skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Let others evaluate the language for you.

Unless a feature of the language is game-changing for you. This might mean it solves a problem that would be very hard to solve otherwise or it might mean it looks very interesting to you.

Which I think is good advice with anything that requires you to be an early adoptor.
"That government is best which governs least." -- Thomas Jefferson

But I tend to concern myself more with de facto than de jure stuff. People tend to do what they can, in fact, do regardless of the rules

Eclogiselle.com already has Creative Commons maps and free flyers that can be used by anyone right now without paying me a dime. That puts completely free resources into the hands of small communities if they see value in them.

I hope to make money providing custom maps and similar services for people who can come up with a few hundred dollars but cannot come up with a few thousand. But I am also happy to see this supported via Patreon and tips by people who believe something like this should exist so small communities have some tools available to them, no matter their budget.
The first rounds you were going for new graduate positions, they were looking at your side projects because juniors don't have anything to show, and they saw something in yourself, a cheap youngster willing to work hard probably like they were at your age. (You're right that 27s was not fresh out of university but it was 20s nonetheless and you were treated as a junior / new graduate)

The later rounds you are going for experienced positions, they have much higher expectations. They want to see successful experiences at previous companies, building things (preferably the same thing they are doing), working with coworkers, delivering in a more-or-less corporate environment. It's completely different expectations. A side project is out of touch at best.
Do Babies Need to Eat Meat?
Care to elaborate on the limits you hit?
The circumstantial evidence of HCQ being positive is substantial, and at least some of the complaints against it are politically motivated. Although how being hopeful about a COVID treatment became a pro-Trump political stance is beyond me.

They can wait until the scientific evidence is overwhelming. No hurry, there are a lot of studies starting to come due. Bodies are complex and maybe something is going on that hasn't been thought of yet.

EDIT Thanks swebs for the HCL->HCQ correction.
For a long time, "AI" meant "unsolved hard problem" to hackers like us. Speech synthesis and recognition was AI. Text recognition was AI. Some compiler optimization was AI. Search was AI. Now, those things are, well, those things. They work.

Things are a little different now. The feasibility of neural networks trained up on vast data sets means we have non-human systems with hunches. That is, we have AIs capable of delivering results without explanations.

Take a look at Neal Stephenson's recent "Fall" for a social network that uses AI to generate "news" stories where the training metric is engagement. The consequence is the construction of an alternate social universe, and the kind of dystopia only Stephenson can dream up. https://www.worldcat.org/title/fall-or-dodge-in-hell/oclc/11...

Human hunches are often accompanied by a sense of ethics. The agricultural savant who sexes hatchling baby chickens knows the success of the farm depends on a low error rate. The judge sentencing a culprit knows the consequence of making mistakes.

I wonder how hard it would be to add a sense of ethics to neural network results? Maybe it's just a matter of managing the error rates. But this article suggests otherwise.
Apple: Designing the A14 Bionic
Where would anyone get the idea that a columnist shouldn't criticize other writers at a paper? Everyone who works there is supposed to have the same ideas about everything?
There's some phone manufacturers that optimize for battery capacity and / or sturdiness; CAT has lent their brand to stupidly sturdy phones that can be yote freely (https://www.catphones.com/).
>> Does someone have a good explanation/intuition for why you cannot exploit quantum entanglement to send information faster than light?

Because physicists can not tell the difference between a particle whose "wave function collapsed" and one that didn't.

The faster than light communication would be equivalent to modulating the collapsedness of a stream of particles by measuring-or-not their entangled counterparts. Since the is no discernable difference between particles pre and post collapse, no information can be transmitted.
They're just being flippant in choice of language. You don't need to be so defensive by identifying so closely with your gender here.

This article is specifically how these women got swindled out of the prestige they should have got and how gender stereotypes pushed women out of the workforce after the war. All the men we're mad at here are effectively retired or dead so there's no need to identify with them because its unlikely you'd actually relate directly to their world view because they're mostly pre-boomers.
You don't think we need to change ethernet so much as to augment it with a co-processor that handles the "bus" aspect such as detecting when devices are plugged/unplugged and interrupt handling. Ethernet is just another serial port with higher level mechanisms which handles framing of the data. We just need a little more brains to handle the bus aspect and a simple protocol to talk to devices with as little overhead as possible.
I'm taking "Introduction to Operating Systems" on Udacity. Lectures are good, but I wish there would be more hands-on with real-world examples. So far it's just theory.
You can still make mexican pizza, you just need to believe it.
MusicNet (2016)
Or Colemak for that matter
The More Gender Equality, the Fewer Women in STEM

https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2018/02/the-more...
IANAL, but I don't think AGPL or GPL are that viral. Companies of course are often conservative and they prefer not to touch GPLv3 or AGPL software at all.
The advocates of "defunding" the police should consider the consequences. Even when funding is not drastically reduced, the defunding rhetoric demoralizes the police and encourages criminals.

