skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
No, it's irrational to think that you won't have to deal with the problems of two different OSes when you're running two different OSes. Run only one of them and you'll only have to deal with the problems of one of them on your daily driver.

It's really that simple.

For work, I put Windows out to pasture on a different workstation - I hardly ever need it at all (I keep it around for for testing and debugging Windows-specific issues and when I want to use SSMS instead of Azure Data Studio or Visual Studio instead of VS Code which is pretty much never), but when I do it's there. For games, I've always had separate dedicated Windows machines.

I run Windows on multiple systems and I'm absolutely aware of it's stability but also it's problems. One of my biggest issues with it is that it ignores my active-hours and starts updating right in the middle of me working or playing. It's happened time and again on pretty much all of my Windows machines.

Another huge Windows problem is that I don't have any control over many things. For instance - they keep re-pinning shit to the taskbar after an update. Or, they change my settings after an update. Or, they constantly nag me with popups or ads disguised as notifications or start menu icons.

> If you buy bottom barrel you will get what you paid for unless you're extremely lucky...

OK, not sure how that's relevant. I recommended buying a very solid, albeit refurbished desktop unit from a major manufacturer that I happen to have been running three instances of for years now without problem.

> ...same goes for linux.

What does that even mean? My years using Linux as a desktop have been filled with far less drama than the years I ran Windows as my workstation.
I'm more surprised they hired him as a senior then whatever salary they gave him.

Why bother fighting over 4 or 5 percent when I can just get another job in afew months that pay 10 or 20 percent more? I don't see the value, and obviously they don't either. I'm more astounded by the number of people who stick around at jobs for years getting very little pay or loyalty in return.
Then there is the scenario of a good manufacturer being bought out by greedy assholes.
Yeah, not interested enough to do that.
Amazon released its Alexa Connect Kit to solve this problem: it’s an end to end IoT integration in a module. It’s a good way to focus on building an IoT device while someone else takes care of the security. https://developer.amazon.com/en-US/alexa/connected-devices/a...
The also was italicized for emphasis.

But to your point, RSUs - unless you did an 83b election - have a bigger income tax component, especially in your sell immediately example. Which reinforces my point that the prioritization is wrong and that focusing exclusively on capital gain/loss is misguided. This time I’ll italicize exclusively, for emphasis, lest that somehow gets lost in the message.
You should use the search function at the bottom of the page before posting. Seems like I see a doom emacs post every month.

That bit of housekeeping aside, I'm not a fan of the various Emacs starter kits, except maybe as a 'demo' of Emacs features for potential users. They don't offer anything new, and they're hard to support.
Those don't belong in core either. Core should focus strictly on the being a rock solid foundation. Plugins are there to supplement that. That's the beauty of the architecture. Or at least, is supposed to be.

WordPress should not have the same mindset as Jetpack. Oops? Did I just say that?? ;)
While slow, it's still better what anyone had just about 25 years ago. The civilization would certainly be able to operate with this level of performance.
It seems to me that “controlling a coffee maker” is about as least resource-intensive application as it gets.

Processing UART traffic is more resource-intensive.
But 1 river is not a defined measurement. It is has a range of meanings whereas 2 is defined.

2 = 2 is true
2 ≠ 2 is false

But

1 river = 1 river is true
1 river ≠ 1 river is also true under some circumstances
You added additional axioms that require a quantity. Not all things exist as quantities with properties of addition, multiplication, division, or subtraction. Various debates can be had that any quantity is largely an arbitrarily defined border.

The point mostly being, any symbolic representation is only that. It is never universal. And to think it’s an objective representation of anything is serious error.
I Just Bought a Bank – Yotta YC S20
If I were made to wear such a device, all it would have to report is the murderous intent I would have for the jackasses that made the device, and those that made me wear it.

