skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> the vital printed circuit boards.

I think it is unlikely that printed circuit boards made in the US make it into any mass produced Huawei product.

PCB manufacturing is not that high tech, and all major manufacturing runs of PCB's are done in China.

The fact the author of this article didn't know that severely reduces the entire articles credibility in my mind.
It'll take like 100 year to get to that point. That's 100 yeard of space engineering simply polluting Earth and then maybe another 100 years to break even?
> By using these platforms you are providing them with a source of revenue for free.

Not for nothing - platform usage costs money. It's for the average per-user cost of building and running the platform.
Painting concepts that can improve your website design
And, what to do if you get stuck:
https://youtube.com/watch?v=_9mmajFmVcc
No. You can also turn of secure boot and I would recommend it. It is mostly a scam and was probably introduced to try to lock down PCs like mobile devices. Microsoft being the usual offender here.

Security benefits are questionable. There is no scenario where non-technical users boot into a malignant OS. They open mails with strange attachments. The security analysis leading to this initiative is some kind of fantasy novel.
Yes, exactly. So, why didn't they just use a Neuralink instead? Now it feels like they unveiled the Amiga a few months after having unveiled some Alienware laptop.

Edit: no, the real reason why the Neuralink could not be used here, and the answer to the previous comment asking for the difference between the devices, is simply that the Neuralink is, for now at least, purely a sensor, whereas the aim with this vision-restoring device is to stimulate the cortex (so that would require different currents, electrodes, battery life, etc), which the Neuralink cannot do (in its current version).
According to the article Adobe reader for Android got this feature recently. I tried it and I am disappointed. Maybe OP was talking about reflow mode that indeed was accessible in many pdf readers, but for technical papers (math) it was useless.
>In other words, can you please explain why priests should not be forced to marry gay couples?

Because part of the whole point of a religion / creed is that you do some things and not others.

"Forcing priests" means no freedom of religion expression, one of the older democratic rights.
From that section: "most Google developers use a common control flow library to construct callbacks"

OpenTelemetry can't guarantee that their users will use a specific library to create callbacks and can't then ensure that this library wraps callbacks with the appropriate threadlocal setup.

Users would by default run into problems unless they take a number of precautionary steps.
There are also deers and stuff here in Europe. ;) But I assume that wild animals are just available at a fraction of what people (want to) consume every year.
Fair enough -- my mistake, just assumed this was kosher based off of finding a few cheap appliances with 120v on the body and finding them plugged into reverse-wired receptacles.
I wonder - but I'm sceptical - if a competitor internet giant will come to the fore that offers similar services that google and youtube does, but whose USP would be better support, less aggressive copyright enforcement (it HAS to have copyright enforcement else they'll be torn apart in court).
>Purposefully

How is that going to be determined?
The whole situation is a joke really when it comes to stuff like this.

Everyone crows due diligence and removing administrative access and putting in security controls everywhere, not using own hardware, having locked down this that and everything, centralising control and environmental access. It adds a lot of friction but realistically ignores the fact that some of the core libraries and packages our products depend upon are probably put together by someone toking on a bong at 2AM in an insecure rural outback shack on a laptop riddled with porn and warez that was bought from ebay.
> I cannot see how a change to a law that's proposed by the enforcement arm of government will actually protect people from abuses done by that same enforcement arm. If they act in bad faith now, why assume good faith will follow?

This seems like an argument that no government will ever reduce its own power, and so constitutional protections, due process etc. are all pointless. Even a single arm of the government is far from a monolith, and the boundaries of what government should and shouldn't do are always evolving. I'm sure this proposal isn't coming purely from the good of this administration's heart; part of it is public pressure, and part of it is the consideration that they may no longer be in power come November. But realpolitik is always a factor; good laws are still good laws.

> I don't think Amazon's user reviews are where uncomfortable discussions need to happen.

I'm sure a lot of vital IRL political discussion happens in the checkout queue at the supermarket (I'm sure that sounds like a joke, but I'm completely serious). As life moves online, we need a corresponding public sphere.

