skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
This description is absolutely at variance with the reality of C++ Standard activity. Compiler and Standard Library implementers are intimately involved in all phases of standardization. Book sales have much less effect than authors would like; they would prefer many fewer changes.

Furthermore, C++ coding experience improves markedly with each new Standard, released on a 3-year cadence. C++20 is nicer than '17, which is nicer than '14, which is nicer than '11, which is much nicer than '03, which is a little nicer than '98. '23 will be nicer than all of them.
> No one is profiling my code or asking O(wtf) it takes.

That you know of.
Due to certain language features that's been added, like generics, the binaries can also be a lot larger. So could very well be IO constraints.

At work we currently use Delphi 10.3 (10.4 was recently released), and it compiles and links ~1Mloc in less than 10 seconds, on my older 4770k with a Samsung 850 SATA SSD.
... which brings us to:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T75v90QKFE8
More than enough. It should be noted in bold writing on the TOS, though.
I got an ELECOM paper feel screen protector for iPad Pro that gets about 70% of that paper feel. It still doesn’t feel as nice as remarkable tablet though. I own both 2nd gen iPad Pro and remarkable tablet 1.
That may be, but it does not refute the accusation that this is a double standard.
What’s next, action against the estate of Philip K. Dick for giving the Nexus series a bad name?

The irony of Google trying a passing-off claim over these names particularly stinks, since they ripped them off in the first place.
Americans have the right to tell the government to back off when the government breaks the law. We shouldn't hold everyone to the same low standard as Belarus.
Well I try to stick to simple and universal, pragmatic problems. The timing thing is easy to see both sides as relatively neutral parties, without deliberate malice and still producing negative effects of consequence.

You could apply the same to being one day late on your taxes or truancy at school triggering automatic effects from phone location tracking, without reconcilliation.

If you want more serious examples there is the problem of what knowledge is deemed to be acceptable by those who record it and the potential for power, control and abusive influence.

Silent judgement and action is infinitely more available to the men and women behind the information gates. Without transperancy you'll never know why the things in your life are happening the way they are.

You might piss off the wrong IT guy at Facebook who then plasters your families' individual accounts with ads and content promoting the necessity of moving out and separating from a parent who has brown hair and other fake 'crimes' you committed. He could manufacture consesus in their social media with fake accounts. Your boss may be influenced to devalue the contributions of your kind of knowledge work because he buys into a work trend that was hyper-advertised to him. Your car may quietly auto-update with a bugged software patch that bricks it. You could have your credit score ruined by fake transactions and have your passport put into question.

There is a lot of power in knowledge these days and we fly by the seat of our pants because we want it to be on our side whatever the cost. I don't think any of this is particularly paranoid when mainstream hollywood movies have chronicled snowden/assange/security researcher leaks.

People are getting hacked every day, experian couldnt save their data from getting leaked, who's to say anyone is safe. Certainly not the head of the nsa or security reseachers who have been doing this for decades.
This sounds like something that can be solved by a separate tool (similar to rcorder that determines the order in which to execute rc files in BSD systems based on their dependency specifications) one can plug into the build process.
It isn't false. They demand content moderation in a way that can only be done by removing the channel.
Why? See how Free Pascal Compiler is alive: https://github.com/graemeg/freepascal/commits/master
And its IDE: https://github.com/graemeg/lazarus/commits/upstream

And we have new versions of Delphi very year, with a free Community edition: https://beta.embarcadero.com/products/delphi/starter

PS, I myself write all my software with Delphi, and this is the newest one: https://docxmanager.com - something that turns MS Word into something like WordPress :)
And then there's the dropped rape case that should have no relevance to this but likely manages to confuse the narrative around Assange.
> data and code don't make much difference

You can really take this two ways: one part being about von Neuman architectures, the other side culminating in Lisp. They’re fairly separate but both interesting views on computing. Of course, the opposite viewpoints also do exist, as Harvard architectures and your favorite “blub” language is still used today…
This seems to match this post, where apple is asking to remove telegram groups used to de-anonymize law enforcement members.

Apple could do something really simple if they wanted to not interfeer with how people organize their fight: allow to install apps outside of the app store.
This would force law enforcement to deal with Telegram directly rather than being able to take advantage of apple's own authoritarian way to run its platform.

Now it's a question of what's apple highest priority, people freedom or profit.
Yeah, I remember seeing your measurements at the time.

I did plots, but for most of the compilers I only measured at a handful of points in the parameter space since it took forever to run and I wanted to be able to regenerate the measurements in a reasonable amount of time if I changed the generator or parameters. I did dense multi-parameter measurements and model fitting for my own compiler; that's how it started, so the comparative data for other languages and compilers came later.
Apple is not a government? That's fine. Let the government regulate them and break them up.
The unwillingness to standardise specific language features back in the 80s, during C89, because they would break pseudo compatible K&R compilers like Small-C, or force vendors of now long dead platforms, to actually spend a little more effort improving their toolchains.
I can’t find current trademark “droid” in the USPTO database:
http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/
That's ridiculous. Google shouldn't be suing you for that.

