skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I would ask them "what is something you want to build? something simple?" and help them. Mentor them. Teach them how to research on the internet the problems they are looking to solve (sometimes people just don't know the right words to look for).

At least me as a teenager I was a very project driven person. It gave me a good feeling to build something neat. Much more interesting than classes and such.

Or is this about a career (teenager could mean someone about to go to college soon)? Maybe introduce them to some people that do the job they want, if it's not you?

I'd ask them what they want and how they work, and really figure out something that works well for them.
While I did not find this article particularly deep, psychoanalysis has hardly been discredited. The core of the theory has been infused into almost every psychological modality practiced today aside from CBT, and studies have shown its general efficacy as a practice to be on par with others and in some cases superior. For the past 20 or so years, the field of neuropsychoanalysis under Mark Solms et al. has done a lot of good work understanding memory, dreaming, and higher cognitive processes stemming from Freud's ideas. Nobel Laureat Eric Kandel wrote in the 90's that psychoanalysis still constitutes the most intellectually satisfying model of the mind; Kandel has gone on to promote studying psychoanalytic ideas with modern neuroscientific techniques. Although several authors have been critical of psychoanalysis, having been criticized by some does not make an idea instantly discredited. There remains no clear way to verify a model of higher cognitive processes in the same fashion as a physics formula.
It’d be a pretty gargantuan task to backdoor the FPGA silicon itself. You’d have to have compromised Xilinx’s software and had some idea of what signals you want to tap. Kinda interesting to think about... I suppose that’s were open source tools for FPGAs would be nice.

The image? Sure, could easily be backdoored, but that’s what open source is for; auditability.

Edit: FPGA silicon is kinda backdoored by definition thanks to JTAG configurability/readability. (Barring cases where keys are used.) So I think the really interesting thing would be addition of nefarious logic by the design tools.
2000+ years too late, cats out of the bag.
I found a typo where the "are" is duplicated:

> enclosure’s length and thickness are are parameterized.
Punching a fascist doesn't make someone an extremist.

Or as dril puts it,

> the wise man bowed his head solemnly and spoke: "theres actually zero difference between good & bad things. you imbecile. you fucking moron"

https://twitter.com/dril/status/473265809079693312?s=21
But composting both avoids methane production and sequesters carbon.
See if there is a FIRST robotics team nearby at a high school. I did not participate in FIRST at that age (my interests were elsewhere), but my friends who did say it was a pivotal experience for them. You learn lots of hands on skills, get to work with experienced industry mentors, and also make friends with similar interests. There are many components to designing the robots, so they can try out and see what they like.

I’m not sure how teams are in the pandemic, but it is probably worth it to try!

Another caveat: depending what you mean by computer engineering, I’m not sure if many FIRST teams actually design their own chips. But they certainly do a lot of closely related stuff.

In general, a concrete application seems to be a great motivation. I resisted my parents’ efforts to get me interested in programming until I realized it could help me make Minecraft mods.
I'm all for having generic associated types too, but by your own argument

> Part of the reason is conservatism about language features, and wanting 'only one way to do it

But for the things HKTs are good for, it's much more usable: easy to teach, simpler errors. Dare I say HKT is the conservative choice.

> But another part is that Rust is starved for compiler implementation manpower.

That's a bummer, and I wish you the best in finding new sources of funding. But if HKT is easier, that's another reason to do it first.

> There's also another, somewhat more mundane problem...

I don't think either of us thinks that is insurmountable :)
That's not my point. The point is that the article claim that rising CO2 levels are likely based on the graph which will lead to increased indoor co2 which might lead to impaired cognition at the end of the century.

Thats one hell of a long set of assumptions not a single one of them demonstrated scientifically and even if it was true at the end of the century we will be able to deal with CO2 through ventilation just like we improved our indoor climate when we didn't burn open firesplaces inside and got ventilation systems and gas or electricity instead.

Again if this mishmash is considered serious research it's doesn't bode well for our future.

Edit: Instead of just downvoting me, why not show where I am wrong here. I am open to argument, there might have been things I have missed but on the face of it, this is an extremely biased and sloppy research paper and frankly nothing but pure speculation.
Get them hooked on reading scifi. That's what got me interested. Before a kid is going to want to tackle actual coding/learning and all that they need to be hooked on the idea of it.

Approaching it direct on rarely works with teens.

Maybe start with William Gibson, cyberpunk is on the rise.
I'm a white dude, so obviously I can't speak for black people and it's not typically appropriate for me to get super offended about this on your behalf, but personally there's something so jarring to me when people use "blacks" as a plural noun. I think by prior experience, when I hear it put that way it subconsciously primes me to expect the person speaking is angry and racist. I've just heard so many people say it that way in agitated tones.

