skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> Suppressing pixel readings is not plausible with the current CCD designs

Better than suppressing pixel reading would be suppressing pixel changes. The first process lets pixel to change as a result of incoming photons, the second one maintains the "unread" state.

Yes, current CCD devices can't do that. Advantage of this change is also in reducing crosstalk - if we need, say, to remove accumulated charge and for that we need to draw the current, the current may influence our reading of neighboring pixels. I'm tempted to look towards "smart mirrors" - MEMS systems, even for mirrors of 1 sq. micron - but purely electrical solutions might be possible.
Bacteria from Earth can survive in space and could endure the trip to Mars
If death scares you, I would certainly not recommend eternal life. That, to me, is far more terrifying.
I couldn't get it to work well either, but note that farm's don't have a city, so your question is impossible to answer.
> Imaging Air Cherenkov Telescopes can only work on Earth as we use the atmosphere as detector medium.

Considering their operating principle, are they actually affected by satellites?
Sounds like I could have been more thorough in describing why I think "that's okay."

> How does the dev know that they've not undone anything else?

I didn't write it, but I was assuming a scenario where a system already has a comprehensive automated test suite. If you have most functionality under test, then hopefully you're pretty confident that it won't undo anything else.

> Also, how does the dev know that the fix is complete?

The same way a dev knows if one single automated test that addresses the one known failure scenario is a complete fix.

In other words: you don't know. You keep doing some manual testing, and watching whatever logs or status indicators, to see if things go back to normal after deployment.

> Or that it caters to the defect?

I also didn't write this, but I had in mind some level of manual testing before deploying the code change to ensure it caters to the defect.

> Why is that Ok?

Hopefully my answers above help explain why I said that's okay.

I'm not advocating for flippantly shipping code without having a variety of other guard rails in place; I was primarily talking about when a bug has really bad consequences for users, your team is confident that writing a test is going to take a long time, and you do some level of manual testing to confirm all seems generally well.
>DNA Damage and Survival Time Course of Deinococcal Cell Pellets During 3 Years of Exposure to Outer Space

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2020.0205...
Exactly. If you dislike DRM, you should be cheering operations like this. I'd much rather see piracy fought by pursuing egregious offenders, and not crippling consumer hardware or suing randos using napster for $5k a pop.
this is pain wrong. i lived in france for 4 years. debit cards are common, credit cards a lot less. no, a debit card with a visa logo is not a credit card -credit means you buy it on credit, and pay for it later. they also have their own system called blue. lots of people in both france and uk pay in cash as well. most people in america don't even carry cash. 15 years ago chip was not rolled out fully. 10 years ago it was not when I was living there. and a whole lot of places needed cash, period.

debit cards, as I originally said, have always had a pin in america, so i'm not sure why you are comparing euro debit cards, to american credit cards.
Given the number of job openings (491) for the company, who actually works there now? By that I mean, how can they already have a car, or know these kinds of specs, when there are that many positions to be filled...
I know some mountain and coastal areas actually do have view ordinances, but they're typically very limited (sometimes only to trees, not construction, etc). But, I don't believe that's the norm in most places.
To defend your point, section 5 only says a "master file is most often used". It does not require the use of a master file to load a zone. Further, in section 5.2, it says "when a master file is used to load a zone". This suggests there could be occasions when a master file is not used to load a zone, e.g., a zone transfer.

Correct me if I am wrong but I think one difference between tinydns and, say, nsd is that tinydns reads a zone file from disk to answer queries while nsd loads the entire file into memory. The whole "on-disk" concept seems a bit dated when one considers tinydns zone files are stored on mfs/tmpfs.

