skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> You think it's ok to sell the set that kills people because they have a set thats save people.

Only if all three of the following are true:

A) they both affect the same risk factor (Just because they're "separate" features and sold separately doesn't make this false. And the way the autopilot is so intertwined with the others, I don't think it's really fair to say they are truly separate features. They build upon each other.)

B) it's impossible to run the dangerous one without the safety one

C) running both is safer than running neither

If you want to make cars safer, then you should be insisting that all cars be safer. The car that kills people because it lacks any of these electronics is just as bad.

To elaborate on (A), with these particular features I don't see the car as causing distinct people to die compared to who it's saving. It's not trading between different groups of people in any meaningful way. It's just a single number of how many people die per mile. With other features you could get into that moral dilemma. With these features I don't think it does.
Liberals' 2021 single-use plastic ban includes grocery bags, takeout containers
Really cool!

Slightly off topic, is there any video conferencing software that doesn't use 100% of the CPU?
If you were correct with your initial choice, switching is a loss. If you were wrong on your initial choice, switching is a win. Your initial choice is only correct 1/3 times, but your initial choice is wrong 2/3 times. It's pretty simple.
For me, it's less about the latency, and more about reducing congestion for other devices that don't have other options (i.e. mobile devices). My laptop docking station is cabled too for this reason.
Pareto's Principle arises everywhere.
Discussion from 3 days ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24677419
In your ideal version, how would the site get paid for?
Nano-5.3 Is Released
Per the Internet Archive, it doesn't look like Reddit has ever acknowledged Aaron as a founder on this page (which seems to date to 2018), so this isn't a recent change.

https://web.archive.org/web/20180409192133/https://www.reddi...

Wikipedia's current note about this issue is

> ^ Swartz has been identified as a cofounder of Reddit, but the title is a source of controversy. With the merger of Infogami and Reddit, Swartz became a co-owner and director of parent company Not A Bug, Inc., along with Reddit cofounders Steve Huffman and Alexis Ohanian.[262] Swartz has been referred to as "cofounder" in the press and by investor Paul Graham (who recommended the merger); Ohanian describes him as "co-owner".[34][263]

I don't think anyone's position on this question has changed visibly since Aaron's death in 2013.
(I get that you're trying to be funny. That's OK.)

Nevertheless: He means that electric cars have a "low center of gravity" which matters immensely in collision scenarios.

See this short video of a Model X in a capsizing test: https://twitter.com/ValaAfshar/status/1310623334367989761?s=...
Openshift starter (free online trial)
It seems Openshift starter (free online trial has entered its sunset phase and will no longer be available)
It has been a loved option for many developers over the years.
Gradually it has been scaled back.
Now since IBM purchased Red Hat (and promised not to change its services … this was bound to happen).
The online starter pro for $50 a month is still available, but the free trial version which started as always free then became bi monthly renew of subscription has now become (6o minute katacoder tutorials).
This is the end of and era (even though the bean counters are unaware of this). There is a cost ie that of culture of new IT generations discovering the joy of the platform as they experiment and learn without restrictions.
The commercialisation of what began as opensource community. Yes there is idealism in this pint of view but that's why we do and love what we do.
It stretches credibility to imagine such a network of tunnels could be built feasibly anywhere in Manhattan
> Watch reddit die is just people complaining about "freeze speech" because they aren't allowed to tell homosexuals, feminists, and anti-bigots to kill themselves.

Gross. Hate speech is free speech, but it isn't fair speech. Especially when shrouded in anonymity. These people already have 4chan and Facebook. They should go there instead.
Peerqr
What kind of game shows are people watching where the host opens a door and says, hey, there's the prize but too bad, now you can't win it? Of course he always picks a door with a goat.
scan or copy link and send files seamlessly
I think it's also good to point out that Gould did not play the piano with curved fingers, as is mostly taught in the West. He played using a flat-fingered approach, taught to him by his teacher Alberto Guerrero. Interestingly, the tendency to keep one's fingers flat was also taught in the Russian school [1].

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eru9FDvUfz4
"weren't qualified"

LOL. You don't know what you are talking about at all.

I have a degree in physics but I have been programming since I was 10. From what I can tell, my programming skills and experience are no less than someone who graduated with a master in CS at a major university.

This is called -- prejudice.
I mean, the word "startup" as referring to a business literally wasn't in use until it was used for silicon Valley electronics companies in the 70s. So yeah, it's got a specific meaning and has had it for the last 50 years.

