skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It could be. I would say it's unlikely, given they had no problem handling a technical discussion when asking me to demonstrate it was a hardware problem (it was done in several mails, during which they asked relevant questions after each of my mails). I guess it may have been handled by a different team, though, sending the ticket back when confident it was indeed related to hardware.
Wow, the big innovation here is that it's self hosted on a system with no disk. I don't think there's anything like it on the system - it's really an impressive feat.

FORTH on the 6502 has been done a few times before. There's a fellow named Garth Wilson who is sorta the self-proclaimed 6502 FORTH guru. He has a website here if you wanna learn more: http://wilsonminesco.com/stacks/

I actually wrote my own FORTH for the system before. My language wasn't very usable, but what impressed me the most was how quickly I could put it together. In just an hour and 100 lines of code, I had a fully featured compiler for a turing-complete language. You can't do that for many languages but FORTH!
How to program computers (Geo Carncross on k & kos) (2014)
No, not according to a reasonable definition of terrorism. It's terrorism if a group is intentionally attacking civilians (non-combatants) for political goals. Freedom fighters may or may not be terrorists, depending on whether they intentionally attack civilians or only hit military targets. What it means to intentionally attack someone is regulated by the Doctrine of Double Effect, is based on distinguishing between side effects and intentional goals of an action. It's a tricky topic and there is leeway for interpretation, but It's not as if a definition in this area could or should never lead to controversies.

Unfortunately, this definition is rarely used, because it doesn't match the political goals of states. First, it follows from the definition that there is widespread state terrorism. Second, countries that send military occupation forces to other countries have a vested interest to brand asymmetric warfare against their military as terrorism, but this is not covered by the definition.
Yes, and browser vendors have refused to enhance support for this. To be fair though, client certificates have some obvious downsides, before all that you only have them on the device where they have been created. Since most people use several devices (desktop/notebook/tablet/phone) throughout the day, you require some way to keep them in sync. Cloud services could solve this, but tend to be vendor-specific, and doing it by hand via sneakernet is painful. Then this same problem occurs all over again if a certificate is leaked, for example due to device theft, and the cert needs to be revoked and replaced.

In summary, while browser and mobile OS vendors could cooperate to improve the situation with client certificates, as of now, there appears to be no interest from any party to do so, and unless it happens, it is not worth it to use client certificates at all.
All I care about is whether this is opt-in and whether I can decide to not give then that data.

Other than that, Google being able to process more data about their own platform than others, is something to be expected.
At some point, you still have to define what the actions are, which is my argument. By actions I mean specific things, not the broad amorphous label of "terrorizing."

As I said, if you narrow it down to specific actions (shooting, bombing, protest, etc.) the distinction between the two seems far more clear. I don't think anyone would claim that killing a crowd of civilians is somehow a freedom-fighting act, even if it is done by someone who mostly engages in freedom-fighting actions.
what about a cycling synergy between digging oil and reclaiming it. A kind of circular two sided market.
I have the same problem consistently on PopOS which uses GNOME just across two monitors.
As a bonus, in the redistribution process, windows are randomly resized to a lot larger sizes. I suspect this is related to me leveraging the experimental scaling features in GNOME which is hard to avoid using 27inch 4K monitors.
Really wish the window management would be more polished but I have no skill in that domain to make it better.
> Now might be a good time to change your password to something longer, or finally get onboard with 2FA.

That “or” should be “and” because a shorter password isn’t really useful even if you enable 2FA. I have seen websites that allow brute forcing TOTP tokens, so an on-site or low-latency attack could guess from 500k tokens (6 digit code with look-ahead time of 1 step) in 30 seconds, even if they change frequently.

I think that it’s time everyone used a password manager to generate really really long passwords. I set all passwords to 64 characters or the maximum allowable characters. There’s are some stupid businesses (hello, banks!) who have weird password requirements, like “more than 7 but lesser than 10 characters”. In such cases you’re better off with randomly generated passwords than a pattern you can remember.
> I know for a fact the charity work the churches do cost less than 10% of the income they make

If you really know this for a FACT, then I'm sure you can share your source for this information.

Churches are currently treated almost exactly like any other non-profit by the IRS. Taxing them specifically, but NOT other non-profits means we would be specifically discriminating against a religious organization.

...and religious persecution is a new level of left-wing intolerance that I, sadly, would not be surprised to see.
Yes, but on average (or equally, in total) it is 1000 times less sensitive than reading messages and 1000000 times less sensitive than selling that data.
The Lenape potato is a great example of this: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lenape_potato

It was basically perfect for potato chips due to its low moisture and sugar content, plus it was resistant to blight and easy to grow.

Shame about the glycoalkaloids, though.
Agreed. My XPS 13 also has a 1080p Matte display, and I love it more than my old MBP's Retina display.

