skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I hated it in the open source chat application Retroshare so much that instead of using a pre-compiled version I edited the source to disable the activity send notifications from my client.

After doing that I noticed the function actaully sent the message "etc etc is typing..." and you could change that message to arbitrary strings. Unaltered clients then display the arbitrary string instead of a "is typing" one.
All 4 points why I like Lisp so much more than Python!
> As is common when HN discusses legal matters I see a lot of people blaming the judges for not understanding tech, but the problem here isn't really the judges so much as the law itself.

Or to state it more plainly: the problem is legislators not understanding tech, and not updating our laws to account for the way computers and the internet have transformed society over the last 40 years. This was a similar gripe in the Net Neutrality arguments on HN. It's truly insane that regulatory bodies are using public utility laws from 1934 - before even the mass adoption of television - to create the rules that govern the internet.
I find it hard to believe that even a top performing law school grad would be a subject matter expert comparable to a 5 or 10+ year developer for this topic.
There is an issue when you need to read two articles with opposite point of view to get an idea of what the reality is
> I also find it weird that "conservative" judges are expected to support APIs copyrightability.

They aren't expected to because they are conservative.

The judges that acted in a way which (the writer believes) suggests they support Oracle's position happen to also be the conservative justices.
Well, it's in an emulator rather than on a real machine, but 8-bit CP/M and its stable of program-development applications. From back around 1982. Just a mere 40-odd years ago.
I can maybe try : no includes. You gain package 'visible' with the 'with' keyword. Packages are built separately then ar'd together. No preprocessor necessary.
> Weird question :) My claim is that it won't be open to "anyone" in a useful way any time soon.

Seems pretty clear it will be available to public in the next few weeks, unless you're saying "general access to anyone who chooses to download the app" isn't about general public.

"Beginning Thursday, any existing Waymo One customer can hail a driverless minivan from a fleet of more than 300. The vehicles will be operating in a smaller, roughly 50-square-mile service area. Passengers are free to invite friends and family and to share their experiences on social media. Waymo plans to open the service to new customers within a few weeks. “At that point, we’ll have general access to anyone who chooses to download the app,” Krafcik said." - [0]

[0] - https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-10-08/waymo-one...
Yeah, but it would probably also be pretty terrible to work next to people you're pretty sure are okay with (say) police murdering people of your skin color. In America, this is the default position, as evidenced by both major political parties largely supporting police despite this behavior. So in order to say "we aren't okay with that opinion in this workplace" and to have a pretty good idea your coworkers don't want you dead, you have to say it -- it isn't assumed.
I don't subscribe to many, but I do subscribe to

filipp.io's Cryptography Dispatches
https://buttondown.email/cryptography-dispatches/archive

Fermat's Library
fermatslibrary.com

The Popehat Report
https://popehat.substack.com/

and I've been subscribed to Bruce Schneier's Cryptogram since before newsletters were cool ;)
https://www.schneier.com/crypto-gram/
Debian stable has been my solution to the endless fiddling for over a decade. But it won't work for you if there's some very specific difficult-to-use-with-Linux thingamajig you need.
well most german car manufacturer have a production ready ev. even mercedes has one, well they were pretty late compared to all others but the eqv is a ev that has a very different market than all other companies.

and if I would have the money I would buy an vw id.4
You seem to have misread what was being said, because you seem to be arguing against something that was explicitly stated to not be the case:

> individual recipes are generally not copyrightable, but if you compile a set of recipes and publish them in a cookbook, the cookbook itself becomes copyrightable.

(emphasis mine)

The law understands that the whole is more than the sum of its parts. And Java adds up a lot of parts. It's also an interesting model case because it's inherently so very open, without (particularly pre-Jigsaw) a clearly demarcated dividing line between "API" and "implementation." Alito's not unreasonable to suggest that a Supreme Court ruling in Google's favor might raise difficult questions about how copyright law applies to software in general.
Totally agree. From what we can see in this thread, when a recruiter / hiring manager / HR department makes it a regular practice to ghost interviewed candidates, it has a significant effect on the company's reputation - that they lack common decency and respect. It does not seem worth it for whatever time/effort they might have saved by such behavior. To put it another way, it seems it'd be worth spending time and effort to improve the process and experience, to improve such a reputation.
Not to mention confusing. The "reverse" of "racism" would certainly be "equality", so why should "reverse racism" mean "more racism"? This is pretty elementary logic--something can't be its own opposite.
>Once you’ve communicated this boundary, enforce it.

