skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It's exactly how South Korea and many other countries developed (and continue to develop) as well.

The difference here is that China is positioning itself as a political rival to the United States. America is under no obligation to help its rivals develop.

Prior to Xi Jinping's belligerent foreign poljcy America was considerably more welcoming to Chinese companies. You reap what you sow.
Same thing happened to me in college, although I never went to the doctor about it. I thought it was a drug flashback at first, and was terrified it was permanent, but it went away after about two hours.
Thank you. I have resorted to asking rhetorical questions as we are now at a stage where stating obvious true facts about certain topics is taboo.

We are now witnessing the beginnings of the great social media struggle session.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Struggle_session

https://www.wsj.com/articles/get-ready-for-the-struggle-sess...
Not a lawyer, but I did work for a short period for a company that was distributing a modified linux kernel and therefore had to release the source. In my time there, there were a lot of discussions (some involving lawyers) about whether (and how) we could reasonably obfuscate the source before releasing it. Not sure how those conversations ended since I left before they were done, but it seems it's not clear cut at this point.
Your comment makes absolute sense especially when viewed with my Eastern upbringing lens. Let me use it to add a few more relevant points concerning other Asian countries.

The same logic is used by people like me to justify why only dictatorial state controlled capitalism with quick decision making, very serious censorship laws and crushing of any opponents to ensure single party rule etc. was important for a country like China to progress so fast. A democracy with multiple dissenting opinions in a third world country would mean many vested and crony interests would hijack the country and nothing would happen, e.g. India where only recently has the system started making faster, more transparent decisions.

I always see the kind of nuance you mention especially for a relatively easy to govern small state which leverages its location for growth is missing when discussing the problems of larger nations. Even in the larger outlets in the Western world. It is mostly a case of intellectual laziness where labels and general summary of a complex and large country is used in day to day discussions or articles.
The "Auckland kid" is the entrepreneur here. And no, I don't believe Harvard would ruin an entrepreneur that would have succeeded otherwise. And they would have attractive alternatives.

Everyone changes, especially in college. Regardless of the school, one can easily assess them the blame, but some of it has to be on you, especially at an age when you should stop making excuses.

With that said, the work load can be absurd, some peers are arrogant and elitist, some teachers are total assholes, and not everything is fair or makes sense. Although, that's true at varying degrees at any school.
True, but if the hashed password is compromised, the user‘s other accounts with the same password might remain safe. So it‘s not about protecting one single account but protecting the user.
http://archive.is/IiArT
So the marketing department of SpaceX works for free?
Google Protocol Buffer Tutorial
It was not built to retrieve Soviet satellites, despite an uncited claim in Wikipedia to the contrary. In fact, it probably couldn't. If nothing else, it'd be hard to fit a satellite designed for a different launch fairing into the payload bay of the shuttle and secure it well enough to be able to land with it. The shuttle was designed to bring cargo back, but only satellites that were specifically designed for this purpose.

What the Shuttle was designed to do in a military context is launch into a polar orbit from the coast of California, release a stealthy spy satellite, and return to Earth immediately after during the very same orbit (so about 90min from launch to landing). It therefore needed the very large wings to be able to glide back to Edwards Air Force Base in southern California, which would have rotated up to 1,500km away from the path of the orbiter. And because of the Pacific ocean, there'd be other landing sites available. This cross-range capability impacted every aspect of the design.

The idea was that big rockets which launch satellites are very easy to track, so it was hard to get a bird up without the enemy knowing its orbital path, and if the enemy knew the orbit they could evade overhead passes. So do a surprise launch on the shuttle, do a little orbit maneuvering while you are up there to maximize the enemy's uncertainty over its orbital plane, then immediately let go and land the shuttle--because otherwise they'd know where it was from tracking the shuttle.

I'm not sure if it was ever used this way, and the requirement is now obsolete anyway. You really can't hide a satellite from modern instruments, which have full global coverage, and its critical that orbits are known to avoid collisions in the much more crowded space up there.
I heard from a tesla engineer that they do use lidar to train their models, but that they don’t see the value in deploying it to the fleet.

It’s worth watching the tesla event from about a year ago if you haven’t seen it for their full position: https://youtu.be/Ucp0TTmvqOE

The quick notes are that our roads are set up for human vision and a truly capable level 5 system will require human level interpretation of visual data (at which point lidar becomes redundant).

He thinks lidar with non human level visual interpretation won’t get us to full autonomy.

They see lidar as a short term half measure, a local maximum that’s a distraction from what has to get done anyway.
While it is repugnant, whether or not it is immoral is another matter. If it is immoral, it likely deserves being criminalized, whereas if it is not immoral, democratic liberal ideals suggest that the law should protect such manufacture from unjust censure instead.

