skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Stop being naive of history and context for pedantry’s sake, and de-emphasizing well worn narratives to manage the emotions along your preferences

Borders define a zone of resource control for those able to protect the borders

A physical reality exists aside from whatever logical diagram you can imagine in your head

Biology explains it without needing some clean room philosophy defined right here with Mr r/iamverysmart

Everyone with a keyboard and net connection thinks they’re unearthing new elements themselves these days by drawing two overlapping circles and jamming whatever they want in it
I took screenshots: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1bxJdI6z3XPNtRDCt1Vva...

If these are readable, then may be your browser+os combo or something else might be the issue? Could you try on a different browser if possible?
> Androids have more desirable features

That's subjective. Many people prefer iPhones. They may find the features of iPhone more desirable or some other aspect about it like the Apple ecosystem.
The difference is Google doesn't stop monetizing your data when they start selling premium hardware.
> I (and many others) are of the opinion that you can’t truly be apolitical; claiming to be so is its own form of politics (and generally one that supports the status quo).

This is a fairly untenable position. Suppose there is an alien civilization somewhere with a similarly complex organization as our own society. You have no stake or opinions in the outcomes of what they do. You might even have beliefs that might give rise to politics ("I don't want earth destroyed," for instance), but in a real sense, you are apolitical with respect to that civilization. That doesn't make you in favor of the status quo, it just means that you don't know or care what's going on there.

Bringing it closer to home, you'll realize that you have similar apolitical beliefs with respect to a small town in a neighboring country, or maybe the government policy of the Central African Republic.

You might object that in these cases, a person is by construction unaware of the goings-on in distant places; however, I think the contrary argument is more absurd. The contrary argument is that as soon as someone merely knows about a political issue, she is then forced to choose, without her consent, that she is in favor of the status quo. That's not a tenable way to treat people with respect, not to mention organize society. And loads of people intentionally ignore the goings-on in politics.

So then, if people can be apolitical about certain or even most issues, certainly someone could be apolitical about all but the most mundane issues (like the governance of a family).

Further, the status quo is not a political issue; it's the condition of living in some reality. Human collective action is only one component that shapes our status quo. Many are beyond human control. So the mere existence of a status quo does not imply that anyone "chooses" it.

That I think is the error. A person can have no opinion and withdraw from politics. That is apolitical. Constructing the concept in such a way that forces them to pick a side of a line in the sand excludes the middle ground, and is also profoundly disrespectful and unfair.
The Higgs field was not predicted by any science before the mid 20th century. Does that mean that according to your argument all science before the mid 20th century was bogus?
> I get stuck for a word in Norwegian and suddenly find that I can't summon the English word either (English is my mother tongue but I have been living and working in Norway since '86).

Side note: this is one of many points sufficient to disprove the popular idea that words are the medium of thought. Thought is not linguistic.
It seems to reflect the cycle of robot traffic.
Until they figure out satellite-to-satellite, starlink will be still limited by having an earth station visible underneath the satellite simultaneously in the same general region as the CPEs. It's all "moving bent pipe" right now. Same architectural limitation as why the original Globalstar LEO network for handheld satellite phones was never able to offer truly "global" coverage, unlike Iridium.

It will be quite some time before Starlink is usable in the middle of the Pacific ocean. I don't think it will kill Inmarsat immediately for maritime and aviation applications. But I am also glad I don't own an of their stock (I also own no stock in any geostationary satellite owner/operator).
If we expand looking for a compiler bug to looking for a bug in dependencies, I still don't think that should be the first step of searching for a problem (unless your dependencies are that bad, which sometimes they are). However, it's not a bad thing to do. Sometimes, you will have bugs in your dependencies, so you should know how to debug them, so it's a skill you should practice. Also, any time spent debugging your dependencies is also time spent getting deep knowledge of your dependencies which is important to have. Anyway, what else are you going to do when you're stuck on a debugging task where it looks to you that the code is right, but the answer is wrong.
And the effect of putting your wing IN the ground is what?

The wing-in-ground effect. It’s a dumb little joke.
Because Trump supported white supremacists?
Because Trump has a proven history of treating women like objects?
And these are not allowed ps of the tongue, these were systematically repeated sentiments.
If you choose to support him, you support these things as well.
We may have found a java compiler bug in high school cs class. The program was all of 2 lines doing some very basic arithmetic and comparison. Half the class and teacher were huddled around the computer trying to figure out what the hell was going on. I was new to programming so it's hard to say with confidence. But there was nothing 'tricky' in the code, just wrong output. This was over 10 years ago but java wasn't exactly new.
>We don't have cheerleaders in the UK, because what's the point anyway?