> But I do think the government demanding what should be discussed on servers owned by private citizens is a clear violation of the First Amendment.

Private citizens acting in their capacity as private citizens are still free to discuss whatever they like, or ban whatever discussion they like. If you want to have a capaciously moderated website that's fine, but such a website will not and cannot be a Section 230 public communications provider.
On the contrary, Linux fragmentation has proven that Linux only has a place on embedded devices and servers.

POSIX CLI and daemons don't need GUIs.
2035. Because we NEED 15 more years with our SUVs.

What a joke. Politicians are useless.
> If Germany hadn’t shutdown 11 nuclear power plants since 2011, emissions in the electricity sector would now be 50% to 70% lower.

That's the thing where you're very likely wrong, as you ignore the political situation where all of this happened.
Germany had a huge boost in renewables for a couple of years after Fukushima, which politically was closely tied to the (hugely popular) nuclear phaseout. This wouldn't have happened otherwise.

The alternative to the nuclear phaseout in Germany realistically would've been having no nuclear phaseout and much less ambition with renewables. Given that the German renewable energy program basically brought down solar prices for the world this would've very unlikely be a win even if you only look at CO2. The alternative of "Germany could've shut down coal earlier, keep nuclear longer and still have a massive development of renewables" is only theory, as that option was never politically on the table.
> This leaves a shock hazard exposed even when the switch is off

Yeah, comment kinda got downvoted into oblivion for a slightly off example, but this was kind of my point. There are a lot of appliances that become significantly less safe when you put the power into places it's not supposed to be. And the danger is non-obvious.
Isn't the energy content per kg more important for planes than energy density (J/m³)?

Energy per kg is much higher for liquid hydrogen (122.8 MJ/kg) than for kerosine (42.8 MJ/kg): https://www.fzt.haw-hamburg.de/pers/Scholz/GF/GF_Paper_DLRK_...

So planes would look bulkier, but could actually be lighter than before.
I've seen another channel do this too, Corridor Digital. They're creating their own video platform, though it seems to be more so to get away from the traditional Hollywood model, but I guess that also has the benefit of not being beholden to the whims of YouTube.

I wonder what the internet would look like if everyone did something like this rather than having all their content hosted on a central platform. What would the internet look like if video hosting platforms were as popular and as easy to set up / maintain as a blog platform like WordPress?
Sites I log in to I don't clear. Other sites _shouldn't_ be able to tell the difference between deleting cookies and being a fresh visitor. This brings a new problem, in the form of cookie and GDPR banners. But there's an extension for that, too: https://www.i-dont-care-about-cookies.eu/.
why then is it that suppliers and users shouldn't expect support?
> Renewables _always_ require a fossil backup.

If the backup is run infrequently enough then that becomes a non-issue. I can definitely forsee a future where the fossil backup is only used once a decade in particularly abnormal weather conditions.
Even the CIA's leaked internal PowerPoints look fairly similar to what you'd get in the valley, for the most part. The budgets big but - especially for defensive operation - it's the same kind of thing most other people do in that sector.

For offensive work, then the motto (of one of the NRO's satellites) comes to mind: Doing god's work with other people's money. Everything is tapped, we should assume at least a proportion of what we take for granted now is unsafe. It's unlikely they'll have broken any big fry protocols or schemes but planting a backdoor is trivial for them (if you can manipulate the entropy on 10% of computers so you should be able to crack it 10 years, think of all the kids you could save!).
> I hope that you have to unlock your phone to be able to unlock your car?

Nope.

Is that really any different from someone finding your car keys? These days, with every car including a remote, if someone did find your key fob, they could press the panic button on it as they strolled around the parking lot to easily find your car. At least with the Tesla phone key, they'd still have to walk around and try to open up every Tesla on the lot, unless they were able to unlock your phone.
OT but classic HN not to read the article and only comment on the headline. I feel this part of the guidelines makes it hard to address, when I really just want to say "RTFA before commenting" to some ridiculous comments that would make no sense if the poster had actually read the article.

