skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Sometimes you need to stop something fast, and the overly broad thing like 'block any mention of tardigrade' so 'we don't go to jail' thing is needed until you can refine the regex to not be so greedy.

you just have to be willing to go back to do the refinement once the bleeding stops.
Word. I live by a small airport right now and the plane noises don't bother me at all.

Large airport flight paths can have different sounds though.
Other way around I think. ref is a single value reactive.
He revoked the transparency surrounding drone strikes, so you don't know how often they happen.

He pardoned war criminals found guilty by our own military courts.

He is setting up companies to steal oil from Syria and has always stated that we would be fools not to take those military earned resources.

The state kills unarmed people in the US everyday, I see drone strikes in war zones as as far tinier issue than all of the above.
>Some of the US' democratic problems could be helped by splitting up the more populous states so their populations have more representation in the Senate and Electoral College, but any such plan would need to be approved by flyover state Republican Senators who benefit handsomely from the status quo.

Do you not see how this could be done by the republican party as well? Split Texas up into 4 parts, make 1 part primarily Democrat, the rest republican?

Besides, I guess your studies are more focused around theory, and not the actual legal government structure in the US. I miss understood. The whole point of the senate was to avoid tyranny of the majority, otherwise 3 states could control the other 47.
That was not the precedent. The precedent was to “allow the country to decide.” Drop the pretext. His side won. Screw the other side. Just have some integrity and own it.
The "qualifications" come from the appointment and confirmation process itself. The Constitution splits the job of filling Supreme Court vacancies between the two political branches of government. The fact that the process can become political where different parties control those two branches in an election year is utterly unsurprising.
I will note that they sold 134 tickets. I'm guessing they only sold window seats! WHICH IS REALLY COOL!

Likewise, since I doubt any luggage or cargo will be aboard the plane, it's probably going to fly pretty light compared to a normal international load. No idea what that means for gas mileage, but stuff to consider.

All in all, I think the idea is pretty darn cool. If everyone gets a window seat, sure, why not? It's not the usual "get from A to B in a big hurry" kinda flight.
Politicians as a class aren't well known for their kindness, but Senator Romney, Jeb Bush, Jeff Flake, Lamar Alexander and Will Hurd come to mind.
is case sensitivity training available through HR we can send the new recruits?
In general, I don't think popular vote totals for President are relevant because they don't produce a winner, so people don't vote in states where their candidate will easily win. This is true for both "red" and "blue" states.

I frequently don't vote here in CA because my choices win whether I vote or not. I can't be the only one who makes the same choice.
> Instead

You're misunderstanding the market.

The point of Cloudflare WAF isn't to be a main line of defense for HN readers, it's to stop the low effort automated drive-by attacks for websites that were already hosed. Like WAFs that block /wp-admin/* and instead generate a new segment.

I'd be surprised if there was a single person in the world who is going to go "oh right I should replace Cloudflare WAF and my sqli with some parameterized queries!"
Its not uncommon for GPU workloads in games to max out about 20% INT32 calculations, but alas its enough to drop the FP32 performance quite a bit. I suspect Nvidia next time will probably separate out the INT32 and 2x FP32 units and gradually move towards going towards a better ratio of hardware that better suits the usual workload split.
Sounds like this solves a problem in VR too if the lens work for visible light or at least contributes to solving it?
Exactly! Which is why this conversation is so interesting – and why it seemed they were unfairly downvoted. The question of "does friendship compromise integrity of systems over time?" is quite fascinating, and there are many examples across many countries that show "yes, yes it does." So it seemed entirely legitimate to say that perhaps a system should penalize friendships, somehow.

