skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I wouldn't be surprised if the gel/mucus produced was water absorbent and most of the water used in the mucus actually came from external sources.
Well, that's the point. 2020 is not 1990-2000. Time to IPO has increased dramatically.
I don't have a single favorite motto, but here's what I'm striving to live like, described in two minutes:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ERbvKrH-GC4
It's not so straightforward. Those with financial interests in the matter manipulate opinion and pay for lopsided science. That's why many globally and especially in the US still 'doubt' climate change. The evidence today is overwhelming but 20 years ago was still more muddled as Shell & co were funding biased studies, while experts and environmentalists were screaming for action and simply ignored. And still today there are media (in the US) telling their audience that it's not real, pointing to some pseudoscience to make this claim. Science is messy, can be biased and we have to rely on third parties to communicate it.

The same problem for nuclear: it's not self-contradictory to be eager for low-co2 energy and oppose nuclear due to its large-scale damage in case of an incident (and with Fukushima, 3Mile, Tchernobyl and various smaller incidents it's not like this is just theory).

It's similar with GMO: there are some studies showing risks and various GMO plants have been stopped due to concerns they could be harmful. Roundup is not exaxtly harmless but rather leaves ecological deserts behind - even if you are in favour of GMOs (like golden rice) you might still oppose some of them (like roundup ready plants), specifically because of doubts about the corporate-funded science by the agri-businesses behind them. Or you might oppose them on economic/social grounds, e.g. the practice of sterilising seeds which already has driven many farmers in level 1 and 2 (aka developing) countries into economic disaster.

Trust the science? Most environmentalists will agree. Trust the science funded by and the actual implementation by Monsanto? A much harder sell, akin to trusting BP's studies on climate and emissions.
Talbot Effect
I am not so sure about that in the absolute.

In eg a 'chaotic' market system, you can just go and buy a yacht. Very quick, very efficient.

If you have an authoritarian dictatorship like eg Stalin's Soviet Union, good luck getting your yacht quickly.

Even the most authoritarian dictator can not make all decisions on their own. There will always be delegation.
Not supporting Monsanto's business model isn't the same thing as not 'listen[ing] to scientists'.

The issues with blanket application of Glysophate combined with roundup resistant crops are real; application volumes have ballooned and we still don't have a scientific consensus on it's effects on humans. Ignoring, in the immediate, the potential health effects of the molecule, it is also a driving force in the expansion of monoculture techniques rather than more sustainable polycultures.

Monocultural key foodcrops are a long-tail risk to food security. The Irish potato famine, the lightning quick elimination of the Gros Michel clones, etc.

I won't get into the myriad legal issues surrounding Roundup, terminator seeds, etc. but they aren't theoretical either.

This isn't to say there's no benefit from Glyphosate application. It's to say opposition towards it is not driven by scientific illiteracy. Quite the opposite.
I assumed the title meant man-made pollutants. That's colloquially what pollution refers to. It's pretty clearly misleading.
Can you share a screenshot/paste of your process listing with VSCode running, showing virtual memory sizes?
I had considered both, as I think they considerably overlap (e: in this case, at least). In fact, if you want to want to completely isolate the two, I had mainly considered the UX-focused and visual aspect.

Contending over the ultimate conveyance of meaning in and of itself would have had me arguing for what we both already agree on.

Come onnnnn. It's not that bad with the grammar/punctuation, capitalization of acronyms and proper nouns, backtick highlights, and codeblocks.
Remember, he didn't have a degree until 1987. And credentials mattered more back then.

When I graduated with a B.S. in 1982 I had 4 offers, ranging from $22K to $28K. It was enough for the two of us -- our apt was $275/month. But there wasn't a lot left over.
The US Military already has those tools and already does produce weapons in secret.

