skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It’s really more nuanced than that though isn’t it?

The issue isn’t so much that TikTok is censoring content. It’s that they’re censoring content at the request of a foreign government.

I’m not a legal scholar by any means so I cannot really comment about the application of the constitution or other applicable law. However, it feels like it’s probably wrong to let another country censor the speech of US citizens, in the US.
On the age of cloud based runtimes and OS agnostic containers, Linux is an implementation detail of the server.

On Android Linux is an implementation detail, most of it isn't exposed to userspace, not even on the NDK as Linux APIs aren't part of the stable interface specification.

And ART is being ported to run on top of Fuchsia as well (https://android-review.googlesource.com/q/fuchsia), so...
Banning calls for the extermination of entire races is hardly the same as banning the discussion of Tibetan independence.
“I’ve got a phone number for you to write down. Are you ready to record it?”

“Uh...no?”

I imagine a jet pack forces some interesting takes on related technology that pilots are used to having access to when in a cockpit.
No, I believe what happened is that the "jetpack" was either hovering or flying at low speed, and the airplane flew by it. So the pilots could see it approaching and get a visual on the jetpack before it zipped by the side.
Emacs:

M-x pyvenv-activate

Or in your init:

(pyvenv-activate "~/code/python/venv_dir/emacs_venv")

VSC:

C-P
Python: select interpreter

It's pretty simple, and claiming nuget, node, and cabal/stack as superior means you're either lucky or inexperienced.
> In my email to mom, I'll write "Please open MyFile.txt" and when mom sees theat there is a myFile.txt and MyFile.txt in the directory, she won't have trouble figuring out which one I meant."

But if she (or any normal user) only sees 'myfile.txt' or "myFile.txt" or "Myfile.txt", she wouldn't respond with "that file doesn't exist." Instead, she'd be more likely to assume you made a mistake in your specification.

Read through the comments on the LWN article: case insensitivity is a practical problem because user-space implementations (such as samba) must perform an O(N) check across all files in a directory before confirming that a file doesn't exist. At the same time, existing programs that assume case-insensitivity (coming from the Mac and Windows worlds, mostly) are often none too consistent about creating 'foo.txt' but opening it (potentially from another program) as 'FOO.TXT'.
You can and could set up HFS+ case sensitive and case insensitive. Obviously, I recommend the former, and I also believe that is the default.
It not like it is hard work. You could easily do a second job at the same time.
The original maintainer (creator) did an excellent job for 10+ years. Here is his response: https://github.com/hishamhm/htop/issues/992#issuecomment-683...
Solve some of the Advent of Code challenges and you should be good to go.
You wrote:

>might provide clues how to bipass PS 4 security

>AMD users would like to get them

They got em:

https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Sony-Tha...

https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=LLVM-10-...

https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Sony-LLV...

Why do i want ANY PS4 specific security feautures in the Compiler??
Partly because it couldn’t be democratized back then. HyperCard achieved a lot of the Smalltalk dream for individual programmer/users.
Sexting is a direct erotic interaction with someone. It is not actually about the pictures per se. A lot of sexting doesn't involve pictures at all.
The probably passed him. Like a semi truck passing a turned up moped that shouldn't be on the highway (though the semi driver would probably just laugh and not call it in).
There's presumably quite a bit of work. Just like twitch or YouTube, to be successful is a huge amount of labor beyond what happens on the set.
It's quite conceivable. I believe my eyes; I read your words. But you have no evidence from which to justify your disagreement. If you genuinely are simply airing your opinion, and don't care about whether it convinces anybody else, then please don't post it to HN, since it is an actively anti-intellectual position.

Everybody's entitled to their opinion. They're not entitled to immunity from critique, nor are they entitled to have their opinion be true nor provable.
The resources, time and hardware implicated in the production of open source software, when all added up represent far more than US$99, in terms of value.

You may say that a FLOSS project has no bank account, but it does not have $0 budget (unless it has no value, and is produced with nothing of value, by noone whose time has value).
We've been trying to push back on cops murdering black people for like 6 months now. The ones with the monopoly on violence aren't really interested.
I get not getting it. But whenever I find myself in that position, I walk over to my closet full of Lego sets. That's pointless as well. But, you know, I have a $700 Star Destroyer.
How would that make things any easier? The kernel supports being built with clang now, and there’s no issue linking an object built with another compiler into a module either.
There is also Richard Browning in the UK: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EAJM5L9hhBs
Right, I will have so much fun when millennials rediscover shareware and PD.
> So one might ask, if all these highways don't even permit quick transit, what the heck are they doing?

