skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I didn't misunderstand what I was writing (though I may not have succeeded in conveying what I meant). At compile time, a hidden class will be created to represent all the variables (both user-visible and user-inaccessible). Every function is actually called by an internal [[Call]]. This will create an instance of that class which is placed on the heap and may or may not copy some values into the stack (it's essentially a necessary performance optimization, but not actually hard requirement in all ISAs).

A closure is an object that has only one public method or property (a function application sometimes called apply). In theory, if you could guarantee that the apply method and all nested lexical scopes never accessed a variable and the variable was not reference counted, you could safely null the entry in the class and allow whatever it pointed to to be GC'd. My only contention is that this is easier to theorize about than to actually do.
P Olice Declare Riots at Portland and Seattle Protests; 1 Killed in Austin
"phpjs" and "jsphp" each have their share of results as well
Ideally, yes! That would be the best outcome.

I don't know why people always see dens of corruption and think that they ought to be protected, because of the jobs of the folks doing the corrupt work. Jobs are not the point of life, and we should accept that some jobs are bad jobs which should be eliminated.
Spoken like someone toiling away on their third postdoc position.
I see, so your problem was that you wanted to scan over all Datoms for one entity over a time period and you would have needed to have an EVAT index? In Datahike it would be fairly simple to add new indices like this.

Yes, access management must not incur a large overhead, that is why many systems have a separate restricted way to express and track rules. My hunch is that it still would be better to keep it in Datalog and specialize the query engine that it is fast on these (potentially restricted) rules and relations.
Being able to specific a particular sequence for the photos in a "virtual album" that is different than, say, their capture date or filename.
the investment page has some interesting numbers on them.

Looks like they may have expectations of approx 5k Pounds a chair.
I think most people who raise series A and then fail don't get rich. I've certainly known people who raised more than that, couldn't make the business work and then wound up personally bankrupt.
There is a whole dimension missing from this article, which is, "WFH has a huge difference in result depending on who you are, when you are (in your career), and where you are in the company".

-- For the budding young developer who can't wait to show ideas to teammates and demonstrate being a go-getter by asking random questions and finding unaddressed issues to innovate on, WFH might be terrible. You're going to schedule time to fortuitously run into the senior person who takes an interest in your idea?

-- For the working parent whose productivity has been slashed by 50% and stress has gone up by 50% due to parenting obligations, WFH might be terrible.

-- For the middle manager who can coast along and not need to move greatly in his/her career, WFH might be great.

-- For the developer who works by tickets on very concrete things and this is nothing new, WFH might be great.

-- For the small company CEO who relies on force of personality and everyone in the same room urgently working to get something done, WFH might be terrible.

There's a huge variability in what WFH means, depending on what you want from the situation.
I normally love working remotely, but only on something I find compelling and only if the rest of my lifestyle is viable. Prior to COVID I was working on a PDF sdk product in-office, which was sometimes rewarding, but mostly quite banal. After work I'd continue working remotely on another thing, then hit the gym, then go to the skatepark. When the office shutdown, so did everything else. When I'd normally work out of a cafe, I'd be sitting at my desk at home. When I'd normally go get exercise, I'd at best be able use some bands at home. Generally speaking my day consisted of waking up and spending 8 hours doing the meanial work of piecing together a next.js app, and then... nothing else except for media consumption and watching the rain. I seemingly burnt out, could persuade myself to type my render functions, and got fired from the highest paying gig I've had so far. Now I've spent 3 months basically doing nothing but skating, hiking, hitting the gym, and otherwise enjoying myself. It's hard to convince myself to even look at my computer for work purposes.

I wonder what the rest of the year will look like.
Without more information it is hard to say if that is a mistake.

Sometimes when businesses send sensitive documents they use a third party "secure" service, if the realtor's domain isn't configured correctly (common) to allow that third party to masquerade, it would correctly be flagged as spam.

Plus I get actual spam (and even generated blackmail) with personal information in it (inc. old passwords), farmed from one of a dozen service break-ins over the last 20+ years (thanks Adobe, amongst others).
Why not, it's the highest selling console of all time
The basis is spending 15 years in NYC high finance and having multiple close groups of friends who graduated from Stanford, work in tech, raised VC, etc
The author is arguing for an expansive definition of fraud that includes things like p-hacking. Probably a lot more than 1% of research is p-hacked; that general category of problem might even account for a majority of your 80%.
I'm familiar with this path as well, and have myself also probably benefited significantly from a slightly lower tier version of it.

