skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I think "lots" is pretty load-bearing here. How many younger people, precisely, have moved back home? If half of them have, I agree that's a big paradigm shift; if 5% have, I'm not sure that adds up to something very far outside normal variability.
> What is stopping these same people from getting bolder with their ideas and orders?

The law? Your complaint is about the administration overzealously enforcing existing laws. How does that lead you to believe that they would begin completely ignoring the law?

According to your source, "child separation" was an incidental effect of prosecuting illegal immigrants for crimes. When I was prosecuted, I was also detained and separated from my family. It was unpleasant to say the least, but it was fair. I don't see why illegal immigrants should be given preferential treatment. Crime has consequences.
I take notes on an iPad using an Apple pencil. It seems to right balance between using the digital to organize and correct things and the cognitive benefits to handwriting.
Did Helios flight 522 crash because one man forgot to flip a switch?
Is that supposed to back or counter my claim?

I haven't dug in, just noticed it's age at the time of award, not time of achievement.

Eg Einstein early 20s for most of his stuff, early 30s for GR. Awarded in his 40s.
My site [1] got a pretty good score, although it only consists of text if first visited. Large text, though...

[1] https://rassohilber.com
> The equilibrium is wherever “the market” decides it is

Remind me the last time "the market" decided on an equilibrium without the Fed. 1912?

> The Fed gave up almost all their normal tools and never asked for them back, and now they’re gone. Which means if the economy gets worse (and staying the same as right now for an extended period of time is the same as “getting worse”), there’s not a whole lot anyone can do about it.

Despite its popularity as a talking point, there is actually little economic evidence that Fed policy becomes ineffective at the zero bound. Nor really any evidence that the Fed is "out of tools."

There is huge empirical evidence that taking a expansionary stance during a recession helps lessen the impact of the recession and lower unemployment.

Why would it be better for the Fed to take a contractionary approach during a recession? So the stock market better reflects how you feel it should look?
If you have a point, make it. Otherwise I am a more established member of this community than you are on every metric, and have just as much publicly identifiable information in my profile.
One question left unanswered by this article: how do they get the addresses of the offenders?
I think QE maybe explains some of the decoupling of market cap from real-world value, but I'm not sure it justifies it.
I never really worked in any system language or strict typed language before, I wanted to learn multi threading or parallel processing, so I thought to learn those concepts with Rust. I am into web development and also quite interested in web assembly, so overall I want to give this a try. :|
Cue the HN note-taking crowd....

From a retention/recall perspective, I think most people are enamored with finding the perfect note-taking method because we want to find the one method that optimizes both retention (memory) + recall (long term searchability) at the same time. It seems to me these two objectives are somewhat in competition.

(there's also comprehension and thinking but I see those as separate)

I think splitting up the two objectives makes more sense. Handwriting notes enhances memory formation, but is less optimized for searchability. Digital notes are great for long-term searchability, but are weaker for memory formation.

Why not have two systems instead of one? Just handwrite whatever you want to remember, and type whatever you want to stash away? It seems inefficient, but in multiobjective optimization we usually end up with Pareto optimality rather than a single point of optimality.

One might ask, how would I know a priori what to remember and what to stash? I personally prefer handwriting, so I'll usually go there first and if I need to stash it I'll retype it into Google Docs. That said, I'll hop on Google Docs first if it happens to be more convenient (like if I'm browsing and want to copy-and-paste something for long-term storage, or if I'm outdoors and all I have on me is my phone)

Meetings are a great candidate for handwriting notes -- and then discarding. You and I know that most meeting notes are throwaways. Despite that, I personally find that in complex multiparty meetings, I'm able to follow the flow better if I continuously take notes. Being able to remember who said what, and being able to summarize a meeting are all very valuable skills to have.

(p.s. with regard to memory, Socrates didn't even believe in writing -- he believed writing things down would weaken our memories in the long term. He believed that talking about things was a far superior way to form memories and to understand subjects deeply. He's not completely wrong about the role of discussion and disputation [emotional connection is a potent force in memory formation], but all the same I'm glad Plato didn't take to this thinking and actually wrote stuff down).
Yes, you're right that most platforms don't have something stable here. I was thinking of the problem more abstractly.
IANAL, but it would seem that the more documentation you release on your patented product the MORE you are protected, since it becomes less likely that they independently discovered your solution.
That’s not the case at all. There is an attempt to explain why the shooting was justified, and it nearly always is justified, which is an important analysis. It’s not as though there is a pattern of unarmed killings.
> Actually higher kinded types are easier than "generic associated types".

Rust leans heavily on associated types in general, and there are several concrete use cases where generic associated types are sorely missed (especially involving lifetimes).

