skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I think the original commenter might have intended to mean without additional build tooling?

While it isn't pretty, you can drop Vue in a <script> tag on a page and define components with template strings.

In React, you can technically do this, but you need to either:

A. Use React.createElement() calls

B. Use something like "htm" also included via a <script> tag, with template literal tags to wrap your component renders

You can technically include Babel in a <script> tag to use JSX, but it only works with <script> blocks that have been tagged as "JSX", not within regular ".js" files you can import using "src="

Jason Miller a-la Preact is the person I see most consistently working on and pushing this sort of React/Preact no-build setup. I definitely get the appeal, for this exact usecase -- you have a simple, mostly-static website (or something old and built with jQuery) and you want to incrementally modernize it/add functionality without rewriting the whole thing.

https://twitter.com/_developit/status/1220102334048624643
> You realize the only reason WeChat exists is because China didn't let western companies compete, right?

I think blocking LINE was a bigger factor. For a time it was growing rapidly in China and it ultimately won in Japan and a couple of other Asian markets.
I mean, as the person in the video says, 1-2 people doing the work of 10 from just using a scythe vs a sickle.

I had no idea how effective a scythe actually was, thank you for that!
> Nvidia is notoriously hostile to open source.

I've been very critical of Nvidia and this acquisition, but I don't think this is accurate. Nvidia as a company shows a lot of evidence of a company that does not deal well with community or intercompany collaboration. But I don't believe they're actively hostile to open source.

The reason Nvidia's main graphics driver is closed source is I think merely historical. Closed source drivers were the status quo for the longest time, and the development of Nvidia's driver is built around this. Right now the thing is probably filled to the brim with hacks, (third party) intellectual property, and near zero support for the Mesa standards/architecture that came into existence way late in the driver's life. AMD's driver would also likely still be closed source for similar reasons, were it not that they decided to invest a lot of money (and lost time) to give it a fundamental rewrite - which was necessitated because their closed source driver was much worse than Nvidia's was in the first place.

There's a lot of narrative around characterizing Nvidia as 'evil' and them being actively hostile against open source, but it's just a company with its own faults (maybe moreso than others, sure) and with its own history.

The incentives around having a mainline Linux driver keep on getting stronger, and I'm actually cautiously optimistic that Nvidia knows this and will consider making the investment to make such a driver. Especially if their commitment around Linux-on-ARM has to improve as a result of this acquisition.
I don't believe it's a blanket requirement, it's rather that if you want to market your product as being Halal then you have to get certification. Perhaps have a look at lemparin2020's comment https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24518270 who appears to be an actual Indonesian who is more familiar with the article's subject matter. lemaprin2020 says:

>>Well obviously. If you want to build a halal certified banking product it has to be implement syariah principles, thats the point.
Thanx for the tips but I can't wait until hitting the address bar just gives me an overview of my favorite sites again. I don't need any new tabs, I only used them to store thing for later (as in next) reading.
FreeCAD has a 2D constraints-based solver (the sketch workbench) which could be used for this.
CAD software is generally inexpensive compared to the price engineers are paid to use it and how much money is made from it. You have to also realize that the paying audience is relatively small and at the end of the day commercial producers of this software have to pay the bills and make a profit to make more software.
No worries, in new versions of Android google already decided that call recording is not something that common folk is allowed to do.
This must have been downvoted by people who don't understand HPC, as usual here. While, typically, latency is the most important metric for an HPC fabric, it's not the only one that may be more important than bandwidth (message rate, contention, offloading...). It's also important to have detailed monitoring, which I guess you won't get from any such provider. Being told, even of the old networking, that it's all terribly clever and we shouldn't ask questions isn't a good way sales pitch.
So most companies aren’t using PWAs to save money on Android and probably wouldn’t on iOS either....

Do you propose that Apple makes Safari more able to invade privacy?

If the only purpose of PWAs for Android is to make it easier to run on low end cheap phones - that’s really not a good argument is it with iOS is it? Even the 6s from 2015 is more performant than many mid range new Android phones.
It depends on what you hack, doesn't it? If your hack causes physical harm, it is a physically violent act. You wouldn't say that someone firing a gun didn't commit a physically violent act just because all they did was pull a trigger.
There is no grub
Also jtr benchmark output.
Quare FreeBSD? (Why FreeBSD?)
A more nuanced editorial imo:

https://youtu.be/JTfhYyTuT44
Go do a fresh install of CentOS/RHEL (or just spin up a new docker container) and what do you see in root's bashrc?

alias rm='rm -i'
alias cp='cp -i'
alias mv='mv -i'

I've also encountered one job which adds this to their base ubuntu image, and my current employer uses Macs which have it added to bashrc by their mdm software on initial install.