I think the issue is more that we have a lot of positive feedback cycles/signal boosting that occur based on early career opportunities. I don't think research fraud is necessarily part of it though, because once you're accepted into a PhD program at a top program you're probably going to graduate anyway; same with undergrad. But the signal boosting is very real, and I find it especially problematic given how much luck there is in things like getting into a certain college.
Thanks for the detailed response. I'm curious, is the NoSQL store a canonical store of its own data? If not, how do you replicate from postgres to the secondary store?

I ask because where I work we sync postgres to a secondary store for search, but the way it's done in a piecemeal, application-specific way gives me the heebie jeebies. It almost certainly will result in that secondary store drifting. Unfortunately we can't use something like zombodb [1] as we're on amazon RDS. It seems like you know your stuff, and seeing non-deterministic consistency irritates the heck out of me!

[1] https://github.com/zombodb/zombodb
AirPods also requires to use app for many features but the app is integrated to iOS. IMO It's worse than dedicated app.
Fakebook like most mainsteam are Global left poltical arms for the state and NWO 2030

Take it with a badge of honor that they blocked/banned your site from their platform

It admits that your right, correct and have factual truth on your side/site
Possibly, but when you raise it at 24 or 25 years old it looks extremely impressive and sets you up for upper management at other companies.
Executive at Vancouver-based BuildDirect charged with Covid-relief fraud in U.S.
"Just like we sometimes buy pottery b/c it is handmade, will we will one day prefer writing that is also “human made”?"

I wonder what the role of cryptography will be to manage authenticity moving forward. Or if the prompts and seeded data become the "true creative art form"

GPT3 may be showing how "shallow" our human writing is, but I do think the real value of writing is to get someone else to do something (ex. writing a company memo to rally and encourage going after an opportunity). It doesn't seem far to when a human just provides intent and the AI may generate writing to best convince people to follow it. The real scary (or at least paradigm shifting) part will be, as you mentioned, when intent is no longer ours
In my coastal corporation you can totally share how much you hate Trump, make jokes how the Republicans are the American Taliban and whatever else you've heard from John Oliver and even raise money for organizations whose stated goal is to destroy American way of life, so if these are things that appeal to you - you won't notice that other perspectives may not be as welcome.
Thank you for raising this question. Well, for my things I use MongoDB because of very convenient integration with programming languages (Go, C++ via Mongo C++) and zero hassle with schema

But I'll be happy to replace it by something else, my load is extremely small and only single requirement is to have DB as network daemon, not as embedded storage as it will be used by 2 applications (main daemon an API).

RethinkDB was really nice candidate for it but it's not alive anymore: https://rethinkdb.com/blog/rethinkdb-shutdown/
See sibling comment. I agree there is a lot of survivorship bias but the reality is more like the first coin flip has a 25% chance and all the subsequent ones are closer to like 80-90% because there are a lot of positive feedback mechanisms you can take advantage of to maximize early career advantages
Cool? They’ll never use them
Well that is actually a pretty tough one. How are they supposed to predict how long the delivery will take or whether the mother will need a c-section? Even if the hospital were able to perfectly predict all of the procedures and line items they still would not be able to tell you what you, the individual, would ultimately pay. Even if they know your insurance information they still would not know how close you are to hitting your deductible or annual out of pocket max. There are a million different things that eventually go into figure out what the end "customer" will actually end up paying.

And just because they "billed" your insurance $85k doesn't mean they were actually paid $85. Billable vs allowable and all that mess.

However, if you went into the hospital and asked for the cash cost of a routine procedure they very likely would be able to give you a close approximation to what you would end up paying.
CAPTCHAs, CAPTCHAs Everywhere
> Carbon fixation is endothermic

The reaction of CO2 with silicates (to make silica and carbonates) is exothermic. This is why Earth is not Venus, with all the CO2 in the atmosphere.
There are commercial services which allows companies to query government's database to check a given CPF's situation.

But they usually don't confirm that the number you give actually belongs to you. I always give a bogus, yet valid number (123.456.789-09). It's usually mapped to a customer, so somebody has already had the same idea or it's the remainders of a test database. They frown sometimes (actual CPFs follow very distinct number patterns) but didn't complain so far.

They don't insist that you use a credit or debit card, which are much more common than cash over here. I couldn't confirm yet, but I suspect that they have access to some identification of yours whenever you use a card, so I usually pay in cash, which is pretty annoying because they never have change.
Ad-hominem aside, do you have anything to add to the discussion? I have been in academia for quite a few years, but I've been in the industry for longer than that. I state the point I stated because I indeed know first-hand what researchers do and what engineers and product managers do. What do you have to add to the discussion?
I'm guessing throwing out "bad data" happens in a lot more than 1% of cases as well.
Email / domain reputation is very complex. Their domain may have been flagged due to excessive marketing emails, so no matter what they send they are heavily weighted towards spam.

