skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
If you're a 1 in 100 type, you've likely had feeling that because you're more capable than literally almost everyone, you should be achieving things more like the people you read about in books or online. But unless you've read 80 million biographies, those people are not 1 in a 100. They're more like 1 in million. And once you reach the truly great, like Einstein, then it's 1 in a billion (or more).

You are not 1 in a billion. You may very well be 1 in 100, though. And that's still pretty incredible. Take, for example the author of this article. She might think that she's not extraordinary because she's not an Einstein, or whatever. However, she works somewhere called "the Quantum Matter Institute" -- that's something that 99% of people probably could not accomplish. So honestly I would be surprised if most people who knew her didn't think that she was extraordinary.
Do you recommend vitamin D3 or D2 and why? Please advise.
>Plays For Sure(tm) (that name still makes me giggle)

On Linux we just have the WorksOnMyMachine certification, which is accordingly crowdsourced.
Switching the voting system to approval voting[0] is probably the most effective action for how simple it is. It would greatly help solve the prevalent "only two parties are viable" problem, which should help remove the need to push for extreme viewpoints.

[0] https://ncase.me/ballot/
That's not necessarily true. Helm is a way to install things, it is not a replacement for an artifact store. Binaries are still required. Besides, not everything can be containerized. In the finance industry that I work in, we do push k8s a lot, but regardless, there are still many things that simply cannot just be pushed to containers without serious re-writes. Artifactory is a lifesaver for us, especially when it comes to handling proxy servers for library repos (npm, nuget, rubygems, etc).
You think Amazon, Microsoft, and Google taken together are not a major customer of Intel? That's preposterous. I bet they are #1, #2, and #3 buyers of Xeon CPUs taken individually.
You mean react renders the UI at high FPS needlessly, regardless of any changes?
Consoles have a very different purpose from phones. Niche gaming-focused item vs general purpose computer (that was apple's ipad marketing at least)
lsp-mode recommends the same on its guide for improving performance: https://emacs-lsp.github.io/lsp-mode/page/performance/
I think PostgreSQL actually is a bit of an odd one in that it relies on the OS to do proper caching of whatever data is read from disk. It has its own buffers for various things, but I'm pretty sure it doesn't (yet) implement its own disk cache.
I would define it as a file that is distributed for use among many decoupled hosts and which is generated from some sort of source input.

Packages/libraries such as those used by NPM and Pip are some examples. It may also be an entire program, an OS package, a virtual machine, a Docker image, even things like PNG images.

Artifactory has tooling to make it easy to integrate into typical build pipelines.
Reproducibility is about understanding the result. It is the modern version of "showing your work".

One of the unsung and wonderful properties of reproducible workflows is the fact that it can allow science to be salvaged from an analysis that contains an error. If I had made an error in my thesis data analysis (and I did, pre-graduation), the error can be corrected and the analysis re-run. This works even if the authors are dead (which I am not :) ).

Reproducibility abstracts the analysis from data in a rigorous (and hopefully in the future, sustainable) fashion.
Those edge cases describe most of the software sold through the MS store...
I agree with the the article - mention directly the problem (context & your own problem) in as few words as possible to allow people to understand if they can help or not.

Same thing about "Do you have a minute?" (most of the time in the company's internal chat, but sometimes as well on the phone) => I'm really working most of the time on stuff that might range from bureaucratic things to confcalls in major incidents => mentioning the context&problem would allow me to take an informed decision.

Having said this, I do fall into this trap from time to time :)
I think this also assumes that the 2 major parties have coherent, consistent ideologies. On the contrary, it seems to me that each of them are fairly diverse coalitions with not a small number of fierce internal disagreements, who are forced to come together because of a winner-take-all, first-past-the-post electoral system.

What if there are millions of sides?
I did it in .NET Core a bit less effortlessly, by adding a sidecar with some profiling tools, adding a few environment variables to the .NET Core process, and execing into the sidecar. Instructions: [0].

I believe kubectl-flame can support .NET pretty easily since it works the same way: "Interaction with the target JVM is done via a shared /tmp folder."

[0] https://github.com/joe-elliott/netcore-kubernetes-profiling/...
The company I work for uses it for the same reasons as yours. We also have to use it to cache things like NPM and RPM packages. Without that caching, we would be putting a strain on public mirrors. We additionally have a layer of security because we have a system for approving which packages and package versions go into our cache.

They also have an XRay offering for scanning things like Docker containers for vulnerabilities, although for various reasons we do not use it. I wish we did! It would keep things integrated.

The main reason why we use Artifactory, though, is because it allows us to share artifacts across different regions and environments.

