skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Editing is everything. It literally is what turns footage into cinema. Otherwise you’re just watching a documentary of people playing dress up and pretend.

That’s why there was such an outcry recently when the Academy discussed movie the Oscar for Best Editing out of the main broadcast and into the second tier awards they do off the air. It makes sense when you come at it with the mindset that no one cares about editors. But much less so when you actually understand cinematography and movie making.
was in high school, hated my pizza kitchen job, talked to a buddy about how to install slackware from floppies during swim practice.. rest is history...
Beautiful React UI Components
Is it concrete? Inside Biosphere 2?

https://apnews.com/article/56b7e682362016c1d97f094c2cde4a46
Alzheimer’s may be driven by overactivation of cerebral fructose metabolism
Fantastic

The killer feature here would be HD voice with no squelch crash on simplex or repeater use. Ham used to be ahead of curve on a lot of communication tech. This would at least bring it more even with the newer stuff out there.
crazy level of symbolicness ..
Not like they don't make money for Coke/Pepsi post acquisition.
> If you really meant as being humble affecting my performance, I fail to see how that is possible

Well, being humble could affect your desire to prove yourself, and from there your performance.
>Unfortunately for them, the rest of the world is coming online and has a different view of things. We’re starting to see this with India and the EU.

Reddit moderation is especially going to clash with many Europeans view on immigration from Islamic countries.
Ask HN: What are your favourite sources for open source tech news?
Mailgo, a new concept of mailto and tel links (repository)
This is shown in the Wild Kratts episode "A Huge Orange Problem", first broadcast in 2012.
> Why can Google develop TensorFlow? Because they can make a lot more money from selling/renting TensorFlow optimized hardware.

Joel said it the best (in 2002!):

Smart companies try to commoditize their products’ complements.

...

Headline: Sun Develops Java; New “Bytecode” System Means Write Once, Run Anywhere.

The bytecode idea is not new — programmers have always tried to make their code run on as many machines as possible. (That’s how you commoditize your complement). For years Microsoft had its own p-code compiler and portable windowing layer which let Excel run on Mac, Windows, and OS/2, and on Motorola, Intel, Alpha, MIPS and PowerPC chips. Quark has a layer which runs Macintosh code on Windows. The C programming language is best described as a hardware-independent assembler language. It’s not a new idea to software developers.

If you can run your software anywhere, that makes hardware more of a commodity. As hardware prices go down, the market expands, driving more demand for software (and leaving customers with extra money to spend on software which can now be more expensive.)

Sun’s enthusiasm for WORA is, um, strange, because Sun is a hardware company. Making hardware a commodity is the last thing they want to do.

Oooooooooooooooooooooops!

https://www.joelonsoftware.com/2002/06/12/strategy-letter-v/

Highly recommended reading it. This blog post gave us right framework to be able to decide which components to open source without worrying about licenses (we have used Apache and Mozilla Public License so far for different projects).

Also, enforcing GPL has turned out to be not straight-forward? If you intend to make money then open sourcing your complements makes so much sense that which license you choose kind of becomes moot (in fact, you're better off choosing a more permissive license like MIT or Apache). If you're going to open source your secret sauce, it better be because you're competing with an incumbent (GitLab -> GitHub; PostHog -> Amplitude) and desire that kind of a differentiation.
I see the same thing with private enterprise everyday.
1965, sixteen years old, learned FORTRAN at a summer Math Camp. Walked off the street and got a programming job with an insurance company in 1970 (Assembler).
Visual Basic, Swift, and even Scratch also rank higher on usage lists than some of those that are on the chart. Chapel is likely to be more influential. The "limited to languages being taught or used" excuse is super thin.
If rules applied to all subs the same topmindsofreddit would have been banned long ago
The ones in that render probably. I think it is very theoretical.
For Scandinavians doing e.g. banking the UK has previously been a good option.
The word "delete" is printed on the key.
French bar owners arrested for offering free WiFi but not keeping logs
There is a misunderstanding. The skynet system did not flag them for any of the reasons you would flag them, it is not intelligent, it simply runs map reduce on "who talks to whom" data, with some scores set for some of the numbers. By nature of the algorithm it tends to mark journalists and lawyers as high value targets, because their phones were in contact with scored phones or low value phones that were in contact with such scored phones.

