skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Yup, we use “single tenant” as a major upsell to enterprises, and just run a kubernetes cluster for each of these, with their own maintenance / release cycles.

But we can only do that because they pay a lot of money for this stuff. Our “shared, multi-tenant” environment is an order of magnitude cheaper.
Do you think current and future interviewers won’t be reading these articles too?
Astronomers don't speak for themselves. Most of them are paid via government funding, and their job is specifically to do things that advance society in ways that the free market would not.

When they speak, they speak for the people, they speak for their students, they speak for the industries that are positively impacted by their research. If you impede astronomers from doing their job, we are all worse off because of it. The astronomers themselves are not impacted that much because they are still getting paid.
it isnt so much the channels that you want its the current IP of a non indexed IRC server[s] that you need, of course you could create and maintain your own dynamic IRC server and invite people that you trust or feel kinship toward.

here are a couple of "for instance" breadcrumbs for you to start from:

https://github.com/saileshmittal/nodejs-irc-server

https://ubuntu.com/tutorials/irc-server

...>>> https://github.com/inspircd/inspircd/releases/tag/v3.7.0
Manga is normally right to left (both pages and lines) because it's written with vertical text. "learn statistics through manga" type books are left to right because they're written with horizontal text (because of formulas, etc.).

(I don't know if I agree with the comment you're responding to, by the way.)

It's irrelevant for computers because text on computers is basically always left to right though.
> What exactly is CIS Image Sensors?

It's what you use to take a picture of the LCD display in an ATM Machine. An ATM machine runs on AC current and you need to enter your PIN number, which it will verify over its LAN network connection.
This really sounds like pure snake oil: a ton of buzzwords, diamonds and nukes to make it sound exciting and cool, an unbelievably long period of power release (how can they even test that their claim is true ?).

I'd pass until one of those devices has been tested by a slew of independent labs and confirmed to at least deliver the claimed power density.
Functional Transformation of Immutable Objects
> The problem is that customers, PMs, and managers often don't communicate clearly either.

Exactly. One of my favorite interview challenges is to write an input validation that checks for a valid SSN. The actual code should be pretty trivial for a competent programmer; but the real test is if they ask for what "valid SSN" means (123-45-6789, 123456789, 123 45 6789, all of the above?) If they jump right to the code based on an assumption, without even thinking or asking about it, that signals that they're likely to make such assumptions in the field.
Well the ones that stream live should be detectable by either sniffing wifi traffic or tracing the Ethernet cables. If they're not battery powered they should also be plugged in the mains somewhere, but not sure how you'd find them easily.

If they're battery powered and record to internal memory then you'd probably need to spot them directly.
Only in your world do the issues go away, but in those worlds in which "many worlds" is not true it is maintained as a standing issue.
I don’t see why people are downvoting. I’m not pessimistic, I just don’t understand for myself the real life applications, so please educate instead of downvoting.

That said, procedural generation is a great example thanks.

Also, whatever happened of Wolfram’s “A New Kind of Science”, or whatever it was called. He literally wrote a gigantic book on sampling the computational universe, but I’m not really aware of it being used, probably because I’m ignorant.
I guess if these kind of fires are “the new normal” for California [0] (and also probably Australia) we should expect that to carry over to how it is covered in the media, too. Reporting will become increasingly localised to the areas affected

[0] https://www.reuters.com/article/us-california-wildfire-evacu...
Portlandia studio guy is a good spoof on gear heads. People that think they have to buy the right amp or classic guitar before they can write their masterpiece.

I like that line from the departed, "im an artist, give me a fucking tuber, ill get you something out of it."
If you want to scale you share the apps and databases.

Nothing worse than having to spin up more and more instances and manage more and more hardware/virtual hardware/services as your customer base grows.
Based on what I've seen: They essentially "shut down the Internet" for probably a quarter of the global population for about 3-4 hours.

That response time is atrocious. It wasn't that they needed to fix broken hardware, rather they needed to stop running hardware from actively sabotaging the global routing via the inherently insecure BGP protocol. That took 3-4 hours to happen.

As an example: Being in Sweden with an ISP that uses Telia Carrier for connectivity things started working around the time of https://twitter.com/TeliaCarrier/status/1300074378378518528
Troubleshooting Containers with Sysdig Inspect
Disclaimer: I work on IoT and build things with little speakers and Blinky lights on them.

Solution: Curtains. As in, room-filling curtains, so people can do private things in an Air-b'n-box.
I was a TA for a programming languages course taught using this book, and it was one of the most enlightening experiences I've had: Implementing interpreters in Scheme to learn about recursion, environments, closures, objects, continuations. I think of it kind of as the dual of a course on developing a compiler for a static languages.
Can anyone comment on how secure this architecture is against speculative execution attacks vs. Intel?
100 uW is nowhere near enough for wireless headphones. They use about 70 milliwats of power, with a 1.5Wh battery lasting 24 hours. So you'd need three orders of magnitude more power.
> "Sorry, that explanation is just plain wrong."

