skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I absolutely keep my personal GitHub account separate from my work one for that reason. It's also because I like to keep my work life and personal life separate. That's why I don't use my work email for private matters (you never should anyway!) and I don't use my work PC for anything other than work. It keeps things clear cut for both my employee and myself.
If they had launched an app, we would have people here complaining about how no one wants to install an app for a tiny functionality, and then when Google would have inevitably canceled the app in a few years because of lack of installs, we'd have posts complaining about how Google pulls the rug from under its apps.

As for those interested in trying it out, the feature is part of Google Assistant.
There isn't anything remotely "leftist" about this sort of thing. It's done in service of some left-ish movements. Or, rather, I'd argue that "progressive" and "left" have been (mis)appropriated.
Trends are already exposed on the Reviews page, behind a click.
They send a representative, probably someone from their legal department if they have one. The important thing is that both you and the company are arguing on much more level footing. You don't need to be thoroughly versed in court procedure, and the whole process is generally a little more lax than in superior court.

With that said, the company can still pump tons of money into things behind the scenes, but because the stakes are so low, and not necessarily precedent-forming, they're not likely to actually invest that much money into fighting you. And even if they do and you lose, since you brought the lawsuit and there are no attorney fees, the most you'd end up spending is the court fees (potentially the company's court fees, but those are minimal too.)
The problem here that this "bombshell" article did not provide enough information to do any kind of verification.

The main evidence is a PDF file of a print of an e-mail (without even providing a header information).

- we don't know if it's Hunter's laptop as claimed (kind of odd that somebody bothers with laptop repair (let's be honest, a lot people here probably buy a new one) and then leaves it there?

- we don't know if this is a real e-mail (headers could be used to prove that)

- we don't know that the sender e-mail is an e-mail connected to the person Hunter is accused talking to (the ".ukraine" in e-mail is very odd, who would put their country in an e-mail address, it's long and is not like he has a super common name)

- we don't know Hunter responded to it (since they have his laptop, you would think they would have his e-mails as well)

- we don't know the meeting actually happened

- this story is obviously an October surprise (the time is picked exactly to impact voting, there's also not enough time to prove it is false)
Anecdotally, it's 3/3 for me, one of which was Kids by MGMT. I'm seeing some fairly divergent results here, I wonder if it's highly sensitive to the particular user's voice.
If I discovered that HN moderators were banning links to specific major news articles they didn't like, I'd find that extremely concerning. As far as I know, the HN moderators restrict only comments which are needlessly inflammatory and posts which don't have to do with the technology industry, and I'd be fine with it if Twitter or Facebook adopted similarly general policies. (I'd be a huge fan of forming some version or corner of Twitter without politics at all, frankly.)
Create a NPS (Net Promoter) Survey with one-click and learn from your customers
Wait so is it actually the case that iOS upgrades make iPhones run slower?
people are strong believers that if they are in the side of "good" they can voice their opinions freely as long as they don't hurt "others opinions" note that this others opinions will change every day/months/political agenda make sense just like when Amy said "sexual preference" and the dictionary deemed it as offensive the day after. we are living in an idiocracy of the good equal to the one of the Z movie demolition man.

Also from the moment you not in this axis of the good anymore you'll be deemed nazi, fake news, banned by social media. it is crazy to see that all the newspaper took the russian collusion seriously at first (and even do it know while many investigations couldnt find it) but their first reaction to a biden article is to ban it.

We are living in a democracy of the good where the good is defined by a minority of overly violent only entitled personalities
> Public Domain source code is not considered "Open Source" in terms of OSI licensing https://opensource.org/node/878

The reasons look to more nuanced than that article (especially for government work) but the crux AFAIK is that public source is not a license, so there is no license that the OSI can approve. From https://opensource.org/faq#public-domain
: There are certain circumstances, such as with U.S. government works as described above, where it is not easy to apply a license, and the software must be released into the public domain. In these cases, while it would be inaccurate to display the OSI logo or say that the license is OSI-approved (since there is no license), nevertheless we think it is accurate to say that such software is effectively open source, or open source for most practical purposes, even though it is not officially released under an open source license. (This is assuming, of course, that in the laws of releasing jurisdiction the meaning of "public domain" is compatible with the Open Source Definition.) After all, the freedoms guaranteed by open source licenses are still present, and it is possible for the familiar dynamics of open source collaboration to arise around the software.”

The next FAQ heading explains that the CC0 license was not OSI approved due to its patent clause.

Public source does have its issues with some jurisdictions, but surely jurisdiction problems are no worse than the specific problems each other license has.
dah daH DAH...dah daH DAH daH...dah daH DAH...duh duh.

