skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Venkman was the only game in town. It was a glorious day when Firebug surpassed Venkman.

https://wiki.mozilla.org/Venkman/Firebug_Comparison
Oh, I hate this. I get your point but as a potential new hire of your company I'm also interviewing you. This means that if you state a problem in a very ambiguous way (like you did in your first message) that's already a red flag for me. Sure, I don't expect 100% accuracy in your problem statement, but I don't expect either lazynnes for the sake of "let's see if the interviewer asks good questions before implementing anything".

Expect professionalism from both parts.
Orcas striking sailing boats in the Straits of Gibraltar
Granted, when the U.S. was as old as the current Chinese government is, it had officially sanctioned slavery in place.

My theory is that as countries become stronger and more confident that they can withstand internal pressures without outsiders immediately being able to take advantage of them, they'll slowly become more and more democratic as they prosper.

I think this is vastly preferable than having the CIA install a pro-US puppet regime that is deeply unpopular and will only lead to another coup, meaning investors are not confident in the country being stable enough for investment and the populations suffer.
tl;dr: Go alone when you want to go fast, go together when you want to go far.
If you dont mandate it, then people can be subtly disenfranchised and then blamed for it.
You're right, I forgot about compound literals, which were introduced in C99 and which are a rarely used feature.

But I guess my statement that "C doesn't have array expressions" was true before the advent of C99. And that's also why array decay made even more sense back then. (It still makes a lot of sense today IMO).
Ion? https://amzn.github.io/ion-docs/
Immigration increases labor demand as well as labor supply. It also permits more specialization.
This is comping directly from the DoD, so the military. And yes, the military uses peacetime to develop technologies to be used later in war to devastating effects.
Non fiction and super depression and full of pain, is everything Bukowski has written.

Love his books. He sees right through it all and doesn't give a fuck. At all.
Spammers linking to your site doesn't prove that Google is operated by a Chinese botnet
Nokia 3310 3G as a podcast player
> I can see it now, the CEO walks into the corporate meeting with an epiphany...

> Guys, lets just pretend that our higher expenses _ARE A CORPORATE TAX_. Then it all washes out in the end and we don't have to whine about putting the burden of society on private companies!

That's not going to work. This isn't about "higher expenses" but about destroying Uber's business model. Uber cannot afford to pay healthcare for everyone who may or may not do a few drives every month.

Maybe you could just pretend that Uber paying lots of taxes is already paying for many social services? Which, come to think of, shouldn't require any pretense.
Despite the name, the European Single Market is far less unified than that of the US. A company starting out in Europe will have to overcome linguistic, cultural and regulatory barriers in 27 different countries. While American companies still have to deal with regulatory differences across state borders, it is not quite the same as what European start-ups face.
It was still a terror attack where people who were not involved with the government decisions in question were killed.

The people can't be held accountable for actions of individuals in their government.
Behavior leading to reproducibility issues is also unethical. P hacking etc is just as bad as simply making up experimental data from scratch. It’s at a minimum wasting everyone’s time that’s reading that junk, but a waste of any funding sources for that research.

The only reasonable option I see is a culture of reproducing results from independent data and blacklisting people when a high percentage of their papers turn out to be bogus. Because what’s happening today in many fields is simply wasting everyone’s time and money.
Data science interview questions with answers
Besides, this is more or less an ode to "common sense" which is in my experience actually not so common.

And definitely there is some form of age group bias, if the large majority were students (first year or otherwise) the sample must be dominated by 20-25 years people.

Maybe (or maybe not) a sample with more aged people (i.e. with more life experience) would have reached more than 59%.
There's a catch with CPU credit balances with EC2 and RDS
Papers are one metric. In the case of ML, as with other technologies such as web infrastructure, there comes a point where the state of research plateaus for a while and the main progress is in commercial implementations.

So, for example, autonomous vehicle technology now is more a matter of implementations than theory. This is where China has an advantage over the US by virtue of the willingness of its government to make large scale infrastructure investments. The US once led in such endeavours e.g. Eisenhower's Federal Aid Highway Act of 1956 that paid for 90 percent of the cost of construction of Interstate Highways.

Now, in the government domain, the leader is China.

China intends for self-driving cars to propel smart megacity

https://asia.nikkei.com/Economy/China-intends-for-self-drivi...
Trans women are men.

If they weren't men, they'd just be called women.
ARMv8 was a clean design not constrained by compatibility with the past and it was created by people having a lot of experience with the implementation of ISAs in hardware and in software tools.

Therefore there is no surprise that it is an efficient ISA.

The only significant flaw in its first version was the lack of atomic instructions, but that was corrected in the subsequent versions.

