skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Manufactured fuels have two main economies: one is energy input per energy output (usually bigger than one and the goal is to get that number as close to one as possible) and the other is transformer system cost, particularly cost that even applies when idle. If this number is very high fuel manufacturing won't be opportunistic at all and will keep the conversion systems at high utilization, offering input energy prices as needed and selling at prices depending on demand. A very low investment/idleness cost on the other hand would lead to wildly variable utilization depending on output demand and input availability.

Hydrogen is usually considered a very simple conversation (e.g. compared to synthetic hydrocarbons) that would be very open to opportunistic transformation utilization.

"Only fire up the converters when there's an open order for synfuel and the grid has excess power", that's the dream. I'm not convinced that this dream is significantly more viable for simple hydrogen than for more complex synfuels (particularly factoring in the many ways hydrogen isn't easy to store), but I can easily see how some people might want to believe that.
Note that you can definitely get a "manually detected" non-DMCA Content ID claim on a video[0] - but the screenshot he shows at 3:43 is in fact a DMCA claim since it says "This video is contributing to a copyright stroke on your channel".

https://youtu.be/jpOzW_kRzHs
With all due respect, my OP contained a relevant anecdote (Largest methane gas leak in US history, also in southern California). I didn't say whether democrats are good or bad, I just asserted that they don't care, and I offered the relevant anecdote about how the attorney general who reviewed the previous methane gas leak has continued to ascend in politics, while no criminal charges have been filed.

I think many people are probably not aware of the additional context I have brought to this situation, and I certainly think it is notable given the thread.

I would like to know why exactly you think my post is flamebait. I expressed a single opinion, not saying if it is good or bad result - and provided evidence to support my opinion.

Plenty of people make posts on Hackernews like "Facebook doesn't respect user privacy" - which is obviously controversial. I cannot help but feel like my post was singled out because some people think that the objective truths in my post are inconvenient.
Disclaimer: I work on OpenTelemetry spec.

Many tracing solutions settled on 128bits/16 bytes trace ids. Here is Jaeger's rationale: https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger/issues/858

It is also recommended by W3C: https://www.w3.org/TR/trace-context/#trace-id
I have never heard of lbry before, but I went to your site and was positively surprised. I looked into same gaming content and found what I was looking for. Playback was smooth and high quality.

For my question I wonder how it compares to the other services that deadalus mentioned?
> Nuclear nuclear nuclear. There's nothing else that can do it fast enough.

Maybe in theory, but not in practice. How much new nuclear generation has been brought online in the last decade in the US? How much solar/wind?

Clearly, the only carbon-free power generation that is actually actively being brought online is solar/wind. With batteries, we'll actually get somewhere with the decarbonization of our power generation.

It still won't be fast enough at the current pace, though...
If all speech has consequences, and there's nothing wrong with putting consequences to speech, what's wrong with the government doing so?
> Biscuit identifies bad citizens and kills them

Yay.
> I still don't understand how things like this can happen at companies of that size.

The answer is right there in the question: companies of that size.
I genuinely wonder if the prices of used EVs with decent range (say a long range model 3 available now) will reach the same price as an older Honda Civic. I figure the batteries will be worth quite a bit still in the car. Essentially making the possibility of buying a used $2000 electric car impossible.
I never claimed a political party was to blame, and It is not a CA only problem, the US Forest Service has had decades of bad management as well under both Republicans and Democrats

It is a GOVERNMENT problem, both parties are terrible.

>>We have the 2004 Alaska fire, the 2017 Montana wildfire or the fires in Idaho and Georgia in 2007 that were over 500,000 acres

Isnt that kinda of the point, the claim is that Climate change is the cause, but fires of this kind have been happening for decades

Fire happen in forests, and proper forest management will lessen their impact (it will not prevent them)

Forest fires have been happening since before humans existed on this plant, and they will continue to happen long after we have killed ourselves with our own stupidity
Irrelevant as Android devs could ship Jetpack Compose pre-alpha months ago to Android users on devices many years old
I was using G Suite on a personal domain, and woke up one morning to discover that google refused to let me IMAP into my account any more. The error message pointed me at a browser verification page which I did multiple times, to no avail, so I moved to a different email provider.

Thanks for the final push, Google. I've been meaning to move for years.
It took me a really long time to understand what I was feeling. I could sense this bittersweet thing whenever the kids accomplished something new but didn't know where it came from.

Then it clicked for me one day: I miss their younger selves. Every new milestone is the end of a phase that I'll never get to see again.
> No. I'm specifically calling out that the government is not impeding.