So what's your justification to dismiss the idea that this is a common practice?
If you need entire browser sessions for some bits of info that are in there, somewhere, is there really not a better way?
I could buy a new apartment for this money :harold:
Why hasn't twitter relaunched vine? The market is very different now from when they shut it down. I'm surprised that investors haven't demanded it yet.
After the initial update, you can use it for something else.
While there are obvious direct causes of the death here mentioned by others, I believe that everyone who has paid out a ransomware ransom has a tiny bit of blood on their hands for this one. The attackers were targeting a nearby University, the hospital was collateral damage, and they wouldn't have bothered with the attack if they didn't expect that the University would pay-out.
What makes you think VR headsets take billions of dollars to launch? The first Oculus was a Kickstarter project.
I disagree - you can play a game with the same rules as chess in 1D but you can't move your pawn forward on the board in 1D. Chess is a cerebral game so it's easier to abstract it down to entirely be about the will of the movements but those movements aren't committed (in a normal game of chess) until the pieces are actually moved.

So I think you can tactically play football and chess equivalents in 1D, but the actual movements required to execute the game still require three dimensions and Chess remains a game that is pretty naturally aligned with the requirements of two dimensional space.

This is very pedantic at this point but I think the naive and natural assumptions about game dimensionality are probably the most correct to stick with. They can be argued up and down (absolutely no game can actually be played in less dimensions than we exist in since we only exist in so many dimensions - we might not need to exercise them to play the game but a chess piece, a computer or any existing encoding of data that we have today requires representation in 3 (or however many you think we have) dimensions - similarly pretty much everything (everything, I think?) can be described in data that can be expressed linearly so all games and the entire world can be said to be 1D. I think the fair middle ground is to try and adhere to the meaningful definition of dimensions in the middle that actually lets us classify things differently instead of saying that everything in existence is both 1D and multi-dimensional.
I'd guess the market for cheap IoT devices running mainline Linux is pretty big.
We don't generally expect every public business to have security to protect patrons from physical attack by random people.
Its interesting how DonnyT ran his 2016 campaign on trade with China, and now by virtue of opening his mouth, more people than ever are aware of certain questionable actions taken by semi-nationalized Chinese companies. I'm not sure thats a bad thing, all things considered.
I have a background in civil engineering with a focus on structural / geotechnical / construction engineering. Standards for hospitals are much stricter than they are for houses. In fact, for buildings like hospitals we have specific parts of the law that limit damages. I don't know the details of this specific hack well enough to comment on where it falls on the spectrum of incompetence, but things like bollards are required by law between a hospital and a street. There are also limits on the amount that one can sue for when they're exposed.

Fundamentally though, this is a failure of the tech community to engage policy makers and a failure of policy makers to engage / listen to the tech community. It took me (and others?) years to get self-driving car regulations enacted in Canada. And even there, we're just getting started with the basics. Not enough programmers are politically engaged and the field is moving so fast that it is tough for regulators to keep up. I'm not surprised that people are dying. Quite the opposite, really. I'm surprised so few have died given how horrible our security is for industrial systems and other fuddy-duddy sub-industries of software. Yes it's a lot better today than it was five or ten years ago, but the offensive tools are much better as well. It's literally an arms race and sometimes it looks like only one side recognizes it as such.
If the brushed lines are uniform, they might have half the state, right? A center cube could be at 0˚ or at 180˚ and the pattern could still line up.

I've never seen one, so I don't know if that's the case or not. I also don't know if there are natural constraints in the topology of the cube that make it possible or not for center faces to be 180˚ out of alignment without others being off by a quarter turn. I do assume that any center face that's flipped would have to be paired with another one in the same orientation. But that's just my intuition.
Not sure if the article mentions it (haven't read it yet) but JTF-ARES was the force tasked with sabotage and often it was against targets such as the militants video (propaganda) productions.

Edit: Really not sure why I got downvoted, as I provided accurate info?
Try Charles Petzold's book "Code: The Hidden Language of Computer Hardware and Software". It goes through the structure of a computer at the binary level in a gentle way that's aimed at non-specialists.
You seem to have forgotten the URL.
Right, I was referring to my parent comment that talked about pulling Docker images which come from the internet unless you set up a proxy.
You don't have to "jailbreak" your Android because it wasnt in jail to begin with. Sideloading works straight out of the box.
You could make this same argument about every criminal act.
The more I learn about this ambitious project, the more I'm convinced it could be the real deal. I recognize the feeling from when I first learned about 'ethereum', probably on HN, in like 2015.
Show HN: Find your ideal eBike based on what's in stock, speed, cargo, etc.
Show HN: Shia.guru, a toy for procrastinators like me
I have a lot of things I want to do. I also suffer from 'decision paralysis' -- rather than starting any one thing from my list, I avoid them all at once. During one of these "avoidance sessions" I stumbled on a reddit thread where someone else had the exact same problem.

shia.guru is the very beginning of a tool to help myself and others push themselves to spend more time on the things that they want to do rather than the things that are easy.

