/24/how-to-run-sys... about how to run systemd in a container via Podman, and is a follow up to https://developers.redhat.com/blog/2016/09/13/running-system... which discusses why the Docker case is even more difficult.

That said, if you just want a process supervisor for a multi process container, there are several more minimal init systems that will work well, for example, supervisord.
I found out that I personally prefer two types of shows:

- ones with a season-long arc. This gives the authors time and space to develop the characters, and reach a satisfying conclusion. But these often suffer from pacing issues, because mid-season episodes become filler.

- ones with episodic stories and with a season-long arc (a problem or a villain that keeps popping up). This helps with pacing, but still lets authors build up momentum and develop characters and stories. These often suffer from underdeveloped arcs though and unresolved season cliffhangers hinting at "that arc we developed, it's so much bigger than you thought".
on the frontpage with 100+ comments https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24780798
Yes, it's a serious newspaper.

But it is known to use sans serif fonts and hire people that went to public schools.
But USB-C is used for literally every other new device and even other Apple devices such as their laptops and ipad pros.

It's the defacto standard for charging any kind of electronic device.
You realize the real story re: Trump's asset depreciation is that he reported one valuation to the govt and one to his banks when seeking loans, right?
"Please note: This report has been corrected. An erratum has been published"

Anyone knows where it is?
(This is true everywhere, not just Google, though. I’m not sure there’s any such thing as an employee who doesn’t get in hot water for bringing unwanted attention to the business.)
I believe it's a combination of two things:

1) Googlers have some internal insight into how the privacy practices mechanically work; that insight engenders trust.

2) Googlers who don't find a level of trust very quickly get turned off to what the company's mission is and take their high-paying skillset elsewhere.

I mean, "To organize the world's information and make it universally accessible and useful." Gathering the information is implied right there in the mission statement. People who aren't comfortable with the ramifications of gathering and using lots of information seek employment elsewhere.
Twitter has a clear policy about hacked material [1]. So stories based on emails harvested from a hack are not shareable. Theoretically even flattering stories would also be blocked if the source material came as a result of a hack.

1. https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/hacked-materi...
Obviously make us money is their motto. The only reason public companies exist is to make money. They can still have marketing campaigns.
If curious see also

yesterday's Minesweeper: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24770616

pure HTLM/CSS Minesweeper (a few months ago): https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23920987

boot sector Minesweeper (ditto): https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23360133

Minesweeper with a twist (2019): https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21883875

infinite multiplayer Minesweeper (2019): https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21854494

Other threads: https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...
I'm no Google apologist, but there's nothing nefarious about this. Why on earth would any company encourage its employees to speculate and talk freely, when doing so would get them into legal/PR trouble. It's the equivalent of a lawyer telling his client to go drinking and have a fun night out with the district attorney.

Rule #1: Never talk to the police without your lawyer being present

Rule #2: Don't create a paper trail that is going to make you look bad when it gets subpoenaed

I personally think that Google needs to be broken up into 10 different companies. And I would love to live in a world where companies face antitrust enforcement because of concrete actions. Unfortunately, we live in a world where a carelessly worded email is going to cause you more legal troubles than actual anti-competitive behavior.
In general, are you more likely to suggest a complete show or one that ends abruptly with several dangling plot threads?

Stranger Things season 1 would have been a fantastic show if it just ended there (without the final cliffhanger scene). I'd recommend it to everybody. If Stranger Things just ended now, I might still recommend it to everybody, but I'd be decidedly less likely to do so, and it would always come with the caveat "They didn't actually finish it." So not only am I less likely to recommend it, but the caveat means the other person is less likely to watch it based on the recommendation if I do. (I might also say, "Don't bother watching past season X," which is still bad for Netflix.)
If by "slowly transitioning" you mean "massively and publicly driving adoption of USB-C", then yes, I agree.