Disney should. They own the trademark on the word "droid".
Well, I've read it, but didn't even convince me a bit. All the reasons that they claim for succeeding against Android and iOS are very, very niche corner cases where 99.9% of users don't care about.
A meta comment: I've noticed this is a variation of another argument I hear from the national security side, usually from the Kissinger-Brzezinski-ites in particular who argue that their anti-democratic actions are because the people are too dumb to govern themselves (The so called "Crisis of Democracy") and therefore in some machiaviellian realpolitik way, their unconstitutional actions are justified. (One of Kissinger's famous quotes being something to the effect of the "The illegal we do immediately, the unconstitutional takes a little longer".)

I keep thinking back to the freedom of speech circuit Christopher Hitchens did and some of the great speeches on the topic he gave, some of which are him broadly denouncing the ability, want or acceptance of any person or group of persons to be the one who decides what you can and cannot read and/or say. I wonder where the voices of whoever holds those intellectual reins these days is, because I'm not hearing it.
> Apple has handed over the entire operation of iCloud in China to a regime owned company, including all user data and keys (they did warn users that they were going to do that though).

Woah. I don’t know how I missed this news for so long.
> Anyone who still thinks C is the way computers work is in for a surprise when

…they read the standard and are introduced to the C abstract machine, where pointers aren’t integers anymore.
The rest of the world is doing fine without them and the associated levels of fraud that comes with a random slip of paper allowing you to transfer large quantities of money. I haven’t even seen a check in decades and even if they are technically legal in the UK for a few more years, nobody accepts them. Why would you?

The US has a ridiculous level of bank/payment fraud compared to Europe (~15x in some areas, according to the fed), who invested in chip+pin, SEPA, IBAN, etc etc. This all lets me pay for something with no overhead and maintain my own audit trail in a way that doesn’t involve a trust-based system from the 1800s.
Correct, and more to that, why would the press care? Did Assange expect anything else from the way he acted?

You keep burning bridges you'll end up alone in an Island. Seems like Julian is having a case of LeopardsAteMyFace

Manning and Assange do deserve protection from whistleblowing. Then Assange decided to take sides and kept digging a hole for himself.
Exposing identities is indeed a very wide spectrum, ranging from identities of sentenced terrorists (nobody'd question that, usually the legalities revolve around the concept of "public figure" which greenlights a lot of publication that would not be allowed about just any random person) on one extreme to identities of people who were found voting for X in an illegal interception of mail ballots on the other extreme.

It doesn't really matter where exactly Apple would draw a line, from absurd extremes like "you are free to talk about Roman officials infamous for sentencing innocents to the cross, but please do so without mentioning PII" when someone types in Pontius Pilate, to pragmatic, maybe even lazy "don't use the channel for illegal communications (but we can't really police them)". But they should at least try to be somewhat consistent about it and, even more importantly (but much easier!), by no means require secrecy. A secrecy requirement is just lame and reeks of foul play, horribly.
No company should be more than 100 employees, problem solved and real compition will exist
Could be because they need to see you impacting the industry (evidenced by letters from peeps at other companies), not just within one company. Which is tough when the company considers your innovations a trade secret.
This sounds to me like a feel good sentiment that lacks careful thought. I agree that "droid" and "android" predate Google and their ilk. It still does not follow that they're suing out of boredom, or that they fear exposure... aren't there bigger brands to protect, like Google itself?

Setting aside who should or not be in a position to sue anyone (I would hope due process guarantees that to everyone equally), why should they be getting sued?
Hasbro has had trouble trademarking certain Transformer names (Jazz, Prowl, etc.) so in the trademark registration the name actually trademarked is "Autobot X" or "Decepticon X".
It's on "Izzy's F-Droid"[0] although, I don't know why there's a separate F-Droid repo...

[0]: https://apt.izzysoft.de/fdroid/index/apk/com.mendhak.gpslogg...
Chrome OS is Linux too.
Oh, I wasn't suggesting that Apple monitors them or actively looks for doxxing, but that somebody (potentially from the police) informed them about it, they took a look and concluded that it's against their policy.

I don't know whether that's a common thing, and I expect many companies wouldn't go the Telegram route and publish the demands because they don't want to put stress on their relationship with Apple.