Who said that Houston's highways don't permit quick transit? They do. They're just not equipped to easily facilitate a once-in-a-generation exodus of 8 million people all in one day.
I'm wondering if what actually happened is that Onlyfans leveraged the backlash around Bella Thorne to implement the limits they have been thinking about for a while, instead of implementing those as a reaction.
This is untrue. The entire design of Bitcoin was never to have exchanges, to entirely be your own money's keeper. You would have to actually read the whitepaper, have talked to Satoshi and Hal Finney and paid attention to it's purpose. What you said was an opinion. Not your code/node instance, not your keys, not your money. Bitcoin was not designed to custody your money to a bank, it was designed __against__ doing just that.
It is very unfortunate when something like this happens but it's very foolish to have more than 1-2 BTC in one privatekey. This guy should've gone through the painstaking process of putting one BTC, or even less, into 1400 privatekeys and new cold wallets.
How is that supposed to help all the small time developers that are trying to get started on a side project and want to distribute it to their 200 existing customers who Apple doesn't care about at all?
Passengers don't have a very good field of view compared to the pilots; they may not have seen it.
Indeed. Especially as companies like Palantir serve the tools on a silver platter.
I mean that it’s not a technical constraint or limit. Not that its trivial to do! If there is an ROI in keeping stuff forever, you can.

Think about what you’re saying about your personal project. What you’re talking about wasn’t financially achievable for TV companies just 20 years ago. Hell, anything older than a few days would be stored offline in some tape silo, or in a shelf. (And 10-12 people to attend to it!) Now you as an individual could afford to do all sorts of stuff with that video data, albeit for some significant $.
Thanks for pointing this out so eloquently. The computer is a lever. You still have to know how to apply it.
Great, hopefully it won't be too hard to set up.
Money with Law of Attraction – Steps to Manifest Wealth
That's the real issue. The target isn't people who can afford it, it's any horny guy, whether they are rich or poor. Rich people won't actually be affected by it, but it keeps some poor people in misery.

Also I would guess poor people are more likely to lack intimate affection, so they are probably the most common profile.

They don't have the income, but they spend the money anyway.
Pokemonmastersex is trending just because of a little error
I have a Pi-hole. That seems to block most ads.

"Needless to say, they don't like it."
Why's that? It wouldn't bother me any more than any other ad.
That is not technically accurate even though that fallacy/lie has been spread spread for a while now. The Constitution is the supreme law of the land … translation, it applies to everyone downstream from that, including politicians and the government of increasingly concentration of psychopaths (and no, that does not only apply to the current administration).

In order to understand this concept that is either intentionally or stupidly being manipulated, one has to understand that the Constitution created the government and, relevant to this point, protects preexisting, God given rights, from violation by that government; the Bill of Rights as most would know them as. They are actually not a Bill of Rights as people today would understand from the term, but rather they are articles of the Constitution that protect those rights, essentially laws that the government of psychopaths cannot violate to infringe on those God given, preceding rights.

So to your point, yes, the government may not infringe on the God given rights, but that also applies to all others whom are subject to the jurisdiction of the supremacy of the Constitution, aka, all people who are not subject to the primary jurisdiction of a foreign nation, aka guests.

You cannot pick and choose which of the articles of the Constitution apply to the government and now; or would you propose that slavery by the government is not permitted, but it is A OK for everyone else to engage in slavery? I understand the compulsion to evade logical consistency to rationalize how one article of the Constitution does apply and another does not, but that is not accurate and is inherently fallacious, irrational, and inherent uncivilized, brutish, and animalistic.
Does a 'fan' imply a subscriber? That could be the difference between a follower and a subscriber.
There is no easy answer that I can see to this dilemma.

Advertising driven platforms lead to people seeking meme type approval and are encouraged to share outlandish claims. On the other hand allowing government to set policy is obviously problematic (insert CCP, United Russia, or even the Dem or Repub parties in the US setting the rules). Other than perhaps dispersed federation (to cap growth) I don’t see a good way to manage this.
I think it's likely also some amount of wanting to support people. I know I've added subscriptions to some streamers I've always watched because I'm watching more of their content now that I'm at home all the time. It only seems fair to pay them for their work if they're entertaining me for an hour or two each day.

I don't care if they think I'm their friend. They're providing a service that I enjoy and I should pay for it, especially now when I have the money to do so and other people may not. If you could pay $5 a month for weekly episodes of your favorite TV show, I'm guessing most folks would?
"By banning TikTok with no notice or opportunity to be heard (whether before or after the fact), the executive order violates the due process protections of the Fifth Amendment."

The 5th amendment rights that they are asserting apply to people.

This brings us back to the question of "Are corporations people?"