The one thing I don't like is how stingy jfrog is with their licenses. It makes automatic deployments of Artifactory a bit difficult for us. Their Mission Control offering isn't enough for the way we deploy Artifactory.
I do the same but with a # to comment it out
No doubt. I'm just saying what would benefit them. They already have the infrastructure for developing cross-platform software. If this suit, taken to its extreme, breaks Apple's hold on the iOS app store then MS would benefit greatly by having their own app store which worked across their OS and the two primary mobile OSes.

As I understand it, though, there's little motivation to sell software on Android versus iOS right now due to the relative lack of sales (that is, iOS users consistently spend more an applications than Android users). I doubt there'd be much incentive to invest in an app store infrastructure on Android right now given the poor expected return (going off of my recollection, Amazon's app store has not done particularly well, what would differentiate MS's from Amazon's right now?). But if you could have the same app store on both iOS and Android, you'd place yourself in a much more compelling position (for users and developers).

And since iOS users have demonstrated a willingness to part with their money for software, it's a better target for companies like MS, Steam, Epic, and others than Android (or Android alone).
This is also the motto of Golang, which is also the reasons it is one of the most practical programming language out there for getting stuff done.
GitHub Actions with your own GPUs
Dammit, I have been playing for two months with mockups and dirty quick PoC for something like that an now someone actually made it.

Congrats to the author, now off to check it out :).
While I conceptually agree, practically - this is a naive take on protecting self interests in an altruistic externalities where if you follow such leaders, the “hawks” amongst the “doves” will wipe out the entire population of doves.

Extreme take of your stance would be to say that we should hold to a higher standards and not strike back if an enemy attacks us because we are peaceful. We should strive to be peaceful, but when time comes, the response should be appropriate to the threat posed.

China should be excluded from the WTO if they don’t want to play a fair game with others.

I admire your righteousness though.
I bet they will eventually wrap it up, as they can't keep up with AMD, and Intel RnD, and given the restarting of competition in X86, and thus falling prices.

Pretty much the only way they could've done that economically, in relative terms, was at the time of obscenely high prices on high core count xeons.
Drink at least 8 glasses of water a day. Is there Scientific evidence for 8×8?
It will make a significant difference for specific species of birds, such as assorted eagles and other raptors, that generally live away from cities with their tall glass buildings, and that would quickly kill any house cat foolish enough to try to take them.

Wind turbines tend to be built in the same kind of places those birds hunt.
There is a site with some data on supplementation's effect on serum D3 levels. Short version, they are effective.
https://www.grassrootshealth.net
If the game itself advertises a cheap DLC available on some other store, it will continue to be sold in brick and mortar store for sure.

This censorship of in-software messaging is something Apple has normalized and is new at this scale.
I mean, the basic idea behind an elite school is you have:

* A community of rich folks who get to look smart-by-association

* A community of smart folks who get networked into the power networks

All the decision-makers would lose out on this. Why would this even fly? George Bush Jr went to Yale and Harvard. He looked smart. And, a bunch of people were friends with the President. Folks like him make the laws.
Could the U.S. govt not subpoena a U.S. company for information, giving them the same power people are worried about China having?
What if I want to hook up my Maven builds to Artifactory, how does Helm help me?
Gradient Descent from Scratch in Python
Re-vengeance breaks the MGS mold but it is still a MGS game and it is also worth playing it. The last boss sounds a lot like POTUS
ECCV 2020 Best Paper Award Goes to Princeton Team
For all you know the "good enough" crowd were also trying to game your scores, but just sucked at it.
Has there been a delivery service that didn't have these issues? Raising the prices is effectively the only means, people don't seem to be put off by how much Instacart can jack prices; Costco even warns you the prices are much higher if you choose this as delivery.

Pizza chains and others who own their delivery process can at least set where they will deliver and tend to encourage bigger purchases to avoid delivery charges and hopes of fresher food.

I am going to assume the only type of agreement would be tighter integration with restaurants to the point the service name is hidden, as in contracting out drivers to particular restaurants but the difficulty there is guaranteeing a driver is always available. Basically an outsourcing for drivers. Restaurants get some filtering of drivers and drivers have a set number of stores with instant familiarity.
Many (or even most) PS5 users will not be able to purchase from physical stores since the cheapest model does not ship with a BluRay drive. And it's likely PS5 Pro or PS6 will not support this model at all.
"There is a real magic in enthusiasm. It spells the difference between mediocrity and accomplishment."

- Norman Vincent Peale
A big cohort of economists would argue that the recent[1] German success comes in big parts because of the Eurozone, and how Germany is draining the Italian[2] industry because the Euro is too strong of a currency for Italy (because of cultural reasons, regarding saving behavior along others, Italy has been used to a way higher level of inflation than what Germans could withstand).

[1]yes recent, the situation was way different in the early 80s

[2] this applies to France too, but to a lesser extent.
It's our private maven repo. Works well for that.
If my trademarked logo contains a red circle and you file for a trademark on your logo, which contains a green triangle, will I lose my trademark if I don't oppose yours?