Some people want to co-opt it to refer to lifestyle businesses and small businesses and whatever else because it gives them better marketing. Most people find that silly.
Wow. I feel like I got my Subaru at just the right time when driver assistance tech was somewhat mature but the user interface was still mostly mechanical.
Maybe. But that's obviously not what the article is about.
Strange, in hardware land I thought that a clean-room reimplementation of something (where you make something with the same interface -- the API of the hardware) was legal.
It's an article summarizing the work for the broader public. If you are interested in the details, you have got to read the actual paper.

https://stm.sciencemag.org/content/12/564/eabb2830
That's exactly why copyright exists. To protect the investment of brain cycles.

If we can't protect our intellectual property, what is the incentive to create it?
https://xkcd.com/1282/
New interpretation of quantum mechanics suggests reality independent of observer
Developing a programming language does not give you brownie points with a judge, and has no bearing on the matter.

What you are suggestying is copying the binary API instead of the texual one. It is equally the subject of copyright.

In the real world Google deleoped their own equivalent of the JVM, which uses different bytecode. This is technically more difficult than putting together a language. But that has no relevance to the subject of copyright.
> that was way over-engineered and actually will be useless.

Completely. It's cute and all. But the better engineering design is to make a console that can stand without a... stand. No parts to lose, no assembly/disassembly process. Just turn the device on its side. Now where have I seen that lately?

Edit: When he pulls up on that one side of the white cover and then the whole thing pops off, I thought, "Sony would be good at designing serviceable androids."
IT had not rung a bell until I clicked your link and as soon as I saw the picture I remembered immediately - thanks for the reminisce.

I was thinking that the old 2d / move around 3-d kind of space chat from waaay back - worldsChat - you had an avatar and moved around a space station chatting.. I always wondered what held that back from being more popular / more used by more people..

Which brings me to the time of having all sorts of friends and family pinging on yahoo messenger for a while - then that was killed off.

Perhaps if worldsChat had this spatial talking kind of option it would of gotten more traction. I'm sure moderating and other factors also apply.
I wonder what Elon Musk would think about people who don't consider him a founder of Tesla?

Reddit's objection here is stupid and petty. Aaron contributed the core web framework they used.
from my short trip in pills I have a few hints that the tongue has wires pretty deep in the mind
Lets see, had to recently replace the radiator reservoir, the alternator, and had an oil leak in my 10yo 328i. These parts don't exist in a Tesla.

Should be interesting to see what does breakdown though.
This reminds me of VRChat.
yea i second importyeti - you can plug in a manufacturer and find their suppliers directly
I wouldn't go as far as calling racist, but you did make some pretty grand generalizations with seemingly detailed explanation about how "Chinese kids" and society work.

Maybe the people you surround yourself with treat their children like that, but I don't think they, and in turn, your observation can be generalized to all of Chinese.

Same with your generalization with your personal experience, not sure if you're American, but there are plenty Americans(or whichever country you're from) who put a lot of pressure on their children to perform well in what they do, maybe you are just not one of them.
The mistake here is thinking that (generally speaking) allowing questionable behavior is a "whole of Facebook" decision.

Instead there is some VP in charge of "ad sales for mid-West US" who looks at their target numbers for a bonus, looks at the ~$100M+ spending planned by the campaigns in that area in the next month[1] and goes "I don't want to sell an election but it is and important free speech issue that campaigns are allowed to get their message across".

Stopping that is a decision that has to be made at the top, by one person who then needs to argue against a lot of people whose financial interest is in the opposite direction.

[1] https://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/electio...
Right. These harmful memes are rotting the minds of young voters. We need to have Facebook eliminate them.

Later when people send them via email, we'll need Google, Microsoft, and Apple make sure our email is vetted by their censors.

Then we'll need snail mail censors, and speech censors.

It's like people on HN can't even step back and really think about what they're saying.
> My love for a job is different than my love for a romantic partner, which is a different love than the love I have for family, which is also a different love than the love I have for friends.

Interestingly, languages other than english have different words for those different forms of what English all lumps in as "love".

In Greek (at least ancient Greek, anyway), "romantic love" is eros, "family love" is philia or storge, and "friend love" is xenia or philia. (I don't understand the subtleties of those last two where they cross over...)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greek_words_for_love

It seems the ancient Greeks did not have a work for "job love", which is interesting to me in terms of the upthread discussion.

I wonder if the paucity of English language around different types of
"love" is a cause of the kind of misuse of the concept to apply to things like "I love my job", or if it's a symptom of it - with language shaping and forcing our understanding and deep deep thought structures?

