skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
By missing intrinsics do you mean you get an error if you try to use the intrinsic, or do you mean the compiler fails to map the intrinsic to the fastest instruction/instruction sequence?
Wow, my first thought was "I love this idea." second thought was "holy crepe this is pricey."

I think we need to see more about the interface for building an app and such. Bubble and others in your space or even Glide your direct competitor are better about explaining how the build process works.
> There is no Republican Snopes because conservatives, since the Enlightenment, don't do sense making that way (i.e. via institutional consensus).

Conservatives have always done sense making via institutional consensus, even moreso than post-enlightenment liberals, though the institutions that they tend to appeal to are those explicitly devoted to their ideological world view (whether it's the organs of a particular Church, or economists of the Austrian School) and not so much those even superficially devoted to objective exploration of facts, even when approaching questions that are, at least on the surface, about objectives facts (what is) rather than ideology (what should be).

> Most people are Liberal (in the American sense)

No, they aren't, unless you are conflating multiple different and incompatible American senses of “Liberal” and thus covering the entire range from the moderate right to the far left.
Persuasion on networks
All of the insurance companies I got quotes from make you list your alarm company and account number on the policy.

Also, the discount is for central monitoring, not merely having a system.

I'd reread your paperwork if I were you. It sounds like you could have falsified information, and effectively have no insurance.
> government data says 451,024 people tested positive... the figure they released was 278,827

I don't know if the data were faked and I assume that everybody is applying "creative accountability" here. Not only in Iran. Is a political thing.

... but this is not so strange as it seems.

People can pass the test more than one time. As immunity is so short lived, each patient could test positive, then negative and then positive again, an "undefined" number of times. This should count as one patient, two events. I assume that each positive has a second try at least to assure that is not a false positive
This is not about US domestic politics.

Will the US government use FB/Twitter to delete the supporters' posts for the candidates it doesn't like?
Cargo works fine with private repositories, and I use it wrapping C++ code and that works fine as well.

I use VScode with rust-analyzer and its been a great experience, had an easier time with it than the c++ vscode extension.
What was the restaurant doing wrong? Was it recirculating indoor air? Or was it actually exchanging the air? Replacing indoor air with fresh air from outside.
I really have to disagree, if you're going the route of hosting stuff in your home, then by all means take an easy k8s distro like rancher.
I have stuff running from openhab, Nextcloud to even my Unifi controller. It runs flawlessly; and together with Rook, I don't have to be afraid of node and disk failures. I haven't learned so much in 2 years since I started linux 20y ago.

Personally I think the amount of pain wasn't enough, so I'm using Canonical Maas, and I can just spin up extra servers, though going beyond 4 nodes seems kind of wasteful in a home setting. Though my rig seeps 100Watt, which for hobby purposes is okayish imo. I've been running this since Ubuntu 16.04 and upgrading to 18.04 has been a relative breeze compared to a situation where I would've built this using adhoc scripts(i.e. non-k8s setup.)

I did make a wireguard tunnel to a colocation datacenter for offsite backups using async mirroring of rook/ceph. B/c with so many moving parts and automation, wiping a cluster accidentally is quite possible.
Of course, that only matters if your needs include rendering 4k video or compiling Chromium.

If they don't, then the old hardware is still good.
I'm thinking at some departments in my company which heavily rely on Google Sheet for their under-cover development needs - basically when they are not given any dedicated developer time - and this is both awesome (gives them freedom to tinkle/experiment) and scary (gives them freedom to mess it up) at the same time, so I feel a bit divided :)
Walking through computer history with Woz at the Computer History Museum (2010)
(Googler, opinions are my own)

I wonder what this says for the Google/Nest Security product future. The existing Nest Secure[0] is a well designed product, but also rather limiting (only one base unit, which is frustrating for houses with multiple entrances, or large houses). The Nest Secure was released ~3 years ago, and there have been some minor feature improvements, but no hardware additions or changes.

[0] https://store.google.com/us/product/nest_secure_alarm_system
After thinking more about the argument that some users are naive and only Apple can prevent them installing apps that would steal their data and money I would say that this naive users could also be tricked by webpages and Apple defenders should ask for Apple to also provide a web filter and allow only Apple aproved web sites. 2

I was also reminded how in the past if you got your phone from Vodafone it would be SIM locked and after your contract expired you could not use the phone on other networks, you had to find a phone service to unlock it, I am not sure if it was a national law or EU law that demanded that unlocking should be easy to do when the contract is over(you should ask for it and you should receive a code for free). With Apple you pay for the phone, you own it but you are still locked, we need a similar law that if you own the phone you should be allowed to unlock it.
> Napster was a godsend. The music industry was a racket.

Completely true - and the reason why, is because it forced competition on the music industry. Competition that couldn't be bought out. Napster wasn't completely free - it came with the costs legality and a bit of tech know how, but it brought competition to the industry.

