skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I think it has a grasp of revisits, I forget the exact terminology but if you rewatch stuff I tries to predict will you like to watch it again. Some stuff is not worthing multiple times though, once is enough. But music videos can indeed be watched multiple times.

I think I heard somewhere that a lot of kid videos rank in the top stratosphere of view counts on YouTube because kids just play stuff on repeat. There's probably a lot of repeat plays going on across YouTube.
Not now, but if the problem arises technology will be invented to make it cheaper. If only to drive profits, not the cleanliness of the Earth.

Of course we should mandate that we keep the Earth clean, we don't have another.
Unfortunately, we've found out in the subsequent 20+years since that was said, that most projects, even major ones, don't have enough eyeballs...

There was a point a few years ago that GTK+ dev was complaining that only he was left to work on the project. A single person for a whole GUI lib..

And GTK+ is the basis of so many FOSS it's not even funny...
The Most Likely Way You’ll Get Infected with Covid-19
Many people find it useful. They are called mathematicians.

You are disagreeing with the definition made by somebody else and yet you are defining dimensionality as you please.

I don't find it useful in the slightest.
> so put it wherever! it's just a directory

You can certainly put a directory wherever you like and put the code there. In fact, that's exactly what the author did, as he describes in the article.

What you can't do is just magically have that directory be the "home" directory of a user and have the $HOME environment variable always point to it. You might be able to set things up to do that in principle, but it might not be worth the trouble as compared to other solutions. In fact, that's pretty much the position the author takes in the article for his use case.
But we also didn't know about climate change yet (for the most part), right? So nuclear was competing with oil.
These transmission lines should be buried. It won't be cheap but it's the only way apart from individual solar or solar communities.
This is perfectly devious and would only work if what the OP said is true. I love it.
The second result on Google for "ESP8266" is the Wikipedia page, which clearly elaborates what it is.

It's a basic 32bit RISC microcontroller, generally running at 80MHz, with built-in WiFi support. They're often available as modules with either a pin header or castelated edges for surface mounting.

They are supported on the Arduino platform and Platformio.org, as well as some other platforms. They've become quite popular due to their low cost (often available for under $10 at individual quantities) and the fact that they include wifi.
It's also something like $12 and not particularly good.
Where did you go to high school that taught this?
Yes, it's a bit like those people in an experiment who went around for weeks in glasses which inverted the image to their eyes. Eventually they adapted, and began to see things upright, but when the glasses came off, their vision was inverted!
This article is literally fake news. It references SPLC which is known to be full of crap (Majid Nawaz) and they provide no evidence that the accused individual is actually a white supremacist. The fact that you and a handful of others have bought into this fake news is what's concerning here.
these same pro users are likely going to need more than a single USB port and will likely have dongles with them.
> Likewise screaming Fire! in a crowded space is not allowed as free speech.

Can we please stop using this worn-out excuse for censorship as if it were some deep insight? It was indefensible back when it was first invented to justify prosecuting people for protesting the draft. It's just plain sad that people still parrot it to this day.

First, even the people that invented it for reasons of political expediency didn't take it that far. You can scream "Fire!" if there is an actual fire.

Putting that aside, even if there isn't an actual fire, no one dies because you scream "Fire!". They die because people panic and trample them in their haste to escape. That isn't a matter of speech. The responsibility for that harm is on the people that panicked—just as it would be if the fire were real. The appropriate response to a call of "Fire!" in a crowded space is to make a rapid but safe and orderly escape without trampling anyone, whether the fire is real, feigned, or an innocent false alarm.
Most of what I see about ECS is how much easier it is to have dynamic behaviors without inheritance, and it is, so I don’t see why it would be bad for newcomers to use it or to have an ecs lib written in js.
> Virtual environments and installing to $HOME are different things.

I know that, and you know that, but I'm not sure the poster I was responding to knows that. In any case, for the use case of the author of the article, there is no "home directory" to use, so installing to $HOME was not an option.

> He says using virtual environments would be a lot more to learn but he just reinvented them.