The case against filmed CP is straightforward: minors are harmed in the process. But what is being harmed in generated imagery? If nothing is harmed, what is the basis for it being immoral?
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0089901/

Sort of a dark role here as a "spy master"
I have read all the comments here, and although the 8-12% per year returns you might get from the stock market are tempting, my investment strategy has always paid off by at least doubling but usually tripling my money every 3 months... buy low and sell high. examples: buy a house in gated community or on the water on a tax auction or foreclosure auction offered by the court house and never bid higher than a third of the appraisal value on any deal, then sell it for what its worth on zillow. number two, buy jet airplanes or helicopters on auction sites and same thing never bid higher than a third. The reality of these auctions is once you bid higher than 50-100k, the small fish drop off and you either win or its a much smaller bidder pool. you're more than likely to win deals that are 5x to 10x cheaper than what they go for on the retail market.
Still just inventing a portable unit at that point.
I'm not arguing for that. Of course there are genetic differences that will make some people better at some things.

But to say that half the population bus not capable of programming? That is elitist nonsense. Especially given the breath of the field.
> You can connect them just like you do with micro services or modular systems - what is the issue about this?

Clearly I'm missing something here. Can you walk me through how exactly a micro service would enable GPT-3 to look up facts, and incorporate that knowledge into a conversation? What would the microservice API look like? How are the outputs consumed?
Your reading of my comment was disingenuous.

I said "eventually".. I did not say it was ready to do that in the current state.

As I said, the government has done a bad job so far.. I suggested a new paradigm.
> > the return of the portfolio would only be slightly worse than that of the S&P 500

If you "know" that a particular portfolio will return less than another portfolio, why would you not choose the one that returns more?
I'd wait till I see the price.
Progressive Web Apps are a thing on all major platforms now. Is there anything TikTok does that wouldn't be possible on using Web APIs?
South Korea ‘Untact’ Plans for the Post-Pandemic Economy
feDisplacementMap [1] should work, although I have no idea how to make one, and Google Meet on Firefox is having problems with SVG filters [2].

[1] https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/SVG/Element/feD...

[2] https://github.com/FlyOrBoom/mercator/issues/2
> Not sure if they can get people to switch from optic cable to satellite

I think the market for this often would not even have a cable option. They’re stuck on old DSL at like 6mbps down or less for $90/mo with bundled landline, or if they’re lucky, the cable company ran a line by their house. If starlink was offering just 20mbps down for $50, everyone I know in the country would switch immediately. I definitely don’t think starlink will compete with city fiber or cable connections. Heck, mine is $30 for 250mbps down. No way satellite is going to compete with that.

In the city, and even small countryside cities, this isn’t a big deal, but rural communities don’t have choice or speed, at least in the US! That’s not a big market on a small scale, but added up across the US, it would be a lot of people.
Not unless animals coordinate using iPhones and feed on lattes.
For anyone unfamiliar, Invidious is just Youtube without ads and it lets you turn the screen off on mobile. It also lets you turn videos to an "audio only" mode for speed/bandwidth.

It's a viable alternative to Spotify IMO as one use.

It's basically free Youtube Red. Really sad to hear this, hope the creator is better off for it though.
The Moore's Law of Moore's Laws
The Covid-19 vaccine is also expected to be ready in an amazingly short time frame compared to normal vaccine development. If we’re asking for a vaccine in 2020/2021 we have to accept that it may have serious flaws and side effects.

I’m fine with the exemption, it’s the speed of development and testing that concerns me. We can’t possibly know the side effects after short trials.
Infinitely zooming botanical floral paradise painting
The lack of standard ABI makes harder to call C++ from foreign-function interfaces or from dlopen/LoadLibrary dynamic loading functions. It lack of ABI also does not allow linking against object-codes built by the other compilers or even older versions of the same compiler.

In C, a symbol name matches the function name, if you have a function called 'void my_function()', the symbol will be 'my_function' and you will be able to load this function from a foreign function interface as libffi.load('my_function', ... types ...). The trouble with C++ bindings is that symbols are mangled, the function names are encoded, a function named 'Workaround1::get_callback()::callback' can be encoded (mangled) as _ZZN11Workaround112get_callbackEvE8callback - this encoding is specific to a given compiler ABI, in addition FFIs cannot load non-C types.

Tensorflow uses the hourglass design pattern, this library is implemented internally in C++, but does not exposes a C++ API, instead it exposes a C wrapper built with 'extern "C" and opaque pointers (void* pointers or incomplete types). This approach allows the library to be used in the same way as a C library and makes easier to call the library via FFI. Another benefit is the better binary compatibility as object-codes built with other compilers canlink against Tensorflow without any issues. Another library that uses this approach is the Squirrel embedded scripting language, that is implemented in C++, but only exposes a C API. So, this technique allows a C++ library to be used as C library and makes possible calling it through FFI.