I'm pretty sure I saw the same in my freshman econ textbook, long ago.

Tyler Cowen also speaks of selling slightly different versions of a product in the MRU video on price discrimination: https://mru.org/courses/principles-economics-microeconomics/...

Looks like Wikipedia's article also states the same: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Price_discrimination
That gets rolled into the price.

Now you know why software sold to governments starts at hundreds of thousands per year.
I create this website using webRTC to play torrent videos
https://popcorntime.tube/ on the browser
> Text within speech bubbles is generally left to right.

This isn't true in Japanese which is what limteary was asking about.
https://www.senteltechsecurity.com/blog/post/how-to-find-hid...
I can't say I follow that logic.

It's true that human benefits and profit don't always align at all points of contact. They do align at some.

Hence I don't think it's true that for-profit systems that are not focused on "making things that benefit humanity" do not actually benefit humanity. Bell Labs clearly has, even though it has had a concomitant commercial objective.

Conversely, it is also not true that not-for-profit systems necessarily produce human benefits -- sure, they can, but not always.

I worked in an university applied research setting for close to a decade before joining industry. I can tell you the incentives and pressures to produce something that "works in practice" and is "commercializable" (whether it is actually done or not) is much greater in industry. Not-for-profit environments are better for long-range explorations with high failure rates and uncertain outcomes, i.e. basic research. For-profit environments are better at the discipline of producing applied knowledge (whether it is actually applied or not).

That said, Germany has a hybrid model called the Fraunhofer model (Fraunhofer Societies do applied research and is 70% funded by industry/government) which produced the MP3 standard. So there are alternatives. But I'm not convinced the industrial R&D model is fatally flawed.
Are they speaking for the hundreds of millions of people who may get internet access for the first time though satellite based internet?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerald_Foos
How did you do the matrix raining code in the demo? I did not see it in the examples. I use an mp4 of that as a screen saver but would love it in terminal instead!
Trying to turn YAML into a programming language reminds me of Ansible playbooks.
Well, for one case, I’ve seen people work really hard to test a == b, or alternatively a != b when a and b are Booleans.

I think some classes were not mandatory in school, or people hated that class.
Well, the problem is that the reality we observe daily is not at all like quantum reality. We know exactly where our instruments are, even though we know that they are completely stationary. There is no particle/wave duality to tennis balls.

This is the origin of the problem of observation - the predictions of quantum mechanics break down at some point, and we have no idea why. In particular, this happens very clearly when our measurement instruments directly interact with a quantum system, so we call this 'the measurement problem'.

Of course, we can postulate that in fact, despite all of our observations, both subjective and objective, the classical world also behaves quantically but we just can't notice it happening (e.g. the Many Worlds interpretation does this).

We can also say that the quantum world does NOT in fact behave that way, but that the universe is perfectly deterministic and just set up in such a way that we can never observe events that contradict this vision of the universe (superdeterminism claims this - that for example you will always happen to choose the right dial on a measurement apparatus to observe entanglement, but that there is no fundamental reason why that should happen - it could theoretically happen otherwise, but in this universe, ever since the big bang, it has been decided that at some point you will set that dial in the particular way that will make you observe the entanglement result).

There are other theories that postulate that quantum mechanics is in fact deterministic, but very hard to predict, but there are non-local effects (deBroglie-Bohm pilot wave theory is such an example).

We can also ignore the whole hope of trying to understand all this, and simply use the math if and when we need it to predict particle phenomena.
We, the figures of your imaginative simulation, have free will, but have decided that you do not.
I used to think it was primarily Objectivism that was giving libertarianism a bad name, but the older I get the less hope I have that a libertarian government can succeed at the core mission: protecting its people.
The difference with the helicopter is that you can approach it safely from almost any angle to board/deboard, just don't approach from the tail, whereas this flying car thing has a ring of death all the way around the outside. And having the option of leaving the thing running has some advantages too.