> Please don't comment on whether someone read an article.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
That is actually amazing! I just hope that it can be scaled and will be affordable.

I would still argue that we should look into reducing our consumption, as other environmental impacts like water consumption are still considerable. Anyhow: A step in the right direction!
You may already be familiar but you might be interested in checking out the comedian Drew Lynch https://www.youtube.com/user/WordsRHard

He developed his stutter years ago after a softball accident (hit him in the throat). He ended up getting into standup comedy and is becoming pretty big.

All this is to say that the "impediment" actually adds character to him and makes him a lot more interesting and memorable in good ways. Maybe you can reframe your stutter in this positive way as well.
It's like telling a person having a seizure, just relax man. Or a person with Tourette's syndrome: "try not to say that word man, it doesn't make sense". Normal people stutter when they're anxious or hyped up. But that doesn't mean that stutterers are always anxious or hyped up.

It's easier for people to arrive to a conclusion (possibly an invalid one) about a man's suffering, than actually admitting they don't know what the cause is and try to solve the problem interactively with that person. e.g. She has lupus, oh it must be because of her weird diet. etc.

In your case, the best thing you can do is listen. Try to ask them questions like: have you noticed any pattern that decreases the frequency of your stutter? how about you try this or that? You also have to be careful and try not to be pushy about it. As a stutterer myself, I came to a point where I just got used to the social awkwardness and starting to accept to generally accept my stutter. It's giving me way less anxiety than it used to do. So, I'd be a bit annoyed if someone whom I don't really know that well try to interactively solve this "problem" with me. Because it's only a problem if it's causing me discomfort.

Also, showing facial signs of petty or discomfort is the worst thing you can do. When you're listening to a stutterer, don't break eye contact, because it shows that you're uncomfortable being in their shoe. treat it as if it's someone saying "ahh" "emm" a lot, most people filter out these noises unconsciously, try to do that. I understand it's a lot to ask.

Imo, the absolute worst thing you can do, is to talk to them a lot about it while conveying that it's a "problem" that needs to be solved and always trying to find a cure. My dad used to be very pushy about it and it caused me some serious psychological harm, because I never felt that I'm good enough, and I'd argue that it caused me to stutter even more, because he always wanted me to be perfect. Instead of discussing their weakness, try to talk to them about how they can leverage their strengths to be the best version of themselves.

Hope that helps, feel free to message me if you have questions.
I find this announcement surprisingly scarce on details. It's basically a press release and some nice pictures. It lacks even basic information like the amount of hydrogen they'll need for a given flight.
You got a lot of flak, but I was similarly confused and mildly annoyed. It does make a difference, especially at that time, if a woman lives as a man or vice versa. I could only deduce that at that time there were very few female lawyers. (Looked it up: In the US Arabella Mansfield was the first in 1869)

At least Wikipedia has a copy before degenderisation:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thomas_Baty&oldid...
When we integrated async jvm (scala) services with another tracing provider, we took two approaches. One was to pass the trace context down from the request handler through anything that would declare a span or need to send trace headers down to another service. The other was to instantiate service clients per request, and pass the trace context into the service client constructor.
BERT Is Not Always the Best Answer in NLP
Presidential Plinko
The PR post states near its end that the more documents go through Adobe Sensei the better it will get. So yes, they’re mining third party data. It would be interesting to see if this is GDPR compliant (I bet no since user is not well informed about the processing).
ReactJS- Digital Transformation Guide for Non-Tech Founder
We built the infrastructure to pump stale dinosaur juice out of the ground in Saudi-Arabia, refine it, and deliver it to your gas tank. We built the infrastructure to bring potable water to every home.

