skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
My firefox just remembers what sites I visit frequently, so when I start typing my bank's URL, that's what I get when I press enter to autocomplete. This seems robust to me; either I get my bank's website every time, or I will get repeatedly scammed (unlikely).
Can you explain what you mean by this? I'm not sure I really understand. Are you saying you create a public channel for each person (ie, their name)? If so, how come?
Similar dynamics to the Wells Fargo scandal [0]

It's a pity that Wells Fargo has not yet exited the banking business :)

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wells_Fargo_account_fraud_scan...
It's not really about what Django supports, but about what all the databases you're using support. If you run it in testing with SQLite, you are not going to have the same set of features for indexing, transactions, and so on as you do in production with, say, PostgreSQL.

The parent comment mentioned GIST indexes; I'd add partial indexes and triggers as two features that can make a huge difference when used even in a very few places in an app (which is what we do in Zulip, on PostgreSQL.)
I'm a broken record, but this is a great time to modularize "social media" and break it apart into a sub/pub protocol, an interoperability protocol, a client, a data store, standard data sets, data portability, and a sorting algorithm (including anti-evil, spam etc.) Splitting whatsapp or instagram from facebook is a fools errand.

A client should be something much more agnostic, that anybody can use on any platform. The platforms would need to agree to an smtp/http like protocol allowing a person to upload and download data. Nations seeking sovereignty can be more protective of data stores and ranking algorithms, BUT as end users, WE would benefit from being able to plop different ranking algorithms between the data set we are connected to, and client we use to view. If I dont like my client, ranker, data provider etc, I can swap out the component, WITHOUT losing my friends or access to my own graph.

Innovation can happen independently at the client and ranking levels, new winners can rise and fall more naturally, where everybody isnt "stuck" with the lowest common denominator default.

In my view, anything else will continually lead to a few titans owning the whole network stack and graph, and governments can peruse antitrust and security angles all they want, but the same problem will just keep happening as long as they incentivize isolated proprietary silos over choice.
I need to learn more about Godel and read the books about him. From the outside, he almost seems like an intellectual rebel, showing how systems are broken when people assume they aren't. With his completeness theorems and his Godel metric, he seemed to be excited by logical exotica. I find the Godel metric and its closed timelike curves to be an interesting case study of general relativity. This is just me spitballing here, as I have not yet dove into the many books I have on him.
You seem confused. What's your point?
The US absolutely has the moral high ground compared to any communist country and it’s not even fucking close.
I've tried to avoid strong sunshine -- UV safe glasses for example.

Now I'm wondering if 5 minutes without sunglasses could be good?

Any link to where you've read about this? Or search words?
Thanks, that's really encouraging. While it has taken a lot of hard-work to develop it, Sysbox would not exist without the excellent work done by OCI runc developers (Sysbox was forked from runc) as well as the LXD developers (who have done a bunch of the kernel work to enable the advanced OS-virtualization techniques we incorporated in Sysbox).
Android has had sideloading as well as alternative app stores enabled by it since the beginning. These problems don't really exist. You'd still want to publish on Google Play by default, but if your app hurts Google's business, morals, feelings, or whatever else, you have the option of distributing it using whatever means you see fit — like an apk with a built-in updater on your website.

In other words, being rejected from the App Store is an end of the world situation, while being rejected from Google Play is not quite.
Does asbestos have impacts on mental health? I thought it was mostly just lung issues like mesothelioma.
Gus Fring said it better than I ever will:

"What does a man do, Walter? [...] A man provides. And he does it, even when he's not appreciated, or respected, or even loved. He simply bears up and he does it, because he's a man."
Your plain and confident statement "it is" doesn't really address any of my concerns, and I just explained why, as it seems, it actually isn't.

P.S.

I did some random googling, and while I'm not sure, all this story seems to be based off of Paul Finsler's work, which he himself thought to be the priority for an incompleteness theorem (Collected Works Vol. IV., p. 9), but didn't seem so to Gödel (and, seemingly, the majority of those who had to say something about it).

If this indeed is the same thing, it would explain to me why this "proof", which doesn't seem to me like a proof at all is so widespread. But, again, I'm not sure I'm reading into it correctly, and operating under assumption that if somebody could provide something more weighty than "it is" statement, I could be persuaded otherwise.
Not the op but I'm betting they're referring to this: https://www.newsbreak.com/news/1607170043110/united-tesla-co...
Eh, there are discovery mechanisms for which features are supported by which server/client.

The biggest problem with XMPP, is that it's really confusing and has a steep learning curve. The barrier for someone to get into XMPP as a developer is quite high, unfortunately. There are libraries like Smack that makes it a lot easier to use, but to understand it... that's something entirely different.

The abundance of XEP's doesn't help, and like you mentioned, everyone implements their own XEP based on their interpretations - right or wrong.

