skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The patients benefit from the treatment significantly since a lot of time people who are manic are living recklessly, spending all their money, gambling, being hypersexual, trying drugs, getting into fights, committing crimes, tearing up their relationships, and the list goes on. The percent of people with bipolar disorder who die by suicide is 10-15%.

Patients who are hypomanic by definition aren't having marked impairments in social or occupational functioning and won't need to be hospitalized. There's nothing forcing someone who isn't currently on a psychiatric hold to take medication, so if they're taking it it's likely because they believe they're benefitting from it.
HR/ The company should be providing advice on going to "at risk" areas.

Also if your going to china take a disposable phone and a laptop that is clean ands can be wiped on return.
I'm sure everyone in the UK has at least one Argos pen and Ikea pencil somewhere!
I'm just imagining, similarly to how some search results in the US have a "some search results removed for copyright infringement" footer, many search results in Australia having a "some search results removed for news content" footer. The interesting thing is that since this _explicitly_ only applies to Facebook and Google, any company repackaging Google or Bing search won't have this restriction, at least until they get big enough to be worth rewriting the law for.
Isn't that pretty much all news works? After all, investigations are a rarity, and most stories in media outlets are basically sourced/paraphrased from elsewhere. If one site/network/paper finds something interesting like this, you bet anything that every other outlet will have their own story on the subject online in the next few minutes.

To some degree it's also how aggregator sites like Reddit and Hacker News work. Maybe even with anti paywall methods, archivers, etc getting the story in plain text format.
Pretty much all actual examples in article are of the "you interpret it wrong" sort.

> A situation you may have misinterpreted as a child can taint your important adult relationships, Kennedy says.

This does not say you should free yourself of hate despite them being wrong. This says, hey, maybe it happened differently. What if I did not misinterpreted it as a child? Or as an adult? What if it is one of those very real situations where you was not stupid, but someone really harassed you, took credit for your work, whatever.

The article does not deal with such situation, rather, it wants you to convince yourself it did not happened.
My first attempt on a Griffin model. I think it's pretty hilarious too, and way better than all these "philosophers" and journalists made out of flesh and bone.

https://pastebin.com/9rJFuWag
Wow what a trip down memory lane. Thank you for sharing!

I bought the Nintendo Donkey Kong Jr from here -http://dev.argosbookofdreams.co.uk/1986-87.html#page=275, as well as Snoopy Tennis back in ’87, and I still have both.

My son and play it every other day. Amazing stuff. :)
Are you reading into this wrong or intentionally attempting to start a flame war?
Well, yes, but in most cases it was like "oh, it's using some exotic library(and hardware) to do physics? cut this whole segment out then". Then once you have something that builds you can figure out how to reproduce the functionality in some other way.
So, this is 100% speculation, but....

Specifically, this has a STM32F303xC. Looks like (depending on quantity, of course), you're looking at $3 to $5. Their other well-known keyboard, the Ergodox EZ, uses an ATMEGA32U4-AU. It's also $3 or $4 on Mouser. I don't know what the actual BOM looks like in total, but it seems like this isn't significantly different in price? Especially at the likely volumes here?

I'm still new to this game, so maybe I'm missing something.
I have a similar issue with my utility provider in London were the previous tenant didn't pay the bill and the wouldn't allow me to open a new contract on the same address until previous contract on that meter was paid.

They even went so far to send the same bills to 'occupiers of address X' trying to let me pay the £1800 electricity bill.
This is one major drawback writing an article about forgiveness and only interviewing authors of self-help books. Whatever it says, right or wrong, it can’t be of much help to someone who is in a situation like you described. Forgiveness, reconciliation, or even just dealing with hurt, are all easier said than done.

I wonder it would be more helpful to interview someone who has been through something hard and actually decided to forgive. For example, maybe one of the victims’ family members in https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washingtonpost.com/news/pos...

Even so, no one article or book can truly “solve” or “fix” pain, so we would be wise to carefully consider our words.
Calling forgiveness “a simple solution to all your problems” (https://www.radicalforgiveness.com/) feels condescending. Even if the statement is true, how would someone who is facing real hurt see that statement?
See this paper [0] bu Gabaix for instance:

> This paper proposes that idiosyncratic firm-level shocks can explain an important part of aggregate movements and provide a microfoundation for aggregate shocks.

> Existing research has focused on using aggregate shocks to explain business cycles, arguing that individual firm shocks average out in the aggregate. I show that this argument breaks down if the distribution of firm sizes is fat-tailed, as documented empirically.

> The idiosyncratic movements of the largest 100 firms in the United States appear to explain about one-third of variations in output growth.