Just because we don't have the charging stations today doesn't mean we'll never have them.
Yeah, it's not great. But you can get to "new tab" by longpressing the tab counter thingy. Yep, I noticed it by accident.
Without excrement from animals you need synthetic fertilizer, whose production causes massive production causes massive environmental damage eg emissions and algae bloom.
From your link mate:

> These only seven dives to more than 300 m do not include the dives of professional saturation divers using a divers bell at constant pressure for the transfer from surface to ground and back. These seven dives are done with decompression in the water not using a divers bell and saturation diving.

The selected answer is talking about huge pressurisation changes in a short amount of time, that's a very different situation and nothing like what commercial deepdivers do.

Saturation diving involves weeks of adjustment in a bell.

Much of the science suggests we haven't even come close to pushing the physical limits but no one is willing to risk it, the world record was set 30 years ago.
Dennis Yurichev also wrote an awesome free book about creating SMT/SAT code to solve real-world (and less real-world) problems.

[0] https://sat-smt.codes/
Because some people are tribal, and root for the underdog.

Other people are impartial, and do not consider the relative size of parties when figuring out who's in the wrong.
This bourdieu fellow seems to be inspired by kafka rather than society as a whole.
The Z4 was the successor of the Z3 which was the world's first working programmable, fully automatic digital computer. Both machines were invented by the German engineer Konrad Zuse from 1935-1941 (Z3) and 1942-1945 (Z4).

During the latter period, Zuse also created "Plankalkül", the first high-level programming language to be designed for a computer.
> [iCloud Backup] should be end-to-end encrypted, but explicitly isn't

Just keep in mind that, when you say it should be, what you're saying is that Apple should make iCloud Backup work in such a way that, if the user loses the keys, Apple is completely unable to help them recover their data.

And, I don't agree. I can support it as an opt-in feature, but wouldn't use it; I expect sensitive applications, such as Signal, to encrypt their backups as indeed they do, and would prefer as a last resort to retain my precious exocortex, even if I lose my entropy.

And if I wouldn't use it, most people wouldn't, and Apple is right not to do it that way.
Most meteorologists probably use the climate data produced, not the program that produced the data. So the data producing program’s natural interface is simply the command to run it and the file system for storing results.

The separation between simple interface for launching a big calculation vs. friendly software for using the results is sensible and common in at least two cases.

1. The data is calculated infrequently using lots of computing power & time. After which it is the data that is primarily used.

2. The data is calculated by one group. Many other groups just use the produced data.

In climate calculations, I expect both cases apply.
I thought they have enough money for getting said resources.

As for why, Microsoft apparently has enough money to port Java to Apple Silicon.

https://appleinsider.com/articles/20/09/22/microsoft-contrib...
A short article worth reading. The title is somewhat click-bait but the analogy is real.

TL;DR: So much leading edge semiconductor chip manufacturing is now done in Taiwan that the island has acquired strategic significance. The analogy is to Arrakis being the sole source of "spice" in the Dune novels.
Thanks.

So, for other who are curious. TamaGo is focused on certain ARM SoCs. So CPUs rather than microcontrollers. TamaGo is more or less a fully fledged go running on bare metal.

Pretty cool, actually.
I disagree, it depends on the kind of programming you do. Build fancy typeclasses to do black magic in Haskell? Then _perhaps_. Write kernel modules for custom functionality in C? Then learning ct is like a fish learning to climb a tree.
Maybe some day llvm will know how to optimize overflow checks as well as JavaScript engines do.
If every creator were personally responsible for their contents, this wouldn't be a problem. As it stands, YouTube is in the gray area of perhaps being a platform (akin to USPS) but too often taking on the appearance of a publisher (akin to Penguin Random House). Thus complaints are directed at YouTube, and not the creator. And since YouTube cannot possibly look into what every creator is doing, they're incentivized to simply delete the accused, despite of the long-standing democratic priciple of the presumption of innocence. (Which is backed by the phrase “Ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat.”)
it's probably not on the front page but they actually explain what is telemetry and observability here:

https://opentelemetry.io/about/

But I agree this is a better explanation :)
Looks like an agitator that layed down in front of a bike to me.
I read it as "it" being the situation. e.g., "was it a child who painted this?"

it isn't bad grammar, though you could argue it's poor writing because it's confusing. it's using a feature of english called it-extraposition. some examples here: https://www1.icsi.berkeley.edu/~kay/bcg/extrap.html

basically, it-xp lets you delay a constituent in certain circumstances using "it". sometimes this is required to make a sentence grammatical.