And overall it again exposed one of the key points. Free markets dont benefit consumers, competitive markets do. Consumers and society benefits when people are free and capable to successfully enter and exit markets as consumers as they see fit, and when entrepreneurs are free and capable of successfully entering markets as suppliers as they see fit. Locked distribution channels, exclusivity deals and the rest all prevent this. Without competitive markets, you end up with gross-rent seeking.

Competitive markets benefit consumers and society overall,
Pure free markets incentivize seeking.

Heavy handed government intervention can eliminate competition in suppliers, however other suppliers are frequently the number one force in current markets eliminating competition in suppliers. And the end result for consumers (as we saw in the record industry) is just as bad.

If we're arguing against regulatory capture, and government limiting market efficiency, then we need to be arguing just as strongly against exclusivity deals, locked distribution channels and moats.

If a tower is teetering one way, giving it a shove so it's now teetering just as far another way is no better when we want it to stand balanced.

Trading govt enabled rent-seeking for industry enabled rent seeking is in no way a win for consumers or society.

And arguing the benefits of free markets while ignoring the fact they aren't competitive due to industry moat building tactic is hypocritical.
> cut ties with a foreign government or stop operating here

How is it possible for someone to prove that they have no foreign government ties?

Are there any evidence backing the "foreign government tie"?
Major news outlets are handing the mic to big business on climate issues
Why not share the video?
I didn't know there's Zeroth Law.

In any case, fetuses don't have rights (for the same reason abortion is widely allowed).

As for freshly-died people, it's no different from about-to-die people: robots have no business deciding to interfere with humans - they should obey only their owners and follow their explicit instructions. People have a right to suicide. Being a robot or owning one doesn't entitle one to violate this right when others want to exercise it.

The "laws" are wrong but not for the reasons from TFA.
I mean, isn’t that just writing CSS classes at that point?
Show HN: PyCrossfade – a library for creating DJ Transitions in Python
Google's customer service is pretty good on the hardware they sell. I've owned a Nexus 7 and various Nexus and Pixel phones and when you call them they are generally helpful.

GSuite is also fairly well supported.
The multi-billion dollar opportunity is acquisition by Autodesk. There's no multi-billion dollar opportunity in Revit add-ons.
Reducing interview stress with independent work
Principal Software Engineer Role VTS
We're looking for a Principal Software Engineer at VTS in NYC.

This person will be a technical leader in foundation engineering. They aren’t expected to create new technologies or solve hard technology problems per se (not inventing the light bulb, writing a codec, or designing Cassandra); but rather, to tackle the hard rollout of significant shifts in technology approach to have multi-year organizational impact. This often requires identifying e.g. the 3 changes we need to start today in order to be prepared in the future, and giving people a clear path to execution.
All of which is either press or speech.
Drift's NLP for customer service workflows ends up being pretty nice.

https://www.drift.com/automation/
We're trying to do much of what you mention here. It ain't easy. Here's some of my thoughts, as one of the people in Development trying to achieve it.

The app whitelist impairs my efficiency, and honestly takes a fair amount of fun out of work. I can no longer use many of the tools that help me, and instead am confined into the corporate-approved structure. This is both a productivity issue and a job satisfaction issue.

Trying to separate our development workstations, and dev environment overall, from the rest of the sordid mess, is extraordinarily difficult. We're trying to do similar what you recommend, with developer VMs running in our internal ESX cluster. However, that technology conflicts with Microsoft's Hyper-V (we're a MS shop). We're trying to get to Docker/k8s, but we can't run Docker inside a VM that runs in ESX. So we're trying to offload the actual execution of the system, even for local testing, into DevSpaces. But there's a lot to figure out, and DevSpaces is a young product. Further, private AKS environments are a new thing in Azure, and we've a couple of times now run into roadblocks with MS's own growing pains.

Your "upvote" system seems to have merit, but with, I dunno, 50 or 60 devs, spread across several teams focused on different tech, it doesn't seem like it would scale well. Coming up with the right mix of apps, and convincing our Risk team, is very difficult. Especially when so much of their pushback seems confusing (like, DBeaver was denied as a FOSS product, but approved when we paid for the Enterprise version).
Because I can't open files from clients who use a newer version than I do - with the 2020 illy update particularly schisming matters.
OMG that "review" is pure gold! <3
If you choose to abstain from current events then you assume responsibility for the outcome. Functioning democratic societies require active, engaged citizenry.