Then again, I've also definitely heard older people talk that way and they don't seem to mean harm or be angry.
I endeavoured when starting a new job last year to be totally digital - I use MS OneNote on a Surface Pro. The experience is very close to using a gel pen on paper for me. The handwriting recognition is remarkably good - I don't really write much but occasionally I'm searching for something and it finds my marginal notes. 20 years of almost exclusive keyboard writing has taken is toll on my already poor handwriting.
That seems like the cheap way out.

The real shocker here is not that people do cruel things. Murderers carrying out abhorrent fantasies exist and existed everywhere, anytime.

Suppose I have such a personality, and that becomes known, my government then should do the appropriate medical and judical procedures.

When the government then goes "oh, here is 10k/month and a ticket to Macedonia and go live your dream", there is something truly, truly fucked up and it is not the individual in question.

And that grievance is a systemic one and therefor a responsibilty of the people should they have the intention to declare themselves as a democracy...
I remember there was a similar attempt years ago (probably between 5 to 10 years ago). I forgot the name of the startup but they were trying to build a non-phone mobile device that's programmable. I actually applied for beta testing and got one for free, but they ended up going out of business. I remember the color was ruby-ish. Can't remember the name. Anyone know what this was?
The moral claim is private companies maintain private property for the benefit of their customers.
I did not mean to question your motives for using the analogy. Nonetheless it is loaded because it casts Epic as an actor doing something extremely dangerous. I just wanted to note that because it significantly affects the framing.
As a hiring manager, I care quite a bit about how candidates think of our process BUT I also know that most folks who bother to write something like 'basic human decency' to a recruiter, who usually has little power or status in a company, are probably not the people I want to hire.

Nothing wrong with complaining but people often hurl needless insults when they've had a less than optimal time.
A better price break down is probably:

$120k on the plane. $5k to move it into the forest. $95k fee for not having friends with heavy equipment. $200k for making somebody else do the renovating for you. $50k on materials. $50k on markup.

Neither the weight nor size of the plane are astronomical. The square footage to renovate isn't that high either. The reason it costs so much is that it's odd and every time you pay someone else there's a huge cost associated with a one-off and everything about the project is one-off.
Is there anyone opposed to trying to solve the problem? I don't understand this dichotomy you're trying to illustrate.
They do and they don't. The net result of a growing plant is the absorption of CO2 and H2O to create O2 and various hydrocarbons, oxygen and plant matter. The carbon is fixed in the body of the plant. But i did mention grow lamps. Keep them lit and there is no night.
Highest GDP in the world?
The BBC & the CBC produce a lot of dramatic radio with full casts & music & sound effects, but not all that much science fiction - see BBC Radio 4 Extra, for example. CBC’s Vanishing Point is the most recent dedicated speculative fiction show I’m aware of with that level of production values.
This is the reality. Having any work experience at all is huge. I thankfully/sometimes-by-accident worked 5 internships during my 4.5 years in my upper-middling college, and had no problem picking a place to work afterwards.

I had many friends who over-indexed on grades and had 0-2 internships. Many of them were really smart, but couldn't get the foot in the door for an interview.

Experience (including internships at legitimate companies) will get you past the the resume screen and recruiter call. From that point on, it's your interviewing skill that counts most.
> I’m not quoting the spectator I’m showcasing the changes

Everyone can see the link that you posted. You could have posted links to the Wayback machine, but you chose to post a link to a transphobic article in a transphobic magazine written by a transphobic writer.

Your second paragraph is incoherent. I can't understand what you're trying to say.

> We don’t know anything yet

This is wrong.

> but in all cases went into cross hormone therapy and then surgical transition

...because they're very careful about who gets those meds, and they're only given to children with severe gender dysphoria.
To add some more detail, my experience was during the mortgage meltdown and fallout from that.

I agree with your perspective. I also think there are issues on the recruiting side. Sometimes it seems like they don't know what they need and they just list a ton of unnecessary stuff in the list of required skills.
My exposure to it is only from the entertainingly campy movie adaptation, which I can recommend.

https://youtu.be/0KUjE995IO4 (trailer, 1962)

I hadn’t considered following that one to the source; what did you like about the book?
> Doesn't seem like the levers they have are working. Economic growth rather than inflation is the goal.

Nope, economic growth is not the goal. Inflation targeting and unemployment targeting is the goal.

I don't see how you can claim that the levers "aren't" working if you don't know what would have occurred without the Fed action.
more annoyingly, it's not even paywalled -- it's just arbitrarily behind a login.
This is how I started! 2 months in a tiny village with no internet. My journey began with a book titled 'The secrets and mysteries of the command line'.
Summation: Censorship by US is good, if it keeps you from hearing things the current administration does not want, such as ways to troll the presidents rallies.
It's a comment in general on the discourse regarding climate change here.
They wrote down the ID during checkin. Standard procedure.
> Planes are quite fuel efficient per passenger

Not if they go "nowhere".
The thrust of the article is right. Though defining “embedded science” so broadly means every construct in the modern world has “embedded science”.