It works by trimming your TODO list to just ONE item for you to focus on -- with a promise to call you in an hour and check in on your progress.
You're correct, my understanding of "full audit" vs "due diligence" was off.
And to add to your point, in my experience I've had "long-lived" scripts that the flags change meaning over the years. This is extremely rare on base-level installs, but frighteningly more common on the inhouse-programs I've had to deal with.

The long flags are less likely to be changed over time. The script will usually fail gracefully and I don't also need to relearn what I was thinking 25 years ago when I first did it. (long flags are like in-command comments too)

And as others have pointed out -v(ersion) or -v(erbose) can happen too.
What's Next for ARM and RISC-V Given the Nvidia Purchase
Checks and balances all break down in the presence of ideologically aligned parties. Its a miracle its lasted this long, but it was inevitable.
If this is their secret weapon for the election then it's not a very good one. If we make a simple division of the population into 4 groups, we'll have

1. People who are ambivalent i.e. don't care or aren't familiar with the app

2. People who are strongly against it for a variety of reasons

3. People who are in favour because it's a blow scored against the Chinese

4. People who are in favour due to their feelings about the app specifically

It seems likely to me that the second grouping will be the largest. I don't think much will come of it but it will take much, much more than this to neuter China. It's not quite as vacuous "Build the wall" but it's not far off - if you want to battle china economically, get trading with their competitors (i.e. vote for centrists - Bernie is almost as protectionist as Trump)
> Raspberry Pi is an ecosystem which is based on proprietary technologies and masquerading as an open source friendly thing.

In a world increasingly more virtualized, multilayered, and interconnected, how would you ensure "purity" in that regard? And can you?
China bans WhatsApp. The U.S. bans WeChat. Great, no I have no official app besides good old text and phone to communicate with my fiancée who is still banned from reentering the U.S. despite still having a job here.

The U.S. has simply become an authoritarian state of a different color. My fiancée is prevented from returning and we are prevented from using our primary communication method simply because the so-called president wants to personally gain from these actions (i.e., swindle a re-election).

And what am I supposed to use to pay for things when I visit China now if WeChat is removed from AppStores?

Freedom my ass. Facebook, Google, and the others all collect the same if not more data than these apps, and those companies have shown time and again they do not have the American people’s best interests at heart and abuse the data collection and their power. So what are we doing here?

Instead, I suspect there was collusion between Facebook and Trump’s cronies for them to have released Instagram Reels when they did.
What really makes me afraid is that the USA Gov is so scared of a foreign social network app, they must really know how powerful are these apps. How would I trust the social networks under the American Gov?
Svelte. Popular.
> If you want to support proper open source development ... buy Beagle board and other alternatives.

What more open alternatives are there with similar price and performance? The Beagleboards are ridiculously underpowered compared to a Raspberry Pi 4. I like the ODROIDs but I don't think they're any more open than Raspberry Pi. They also tend to be more expensive.

YMMV on all of this stuff:

* Some folks are doing microcontroller-esque things and care about openness more than performance.

* For my applications, I need the performance. The sort of open hardware, no blob stuff you're talking about would be great on principle but I may or may not take advantage of it. I'm still able to run and develop open-source Linux userspace apps without it.
> [...]with vastly less competition.

On consoles, as far as the majority of consumers are concerned, there’s three players: Sony, Microsoft, and Nintendo. On phones, there’s... Apple, Google, Samsung, Huawei, OnePlus, etc. Sure, it’s basically iOS and Android, but even then, it’s 3 for consoles and 2 for phones. So to say that phones have “vastly less competition” is simply disingenuous.
Is that a JoJo reference?
Someone can be on the network and fail to crack encrypted data and you'd be in compliance. HIPAA is only about information leaks, not about operational health.
Not OP, but I also made the choice not to carry a phone (not even a dumb phone) because I don't want the inconvenience of carrying an interrupting device everywhere I go.

There's a phone at home and one in my office for emergencies, but other business gets done by email, on my terms.

I live in a (non-US) large city, walk or bike to work every day and don't own a car. We have a pretty good public transit system which I used to use a lot, pre-covid.