I think most bosses are probably not stupid enough to think this is a good idea.
The MBAs are coming to take me away, ha ha he he, the MBAs are coming to take me away!
The page lists all !bang search operators on one page, i think the feature is easier to use when you have all of them in one page; The page is kept in sync with all duckduckgo search operators by a nightly build process. The build script/motivation for the project is here https://github.com/MoserMichael/duckduckbang
>Assange did not reveal a source for the leaked emails, and in fact claims the source is not Russian,

Assange's denials about Russia's involvement aren't credible on its face. The question is whether Russia hacked the DNC emails that Assange published. Assange fundamentally has no knowledge of the origin of the emails as the final stop in potentially multi-person hand off, unless he was involved in the hacking.

We also have multiple intelligence agencies, foreign and domestic, that have confirmed the source of the hack. Not to mention the context of the election, Trumps close ties with Russia and Russian agents, and the broad and multifaceted attempts at hacking the election attributed to Russia (disinformation farms, hacking state election networks), it is far past the point of reasonable to defend the theory that Russia didn't hack the DNC.

>You’re acting like if they had kept the manipulation of the Democratic primary a secret

But there was no manipulation. There were things that could be framed as manipulation, which people did, and that caused unfair damage to the Democrats and to democracy. It's like if there were two sellers of sausages and one of them had their sausage-making process recorded and leaked online. The other sausage maker goes "see their sausages are disgusting, buy ours instead!" all the while their sausages are made in the exact same way. It is unbalanced transparency that is inherently manipulative. It is a self-serving lie to pretend otherwise.

>It’s like if a sitting president referred to dead service men and women as “losers” and “suckers” you somehow think a newspaper causes harm by publishing that truth

No, its not like that. A sitting president's words are a valid source of news. The internal machinations of a private organization are not a valid source of news unless wrongdoing is documented. But no such wrongdoing was documented. It was all gossip and fodder for misrepresentation.
You're doing a good job of making me want to read this book which I know doesn't exist yet but maybe should.
In the first video he mentioned over and over that was wasn’t profiting, but now it turns out that he is profiting through Youtube monetization. That’s a huge difference.
There’s a massive overcorrection going on here. None of this feels sincere.
Cryptocurrency is supposed to be used by regular people (and that's how it gets money, basically as a pyramid scheme). Quantum computers are supposed to be used for a certain class of problems where it can do better than classical computers. So I'd say it's a significantly different domain and it doesn't really matter that most people don't understand it because it's a very specialized use case.
I'm curious, as a Wikipedia photo poster yourself why do you recommend Pixabay over Wikimedia Commons?
Seriously, they should start off with a brief summary of their article..
I’m curious, given salsa’s[1] so-far quite-effective use of the incremental computation (Adapton/Incremental/Bonsai), if you could elaborate on some of the pitfalls there for UI specifically. The primary salsa use case so far (in rust-analyzer[2]) is obviously fairly different from the pure UI use case, as it’s allowing other things to do the work on the UI and is using it purely for the incremental computation of compilation results, which are a very different set of constraints from UI painting. But at that point, my own knowledge runs out: thus the question.

[1]: https://salsa-rs.github.io/salsa/
[2]: https://rust-analyzer.github.io/

This is particularly of interest to me because I work day in and day out with what is to my knowledge the only application of the incremental computation approach to browser UI,[3] and colleagues and I have talked about what it would take to reimplement in Rust—what the tradeoffs would be, where the problems would emerge, etc. I suspect part of the issue is that the constraints of using the DOM informs a lot of the design considerations in the space, whereas implementing from scratch gives very different tradeoffs?

[3]: https://v5.chriskrycho.com/journal/autotracking-elegant-dx-v...
Age Old Question – To Be a Jack of All and Master of None or Not?
Except ... factual impossibility is not a defense to a charge of conspiracy, or indeed most charges of inchoate offenses.

If you have a gun, and we agree that I will shoot someone with it, but it turns out (unbeknownst to either of us) that the gun has in fact been permanently deactivated ... that's still conspiracy to commit murder.
The good news is that eventually intrusive devices, like Neuralink, may modulate your ability to care.