skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Erlang comes pretty close to achieving this. When/if people get past the “weird” syntax it’s a very straightforward model that minimizes a lot of the hazards, though locks are definitely still possible.
The court is ridiculous. It has had 2 convictions in 13 years and has cost over a billion dollars.

Have the UN set up a trial commission whenever there is need to prosecute someone internationally.

No need to have it wander around on geopolitically volatile fishing expeditions when they have nothing to do.
That's one theory that has been thrown. It's pretty sensible. The hardware and software does a ton already .. every year seems like tweaking absurd performance counters already.
While I don't have an opinion on the quality of Apple's spam filtering, your case seems particularly interesting (and hard!) because it is not spam - it is send by legitimate people with legitimate intentions.

I mean, sure, it is spam to you, but I doubt you could train a decent spam filter for this situation. Maybe a whitelist, but that's about it.
Ask HN: What book(s) changed your life?
I wonder if the owner of example@example.com experience the same.
If you take a look at the ios device support charts you can see that the trend is that every iphone gets 1 year more support than the device before it. My 2014 ipad is getting the upcoming update while 2 year old android devices get cut off and budget models never get updates.

I got this 2014 ipad second hand recently and it works more than well enough. I expect this is a big reason for a drop in sales.
To be fair this is not a new thing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_and_the_Internat... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Service-Members%27_Pr...

They literally have a casus belli to invade the netherlands.

To be honest, I do not find this to be that absurd. The only bad thing about this is that the US is not willing to punish their own war criminals.

> This administration is shattering any form of international cooperation not based on power and submission

The only other two things that I can think of are the withdrawal from UNESCO and from WHO (this one was justified IMO), do you have anything else in mind?
That must be an Easter egg.
After they come out with a 6.5" phone, they will need a clothing line with bigger pockets.
> I hate OOP and I'm pretty good at both FP and OOP. Well hate is too strong of a word. I don't hate OOP, but i definitely think it's a mistaken paradigm.

Thank you for demonstrating my point :p

This is exactly what I'm referring too. The use of hyperboles or blanket statement by experts, which are taken at face value by those learning from them. Whereas your real sensibilities are well reasoned, nuanced, and your disliking of OO is in the details. Not everyone can get that from your reaction. So it creates this fashion trend, it's trendy to hate on OO. That's not constructive, because experts also know there's a lot to learn from OO, and not everything about it is bad.
Koa.js just got a beautiful, auto-generated admin panel
It sounds like the free tier is more of a trial with 100k tokens total, not per month
1: ACLU gained membership after Trump was elected. So?

2: ACLU is not a strong proponent of individual gun ownership, according to the article this has been true for at least 30 years.

3: Article makes far reaching claim in headline but mostly focuses about a single issue, the changes to title IX. Clearly the author disagrees with the ACLU, but the article doesn't give any context on the issue. It's hard to tell if it really is an uncharacteristic position for them to take. I think the heritage foundation has hated the ACLU for a very long time, so that's consistent.
It does not follow that you have huge personal issues if you mistake a 59.99 price tag for 50 dollars and make a purchase, when you would’ve reconsidered it at $60. If that didn’t happen often enough, it wouldn’t be common practice.
I was speaking of two separate cases — Spam + legit mails; but no matter which, the sheer amount of mails make it unusable.
I always liked Ada, from my first reading around 1980 of MIL-STD-1815. Many of D's features were inspired by Ada.
I was recently in an Xbox party with 3 char anime/Japanese theme tags. I asked them why there weren't any numbers after their tags and they went on for two hours teaching me about OG tags and that his $750 tag was a steal as it wasn't just random letters, but an actual word. The other guy paid $1,500 and at one time paid $12,000! They explained you can buy them on IG or a site called ogusers, but that you should always use an intermediary who holds the account and your bitcoin, and acts as a security check middle man for a small fee.

They also told me about an MS website hack, where you could enter spaces into your name by changing the client-side javascript and entering about 500 spaces between each character and then filling the field with spaces until maxchar.
The strongest tidal influences (m2,s2,n2) are all about around 12.5 hours, i.e. about half of the discovered cycle of 25. So it seems weird that the moon theory was so easily dismissed. It doesn't even get a mention in the article.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_tides#Semi-diurnal
Not really. If the patient asked the doctor to be contacted at that address, the doctor’s not on the hook for obeying their wishes.
They are still probably holding class meetings online.

And the effort of converting everything to online in the first place can be pretty overwhelming.
Yeah, I have the same type of email, and I received legal and medical documents, letters from schools about students, tons of personal notes, and daily signups for services.

Its crazy.
They're spooks. This is what they're for. The constraints are at best just theatre, obviously their adversaries aren't going to obey these rules, and they know that so if they are to be effective (and if they aren't why would they exist at all?) they will also disobey these rules.