But, after watching Scalia, how can you not like him?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ggz_gd--UO0&ab_channel=Ameri...

https://youtu.be/TRS-jdgHok4?t=105

He was witty, charming, and a master orator. So when people hear "can't have a friendship with Scalia, even though you work with him," it's kind of like "can't breathe, even though you're human." It's a logical contradiction. And it's not even a well-defined problem: what is a "friendship," anyway?
Sure. I was pointing out that there's up-and-down fundamental issues with the American voting system that would take a massive reform to fix as mere tweaks alone won't suffice. I think we'd agree on this.
June 1992, quite a bit ways past February.

There's always another election coming up.
Because that's the only way there would be a federal government in America.

What choice would you have made in 1787?
Mcconnell has already said he confirm a nominees without delay. He can even confirm after losing my the election in a lame duck session if he wants.
> its hard to get much lower than srone striking Americans on foreign soil.

Trump killed this American on foreign soil: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nawar_al-Awlaki
A man literally arguing against himself.
I don't see how its contradicting.

>flying from London to New York and back generates about 986kg of CO2 per passenger.

This is around 5.8% of annual average co2 emission per Australian.
So if you take this flight to no-where and reduce your other consumption by around 6%, you are no more guilty than any other Australian.
And it was only one hysterectomy. [0] For cancer.

Crying wolf like this does no one any good.

0: https://apnews.com/f2008d23c5f9087f4214d9722dfb097e
Except the vacancy opened up in 1987, not an election year, and it was Reagan's third attempt to appoint someone to that seat.
There is nothing good left in this world. I don’t plan to kill myself, but I don’t see much value in living.
How many people from this administration ended up in jail? And how many from the last? You can feel whatever you want, but the math isn’t in your favor.
I miss 80s-90s action flicks :/ cgi, even in 2020, looks like cgi.

Glad the article did a shout to Tom Cruise. The helicopter stunt scenes in the last MI were _absolutely phenomenal_.
https://archive.is/rNFxx
I don't think it's a "new" political flashpoint. RBG was 87, with cancer, it's not a surprise.

McConnell has certainly laid plans for an attempt to force a crony through as quickly as possible before the election. Hopefully it won't happen before Trump gets flushed.
lol well time for a name change, but I don't know what to change it to
It is the fault of Pi hardware when it still refuses to provide a hardware shutdown button for proper file system unmounts, after all these years.
That's what we did when developing our original Embedded Linux stuff. Once you get it working it's really nice. You have your standard tools, version control, etc running locally on your system.
This is a key aspect of the struggle of civilization and not utopian at all. If we hope to change anyone's mind and reach a level of social consensus on anything then it's imperative we make a safe space for everyone to think and have civil discourse. Knee jerk recriminations for essentially thinking is the recipe for entrenchment of positions and pushing people to the margins where they are more likely to mix with extremists. RBG and Scalia were a great example of how to disagree respectfully and not treat ideas as a personal threat but to engage with them with enthusiasm. I am with you in your quest to listen and give ideas their due and all people respect.
Containing a Real Vulnerability
Rip RBG
"romney, collins, murkowski" ... appreciate the hint. Researching that now. My humble apologies for HN blindly downvoting you. Is asked because I don't have a hard preconceived notion, and wanted replies like yours.

Honest curiosity and debate is tricky business here.
At the same time, from the Republican perspective... They won "fair and square", and then largely liberal-staffed agencies and other organizations delayed and resisted the implementation of Republican policies as much as possible. The other side wasn't playing fair, why should they?
GoDaddy’s response to the earlier accusations from the throwaway account here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24506303
See, I actually See a lot to be recommended by adopting a much more proactive management of policy makers through a vote of no confidence than this "get in, blank check til next election" system we have. Though I'd still want to timebox the change to the fundamental political process and only affirm it as permanent until say 15 years of it's successful exercise.
And Banana Pi, better designed hardware. Lots of alternatives.
You may be right about politics alone. But there's a much greater division in the US right now of worldviews, of which politics is only the most visible interface--probably because politics uniquely forces us to choose collectively one way or another.
I really don't believe legitimate criticism is problematic and it is very problematic to call people who speak out an "unhinged mob"

Karanaugh's interesting interpretation of the law is enough to give him a hard pass but he also lied under oath.
Let's ask Google.

