skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It’s coincidental to my section of the universe you mention what you did in the first paragraph:

You are the third person this week I’ve heard make some commentary to that effect or another: “anyone else feel like WFH has made work easier for everyone else BUT engineering? My tickets haven’t slowed down an iota yet support and product queues are lower than I’ve ever seen them on the (Trello) board”
It wouldn't be popular if they also filtered it to a suspect's geoip range or other qualifiers.
Ask HN: If you could work at any company where would you work and why?
We all should.

Setting aside $50 a month, no initial investment.

https://www.calculator.net/investment-calculator.html?ctype=...

$100/month

https://www.calculator.net/investment-calculator.html?ctype=...

If you can't afford that, you're not funding JEDI.
nginx-rtmp can take a source and forward to multiple outputs.
Fairly more advanced is BBC's Brave which is more of an API-driven live video editor that can push to multiple outputs.
> If you're willing to bet [...]

> [...] knowing [...]

These things are not the same.
Will the chips be available on their own? This is the biggest problem with Raspberry-PI- I can't buy the CPU on Digikey.
There is no reason why efficient pricing of all assets is socially desirable. Efficient pricing may have a cost. Housing is a relatively illiquid market on a local basis. The way to make it more liquid would be to have people buy and sell houses more frequently. Sure we might have a finer grained understanding of what a given house is "really" worth at any given moment but what good is there in that information? Likewise what social good (as opposed to good for the individual speculator) is there in shares of companies changing hands easily and frequently? Liquidity has a cost. The cost of liquidity is instability (volatility) and short termism. Fractional ownership of a company should be a long term undertaking. Not a speculative position. Otherwise how can good corporate governance be incentivized if owners can jump ship at a moment's notice with essentially no cost? How can debacles like Boeing engineering failures be avoided when all that matters is quarterly appearances?
User 'potamic' made most of the point I would have made, so I'll address this:

> I get to keep tabs on friends without actively having to reach out. So people don't become strangers over time.

This is a fundamental perversion of the notion of social interaction. It proposes an argument whose form and frame substitutes people and relationships for a passive consumption of images of people and relationships. Instead of people becoming strangers over time (which is normal and healthy), everyone is transformed into simulacra of acquaintances or friends instantly; you are implicitly, automatically estranged from the beginning. Your Facebook-mediated relationships last longer than they would have without Facebook precisely because of its impersonal and inauthentic character which absolves you of the real effort otherwise required to have an authentic relationship.

To use it is to delegate an always-increasing portion of your social existence to the black-box of the Zuckertron, with all of the political, ideological, and economic implications, caveats, and perturbances that come with it. To wit: you've already accepted the argument, and you're here defending it with evidence amounting to 'everyone else plugged into the Borg cube is plugged into the Borg cube, together we all cube the Borg cube'.

Needless to say, I am skeptical that the niche Facebook has carved out for itself as the arbiter of who-and-what-I-see-and-how and who-and-what-sees-me-and-how is likely to work out in my favor.

Recommended reading: The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction, Walter Benjamin https://web.mit.edu/allanmc/www/benjamin.pdf
I can't imagine what you are trying to insinuate.

What's the difference between a trend and a slippery slope?
It is a combination of feeling powerless and feeling afraid.

The majority is more afraid of what will happen if the government does not find the information to catch the person trying to hurt them, than they are about the government finding information about them and hurting them with it.

Remember it is majority rules. Not even 80/20 but 51/49. You only need 51 percent of people to have less to hide. And people in the majority are typically not the ones that have things to hide for legitimate reasons. It is the people in the minority that are innocent of any wrongdoing , but be undesirable for some reason, that have something to fear.
Because if you don't have an Open ISA you can't have an Open chip. That it, if you ever want to use open source hardware, you need an open source ISA.

The RISC-V ISA with the Compressed extension is very competitive and often better pretty much anything else.

RISC-V also has an innovative modular structure that allows it to be optimally used in many different industries while sharing a lot of code.

The RISC-V Vector extension is really good and innovative. And so are some of the other extension.
Asset prices going up ad infinitum means you can no longer afford a place to live.

In fact it would mean that the only people who can afford assets are people who already have assets.

> "Or maybe it's because with rising productivity, capital has become more valuable over time."

We have 0.1% interest rates, negative in some countries, that indicates a glut of capital, not "shortage of valuable capital"
Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they don't want you to think they're out to get you.
Buying monthlies / leaps has been free money the past few months.
It's essentially nginx-rtmp as a service with an SLA (maybe?)
Rainbow tables: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rainbow_table

They are just trying to avoid a quick lookup in a pre-computed table. Adding a salt means they have to start from scratch.

