skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Are you sure you like Apollo? I ask because your comment says it's wonderful, but then gives a lot of reasons as to why it's not. I don't like Apollo on the client (no issue with it server side). I feel the sharp edges and pitfalls are numerous and it's a lot of boilerplate to get anything off the ground. To be totally fair to Apollo, I'm also not sure the projects I worked on really needed or benefited from GraphQL on the whole, so...
This concept has to be the new[1] whathaveyoutried.com, the site which became the favourite snarky unhelpful comment on StackOverflow for a while and which the author realised was a bad and unhelpful approach and regretted making.

Just say "Hello" back. You don't have to wait while they are typing. And if you are busy enough that you don't want to be disturbed, put "Do not disturb" on or close the chat client.

[1] newer, anyway. That was 2008 to this 2013. What's the 2018 version?
Where does one find more of these secret URLs?
Contradicting lie #142 from the environmental movement.

The worse you make land for humans the better it is for the environment. See... anything radioactive.
I agree that advertisement should show why a product is good for the problem it solves and not why the problem should be solved.

My previous comment was meant as a motivation to you, to market your (presumably good) product, even if it is not the best in its problem domain, even if it is not the best and let the customer decide. And if you do so, never lie about the actual properties of your product.
Just to clarify:

https://fullfact.org/health/flu-covid-deaths/
Pretty much. But back in those days the central computer for the college, where they kept student records and stuff, was a Prime mainframe running PRIMOS, and I'm not sure how well it handled NULL. So who knows what (apparent) grade I would have wound up with in that case...
Err, no. A union is inherently a political entity.
Sylvain was working on fastai for Swift, but he became busy with the book and course and also has left for HuggingFace. Jeremy has not been working on Swift. No lectures on Swift in the course. The Swift4TF team is still active, though Chris Lattner has unfortunately left.

Another project that is similar is Fastai.jl, a port of fastai to the Julia language. It is still in active development:
https://github.com/FluxML/FastAI.jl
What brand/model?
America becoming more like China when dealing with China is by all means a desirable outcome!
Police unions have always been used to bust other unions. Expecting solidarity from them is madness. The police were created and exist for one role: stopping democracy because democracy implies socialism.
I’d bet 1:2 odds that this activist wasn’t the target and they’re just trying to get some low effort dope busts.
> No more external cameras etc..

Woah; this would affect me, but I can't find any reference for it... can I convince you to expand a bit?
Also not being limited by G-forces or endurance.
I do not think this type of discussion is useful at all.

Even inside China. They need to learn and study other nation's policies and laws to make sure they can continue maintain a society of 1.4 Billion people.

Both US and China would benefit from open competition, in general.

Of cuz, in certain scenarios & times, the discussion is much more nuanced. Like the TikTok discussion here.
more click bait
SPA apps wouldn't like that, security wise.
Senseless. Money governs access to political power in this country. You would take away nearly the only alternative tool regular working people have to make their voices heard with impact and call it "deeply corrupt" - how do you reason yourself into this place?
I dont think its fair to downvote you for asking a question. But no it does not seem to be the case.
Ah this is it right here. I had been very confused as to why Apple made this move. This is at least consistent with their past actions.

But yeah the lack of ability to link to web based payment for subscription plans or even mention it will probably be something that has to go from the app store’s terms. It’s bad for both users and developers. The situation is confusing for users. Not all apps have margins that can support 30%, but this policy makes it non obvious how to even subscribe.

I think if Apple had a flat 15% for subscriptions they’d still get a fair bit of usage, as there are big conversion advantages to using the IAP system. They might even get more revenue by attracting dev’s with reasonable terms, growing the amount of subscription apps using.

This seems much more clear cut to me than Epic’s demands. Epic wants to dismantle the whole phone system as we know it.
20 million * $99 certainly is real money.

For a popular income generating app, the $99 will make an insignificant impact on the marginal cost. But the vast vast majority of apps are not in that category, and the $99 does have an impact.
Unions are democratic organizations that exist to advocate on behalf of their members. Of course they should be involved in politics.
In the earlier days of the US one of the police department's responsibilities was breaking strikes, often by injuring or murdering union members: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_union_busting_in_th...
I put off doing LFS for several years: Ubuntu, then Debian, then OSX. I discovered NixOS a couple of years ago and never looked back.
Counterargument that you should focus on letting the compiler help you which is just a redirected way of "helping" the compiler.