There's also a lot of peculiarities with XMPP that aren't expected in a modern world, such as offline messaging and multi-device messaging (receiving messages on both your phone and desktop simultaneously). XMPP was never intended to support these things. Some servers will attempt to imitate these features, but it's always a hack and works with varying degrees of reliability.

With all that said - we drove an XMPP Server (Openfire) and clients within our company for well over a decade. For that use - it's amazing.
There is a standard way to join a street gang. That doesn't meant that the street gang rules the neighborhood according to a representative democracy, under which people have constitutional rights.
CoinTracker is hiring engineers to make crypto easy to use (Remote, Global)
The Gimbal UFO video is not a rotating flying saucer or a rotating aircraft
> they can be used in any with any framework, no wrapping required.

That's the selling point, but is not quite true. At least a while ago there was still some ceremony needed at least in React. You could say that that's React's fault, but it doesn't really matter whose fault it is - Web Components are different from standard DOM elements, and thus need special treatment from frameworks that interact with standard DOM elements.
We can do both.

What you and nearly everyone who argues from your point of view fails to concede is that that these are not mutually opposed strategies. It is possible to censor dangerous information without falling down a slippery slope towards arbitrary thought-policing and Orwellian dystopia, or to at least attempt to slow the spread of dangerous misinformation by not allowing it to be normalized or given equal weight to truth, and it is possible to do so while attempting to engage the open-minded few.

In a world where the only thing one could do about the next Hitler is politely and civilly ask him and his neo-Nazi cohort for a vigorous series of Lincoln-Douglas style debates, one will be told to get lost while they go on about their business of saturating every platform they can with their propaganda and poisoning the well of public discourse.

And then what? Their strategy is more effective than yours. What can you do when your only option can be rendered ineffective simply by ignoring it and mocking it with Facebook memes? You've already lost the battle.
One thing that is not often mentioned is these threads is how this is particularly beneficial for European workers. They live in cities that are already small and dense, generally don't depend on the office for their socialization, internet speeds are good (due to density probably) and family life is balanced. Plus a lot of them are already accustomed to working remotely. They 'll probably be able to compete for a lot more jobs now.
Yes, very true, thanks. Another interesting angle is how DOJ can subpoena tech co's for, say, location information, but defense attorneys can't. So if you want exculpatory data, you have fewer avenues for getting it. The deck is stacked in a lot of ways against the defense.
My solution was to reverse engineer highly ranked web pages. I used a subset of the schema that seemed to be universal to those pages. Schema.org just gave me the proper file formats.
It is one thing to support the literary works of someone who has views that are disagreeable.

It is quite another to continue that support when the person takes actions that are treasonous on the one hand, and supportive of murderous and barbaric activities on the other.

The world was engaged in an existential fight for the very ability to speak freely at the time. Many people lost loved ones in this fight, and the cost was very high.

And Pound decides he's going to lend his talent to the people killing of Jews and anyone else who got in the way of the fascists.
Of course, this has been proposed as a mechanism for killing the dinosaurs.
https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9505028

(obviously in conflict with what you posted, and I haven't run through the numbers. Also, our knowledge of radiation effects on organisms is honestly quite limited).
I think the perspective of "who cares about blue collar worker" is assuming that wfh is always a choice, a preference and ideal for non-blue-collar workers.

I'm sure right now, lots of people who dreamed of wfh and couldn't have tried it and learned that it might not be the right arrangement for them.

Also, I find it hard to accept that people who pick certain jobs out of preference (not made to chose out of circumstances) like "blue collar jobs" would expect working from home. What does it mean for a steel worker to be working from home? A warehouse worker? A painter? A housekeeper? A cook?

I do agree with the rest of the sentiment you shared though... The sense that some people who are enjoying the current state of affairs want others to return to normalcy while they are living the exception.
I just saw this sign yesterday and was thinking how many ways it could be parsed:

"Big golf factory sale opening"

Seems like at least 8:

"Big (golf factory)" vs "(Big golf) factory"

"(factory sale) opening" vs. "factory (sale opening)"

"... opening:V(PresentProgressive)" vs "... opening:N"

Only two of which are semantically likely, and one of which is pragmatically likely - unless you're really rich and in the market for golf factories.
The judiciary merely interprets what is written. It does not amend.