Didn't work :/
The inescapable premise here is that there's something that's obviously wrong to "us" (some enlightened circle of censors), so obviously wrong that we don't to discuss it further, but not obviously wrong to the masses who might fall for it. And that might well be true in any specific case, but the historical record of people with this attitude isn't great.
> 6. They’re not getting stupider; I’m just getting more conceited.

This seems like the most likely explanation in your case.
1. ECS yes, Fargate I don't think so yet but we're looking into it.

2. Yes, you want this: https://www.waypointproject.io/docs/workspaces

3. Yes: https://www.waypointproject.io/plugins/aws-ec2#aws-alb-relea... with more on the way.
People have always relied on work for building social lives. Even when I worked in a shop, I'd end up going for drinks with those people and making friends. When I moved to a new city, my entire social fabric stems off of work (even if the majority of friends are now 1 or 2 steps removed, I needed that foundation to bootstrap).

We're already in a loneliness epidemic, WFH will make that 10x worse.
The NY Post is not a serious news organization. Whatever the implication politically, this is more akin to limiting the spread of a headline like "Lizard-man found at UFO landing site." And a naked political hit job.
> How is that related?

I thought we were talking about running applications reliably. Why is complete linux userspace bundled separately in each container?

> Environments and languages change.
Yes.

> That's entirely different to running programs with zero-downtime deployments, load-balancing and traffic management, health monitoring, logging and observability, secret and config management, storage volumes, security roles, and much more.

That's a lot of new requirements in addition to "running applications reliably". Most applications simply do not need that. And I believe this is the point of the original comment you replied to.

- zero-downtime deployments -> not needed for most applications (for example, twitter outages are not a big deal either). Btw how do you do zero-downtime of (websocket) streams with kubernetes? ;)

- load-balancing and traffic management -> in standard k8s you are pushing all traffic through one active LB (nginx) anyway => strip most of the extra layers and you dont even need that LB

- health monitoring, logging etc. -> you can use an existing solution that provides only the functionality you need, most of the work will be in your app anyway (every application needs different metrics ..)

The argument is that most applications do not need to scale at this level (until you need anycast DNS returning per-node IPs or at least geodns, you are not scaling that much anyway) and can be implemented in simpler manner hence easier and cheaper to maintain, audit and secure.

I do not want security roles, storage volumes and config management or observability I want my application to reliably and quickly serve my customers and be easy to maintain and debug.

If you want to discuss how to design architecture for scalable applications which keep all state in distributed databases but based on a platform with stable ABI that would surely be an interesting debate as well.
How do you imagine such an educated population occurs when you conflat Freedom of Thought with Freedom of Speech?

If you don't like certain ideas being distributed then who made you the boss of ideas?

Without a free exchange of ideas, you can not have a educated population, you only get programmed automotons.
Mine does not.
Not to disparage anyone’s efforts, but...

When I load Grid.js on my phone, 100% of the examples I’m able to find work well, probably better to than any I’ve seen. I looked at a lot of examples because I was trying to better understand their React support (and honestly I’m perplexed trying to navigate their docs).

When I load Datatable (which I’m familiar with from previous table library research, so this observation isn’t a new one for me) on my phone[1], I see a big grid almost entirely filled with ellipses. I can’t read a single word in the table.

I know that’s not the primary consideration for probably any table library, but I know I’ll keep it in mind the next time I need to do anything on a website where tabular data presentation is a concern.

[1]: it’s an iPhone 8 Plus, so its a pretty dang large screen.
Counterpoints:

- Attention is a zero-sum game. In the past, we'd get more of our news from local papers, radio stations or lunch break gossip, resulting in a natural diversity of viewpoints. Nowadays, it's all the same social media outlets and handful of national newspapers (whose staff generally spend all day and form their opinions on Twitter, which thus winds up being upstream anyway) for everyone. Compared to what we had before, one side winds up getting free amplification anyway.

- I don't think free speech as a positive right for the speaker is necessarily the correct framing; at least, it neglects half of the issue at hand. I consider it at least equally important that "free speech" protects my right as an information consumer to get exposed to as many viewpoints as possible on a matter. Right now, my sense is that national newspapers all echo the Twitterati consensus, Facebook has developed in such a way that social and increasingly technological pressure would not allow even those people on my friend list who I suspect had interesting and generally well-thought-out non-mainstream opinions to share them with me, and the rest is all conspiracy websites that are unusable as a source because they've largely been cut off from the means of establishing credibility and separating wheat from chaff via social proof.