Ah, you are making the same claim (and thus mistake) as another commenter in another thread I responded to. Freedom of speech is not just a law, it is also a social more. It's basis is first in philosophy, and then in law stemming from that. Just because the government has not violated your First Amendment civil rights, does not mean your freedom of speech has not been violated in some other way.
Your comment is puzzling. It is true that there is nothing we can realistically do about the CO2 that is already in the atmosphere. Whoever lives on this planet will have to deal with it for thousands of years. But we can do something about the CO2 that has not yet been released. The question is not to go back to pre-industrial levels, but to prevent Earth to become an unlivable hell within the next 80 years.
Not if using the regular popular DNS and want a domain name because you are just paying some entity for the right to include you on a list of addresses and nothing more. However you can own IPs and you can run your own DNS. Though you might have a hard time getting your IP routed to if you dont let it be managed by some ISP.
I'd be lying if I said I hadn't built my own CMS. Twice.
Nothing other than Google is obsesed with automating things with half baked machine learning solutions and thinking they don't need a service desk with humans.

Other companies automate a lot but its way easier to get to a person. Twitter, Facebook, Amazon - they will all get back to you in under 48 hours and actually undo what the machines have done.
Not as helpful for reducing effective emissions as you might think.

High altitude water vapor is just as big of a problem as CO2 as the lifetime of water vapor in the stratosphere is measured in years, not days or hours like it is in the lower troposphere. Water vapor is, after all, a much stronger greenhouse gas than CO2, it's just that normally its lifetime in the atmosphere is so short so as not to matter.

So unless we can be certain these planes will fly solely in the lower troposphere (unlikely, considering the aircraft presented), then hydrogen is not actually necessarily a silver bullet and in some situations (i.e. very high altitude flight, ala Concorde) could actually be worse than kerosene.

https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/200...
I'm not aware IP addresses have language settings associated with them? since when is this the case? any links for further information?
Yes. Some form of the Obama-era "cash for clunkers" will be required to get those off the road.
I suggest something similar. When we are constantly buying and requesting things we create work and stress for others. We become a high-maintenance humans. We contribute to the rush and tension we feel around us.

By consuming less and demanding less, we live a low maintenance life. Not minimally good, just low-maintenance. This along with looking for ways to serve our communities is the better way to go.
I'll chalk it up to an innocent typo, but you got the terminology wrong. R_0 means R(t) where t=0. In other words, it by definition means the basic reproduction number which does NOT account for any level of immunity.

R, or as I prefer to call it, R(t), is the number that factors in how many have immunity. So you mean herd immunity is when R(t) < 1.

---

Anyway, I was having trouble understanding exactly what you were saying about Sweden, but to be clear, Sweden has hit herd immunity, unless you think that the utter absence of COVID mortality at this point is due to seasonality.

What you need to understand is that simplistic models view the population as homogenous, both in terms of mixing (social connections) AND susceptibility/transmissibility. Neither are true. Essentially, the people who tend to get infected sooner in the pandemic are the ones who tend to spread more, so the first, say, 10% of antibody prevalence is worth a lot more than the next 10%.

There's also the presence of pre-existing T-cell cross-reactivity; exposure to other hCoVs is protective against SARS-2. It seems that it does not protect infection, but it does make the disease course a non-issue: this probably explains the high degree of asymptomatic infection (with part of it just being explained as an artifact of the PCR cycle threshold fuckery). Technically these findings are already implicitly factored into the estimates we have for R_0, etc. (BTW, initial studies were claiming R_0 of 5.2, 5.5, etc, but now with more data it seems it's around 2, give or take)

Many, and I am in this category, believe that the true herd immunity threshold is somewhere around 20% of the population. That explains what we've seen in places like New York, Sweden, etc. This is lower than what the classic herd immunity formula would predict, because that formula does not account for a non-homogenously-mixed population (as I mentioned earlier), nor does it account for certain individuals having an innate genetic resistance that makes it less likely that they get infected.
The basis for authoritarianism isn't authority over logic, it's the disregard for truth and expertise in and of itself, that is to say the inability, or unwillingness to distinguish legitimate authority from demagoguery.

What's increasingly prevalent isn't inability to disagree, it's too much disagreement. QAnon's slogan is "question everything". The conspiracy theorist doesn't lack scepticism but trust.

That's the basis for misinformation, a culture in which anything goes, and in which the average consumer of media trusts nobody and is destabilized.

>but if you ask for evidence substantiating that assertion, they often behave as if the notion that assertions should require evidence is absurd

That's not the point. The point of constant questioning is to essentially exhaust any institution. When you tell someone that masks don't kill people and give them some proof, they'll say "but what if I don't trust the health authorities?", then you'll give them a reference to the science and they'll say "but what if I don't trust the scientists" and then you'll explain it again to them and they'll have another reason to disagree. That's what I mean by 'childish', it's literally a never-ending sequence of "but what if's", the same can of course be seen with issues like climate change and so on.

this is on display in the US right now. Political lies are repeated without end that have long been disproved but the mere fact of bringing them up again and again exhausts everyone and creates an atmosphere of insanity, which is the breeding ground for authoritarianism.
What do you think the alternative is? You want the government to mandate that every book store carries all books? Book stores have a right to curate their selection as they see fit in exactly the same way that authors have a right to write what they see fit.
Housing is fungible.