I 100% agree with you that setting clear professional boundaries is a necessary thing to do. I am also of the opinion that a big part of that is to not use tattle-chat systems whenever possible, because they actively work against exactly this. Or, to put it another way, refusing to use a system like this is to actively choose to reduce the number of dings, pings and alerts for both yourself and everyone you communicate with. Win-win!
Who knew there was a whole manual? My brother and I just edited different resources to see what happened until we figured out what did what. Then it was off to the races with custom Balloon Help, Tetris Max backgrounds, and "Welcome to Macintosh" icons.
Of course you can buy a better Cpu. It's not a valid argument in this context. The OP was talking about needing a better CPU because his large C++ project takes a lot of time to compile. That's something inherent to C++ programming. You then make the argument that js devs also require better CPUs because your js project use 10 docker instances. That's not valid logic since docker and js have nothing to do with eachother.

There are many alternatives to docker which don't cripple your computer. Nix is the best one.
If the goal of this hypothetical is to show how technological methods are a societal risk, I would suggest couching the hypothetical in something other than "a bomber that is otherwise un-findable." Technology making it possible to find them through data correlation---even if the technology also has some false-positive risk---seems like an argument in favor of these methods.

It's probably also worth noting that these technologies can be used on the opposite end of the story too. "but officer, I can't possibly have been at the site of the bombing, here's my alibi data trail" is also enabled by these mechanisms.
> There is not general agreement within the Democratic Party on universal single-payer as even a long-term goal. The currently dominant neoliberal faction of the Democratic Party supports a public option as a long-term component of healthcare policy to acheive universal access, but does not generally support single-payer as a goal, in either the near or long term.

A big majority of Democrats support Medicare 4 All: https://www.kff.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/9394-Figure-3.... They support a public option somewhat more, but to me it seems more like they do so to soften the transition to a single-payer system. A “public option” wouldn’t be like the multi-payer systems of Germany, Switzerland, or the Netherlands. Since it would kill private competitors in the long run, it’s just a slower road to single payer.

Regarding taxes: netting transfers mixes up the tax system from the welfare system. As the article points out, our taxation is progressive but our spending is regressive. It’s a system designed to redistribute money from the rich to the middle class, not the middle class to the poor.

As to Germany, I use that as an example because it’s a large European country and I’m familiar with it. CDU has been moving left for the last 15 years: https://fivethirtyeight.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/hazar....

Like the above, various international party comparisons show Democrats moving left of center by 2012: https://fivethirtyeight.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/hazar...

As to social or religious issues, Italy or Spain would be more conservative in some respects. (Islam isn’t a recognized religion in Italy.)

The recent rise of progressives has moved Democrats sharply left in part because Europe has been moving to the right economically for decades. Low corporate and investment taxes and deregulation is gospel across the European center, but it’s disappeared among progressive Democrats. That wasn’t remarkable in 1975 but it’s remarkable today. Macron, for example, is campaigning on deregulation and a government takeover of Islam, and his major competition is to his right. Center left parties in France aren’t questioning the country’s fairly low corporate and investment taxes. Neither are those in Spain. Democrats (in particular Warren’s utterly cockamamie proposal) really stand out in that area as a throwback.

Green New Deal is a great example of this. It’s an FDR era jobs program. It stands in stark contrast to Europe, which is doing carbon pricing. Progressives seem to have developed an allergy to markets, and while the center isn’t there yet it’s not pushing back either.

I mean that’s before you get started on Sweden’s center-left party continuing to cut corporate taxes and partially privatizing social security.

Oh, I forgot about school choice. Democrats are far to the left compared to Europe in that.
I guess windows should start banning installers and force everyone to go through the windows store.

Hmm maybe epic and steam should be banned and just use the windows store. They provide the platform after all.
Pimeyes reverse people image search company moves to Seychelles after backslash
Crazy how far into the plot they got before they were stopped. They tracked down her private homes, did surveillance and recon, acquired explosives and other equipment, and it all planned out. I don't know whether it would have actually worked (my guess is not), but it's amazing they got that far considering how early the FBI knew about them. https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/local/michigan/2020/1...
> I'd be happy to use an app store that tracks active screen-time per app and disburses a monthly "subscription" proportionally to the developers of all the apps I use.

Screentime is a really, really bad proxy for usefulness though. Weather apps, email clients, maps (without turn-by-turn directions), the alternative app I use to control my Hue lights, ... will starve, while the Kindle app and social media will get showered in money. That alternative camera app, hardly any screentime at all. My to do app shows me lots of notifications but gets very little screentime. Netflix however...
They've already potentially interrupted you by sending you that "hi". But the "hi" contains zero content. And worst of all, they often wait for your reply, which means you have to actually do something to get them to tell you what they wanted to tell you.
How does revenue growth compare though?
It wasn't that long ago that Texas nixed critical thinking from K-12 education. The reason given was, and I wish I was making this up, that teaching children critical thinking might cause kids to question their parents and their church.
Maybe that works when you have thousands of users like here in hn. I don't see much value in it with a team of 6 people.
Have another look at https://github.com/CodyReichert/awesome-cl maybe? There might be more than you think. I know I have regularly discovered great libraries the last years.
Giant Silicon Valley corporations like Facebook and Twitter are not "The Left".
Yeah it's weird so few took it up given how low median tenure in tech tends to be.
Agreed, it is very inconsiderate of people's time. The expectation that I'm here sitting all day watching and responding on the chat window is not good.

