skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It sounds like you found the solution, you just made it really cumbersome: undo.

All confirmation dialogs should be replaced with undo. The happy path has lower friction, and in case of a mistake they'll heave a huge sigh of relief. When possible, it's better in all cases for all users, whether novices or power users.

And many things that at first blush seem like undo isn't possible, are actually easy to make undoable with a simple tweak: deleting data? Don't actually delete it until 24 hours later. Sending an email? Wait 10 seconds to actually send it, similar to Gmail's Undo Send.
The court cannot do anything that contradicts the law. I didn't say whether the US is or not a democracy, I have only stated what I think it should be.
> Even Arrow himself said that cardinal voting (Approval, score, STAR) is probably the likely answer.

Cardinal systems are mathematically better by some criteria but have the extreme problem, that those criteria overlook, that their is no clear mapping from real preferences to honest ballot markings (and, similarly, no clear interpretation of what any given set of ballot markings mathematical analysis which assume that there is some real underlying thing which maps neatly to ballot markings on cardinal ballots may find that cardinal voting systems are good at aggregating that mythical thing, but we know from experience with rating systems that markings in cardinal systems aren't consistent for similar preferences but instead vary, for similar relative preferences and absolute opinions on the rated subjects, by culture and subculture. And you can't really argue that that would be mitigates in practice by people learning voting techniques that are efficient in achieving goals under such systems, because that is too complex of a function of other voter’s expected markings to be tractable. (There are situations where the markings on cardinal ballots can be concretized in terms of prices people are will to pay for or to avoid certain outcomes, and where those become concrete binding mutual commitments among voters, those systems have clear utility. But in general public elections they aren't.

Where you have multiple winners naturally (which includes elections of Presidential electors, which are always at least 3 per state), proportional systems (whether party-list or candidate-centered like STV) are the natural solution, as multiwinner elections are fundamentally easier than single-winner.
When you only force a small number you get compliance cars. If they need to supply 40 million people you'll see real competition.
StarCraft: Orcs in space go down in flames (2012)
I didn't say we don't need hydrogen though. I just said it makes more sense to use liquid fuels rather than hydrogen in aircraft.
Haha, yup no problem. I saw someone do it once in a youtube video and was like WTH was even that!!?
Google tries its best to obfuscate YouTube's independent profitability (believed to be obfuscated because it's not actually profitable) but a few years back Bloomberg reported on an insider source that YouTube barely breaks even. Human moderators at the scale of YouTube is, quite frankly, a pipe dream. Automation is the only viable solution at the scale of YouTube.
I think the question was how much you are paying to maintain this.
Those tests seem to be at >200˚C if I’m not mistaken. Hardly room temperature. Regardless, the main trick is to avoid using certain types of high-strength steel, line exposed surfaces with polymers, or using composites where ever possible. The problem is for the most part solved.
The migration off of Youtube is slowly gaining momentum. It will only take music industry shills and trolls taking down a couple more of these sites for a mass migration.

What’s the alternative content site? Vimeo? Twitch? Instagram/Tiktok? Something else?
'Conscientiousness'[1] (there's some science to this one)

Basically shared values, behaviours, rough sense of justice, morality and humanity, and a sense that individuals ought to aspire to those on some level.

It's funny because in the West we talk a lot about 'freedom' and 'classical liberalism' - I really think that's partly:

a) A response to historically authoritarian systems either political or cultural which were possibly 'too much'

b) An appeal to the ego: none of us really want to 'follow rules', I mean, we all just want to 'do whatever' - it takes 'second order thinking' to act 'morally' and 'responsibly' in whatever context those are defined ... and we're always going to define them a little bit differently.

I think we all understand this on some level, even if our ideologies are wrapped up in something else.