Quoting the article:

'But some residents think the council’s rhetoric was enough to embolden criminals throughout the city.

“Through ongoing irresponsible rhetoric, City Council members, you have endangered us, our homes and our businesses. Brazen criminals now lurk in broad daylight knowing that the City Council, the city’s own leadership, through its anti-law enforcement and anti-safety rhetoric, is giving them opportunities to terrorize the community with more ease than at any time before,” an immigrant who has lived in Minneapolis for 16 years told the council last week.'
I believe that's the initial, scribbled signature of homo sapiens and post-modernism. We're past survival and aware enough to know something is up, but highly susceptible
to our instincts and especially to control by others.

While we could survive with so little work, others keep us in artifical scarcity to elevate their quality of life and protect themselves from people more predatory than them.
The best tutorials I've seen for both Flexbox and Grid are from Kyle at Webdev Simplified. Seriously check out this dude's channel. He explains everything perfectly.

Flexbox: https://youtu.be/fYq5PXgSsbE

Grid: https://youtu.be/9zBsdzdE4sM
Automation certainly doesn’t hollow out the “economy” but it certainly can contribute to wealth inequality by reducing the number of employed humans required to generate value. At the extreme it could permanently upend the concept of full employment in the economy.
If you want to consider the scope of agpl you first step is to consider the potential boundaries of a single work that are used over a computer network.

Take HN as a website. Should every resource be seen as a seperate work or should a whole page be seen as one work. Is every sub page a separate creative work, or part of a work called HN. Is the search button, which is actually on its own seperate domain name part of the HN website? From there we can move forward like talking about middle layer and db layers and ask if those are part of HN or simply aspects which HN communicates with. Is the loadbalancer, database server, web cache, and so on part of the creative work called HN?

Personally I would draw the line to be similar to traditional web development with presentation, logic and db abstraction defining the work in terms of a website, and everything around that being simply other works which the website communicates with. That however depend on the website being a classic website, rather than say an webified version of an application. A game, an office suit, a email client, all those might have a very different scope and what defines a game as a single work may be quite different from a website that display news items with comment threads.

> if Microsoft developers use network disks to access my software are they screwed?

That condition says that the terms of AGPL goes into effect if a use access a "derivative work" over the network. Microsoft using network disks internally does not matter, as that scenario does not have a defined user. If a user download a program over NFS then technically that is over a network but both AGPL and GPL would consider that "copying" in traditional sense.
Flexbox has been useful, but for me has essentially been superseded by css grid, pretty much for the reasons you mention. I find flexbox to be difficult to use and feels more like a stopgap feature on the way to full blown grids than anything long lasting. I wish subgrids would become standard, but regardless we're in a much better place these days vis-à-vis css layouts than we were pre-grid.
> ... imagined injustice

And that's why you've been downvoted. While you started with what appears to be a legitimate question, you devolved into not only appearing to have avoided reading the article, but also not having empathy for the subject of the article.

The injustice is the complete lack of acknowledgement, for decades, of those who 'coded the software' of the machine. The seemingly willful ignorance of the bosses who ran the project and the media who covered it.

Take exception to the terminology in the heading if you like. Make a good argument that it's not productive. But at least have the ability to acknowledge the content of the article.
> I hate to be that guy, but most ML is definitely not linear algebra...

Yes, I'm not disagreeing with any of that (see also my other reply), it was a misuse of terminology on my part.

> But mostly I agree with you: modeling is horse shit, worshipping models...

Absolutely. The way I see it is that models are like theorems: they are useful and worthy of being studied, but if you forget to validate that your hypotheses are correct, you get wrong results: garbage in, garbage out.

An alarming amount of stuff these days is the equivalent of people trying to apply the pythagorean theorem to a non-rectangle triangle and then complaining the results don't match.
Neutral: Live carbon neutral and create a better future
> Must be an old article

There's a pretty big date right at the top of the page.
I'm really happy to see my favorite license get more and more widespread usage! There's already quite a few "famous" free software packages using this license. Go, AGPL!
sorry, I misremembered, I used a Z-order path in the end:

https://github.com/nraynaud/webgcode/blob/gh-pages/webapp/cn...

I guess I decided that some order was better than random.
I commented on this before, but I would love to have an ALGPL license for the libraries. Has limited scope but still applies to SaaS usage.

Also, for the record: if you _are_ considering LGPL, you should consider EPL or MPL license instead. The reason is that Apache Foundation and Eclipse Foundation are not happy to allow LGPL dependencies in their projects, while EPL and MPL are also copyleft with a limited scope just like LGPL.
> You don't need to be so defensive by identifying so closely with your gender here.

