skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
There's some nice python packages to natively use it.
https://pypi.org/project/jsonschema/

We use it at Uclusion to make sure our front end is passing the right arguments, by having it be the first thing our lambdas do with the request body:

from jsonschema import validate as validate_schema
def validate_syntax(self, event):
"""
Subclasses are expected to override this to handle any syntactical validation different from here
:param event: the request event object
:return:
"""
schema = self.get_schema() # implemented by individual validator objects
validate_schema(event, schema)
>80% this, 20% that" talk, while citing no sources yourself, is not a becoming way to argue your point.

That's normal distribution which is abundant in nature.
Stalling tactic? I don't recall anyone ever being fined over a breach. Sounds like a tactic to escape whatever is left of the news cycle on this.
malicious bootloaders that could give hackers control over the victim device
If the arguments are old, how is that a point in favor of people in the field being unaware of them? There has been 50 years of people arguing against the use of resources in pursuit of this field. You still think people in a field of physics have somehow sheltered themselves from these arguments? You have had a conversation with a physicist, yes? They will shred someone making dubious claims.

Further, if you think plasma physicists would go hungry if fusion research ceased, you’re simply wrong. Nobody researches fusion for the paycheck. An industry paycheck for the equivalent quality of work is double.
I suggest YouTube Music that's really awful.
Paper Mario is clearly an RPG, but it has a similar amount of numbers backing it's system as your average Zelda. It's just that Zelda hides the numbers from you and Paper Mario does not.
In the last 5 years Intel revenue has grown from $55B to $72B. Sure AMD's TSMC-manufactured chips have a price/performance lead today, but 50 years of history show us that's only part of the story between AMD and Intel.
> This is a game for two

It's a game where the politicians are in charge, subpoenaing the businessmen to come answer their questions, under their rules, at penalty of perjury.

Of course the businessmen do their best to present their side, but let's not pretend it's an even playing field.
Yeah, no, they don't, and it isn't.

Estate tax being practically zero means huge quantities of un-earned wealth are transmitted from generation to generation. This isn't true in most first-world countries.

The top tax rate in the US isn't nearly as high as many European countries.

The specific quantity of money that is collected as tax revenue has much more to do with just how successful the higher classes are in the US as compared to other countries. This is a function of (wealth inequality multiplied by the top tax rate) not of how progressive the system is -- certainly not at the federal level.

If you have citations, they are much welcome.

The post you're replying to missed many critical factors, such as the fact that the average salary in constant-dollar terms has remained the exact same since 1964 in the US. [1]

[1] https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/08/07/for-most-us...
Yes, of course, that's how they all work. A real time game wouldn't work over a tty.
the production team can. it has made very hard to debug. Now the production team has to do most of the debug work, they have to give us anonymised data (and you cant turn personal data in anomymous data. it would be pseudonymous at best) that trigger the bug.

It can be pretty hard if your organization was not organized with this in mind in the first place.
Not sure about US, but for EU (and IANAL):

In case of physical manifestations, there is an ownership of the physical medium, and copyright rights are 'subservient' to ownership transfer/loan of mediu through 'first sale' doctrine.

For intangible copyright works (e.g. downloadable software), it is just contract and there is no transfer of ownership.

There is specific legislation that establishes 'first sale' doctrine for intangible software, but not for other copyright works.

See https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=449a705d-d76a... (or http://archive.is/GZ6mX )
that's cute. 2011 you say? you can run android 10 (current latest release) on galaxy s2. released in 2011. and it's actually usable, because screencandy has been removed to give it a perf boost. can you run ios 13.6 on your 2011 iphone 4s?

i know in the iphone world it's important how long apple updates it. in the android world that doesn't apply. the manufacturer doesn't have to. because literally anyone can, and does.
I'm not an expert in this area, I've just read enough literature on software transactional memory to understand some of the fundamental limitations of modern hardware architectures.