We tend to build ideals around nitpicking, and when a certain 'orthodox morality' clashes with some other form of 'expression' (say, no common acceptance of trans people), then we get into an existential fight with said 'orthodoxy', The 'sides' become polarized, revolutionary, we look at everything through that narrow lense and end up missing all of the other 'very important things' many of us take for granted ... when probably what needs to happen is just some tweaking.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conscientiousness
There's a difference between the legal American right to free speech, and the global ethical principle of free speech. One can only have their right breached by the government, but one can be censored by anyone who has the power to read their incoming/outgoing communications and modify or remove parts.

There's a difference between your home, which is a privately owned private space, and a mall, which is a privately owned public space. Youtube is more like a mall or a newspaper conglomerate than your house. For it to have a bias when censoring content can be objectionable in the same way that a big media conglomerate with a bias can be objectionable.
Xkcd: Message Boards
I think this is world of new, interesting possibilities.
They have ways to detect the "unusual". If I fill a form really fast, or something is weird in the state of my browser I get prompted to select crosswalks, road-signs or hydrants.
It will be great if they would apply them on their algorithms too, when an "unusual" result occurs.
Lol - true true!
Grid-attached solar can also reduce strain on the grid, so it's not all for naught in terms of increasing reliability.
> My bet is that the vast majority are honest people

what makes you believe this? feel like this is Hobbes vs Rousseau
Process it into material that will end up in structures or even landfills also sequesters a lot.

The roots of plants to end up donating some carbon content to the soil, so it’s not just the above ground part that’s part of the equation.
Is there a source you could point me on how this is happening infrequently over the years ? I am curious to see the progression.
Absolutely. ML on Edge will be one of the defining technologies of this decade. Comms use many orders of magnitude more energy than chip operations and sensor reads on embedded devices. The key is to avoid sending all that data to ML models on the cloud and instead inference on the device itself.
You can check the first link that states the overview - https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-specificatio...

It's a distributed request tracing specification & set of libraries implementing the said spec
I don't want to sound like a nitpicker, but "basic understanding" and "facts" are two very different things: facts are facts. Their understanding has more to do with the interpretation.

And if we all agree on interpretation of the facts, then cementing the society becomes too easy of a task.
Mind sharing your script?
You almost got me.
I even had an endoscopy without drugs. That’s the one with the scope down your throat. It wasn’t a fun experience, but certainly doable!
Alas, claiming that your opponent discusses things in bad faith is often the simplest way to get the upper hand.
Seeing these results touted as being pretty good makes me wonder why we haven't fully adopted microkernels yet. Their singular disadvantage, which is the need for two IPC calls vs one for a monolithic kernel, is completely irrelevant in comparison to these numbers. The average IPC cost of an L4 IPC call is about 500 cycles, which is about half a microsecond on a 1ghz processor. Cache locality is a big deal, and L4, which can fit entirely within a core's l2 cache, is king when it comes to cache locality.

And you don't have to worry about memory safety either. Memory safety has been formally proven as part of the SeL4 spec.
As info flows through brain heirarchy, higher regions use higher-frequency waves
I'm HOOKEd, we got a 4 pack for our school plays!
Fortunately it is possible to switch to text-only buttons in Gmail.
It’s technically explosive in many situations where the location or net energy released makes that irrelevant. Being significantly lighter than air you might hear a loud bang above the vehicle where gasoline’s foof ends up being significantly more deadly.

It’s not strictly better or worse, just different. Diesel for example can be very dangerous in a large open topped container, hydrogen just doesn’t stick around in that environment.

PS: Consider what it would take to make a large hydrogen fuel air bomb that’s as effective as it’s hydrocarbon equivalent.
This is really fantastic. I've played around with Obsidian periodically, but it's difficult to groom and maintain. This approach seems more manageable.

I'd like to start using this, but at the same time you likely won't be maintaining it.

Final point: we really need a memex/knowledge graph ecosystem with easily interoperable components (e.g. browser extensions, book highlighting, etc that can all feed into one of many viewers).
When will Tables be added to G-Suite as a core product? Time frame? Gating factors?