[0] http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~xgabaix/papers/granular.pdf
Building Glyph: A Year with SwiftUI – Part 2
Target has a decent electronics section (nothing like a dedicated big-box store, of course).
> That's part of the problem. Publications are seen as achievements. If you got accepted to a prestigious journal or conference, you can list this on your CV as an impressive "award"-like thing. A publication list is not just a list of "Look, this is the kind of stuff I've been working on, have a great read at it", but "Look, my research is so great it got accepted to all these fancy places!".

I don't think that this is necessarily a problem. The problem is that these "awards" are awarded based on results rather than on work.

In my mind, a prestigious journal should be one where the studies have a high percentage of replication of their published work. A high-impact study which fails to replicate is just a popular lie, and has no place in science.
I guess one way to "solve" this is to skip the signature in the email and do what every person working in my kids school do: Write your message in MS Word and make sure it's propperly decorated with clipart. Then mail the wordfile.
Why Indian TV news ignored the first ever caste discrimination lawsuit in the US
IMO, the core principle of agile is “early feedback means smaller corrective action”. Everything else is just process to achieve that without running afoul of the evil twin “noisy feedback means constant corrections hunting for the solution.”

Agile goes wrong when you don’t get and use good feedback.

You do upfront planning and design, but you only do enough to establish your general course of action. Because good feedback requires context about your goals. If you don’t care where you’re going, then any direction will get you there.
There are some GPT-3 based users actively posting on HN at this moment. Is there some derogatory term for them?
I think there may be an overallocation of failure reasons to "no market need". If the founder started working on something to solve a problem of their own have seen at least a few other users use the product successfully but are not getting enough traction, there's a bunch of stuff to figure out, but success may be a long way off.
What happens when you go up?
For a serious academic take on the topic, I recommend the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy's articles on Forgiveness and Reconciliation.

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/forgiveness/

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/reconciliation/
No idea myself but does this help -

"Recommended Answer
YouTube auto-generates videos for artists who distribute their music through companies that have deals with YouTube. Read the fine print on any sales/distribution deals you have entered into."

More here -

https://support.google.com/youtube/thread/28270137?hl=en
No stakes that I'm aware of.
Only time I saw checks was when some American company send me a check. I think it cost me 15euro to cash in the check and the time at the bank. So next time I asked if they could pay the royalties by bank transfer. Boy, American companies weren't ready for that in the early 2000s
People read emails on their small screen devices, and I think it would challenging to read an email on a small screen made with tables.
but this behaviour (as said above) is not unique to tech. All sufficiently large, sufficiently multinational businesses effectively stop paying the full rate of tax
What gets me is how even though today we do not have totally perfect emulation of a lot of systems. Probably the closest to perfect is the byuu emulation of the SNES system. My amazement is some of this stuff still runs. I have over the years tracked down many one liner bugs in my own code. I also remember people in the alt Amiga groups arguing about perfect emulation before that system would even boot and 30GHZ computers. Yet it all still kinda worked.

The MAME guys are adding in netlist bits to get rid of those wav files they have used for years for sounds. They had to go back and re-model the circuits component by component which is obviously not great on CPU. Which is how much of it was able to run on older computers. They took massive shortcuts. If something took 500ms on the actual hardware they would do it in 30 and give the time up to something else that needed it. Whereas maybe some very oddball bit of software would rely on that 500ms. The funny thing is most dont. The other way holds true too. Those circuits emus they are adding in eat massive amounts of CPU time to calculate. But on the real hardware finish nearly instantly.

I still am amazed some of this software works. For some bits of software you do need that deep understanding. But so much of it just blts junk from one area to another and polls on the controls. When you get to those weird effect where the developer was squeezing the console/computer on scanlines and store/load boundaries you need that but so much of it just works...
After 4 years can't you tell he won't be able to accept any kind of defeat. From his lies about his inauguration crowds on his first day in office when have you seen him accept any thing gracefully. He is what he is but I personally feel the Republicans are worse to stay in power they have let him destroy their own country and it's institutions.
You may want to try to track down u/iamthatis, he wrote the Apollo app for iOS and has been able to get reddit video/galleries/etc working natively. He regularly rants against the api not being well supported, maybe he can share how he got around it?
How to Build and Deploy Serverless Functions to Netlify
What's the beef with polymorphism?
You can definitely “lazy load” TLS certs into Envoy.

The SDS (Secrets Discovery Service) supports this, and is touched on in TFA: https://www.envoyproxy.io/docs/envoy/latest/intro/arch_overv...

You provide a gRPC service that can return the keypair needed for any host, with host config also being dynamic.

https://www.envoyproxy.io/docs/envoy/latest/configuration/se...
That would be copyright infringement and is already illegal. Not the topic of discussion.
The reporter needs to get paid. Usually a publisher will pay them and publish the story. Everyone else running the story is a leech. Places sharing headlines and linking to the proper publisher are usually helpful.
False dichotomy.

