skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
As others have said, very nice looking site. Small suggestion, change the two generic people images - seems all sites use those today and the rest of your site design is so nice you don't need to be generic.

I use to be in the job board/resume space and built a resume reviewer and builder. A few things you might want to add in the future:

- Analysis of the current resume to recommend passive vs active works, spelling mistakes (happens all the time), and length (shorter is better). This were big hits with users.
- Templates of resumes - in the U.S. we don't put our picture on the resume, so good to see you have templates that support different country needs.
- ATS readiness is awesome, but most people don't know what that is. I would just describe why important and not go into the ATS details.
>"...and tries to discredit reality itself..."

So you are saying they will remove the Earth is Flat, The God had created world in 7 days and other similar things?
I lived like this for a while, both in Hong Kong and in Los Angeles, with two kids. There's a sense to it.

But what's not discussed in this article is the friction of this sort of lifestyle. The time when you couldn't get the rideshare when you needed it. The time lost using less efficient public transport. The hassle you go through every time you need to do... anything.

And as the children get older? Well, the lifestyle gets old too.

Don't pay for what you don't need and won't use. I agree. Just keep in mind you're paying for more than just the few minutes you're actually in a car.
The kernel has little to do with how software is run. Wine already has better support for windows 98 apps than does current windows.
If I annoyingly posts photos of victims and eyewitness accounts for people who may be influenced can see, I believe that is far more powerful the driving them underground. While the author or the post may be unaffected, people who may fall under their influence may be.
I think potential for harm to others is probably more of a factor than truth for these types of bans, though if they ban flat earther groups then I will reconsider my statement.
> even for a civilization at the end of the technology development tree.

How do we know what the end of the technology development tree looks like? There are just so many mysteries that remain within our current understanding of science, we can’t say for sure that it’s not easy (for example) to bend space time or some other possibility that makes faster than light travel possible. Quantum entanglement, for example, breaks many of our assumptions about the impossibility of FTL travel.

> When aliens visit, everyone will know.

Maybe, but perhaps a civilisation that has survived the great filter would look differently at civilisations they stumble upon. Maybe, like we do when searching for microbes on Mars, they would try not to disturb the life they discover.

This is all just speculation of course, but I think when looking at this topic it’s all too easy to apply a human centric view on what’s possible and what’s not, and the truth is we just know so very little. Or, we know a lot, but there are so many more mysteries than solved problems.
The US was actually building a weapon system for this when it was banned. It’s more than just a laser, you need a complex targeting system to be effective. Anyway, the limitation on line of sight vs over the horizon missiles and the straightforward countermeasures probably played a major role.
It appears to have started in 1993: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classless_Inter-Domain_Routing
Is the government doing this, or is Facebook doing this? Free Speech is only a concern when it's the state, not when it's a private entity, no matter how much HN tries to conflate the two.
The problem with your logic here is it makes the line between police and the military incredibly blurry to the point where police become just another type of military personnel.

Maybe if you have criminal activity at the level of needing automatic weapons, then you need military intervention and not police.

As many ex-military have pointed out in various forums, even in war situations rules of engagement for soldiers are very clear and strict, which is not true of most police. Soldiers are trained to deal with situations where lethal force and high power weaponry are assumed standard.

Police, if they are really to protect and serve, and act as part of the community should be dealing with an entirely different set of tools and skills. A solider and a police officer should be completely different roles. The former should be an expert in using state sanctioned violence to deal with high level threats to public safety and the latter should be a member of the community with the ability to resolve local conflicts and enforce standards agreed upon by that community.

You can't reasonably mix these two responsibilities and expect good results.
> You're right, Apple should have less control over our guns!

According to the analogy, Apple should have less control over our phones.

Which is true.
Many minivans are less expensive than many small cars. I do think there's a good life hack here of "don't spend a lot of money on a car" but I'm not sure it says much about the type of car.
Does free speech really apply to proprietary platforms in the first place?

You are not prevented from saying whatever you want to whomever you want, you just can't broadcast it throughout their platform. You will not face legal sanction, only have your content be removed from the proprietary platform by the platform's owner.

I'm seeing people complaining that they should be able to run their platform however they want and promote/ban whatever they want because of their freedom of speech. And then later I see people arguing that you shouldn't ban anything from your platform because freedom of speech. Hopefully those are distinct groups, but I can't shake the feeling that "freedom of speech" is mostly use dishonestly to try to justify one's actions no matter which direction they go.
And perhaps a way to turn over the army's stockpile & keep its suppliers in business.