Discord apparently has channels that are used for similar activities, but I don't know whether Apple has asked Discord to hide those channels from the app, or whether anyone complained to Apple in the first place.
What could someone leak that would justify locking them up, according to you?
Doesn't change the fact that their behaviour itself is more than shady...
'This is the loudest wake up call': documentary The Last Ice on melting sea ice
He addressed performance issue. Just what parent asked — separate interface and implementation.

Looks like you ask "why convention, not restriction?" It solved their problems while maintaining interoperation with UNIX world [1]. If convention is not enough for you, you may define format and tooling.

[1] http://doc.cat-v.org/plan_9/4th_edition/papers/ape
Independently of who said what, look at the facts and make up your mind.
Curious, what do you do? Get off social media, less screens, that sort of thing?
You antagonize every western country and then wonder why they treat you like an enemy. Assange suddenly screams "Wait, you still have to follow the rules!"
The Issue with the Cloud
That didn't keep them from going after davdroid (now davx5). Afair lucasarts was behind that.
Die Sache mit der Cloud
They could, but these aren’t the droids they’re looking for.
Hey, sorry I wasn't clear. I meant 100s of approaches for extracting that knowledge (using questions from "The Mom Test" and so on).

You've mentioned asking people about their sleep, what they do about it, what did they try.

Have you tried something like:

a) Asking: What are the last 10 places on the web (related to improving your sleep) that you visited?

Another way to formulate the question:

"What sleep-related sites/communities/etc. did you visit over the past 10 days?"

b) This is just my idea, but wanted to hear your opinion: Give them a gamified experience (top 100 resources on the web for improving your sleep), but before they see each "section" (1 section=1 acquisition channel, like a FB group, subreddit, etc), they need to shortly type the answer to "What [section] (related to sleep) have you visited?". Can be a simple quiz-like experience using a input box.

Curious to hear your thoughts.
> Today, I ship all over the world via the internet for $0, have no stock, no scrap, no middlemen, get paid instantly, ship instantly, and the transaction cost is 1% for paypal and 3% for credit cards.

This all true, and empowering for those who have the relevant know-how and opportunities. However, these apparent efficiencies are built on the back of the factors that GP points out. Empowerment for some relies on structures that disempower others. Agency staff live precariously; the companies that use them have ever tighter margins, they are increasingly hollow shells that serve only to generate cash not to provide the security of employment.

The convenience we appear to benefit from is an ever-thinner veneer that disguises deeper problems.
I’m aware Pascal is still around (I have Lazarus installed and use it from time to time) but given how dominant Pascal once was, it’s fair to say the Pascal development community is a fraction of what it once was (even smaller if you compare it to the popularity of other languages right now).
How Does Premier Diet Keto Work?
There are lots of products out there that claim they can help you with your diet, and it’s hard for the average person to find the one that is right for them. We review products like Keto Premiere to make sure they actually work. It’s our firm belief that people deserve the best, especially when it comes to something as stressful as dieting. That’s why it’s our mission to bring our readers the best of the best products. We do the research so that you don’t have to! In our Keto Premiere South Africa review, we’ll tell you what this supplement can do to promote weight loss and fat burning during a keto diet. You’ll also learn important information such as what the formula contains and everything else you should know before ordering today! Let’s get started!Click Here https://www.streetinsider.com/FMR+Wire/Keto+Premiere+Reviews...

https://sites.google.com/view/keto-for-you-pills/Keto-Premie...

https://ketopremierebuy.over-blog.com/keto-premiere
HCQ is most expected to work at low doses on mild cases.

So this is NOT the correct population to be studying.
> 17 out of the 18 charges that Julian Assange has been indicted for are for espionage. Espionage is the quintessential, textbook example of a political offence

Could someone explain this to me? It seems to me ridiculous to claim espionage is a textbook example of a political offence.
As long as they can trademark a color, they can do it with a name.
For as long as I know, it's explicitly legally forbidden for private parties in US to engage in foreign relations.

So, "even" by the word of US law, Apple has no permission to engage with Belarus government.
Because most users don't want this. Those who do though are highly motivated and are able to overwhelm any service with spam.
£15.50, an absolutely insane price.
Oracle vs. Google: list of the Java API's
Eh? I don't understand which kind of involvement. I occassionally read C++ proposals, and also read blogs from some very good C++ programmers.

The "everything implemented as library" pattern so pervasive in new C++ releases is not doing any good to the language. All those are half-baked implementation of what exists as a simple orthogonal language feature in languages like OCaml. The "implement as library" sentiment has gone too far that it hurts, among other things:
* Debug build performance
* Compilation times (a big thing)
* Quality of error messages
* Reliance on not-so-reliable optimizations, often causing performance regressions (there are many instances of this happening).

Even if clang / gcc developers are involved, probably they don't bother about 1000::template shittery because their compilers have already got comparable quality inliners, and it is hard for a competition to surface here. Or they might bother but can't be sufficiently involved into the C++ standard committee crowd.

