skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Not just the US, but the US and those that is trying hard to be just as bad (like the UK) are not like the rest of the western world. For example a union in the US versus one in Scandinavia is like comparing apples to ...something not even a fruit. The US unions are not real unions and haven't normalised since the war against the police and their mob ties.
Cell Modem is Sierra Wireless Airlink GX440

https://source.sierrawireless.com/devices/gx-series/gx440/#s...
Pledged! (My email address is available via my profile.)

But also, for the 1st part, LOL! (IMO, HN needs to learn to laugh at itself from time-to-time.)

And also, for the 2nd part, thank you for organizing this.
Because I'm bootstrapping for my retirement fund, I'm not particularly flush for cash, and so too often I'm a freeloader. This is great though - I hope you get it together.

One final thought is that Mozilla executives don't really deserve to be the custodians of MDN anymore, and so perhaps as a community we need to be looking for ways to liberate MDN from Mozilla. For example, the technical writer, rather than being a Mozilla employee, could be an independent MDN contributor collaborating with Mozillla employees, and contributing under CC-BY-SA 2.5. [0]

[0] https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/MDN/About
Maybe I was only looking at 3200 or faster.
Why do many comments in response to my initial question default to the alternative being gigantic blobs of text and not advocating for merely brief and concise but informative communication styles?

Is it no less valid than the rapid fire messaging on the one extreme and large paragraphs of words on the other?
Are we looking at the same Corsair One that runs $2,200 in its cheapest variant? Because I built a SFF form factor PC with equivalent specs and zero exotic parts that fits in a case the size of a console (Dr Zaber case), all for under $1500. It's a bit trickier if you want to water cool it, but I'm not sure why you need to if you use an AMD CPU (much better performance/watt) and don't overclock your GPU.
Using open source tooling? Yes that makes sense and should carry some weight for an open source project.

Abandoning real client apps and instead telling everyone to use a webpage has nothing to do with software licensing.
But try telling that to the California state government when they come to collect their 0.4% wealth tax.
Ticker symbol should be RGB! Apparently NASDAQ ticker symbols are typically 4 letters though.
Postpaid service is around $1000 per year, so why not get a $1000 phone to go with it?
His views are just simplistic, too simplistic. Additionally, he delves in topics that have been already looked at in a more abstract way.
Not quite: An employer in France must provide a private health insurance plan to employees. It is paid out of the pocket of the employee and they can't refuse it.

France has good public health service but it's also pushing private health insurance down the throat of everybody through their employers, quite like the UK or the US. The large majority of the population has double coverage.
Opinion on Structuring and Organizing Code
Worked in tech support for a bit, had to do a lot of emailing. You quickly pick up what annoys you.
Any idea on who’s the best psu manufacturer now?
Can you support that? This doesn't seem like anything approaching the truth in the vast majority of web applications (where things like React are typically used). Mostly, in my experience, front end development is made unnecessarily complex by the developers involved.
> to make an exploitable attack you would need at a minimum to have a copy of the flight AI and be able to simulate possible encounters.

I'd disagree. Data is more important than the model. But also you can do black box attacks on AI pretty effectively. What you do is train your AI to perform a similar feat and then figure out its weaknesses. Those weaknesses are likely to translate to the other AI. Robustness is a difficult task.

As for blasting confusing data, well that already happens to human pilots. There are radar jammers, targeting jammers, visually occluding devices, etc. But hey, if an AI can operate under 90% of typical dog fight situations, then that's a big reduction in needed pilots. Then those pilots can be all trained to be aces.
So an operation against people who unite and protest legally and who are then beaten, killed or hunted like cattle? What better place than a union leader to catch "bad guys".
It limits the types of apps found in iOS.
> Missing the point.

Missing the point, or making a joke?
For #1, it seems the president could prohibit most app activity as it collects data until such a time they remove the data collection. For #3, TikTok the app is a content delivery platform, not the content itself.

Since there is data collected and something of value, it seems that although parallels can be drawn between the content on TikTok and the list of explicitly allowed items, the whole of TikTok is something different than the items listed in #3.

(And if those are the only exceptions the powers are quite broad.)
We unambiguously differentiate by setting a threshold.

Does your water heater produce hot water? We can decide this unambiguously if you provide your required temperature and the actual temperature you are getting.

Despite the lack of a universal definition of "hot", we can unambiguously determine if your water is hot or not.

For your water heater, you probably set the threshold based on how much you enjoy your shower, how well your dishes get clean, and so on. For a monopoly, we can set the threshold at the point where there is an unacceptable amount of market control.

Measurement of market control is more difficult than measurement of water temperature, but that is no excuse to give up. We measure beauty, intelligence, bad driving, poverty, odor, and misery.
Unions are directly elected institutions with general assemblies. That means you can't ever capture a union using money alone.