What does that have to do with building high power to mass nuclear plants for space applications?
Deconstructing a Genius Climate Change Argument [video]
I don’t understand how noting that something is based on conjecture and not on any allegations in the public record (the earlier hearing that first made the mental health claims are under seal) is inappropriate. Of course more information will be made public in the future! You can disagree with my personal conjecture about what a defense will be — and I could absolutely be wrong, I’m not her attorney and I don’t work for the government. And that’s exactly why I’m making it clear that my personal opinion is based on the information we do have. You don’t have to agree with my opinion but it calling it inappropriate to even have one is weird.
seems like the missing ingredient is being able to recognize high quality vids with low view count. Recognizing quality before the masses do.
I keep wanting every new law being added to the books to require a "reason for this" section. When debugging and throwing out old laws it would be easier when the reasons for their addition are clearly stated. Also it would make the judges' decisions easier in certain cases.
I think GMO's are disliked not just because of gene editing, but the decidedly non-organic way that GMO's are typically grown. My understanding is that GMOs are typically used on industrial scale monocrop farms, with pesticides. So it gets tarnished by association.
Well, if I'm putting on my rose glasses I'm just hoping that if she wins by this argument, she might just set a precedent for all the youth offenders of crime?

Why would this case be any different of say, someone that grew up in an extremely poor neighborhood and had most of their life working against them, and then turn to crime. Instead of just throwing such young offenders into jail for a long time, a lawyer might argue that this high profile case is a precedent for the young offenders - because they couldn't help themselves.

It feels really unfair, though.
Sure, but then we’re just talking in circles. The obligation to represent a client a certain way is dictated by the Rules of Professional Conduct (RPCs) promulgated by the state and federal bar associations. And what makes an attorney’s representation of a client adequate is additionally influenced by the area of law at issue and what makes a good or bad case theory/defense. Nowhere in any RPCs or in any case law is there a requirement that an attorney do what a client says, except in regards to letting a defendant testify if they want to.

Edit, to add: if it happens that what a defendant recommends comports with the RPCs and the best practices dictated by case law then an attorney would follow that recommendation... because it was required by an RPC or the best practice given the related case law, but definitely not because a defendant said it. If a defendant is giving an attorney pertinent legal advice then the attorney should probably look for a new job though.
Your answer illustrates what he's talking about

You are not even realizing what he's actually saying

HE's not talking about lowballing on salary

He is talking about what percentage of the company you are going to get, how soon you will get it, and other details

*

Most people won't get this. I will still try

A) What percentage of the company are you getting?

B) What dilution is going to happen?

C) When can you sell your stake in the company?

D) How soon and in what manner does it vest

*
People fixate on things like 1,000 options without considering what it really means

Please consider what you wrote:

The standard for pre-IPO seems to me to be N number of options, at a particular strike price, 10-year expiration (or 90 days if you leave the company). That doesn't seem all that complicated to me, or deceptive.

NOWHERE in that is

What value do I bring the company

IN RETURN what percentage of the company am I getting

AT WHAT RATE will I be given that share of the company
It's aimed at watching movies, running android likely for the support of streaming apps; What I want is a computer monitor on my eyes and so this either underperforms for that need or is an overkill.

OP project may in fact solve this, I need to look deeper into the tech.
It is very interesting to look at the intersection of state capacity and legal systems.

However, you don't need much government (nor state capacity) at all for legal systems to work. Some might even say the can work better without under some circumstances.

See http://www.daviddfriedman.com/Legal%20Systems/LegalSystemsCo... for many historical examples like Jewish law or Romani law or England in the Eighteenth Century.
Visual Studio Code August 2020
Tundra is manufactured in the US and doesn't sell anywhere near as many. Other manufacturers are free to open production facilities in the US to avoid the tariff as well. Not sure what your point is...
> If you want to add 2 to a future, you block and then extract the content and add to it.