It may be better to say that our creations better incorporate an understanding of the true nature of reality.
True. The only experience I had was as a freelance web and android dev.
I have two of them, one inside and one outside. They both go down to roughly 400 ppm and the indoor one goes very high when it's all cooped up inside. The outdoor one fluctuates since I'm in an urban area. I believe they are accurate to within about 10%.

During the smoke event, they combined with my indoor/outdoor pm2.5 sensors have been extremely useful.
Wood cribbing can hold up ships. Unlike a house or conventional building the plane has enough strength to not fall apart when subject to uneven loading and the three point foundation is going to make it basically impossible to twist it apart if one piling sinks and the others don't. As long as it's level enough for the owner's satisfaction it should be fine.
I'm hiring now. I don't think no one cares. Our recruiter is processing 400 candidates at once and relying on a lot of new hiring managers to follow a process. It's a lot of work to keep up and stuff does fall through the cracks. And we're a tiny startup.
Oh Lawdy, people are saying things on social platforms I disagree with!
Ugh. Look ignoring race is why people of color systematically get worse medical treatment. Look at Sickle Cell Anemia. It is widely documented that people of color whose ancestors were from Africa and sub Sahara are much susceptible to it. This has been studied extensively and all potential confounding factors have been ruled out. Is it racist to study this? Is it racist to use our understanding of genetic research to try to figure out how to treat this particular syndrome?

Race the social construct is a social construct. We are the same species. Period, the end. But differences in genetics and physiology do warrant study because this is how we can find treatments and preventative measures to a multitude of disease.

This is a lot like saying that research that shows that men are more susceptible to heart attacks then women is sexists because gender is a social construct. Gender is a complex topic that evolves with our evolving understanding of wha it means to be human on a philosophical level. But the X chromosome isn’t a social construct and has very direct very tangible effects. You can’t call it a social construct.

In short: when it comes to how we build a society, recognize differences and account for them to bring as much economic opportunity equality to everyone. When it comes to medicine, study everything including genetic differences in order to get the best understanding of the problem at hand. Getting offended doesn’t get us closer to for example a cure for COVID, does it?
How the curse of recursive mutexes infected coding, “because of a dare”
Well, yes, but in the past this type of device would be floated as an attempt to fight state-level actors. And... it can't do that. That's all I'm pointing out.

Either the silicon, the synthesis software, or both could be compromised. Per leaked documents usually what gets attacked is random number generation, but there are more avenues I am sure.

You can usually turn off JTAG, but having JTAG or other debug interface not be permanently disabled is actually an exploit class.
If you check in with your government issued ID then the government knows who you are and can find your registered address :)
Microsoft, sure--nobody has worked harder than they have to try to make C++ safer. And there are other big companies seriously investing in making C++ safer (e.g. Facebook, bad as they are otherwise).

But I've also talked to many of the researchers actually working on these projects--they'll freely tell you how hard the task is and how impossible it is to really apply Rust's straightforward solutions to the massive existing legacy of C++ code. And let's be honest--if your tool requires people to rewrite everything anyway, they might as well choose Rust, so it's not acceptable for your tool to only work on modern stuff, or require annotations everywhere you use std::string_view, etc.

And I should be very clear that this is quite specific to C and C++. Ada, for example, has been able to adopt solutions from Rust with ease, and even add some interesting improvements, because the safe subset of their language was conservative and the borrow checker allows them to extend it. So I'm not saying other languages cannot copy Rust, it's very much specific to unsafe by design languages like C++.

They're trying to make their existing codebases safer, and I think that's great, but unless there's a massive breakthrough in the next few years these aren't going to be general purpose solutions and they are definitely not going to be close to sound. For example, pretty much everything I'm aware of for C++ that tries to do memory safety, punts on thread safety, because it's just virtually impossible with all the other stuff going on; many of them punt on recursive function calls, and a bunch don't even do anything but very basic interprocedural analysis, focusing all their energy on "local" intraprocedural bugs that are much easier to catch. The tools would just be too noisy to be useful otherwise.

As for Google... they resisted investing in static analysis tools for years and I don't take them seriously at all when they talk about this sort of thing.
Well in all fairness, I might've kept reading had it not been for that blatant factual error.
I became interested when I realized you could mod weapons on quake 2 by editing source code.

What games are they playing?
Cockroach farm houses a billion roaches contained by a moat with fish[video]
It depends. Some people still find them to be too fishy, but I’ve heard storing the plastic pill bottle in the freezer and downing them frozen can further mitigate the fishiness and reduce fishy reflux.
Huh, interesting. I did (naively!) only do a quick google search, and the first article (CNN) has completely different numbers.
Just a note that they are estimating race using zip code. I’m not sure you’d want to draw any conclusions from that.