Don't football clubs have fan groups that meet up and plan the chants that will be uses during a match? That is roughly what the "classic" cheerleaders (like George W. Bush) do. At some point this also developed into an independent sport, which is like a team gymnastics routine.
That type of exception is explicitly stated in the CEOs blog post:

>We focus minimally on causes not directly related to the mission

>Policy decisions: If there is a bill introduced around crypto, we may engage here, but we normally wouldn’t engage in policy decisions around healthcare or education for example.

https://blog.coinbase.com/coinbase-is-a-mission-focused-comp...
Then change the law and make it fair for eveyone. The current system of protecting people entering into USA favors a particular demographic, which by itself is unfair and unjust.
I am also looking for a better life and want to immigrate to USA. But there's no easy way to do it without breaking the law. Creating a system that incentivizes people to break the law and deters law-abiding people to immigrate is not the answer.
I have several side projects and blog regularly and can definitely agree that it's rain or shine for smaller creators without large audiences. I go from several sales in a day to weeks without any interest.

Edit: That being said I'm on Twitter @k0ode if you want to follow along.
Gene Therapy Could End Deafness. Should It?
Why? If you asked the same question today about BLM you would also see a divergence between the two. Almost certainly not to the degree to which a strong majority favor the notion but disapprove of the demonstrations, but there's going to be a difference.
It becomes stronger in a nonlinear way, but not in any fashion that American antitrust would block.

European antitrust is a different story, and if the concern that FitBit being a "blessed" device on Android pushes out other biomonitors has teeth, so be it. I personally find that flavor of reasoning too conservative (by that model, GMail bundled with the Android OS is a faux pas because it makes it harder for other email providers to compete), but there are differing theories of what antitrust is for.
You're missing the point. Apple makes money by people buying their products, and Apple sells more products when people trust them. Therefore, they have a strong financial incentive to be trustworthy and at least appear to care about user privacy. The best way to appear to care about user privacy is to actually care about it: they make no money selling private information to 3rd parties, so there's no point in doing it.

Google, on the other hand, makes some money selling stuff to consumers, but they make a lot more money selling your data to whoever wants to buy ads. That's the business they're in.

No one is saying "Apple is inherently good and Google is inherently evil". They're both amoral massive corporations that care about profits above all else. It just happens to be the case that Apple makes more money when they protect user privacy, and Google makes more money when they violate user privacy.
Apolitical workplaces works just fine in practice, you are just fearmongering.
HD Radio is a digital radio standard in the US, Canada, and Mexico. Many new cars are sold with HD Radio. Many new cars are sold without HD Radio. Go look at some new car listings, you'll find tons without HD Radio. Many will only say AM/FM. Sometimes they'll also mention Radio Data System (RDS), the thing that shows a snippet of text with song titles and station names. Some will mention HD Radio Ready, as in you can buy an additional module to upgrade the OEM stereo with an HD Radio decoder, this is also common with satellite radio. Sometimes a car will have HD Radio.
Some of your coworkers might want to drive to work without fearing that they'll be profiled, pulled over, and arrested or shot. They'd also like to be in peace.
sounds like my experience at google
Works fine for me on Firefox 81 with JS disabled.
> Monopoly are illegal both for good and bad companies, their standard doesn't change that.

Monopolies are illegal !! Source?
If I followed you around at work all day pestering you about obscure political issues irrelevant to your job, you wouldn't be able to get any work done.
,,I don't think the crypto crowd really get what sovereignty enables governments to do. ''

Of course they do. At least the ones who put their whole life on it, like Dr Adam Back who was risking getting into prison for ,,exporting classified munitions'' on a T-shirt (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_Back#Cryptography_softwar...).

Also the risk to central banks is real, and the change will be huge. People still underestimate how hard the 21 million Bitcoin limit is, and how hard it will be to own 1 Bitcoin in the future (it's just possible for 1 in 400 people in theory, but in practice it will much harder than getting in the 99.9% percentile).

Coinbase is not part of this crowd though, they just want to push altcoins so that they can make money from day traders.
Pretty much all lucrative career paths have pretty well paid internships. Anecdotally, I've never met someone who's taken an unpaid internship. Of course this sample sized is bias as I work in finance and most of the people I know do as well (some tech as well).