Types are a really good example of where you want to help the compiler. Type signatures let you define how the type can be used. By adding as much information about how the type should be constrained, you can help the compiler prevent you or someone else from doing something stupid and on occasion, you can earn some optimisations in the process.
Wow, this is wild. A great example of how regulation can be a double-edged sword. Anti-trust law prevents market participants from colluding to increase their influence - which is exactly what a labor union does. Lawmakers patched the issue by exempting labor unions, but they didn't cover independent contractors.

The latest attempt to patch the issue is to force reclassification of many independent contractors into employees. What unforeseen effects might this have? Does AB 5 have enough special cases to avoid making things even worse?
That’s me!
I don't care what the stores need, I am paying for goods and services with money, period.

They can rearrange products or do whatever else they need to do after asking people for consent. Funny thing, most people will let you do a lot if you just ask. The problem is you think you shouldn't have to ask for permission to stalk people. It's stalking when the person you follow around does not want to be followed around. If they do, then you may happily call it analytics.

I would personally spend hours at walmart tha have walmart track me in their stores as i move about, as a courtesy to their paying customer and to be decent ethical human beings they should allow my exclusion or opt-out of that program.

This is all financially and technologically practical, the question is will you live without the extra profits generated by unwilling participants in your scheme?
I've seen some VPN apps do this. Not by explicitly telling the user that they'll be paying more, but it was rather blatant.
Lol most people don't have the latest iPhone you can get an older one for a couple hundred at walmart (same a mid level android)
Stereotypes of serfs were largely accurate in feudal societies.
Don't understand the downvote, it's a fact that downtime does happen.
What Makes You You?
I’ll get some merch. Thanks!
PCs are definitely not more expensive than consoles when you compare the TCO over a year or two, and that gulf keeps getting wider the longer you're on PC.

This was true even before Steam sales and Humble Bundle and free games on the Epic Store and and and...
Retail Marketing: 21 Solid Strategies on a Small Budget
This is true. I am a NixOS fan, but when a piece of software asks me to use a Nix binary cache it can mask problems like a private git repo or other issues that would prevent a full build without me knowing. Worse yet, a Hydra box eating it's own dogfood ...
You can play this game at any time by going to chrome://dino
Pinging someone with a "hey" or "hello" isn't really the same as putting a call on hold. As the site points out, chat is asynchronous, so the recipient doesn't have to wait around as they would on hold. Plus it's a status check. With a call you have instant audio feedback to know they're on the line. Not so with chat.

Granted, you don't always need to establish the recipient's immediate availability. But often chat gets used for questions that need answers almost now but don't warrant the time and emotional investment of a phone call.

If you don't do a status check, you risk the recipient not being available to answer your question in time. And if they aren't, you'll waste more time typing your question than you would have with a precautionary hello.
Over and over again this is once again made obvious to everyone as some large company abuses their monopoly or shuts down their website, and the people who have been saying adamantly for decades that this had never been OK to begin with sit back and know "y'all still aren't going to stop" :/.
How to Write a Custom Comparator in Python
Well, it's only illegal if you lie under oath. But lying to the court in your filing is probably not gonna sit well with the judge.
The expectation is that the new Navi (which will come out probably earlier than xe-hpg) will be 80 cu [0], it is essentially 2x 5700XT [1]. This should put it in 15-20TFlop range, 1.5-2x Intel single tile.

[0] https://www.pcgamesn.com/amd/big-navi-rdna2-80-cu-rumour

[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radeon_RX_5000_series
And you can use it with the same ticket, because VRR.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verkehrsverbund_Rhein-Ruhr
Make no mistake, the US judiciary is also fully captured by the two parties. Just because one person doesn't have total power means nothing, Xi Jinping doesn't have total power either.

But the the two US parties and sometimes even one party alone can totally make anything legal. The judiciary is independent only instantenaousely, not long term.

Mind you, this is because the US political system is not made to deal with parties. When you add a duopoly of power every single check and balance of the US political system breaks down.

That, makes the two comparable.
But that’s not the person’s fault: it’s the medium. Chat is about chatting, it’s not a mail, it’s not a letter, it’s an impromptu chat.
It would be funny if the irs decided to go after all the people who legitimately donated To the development office to get their children admission, but took the full charitable tax deduction and didn’t subtract the fair market value for the admission... even funnier if they clawed back the universities tax free status or atleast back taxes on the donations as well.

Which brings me to, Wikileaks or someone should publish the FMV of quid pro quo admissions charity by college.
Interesting that they felt they had the right to tamper with what is obviously private property.
No, IQ tests are sheets of paper full of questions like "complete this two-dimensional sequence of shapes", "hand = finger, foot = ?", etc. that get scored based on your answers.

