skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Your original statement was, ALL of the founding fathers viewed commerce and property as a function or construct of society, rather than a natural right in itself which is false.

You are quoting out of context to support a particular view.

For example the first you posted from Franklin continues:

"All Property, indeed, except the Savage's temporary Cabin, his Bow, his Matchcoat, and other little Acquisitions, absolutely necessary for his Subsistence, seems to me to be the Creature of public Convention. Hence the Public has the Right of Regulating Descents, and all other Conveyances of Property, and even of limiting the Quantity and the Uses of it. All the Property that is necessary to a Man, for the Conservation of the Individual and the Propagation of the Species, is his natural Right, which none can justly deprive him of: But all Property superfluous to such purposes is the Property of the Publick, who, by their Laws, have created it, and who may therefore by other Laws dispose of it, whenever the Welfare of the Publick shall demand such Disposition."

It is the "Property superfluous to such purposes" that belongs to society. Your interpretation was contrary tp that, believing it to mean ALL property belongs to society. That is refuted by the very links you posted.

In Frankin's second quote, he stated his belief, rightly so, that he was hesitant to create an aristocracy based on property. He was arguing for a bicameral legislature and in the process admitted the rights of people to own property (the upper legislature composed of property owners).

Also, in Franklin's second quote, you quoted out of context. Immediately, prior to what you quoted, he spoke about property rights. We know, that, when one of them has attempted to keep a few Swine, he has not been able to maintain a Property in them, his neighbours thinking they have a Right to kill and eat them whenever they want Provision, it being one of their Maxims that hunting is free for all; the accumulation therefore of Property in such a Society, and its Security to Individuals in every Society, must be an Effect of the Protection afforded to it by the joint Strength of the Society, in the Execution of its Laws.. His argument is that the purpose of a society is to protect property rights.
My numbers were out of date. Germany has a higher GDP per capita than South Carolina, Alabama, Idaho, West Virginia, Arkansas and Mississippi.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_and_territ...

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_Germany
Even if they couldn't, I'm sure they'd try.
> And as an Iraqi, I wish they had the balls to bomb their headquarters.

Please don't. It breaks the rules at https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html badly, and it also badly discredits any good information in the rest of your comment.
"<(cmd)" and ">(cmd)" would be nice to add.
"Really, Sonos is a great example of what happens when you follow your instructions to "make a good product and sell it at a profit"... they did that for many years, and made money.... but now most people who want a speaker like Sonos makes already have them, and their growth has stopped."

No.

Sonos has a very small market penetration and could have continued growing, modestly, with enthusiastic reviews and glowing recommendations forever.

The problem was not that they did not have a business model - the problem was that nobody was going to get filthy rich with that business model. They found that to be unacceptable and did silly things - like an IPO.

Now they're stuck on a path that requires rapid growth. You could have easily predicted, years ago, that any company in this position would do things like drop support for old devices and get pushy with people to adopt their app (although I have to admit, I never would have predicted that they would gut their desktop player and force people to use the app) ... and adopt sleazy and desperate relationships with data brokers, etc.

Fuck them. I wish they knew how much I loved their company, and their product, and how much I hate them now.
yea so there is a "drift threshold" of 2 seconds, and my thinking for this is that instead of having the frames jump around many times when we go out of sync it would be preferable to allow for some difference between peers to reduce the number of times we need to sync up.
It's a good counterpoint to people that invoke nationalism as a reason to allow shitty business/environmental practice
I'm hearing this rationalization more frequently: if we don't do it, someone else will.

It's a last ditch effort to justify bad behavior. Really? That's all you got?

We are broken.
Note that an FE car can't run a full F1 race, and the "ICBM" doesn't exist in the context of motorsports. Both racing series are much more likely to stay where they are given the circumstances. The most extreme outcome would be F1 switching to zero emissions in some way.
That’s not a fallacy. I’m telling you the problem doesn’t lie with Facebook-the-platform alone.
ADHD brains are actually different due to pervasive developmental delays.

It's not even really related to intelligence. ADHDers run the gamut from really stupid, to average, to really smart.

I'm reasonably intelligent, but boy do I struggle with the basics on a day to day basis. Understanding complex stuff is fairly fun and engaging for me, so I spend a bunch of time doing it. That's usually at the expense of being a good husband, father, friend or brother.