That makes using futures completely pointless. Why not just write blocking code if you're going to block anyway?
Thank you! And like you, I’m also here with the popcorn. #TeamDrama

I have a $500 bet that Holmes won’t serve any jail time (not that she won’t be convicted and putting aside any plea deals), so I have a vested interest in whatever her defense is as working. But on a personal level, I think she’s a terrible person and I’m just excited to watch the case unfold.
It was my typo. I have no CDs from 1900...
"Nothing better than having a lategame make it or break it wonder sabotaged 1 turn away from completion by cave people that you smashed to bits two and a half thousand years ago because they have been accumulating espionage points against you since the dawn of history"

This quote won't age well.
There are a few projects with a similar feel as json yet allowing nice to haves like comments and trailing commas:

* json5

* HCl

* hjson (now unmaintained)
There is a structural disadvantage but it isn't that. It is a company hires people, whose job it is to make the company more efficient and profitable, and to do so, you need to set things up so no employee can be in a powerful position. For example tech choices so "Use Java and X Framework we can easily hire people", and such like. Keep it plug an play.

To the point where it is seen as immoral to do things 'for job security', whilst the company itself might do this to it's customers. I think this affects things more than negotiation.
FAANG income certainly isn't "rich". Maybe you recognize this and I'm just picking semantics, but I've noticed this annoying trend of FAANG engineers who crack $1m at 29 acting like they are a member of the rich when their just a person with a great job. To get rich comes from investments over time, or an impressive startup exit, or starting a business, or getting lucky. Nobody gets rich on the standard FAANG salary until they've been there for 20 years.
Those reasons are often known.

Though you can't always trust them. Even the titles of laws are often the opposite of what the law is accomplishing; and that's intended.
That's not what I said at all.
Humor isn't frowned upon, but comments that are limited to pure wit are, just because everybody likes them in the small, but nobody wants them to dominate the discussion in the large.
Project Lighthouse – Part 2: Measurement with anonymized data
> Discovering subdomains is much harder...

Is this because you don’t publish MX records in DNS for the subdomains and the default setting on the main domain is to accept only specific addresses (and reject catch-all addresses)?
> Harvard Law School’s Criminal Justice Policy Program found that Black incarcerees received more severe charges, harsher sentences and less favorable outcomes than their white counterparts. They looked at more than a million cases, from the initial charges through the conviction and sentencing, and discovered disparities that could not be explained by logic or reason.

https://www.theroot.com/a-judge-asked-harvard-to-find-out-wh...
Maybe I’m too cynical but I imagine such a section would just contain nonsense propaganda rather than any actual truth.
9/11 Truth and the Silence of the IR Discipline
The question is for how long. Many states have had a tendency to grow over time.
>"Since 2009, Singleton and his colleagues at Transient Plasma Systems have been developing an ignition system that would address this challenge for lean-burn engines. It works by condensing megawatts of power into nanosecond pulses of plasma created from ionizing the air around the plug’s electrodes; that’s the power of six semitrucks released hundreds of times faster than the speed of lightning.

Transient Plasma’s ignition system consists of a power supply that looks a bit like an internet router. It is connected to a series of plasma plugs in each cylinder of the engine. The power supply banks energy from the car’s battery and releases it through the plugs in an ultrafast burst of blue plasma. It’s a low-energy, low-temperature version of more energetic pulsed power systems like rail guns and the lasers that physicists use to simulate nuclear blasts.

The main difference between the plasma plug and conventional spark plugs is that it doesn’t ignite a combustion reaction by transferring heat. In fact, it doesn’t have enough thermal energy to even light a match.

Instead, it directly bombards the air molecules with electrons to break them into more reactive elements, like atomic oxygen.

This rapid infusion of non-thermal energy causes the molecules to slam together in the fuel mixture, which kicks off the combustion reaction. If a conventional spark plug is like a lighter, Singleton’s plasma plug is more like a lightning bolt."

PDS: I seem to remember reading something sometime back about some company doing something like this to ordinary water, to convert it into an apparently reactive fuel...