You might ask, why not both? Part of the reason is conservatism about language features, and wanting 'only one way to do it'. But another part is that Rust is starved for compiler implementation manpower. The current generic associated types RFC was proposed in 2016 and merged in 2017, and it's a highly prioritized feature. But implementation work didn't even start until sometime in 2019 (AFAIK), and it still has a ways to go.

There's also another, somewhat more mundane problem...

Higher-kinded types somewhat conflict with default type parameters. If you have

struct Foo<T = i32> { t: T }

then you can currently write

Bar<Foo>

and it's equivalent to Bar<Foo<i32>>. So how do you distinguish that from passing the Foo constructor itself?

It may be possible to just distinguish based on context, but it's an issue.
No, I listened to economists who are skeptical that quantitative easing works for the original purpose (to increase liquidity and stimulate real economic growth). If you ignore the interviewer this chat with Lyn Alden and Jeff Snider on QE is interesting.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=B4xcCO9v-Os
‘Hotel Rwanda’ Hero, in Jailhouse Interview, Says He Was Duped into Arrest
I already future proofed. I bought a router running dd-wrt built before the FCC firmware upgrade ban. Because the future I want to prevent is the one with my router easily hacked...well that and the future where I keep having to upgrade routers.
Additionally, book values have become much less meaningful over time. Many leading companies in the pharma or software space don't have large tangible assets to speak of. If you want to understand google, you won't find much valuable information in their balance sheet.
I agree with the latter part, but even worse to be complacent or ignorant of a time limit.

A pragmatic compromise to acknowledge it and manage your limited time in a psychologically healthy way.
I think it's that JS has no standard library, so dependency graphs are an endless fan-out instead of fanning back in after a while. That's how you end up with 900 dependencies after importing a single Node module, because every author of every upstream lib chose a different way of doing the same thing.

To add to this the Node ecosystem seems somehow to encourage outsourcing extremely simple pieces of functionality (leftpad anyone?) so you end up including a bunch of crap that you don't really need, all because someone didn't feel like using 10 lines to reimplement something simple.
Facebook does have a data export feature, although I don't remember whether it existed before GDPR.
A 12-storey pig farm: has China found the way to tackle animal disease?
What makes you say it’s vaporware? Doesn’t it like...exist?
> I would like to ask you for exactly what reasons is Haskell not suited for that kind of work?

The most obvious one is the mandatory runtime.

EDIT: those projects you cite are effectively languages on their own, you're not running Haskell on the device, you are writing a DSL in Haskell that compiles to something else entirely. That is an approach that can work, but most of the ones I know about had some limited success and then have basically died out. Atom was last released in 2015, and has had only a few commits since then. Similar projects like Ivory have also petered out, in my understanding.
And I'll pre-emptively add that I've mentioned about 3 or 4 times already that there's a scenario that involves the possibility of exclusively banking on renewables, and that scenario is the de-growth mentioned in my very first post too. It is entirely possible to go there (and in fact, it is where we're bound for ultimately from a purely physics-based understanding of fossil fuel depletion, which includes uranium and therefore nuclear ending too).

So the real question actually will be one of consumption (of goods and energy), and if we're willing to ask and answer that question before we reach critically low levels (so at an absolute stretch within about 2 centuries) then we will be in a position to totally live off of energy sources that we can approximate as infinite (much more robustly so than what we did with fossil fuels, since the sun and wind for all intents and purposes would not go before we do).
> “it’s easier to narrate your failures once you’ve emerged victorious”.

This is similar to survivorship bias, and its relationship to cause and effect stories.
I think I stumbled upon your itch.io page at some point because I remember Shit Game, but never got a chance to really play it, hopefully I can get to play some of these this time, nothing can go wrong with that 90 visual appearance score!
i believe so too. CIA has every witness to Assange's trial under surveillance and JTRIG are actively targetting them for harassment. anything to sabotage the defense.

i hope the fact of that leaks onto Wikileaks. then Assange walks for the same reason Ellsberg walked. FBI used illegal tactics to persecute Ellsberg before his trial, which the govt was too embarassed about revealing to continue his prosecution.
Not only that, but there is no evidence that the fires had anything to do with climate change. You can not attribute individual events to climate change. There is also an argument that they were as bad as they are due to poor forest management.
https://advances.sciencemag.org/content/6/38/eaba8940

Seven, actually. They found hundreds of footprints of various animals, about half of which were too questionable to identify.

Footprints are often identified because they get filled in with a different material than the substrate. One on its own might not be enough for a positive ID, but this is way bigger than "two holes"
Be cognizant of phony social pretexts. I can remember everybody saying I needed to go to college. I did but I don’t college to be a software developer. Go to college not because of some bullshit social pretext but because you honestly want an expanded education.

