skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Thanks for recommending this! It's really cool. I submitted it as top level submission here and seems to be getting some traction: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24710948
Another similar project (16-bit map, Jitsi):

https://workadventu.re/
My wife’s cousin is a dealer mechanic, and he described this really perverse incentive WRT GM.

If the dealership sees a particular failure mode and reports it to GM, then they’ll issue a TSB (or maybe even trigger a recall). But in doing so, they’ll only pay a fixed fee to the dealer.

Instead, what happens is that the dealer has an incentive to build a local knowledge base on how to fix the common problems but not share it with GM as they can bill the repairs hourly.

(The specific failure mode he used as an example was inadequate weatherproofing in door electrics. The local fix was to pop-rivet the bottom of a plastic container in the right place so as to improve weather resistance)
It's also not always emphasized that the host never picks the same door you did. The host's behavior is not done in isolation. It is a response to your choice.
Mostly browsers require Secure Context rather than TLS, so http://127.0.0.1/ which is a secure context is fine.
How so? Surely the variable ping times and packet loss affect both scenarios equally?
I strongly disagree with your view of how markets and prices work, but I think we've have to agree to disagree here.

Thanks for the chat!
I don't think Fox News presents any particular difficulty to running the Color Revolution playbook in the US. They're so obviously biased that decent people can (and do) ignore them.

What matters is boots on the ground (aka protests) and whatever the legitimate media promotes to the public. That gives politicians (in both parties) the necessary cover to remove Trump from office by force.
“Founders” are PR for the current management, and are added or removed as suits that purpose.

Of course, the greater public awareness, the more likely that change will itself be negative PR and thus avoided. Also, contracts and legal disputes play role.

Elon Musk was not one of the two people who founded Tesla, but he is one of the five people who can call themselves cofounders after a lawsuit among them and the company.
> What happens when your ping time is >500ms?

Actually, that's not a problem with one reused connection versus N simultaneous connections (as coddle-hark said, the connections are made in parallel). It's a problem with how many round trips it takes to set up each connection.
that's an interestingly worded statement.

in concorde, the passengers didn't even notice breaking through the sound barrier either.

regarding sonic booms over land, their plan iirc is to reduce the noise level to the point where they can lobby to change legislation.
LibrePCB 0.1.5
Will you sponsor me to rush?
Its a joy in the corners. The batteries have all the weight, and that weight is at the center of the car, and you get a car that spins like a top(when you want to). My last accord (2015) had better ride quality. I was honestly very impressed with autopilot(works for commuter traffic very well) and handling..
When you get there: Consider allowing people to say they own the product, without writing a review for it. Then, allow people to request reviews for that product, along with specific questions they have about it. Send an email to the people who said they owned the product including the prompt from the requester, and publish their responses as reviews (with question as context).

On the reviewer side, I'm much more interested in reviewing a product if I got a note from an actual human asking about it. And maybe a little harder to game, since generic review text can't be copy-pasted as easily.
skeptical of any battery I'm not holding in my hand.

Um, yes. Still, this seems to be a reasonable way to go, especially since the developer claims to be able to make layers of carbon nanotubes cheaply.

Nawa, though... They announced in 2019 that they would be shipping ultracapacitors by the end of the year. But their products page doesn't list any. They're not a vendor known to Avnet or DigiKey. They announced a super-bike with ultracapacitor boost in 2019, and there are pictures, but none show the bike in motion.
And where the mods are mass deleting comments providing civil but negative feedback to the mods? Yeah, that's a really bad look.
The model 3 handles way better than the Model S, except for (probably) the not yet released model S Plaid (due next year).

The new 2020 model S handles a lot better than the older models, but is still quite big and boaty compared to the model 3, at least assuming that you want a "drivers car".

That said, I love driving my model S, it's quite comfortable, and rock solid for "normal" driving.
The benefit is that you can open up as many channels within a connection as you want so you obtain the same abilities as you'd normally implement in a game engine.
You can't really turn it around, because Monty knowing and using his knowledge of where the car is to reveal only goats is what makes switching advantageous.