This comment is a bit hostile. They are simply applying the same standard to both sexes.
Your workforce is going to reflect your hiring pool and pipelines

Prior to the advent of readily available digital electronics to do the job arithmetic and number crunching was considered secretarial work and the field was dominated by women. This was the talent pool from which many early computer programmers were hired since they already knew the math and the business logic. They learned programming and worked in punch-cards instead of spreadsheets

As computer programming transitioned into a more engineering type profession it drew on more engineering type talent pools and hiring pipelines which were (and still are) more male.

So the question should really be why did computing become more of an engineering type profession.
History is horrifying.

Maybe they should start a female only Nobel prize kind of like they have female sports?
Many companies make a business out of selling libraries, just saying.
Pathologization of masculinity is an exclusive phenomenon that revolutionaries carry in the Western World. All the answers to that can be found in the movements that came out of the Frankfurt School.
Same wackos got us WikiLeaks when these very papers were promoting WMD. Result a million brown people dead.
Cool, just yesterday my son tried a little bit of coding and was disappointed that the micro:bit had no speaker. So this upgrade is very welcome.
We still use it in tech to loosely describe programmers that don't genuinely have a love or deep understanding of the craft.
In Eastern Europe lots of engineers are women still, especially in CS.

In Western Europe, where I live now, you need to look hard to find women on engineering campuses, and when you do, they're usually from abroad.
If this is triggering Poe’s Law, then what is the opposite end of the belief spectrum? My brother runs a company that will hire literally anybody. The interview is orientation. 80% can’t do the job and quit.

Side note: 10 minutes of pure fast typing sounds disastrously long for a simple brute-force algorithm question.
One can only wonder how much the economic damage is from such small annoyances.

I always have to check under the D for Dutch, N for Netherlands, and T for The when filling in my nationality or my postal address on an international form. Its a minor annoyance till you encounter very important forms without an easy way to scroll or some other broken UI making input hard.
> just looking at them in the raw HTML document, they make it obvious how the page is going to be presented in the end

I guess you can say the same thing about the infamous <FONT> tag. But if you want styling information directly in the HTML, you can still do it with the "style"-attribute, using marginally more syntax. e.g. <div style="display:table"> or <div style="display:flex; flex-direction:row"> instead of table <table> where html table semantics are not appropriate.

I do find flexbox a much nicer model than tables, but I guess that comes down to taste. A flex is basically like a table with either a single column or a single row, and a bit more fine-grained control.
Agree.

Grid is great for 2D layouts especially if you're going to shift stuff around (e.g. responsive versions of the layout).

With Flexbox, you can sorta do it but it always feels way too hard, even if your layout is convenient enough to be able to use the order rule.
Edge Not Found is such a good idea. I love it! A full fledged unique puzzle game could probably be built around this concept if the authors wanted to expand on it - although I'm probably stating the obvious. Pretty sure Hollow Knight has its origins in a game jam and it would be nice if this competition yielded a success like that. (mostly because I want to play more of it)
This.

I used K8s and serverless tech and while serverless wasn't as simple as some evangelists try to sell it, it was at least a magnitude simpler than K8s.

Even managed K8s, which removed most of the admin plane work with nodes, was still significantly more work to get up and running.
Not all US citizens are complaining about them, just those who don’t understand what they are and what they’re used for.
Without non-linearity you are mathematically provable not able to get solutions for most contemporary problems.

Refusing the general AI hype bullshit and over-simplifying the hard foundations are quite different things, IMO.
Also, with all the negative media which Facebook is getting these days, it would attract more psychopaths. Psychopaths want to control people, so Facebook is the perfect company where they can realize their ambitions.
Casual reminder that if you intend to support IE11(say for business use), Grid is completely unsupported.

Flex isn’t too bad and honestly really unlocks awesome abilities after you get used to it. Once you know flex, you can do the infamous “how to vertically center anything” move pretty easy.

Also, using order with flex is awesome. If you are using Bootstrap 4+ you can very easily use most flex properties responsively to do some crazy transforming layouts as well.
> One downside they don't mention is that the license restricts who can contribute to your project.

In that case Google's policy is what is restricting you, not the license. The AGPL doesn't say you can't contribute if you work for Google. I'm sure AGPL users (like the company in TFA) wouldn't mind if Google reversed their policy and gave their employees permission to contribute.
Multiple generations of men were lost in WW2 in USSR. Higher education was one of very few ways to legally move to cities. On top of that, USSR had quite harsh maternity policies. Sustaining family on a single salary was not an option. Thus women had no choice but work.
The Internet Of Today is filled with scam due to the world pandemic, the rich are getting richer and you have to follow Quality job assurance, These hackers have helped Individuals Organization to Secure and to Recover their lost files/Password/ funds etc. They Are Hackers for Hire. I am saying leave your problem & your Worries for them to solve for you 100%guarantee* iOS/windows/iPhone/Android Phone Hacking
* loans
University Grades
Iclouds breaching
Criminal Records
Hacking ATM/Credit Cards
Binary Recoveries
BTC Mining
* Cyber Scam recovery
Etc…!
Email:scottfranklin800@gmail.com

text/whatsapp:571 318 9498
From an economic perspective that's not really the issue, it's the facilities, employment, skills and access to technology that governments mainly care about. Who the owner is only really matters to the extent that it influences those facts on the ground. Any owner could move the company's operations, no matter what their nationality.
At Google, MPL (and other copyleft licenses) are OK for internal use and for external contributions.