I still use tinydns (and cdb) heavily. I think it is well-suited for the home user. BIND OTOH is an ever-changing, relatively large amount of code to compile, a hybrid authoritative server/cache, and it comes with a sizeable amount of complexity. BSD developers have long been trying to replace it with something else like unbound. djb used to refer to "the BIND company" and I think that is a reasonably accurate description of its developers. Thankfully, djbdns is non-commercial. Its author does not try to earn a living by monitoring/manipulating other people's DNS use.
Nice, I was doing the same on pages that would allow it, but it was never an easy process.
I cannot test your page now, but it's it possible to add a new book (I would like to practise on Ulisses) and would my progress be stored? I don't want to always retype the first page.
s/three-quarters-billion-dollars-a-year/three-quarters-trillion-dollars-a-year/

Why is that so hard to type?
>The solution here is to outlaw targeted advertising

Thanks, but no. As an end user, my preference goes as:

no advertising >>>>> targeted advertising >> untargeted advertising

And I am not just speaking hypothetically. Google has a switch in your account settings where you can flip a toggle to turn off all targeted Google advertising and make it un-targeted. I couldn't last more than a day with this and flipped the toggle back on.

While with targeted advertising, most ads were useless, they at least were somewhat relevant, and a few even piqued my interest. With untargeted advertising, I was getting absolute trash that was actively annoying me.
Maybe all the people there will walk to the light rail? Seems like an ideal situation, actually. Mass public transit near high-density housing.
A good sign is when people are trying to do something using a complex workaround because they need it that badly, and you can implement a change to make it easier.

If they haven't even attempted to do it now, chances are they won't after you implement a new feature.
Yeah, I will go out of my way to avoid shared paths, so I guess we just have different tolerances for these things. :)

I do have a bell and a voice and I'm ready to use them if needed, but I'm happier when they're irrelevant. I take pedestrian priority and safety seriously when I'm riding (as I hope others do for me when I'm walking), so if I can ride in an area where I have less of that worry, I will.
The Three Filters of the Information Lifecycle (Illustrated)
Facebook warns iOS 14 could shave more than 50% from Audience Network revenue
In nyc there’s less than 10,000 investing jobs.

You’re talking about a few thousand people a year
How so? I can open my web browser right now and install F-Droid in a matter of a minute. I assume the same holds true for Amazon's app store.
Covid-19 Transmits in Aerosols. We Have Enough Evidence, Now It Is Time to Act
I would understand where you're coming from if Apple allowed apps to mention that other signup methods exist.
Modern != contemporary
Couldn't have said it better – I feel as if I wrote the very comment I'm replying to. My solution has been to play old classics that transport me back to those times and those are so much more enjoyable than most new titles.
Hawking came up a decent number of times in my astronomy/astrophysics classes. Hubble came up everywhere.
I see your point, but that's a false dichotomy. Brutalism isn't the only alternative to glass buildings.

https://trip101.com/article/famous-buildings-in-vienna

Most of these look pretty safe to me and objectively prettier than cubes of exposed concrete
Personally, I think his work on the Photo-Electric Effect deserved the recognition that it received. But Albert Einstein is far more myth than man. Everyone idolizes Einstein, he was the quintessential mad scientist. And it is difficult to challenge the notion of this myth without being accused of anti-semetism. But I risk doing so...

When one actually studies the History of Science, one discovers shocking things. None of the ideas attributed to Einstein were actually Einstein's. I don't want to bash Einstein. He was truly brilliant. So another way to put it is Einstein stood on the shoulders of giants. Though I can and will bash the notion that Einstein was so innovative that all the ideas were his. None of them were. Let's examine all the original insights traditionally attributed to Albert Einstein.
Comment too long, I will reply to my own comment and continue...
This is false for both Seattle and Portland. Like pretty much everything else you’re saying.
This nicely encapsulates what I was hoping to say, but didn't take the time to write out. Thank you!

> Maybe development of a proper test involves some test infrastructure work that's a larger undertaking than you have the opportunity for at the moment.

This is something I've encountered many times.

> Maybe you have a solid manual/QA testing system behind you, allowing you at least temporary assurance that your fix is valid.