The 32-bit POWER was a very nice ISA, but it was not designed to be extendable to 64-bit. It had blocks of the encoding space reserved for future extensions, but various details of the instruction word formats depended on the fact that the size of the registers was 32 bit.

When POWER was extended to 64-bit, much earlier than IBM expected, i.e. only 5 years after the introduction of the 32-bit variant, the extension was constrained because IBM has chosen to not have a mode switch like ARM but they have chosen to make a compatible ISA extension, i.e. which has the original POWER ISA as an instruction subset.

This has constrained the instruction encodings, so the 64-bit POWER ISA has some parts that seem more clumsy that in ARMv8 and the result is that programs for POWER are usually slightly larger than their ARMv8 equivalents. However, the hardware implementation effort for equivalent performance levels should be very similar for POWER and ARM and significantly less for both than for x86.

POWER also had a compressed encoding variant, but that was implemented in very few chips. Now the latest ISA variant has introduced 2 instruction word lengths, i.e. both 64-bit and 32-bit long instructions, instead of just 32-bit long instructions.

This allows the embedding of large immediate constants in the instructions, which is an important advantage of x86 vs. traditional RISC ISAs. This might help to reduce the sizes of many POWER programs.
I'm sure that some wouldn't mind other's cultural suicide, however.
I once came across some Python code on Wikipedia which looked like:

for i in range(n):
a = [f(i) for i in range(q)]

I was reading over it and got temporarily confused by the re-use of the variable "i" in the list comprehension so I edited it to something else in order to help the next person. Reverted without explanation.

Another complaint I have about Wikipedia: There are certain people who are sometimes described in the media as "antisemites", "white nationalists", "white supremacists" etc. If it's a reliable source then Wikipedia will describe the person as a white supremacist or whatever. That doesn't bother me a lot.

However, in some cases the person themselves will say something to clarify their view, and a surprising number of Wikipedia editors think that the subject of the article's own statement of their political view does not merit inclusion in the article.

I believe I remember one particular case where there was a person whose Wikipedia bio referred to him as an antisemite, but if you went to his Twitter profile, he used some of the (very limited) space in his Twitter bio to refer to himself as pro-Israel... and a certain senior editor strongly objected to mentioning this fact in his Wikipedia bio.

At that point I think you're effectively just smearing living people in their Wikipedia bios and that really rubs me the wrong way.

The broader issue here is that Wikipedia, due to its reliable sources policy, can't really be much better than journalists are. And journalism isn't what it once was. Same argument for academia and the replication crisis. We live in a society, basically.
This reminds me of two other now-obsolete web debugging tools.

Weinre[1] let you to view the DOM, network requests, and console output when testing sites on a phone. Aardwolf[2] provided an interactive JavaScript debugger, by rewriting the code to add debug hooks.

[1] http://people.apache.org/~pmuellr/weinre/docs/latest/
[2] https://github.com/lexandera/Aardwolf
One of my favourite earth's 3D visualisation
What's that about Maximator?
Quite a few large french companies that are global in nature have switched to English first, but for the broader acceptance and the government to officially support English as the unifying language I share your skepticism
Nvidia buyout of ARM is imminent, report claims
But it's still terribly fragile and Brexit risks the whole thing collapsing. Not necessarily an innovation if it won't stand up to time.
If you've been poor then you can see that these laws that limit the kind of work people want to do aren't the reason for you being poor.

What should be had is sufficient welfare programs and still let people work as they want (mostly).
This is such a fucking great saying, that I've not heard before. Thank you.

A similar saying I've heard is 'it was a very long walk for a short drink'.
Why is that always green accounts post these conservative dog whistle comments? Are you afraid to use your main account?
You're right, they have. Unfortunately, having failed to retain the lessons of the first Gilded Age, we're now well into a second, and closer to its inevitable failure and collapse than to its "morning in America" beginning. So it goes.
John McPhee: Annals of the former world,
Simon Winchester: The Map that Changed the World,
Lutgens et al.: Essentials of Geology
I found their overall response to be thoughtful and objective, and painted an overview of the situation.

I found your response to hone in on one detail and contribute nothing useful to the conversation.
If code quality is the most cost effective mitigation, then does it follow that valgrind and now Rust are the most effective defensive tools?
People in general are notorious for their short term thinking. I’m not re-evaluating personally, even though a good chunk of those amenities are gone and it remains to be seen what will replace them. However, people I know are “fleeing”. At the height of the lockdowns, many people with kids freaked out a bit as the services that serviced the homeless, addicted, and those with mental health problems closed, essentially dumping them on the street where they took over public parks. Even though things are going back to normal, the damage was done in these people’s heads and they’re heading for the suburbs.