Point is: if such a system would be used against other populations, it would again flag journalists and lawyers as high value.
I guess this spot is not so sweet when Amazon "self-hosts" your software. So you need to make up your mind.
I became a Mac fan before I was a developer, because it was a lot more pleasant and less buggy and crash-prone than Windows XP or 7.

Then I became a developer, around the same time that MacBook keyboards started to suck, and now I use a ThinkPad and haven't looked back.
But that's exactly what wouldn't be suitable for reducing pollution from bunker fuel. Shippers would pay the same taxes as for burning kerosene or diesel, plus or minus a few percent, but they'd go with the cheaper option and cause huge sulphur pollution in port cities.

The regulations we have now (no high-sulphur fuels in cities, no leaded gasoline...) are better than taxing only CO2 emissions, even if they're not perfect.
It can’t be a free speech issue. Reddit is not part of government.
Yet somehow Japan and Korea, despite their developed economies, manage to find native workers for nearly all jobs. But I guess if a TV show says so, it must be true.
Parent poster might be reacting to the last few days, which really did have an uncharacteristically high number of very busy threads about psychiatric medication. Hopefully it’s just one of those “phases” HN goes through week-in week-out.
So they are technically correct. It shows though that --given the near martyr status Aaron has-- he is left out of the picture. Reddit are no rebbels, at least not anymore or "less so nowadays".

I have most hopes for Lemmy[0] as a place for the more rebbel Redditors to seek refuge. Really cool project, advancing really nicely.

[0]: https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy
Did you notice that the author added Algol and Simula since we had this exchange? Kinda blows apart your theory of what the criteria were.
Switzerland.

(and for the cousin comment: PfP yes, NATO no.)
If I remember correctly, he had written a quite modern webserver in Python for its time et it became the basis of Reddit, or something like that. Anyway, I've always associated Aaron to Reddit, from the start.
The fact that you mentioned "paperwork" for an app store application sums up exactly how this whole mess will turn out. :)

This Indian government has certainly reduced regulations and compliance - if you're in the B club. I have a distant grand uncle and an uncle both in the B club. They were essentially waved through to set up shop in UP - even though they're Muslim, openly religious and practicing, and have literally been photographed very often inviting Rahul Gandhi and other Congress leaders to their homes right before elections.

Money talks. I mentioned in another comment on HN, that if you are in the B club, you're likely the one ordering the gangsters in the government.
By extreme procrastination. It works , but is unnecessarily stressful : those few days. And very demotivating the rest of the days.
US has never done anything in foreign affairs for free.
I’ve never felt so close to hanging out with people online as when I frequented voice chat channels. In high school, my friends and I had one that we’d spend time in, doing homework, video games, w/e. If you needed to go heads-down on something, you just went into the AFK channel where everyone was force-muted.

I’d love to try it out at work, but I feel like there’s a lack of understanding culturally how voice chat is supposed to work and what a good setup looks like. People I’ve talked to about using it at work are (rightly) worried about interruptions to flow.
Shapez.io: open-source base building game inspired by Factorio
Is it legal to use crypto with ham transmissions? I was the under the impression that was generally forbidden.
> See Japan where comics that show sexual abuse of "young looking individuals" are freely distributed.

https://myanimelist.net/manga/127513/Dansei_Kyoufushou_Datta...

A manga that depicts serious child abuse that turned the author into a porn star. It's written by herself. Maybe she shouldn't be allowed to express herself and hide it. We can all then live a happy fantasy where everyone is a good person in any depiction.

