skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It's also often presented as if it is representative. See the various people-on-the-street 'interviews' of people with opposing viewpoints being argued with by the interviewer who clearly came armed for an ambush.
Yeah, I was probably a bit spoiled at the time. I was at startups that leveraged AWS in the early days and their reps and support people were at least somewhat accessible but at the very least knowledgeable. That flew in complete contrast to my experience with GCP.
I'm surprised Outlook held up. In my experience the program starts crapping itself after the first 3-4GiB of emails, and it only gets worse after that. I wouldn't rely on the file remaining intact for long with such a setup...
A lot of people on this site still use the original iPhone SE. As you mention, replacing the battery is usually all an iPhone requires.
It seems extremely likely that the market cap of Tesla is larger than the market cap of all jetpack companies combined. In any case you assume that any such CEO is concerned with the fate of other companies in the same space, an assumption for which the proof is extremely lacking.
Is there a way to use this with MacBook Pro without having to invest in an expensive HDMI capture card? The cheapest (reputable) HDMI cards I can find are around $100, many are much more expensive, and they often have features I don't need. I just want a straight HDMI to USB-C.
Hopefully the next revolution is rediscovering the wonders of dynamic linking.
I doubt it. I think most everyone using social media has shined a spotlight on it though.
Not really. I think most people take a glance "Biden, Hunter, Burisma" and tune out -- they decided long ago what they think of the matter.

The only news here is Twitter/FB's policies -- which is what people are actually discussing.

So, respectfully, I don't think this is the Streisand effect at all in this case.
I wish we'd just try to do better. It won't be perfect, and it'll probably never even be good. The worldview that espouses an inevitable loss of the products of human toil fills me with crushing sadness. Why bother doing anything then?
Call option 101:
A call option is basically a right (not an obligation) to buy a specific stock at a specific price (strike price) some time in the future. Loss is limited to the premium paid for option and gains are basically unlimited.

If for instance I buy a 2-week NFLX Call option at a $2 premium with a strike price of $545, and in two weeks the price of NFLX is trading at $560 then I would exercise my option to buy 100 NFLX stock at $545 and could immediately sell it for a profit at the market price $560.

A lot of times also, speculators never exercise the option and just close the position by making the opposite bet. (i.e. sell the call option to another investor/speculator rather than buy 100 stock at the strike price)

Thoughts:
I think this guy is making a fight against times as well as believing a fallacy that the stock-market 100% correlates with fundamental analysis of the underlying company. Yes P/E is high for many companies, and I have heard of a current "tech-bubble" but who knows. How much is "too much"? No one really does. Bet on the total markets long term and you'll probably be ok. Also buy BTC
I would not under estimate the value of a shared "life culture", and not just "work culture" as expectations don't always line up with reality when having an office in a truly different culture. Sometimes it is amazing, other times it is a difficult situation from my experience.
I've Been in a Midle of a Fire
After enough flight testing, done solely by the aircraft builder/owner.
Some amazing advice I have to say.
Sorry, should have included /s

I thought it would be implied since GP was not serious either.
There's no evidence that it was a military aircraft. Based on the IDAHO call sign, it was probably police, or maybe feds.
I don't think it's comparable. If social network is the new newspaper, everyone is free to create your own newspaper. That's why I'll always defend net neutrality. But forcing a private institution to adopt a specific editorial stance, THAT'S anti-freedom. In general, we should work to promote alternative platforms, not to force the existing ones to promote what we believe is right.
I think this is the ticket.

There's often only one way to be right.

There's an infinite number of ways to be wrong
It's not a great comparison because both entities are regulated completely different based on what they allow on their platform/paper with exceptions to certain things. That's where people are getting confused. If you curate the news, you can be held liable for things published, if you don't you are allowed a pass (with some exceptions.) By stepping in actively censor a news story that has yet to be disputed, social media platforms have opened themselves up to being held liable for -all- posts.
The Reserve Banks of the world are making people dumber by aiming for full employment... This means stimulating the economy and giving companies an incentive to create jobs which don't need to exist... Because the jobs are useless, people start to focus on increasingly menial and tedious tasks and lose their sense of pragmatism. We've all seen meetings going around in circles for hours, people arguing about tedium, coming up with bureaucratic procedures, adopting bureaucratic workflows, etc...

Most people have a deeply held trust in authority and so they tend to think the problem lies within themselves rather than something wrong in their environment and so they dumb themselves down in order to normalize their situation...

In order to cope with their environment, they convince themselves that what they're doing is useful and, in doing so, they start to neglect their own common sense and they gradually lose it.
It's more of an attempt at a steelman. Just for the record, I don't like the current centralized internet; I've all but deactivated my facebook account; when a site requires a Google or Facebook verified login ID without their own "create account" option I avoid them at all costs; I avoid Paypal now because there are better alternatives (but in the early '00s, I would not have trusted most sites enough to pay with a card). And so on. I'm not trying to advocate for their position, but just understand the problems that they solve and why we got here.