"(What to do next) is not clear"
"It is not clear (what to do next)"

*"Was (who painted this) a child?"
"Was it a child (who painted this)?"

We can combine this feature with clefting the end of the sentence to make something that seems to refer to a person by "it", but actually refers to an elided constituent:

Discourse: "I don't know the gender of the writer"

R1: *"Was (who wrote this) a man?" (can't have wh-phrase here, needs it-xp)

R2: "Was it a man (who wrote this)?" (OK, but the last part is redundant. Discourse already includes we are talking about a writer. Grice's maxims suggest we will usually drop it.)

R3: "Was it a man?" (looks weird, but sounds perfectly normal in context)

I'm a linguist / syntactician by training, but also nonbinary and use they/them, so I have some skin in this game. I think the GP was being obtuse, maybe purposely, but not malicious.
It's easy for politicians write laws that suppose to take effect in far future as it won't be them who will enforce them and be responsible for the failures in the process.
Wow. That's a neat project. It should also be a good way to run Windows binaries on Wine on ARM.
oh yes, I was soo amazed (and still I am!) when I've first learned about this! Really clever work!
Weigh the cost of false positive against false negative. In the current landscape YT has little incentive to change.
I wrote a more detailed answer to GP: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24576616, but basically: yes that's totally natural, but in edited writing / speech sometimes should be avoided for clarity reasons. But I didn't blink twice at the comment myself.
There's also the "classic" option, discovered some 200 years before synthetic fertilizers - crop rotation that includes some form of legumes. IMO with the current state of agriculture and food production we went into a local maximum that is very unsustainable and bad for the environment.
Just looking at the photos (1961, 1977), I'm reminded of the alkaloids mentioned on pages 3 and 146 of The Space Merchants, née Gravy Planet (1952).

https://archive.org/stream/galaxymagazine-1952-06/Galaxy_195...

(SPOILER) https://archive.org/stream/galaxymagazine-1952-08/Galaxy_195...
More than 28 hours of work was done on the deepest saturation dive ever made, it was beyond your 500m mark:

https://divingalmanac.com/deepest-saturation-dive-open-sea/
Can't they just take the text based format and create a config tool that reads TOML/YAML and then writes that configuration to etcd, redis or whatever else they support?
You definitely can use Librem Key to protect the bootloader. Below it also says "tamper protection", although with few details. More details are here:

https://puri.sm/posts/the-librem-key-makes-tamper-detection-...

or here https://docs.puri.sm/Librem_Key/Getting_Started/User_Manual....
Your career Ladder Is Broken
In my environment the adage is "when you say foolproof you mean fooldetecting".
A separate bootloader and key on USB does not protect against many physical attacks, nor ones that involve changing the firmware or nvram configuration through software attacks. Without some sort of sealed keys or attestation of the platform configuration, your external bootloader has no guarantees that the device itself has not been backdoored. mjg59's tpm-totp talk[1] discussed the difficulty of trusting the firmware that loaded the bootloader that loaded the kernel that is now asking for your password (although even with that it is necessary to add integrity protections on the encrypted disk, otherwise there are a variety of attacks against the systems).

Secure Boot is trustable, if you remove the vendor keys and reprogram the platform key with one under your own control. Likewise, the TPM is useful for protecting your secrets, not just enforcing DRM, if you take ownership of it and make use of the sealed key policies. See the safeboot.dev threat model[2] for how these protections are applied and how they detect or prevent many sorts of attacks.

1: https://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/35742.html
2: https://safeboot.dev/threats/