Studies on IQ tests however do control for the factors you named, at least if they are good studies.
Why should we protect cartels?
The point I was making is that in the 1/N system, the failure of the one person or element brings the whole thing down, it's a single catastrophic failure mode, where when N/N at the other extreme, the failure is contained to that group. The partial ones mean that the number of people/parts that have to fail is greater to bring the whole system down.
(the example case is storing a single shared secret, which if compromised, means re-enrolling all N people in that secret again)

You can replace a root of trust, but then you have to re-enroll all parties into it. When you have partial or federated trust, the failure is contained to the N/x group.

I'm thinking there may be a universal trade off between number of trusted parts and the consequence/cost of failure.

The concept being that a trust model is essentially a non-reversible function you iterate from its initial unique "trusted," conditions (like derived keys, or a certificate chain), and if those unique initial conditions are replicated, you have to re-compute the entire function from a new unique initial condition, or risk "fake" branches.

A root of trust is the root node of a tree (or a DAG these days), and a compromise of any of the roots will effectively isolate its downstream branches. Compromising a single N/1 root means you compromise the whole tree, where a federated multi-rooted tree means the damage can be contained - in the model I'm thinking of.

TL;DR: the cost of the recovery mode in the 1-of-N case requires re-instantiating or enrolling all of N, which basically means bootstrapping the whole scheme. Fine for a closed system, Hard for an open one.
What else can this piece be but propaganda?

Covered over is not clean. This piece is disgusting. Is it really trying to claim that because it has green plants that it is clean?

The author must consider Chernobyl lovely too.
I'm sorry but that is just insane. What about the company employing the workers? What about the owner/CEO/board members of that company? Will they be similarly restricted?

The whole point of the union is collective bargaining and providing a united front, and they need to be able to defend their right to exist in the political arena. If they can't make political contributions, it won't be long before they are outlawed. It's not like they wield disproportionate influence, anyway. They are far outspent by the capital class, as evidenced by the gradual erosion of union power and the passage of anti-union laws such as "right to work" in recent decades.
I always found it funny that Canadians score better (before normalization) on the WAIS IQ test than Americans even though the WAIS is an American test with some American history knowledge questions and American notation/units in the questions. Canada doesn't actually have their own IQ test afaik, they just use the WAIS and renormalize.

I'll never understand why US politicians don't strive to close this gap or many others when the two countries are otherwise very similar.
Why do you think it is just the USA? Are you genuinely surprised or this just a baity-get-things-rolling type of question?

Just off the top of my head this is one of the most famous (exposed) examples in the UK
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-47457330

Police were created explicitly to help with suppressing the threat that comes from anyone that earns their living by a wage from others.
Ever since I was a kid I’ve been fascinated with natural disasters. This is the one of the most fascinating ones. Can you imagine a giant wall of water this size coming at you?
Guest accounts
Also, you can choose much better quality components for cheaper. Even with economies of scale, it seems like OEMs can't build a high end gaming PC for cheaper than what you can do yourself.
As a developer, APIs changing and going away is a part of life. Apple deprecates APIs on macOS and iOS all the time. Even the concept of porting from an older to a newer OS is quite common.

Everyone rewrote DOS applications for Windows 3.x, then Windows 95, then Windows NT; Everyone rewrote applications for Apple II, MacOS classic, then OSX.

But, when I read this article, it exposes a clear need for powerful 3rd party browser APIs; even though the API may change between browser releases. (This, BTW, is what happens on Mac. If you develop a MacOS application, every year or so you need to tweak it.) Also, there's a clear need to install 3rd party plugins that can do things to screw up the browser. (This, BTW, is why desktop computers let you install whatever you want, and why you can sideload on Android.)
As a black person I'm going to swallow my disgust at the fact I had to read that this drivel evening and point their own study is clearly stating the opposite point they made, that IQ tests are not measuring some sort of inherent intelligence difference in races:

> Second, even IQ scores clearly respond to changes in the environment. IQ scores, for example, have risen dramatically throughout the world since the 1930s.

-

Pseudo-intellectual "redpilled" types like to pretend that racial conflict ended the day slavery ended, but since out redlining wasn't even fully illegal until the late 70s... it makes sense that a test highly affected by environmental factors would reflect systemic and persistent policies that were designed to destroy the environment of minorities.
I would much rather have the wall of text. Whenever I get to the message, I can process it without asking a million of follow up questions.
The site doesn't rank well on Google, because of competing sites in the niche. It turns out 8th page on Google does worse than first result on Yahoo.

In order, traffic comes from: Bing, Duckduckgo, Yahoo, Ecosia.org, Oceanhero.today, Google, and the various country based Yahoos (nl.search.yahoo.com, and so on).
Has anyone gone through a career change (to something in data science / ML) after going through courses like fast.ai? If so, how difficult / easy was that change?
By investing students fees in the stock market?
More importantly, the IQ test was created specifically as a way to validate racism.