I know the GP's post is grammatically phrased as an opinion, but I think a lot of its points are more preference-based than implied
Some data brokers are threatening you with "if you get removed from our database you will be marked as high risk of fraud and your transactions/orders you do online like hotel reservations will get rejected/put on hold for screening".

Well played. Absolutely legal but totally immoral
I guess I'd just assume she had a prescriptive personality type and preferred the dictionary she happened to look at to have the same view of language.
Check again: Firefox will do this for you now using VAAPI on Wayland since a couple of weeks. If you have an AMD or Intel GPU it should just work on e.g. Fedora and (not sure about if this is explictly needed) setting a Firefox feature flag.

Of course the problem here is that this Rockchip's video decoder has no VAAPI driver.
Messi eyes Leeds coach to replace Quique Setien
It is, but good luck finding yourself in that situation.
I received an offer during my bachelors which was not contingent on me completing the degree, but it came after a helluva unusual story that I can't repeat here.

Display exceptional creativity and promise in the field in which you're looking to study, attract a lot of attention for it, and then maybe, just maybe.
>At some point, you still have to define what the actions are, which is my argument.

Person A defines the EXACT SAME precise sets of actions as 'terrorism'.
Person B defines the EXACT SAME precise sets of actions as 'freedom fighting'.

They do it ostensively. THAT (points finger) is X.

Language doesn't work the way you think it works.

What you are trying to achieve is called Essentialism.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Essentialism
I had a similar experience trying to report a product that extremely misrepresented itself and yet had ~5 stars from reviews that were obviously assigned from an unrelated product.

My impression is that Amazon doesn't want to know: good reviews, fake or not, drive more transactions in the short term.
Prison/criminal slang. “Bratán” is a member of “bratvá” (gang).
> the data was never mined for anything

Oh I wasn't implying what's generally seen as "data mining". But for such a company to offer many of the features in the paid services they need that data. They don't have to sell it to others, they only have to sell it back to the users as added services even included in the price of the hardware itself. Those added services can be as simple as sync between multiple phones or sharing on social media, or premium features like advanced analytics.

On the other hand this kind of data can be also sold entirely anonymized. Strava does this and many cities' urban planners buy the data to understand better how the city infrastructure is used by the people (running, cycling, etc.) and how to develop it.

I'm not saying there's no value in it, just that without it the value of the product decreases significantly. So it's in the manufacturer's best interest to have it as part of the basis of their offering.
> 3D printing masks for an emergency and other one offs don't come close to the amount of non stop, year long, permanent activity in charity and community of churches and mosques.

The problem is that in the U.S., the state has given up on helping the poor, especially when compared to EU countries, and it is then up to private institutions to fill in some semblance of what should have already been there as nonnegotiable basis of a developed society.

I am not from the U.S., (but with a lot of fiends from there), and I can tell you that a lot of what churches do in the U.S. is so basic that it should not be their role to provide. It is often used as a metric of "success" for churches and private charity in general, but in reality all it shows is a failure of the wider society where things like medicare for all are still not a thing, even during a pandemic.

When there's a possibility of thousands of dollars that need to be paid for an ambulance ride, that is a systemic failure of the system no church can fix.

I am not religious myself, but I want to make it clear that I am not arguing churches do no good. They absolutely do. I just feel that the awful shit they do is often overlooked as soon as something positive can be said about them.

There are multiple sides to every story, even characters you wouldn't think much about based on the overall picture did good, (one particularly repulsive character of history did a lot for animal rights for example).

I also feel like other forms of charity are often diminished in their impact because they're less visible than church charity.

Let's take FLOSS for example; I come from a relatively poor upbringing, without access to good education or the internet for the longest time. I have cerebral palsy and that means any kind of physical work is pretty much a no go for me. What I did have was a couple of friends who gave me Mandrake Linux on 3 CDs back in the day with GCC preinstalled and a book on C.

Now I am able to support myself as a programmer and donate to FLOSS on a regular basis.
Because FLOSS gave me hope, I also found the motivation to exercise really hard and to preserve some amount of mobility for myself, even into adulthood.

Without it, I'd most likely end up dependent on people I wanted nothing to do with and without any kind of dignity, demotivated and miserable. I cannot overstate the impact the free software community has on me and I feel like it did more for me than any church ever could.
How do you get the ball rolling on that and are there any good open source projects to start on?
Let them. One step at a time until the industry dies.
SCrypt is specifically designed to be hard to crack using FPGAs. To achieve this, it relies on high memory requirements for calculation of the hash. Crypto-mining boards for traditional cryptocurrencies have no memory requirements, and therefore cannot be repurposed to calculate SCrypt. However, with the advent of cryptocurrencies that also rely on memory-inefficient hash algorithms in order to prevent people from using classic FPGA clusters to mine them professionally, this is likely to change, as now there is monetary incentive to develop FPGA boards with high amounts of memory. The situation is still less bad though.
I don't see Google or Facebook relocating to Mexico soon. They don't have to, when they finance politicians
Location most likely.

