skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Well, it's complicated, and we could brainstorm a few ideas. The problem seems to be that this brainstorming session never happened.

One problem is that the import path doesn't really give you enough information to totally figure out how to fetch the package. It's treated like a URL, and then the go-source tag comes in to relate it to something VCS-controlled. If we encoded the VCS into the import, we could e.g. have "git+https://git.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/getopt" as the import path, or we could move the import details into a separate file (like go.mod).

But if we assume that the import path and go.mod formats are fixed, then we still have more things we could do. For example, why this:

<meta name="go-import" content="git.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/getopt git https://git.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/getopt" />

When we could have this:

<link rel="alternate" type="application/x-git-http" "https://git.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/getopt" />
<link rel="alternate" type="application/x-git-ssh" "git@git.sr.ht:~sircmpwn/getopt" />

And why this:

<meta name="go-source" content="git.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/getopt https://git.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/getopt
https://git.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/getopt/tree/master{/dir}
https://git.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/getopt/tree/master{/dir}/{file}#L{line}">

When the same tag could be "source-browser" or something similar? I'm sure many projects other than Go would be very happy to have features like this standardized and available for all of them to use, but the Go team sees no further than its own nose when designing this sort of thing.

And furthermore, with the specific case of hardcoded software hosts on pkg.go.dev, why isn't it using the go-source meta tags to look up how to create links to files & line numbers? You guys forced this upon us and then don't even use it? There's no reason to hard-code regexes for various git domains when you could just fetch it like godoc.org does.
Show HN: Google Meet Studio Mini – Change your appearance with a browser script
Certainly not at the aggregate level. But if you have a chronic condition, and your doctor's advice isn't working, I think it's reasonable to do your own research even though in general the doctor knows best.
It's a beautiful bit of folklore, but is probably apocryphal: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2634635
Some programs may allow for plugins which can have their own options. But you may want to provide an option for where to load the plugins from.
List of Longest-Living Organisms
There is a weird argument by one of the commenters further up. Index funds are too risky because are not diversified enough and mostly focus on tech companies (mostly wrong). Why not buy 5000 stocks individually? Who is going to pick 5000 stocks by hand?
See my comment here which explains how "go-source" works:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24024130

It doesn't work on godoc.org not because they don't recognize your domain, but because cgit doesn't have go-source meta tags.
How is it ok for the US president to ban a media company? How is it ok for the US president to put pressure on the owners of a company to sell to another company? This must violate > 1 article of the constitution.
> prosperity is not right

If we directly translate this to Chinese, the statement doesn’t make any sense. Is “pursuing prosperity” a right?

Looks like between the two cultures there might be quite a diverge Of the definition of “right”

Otherwise though I agree with what you said and China probably has been making a good progress already. Believe it or not, low Carbon life style is promoted by the official media
I think your conception of rights is far too narrow.

If the government forces me against my will when I am not harming someone, it's a violation of my rights.

The rights listed in the Bill of Rights are not intended to be exhaustive. One reason some people opposed the Bill of Rights was because they feared that it would later be misunderstood to be exhaustive.

> Banning Chinese printers don't violate the rights of Americans either.

It absolutely does. It prevents me from buying a printer from whoever I want.

Look, I get it: like most people, you probably don't care about a theoretical way of looking at rights.

Nonetheless, we should all agree that the American government shouldn't do things that harm Americans. Does arbitrarily banning certain businesses, even if owned by foreigners, hurt Americans? Yes, it absolutely does. It's not in our self interest as individual Americans.

The point of developing a theoretical way of looking at rights is to delineate, ahead of time, all the things government can do that will be contra the interest of citizens, and disallow them. That's what rights are for.
Look at landingrock.com they offer insured accounts up to $10 million and competitive interest rates.
I feel you. I hate seeing the talking point about seeing other doctors being ‘harder’ in countries with socialized medicine. Most of the debate in the US is centered around how one single system works: Canada. Canada’s system is pretty restrictive compared to pretty much every other European or Latin American country with socialized health care, and conservatives in America have latched to a few shortcomings of that system to paint every other system as worse than the US, when in reality the vast majority of Canadians themselves would favor their systems to the US.