Do the hard things first. Hard things get easier with practice but practice takes time. The easy things remain easy regardless of practice and just rob you of the time required by the hard things.
Thanks a lot for the suggestion!
Perhaps but that graph has little to do with their argument. Their argument is simple. If CO2 levels go up its going to make indoor CO2 levels worse. At some point this causes cognitive impairment.
I use FreeCAD and Solvespace mainly for personal use, but I use Fusion, Inventor, Solidworks, and Rhino at work with Inventor and Rhino being my two main CAD programs. We also have Revit and I had been using IDEAS back in 1997.

I love FreeCAD for the Python API, and the now-integrated FEM workbench. I've done some fun CFD work with this.

I like Fusion, but I do fear a web-based-only CAD. For this reason, I am looking at Alibre Atom for $199 for personal use. It seems really polished, easy to use, and it has been around for a while in different incantations.

Solvespace is great for four-bar linkages and other geometrical work, but there is no way I could spend the time doing a three-hundred part assembly when I could do it in Fusion or Inventor in much less time, and it could be shared or worked on by others more readily. Solvespace is amazing for what it is, and I will continue to use and follow it.
Another 72% here.
My handwriting is horrendous, particularly by the end of an extended writing period. But taking notes, for me, was rarely about reading them. The act of writing helped me remember so much better (especially if I'm not writing a transcription, but a summary and examples). My math/CS notes were understandable, in general, in college due to the ability to use shorthand notations or to write things in clearly hierarchical forms (pseudocode, proofs, solving math problems) where the structure aided in interpreting if the handwriting failed.

As to improving handwriting, in particularly dull periods I'd pull out a pen and do alphabet practice. Literally just pages of writing out the alphabet over and over. Then words, practicing cursive specifically but it doesn't have to be. This got my short-form or unrushed handwriting quality to a point where it wasn't embarrassing and I liked writing letters to my girlfriend. Learn to have a looser grip on the pen or pencil (I had an iron grip which I picked up somewhere along the way which led to cramping and poorer handwriting).
No mention of peloton? The big problem is the umbrella of “tech stocks” includes an increasingly diverse set of companies that have little in common. FANGs are an example. Movies, advertising, consumer electronics, online retail, but we talk of “tech” stocks being too high or low as a group. Microsoft is not peloton. Amazon is not zoom.
Both things could be true, but if you want to pick one possibility that is more true... have you ever spoken to an American? Of course we are deluding ourselves.
But practically, you can socialize the risk by devaluing the currency.
No, it's unclear why the location of people that never worked for Amazon is relevant in this context.
It still takes time for outdoor normal co2 level to reach those levels.

We gain 2 co2 per year.

And you can have an indoor garden
I remember getting rejected by Google because I completely blanked on a binary search question. All my other rounds were great, but you can’t miss the search question at the search company.
Needs 15 more years of hype cycles, that's why only :)
Probably Lucid. They claim 15% better whole-car efficiency than the next best:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JwzOlPBheO0

The Lucid Air Dream Edition does a 9.9 second quarter mile:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7LRT7bIJcis

And the Lucid Air Grand Touring is supposed to get 517 miles EPA rated range:

https://www.motortrend.com/news/2021-lucid-air-technology/

https://www.lucidmotors.com/
> GoDaddy rejected me a year after I applied and only realized it when a recruiter was trying to input me into their system.

I don't understand this bit. Did the recruiter input your info in their system and then the system send you a rejection email?
Is it the job of the fed and QE to boost stock prices?

That's not what it was supposed to do. It also wasn't supposed to be policy forever but a carefully calculated (quantitative) intervention.

I'm not even sure it's working any more to boost stock prices.
There were internet companies before the CDA came along. I don't consider actively moderated, special interest forums like this one to be dependent on the CDA for survival. Facebook, Google, Twitter, and any company with a business model that precludes active content moderation would be threatened. Those are exactly the companies that everyone complains about.
https://academind.com/learn/angular/angular-vs-react-vs-vue-...

This link might contribute to your evaluation. It's a seemingly reasonable overview of the top three frameworks. Author recommends using all three, spoiler?
1/3 of that is health insurance.

Health insurance is a weird one because even though people think they want it when "daddy" is paying for it, if they got to trade health insurance for something that cost about as much such as

* two months of vacation a year
* free housing for life, etc.

many would pick the later. Michael Foucault, in his "birth of the clinic" points out that rich people who could afford (say) Heart Bypass Surgery couldn't get it unless somehow other people who couldn't afford the surgery could get it, because otherwise the surgery wouldn't be done often enough to not be a death sentence.
I've seen discussion from time to time about there being two different types of genius which manifest at different ages. Especially as it applies to writers.

https://qz.com/1606423/the-two-types-of-creativity-peak-at-v...
Agreed.

When I was younger and writing regularly, I could scribble fast and it would still be relatively neat.