I solve it by configuring slack to send me email notifications and then close the tab. I'll check email only a couple times a day, I'll see it then and open a slack tab to respond, if needed.
> You can’t copyright a single recipe that contains components of other recipes, but if you had written a book titled “My grandmas chocolate chip cookies from scratch”, where the first recipe is for homemade chocolate chips, the second is for how to grind your own flour for dough, and the third is for combining the previous two into a cookie, then yeah you can copyright that particular set of recipes.

Suppose I want to compile the big book of all known recipes. Then it will contain every recipe in your book, in its entirety, as well as every recipe in every other book. But if I can put the entire contents of your book in my book then what is it that you're really claiming to protect? The order the recipes appear in the book, i.e. the order the classes appear in the file? Which isn't generally regarded as part of the API.
On the other hand, I want to buy a beer for whoever invented "email recall" messages, because they have given me a great deal of entertainment over the years. Pretty much the only way to get me to read one of the constant HR/Health & Wellness/Safety/whatever emails that deluged us in my previous job... if I see a recall message, I'm going through the original with a fine-toothed comb.
Astroturfing just means faking grass roots / community movement. Makes less sense here than in politics, but it would be possible if the marketing department was writing these blog posts on behalf of engineers.
I mean this in the most constructive way possible.

As a stripe customer for 6 years, I effectively only care about reducing transaction costs. Period.

Stripe's core business is being a part of a "credit card sales tax" that is substantial. Much of this is the fault of Visa/Mastercard/Amex, but that is the problem-space they exist in. Payments are transferring bits, and should be effectively free. If they want to "make the world better", that is basically the only problem that matters in their space, and I never see any recognition of this fact in anything Stripe puts out.

They do a LOT of work to try and make me feel better about the tax (e.g. your money goes towards book publishing!). None of it works, it just seems like the "your tax dollars at work" road signs.

Now maybe people at Stripe are working on ways to reduce the tax on businesses/consumers. It is not a technical problem, its societal. I hope they are, and they will announce something amazing and I can worship at their feet.

Please Stripe, work on reducing the costs to transact online by 1-2 orders of magnitude, where it should be.
> Tesla needs service, technician comes and fixes it on your driveway!

Unless the parts aren't in stock. Then technician comes and fixes it on your driveway, 2-3 months later!
> Tracking is the thing that makes the rideshare services better--and taxis could apply that, if they wanted to.

Don’t forget: upfront pricing. Most taxis won’t tell you the price until you get to your destination. And how do you know they took the quickest route?
Both parties are liberal. Republicans deviate from liberalism when pandering to their religious base, and Democrats deviate from liberalism when adding to the social safety net and labor rights, pandering to their left base. Neither party takes their deviations from liberalism seriously, and both parties have an interest in not resolving those (wedge) issues to keep voters from drifting to the other party.
Ha, of course :) This is what I got for searching for "networked channel controller": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=networke...
5G might make your situation worse.

My understanding being that for 5G to work well it needs more but smaller cells deployed around cities. I don't think 5G's strength is signal distance. Just given its higher frequency therefore it might make your situation worse.
Apples net income is bigger than their GDP and most of their people as impoverished, malnourished and poorly educated.

The upper caste from which all their "talent" is drawn is a small fraction of its total population mostly composed of the descendants of the lower class peasants and workers who supported the rise of the current regime. They supported not an establishment of such a system but rather an inversion of the prior order. It's an impoverished field from which little of value grows. To be clear there is nothing inferior about North Koreans by nature it is that the regime wastes the value that it does get.

Einsteins are in theory as apt to be born from the less privileged classes but there is only a 50 50 chance of getting enough food to be healthy let alone a chance at intellectual development.
US labor law doesn't actually use the word "racism", it's "racial discrimination" that's illegal in the workplace, which neatly avoids any argument about the definition of "racism".
If they wanted to lose, wouldn't it have been much easier (and possibly cheaper) to settle?

I can't imagine Oracle would have a problem with getting to say they were right, and getting a boatload of cash, without all the bother of the Supreme Court.

And doesn't intentional bad representation have weird and costly externalities, like reputation damage for the lawyer?