And while I hate using recaptcha, I also had the even more unpleasant experience of watching a forum that I moderated die under a crushing assault of spam bots that were smart enough to make it past the built-in CAPTCHA. Recaptcha isn't there to solve problems for the people who interact with it, it's solving problems for the people who chose to put it on their site.

I wrote in a sibling comment what value Facebook's login brings to the sites that opt into it. (Offload all the work of password handling, claims about stolen accounts, preventing sockpuppetry and catfishing, etc).
I am the same age as you and agree with you, but don't plan on dying on any hill: the high ground is a strategically superior position so we should win.
Download: Pixel Launcher from the Google Pixel 5 adds grid size options
That isn’t a credible argument. Why would Hunter Biden, whose dad is running for President, leave his laptop at a Trump-supporting discount computer repair shop without paying with (supposedly) incriminating emails on it? It’s so convoluted... it only makes sense if you wanted to fabricate cover for illegally hacking someone’s data (or more likely, modified and/or falsified data) and releasing it. As it is, the computer repair shop doesn’t own copyright of the PII and has no right to release it.
Suppressing in direct messages is pretty different.

A lot of people I know use twitter DMs as a primary communication method for people in their own families, even inside the same household. Twitter filtering communication between family members in your home is ... well ... a perfect excuse for me to strongly encourage them to stop using twitter.
You don't have the freedom to choose OSS in terms of implementation, and haven't for more than a decade.

You do have the freedom to choose OSS the API. Some programmers even think that it's a better API (they're wrong, but what can you do?).

I wasn't thinking at all about user-visible things that Haiku "dictates", but internal design patterns. Most of them are great, and most of them exist on Linux too (but alongside a bunch of alternatives, hence the "problems", such as they are).
I love the possibility of chatting, but the chat bubbles are a bad user experience everywhere. The best solutions I've seen just opens a small popup window with the chat inside, and that's it. Native cross-tab-chat, can easily keep an eye on the chat while doing other things, etc.
Yeah. There was a significantly higher ratio of moderators to users back then and the way I remember it is that toxic people were banned and no one batted an eye.

Now it seems like half the internet is comprised of toxic people.

The “communities” are also huge and generic rather than smaller and topical. Back in the 90s/2000s moderators were usually enthusiasts with domain knowledge and insisting people stay on topic was a pretty solid moderation tool since the moderators’ on topic opinions usually had more value than some random troll.
Stupidity? Alternative wisdom I would rather say...
I've been thinking the exact same thing.
I especially like how I'm guilty of an ad-hominem fallacy, while the person calling their opponents "con artists" while citing no evidence whatsoever wasn't.

Re-examine your own biases, then post.
People have gotten stupider because the world is too complex (and fundamentally impossible) to understand in a completely rational way. Historically we have relied upon intuition, heuristics, and a network of trusted authority figures (usually a network of trusted institutions).

The modern condition (post Enlightenment) can be understood as the elevation of rationality over all else and hostility towards heuristics and intuition. Heuristics and intuition come from listening to your grandmother and from sources like the Bible and old folktales.

Furthermore the networks of trust and the institutions are completely and utterly corrupt, inhabited and headed by the worst (morally speaking) and dumbest people (intellectually speaking) in society. Think Harvard and The New York Times.

The typical modern person (including the vast majority of people on HN) are almost completely hopeless when it comes to what we would traditionally define as "not being stupid" (aka "not being a sucker").

In your own life if you think of the stupidest people you know they tend to be the most "intelligent" (software engineers, PHDs, doctors, lawyers, etc). That's modernity.
I suspect 3 and 10 - the internet is more accessible to the masses and rather than becoming smarter when information was more available they mept their same patterns and they communicate more over it which makes it easier to notice when they were confined to say doing stupid stunts or staging innane protests for stupid causes. Remember when Jackass and Reality TV were considered the downfall of civilization? (Although there some may half-seriously blame Trump on the latter it is a matter of debate of how much he is considered a symptom vs a problem in himself.)
I am not sure.

But when I look at something like this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3wfNl2L0Gf8
(Chomsky and Foucault debating at human nature)

I tend to think that current (public) thinkers are not as good as they were.
Being unintelligent used to be something to be ashamed of in polite society. Society is becoming less polite.

This cycle has repeated throughout history. There's even a name for it.

The infliction point is when it becomes more advantageous - or even necessary for survival - to self censor.