Uniqueness is not really a factor, reversibility is. Given a hash will be fixed-length, and passwords can be an arbitrary length, you get a very large number of passwords mapping to each hash. But the key is to make them hard to find.

So for the server it's good to have a strong (which often means slow to compute) and non-broken scheme. Something like MD5 is just too fast to compute, if someone is targeting you in particular (and not the entire breach) you might have a bad time anyway. Some schemes have a work factor meaning the computer basically repeats calculations a lot to waste time, which a cracker would also have to do. This factor can be updated to keep up with computing power over time.

On the client the best you can do is not reuse passwords, make them long, and try not to overlap with any known wordlists (dictionaries, past breaches, etc).
So it turns out that Clojure is the ultimate data-wrangling tool yet there's no chance of earning a living with it. So much for innovation. Technology is a strange industry where conservative Java bondage and a 2-bit browser scripting extension with no stdlib reign supreme.
“At present, it's not possible to make bootable copies of Big Sur”
This is from Mapp v. Ohio, an old Warren Court decision establishing the exclusionary rule. It has long since been hacked to the bone.
They don't encrypt your password, they hash it.
Airport security is very similar (if more efficient) in non-US airports, so rent seeking can't be the whole explanation. As far as I know, in most countries security is done by private contractors and not a government agency.
Amazon already has IL5 certification though [1]. I have loosely been keeping an eye on all the CMMC stuff, but not in detail. What does Microsoft offer that Amazon can't here? I honestly would like to know, as it could be very useful information.

[1] https://aws.amazon.com/govcloud-us/dodsrg/
The culture aspect is big, splitting a viewership base across multiple platforms makes it hard to do things like community building, on screen chat, etc fluidly. These are especially prudent for small streamers, much more important than being on every platform at once.

Quality over quantity.

I could see this being useful for brands though, where a live stream is pure marketing maybe.
thanks, yeah that's what mean... but i see that the the core insight is that using salted hashes has an exponential decrease in the ease of finding and storing "hashed passwords" for a lookup tabke

So am i still in the right mindset to think that the "uniqueness" of every hash/ lack of collisions is still a valid area?

ie that the hash function is really unlikely to produce the same hash twice....
RubyKaigi Takeout 2020 – Ractor presentation by koichi sasada
Legislation isn't based on majority votes though...
Barf cascades! ;)
Wow, I didn't realize how many of these x86 extensions are basically just SIMD with more and more registers, even going back to MMX in the 1990's. It somehow looks like they never planned ahead and just kept re-inventing a slightly bigger wheel. Great to see RISC-V does it in a unified way.
The worst people you'll ever meet are always very forthcoming with insisting that they aren't monsters-- well before you've had any cause to question their integrity.

Consider their business model from day 1. It didn't take long before the allegations of email data mining started to surface.
How to Become a Successful Data Scientist
If I didn't know whether I'll be born in the bottom 1% or top 1%, I'd still choose a society that incentivizes wealth creation. Poor people in those societies are the richest poor people in the world. They have more prospects, they have more rights and they have more access to the benefits of civilization like education or electricity than the societies that promote the idea of taking away someone's property and make it difficult to start businesses.
I'm many days late, so I don't expect an actual response, but there's literally not a single article on the front page of that search that says anything that matches your original claim?

There's an article from the NY Post, which is literally a tabloid, that claims the "only thing keeping them safe" is people mistaking them for cops, but not that they were explicitly disarmed and attacked as a result?
> Consider Go, ... addressing them with the simplest solution possible.

Go code doesn't result in the simplest solution possible.
many people still don't realize google has been scraping and tracking everything you've ever bought, for years

https://myaccount.google.com/purchases
If you think the living arrangements of everyone in America were decided by "civic leaders", you need to get around more.
Couple problems with your conspiracy- this began years ago, it’s been in the works for a long time, it is being led by a democrat and has bipartisan supprt
Writing the requirements of a tender so that it can be won by a specific vendor is called “single sourcing” and it’s extremely common if you’ve ever sold to the government
Can bitcoins be stolen? As in, don't they belong to whoever can access them. What makes a bitcoin mine besides that?

Like if I guess your hash and transfer them, is that illegal?
I’m having to make my own options, which is the fun part. There is an incredible amount of opportunity that’s too small or not scalable enough for VC and PE. You can effectively do both at small scale and that excites me much more than dropping money into the market and praying. At the scale you and I invest at we can make a meaningful impact on the business with our money and involvement, where that isn’t the case for large companies. I like the prospect of small scale private equity where 1 or more people can vastly change the business, and be long term (not looking to raise a fund else investors come looking for a 2x return every few years). And btw, that is a structural problem with PE, they take huge amounts of money and “guarantee” 2 or 3x in 5 years, which means there are a ton of businesses which will never be attractive to them.