> To analyze race/ethnicity, patient data were linked to estimated race/ethnicity proportions reported by zip code in the 2018 5-year American Community Survey (ACS)
Get them an arduino and a strip of LEDs and teach them how to attach the LEDs to their clothes.

They're going to have to learn a lot about programming, and some about electronic circuit design as well (eventually).
If it's really that standard, then wouldn't we just use a library for it to cut out a large portion of the development, testing, and maintenance?
"Fair and just" is out the window as soon as others get to decide how the fruits of 40% of my labor gets spent without my consent. At this point, we might as well just change the rules as we go along because you can't really point to the system we have now and say "it's fair" or "just" in a 100% clearly defined and unambiguous sense that we can all agree on.
Well impossible means that it can never be done, which I wouldn’t put past the capabilities of some far future civilization. There are a finite number of ways something can be alive, at least in the current consensus.

‘infeasible’ is probably a better way to describe our present capabilities.
Avid note-taker here. I agree with you in that the two mediums - (1) a note taking software where you type in things (2) writing notes on paper - have different benefits and use-cases.

In my case, I pretty much now know what kind goes where. For the "planning" kind - these are TODOs, movie and reading lists, project ideas, project subtasks -they go into a tool like Notion, or Google Keep if they are very simple transient lists. What I need here are: the ability to search, modify in place (not strike-throughs), and access on any device (so this s/w typically is cloud-enabled). The last aspect is needed because I need a way to accommodate ad-hoc ideas into a larger pre-existing plan, when I am travelling and I just have my phone, or a different laptop.

When I am reading a paper, or watching a lecture, I strongly prefer handwritten notes. I have experimented with standard notebooks, moleskins, having a "two-level" system: one notebook for quick notes, and another one for well-formed versions of notes from the first one, and finally, taking notes on loose foolscaps and adding them to a folder. The last one has stuck, mostly because I don't have to worry about "wasting" pages with ill-formed notes; I can choose not to add it to the folder. Also I can change organization at a later date. For this category of notes, I am looking for: the handwriting experience, the ability to arbitrarily format and color things (very helpful for technical material that need diagrams).

PS: the article links to some ways of structuring notes, which seem interesting.
We do. It’s called nuclear power and it‘s fought by those who claim they are fighting for the environment.

> https://www.giss.nasa.gov/research/briefs/kharecha_02/
Generally I don't do this (go ahead, have yourself a google). But the error was so blatant that I just couldn't not say anything about it. In a sense the article baited me into it.
FYI Recent iPad Pro models have pencils magnetically attached and charged at once.
You're not acting in good faith here, and it's both obvious and hilarious. You respond to someone summarizing decades of malignant propagandizing with, literally, a Whataboutism dredging up a single minor procedural issue, out of context, from like 23 years ago, and pretend that single disingenuous statement disarms the thing it's responding to. This is -- you are -- exactly what I'm talking about.
According to pokemon, gyms exist only as a place for making your pet fight someone else's pet
You should be using the newer version, MH-Z19B, not MH-Z19.

The protocol is compatible though.

Also note they come in up-to-3000ppm and up-to-5000ppm variants. Be sure to get the latter.

In case it helps anyone: a very fast way to get it working and get graphs is to connect it to a Raspberry Pi running HomeAssistant. Takes a few clicks and 3 lines of config.
I don't think I am.

The causality of the article is.

Outdoor CO2 might be rising dramatically > dramatically rising outdoor CO2 leads to dramatically rising indoor CO2 > too high a concentration of indoor CO2 might have an impact on our cognitive abilities.

That's not the worst part of that paper the worst part is that they then just throw in things like this:

"The best way to prevent indoor CO2 levels from reaching levels harmful to cognition is through reduced fossil fuel emissions."

What about better ventilation? Just like we do with a lot of other things today. But no instead they just go for the most extreme recommendation based on absolutely nothing.

Keep in mind we are talking at the end of the century.

I don't understand how anyone can read this and think this is quality research.
You know how in a bureaucracy heavy industrial workplace even the most distant of "near misses" gets the book thrown at it even if it doesn't make sense.

Well flying is like that kind of workplace but cranked to 11.
In the physics lab the T.A. will yell at you if choose a scale that starts at zero instead of a scale that shows only the relevant section. When the T.A. is tired, he/she will ask another T.A. to continue the yelling. (Or sometimes just make you redo the report until you choose the correct scale.)

The research journal have a similar policy.

For some reason people in the Internet don't like it, so a solution for a blog post is to show both graphs. One that starts at zero and other with the relevant section.
Biologists create new genetic systems to neutralize gene drives
38% is also the same as a 403 Forbidden page.
Whales?