skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
For me, a lot of those use cases are covered by GNU screen.

I can quickly switch between multiple terminals (which I label with names like 'edit', 'build', 'run', and 'console'). I've experimented with splitting a single window into multiple panes (GNU screen has slightly clunky support for this), but overall haven't found that to be as useful. I use the vim keys for viewing / copying the terminal window history as well as command-line history.

For a long time I've eschewed using multiple tabs in Gnome Terminal, but I've started using those as well. Instead of having multiple terminal windows for different hosts, I just use different tabs, and switch between them via Ctrl-PageUp and Ctrl-PageDown. Another option there is to use another level of GNU screen with a different hotkey, but perhaps down that path lies madness.
Very interesting. As I understand it, IBM consistently avoids high-competition low-margin markets and focuses on low-competition, high-margin markets.

This makes sense to me. Apparently, IBM is not good at high-competition/low-margin markets (and has never been), but they have been a huge R&D powerhouse for decades and probably remain so.

Now I think, the previous CEO should've done this split years ago.
The comment you're responding comes from someone who in another thread demanded that global names for other things conform to their own culturally-specific and creatively exsanguinated expectations. Earlier in their comment history you can find them complaining about "South Asians" and justifying casual racism by claiming they "optimise for efficiency". Another page or two back, and they're describing sex as an obligation of marriage.

The point being, reactionary bigots tend to out themselves, and that's the obnoxious worldview driving by here. Erasure of someone's identity in conformance to external expectations is something that - remarkably - remains a thriving and actively promoted idea. This makes it all the more important to confront and openly, firmly reject.
A Constitutional Amendment is an "amendment" to a law (the Constitbution), although I would say that's the same as any other law insofar as it's a sum of written parts. Also, SC decisions are generally limited in some context, so there's no "need" to amend over it, as long as you can challenge again under a different political climate (court makeup or public opinion).
I went through the whole loop, "cleared" the interviews (as per the recruiter) and was told to stand by for the offer. A week later, instead of the offer, they just said they ran out of headcount. Never heard back from them again (even though they said they'll reach out when they get headcount back).

This was for a pretty senior position.
> It could be copyrighted but its usage doesn't mean you are thieving it.

Says who? Oracle is claiming exactly the opposite, and if they win this will become "law" in the USA.
I think you've missed the whole point of this issue here.

> For instance "Linux" is a copyright owned by Linus Torvalds…

For starters: Linux™ is a trademark, not "a copyright".

> Your understanding is incorrect here.

It seems, at least to me, that you actually missed a few core point of the whole story. ;-)
Not sure.. The business model is really hybrid cloud with cloud being the endgame. As a traditional mainframe customer you want your application to work both in house and in the cloud. If you can move everything to the cloud and it's managed for you, you don't really need IT services anymore.
Yeah, it's slow, but competition is coming for Tesla to the US as well. And when it does, EU sales figures show that Tesla ain't doing so hot.
Hahah, docker! They will never ever use that because they know the slang meaning for it.
Well, they sort of do. When existing precedent is clearly outside the bounds of what's considered "just" today, it's not unknown for SCOTUS to discover a new right or reinterpret a precedent. That said, they (rightly) mostly rely on precedent and the law rather than deciding on the basis of the good of the many by their lights.

As someone else in the comments said, I'm on Google's side here on the basis of this being the general industry assumption for a long time and interoperability generally being a good thing. On the other hand, does anyone here honestly believe that a complex API some team spent a lot of time designing isn't really a creative work?
I have a hunch that I won the silicon lottery with it, though I haven't confirmed with any overclocking. I'm happy to dive deeper if you want. Below is a basic summary.

I have 5x140mm intake fans, with a Noctua NH-U14S TR4-SP3 cooler. That runs with push-pull 140mm fans, 2000RPM in/1500RPM out.