Search cyber security jobs on indeed in London and there is hardly anything coming up. I can't imagine what it's like in a small city.
You are right and I don't understand why you're downvoted.

CCS is literally unburning coal and oil. Gathering ashes (CO2) and putting them back in the ground. Instead of energy producing goods and services, it just funnels air into the ground. The energy needed for this is at least the same energy that was released in the last 200 years.

It's also needed to stave off catastrophe and civilisation collapse, but let's not kid ourselves: it doesn't produce anything, except in indirect ways. Capitalism is not equipped to deal with this scenario.
It's obviously a question of preference but Linux trackpad drivers (eg libinput) are less capable than Apple's in terms of gesture/palm detection etc.
I'm an ASC. I find my security related work much more interesting than my development work.
Does RocketReach have servers in the EU? Employees? Subsidiaries?

I generally don’t know in this case. But in general my European friends seem to think that merely having someone from the EU access a website makes that website’s owner have a presence in the EU, even if the server that handled it isn’t. That seems like overreach to me. If that were the case, I’d block EU access for any of my domains, and I don’t think we want a future where that becomes the norm. The ideals of the Internet are free exchange of ideas and information, no country-specific walled gardens.
There's lots of honorary doctorates to people who contribute to the uni, or just contribute to the world in general. Usually people don't use the title but some do.
Why is this comment so unpopular? I also fail to see how these ex oil companies will profit from carbon reduction. A far more likely scenario is they apply what they have learned in oil and gas to offshore wind generation and continue to have a business model around provision of energy, e.g. the transformation of Statoil into Equinor.
I like that saying.

And i agree companies should only be allowed to gather the minimal data necessary in a given situation.
Don't recommend this old setting. If you need GPU acceleration, force enable WebRender support in Firefox (gfx.webrender.all=1).

Making web pages render with GPU support will barely help video decoding if at all though. For this to work well you need to tap into your hardware video decoder, which none of these settings achieve.
Sooner or later you have to open the borders and restart economies. After doing which you get unlimited rides on this pony.
Sweden had 10 deaths yesterday, the UK had 123. While that may sound like "essentially zero" when compared to the US, it's not.

The decline in deaths is due to the decline in cases which in turn are caused by improved preventative measures such as social distancing and masks.
I was more thinking of deploying trojan-code into the production service (as a trivial example, allow a special password to access any account): it can't be practical to vet every production service change through too many people.

You seem to suggest that you are using an encryption key based on the password or oauth token on login, which is great to hear, which stops the simpler forms of trojans like the example above. That makes it much more involved to achieve the same (and login from new computer reports make it harder too), especially undetected (because it has to happen over a short period) but not impossible (thinking of cases like just making a new API endpoint or perusing an existing one to store actual content in an often unlooked at log file/service).
> Everyone knows that operating systems run short time slices of processes on physical cores

The Amiga 1200 I mentioned earlier does pre-emptive multitasking on a 14 MHz CPU with 256 bytes of cache. I can switch between my IDE, my paint program, the OS desktop, a file manager and a simple text editor without any noticeable delay. It's as fast as flipping between desktops in FVWM on my PC (an operation which, incidentally, never seems to suffer from latency).

> The video card in turn is no longer just a block of memory mapped into the address space of the program doing the drawing, but is its own little computer with cores, threads, schedulers, locks, clocks, delays, and so forth.

The graphics architecture of my Amiga consists of several different chips all timed to a PAL signal and, since they're sharing memory with the CPU and other I/O, are also affected by constant interrupts.

> The desktop window manager

There's a DWM on my Amiga as well, called Intuition, providing several abstractions for programs to open screens and windows and render graphics and text in them. Plus, of course, GadTools, the system library for drawing UI widgets.

> The display in turn might further delay things because it has complex overdrive or scaling logic

The cheap, modern flatscreen connected to one of my Amigas upscales and upsamples _and_ does A->D-conversion on the analog RGB signal and yet manages to show my double-buffered displays scrolling in one pixel increments, with 50 Hz vsync without stuttering or tearing.

Yes, the layers of abstraction have increased in number and complexity, but so has the speed of the surrounding architecture. My PC's clock speed is more than 100 times that of the Amiga, it has 4000 times more RAM (in fact the caches in my cheap CPU exceed the amount of RAM on the Amiga), displays are now connected to the GPU with a wide-bandwith digital interface, and so on.