I'm just not buying that this design solves any problems. At most it miiiight be a cheaper helicopter, but right now, it looks substantially less capable than helicopters too, and it seems like its failure mode is worse (helicopters can survivably land through autorotation even with a full loss of power; N-copters can't). So I'm not really seeing the benefits of this design.
We are rational creatures but we have imperfect knowledge. It's in our nature to advance through search and competition rather than attempt to preplan everything.
They almost all look the same (or at least have the same weird smirk). Is that an artifact of the methodology or is is a problem with the training set because all roman sculptors were trained by the same school?
I got curious and looked through sources. I'm not sure where it was added, but it appeared between 4.3BSD and the 4.3BSD Tahoe edition according to the man pages. It did not seem to be present in System III. Searching for actual uses, I didn't find any that weren't testing the functionality (unit tests) or hacking the stack.
Local consultants. Hire a local engineering firm or PR firm or attorney as a representative to do the handholding. You hire someone who knows all the right folks with a good rapport and a grasp of the technicals. Even paying someone who normally charges $400/hr for a few weeks of work who has the right contacts can reap rewards. You can structure those consultants with a lower base rate and a commission upon success.
If you spell everything out all the time, you will have laughable information density and hurt your user’s productivity. I would strongly object to that.

It seems natural to spend a little time exploring the interface of an extremely complicated instrument that is an integral part of your daily life, reading Tips, etc. That also means if this device is not exactly that heavily used (say you have assistants for that), you are spared of wasting your cognition cycles on simply being aware about all the features it has in store.

FWIW search field in Apple’s own apps like Settings mentioned upthread is revealed to me every time I scroll from the bottom back up to the top of the list due to inertia, I don’t know if they changed it recently or not. (Other apps often make a mess of the same UI pattern. In WhatsApp it is much more difficult to discover, requiring to really pull down and wait to see Archived Chats, and meanwhile Search field is just there wasting screen space despite being used once every few months.)

That said, I don’t have a strong opinion about message timestamps in particular—I believe there are ways of showing them smartly if you haven’t used your phone for a while and missed a bunch of messages without overloading the UI for people like me who couldn’t really care less about that (RIP my IRL social life as of late). Perhaps Messages could use more attention from a good product designer.
That’s great, anti-nuclear energy was definitely one of the anti-science stances standing in the way of progress.
and who should be the spearhead of this coalition?

Let's not forget that this is mainly a political problem and not a technical one. Would countries be willing to join a coalition with heavy influence from china for example? (or vice versa with the US).
Activision suing popular hacking installation website
Actually, thinking about it, if the glass wasn't completely flat, using the sides as clamps like in the iPhone 5 could work too.
> no kind of statistical reasoning makes any sense

Probabilities are useful when you don't have perfect knowledge. But yes, they are an illusion. In truth, every event has a 100% chance of happening. And things that didn't happen aren't real events, they just seemed to be possible, but we were wrong.
Mac and Windows have this functionality in the accessibility settings if you want to try it out.
> It’s the opposite of noise by making the logic more precise

There's cases where this might make sense (when things like truthiness are unclear). But in any of the cases I've seen, it's where things are pretty obvious and even when things are explicitly boolean types.

Write the boolean expression and if it doesn't fit or has lots of parts, define them separately above the conditional with clear names.

People seem upset by this, but idk it seems like common sense.

I'm not sure I understand how `if (someCondition == true) {...}` is preferable to `if (someCondition) {...}`
> We'd get the same thing if we actually defunded police and shrank the military in the US.

Only if we did it stupidly. We've done a fairly good job of it in foreign occupations prior to the Iraq debacle (notably, post-WWII, the model that experts warned should be followed for Iraq but which was not), we could certainly manage to not screw it up at home as long as the political leadership paid attention to pragmatics as well as (not even “instrad of”) ideology.

> We're one weak but aggressive left-wing elected government away from an American ISIL.

We already have an American ISIL (a militant, fundamentalist, theocratic politico-religious group), and their allies in the formal political system already run the federal executive branch, dominate the federal judiciary, and control one of two houses of the federal legislature.

Insofar as a failed political demobilization relates to them, it was the demobilization after the Civil War (which the battle flag of the losing side of that conflict remains one of their key symbols.)
You can just get on the phone with them. Talk shop for an hour. Tell them about problems your company is having. Ask them how they would solve them. An experienced engineer can determine a person's relative skill level this way.

Algorithm quizzes aren't the only way to reduce false positives. Can we say definitively that they are the best?
If the Go team made Goroutines types like ADA tasks, nobody would have to deal with any of the problems people using Goroutines have to deal with. This is yet another short sighted design decision made by Go designers. There would be no need for a context package at first place. The Go team tried once again to solve a language design problem with a library, it didn't work.
Just to be clear : I am talking about the book, not your HN comment ( for example at https://webrtcforthecurious.com/docs/01-what-why-and-how/ there are multiple examples )
Well, I consider org-mode friendlier than markdown, but besides the language differences you are mostly missing the Emacs goodies.

- you can weave this file to one or several code files, even export the plain text parts as comment on the language if you decide so.

- you can execute the code directly from your local machine into one, or different remote machines.

- you can use the output from a previous block inside another block, even preprocess it on another language before executing in another block.

- you can get the results recorded on the same file you're executing so you can also document what would the results be for executing x command.