Moreover, unions are legally prevented from contributing to political campaigns, while corporations are allowed to do so.

Therefore, the comparison breaks down at every single level, and no useful conclusion can be reached from it.
> But money got both of them to the stage.

So what? They lost comprehensively. The point of politics isn’t to be heard. It’s to win so you can get what you want done done. If being heard led to political change US politics would be a great deal more libertarian. You don’t just need to be heard you need to persuade people to believe what you believe and to vote for you. Money doesn’t do that. It buys you a bigger megaphone but if no one likes the message they hear from you they won’t vote for you. Then you end up like Bloomberg, having spent a ton of money on a Presidential bid that failed utterly.
In k9 it should be:

A_B
Configuring Google Colab like a pro
It's a good question. The very purpose of a union is to protect its members even at a cost to everyone else. The chicago plumbers union for instance fought successfully over and over to prevent the city from switching their aging lead water piping infrastructure to a composite type.

The reason? Lead water piping required more billable hours of maintenance. The result was that Chicagoans had to pay more money to continue drinking from a poisoned water supply, and the plumbers got richer at their expense.

In general, there is little evidence that cartels produce net benefits, whether they deal in oil or in labour or in anything else. I suppose the average person is sympathetic to unions both because they can see themselves as a plumber more easily than as an oil sheikh, and because the societal costs of labour unions are hidden and do not take shape in a very tangible form, be they high import tariffs, reduced R&D spending, bad water infrastructure, or more expensive and noncompetitive goods and services, among other things. Regardless, the economics of cartels will never be sound.
To an extent the iterated prisoner's dilemma game must be played with the tit-for-tat response to a defection, but if the US can't find a way to play that game without sacrificing its core values, then the US implicitly loses the game anyway (people more versed in game theory please feel free to correct me).
You should have been bullied more as a kid.
Haha, love this comment. Exactly my thinking as well:)
Or just bleach. Cyanide if you can get it?
I would have a problem if it involved america devolving to china's level, making life worse for its citizens (eg. surveillance, censorship). However, I don't have any problems with america engaging in tit-for-tat exchange against china.
Are cable/internet bundles illegal?

If the US had an Justice Department that wasn't totally out to lunch on antitrust enforcement, they would be. US antitrust law is far stronger in law than in practice. Wikipedia has a good summary of the history.[1]

In the UK or EU, you usually have several choices for Internet or TV service. Their antitrust authorities didn't let them all merge.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_United_States_antit...
Half the "gamers" are on candy crush or supercell mindlessly clicking away, getting pavlovian salivations whenever some chest reward notification rings. With these numbers its an epidemic.
Sure they will take the risk at low altitude when there's no other option. But the preferred technique now is to orbit at medium altitude and dispense precision munitions. Why expose the aircraft to ground fire when it's not necessary?
The Post-Capitalist Interregnum
Because the police's primary revenue stream is taxpayer money and therefore they are very interested in anyone who may affect political change for any reason.
I dunno. I was pretty frustrated by most of the state management solutions out there, so rolled my own [1]. So far been really happy with it. Super simple graph based notifications, does everything I need.

[1] https://github.com/claytongulick/applicationstate
Using this event to think about what an asteroid hitting the ocean might be like is quite clever.

"The author suggested that with proper scale corrections, analogies could be drawn between the impulsive impact of the Lituya Bay rockfall to asteroid impact on ocean floor sediments and on such impulsive wave generation. Although, the trajectory angle, terminal velocity and total mass and density of material of an asteroid would be significantly different than those of the Lituya Bay rockfall, it was suggested that these could be scaled and adjusted for the purpose of validating a model of asteroid impact."
So you want to use others' hard work for your own financial gain? That doesn't seem overly fair.

I get your point, in a perfect world folks like you might land a nice job and kick back 10k as a thanks. Unfortunately, that doesn't happen, so alternatives are necessary.
Stereotypes about serfs were very accurate during feudalism.

Oppression has real effects, the core question is the direction of causality. Which way you think it points is precisely how much of an actual, factual nazi you are.
They aren't doing any pretending. It's well publicized fact that legacies get preferential admissions and people who donate to put their names on buildings get even higher preference. It's not something they are doing quietly in the background.

The colleges I applied to all had a section on the application for listing alumni you're related to.
Police are agents of the state and the state serves nothing but itself.
>Why hadn’t we stockpiled key supplies and machines, built up hospital capacity, or ensured the robustness of our supply chains? The reason, of course, is that it would have been seen as inefficient and profit-robbing.

>Seen in this light, at least some inefficiency is like an insurance policy. Think about your own situation. Every year that you don’t get into a car accident and your house doesn’t burn down and you stay healthy, you could think to yourself that you have ‘wasted’ your money on various pointless insurance products, and that you’d be financially better off without all those insurance premiums to pay.