"democratic senators"
> About 969,000 results (0.52 seconds)

"democrat senators"
> About 92,800 results (0.42 seconds)

Bonus:

"democratic senators" site:breitbart.com
> About 1,010 results (0.32 seconds)

"democrat senators" site:breitbart.com
> About 2,300 results (0.27 seconds)

Conclusion: "democratic" is significantly more common outside of right-wing propaganda.
If you can't beat 'em, ...
We're way beyond 1787.

The Reapportionment Act of 1929 is the cause of the worst distortions.

It fixes the HoR at 435, and is the main cause of the gross imbalance of power.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reapportionment_Act_of_1929
You need to tweak your understanding of appsec to realize that most websites are run by non-technical people running old versions of off the shelf software attacked almost exclusively by automated drive-by attacks mass-scanning the internet.

If you don't see how WAFs could be useful, you may have been in the HN bubble too long thinking every website is some hand-coded Flask app.
It's depressing how much better Republicans are at politics than Democrats are.

Because of that, they will get their way.
Asking the Wrong Questions: In Defense of “Paranoia”
If the Democrats don't hold the moral high ground, why is McConnell lying about his rationale? He didn't say "The majority can do what ever it wants, and that's moral", he made up rationales that change to as the facts do.

The idea that a Supreme Court opening should never be filled when the President and Senate are opposing parties is utterly absurd.

It's true that the Constitution wasn't written like Ethereum to preclude all attempts to undermine it with bullshittery like refusing to even put matters up to a vote. That doesn't mean it's at all moral to ignore it.

Also, was "Packing the Senate" a typo? FDR threatened but did not pack the Court.
"Packing the Senate" is a Republican tradition (not that the parties mean much consistently, going back centuries), which even a blatant partisan couldn't avoid admitting:

https://www.newsmax.com/michaeldorstewitz/democracy-republic...

And slaveholders (the spiritual inspiration of modern Republicans) had manipulated the Court to themselves since the beginning:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judicial_Circuits_Act
WeChat/TikTok ban in effect on Sunday
https://www.cnn.com/2020/09/18/tech/tiktok-ban-sunday-need-t...
Doesn't need to happen before election - whoever wins the election, the current folks will be in office until January. They can press this forward before or after the election.
I upvoted and agree with the GP comment, but some might be mad that he didn't go one more step back and explain that the Republicans had already decided to block nearly all of Obama's appointees for purely political reasons. So Reid was just responding to a prior escalation.
> The fact that the process can become political where different parties control those two branches in an election year is utterly unsurprising.

Correct, no one is actually surprised that Mitch McConnell abandoned the flimsy justification for his power grab the instant it outlived its use to him.
As the glib aphorism goes, Democrats want to fall in love, and Republicans want to fall in line.
If you just want to prevent other users from snooping you, use VLAN.

There's no protection against the network administrators though.
Monitoring My Home Network
I am so not a good example of anything.

But genuinely do appreciate your reply - makes that little voice in my head feel "less alone"

What was interesting/depressing was my "how about a creed" post was getting a few up-votes, then the moment I replied below saying maybe I was a "crap anti-rascist", my OP started to get down-votes.

Text hadn't changed, but by putting some context around it, it was read differently.
A nuclear holocaust would render the problem of some cancer ridden nomadic humanoid type creature stumbling upon a nuclear waste dump fairly moot.

It's still exceptionally unlikely that such an event would take place, given that humanity managed to stagger through the cold war without such an incident occurring. There are no longer any grand ideologies fighting it out for global supremacy. Most countries look fairly similar in terms of economic systems.

A global blight is exceptionally unlikely, the current free trade regime will enable the mitigation of localised shortages as the climate changes and the carrying capacity of the earth reduces precipitously. This will enable humanity to find technological solutions to these challenges as they become more pressing.