If I were a US voter (I'm not), I'd want to know whether Biden was involved in corrupt dealings. As it stands, it seems that if there were a compelling case that he was (and, well, I don't know if there is one!), the media and its allies would be working overtime to prevent me from learning about it.
How many times do we have to go over the fact that the fire issue is actually proves the point. It was a bad ruling used to silence Yiddish WW1 protestors that referenced that hypothetical in the first place! So tired of seeing this regurgitated so much.
The un-subtlest attempt to get more people to enable microphone access.
Thank you, that's interesting! I think some of those things are going on. Other points I'm a little skeptical about—for example I don't believe that the left/right divide correlates as strongly with the US vs. Europe as you suggest. Many of the strongest leftist posts we see come from the U.S. and many of the strongest rightist posts come from Europe (to judge by IP geolocation).

Your 'no synchronization' case is tribalism. That's certainly happening here, as probably in every large-enough group. Yes, it's a significant problem. But it's not the astroturfing/manipulation problem being discussed in this thread. If your skepticism about "strong defenses" was meant to include this case, that's too general.

Your 'synchronized' cases would constitute abuse in HN's terms, and if you or anyone notice it happening in the future, we'd greatly appreciate being told about it at hn@ycombinator.com. Actually, if you can even point to cases where it happened in the past (e.g. "some content [was] getting popular on /r/rust, or /r/python, some people there [connected] to HN to upvote it here"), it would be interesting to look back and see whether we detected it and/or could do something differently.

The one thing I'd caution is that it's extremely easy to convince oneself that these things are happening when they're not. Nearly everyone with strong views about this phenomenon is massively deceiving themselves about it—if you're only guided by what feels like it must be happening, there's far too much opportunity to just project things into the situation. People do this all the time, and it's a big problem—as I've said elsewhere in this thread, it's actually a bigger problem than the abuse and manipulation being complained about. The solution is to guard against that by always looking for some extraneous indication (i.e. evidence)—for example a thread on Reddit saying "let's upvote this on HN"—and to be agnostic in the cases where one doesn't have that.
Ah yes, my lonely concrete bunker beneath my house.
How are your diodes holding up?

My capacitors are giving me gyp.

lol
The usage stats for our MS Teams instance shows this. Before COVID hardly any messages, after a massive increase as you'd expect, but private messages outnumber public messages 10:1 or more. Several times I've found out that there are multiple private chat groups all for the same P1 or Project instead of using Channels that all staff can see.
>Spacy doesn't has autocompletion

Python libraries don't implement autocompletion, language servers or completion engines do. I suggest you configure your editor correctly, because spacy works just fine with vscode vim, or whatever have you.
End-to-end encryption – The case for a backdoor, CurePrivacy
I'll spell it out explicitly, since nobody else has.

In a semantic sense, deregulation is the same thing as removing laws. De = remove, regulation = regulation. But what de-regulation really means is "the reduction or elimination of government power in a particular industry".

In this case, this law is basically an exemption. Putting the merits or validity of that exemption aside, if you remove the law, you're increasing the power the government has rather than reducing it. The courts now have the power over tech companies to enforce laws that make the tech companies responsible for what is posted on their platform.
>> and we go back to uncurated things and to an internet where you have to look for the things you want to read/watch, versus getting content pushed onto you.

But people are lazy. Why write a post when you "share" some crap that came through your feed with one click.

We will get to self hosted distributed social media when it becomes easier than Facebook or Twitter.
Which tools are you talking about? I'm new to this and I'm just looking around for better options.

My use case is app releases and deployments across multiple on premise servers behind private vpn.

Deployments are a very manual process, due to the vpn, but we use git to pull the project, docker for managing all the different services, and ansible to manage config per host and run deployment playbooks.

What other/better opinions are there, for a very small team of fullstack debs?
I'm from Canada, my bank has a separate "telephone banking" pin, that's separate than the card pin code (you could make them the same though).

The automated phone system accepts number input, but the resulting rep may ask to verify.

My bank claims to not know the card pin(my dad forgot, he had to go to the bank and set a new pin after verifying it's him)

Not sure op meant the same thing or they literally providing their card pin over the phone which is a bit crazy
And you definitely don't want them as an _unelected_ committee member with authority to decide the direction of your children's educational future.
> You signal your intelligence when you show blatant disregard for the rules/law...There are so many reasons why people do this (not knowing any better/not believing they work comes from lack of education), but it all stems from lack of intelligence (in my opinion)

Coming from a country which had low enforcement of laws even before the pandemic(one of the reasons why it's still under "developing" category instead of "developed"), I doubt the disregard of law is due to lack of intelligence. On the contrary, the more intelligent/shrewd someone is, higher is their chance to get away disregarding the law(in these places). They are more selfish than stupid.
I don't think that addresses the problems sufficiently.

Official government statements should come through more secure channels than a privately owned and operated web site that arguably resembles a 21st century tabloid where people's accounts are regularly hacked or otherwise taken over, and both censorship and access are arbitrary and unregulated.

Just today we have an example of a C-SPAN political editor admitting to having lied about their Twitter account being hacked to abdicate responsibility for comments they made on the platform [0].