This is one of the few areas where a subscription to the ACM Digital Archive is priceless. It's been several years since I went down the rabbit hole, and many new data structures have since been published. If there's a decent self-contained solution, there's a good chance it's been published there. Any particular paper is likely floating around on the Internet, but efficiently sifting through the literature benefits from friction-free access to all the citations.
this reads a little too much like a press release

I'd appreciate some commentary from anyone with industry experience

how does this compare to other options in the field of educational robotics?
Look up Basilisk or Sheepshaver. Main hits for those will tell you the rest of the details.
> There's actually pretty solid legal argument for first doctrine not applying to digital media.

Of course there is. When someone uses a loophole, they’re doing something legal to get an unintended or nonobvious benefit— If an activity isn’t legal, it isn’t a using a loophole: it’s just fraudulent / criminal behavior.

The net effect of moving from producer-supplied media to consumer-supplied media has (among other things) resulted in a de facto curtailment of historical consumers’ rights, despite nobody doing anything illegal. The original drafters of copyright simply didn’t envision a world where products would be regularly delivered in a form that couldn’t be physically separated from the purchaser’s other posessions.
Debian has a detailed note on the secureboot vulnerability
D) Race is strongly correlated with socioeconomic status.

E) The police responses in poor and targeted neighbourhoods often involve harming residents and criminalizing the impoverished and racialized.

F) 911 is a Joke
I guess time to live is scope too but I think it's far too often ignored.

Scope generally determines feature coverage, not quality or how long we expect to use the system.
The Atari ST had its own way of dealing with this that didn't use the standard 68k trick.

As explained by EmuTOS contributor, Vincent Rivière: "Note that such "standard trick" is not used on Atari ST hardware. The first 8 bytes of the address space are always remapped to the start of the ROM. So the first 8 bytes of RAM are always inaccessible, as they are shadowed by the ROM. Actual usable RAM starts at address 8, even of cold boot."

Basically as I understand it, RAM "starts" at 0x000000 but is only writable at 0x000008 and beyond. So the first 8 bytes is actually ROM and be used to jump to the rest of the ROM. The rest of the vectors after 0x000008 are written to by the OS as it boots.

A little fiddly in the address decoder, but maybe less complicated than timer tricks and the like.

Your 68k + FPGA project sounds interesting. There's another one that's been discussed on the EmuTOS list lately, that is using an older MAX10 FPGA which is 5v tolerant. But 68000, not 68010. I think mainly because the 68000 was produced in packages that could do higher clock rates, while the 68010 never made it above the low teens.

But have you thought of just using Coldfire?
you're entering passwords manually to enter zoom meetings? I don't think I've ever done that, usually they are included (hashed) in the URL distributed to participants, as the OP mentioned several examples of.
That hearing was a joke, to be frank.

Anyone notice how much time the congressmen spoke versus the CEOs? Or how often they were interrupted mid-sentence?

They weren't interested in answers, congress wanted to put on a show. Except it was a poor attempt at...whatever they were trying to accomplish - should have been expected given that it was congress.

And of course nothing will come of this hearing - those companies are not technical monopolies. That's why they are being grilled in congress, rather than being taken to court, because they would win in court.
Sounds better and shorter than: give me a summary of how your traversed your decision tree to come out with this answer, which to be honest is pretty close to what a monologue actually is
The libre purism BRICK if you don’t mind opening a shell randomly to do things throughout the day
> As a customer, I don’t want to have a decoder ring for how to get support for my product.

As an Australian this is so weird to hear. I have a business relationship with the person I gave money to, not some third party factory or manufacturer that I never met. The law requires the merchant to take the return and make it right, after that it's their problem. Most likely they have a better idea about the next step than I would as a random customer.
Missed process shrinks and had multiple major security issues. Went from having all of the major oems and cloud providers on lockdown to them universally seeking other options: whether amd, in-house arm, or both.