Dm me on Twitter, or email me if want to talk further offline.
DearPyGui Discord
Well, there are decentralized stablecoins on Ethereum, like DAI.
Proof that with the right software anything can “fly” (SN6 test hop from SpaceX)
Unfortunately it hasn't been updated for RTMPS (rtmp over tls), which is required/heavily encouraged for FaceBook Live.
Although, in some cases just having the hash is enough: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pass_the_hash

User PC gets owned, attacker elevates to admin, now has access to IT Support hashes cached locally which can be sent to other devices directly to authenticate.
The essential subliminal concept of Magic Carpet is that you're a dog running around peeing on things to possess them, again and again as your pee smell fades. That's why it's so great! It taps into and satisfies deeply seated behavior in your dog brain.
This is what all the people who are continually wrong say to excuse their failure.
This is going to be great fodder for some debates, thank you very much.
That's not the complaint. This is orthogonal to the AI vs ML vs stats debate.

It's "an AI/ML/stats model" vs "an AI." "An artificial intelligence" has baggage that's hard to pin down, like it suggests it has a notion of self or sentience or something.
It is worth noting that there has been a 40+ history of organized terrorism against commercial aviation with dozens of fatal attacks.

It’s essentially a law enforcement problem. I agree liquid rules are ludicrous but the current situation didn’t happen overnight, and also it’s not that similar to an infectious disease threat.
iOS Queueing, Thread-Safety and Synchronisation Notes
I don't understand why the article claims that Theme Park's view on such parks is cynical, as if "theme parks did not focus on user experience". They don't. Every single theme park out there has hours of waiting lines to do just anything. How is that even a good experience to begin with?
The government being beholden to any multinational corporation for technical expertise is a national security risk.
From quick googling:

https://github.com/praveen001/go-rtmp-web-server

https://github.com/gwuhaolin/livego

https://gitlab.com/valeth/javelin
First company: My manager met with me once over two years. It was 18 months into my just over two years stay, and all she told me was "We don't know eachother at all so I can't really judge your performance." She gave me the standard 7% and we never spoke again.

Second company: It was a huge joke. The CTO invented KPIs that were unattainable and didn't matter, and we were given raises purely because our contract was profitable.

Third company: We had such a ridiculous process of "Write three goals and go over them with your manager", which turned into "Just write anything so HR doesn't complain." The goals were totally useless. Engineers did not have the ability to decide what they worked on or how it went, but the goals implied they did. It was awful and, luckily, did not effect bonus targets.

I honestly think that "performance management" at most companies is a huge joke. I haven't seen it, and none of my peers have seen it, run successfully or be taken seriously. Companies want to pretend they care about your career trajectory and goals only until an employees goals require any legitimate effort from the company's side. The goals/KPIs are pretty much only successful if an employee sets those goals to be "Do whatever their manager thinks they should do", which I would argue isn't a goal at all.
I'd also be fine with something with a very simple framebuffer. They should consider throwing HDMI or display port or on their V1. Or hell, why not the "Display Parallel Interface" DPI thing that's on the RPI. I suspect they'd find the market for that would be fairly significant. At these clock rates and with multiple cores plenty can be done without acceleration.
Not even mentioning that the approach the author takes assumes that everyone is a rational player and will not actively try to undermine you and ruin your career if you (even inadvertently) point out that their project may have flaws. I’ve learned that the hard way.
I remember the Air Force Tanker deal, with the civilian official running the most obvious palm-greasing ever.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KC-X
I had the displeasure of working for a company that had a similar review system, but it was quarterly rather than annual. Total nightmare.
Other than initially temporarily getting pulled in to work support for Citrix for our large organization converting from almost 100% onsite to 100% remote with almost everyone who had been desktop dependent getting Citrix access overnight, I feel like WFH has made work as a dev easier. It hasn't reduced expected velocity, but it has reduced meetings that should be emails, drop-in interruptions, distractions from people doing conference calls on speakerphones in an an open office, facilities issues, and commute stress.
> I think what's missing from education in the US isn't more depth or breadth of facts, but the ability to think independently and critically

Absolutely. I've long thought a modern version of rhetoric is perhaps the most important class to mandate in a democracy.

At least one full semester of a teacher trying to lie or convince you of things using common approaches, coupled with an analytical study of what they are and how they work.

> We need to gain better awareness that if we're responsible for making an important decision, but we can't be bothered to become informed before making that decision, bad things will happen to us

IMHO, democracy is predicated on the ratio of informed_voters : total_voters. That ratio has never been 1, but it feels like it used to be higher.

I think the next version of democracy is going to use a pre-test of objective facts (so loaded!) to weight votes.
Should we boycott Bic if government uses their pens?
I don't usually have a problem with you posting TXR comparisons in every lisp thread, but if you're not going to take the time to understand what the library does, this is just spam.
People have been hassled by tech illiterate statists for ever.

