For sake of reading primary sources and being independent thinkers, ok I'll bite

---------------------------------------------------

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/features/uighurs/

=> click on "1 million" on second page

=> https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-rights-un/u-n-says-...

=> "A United Nations human rights panel" [...] "the U.N. Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination"

=> https://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?N...

=> "NICOLÁS MARUGÁN, Committee Rapporteur for China, congratulated China for creating extraordinary prosperity and lifting hundreds of millions of people out of poverty over the past 30 to 40 years",

"VERENE SHEPHERD, Committee Co-Rapporteur for China, recognized China’s vigorous efforts to promote education among ethnic minorities, as well as the education on ethnic unity in the country",

"GUN KUT, Committee Rapporteur for Follow-up to Concluding Observations, commended China for the timely provision of the follow-up report to the Committee’s concluding observations issued after the 2009 review".

OK...

GAY MCDOUGALL, Committee Co-Rapporteur for China, raised concern about the numerous and credible reports that in the name of combatting “religious extremism” and maintaining “social stability”, the State party had turned the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region into something that resembled a massive internment camp shrouded in secrecy, a “no rights zone”"

ummm, this one is special...

=> https://thegrayzone.com/2018/08/23/un-did-not-report-china-i...

"A spokesperson from the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) confirmed in a statement to The Grayzone that the allegation of Chinese “camps” was not made by the United Nations, but rather by a member of an independent committee that does not speak for the UN as a whole. That member happened to be the only American on the committee, and one with no background of scholarship or research on China."

=> https://apnews.com/35ab4fdc95a64a849e8d9a960bab50df

=> "She did not specify a source for that information in her remarks at the hearing."

Great. Solid so far.

---------------------------------------------------

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-53463403

=> It is believed that up to a million Uighur people have been detained over the past few years in what the Chinese state defines as "re-education camps".

Just a statement. No links, no sources.

---------------------------------------------------

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/09/activists-probe-genoc...

=> In an open letter signed by groups including the United States-based Uyghur Human Rights Project

=> UHRP is just a NED/CIA overthrow NGO

https://thegrayzone.com/2020/03/05/world-uyghur-congress-us-...

---------------------------------------------------

https://www.vox.com/2020/7/28/21333345/uighurs-china-internm...

=> sources ASPI https://www.aspi.org.au/report/uyghurs-sale

=> Sponsors: Raytheon Australia, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, MBDA Missile Systems, Saab AB, Thales, and Austalia

=> https://apac.news/aspis-strategic-funding/

"ASPI strategy pays off" "ASPI rakes in millions of dollars from Commonwealth Government contracts while publicly driving the “China Threat” narrative"

"The government says it will spend $800 million on the US-made AGM-158C Long Range Anti-Ship Missile (LRASM). Those missiles are manufactured by Lockheed Martin, which gave ASPI $135,909 in sponsorship funds in 2018-19."

Great.

I also invite you to download the https://www.aspi.org.au/report/uyghurs-sale PDF and click through the sources. They're reasonably machine translatable. See if you get anywhere close to the conclusions it's drawing.

---------------------------------------------------

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/11/16/world/asia/ch...

I don't think this document needs any commenting on. The sentence structures are just written in English transliterated into Chinese.