skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
>This doesn't make sense. If "minimum bar" is your selection criteria

I think "minimum bar" refers to technical skills, not all selection criteria. It's perfectly sensible* to look at a larger pool with the minimum skills and select from the few with the right attitude and attention to detail.

That's not the same strategy as reducing the pool to the cheapest candidates regardless of their attitude, and isn't going to produce the same hiring decisions.

* even if it's not a universal strategy
I am definitely an Apple fan - I have an iPhone, iPad, Watch, Pencil, AppleTV, AirPods Pro and a work MacBook. But, Apple does a lot of things that are not consumer friendly.

- 5GB of free iCloud storage in 2020. I can imagine the countless number of people who have lost photos that weren’t backed up because they didn’t upgrade their iCloud storage plan. 50Gb should be the minimum when you buy a new phone.

- subscription apps not at least being able to say something vague like “go to our website to create an account”.

- not being able to change the default mail, browser, calendar, maps, music app. Some of that will be correctly in iOS 14.

Apple’s pro-privacy stance in merely a strategy credit. That’s not their business model.

Just like FB can say with a straight face that they won’t put data on servers in non democratic countries - they aren’t allowed there anyway.

Cook also kissed Trump’s golden ring and let him tell lies about Apple’s US manufacturing plans during a photo op.
I don't think primary driver for this move is US it looks like to be coming from the Indian ban. India had 120 million active TikTok users. It was one of the fastest growing apps there.
colorForth Primer
Leave it to America to have an app that works just great (Vine), destroy it, let China copy it, and buy it back.

stonks all the way my brother
I use sql on a daily basis.

Many of my etl processes are based on stored procedures. These are large transfers usually via bulk copy (bcp).

Crud operations are done via orms (Entity Framework) or a light orm, Dapper which requires sql statements at times.

Generally, I try to avoid complex sql statements though they are necessary.
> In Rust (as in C, for that matter), two structs are not interchangeable just because they look the same.

In C, two structs with different tags in the same translation unit are indeed incompatible. (That includes two structs with no tag that look the same, because, effectively, each has some internal, machine-generated tag.)

Within the same translation unit, looking the same is not a consideration at all; it's all based on the tag symbol.

Between translation units, two complete struct types that are exactly the same (same members, of the same type, in the same order, with the same names, and other details like bitfield configuration) are compatible are if they both have the same tag.

But they are also compatible if neither has a tag: and in that case, they would be incompatible if they were in the same translation unit.

Basically, two machine-generated tags for anonymous structs are considered equivalent if they are in different translation units, in which case compatibility is purely down to structural equivalence.

In practice, C compilers do not police struct tags at all between translation units; you can get away with it if the same object is known as "struct point { double x, y; }" and "struct pointe { double x, y; }" in another translation units. You can even change the member names, for that matter.

You will run aground with a C++ compiler, though, due to type safe linkage which pulls in class names.

FFI implementations obviously don't care about any of this. If I'm declaring an FFI type that is to be compatible with the C "struct stat" in a Lisp, so I can call the stat function, these concepts have gone out the window. The memory layout compatibility is all that matters: correct sizes, alignments, conversions.
Haha yeah I find it easy too, which is why we're here, but I'm trying to also make it easy for people who normally think it isn't.

And yes, setting up Python is a pain, so I think being able to start learning and running code without any setup is a big deal for learners. Get them excited about coding before they have to deal with that!
It's a bit late in the cycle, but you can still make a few bucks in gold. As soon as your friends & family start talking about investing in gold, sell.
We used to have Matt Cutts [1] here, and he used to take a look at somewhat similar problem. I just guess that if someone is going to give e hand, s/he needs the link to take an unofficial look.

There is still a link to the old site in https://www.chess.ca/en/ws/under-construction/

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matt_Cutts
Combine Publishers, Part 1: Creating a Custom Publisher
One solution is to use Ana / Miniconda. If you are not that tech savvy, if you don't mind downloading several hundred megabytes you can get away with this easily.

In my case, and contrary to what one of the other commentators said, I'm using docker.

It took a while to get it ironed out, but I use a "base" folder where I have already downloaded all the packages I use by default (Top of my mind are pandas, numpy and youtube-dl ;) )

I have all the related configuration in an env file that tells pip to save the packages in the base folder so they don't disappear when I shut down the container - that I always run with --rm so they get removed when dead - and for creating a new env I just have to copy that folder. As I use a base folder for all of this I don't need to remember the names of the envs, as just need to list folders.

Only downside to this - because I'm lazy and it still hasn't bothered me enough to fix it - is that new files & folders are owned by root.

I use just a base image with python, and for different versions that work with this - supposedly - I just have to download a different image.
This is kind of the meta plot of Gattaca. You get what you measure, so if we try to measure "potential" we end up getting only the potential our measurements say we have.
US operations alone cant be valued at 50 billions.
Actually surprisingly solid advice, even though it's reddit.