My first thought when reading the manga, how can we stop this?

Suffice to say, I didn't enjoy it one bit but I never thought this should be censored.

There are many similar manga that depicts all sorts of stuff. Some of them written by the people which were unfortunate.

It's also evident you don't care about the medium because you used the word comic.

Censorship of evil acts was rampant in the history. People didn't want to admit what others were doing. There are broader issues if people are pushed to the extreme by media. Why would someone join a terrorist group after watching one of their videos? There must be something else causing the problem. The videos are a symptom, not a cause.

Last, I have consumed media of both your examples. It didn't turn me into a child abuser or a terrorist. I want to help make world a safer place for children and terrorism free more than before. I want to stop it so it stops get depicted on its own.
I have no idea what you're implying by that, but do you know what else clashes with "Europeans view on immigration from Islamic countries"?

Views from other Europeans.

We're not an homogenic bunch as you think.
Reddit is very much a nest of hate, if you are any stripe of conservative.

"The Donald" was censored, then banned, for speech less heinous, in lesser amounts, and with lower, or often negative, voting scores, than is currently allowed on the site now (by those with approved political beliefs, of course).

Those with non-approved beliefs find themselves silenced and censored by moderators and admins, while those who instigated their silencing are left unmolested.

Subreddits with thousands (or in the case of "The Donald", HUNDREDS of thousands) of members are banned for the actions of a very, very few. In some such cases, those few were outside instigators (Reddit calls them "brigaders") from subreddits with opposing views; purposefully posting inflammatory material under sockpuppet accounts. The "brigaders" then report the naughty speech to the admins.

Doesn't take many such reports to have all those thousands of voices silenced. Of course this tends to go one way. Although "brigading" is ostensibly against Reddit rules, subreddits with approved views are allowed to do it openly, although some do in private.

And lest we forget, the CEO of Reddit HIMSELF has hacked into user accounts of those with unapproved views, and posted inflammatory things posing AS them (an act which Redditors were assured was not possible). Supposedly he's only done it a few times, but how are Redditors to know for sure?

When all these activities on the part of Reddit's leadership go one way, and are directed specifically against one political persuasion, it becomes very clear that Reddit IS a nest of hate, and that's the way they like it. It is also clear that they censor not to stop "hate" but to cease the discussion and meme production of conservatives, to which they partially attribute Trump's 2016 victory.

To this end, they've recently gone so far as to announce that they will censure users for merely VOTING on unapproved topics. Sure, they say those unapproved topics are "hate", but when the people defining "hate" are so slimy as to hack into and pose as their own users to sow discord, or to tacitly approve one way "brigades", one need not wonder their actual purposes.

Like so many of their brethren in the media who took it personally when Hillary lost, they are taking drastic action to be sure that such free speech activities not continue if there is any possibility of a repeat of 2016.
I'm not sure was is your point. I'll try with another answer.

I don't remember something like the clock at the molecular level, but I think it is "theoretically possible" (or to be more accurate, "not theoretically impossible").

[Weird example warning]

In the mitochondria the ATP synthase https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ATP_synthase use the H+ difference of the inner and outer part to produce ATP. The main problem is how to create this difference without sugar or pyruvate, using only a change of temperature.

Perhaps it is possible to put a weak acid outside of a mitochondria, and select the weak acid that changes the dissociation constant a lot with the temperature.

So when temperature is high it is mostly dissociated and the acidity is high and the mitochondria produces ATP. But after some time there is no difference in the concentration of H+ inside and outside of the mitochondria and the process stop.

Then reduce the temperature so the acidity outside is low, and the H+ inside the mitochondria can escape by other pores. (Perhaps we need to make some additional pores for this? The pores must be small and not very polar.) After some time, the concentration of H+ inside the mitochondria is low again. And we can repeat the cycle.