Quite a bit of the defense budget seems to have this goal, and it's not crazy -- if you skip a generation of tanks/planes/ships because your old ones are OK, the experience to build the next generation will have to be re-grown from scratch.
I'm having the opposite experience, I tried playing an old DirectX 9 game the other day and it was unplayable in Windows. It did at least boot and menus worked fine, but for some reason for another the framerate in-game was so low it was unplayable. A few days later I tried it on my linux machine with Wine and it was perfect (thank god for DXVK).
That is terrifying! What's interesting is the damage from the 6.8 magnitude Portland Hills Fault earthquake is simulated to be much greater for me than the 9.0 Cascadia Subduction Zone earthquake.
Unless you want to consider all those people who contributed as not really smart for spending their time on something that a single person can easily do along the way in their project, I'm not sure why you would suggest doing so as a better alternative.

There are numerous other discussions on whether use of a state management library is needed ever, or at least in some projects. As someone who doesn't usually actually need it, I can understand the motivation for less people to use it until they know enough to realize they need it, but also don't understand people who ignore valid needs of larger teams and projects where something like Redux makes a lot of difference and is necessary. Again, unless those people consider themselves and their projects to be the biggest and most complex that can ever be, which is very likely to be false.
I would say that is given, you can't help gambler by giving them cash.

> serious substance use or mental health issues

You need provide different options for those cases ie decriminalize drug use and support addiction fighting initiatives and re-establish mental health system that is currently in de-funded into near non-existence in US
There are several ways to respond. We can take the absolutist position that Facebook should never censor - and that may be OK if Facebook actually holds to that positions and trains their audience correctly ("Hey, everything on your feed is unverified and you should never consider anything you read here as having value").

Facebook has a long history of engaging in censorship of some kind though, so that's very unlikely as an actual outcome. They could try to form a coherent policy ("We shall censor nudity, things that disagree with US history books and anything that shows violence that isn't a cartoon") but those policies are probably impossible to write.

They're probably in a ditch they can't rescue themselves from so they're going to stick to the "Well, we'll censor it based on how our censor feels at the moment and their individual preferences, and if we don't agree with that later, we'll fire them and make up a new policy" which is what they've been doing for a while.

I don't imagine Facebook would say, allow the Snowden disclosures under pressure from the US, so I don't see how they can claim any moral ground on what they would or would not censor. Everyone hates Nazis, but the interesting cases are beyond that. Never assume a practice run is in good faith.
So...care to show us?
Maybe pay for 95% uptime? :) Here is a cached text-only version: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:81YCedw...
This isn't life optimisation, it's putting cost optimisation over happiness.

Having a yard/garden with kids is wounderful, open the back door and shove them outside without shoes to play for accessible easy outdoor time.

Half the fun of Friends staying over in the guest room is when you can have a few drinks and everyone relaxes knowing no one is traveling. The next morning you can all have breakfast together.

Car shares are great for going to the shops on Tuesday, getting a car for Christmas when you want to see family is a different ballgame.
Here are the updates
https://www.reddit.com/r/Justrolledintotheshop/comments/j9ji...

https://www.reddit.com/r/Justrolledintotheshop/comments/j9qn...
>And then I better understood the stupendous energy requirements for a two-way trip to even the very closest neighboring solar system. And it is just not practical, even for a civilization at the end of the technology development tree.

This is blind arrogance.
Security and safety systems in a car are 2 different things.

Being able to reset a car that was immobilised due to a failure in the safety system does not mean that you can steal it, nor does it mean that you could create a dangerous situation. Resetting the system does not mean overriding. If the problem persists, the car will automatically immobilise again are the reset.
It's complicated. If I put up spikes to prevent people entering my garage, is that vigilantism?

Is it vigilantism to exterminate a beehive that a vandal drops on my customer's property?
This is a fine argument for simplifying your life, but it is not a good economic argument.

Hotels are expensive. Rental cars and Uber are expensive.

If you even take a few Uber trips a month, you're probably better off owning an affordable car.

If you have visitors regularly, you should probably buy a house with that extra bedroom. It's an asset that you can sell and recoup virtually 100% of your investment later on. You can't sell all the hotel rooms you've previously rented.

Having a yard turned out to be a fantastic thing to own this year since parks were all forced closed. Trust that you will always have access to that local green space (and that it will be safe and accessible) turned out to be misplaced.
> Romer's textbook of course gave him total mainstream cred

You might be thinking of David Romer's textbook. As far as I know, Paul Romer never wrote one.