Helps that the first sublink in there is bogleheads :)
The Google home page is horrible on mobile without an ad blocker. Don’t get me started with AMP pages.
:ve=all

Cursor in virtual space... Emacs doesn't do it right.
This would be simple for the user to execute but it would very quickly be spotted by the operator as it's all from a single originating MSISDN.
Spreading the load over many users like your latter example would be a lot harder to spot, as would spamming through multiple SMS providers as you're diluting it (but it might also get picked up by the provider e.g. Twilio, MessageBird etc).

My point was that most spam originates from people with SS7 access and not SIM cards. It can also come through low cost SMS providers but is short lived as it's blocked the moment it's discovered or there's a complaint.
They will not have remotely the same size of users who will be using the web version. The concern is size of their the control , not that they control at all
What percentage of people do you think are willing to take even one of the steps mentioned in OP's comment? I'm pessimistic.
Yup, it was Trump that tantrumed out of the TPP, which was created as a firewall to China. Because of this, China has been growing increasingly confident, sensing the weakness in this administration and its inability to play geopolitics properly.
So what is the source of Beijing Biden?
Which also means USA is doing with it's citizens what China did with theirs.

You will regret having the government choosing your apps and websites. Your jubilee will turn into sorrow, the Chinese way of life business is not a good life. You will regret becoming a China.
I doubt China is interested to escalate this, beside some rhetoric. In fact, U.S. might open the pandora box of data sovereignty.
China already started to change U.S. just as Pompeo feared.

FYI, among the big tech Microsoft seems to have one of the best relationship with the Chinese state. Bing and Outlook is available albeit censored. Windows also widely used. It could be the case that Microsoft has a back channel with Chinese gov and already discussed this issue. I hope that the acquisition will be smooth.
A Brave New World did it easier, simply sort each person into a genetically pre-determined path prior to birth. No reason to go through all that messy data collection and analysis.
Not the op but I wish downvoters would comment giving their reasons. I remember seeing something about this in the atlantic a while back, and it would be good to know if/why it's a bad argument.
Should they not follow the laws of the country?

Wasn’t it just found in the large ElasticSearch hack that a number of no-logging VPN providers were in fact logging?
So Odin is actually configurable workflows in four supported runtime at the moment - Python, Go, Node and Bash. Temporal seems to only support Java and Go as far as I can see!

Specifically, the observability hooks in Odin would be the differentiating feature. Information is gathered to help infer the internal state of jobs. This means Odin can directly help diagnose where the problems are and get to the root cause of any interruptions. Debugging, but you're one step ahead.
If you do use a financial advisor, use one that charges hourly. The ones that charge a percentage win regardless of your outcome. I have been very unimpressed with their work when I have seen it in action. The flat fee ones are incentivized to give you less than what they would do in the same number of hours. Probably you can set up an initial allocation and learn about rebalancing, and you’ll only occasionally need advice in the future.

Another good book to read is “A Random Walk Down Wall Street”.
Of course they don’t need to, that’s not the point at all. They have, essentially, free money sitting there for the taking. A There is no guarantee the stock price will keep climbing, it could very well fall based on the P/E of 740. Borrowing against today’s inflated price in order to make acquisitions and investments actually seems like the fiscally responsible move.
The Easiest and Fastest Way to Deploy an OKD 4.5 Cluster in a Libvirt/KVM Host
> be a bit antagonistic to your existing user base and make up on the hope that you'll get a new rush of users to make up for it.

I think this is exactly it, and I also think it's the right thing to do. The antagonism to existing users (that don't want to change versions) is minimal. To them, it's just that Perl won't release anymore after a while, but there will be third parties to step in and offer support. I'm sure ActiveState is very interested in Perl 5 right now.

All this is is a recognition that Perl has been in maintenance support mode for years now, and providing a clean and clearly defined way for people that are interested in changes to opt in to them.

As a community, I think this is clearly the correct choice. The (current) nature of programming language communities and new user means that a large percentage of new users comes into programming each year. For a community as small as Perl, if you can increase the amount of those people that are coming to your community even minimally, it will probably dwarf the existing community fairly shortly, and that's needed if it's to survive at all.

I do and have developed Perl as either my main or one of my main responsibilities in by job for over two decades now. Perl 7 won't change how we do anything at work for years, if ever, since we have decades of Perl code to maintain and extend. I still am extremely happy about Perl 7 because it's the first time I've been excited about a Perl development in quite a while, and because I can't see any negatives for our existing code.
Maximise what return? Money? Gratitude? Ego?