He invented a sort of poor man's venv that just meets the particular needs of his use case. Sometimes that's a better solution than adopting a standard tool that requires more work and understanding to use.
How do defects factor into pricing? Do you pay $17,000 per wafer, regardless of the amount of defects? What if TSMC's estimates are off? If defects are higher than expected, do you get a rebate?
> GnuPG is more of a CLI "library" to interface with it

It abjectly fails at that. It's just awful to interface with.
For some context, the table is on pages 44 and 45 of this PDF: https://cset.georgetown.edu/wp-content/uploads/AI-Chips%E2%8...

via https://twitter.com/chiakokhua/status/1306437988801486848 (the article is based on this guy's tweet)

Also note these are not actual prices but estimates.
Video from a low orbit satellite could be pretty spectacular. Especially if it's in a polar orbit and can see in whatever wavelength is necessary to see the weird geometrically symmetrical storms at the poles.
In a situation where you want to rapidly ramp a generator's output up or down, Xenon poisoning narrows the window of reactor control system authority. This prevents the reactor from achieving full power on a reasonable time scale.
WiFi and Bluetooth basebands are regularly compromised by attackers, through no fault of Apple. There are use cases for offline pocket computers, which never use WiFi/BT, have wired headphones and intermittently sync data via wired ethernet. Would love a kill switch for all radios & microphones & cameras, plus the return of touch ID.

Google Project Ara used UniPro (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UniPro ) as an interconnect for modular components.
If you call a piece of functionality from your own single deployable that you are refactoring, it’s much more like refactoring a function call than if it were an independent micro-service across a network.
Whether or not a property of a system is emergent does not seem particularly relevant to discussing its effects. It would be nice if we could just look at the way a platform like Facebook works, or see that it does not intend to be a "political actor", but the reality is that its effects are destructive. It has a strong effect on politics. The effects of Facebook are not outside of its responsibility simply because it isn't programmed to be political.
> Good IDE lets you move between the resource file and the code with a single click.

Well, not exactly. Most IDEs do NOT support clicking through a generated method call to the corresponding element in a resource file. Manifold is all about that. See it in action: http://manifold.systems/images/graphql.mp4

The Manifold fragments discussed here address only a narrow band of use-cases where embedding the resource improves the dev experience, like with queries and such. It's not for everyone, though.
> If only the desktop (read: personal) computing experience on Linux wasn't so awful[0]. I realize that's a subjective statement, but come on, I've been hearing "Year of the Linux Desktop" rhetoric for 20 years now and it's still a platform[1] so utterly unorganized and chaotic that even a whole lot of people like me, who believe strongly in personal computing and value the ideas of openness, don't want to use it[2].

Well, who's going to pay to make it better? Yes, there are for-profit companies behind many Linux distros with paid developers, but they don't have anywhere near the resources Apple or Microsoft does, so it's simply not realistic to expect a Linux distro to be as polished as Windows or iOS.

The Linux world is unorganized and chaotic because it's full of developers who can get what they want out of the OS, while Apple and MS are organized because they are driven by a top-down vision.

Maybe, just maybe, some Linux company gets a large enough contract, maybe from a nation-state or two, and over a decade is able to polish up a product which slowly starts to gobble up a market segment. That's not impossible, but not likely either.

EDIT: also, normally when people cite things, they're citing something someone else said :). If it's all just going to be your opinion, you could just write it as such.
Microsoft’s underwater server experiment resurfaces after two years
Assuming the criticism is true, would an edited version put US history in a much brighter light?
I assume as transistor density increases, you get more chips per wafer.
The way I check prices at multiple registrars is to check the price on admrgbldflkrjanjscknadsc.<tld> instead of <name_I_want>.<tld>, where admrgbldflkrjanjscknadsc is just a bunch of random keyboard mashing.

I do not enter <name_I_want>.<tld> into any registrar until I am actually attempting to buy it from that registrar.
> an armed guard almost forever

Things that have long half-lives are not very dangerous, as in order to have a long half-life it must be emitting radiation at correspondingly lower levels.

For example, something with a half-life of 100,000 years is emitting 1/100,000 of the radiation that one with a half-life of a year is.
I agree with what you're saying; pointing a finger at one particular thing and saying "this gets suppressed" is a bad solution. In fact it probably opens the door to a whole new category of problems.