This reaches steady state within a few minutes under load. With an open case, it will clock down to ~4.2GHz after 5-10 minutes. With a closed case, that is faster. For fun, I ducted the A/C vent in the room into the case and cranked it. It stayed reliably up around 4.4GHz all core. Technically, I think it would reach a lower steady state clock/higher temp if I left it for days, as it does noticeably warm the room.

I don't recall idle power, but yeah, it's warm.
He's satirizing the rigid and dismissive Gilfoyle type of person (HBO Silicon Valley character) while also exploring what app developers can learn from them.
Yeah, not knowing about him at all when I watched a talk by him and then realised that he is somewhat of an icon for indie/solo founders, I was very surprised to find out he had starting working as an employee in the meantime. I know he's doing well, but since I had just started out solo myself it felt a little like he had thrown in the towel ;)
Can you explain what stood out to you as conservative about the "progress studies" article?

Wikipedia defines conservatism as "a political and social philosophy promoting traditional social institutions in the context of culture and civilization".

Patrick Collison's article [1] to me seems to be saying "we should be a lot more systematic and scientific in figuring out the drivers of societal progress, and aggressively invest in those things." That seems in direct opposition to conservatism, since it advocates a dramatic overhaul of ineffective institutions.

Collison's definition of progress does seem narrowly focused on measurable economic metrics. Is that the source of your grievance? I think that developments like women's suffrage and racial desegration should be included in discussions of "progress studies", whether or not they led to improvements in measurable metrics. Collison neglects to include examples of this type in his article, but it's not clear to me that he considers them unworthy of study.

[1] https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2019/07/we-need-...
I bet if this goes through, the US will try to enforce a completely backwards view on the rest of the world in the name of profit. One can only hope that at least some countries will tell the US where to stick it with idiotic laws like that.

Absolute lunacy.
I find internal libraries are incredibly frustrating to manage in microservices. I spend more time changing the library, updating each service to the new version, getting PR approvals, and deploying then with a monorepo. Additionally, identifying that changes in my library dont break any of my clients are more difficult in distributed repos.

This is all with a fairly robust CI/CD pipeline so its not like i'm marred by inefficiencies elsewhere -its just an annoying process that makes me (and others) not want to write libraries.

edit: I should qualify that this is most annoying when you own the library and the services that consume the library. If the burden of the upgrade was left to my customers then the tradeoff might be different for me :)
There’s a much more recent example from 2020: https://www.france24.com/en/20200703-france-united-kingdom-n...

Police ran that service for quite a while before cracking down simultaneously across multiple countries.
Maybe that's a strawman...but I see your point.
If I had an equivalent offer, I would take the severance (4-6 months paid leave) plus that offer in a heartbeat, regardless of any political statement or non-statement.
30 Years of ‘Minesweeper’ (Sudoku with Explosions)
He was also recently interviewed on a podcast here: https://swiftbysundell.com/podcast/71/.
Dendrite can be built and run as a single binary. Kafka is only needed if you want to run the microservices as separate processes.
Population immunity has to be on the list: if the population has some level of immunity, it affects the observed R0. And we can't really measure immunity, other than in very crude ways (i.e. antibody tests for specific epitopes), so we can't control for it.

This isn't a political statement of any sort.
Thank you, I started almost exactly a month ago.
I think the question is whether the utilitarian need to copy that arrangement for compatibility reasons is enough to argue fair use.
If I'd publish a cookbook with the same chapters and recipe names as a different cookbook, but every recipe my own creation from scratch; I wouldn't consider that copyright infringement.
I have heard that a lot for trademarks, do you have reference for copyrights?
> But the CEO's "progress studies" thing repels me because it reeks of the Kochs' efforts to implant conservatism into education. I don't want to enable that. It sucks.

If you had that amount of money (and that reputation), you'd probably try to improve the world _according to your vision of improvement_ too.
What do you want him to say publicly ? Do you want him to say that he doesn't care about developers he doesn't hire ? Even if that's what every business owner thinks, you can't tell it because you will sounds like an arrogant person.