I love the image of Google and Oracle behaving like gangsters, but I'm having trouble imagining it being this sloppy.
To be brutally honest (as if not already), Doppler makes me wonder why not simply focus on building on-top of open solutions like Vault. Considering there is no on-prem version of Doppler, you could essentially run Vault behind the scenes and provide the experience you are aiming to deliver with Doppler, giving you a marketing strategy for free ("Ready to run secret management with a focus on usability; the fastest zero to production option for 'Enterprise' secret management"), that doesn't require contrasting yourself ("We ARE Vault; it's a great tool, we made it easier"), and could even value-add or contribute back upstream (vs trying to cannibalize someone who could be your peer), and even reduces your engineering effort and the need to revalidate all the security primitives (and have 3rd parties do that for you just by their using it).

Disclaimer; I have nothing to do with HashiCorp, they've just done right by me, have been great to the community, and are always improving and learning from their mistakes. A nerve is struck when marketing tells people that they are using the wrong tool (without backing that up with data), and making comparisons to a protocol which has fallen to the wayside aside from limited use cases but otherwise is predominantly insecure.
My mind kept replacing it with "surveillance detection route", even though I knew that wasn't right, until I looked for a meaning.
You can use the proton mail app to access a free proton mail account.
What meaning are you using then? Even the most basic dictionary definition of "politics" is something like "all the activities involved in determining the policies and actions of an organization or government."
So if you opt not to leave a data trail you are now extremely suspicious. How wonderful.
OpenJDK did not exist when Android was developed and initially released. Google did move to using it 2016 and may not have liability after that date.
TextSpark AI: “personalized AI writing assistant”
> A big majority of Democrats support Medicare 4 All

Sure, a big majority of Democrats in the electorate do.

The description of the center or center-right nature of the Democratic Party is not a description of the party-in-the-electorate but the institutional party. In fact, it's frequently expressly contrasted with the views of the party-in-the-electorate to argue that the institutional party is a poor agent of its membership.

Turning to polls of the party-in-the-electorate to argue against the characterization is, at best, not understanding what the discussion is about and, at worst, the fallacy of equivocation.

> netting transfers mixes up the tax system from the welfare system.

In every state, taxes and the welfare system are already mixed up, and the division of function between them isn’t consistent fromm state to state. Viewing them separately miscasts differences in preferred vehicle with differences in preferred function. Or vice versa.
Slaughterbots - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9CO6M2HsoIA
I meant model libraries/implementations with that like e.g. Stardist[0]. Obviously there will be some research niches that are mostly implemented in TF over PyTorch or the other way around.

[0]: https://github.com/mpicbg-csbd/stardist
To really understand how ed was useful, it's eye-opening to see exactly what life was like before video terminals.

Essentially, think of using your laptop, but instead of looking at a monitor you're reading the output from a printer. So if you type `ls`, you see the directory listing being literally printed out on a dot-matrix printer. Naturally the only way of text editing is with a line EDitor, which lets you edit text one command at a time.

When trying to use ed on a video terminal, it obviously looks wasteful. But that's because it was designed before video terminals were a thing. Kind of like using a modern day graphics card to play pong.

here is a video illustrating using a teletype:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2XLZ4Z8LpEE
Their latest is the z15 and their branding refers to IBM z (the same way they call their POWER lines IBM i, for the descendants of the AS/400, and IBM p, for the POWER boxes that run PowerVM, Linux and AIX). They build them mostly to order, in-house.
Wait what? Uart is active low. So it’s not to hard to bump the 12V down to 5V, but what happened with the -12V?
https://routific.com/
Certainly not, because the question of whether a government ought to be involved in some interaction is, clearly, a political question, and asking that question is clearly not equivalent to saying that the government ought to be involved in all interactions.
I will start looking into how to make the code open source before launching the project officially!

Unfortunately I won't be able to submit the project to https://hnpwa.com since they only allow (more or less) direct copies of HackerNews to their directory. [1]

[1] https://github.com/tastejs/hacker-news-pwas
This may not be true at all, depending on the distribution you use. You should ask a Linux user who does work similar to yours. I haven't had to "fiddle" for years, though I probably subconsciously avoid using software/hardware which I suspect may cause trouble.
Charles Fitzgerald (Platformonomics blog) has a series of sobering blog posts about IBM that are worth reading:

https://www.platformonomics.com/tag/ibm/

As for his take on this latest piece of news:
https://twitter.com/charlesfitz/status/1314310748835704833?s...

> IBM splitting itself up into two companies is kind of like when Netflix proposed to split itself up into its future-oriented streaming business and its dying legacy DVD business. Except to make the analogy work for IBM, imagine Netflix had no streaming business...