I’m not sure how things may change long term. (God I hope) in 5 years a new wave of people who didn’t live here during the pandemic will replace them. I suspect that even if people work from home full time on a more permanent basis, the cul-de-sac bedroom community suburbs will become even more isolating as people spend all their time there, not just for the quiet evenings and weekends.

We’ll see, I guess.
As the post says: « Each person has and keeps having their own policy for signing keys. ».

Many people will only sign keys if they have confidence that the name on the key is its controller's "real name" in some sense.

Maybe there'd be a way to model this new kind of endorsement in the distributed database made up of keys and signatures (using signature types or whatever), but it doesn't surprise me if the Debian account maintainers think that a centralised database of assertions that exist for Debian's purposes is going to give them an easier life.
In the film they explain that since wind turbines extract power based on the area they sweep, their kite would be able to sweep a bigger area more easily. (No need for so much material, no need for a 150m tall tower, etc.)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qd_hEja6bzE&t=6m40s
Just curious, why is allowing cuba in the description so important to you?
English may be more acceptable once the UK excited, leaving no favored EU state.
No different than green people opposing nuclear energy.
Panpsychism is a pretty interesting idea, but this article does a poor job of explaining it and then making its own moral argument. I'd say skip the article and read this instead:

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/panpsychism/

One line of argument for panpsychism that I don't often see mentioned is that humans/animals assume that we're the only form of consciousness in the universe. This strikes me as rather myopic, at least as a baseline assumption. It seems like the starting point should be assume that other bodies in the universe are constituted in similar ways and not animals on Earth are exceptionally, unexplainably unique.
> So it's creating a whole new genre of runs that simply isn't about execution anymore.

Did we watch the same video?

It was completely about execution. You still need to be exceptionally good at the game to get those frame-perfect setups.
That's very interesting!
I remember this happening a lot with sports / nutrition studies. I'm not surprised to see medicine in there as well.
Overall, understanding the brain is hard, understanding our bodies is hard, it's normal that we can come up with a limited amount of consistently reproducible knowledge per year.

From all my friends who pursued STEM, I assume this is happening because of the pressure on people pursuing higher education at all costs, not finding enough qualified jobs, getting stuck in academia and printing low quality papers to get a promotion / keep getting another public grant.

If you add in to the mix results influenced by the current political climate, what your peers think, what your sponsors want to prove for financial gain, the situation gets bleak very fast.

Irreproducible papers are the abandoned OSS projects of software engineers in private tech + corruption + public money, a recipe for disaster.
I was surprised how article is easy to understand and then I figured out the author is high school student. Impressive knowledge and skills for your age.
Maths is what happens when you take nonsense very seriously.

For some odd reason a subset of all the possible non-sense maps really well to the real world.
What laptop stand is that?
The public market also has some trouble with valuations.

Consider a company that has several big shareholders that are in it for the long run (several years to tens of years); they are just holding onto their shares as long as nothing catastrophic happens.

Those shareholders don't trade these stocks much, if it all, so they don't actively participate in determining the trading price; that is mostly done by the more volatile market participants.

Somebody runs a short against the company, the stock drops 8%, all of middle and upper management is freaked out -- even though less than 5% of all company stocks have been traded, and the long-term shareholders are actually cool with how things are run.

As for example and employee holding some stock, you'd typically want to know:

* how do the long term investors value the company right now? (this doesn't change all too often, no need to look at your stock ticker twice a day)

* how much would I get if I sold some stocks right now (to liquidate)?

The first information is very hard to come by right now.
> especially around arrays of structs vs regular arrays or arrays of structs which contain one key-value pair each, and especially the struggles around multi-line strings or other kinds of entries in YAML.

Can you give examples? I don't see how they pose a problem.
mandarin and German are not exactly easy to learn in my country. maybe French, but I’m still culturally exposed to English. I live in a Spanish speaking island in the Caribbean, and really, being drawn to the US is inevitable. With that being said, most people are drawn to the US for the reasons highlighted above. That will not change any time soon.
I’m currently on an iPhone 7S. I’ve got a mosh session open to a remote raspberry pi 4B (time looks right), bash shell, “while(sleep 1); do date +%s”, running in Blink SSH while I read HN cause I couldn’t sleep. Have an alarm set for 12:26 UTC so I can grab that screenshot. Following along with you :)
Looking through the doomsayers in this thread, this is the result I believe to be most likely. If ARM goes belly up through gross mismanagement, then the laurels will be taken up by someone else. I think another aspect to consider is the perpetual license agreements ARM holds with several other businesses. I think this may muzzle Nvidia to some extent.
I disagree, I live in Denmark where the majority speaks very good English. There's no shortage of Danish media.