Rental housing owners are not.

Elites (such as those who run the CDC) look at rental housing owners as a group, but the impacts are disproportionately borne by those who have the fewest properties - families who are doomed to lose their life-savings.

Real-estate investment trusts, etc., can both outlast family owners, and are usually owned as a fractional portion of people’s portfolio; their failure is not a catastrophic event.

Families losing their inheritance is catastrophic.

Elites extra-legally terminating historical conventions on rental liability are dooming families to poverty, not just “helping” a renter.
I'll preface my statement by saying I'm an independent and don't support either major party because it seems like the moment you criticize either you get called a libshit or republicunt.

That said, why are ID's not required to vote in the US when they are required for every single other government related task? Congress could very cheaply fund such a program, and even if they didn't it's not as though licenses/ID's are free yet they're required for everything, even to get a job. Voter suppression is a bad argument but I've never heard another one.

Second, why are states choosing to mail everyone on voter rolls with a ballot whether they asked for it or not? Now does not seem like a time to be changing the way we vote. We manage to grocery shop for the past 6 months, we can manage to go to the polls without dying.

It almost seems like democrats want the results of this election to be in dispute. Because there is zero logic for the things they are doing and all of it requires extreme levels of cognitive dissonance to stomach.

Both sides are playing dirty and neither side wants to admit it.

I'm astonished at how many friends, brilliant people I'd never expect to become so tribal, have fallen into the trap of partisanship in the past four years. These people are 100% convinced the other side is evil, and are unwilling to admit their side could be wrong about anything. I will point out something a candidate on either side did any they will do all the kinds of mental gymnastics to justify it. And funnily enough I get flak for not choosing their side. Centrist are apparently aiding the enemy now.
What if you get a letter from the bank telling you to withdraw all your money and cough up the value of the mortgage in a week or be evicted?
iirc they modified Go runtime
> the service provider needs to reinstate the content

I believe this is may reinstate the content, I don't think they're obligated too. Also not a lawyer.
>So when a competitor comes along, the natural way to differentiate is to say "we won't ban you unless you break the law".

We are "Social Media X but with no moderation" is a braindead business strategy. I'm failing to find a source, but moot (this founder of the anything goes social website), once said of all the 4chan clones, the ones that never lasted were the ones that were started by people who decided to make their own 4chan clone after being banned from the site. Naturally people discovered those clones were filled with insufferable asshats and died off.

Naturally when you look at these video sites, very few of them actually offer the number one thing I would expect from a YouTube clone - revenue sharing. So not only are they not competitive with YouTube, but for a large group of people kicked off of YouTube, they aren't even substitutes.
Facebook is a site where people who are not journalists or celebrities can shares stories with their friends. The general public, unlike the media or the movie industry, is about equally split between the Left and Right, so Facebook is despised for giving right-wing people a platform.
Wtf is the point of sourcing market investment if you are going to guarantee profits? All the usual market mechanisms to ensure efficiency don't work, you are just handing out free money at the expence of the taxpayer.

You might as well just issue bonds and invest money directly.
At least 5 other times I've seen these stories reach the HN first page have all been resolved within 24 hours. Then everyone complains that even though they fixed this specific case, imagine all the other people whose channels aren't fixed! Even when the system works, everyone will still complain.
Can it work with fpga etc. so still learning but one learn more. Also with general pin in out more scope. Not just IT
The main difference is traditional large companies aren't nearly as valuable or profitable because they employ a increasing number of support and customer service staff.

The only reason Google is as profitable as it is is because it's happy to automatically delete people's livelihoods programmatically for free.
That literally has nothing to do with this whole outage thing.
I find the snark response more "non sequitur" than the grantparent's comment, which at least makes a point.

(The point of the phrase "It was 12 years ago" being that:

(a) people change with time

(b) we should not hold things people did long ago against them forever

And thus, that a reaction "but he did X bad thing" to the suggestion of bringing Brendan back is not relevant anymore...
Are there free email providers that let you bring your own domain?
You refuse to use eyeballs for viewing?
I meant a residential fiber network, where the fiber really goes into the home, and the topology of that network is point-to-point. As in from some POP(point-of-presence) from ISP into the home, not over shared channels like in GPON.

My ISP is rolling that out, though with delays. They are a spin-off of a public utility.

Already rolled out the CPE looks like this:

https://genexis.eu/product/fibertwist/

and in the user-forum of that ISP there are people describing how to directly interface to fiber with a pre-fabricated cable and SFP-transceiver with the right wavelengths, from a self-owned router with SFP-cage.