All of this could perhaps be valid excuses if it was consistent. Yet typing in a Firefox <textarea> feels faster than typing in for example FocusWriter, and typing in an xterm faster still. I can paint smooth freehand curves in Gimp with instant feedback (something the Amiga is not always capable of, depending on how much bandwidth the selected resolution requires). The computer is capable of full screen, full frame, fully vsynced full HD movie playback without stuttering or dropping frames.

The most interesting aspect is of course that a computer that might feel laggy in certain applications is fully capable of emulating an Amiga, complete with the perceived snappiness of the UI, despite all the overhead of emulation _and_ the supposed delays of the surrounding architecture.

(edit: getting some numbers straight)
When you are trying to login to iCloud or AppleID homepage from Safari on iOS, the OS asks you if you’d like to authenticate to the website using the iCloud account that is currently added on that device. So we have that tech, but I think the browser vendors need to do some work to support what you’re asking for.
I mean, you can define words however you want, but as I just said, I have a hard time believing that anyone would categorize "blowing up a bus filled with civilians" as a freedom-fighting act. Are you arguing that some people are justified in saying it is?
Just wanted to point out this might not be true of other religions in the US. Yes they make up a smaller number, but I know for a fact that Muslims are religiously more participatory than they were 20 years ago in America. It could be sheer rising numbers, but I and many of my peers have also become more involved in our religious centers than we used to be.

So what if, in order to accommodate the changing role of the church in America, you prevent the other minority religions and minority communities from ever having their centers grow in the same way churches were able to?
Twitter is filled up with great experiments using GPT-3
You can, see my definition above. The crucial feature is whether civilians are intentionally targeted or not. You can add all kinds of clauses (e.g. to conveniently exclude military forces of nation states), but that's the morally relevant criterion. A group that is intentionally targeting civilians for political reasons is a terrorist organization.
I believe this now makes you the cheapest subscription monthly order seed service.
You might have some trouble marketing this angle though, what with the hysteria over seeds from China right now.
It’s not that hard to do text similarity tests, but they also don’t need to: simply having a survey or report button would make this scam harder to pull off. You could even toss in a bounty like they do for choosing slower shipping.

Amazon doesn’t because they don’t care. It must not be costing them much money because we know they’re watching the numbers closely.
The person who blew up the bus and everybody who supports their actions defined it as 'freedom fighting'.

That is how they justified killing civilians to themselves. Casualties of war.

Just a short excursion into recent history: Nelson Mandela was once classified as a terrorist. It's because the ANC was involved in a number of bombings while engaging in 'freedom-fighting'.

https://time.com/5338569/nelson-mandela-terror-list/
Unsurprising. Another decade-old example: in the pre-iPhone/pre-Android era, when Google Maps was available on BlackBerry, Google created a vast database that associated cellphone tower locations to addresses, on the (smart) assumption that the “from” location is usually where you are.

They used this as a negotiating tactic for acquisitions they made in the space...
That seems a dangerous argument to make. Where do we stop? What other luxuries will we only allow to those who can afford the sustainable version of it? Warm water? Having a fulfilling job that unfortunately requires commuting?

Edit: to be clear: I’m not saying we shouldn’t do anything, I’m just saying the solution cannot be to make disparity between rich and poor even larger
It works by having lawyers :)

And we'll, there seem to be ready to use libraries, you can use without signing the NDA: https://github.com/search?q=fit+garmin&type=
Putting carbon into the atmosphere much easier than removing it, I don't see how this could ever happen
But this is not a valid argument for removing their tax exempt status since their tax exempt status is not based on agreeing or aligning with the government's views on homosexuality.
But god is not real and belief in god is anti science. It is sad when smart people choose comfort over logic. I am not anti church or anti religion, I am anti logic. The world is trending in the right direction and eventually issues like this article will be gone, but in the mean time, compassionate people should find a better way to serve the less fortunate and their communities than in houses of worship dedicated to a bronze age religion. God is not real.
I'd suggest going by what you use. At least for me, the initial motivation worked way better when fixing a bug on or improving something I regularly use. That can range from some random browser extension to tooling of a programming language you use. Sending PRs to one-person projects can be a bit hit-and-miss if they are active, but on the other hand they're often happy about any contribution they get that shows someone else cares about their thing. On the other hand, large projects are more likely to have a community where someone might help a first-time contributor through the steps.
> If this was about a purely intellectual roleplaying game with internal rules there would be no discussion in the first place.

Which is what makes the discussion bullshit. Because if you're starting your experiment with "assume that", that's what you're signalling you're doing.
Homeopathy combat against coronavirus disease (Covid-19)
Where are all these numbers coming from? Would you be ok with a publicly broadcasted CCTV in your bedroom, since one in your bathroom would be 1e4 times worse?
It’s hard to make an argument for the EU courts having that jurisdiction without also granting the same to Saudi Arabia and China.