I would hope most people are doing this anyway, especially when a big production bug has been found.
Cosmic rays could pose a problem for future quantum computers
is alleged to have caused “tens of millions of dollars” in losses

In short, a typical day for an investment banker. Odd how one is legal and the other one gets you an international secret police task force.
I do like the boilerplate module stuff, thats trick..

However a large number of people in the terraform ecosystem are already using terragrunt.

Can you use this with terragrunt?
While the technological feat seems logical, I wonder how viable is a business model built around retrofitting human-controlled planes with human out of the loop software.

Given the intricacies of IFR flight and the challenges faced by the self-driving industry, my guess is this will not be a short road to commercial rollout.
Ingress going GA refers to the Ingress API resource in the Kubernetes API becoming stable. There are no discussion (or Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals (KEPs) regarding providing a default ingress controller. There are two areas that Kubernetes has taken a hands of approach and it is ingress traffic (and external load balancing) and storage. Those are provided by external vendors through APIs.
Sure, there’s an example where best case the user experience is improved and business metrics aren’t affected. But I assure you if that app has a decent analytics setup they’ll also be tracking business metrics, and if for some reason business metrics went down with that change past some acceptable threshold, that change won’t be launched.

Now if you look at opposite case, where a feature is worse for user experience but helps business metrics, that feature will definitely be launched. A small, mostly harmless example: Ever tried to hide twitter’s recommended accounts? It gives you the option to “see less often”, but curiously there’s no option to stop seeing the window forever. Why? Because clearly it benefits twitter’s business on average to keep showing these recommendations.

I’ve built enough dark patterns at my last job to know it always comes down to business metrics.
Shinichirō Tomonaga also shared the 1965 Nobel for this work, and his work was much more fundamental to QED than Dyson.

The Nobel Prize can go to at most three people.
Show HN: Random Daily Art – Have the Museum and Art Gallery Come to You
> Of course, when I am dead, I will not fear death. That is not much consolation.

I see what you mean. What is it about death you fear? I think for these things, like starvation, loneliness, and dying, I don't fear them inherently, I fear their effects. I will feel physical pain while starving; I will feel emotional pain while lonely; I might feel pain while dying. But while living, I don't fear being dead because principally, I fear pain, and I won't be experiencing pain when I am dead. I understand not everyone will feel the same way about being dead, though.
It is well-known that Einstein was notoriously bad at mathematics. The sole reason for the decade of delay between his 1905 Special Theory of Relativity and his 1915 General Theory of Relativity is that Einstein did not have the mathematics to calculate the formulas. He needed some of the work done by Hermann Minkowski. By 1908 Minkowski realized that the special theory of relativity, introduced by his former student Albert Einstein in 1905 and based on the previous work of Lorentz and Poincaré, could best be understood in a four-dimensional space, since known as the "Minkowski spacetime," in which time and space are not separated entities but intermingled in a four-dimensional space–time, and in which the Lorentz geometry of special relativity can be effectively represented using the invariant interval x^2 + y^2 + z^2 -c^2*t^2. So even the notion of space-time was not Einstein's idea. Although Einstein is credited with finding the field equations for General Relativity, the German mathematician David Hilbert published them in an article before Einstein's article. This has resulted in accusations of plagiarism against Einstein, although not from Hilbert, and assertions that the field equations should be called the "Einstein–Hilbert field equations". However, Hilbert did not press his claim for priority.

Albert Einstein's friendship with Marcel Grossmann began with their school days in Zurich. Grossmann's careful and complete lecture notes at the Federal Polytechnic School proved to be a salvation for Einstein, who missed many lectures. Grossmann's father helped Einstein get his job at the Swiss Patent Office in Bern, and it was Grossmann who helped to conduct the negotiations to bring Einstein back from Prague as a professor of physics at the Zurich Polytechnic. Grossmann was an expert in differential geometry and tensor calculus; just the mathematical tools providing a proper mathematical framework for Einstein's work on gravity. Thus, it was natural that Einstein would enter into a scientific collaboration with Grossmann.