Adopting a new workflow and project process is a massive investment in data conversion, adoption, training, and internal politics. For those reasons, my teams would need to know to a high degree of certainty that our efforts will be rewarded with a long term, well supported service.

Congrats on launching and I'll be watching to see how things go for this product.
I use the WikiWand browser extension which improves on UI quite a bit,

https://www.wikiwand.com/
Inflammatory generalizations like "California Democrats simply do not care about the environment" are garden-variety political flamebait.
Is Norway even more immune than Sweden then?
Planet, KSAT, Airbus Awarded First-Ever Global Contract to Combat Deforestation
This is not in competition to lightstep or any one vendor in particular. It is to converge all open source & proprietary solutions to follow a common spec and allow them to build on top of a common base.

OpenTracing dealt only with Tracing, it didn't care about logs or metrics. OpenCensus did all 3. This is combining the best of OpenTracing (which is Tracing) with idea that OpenCensus brought - just one library to collect and ship all the observability data that your application is supposed to emit.
H2O as an emission lasts for days, not centuries. It shouldn’t be that big of a deal.

You do realize a fuel cell is a hydrogen-air battery? If you’re going to bring up metal-air batteries, you might as well skip to the end and try to figure out fuel cells.
But then what? They talk down to you if you are a lower caste? In what ways does their behavior change if they know your caste? If they talked down to you and you told them that you don't appreciate their tone, then what would happen?
> Not sure how you morphed what I said into what you are saying. I did not say that a "600ppm world and a 1000ppm world are indistinguishable" anywhere.

It's a direct consequence of "There is nothing whatsoever we can do about it."

We're at 400ppm right now. For there to be "nothing we can do", there would have to be no appreciable difference between keeping our current trajectory (1000+) versus slowing emissions down to 600, or 500, or 400.

If what you're actually saying is that "nothing we can do will bring us down to 300ppm", then that might be true, but that's a statement about a hundred times weaker than what you actually said. Being stuck at 400 would not be a tragedy. 400ppm is not what people are extremely worried about.
Imagine thinking that reading a document from the DOJ on their own site meant you're free from bias.

The DOJ has their own bias you fools. They're literally operating as trumps lawyers at this point.

You people are so damn slow. It's kind of sad.
The sun is not a muon source. Muons have a 2 us lifetime, so even highly relativistic ones don't get very far before decaying.
Go is the language that taught me to be grateful for Java.
Financial success can lead to loneliness, struggle maintaining relationships
> Then this is a case of a tenant agreeing to onerous terms before setting up shop in a retail space

One small caveat - the small business owner had no choice in the matter when they moved in 10 years ago. There was only one mall people would actually visit across the entire world. And that mall has a clickwrap agreement for all their rentals, one which includes a clause that says "and we can change this agreement at will and without notice."
They're so huge. I'm surprised they didn't retrofit for cargo.
Metal-air cells have the same problem. That’s why they were briefly considered for airplanes, and then abandoned once they realized that problem.
Xiaomi is connected-oriented brand. Choosing from other brands is better to avoid connectivity.
Great question!

lessee...some of my favs are

rust by example

rust 4 cpp programmers

https://github.com/mrDIMAS/ <- All of this, the cargo.toml has like 4 dependencies.

OH, I think there's like `Unofficial Rust patterns` too!

you could search for things like `rust playground` or `rust fun`, that's what I did I think, on github.

Also I like to build packages with cargo and pay attention to which crates get used for which apps (like ripgrep, or grex, or bat, or lsd, ). Then go back and have a go.

Oh , and `Practicle Rust` I think had some good examples on github, like a cowsay clone.
Require a different user's authentication or admin code to approve an "ALL" transaction.
Ok, we've moved the comments to https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24556858, a submission of that URL. Thanks!
We are in agreement with the only slight quibble of "fix that first". Using that triage example again, we need to get the patient's heart beating again before we worry about changing the patients diet to address their heart disease. And sometimes a defibrillator is the "better idea" but you don't always have one available and CPR is better than nothing.
Seems to be fixed in 160.1
I don't think anyone suppressed cold fusion. The original results couldn't be replicated. There were some anomalous results, but no results that lined up with the original claims that were made.