> Furthermore, C++ coding experience improves markedly with each new Standard, released on a 3-year cadence.

And don't tell me my knowledge of last standard is obsolete and I have to read the new shiny c++ book to learn Modern C++. Another consequence is the scarcity of freely available resources accessible to students, due to rapid change.
Productivity can be used to increase future productivity or to increase current consumption. By giving it to capital they use it to build factories or software to increase future productivity. By giving it to workers we let them consume more and live a better life.

Now, the thing is there is a lot of factories and stuff that needs to be created in order for the entire world to get productive. So until the entire world is productive we need to spend a lot of our current productivity on it.

Btw, the 1% consumes more per capita than the rest but they don't really consume a big fraction of the economy overall, when you give them money they mostly invest it.

So the ultimate result is that in times where there is need to build a lot of factories or equivalent capital will get a bigger share of the pie, and as things stabilize workers will get a bigger share of the pie. Currently thanks to globalism there is need for immense capital investments to increase productivity so of course capital needs to take huge share of our productivity. And personally I'd rather see that another factory gets built in China providing them better productivity and living standard than seeing American workers get another car. This isn't rocket science.
That looks like a possible apple product so i could see why they would not allow it.
Maybe we need a chat protocol that does the same decoupling, then.
To be fair, Telegram is a total nightmare. It's like bitcoin or Tor and dark web, it may facilitate anonymous free speech, but in doing so, it facilitates a helluva lot of crime.

There has to be limits on freedom, you can't just be allowed to post bomb making plans on the internet or yelling fire in a crowded theatre
Someone mentioned timeslots witch might not be a too bad idea. Then you would have to meassure traffic independently via eg. some panel or something. It is probably less easy to game. It would also kill spam sites since the panel would not stay on those very long.
Seems like Apple only asks to delete specific messages and not the channel itself. Mind you RT is obviously not 100 credible.
But this story lack sources anyway.
https://www.rt.com/russia/503030-apple-telegram-delete-chann...
In a situation like this, the only option is to block the channels because a single user post (even if it is taken down quickly) could result the app's removal and being blocked.
That was already accounted in my answer

> whenever a header is compiled, you could store a hash of all used defines and their checksum. Whenever that file should be read again, compare the checksum of the used defines to the one stored. If they are the same, you can reuse the precompiled header. If not, create a new version of the precompiled header for a different set of defines.

In this example, when compiling b.h, you can store that this compiled header is for when state<I_LIKE_FEATURE_X=1>. Next time you have to include it, check if the state matches. If that is the case, use the precompiled header. If not, create a new version for state<I_LIKE_FEATURE_X=0>. As also already mentioned, it is quite rare for a single project to include the same file with a different configuration of defines that would change it. 99.9% of the times you would just -DI_LIKE_FEATURE_X project wide, so à single precompiled header only would be necessary
Maybe Apple pays for showing good guys with iphones, but not bad guys.
Anything that puts human lifes at risk.

That's why Assange and his team worked in close collaboration with a number of news organizations (for example the Guardian) and reached out to the US government in order to remove all information from the leak that could put someone at risk. The unredacted version of the leaked documents were released by cryptome, and not by wikileaks.
What is the chance they are shown and click the same ad? Pretty much bogger all.
Basically what MrsPeaches said and with more stratifications. I see way more than 3 brackets, the accent groups and all the other trappings of class stretch from the mythical heavenly top, people you can only theorize to exist all the way down to missing teeth and barely speaking english in hell underneath the poverty line.

I've been lucky enough to see a lot of the levels, it's vastly different to my home country which only really has the three levels (it isnt discussed) and is largely culturally homegenous.
Considering it never happened I think it's a pretty poor fit for an image that captures, so either way I'm not very impressed.
> You can compare the use of alarm clocks to smoking or eating hot dogs.

Wow. That’s a big statement, surely comparing alarms to smoking is a bit much?
Matt levine is clickbait for people who know nothing about wall street. Anyone who actually knows anything about wallstreet ignores the guy
* is the wildcard in some forms of regular expressions, such as file name globs.
Lots of decent, innocent people were tortured and killed because of Assange. My mind is made up.
Universities are non profits and those buildings are usually scholarships for a lot of people who can't afford university and/or research grants to help solve very important problems. Matt Levine is an idiot.
Probably they click other ads to hide which ads they want to click which could be specific competitors?
They also tried to spread the rumor that he is a pedophile.
How does the rest of the world manage disputes fine without using a paper slip as proof?

The fact “bad checks” can exist is the problem, which necessitates the use of a literal paper trail.
Coming from Russian books I was extremely confused by the varied asterisks used for footnotes in English/American literature. Why would you go to all the trouble with 15 different types of asterisks when you can just use numbers?