I think we have a mirroring system setup to automatically publish any internal changes.

Edit: See https://opensource.google/docs/thirdparty/licenses/#reciproc... for the public info about mirroring.
> I've had to remove AGPL from consideration. This is because I want companies to be able to use the software for their internal use but not be able to create a user-facing product out of it.

That's the whole point of the AGPL, isn't it? This license solves exactly the problem that you want to solve. They can use your AGPL software internally as much as they want, without restrictions. But if they create a user-facing product out of it, they must make their modifications available to everybody under the same terms.

(EDIT: changed you/they on the second paragraph)
There's evidence that deliveries of urns to cemeteries was substantially higher than reported death counts [1], as well as gigantic drops in active subscriber counts in China's telecom providers [2].

I also vehemently disagree "the evidence would be clearly visible". History is littered with genocides on a massive scale that were successfully covered up. We still don't know exactly how many people died in the Holocaust or Holodomor, for example (estimates vary by millions). So this claim that you cannot cover up deaths is clearly false.

It's also very likely the US is over-reporting numbers.

For example, studies have shown US death certificates have "major errors" the majority of the time [3], and several US states have counted unrelated deaths as "COVID" deaths, including Washington State (later partially corrected) [4].

I also disagree with your claim that evidence of China's data manipulation does not count because it's 'six months old', you can't wave away evidence like that.

[1] https://nationalpost.com/news/world/lines-of-urns-in-wuhan-p...

[2] https://www.developingtelecoms.com/telecom-business/operator...

[3] https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/investigations/2020/04/2...

[4] https://www.doh.wa.gov/Portals/1/Documents/1600/coronavirus/...
> This comment is a bit hostile

As is getting riled by the choice of language in the way that commenter did. There's no need for that shit.

> They are simply applying the same standard to both sexes.

No they're not, they're just taking sides because they share characteristics with what they perceive to be the slighted party here. Its likely they're projecting anger they have about gender issues elsewhere to the discussion of this article. They're being off-topic by doing so.

I'd wager that they didn't even read the article.
> everything will feel local.

Not in what concerns graphics rendering performance.
At Google (and most big companies, I believe), the rules apply to all work, not just working hours.

Joel Spolsky has a good article explaining the rationale:

https://www.joelonsoftware.com/2016/12/09/developers-side-pr...
If you read the article carefully, it leaves the two options open, refusing to conclude, with a preference towards a natural mutation. BTW the virus may have jumped from animals to humans inside the lab itself. What is BS is "mutations occur in the wild permanently, so that's the most likely hypothesis". In this particular case, that's unfounded and specifically what I am challenging.
Startup Is Vision (2011)
So me and my friend are continuously getting those envelopes. I am opening all the envelops one after another and found that they are distributed 50/50 to red/blue.

Same if my friend is opening the envelops.

Now for all the opened envelops if I have got 10 red balls. Now if my friend open the paired envelops, he will probably get 7 blue and 3 red.

My observation of the balls had an effect on his side and shifted probabilities on his side.

If that's what you mean, what does observation or measuring even mean? How do the balls know the envelop has been opened.
yes, for one thing German companies can and do purchase and operate US subsidiaries without much government interference, unlike in China
- C++

- Advanced linear algebra

- Differential equations

- How to work on a complex system with a large codebase

For the first three at least there are plenty of books and courses online.
That's a very common rule of thumb.

Where I struggle is that grid can do most of what flexbox does in 1d but ... generally simpler if you're relying on breakpoints to change your layout.
> So how can a corporation commercialize a FOSS project without open sourcing their modified code? They can purchase a commercial license to remove the copyleft restrictions and in that way support the original project.

Looks like they are doing something like dual license? Can the company comment and clear this up?
Nvidia Previews Ampere Kicker to Turing GPU Accelerator
Isn't this a competitor with the Raspberry PI - who had the same goals? And this was sponsored by the BBC (i.e. via licence payers money). And free devices given to children.
Shoudln't the BBC worked with the Raspberry PI foundation (charity) and given Raspberry Pis to children? Also the investment spent in making the PI not 'overwhelming' - which my 9 year old says it isn't (btw).
I just had to fix a bunch of css yesterday because someone forgot we still need to support IE11! For the exact same issue!