Also, combustion and engines aside, the above technique might find an application in chemistry, that is, to react (better) chemicals/reagents normally thought to be non-reactive or only partially reactive at a certain temperatures...

That is, in Chemistry:

plasma = catalyst (At least, there's a good case to be made for this...)

(Also, possibly, free electrons = catalyst (maybe, depending on reaction...))
Container image spec for WebAssembly modules
$625,000 and free entrance into the witness protection program.
>there is no need to transfer IP

Provably false. [1]

>comply with Chinese law

Chinese law requires companies to hand over root access and data, and also effectively forbids E2E encryption. This is IP transfer. [2]

>The US is simply scared of losing it's advantage in tech to China

The US has several tech companies with market caps more than double Tik Tok.

>National Security

There's evidence Tik Tok has been promoting CCP propaganda. [3]

>the average person isn't harmed by TikTok anymore and indeed less so than Facebook

Depends if you trust your data with the same government who regularly disappears journalists, I guess.

[1] https://www.wsj.com/articles/forced-tech-transfers-are-on-th...

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China_Internet_Security_Law

[3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pOlu624glKw
This sounds fascinating. Can you link to more information?
The law is less like source code and more like bytecode with the legal system working as a constantly changing interpreter. Sure, the bytecode gets updated. However, in this case, the interpreter is more often updated than the bytecode.

Take, for example, the recent Title IX case in the US which ruled that someone being trans is protected under title IX. When the law was first written, that certainly wasn't the intention. Yet, the law was written in regards to sex. Something that we as a society have had an evolving view on.

AFAIK, most legal systems (at least based on the British legal system) operate in a very similar manner. Laws may be written, but ultimately the courts have to decide what they mean. New laws can be written to correct for a courts opinion, yet the courts are free to evolve what they think things mean over time.

Laws are pretty much never as black and white as you might consider. There's the text of the law, which matters, but theirs also the courts understanding of the law, which also matters. In fact, prior court rulings on a law often matter MORE than the actual text of the law.
I mostly rely on digital music in various forms, but there is one advantage to vinyl: it removes choice.

It's one of those "paradox of choice" things; the more decisions you have to make, the less happy you are. When listening to a record, I just have to decide to put the record on, and then all choice is removed from me and I just sit back and enjoy the ride. I don't have to decide whether to skip a track or whether to jump from a playlist to a specific song I just thought about; the "would I rather be doing something else?" part of my brain takes a break.
No Package Namespaces in Rust is a Feature
But, for 90% of websites that force me to use an email, unless it's for something i'm paying for or care a lot about, I use one of several email addresses I set up specifically to sign up for websites and never look at them again.

If I didn't have to give an email, I'd probably still use those services, reddit comes to mind, i'm only signing up because i'm interested in the first place.

Having my email and spamming me...sorry, remarketing to me, makes no difference to my retention because I never see it. Providing a quality service I care to use is why I stay with things.
Recently had this happen to a site I launched too. You should open an issue in their support forum, and they will get it sorted within a few days. I was surprised that people still use McAfee.
Ergonomic Haskell 1 – Records
Getting macOS style hotkeys working in GNU/Linux
this is very similar to the kind of questions job platforms uses to test someone's english. I think this will help a lot of non-native speakers. good job
Based on some reading online, maritime delimination of boundaries beyond a 3 mile "cannonshot" distance didn't become common until after the 1950s when treaties were drawn up that would become the precursor to UNCLOS. In those treaties, the starting point for border delimitation was the equidistant point between two countries' coastline. When two countries have adjacent coasts, this ends up roughly perpendicular, but it still works even if they have irregular coastlines and doesn't involve any angle measurements, just distance. Considering that ocean borders only became common after the age of British colonialism and that perpendicular baselines were never specified as the standard in UNCLOS, I'm inclined to say that this is a myth.
I think the ACLU has a great set of examples:
https://www.aclu.org/other/whats-wrong-public-video-surveill...
They should set wrong timezone.
you probably sign TOS as part of the installation of the binaries
https://www.sfgate.com/business/fool/article/Why-Ford-Motor-...

