skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I'd say another difference is the percentage of your attention is being devoted to this kind of thing. Presumably reddit or phpbb mods aren't spending 40 hr/wk looking at gore.
As customer interactions grow increasingly online, businesses are challenged to maintain engaging, consistent customer relationships. Beingo is the solution. A code-free digital assistant plugin for web & mobile apps, Beingo will transform & humanize your virtual interactions within minutes. Introducing the “Beingo Personality”, where Beingo matches your user persona to automate natural conversation and provide tailored, cognitive customer facing solutions. with a no-code drag & drop, plug & play builder, Beingo is super user-friendly. Simply select a template, or build a custom Beingo, and then embed it in your website or mobile app. Whether you have a small business a startup or a large enterprise, your business can deliver premium customer assistance with Beingo.
Yes, generally a security audit is worth it. I am bias as I am a security engineer and have pentested multiple companies during my career.

Theres a cost saving by designing things up front say for GDPR or handling credit cards safely that is worth investing in. Sometimes, a threat modeling session alone could save you time and money in the long term. It's harder to change things when you've built a product, have customers relying on it.

In terms of the actual product, you will have users, they will need to login/logout/reset passwords. Ensure proper authorization and authentication.

How are you handling logs, secrets, 3PP. Do you handle customer input, do you reflect it onto the page, store it in the database? Do you allow them to do HTTP requests? How do you prevent SSRF.

How are you protecting your code? Laptops? Do you have antivirus? Do you patch your infra?

These are the questions you don't really think about, however they can have real consequences if you don't.

In terms of who I'd recommend, you get what you pay for. Generally, I'd look for a small shop in your local area and vet them.

Yearly pentests are a +, and if you do go through an Acquisition or someone trying to whitelabel your product they will want the reports.

If you don't have any revenue yet, do check out OWASP top 10. Run scoutsuite on your AWS/Azure/GCP. Enforce MFA where you can, Github/AWS/Gdrive/O365. Setup SSO right away and just use that to login to all your infra and services. Will save you so much headache down the line. Make sure you keep your logs application and service logs. Try to aggregate them somewhere.
Right now, we support branch-level commits as well. That is, you can add a specific branch that Reploy spins up environments on (in addition to open PRs). For any branch or PR that reploy is handling, you can "restart" previous commits to do comparisons.

The idea for supporting any commit on the whole repo is interesting (and honestly, not hard to implement), definitely see the benefit there!

Re: mobile. Yeah, maybe we could push arbitrary assets to a bucket somewhere so that you could serve an android build there. We're definitely focused on the web aspect, but this is exciting wrt/ making Reploy more encompassing.

And re: pricing. Got it. If you don't mind sharing more about your team's situation, we can probably figure something out (my email's in the post). The reason we charge per seat is because its a reasonable proxy for how many environments are being spun up, and frankly we're still learning how to metricize. It'd be cool to see what your team's workflows look like.
> They've invested all their resources into building out the infrastructure, and have spent very little if any time on building the UX around it.

In AWS you need to explicitly set a bucket as publicly accessible, which requires you to go through a couple of dialogs where you're expected to say "yes, yes I want to allow others to access this S3 bucket."

Afterwards you still get a bucket that does not have write access by default. To allow write access you need to specifically set bucket access policies that explicitly allow others to write to your bucket.
>On a PhD you work for yourself

What field do you work in? Modern science is team science. I think the paper I have under review right now has... six authors? That's pretty average for the particular interdisciplinary collaboration I happen to work in right now.

It would just be silly to claim that every other junior author on the paper is working for me, as the first author, rather than admit that I work for my adviser (who I haven't complained about here because I lucked out and got a very good one).
For your first question:

Tan^-1[(160/2 Au)/(300 lightyears)] = 2.4×10^-4° for the distance between the inner planet and the star. You can divide this by the pixel length.

With respect to your second question:

Resolution is not tied to do pixel size for this type of measurement. You can resolve an object of any size if it is emitting enough photons.
Completely agree with the point except the needless use of racial stereotyping on an economic issue.

The reality is that millions of white people come from impoverished backgrounds. And millions of Indian, Asian, and yes even Black and Latino people are from wealthy backgrounds.