In the case of the clumsy Monty of your example, it goes like this:

1. There is a 1/1000 chance door 429 has the car.

2a. If it has the car, then when Monty accidentally opens 998 doors no car will be revealed. This does not change the chances that 429 has that car, which remain 1/1000.

2b. If 429 does NOT have the car, then 998/999 times that Monty accidentally opens 998 doors, he will reveal a car, which presumably ends that game. There is only a 1/999 chance that he will not reveal the car and the game proceeds.

3. Thus, there are two cases where the game reaches the point of two remaining doors, with 998 revealed, the car is behind one of the two, and you have a chance to switch.

3a. Your door has the car, which happens 1/1000 games.

3b. Your door does not have the car, which happens 999/1000 x 1/999 games, or 1/1000 games.

In other words, if the clumsy Monty version is played repeatedly, 998 out of 1000 games end without even getting too the point you get a chance to switch, and 2 get to where you get the chance. In those two, one has the car in your door, one not. There is no advantage to switching.

In the case of the systematic Monty who knows where everything is and ALWAYS opens 998 goats, it goes like this:

1. There is a 1/1000 chance your door, 429, has the car.

2a. If it had the car, Monty opens 998 doors that do not have the car, leaving one door besides your yours.

2b. If your door did not have the car, it is one of the 999, and Monty systematically opens the 998 of those 999 that do not have the car.

3. You always reach the choice stage. You can either get there via 2a, which always results in the car being behind your door, or via 2b, which always results in the car being behind the other door.

3a. You get there via 2a in 1/1000 games.

3b. You get there via 2b in 999/1000 games.

If you do not switch, you only if and only if you got there via 2a, so you only win 1/1000 games. If you always switch, you win if and only if you get there via 2b, so you win 999/1000 games.
> If so, anything we can observe of seemingly another universe is in actuality part of our universe.

Yes, this is how I would interpret the definition of THE UNIVERSE. My personal interpretation of "another universe" would be something like- a multidimensional vacuum populated with matter/energy that currently exists from our inertial frame of reference, and there is nothing linking our own sparsely populated vacuum to this other universe. i.e. if you can observe it, then it's not a different universe. As Penrose states, this is merely an earlier version of the same universe, which existed before the Big Bang.

Here is a different prediction, a timelapse, of the fate of our universe (as told by Brian Cox), which assumes the universe will continue expanding...

https://youtu.be/uD4izuDMUQA?t=10
> I don't think steel is used much in aircraft.

It's not, but there's a very conspicuous counter-example - developed in the USSR.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikoyan-Gurevich_MiG-25 - with only 9% titanium content, compared to 26% of the F-15.

For a number of economic and engineering reasons, instead of making jets out of titanium, the USSR, for the most part, preferred to export it to the US, in exchange for dollars.
The problem with vetting is that it's unlikely to be done in an unbiased way. Facebook is a Silicon Valley company with a young staff that leans significantly to the left.

As a right-leaning individual this makes me uncomfortable because I know that staff aren't going to separate their politics from decision making surrounding vetting/choosing who gets to do the vetting. Here's a concrete example: Facebook staff, being left-leaning, do not view the "fine people hoax" as misinformation - their echo chamber wouldn't even bring it to their attention as something that could be misinformation, even though it is.

The only solution would be for a politically balanced workforce to be making these decisions, ideally a satellite office in a purple state/city with quotas for political leaning, set up only for the purposes of vetting. If we lived in a less polarized society, this wouldn't be an issue.

Would you feel comfortable if oil and gas workers who lean 80-90 percent Republican are "vetting" the information you're seeing (or are choosing who gets to do the vetting)?

As Naval says, you have a good system if you can hand the keys over to your opposition and things don't go wrong.
If pricepoint is the main concern, have you considered buying one of those used?
> On the other hand all things are not equal. Take laptops. You might think that a cheap one that costs a quarter of an expensive model would mean that you change it more often for the same cost.