I worked at a SaaS company that had about 50 sales reps. They were sending emails day and night, eventually getting the main corporate domain flagged. The product's transactional emails (signup, confirmation, etc.) would be flagged as spam, until we moved them to their own domain.
I see a number of people saying this but I was able to pair mine without an app. Installing the app didn’t require location access.

There’s also several people saying their experience was like mine.

It’s pretty obvious different people are getting two distinctly different experiences with the company. It’s not a spectrum, just one or the other. That is strange and I wonder was the cause of that is.
You're just listing the earlier stops on the slippery slope. Make hosts responsible for policing information when it's viscerally-revolting child porn. Then make hosts police content when it's directly harmful to people's computers. Then make hosts police content when it's an attempt to scam.

There's already a call to control political information when it has harmful effects on society. Next up is "your website was blacklisted because you allowed a user to link to Plandemic". I agree Plandemic has no redeeming purpose, but censorship is not the answer.
Just checked, more wankers that support "diversity and inclusive" and anti merit/hard work

Shame
I enjoyed using LJ back in the day

Just another case of the left eating its own i guess
My guess is the education bubble. Loans are subsidized, universities have bigger budgets and want more studies done.
They may deserve some blame for not defending the term as well as they could have done but I don't think it's a badly defined term, I'll be up front in that it seems to me to be incredibly intuitive that open source should mean access to a programs source code in a manner that isn't burdened too heavily by copyright or intellectual property laws or otherwise coming with baggage like usage or redistribution restrictions. Releasing something as 'open' and then placing restrictions on its use seems like the counter-intuitive use of the term here, and for some perspective this is something the FSF and GPL gets criticised for by proponents of more permissive licences like BSD or MIT and is part of the reason why we have the split between free/libre software and open source software in the first place.

As far as the terminology goes, keep in mind that the people defending the OSI are generally the people or at least in line with the people that coined and popularised the terms and their continued usage, and while that may seem like an easy way to dismiss certain talking points it's a point that's going to keep being brought up in response to the argument of feigned ignorance to the terms, and I don't mean this to come across as too mean but something like open source has 20 years of mindshare, free software 30 years, more broad but still applicable terms like open access 40 years, or the greater cultural undercurrent much longer than that. At a certain point even the most well meaning individuals who are looking at existing open source licences and creating their own with the express intention of avoiding commercial exploitation[0], a problem almost exclusive to open source licenced software, are going to recognise that what they're doing isn't entirely in line with the existing open source ethos, and I don't think it's unfair or entirely unexpected that people will point out that it's not part of the open source ethos.

[0] From the licence: 'Under no circumstances shall the Person be permitted, allowed or authorized to commercially exploit the Software.', but other similar and more fleshed out licences might make the connection to open source software being exploited more explicit.
Sorry, that theory was properly discarded when it failed to match the observations.
My account got hacked Please back it and account is username
That might have more to do with the subject than the individual.
This looks like a rebuttal of something I did not say. Can you clarify which point of mine you’re refuting?
There are a few more old manuals here: http://bitsavers.trailing-edge.com/components/intel/MCS80/

The interesting thing about the older documentation is that it seems to be written assuming far less existing knowledge of the reader, which I find makes them much more accessible to beginners.
I love these discoveries but I dislike the guaranteed follow-up by game conspiracy theorists who don’t appreciate how games are built.

For any game, the odds are that it has unused assets or partially completed systems that hit the cutting room floor.
Fair enough. Still, it's one thing to be specced for 24kW peak load (the breaker) and quite another to require 20kW continuous (two 10kW nuclear power plants). I still think 20kW is an awfully huge amount of power - the average US house only uses about 1 kilowatt when you smooth it out.
Similar to research fraud, I want the medical field examined for anti-science fraud.

I caught my Physician recommending an expensive and dangerous surgery that could be done by a dentist or surgeon. I asked if there was data, she said yes. There was no data. And the trend was using lasers rather than surgery since it's safer. I confronted her and she said-

"If you ask a physician, they will recommend a physician. If you ask a dentist, they will recommend a dentist."

This physician used factionalism rather than science.

I imagine this has happened on a massive scale.
That's completely true. Makes it even more challenging, even with the use of emojis.
We don't share revenue information but we've seen steady growth for the past 10+ years. All I can say is that Shodan is a profitable, bootstrapped business with >3.5 million users, 80%+ of Fortune 100 and thousands of universities (we let them setup monitoring for free for up to 120k IPs).
AOSP and the "openness" of Android is responsible for its global domination and success. I've been a big Android advocate for over a decade, but I am not a fan of what's happening and what Google's been doing as of late. Everything seems to be headed down a path to make Android like iOS, where it's more locked down and controlled... and this is the concern.