Now I type all day, the few occasions when I do write just end up in a mistake-ridden scrawl.

I find I need to relax my finger grip and slow down, almost like I'm back in junior school.
I mean, black and dark skin colour are overlapping sets, but the word black doesn't define everyone with dark(er) skin.

If you mean darker skin (darker than what???) then use that term.

Accuracy is important.
Somehow, many public figures misunderstood his intentions.
Internally they are actually quite different. Hydra is much simpler, which has its benefits. Transient is much more flexible, which it has to pay for with complexity. There's value in having both options.
It seems like for this to be successful you'd want access to engagement/conversion data to train your model on. Google / Facebook would be positioned to execute on that, others less so.
Mine from Amazon is accurate enough to remind me of opening the window
What are LTO Tape Drives and are they better than NAS?
This made me think about what I want to be doing on my deathbed versus what I’m doing now.
I also thought that, but then somebody here mentioned (in another topic), that the RK3388 from Rockchip runs entirely blobless. I'm having trouble digging up that post, but i'm sure I did not dream it. I'm hoping that statement applies to other members of the Rockchip family too.
I'm on the interviewer's side of the table and we absolutely do care.
> the “left”

Makes sense that you put this in quote marks, given that you're just inventing wild caricatures to argue against.
A few cm are enough
Also a golden age of radio. Orchestra, cast, sound effects. Are shows like this ever produces nowadays?
Build Team Trust with Code Reviews
See also Science Fiction Theater. Here's the episode that played the night of the "Enchantment Under the Sea" dance that George McFly would have seen in Back to the Future:

The Hastings Secret
https://archive.org/details/ScienceFictionTheatre1956TheOthe...
This sounds about right. I got dinged a lot on my website for "Visual Clarity" although imho it's a pretty standard blog page with sidenotes, and the "similar scores" all had a decent amount of text.

Looking at the "similar scores" carousel for higher scores was primarily huge hero images with little text.

https://myraah.io/index.php/visualmind/report/aHR0cDovL2pzen...
They should definitely try the Nand2tetris online course!
> Leonardo da Vinci wrote: “…the more minutely you describe, the more you will confuse the mind of the reader and the more you will remove him from knowledge of the thing described. Therefore it is necessary to make a drawing … as well as to describe …”

I take my notes with the computer or tablet. But, I think with a paper and a pencil in my hand.

For design sessions my team uses simplified UML diagrams to understand the flow of data. Just talking and taking notes feels incomplete and, literally, difficult to visualize.

So, I agree with the post that hand writing is important, and it allows for graphics and other enhancements.
I'd recommend anyone interested in the future of VR displays to take the time to watch Doug Lanman's (FRL) recent presentation (IS&T Electronic Imaging (EI) Symposium: Quality Screen Time: Leveraging Computational Displays for Spatial Computing) to get a taste of what's coming: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LQwMAl9bGNY - it's great, and one of the more optimistic technology talks I've seen in a while.

As far as the limits of mobile computation goes, I think the thing to consider is that Qualcomm is already providing Wi-Fi 6E chips that have VR-class latency (<3ms) - this is bog standard, but of there are of course companies like Amimon that have been offering proprietary ultra-low latency (<1ms) solutions for a while now. We'll see if the PS5/PSVR2 offers a wireless solution, but I don't think it's too much to ask for those looking for cutting edge experience to use untethered, local compute - why do you need to strap an RTX 3080 to your face? There's already more than enough power on mobile to provide the basic I/O for presence and engagement in VR.
I keep saying that one can embed his language of choice into Haskell and get whatever one needs. Including, but not limited to, LLVM and other backends.

Linear Haskell is a disgrace, glad you asked. It can be implemented as a library, as usual [1], and the process of inputting that linear logic into compiler I see as political, not technical.

[1] https://jpaykin.github.io/papers/pz_linearity_monad_2017.pdf

Compiler (ghc) can recognize what code that monad from [1] produces and apply transformations accordingly. The bonus here? That recognition process can accidentally optimize parts of program that do not use linear monad at all but happen to have same structure and same satisfied constraints.

About fifteen-twenty years ago I tried to invent a linear programming language or add that to Haskell. And it was not pretty. Linearity pops where you clearly don't want it to be, preventing clear explanation of ideas and/or requiring several types for innocent expression (there's no possibility of most general type in some variants of linear logic).
It's Possible to Write Flaw-Free Software, So Why Don't We? (2019)
I tried Jitsi Meet in a conference call of forty people and we all switched to Google Meet because it was so unreliable and broken. This might have to do with compute limits on the server side (Kubernetes auto scaling?) but it didn’t work.

I use MS Teams wherever possible because it just works and most group calls I am on are in a business context anyways so the other integrations are pretty useful