If scientist makes claim X and no one can replicate the experiment and most scientists conclude that claim X resulted from experimental error. That is not suppression.
TL;DR is Earth getting sucked into a black hole or not?
disclaimer: otel maintainer, etc.

one thing I want to point out is that, eventually, we'd like for a lot of the complaints people have to be... well, things that you don't have to complain about, because it's not important. three or four years from now, it'd be nice to see a world where most people don't actually have to interact with otel at all because it's either built-in to the libraries/frameworks they're using, or because they're using some kind of wrapper that helps with best practices.

you can see an example of this with something we're doing at lightstep - we're introducing launchers that wrap upstream otel and standardize config format/defaults between multiple languages (https://github.com/lightstep/?q=launcher), and trying to provide "missing link" documentation (https://otel.lightstep.com).

i suspect that eventually the question of "how do i use opentelemetry" becomes a moot point because it's already there.
Understanding Tuples in Python 3
You don't need "Service" for Bluetooth.
I know, but it is a direct response to your comment in which you asked about Tesla's marketing.
> What choice do you reasonably have ?

They are the ones providing the tools and also set a number of rules (following the law mostly) to use it. Are you arguing that they can’t improve their tools to add even surface validation, or go deeper and force the filling party to provide enough information for the claims to be reviewable by a human (the receiving party)?

Would the copyright owner sue Youtube for forcing them in the interface to provide evidence of the claims ?
This seems like a fantastic reform. It may lead to Twitter finally applying the same moderation standards to Trump, ie banning his account.
Go to CARB and CEC they have the roadmaps for CA.
Re: getting better there were absolutely industrial and scientific advancements. But for the common man it was pretty grim for an entire generation. My recollection is the production & availability of food and basic goods (eg clothing, shoes) per person remained at or below 1910 levels through the 50s.

Personally saw a lot of parallels to the bolshevik/menshevik/socialist divide in recent US history.

PS: you have a typo of 2018 instead of 1918
Four Keys Project metrics for DevOps team performance
https://archive.is/jAIB
Shadowbans make it harder for users who have been affected to report these outcomes.
Organic reactions to produce complex molecules have an horrible efficiency. (For example, photosynthesis in plants has a 1% or 2% of efficiency.)

Perhaps the efficiency to produce methane is not so bad, but a chain with 6 or 7 carbons like gasoline is very complicated. It is not equivalent if they are aligned or they form a ramified structure like a tree, and it is very difficult to choose which one they will form unless you have a very complex process. There are some graphics in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Octane_rating#Isooctane_as_a_r...
we also explain it a bit on our website, https://opentelemetry.io
Top Microsoft Ignite 2020 News for Developers
The Sahara has grown something on the order of 10% over the last century [1]. So ~200 million of its 2.2 billion acres are new. Wouldn't we just be restoring the albedo to what it was?

[1] https://www.livescience.com/62168-sahara-desert-expanding.ht...
I'm aware, thanks, I'm a developer. That makes the column width wider as well. What you want is a thin column and a large font size, and you can't expect regular users to zoom in.
When Github was sent a DMCA for the PopcornTime repo, PopcornTime was able to submit a counter DMCA which allowed the repo to be reinstated. Then, if the repo was really in violation, it had to be proven in court by the original claimant. Youtube doesn't allow creators to file a counter DMCA.
F-35 uses totally different configuration and 400 million were for further Yak-141 development which Russians botched anyway.
> […] four key metrics that indicate the performance of a software development team:

> Deployment Frequency - How often an organization successfully releases to production

> Lead Time for Changes - The amount of time it takes a commit to get into production

> Change Failure Rate - The percentage of deployments causing a failure in production

> Time to Restore Service - How long it takes an organization to recover from a failure in production
> When you get thousands of videos uploaded at any given moment and probably a huge amount of DMCA takedown requests what choice do you reasonably have?