Past revenue has never and will never be an indicator of future success.
> It's not like anyone owns the copyright to this stuff

I would think the copyright still exists. Maybe the owner just isn’t aware of the infringement.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-07-29/herd-immu...
This is just one hop away from resolving into racism, but somehow this kind of bullshit is consistently allowed on HN.
and everyone has to be on mute if they're not talking.

In all the calls I've attended this was always the case anyway, and there seemed to be an implicitly understood rule of "keep yourself muted unless you want to say something". Seeing someone's mute indicator turn off was a cue to pause and wait, as it indicated someone wanting to say something.
So what are the options for proper digital video (DisplayPort/HDMI) generation on retro systems like this?

Other than the typical (and ugly) "duct-tape a Raspberry Pi to it" and/or "software composite video to a converter dongle" approaches.
Oh, by "anyone" I meant, "any of the sites currently hosting this content". This should be clearer in my edit; sorry for the confusion.
I think you're right here, and I worry we are overly compartmentalizing security away from engineering. Ideally you should be both. One of the issues I see is that (at least in my experience), security isn't too bad to get up to speed in, if you get the time, but it's pretty time consuming to stay on top of advances.

Cross team working is important, but I think it's also important to try and embed security "people" into the day to day development flow on a regular basis. It ought to help the developers through learning by osmosis.

Definitely think companies need to better signal the demand for deep technical skills in security though - too many seem to actual want generic risk management experience but no particular technical knowledge. To my mind, anyone in a security role should really be able to break their way into a typical corporate internal webapp in a few minutes, just out of their own residual talent and ability to show stakeholders the importance of their profession. It's amazing how quickly security gets a seat at the table when they show how they can pop the self service password reset portal with just a web browser (with appropriate permission of course) and are asking whose password to reset to show it works...
What editor are you using?

It's about having things auto completed and you get to see errors before you run.

And what kind of library are you using to complain that third party typings are the source of your concern?
He comes from an important political family, but he hasn't been Prime Minister for his whole life. There's a fair chance that LifeLabs has handled his data at some point.
Doctor GPT-3
What Are Swift Codes?
The HP 49/50g are excellent.
Ask HN: Why did USCIS remove H1-B population Estimate? [pdf]
Reminds me of a small privacy issue with many Canadian institutes: a lot of medical institutions and facilities use google maps or google fonts. This sort of reveals to google that a user with a certain ip address is visiting a certain site related to <private medical issue>
This also happened with many people's Nexus Players, a Roku/Firestick competitor, myself included. It's co-developed by both Google and Asus. Of course after the update bricked them Google tried to blame Asus and put it on their shoulders to provide a fix and Asus seemed to do the same. Needless to say, I won't buy Google products anymore.
I've read all the release notes and I couldn't find anything that wasn't upstream sync or redistribution, packaging, irrelevant stuff.

I just want to understand what they delivered since June, 2019. Could you name a couple of examples?
I see an advantage to the businessmen as the net outcome. It's still business as usual and they continue reaping handsome profits for questionable practices while addressing the accusations from their 'critics'.
This article[1] talks a little more about Rob Reich's discussion of why large donations to charity can be paternalistic.

From memory, most donations "with strings attached" establish something new (like a new building), but explicitly disallow the donation to be used for mundane (but very necessary) maintenance (eg. heating, electricity, maintenance, janitorial, admin/professor salaries). I think the quote is simply reinforcing the idea that a university probably knows better where the additional dollar should be spent than a wealthy donor who hasn't been on campus in years (if ever).

[1] https://news.stanford.edu/2018/12/03/the-problems-with-phila...
Upscale Motels and Travel during Covid-19
Agreed.

It is crazy that for a standard "Savings" account:
- interest earned is less than inflation.
- I pay tax on that interest earned.
"Saving" money in a common savings bank account pisses away value.

Many people are not capable of more financial management capability.

The middle class is often locked into a mortgage - I am too! - and is barely one step up. But it is one step up.