"No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation."
Agreed, it’s not in the interest of my career. I was more just commenting about the GP’s thought that it might be more fun to get to only intervene for landing. Ten simulator landings will never outweigh one real landing, even if the price is butts in seats for 10 hours.
It works in vivo in cats and is already in active use, which should raise the odds of this working in vivo in humans by a lot.
Nobody needs 100% accuracy though, they just need better-then-current accuracy.
There are many mobile apps out there which work great and are offline first. For example the whatsapp client. So saying it is "fundamentally flawed" sound weird to me.

I have no deep knowledge of Firebase RTDB so I cannot do any comparison on that point.
Private organizations are allowed to decide how their property is used, including the type of speech it is used to facilitate. This is inherent to the concept of private property. I don't know why you think these companies are public forums. If there is a public forum in this space, it is the internet itself.

People who dislike the limits of these platforms have a variety of other venues on the internet to choose from, but what they are not at all entitled to is the automatic amplification of their voice by these large but private platforms.
I wish I could up-vote this 1000x. Scientific literacy is beyond lacking these days, and the number of people who even know what "in vitro" or "in vivo" actually means is even more staggering. My favorite are the people/groups who tout the toxicity of products like Roundup to skin tissue in an in vitro experiment, completely overlooking the fact that the surfactant used in Roundup to make glyphosate stick to a plant so it can be absorbed causes chemical burns to the skin if you pour it on and leave it on... which, in vitro, kills skin tissue. All of which says nothing of the toxic effects to human stomach enzymes of plants which have absobed glyphosate. But hey, it's a headline on which people will click...

Perhaps even more staggering is the illiteracy of people regarding the field of statistics. I have read that epidemiologists are constantly having to explain the statistics of their findings to MDs who know medicine but not statistics. If medical doctors are stumped by the language and rules of statistics I don't expect news editors or presenters to do any better with it.
Yeah whatever, have a good day.
Just in case someone on HN still haven't read the famous SR-71 speed check story: https://www.thesr71blackbird.com/Aircraft/Stories/sr-71-blac...
Time and time again we see the danger of letting an outside entity manage things for you.

They make things easy for you but when you disagree with the way they run things you're often left sol. And the cost to exit the platform is much higher now.
Show your work. Prove for us that the wavefunction of the universe is ontic.
Nobody is going to mention how this is an overly-hyped PR stunt?

edit: Nevermind, I thought the embedded youtube videos in the article was footage of the event described in the article. I didn't realize the video footage was a separate flight from 2015.
A VS Code extension that visualizes data during debugging
Maybe I'm missing something, but it seems like the foreword has little to do with the rest of the article. I was hooked after reading the beginning anecdote, but the transition to a general overview of security concepts felt a bit abrupt.
I agree with the general sentiment of the article though. I'm glad that there's been an increasing amount of attention placed on privacy lately.
Tsunami risk is specific to particular fault zones (subduction), a small fraction of all earthquakes.

And proximity to water.

Effects can be widespread (as with Indian Ocean), though that was a ~50 year event. Awareness, warning, elevation, and robust construction mitigate risk.

Earthquakes are generally infrequent (Japan and Chile are notable exceptions). Up to mag 7 or so, most structures can be designed survivable, though with poor construction, even mag 5 (100 times weaker) can cause widespread death & destruction (unreinforced masonry, stone, brick, etc.).
What if the model data is citizen reported crimes?
I think your knife analogy is poor. Banning/destroying data is not what privacy is about. Privacy is about ensuring no one has your data who shouldn't. Knife safety also involves ensuring no one has a knife who shouldn't, such as toddlers.

Assuming all information is public and fixing the issues that arise is like giving everyone (even toddlers) a knife and then fixing the issues that arise from that. There is no fixing the issues that arise from a toddler having a knife. The solution is to take the knife away, they should not have a knife. The same solution is there for data, take the data away from the people who shouldn't have it, they should not have it. Or even better, don't get a knife to a toddler/your data to people who shouldn't have it in the first place.
First, not really: moving means leaving your job (unless you can do it remote), and incurs significant monetary expenses. If you have a family it's even worse, switching school, etc.

Even if you do get to pick where you live, we live in a highly dynamic world. The quiet dead-end of today could change within a matter of months and have a highrise on it, especially given how cities are sometimes taking drastic actions to fight the housing crisis.

Finally, there's a difference between ambient noise and outliers. You can live on Manhattan and be naturally dealing with cars and people, but then your upstairs neighbor decides to get into drumming or start dating someone with 3 toddlers, and that's a whole different game.

Even if we take out changes from the equation, it's VERY hard to properly assess how noisy somewhere will be, even if you visit it multiple times. By the time you realize there's a problem, you're stuck with a mortgage or a lease and have to deal with it for a year or more.
Sorry to be pedantic, but your misuse of apostrophes in an otherwise perfect text annoys me.

All three uses of "it's" should be "its".