But... I think what we're seeing with political content is just a symptom of the real problem.

> Disasters, outrage, politics, polarizing topics - these are all popular topics both online and off-line, and spread quickly as town gossip well before Facebook.

This is true. But when information spreads through people's conversations with each other there's limits to how fast it spreads. There's also a lot of room for dialogue and different perspectives. If I have some silly conspiracy theory that I want to spread around, it's going to be pretty hard to convince the people around me that 5G is going to activate microchips that were injected into my bloodstream. They will likely point out that basic laws of physics don't really allow for that. But if I know how to game a social media algorithm[0] to connect me with millions of people that are susceptible to that kind of thinking, I could convince a shockingly huge number of them to believe it[1]. Especially if the social media platform isolates those people from opposing opinions and connects them with people that think similarly.

I think social media is like removing the control rods from a reactor. Those basic human flaws are now being amplified and capitalized on at a scale we can barely even grasp. And it really doesn't matter if Facebook, Twitter, etc. are "at fault" or not. It's a fundamental problem with this services and the problems will continue to get worse.

0. https://www.npr.org/2020/07/10/889037310/anatomy-of-a-covid-...
1. https://www.cnn.com/2020/04/13/us/coronavirus-made-in-lab-po...
That would be too easy. Better to make vague accusations.
Why would I use this over plain HTML/CSS? I don't understand exactly what it adds on top, if you have to write your own styles.

Does it use web components?
Isn’t it normalized to a 610nm die on all processes?
This is really nice listing.
AMD style chiplets also increase yield.
> let's say that the news feed showed you content based purely on number of likes

Does any site actually do this successfully? It seems to me that even sites that lean heavily towards algorithmic curation (including HN) still have an element of human veto.
To expand on this, you have say the elementary subparticles that interact and at some point form an electrons, protons and neutrons. Those particles then follow another set of rules (or maybe the same set) in some way to produce atoms.. and so and and so forth.
By “they” do you mean Facebook? Or the rioters?

…or were you intentionally toeing the line between sarcasm and anarchy?
Who said that it's for a user to interface with directly? mutt interfaces with it perfectly fine, and mutt's PGP UX is also fine.
Ostracism, economic of otherwise, is just people exercising their freedom of association and choosing not to associate with you. Which they are free to do for any reason or no reason—you do not have a right to receive services from someone else against their will, and freedom of speech doesn't change that fact. This is categorically different from having harm inflicted on you (capital punishment, imprisonment, loss of property, etc.) on the basis of what you said.
They could just block these IPs outright. A massive percentage of attack traffic runs over these networks. Before, site owners would often have to block Tor completely after dealing with enough spam/attacks from exit nodes, and now they can allow actual humans without any sort of complex setup.

I think it's a net win for everyone involved, personally.
Marcus Almeida Buchecha
AskHistorians is a terrible place to get history. It's as bad as getting politics from politics sub or news from news sub. Reddit is a cesspool of propaganda. If reddit was as big or successful as facebook, google, etc, they'd be getting a lot more scrutiny.
I assume it's bulk prices, requiring thousands/tens of thousands of wafers of commitment.
I believe that requirement ended. I had to get a different DNS at one point for my .is (registered in 2009) and I still maintain that account with DNSMadeEasy out of laziness), but when I helped a friend register a .is and when I got some additional ones more recently, I didn’t have to do that anymore.

I believe Namecheap offloads some of the info for .is back to ISNIC. The only reason I don’t do it under Namecheap is that I’ve had the ISNIC account for 11 years and it’s easy enough to get my annual email reminding me to renew, but I was able to get my friend’s registered through her Namecheap account without issue at the end of last year.
> This is a fair point, but I think the political aspect is an "emergent property" if you will, rather than an inherent one.

This is like saying discrimination that gets baked into an ML model isn't the creators' fault imo.
And yet any random person on the street can easily flag something as being political or not political. I don’t accept that everything is automatically political. That is just an unrealistic argument that doesn’t match the reality of how the word is used.
Finally, pull requests from the command line without git arcana.
Modern societies run on heat engines, and nuclear power is still a heat engine just with a carbon free source of heat. It's possible to run a carbon free modern society without drastic change in energy use, through using nuclear energy - France has done so successfully for decades.