It was mathemetician Marcel Grossmann who emphasized the importance of a non-Euclidean geometry called Riemannian geometry (also elliptic geometry) to Einstein, which was a necessary step in the development of Einstein's general theory of relativity. Abraham Pais's book on Einstein suggests that Grossmann mentored Einstein in tensor theory as well. Grossmann introduced Einstein to the absolute differential calculus, started by Christoffel and fully developed by Ricci-Curbastro and Levi-Civita. Grossmann facilitated Einstein's unique synthesis of mathematical and theoretical physics in what is still today considered the most elegant and powerful theory of gravity: the general theory of relativity. The collaboration of Einstein and Grossmann led to a ground-breaking paper: "Outline of a Generalized Theory of Relativity and of a Theory of Gravitation," which was published in 1913 and was one of the two fundamental papers which established Einstein's theory of gravity.

continues in reply to my own comment...
Removing user friction isn't always a good thing
Used to be quite common for gay people to have kids heterosexually; at one time it was more or less socially expected that everyone would marry and have children, particularly in the middle classes.
And farmers thought the tarriffs would help them. I don't see what size has to do with their entitled delusions for unenforceable at scale laws.
If they had an example, they would've never deleted it though. I mean, that part is so unprofessional, it's rude to believe are that incompetent, the polite explanation is that they lied about it.
I realize that we all struggle to overcome confirmation bias, but I really am not seeing the police preemptively gassing people prior to the riotous or threatening behavior. I don't doubt that there might be some examples of this but it is overwhelming outnumbered by people rioting but claiming that they are "peacefully assembling". What I really can't figure out is how many of these people are honest in thinking that the riotous behavior is legitimate (and useful) protest, how many of them are just excited to participate in a very realistic LARP game, and how many are attempting insurrection/rebellion.
Hmm. When I ask "What is the LName of all the students" it will only give me the first name instead.
Piracy to the rescue I guess?
There are a lot of games in the art world, no question. Mostly comes from the fact that money flows are super opaque and most folks aren't making any.

Anyway, I dunno. I don't think I've ever lost social favor for not liking some dead artist. (Live ones are like everyone else, and tribal bullshit applies. Just like in any other group of humans.)

One thing to be aware of is most folks with an interest in art aren't going to find "I could do that" to be meaningful criticism. Yeah, and? You didn't. Someone other than Armstrong could have been the first man on the Moon, but they weren't, either.
Required to get into? No. But I'd say it's a pretty good overview of what you'd deal with in DevOps'y kind of position.

I guess ideally you'd be before the "infrastructure as code" step to be productive on day 1.
Slides here: https://codesync.global/uploads/media/default/0001/01/de7dfa...
The answer is Ed25519, as most people probably expected.
> Copyright law has a place

Yes, in a pre-computer and pre-internet society. It has no place in the 21st century.

> allowing large corporations to use legal action to shelter themselves from having to improve their offering hurts both consumers and small businesses

You know what sucks? Wanting to buy something, being willing to pay for it and finding out that what I want is not available to me. Because of copyright.

Every day I log into Netflix and search for something I want to watch, Netflix autocompletes the movie's name and yet it doesn't actually show up in the results. It's there, just not available to me. I lost count of the number of lesser known works I wanted to view but couldn't because they aren't popular and therefore not profitable. I don't even try to find them anymore.

Somehow, copyright stops the service from offering the content to me. I suppose I'm part of some irrelevant market segment they don't care about. So it's not just a service problem.
Same here and it was fairly complex in its geopolitical views. It wasn't just fish and bikinis.
This same reasoning kind of applies to everyone on this list though. If they'd just lived longer a lot of them could have eventually won a prize.

