skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Or that’s a Complete fabrication at the request of a political party that has the ear of most major news outlets?

During the 2016 election these news outlets breathlessly repeated the misleading statement that 17 intelligence agencies agreed Russia was responsible for the stolen emails based on a statement from USIC, which represented 16, and Crowdstrike, which was the 17th. The USIC statement says nothing about how many subsidiary agencies were actually suggesting this (later we learned it was 3 or 4).[1] A year later when Trump’s USIC issued a statement, NPR was quick to point out that the USIC comprises 17 organizations, but only a few of them reached conclusions in the report.[0] We’ve also since learned that Crowdstrike, while publicly saying Russia was responsible for exfiltrating data from the DNC, was telling Congress under oath that it had no evidence to such claims. no other agency had access to the servers in question, including US federal intelligence agencies, which could have performed forensics while a sympathetic party was still in control of the executive branch.

0 - https://www.npr.org/sections/memmos/2018/07/18/630057400/gui...
1 - https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2016...

(edit: s/ ased/ based/)
Yep, there is a lot being done today of course and progress has picked up in recent years. But knowing what we know, it's still underfunded.
It will soon be 4 years that a petty and vengeful executive is in power that would do anything to spite his opponents, real or imagined. Would he not use every possible avenue to investigate this, and, had they found something, use all his considerable media influence to trumpet it everywhere he can?
If you are ready to pay to remove it, just pay for the YT subscription.
Everyone in a bubble thinks that they're being exposed to new contrarian ideas. You absolutely are, but not contrarian ideas being seriously discussed outside your bubble. The valley is the obvious example, contrarian ideas are tossed around like hotcakes, and yet it's so contrarian to support trump nobody does it.

How many open Trump supporters do you interact with a week? Or would you feel comfortable telling your coworkers you plan to vote for Trump? He very well may win this election.
Hey, I wanted to tell you I worked deep in the Democratic Party's technology operations for several years. I didn't know Seth but I know plenty of people who did. What you are saying is nonsense.

I can't prove a negative, but I am not sure where you got the idea that Seth was in a "perfect position to screw" the DNC over, nor the idea he was motivated to do so. His family has begged for years for conspiracy theorists like you to let this rest.
I've never had this issue with Gandi.net. They are excellent.
No, sir. They don't lie. At least not wittingly.. There are cases where they may inadvertently.. perhaps lie, but not wittingly.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QwiUVUJmGjs&t=402
I don't think you can go before a judge without having the rules enforced against you.
And? Everything is an approximation so if you can fake it 'til you make it does it matter?

I assume by the end of the century we will end up with some kind of physically based rendering at a near photonic level of detail.
One thing I've come to learn about humans, and while I'm tempted to say seems like an artifact of modern times, I know is something that's been with us for as long as we've been human beings:

Narratives matter to most people far, far, far more than facts.
Would be nice if we could turn this into an argument over data portability. If there was a service an app that migrated data out of TikTok to a clone service, I'd switch. Imagine if users could easily move their posts, photos, friends, etc. out of Facebook to another system.
E-Commerce: Sales Performance from Plerdy vs Google Analytics
Collaborative online painting and drawing tool
Please, for the good of this site and the wishes of his own family, don't post baseless conspiracy theories like that.

Edit - as the original post I was responding to has been removed I have edited out my response to it delving into more information.
Whistleblowers not actually required: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XylBrECV7Wc
Looks like something went really wrong with the HTML in this article - almost every paragraph has link styling and leads to a 404 page when clicked on.
I actually didn't know that Drew had registered getdropbox.com with us! That's awesome. Thanks for being a customer.
They can "not understand the question." https://apnews.com/33a88feb083ea35515de3c73e3d854ad
Canva markets itself as a design tool. So I tried to design my app with it
So thinking beyond their stated reasoning - which doesn't make much sense unless they do something similar to facebook and co, which they won't - makes me wonder.

With this administration everything is overtly political and typically defensive and/or misdirection.

* To ban something 'from China' appeals to his base.
* Tiktok was used to 'humiliate' the president at his Tulsa 'comeback rally'
* Trump is having 'issues' with Twitter and to a lesser extent Facebook and other social media. They are marking and removing posts for example.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/abrambrown/2020/08/01/is-this-t...

Perhaps the larger theme here is to fire a warning shot at Twitter, Facebook and to a lesser extent Google. If you mess with us and don't do what we want - we can and will shut you down. Because 'national security'. Does that seem a leap? Not really because foreign entities (in particular Russia) actively and successfully use social media, against US interests.

Is this good? No. It's really bad. This is classic Trump - distracting, destructive, coercing, nonsensical, abusive and chaotic. With even a small amount of thought it can be seen to be smoke and mirrors.