Polices designed to help economic diversity will necessarily and disproportionately help certain racial minorities and that’s all for the good. If you want to actually help the world stop making it about race when it is not. And feel free to make it about race when it actually is.
It is very difficult to debate with someone who doesn't understand the very logic of how pensions work. No company in the world will pay the NPV of a future pension. Like any other person or institution, they will start making contributions over time to meet the requirements of that pension 20, 30, 50 years from now. To require otherwise is absurd. For example, suppose you are retiring 30 years from now. You cannot assume that you have to calculate the NPV of the required pension in 30 years and then contribute that value today. Like any normal person you will setup a plan to contribute towards a pension that will be available 30 from now, with the required amount. The same happens with any company. In fact, when you hear someone calculating the NPV of pensions that will be paid 20 to 50 years in the future, you most probably are talking to a republican who wants to "prove" that public pensions are insolvent. This is the pattern I've seen.
It can be used on curses but usually you want to get rid of either the base deck or cards which don’t gel.

If you add powerful cards the power of the deck increases, but if you remove weak cards it also increases, and the consistency increases further: if you have 15 cards 10 of which are starter every hand will average 4 starter and 1 new card, but if you have 10 cards 5 of which are starter it’ll be split 3/2 ou 2/3 on average.
I agree that it won't work tomorrow. To have a system that would continually work you would need to get access to an API that performs facial recognition and then continuously have the system perform queries on that system that would monitor that the facial recognition would fail.
Unfortunately these days it is really difficult, borderline impossible to control what images of you are uploaded to the internet. This is discussed in the "Real World Limitations" section of the paper. Even assuming you have no identifying photos online, non-public photos are still analyzed by big companies like Google, Facebook, and Apple, who have access to them through their cloud services (e.g. photos you, your friends or family sync with Google Photos, Apple Cloud). Having just one image correlate to your identification details and you lose anonymity.
"100% winnable" just means that you have a chance of winning if you do the right things at the right times in relation to what's happening in the game. Nobody wants to play a game that they don't even have a chance of winning even if they play optimally. Replay incentive comes from knowing that if you improve yourself you'll do better, not from flipping coins and hoping for a favorable outcome.

> With procedural generation, in order for most games to be challenging and interesting, you have to have games in which the game just stomps you.

Only if you have a chance of winning or you're given the chance to detect the situation and run away from the fight until you do have a chance of winning. Otherwise it's just annoying.
Now you’ve got my attention.

It’s that one by Judith Rich Harris?
Because intersectionality cuts both ways and we've only been talking about one of them.

By the new definition of 'middle class' (which now includes people up to their eyeballs in debt), the middle class would call me a 'rich dude' even though millionaires would tolerate my presence at an event but not be that happy about it. I see this every time I am given bad news about a large bill for the vet or repairs and they are visibly surprised when I just reach for the wallet instead of argue. You are a rich dude, dude.

But I've noticed that I am comfortable in other situations where my white dude peers are not and it's because I belong to other privilege groups that they don't. Like physicality. Which I think speaks to how people react when you point out their privileges, because there is always somebody who has it better off and if you are jealous of other people, it rots your brain. Sympathizing with people who are jealous of you while you are insanely jealous of others takes some internal work that people don't want to do.
It could be, but considering the developers made the conscious decision to use a static seed and show that seed to the player they are probably okay with that.
> One thing you really miss when leaving Medium is the audience. It is easy for people search Medium for a topic they are interested in and find it within the first couple of articles.

Not sure I'd agree with this. I've tried looking for interesting articles on Medium recently, and it seems that once you want to go outside the 'make money online/internet nomad/political rants' genre, finding anything interesting becomes real difficult.

It'a slso quite hard to find things from unknown/unpopular authors there too. Remember looking through a few Medium Digests and counting how popular each creator was, and found there was a huge bias towards people with large social media followings/existing fanbases in what was being promoted in those newsletters and on the Medium front page.
Why is this very bad? What is wrong with society not existing if it’s inevitable. Is dying very bad or is it an inescapable reality that isn’t good or bad? What is inherently good about life existing or spending the finite energy of the cosmos? It all comes to an end eventually. Is that bad? Can humans offer anything to the universe other than parasitism?
>Give us what we want or... we'll quit our degrees and throw away years of our lives?

Give us what we want or you have no teachers and your research output drops to near-zero. Most of the actual work of scientific research is done by what we politely euphemize as "early career researchers" or "junior authors": grad-students and postdocs. Tenured and tenure-track professors don't do the bulk of the bench-work, even when they really enjoy it.
Three methods for finding least positive residue in modular arithmetic
I would imagine that even the check sizes they offer still don't solve this problem.
I disagree. They started by just providing the plumbing, and Twillio is using that plumbing.

But today if you make an S3 bucket, they take you through a wizard that makes it secure by default. They also run audits for free and send you the results.