Having said that, obviously, the interpretation often has the effect of amending. But if we’re going to be technical about things, that’s the reality.
Data collection by domestic companies worries me, but it's much easier to control/litigate/regulate issues domestically than abroad, especially if we're dealing with geopolitical adversaries.
It's my understanding that commands don't have to be specially written for Crush. As long as they speak an understandable format, they can be used. https://github.com/liljencrantz/crush#reading-and-writing-fi...
With there being so few with that power, I fully expect them to have a special relationship with the admins themselves. From this, it follows that the admins might be very influential if they wish, using these few mods as proxies if the actions might be sensitive.
I don't think there's enough information to make that conclusion. The strongest conclusion I think we can make is that ocean current's changing is almost certainly going to change regional climates in unexpected ways.
hi -

I practice mindfulness. Your post is both entirely true and also total BS. Because this: we live in our physical bodies , we are deciding to live in that world. Of course Donald Trump is, like all of us, another infinitesmally small point of energy that is consciousness like all the rest of us. However, within the physical realm that pure dot unfortunately happens to be manifested inside of an orange bucket of authoritarian narcisssm, which is a threat to all the other physical entities. When we practice mindfulness we still live in the physical world. I can feel sorrow and love for the innocent dot that is inside of DT but the physical manifestation should be rotting in jail.

put another way, if you truly accept everything about manifested reality without condition, why does it matter that there is conflict? the decision to no longer suffer is to accept whatever one's fate is, not to circumvent that fate.
I went into a GMP company (i.e. medical goods manufacturer subjected to regulations) with the attitude that I could impress with my tricks for efficiency. But GMP is so insane that there is simply no way to do anything efficently at all. I think the only thing I managed to improve was a few excel sheets. I am back in research now, and very glad to be in a culture where the most efficient and effect technique is the one used. The thing is, people know there are better ways, but sometimes their hands are tied by stupid rules.
I’ve been trying to build a really simple only boxes and arrows whiteboard at https://whiteboard.systems

It’s definitely not the same as drawing on a whiteboard, but I’ve found it useful for explaining abstractions.
"Certainly don't change your behavior! By all means, continue to lie, cheat, and steal. Just make sure you come up with code words for it."
The fees are ridiculous. Google Scholar is free but it’s very difficult to use if you just want records for a particular case. In my attempt to solve the problem, I created the website bankrupt11.com which offers free access to federal bankruptcy records.
PyRGG 0.7 Released: Python Random Graph Generator
Until we solve AGI (if we ever do), someone is still going to have to go out to do a wide range of jobs that just can't be done remotely.

The fewer people out and about, the less opportunities for the virus to spread.

Yes, it's messed up, but it's better than the alternative: Everyone going about their lives like normal and spreading it even more.

I honestly don't see any better alternative.
That's your opinion, and I respect it, but my opinion is that you are drawing too hard a line, and that it can be possible to separate a person's work from their other views and actions. Perhaps not always, but it can be. And -- as I said in my original comment -- it is still possible to suffer bad consequences from doing this, so we still must be careful when choosing to publish non-toxic works from toxic creators.
Counterpoint: working on infrastructure teams at Atlassian are significantly more pleasant than the product teams.
Nothing is for free - especially around no code platforms. We aren’t far from zapier, bubble and webflow getting a % of equity on whatever you build on/with their platforms!
There are a number of blue-collar jobs that don't require close indoor proximity. That's almost the differentiating factor. A landscaper, welder, framer, forester aren't sitting in conference rooms breathing each other's exhalations for 8 hours a day.

And since most of those jobs aren't usually salaried, I think they'd all welcome being able to go to work and continue to earn.
What other countries have long term plans and initiatives and effectively execute on them as China does?
The Nana Dome Part 1 – Short story series about the 2014 Israeli-Hamas Conflict
What are you actually saying? That white colar workers cannot have certain benefits that come with the job because blue collar workers cannot have them?

Let's hope everyone can choose the job they want and have the benefits that come with it.

I know plenty of blue collar workers that would never want to work behind a desk, and also know plenty who started earning a lot of money at 18.

I find your "blue collar victims" mentality very strange.
It really bothers me, how many (I assume) PRC loyalists are on here. This BBC article is valid, and on topic to this thread, and elaborates on how "just making stuff" isn't simple.

Why else would this be a vote down, other than puppets of the PRC?
Sure, but does it matter when unit testing code or developing the 95% where it doesn't?

It matters for production sure if you start getting slowdowns and you can have migrations that do that. But for cranking out APIs on DRF, say, it matters a lot less than you think it does.
These are all extreme niche cases for WebRTC, aren't they? Niche, here, relative to actual usage, not "number of apps".

If the overwhelming majority of daily invocations of WebRTC protocols is due to simple videoconferencing applications, and all those invocations have to pay a complexity and security tax in order to potentially enable someone else's "teleoperation", that's a misallocation, isn't it?
Back in the 90s we hit a massive wall on three fronts using Smalltalk: collaboration between developers (no file system to share code); no change control; deployment to users (stripping down images to make applications).

We had a pile of hacks but integrating changes took all the productivity of Smalltalk away.

However, tools like Envy/Developer fixed a lot of it. It still didn't fix everything but at least sorted code integration and source code versioning. Not sure if the product still exists though.