Passive, disengaged voters are what creates the conditions for Donald Trump to arise.
Hi, how do you compare with appsheet or retool?
Ray Dalio: Changing World Order, Big Cycle of the US & the Dollar Ch4 Pt1
"Open the pod bay doors"

https://youtu.be/dSIKBliboIo
The typical copyright term in the US is life of the creator + 70 years. Are potential revenues a hundred years from now really figuring all that much into the price of copyrighted work sold today?
It’s a TEDx talk but the social media photos (and captions) all crop out the x
1k Fake iPhones From Hong Kong Used in AppleCare Fraud
I'd compare it more to the law of entrapment: You need to show that you did the action because it was an officer convincing you; the fact that you were convinced/talked into doing something is not enough. Which seems parallel to our case: The spouse in question was open to cheating; the fact that it was a detective (or fraudster) on the other side seems irrelevant.

But I see your point, it feels fraudulent since you prove one side is bad by doing something (possibly) equally as bad, but only one thing is regarded in court. Though it will probably look bad if it's found out.

> I am not your lawyer. This is not legal advice.

Me neither, but I think it's an interesting topic.

> If your partner is actively sabotaging your relationship, it may not be a good idea to stay with that person.

Of course. But that was the point all along, I guess ;)
If Maddow is the vanguard of mainstream liberalism, why are her ratings so terrible?
CEO of bytedance is not a member of CCP
> Perhaps we should be looking at other approaches to the problem of unhappy marriages, in particular the due diligence of people in choosing their partners - especially when there are children involved or intended.

As someone who's been through a divorce, I think this is the wrong perspective.

The law should always be considered a backstop for when other solutions fail, not a first solution to aim for.

For instance, if you have a disagreement with your neighbor about a fence or a tree or something, you should always go and talk to them first. If you're a business and have a disagreement about the contract with some other business, you should always go and try to sort it out without lawyers first.

Making it possible to sue your neighbor or your business partner when discussion fails to produce results doesn't mean that you're "trivializing neighborhood relations". Well-written and consistently-applied laws means, ideally, that when you have those conversations with your neighbor or your business partner, you never end up going to court, because everyone knows exactly what's going to happen.

The law in the UK is already written to try to encourage people to save their marriage: In the absence of adultery or physical abuse, you can generally only file for a divorce after you've been separated for 2 years; and this includes provisions for short stints of living together to give it a second chance. (E.g., if you separate for 6 months, come back together for 3 months, and then separate again, the "clock" doesn't start over, and you can file for divorce after another 15 months.)

By the time that people move out, the relationship is almost always in a really bad state; and by the time you've lived separately for 2 years, there's almost zero chance you're going to get back together. At that point what you have is no longer a marriage, and the divorce proceedings is only recognizing legally what has already happened relationally.

I mean, yes, we as a society should also be trying to prevent disaster-in-waiting marriages from happening; and should be investing time trying to strengthen marriages -- even marriages which are relatively stable.

Making divorce difficult won't save marriages, but it does add all kinds of perverse incentives. If you have to prove adultery or abuse to file, then suddenly you have to bring in private investigators to spy on people, and sling around reputation-destroying accusations in public, making the whole thing a lot more nasty.
Reading the book description on Amazon, I don't associate Constrained or Unconstrained with Conservative and Progressive respectively.
> "FAANGs swallow up promising engineers and have them work on mundane problems to help generate revenue."

That reminds me of how 10 years ago, the smartest people in the world were working for investment banks on high-frequency trading to improve tiny efficiencies on stock market profits. And today they're working for FAANGs to improve ad targeting.

Both cases are really just shifting money around, not creating new technology or wealth. But apparently improving marginal efficiencies of administrative work reaps more short-term profits than creating new value.
Sure, but this is impossible to escape. Even if you're looking at a dry set of facts, there was editorial decisions made regarding what to put on that list and what to leave off. There is literally nothing you can read where you can escape the opinions of others.
What I'm claiming is not specific to Google. In general, large companies very rarely take a strategy of publicly saying "we don't do X" and then trying to secretly do X. It doesn't work out well for them, because they aren't the kind of entity that can pull off that kind of deception. Documents get subpoenaed, auditors look at things, whistleblowers release things, things get leaked.

You're referencing anti-trust and privacy investigations, but those don't seem to be about lies?
According to the OP he said Trump would be easier to remove than Clinton. The fact that Trump was not removed from office does not make the statement wrong.
'Cancel Culture' here seems to refer to the rash of firings and administrative punishments for academics who question the progressive dogma, especially w/ regards to BLM, the gender pay gap, institutional racism, etc.

Here is an academic 'cancellations' tracking document by the National Association of Scholars:

https://www.nas.org/storage/app/media/New%20Documents/academ...
Perhaps, but is that really a telling statement about the book or a more telling statement about the current state of academic economics?
Read a Paper: Verifying the WebAssembly Specification
They "failed" because the social party mayor didn't get re-elected and a conservative mayor got elected. The new mayor then blamed LiMux for problems that mainly rooted in the ongoing migration of all departments to LiMux and then ordered the migration back to Windows for a price that would have had LiMux running for decades.