A strong argument can be made that social media is a big problem in the US, for a variety of reasons, including national security. That this step is nothing to do with trying to fix that, and everything to do with the failing and flailing administration.
Being Bad is Bad
Looks like you've got the receiver and sender commands reversed. The sender should use input redirection (< file) to read the file and the receiver should use output redirection (> file) to save the file.
I'm confused about why you wrote "relay code shouldn't be written to only support <10 channels" as any three character combination is a channel?

You mention wormhole doesn't have a problem with colliding channels, but that it requires assigning a channel from the relay. To me this is a trade-off. If wormhole can't connect to a relay, wormhole can't assign a channel and won't work. Whereas, in croc, if you can't connect to the relay it will still work over LAN since the client chooses the channel.

I appreciate this discussion, there's a discussion on Github about this now. [1] Would you mind moving this discussion there?

[1]: https://github.com/schollz/croc/issues/261
Any real effort would start with using a hash instead of plaintext password.
It's just a normal length 'e'. About the same length as the 'ch' that follows. At least that's how I'd pronounce it.

But it can have a negative connotation in German too, unsure if the author of the language is aware of that.
I’ve scoured the internet for the crowdstrike documents that offer any kind of proof to their claim. Can you point me to it? The HN crowd I’m sure is capable and qualified of looking at the technical merits of it.
What I don't grasp is - how are you not bothered by an adversary picking our president? It's not about Obama anymore.
ZFS compiles a modified version Lua 5.2 into zfs.ko and loaded into Linux kernel.
At that point isn't it better to just set up some bookmarks? Navigating 700 tabs is much harder than navigating a hierarchical bookmark list.

Personally I only keep open tabs that I am actively working in, if I have more than ~15 I get less productive since I have to hunt through to fine the one I need. Several times a day I just clear out all my tabs aside from a couple pinned ones.
Yes, and any pardon must be 100% complete and unconditional.
True. Heard this story many times.
Gulf of Tonkin was an NSA op.

https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB132/press20051201.ht...
From 0 to Reader Monad
> The title of this post is misleading

Probably because "AccessiBe" has a bad reputation [1]

[1] https://adrianroselli.com/2020/06/accessibe-will-get-you-sue...
Have you tried OneTab? It's an add-on that squashes all your open tabs to a list and saves the list to a page. You can reopen tabs, remove them, etc. from the page. It's super good.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/onetab/
Ask HN: Any compiled list of plain text User-Agent?
From what I've seen it's a common practice to use HTTP User-Agent to differentiate plain text clients like curl from html clients like browsers, in order to properly serve readable text if user is using a plain text client. Is there a good list of all relevant plain text User-Agents? On the top of my head I can only think of curl.
This is within the well known (and tested) limits of freedom of speech... which neither TikTok or WeChat software were found guilty of (with or without due process).
Assange is a cypherpunk and hacker, and is currently undergoing a massive violation of his rights by several leading world powers (who claim legal jurisdiction over many of the world's most prominent hackers) for liberating information to the public (in the spirit of many original hackers).

I'm not sure why it wouldn't.

Not everything that the mainstream culture war has picked up as its touchstones is actually about the mainstream culture war.

Shoehorning leaking of data, by a hacker, about corrupt governments into the standard (and frankly boring) left/right US culture war is one of the most obvious examples of this ridiculous phenomenon.

Regardless of your political affiliation, the world is a better place that this information is public.
> I have two main points to make. The first is that Shenkman was sent a 180 page evidence bundle from the prosecution on the morning of his testimony, at 3am his time, before giving evidence at 9am. A proportion of this was entirely new material to him. He is then questioned on it. This keeps happening to every witness. On top of which, like almost every witness, his submitted statement addressed the first superseding indictment not the last minute second superseding indictment which introduces some entirely new offences. This is a ridiculous procedure.

After 10 years of preparation, one would think they'd have the offenses figured out. This behavior doesn't seem to be about seeking justice. And if it's an indication of what's to come when he's extradited, then oh well.
>but also of protecting it's credibility to decision makers

The CIA spied on the Senate, the director lied to them about it, and nothing happened.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/jul/31/cia-di...
Great, then I would love to hear the more likely explaination for his murder.
You can use % search to find tabs with a certain page or you could install the extension "vim vixen" and use the key w.

To use % search, open a new tab and type "% stack" to find the tabs visiting stackoverflow.
Smells like an US version of GFW (but much benign, totally not Trying to make a comparison- don’t judge/downvote me)
How about "doesn't scam you"? Gandi is widely respected. I've registered all of my domains there for over a decade.
Maybe, but imagine looping over this:

"How can we, as [profession], help to make [x] more energy efficient?"