Paul Romer had tons of mainstream cred from his two classic publications. He left the profession and really didn't have anything to do with it for many years, even becoming a startup founder. Then he showed up to coin the term mathiness while criticizing his advisor, and later wrote a critique of modern macro.
Agreed, but maybe it's best to think of the 95% as a convenient placeholder to remind you to account for extreme cases rather than a hard and fast rule.
Every modern police department all over the world has assualt rifles, carbines, military sights, sniper rifle a, scopes, and armored vehicles.
Sounds like you think its worth it but I would never spend hundreds of dollars a month in payments and insurance on something I don't use for months.
Based on the study, it seems like the answer is "yes" for violent police departments and "no" for everyone else.
Speaking only for myself: Because Gerrit's unit of review is a single commit instead of a branch. Commits are units of change, but the unit of work and review is almost always a series of related changes. Just because the changes are individually atomic (testable, cherry-pickable, etc) doesn't mean that I want to review them that way. The typical flow is for an engineer to produce a cluster of inter-related changes that motivate and rationalize each other.

Reviewing such a chunk in Gerrit is a PITA. It breaks up the flow of discussion and encourages a myopic perspective on the work.
Got would have been a better name.

It includes Go and sounds like Git.
Same, I was trying to highlight the absurdity of making absolute statements in regards to future performance of stocks.
If the next thing on the chopping block isn't something we like, we'll decide whether this private company's media service is something we want to keep using.

YouTube modified their content model to make it harder to find trans-friendly content. We've already had this fight over YouTube. People complained and they adjusted the model.

But the complaints that were heard were that being anti-trans is bad, not that YouTube has no right to maintain a model.
I like to think that advanced alien life may already be established in our solar system, and we just haven't detected it yet. Unlikely as that is, the solar system is a big place and we are still just scratching the surface in terms of exploring it.

Perhaps we have a highly advanced neighbor that values their privacy and has the technology to remain concealed from our "primitive" observation capabilities? Again, not likely but it's fun to think about.
Took less than a minute just now to opt out for all of my phone numbers. They don't give you a single yes/no switch to opt out - you have to set each phone number to "no" for each of several services - but all things considered, it was pretty quick.
My goodness, "Free Speech" whatever HN folks imagine it to be does not mean you get to use FB's infrastructure to disseminate it.
Data point: as someone who grew up in villages and small cities in eastern Europe, I've seen cars being used for whole hours a day in total. Driving somewhere for thirty minutes a day is still a short total commute time relative to what I have experienced in rural and little-urbanized regions.
Sure, I can agree with the weight savings.

Having hit a pothole recently, I've been driving with a bit of a lean... this could be extremely easy to fix in software, and I suspect that automatic recalibration would be pretty simple to implement. As it stands, I'm waiting for nice weather on a weekend in the Fall, and I'll probably end up at the mechanic.

And economy of scale doesn't just apply to LHD/RHD, but the parts necessary to implement drive-by-wire can be shared between makes and models -- a Fiat won't need as much torque to steer as a Peterbilt, but in theory a huge amount of that system could be shared. That can significantly reduce engineering costs as well.
I'm thinking the real benefit of allowing people to stay given they do visa runs, is that it's a way of setting expectations. If you want to kick out someone who has lived in the country for a long time, you don't get as much resistance, since you were upfront about their stay being precarious.

Also I guess it makes it easy to do selective enforcement against troublesome people.
Can't you be a holocaust denier (i.e. a strictly historical perspective) without also being pro- "outright violence"? That's like removing all of BLM just because some of them are also violently rioting...
Eero is well reviewed but it may require an account. I know Nest Wifi requires a Google account so you can skip that one.
> "Right to repair, but only if the car's online"

You have the right to repair. But you do need the correct tools to do it. If you don't have those tools, Ferrari may help you remotely, but you'll need connectivity for that obviously.
Learn how to get your dog to be smarter
Best brain training for dogs
This is as circumstantial as it gets. I think this is happening, then I saw an ad that confirmed my original thoughts and thus this lofty claim must be true.

Its similar to that Reply-All story where they looked into whether the claim that FB was listening in on people's discussion, and despite there being no physical way for it to happen, people still believed it.
Right, you have to pick the dimension of comparison to matter to you. Maybe the extreme case is getting a sports car that you only get to drive on the track once every couple months instead of a cheaper workhorse vehicle you'd use every day.
App's revenue and downloads on Apple Store
I hope some pseudo open source components come under non profit with reduced Google control. So other big player have bigger say in stuff Chromium and Android.
Anyway of seeing a live stream of your trades? Genuinely interested
You can setup iOS devices without an Apple ID if that is what you are trying to imply.
Holocaust denial is banned in Germany (same as swastikas by the way). It works really well. The only people complaining are literally people trying to twist perception of the arguably worst crime in the history of humanity, to make Germany look like a victim. FB is clearly doing the right thing here. Free speech has limits.
Wouldn't forcing Facebook, a private company, to promote and convey any and all content equally, even content that they fundamentally disagree with, be restricting their own freedom of speech? Why should they be forced to distribute such messages?
Regent Street to get wider pavements and cycle lanes
Believe me, the world would look a lot different if Facebook were actually an arm of the government.
GPT-3 – How to Screen for Ethical API Usage at Scale?
We are building this: https://www.exodusorbitals.com