By comparison proposals to use renewables almost invariably involve immense amounts of energy storage which is nowhere near deliverable with current technologies. Either that or they involve massive changes to how society used energy, essentially refactoring the whole economy and infrastructure to work around the intermittency of renewable generation.

There are fundamental physical challenges to using a low density and intermittent source of energy, and nuclear largely offers all of the same benefits as fossil fuels just without the carbon.
About 50 power reactors are currently being constructed in 15 countries (see Table below), notably China, India, Russia and the United Arab Emirates.

2020 Korea, KHNP Shin Hanul 1 APR1400 1400
2020 Russia, Rosenergoatom Leningrad II-2 VVER-1200 1170
2020 Slovakia, SE Mochovce 3 VVER-440 471

2021 Argentina, CNEA Carem25 Carem 29
2021 Belarus, BNPP Ostrovets 2 VVER-1200 1194
2021 China, CNNC Fuqing 6 Hualong One 1150
2021 China, CGN Hongyanhe 5 ACPR-1000 1080
2021 China, CNNC Tianwan 6 ACPR-1000 1118
2021 Finland, TVO Olkiluoto 3 EPR 1720
2021 India, Bhavini Kalpakkam PFBR FBR 500
2021 India, NPCIL Kakrapar 4 PHWR-700 700
2021 Korea, KHNP Shin Hanul 2 APR1400 1400
2021 Pakistan Karachi/KANUPP 2 ACP1000 1100
2021 Slovakia, SE Mochovce 4 VVER-440 471
2021 UAE, ENEC Barakah 2 APR1400 1400
2021 USA, Southern Vogtle 3 AP1000 1250

2022 China, CGN Fangchenggang 3 Hualong One 1180
2022 China, CGN Fangchenggang 4 Hualong One 1180
2022 China, CGN Hongyanhe 6 ACPR-1000 1080
2022 India, NPCIL Rajasthan 7 PHWR-700 700
2022 Pakistan Karachi/KANUPP 3 ACP1000 1100
2022 Russia, Rosenergoatom Kursk II-1 VVER-TOI 1255
2022 UAE, ENEC Barakah 3 APR1400 1400
2022 USA, Southern Vogtle 4 AP1000 1250

2023 Bangladesh Rooppur 1 VVER-1200 1200
2023 China, CNNC Xiapu 1 CFR600 600
2023 France, EDF Flamanville 3 EPR 1750
2023 India, NPCIL Kudankulam 3 VVER-1000 1050
2023 India, NPCIL Kudankulam 4 VVER-1000 1050
2023 India, NPCIL Rajasthan 8 PHWR-700 700
2023 Korea, KHNP Shin Kori 5 APR1400 1400
2023 Russia, Rosenergoatom Kursk II-2 VVER-TOI 1255
2023 Turkey Akkuyu 1 VVER-1200 1200
2023 UAE, ENEC Barakah 4 APR1400 1400

2024 Bangladesh Rooppur 2 VVER-1200 1200
2024 China, Guodian & CNNC Zhangzhou 1 Hualong One 1150
2024 Iran Bushehr 2 VVER-1000 1057
2024 Korea, KHNP Shin Kori 6 APR1400 1400
2024 Turkey Akkuyu 2 VVER-1200 1200

2025 China, CGN Taipingling 1 Hualong One 1150
2025 China, Guodian & CNNC Zhangzhou 2 Hualong One 1150
2025 UK, EDF Hinkley Point C1 EPR 1720

2026 UK, EDF Hinkley Point C2 EPR 1720

https://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/current-an...
That phenomenon is not in any way unique to Zinn. You can see parallel behavior across the political spectrums.
Fair enough, I've updated my top comment with an attempt to clarify.
I'm not imagining an intentional conspiracy by anyone. Everyone need only respond to incentives. The AI responds to the incentives it was programmed to respond to such as engagement. The workers are responding to incentives such as profit. They tell you they censor some people because they fear it will radicalize you, will harm profits, or other similarly non-nefarious incentives. No conspiracy or under handed behavior is required.
Export from the US is not uncontrolled

https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2014/11/the_return_of...
Its completely portable. I can dump the same repo on github and it works or I can compile it myself and dump the files on any webserver.
That's true that in this case their plan of making the input generic wouldn't work, as it relies on the output being borrowed. The technique of reducing the size of monomorphized functions would be useful in other contexts, but not this one.
Not long ago, CF has been blocking access from Tor. And they are blocking access from my web crawler sometimes. I don't like CF as they act as a police or gatekeeper to the origin website, deciding who to penalize and who do not, while pretending to be speeding up websites and protecting from 'threads'.
You pay the same per wafer regardless or defects.