By total coincidence, shortly after announcing the move back to Windows, Microsoft announced to relocate their German headquarters from Hamburg to Munich.
And as a percentage of the population, I'd be willing to wager they're far smaller than the number of humans who've looked up at the sky and dreamt of what the Earth looks like from the cosmos.
I've seen some decent refutations of that kind of thinking by Chomsky himself. I don't have a great recommendation just because my eyes tend to glaze over when people start droning on about how xyz would be nice but iT's NoT hUmAn nAtURe.

Also, I don't know how anybody could say that kind of thing about Marx, specifically Das Kapital, which is what I'm most familiar with. It doesn't delve much into human nature, it's all about modes of production and exchange and labor value.
No.

I purposely don’t tie my account credentials to a 3rd party.

(Which always seemed crazy to me that people would do. Especially business accounts)

EDIT: why am I getting downvotes for this comment? I’d rather you reply to this comment to create a health dialogue on this topic if you have an opinion - rather than just some random downvote without reason.
At a very basic level, of stats and epidemiology of course I agree and you are quite correct.

However, that is the stuff of the future and the ivory tower. In the course and flow of this public health crisis it is necessary for reasonable speculation and extrapolation to be used to drive our responses.

There is no evidence that I have heard that the most susceptible have been culled from the population yet, and there is no logical reason to believe that this has happened. In fact the contrary seems to be true when the pattern of the outbreak is observed in the USA. Potentially there remain a huge well of victims left in the population.

To claim that this abet contingent knowledge is illegitimate in the face of the human catastrophe that could result from rejecting it strikes me as an rejection of all of the principles of the enlightenment. Our rationality is our sword and shield for fighting the shadows on the wall of the cave. I for one will not be putting these tools down. It is wrong to cower in the dark when our brains can light a light and let us see a path to safety.
Rhino is primarily command line based, it is a perfect mix of CLI and GUI.

Also it is 4-up by default and designed around that paradigm. I don't understand how people stand using modeling programs that only have 1 viewport, but they are common enough that I presume everyone gets by.
Of course, a very good point. For me it's a hobby which I enjoy.

In an area without Internet service, for me, it is common to miss calls as well. Plus, from personal experience, the security company will not notify law enforcement until they have called you to confirm it is not a false-positive alarm.

In my case, before the alarm goes off due to a forced entry, I will have automatically received notifications with snapshots of people around my property. Even if the security company had called immediately, a response would take >10 minutes. So I just self-monitor.

Overall, with home security you basically just want to be a more annoying, harder target than your closest neighbors. It's sad but true.
Love the idea of "under-cover development". Sneaking in at night to ship software to make your team more efficient.
If you want people to accept your point of view, the burden is on you to articulate it. There's a lot of this "people should just see it the way I do" attitude floating around the internet.
Types Of Artificial Intelligence: Details that everyone should know
"Skilled" employees will be in for a rude awakening if this continues. Airlines are not building planes right? So they don't need as many skilled workers, they will also cut down aeronautic engineers, software engineers, accountants, lawyers, etc. There are lots of industries that support them too. If this continues, it will cascade like a domino effect.
Meanwhile Amazon will happily ship you toxic counterfeit products all day.

Don't do business with Amazon.
~2B is peanuts among accounting scandals.

In NL we had our flagship grocery chain inflate the numbers by ~10B in 2003.
Big nets.
It matters that we recognize patterns of unaccountability and lazy leadership. The issues with the presidency are much larger than Trump and if we ignore that it will keep happening.
Gandhi to become first non-white person on British currency
> If you get one of the top 5, you're golden. However, they might prefer the real expensive enterprisy solutions.

This can be mitigated, as if Stacker offer the top 5 a massive licence discount compared to big enterprisey tools, so they're making more profit on the same result, then they'll pick it. And for the big enterprisey solutions that are built in an old, expensive way, they won't be able to compete on price for long, which could be interesting.
There are two mobile platforms: Apple iOS and Google Android. Each mobile platform has changed its preferred language: Objective-C -> Swift and Java -> Kotlin. There are two popular language-specific cross-platform mobile ecosystems: Google Dart and Microsoft C#. The article excludes the hybrid mobile/web cross-platform approaches that use JavaScript/JSX such as PWAs and React-Native. The preferred mobile platform IDEs, Xcode and Android Studio, seem to be as central to each mobile platform as the programming language.

It seems to me that the important questions each developer must ask are:

1. target mobile platform(s)?

2. greenfield vs. brownfield app?

3. current skillset?

The ideal language falls out of these questions, IMHO, but there are a multitude of edge cases that may apply.
Surely all industrial / professional HVAC get installed with HRV and the loss here is going from the "100% efficient" recirc to HRV, no?
How many corpses are there? How did they die?

If you're claiming they died of cancer or heart attacks or cardiac arrests or stroke you still need to explain why there are so many more than normal.