Feel free to ask questions
>Most of the modern games today aren't made with the Unreal engine...For example, among triple-AAA studios, EA, Rockstar, Activision, and Ubisoft all use their own engines (note: Activision uses Unity for some of its games).

Just played Tony Hawk 1+2( remaster by Activision) , which uses Unreal.

It's going to heavily depend on the team and the project.

Generally lower spec games are good fits for Unity, while Unreal is best for higher end ones
When Holocaust denialism spreads it erodes solidarity with its victims, and people who do it are wittingly or not contributing to build the conditions for its repetition. So yes, we should be having the argument.
The slope is incredibly slippery. It starts with Holocaust denial, then pedophilia advocacy, then saying blacks are racially inferior to whites, then to plain old anti-Semitism, then to saying men have higher iq than women, then to militant vegans ("meat is murder you say, incitement!"), then to people wishing that Trump will die in Covid, then to people arguing that U.S. soldiers should be drone-striked.

Two weeks ago Facebook banned a seminar arranged by a U.S. university because one of the speakers was Leila Khaled. A 76-year-old lady who hijacked two planes 50 years ago. How can what she had to say be so "dangerous" that Facebook had to ban her? Sooner or later, this censorship will encroach on what you have to say too.
Well I already said it. I say that Facebook is within their rights (by your definition) to "censor" this. Personally I don't consider this censorship.
What else do you want me to say? You're talking about this like if it was a science where 2+2=4, and that's far from reality. That's why I provided an alternate angle, showing that in other countries Holocaust Denial is a crime.

I'm not changing what "freedom of speech means". I'm telling you that freedom of speech doesn't come with extra rights to give you the ability to disperse your thoughts and Facebook is also well within its own freedom of speech rights (as a Corporate personhood) to enforce whatever content rules they want.

Either way, I'm not even trying to argue here. You believe this is censorship. Fine. I respect that and really don't see that as an irrational thought at all. There's some sound reasoning around your idea that this is censorship. I just think that trying to create blanket definitions for "censorship" or "freedom of speech" is an easy escape to allow people to behave like shit. That's what I think. Totally a personal opinion, though.
Hey, really appreciate the feedback!

- I have prepared some guidelines like "how to write a resume" but it would be better to prepare examples and show them the hints inline..I guess.

- Ah yea few people actually asked what 10 applications mean. You can download your resumes as many times as you want but you can only have 10 at the same time.

- I thought about removing the subscription model completely and go with lifetime accounts, at least for the beginning.
What do you think?
Only the DNS root operators can seize domains. They did do pursuant to a US court order.
There is a a very very close to zero percent chance that somebody that is denying one of the most heavily documented genocides in history is acting in good faith.
This doesn't work for rural and suburban America. What are you going to do, drive half an hour to pick up your other car? And spend another half hour waiting? That's incredibly inconvenient and costly.

The car-agnostic ideal won't work outside of major cities. The backbone of America is car travel. People outside cities have more space and more stuff. They expect hauling and utility function in their vehicles. This isn't changing.

Maybe if you can convince suburbanites to downsize, you might have a point. But that's also a city-centric viewpoint imposed by limited space and desire to move easily. Neither of those things are desired in the suburbs.

City dwellers don't get it because they don't live that life.
Microsoft actually already ships a Windows layer on Linux, as part of SQL Server for Linux. The approach is somewhat similar to WSL1's: https://cloudblogs.microsoft.com/sqlserver/2016/12/16/sql-se...
There are situations where it makes sense. If you don't particularly want a pickup truck for other reasons, don't buy one because you might want to pickup a load of mulch or a tree in the spring. Rent a truck at the home improvement store for an hour or pay for delivery.

But the vast bulk of the things I own and don't use on a daily or even weekly basis are things that would either be a hassle to rent or pay for as a service, would end up costing more using them that way, or simply aren't practically available at all as a rental item.
Indeed. People use Facebook because "the public square," as it were, is cantankerous, unfriendly, and shitty.