No reasonable person of sound mind would ever confuse the two logos in this case.
A comprehensive explanation is less efficient than a cursory explanation.
The downvotes to your comments suggest that people here either don't agree with your argument, take issue with the way you're presenting it, or both.

I'm not claiming a moral high ground, I'm suggesting that there's a flaw in your reasoning. If something you do or want places an externality on other people, then you don't automatically get to claim that behavior as a right just because you wish to be left alone. The other people who are affected by the consequences of your actions have a right to a seat at the table, and they're going to tell you to grow up, because you don't live in a vacuum. That's not a moral high ground, that's just how life works when you live around other people.

In this case, one externality is that when you or others like you get sick or injured without insurance, society picks up the tab. Society would rather not pick up the tab if they can force your wealthy employer to pick it up instead.

If you want to make an effective counter-argument, you need to explain why your position doesn't actually place this cost on society, or suggest a different way for this cost to get paid.

"But muh freedom?" is not a good counter-argument. "Why has society chosen to pick up the tab?" is a valid question, but is not a counter-argument.
Oh thx!
Because rockets have tight tolerance requirements, but very low reliability requirements. Consider this case [1] where missile software leaked memory because it would blow up before it ran out of memory. It would hardly be reasonable to state: "If missiles can leak memory, then why shouldn't that be okay for a car." even though missiles are probably more advanced, complicated, and more difficult to make than a car. This is because the "features" are largely orthogonal from the "reliability" of the features which is really a measure of how consistently the features as promised are delivered.

In the rocket case, you need very tight tolerances, but it does not matter much if it fails 1 in 1000 times since the total-system-failure rate is on the order of 1 in 100. A single 1 in 1000 failure mode does not massively increase total-system-failure rate. However, in the car case the tolerances are worse, but the requirement to consistently deliver on those tolerances is vastly more important. Consider Ford Pinto which sold 3,000,000 cars and had 27 deaths attributed to the fuel tank design defect. A 1 in 100,000 failure mode is viewed as an unconscionable deathtrap, so adding a single 1 in 1000 failure mode would make your system 100x deadlier than the most egregious example of an unsafe system.

The prevailing rate of system errors tells you what sort of errors a quality assurance process can detect. If you have 1 in 1000 system errors, then it means you can probably detect things on that order otherwise your system error rate would be dominated by those higher frequency errors. However, you probably can not or do not bother to detect 1 in 1,000,000,000 errors since they would either happen so infrequently compared to other errors or not be worth solving since they have such a minor impact on overall reliability.

So, in summary, reliability is different from tolerances, techniques used on low reliability systems are not necessarily applicable to high reliability systems, rockets are on the order of 10,000-1,000,000 less reliable than cars, so technology used on rockets does not necessarily apply to high reliability industries.

[1] https://groups.google.com/forum/message/raw?msg=comp.lang.ad...
> this is how social justice views it

I don't know exactly what she means, and you are presuming a) that you do and b) that it is something deceitful. If you can't do facts, attack the person.

> It's illuminating that "un-erasing" is coming from edgy personalities elevated at the NYT and not the broader academic community

Again, you're throwing dirt. I'm damn sure eg. the trail of tears is well documented by academics but is it covered much in schools? Is slavery?

> because a NYT personality probably isn't likely producing original, creative content but waging a tweet war

That's a descent to mud slinging. I'm not impressed.

Again, I see that you haven't answered my questions. Why not?
How would audio/video format solve the problem though?

A lot of communities have been moving to chat platforms like Discord, Slack, etc. They definitely help to get a faster answer.

But in any case, responsiveness depends on the community health and on how well the question is prepared and clear.
Sure, if that's how food delivery works where you live, then I'm sure that the SF/Silicon Vally type services works better. But that's because the service suck where you live.

Most fast food place either use JustEat or Hungry to accept your order and take your credit card information, if they don't have their own website or app. They will have their own drivers, employed and paid directly by the restaurant and they don't expect a tip.

That's what I compare any "startup" food delivery service to. So they will always be worse and more expensive, because a third party is now involved.
Well, they could use different rate limits depending on the size of the image. Say if the image size (or the size of the added layers) is in line with what we want for dockers you could offer different rates. Unlimited for images <10MiB, high limits for <100, and low limits for everything else. That way they both push for small images, and keep everyone happy.

Or people will just add a proxy/imagestream in between instead of directly pulling from docker hub.
I understand that GetComponent is a runtime lookup, and what I'm arguing is that Unity made the wrong choice. Runtime lookups lead to more bugs. They lead to slower code.