It’s almost impossible to have a real conversation about socialized medicine here without encountering a myriad talking points like that one.
Perhaps they are waiting to allow government policy to create a better negotiating position.
So much this - ESPHome is incredible. The next amazing bit is how good a system you can cook up with some low cost ESP8266 or ESP32 chips and a few sensors.
I’ve been looking for ages for a decent thermometer that connects to Home Assistant. All were expensive and required all sorts of contortions to get into HA. A week or two ago I bought some US$6 chips and a few US$3 sensors and they had me there in short order. I have no electronics background and very little coding experience.
You, sir, have made my day. Doom in the terminal makes life worth living. I've been using vim for several years and am loathe to leave the terminal so this is useful. Very.
Ouch, missed it. My bad.
One day stack overflow will be offline for weeks and then people will have an answer to this.
I guess I'm even more cynical. I don't think it's an accident that Zuck is playing much more friendly to Trump than people may have expected. This would be the perfect quid pro quo. I hate to think it could be happening like that, and it sits purely in conspiracy theory land. However it is completely consistent with the level of corruption from the administration in other areas and amoral approach by Facebook to its business.
Index funds allow amateurs to make money without losing it to "competent" active fund managers. That's all there is to it. You might not understand how many middlemen insert themselves between the amateurs because you're not one of them.
The wheels of justice turn too slowly for election interference, which a state controlled company like ByteDance is almost certain to perpetrate. There's even plausible deniability - you could blame it on "algorithms".

Succinctly, here's why TikTok will get banned: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wSTHgoaVtSw

This is also why Google, Twitter and Facebook will get their asses reamed at some point if they continue doing what they're doing.
> Chinese policy seems to have not significantly changed in the last 5 years towards the US, but on the other hand US seemed ever more keen and eger to pursue a hostile attitude towards China.

For decades, China has blocked U.S. companies from fair competition, reneged on trade deals when it suits them, backed out of industrial partnerships after extracting the IP it deems useful, and generally been a bad trade partner.

I agree that the president shouldn't have authority to arbitrarily block a product or company (and ultimately he doesn't, he'll need broader support among elected officials), but it's absurd to suggest that the U.S. should blindly accept hostile behavior for decades on end without reacting, or else itself be labeled "hostile."
Other countries shold summarily ban Twitter and Facebook, out of fear of possible local elections influence by US government
> all these jobs were in the last 7 years.

Question here... I hope I’m not being a huge jerk here, but uh. Does this feel like this strategy is working well for you?

Did you like any of these positions?
if you are trying to maximize returns, i would say crypto. you could have doubled your money in ethereum in the last few months.

if you are maximizing stability, probably guaranteed return products around 2-3%
You can take a 4% draw based on any 50 year period in the past 100 years. It is not risk free correct. There are many books and articles on the topic that are not worth trying to fit into a comment.

For most people, being able to retire and never work again with 95% certainty enough, especially when tweaking consumption and tweaking side income are easy knobs to turn. No reason to delay retirement 20 years to be 100% confident. Raises the risk a lot you just die before you retire.
What is “fair”? We believe in a free market economy. There is no way to “game” it because by definition a free market has to be free and what arises from it is what is supposed to be.

China has a planned economy. They pick and choose what happens economically and they have a heavy hand in manipulating it.

It honestly sounds like we want to have our cake and eat it too. The free market is the best way to develop a healthy economy, and it does not require the generosity of foreign players to function.

Fundamentally we’re just being rattled by the economic rise of China which is shaking the beliefs of some free market capitalists.
This is not a "no true Googler" argument, but a factual statement supported by the history of Go. The design of Go is heavily inspired by Plan 9, Inferno, and Limbo, none of which came from within Google. In fact - name any of the flagship features of Go and I'll draw a line for you from that feature into the historical influences. Goroutines, channels, garbage collection, GOPATH... none of these were invented by Go.
I'm also curious - he mentions that the trigger for this note was someone becoming a paid subscriber, but I could not find that option in partizion.io or any other web presence.

EDIT: found out, after installing the extension, there is a 'Subscribe to PRO' option. Costs $6/month or $48/year and unlocks unlimited workspaces.
Zoom’s founder is of Chinese origin but it entirely US based from the beginning.
It should be challenged in court. This is a country of rule of law.
I started my comment out with “ Not that it justifies our behavior” and referred to similar actions by both China and America as bad behavior. Bad doesn’t justify bad, and only provides a measure of irony.
Yes, I think a guy that compromises his own country's security by inadvertently sharing secret info on social media doesn't care/know much about security in the first place.
There's an amount of money you could plausibly need to avoid life consequences. You get laid off or your business fails, and you have to dip into savings to keep a roof over your head and food on the table.

Figure out how much that is, and leave it in cash or other extremely safe assets. This is a highly personalized number and it's hard to give good advice for it.

For the rest of your money, you now know that you'll basically never need to sell it. The only thing that matters here is the total return over thirty-plus years. This is broadly-diversified stock index funds - the standard boglehead advice works great here. There's always a risk that today's stock price is the best you'll ever see, so the historically superior plan for how to get money in the market is to just dump it all in and ignore the current price.

So yeah. Enough cash to make you "safe", rest in the stock market and ignore the current price and any price movements over the next three decades.
[edited to remove snark]

An earlier discussion on why Odin: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23460066
Good bye Tesla Shanghai factory, then
I think this is a solid idea.