Apple has been pushing for the interoperable USB standard for as long as it has existed. The original iPhone was either the first phone to charge from USB, or at minimum the first successful mass-market phone to do so.
Google Play Music was perfect for my needs. Once it's closed, I'm going to test Qobuz and its CD-quality streams. It's probably either them or Deezer.
I wouldn't be surprised if these kind of policies also change culture and behavior for the better. Or maybe another phrasing makes it clearer: If your boss has a slide deck on crushing the competition that could cause some impressionable folks to bend the rules just a little.
> we've come a long way, amazing.

I worked a demo booth for AutoDesk in the mid-90's. We had just released a Gouraud renderer for the Intel Pentium Pro launch and people were amazed to watch it render a few thousand polys (no textures, just interpolated vertex shading) in a few seconds.

This web app made my jaw literally drop.
"Ride the tiger" is an interesting title choice considering how that saying ends:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24361372
HN is full of unwitting Trump/conspiracy theory enablers with their high-minded bottomless "benefit of the doubt" schtick.
wait though, bc i really dont see it in any of these articles:

who has been hacked?
Mozilla RegretsReporter
> An elderly Dutch woman has become the first known person to die from catching COVID-19 twice, according to experts, raising serious questions about how long immunity and antibodies can last.

She was 89 years old and immunocompromised from bone marrow cancer treatments while also receiving chemotherapy. It's not surprising to be vulnerable to reinfection after you nuke an octogenarian from orbit with cancer treatments then expose her to SARS-2.
I feel like he didn't watch the last episode of the Sopranos...
I stopped reading the post once I got to the drawing of the waterfall diagram. There's not a single service I'm aware of that runs today on a waterfall process.

Not sure how you can trust anything else in the post with that obvious of a strawman argument. I'm not going to spend the time trying.
https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/chronic-traum...

Seems like you can't do anything medically for your friend, but if he brought his condition to light, it would help the statistics and research, which could then help politically in preventing it from happening to other people.
It would be interesting if the networking model for the end targets could also be inverted, so that an agent (or something) on the end target could make an outbound connection to establish a reverse tunnel to the proxy that user connections could then be sent over.

The use case I'm thinking of is for IoT or robotics, where you have devices you want to manage being deployed into remote networks that you don't have much control over. It's really helpful in this situation if devices make outbound connections only, so that network operators don't have to configure their firewalls to port forward or set up a VPN.

Edit: clearer language
It shouldn’t be that surprising. The change in the way your life is structured and how you are treated by society drastically changes after high school.
Neither are early stage R&D projects in industry.

It's a fallacy to believe that there is a bright line distinction though, and that no engineering practices or tools will improve your research productivity. Traditionally e.g. academic labs traditionally eschew all such approaches not because they wouldn't benefit, but because they don't understand what they are missing and have little incentive to learn, and few opportunities for it.
I don't think that's a fair judgement at all. Not when the right is actively attacking honest journalism at its source while also screaming about anti-conservative bias on social media every time they filter disinformation. I would also not at all categorize deplatforming disinformation as censorship either. Nor incitement to violence. I only agree in that it's not a job that any of these companies are setup to handle.

EDIT: https://www.npr.org/2020/05/27/863011399/trump-threatens-to-...
Jens Mönig and Brian Harvey both received a National Technology Leadership Summit (NTLS) Educational Technology Leadership Award for their impact on educational technology over the course of a lifetime, for their work on Snap!

https://ntls.info/ntls-educational-leadership-award/brian-ha...

>[...] Snap! is a remarkable technological achievement. However, like Logo, its greatest achievement is arguably the educational philosophy that it draws upon and supports, and the associated community drawn together by this philosophy. In a very real sense, the Snap! community embodies the spirit of the early Logo community, extending it for the modern world. The NTLS Educational Technology Leadership Award, awarded to Brian Harvey and Jens Möenig, is presented in recognition of that accomplishment.
This wasn't really a 'hack'. A laptop repair store backed up the drive and then sold the backup. It's shady, but not illegal.