I loved using Smalltalk but in a team environment its useless and keeping your code disentangled from the underlying environment is a nightmare.
These are free

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/slipopinion/19

https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/district/als...
There's even a warning that you should make sure to make your query as specific as possible, because if you screw up and it returns 100 pages, sucks to be you.

There's basically 0 chance this would be legal if you're a private company.
One of the most influential philosophical concepts for me from the last decade was from this very blog called “Nebulosity”. It just speaks to the nature of reality that is misinterpreted with overlays of meaning.

-

‘Nebulosity’ refers to the insubstantial, amorphous, non-separable, transient, ambiguous nature of meaningness.

From a distance, clouds can look solid; close-up they are mere fog, which can even be so thin it becomes invisible when you enter it.

Clouds often have vague boundaries and no particular shape.

It can be impossible to say where one cloud ends and another begins; whether two bits of cloud are connected or not; or to count the number of clouds in a section of the sky.

If you watch a cloud for a few minutes, it may change shape and size, or evaporate into nothing. But it is impossible to find an exact moment at which it ceases to exist.

It can be impossible to say even whether there is a cloud in a particular place, or not.

[from] https://meaningness.com/nebulosity
Worded as such it does appear threatening. If someone tweeted that about me I would feel worried about my personal safety and that of my family. The law specifically states that placing a reasonable person in fear for their safety via online communications is a crime.

If you're going to request personal information for a legitimate reason then you should word it in a non threatening manner.
apparently this person really is a useful idiot lmao
How does Sysbox compare to Podman?

(If I remember correctly you can run systemd in a podman container and/or run a podman container with systemd.
They’d probably be better off just charging people for the ability to opt out of junk mail.
There is also the GLUE benchmark, which includes ambiguity handling but also includes other NLU tasks: https://gluebenchmark.com/
Indeed. I deployed julia on 40,000 cores at TACC, but they wouldn't take an upgrade ticket so I had to run it in a container (not docker, obvi).

On the other hand Julia probably has a very strong long game, given that the Federal reserve bank uses it.
Steve Blank talks a lot about true start up business models, and he has all kinds of content out there:

https://steveblank.com/

Here's his blog section on business models:

https://steveblank.com/category/business-model-versus-busine...
Free association leads to the much-lamented "echo chambers" though, and "polarization." But maybe that's the best we can hope for.

Actually the biggest problem with "polarization" in my book is that there are only two poles, at least in the US. And the only real reason for lamenting "echo chambers" is some sense that "we all" need to get along. But that's only because "we" are "all" cooped up together, forced to associate and to share large and insufficiently flexible political organizations -- whether it's the too-few nationally-viable political parties or the too-big nation itself. In other words maybe it's still just a problem of insufficiently-free association. If I could freely associate, at not too great a cost, with some political party or nation that aligned perfectly with my values, I would do it and probably should.

But then cynically I suppose those nations would then start warring with each other if you didn't separate them strongly like little kids on the fucking playground. Sigh, time to get drunk.
Tu quoque type of arguments are useless when you re the world's leading power (and want to keep being so)
> The Government of China wants power. They want influence. They want information. They want control. And no Chinese company is allowed to refuse its pursuit of those.

I am not sure how this distinguish CCP from any other power nation's government, and warrants unlawful ban on a private company's APP.
That's awesome! I searched for MuleSoft, not expecting anything in particular, and found a random fact (at the end) that certainly wasn't in the title of the article.

Bug report: in Safari on dark mode, the text in the search box is almost the same color as the background (white on white).

From "GitHub was also talking to Google about a deal, but went with Microsoft instead" https://www.cnbc.com/2018/06/05/github-interest-from-google-... - Salesforce got MuleSoft for $7.5 billion, Microsoft got GitHub for $7.5 billion.
My aunt got one and I helped her set it up and install software on it. These things were so cool at the time. It even had a built-in 3.5" floppy drive. I think it had a trackball and buttons instead of the touchpads we're all used to now.
I'm risking losing a limb for saying this, but I would be much more comfortable if the EO clearly stated the main reason for the TikTok and WeChat ban is a retaliatory tit-for-tat against China's long time behavior of banning US tech companies operating in the Chinese market, which sounds like the main reason why many here support this ban.

Whether or not that tit-for-tat behavior leads to a net benefit for the US is up for debate. But the fact the EOs cite "national security", "privacy violation", etc. as the main reasons for banning makes you wonder "are those the real reasons behind this ban?" If they are, then questions raised by OP's article is perfectly legit, and makes the ban look either misplaced or hypocritical. If the ban really is tit-for-tat, what's stoping the EO from just saying so? Honestly, this whole situation makes the White House/Department of State look like they don't even believe those allegations themselves, which weakens their ground in any legitimate discussion around"national security threat" , "privacy violation" etc.
What does WYSIWHG stand for?