The two primary constraints on humanity presently are energy and fresh water abundance. There are a number of promising candidate technologies to address the problems of energy abundances including: advances of hydrogen electrolysis, nuclear power (as mentioned), fusion, wind, and photovoltaics. Increasing energy abundance will partly address the problem of scarcity of fresh water by making desalination cheaper, but there have been a number of advances in material science that have also shown great promise in this area.

If you combine these advances with novel approaches to farming, such as vertical farming, then the carrying capacity of earth could increase by several orders of magnitude!

This is not even to mention the numerous proposals to at least delay the onset of global heating through climate engineering. This delay would give humanity time to adjust to the new conditions. They could even possibly be used to mitigate the problems caused by previous pollution subsequent to a switch to renewable energy while the earth heals as it gradually expels the carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.

People running around today, panicking over a supposed coming apocalypse, remind me of Malthus. You cannot look at the current technological conditions as a fixed factor when evaluating the carrying capacity of the earth. It completely ignores the fact that the planet is inhabited by the most ingenious creatures in the solar system.
They really aren't worth anything. My uni got a boneyard 737 to display near the Aero building here in India. Plane itself was free, transporting it to uni costed $50,000.

For the curious, heres the plane : https://www.google.com/maps/@12.7994926,80.2283484,166m/data...
> But it's similarly splitting hairs to say that the party of the president makes meaningful difference as well.

Of course it does! The Constitution splits the nomination/confirmation process between two political branches. The process is supposed to be political!
> with integrity.

What exactly do you think politics is?
You can use the Fresnel lens in an old projection TV as a laser.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OmlXR2nsis4
He was just saying that the nomination should not happen during an election year and then he expands that he won't consider conservative nominees from the conservative i.e. different party president. It's just 4 minute video of several speech fragments, does not take long to watch and be informed.
The last 4 years have been very dark but I hope the following quote gives you a better perspective:

"Take a moment. Breathe.

And then we fight for our country the way she always did for us. Or we will lose everything."

https://twitter.com/MaryLTrump/status/1307109748744114177?s=...
Just like ARM, the only thing standard is the core and there is massive (and almost always publicly undocumented) diversity of everything else.
I also live in California, and often feel as though my vote does not matter.

This is sort of the crux of my argument. Our system has reached a point where individual Americans can feel as if their vote doesn't matter because......well, it doesn't. That's a very unhealthy point for a democracy to be at.

I don't believe that is the intention behind our Democratic system (unfortunately maybe it was originally, but I'm working off of our 21st century interpretation of what the democratic system is for, not that of the slaveholding founders).

It was engineered to avoid the tyranny of the majority, not to facilitate the tyranny of the minority (again, ignoring the actions of the original founders).

Some of the most significant policy decisions of my lifetime (from the Iraq war to the present scuffles) have been enacted by presidents who did not even receive the popular vote (with, as you pointed out a popular vote not being a majority vote). That seems to me to be a problem.
Friendship is the process of learning about and recognizing the value of a human being that usually leads to a greater comprehension of that persons life and views not a synchronizing of those views.
> But we routinely look back to the 1800s to establish what is accepted practice in our government.

Routinely?
Or puritain instinct, many people can't stand the idea of others enjoying themselves so look to find some reason why doing anything fun is bad.
Dependence on SD Cards and lack of orderly shutdown was what caused my company to not go with the Raspberry Pi. Even then we have back up power to allow the system time to shutdown.
Huge caveat: of those 3, only Murkowski actually made her statement after RBG passed. Collins made her statement hypothetically earlier in the campaign, and Grassley made his hypothetical statement back in 2018 during that election cycle.

So far, Murkowski is the only confirmed GOP defector, and 4 total defectors are needed to prevent nomination hearings before the election.
I’d say he could also wait until after. Last time, the vacancy motivated Republican more than Democratic turnout — and if Republicans don’t win the Senate again, there’s still time after the election to do the appointment.
Any Democrat who accepts a lecture about the "moral high ground" on the subject of the Supreme Court is the Republicans' useful idiot.