Ultimately, poor people don't own things that make money.
They are not "rent seekers".
They don't own stocks or real estate or anything else where the simple act of ownership makes money.
Hyperarchive, formerly of hyperarchive.lcs.mit.edu.
However, the Times reports that the company has been criticized for launching its balloons in parts of the country that already have developed internet infrastructure and that some people in poorer areas of Kenya can’t afford the phones needed to connect to its 4G service.

Yup. Exactly as expected.
The problem with "local" (where local is maybe not even where you are, but where your base is) storage of data is that it's a pain in the butt. Maintaining hardware, doing backups, etc is fun for me as a hobbyist but is a drag for people who don't like that thing. Cloud took off because it's easy, not because it's better.
You asked > How do compasses work on aircraft?

So the parent responded with gyroscope based navigation. Perhaps you'd meant to ask

> How would these compasses work on an aircraft?

*Edited
Yes, that's a fair point--the numbers for the potential upside and downside matter a lot here. I was only trying to make the case that in some cases, the downside risk may not hold a candle to the potential upside.

I also think that they want to see founders who are willing to charge up those hills rather than to shirk away from challenges that seem to be too big for them. Sort of like burning your ships behind you in terms of morale--if it's go big or go home and you can't go home, there's only one choice left.
marginal utility is much higher for the government (and the public) than for you
Bitbar is amazing. Its become a dashboard for my life.
Yes! old memories .. I remember my casio fx501P where I start writing my first software and the TI58c of my nearby mate, much powerful but with a poor battery, havvy, and almost unusless for long time calculactions, my little casio always was winning against the texas!
C actually had better support (than C++) for double-checked locking (which is a lockless algorithm) up until relatively recently https://preshing.com/20130930/double-checked-locking-is-fixe...
Shut up God.
Unfortunately I am yet to see evidence of these new "coding robots" actually providing educational benefit, they seem to be more of a distraction from the fundamentals of maths and science, and an even greater burden on an already stretched education system budget.

Perhaps children aged 6 should be focused on reading and writing rather than worrying about Moravec's paradox on a $200 bleeping pile of plastic.
You're forgetting development and marketing costs.

If there is a sunk cost component that number skyrockets.

Try adding a $5 customer acquisition and $1 developer time.

Thats a $1 profit, you need to sell 3 apps to cover the cost of apples fees. You also need to sell another 6 to cover the sunk costs you don't get back.

So 1 refund costs you 9 sales.

To cover the 1/10, you'll need to charge 10.90, or more likely 11 to cover the moving 30%.

But this is just to break even with your original $1 profit margin.
And there are no real alternatives. I really wish the government was doing these tests rather then some rando company.
In case anyone hasn't read Warren's policy recommendations, it's worth the read to get a sense of possible steps beyond questions on CSPAN:

https://medium.com/@teamwarren/heres-how-we-can-break-up-big...
There is - Heads[1].

[1] https://github.com/osresearch/heads
Your post is, in all effects, a recapitulation of the precise juncture and jettison of which I was speaking. That you strongly disagree with my post, all I can say in response is e pur si muove.
The perfect is the enemy of the good. We can have both.
Huawei Game Service Implementation: Leaderboard
When I need to refactor a function in one part of the software, and the rest of the team needs to keep developing features against the existing version while I do my job, how would this work with Lepsta? (i.e. I need to change a function signature)

If I develop a package that other people use as a dependency, how does this work?