The best practices that have sprouted up around GetComponent say "Use GetComponent<> only in Awake(), and don't use AddComponent or RemoveComponent at all." But once you start following all these best practices, you've lost all the benefits of having GetComponent be dynamic in the first place. So just enforce it at a code level, and give me the benefits of static typechecking and compile time errors when I screw things up.
Is taking 100mg of chelated magnesium 3-5x a day harmful to by health? I've been taking this for a while now and just found out it can increase calcium to dangerous levels (citation needed). Please advise.
Eleminder – GitHub and Gitlab Pull Request Reminder for Slack
Being Mozart was often in debt, it wouldn't make sense that he wanted to please musicians over paying customers. But who knows. Maybe his desire to test the limits of music subconsciously overrode financial worries, and that's why he was always in debt.

Most creative pioneers have a personality quirk or two.
I use web-mode, tide, react-snippets combined with yasnippets, and prettier. You can see my config [here](https://github.com/jidicula/dotfiles/blob/master/init.el#L61...) (or search for "react-snippets" if that line number is outdated).
dont change my cursor and to be honest, i cant stand the font.
The only difference between top colleges and not-so-top colleges is admissions and endowment.
If the number of "sides" is unbounded and it's necessary to acknowledge, consider, and respond to all points/beliefs from all sides, then it's functionally impossible to do what you're suggesting. Especially so when there are trade-offs to prioritizing one belief system over another and not an ideal outcome for all people.

I think, at its very core, the exercise of trying to "solve" politics is misguided. It's naive to assume that there are objective truths that can be distilled from rationally deconstructing peoples' political beliefs. There is a huge emotional component to any individuals' framework of beliefs, whether they will admit to it or not, and I strongly believe this is a good thing and part of what makes us human.

I see very often here that people try to totally factor out emotions from their thinking and think like computers. While this makes for good storytelling tropes (characters like Elliot Alderson or L from Death Note), it makes for bad human beings. We should be embracing the fact that we are emotional beings and encouraging passionate behavior, at least so far that it's not used as a bludgeon to "destroy" other people.

I think a better exercise would be to accept that people have different beliefs and encourage constructive debate based on curiosity and empathy. All too often people throw around the idea that a plurality of people in their countries are "evil" - and I think it comes from a place of fear and ignorance. It will be more fruitful and interesting to break down peoples' barriers rather than change them or figure out who is "right."
Saving the Web with Tiny Amounts of Money
I checked https://www.reddit.com/r/Denmark/comments/ifkfsi/tre_ledende... - seems like noone really understands what's going on. Internal drama?
> get at least 15 (and preferably 30) minutes of direct sunlight exposure each day

This time is directly proportional to how much skin you expose to the sun. If it's only face & hands you need a lot more than if you're in the swimsuit.

It would be interesting to know what clothing the 15-30 min tip assumes.

Also, sunlight through a window does nothing. You need the UV light.
NixOS is insecure -- unlike Windows, MacOS, iOS, and Android, it has no application sandboxing.

Not sure anybody uses Qubes.
> Information on how this actually works is scarce since relative to the US there is much weaker rule of law/discovery, and fewer independent journalists, considering how tightly China controls and polices which journalists are allowed in and what they write about.

I think this has more to do with our ignorance of how their system works than China having a truly ruleless society. Even the Mafia has rules governing their behavior despite not being a democratic organization.

> "Companies in China, including foreign firms, are required by law to establish a party organization, a rule that had long been regarded by many executives as more symbolic than anything to worry about."

I think after the Snowden leaks we’ve been shown to have similar opaque government compelling private company scenarios. There are also the opaque national security letters. After 9/11 we traded a lot of our freedom for security in much the same way “communist” regimes like China operate. At this point we practice most of the same things, which is probably why we know that China does what we do (perhaps even more).
It's 4, Snowflake as well.
If you’re using docker for production distribution of images, you should be paying for it. That’s exactly the behavior that creates the need for a limit.
Are you saying that you wouldn't suggest supplementing in young deficient males, who are otherwise healthy, or just that the evidence is unclear on the benefits but it's still probably worth supplementing in that case, under medical supervision?
One of my favorite colleagues is just an average developer, but he’s also very funny. He has figured out his niche and excels at it. To leverage strengths, it’s often helpful to understand the team.
Number of people working for intelligence services in my country: around 2000.

Number of people working in education: 342100.

It won't make a dent.
Well, there's always the Roko's Basilisk folks
> Essentially the internconnectedness of everything is making it hard to find the niches you speak of. There's always someone who loves his job so much and works at it so much that he defines the meta, so to say. This is a problem in computer science, even.

Then, seek out those people and work with them. Computing is collaborative. It's rather difficult (and unnecessary!) to create anything meaningful entirely by yourself.
only if you imagine small.

at Uber scale, they can get VC funding for $500-800 million, to hire the thousands of chefs that were laid off during the covid shutdowns. You can also imagine going international, so Uber Chef is actually thousands of chefs around the world. (hiring chefs without the overhead of restaurants - that's the play)