They don't have (and you should not expect them) to give a feedback to anyone who apply (as it is the case of the parent comment)
How about this one: https://www.nber.org/papers/w27597.pdf?
Lol I sit at the same chair at the same desk every day. Perhaps you just persuaded me what I should do next.
Although everyone is saying that Intel is dead in single thread (which is definitely far more true than previously), I don't see 5.4GHz as infeasible for them - tenth gen goes up to 5.3GHz at the very high end and I would be surprised if they didn't reach at least 5.4GHz.

Looking historically, the 6700k reached 4.2GHz, the 7700k 4.5GHz, the 8700k 4.7GHz, the 9900k 5.0GHz, and the 10900k 5.3GHz - which would imply 5.5 or 5.6GHz for what will (presumably) be the 11900k.
You make this out like I've picked on some rare outlier day

Sorry, I didn't mean to convey that impression. Florida has been regularly reporting daily death counts that include deaths from several months ago.

I would need to know that the older, higher numbers were not also subject to the same delays.

They were, in the other direction. If you look at the date-of-death chart in the thread I linked, you'll see that for a few weeks there were consistently over 200 actual deaths per day, while the reported 7-day average in your chart never reached 200. The delay means that the reported count will be lower than the actual count when deaths are rising, and higher than the actual count when deaths are falling.

And of course we can't be sure which of those categories we're in at any particular point in time; if deaths do start to increase again, it may not be noticeable in the reported numbers for several days. But based on the hospitalization trend I believe it's probable that the current reported numbers overstate the actual deaths.
If you can't sell your products in the US, I think you're going to have a problem.
Half of Milgram’s subjects told him to take a hike (2010)
Honeywell divested from the defense sector a couple decades ago, spinning off "Alliant Techsystems" and sending debt along with the new company. ATK went on to be successful, merged with Orbital Sciences as equals (2015), and then was acquired by Northrop Grumman (2018). Financial Engineering, as one commenter put it, is quite nuanced and interesting.
"every time I convince a Stripe customer to raise their prices ... we benefit directly" sounds like the exact words of an illegal cartel. While I doubt that that is Patrick's intent, if I were an antitrust attorney, this would convince me that the notion of payment processors as clearinghouses for price-fixing merits investigation.

This is a great example of how one can do something well-meaning at small scale (Advise tiny, tiny businesses that they would be better served having more confidence in their value) that can turn into something illegal at scale (Advise price leaders that they can safely lead by less and so-on).
I agree. Personally, I espouse the "copyright should not exist at all" viewpoint. However, I think in the current legal framework, APIs are clearly copyrightable. However, re-implementing the APIs should obviously be allowed under fair use.

Remember that copyright exists solely for the purposes of increasing the production of otherwise-easily-copyable works that take time to create but then are "worthless" (i.e. the marginal cost of each additional copy is ~0 or negligible).

From the Constitution itself:

"[the United States Congress shall have power] To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries."

I can see how one can argue that software itself - the actual code - will benefit in the same way (though the myriad successful open source projects and SaaS platforms seem to suggest it's not necessary......). However, I think it's pretty dang clear that limiting the copying of APIs will broadly lead to less software being created. It's well established that, for software, ideas are cheap, and that competitive advantages primarily come from excellent execution and excellent VC funding. If someone re-implements your API and your business folds, it's not because your API was your secret sauce and they stole it. It's because their re-implementation - which, by definition of an API, must be "the exact same thing" - was better than yours. They produced a better product, and the market rewarded them for that.

So, for a legal framework whose purpose, as outlined in the constitution, is to promote the arts and sciences, I think it's pretty clear what the path forward is.
It's safe to say that a company can impact the public affairs of a country by creating economic value without taking an official speculative stance on e.g. the racial distribution of unjust police killings. It's pretty obvious to me when people talk about "leaving political topics out of the workplace" they mean "topics which are unrelated to one's work".