They also have Lightsail that just does everything for you securely.

They have lots of user friendly options.
anything like this for US shoppers?
> A procedure that is presumably permitted by said constitution, right?

Yes, the Spanish constitution does explicitly support state of alarm, which is a way to suspend constitutional rights.

https://english.elpais.com/politics/2020-03-13/what-is-a-sta...
No, All-Remote Work Is Not a Mother’s Dream Come True
Here’s a sentiment many working mothers now doing double-time at home don’t want to say out loud: we hate this. Not because we are stuck in a pandemic but because we need our own lives. Many of us keep our sanity because we have the opportunity to be away from our children and create professional achievements independent of our domestic lives.
You don't need Ascension, just to have unlocked Ascension. With that said, I swear it's easier to beat the heart on A1 than A0 because of all the elite rewards.

The heart itself, well it's definitely challenging, but it only works for very specific builds. I went to some effort to beat it once on each character and basically have no intention of doing so again.
Post gore, rape and torture in places where people don't want to see that and you should lose the right to have internet access. Criminalize this behavior.
I have studied in Germany this included some online curses.

From my experience studying online will be harder for a non-small degree of students. (Through for some it's easier as they anyway don't show up for curses and do anything from home "ad-hock".)

I believ that for courses which are mainly frontal putting this part online will be majorly helpful (e.g. a reading in front of a large publicum with close to no questions from the publicum).

But especially during a CS master many curses are smaller and with a lot of student professor interactions. This translates not so well to online, even with video conferences. And that is assuming that students do have a easy to access internet connection which is good enough to do a ~20 people conference.

So while I hope for a lot of improvements by putting parts of the studium online I also hope it will be just part of it.

Lastly in-person studium creates a social environment (similar to in-person work) having online only studies/work would have _major_ health risks for a non small amount of people (such which e.g. are already somewhat depressive, have problems creating social connections, have a weak social net, lost most of their friends due to problems in their school years etc.). I have meat at least one person who would not unlikely already have committed suicide in a "online only" world...
Sure but that's not addressing his point which is most of the ideas being funded are uninteresting and aren't really moving the ball forward. Instead they're doing some kind of rent seeking.
The basic cards are pretty bad. You can't play your full hand most of the time anyway, so cutting them makes it more likely that you'll draw the better cards.

This is also why Snecko Eye (the relic that gives +2 draw every turn and randomizes card cost) is arguably the best boss relic. Even if you only get to play one 3 cost card, it's more likely to be the best card in your deck.
The article does not point out how the system can go astray.

Design docs are great when they can in 1-2 pages describe a how an important/large/complex system will work and the tradeoffs made when designing it.

Some groups in Google confuse design docs conflated with the promotion process, and thus engineers start create long/time consuming docs for every little thing as part of building a case for promotion.
Do both these planets just happen to be passing in front of the star then, because they would typically be a mile or so outside the image at that scale wouldn't they?
Don't ever try this as a student
Zoom already has a chat app that's basically a Slack clone. I swear, if they were skinned the same, you couldn't tell the difference (in features, or layout).
That happened in a country with a Constitution, which sorta proves that you shouldn't put your faith in a Constitution.

The only way good things get done is if people continually fight and push for them. Laziness will doom you, no matter what pretty words are on a paper somewhere.

And in a pandemic, "good things get done" has a very different definition than it does at other times, something no static set of law is going to be able to anticipate. You have to be active and you have to be flexible.
I have no idea if this will help you in particular (depends on how you play right now), but something counter-intuitive about deck-building in general that helped a friend of mine up his win-rate in StS a lot is that you need to consider the cost of taking a card.

StS lets you not take a card when you are offered one, and often this is the best play, particularly as you go later into the game and have a deck that is stacked with powerful cards.

Fundamentally having more cards is bad, because it increases variance in what you can draw. Obviously taking a good card can be worth that cost, but often players fall into the trap of assuming the best card of the options given is worth taking, when really the question should be "does this card beat the average card in my deck, or does it dilute the power of the deck", because you are reducing the chance to draw one of the other cards in your deck.

Obviously there are edge cases: sometimes something may reduce the power of your deck right now, but introduces the chance for later synergy, which may be worth the cost—especially early on, but in general it is worth considering not taking the card.

The ideal deck is always the minimum number of cards that allow you to pull off your win state, everything else is just stopping you getting there (this is also why cards that allow you to draw cheaply are good, and one of the reasons why removing cards from your deck is powerful).
I haven't dug into the puzzle very far and it didn't seem to like my experiments, but in bash and zsh `$$` will expand to the shells PID.