It's not much for Twitter, and they can see exactly who needs to be remunerated for how much.
> I’m constantly being dragged back into my former life!

> It must be the price to be paid for the Nobel.

That reminds me of a study a decade ago or so, showing Nobel laureates to enjoy a ridiculously higher life expectancy, in comparison to people who were merely nominated for the prize. It was something like 5 extra years, IIRC, and there was no other profession or status symbol even close.

Other nominees are unlikely to have significantly less access to healthcare, or be otherwise depraved.

So what's so unique about a Nobel? The hypothesis was that the Nobel is the only absolut "Game Over: You Win" scenario in existence, allowing its bearer to escape the rat race and its deleterious effects. Start-up or banking billionaires clearly aren't satiated by their money, so they continue on to space, or ocean racing, or becoming really bad politicians. Nobel laureate are done.
Why would a media company be special. This type of thing happens all the time, for example the US government banned a Chinese company from purchasing Lattice Semiconductor, the third biggest FPGA company (and really a much smaller player than the big two).
Previously discussed in 2013 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6835403 and 2018 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17585520
There's a lot of great tooling for making iOS apps without using Swift or Swift UI (Flutter, ReactNative, etc). I'm a JavaScript developer, and I hate Electron apps as much as anybody. The ability to use ReactNative to compile to an iOS app that runs on the desktop opens up a LOT of possibilities for me.
Big Tech antitrust aftermath, effects of an M&A clampdown on SV and more
TPP was created to counterweight China’s influence by increasing commercial ties between other Southeast and East Asian nations and the USA/Canada.
>what brought you to this forum?

I am only here for information/educational reasons, not entertainment. This is more about educating my mind.

>Dance and music is how a certain demographic of humanity lives to express themselves, and there is an app that lets them do so. What the hell is your problem? Who are you to take it away from them?

Maybe you haven't seen all the videos of young ladies threatening to kill themselves if the President goes through with it. Or the 1000's of people who have come to name calling and threats against the President.

I don't find that normal and I have a problem with it.
How is it possible that a wiki page about a trial neglects to mention the outcome?

> The Circuit Court finally refused to admit the
complainant's testimony, and dismissed the bill with costs. An appeal
was taken, but withdrawn, on a settlement between the parties whereby
the complainant received her expenses, costs, and counsel fees. The
probate of the will of September I, 1863, therefore, remained undisturbed,

From
https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?refere...

Which references as the original source:

> The American Law Review (vol. 4, pages 629-54)
Cognitect, please stop adding alpha to your namespaces
So what do we call the ideology that drives the murderous occupying state that exists today under the name of "Israel"?
Or people need to wake up to the security threat.

This is not about us vs them. No apps from Australia, Europe or Africa are on the list of banned apps. Its China where in order to do business there, you have to give the government access to your trade secrets and full server access without a warrant.

While its possible for any company to succumb to government pressure for unreasonable access, it is a prerequisite to do so in China. The world knows this.

Hong Kong's new national security law is plenty proof that China is not a genuine partner and is a bad faith actor. Your right to look at TikTok videos does not trump anyone else's right for security.
I haven't changed my meetup.com subscription. Meetup is a fantastic site for in-person events and I really want to see the service survive the Covid events even though all my meetups are on hiatus.
I understand your question, but I'm sorry, that just sounds bush league to me. So you have to change your business to suit every political party that comes to power? That's a lot of unpredictability. How can you run a business like that?

Plus, what if elections are "postponed until a more appropriate time"? I mean, the environment would just be riddled with so much uncertainty that I'm not sure how an honest business would be able to engage in cogent decision making?
HTTPS is great for users, but I'm annoyed that it will let companies get around this sort of thing. I want to control the traffic on my network.
Have you spoken to practically any normal (i.e. not speaking on behalf of a government) citizen of almost any Arab or Muslim country today? Palestine is always on their mind.
Well, Tiktok has taken all the younger crowd away from Facebook and Instagram. Your suggestion is not beyond the realms of possibility for a guy like Zuck (I always think back to the dumb f comment he made a few years ago to remind myself of how he views his users).
I don't believe Trump's banning TikTok because of its Chinese connections.

I think this is a retalitory action because of its use to mess with his reelection. Brad Pascale got demoted over the Tulsa debacle and this is Trump's way to get back at the TikTok users.

While checking my facts, I noticed someone at Forbes was also thinking that its only about Trump as usual and put together a timeline.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/abrambrown/2020/08/01/is-this-t...
There was an article or a documentary (cant find it now for some reason) about a corrupt "professional" guardian and a judge. She would find older people or couples with some assets and no or remote relatives, come up with some bullshit story and take over guardianship in court with the help of the judge.