It doesn't take long before that starts to add up.
Is there a non-paywall version? I cant read this..
I would take it if it was available to me. The risk of a side effect seems much lower than the risk of catching or spreading the disease to others.
Assange repeatedly said he didn't know who the source was. Contrariwise, he has also repeatedly said that he knows it's not Russia.
I hope that if nothing else happens after Trump is out of office, that we all at least collectively regain our distrust of US intelligence agencies again.
You aren’t paying enough to have it processed, is the technically correct answer.
if only there were some investigations into the source of the hack. i guess we'll never know
I don’t think “sparsity” in ML, where like 10...50% is sparse, is the same as sparsity in Physics, where 99.999% (add more 9 with larger problems) of your matrix is sparse.
Not aware of this issue but I'll have the team look into it. Have you tried adding account funds? https://ap.www.namecheap.com/profile/billing/Topup
How to deploy a Django web application to Heroku – a comprehensive guide
That makes you a solid contributor in my book!
Accurate in that the original title feels authentically like it came as a quote from Trump, who consistently says “Democrat Party”, etc. Removing Trump and correcting the word to “Democratic” depersonalizes it a bit, and feels like editorializing.
https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4579950/user-clip-brennan-bla...

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/jul/31/cia-di...
Hi, I own/operate Instant Domain Search. We make plenty of money from GoDaddy and other partners by helping them find domain names.

We show results quickly because we check if your search is in the zone file. We keep a copy of the zone file in memory, and check searches against that. Some names are "unconfigured" for a variety of reasons, and do not appear in the zone file. So this means we might show a name as available, but when you go to register it, it's gone. This sometimes leads people to believe that we've registered it for ourselves. If you check the WHOIS record, you'll usually find that it's been registered for years before you searched for it.

The only major registrar that I know of that did this was Network Solutions. They did it for a few days in 2008 before getting trashed in the press:

https://arstechnica.com/uncategorized/2008/01/network-soluti...

More recently, when we show a name as available, we'll check again with VeriSign (who runs the .com registry) to make sure. And if it's not available, we'll switch the color from green to red -- a good example is eager.com. It's not in the zone, but not available to register.
Intel (and presumably others) use formal methods to verify their hardware designs, or at least large portions of them. This started in earnest after the FDIV bug. Here's a presentation on the topic (dated now, but my understanding is the use of formal methods has only increased since then).

https://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~jrh13/slides/nijmegen-21jun02/slid...
Everyday this man pushes us further and further down. He is by far the worst human being to ever hold high office. He has zero moral character, zero.

The future is not bright for him nor his followers. People who it seems are too blinded by their hatred of others to notice their noses being cut off right in front of their own eyes...
Learn how to build with no-code from a no-code founder
And the Dutch, who are a primary source for evidence used by all 3 investigations.

https://apnews.com/ef3b036949174a9b98d785129a93428b/Report:-...

https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2018/01/dutch...
I guess I don't understand how that's a response to anything I've written in this thread.

Edit: I'll expand the quote from the original thing a bit if it helps:

(Open)PGP is first and foremost a flexible packet format (and other specs), and GnuPG is more of a CLI "library" to interface with it -- all of it. You can build something that hides metadata, you can have forward secrecy, and encryption always-on by default with PGP (and GnuPG). You can use it for whatever trust model you want, neither OpenPGP (the specs) nor GnuPG prescribe a certain model. It provides building blocks.

This is a huge 'nope'. It's, by this point, an uncontroversial, well-understood nope. A known-nope, if you will! The only people who don't seem to think so are PGP people and that, in itself, is rather telling.
I see many developers betting on VR. I could see it happening everywhere but at home.

At best VR somehow is a perfect argument on why people should play escape games or paintball/airsoft. It sound like a second version of the google glass.

You just need to use some common logic: a video game works on a screen. It's too difficult to add new sensors. You cannot bridge reality and virtuality. You either have a video game or a normal game/toy/puzzle, you cannot have both.

Maybe the military will come up with new sensors, but until then, I would not bet on VR.
Types of Herbal Teas with Their Health Benefits
So the possibility of Apple's rules being illegal is equivalent to the moon being made of cheese?

I used the phrase "can be argued" because I think the idea has enough merit to warrant being tested in court. These companies certainly have enough money and market influence to justify exploring it.
This was maybe the one point in the whole article I disagreed with. I find that I can only be creative if I start with unconstrained thinking. But maybe that's because my natural mode of thinking is to try and constrain things as quickly as possible (which is part of my job, I guess, as a technical person). But when I jump to constraints quickly, I often rule out answers that may make a lot of sense, even given the constraints, or end up forming the wrong constraints.

Anyway, maybe being creative is just an exercise in fighting our inner biases. If you're an unconstrained thinker, it requires you to constrain things. If you're a constrained thinker, it requires the opposite.