[/Weird example warning]

This will be painfully slow and painfully inefficient. My biochemistry level is too low to be sure this is possible, but at lest I think it is not theoretically impossible.

It is a small system, so I think it is a relevant comparison in spite it is very different of a graphene membrane in a vacuum chamber.
I'm not a lawyer either, but from what I understand: the rights you can transfer are limited, and you can generally only give usage rights, potentially exclusive usage rights that also exclude the author from using the patch.

However, it gets complicated quickly. For example if they decide to sell the company or take on a new investor, the author could take back the grant under some circumstances which brings its own set of challenges. Can you now simply fix it yourself by writing the same code? Either you'd violate copyright or you didn't need the whole licensing thing in the first place.

Another issue is the fee: you can agree on a fee but if it's not "appropriate", that agreement is void (to protect authors from being tricked with regards to the value of their contribution).

There's a lot of uncertainty involved, which is why companies like using commercial licenses: you can usually trust that the company selling that license has figured out all the details.
One knob is even better.

https://www.usaequipmentdirect.com/sharp-commercial-medium-d...
In your example company, I think remote work may have been the catalyst for the change you’re talking about in the specific case. But what if they’d introduced some other small change that had nothing to do with remote work like moving the conference rooms to the other side of the building so that people not in a conference couldn’t easily tell there was a meeting going on. Each time the environment changes, new building, new project etc... we don’t think it’s necessary to have had a different culture from the beginning or to completely remake the culture from the ground up. We just make the appropriate changes.

Culture has to adapt to the environment. There’s nothing special about it being remote.

If you have an open office and everyone is constantly having loud, impromptu meetings in the same space, that’s just as much of a problem.
I have to second your two points on finding a seasoned psychiatrist. I also found an extremely good therapist who didn't case judgement on my experiences.

Between the two of them, I was able to take charge of my own treatment and be able to help myself instead of being backed into a corner.

Poor mental health treatment just makes things worse. I have friends who badly need therapy and coping skill but can't get over a therapist who hurt them in the past.
"The nail that sticks up" isn't necessarily about talent. It's about standing out in any way.
They could try begging to Congress, like the airlines.
To put it into context I'm in a small team, our team is part of a larger 40+ team. There are things I would be comfortable saying openly with my team Vs the wider team.
Not that I have much of a filter anyway...

We tried doing a bimonthly quiz across our wider team but attendance waned and it was a lot of work for people to pull together content and manage etc.

In our smaller team, you are right and not everyone is into the idea every week, but they are vocal about it and the reasons (deadline/family etc). They are not penalised in any way shape or form for being honest.
We also had themed stand-ups for a while (it was good to cheer us up from time to time but a lot of work).

We also have to acknowledge that it's different for everyone, we all have different circumstances.

I have a daughter, two of my colleagues have two kids, one is single, one is in a relationship.
Half the team are from different countries, and have had visits home cancelled, they have been upset on calls I've been depressed about things too at times, but you have to be honest with your team, now more than ever you need to be supportive of eachother.

The most simple thing I've found is to have a variety of MS Teams backgrounds that are not your standard ones. It's a simple thing but can get a smile every now and then, especially when someone's kid appears!
Subreddits are composed of communities which (in theory) are self-moderating. The communities themselves can be publishers or platforms, the question here is about whether or not Reddit should have the editorial authority to delete subreddits at will.

Here is a small list: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Controversial_Reddit_communiti.... Most of these subreddits are not Nazi or Stalinist-level hateful, but could still be considered hateful (the definition of hate is actually very shaky, I regret saying "objectively hateful" in my above comment).

I could back to you with a longer list of more underground subreddits, though I don't really have the time to. You can go to something like https://reddit.guide and search for subreddits similar to the ones banned. Plenty are still active, just much smaller.
A simpler UI is Sharp R21LCFS. Link elsewhere in thread.
Simple SaaS Using Django and Vue – Tutorial
> Now you have to check that your vector has at least one element.