I guess that in the case of LLVM it may also use this pattern of using C++ internally and only exposing a C API via extern "C". The disadvantage of this pattern is the need of lots cumbersome extern "C" wrappers for every member function of a class and for all exposed classes. LibClang LLVM may be helpful for automating the generation of this C wrapper code.
After reentry the next most dangerous part of the entire launch/return process is likely landing at sea and being rescued by helicopters or ships.

So I will be holding my metaphoric breath until the astronauts are delivered from SpaceX responsibility to NASA responsibility, which should be on land somewhere in Florida (too lazy to look it up sorry not sorry)
Are you speaking from professional psychiatric authority that generated CP cannot be useful at all? For example, that it cannot be useful as part of a plan in helping a pedophile (in state of mind, not in action toward others) cope and adjust to become a useful, integrated, and satisfied member of society?
>mostly composed of headaches, muscle aches, and dizziness,

I think you are imagining the most mild manifestations that could be categorized as those things. Those terms could cover a range from trivial to debilitating/life destroying.

It's like when you read that someone isn't or no longer is in "critical condition". It sounds good, it's antiseptic, but it could conceal unimaginable horror.
I never quite got how the Apple story was an indictment of NVIDIA. The first-gen RoHS-compliant solders sucked and would fracture... how exactly is that NVIDIA's fault? In fact, wouldn't Apple have been the ones who chose that particular solder?

It is the same issue that caused the Xbox 360 red-ring-of-death, and caused "baking your graphics card" to become a thing (including AMD cards). It basically affected everyone in the industry at the time, and Apple would not have gotten any different outcome from AMD had they been in the hotseat at the time. They were just throwing a tantrum because they're apple damn it and they can't have failures! Must be the supplier's fault.

That one has always struck me as a "bridezilla" story where Apple thinks they're big enough to push their problems onto their suppliers and NVIDIA said no.

And as far as the Xbox thing... Microsoft was demanding a discount and NVIDIA is free to say no. If they wanted a price break partway through the generation, it probably should have been negotiated in the purchase agreements in the first place. NVIDIA needs to turn a profit too and likely structured their financial expectations of the deal in a particular way based on the deal that was signed.

Those are always the go-to "OMG NVIDIA so terrible!" stories and neither of them really strike me as something where NVIDIA did anything particularly wrong.
By definition and pedantry: yes. Humans are animals.
dataflow's comment (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24019778#24025779) seems to answer this, and https://opensource.stackexchange.com/questions/5759/code-obf... elaborates: FOSS licenses require distributing the form you use to make modifications to your program. To do anything else opens one up to legal liability.
I prefer the mutuals because I can invest money that day. With a broker account, there’s the ACH waiting period, so you miss out buying dips.
Curios History Photos of the Color Green Inspire You
Opinions vary on that one, does a footprint reduction by 90kb really matters in the day and age where megabytes of bloatware like angular, react, vue, etc. goes unchecked?

If adding 90kb helps me write `$(document.ready()` instead of `window.addEventListener(DOMContentLoaded)`, I'd rather add that because making code more intuitive and readable is what software engineering is about.
What Apple is really worried about with NVIDIA is vendor lock-in. They own the walled garden, they absolutely are not going to accept an "external dependency" they can't control.

CUDA is such an "external dependency". It locks you in to something that's not an Apple product.
To those what?
Yes, the website is barely usable on mobile. The design is really strange, as if there was a stylesheet missing.
When has anyone ever died for that right? Names and dates please.
> beyond the obscene

I mean, that's pretty arbitrary too, e.g. FB censors female breasts, which is not considered obscene in many places.

It's a difficult line to walk.
Funny cause I got a cuckoo based on an Amazon review that said it cooked the best brown rice. YMMV I guess.
I think the use cases of FHE are much more limited that you're thinking, specifically because it allows you to execute code on someone else's machine without them being able to see _anything_ about the data they're operating on, and send the results (which again, don't mean anything to that machine) back to you. So, for example, you could mine cryptocurrency on someone's computer, but the only benefit you get over running FHE-encrypted code on the client machine over running it on your own server is compute cost. It wouldn't be useful for e.g. DRM.
You can fit it in a sliding window. Go to the hardware store and buy a sheet of 1-inch thick foil backed insulating styrofoam. Cut it to fit perfectly above the AC unit.
So true. Adding features just makes more work for you. It doesn't mean more users or more active users. See I think when users request features the subtext is they're actually giving you an excuse for why they don't use your product more or don't use it at all. Features won't change lack of interest. And yet new features are so much fun to add when you enjoy your work. Just don't expect users to care. And don't expect to get paid.
Other than perhaps tax-loss harvesting and muni bonds, my experience is that financial advisors know next to nothing about taxes. They aren’t accountants, and only know securities and derivatives and other basic investment vehicles.