- If you'd like to make a dent into ones life, help someone out with a low income to achieve their goals. Like paying for a drivers license or buying a okay car so mom can bring her kid to school. With that kind of money you can help a lot of people.
- If you want to use money to feel safe, put some money on therapy, to know you never needed it in the first place and to get to know yourself. Buy a piece of land for everyone to live on your family and friends.
- Ego? Spend it on cars? Parties, everything that was unreachable and plaster your confidence.
- Want more money? Invest it in arms, wind energy, or start your own fund in the balkans.

Up to you
I don't know about how the photo was originally presented, but the tweet that I linked explicitly says the frame is "17 30-second images of the comet added up", so it's hardly disingenuous.

The impact of Starlink on astronomical observation is in dispute and by no means is a settled matter: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starlink#Criticism
My take:

- Buy some TSLA now that its price has fallen recently.

- Try to find out what other S&P 500 stocks would hedge fund managers have to sell to make room for TSLA. I suspect these won't be best-performing or long-term most promising stocks. Sell / short them now before they plunge, if you hold them for whatever reason.
My advice is unconventional.
Why maximize your return? Money is a renewable resource, but time is not.

If I were you, I'd spend the money to enjoy my time with others I care about and donate the rest to others in need.
They recovered their costs. I already pay for the service. Tracking is just another excuse to raise rates, which as you note is the goal (bring money in, don't let it out). When rates have nothing to do with liability is it really insurance?

To quote wikipedia:
If the likelihood of an insured event is so high, or the cost of the event so large, that the resulting premium is large relative to the amount of protection offered, then it is not likely that the insurance will be purchased, even if on offer. Furthermore, as the accounting profession formally recognizes in financial accounting standards, the premium cannot be so large that there is not a reasonable chance of a significant loss to the insurer. If there is no such chance of loss, then the transaction may have the form of insurance, but not the substance (see the U.S. Financial Accounting Standards Board pronouncement number 113: "Accounting and Reporting for Reinsurance of Short-Duration and Long-Duration Contracts").
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insurance
How is that a good idea? They are already building 3 giant factories (Shanghai cont, Berlin, Austin), have enough cash for that and some more. They are profitable, free cash flow continues to increase as Model Y are delivered globally. They couldn't spend their money faster. Why would existing shareholders support a secondary?
"removed by mods" - exactly why I deleted my reddit account. They were conditioning children and young people to be okay with censorship.
>Super duper aggressive marketing spend, akin Apple's iphone rollout.

That's the real reason. Bytedance spent millions, possibly hundreds of millions, to buy those users. You couldn't escape from those ads in 2019.
The shimmies! I've forgotten about them :-) Had them at 65. They were very unexpected when they happened the first time. And were gone at 67/68 again. I think they result from imbalances in the rims, due to the valves. And it varies with different frames-
Or you know, other phone manufacturers could make a product that users were actually willing to pay a premium cut.
This has been true for the US markets till now but I am always scared to think of a scenario where they go the way of UK markets have done in the last decade. Look at one[1] of the FTSE 100's Index fund returns. They stand at 3.58% annualised, i.e your money is now 1.4x of the original amount. This is considering the fact that we are looking at returns from Aug 2010 levels when the FTSE index was already 20% down from the 2008 peak.

So the peaks I see now in Nasdaq actually look very scary to me. Anyway, I think if they decide to go ahead with equity, they should spread it out over a period.

[1] https://www.morningstar.co.uk/uk/funds/snapshot/snapshot.asp...
Wow, pretty inventive! You can get similar devices which plug into a computer and would be a lot easier.
It's funny how fads + web = information now. It used to be a transient thing, now it's stored and analysed ad nauseam (I suppose).
I write a lot of commandline utilities and scripts for automating tasks. I find environment variables much simpler to provide and accept key/value pairs than using arguments. Env vars don't depend on order; if present, they always have a value (even if it's the empty string); they're also inherited by subprocesses, which is usually a bonus too (especially compared to passing values to sub-commands via arguments, e.g. when optional arguments may or may not have been given).

Using arguments for key/value pairs allows invalid states, where the key is given but not the value. It can also cause subsequent, semantically distinct, options to get swallowed up in place of the missing value. They also force us to depend on the order of arguments (i.e. since values must follow immediately after their keys), despite it being otherwise irrelevant (at least, if we've split on '--'). I also see no point in concatenating options: it introduces redundant choices, which imposes a slight mental burden that we're better off without.

The only advice I wholeheartedly encourage from this article is (a) use libraries rather than hand-rolling (although, given my choices above, argv is usually sufficient!) and (b) allow a '--' argument for disambiguating flag arguments from arbitrary string arguments (which might otherwise parse as flags).
18yr old are hopefully not pissed off primarily stemming from the ban of this one app.

Regardless, young population have historically been absent from voting.
> The timing isn't particularly important, as long as you remember to turn down the heat as soon as it starts boiling.