Are there any Greek speakers reading here who could tell me if those multiple differing words for love still exists in modern Greek, and if so how the concept of "I love my job" would be expressed in Greek, and what the word and definition/connotations of the version of "love" that'd be used in that context are?
>The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle as an Endogenous Equilibrium Property of Stochastic Optimal Control Systems in Quantum Mechanics

https://www.mdpi.com/2073-8994/12/9/1533
Have you seen Valentina Lisista on YT? She is incredible and may hook you into Classical piano being cool, her videos are very well made and her playing is beastly.
They're not the same if the host chooses randomly. Check it out:

WLOG assume the car is in door A (The rest will be the same by symmetry.)

You pick A, B, or C.

The host picks one of the other two doors to show you.

The universes can be described by your choice, followed by the host's random choice. There are 6 possibilities: AB, AC, BA, BC, CA, CB.

Since we're not in a universe where the host chose a car, we eliminate BA and CA.

We are left with four possibilities: AB, AC, BC, CB.

AB = You chose the correct door. (probability 1/4)

AC = You chose the correct door. (probability 1/4)

BC = You chose the wrong door. (probability 1/4)

CB = You chose the wrong door. (probability 1/4)

Since the host's choice was random, it's 50/50 as to whether the car is behind the door you chose or the remaining door.

This same reasoning breaks down when the host knows what's behind the doors because you're no longer eliminating a couple of the universes and it's a 2/6 vs 4/6 situation.
If your going to make money on the backend via services then there is no point in cheaping out on hardware. You make money by having more customers, in a competitive marketplace this means that you need to be the best, a distant #2 won't make you anything once you start needing to offer incentives to both keep customers on your platform - and keep developers onboard.
The fit, finish, and overall handling of an entry level BMW 3 Series is absolutely comparable (if not superior) to a Tesla Model 3.

The Model 3 wins on acceleration, though, no question about it.
The article mentions that talk therapy is already an accepted treatment. Not guaranteed to help, of course, but probably that means you could get access to it (for a lot less than $50k, I would hope). So, worth looking into if anyone near you has done this for tinnitus.
> Is it important the host looked behind the doors? If the host had just picked at random from the two doors, and it happened to show a goat, the odds would be the same.

If the host picked a door at random, and it happened to show the prize, then the game would be ruined. That would make some terrible television. Therefore, he can't be picking a door at random.
Are people using named tensors a lot these days? I haven't seen a lot of code using them but I also haven't been looking at a lot of tensor code lately.
I agree with your last statement that dirtbags deserve rights too; however, companies should not have rights on par with civilian rights at all. Hell, I'd like to write up a TOS they implicitly sign by taking on my business. ...while we're on the subject of normativity, anyway! :)
I didn't know "loving the job" was part of the job. I think I see what you're saying if I stretch a bit, but "effectiveness in role" and "communicates respectfully and accurately" should be the main drivers, not "Does she still dream about her merge requests?"
Medieval 'wine windows' reopen, reviving Italian plague tradition
Same goes for HN. I'm actually surprised you weren't already heavily downvoted or flagged for hate speech.
I spent a year in the US, despite my English being pretty bad, to a point where I struggle to pronounce some words correctly, or often ask the other person to repeat what they've just said.

Despite all that I feel no need to improve my English, since I survived that year somehow. If I was to invest my time in language learning, I would probably start a completely new language instead, due to better ROI.
If someone is struggling to understand it with three initial doors, instead start with a million initial doors and close all but two.
But part of this article is about giving DNT some teeth. The parenthetical statement was to show I understand that without the legal teeth it is another metric. But by ignoring the legal part you're ignoring the entire point of the post and my comment.
Very interesting! Thank you for the information!
I bought a model 3 about a week ago. This is a fantastic car, best I’ve ever owned. No problems yet. My favorite things about it: great acceleration at all speeds, charges to 80% in usually about 30m, cruise control that keeps a safe distance from cars ahead.
How to Become a Freelance Web Developer [Tutorial]
Intel Sapphire Cove Details
If anyone cares which they shouldn't
Yes, and also say that you're not making money on any part that people complain about being expensive. Salesmanship!
Pretty much everyone's current car is the "best car they have ever driven" because cars get nicer with time and people generally get richer and able to afford nicer ones as they get older.
That's incredible. Meanwhile, my Honda has received free repairs after multiple recalls for far less serious defects identified after far fewer incidents.
I would recommend not doing liquid metal. Buy a good paste instead.

Take a look: https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/thermal-paste-compariso...
Difference between good paste and liquid metal is couple degrees. Between good paste and cheap paste much more.

I don't like the idea of liquid metal. Conductive liquid is the last substance I want in my electronic devices. Also, some metal alloys have rather unexpected properties: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mExi4NuLn9Y
I did not know I needed this, or how much. Thank you.
And what happens if he opens the door you picked and the car is there? Is still obvious that you should switch?