The Roberts Court disenfranchised millions of Democratic voters by gutting the Civil Rights Act. The fight over the Supreme Court's composition is a fight over pure electoral power.

It shouldn't be this way, but it is.
Verbally planning out a crime sounds like criminal conspiracy to me. Just harder to make the case if no evidence is generated.
RTX I/O is a parallel to a key feature in both of the new consoles (XBox Series and PS5) so I suspect cross-platform titles will have support for it.
With the large mail in vote, an appointee before election day seems likely.
My favourite article on Pratt parsing, it’s in Rust but easy to port to any language:

https://matklad.github.io/2020/04/13/simple-but-powerful-pra...
This is true, but it depends on the topic. If I have a very strong opinion about the ineffectiveness of the Laffer curve when setting tax policy, I can probably be pretty good friends with somebody who believes the opposite. But I think it probably is important that we don't remain friends with people who deny other people's essential humanity, or who support political policies that have no effect other than to hurt people, and so on. Just because an opinion can be described as political doesn't mean that it's automatically coequal with others, and we don't have an obligation of deference.
Ah yes, the good old "should have been so weak", "deserved it" victim-blaming.
While some of this may have happened, both Turkey and Qatar's assistance is dispute, reports say 70% of members in Syria were Syrian and 90% of members in Iraq were Iraqi. The leadership has been full of former members of the Ba'ath army and intelligence agencies who lost their jobs during De-Ba'athification.

Stopping the help provided by outside countries may have weakened the movement, but not prevented it.
Amazon operates in all 50 states.

For it to be a federal crime, there just needs to be federal interest. They can make it a federal crime if they're interested.
Blame has been placed on a bug, meaning you can safely assume there is irrefutable proof of camera access. (Why else would the claim of a bug need to be made?)

Spying or not, it's completely unacceptable.
I, for one, am tired of "precedent" being broken benefiting Republicans and Democrats continually being expected to "take the high road".
As Republican Senator Richard Burr said in 2016, after Scalia died, "...And if Hillary Clinton becomes president, I am going to do everything I can do to make sure four years from now, we still got an opening on the Supreme Court."
Trump killed a US citizen with a drone strike and then simply banned the military from reporting on drone strikes.

It's very possible that more US citizens were killed during the Trump administration, and we won't know for decades until the records are unsealed.
Can you imagine a 4-4 Supreme Court deadlock in a Bush v Gore type situation?
Not really. It's just Weekend at Bernies with higher stakes.
That's a fantastical interpretation. Reid pulled the nuclear option to stop Republicans from refusing to do their job (approve judges). McConnell would have pulled the nuclear option himself as soon as he got the majority, regardless of what Reid did.
> no one thinks that "monopoly power" refers only to a single firm.

Actually, it is extremely common. It so common that the literal FTC has to put out information to correct this misconception.

Just go look at the offical FTC statement.

https://www.ftc.gov/tips-advice/competition-guidance/guide-a...

Because apparently, the FTC thinks that this is important enough, and a common enough mistake, that they have to correct this common misconception.

Also, Do you take back your pervious statements, and agree with me when I said the following then? "Actually, if the company has significant market power, which does not require a monopoly"

Because if you now agree with me, then great.

Because my original statement was that a company has to have significant market power, which you said was incorrect.

But it now seems like you agree me with, that all that has to happen is that a company has to have significant market power.

It seems like you do not think that I was "incorrect" to point out that only significant market power is required for the Sherman act to apply. So your previous statement, where you said that this was "incorrect", no longer holds.

That is great that it seems like you no longer think that my original statement was incorrect, where I said that only significant market power was required.
The other quote that pairs really well with this one:

“We don’t inherent the world (our country) from our parents. We have it on loan from our children.”