But you still have to connect over PPPoE with a MTU of 1492 bytes. Multiple times actually, on different VLANs for
management, VoIP, and public dynamic IPv4(CGNAT)/IPv6(native/64)
Linux audio and video problems as well as a few intentional decisions by game developers have forced me to use Windows to play games with my friends.
>SEO optimizations

"search engine optimization optimizations"
I'm skeptical that the net effect of a desert is better than the net effect of a forest. I understand exactly why deserts are useful, but I can't imagine they're more useful than forests.

Forests continuously sequester carbon as trees grow, live, die, and the microbes which feed off the dead trees ones grow, live and die. The cycle of carbon utilization is never totally efficient, and the carbon that is "lost" in the cycle blackens the soil.

Plus, you get biodiversity as a bonus.
Fuel cells are better because they don't emit directly. Turns out high altitude water vapor is itself a powerful greenhouse gas. At least with fuel cells, you could collect the water and dispense it periodically as a liquid at lower altitudes.
https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/200...

But actually, batteries are better than people think. 1000km battery-electric range is feasible with current chemistries, and ~3000-5000km is feasible with metal-anode, maybe lithium-sulfur or other advanced chemistries plus extremely high performance structures and aerodynamics. Lithium-air batteries with these improvements could enable >10,000km flights.
A statement from the user who submitted it, including their unverifiable copy of the offensive message. The law is not computer code. They don't need to break ciphertext to get a warrant.
Define "hate speech". You never do, you merely assert that there is such a thing, that we know what it is, that it is legitimate, that it can be and probably that it should be legislated and enforced. I'm asking a serious question because we're witnessing the suppression of discussion that some groups don't like. It's an empty phrase. And in the absence of meaning, guess who decides what to classify as hate speech and thus which groups have a voice and which don't? Thrasymachus in Plato's "Republic" has an answer: the powerful.

Since we're on the subject, anti-Semitism is one of those accusations that is used liberally to attack anyone that organizations like the ADL don't like. For example, if you compare the treatment of Palestinians by the Israelis to apartheid, if you criticize Judaism in a way that resembles what Catholics are subjected to on a regular basis, or some tendency in Jewish culture, then suddenly you're an anti-Semite. Anti-Semitism is a hatred of Jewish ethnicity, a hatred of a person who is Jewish because of his ethnicity. It is not a critical stance toward questions of culture, religion, or politics. But the legitimate definition of the term has been expanded by political hucksters into what Norman Finkelstein (whose parents are survivors) calls the Holocaust industry, where a grave crime is exploited to silence criticism and bully people into silence on matters that have nothing to do with anti-Semitism. So we have a textbook example of how "hate speech" is deployed to silence political opposition and stifle debate. There are, of course, other examples.

Mind you, I do not include things like libel and calls for violence in hate speech. Those kinds of things are already legislated and penalized as they should be. Too many things, like pornography, have been falsely defended by appealing to "free speech". What I'm talking about is the use of this insidious term by powerful groups to silence those they don't like, and then pretending like that's not what's happening. It is that simple.
It’s almost as if we’ve been given a planetary system with an ideal set of building blocks to get to the next phase of life. But instead we’re going to choose to destroy the planet we currently have.
Shouldn't radical decisions come from the people? I guess Authoritarianism is great if one agrees with the outcome?

Newsom is the governor of a state that lauds itself as being the most insightful and aware of Climate Change -- yet for all these years the wise leaders have been doing nothing to prepare. We've been in drought and fire mode for about a decade now. How many new reservoirs have been proposed and built? What forestry practices have changed? Basically, none.

His state is on fire, and he cannot keep the power on at peak times. This grand move is an attempt at deflection and distraction from his (and his predecessors') lack of true leadership.
> This is about making them liable even when they aren’t aware of it…

There are two sides to this though. If you make a carve-out for ignorance you incentivize ignorance.

I think the argument is that if you’re not able to moderate your user-generated content at the most basic levels like running image hashes against the CP database then you shouldn’t be hosting it.
Can you cite any sources for this?
And, the fact that a project didn't complete on time and within budget does not mean that is unprofitable for the rest of its lifetime.
I've been reading some Kafka this month. Issues like this article are the 21st century realisation of his pessimism.

The Castle, and The Trial particularly.

I wonder if there's anyone writing Kafkaesque fiction about the modern world. I'm sure it could be Googlified. Any ideas anyone?
Thanks - this is exactly what I was looking for!
So set up your own "racism allowed" alternative to Cloudflare. At some point, yes, you're going to be basically reduced to shouting at people in the street because mst people think what you're saying is repugnant, but that's (mostly) up to them. It's not their duty to host your stuff.
A pretty dire assessment of Mozilla