The purpose of such rules in practice is to help the American public to sleep at night despite having tacitly authorised a nightmare. You know the scene in Casablance, even if you've never watched the movie - it has permeated our culture Captain Renault claims to be shocked to discover that the club is being used for gambling, undercut by a croupier giving him his winnings.

If you don't want spooks to do what spooks do, don't pass a law saying it mustn't happen, don't vote for a government that promises they'll exercise oversight over the spooks to prevent it. Just get rid of the spooks. Congress could, if the American people wanted - which they do not - abolish these agencies entirely. They'd just cease to exist and while I'm sure some small scale abuses would continue you just can't run programmes to snoop these huge volumes on pocket change, and companies would be less likely to co-operate with informal requests than with the Department of Justice.

But as much as they enjoy bluster, Americans are afraid, and so the spooks will certainly continue to be authorised and "outrages" will happen when once in a while it is revealed that the spooks are doing what spooks do but nothing actually changes. Eventually it'll get to be so routine the The Onion has a pre-built news article for it like for the mass shootings.
Anecdotally: I have a 2 character GitHub user (https://github.com/j-) and I like to think I do more than name squat. I missed out on the 1 character user (https://github.com/j) by only a matter of weeks!
Google neither uses stock Android on Pixel phone nor release full source code of pixel phones, so why should only the Chinese be forced to do that?

Before anyone downvotes or questions if Pixel uses Stock Android, ask yourself why Pixels have Pixel exclusive features not available in AOSP or not used by Android 1 phones like Nokia
Can't that be said for most languages? Is there anything special that other languages do to make race conditions less likely than they are in Go?
I’m not sure I understand this. I’m working on a 100,000 line swift project and we don’t seem to have those problems.

For example I just added a data caching system where a generic DataCache is used by most data types, with a few more sophisticated caches for special needs implementing the same DataCache protocols, so they can all plug in to the same places wherever needed.

And a series of CacheRefresh objects that inherit base refresh functionality from a superclass, and just impose the their specific REST api calls. And everything is written as functional as possible, with limited state and parameter dependent methods.

It’s working great, any model that needs caching can have a data cache, and any UI that needs to prefetch data can have a CacheRefresh object for each type of data it’s dependent on. I’ve pretty much minimized boilerplate and redundant code this way.

So what am I doing wrong, or what could I be doing better?
Then the answer is no.

I will not pay more taxes indirectly for feelings
The Moon Is Rusting, Even Without Liquid Water and Oxygen
Garden variety, I’ve seen worse
> Solaris 4.1

SunOS 4.1
Global and Local Variables in Python
> People without experience come around and think they can replace an old tool with a better one

Just for posterity, the tool linked above that everyone is discussing here was written by the Go Lead Dev for cryptography and security at Google.
That's nihilism right there. There should be an international court and if you want to "judge" it you should have the credentials to divredit their work. Software developer is not one of them.
One more step towards dystopy.
Perhaps, but there is a small benefit to the consumer. A whole number can indicate the brand is positioned towards upper-class consumers and that a price conscious consumer should look for cheaper alternatives.

It’s not a significant benefit, restaurants are the best application I can think of, but the harm that occurs from it is similarity miniscule.
That's a point worth emphasizing. Functional programming is advocated as a means of simplifying programming. When you program with pure functions which always return the same results for the same arguments, things become like mathematics, expressions can be simplified and reasoned about. Yes.

But I don't see how such a purely mathematical viewpoint could fit nicely into the real-time world where processes evolve concurrently and can take different times to do things on different executions. In the real world things are mutable, and concurrent programming must take that into account. Therefore it is "complicated".
I think it's rather that the YT algo promotes channels that put out a steady stream of content more than channels that put out content once in a while. Animation takes a lot of work and thus time. This makes them much less likely to put out a lot of content.
You cannot punish an org without punishing people. An org is not something with feelings and isn't sentient. The people within it are. To punish the org, you need to punish the people that make the decisions inside it. Shutting down the entire organisation doesn't hold anybody personally accountable. They'll just go and get jobs elsewhere. It is a silly concept.
I hope there will be resellers. There is room for a lot of markup in the small volume.
Facebook Declares Kyle Rittenhouse’s Actions ‘Mass Murder,’ Won’t Allow Support
The 400$ SE seems to be pretty awesome from my 1 month of usage.
The highest impact things an individual can do, roughly in order are: Don't have children. Don't own a car. Don't fly internationally. Don't eat meat. Don't eat dairy. Don't eat imported food.

And you don't need to be a hardline child-free bicycle riding vegan hippy to make a difference.

Reductions in all those things will make a difference. Have fewer children. Choose to own a more efficient car and choose to drive it less. Reduce your long distance and international travel. Eat more plant based food and less meat and dairy. Eat more locally sourced and seasonal food. And there are other lesser impact things too: live in a smaller and better insulated house. Prioritise efficiency higher - choose to buy more efficient appliances. Use low energy lighting. Choose to live near where you work/play/socialise. Choose lower carbon impact hobbies and recreation, perhaps a sailing boat instead of a ski boat? Perhaps athletic sports instead of Nascar?