Switching is the best ex-ante strategy, not necessarily so after a door has been opened.
They do MX-30.
I felt the same - the interior looks so much sexier than the exterior.

The exterior case looks like it was designed by some random small ultra-low-cost Chinese company.
> ... most of us will not be able to master grammar like a native speaker — or probably sound like one either.

I disagree with the "mastering grammar" point. I think that many native speakers are less than perfect in terms of mastery of their language grammar, especially in various tricky / special cases. Native speakers' ability to use correct grammar stems from combination of language environment immersion and some formal teaching in school. However, I believe that the immersion plays lesser role in grammar mastery and larger role in fluency (due to "thinking in native language"). On the other hand, formal grammar of any language is a relatively limited set of rules, so, given appropriate determination, time and effort, it could be mastered to a native or near-native level regardless of the learner's age. In my opinion, the most difficult aspects of learning a foreign language are richness of vocabulary, idioms, fluency in embedding cultural references, and accent-free pronunciation.
This. The extra mass is done about as well as it can be because it's all at the bottom of a car but jerk the wheel left and right it becomes instantly obvious that it's not a light car.
I mean, that is how money works in general. People or organizations with more of it can outbid those with less of it.
should you buy a tesla? what are the best alternatives?

take this quiz to get personalized vehicle recommendations based on your unique situation and actual owner ratings:

https://driverbase.com/recommendation/step1

it is a free car comparison tool - no email or account required to get your results.
Hopefully you will see this a few days after the fact.

Markets, and people generally, don't work like that. The exact logic varies with strategy but, in this case, people like strategies that involve picking up quarters in front of a steamroller (i.e. selling deep OTM options).

These strategies sell exceptionally well with retail investors. French investment banks, in particular, are known for absolutely loving these strategies. And they blew up hundreds of thousands of Korean investors a couple of years ago with this stuff (and they did this in 2008 too...people really love these strategies and French banks really love blowing up retail investors).

A slightly more trenchant example is tech stocks. These are high momentum stocks, we know that high momentum is extremely cyclical and will eventually blow up (i.e. like option selling) but people do it because they think they will be able to jump out before it goes wrong (spoiler: they won't).

So yes, there is always a price at which something stops working but it is very unlikely we are at that point with this strategy. Implementation of this strategy varies. Empirica (or whatever they are called) apparently do something clever, I know someone doing this who just buys 10-15% OTM puts (and does some kind of simple backtesting/valuation)...but the basic idea is: what is the probability of the price falling this much, what do I gain if this hits, what do I lose if it doesn't. You can get very complex with modelling volatility, if you are trading volatility then that is relevant...for this strategy, you have no real idea when it is going to occur (the PM I know who was buying puts was doing it for three or four years before this happened, they still a lost a bit in the drop but, importantly, they didn't have to sell anything so have had a great year (up 10-15% with very little net exposure to markets).
Conventions exist for a reason. Choosing a name which is immediately recognisable and conveys the meaning you know others will glean from it is a sensible and rational thing to do. In fact, picking outlandish names purely to "buck the trend" and make some kind of statement about naming and identity reeks of immaturity and ideology.
Controversies in Machine Learning [video]
After all, the browser could always just resolve DNS itself.

That's exactly how DoH is being implemented, and it's why it has caused so much controversy.
Exactly. Glad to hear someone has understood. Eliminate all sources of untruth in society. Truth will prevail.
If I get to choose the style, I like doing this...

bar
|> decorate()
|> some_more()
|> case do
result ->
{:ok, result}
end
Follow-up: https://newscrewdriver.com/2020/10/07/a-delight-for-the-butt...
I thought it's because Google isn't allowed to promote Google Maps in its search results, but a cursory search didn't yield any evidence.

Presumably if Search did link to Google Maps, other geographic information systems would have to be represented, just like various streaming platforms are represented in the video tab.
Dang, this sounds like taking literally everything I hate about "the future", and doubling down on it. I just had a bad experience with a dealership where I thought my thorough explanation (including error codes) was sufficient to narrow down the issue, but they completely ignored anything I said and did their own thing, which ended up solving exactly nothing. I ended up getting the diagnostic fee waived and have now taken the vehicle to an independent shop, where I can speak 1:1 to the owner and actually have my input listened to and respected.
Probably for the best, considering how Steve Huffman and company have turned what Aaron Swartz envisioned as an open platform resistant to censorship into a publisher that will not hesitate to delete entire communities because they don't like their politics.