On the other hand, economic suicide is assured by insisting on a high standard of living while doing everything possible to prevent innovation.
Is that a rhetorical question or can't you really see that not every occupation can earn a living wage?
I am indebted to Firebug forever. If it weren't for Firebug it would have taken me a really long time to understand how the web (browser) works.
Why get political? Surely, if you disagree to the point where you assume their comment is made in bad faith, or is written by a person of poor character, you can put forward a better rebuttal than this.
The process you describe nostalgically is called braindrain on the third world, and if it's wavering it's due to changing economic and geopolitical landscapes. The process itself created an outflow of scientific and technological knowledge, which paired with industrial outsourcing strenghtened even America's geopolitical rivals. Actual xenophobic and nationalistic attitudes might have protected American hegemony, but you can't put that genie back in the bottle.
The cost of innovation in crude governments of faith (Dictatorships, Tyrranies, etc) is measured in starvation, famine and deaths in the population. The cost of innovation in modern governments built on systems (socialist or capitalist democracies) is a lot of squaking about the innovation and its uses.

The cost of the NORK's replicating nukes and China's profiling their citizens contrasts with the US in that those costs are much lower in the US. The US isn't carting off undesirables to re-education camps (there's a prison system with a lot of people in jail but every single one of them was put there by a jury) or starving its citizenry to make innovations (although there is a point to be made there). This, in turn, tends to increase the rate of innovation (people don't come to associate the change with bad things and because they are discussing them more people are exploring them).

China or Europe can be #1 in scientific paper publishing but until I see robots that can do what General Dynamics is doing or even what Honda was doing 5 years ago, it's all just copying the leader and the development cycle for those countries to product decent copies is quite long and tends to be inconsistent due to people developing bad cases of I-don't-give-a-shit-itus. E.G. China has problems innovating for the same reason they have problems making an aircraft carrier and maintaining a navy; their steel mills churn out inconsistent crap.

The BBC article is trying to deliver a message using Schmidt's name, and isn't coming to any conclusions or providing any data. It's pure propaganda and a total waste of time to read or comment on really.
You are nearly there. It is hand-waving psychobabble paid for with taxes. This fraud and narcissist, Goff, is employed by a UK university. This is the tw*t that wrote "Galileo's Error". Presumably, he'll be bringing out a sequel, "Einstein's hopeless confusion".
In Russia we have several successful competitors to Google Maps and even a search engine that's actually good. Competing with Google is extremly difficult, but possible
Obviously for pee it is the same. Does not mean you have to do it everywhere. I would not get in an airplane without a diaper. And obviously western nursery does not work without it either.

About accidents:
And then what is more unhygienic?

Feces, urine on the floor or feces, urine all around your bottom? For the first you can use almost any cleaning liquid you want, for the second even to much soap is not good.
The fad success of the "Snow Fall" by NYTimes has created a generation of confused writers who think they're artists.

Even the NYTimes has moved on from the all over the place interactive format for articles because it's not good for readability. If you are confident about your writing you should focus on the writing itself instead of trying to package it in all kinds of bells and whistles. It just signals insecurity.
The keywords in what you said is “to me.”

For some reason, passionate work from home workers assume everyone likes what they like and everyone has the same situation as them.

I prefer going to the office. It’s not a moral failing, it’s just what I like. I think people should be free to do what they like.
Nice product you have here. Is there a free version or any plans for free version? Why do you have to say "unfortunate event of a shutdown" when the project isn't even launched? You can maybe put that under a FAQ (like you've done in the comments) but not like this.

That said, I have signed up and I'm looking forward to your project launches ;)
How Long It Would Take a Hacker to Guess Your Password, Visualized
>SpaceX isn't going to go public, possibly because it's a very long-term endeavor, and his goal is to go to Mars, not make huge profits.

I think it's due to the nature of being a military contractor.

Being public means that Americans can be upset our taxes are going to a billionaire. But private, there's deniability of how much money is coming from taxpayers.
It doesn't matter whether you see something immoral about it. Employers do punish employees for doing so.
I've similiar setup except Mac, setup VNC on Linux and RDP on Windows, so I only need to open single laptop + external monitor.

I use Mac on virtualbox to build the iOS and some as gitlab runner
Debian: Dam Key and Identity Requirements
As others have stated, there’s no lens for focusing.

What is however kind of surprising to me is the amount of hot pixels and also dust / debris on the sensors. You’d think that as expensive and fragile as they claim the sensor array is, they’d keep the environment cleaner. Example: https://www.dropbox.com/s/rhldlwyqzuvbf2o/2020-09-13%2007.36...

I also question the “five human hairs” wide gap between the sensor pods given that the gaps are clearly visible in the press photos of the sensor array.