It doesn't seem to be what you think it is.
Those two aren't particularly interesting outside macOS/iOS -- they're mostly just front-ends. The real implementation is in diskarbitrationd and the kernel.
Which is interesting since that would mean that "the nine planets" is a totally valid, understood concept, just like "the seven seas" - which is actually since a more interesting concept since that's a much more vague term since arguably the actual number of "seas" is anywhere between 1 (since basically all the worlds water is interconnected, bar a few endorheic basins) and "many", if you start counting large inland bodies like the great lakes that see substantial ship traffic.
The cars are so fast and powerful that they have these boost rules that the drivers can use up like nitro in a video game. If F1 went all electric, slowed down a little, and got rid of this boost stuff I think it would be far more entertaining and easier to follow the action, like it used to be.
that's not how pardons have to work. You can be pardoned post conviction or preemptively. I'm glad I could update you on that. See Abraham Lincoln's and Gerald Ford's pardons in particular.
The real problem with these terms - if there can be said to be a real problem - is that they give the appearance of there being a naturalistic process by which the English language evolves a great deal of flowery diversity. One assumes that, because there are all these apparently used terms, there must be a reason of sorts as to why they evolved.

But there isn’t. They’re just silly things people made up for the purpose of making them up and having funny names for things.
Fratelli Tutti: On Fraternity and Social Friendship
That was tried with OpenDarwin, but Apple was not a fan of the project IIRC.

More generally, it doesn't offer much of practical value to use the Darwin kernel which is at this point pretty tied to Apple hardware that comes with OS X anyway. You can still Hackintosh but it just adds a lot of additional complexity that you won't have to deal with on Linux.
the server does not actually ever receive any part of the video, it is peer to peer (webrtc).
That's one of the reasons why medicine is tricky.

Sit down and come up with every single possible cause of that pain, from something random and physiological, to something psychological, to something you may be doing, but may be embarrassed to talk about, to shoes, to pants, to your belt, to your cell phone holster, to the wallet you sit on, to the chair you use at work, to referred pain, to a myopathy, to a pulled muscle, to a whatever. What if during those morning runs one side of the street where your left foot falls is a slightly different height than the other side where your right foot falls and that was causing the pain? What if you keep smacking your hip on the edge of the pool? What if you tread water weird?

That's what you're asking a general practitioner to do perfectly in 20 minutes, who then would also have to know every single weird possible cause of every other possible thing a human being could wander into the office complaining of, a nonzero percentage of which is totally imaginary.

You are far, far better at knowing every strange element of your daily routine that may be causing you bodily discomfort. No doctor can reasonably sort all of that out for every patient, let alone a GP who is supposed to know everything about everything.

It's like the office HR person doing WFH asking the tech guys to diagnose their computer that is bugging out because the HR person's cat unknowingly puked on the case and it leaked onto the motherboard the night before. All in 20 minutes. Then the HR person gets mad because the tech guys didn't specifically ask "is there any possibility that an animal may have vomited on the motherboard?"

I don't mean to belittle your experience in any way, I'm just trying to make my comment entertaining so you might chuckle at it, but does my point make sense?
Maybe they could get away with slightly slower. They already have a bit of a problem where the aerodynamics have gotten so good that a lot of the tracks have corners that are just taken flat out now. Lap records are still being broken with the lower powered hybrid engines.
Does FastCGI have a history of security bugs due to environment var / header confusion or just regular CGI?
I can't tell you how to implement one from scratch if that's your question, but I use apache httpd with mod_fcgi.

This server isn't directly exposed, only valid requests are proxied to it.

I have no reason to think this is the best approach, it's a near forgotten foundational layer of an application that has been stable and reliable for a decade, that is under constant attack and regularly pen-tested.
Bonjour Compatibility Test
So we've just rediscovered stateful web applications. Been doing those since early 90's and still doing it now (well among lots of other things). The difference for me is that I've never went for FastCGI. I would instead embed HTTP server in the application itself. In the beginning when the whole concept was young said server would face the outside world directly, now it is hiding behind reverse proxies like Nginx.
I tried to write some cgi/fastcgi apps in C++ with apache. A lot of documentation has disappeared from the web sadly.
80€/h seems really low to me. I don’t think there’s a point of charging by the hour unless you’re doing very small features adds, tests, or maintenance work. I think one should always opt to get paid on a project basis.
I've been working with a cardiologist, a rheumatologist, and a pulmonologist all within UCSF, and as far as I can tell they're doing a great job coordinating with each other to treat my malady. For example, they've avoided ordering redundant scans in order to minimize my radiation exposure. I think I'm pretty lucky to have access to UCSF, and doubly so since I arbitrarily switched to a PPO insurance plan this year before I knew I had any problems. I'm feeling especially appreciative because my failed atrioventricular nerves started working again today! Apparently they've been giving me the right drugs.