And I assume you're referring to the automotive bailouts in 2008 when companies in many industries were falling apart and received bailouts or TARP funds? It was a rather unprecedented situation at the time, not really reflective of overall business viability.

Domestic OEMs have plenty of issues (poor innovation, arguably poor relative quality, unions, etc.) to criticize. Operating margins, which tend to be on par with foreign OEMs, aren't really one of them. And it really depends on what you're comparing it to to make a determination about how profitable the sector is. Pretty much nothing is as profitable as SaaS, but 4-5% is nothing to laugh at.
One other possible reason is to severely hamper any third party service or parts market from forming around this part of the car, and in particular, their IP.
There's some crazy pictures here showing WTC towers pulverizing in mid-air rather than "collapsing"
You and I have very different perspectives on what rich is. If you're 29 years old with >$1M in personal wealth, you're rich. That net worth would put you firmly in the top 1% of net worth at that age.

https://dqydj.com/net-worth-by-age-calculator-united-states/
Assuming this strategy works, or almost works, will a requirement need to be implemented that every year company directors must declare they are of sound mind, and have that signed-off by a medical expert (so they cannot claim that their mental unsoundness caused them to make a false declaration)?
It's not even valid to assume the government cares about what is legal.
It would make the ruminants meat more expensive. That's a hard sell politically.
Michael Jordan was an unprosecuted monopoly abuser who got away with presenting fraudulent evidence under oath, and set back computer technology by decades, getting people used to crashing systems without demanding their money back?

Who knew?
This means the police and military can, too, with the right demands to GM.

(And, in the right circumstances, perhaps other militaries as well.)

Remote disablement of physical infrastructure, with due process recourse for misuse weeks, months, or years after-the-fact, truly terrifies me. This is basic health and safety stuff.

I simply don’t trust the rule of law enough in the Five Eyes anymore to assume these things won’t eventually be abused by the state.
What a great writeup. A lot of it sounds very familiar to my experience as a principal engineer at Amazon. There’s a certain point at which you realize the hardest software engineering problems for a large company are social problems, and that’s what you devote most of your energy to as a PE (or, I guess, a Staff Engineer).

Personally, I really didn’t have the stomach for the work, eventually; I have gone back to active programming, this time for scientific projects, and I am much happier.
Are you confident the "good" video would.be released?
Way faster and uses less memory. Unified inbox. And the killer feature for me is Command-Tab - being able to keyboard switch from my email to the browser.
I think there are probably a lot of people in jails and prisons who have undiagnosed mental illness, though.

I don't remember where I heard the following claim: a substantial rate of death row inmates in some study were shown to have prefrontal cortical abnormalities.

It's an interesting question if it's possible that understanding of the brain ever reaches a point where things of that nature can be detected and/or treated, either before or after a crime, instead of jailing people or sending them away.
What is unfair here exactly? There hasn’t been anything close to a ruling. These hypotheticals in this thread are getting way ahead of reality here.

It sounds like the courts are preempting the defense strategy by forcing a gov psych review instead of one paid for by the defendant.

In criminal law cases it’s not an instant get out of jail free card if you’re found to have some mental issues. Nearly every lawyer brings up mental states in serious crimes. These judges aren’t stupid.
By dollar value, not by units sold. In 1H 2020, CDs sold: 10.2 million, records sold: 8.8 million.

So the headline is extremely misleading.
The Power of a Timely Collaboration
I had a substitute high school teacher one day who made us all write letters to ourselves, then sent them to us like 20 years later long after we'd forgotten about it. It was amazing!
HarmonyOS
If only they would master CD's properly... The loudness wars really killed the audio quality and persists to this day. That's probably one of the reasons why people associate harsh and sharp to digital audio, even though CD made before the loudness wars sound absolutely brilliant.