I read the policy. I think that's a good policy that isn't politically motivated.
Sohrab is a conspiracy theorist nutball who fled a religious dictatorship in Iran and now openly advocates for a Christian monarchy for the US.
My company self-hosts LDAP, so that's essentially a dealbreaker for us.
I was using FTP in AdTech in Q2 of last year. We always had a bit of a chuckle when the onboarding client was so strict about security and obfuscation, but the platform they wanted the data deployed at didn't have any security for uploads. I've moved to a new industry, so I don;t know if this is still the case, but when I left the platform in question had no intention of changing.
It takes about 1 second to come up with some examples.

And the memo would be very reasonable to write if it were true, and if the company were actively discriminating in favor of conservatives, like Google was with women.
Corporations that do this look at their customer demographics and if their demographics support BLM then so do they. They will reflect their customer base.

They're not effecting any change in this way. The change has already been done. They're just riding on its coat tails.
I'm not sure if it's accurate that they would "simply..." but I think the consistent thing I've heard from my lawyer friends is that judges do not like to be deceived or misrepresented to or have their time wasted. You should not try to be "clever" with them, even if you think you've been clever with the law.

This approach combines all three of those things, it involves deceiving a judge or jury with language games, misrepresenting that these words or languages have hidden meanings, and wasting their time in deciphering what was really communicated.

This would be akin to everyone at Google typing in qwerty but using a keyboard setting that interprets the keypresses as dvorak, and also having an extension that substitutes characters viewed from fellow employees back to qwerty. How the message is stored or exchanged doesn't change the material fact that one employee intended to write "competitor" and another employee read "competitor" and in depositions both would admit to those facts.
It's a newspaper collaborating with the president's personal lawyer, who is already the subject of investigations into persons in violation of the Foreign Agent Registration Act, during the run up to an incredibly contentious election after these networks - Facebook and Twitter- have already been accused of allowing rampant disinformation campaigns. If they had reason to believe that the information was part of a malicious campaign, I can see why that might spur them to action.
I did that once with Lost. Never again.
The last few posts on this topic were quickly flagged to death. I expect the same to happen to this thread.
Except for the parts that aren't that. Which I honestly can't think of an analogy for. If you're making that argument, don't go on a tangent about cultural marxism.
I don't see what the point of the article might be (except as click bait to get ad views, of course). I had exactly the same training when I worked at IBM, every year. "Never talk about dominating the market", yadda yadda yadda. It's sound legal advice that I would expect all corporate employees would get. VMWare won't want their employees to talk about how they dominate the VM indusrty; EMC wouldn't want their engineers talking about their enterprise storasge arrays "crushing the competition", and so on.

And at all companies, the standard line is, "never send in e-mail anything that you wouldn't want to see on the front page of the New York Times, or might cause you to be deposed as a witness in a courtroom." And it's not just about anti-trust; you also never want to talk in any kind of discoverable medium how an engineering short-cut in the development of your product (say, like a 737) is going to cause people to get killed.

All of this is not unique to Google, but applies to any company with half-way competent lawyers and a half-way competent HR department.
The point they made around this was roughly, "Let's say that the US Government is making a case. If they can argue that you used your personal email, personal phone number, or ANYTHING for work at any point, they're going to subpoena as much of your private communications as possible and find a way to use the most embarrassing stuff to encourage you to cooperate."

I left this part out of my other post because I was a little fuzzier on the details of what they said, but this was the gist.

Edit: clarity
React v16.14
> Twitter’s actions came after Facebook announced it would limit the sharing of the story while fact-checkers reviewed the piece.

The link says Facebook did censor it.
Here's how I see it: the phone industry is in a bad Nash equilibrium.

Chargers should be sold separately, they tend to last longer than a phone, cheap ones are dangerous, and people buy phones, the chargers just come with because everyone sells phones with chargers.

Apple is big enough to shift out of that equilibrium, by pulling the good-ol' reality distortion field and encouraging everyone else to stop bundling chargers on environmental grounds. Which grounds are actually valid, though not the actual motive in play.