Arguments like "abortion is highly related to site reliability engineering" are pretty overtly disingenuous in a very clear-cut fashion.

> Here I have to say, I'm more likely to give the point, that those topics are not professionally relevant, but neither is sports.

Sports don't cause the same degree of strife in the workplace. No one is demanding anyone's termination because they like a different sports team or because they were caught in a photograph gesturing in a way that looks vaguely like the hook 'em horns gesture (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hook_%27em_Horns).
> For instance, can we explain where Sweden’s deaths occurred? Large care homes (100+ residents) that were ill prepared?

A large problem in Sweden is that many of the staff in care homes do not speak Swedish or don't speak/read it well. This has led to the instructions on how and when to use PPE not being followed or not being followed well which led to a large number of infections in care homes [1]. Since people in care homes tend to be part of high-risk groups for severe COVID-19 this had led to a large number of deaths which could have been prevented. I stated this in the original message ('Apart from some bad mistakes in the beginning where the infection was allowed to spread in care facilities').

[1] https://www.sydsvenskan.se/2020-07-10/svag-svenska-kan-ha-pa...
Exactly. It would be like a company copyrighting the shape of its proprietary replacement parts, and then suing another company for providing 3rd party replacement parts.
It would be more like a restaurant banning people for talking about things they did not like.
Yes it exists but GE doesn’t own it.
“Then using some dd commands I would rather not think about” ! lol
Facebook bans troll accounts linked to conservative group
BuildZoom (better way to build custom homes) Is hiring a Principal Engineer
Tutorials – The Way to Your Clients
They needed cash and it’s a profitable business so they sold it.
patio11 quite famously on here had a recruiting startup before going to Stripe. Recruiting is likely the only reason they hired him.
you can do similar things with 1Password CLI.

Here is short example: https://github.com/stumyp/ope
IBM, Seeing Its Future in the Cloud, Breaks Off I.T. Unit
We have a lllooootttt of work ahead of us! heh!

(But yes: It's a good place to hook the AGI up!)
The ability to understand and effectively seek clarity on the specifics of the problem you’re solving (both “what does the prospective user actually want?” and “what makes this problem and/or solution distinct from seemingly similar problems and/or solutions?”), and the corresponding ability to map that understanding and clarity to the selection and appropriate application of generalized tools that will achieve those specifics.

In other words:

- Empathy

- Listening

- Communicating

- Collaborating

- Abstract thinking
Just stop already. Nobody notices these kinds of things, and if they're offensive to anyone, that's their problem. It's a math problem as old as the 1800s for gods sake. Stop already. Why, out of everything that is important in this world, would you immediately notice the fucking "man", out of all things?
People do it less on Instagram than on most social networking platforms though, and that's one of the reasons a greater fraction of the content on Instagram is original. A bit of UI friction has a big influence on user behavior.
Stories like this make absolutely no sense to me, and yet I hear them all the time about Stripe.

Why not just tell the candidate that they aren't getting an offer? Why make up elaborate stories about headcount? Why say you're going to follow up? It's clearly not a bandwidth issue since they took the time to respond anyway.

Even something like "We've filled all positions. Your application was strong, but not strong enough. It's unlikely we'll reach back out."

That's 1000x better than getting ghosted after being told they WOULD reach back out. Complete bullshit on their part and a total lack of integrity. There's really no excuse for it.
How is this announcement related to Red Hat?
and he doesn't like to talk about it ;)
Little note: what you're really asking is whether the authors of GPL software would have grounds to sue Oracle for copyright infringement.