> By the end of the upgrade cycle you'd probably have a faster cheap laptop than the original expensive one and that might be true but you'd also have to live with the cheap keyboard and the cheap screen and the cheap build quality of the case.

It isn't actually the case that the cheap laptop would be faster, unfortunately. It's not an apples-to-apples comparison, but my $1000 i5 MacBook Air from 2013 is still a snappier machine than a recent $250 Celeron Chromebook.
As COVID-19 shows, it is most of the times

Nerds are unpopular, admitting they really are and care about being popular, because they mostly don't believe in luck, faith, higher beings and what common people usually think it's important in life

A nerd won't think yoga it's good because yoga is popular on Instagram, a nerd believes exercise is important, regardless of the cool factor

People don't like being told "your beliefs are based on fashion" and will rule nerds are as "not interpersonally aligned".

Truth is they are usually right

Cassandra was a nerd, Trojans believed she was unpleasant and were defeated by a wooden horse

Also: being popular sucks, many intelligent people prefer other achievements in life
It is not disrespecful if done correctly....
Sounds like this would have a negative impact for startups where the majority of the compensation comes from equity right?
It’s quite fun to speculate. If you’re into this sort of thing, you’d like lemmino on YouTube. Pick any one of his deep dives and you’ll end up listening to something pretty close to what you did here: speculation, in a tight straight jacket.

Part of the problem with dark energy is that so much of it is unfalsifiable in ways similar to these theories. Of course, the key difference is that we can measure the effect dark matter has on the universe, whereas thus far no more than 4 dimensions have ever been observed.

Sure makes drinking fun though. Take a sip and say a hypothesis. Like apples to apples but for physicists.
The website will be back online soon; the system can be accessed ssh dps8@m.trnsz.com
It's no longer possible to fetch some things over HTTP at all, because the server responds, not with the content requested, but with a demand to use a different, more complicated protocol.
Airframes and the like automatically fall under ITAR. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Traffic_in_Arms_...
Absolutely agree, and it's essential that it remain that way if we hope to have any success with the Color Revolution playbook in November.
Unsafe is not how I would describe a model 3. It is not as comfortable as other cars.
I think you did not add the right context in your original post which is why you got that harsh response.
Imec Demonstrates CNT Pellicle Utilization on EUV Scanner
Memcmp being wrongly stripped like strcmp
‘Squidbot’ Jets Around and Takes Pics of Coral and Fish
Of course. He talks about research on quantum effects in microtubules, for example. Of how the concepts of computability and consciousness relate, how quantum physics drags in this concept of consciousness into science hitherto imagined purely objective. There are so many interesting connections, which might well be directions science will investigate in the years to come. That's a big part of what the whole book is about.

The other part is where he describes how quantum physics, logic and consciousness are weird. That's basically just science popularization, coming from a top mind in both math and physics. To me, that's already enough to justify the price of admission: the time and mental effort of going through the book at a pace that assures comprehension, which does take some patience.
> Without ECC RAM, how would you know that you had a single bit flip?

Errors, glitches, or files with unexplained errors. If there is a bit flip in code, more likely than not that'll be an invalid instruction, jump, or something like that, so it would crash. If it's in data, often there's some algorithm involved (compression, linked list, js/css/html, whatever), so that would either find invalid data and crash or display an error, or display at least a wrong pixel to a certain degree (but, true, I'd have to spot a single color channel being off and there's, let's say, a 4/8 chance of the significance being too low to really see; but this only applies to a raw bitmap case). Data on disk should also become corrupted (I'm thinking of image or video editing, data processing like gigabytes of port scans that I recently processed, etc.) if it was inadvertently modified in RAM. There are a ton of ways to notice this, though admittedly also a certain number of cases where one wouldn't.