Legally following the DMCA process. The DMCA process allows a response and does not demand channel deletion. Also the DMCA complaints are supposed to be forwarded.

> That guy makes song covers. He claims it's non-profit, he claims it's fair use. The IP owner disagrees, issues a takedown.

Automated takedown software issues the takedown because it's crappy software that can't tell a cover from infringement. Covers are not new, they are very well protected and very common. This isn't some kind of new internet thing, covers date back to like the dawn of radio.

> I'm not entirely convinced that his "non-profit fair-use" defense would even hold up in court

That he makes money from the cover isn't infringement, anymore than other covers are infringement when they were sold on physical CDs.

> Focusing on big bad google is a bit simplistic here IMO.

Yet other services are capable of handling the DMCA process correctly. Instead Google didn't even forward the DMCA notices, list the specific infringements or give him the legally required ability to respond.

Google is choosing to not follow DMCA and instead just delete channels because it's more cost effective. That's it - this is about a few dollars of profit margin that they're destroying someone else's business they've spent a decade building. So yeah, they're the big bad in this situation.
Interesting concept. I've been hoping and wishing for something, anything, to come along and replace Youtube with a freedom-of-speech oriented platform.

But in the FAQ there's this: "LBRY.COM / LBRY.TV allows content to be flagged as inappropriate. Should any content be flagged as illegal, unlawful, harassing, harmful, offensive or various other reasons, LBRY.COM / LBRY.TV shall remove it from the site without delay."

So how do you actually remove stuff if it's so well distributed, encrypted packets, no central authority, no censorship? Seems contradictory.

Or maybe I'm just not understanding how it works and LBRY.TV only represents one implementation of a broader standard that is platformless?
I can get on board with us needing help to learn how to discern fact from fiction, but considering the amount of people with post-secondary education who seem utterly helpless I don't feel like the universities are the place to turn, I certainly don't trust the government to come up with a trustworthy system (I'm suspicious if such a thing is aligned with their true interests), so I'm not sure how we find our way out of the corner we've painted ourselves into.

And ever present in the background is China, who due to strict control of speech seem to have very few problems like us. Evolution being amoral, I'm a bit worried that their restrictive approach might end up being selected for fitness.
In the United States, using a phone for a drivers license puts you at risk of death during an encounter with a police officer

https://google.com/search?q=police+officer+cell+phone+gun
In a surprise move, the guy - who has a platform large enough to have his year-old blog post hit the front page of HN - preaching about the utility of not living paycheck-to-paycheck is speaking mostly to a wealthy minority. /s
They can't lift the mass of a full load of cargo of any realistic density though. This is a nice summary:

https://www.flexport.com/blog/airbus-a380-no-cargo-equivalen...

Oops.
This is kinda missing the point: to appease Viacom and the other media companies when Google took over years ago, they set up a parallel but separate system for processing copyright claims that is in addition the DMCA.

A creator can have up to three strikes, with them disappearing over the course of time if they don't get more strikes. Contested copyright strikes may be elevated to DMCA requests if YouTube finds in favor of the creator, but it's not required.

If you run out of those strikes, your channel is immediately shut down. It's possible (especially with a large backlog of videos) to exceed this strike count before you can use their tools to argue against the strikes. When this happens, your account is shut down, and a "grace" timer is enabled to allow you to try and challenge the copyright strikes (one at a time). If that grace period passes and you're still out of strikes (don't dare to take a vacation), the only remaining choice is to appeal to the public.

No DMCA claims necessary.
> force bookstore owners to carry any and every book. Which is a ridiculous proposition

it is ridiculous when there's physical constraints, but for digital goods, such as youtube, there's almost no physical constraints.

Noone is saying the bookstore must promote or give prominence to all books equally. But preventing the books from existing by virtue of their platform size is wrong.