I think the implicit argument this list is making is that it's not fair to exclude people just because they died. We are after all recognizing actual discoveries, which live on following the death of the discoverer. Many other awards are awarded posthumously and there's no good reason this one couldn't be either.
Just stick to stable Kubernetes API resources[1] and they are guaranteed to continue to work through all 1.x versions.

[1] https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/overview/kubernetes-api/...
Startups rarely distribute income. When a company gets to that stage, it can probably afford any tax lawyers and any jurisdiction it might want.
same holds for sending your kids to a bad school. I had a conversation with someone about how i should send my kids to the neighborhood under performing school rather than private school because I was perpetuating the downfall. I said to him that he was perfectly free to sacrifice his kids on that altar but I reserve the right not to sacrifice mine.

if you want to move to a poor neighborhood with high crime in order to help save it then more power to you. However, I don't fault anyone wanting to avoid it either.
That article is a just a bunch of rambling drivel. There is no supporting document or links to back his claims. I guess if you feel the same way its a great article but if you are looking for validation you will not find it there.

Regardless of how they are built they must meet government standards for energy efficiency which is expressed in the simplest terms for most people, as in kWh/Year and how much that will cost you per year to run. Seeing that some brands highlight their efficiency its pretty easy to shoot down his rant because that is all it is.
The scary yellow screen that everyone clicks through anyway. I don't think 7zip needs to worry about that harming its adoption.

Codesigning is a protection racket, and FOSS should not feel pressured to participate in it.
This is an explanation (from the amazing three blue one brown) of the DFT not the DCT, but this was the first thing that ever really made sense to me. It is explained by someone who really knows math incredibly well and is an amazing teacher, with amazing visuals: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=spUNpyF58BY
This is the most important information in this. Other people who are looking for code signing certificates should use this information to choose their CA.

From the view of the certificate holder, the CA has one job: Keep their certificate valid. Everything else (including the trustworthiness of the CA, e.g. whether they issue false certificates) only matters insofar as it affects that job (if the CA were to screw up up badly enough to get removed from certificate stores, the certificate also becomes invalid, but other than that, the certificate holder doesn't really care how the CA acts).

By relying on a CA known to take such action (whether justified or unjustified), you're putting the continued usability of your software at risk, i.e. there is a strong reason to pick any other trusted CA.
It shouldn't be surprising though since English, Bengali, French, Persian, Italian and Hindi belong to the same family of languages.

If you actually compare the languages it's astonishing how similar the words actually are.
For a few years, Amazon had an "Actually Free" campaign that let you play Android games for free with no ads as long as they were installed through Amazon's Appstore. Even that wasn't enough to dethrone Google Play :)
TLDR: don't fear death because you won't know you're dead.

Pretty much misses the point when the fear of death is frequently not about what comes after, and much more about the big "nothingness" thing.
>What distinguishes human beings from animals is the ability to speak on behalf of evil.

When was the last time you spoke with a animal? And why do you think Humans are not animals too?
Reminder it's time to get off 1.16 now. Only 3 versions (current-2) are supported upstream.

https://kubernetes.io/docs/setup/release/version-skew-policy...
I’m generally against eminent domain in the case that land is being forcibly purchased from one private party and sold to another private party. I’m against it because of its very high abuse potential.

Property rights are essential in keeping society civil. Sure, I pay taxes and give up some of my property in order to provide common good. I’m happy to pay for schools and roads. Sure, maybe the government will need to build a highway over my property, I understand it needs a mechanism to do this for the public good. However, if the government forces me to sell to a private party I’m concerned that the reason will be less about public good and more about enriching the private party. It opens up the government to legitimate ethics concerns. It makes people begin to feel cheated out of their property. This is bad for society as a whole.
Ottinger's Rules for Variable and Class Naming
A Quantum Procedure for Map Generation
This is a very low standard of evidence. The model answers an arithmetic problem correctly - "It has learned arithmetic!". The model answers an arithmetic problem incorrectly - "it has learned arithmetic!". What sense does that make?
Correct, there was a typo in my comment. I edited to add “14”.