I see your point though, like, if the error is silently corrected by the software or I just hit retry and don't figure what the error must have been (also because it won't be reproducible), I'm unlikely to find out that I need ECC. Maybe I should introduce random bit flips on a raspberry pi (so I don't corrupt my actual production filesystem) and use that for an evening for browsing / programming / other usual activities to either prove or disprove the theory that I'd notice if this happens with any sort of regularity.
Pills have more things than the active compound. Taking less may reduce any hypothetical secondary collateral effects from those substances, so it could be useful to explore it at least.

On the other hand, taking just a tenth part of a pill would be not easy to measure. Specially if you need to take the pills often. Sometimes you would take 1/10, other 3/10 or 1/20. That could be a recipe for problems.
There was a French retiree who got a ride in a Rafale, quite recently, and pulled the ejection handle by accident. Luckily he survived.

https://theaviationist.com/2020/04/09/report-released-on-fre...
Great idea; one I had considered myself, because I'm sick of buying garbage. There are two kind of rocks I saw it foundering on; one is luxury goods. Davok umbrellas; marketed as a luxury good -really, it's just a badass umbrella -maybe last one I ever need buy; very well made -almost worth what they cost.

The other rock it could founder on is green. I mean, if you buy something once, that's pretty green, but so often this sort of thing turns into sackcloth and ashes or absurd high fashion sackcloth and ashes that cost too much. The green variety is already a sort of consumer preference in Germany, but I think their idea has some "well made" meaning as well (nachhaltig? I dunno).

Here were a couple of places like that my German pals sent me early this year when I was thinking about it in earnest:

https://www.manufactum.de/

https://utopia.de/bestenlisten/onlineshops/

https://www.biber.de/

https://www.torquato.de/haus-wohnen/

Anyway, it's just a bunch of disconnected thoughts in my mind. Good on you for taking it further. I had thought the sibyl problem would make a rotten tomatoes type thing too difficult if it ever got juice (even if it didn't; bots are everywhere linking trash products). I had also thought it would be very difficult to scale as a manually proctored catalog of carefully assessed things, and it would be real easy to corrupt if you don't scale to the right kinds of reviewers.

The world does need more stuff like this. People who make shitty products should be punished.
I'd pay that much if it was guaranteed to cure it forever (minus any new injury that could occur). Been having it since I was 24 with a massive ear infection, it's been hell some days.
Linus Pauling too (perhaps even more notable, as he shared none of the prizes). But neither won prizes in different fields for the same work, which would be quite unexpected.
Yes, it is so simple. News should only come from approved sources. Once the veracity has been checked by a Facebook employee, it is then empirically true or false. I don't know why people in the 21st century cannot understand that all statements are true or false, and that we can place authority for determining truth with companies with known, trusted political allegiances.

For example, I have read a lot about healthcare-for-all not being free. The clue is in the name: "free" healthcare. I can't believe that misinformation, probably spread by insurance companies, has been allowed to spread. Facebook should put a stop to this.
Very similar story here but I'm not resentful of the late diagnosis.

Getting through most of my 20s without meds gave me more confidence in my own abilities.

If I had them earlier? Maybe my life would have been easier but maybe not.

Even today there are times when a bit of ADHD helps me make better decisions by just letting my mind wonder.

I think that using stimulants to control the ADHD like an on/off switch is the best of both worlds.
> The barriers to learning a new language like a native speaker are mostly economical rather than biological.

Are they? The article doesn't present clear evidence either way. And yet, that would be the most useful finding of this inquiry, were it to be completed.
For sure, just gotta get grinding though!
I was lucky enough to get this explanation from my high school physics teacher, who first presented the classic Monty Hall problem and then illustrated the changing of the odds by substituting all of the lockers in our school for the three doors. Switching gives a clear advantage.

The rest of this post is an anecdote from the same class that this brought to mind, and is unrelated to the topic. Maybe we can say it shows how good teachers engage their students or something, but really it’s just a good yarn.

We were learning about inelastic vs elastic collisions, and how an elastic collision has 2x the energy of an inelastic one. The teacher asked for a volunteer, and a bright-eyed student rose to the occasion. The teacher gave him some safety glasses and told him to lie down on the floor.