I'm assuming whatever happens if estimates are off is a crapshoot depending on your contract and specifics.

I could be wrong but there is also usually at least a little 'buyer beware' on newer processes; I know that was a big part of AMD being kneecapped at the offset of the Bulldozer arch era.
They do? I'm pretty sure they've always banned phishing pages. Do you have a source on that?
I wouldnt necessarily agree. It needs to be stored for a time that is longer than any single civilization has survived. Its pretty arrogant to assume we will still be around for that amount of time.

This source pretty heavily influenced my change of opinion on nuclears efficacy

https://www.pbs.org/video/independent-lens-containment/
For awhile you could use Pidgin and OTR to even have secure messages through facebook's messenger. I'm not sure if they decrypted it or not, but it sure was fun.
mudb: Low latency state replication for the web
> I don't know, I guess it's possible? Maybe you have a better idea for how it could be happening, but it just doesn't seem very likely at all.

I’ve seen this kind of thought pattern a few times and frankly the way you are thinking doesn’t match reality.

I work on a 1000+ person enterprise software project.

Less than 5% of those 1000+ understand our customers requirements and use cases in any real depth. This is despite trying for years to incentivise developers to have a broader understanding of our business.

Within that core 5% most decisions are driven by the 3-5 people who care about the particular area.

So for a 1000 person+ org you would need to corrupt 3-4 people to drive a hidden agenda.

This is for a project not trying to be secretive in any way.

To relate it back to Twitter you would probably need the right 3-4 people to push hard for content moderators to be hired in San Francisco instead of Bangalore in order to push hard left views.
> In the table on the page, why does "Foundry sale price per chip" decrease, while "Foundry sale price per wafer" increase

I had the same question. Seems it's based on an earlier table in the same PDF (see my top-level comment for source link), namely Table 7 on page 41, which lists transistor density to calculate average chips per wafer.

And then, for the table referenced in the article (which is Table 9 in the PDF), it says: "In line 8, we convert the per wafer value to a per chip value by dividing by the number of chips per wafer of a given year’s node listed in Table 7."
Please clarify. I thought all those captcha puzzles were coming from Cloudflare. Are you saying they are only enabled if the destination page has JS?
> Googling around shows there used to be a 'Don't recommend this channel' button which would be awesome to have back.

It's still there on my Chrome desktop or Youtube app on android.
Or refer to that picture Trump printed out of the Iranian (Pakistani?) rocket failure that was apparently being watched with a keyhole satellite..
Yes. That's pessimistic.
I think that there was a time when a smaller number of DNS providers was registered with ISNIC. As the gTLD has become more popular, more DNS providers have gone through that process.
That doesn't work for all TLDs. I just checked a .us domain and it says "No registry RDAP server was identified for this domain. Attempting lookup using WHOIS service", and then "Failed to perform lookup using WHOIS service: TLD_NOT_SUPPORTED".
Nobody said anything about “personal rights”. Also, yes, it is a political stance. And one in this context your own comment indicates you have a solution for: don’t work there (at FB). A lot of people don’t have the luxury to pick and choose employers for their political activities: arguably they’re not a position to agitate on the inside, either.
Google plans additional $600M into Henderson facility
That's why I put "black" in quotation marks, as it covers a whole range of skin tones that exist mostly in the eye of the beholder. The reconstructions or artistic depictions of those early Britons doesn't make me think Africa as much as it makes me think exposure to the sun by a non-fair-skinned population.

I am from very Northern European stock and I get very dark with consistent exposure to the sun despite my extensive freckled skin. My brother by the same parents was often mistaken for someone from Southern Italy or Mexico especially if it was Summer.