Edit: Oh, I see what you mean now. I think it's just that you're expected to see that there's only a handful of PIDs in /proc and just try them each.
I think it's the graphqleditor.com which makes sense being their blogpost.

At the end of the post you can click the button and try (as in a trial) the graphqleditor

It's nice, but if you want a free one check altair or just use postman?
Sounds reasonable, I'll keep an eye on Reploy for the future.

Thanks for answering.
Yes, but tbh I'm not sure if the US study costs had been reasonable even when they where not online.
I thought in common law countries theft required you to have the intent to permanently deprive the victim of the property. this is why there are separate statutes to cover stealing cars because people just claimed they were taking it temporarily.
I think in regards to India, the issue is a little more complex, and intertwined with social mores. This one sentence from the article is really important:

> According to Dr. K. Jyothirmayi, a Hyderabad-based psychiatrist, stigmas, such as the perceived impact of a mental health diagnosis on one’s marital prospects, often prevent young Indians from seeking treatment.

From growing up in India, my view is that meditation and the general state of the mind has been taken seriously for, well, centuries. But move the focus towards anything with 'psych' or 'mental' in the title and people in India will shy away from it even if it is affordable or free. "Seeing a mental health counselor" is a recipe for considerable social stigma in India [1], not an empowering practice like it's perceived as in the United States.

The solution to this is hard, and in my opinion not something that Facebook or their Indian subcontractors can accomplish.

-----------

[1] I'm talking "All your relatives will refer to you as the crazy person" or "Your girlfriend's parents will call off the engagement" levels of stigma, not just "I don't feel comfortable talking about it in a bar" levels. Like a lot of other things, families with higher levels of income and education are sometimes an exception.
Consider getting a “DIY” degree online instead of a traditional CS major
They create a picture that is designed to fool facial recognition systems and then they will test it against JPEG and other image compression techniques and then run the facial recognition on the compressed version and if both of them pass then they don't change the image.

If the procedure fails then the GAN will know this and it would change the output so that it would pass both outcomes.
I agree, but instead of creating projects I want to buy land and have a small farm.
Honestly, I'm jealous. For so much of my life I was deeply skeptical of history as a field of study. It seemed arbitrary and useless. It turned out that what I'd seen of the subject was a bogus selective narrative carefully constructed to make me ignore the fact that the polity to which I am subject has been at war against non-white people for centuries. I probably should have been smart enough to figure this out earlier, but I wasn't. I wish that rather than constituting a complete waste of time, public school history classes could have better acquainted me with the world as it really is. Although, I wonder if that younger me would even have cared? The war media has a strong effect on inquisitive young minds. So much trivial bullshit to learn!
I believe a Procfile on Heroku is used for Dockerfile-based apps, though the `heroku.yml` takes precedence if that is available.
How to Create a JavaScript Network Graph (Visualizing Game of Thrones Battles)
A wise man once told me "Never count another man's money" and I'll pass that on to you. Figure out what you want in life, stop comparing to the Adam Neumanns and Jeff Bezos of the world, that's a surefire way to lose your mind and self.
Using Multiple Algorithms to Improve Organization Name Matching
How much would it cost to operate the USPS without bulk mail, i.e., with next to no revenue? I'm not even necessarily against it, but it has to be astronomical.
Interestingly, to me, good modular design creates both ease of extension and of contraction. In some of my most successful programs (read: met user requirements over an extended period of time with relatively straightforward modifications) it was the modular design that permitted the extensions. But the same structure made it feasible to easily remove old features or migrate them to new programs based on user needs. Maybe the main program was a bit of a Swiss army knife, but we had a customer who only needed a few features. The design made it possible to extract a new program from the old one primarily through selecting which parts of the core (lower layers in this paper) were needed and wrapping them in a new (or simplified) GUI.

But maybe it's possible to do seemingly good modular design which favors extensibility, but fails at contraction/extraction. I had some experiences in my formative (college) years that lead me to want to write things the way I did for those successful programs. This is certainly something that requires exercising. If it weren't being exercised, maybe we wouldn't have been so successful. As in, if I tried to make a good modular design and only 5-10 years later we contracted the program or extracted new programs from it, maybe it would have grown enough cruft to make that a challenge, but extension would have still seemed easy.

As I think about it more, I'm leaning towards the issue being exercising the option of contracting the program. If you only ever extend, it becomes increasingly easy to blur the lines between the layers of the system.
I wonder if it would lower the resolution if they would remove fake colors....
1SecondPainting: Generate abstract paintings in one click