This is a faulty claim. Traditional economic efficiency would say we _should_ stockpile medical supplies if it were more efficient for the markets in the long-term, which it would have been. The issue here is that _governments_ and experts didn't work together effectively (despite experts regularly noting the possibility of a pandemic, for example, Gates et al.) and the fact that our government generally isn't Keynesian. A quote (source: IMF https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2014/09/basics.ht...):

>Keynes argued that governments should solve problems in the short run rather than wait for market forces to fix things over the long run, because, as he wrote, “In the long run, we are all dead.”

As it relates to Global Warming, for example, we have various options. We could solve it by being "less efficient" (extracting less from the earth — and in fact, a Keynesian approach to that would be taxation to slow growth in harmful industries) but zoomed out, if we deal with global warming, we are more efficient over the long run. Moreover, we want to be _efficient_ in our development of green technologies.

The trouble isn't so much efficiency, it's zeroing in on making particular processes efficient to the detriment of the whole across time and in the present moment.
Corporations, like unions are free to campaign independently. For example the for profit Fox, Breitbart, New York Times and Washington Post Corporations all made their political preferences very clear over the past two years. They each spent a lot of employee time and money supporting their favoured candidate. Or Disney, a for profit corporation, releasing Michael Moore films. They’re political propaganda, just like the garbage Citizens United produced to denounce Hillary.

Political speech rights in the US belong to individuals, who do not lose them by coming together in corporate organizations, whatever their form. This is just.
I was just going through the entire mame archive for hours.

Are there any fun games?
One absolutely doesn't need to be a foo in order to engage in foo gatekeeping. In fact I would go so far as to say the preponderance of gatekeeping is done by people who are not in the group they are gate keepers of.
Well, at least measuring temperature doesn't depend on the K-street, campaign contributions, or ideologies.
Have you actually looked at Adobe's site? You literally have to select "annual subscription billed monthly" to sign up. It's extremely obvious.
Sure the first 65% is work hard. But guess what? The last 35% is a much different ask that just does not succumb to that same hammer.

As the immediate parent implies, wall building is not all or nothing. Even in statistically controlled manufacturing processes there is std deviation. Not learning from mistakes is itself a kind of arrogance. In fact the preferred model is neither arrogant rejection or passive adoption. To use an a sort of Bhuddist analogy, we listen carefully and extract the gold from the gold+useless ore in the wisdom we hear and refashion it into our own art. This requires decent teachers (suppliers of know how) but also decent students who are interested in real learning not passive regurgitation. Making our own art is demonstration of mastery and of appropriate internalization. It avoids the silly extremes of man as an island and man as an empty if pious vessel to be filled with rhetoric that we can grandstand on.

Those of us in profitable and large organizations will see the same truths about market acceptance and customer approval in a modified way: often our organizations are too sterile and inward looking. Losing the customer starts slow but in that last quarter or two accelerates fast often with a profound finality to it.
Like Roadrunner, they have to deliver something but it doesn't have to be broadly applicable. I expect that Ponte Vecchio and OneAPI will never be used outside of Aurora.
IIUC, JSON is available too...
That's stripe rate. You will pay higher elsewhere.
When you respond to the guys who follow nasty strategies with niceness, you are literally rewarding the bad behaviors. If being cooperative wouldn't get much differences than being exploitative, then the nice guys will vanish and only the bad guys will remain. A reciprocal strategy is necessary and beneficial long-term for the world IMO.

The well-known book The Selfish Gene by Richard Dawkins has an interesting chapter titled Nice Guys Finish First giving a good illustration relevant to this idea.
This blog is great, highly recommend. Along with this series, he has some really interesting ones on medieval warfare illustrated via Lord of the Rings:

https://acoup.blog/category/collections/siege-of-gondor/
https://acoup.blog/category/collections/the-battle-of-helms-...
I guess if you sell a pre-constructed device, that could work. There would be other issues (you have to spend money on hardware, potentially have to get it shipped, may not be able to get access to the device at all based on your region, keeping it always on and accessible, etc).
A Gentle Introduction to Zero-Knowledge Proofs with Hands-On Examples
You say risk has 2 or 3 components. The two you list, liklihood and severity, are the two I usually hear. What is the third?
Dark matter is going away, regardless, because it is not necessary to explain galaxy rotation curves.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PL0ewiwqoTw
Dark matter was always just a way to fudge what was observed. It is hard to believe most physicists, astronomers and cosmologists still believe in and are still looking for something that never existed.
Antitrust laws might.
Therefore, the judiciaries are not truly independent.

That's like saying that, because you were brought up by your parents, you will always behave exactly as they wanted you to, removing all agency. SCOTUS justices' decisions, against what their proponents desired, prove they work independently. They can be flawed, but that's why there's more than one.

the CCP is by far the most popular party in China

The CCP is the only party in china.