Anyway, I loved the article overall. Very thoughtful and inspiring.
Well I guess it’s a good thing we didn’t back down on building a wall and making Mexico pay for it by that logic. /s

I don’t think this reasoning makes sense. Wouldn’t it be better for the US to back down, showing that we are judicial and fair country that doesn’t lash out in petty ways? Trump makes insane claims all the time; no one would take any notice if he didn’t follow through on this one either.
Database Monitoring Tool – percona monitoring and management
> It's a point of information, not an endorsement.

This is the world we live in now. And tbh, this is the problem.
It’s not a point of information, though. It is one man’s claim from a very biased site on this topic. That’s why you are getting downvoted.
Could you please provide sources for both?
I wish I shared your optimism. 2nd spike is coming.
It’s definitely largely accounting but that doesn’t mean it’s bad. Offloading virtualizing to a dedicated chip means that the virtual VM (theoretically) gets all of the CPU and thus suddenly workloads in aws are much more efficient, at the cost of developing and deploying new hardware.

It also seems like an easier engineering problem to be able to give 100% vcpu to the customer rather than adding a fancy middleware that tries to fairly allocate the requested number of cpus while transparently hiding the cost of virtualization. The efficiencies of running on dedicated hardware might be great but just being able to separate is in itself pretty amazing.
Pictures of Melted Objects from the Northwest Fires
As opposed to orchestrating open slaughter and genocide of other nations repeatedly? As opposed to destabilizing and overthrowing countries into chaos and creating new breeds of terrorism? As opposed to experimenting on its own citizens, conspiring and prevailing multiple times to commit terrorism on its own population for social manipulation? As opposed to being largely run and headed by fucking Nazis? Yeah man, the CIA totally cares about its citizens and country servicemen. It totally never used them as pawns, as cannon fodder to be slaughtered for their own corrupt gains, for wargames, to further entrench its power.
Frankly I think what GoDaddy does here should be illegal, because it causes an unethical inflation of prices and undercuts other domain searchers and registrars, causing them to need to compete on a price-gouging scheme. Maybe NameCheap should investigate a lawsuit or lobby Congress for some ethical practices here that don't cause artificial pricing and spending.
For anything non-tech related, tech people are just like everyone else. Our supposed higher IQ's don't mean much when forming opinions.
I have noticed a reoccuring identity archetype of stereotype of any non-world power (including oddly enough large cities who are a world power) freely complaining about the entity in all aspects and then being offended if an outsider complains about it. As opposed to a "used to it" as a world power and being unable to counter by saying that the matter doesn't affect them.

My guess is it might be a result of that sort of defensiveness forming social baselines that it results in a double standard where to say for example "It is because the people of the US doesn't want the pesky innovation part and just wants to rent seek." would be accepted but a non-hypothetical enclosed "It is because Germans don't want the pesky innovation part and just wants to rent seek." would get flagged as flamebait.
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/03/120322142157.h...
I don't really see this as a liberty issue, but rather one of strict economic advantage.

China currently has that---it ignores IP laws, when it suits them, but enforces them when it suits them. It forces ownership requirement rules on foreign companies within China, but encourages Chinese-backed take over of foreign companies outside of China.

It bans foreign products within its country, to protect homegrown companies (or steals the IP, then bans the competition if it can't buy out the devalued company).

In the case of trade between two multi-trillion dollar economies (US & China), if one side never retaliates over bad faith, and always is more permissive than the other then that side is bound to lose out.

The way China is behaving, and has behaved for the past 30+ years, is unfair and detrimental to US companies and trading partners. It may sting in the short term to be denied Chinese financial support, and Chinese products but in the long term this is the only way to either force China apply parity and fairness in its own rulings, or stimulate a local economy that isn't wholly dependent and subordinate to Chinese interests.
You are wrong about a 99 channel limit. You can see that is not the case by passing the `--code` flag to wormhole and specifying a mailbox id larger than 100.
Weeeee! Sooo sliperyyyyyyyyyyyy.....
The issues at play here have nothing to do with how much money Epic or Apple have.
TikTok Open Source Licenses
Electric Ford F-150 Will Offer Fleets Game-Changing 40% Lower Cost of Operation
> Stooping to China's level by blocking foreign software seems like an admission that the US cannot produce a viable competitor with its much more free market, does it not?

I don't understand why this would be a difficult or controversial admission? It's obviously true, and precisely because China is blocking.

It's like I was to take my co-workers and play a soccer match against FC Barcelona, with a special rule added that our opponents cannot leave their side of the field. FC Barcelona would be right to admit they cannot compete in this game, despite being much more skilled players.
Like the weapons on mass destruction in Iraq...

I don't believe anything the state says and so far every leak Asange has provided has been proven to be true. At this time he has more credibility than the government.
I wonder if any of these concerned employees have ever listened to the rap songs Spotify so proudly hosts and promotes.
I'm interested to know why you think its wrong.