Which may lead the candidate to ask the interviewer “What should be the behavior on an empty vector?” Returning MIN_INT or throwing an exception may both be reasonable depending on the application, but I would consider it good signal if the candidate at least acknowledges that this is an edge case.
I’m sure that is caveated on some people and for some conditions. I’d expect a better standard and more research to be defined here or we’ll end up with another paroxetine mess on our hands.

I lost a decade of my life to cleaning up after that mess and that was just a family member’s encounter with it.

What is factual is that things are invariably more complicated than they look when it comes to human minds.

Look up “study 329” for an example of complexity.
Show HN: Build a Pokémon Game to Train and Battle with Pokémons Using Vyper
>"I was able to log into my own account after resetting the password" isn't a particularly good attention grabber

You’d still be resetting the password in a way that doesn’t require access to the associated email account but only knowledge of the email address. It doesn’t make any difference whether you created the account yourself or got a friend to do it for you. You're still showing that anyone who knows my email address can access my Grindr account, which surely ought to grab people's attention.

From my point of view, its a precursor to a sensible discussion about this that we acknowledge that Troy had Scott make the profile purely to add a little humor to the post. There’s of course nothing wrong with adding humor to a blog post. However, subtly mocking people for being gay is a pretty ingrained part of our culture, and it’s easy for straight people to thoughtlessly slip into doing it.

I know that you have given an alternative explanation of the intention behind the photo, but unfortunately it's not the explanation that Troy himself gave in the comments.
So AX.25 isn’t standardized anymore but now proprietary?
The woke Disney remakes have all been worse than their previous counterparts. The pseudo-empowerment of Jasmin in the live action Alladin was particularly egregious. She is a strong character in the original with nuance and agency. In the remake she sings a song about female empowerment where she tells everyone off, but it turns out to be a dream sequence. Sigh.

Having said all that, the live action Cinderella remake was really something special. I can’t recommend it enough. After seeing it, I great hopes for the rest. I’ve since been disappointed.
Yeah, ethics is subjective and it's fascinating that many smart people don't realize this. Ultimately it always boils down to "I feel this is right".

Of course, you can have objective claims such as "if all people followed this principle, it would have this outcome".
As said, and said agian, I mention videos of abuse (not abuse itself). I will not tell you this again if you still dot get that.

> To argue that child pornography is a form of speech is rather ridiculous

To lawyers it is not. Again this is about the video, not the act itself. You repeatedly dont get that difference.

> but there are limits on forms of expression. I cannot choose to stab people as a form of free expression, nor torch a building.

Great! you get it! We cannot allow all expression. Now on stabbing we agree. On abuse videos as well. But on inciting hate/violence we dont.

May I ask why you want to defend inciting hate/violence -speech?
crickets...
For me that is very group dependent. The variance is so high that talking about my average behaviour in these groups is meaningless.
"Pesticides like Zyclon B were used to gas the Jews. This man is an evil Nazi who we must ban."
Then why did they ban /r/Holodomor? Ideological motivation.
Very boring: wiped windows from my laptop and installed Ubuntu. Didn't have another option but to use it afterwards.
> I suspect the human mind is tailored to promote the first outcome and stick it's fingers in its metaphorical ears about the last two outcomes.

It's more complicated than that. Plenty of people hear the bad outcomes and stick their fingers in their ears about the good ones. The subject of recreational drug use is a particularly good one for eliciting this behaviour, both for and against.

The interesting questions are how people in the same society get primed for one reaction over the other, and how we can individually avoid this behaviour and approach controversial topics with an open mind.
Speaking of this, studies of open source projects have also shown that the primary barrier to communication is organisational distance (i.e. how far up the chain of command you have to go until you have a manager in common) and not physical distance.

(Personal hypothesis: this is probably more of an issue with the type of organisation that values a hierarchical departmental layout inspired by the industrial revolution, instead of smaller Toyota production system-style teams.)