Have you felt in recent years less and less inclined to argue with people? That is intellectualism being driven out of public discourse.
CUT TO: Stallman standing on a rooftop, brooding. His hands at his hips. His cape flutters in the chilly evening wind.

"In your darkest hour, when the demons come, call on me brother, and we will fight them together!"
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/leading-causes-of-death.htm

Wear your mask, wear your seatbelt, get exercise and don't do drugs.
Same here, and they owe me quite some money. They absolutely know it because they then had the audacity to send to my physical address a voucher for adsense after banning me for allegedly clicking on ads, which I never did.

Now every time I have the opportunity to make a case against using any Google service in a business I'm working in... and I worked in a few big Telecom and IT businesses for the past 15 years, like the first internet provider in my country.
Instead of writing 1 + 2 as in mathematics, in Lisp you write (+ 1 2). I'm not sure I get the second statement of yours, but personally I find Clojure in particular very inspiring and amazing, if only it had a better syntax...
Infinitely running jobs, highly reliable application level orchestration
Adobe Creative Cloud is probably the worst sync software I ever encountered. On Mac and on Windows. It's probably even way worse than a one week demo with Windows Cloud Sync Engines. Most Adobe products are crap, slow and have tons of bugs. Their specification around pdf is so complex that even adobe reader does things differently than the spec.
Do you know much about IPFS? It's top of class for distributed storage.

I'm interested to know what you think is a better value proposition?
Same story with IBM OpenShift and their telemetry.
New species of water bear uses fluorescent ‘shield’ to survive UV radiation
Given that Google Fi support is being moved from Hangouts to Messages by Google, and Messages doesn't exist for iOS... Does this mean that Google Fi for iPhones is officially discontinued? Or did Google just forget about that use case?
how do you write a post on this without mentioning the flynn effect
Great article!Did you do any work on the network for your homelab?
I suggest checking out some of this blogger's other posts, or his book "How to Industrialize Mars: A Strategy for Self-Sufficiency".

Here's a good post on what's worth producing in situ, and what's worth importing from Earth over time.

https://caseyhandmer.wordpress.com/2020/08/23/progression-of...
>And in 2030, I'd be happy to pay Apple the incremental extra $ for the guilt free experience.

Gosh you really belief in that right?
Is it “free speech” to deliberately create a misleading story/propaganda for your advantage, then spend money on fake accounts to astroturf your propaganda and give it fake credibility on third party corporate services? — That sounds beyond the intent of “free speech” to me.

BTW, I use to run “blue ribbon campaign” banners on my 90s era webpages. So I understand where you’re coming from.
How little infrastructure works they have if they had to pay for it to be 1000x overbuilt?
Verizon only got two-thirds as much time as AT&T did for the iPhone launch — 4 minutes instead of 6 minutes.

MacWorld keynote, 2007, the CEO of Cingular is given the stage at 78m23s, in front of a giant Cingular logo. He leaves the stage at 84m23s, in front of a pair of Cingular and AT&T logos. So that's precisely 6 minutes on stage, out of precisely 80 minutes total.

In the 71-minute iPhone 12 keynote, the CEO of Verizon is brought on stage at 15m55s, and speaks until Tim boots him at 19m55s. So that's precisely 4 minutes on stage. Additionally, millimeter-wave 5G is given airtime, but says Verizon's product title for that a total of 5 seconds only.

ps. All iPhones offer carrier branding in the top-left corner of the screen when cellular service is active and control center is open (non-notch phones may not need to open control center).
Illegal? Unlikely. A bad business move? Definitively.

As far as I know, the reason no company divulges information like this is to stop the endless protests and appeals from people. Dealing with people who believe they've done nothing wrong even though they have is tiresome and expensive and the more information you give them, the more ammunition they have to protest.

The result is innocent people like (presumably) OP's husband getting shafted by a short email without any details, but it's finanicially unattractive to change the system so without court or legislative action I doubt Google will improve their services any time soon.
Intel to Amp Up Security with “Ice Lake” Xeon SP Servers
Yes. My reasoning is this:

The social media, centralized internet and content control on platforms are turning people into sheep. What we are doing is enforcing moral censorship and allowing bots to retweet echo chambers, what you end up with is people believing what they want to. Stupidity will prevail at that rate.
4.2 in SF location. So this is very good info. That's the baseline. Below 4.2 => DO NOT CONSIDER.

I know on ebay and amazon I do not buy from sellers under 99.6%, as an absolute minimum.

It's ok for the system to be gamed, as long as one can understand the rules.
The war on free speech continues apace. As ever, if there's anything both parties agree on it's screwing the public.