At a bigger picture level. Vote for the planet, appropriately prioritise climate change policies in your voting choices (and with two party politics, this can be difficult to do, don't vote in a facist just because they're a treehugger, but try to also not vote in your own self-interest if that candidate is deeply in bed with the fossil fuel lobby). Focus your career towards ecologically sound companies/industries where you can - actively seek and choose jobs with climate change in mind, if you have a choice between two roles consider carefully before jumping to the slightly higher paid fossil fuel job. When making or contributing to decisions at work, ensure consideration for climate impact is brought up where appropriate.

And make a noise. Be publicly unsatisfied, even if you have no solutions. Let other people know you care, even if you can't see any real way to make a difference yourself.
"There is 0 chance that this approach will have any kind of success in understanding memory and thought"

You don't need to understand it, you just need to be able to derive a correlation. Look, we've already been able to do this in a crude fashion with both brainwaves and PEM and fMRI.

What you're saying is that you'll never understand biology without studying DNA, and molecular biology, but you can "understand" a complex system at many different levels. Or locating say, the language center of the brain at a gross anatomy level is useless. All of these coarse grained high level scientific discoveries have advanced the state of the art.

Neuralink isn't try to decode the bits in your neurons. They're trying to construct a broad association between spike patterns and thought processes. We've already had success doing this, they're just upping the resolution. And to say that this can't grant your more than 0 insight into how memory works is as silly as saying that brain injuries to things like the hippocampus didn't grant any kind of help in understanding memory formation.

Put another way,
1) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1_yaQTR3KHI
2) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gWoPI-VoFV0
3) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fs2GDSYYCoA
State management systems are what OOP is used.

It used to be GUIs until React, Elm and such proved that FP style describing the end state is a better fit.

"Simulations" can be done in both real time state management OOP style or FP or data centric style with explicit time.

Operating systems are a good example for state management OOP. Linux is written in C with OOP techniques. FP with immutabilty of objects would likely not be a good fit because operating systems are expected to just run in thr background and to not waste resources (eg by copying full objects each microsecond).

Anything where Erlang shines is another good fit for OOP because its actor model actually is the original vision of OOP - objects reacting to messages.
Do the items on your to-do list, well, stay on your to-do list?
Maybe he means "comprehensive frameworks". The kind that do everything. The kind you probably shouldn't mix together.
It's nowhere near that simple though. CO2 is one big contributor, but not the only one. Methane is also a big contributor[1], and things like beef production are a big part of increased Methane emissions (by no means the only source).

[1]: https://www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/global-warmin...
>The founders leaned very much in the direction of aristocratic...

Besides Hamilton, they absolutely did not. They were just anti-direct-democratic because they were well aware of the logistical problems, and structural ills of prior democracies. There is no concept of "Nobility" in the United States. We have Civil Servants. People who as a consequence of their office, in many ways have much higher legal exposure than the normal citizen. All Citizens may take any office with only mild qualifications on Age, literacy, and how one is chosen to get there.

That is the exact opposite of Aristocratic. That leaning is a much more recent thing that has emerged out of nearly half a century of political and economic consolidation through wage stagnation and technological advancement paired with a complete dismantling of top-to-bottom wealth redistribution, whether by market forces/government action notwithstanding.

>>My words are a desire to see an amendment/law/ruling to go further in holding these leaders of our government accountable. As it's toxic to maintaining the social contract within our society, IMHO. If we are lenient on political corruption, even the foundations will crumble, IMHO.

The founders actually culturally understood this believe it or not. If you look back in history, you can find numerous examples of incitement to refuse to engage in base behavior in executing the duties of office. It isn't universal, but the examples are relatively generous in frequency of having been recorded. You can also find many of the Founders personal papers and nuggets of wisdom warning that there is no greater danger to the Union than to the undermining of it's legitimacy through unwise or impulsive action or political theater.

Abraham Lincoln came to treat his responsibility to the country as something close to religious. Franklin, Washington, Hamilton, and Jefferson all realized that a State would only last as long as the people running it could comport themselves as more-than-a-person in the fulfillment of their duties to the populace, and that the populace remained United in their respect and maintenance of each other's liberties, even in the face of taking on personal risk for the preservation of their fellow man's freedom.