She'd then charge $7 / min if ward calls her for anything, would do unnecessary repairs, move them from their house into a tiny studio, and then to nursing home shortly after, etc. Basically everything she can to drain the assets as soon as possible.

What was really striking, that in some cases there were relatives who'd find out about what is going on - and even one couple's daughter could not take guardianship back from that professional guardian in court.

I don't know how widespread such abuse really is, but with the sheer amount of power that guardian has and the fact that wards are usually old, sick or disabled people, i can imagine the abuse is rampant.
Indeed, I was basing the 7% return on the S&P hence assuming liquidity in the investment. Liquidity matters and, yeah, YMMV. Still works if you invest in CDs instead but it’s not nearly as attractive.
The GP isn't disagreeing with you. They just said in the limit that all investment couldn't be passive. There is probably some equilibrium value between active/passive investment.
Discovery of earliest known tool for making rope (circa 38k BC)
If Tiktok was European/Japanese/Korean/Canadian this would not happen, as those countries are free democracies and work with a similar/common rule of law

1. China doesn’t play with the same rules, and it has been proven to be a malicious
player

2. They don’t allow western companies to operate freely in their country, why should we let them to?

3. The US and to a lesser degree Europe, are in a de-facto new Cold War, and informational warefare is big part of it

You can view either on the reciprocity Point of view, or data-safety point Of view, the US would be foolish/dumb to allow TikTok to flourish in the US., while American companies just can’t in China.

Now, if the US was banning an app from another western country, that would be a true scandal.

In this case they are doing the right thinks
Wow, I love expensive equipment that can’t work once the company goes out of business. If you want to have a subscription based hardware device the hardware should be free.
Maybe VTSAX?
>Anyone investing in equities is just in it for the ride, as it is impossible to predict what will happen

So people like Jim Simons are merely the luckiest people alive?

The average person earns the average market return, less fees; that's a tautology. Unless you have some reason to believe you aren't average, most people are better off following your advice. It's what I do, personally.

But the idea that no one is winning at this game flies in the face of a lot of evidence.
Stack overflow is awesome

Stack overflow runs on .net

Stack overflow squeezes lots of performance out of very little hardware or cost

Stack overflow doesn’t do that much

Customers haven’t added feature after feature until it resembles a half dog half cow hybrid

Stack overview developers spend time working out how to scale for their specific use case rather that theoretical use cases

I honestly believe that by sticking to a singular narrow focus stack overflow has achieve magnificent things. It isn’t because of .net it is in spite of it.

Well done stack overflow but unless you can stop the business or the users with extra requests or expanding the product you cannot replicate it.
I like GDX as it contains both these and miners.
FNV, WPM, SAND. There should be a lot more.
The problem is that they are already extremely pricy.
All gold related stocks had quite the ralley in 2020.
They do have a way, and godoc.org uses it: go-source meta tags.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24024130
Clinton established the WTO and signed NAFTA. He also saber rattled against China during the taiwan straits crisis, bombed plenty of foreign countries, went to war over Kosovo in violation of the UN charter, and various other actions. I don’t really see how that’s “withdrawal from the global stage”
> I think your conception of rights is far to narrow. If the government forces me against my will when I am not harming someone, it's a violation of my rights.

Is this something that's recognized by the courts, or your own headcanon? If it's the latter, there no point arguing because it basically devolves into a generic "what's the role of government" discussion.

>Does arbitrarily banning certain businesses, even if owned by foreigners, hurt Americans? Yes, it absolutely does. It's not in our self interest as individual Americans.

So does setting tariffs, yet that's widely accepted (as a government power) by both parties.

>The point of developing a theoretical way of looking at rights is to delineate, ahead of time, all the things government can do that will be contra the interest of citizens, and disallow them. That's what rights are for.

This is probably why you're being downvoted. When you say "x violates your rights", most people take that as to mean it violates your legal rights. They don't mean some amorphous concept that roughly equates to "is the government doing the right thing?".
You are the government. You made these laws to protect you. Tariffs allow key industries to remain active in countries with a high dollar.
Tiktok users did boycott the Tulsa rally. I think that annoyed him, and this may well be petty retaliation.
Go to any half decent bike shop and say you'd like to spend that much on a bike/trainer and they will bend over backwards to make sure you get exactly what you want and need. They will very likely even throw in a custom fitting using all the special tools they have at their disposal.

Not sure what twiddling you are doing with resistance and elevation, smart trainers pick the resistance based on what the app tells it to do in real time.

By no means can a 'large' chunk of the population afford $2,500 up front plus $60/month.

With a real bike on a trainer some people might even decide to try riding outside, who knows...
Even more pronounced is the silence of life long legislators who were always opposed to this kind of strong man government all along.

Ps: I side with Trump on this one. Just hate the fact that no Republican opposes him anymore.