Both China and the US, are in theory democracies

No, they're not. And I'm not nit picking with the US is a Republic. It's that is a joke to even attempt to place China at the same level.

So in China, to have effective absolute power, you need to control the CCP and discourage people from running as independents. In the US, to have effective absolute power, you need to control both the DNC and the RNC, and independents naturally cannot win. So in both cases, separation of power is theoretic.

I don't even know where to start with this one. The CCP controls China. Maybe not down to the most local level, but almost. Nor in their wettest dreams the DNC/RNC would ever achieve the level of control and oppression the CCP has. And I'm pretty sure many on both sides wouldn't even allow it.

the judiciary, executive and legislative are indirectly dependent because they are all dependent on the same parties.

And back to square one. No. By a million miles. Not even close. With all its flaws, the US judiciary, and its Rule of Law, are orders of magnitude above the Chinese, if we can even start comparing apples to oranges.
Postgres foreign data wrappers is a weird choice of engine. Most queries to this service will be scans, in which case a column-oriented, vectorized, massively parallel engine like Presto will be 1000 times faster or so. Postgres’ underlying engine is optimized for scenarios where you read a small number of rows using an index.
But even more effective and efficient to use a transfer resistor
I'm not omniscient nor an economist, I have no idea.

Here's a comparison though: War is another of those realities—like aging and death—that we seem to have normalized and accepted at a cultural level. It's fair to ask how economics, labor and allocation would play out once a civilization stops dumping a third of its resources into the destructive act of war, but to ask whether we should end the war, just because we're uncertain of the answers, strikes me as absurd.
That's the basic premise that drives economic theory.
Faking Useful Refinement Types in Racket
Today, local Oakland air is terrible - and the difference between these 2 maps seemed quite strange. Thanks for a very detailed analysis!
I am sure that nutritionists _understand_ the popularity of sugary drinks, as in, they know what human motivations are, and they know why people prefer them to better foods.

But nutritionists also _understand_ that sugary drinks are bad in the long run, and that is why they keep saying that one should drink less of them, over and over. If at least few people get convinced, stop drinking sugary drinks, and avoid diabetes and heart disease, they nutritionists succeeded.

The same logic applies to blockchain/crypto-currency warnings that HN commenters produce.
I recently bought this case: https://formdworks.com/products/t1-black

You can build in this case pretty easily as long as you don't try to do fancy things, like custom loop. It's smaller than the Corsair One, and you get better upgrability. It's small and discreet. Silent depends on what parts you pick.

There are many other cases that are similar, but not quite as space-optimized. Popular ones include the Ghost S1, and the Ncase M1. All three support the same-caliber specs you would get with a Corsair One.

Let me know if you want help selecting parts/building in such a case.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nemesis_(hypothetical_star)
Clear Docker Buildx Cache
Candy Crush is clearly a game. Is it a "video game"? That's less clear.

Candy Crush and games like it are closer to https://www.kohls.com/product/prd-2796704/trademark-games-el... than https://store.steampowered.com/app/10/CounterStrike/. I wouldn't call the former a video game by any reasonable standard.

I think Candy Crush qualifies as a video game, if only by the most technically narrow of definitions. But it's a pretty hard sell to put the stereotypical Candy Crush style game player in the same category as someone who owns and regularly utilizes a console. There is overlap, obviously, but that's also clearly not what we're discussing.

At some point the casual application of "video gamer" will make the term meaningless--especially as we move toward almost ubiquitous electronic interfaces and devices for even the most mundane of life's activities.
You know, famous historical young female characters like Oda Nobunga or Leonardo da Vinci.
TL;DR: use a programming language that has data types. That's it.
You are free to step back from any job offering if you think you got unfair advantages but to expect it from others is where your elevated perspective falls short. On the other points we just need to disagree.
The joke is on you.

Specifically, actor 2, who charges less than the competitors. Unless actor 2 is both a) selling at less than cost and b) either a de-facto monopoly supplier or is acting in concert with most other significant suppliers, then there is no monopoly issue.

The issue is complicated if the low-cost supplier satisfies condition a by using its monopoly to strong-arm one or more of its suppliers into giving it preferential treatment, but the consequence of this is that not all valid cases are acted on.
Note this in the development tree not the stable release tree. No 7.x has not been released as stable yet and probably won't be for a while. The stable 6.x is still based on an ancient 3.X kernel.
Why not renew your certificate a year before the expiration date?
I tend to do the reverse, with questions as the very last thing. Sorta introduce what I'm about to be asking about.
All you have to do is look to history for the movements and societies that have put "efficiency" on a pedestal to gauge the value and practicality.

There was a major one in the 20th century. It did not go well.