Taking steps to heal yourself from damage, such as a physical burn or a psychological wound, doesn't necessarily mean not taking the threat seriously in future. Pain is a signal that teaches us a lesson. Once the lesson is learned, holding onto the pain can just be needless suffering.
Robin Hooders + solar energy + funds that buy Tesla after 4 x profit profitable quarters + China + ...

Still doesn't explain the crazy valuation
Core problem is coupling "virality" and moderation. They're incompatible goals.

Remove the gamification and few would care that moderation lags.

The platforms try to mitigate virality with automated moderation. Anything to preserve that ad revenue.

The only societal fix is to slow down or break the engagement feedback loops. Something the platforms won't do voluntarily.
> Compare this with Java or Rust where you have separate types for mutable strings (StringBuilder in Java; String in Rust) and immutable strings (String in Java; str in Rust).

Not to detract from your point (which is broadly correct) but this isn't exactly right for Rust. Or at least isn't the right way to phrase it.

Rust has one string type, `str`, which can be referenced immutably (`&str`) or mutably `&mut str`. What `str` can't do is manage memory, which means it can't grow a string. `String` is more correctly a `StringBuffer` (technically a `Vec<u8>` albeit with additional checks). It can manage memory and therefore grow the size of the string, either by using spare capacity or by reallocating the memory. It is not really a string type in itself; it's just a memory buffer for holding a `str`.

This is all a long winded way of saying Rust separates managing memory from operating on the memory. This isn't the same as an mutable/immutable distinction although it is in some ways similar to growable/un-growable.
This is a complete misunderstanding, in my opinion. It is not an accounting of receipts and expenditures, not some “game theory” example, not an investment onto “the betterment of a society”, etc. You don't need anything to forgive, to do the right thing, it is always in your power. It might be hard, but it has always been like that.
Policymakers are keen on breaking up Big Tech
>"Writing the above formula as a matrix-vector multiplication leads to a very special matrix that is called circulant:"

[...]

>"A circulant matrix has multi-diagonal structure, with elements on each diagonal having the same value."

[...]

>"One of the first things we are taught in linear algebra is that matrix multiplication is non-commutative, i.e., in general, AB≠BA. However, circulant matrices are very special exception:

Circulant matrices commute,

or in other words, C(w)C(u)=C(u)C(w). This is true for any circulant matrix, or any choice of u and w. Equivalently, we can say that the convolution is a commutative operation, x∗w=w∗x."

[...]

>"A particular choice of w=[0,1,0…,0] yields a special circulant matrix that shifts vectors to the right by one position. This matrix is called the (right) shift operator [4] and denoted by S. The transpose of the right shift operator is the left shift operator."

>"Circulant matrices can be characterised by their commutativity property. It appears to be sufficient to show only commutativity with shift (Lemma 3.1 in [5]):
A matrix is circulant if and only if it commutes with shift.
The first direction of this “if and only if” statement leads to a very important property called translation or shift equivariance [6]: the convolution’s commutativity with shift implies that

it does not matter whether we first shift a vector and then convolve it, or first convolve and then shift — the result will be the same."

[...]

>"Another important fact taught in signal processing courses is the connection between the convolution and the Fourier transform [8].

Here as well, the Fourier transform lands out of the blue, and then one is shown that it diagonalises the convolution operation, allowing to perform convolution of two vectors in the frequency domain as element-wise product of their Fourier transforms."

[...]

>"Since all circulant matrices are jointly diagonalisable, they are also diagonalised by the Fourier transform [11].

They differ only in their eigenvalues. The last missing bit is the realisation that

The eigenvalues of C(w) are the Fourier transform of w.

We can now put all the pieces of the puzzle into a statement known as the Convolution Theorem:

the convolution x∗w can be computed either as a circulant matrix C(w) applied to x in the original system of coordinate (sometimes this is called “spatial domain” convolution), or in the Fourier basis (“spectral domain”) by first computing the Fourier transform of Φ*x, multiplying it by the Fourier transform of w [12], and then computing the inverse Fourier transform."
So is someone who is unable to move unintelligent?
Exactly my point Instagram is not technology, it is a platform for user content. Sun was a technology company with some real deep tech.
You sound knowledgeable, but this I don't understand:

> This approach does not work well for real hardware because it makes instruction decoders larger and slower, since it prevents them from assuming that they will only be fed instructions they do know.

But what if you fail to do the runtime checks? And for example just feed an SSE4 binary/instructions to a processor that only supports SSE3? Then won't it segfault?
> OSS is simply not a sustainable business model

OSS is not a business model, but more closely matches charity and non-profits, and run on donations and altruism of their users.

i find it annoying that people here keep saying that a company _should_ pay for their open source software usage just because they have money to do so. They don't have an obligation. They could donate - and some do - but it is in no way required of them, regardless of how much value they derive from using said OSS.