Stanford psychologist Lewis Terman’s IQ test, the standard upon which our current tests are based, was meant to show “enormously significant racial differences in general intelligence, differences which cannot be wiped out by any scheme of mental culture.” The Measurement of Intelligence 1016
Corporations are voluntary organizations that exist for the benefit of their owners and if their owners don’t like their politics they can leave much more easily than any union member can. Of course they should be involved in politics.
Several versions of traditional solitaire are extremely deep games when you try and maximize your odds of winning. Video games can be mindless or mind bending puzzles.

Which is why I think lumping all video games into a single category is meaningless. Beat Saber and Minecraft have little in common.
> Either pay-up for sec experts ..

It's next to impossible to measure 'sec expertise'. This would only go far if the security expert gave a warranty on their service which we know is never going to happen.

Besides which, the thing that would save this companies is mostly obvious and any half-decent security officer will do them. The difference being buy-in from senior management.

https://www.cyber.gov.au/acsc/view-all-content/publications/...
This is true if the software isn't being maintained. I rely on a few deprecated utilities that are stable in the very limited sense that they will likely never break on their own in the current way they are being used. They doesn't mean they're not currently vulnerable.

Systems are as stable as their most vulnerable components. I don't think that's a contentious notion at all.
it's probably the state AG's office
At that time at that place NIMBYs would have been tared and feathered, or something similar. Which applies to the whole region, and time, I think.
>The CCP, in terms of respecting international laws, are behind the US.

Only because the US unilaterally decides what international law means. China has not committed any offence of international law anywhere even near that of the Iraq War in the last half-century.

The US only seems good because they set the example. The US literally has the Hague invasion act. It has absolutely no care in the world about international law, international law retroactively changes to suit the US.
So you don’t have any evidence that Apple has banned an app or forced them to sell everywhere at a single price?
It's ironic that it's situated in Serenbe, an exclusive $300k-$1M+ 'new urban community' that, despite its efforts to appear otherwise, is designed for anyone other than the common person.
Why would you need a follow up question more for a bunch of lines of text vs a block of text? We're talking about putting a bunch of new lines (i.e sending many messages) vs sending just one large one. They can contain the exact same information.
This is great! I've been wondering about the discrepancies for years now. Thanks Josh :)
Anyone who plays RTS games knows this is about resources, speed of construction, how much damage the unit can project, and how much damage the opponent can absorb.
Are you asking because you think the parent point is right? (despite dozens of replies to the contrary)

Because your wording strongly implies you understand it's additionally repulsive...
Sony is using the Canno EF playbook and it's working. The E mount is also by far the most open FF ILC system available.
I wonder if corporations would be more efficient long term if each layer in the hierarchy simply collected 30% tax from the layer below like capitalism, instead of being run like a dictatorship / communism that they currently run as... I mean if 30% ownership of everything via taxes is good for capitalist governments, maybe it’s good for corporations also ?
Basically most of the etiquette described in http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html is valid.
But it is not simple to find the "right" level.

You do not have to live for ever, so surviving a extinction level ecvent is more than the "right" level.

Being so brittle that the failure of one delivery kills you is less than the "right" level.

How long do you want to live? And when you die, how is it going to happen?

It is pleasing to see firms go out of business in a orderly fashion, such that they have the resources to shut up the shop properly, and every one in the business gets "onto the life-rafts". But it is more common to see businesses go down in a screaming heap with huge debts and big messes for others to clean up.

When I was at business school I was taught that a firm should have the correct amount of debt such that it maximised the tax shield of interest payments and had no fat that a hostile acquirer could use to do a hostile takeover.

That was in 2007. I am quite sure the course teaches something different now!
In-person I almost universally heard stuff like "is anyone else having problems with X? the site won't load for me" and that second part is crucial.

In chat, something like 1/4-1/2 are "is X working?" followed by total silence. Sometimes they really are just asking if it's running, i.e. does X still exist. Sometimes they're having a failed build on a different system because their dependency manager cache is broken and it's blaming random libraries. Sometimes the frontend is busted.

What they're doing in practice is asking for 1:1 dedicated help on literally anything, so the only reasonable choice for a responder is those unicorn devs who know everything somehow. They almost never exist, so those "questions" go unanswered for a long time.
Got links for US ones based on net assets? Would definitely clear up the situation one way or the other.
How is their game store a walled garden? It can be installed alongside others on the same hardware. Even their exclusivity agreements are time limited.
Could you help me understand this a little better and define what you mean by local interest?