People aren’t into collective action as it basically means admitting government has value, which is contrary to the propaganda model we’ve been fed for decades, so of course that ain’t an acceptable response from our cortex.

Politically feckless pudding brains whose cognitive dissonance is paralyzing works out great for the fascists.
Molyneux burned himself long ago with Fable, making extraordinary claims about the upcoming Xbox game and failing to deliver on something like 99% of them. At the end of the day it was a fairly simple game with evil/good branching.
It's just an open instruction set architecture. You can implement an open or closed source CPU on top of it.
This comment is such a broad generalization that it boarders on useless.
My bigger problem with the article is he’s fishing. He’s just throwing a bunch of technical parameters against all stocks and testing a few randomly selected time periods. Of course he’ll find something especially when he can wave off a model by saying oh it doesn’t work on X

Reminds me of https://xkcd.com/882/
You disclaim your right to bring suits against infringers?
I prefer to work for managers who recognize me as a person who can grow in the team. I get a lot of support because I foster a relationship that our combined success is important. Is this friendship? No. But it’s worked out very well. We both have our own friends. However, I haven’t ruled it out - we just aren’t a good match (often there are gaps between us in life stage).
If it’s a small/medium company/team - sure. But if you try doing that in a giant behemoth of a company as an IC - this is a recipe for quick burnout and/or ruining your mental health.
My very cynical experience:

> For all its flaws, the review process at forces a conversation where you get to summarize to higher management what you have accomplished and why it is important.

In my experience, they've decided it already and don't really care what you put down - unless they want you to get a promotion and then they will care as they need buy-in from others. Particularly, if they want to screw you over, then it doesn't matter what you've written (i.e. even if you put in great accomplishments you can still get a poor rating).

> Peer-review at least gives you a chance to call out outstanding work from your co-workers.

Same thing here. We used to require naming 3 people to give peer feedback. When they want to screw someone, the manager would actively seek out negative reviews to support his case - regardless of whoever you picked.

> And the review itself at least gives you a venue to hear what management thinks of what you have done.

I can agree with this - although where I worked they'll let you know throughout the year. I did have one manager who was very reluctant to give negative feedback, though, so I suppose this benefits the employee where the manager is at least forced to formally give you negative feedback.

Processes are good in general, but useless if the system doesn't value it. If the manager can actively go and solicit feedback from folks you didn't nominate, then why waste my time and the time of the people I did nominate?

I cheered when my company stopped doing annual reviews.
Isn't the problem that they are driving into a $10B contract instead of being agile and avoiding a single point of failure?
Agreed. Legislation will even take an infinite amount of time to pass when the political parties in power don't want to pass it (despite any ineffective posturing to the contrary).
Too often the basic rights of people with dementia are overlooked
People who read the NYTimes/WaPo are the ones who enjoy sound bite politics. Whether it’s a 8 paragraph article or a 20 second sound bite, they are the same class of understanding.

Someone who is ignorant and understands what not knowing something means eschews sound bite politics and any other simplifications due to all of the biases that come with any reduction.
https://archive.vn/NKNsD
My experience:
Most of the time, all it takes , is to beat the system..

In one of the companies I worked for : one hand we were doing marvels in automating stuff and repetitive work which saves ton of manual efforts and reduces human errors , and guess what ! its not even accounted for in the standard goals..

Sometimes you need to stare at the bullshit and say here we go and beat the crap out of it..
I just add a random thing to the end of the password that fits the criteria
That doesn't really mean anything, other than the fact that the technology has gotten insanely cheaper. It's much more relevant to the question to compare the relative costs to modern chips. I just thought it was interesting that we could actually do this using things relatively close to the original price points in the article.
"MS runs a lot of propriety IT systems" isn't a reason I'd want government using their stuff.

Government should run on open standards.
He did forsee that, if you read his writings.
> (even if limited to 26 letters and 8 characters that's over 200 billion different passwords)

Of course, if you're using a fast cryptographic hash function then someone with a good GPU can throw a surprising amount of brute force at the problem. A Tesla M60, which is five years old, can do about 1.4 billion SHA-256 hashes per second; Amazon will rent you a server with one of these for $0.75/hour, and cracking a single 8-character lowercase alphabetic password should take about 2.5 minutes at most. Half that on average.

(Functions like bcrypt help with this by being designed for slowness, and newer ones like scrypt also try to use large amounts of memory with unpredictable access patterns so they're harder to accelerate with GPU/FPGA/ASIC hardware.)
fractional reserve is an outdated myth, read "Money creation in the modern economy" by the Bank of England

https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/-/media/boe/files/quarterly-...