And I would just write "Mac Pros" instead of Mac Pro's".
Yeah, and really, all inputs to open() and co should be piped through a spellchecker first too.
Moving to another country is quite difficult unless you are sponsored by an employer there, have dual citizenship, or are rich.

Sure you can fly there, but your tourist visa will run out in a few weeks and they will kick you out if they can find you. So now you're on the run, and good luck finding a job, renting an apartment, or getting health care with an expired tourist visa.

Oh and if you're an American, you won't be able to open an account in a local bank because American banking laws control all banks everywhere.

The above are generalizations and some countries are easier to move to than others. And all of them IMO are much more difficult than deleting Facebook.
Personally I see this as a good counterargument for "just fork it." Imagine if chrome decided to crank up churn with the intention to exhaust forks. Maybe all forks would join together to fight google or more likely they would just fall behind.
Hiring a web company to set up your own site takes up front cash. Having a web host that can serve video and images is an ongoing cost. And those costs grow as your userbase does.

OnlyFans only requires you to sign up.

You could ask why people on YouTube don't hire web companies to set up their own site.
AWS Amplify is in a similar space. It supports several frameworks and the development workflows and infrastructure management are built in to the project.

https://aws.amazon.com/amplify/
Thanks for posting that. That was great.
And nobody on the plane recorded it?
Note the unit is px, not pt, it does not scale with devicePixelRatio.
Do they charge a flat fee or some kind of commission? If its a flat fee I guess it would be in their interest if its commission it wouldn't.
softer approach: add
```
set completion-ignore-case on
```
in ~/.inputrc
I think most of these things rely on whales. I know mobile games and twitch streamers receive a massive amount of money from less then 1% of their audience dropping obscene amounts of money. I imagine it's the same here.
Irmin-pack: a storage back end designed for tezos
> I can have cyclic graphs with mutable data without writing any unsafe code

You can, because the libraries that you use fallback to unsafe blocks. How about those who want to write these libraries without having to use unsafe?

> You will likely argue that using unsafe code in a library is just as bad as writing unsafe code, even if that library is used and tested by a lot of people and the unsafety is corralled behind a safe API. You would be wrong.

just because you think I'd be wrong doesn't prove me being wrong. Why should I rely on unsafe if I can implement the same algorithms and data structures with proper safety guarantees, but not in Rust? Why should I stick to Rust specifically for that matter?

> My current project is 170K lines of Rust code, and has 225 uses of unsafe. That's about 1.3 uses of 'unsafe' per 1000 lines of code. If I could write C++ code and introduce less than 2 exploitable vulnerabilities per 1000 lines of code I'd have an even higher opinion of myself than I already do.

yeah, it shows your personal commitment to Rust toolchain. This is good. But what if you've already acquired some knowledge of more powerful tooling out there, and you're given a task to estimate applicability of these two toolchains to the development of Linux Kernel?

> We should adopt proof systems that let us verify safety properties for those little bits of unsafe Rust code. We should not, however, make that a precondition for writing that vast majority of code that can be written in safe Rust in safe Rust.

Why shouldn't we do it specifically for Linux Kernel? Why shouldn't we use compile-time checks for element incusion, length-based non-emptiness of containers instead of implementing another set of runtime validators?

> Safe Rust is a sweet spot where the compiler and tools can verify a strong set of safety properties without the developer having to deal with proof systems and dependent types

How do you define a sweet spot? Is it indeed a sweet spot when it comes to kernel development? Why does this spot happen to be at the level of Rust type system, and not somewhere else?

> Trying to put the brakes on Rust and get everyone to buy into ATS instead is putting the needs of the few over the needs of the many.

I'm actually arguing here from a position of technical merit of two tools in the context of Linux Kernel development, but for some reason you bring vague and non-technical definitions of "sweet spot", "lots of people using something", "needs of the few vs needs of many", which I've not mentioned anywhere in the thread.
That phrase should be "there is no ethical consumption". To pretend capitalism is the sudden problem to the world is a feat of self delusion and dodging having any form of self-accountability. Because the world was a perfect place prior to modern capitalism? I'm not saying it's perfect, but seriously, quit pretending like it's the cause of the world's problems. The cause of all our problems is the fact we are human.

That and boycotting is political mob mentality. Needing a random person, you'll never meet or have a coffee with, telling you what to do so you can be a "a good person" in their eyes is bullshit. Do it strictly because you believe in your own ethics.
GetBlock together with DigiByte is holding a giveaway
To celebrate our partnership with DigiByte, we’ve decided to hold a crypto competition on Twitter.

2,000 DGB will be shared among 5 winners!

https://twitter.com/getblockio/status/1300358302669430786?s=20
ASK HN: Sedentary Effects of Remote/Office Work