- if you use Emacs as another tool, you can easily send the results for example on email, slack, irc or whatever system you can interact with on Emacs. I think confluence made it harder on recent versions, but previously I was able to generate documentation pages and easily upload them to confluence without worrying about format or even upload.
> The stock market is supported by ample goverment intervention, the rest of society not at all.

Mind clarifying this with specifics?
Flyin Ryan, thats great. I like no-neck newman
In fact, all statistical experiments, from clinical trials to observations of Bell's Inequality depend on the idea that there exists either free will or true randomness (and that we can base our decisions on that source of randomness). If neither exist, then there is no such thing as statistically independent events, and no way to make statistical observations (since that would imply that your choice of what to measure would always be correlated with the result of your measurement).
How is that multitenant? That's just running a separate instance of application for each tenant.

I agree that it is a completely valid approach, especially if you can afford it, but in my opinion it is just a single tenant application that can be easily spun up. For example, what if you want to manage all of your "tenants" within an admin interface. With a separate instance for all your tenants this is not really possible without additional development or a completely separate admin application.
كلمات اغنية لبى الغزال بدر العزي
It's pretty interesting the top favorited articles are about learning. It's a good list for finding curated educational resources. The top ones are really mind blowing in execution.
Republicans will use their fear mongering tactics, point to Chernobyl as an example of why nuclear power is bad. Also, it goes against what their base wants - coal power.
I use neoranger to do exactly this.
It might not be in the headlines on major news, but there are updates from local cal fire every day. I’ve been following cal fire scu posts on twitter. Currently 375k acres and 40% contained as of yesterday. People living in the evacuation order areas are starting to be allowed to return home. Not a lot of structural damage out here as it’s mostly wilderness, but the other fire up north in the Sonoma area has burned through multiple buildings and homes afaik. I don’t have much information on that one though since I’ve been so focused on the one close to home for me.

Edit: https://twitter.com/calfireSCU
Tell me about the 'superworld' that hosts the many worlds.
You can use the matrix effect by adding `<!-- effect=matrix -->` to the top of your slide! :)

These effects are supported right now: fireworks, explosions, stars, matrix, plasma. I plan to add more asciimatics effects soon!
The thing is, for the Horcrux to have any effect at all you need at least three devices per endpoint. And at that point using split TCB architecture is much better as under some assumptions it's provably secure against remote key exfiltration. See my work on TFC here: https://github.com/maqp/tfc
I'm talking about something different, which is the actual current timing of the day/night cycle relative to people's daily schedules. I'm assuming daily schedules (e.g. show up at work at 9, leave at 6) won't change, so the distortionary effect would be on 8 months of the year by changing to permanent standard rather than only on 4 months of the year by changing to permanent DST. This means that e.g. the available sunlight on my bike commutes to/from work would be changed in 8 months out of the year from what they are now by switching to perma-standard, vs only 4 months out of the year by switching to perma-DST. Schedules for things that rely on day/night cycles would thus be more disrupted by being upended for fully twice as much of the year with perma-standard as with perma-DST.
If we "build and maintain one system", we are maximizing our chance of accidentally having zero working systems.
> They always end up with few people gaining power over everybody else

It sounds a lot like a famous democratic country with that 1% thing
Thanks again! I loved that presentation! Looking forward to a longer one :D
The opposite of this is common in restaurants in China, particularly rural restaurants. You enter and are invited into the kitchen area where you discuss what ingredients they have and approve suggestions for dishes. I enjoy it, though the pressure to make fast decisions can be overwhelming with the language barrier.
For the uninitiated, nuclear power is actually much, much safer than it was in the previous century, and fossil fuel power plants have killed exponentially more people through pollution than all nuclear power accidents combined – it's just not something that happens all at once so it doesn't seem like a big deal to most people.

We will not be able to "defeat" climate change and keep this planet inhabitable for future generations without mass adoption of nuclear power.

> Nuclear energy is by far the safest energy source in this comparison – it results in more than 442 times fewer deaths than the 'dirtiest' forms of coal; 330 times fewer than coal; 250 times less than oil; and 38 times fewer than gas.

https://ourworldindata.org/safest-sources-of-energy
I write this with the upmost hope in the future success of private space sector, and with a desire to live to see Mercury turned into a Dyson swarm and to be part of the initial colonisation of Mars or Luna:

There are other ways to get cheap internet, and these satellites serve low-population rural areas much better than they serve cities where most people live.

(Also: Musk does seem to care about the effect on astronomy, presumably because his drive is “prevent human extinction” and astronomy can help with that).
Just tested and `(require foo)` works fine in `#lang eopl`.
That is, if you define `define-macro` and put it in package, say, `eopl1`, then you can use

#lang eopl
(require eopl1)