What kinds of industries have no pay internships?
Those are very good points. I think using trackers on websites is not evil in general, it's just that we make it way too easy for the third parties to persistently track users across sites. A single Facebook, Google or Youtube script is not very problematic from a privacy standpoint, if 60-80 of sites have such a script it can have serious privacy risks for users. So I'd say we just need to make it harder to re-identify individuals across many sites, then the privacy risk becomes much smaller.
Yes. When you join a company, you are signing onto their political agenda. If you don't believe that, then I wonder if you'd have an aversion to working for Jeffrey Epstein.
My daughter is only two, not sure what I will do when the time comes to discuss this stuff. I need some way to make her understand that her sexuality is a valuable thing, and she should demand a high price for it. Ideally a marriage and a house.
It's important to talk about what we're talking about. Uber/Lyft do a bit of sleight of hand by talking about the "median driver's median hourly wage" when they ought to be talking about the "median hourly wage." If there are jobs available for low-skilled teenagers that's fine, but that's a misrepresentation.

In fact, in most cases, low-skilled teenagers, even if they are a majority of workers in a role, still make up a minority of hours worked. Similarly, people putting in 0-20 hours make up 2/3rds of the drivers but something like 25% of the actual hours worked. So they're not really what we should be looking at when looking at what Uber/Lyft's business actually looks like.
Borders are not meant to "control access to wealth and opportunity". One thing they actually do is keep social welfare programs in check. That's just not possible when you can't control the number of recipients of these benefits, much less the number of non-contributors, but it is possible when legal immigrants receiving these benefits can be counted as such.
Retaliation by government.
Thanks for posting this, I've just pre-ordered it. I didn't know he was coming out with a new one until I saw your post. I really liked reading On Intelligence.
> A real world implication is that if you want to add a new operation to a system (...) with OT, you can probably find a way to extend what you have to get it in there, with a painfully non-linear cost as you add more new operations

Exactly the experience that we have in CKEditor 5. OT is awfully complex. However, we can fine tune it for new operations and different scenarios of usage (e.g. undoing changes is one of them). With CRDT, at least to my understanding, we might've been limited to what we'd took into consideration on day one. Seeing how many things we learnt very late in the process (5 years so far, some documented in https://ckeditor.com/blog/Lessons-learned-from-creating-a-ri...) makes me thing that we'd sink the company twice already.
This just happened to my family. We booked a non-stop flight on Alaska Airlines from Southern California to Maui only to have it canceled a couple weeks later. They rebooked us from so cal -> Seattle -> Oahu -> Maui, but with young kids this just isn't a realistic option for us. If they wouldn't have offered the flight in the first place we could have looked for a different airline or even a different destination. Now we are doing all that last minute. It is frustrating that they rebooked our flight to save them money at the cost of our time, without reducing our fare at all. It felt very one sided and like a bait-and-switch. We also asked if we could change our dates to a non-stop flight in November or later, but they said we would need to pay the fare difference. Super frustrating, but it seems like airlines just kinda get to do whatever they want.
Seattle’s median household income is $93,500 (2018) and it has a population of 744,955. Their clearly doing something correctly.
I'm a little confused, what did you actually sell? If its not a secret of course.
My compromise has been to use [flutter-rs](https://github.com/flutter-rs/flutter-rs). Flutter is a powerful and performant GUI/Drawing framework, even if you need to hold your nose when slinging Dart.
So, IEEE 754 took the very unusual step of tossing their old definition of minimum and maximum and replacing them with a new definition. This is effected by deprecating the operations under their old name and introducing new operations with new names.

Here, LLVM's intrinsic names are following the IEEE 754 standard names. C and C++ only has the old definition provided in their standard library, although there is a proposal for C2x to add the new comparisons under the names "fmaximum" and "fminimum" (see http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2489.pdf).
Just use Reader View to make it more accessible.
When the user clicks on specially targeted ads, they reveal themselves to be part of the group and are individually identifiable.
I understand what you're getting at but surely there's a better solution. I don't want my daughter afraid to potentially be in that situation. I want her to be able to act in a way that would make me proud if she was.