While I'm reflecting on how lucky I am to live somewhere with great health care, here's a shameless plug for the company I work for, Zipline International. We're building a scalable platform for delivering life saving medical supplies to hard to reach places that wouldn't otherwise have access, based on really cool/boring because they're so reliable UAVs. We're definitely hiring on the embedded team, and I'm sure on all the other software teams as well. Our internal metrics are getting pretty mind blowing to follow, in terms of deliveries per day/cumulative distance flown per day/literal lives saved per day. I guarantee there's plenty of fun projects to work on!
I thought only the big theater version took arbitrary speaker positions, and the home theater version used premixed channels. But now I can't remember where I read that, so I could be wrong.
For what it's worth, I've had the same issue and have been able to reproduce some Safari bugs in the WebKit-based Midori.
Don’t know what a p-value is?
I saw this behavior under Ubuntu.

Poking around the Firefox wiki, it looks like it uses it's own native backends on basically every platform except Windows.

I have no idea whether any of this is relevant to the original Firefox support issue.
I think the midfield racing has actually gotten better this season. If they could just do something about Mercedes being so dominant the sport wouldn’t be in a bad place.
Except mainstream science rejects the validity of SPECT scans as a diagnostic tool for ADHD.

fMRI is getting closer as time passes and the techniques improve but still agreed to not be good enough yet.
The first versions weren't. It wasn't until people wanted to port it to the DEC Alpha architecture in 1995 that the changes that they proposed ended up removing a lot of the X86 dependencies. That made further ports much easier.
ohhh nice, I've been looking for something like this, actually. Thanks!
That is precisely the reason budget cap will come into effect from 2021.
Can someone point me to some literature that explains the benefits of using something like Xen over KVM/qemu? I’m mostly experienced with Linux systems, so KVM is generally what I reach for.
That's the reason Nassim Taleb gave in Black Swan as well. He said in Europe and Asia, failing is looked at negatively, while in the USA failing is fine, as long as it wasn't due to lack of effort. So the USA has a lot of failures, but also a lot of innovation, whereas European businesses are more stable, but also don't innovate as much.
Or are developers paid a disproportionate wage in comparison to other jobs?

Why should a software developer get paid hundreds of thousands of dollars a year, while those who weren't lucky enough to be born with the required intelligence (despite what coding bootcamps say, not everyone is cut out to write code) are doomed to work a low-wage job for their entire life? It's the height of privilege. And if you subscribe to the theory that intelligence is a product of a child's developmental environment (nature over nature), it serves to increase social stratification and decrease class mobility.

Builders and electricians are just as much key employees as software developers. In Australia, a skilled electrician can earn the same salary as a software developer, and that's the way it should be. My job is easy, I sit at a desk all day. I don't have to wake up at 5 AM every day and spend 8 hours a day (more like 6 in Australia, thanks to the unions) running cables in a construction site.

I'd love to see most software developers try their hands at a trade, it's backbreaking work.
That would have to include a rule about scope, so that it doesn't end up as two old laws concatenated into one new law

...this would be good for other reasons too, like unrelated riders tacked onto appropriations bills
>In a desktop performance per watt effectively doesn't matter.

Unfortunately it does. Just different sort of ways. If you want 64 Core, And you have max ~250W TDP CPU on a computer ( Assuming no fancy cooling ). You are effectively limited to less than 4W per core. Even less if you exclude memory controllers and Interconnect. You could argue you want 32 Core or even 16 Core, but scaling the up the clock speed curve beyond optimal level will means power increase exponentially. i.e You are still hitting the same wall.

And I should note, with anything per dollar, the question isn't really technical per se, but function of market. AMD is pretty good at performance per dollar right now, and will be more so once they announce Zen 3.

Some day if I could be bothered I should write a blog post on it.
So some parts of your argument make a lot of sense. Nobody should be starving on the streets. But there are some issues with the perspective I want to challenge on the principle that the person who takes the risk should get the reward:

1) If owning a rental property makes me responsible for my tenant's failures and misfortune beyond a rental contract:

- Why am I not also entitled to a cut of their successes beyond the rental contract?

- If they are making decisions that affect my financial prosperity, when will I get a say? Can I demand they go into IT rather than going for a communications degree?

- What do you think of the incentives that puts on me not to ever rent my property out to poor people?

2) People have to exist, they need ... medicine ...