Open-core projects, which has a somewhat useless core and a paid for 'enterprise' version is not, under my eyes, a proper OSS project, but instead is a way to market their proprietary product.
Big companies like Dropbox....
I certainly agree; the signal to noise ratio is poor about why this stuff is a good idea. But it does get at some practical issues that are quite subtly layered:

1. Be realistic about what is likely to happen. If someone has a history of drinking and hasn't committed to stopping then they will probably continue. 'Forgiveness' doesn't mean stupid.

2. Don't make the past emotional. If someone chopped my leg off, for a silly example, then there is nothing I can do. Revenge does not regain me my leg. Seeking vengeance for the emotional pleasure is tragic; if a matter must be pursued then it should be to prevent a future risk (eg, losing the other leg) or for meaningful restitution (maybe they provide income for me since I can't work as effectively).

3. Strive to create prosperity. If someone hurt me in the past and I have an opportunity to better us both, it is foolish not to take that opportunity unless they are likely to do future harm.

4. Negotiate terms - keep asking for what you want, and be strategic about what you give ground on.

Bundle those four things together and the result is a very productive perspective that is hard to differentiate from forgiveness. The past is ultimately subjective and people who make good decisions going forward will get better results than people who make bad decisions and justify them with history. It is hard in practice.
look to the law MAKERS, not the law followers.
In the future, just use https://mjml.io/. Yes, the HTML it generates is god-awful-ugly, but it does generate responsive emails that render very nicely in almost every client back to Outlook 2010.
I think the only times it ever really makes sense to use logs to generate metrics are fairly limited:

1. You haven't yet instrumented the application with metrics yet.

2. The logs are from a third party tool that don't emit metrics

3. The log format is well defined and doesn't change (I'd still prefer native metrics)

Otherwise the issue is that logging messages can and do change over the lifetime of an application. Relying on the content of the log for metrics becomes an implicit API that's not obvious to developers working on the code. I've seen issues of broken monitoring and alerting because a refactor changed log formatting and content. Much better to be explicit about metrics and instrument them directly.
Because newspapers are failing anyway, and tech companies are thriving anyway. So if this system fails, nothing changed.

If this system works, and suddenly Australian newspapers are viable while newspapers elsewhere are still struggling, then it will prove that forcing tech to pay for content works, and that therefore tech was probably stealing media's revenue.
This is just the software industry. Maybe it’s because we’re so young. Maybe it’s because software is relatively easy to change and experiment with.

Who knows. All I know is, it’s exhausting, and ultimately it’s terrible for the end user. We have no idea what we’re doing when we pull in a new dependency like this. There’s tiny corner cases we don’t think about, and those get passed on to the user.

Innovating is fun, but exhausting in aggregate.
>> UBI does not come from an employer and is not tied to an effort

Where do you think government's money come from? Financing UBI will require raising taxes.
> Refusing to respond at all and allowing abuse to continue can be construed as taking the high road but it isn’t the only way to healthily manage toxic people.

In my experience, this is what people usually expect when they talk about "taking the high road" or "being the bigger person". It has zero to do with "healthily managing toxic people" and everything to do with comfort of whoever does not want to deal with conflict at your expense.

I had to unlearn these quite late, when I finally figured this out.
also because there is a fixed amount of land (like literally the surface of the earth occupies a finite area at least on human time scales)

and because building housing stock takes time

and because of zoning restrictions and other institutional constraints

and because of cultural reasons (e.g. to live near family, bc they prefer living in a certain environment like a big city etc.)

and because you (almost literally) can't live without shelter

...
World War II-Era Obstacle Is Curbing French Startup Diversity
Is means testing not about income? I mean to take income out of the equation, so people don't lose benefits when their income rises, because that would create perverse incentives. If you manage to hold a job despite being severely disabled, more power to you. That's not something that should be punished.

I think I already addressed all of this in the comment you're responding to: if UBI is high enough, I think there could indeed be a single tax rate for everybody. Because the UBI would already provide a comfortable living income, and only income for luxuries would be taxed.

But I think UBI will start lower than that, which means that at first, progressive taxation will still be necessary to some extent.
Agree. That reads like pure PR-corporatespeak to me - oops sorry, wont happen again, business as usual.

“They” only “care” to the extent it materially affects the business.
Or try a different role in the field... Instead of developing, try your hand at a BA role or BI role or a PM role
I avoid third party sellers. Most of the items are sold by Amazon themselves. They have serious problems. I think it depends on what you are buying and how unlucky you are.
La svizzera. For instance, the CEO of the UBS started out apprenticing at a bank as a teenager.
I would join others here in saying this is a useful concept. I wonder, though, if you were to drop it in conversation that anyone would know what you mean or if it would just disorient them and demand explanation.