As another HN commenter put it to me when I made the same mistake: "The GPL is not viral." If one party breaks the terms of the license, then normal copyright goes into effect.
There have been stories of this kind of rural mass hysteria from all over the country over the last few months. It reminds me of modern African witch hunts, or the 80s “satanic panic”.
It looks like it's predicated on an assumption that "nodes with odd numbers of edges have short edges." It's novel, but not reliable. I do love the breakdown and effort though - very useful.
I would bet that an event like Jeffrey Epstein being suicided in federal prison under impossibly suspicious circumstances -- after it came out that he had been running a child sex trafficking ring of immense scope, been granted a sweetheart deal during his first legal run-in in 2007, and had close ties to the uppermost echelons of wealth & power including Bill Clinton, Donald Trump, and Bill Gates -- has probably also greatly expanded the number of people willing to take the theory seriously. Alan Dershowitz even says he was introduced to Ghislaine Maxwell by Lynne de Rothschild herself!
Hi hi! Speaking as both a bug bounty vet, and a consulting vet (I run includesecurity.com), here's my .02 on some things you may not have considered given your comment.

1) Sam and the other hackers did not do this as a full time gig, they primarily do this as moonlighting from their full time jobs (you can verify this on LinkedIn)

2) Consultants are often given tight scopes, and these artificial client-driven constraints often prevent consultants from identifying similar findings as Sam and crew found.

3) Bug bounties provide no defined level of assurance. They found an SSRF, but it is a very real possibility that somebody in their crew (or an individual bug hunter) doesn't have experience in that particular topic and Apple would have never been the wiser. In a bug bounty you're at the whim of the crowd's varying skills and interests. You can game this by offering larger bounties, but you can't pre-define a scope or level of assurance.

4) They've gotten paid ~$50k thus far for four bugs, if you read the article they mention they'll very likely be getting paid more. I'd be surprised if their total payout isn't six figures when all is said and done.

5) Your stated rate for consulting firms charge for a particular role is correct for the US market, but the level of "seniority" in a senior consultant varies wildly. Many large firms will undeservedly give somebody with two years experience the title "senior", regardless of actual skillset.

6) You state "a group of amateurs will do better work", first point is to note these five are not amateurs in any way! They're in the top 1% of global bug bounty hackers. Second it seems like you're defining "better" as "finds more vulnerabilities from a blackbox bug bounty perspective". I find that client's IRL don't define things in the same way you've done here.

7) "but over the years I've found that the difference in the security world is that you hire a small shop to discover the truth about risks, but you pay a big firm to lie about them." This I couldn't agree with you more on, it is MIND BOGGLING to me that firms with no ethics, actual standards, or transparency are the top firms in the security assessment/pentesting space. For an industry that proports to hate snake oil security, we sure are comfortable with a ton of snake oil security assessments.

8) This industry needs standards, for-profit old boys clubs are not the way
https://www.theregister.com/2020/08/11/ncc_group_crest_cheat...
And the grass roots/non-profit approach also failed due to lack of advocacy, adoption, and persistent leadership. http://www.pentest-standard.org/index.php/Main_Page

I'd love to see a world where Bug Bounties and full security assessments can live harmoniously and people do flip out declaring one or the other service totally useless all the damn time.
It's a business. Not a kindergarten. Though in Silicon Valley (having worked there) I know many employees don't understand this.

It's like that person who screamed "we're trying to build a home here!" at a university when someone was to be cancelled. What? No... that's not what a university is.

Emergent values and culture? A CEO should just start paying people and hope that a business emerges? What? It's literally the job of the leadership to steer the company.
Including, amusingly enough, Oracle:

https://docs.cloud.oracle.com/en-us/iaas/Content/Object/Task...
>adjudicate your violation, all under one roof.

You still have Article III remedies in that case.

If the extreme version of non-delegation took hold, it would be the end of all rational regulation. Do you REALLY want Congress writing technical documents about effective isotropic radiated power? Or the shape of curb ramps?
The museum has closed for the moment. Its future is uncertain.
You may always refer to a female actor as an "actor". The term "actress" is slowly fading, but it won't disappear for quite some time, especially as long as the Oscars continue to use "actress" for their categories.
I gave more weight to a remand than SCOTUS upholding the trial verdict itself primarily because the court is currently shorthanded. I agree that the court prefers to punt for good !