Lincoln himself saw litigation and to a point legislation as a fundamental breakdown. The raising of an exception, if you will, of such a magnitude that it took the body of the Nation coordinated through it's elected Government to resolve the ill so rampant that not even a town could alone fix the issue.
I expected a totally different article based on the title.
Fiduciary License Agreement 2.0 (2017)
> if you're playing with v-sync

High refresh rate monitors tend to support freesync or Gsync. For minimum latency disable vsync, enable free / gsync. Only enable vsync if your fps is above the monitors refresh rate. Alternatively you can enable a framerate limit just below the refresh rate.
I'm just really curious so if you're comfortable sharing, can you share why are you looking for work?
I mean, if you 30+ years of experience, I assume you're at least 50? And considering the fact that you've generated this lifetime value, I don't think you have financial issues either.

My only guess is that you're mostly bored and you love solving problems
My personal style here is to use a number of goroutines equal to the desired concurrency. I know goroutines are cheap and there is no particular reason to conserve them most of the time, but this feels more natural to me than using a semaphore--although it is less flexible.

Simplified:

var wg sync.WaitGroup
wg.Add(jobs)
ch := make(chan workItem, jobs)
for i := 0; i < jobs; i++ {
go func() {
defer wg.Done()
for item := range ch {
processItem(item)
}
}()
}
for _, item := range items {
ch <- item
}
close(ch)
wg.Wait()
After one hour and 23 comments, you are the first one to notice it.

Shows that even on HN, the vast majority only reads the headline of an article.
It looks reasonable restriction.
> OOP is a superficial lowest common denominator of programming.

That statement seems out of touch of the decades of OOP flogging that it took to get OOP support to be a staple of mainstream programming languages, so that it could be a common denominator.

Just a some three decades ago, anyone using OOP terminology was instantly stereotyped as an ivory tower academic.
In operation crossfire hurricane, the FBI doctored an email and used its contents as part of an effort to get a FISA warrant to spy on a member of the incoming administration. This gave them access to listen to conversations of anyone 2 levels of connection away from the target.

They also withheld exculpatory evidence at the time of requesting the warrant, and relied on a fictional document paid for by the opposing political party.

This was used as a basis to conduct a 2 year long investigation into collusion between the campaign and the Russian government, which resulted in the conviction of Michael Cohen for tax evasion and perjury, and Paul Manafort for tax fraud, bank fraud and conspiracy all of which predated the campaign and had nothing to do with it.

Not only are these agencies spying based on fabricated evidence, they are using the spying to kick off independent investigations, each of which unveil various unrelated crimes, which they then prosecute.

The whole system is rotten to its core.
Some languages emphasize persistent data structures, or even enforce immutability, which means you can only introduce race conditions via explicit concurrency. That's a lot less surface area for bugs.
I've got [first initial][last initial]@[my email provider] and have come to find much of the mail I receive seems to be addressed to people with the same initials as myself. It's incredibly frustrating to find the same culprits over and over again. Do they not know their own email address? Or do they just not care? (I suspect the latter)
Don't forget that it all starts with business development, so consider the more holistic approach of BDSM.
Exactly to a WWs mentality. Before those wars[1] the mentality (at least for continental europe) was balance-of-power (with a brief interlude during which Napoleon tried to export revolution[2]).

... δυνατὰ δὲ οἱ προύχοντες πράσσουσι καὶ οἱ ἀσθενεῖς ξυγχωροῦσιν.[3]

[1] In another few centuries they'll probably be lumped together as the 31 years war or something.

[2] not all of which was bad. Afterwards, unlike the Bourbons, my country kept the best changes (e.g. the law code) and got rid of the worst (e.g. the french running things).

[3] If JFK were alive today, I bet he'd have half a mind to call these sanctions a dick move.
No, no, no.

Everything is a pointer-wide cell of bits, with a type tag.

Now we're cooking with gas!
Likewise, and I was like... wow that's surprising to see on HN!

I'm assuming that was the point of the title though ;)
My first thoughts when reading the title jumped to In Extremo and Saltatio Mortis!
SQLite running in wasi with a sync protocol, maybe like couch, or a CRDT depending on multiple writers.

When I use an application on the web, it should save data into my database not the app providers.
Concurrency is hard and we have very poor support for testing correctness of concurrent and distributed systems. Language abstractions help but they aren't nearly enough (as evidenced by this post). My team at Microsoft leverages Coyote to check the safety of our services against such subtle race conditions. We blogged about using it to reliably reproduce and fix a very subtle bug in a bounded buffer implementation over at https://cloudblogs.microsoft.com/opensource/2020/07/14/extre...

If you're using .NET in your projects, you can start taking advantage of such tools _today_. I would like for such tools and testing techniques to become more and more common place in the industry as concurrent and distributed systems are _hard_ and we should use all the help we can get.
Yes it is unethical, because it's there to trick people.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_pricing
> They literally have a casus belli to invade the netherlands.

> To be honest, I do not find this to be that absurd.

What? This is the definition of absurdity.
Whether a price is $59.99 or $60.00 conveys a notable degree of information to the consumer. I wouldn’t be quick to assume it’s taking advantage of people’s innumeracy.