How does one have a LTS version(s)?
I.. guess? Didn't even occur to me... I thought it went without saying that my comment wasn't just blatantly irrelevant to the article, but maybe I shouldn't have assumed that.
dear googler. fyi -this is what that thinking and lack of integrity and support does:

you have gcp. working for vars over the years, per year i sell over $10mil of solutions that run or dr to cloud. i have not once put gcp as an option in front of a customer - all azure or aws. google has, and will, lose millions in gcp revenue. because of me. and this is true for most vars.

now, as far as others in my office -8 people like me. only one puts gcp in proposals. he's new.

this is very common. we don't trust or respect your offerings -too flaky, not going to risk our customer relationship when you drop the ball and we get the hit for proposing a bad solution. and yours are all bad solutions. not because of function -because it's risky for a business to be involved with you in any way, or count on you for anything.

you probably lose 50-80mil annually from my office alone. and it's not just lost cash. it goes to your direct competitors.

and i don't know a single person who wants you to fix your practices and act like a real company. only 2 real cloud players drives up prices, and we get more on our spiffs.

and last i checked, aws and azure have been, are, and will always be kicking your ass. because even if you fix your business practices now, you'll have to wait 30 years before all the sales staff and company decision makers retire. and that is eternity in tech time.

do you, yahoo!? see you on myspace.
after clicking the button in Firefox

A not-so-subtle (and IMHO abusive) effort to get you to use Chrome instead? They've already done that with YouTube's new horrible redesign, it wouldn't surprise me if other Google app-sites were the same.

The state of web browsers is a mess but that's a rant for some other time...
Compared to Arduino & other microcontrollers, a 68k has more capabilities- you have the real system bus available to you, which I don't think you do on an Arduino (or a rasPi for that matter.)

Compared to a raspberry pi, a 68k SBC is more "knowable". There aren't any proprietary blobs there... You can still wrap your head around the whole computer- it's simpler.
I will ignore the barely veiled contempt and give you my best answer. YES.

I don’t think there is a shortage of kids in our planet.

Taxpayers are not ‘taking care of kids’ ..they are subsidizing parents’ lifestyles and choices. I am really not very sympathetic towards this.
yo be real seems like a good answer to a loaded question.
This definitely. The US has reached a fairly catastrophic level of social dysfunction today, a bizarre and perhaps unprecedented sort of social polarization that bodes very ill for the future. It has appeared in social media, it might be accelerated by social media but it isn't explained by social media. The division of the US into "red counties" and "blue counties" especially should have people worried. Even more, the existence of a multitude of Christian institutions parallel to secular institutions (from Christian "health experts" to Christian law schools and colleges to Christian media to Christian rock) bodes further ill for unified nation.

I mean, genocide in Myanmar happened through Facebook but Facebook didn't create it out of nothing. Genocide in Rwanda happened through radio, TV and word-of-mouth but wasn't explained by these either.
>It's a game where the politicians are in charge, subpoenaing the businessmen to come answer their questions, under their rules, at penalty of perjury.

>Of course the businessmen do their best to present their side, but let's not pretend it's an even playing field.

Your response is odd. The fact perjury is a possible outcome if a knowingly misleading answer is given doesn't change the equation of the fundamental social interaction.

Congresspeople are not fishing for soundbites. They have a legitimate interest in knowing what are the current practices being engaged in by major economic players. They need information pertinent to building consensus amongst their numbers to fulfill legislative mandate.

The capacity to give a concise number, or the propensity to avoid answering the question speaks volumes more to the necessity of regulation than any candid response would.
Part of the problem is that "Who waits?" or less colloquially "Are you guaranteeing fairness, progress, or performance?"

For example, in a network stack, I may want fairness. In that case, all of my packets should get through with equal probability so I want my threads to all make progress even if I lose some maximum bandwidth.

However, in an audio stack, my thread feeding the audio hardware had better NEVER block. I don't care how long the threads feeding into it have to wait, but the thread feeding the audio hardware gets priority under ALL conditions and I never want it to have to wait more than a single instruction.

Those are VERY different locking scenarios, and you can't automatically differentiate.
FTFY Communism 2.0

> A UBI is the logical next step we must take to move forward as humanity. If we continue to wait more people will suffer and we’ll end up stagnating for decades, or destroying the fruits of capitalism in revolution anyway.

This simply isn't true, by almost every possible metric the world is getting better.