That word "medicine" is much more flexible than the others (fed & shelter are binary things), it changes over time. What standard are we applying here? Does the landlord get to object if they give themselves a lifestyle disease, eg, smoker gets lung cancer or tenant refuses to wear a mask for political reasons and then gets COVID? Where is the line for rare conditions that cost a large fortune to treat, verging on untreatable?
Heh, from where I stand "the no-code movement" and "the same mundane ideas rewritten with ever-more-complex toolchains while legions of programmers argue why the latest blend of frameworks offer things completely impossible before them" are much the same thing. What the industry needs is the boring grunt work of replacing frameworks with libraries. Rather than generating a 55-file "project skeleton", we should be able to call standard libraries written in plain old code and get the same behaviour, adding the extra stuff as and when we need it.

Why don't we have a library stack where I can define some datatypes and get database migrations, CRUD REST endpoints, and a basic editing web UI, in a maintainable language where I can understand where all that's coming from and incrementally start customizing? I'm pretty sure I've implemented all the pieces you'd need, scattered between the codebases of my last three or four employers: in a language with a decent record system it should be a one-liner to build a set of HTTP routes for a given datatype, not through invisible magic but through a function call that works by plain code.

But it's in no-one's interest to package that up to release it. A traditional business doesn't produce new systems often enough to make a general toolkit. A consultancy does new systems but has no need to make them maintainable (thus Rails, which does all the automatic spinning up but doesn't have the comprehensibility to be reliable). And there's no money in selling libraries to developers, partly because developers would rather do it themselves but mostly because a library you have to buy will never be popular enough to get talented developers using it. Occasionally a huge corporation decides it's worth making a framework for their in-house applications, and even more occasionally they find it worth publishing to the outside world, which is an astonishingly inefficient process for our whole industry to depend on.
Good job, it works pretty well. I see you are using WebRTC and WebTorrent, so I assume that this scales well, do you have any stats you can share?
and regarding a public room, just uncheck the private boolean when creating a room, it will then show up for everyone at: https://peer-flix.herokuapp.com/.

although public rooms are kinda pointless right now because once you close your browser the room is basically dead and is not being cleaned up atm.
I’d suggest using GNOME Web over Midori, as it seems to be actively maintained.
Ha :) Yeah, Sometimes I think I'll just post these and call it a day.
I honestly think something like this makes a lot more sense.

First year or so, you're in a probationary period. Unemployment benefits will kick in, but you and the company are still feeling each other out.

After that, you get certain protections, whereby firing you becomes a more lengthy (3-6 month) process with specific regulatory milestones.

Speaking from a management perspective, if I have had an employee that has been solidly meeting the bar for a year, I am better off to work with them to remedy performance problems afterwards, then I am to fire-and-replace.

Training costs are a thing, and there's also a real benefit to not having your workforce continuously worried about being fired on-the-spot.

It is fair for newcomers to "earn their stripes" as it were, to show that they can productively participate in and contribute to the organization, but people that have cleared that hurdle do deserve some protection from bad actors in their management chain.

As always, I like to hear from others where they think this doesn't work. :)
What if the robots decide they have different priorities?
Android In a Box – Run Android applications on any GNU/Linux operating system
> In this scenario, how do you track which parts of each file are GPL and which parts are MIT?

All the code is GPL. The contributions are dual licensed to the maintainer as GPL+MIT, which means that the maintainer can relicense them as they please, just like the code they own the copyright for. So other than minor formalities like maintaining a list of copyright owners, the maintainer can continue to release both GPL and commercial versions unimpeded. Keeping track of which lines were contributed in this way going forward isn't really necessary (although a note in the merge commit would be prudent).

The main practical difference between a CLA and actual copyright assignment is when you are suing a violator. At that point it is a bit simpler if there is one copyright owner, rather than asking other copyright owners to join the suit, but it is important to realize that they don't have to join the suit for it to go forward (in fact, every copyright owner could sue the violator independently if they wish). Only when you are the copyright owner of a minority of the software's source code (IOW most of the source comes from contributions) do things get inconvenient in terms of a violator possibly being less motivated to negotiate with you (although that would actually be really stupid on their part).
why bother following the clearly failed model? ReactOS has been there for more than 20 years, how many people are actually running ReactOS in production?
* Few companies are good at hard- and software at the same time.

* Competitive market - pressure on price, in consumer market especially on up-front price. Weirdness around pricing schemes with ink, fight against cheaper alternative ink/refills, now ink subscriptions, ...

* this has generally let to low expectations, and in consumer market getting out of that is difficult. What does a "premium" consumer printer brand look like?!

* Complexity: Quite mechanical in nature compared to e.g. PCs or phones. Some parts need to be very precise (but still cheap). Handling paper is just tricky. Printers have very differing usage patterns - sometimes very high load at once, otherwise stuck in a corner for months or years. This doesn't jive well with cheap.
The local keyboard attached to the remote computer.