The teacher took the inelastic ball and said, “Okay, I’m gonna drop this on your forehead now, ready?” PLONK. “Ow.”

“Remember that feeling! This is the elastic one, and it has the same mass, so it should hurt twice as much.” PLONK. “Ow.”

The teacher asked, “So, did the second one hurt more than the first?” The rest of us anticipated the experimental confirmation of what we’d just learned about.

“...I couldn’t really tell the difference,” said the student.

“Yeah,” said the teacher, “I knew you wouldn’t. I just wanted to see if you’d let me do it.”
The English will correct your accent, by lightly making fun of it. It is most clear when you are an immigrant from an english speaking country or switch class brackets.
If I'm understanding you correctly, there was a period of a few days where you were both drinking grapefruit juice and taking vitamin D, and your headache lasted for a month afterwards?
The first public release of Android was a beta in 2007 (also, layer in 2007, the first SDK preview was released), and it was released to OHA members before that.

But the GPL is irrelevant, Google has never distributed under the GPL terms. That whatever it was doing was not under a Sun/Oracle license is not in dispute.
Late Aaron Swartz is omitted from the founders page of Reddit
Uneconomical, dragging a huge cone of air along with your plane.

The pressure Wave in front of the moving plane moves away at the speed of sound, so it just stacks up.
I interpreted the original game as follows: you can freely choose any of the three doors. Monty then opens one of the doors that you didn't pick, and then you may again freely choose any of the three doors. (In the standard problem, there is no reason why you would choose Monty's door). The question is: does the strategy "choose a new door" have better odds of winning?

We can work out odds for this "always switch away from original door" strategy: suppose you initially chose a door with the car (1/3 probability). Then choosing a new door makes you surely lose regardless. On the other hand, suppose you initially chose a door with a goat (2/3 probability). Then regardless of which of the two doors Monty opens, you can choose the car (if he revealed the car, choose that. If he revealed the goat, choose the other door). So our odds of winning with this strategy are still 2/3.

So it's up to the interpretation of the modified game I guess.
That's a great theory, until you realize that Tesla's been around 17 years, and that for a lot of their issues they really could crib notes on how other vehicle manufacturers do things. A huge amount of their QA issues around non-drive train components are solved problems everywhere else, and they've been at it for a while now.
This lady sounds quite obnoxious even by German standards.
Replace 'A' with 'The' and it works. Tbh I assumed people were already familiar with the Barber Paradox and didn't word it defensively, but if you take 'a barber' as referring to a specific barber then it's a paradox.
The article says you need a hardware device to maintain persistence and also recommends using Apple Configurator to “ reinstall bridgeOS on your T2 chip“.

So, a) a T2 hack persists until such reinstall and b) you don’t need a persistent beachhead if you’ve taken the hill and maintain persistence there. This exploit opens the door to that, and you can install keyboard intercepts via the new System Extensions Interface. Did it yesterday myself via an update to Karibiner. Notarization can be disabled by interrupting the network pathway and you can definitely disable SIP after you capture the password. In essence, T2 is the lynchpin that prevents the defeat of other aspects of macOS security.
Funny you mention it, because if you search “PS5 teardown” on YouTube right now, the original video is the 13th (!) result.

https://web.archive.org/web/20201007230301if_/https://www.yo...
But it's not just better than nothing. It is good, even great. It does exactly what I need without issue and has worked reliably for me for decades. It may not be perfectly elegant and beautiful in every technical aspect of its design but that doesn't really matter to me.

You might say Firewire could have provided the same for me, but Firewire wasn't widely deployed or adopted. Therefore it could not have replaced USB for my use cases. That may not be a technical issue, but I don't really care as a user if the failure of Firewire is technical or not. Technical superiority is only a small piece of the puzzle. Plus, I think you are underestimating the technical advantages which led to USB's success (e.g. low cost).
Ah, that is unfortunate. Someone submitted a PR on GitHub. Since it doesn't work, I'll revert it.