They might have access to some exotic things that could be tax-advantaged, but again they aren’t accountants, and could care less what you pay on your gains.

In fact I would wager to say skillful accountants might have better investing advice for the rich than most any financial advisor.
Just like China, gotcha.
> Dyson

Interesting! My AM11 fan started screeching and making a strange noise so I called in and my warranty had expired just a month ago and all they could do is replace my unit with a refurbished one.

Sounded fine to me, especially because it was out of warranty, officially, but the unit that came was a different color and cosmetically in horrible condition, much worse than the one I sent in.

At least it didn't squeak or screech and I suppose the fact they even helped out outside of the warranty period is nice.
Open it in an incognito/private/InPrivate/stealth tab.
Verisign Monopolized the .com Domain Registry
#1: go buy those night vision goggles you've always wanted and take a vacation. Life is short and you should have some fun. Once that's done, do the below:

Expect inflation over the next 10 years, so keep the land & real estate investments (good hedge against inflation). Also, there are strategic ways to use these for tax purposes...talk to a good tax lawyer.

Treat 10% as "gambling" money with investments. Try to pick some stock market sleepers.

Spread 60% across a few American Funds and/or Vanguard selections, depending on your risk tolerance. Also, max out a Roth IRA every year starting now.

Keep 7-10% in a savings account that's accessible for emergencies.

Put 7-10% into bond funds.

Take whatever's left and put into a down payment on more real estate, either for a personal property or investment property.
I dunno, Jesus? 0 ad.
Sure things have changed and the wealth gap is a problem, but it is not stealing. If it were, you could take them to court for paying you only min wage and making you work 40 hours.
What they got fined for was playing brokers off each other for the same order in order to maximize their fee. This violates the best execution principle. Now they give each order to one broker only, irregardless of the fee.

But why is the broker giving a fee to Robinhood to handle the trade? That only makes sense for them to do if they have the stock available at a lower price point than the Robinhood user is getting--had the order gone straight to market it would have cleared at a better price.

The broker is paying Robinhood for the burden of handling the order. Why? What's the profit for them? If they just sent your order to the market and it cleared at the market rate, there is none. Instead they do a number of tricks that are designed to profit off of foreknowledge of the order before it hits the market, while trying not to run afoul of front-running regulations. When they succeed, they do so by taking money that you left on the table.

All that said, I still use Robinhood. I don't trade at high enough volumes to get upset over these hidden costs, and I'm under no illusions that other retail brokerages aren't doing exactly the same thing.
Download the raw patch from lore.kernel.org, apply it with "git am", fix up the commit message with "git commit --amend", add your "Signed-off-by" below the existing one, submit with "git-send-email" or "git format-patch" + "msmtp".

That way the commit author remains the same because "git format-patch" includes a "From:" line in the message body which "git am" will interpret as the commit author when the maintainer applies the patch.

Your Signed-off-by is necessary to keep the DCO chain intact:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-pa...

However, that is now done:
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/086b426f44bc24360cc89476fe18d...

Thank you for the report.
> The article is basically worthless and I have no idea why it has even a single upvote from this community.

People often upvote if the discussion is good. The discussion on this page was very good, I thought, very much worth reading - informative and touching. Thanks all, and good luck.
Show HN: Simple habit tracker built using Google Sheets
Blaming it on cis white men?

That isn't remotely what I'm saying at all.

And you are making erroneous assumptions about what I've studied.

This is a pointless discussion.

Have a good evening -- or whatever time it is where you happen to be.
It does not really matters, the purpose of salting is to avoid rainbow table attacks (i.e. comparing against precomputed dictionaries of known hashes).
(Edit: typo)
And yet when I pointed out that you can't do business in India without paying bribes I was downvoted to hell. :-)
Intel had that in-house too... it just also kinda sucked too...

That is the thing with a lot of these side projects Intel is always working on. It would be great if they actually delivered good products, but they often spend billions acquiring these companies and developing these products only to turn out one or two broken products and then dump the whole project.

I think this time is different with Xe, but I can't blame anyone for looking at the past history and being dubious that Intel is in it for the long haul.
William English, Who Helped Build the Computer Mouse, Dies at 91
No one would argue that humans aren't animals, but do all animals swarm? Genuinely curious, not trying to be a smart-ass.
Business is owned by an African-American, too.
To add some color to this, if it's a common name it's really hard to remember but if it's a foreign name to me or something I've never heard of, it's as if my brain thinks it's a random sequence of sounds and I'll remember it forever. Indian names, native Hawaiian names, no problem, but forget about it if your name is George. It's just the common names I'm used to that I have a hard time with.
You can take on more risk and not get any more return. Conversely, you can get more return and not take on anymore risk. That's like the foundation of Modern Portfolio Theory.