Even Trump and Biden are united in gutting the one law, that is uniquely responsible for the proliferation of the open internet.
Same experience, we spend less than 10k on Azure. The customer service people have been phenomenal. Though they need to move to some modern ticketing system.
No, I'm not confused. Police has been of great help in my community. They are kind. They take crimes seriously. They are friendly to kids in school. I shouldn't need to mention this as it goes without saying, but whatever: they are kind and friendly to kids of all colors in my community.

And dictatorship in what way? You mean that the president repeatedly asked mayors and governors to ask for national guard, as required by law, but couldn't do anything because they said no? You mean the president has no power over state or city jurisdiction so he could only yell on Twitter for opening the cities -- pathetic in a way. You mean the president has no authority to ban critical race theory so all he could do is to ban them in federal agencies, again under his full authority? You mean the president has no power over media so all he could do is to call them fake news? Or you mean that the first thing that Hitler did to gain power is to disband the police, just like many of our justice fighters have been demanding?
No.

But I do believe the number of people who go around thinking everyone else is stupid is going up.
I missed this!

Perhaps you are correct. But I know where I live (Pittsburgh), if I put soiled and nasty cardboard in the trash, Pittsburgh’s sanitation people will take the cardboard out and leave it for the recycling route.

Sometimes the recycling driver notices its not “clean”, and leaves it for next weeks’ trash route.

<Cue Zaney Movie Theme>
Compiling Rust for Raspberry Pi ARM
Probably for the same reason that people who've never driven before are allowed to drive on public roads. The added danger isn't that high
It should be the hill that civilization dies on, because without free speech there is no civilization. Without free speech corruption will grow and societies will decay because there is nothing to stop the rot before it spreads.
Team to Go [audio]
Obligatory share: [0] An interesting story onboard an SR-71 Blackbird

[0](https://theaviationgeekclub.com/sr-71-blackbird-pilot-tells-...)
I'm running k3s in production. K3s has hooks to setup Prometheus, autoscaling (for spot instances), etc.

I don't see all of these in microk8s. I'm not sure if this is on the roadmap.

I'm also not sure how customisable microk8s is. We run k3s with haproxy ingress (which is not the default) and calico for network (again nog the default)
> As I watch another flat earth debunking video suggested by youtube to have a laugh I'm wondering ... Am I the part of the problem?

I feel the same way. It seems sites like reddit have taken a sharp turn towards pointing out "stupidity" to briefly secure some fleeting sense of mental superiority. I find it mean spirited. It's strange how the zeitgeist of CURRENT_YEAR is fighting both for hyper political correctness and lambasting the mentally unfortunate. I find Gen Z very hypocritical.
You clearly don't understand how [Administrative Law](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Administrative_law) works, which is understandable, because it's a complex morass. We have, largely, FDR to thank for this, with the creation of all of the alphabet soup agencies.

Basically, Congress passes laws that grant powers to the Executive to ... execute .. the law and enforce it. These laws instruct the Executive Branch to write administrative policy which is then enforced -- this is the reason, for instance, that the Department of Education could unilaterally rescind the Obama era "Dear Colleague" letter.

The laws that are passed, including Section 230 and the rest of the DMCA, grant the Administration broad powers to write policy from the law in places where the law is insufficiently defined. This is why the Section II/Section III reclassification (called "Net Neutrality" by its proponents, though the actual "Neutrality" is of course controversial) could be done unilaterally by Pai and it's the same reason that the FCC is open to re-interpret the law as written in order to write administrative policy.

If Congress doesn't like the new policy, they can pass a new law that better defines the Executive's role in enforcing their law.
It is a well known phenomenon that the news is more violent than reality (if it bleeds it leads, and all)... this is simply because the mundane and peaceful happenings are not interesting to watch. People like being scared a bit, and they also like feeling "at least that bad thing didn't happen to me!"

I think there is a similar phenomenon with stupidity on the internet. Because of social media and the internet, we have access to so many people. We can see what anyone on social media is doing.

Now, if someone is doing normal, non-stupid stuff on social media, that is not going to be widely shared. But if someone does or says something really stupid, it is shared with everyone. People love feeling smarter than others, so reading what stupid people say and do is addicting.

So we are bombarded by stupid people doing stupid things, collected from all over the world. We have the entire world's worth of stupidly at our fingertips, concentrated and curated for us.

In addition, now that people realize it is what people want to see, people do fake stupid things for attention.
>Rare earth metals are rare;

No one said that...an exaclty because of that i am no shure if recycling is better or worse for the environment.
It seemed like a mistake that has ruined my life, i would have lost up to 180000 Dollars in deposits, not to talk of how much I've grown the account, Thank to being relentless and hopeful , i came Across a set of consultant and attorneys who have currently helped me recover 100000 dollars, recovery is ongoing and transparent. In case you also need help, reach out to wizardcharles1 @ gmail com
maybe this works if you have to 1) be invited and 2) also pay to get in?