A world where chargers aren't included is better than one where every manufacturer feels bound to bundle one in to every single phone purchase. So I think Apple is doing a good thing here, just like when they were the first to stop including floppy drives.
Why would Twitter allow sharing something in DMs that they block in tweets? I’m sure this is just their normal policy - block things platform wide.
According to Wired [0]

> the new API will limit extensions to 150,000 rules each, a big jump from the old limit of 30,000 rules per extension

Couldn’t someone make separate extensions for each block list and break them into 150k chunks?

[0] https://www.wired.com/story/google-chrome-ad-blockers-extens...
I had forgotten how much I hated Android manufacturers making "Verizon versions" with the carrier name on the forehead and back case. That part of the event felt really cheap.
employees criticizing the company for not sufficiently punishing sexual harassment are protected by whistleblower law.

Employees trying to build an Orwellian counter-story that punishing sexual harassment as the law requires creates a hostile work environment are treading on thin ice. Very easy to misinterpret that; I wouldn't commit it to discoverable media.
The just consequence should be that they should be considered publishers, rather than the republishers. And thus lose their 230 protection from civil litigation.
You've pushed this narrative a couple times in these threads that only nerds care.

That's like saying only car mechanics care about kind of oil that goes into your car. Yeah I mean nerds care because nerds know the difference. This is not something where nerds caring about e2e is at odds with what everyone benefits from. Better security benefits everyone without taking away from the experience.

There's absolutely _nothing_ preventing recording while having end-to-end encryption. It just means the recording happens at one of the ends and can be uploaded. Hell, you could even go as far as storing the encrypted streams, and then decrypt on the device during playback. The keybase people especially have experience with messages that are encrypted so that only a handful of recipients can decrypt it.

The POTS line, I'm less sure about. But I'm still a little iffy about it, since everything is VoIP now. But that may not matter.
Unifying the Technical Interview
The largest seems to have unflagged and saw some moderator activity (link updates, etc.), I imagine many are now being closed as dupes

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24780798
They're also declaring a "smoking gun" of Hunter peddling influence when the only data point is an email from a Ukrainian to Hunter saying that he was looking forward to meeting the Vice President. There doesn't seem to be any message from Hunter, and Joe has already said his official schedule is public record and no meeting ever happened.
"Content is King"

But maybe what Neflix needs to do is add more "100x" developers to make the user interface even more polished, and that will bring the users in... /s

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24618541
Reading this article, I feel like I read a satire?

I mean come on, comparing your executives to priests and yourself to Jesus has to be on the high end of arrogancy?

Especially when your company is not THAT kind of a big deal. If we convert the yen to usd, his "conglomerate" which is almost 30 years old had revenues of $2 billion dollars?

Don't get me wrong, it is a lot of money, but if you are going to compare yourself to Jesus then better start pumping those numbers..
Yeah, that is a great question, and the only answer I have really is "faith". Specifically, "faith in Elon Musk". Which entirely depends on your risk profile and if your vision for the world aligns with Elon's and you (like him) are tolerant that your investment might hit $0. And frankly, for me personally, this wouldn't be enough for me to invest.

That said, given that TSLA's startegy is much like AAPL and AMZN, i.e. vertical integration, I don't feel they are "dipping their hands into many fields", but I do agree with the sentiment that they are "challenging an ever increasing number of incumbents" and its unlikely they can outperform all of them at the same time.

We will need to wait for TSLA's next 2 quarters to really know if they can sustain/grow their EPS. Which will be the only real test of "are they spreading themselves thin?" (compared with "spreading themselves thicc?").
As further anecdata: where I work, the interviewing system doesn't support random urls to stuff, and only shows the uploaded doc (if any). So unless we checked the linkedin link (almost never provided) and clicked through to projects (or followed links in docs, neither of which I or any I've talked to have ever done AFAIR), we'd never see it.

It might be workable for last-round or very small + "high contact" interview pipelines, but it's probably useless earlier or at larger companies.
> Star Wars franchise also provides frequent scenes of characters taking a posture and saying some short sentence that becomes a meme you can share with friends.

Or you can cram a movie full of it and call it Star Wars IX...
But why do you need any of that to solve biological aging? It's like, step 1: boil the ocean.
Reporting one set of finances to the government and another to banks is a crime.