Such claims would not only be unbelievable coming from secure government owned and operated channels, but would be damming to the administration should they honestly occur, incentivizing running such services properly without such vulnerabilities and with an immutable audit trail.

Furthermore, if a .gov provided forums for open public discussion in response to official statements, they would actually be protected under the 1st amendment. Unlike on private platforms like Twitter, where arbitrary censorship and blocking of discussion/access is perfectly legal.

All of this junk occurring on private websites like Twitter/FB is completely misguided and a tremendous disservice to the American public.

[0] https://www.cnn.com/2020/10/15/media/steve-scully-cspan-susp...
This reminds me of the story Lorenzo Hagerty[1] of the Psychedelic Salon[2] likes to tell of the first time he took MDMA at the Starck Club:

"I walked in as an Irish, Catholic, Republican lawyer. I walked out still Irish, but everything else was gone."

[1] - For example, at about 18 minutes in to his interview here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-YRzu8ar1ew

[2] - https://psychedelicsalon.com/
Freedom of speech has always meant the idea that different points of view should be aired, not suppressed, and that people should decide for themselves what is right or what is correct, rather than authorities deciding for them.

A society where "wrong" points of view are thoroughly suppressed by giant social media companies or angry mobs (or angry mobs on social media) might not violate the literal text of the First Amendment, but it lacks the spirit of free speech that inspired the First Amendment in the first place.

What I find most disappointing is not that Facebook is censoring QAnon (or whatever), but that the popular sentiment is they should be. That's a big change from the culture I grew up in, and not for the better.
The prequels were perhaps less entertaining than the original three (although I really feel this depends on one's age at first viewing), but when considered carefully they rhymed beautifully, and said something deep about contemporary society as well. It helps to consider the fact that the "good guys" in the prequels are the "bad guys" in IV-VI. Then compare Luke to Anakin. Lucas tried something audacious, and it worked magnificently, and maybe a dozen people understood it. Then he could sell the whole mess to Disney with a clear conscience.

http://www.starwarsringtheory.com/
There was some nonsense about "Happy Birthday" being copyrighted.. maybe it's a holdover from that?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Happy_Birthday_to_You#Copyrigh...
In summary, the pragmatic view. Learn when to say good enough, but only say it when it is true.
But what about a control experiment? How about letting the PdAg sit in a vacuum for the same amount of time under similar conditions and see what develops? How do they rule out contamination, such as by cosmic rays?
Twitter doth protest too much, methinks.
Or rather, who are you going to entrust with the task?
The same educational establishment that produced the
current populace?T

Ideally, education teaches critical thinking, not a specific indoctrination.

Education, obviously, often falls short of this ideal and you don't necessarily need formal education to be a critical thinker.

I do think that's pretty achievable. When I went through school in the 80s and 90s we weren't exactly devoid of this sort of thing.

Absurd ideas like chemtrails and flat-eartherism don't last very long in the face of the slightest hint of critical thinking.

But even if you can produce your more educated populace,
you still have the problem that the Russian trolls aren't
going to stand still. They're going to be better, too, by
then.

I certainly don't disagree, but doing a better job of critical thinking certainly seems like a reasonable first step no matter what else we do.
As a former New Yorker the thing I can't wrap my head around is how the Post ("Headless Body in Topless Bar") is now apparently being referred to as a respectable publication.
This is very much a #TIL.

There's a rather jumbled Wikipedia article as well:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manfred_Max-Neef's_Fundamental...
No one says anyone has a right to be listened to. The right to free speech does not guarantee a right to an audience.
you're wrong.
Give me a pill that increases my IQ and I wouldn't care even if it changes my gender.
Sounds like shit.
I thought there is no Red Hat anymore.
Hold your finger on the image in chrome and in the pop-up menu there's 'search with google lens'. On https://www.google.com/imghp?hl=EN if you request a desktop site there's an upload capability as well...
Another fictional investigation of bicameral minds are two novels in the Firefall series by Peter Watts.
Parties would realign to more evenly split the electorate. Wyoming would still count.
For context I am a developer in the Silicon Valley. The more I see around me and our nation at large, the more I am forming the opinion that greed is THE defining attribute of our time. The way the economy and society is structured, there is absolutely no breathing room left for anyone to perform any activity except to exist in the service of a paycheck. Why? because of greed. Because of greed and the blindness it brings with it, any attempts to build even a slightly more benign economic arrangement gets immediately labeled as "socialist" or some such. Not to mention the absolute beating our natural environment and habitat is taking in the process of servicing this greed to accumulate as much as you possibly can.
It's sad that mainstream media outlets even get away with slander in politics. Everything is twisted either to fit their views or just to make outlandish headlines to get clicks.