The timing is never important on anything as long as you always get it right.
Yeah this was a big thing back in the heyday of CSGO skin trading. Putting the word "damascus" into a transaction comment would get your account locked.
Your computer has circuitry that is capable of being reused. It isn’t a simulator; it could, in theory, run that loop ad infinitum.

FHE can’t reuse circuitry. There’s no concept of, “based on the output, we now need to plug it back in and repeat.” Instead, it has to literally repeat that circuitry for every possible loop.
Awareness does matter, as does agreement in the same set of facts. And sadly most people, celebrities or not, do not have the time for the deeper activism you talk about and usually do not have the same mental
model of what the problem is if it exists at all.

And having gone through that activism in the UK back in day, from grassroots meetings to media and then advocacy to policy makers, what really really helps is a movement - ordinary people making a noise. And a noise on twitter is heard in the corridors of power today (tomorrow it may change.)

So if you want something to change at a local or national level, social media is a big part of your arsenal (but I agree not the whole part)
How the FBI tracked down the Twitter hackers
It will cripple China even more than Apple .

Apple will have 1-2 really bad years and would eventually be able to move their supply chain to other countries . Apple has the money to whether that storm

The millions of jobs lost in China would be permanent, and start a trend and they loose their manufacturing edge .
They'll probably end up banning advertisers from paying them, and TikTok from paying content creators. Sure, Americans will still be able to access the content (over an inferior interface), but TikTok will probably be losing money on American viewers (not necessarily a problem for a propaganda outlet), and TikTok won't be able to incentivize good content.
I'm curious about what kind of cancer masquerades as iron deficiency, an infection, and a benign tumor?
Don't do the French cheers "chin chin" in Japan... You'll get some laughs.

The site gets it right. Also kiss in Arabic is quite bad
Because managing the money wisely allows you to exchange less of it for more enjoyed time and more donation power, of course.

Your goal of using money to make you and other people feel good is not unconventional; the advice is unconventional because it's not an effective way to reach that goal.
> My car insurance company would sure love to put a tracker in my car but there is no way in hell that is going to happen.

If you take your cell phone in the car with you, they are already tracking you.
Thanks! I think I get it, but not fully yet: if you'd deplete the entire trust before dying, you'd have paid the same capital gains tax as you would've if you had not made the trust, correct? Just spread out over many years.

Why do you feel that it is a loophole if you pay the same, just at different times? (except over what you give to charity, but isn't charity untaxed pretty much across the board in the US?)

EDIT: by they way, yours is the first tax related comment that I recall reading that complains about unfair rules that are in your favour. Hats off, I had expected the opposite answer.
> Why not use card itself as u2f? Most phones now has nfc reader now.

Most budget Android phones don't, and the iPhone one is locked down.

Some banks now have an in-app token.

Many bank apps also have some form of jailbreak/root detection. If the detection is tripped, the app will either kill itself, or disable the in-app token.
Do companies have a fixed DNA that acquisitions can't change or can companies use acquisitions to evolve into something different?
Get some land, plant trees and all sort of vegetables, and live there basically in this small heaven.

That's my plan at least
Informally, I mean reducible from time-bounded Turing machines. Given a Turing machine TM and a time bound T, a (binary or arithmetic) circuit can be constructed to simulate TM for T steps. Or in other words, a circuit can be constructed to solve any particular instance of FNTIME(T).
Thanks! Yes sliding in texts / headers / annotations are on the upcoming features list. Any specific kind of text widgets that you are thinking of?
That doesn't mean that the system isn't dysfunctional. Merely that it's less dysfunctional than elsewhere.
You know Spotify also charges the music industry the same 30% to be on their platform that Apple charges?

Can I pay a $99 one time fee and bypass Spotify’s 30% and get my share of all of Spotify’s users subscription fee? Like Spotify does with respect to Apple?
So much software seems to share the name, I am are currently trying to figure out something a little more unique!
I just created a Discord server for hak.to a new hacking community
Hey guys and girls, my name is George aka gexos and I'm the founder of hak.to a new hacking community that tries to grow, we follow in the steps of our friends at dev.to a great community for developers.

HAK.to is a community of hackers getting together to help one another out. The information security industry relies on collaboration and networked learning. We provide a place for that to happen.

For the moment this is the project of one person, but I believe I will find open minded people to join me on this journey!

I just created a discord server If you want to talk to me, or eachother, join with this link! https://discord.gg/wnzvH2q

I also need two admins, if you are interested and have some knowledge with discord then message me on discord.

Thank you!!
Could you elaborate, in what way(s) is it slow?

Please don't downvote, I'm just curious.
Can you fill us in what they did for those who are uninformed?
Huh? The key point here is I don't think Google should block any website without providing some warning an an opportunity to fix the issue before imposing an immediate punishment. What if google.com search engine linked to a badware website? Should it be immediately blocked until fixed pending a review? No, of course not. Do onto others as you would have others do onto you.