I don't trust Apple much and don't hold them to any high standard. I am not a fan of their locked down ecosystem and their moves to remove things like headphones, which become accepted as industry norms. We know they sell overpriced hardware and ads are not a core business for them, it's the big thing that enables people to trust their [recent] "privacy" marketing. Now that they've made a big deal about it, we can expect them to (atleast) protect their brand aggressively and try to not screw things up.

As much as I hate to say it, I am going to give iOS a trial run soon. I've gotten custom ROMs on my phone in the past to remove analytics SDK, trackers, and other hostile app functions that tries to exfiltrate data from my device without my knowledge. If I have to give up some OS level leverage to get more control over my user data overall, I'll consider it.
I think the disproportionate harm argument is a big deal. A single high-profile case of fraud undermines trust in the entire field, and that’s critical to maintain.
TSMC's original 7nm process 7FF did not use EUV. They did introduce EUV for certain layers in N7+, their "second generation" 7nm process. Don't confuse N7+ with N7P, the performance-improved version of 7FF....

There's more information at https://fuse.wikichip.org/news/2567/tsmc-talks-7nm-5nm-yield... or https://community.cadence.com/cadence_blogs_8/b/breakfast-by... .

(This is why I always try to give the full name of the process, in as much specificity as I know it; it's very easy to talk at cross purposes about N7+ and N7P despite them being quite different.)
the truth is in the middle you have to take some responsibility, but yes of course some blame goes to those who also make it possible. If people just throw their hands up and say they're victims and have no responsibility to secure their systems then they will always be victims.
That some aspects of the self-fulfilling nepotistic bureaucracies are meritocratic begs the question if those meritocratic elements only exist to justify the nepotism, and indirectly, the gatekeeping meritocracy.
> I'm thinking / hoping it's sufficient to simply avoid headphones that require an app.

I'd hope so - as far as I know there's no way for a Bluetooth headset device to get internet access via the thing it's paired with. It's getting harder and harder to be confident about this kind of thing, though.
The claims that solar and wind are deadlier use cooked statistics (very old numbers for wind, and dodgy assumptions about rooftop solar that don't apply the utility-scale fields that are now dominating).
This is not relevant to the question asked since it's about vegetarians who gave eggs and milk.
You don't have to be unprofessional to get in trouble. It might just be a misinterpretation of your joke by the quiet intern, or you react unexpectedly to some politically-charged story because your mind was elsewhere, or you forget about a sensitive demographic of people when proposing an idea. Not everyone can keep a professional demeanor all the time, and always say the right things on the spot, especially if you just spent 6 hours debugging a race condition or something. I think you're overgeneralizing perhaps your strong ability to do so.
Because we use heuristics instead of actual analysis.

How many people citing a paper or reading it actually have time to think that deeply about it?

The alternative to a world of trust and heuristics is a world where we are all bogged down trying to make decisions.

This is heavily demonstrated in recruiting. Resume reading is about 7 seconds a person. How long would it take if they spent a minute for each?
Why would someone buy noise cancelling headphones if they don’t need that feature?

The QC II’s bluetooth range is horrible. Less than half of the QC I’s.
I've also been self-hosting email for 25 years. I see these exact patterns you describe.

Currently I'm using postfix, dovecot, and rspamd, with several users using pine and mutt locally. Every time I do a major server upgrade, I re-evaluate the configuration.

My mail server also runs a web server for some static sites, so the letsencrypt part was simple.
Also:

- Working remotely adds 10s of micro-frictions (through chats and calls) every day that complicates or even break a sane flow of information, as well as focus. This is not some “technical issue” that will go away as technology improves: speaking to someone in person is as frictionless as it gets, and cannot be matched.

- The social component of work is completely erased, and that matters a lot.

- Private vs working space and time blend into each other, essentially making you “always on”

Work from home is nice when needed, and if the conditions at home allow it; on the other hand, imposing work from home on everyone may create a distinction between “efficient workers” (= with no children) vs “less efficient ones” (= with children)

Work from work, home from home
Those are even easier to hack. Here's the result of measuring by projects launched: https://killedbygoogle.com/
Even better: they’re in your bloodstream, fighting disease. Say there’s some cancer, they’ll destroy it before you even think about it. If there’s plaque in your arteries they’d be able to remove it, they could repair damage from injuries, etc.
It ‘seems’ that way for sure, but i have a feeling its because these people who were always this way now have a platform to speak on, or that validates their existing thinking and solidifies it. Its a good point though - how do we test a theory on this? It would be interesting to see if people are doing scientific tests in this space
It can be though. Downsizing and getting rid of specialists certainly hurts companies. There are only so many hours in the day and that desperate guy working 14-16 hours a day because of covid downsizing is eventually going to eff up no matter how talented she is.