The biggest inconvenience of not carrying a cell phone was that I didn't have access to live bus and subway schedules, so I would sometimes take a suboptimal route to my destination.

My schedule is done on paper in a pocket schedule book that I always carry. I also carry a pen, a simple watch, a Swiss army knife, and a small flashlight, all of which I use at least once every day. I also always have a book in my bag, for reading while waiting for the bus, the doctor, or other things and people.

I look things up on the Internet at home.

I'm not saying I will never carry a phone, but it seems that not having a phone is the right choice for me at the moment.
Why would you presume that the new hardware would cost 40% of the server? Sure it’s an accounting trick to decide how to amortize the development costs. However they do it, I really doubt AWS would be continuing down the Nitro path if the TCO + savings wasn’t in the black. I’d like to see the energy efficiency of the new hardware and TCO estimates too, but probably that info is deemed “sensitive” and not released publicly. Likely the Nitro cards cost a fraction of that 30%, probably more like 5-15%.

I’d wager that new hardware could have a huge energy efficiency gain for the specific Nitro workloads mentioned. The 30% resource utilization on Xen could be wasting a lot of time waiting for locks, context switch’s, etc between cores that could potentially be removed entirely from custom hardware optimized for handling multiple memory contexts simultaneously just by removing cache coherency at certain points.
Funny that being ethical and prioritizing to not do harm is not on the list.
Hello Hacker News,

When I bought my eBike, I was frustrated that it was hard to find unbiased reviews that weren't on their website or part of marketing campaigns.

I am launching a website called eBike Match (https://ebikematch.com) that helps people find ebikes, discuss, and review bikes and ultimately help people choose the best bike objectively.

I would be very grateful if you could share your review on our website, just scroll down to the discussion section.

If you have an ebike, I would appreciate your review! If you don't have one, let me know how the website can be more useful for helping you find one.
Jerry, Inc. (YC S17) Is Hiring a Software Engineer (Toronto, Boston, Palo Alto)
I find that at arm's length, my body posture is more open and the iPad feels more social than a phone that you're hunched over or a laptop with two hands at attention.
No. It is evil, just as the Chinese bans on Facebook etc are evil. There is no real, legitimate reason to ban any software meant for communication. Payments I accept, but general communication should not under any circumstances.

Just because some people want to turn the US into a mini PRC doesn't mean we have to embrace their noxious, evil value system.
Buy books and print research papers?

Personally, I don't view a black/white Kindle as the same as other screens, so a bike ride to a park where I might read a research paper or book I've put on my Kindle.
Absolutely not. Long flags are non-standard and non-portable. Don't write GNU scripts - write shell scripts.
IE11 is also frequently represented as `mshtml.dll` in windows programs that embed a browser (eg: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trident_(software)#Use_cases )
Aliases shouldn't be run in non-interactive shells IIRC.
Farther up I detailed the specific things I thought Carmack was most pessimistic on. I clarified that I don't think he's down on VR, just on big hardware gains on mobile in the near future. I took it to mean "Hardware's done. Have at it, devs." And I think that's the reason he's moving on to the next project, since this tech is now in the polishing phase and out of the pioneer phase. I think it's a good thing and a sign of a maturing platform, just like how slowing advances in smartphone hardware marked the begining of their global sales s-curve (LTE retina iphone 4 in 2010).
Some Notes on Balaji Srinivasan's Future of Media
This is an interesting little website showcasing this kind of "tech tree" idea :) - https://simplifier.neocities.org/
> The FTC case against Microsoft was specifically that Microsoft was a monopoly

This is a misrepresentation of how section 2 of the sherman anti trust law works.

It is a very common misconception, though, so don't worry.

The sherman anti-trust act does not require a literal monopoly. Instead, it only requires significant market power.

https://www.ftc.gov/tips-advice/competition-guidance/guide-a...

"Courts do not require a literal monopoly before applying rules for single firm conduct"

So, according to the officially released government information and guidance from the experts on the matter, the previous point still stands.

Apple can still be illegally using market power, even if they do not have a literal monopoly. As a literal monopoly is not required, under section 2 of the sherman anti-trust act.

It is a completely uncontroversial statement, backed up by the information released by the government, that a literal monopoly is not required, for something to be covered by section 2 of the sherman anti trust act, and that, instead, only significant market power is required.

50% of the market share, in the US, is within the realm of market share, where anti-trust law may apply.
The point is that Apple doesn’t want to do that, so if they do it for one person, they’d have to do it to all. Ultimately doing something they didn’t want to do in the first place.