I want her to be in a bad situation of any sort even less than I'd like myself to be in one but I'm not going act unreasonably cautious at the expense of something wonderful. I don't want her to do that either.
Once I learned MigLayout, I never went back.
Does anyone have recommendations for a privacy-conscious alternative to the Aria scale and mobile app?
I suspect that there is a defect probability per mask layer. If so, your 10,000 layer cube is going to have a very low yield.
I was "married" to another guy on facebook during my undergrad, one of those joke scenarios.
My interest was set to women. However, i kept getting gay dating ads. I always thought that was weird, why would it give me dating ads if i was married?

I've always wondered how it weighed my preference and my apparent relationship status.
Yes, but in the context of this thread: undocumented instructions can change from generation to generation of a processor architecture, while documented instructions are much more stable; and because of that, compilers will not generate undocumented instructions. When reading compiler output, the official documentation of the instructions (plus documentation of the calling conventions) should be enough.
I don't think Gitter development was very active, before or after their acquisition by GitLab. It has been pretty much the same since 2016. It being folded into another tool felt inevitable to me.
Yeah I think it was a combination of a technical decision to keep the CPU power requirements down and a political decision to not give people high enough quality for piracy. "Home taping is killing music" and all that.
man some people really find anything to complain about huh
Equality of outcome is extreme left, California subscribes to it pretty hard. The left we have in Europe are much saner.
Show HN: CascadeStudio a New MIT-Licensed SCAD Tool Built on Modern Technologies
I think the fact that this list has microsoft in the #2 position and mozilla at #10 casts serious doubt upon the method and conclusion.
Freedom became an empty word once US turned it to plastic.
People always lose some freedom in any social interaction.
If you treat any such compromise as "no freedom" than you'll be left with no "freedom".

This whole dichotomy is just stupid and abused because of historic American politics, the word has lost all meaning.
Right. To expand: Maybe someday we can use liquid hydrogen or nitrogen (or even water, depending on progress with hydride superconductors) for these reactors, but a big reason they’re able to make this more compact reactor work is the much higher critical currents/fields that these high temperature superconductors can handle when cooled far below their critical temperature. See: https://fs.magnet.fsu.edu/~lee/plot/plot.htm
Towards the end, multiline commands are more common. I'm using "one-liners" to invoke a mental image like grep/sed/awk/perl one-liners.
VMware to Acquire SaltStack
I don’t see how this changes the calculus. Presumably the parent knew this when they bought the laptop. People buy cars that are stupidly expensive to repair all the time. Just because the cost of ownership of a Honda Civic is lower than a Mercedes doesn’t mean everyone’s gonna go with the Honda.

If it works like iOS and just flashes a warning then I don’t see the issue. The self-check thing is invaluable when buying used devices.
To a first approximation, yes. There isn't any authentication around following an ad link, so technically anyone could click the ad.

But practically, no; nobody's going to randomly click an ad link someone else handed them for funsies. In the common case, the ad company will be able to do conversions on the target demo (and make strong assumptions about the target demo, even if Google doesn't explicitly leak that data).
> The companies included tips and not any delta associated with insurance.

Tips are not part of wages. You should make whatever wage you are going to make and then get tips on top of that.
No, we don't constantly live with theoretical extremes in our day to day life and can operate without political discussion, like our company and many others do.

And yes, corporations can set the rules of the workplace they maintain. It is not about "inconvenience" but to avoid chaos and improve productivity. You are free to do as you wish outside of the workplace, including choosing a company that lets you say whatever you want. I applaud and encourage this freedom on both sides.
The ideas I had been studying these days come from Carol Sandford. I am not sure how to summerize her work. In the case of developing a person’s (be they children, teens, or adult) capabilities, it comes in a couple ways:

1. First, linking intrinsic motivation with something meaningfully contributes to something outside of them. The catch? This is something the person chooses for themselves, based on what Sandford calls “essence”. Rewards and incentives are still external. Whatever is chosen may be beyond the child’s current capability.

2. A framework (a way of seeing the world and self) is given so that the child can grow his own capability in order to accomplish what he set out to contribute. Those things like observation, problem solving, critical thinking, systems thinking are developed by the child, and driven by the child’s intrinsic motivation.

There is a lot more to that, and I am still learning and applying this myself.

Something like this does not require a child to have genius level iq.
How will Seattle respond to robotaxis?
FWIW, Bluetooth is the wrong tech if you want high end. You are much better off with something Wifi connected and the quality is much much better. Obviously doesn't work for everyone, but I imagine this is not much better at reproduction than even mid-range Sonos Speakers.
The same issue occurs on https://super.so/, if you happen to have any affiliation with them.
Personal monetary relationship between employee and employer is business, not politics.