skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
That's what I'm thinking, or worst case, one that communicated via USB to TTL adaptors. Or an ESP-based board that connects over WiFi. Or BT-enabled board.

Combined with a HDMI switch, you could then control multiple devices with just one Pi+Cap device.

I've been looking to do something similar for a while, albeit possibly with Windows as that's where I've (very rusty Delphi) programming experience.
Thanks for the heads up. I wasn't aware of that acquisition.
DO doesn't have a great track record for customer trust. I run personal workload but couldn't recommend it over AWS to a larger company.

- https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23117660
- https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20064169
This doesn't surprise me. I am also afraid to express myself for fear of being rejected by most of my friends or excluded from my professional network.

It is sad that I can only be honest and say things such as "let's wait for the facts" under a nickname on some dark corner of the web.
Being a centrist isn't about avoiding change or believing in the status quo.

It's about making changes based on rationality rather than emotion and ideology.
A Tool for Hardening Java Crypto
You are welcome! :-)
Age will come for it sooner than 'AI'
IMO that's a big open question. Anecdotally, I've heard of a lot of people moving away from these cities, but most of them say they intend to move back. Since the appeal of both cities is largely in activities that are unavailable now, this is plausible to me. But it's also plausible people will find they miss the city less than they expected.
That's not a centrist view, that's an independent view.
"The left will ruin you.."

I've never ruined anyone

Those are the very kind of toxic comments we need to get away from
> According to this post, they did not break the 1:1 ratio of physical to digital book...

I think the article implies that without explicitly saying it. Their own announcements and FAQs about the NEL certainly didn't say that.

Is this controlled digital lending?

No. It is close to controlled digital lending but is significantly different while waitlists are suspended. This library is being mobilized in response to a global pandemic and US national emergency. It shares aspects of controlled digital lending by controlling the physical book that was scanned and the redistribution of files through digital rights management software, but differs by having no waitlists for users borrowing books. Once the US national emergency is over and waitlists are back to their normal capacity, the service will return to full controlled digital lending.

https://help.archive.org/hc/en-us/articles/360042654251-Nati...
I work for one of the Big Three and I can't let anybody know I support Trump. The threat of being harassed at work and home, being fired or passed over for promotions, it's too much to risk. So I will continue to wear my Biden shirt to work once every fortnight and take Trump secretly with me into the ballot box.

EDIT: already downvoted. Confirming what everybody knows, there is a war against non-lefties.
Things like twitter have unwittingly become Orwellian. A log of everything you've ever said and thought for the rest of the world to see.

This is why the future of the internet is going to be a closed end internet.

Something that isn't accessible by everyone.

Whether through paid entry, invitation, or geography, the future of the internet is going be more closed end than it is now.

The open ended internet of today will become a junk yard of spam and identity thieves in the future.

Early adopters and rich people were the first to get on the internet and they'll be the fist to get off of it too.

For something more private.
> You appear close-minded.

Hacker News guidelines say you shouldn't do that
https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

When disagreeing, please reply to the argument instead of calling names. "That is idiotic; 1 + 1 is 2, not 3" can be shortened to "1 + 1 is 2, not 3."
> These things are not asking to be judged by you.

Somebody needs to tell me what voting is supposed to be about, then.
Show HN: Sharezies – Share Your Online Subscriptions
They're clearly not reaping any reward from their process, TSMC has them beat hands down and they continue to show lack of forward progress towards smaller nodes. They have a much bigger IP portfolio than AMD, and frankly, it appears their foundries are a cost center/boat anchor rather than a profit driver for next-gen silicon.

They don't have to give up their existing 14nm capacity, but next-generation processors could much more easily (apparently) be fab'd externally.
People who feel unrepresented often lapse into apathy; you can only struggle against an uncaring world for so long before you tire or go insane.
Or perhaps, I just hate both sides? I can't stand the crazy right wingers who think climate change is a hoax, that masks oppress people, etc. I can't stand left wingers who virtue signal constantly and call me x-phobic or x-ist for not agreeing with something. So yes, I'm apolitical because I truly hate both sides anymore. I think of it as polarization to the point of pushing people like me aside.
"If we would give climate-deniers and anti-abortion biggots the platform they deserve"

My wife happens to be vehemently opposed to abortion, and also a woman of color. Yet you associated her with a bigot and climate change denial.

Which exposes similar thinking to what the OP was talking about:
Not everything is political, but because my wife thinks differently from you on terminating fetuses due to her having worked in a neonatal ICU with premature babies, she's a bigot? Sounds like you are in a tribe and are lumping my wife into the opposing tribe based on one opinion she holds.

By the way, I find it ironic that your last sentence that condemns view points that differ from your own to be silenced and then mentions flat-earthers. The original flat-earthers gave Galileo the platform they thought he deserved: a life sentence in prison. They were confident and lacked the intellectual humility to believe opposing views should be countered, not suppressed. Ring a bell?
x can be negative.
@notjim @chosenbreed37 - I chose not to expand because it's specific to my own situation, but: I found remote work isn't for me. A selection of reasons (from pre-and-post covid experience): I find my communication stilted, I really miss hanging out with my colleagues, online whiteboards aren't the same, we have beer and board games, aisle conversations are useful, it's easy to see if it's OK to interrupt someone with a question in-person, and frankly it's motivating to have people bustling around working on stuff directly related to your own work. Half-and-half remote and in-person is probably a good balance for me. Yes a lot of the above reasons are a) privileges and b) can be mitigated with good remote work discipline, but again, it's just my preference.

> Really the biggest cost you're leaving off is space though.

100% agree. Many people are literally working in closets or worse, if they even can.

@taurath - "Quarantine Work Is Not Remote Work" good point. People are learning to support their remote colleagues right now, whether they intended to or not :) So "normal remote work" might be even better after this chapter concludes.
It's a lot more complicated than that. Many of these people are chronically underpaid, the service industry in particular. Yes, of course they like the extra unemployment money, but I bet 95% would prefer to return to work and be paid a fair, livable wage, comparable to what they're receiving on unemployment.
I think one of my biggest annoyances, from a development perspective, with Sidekiq is that it typically moves you in the direction of running foreman or something like that, which makes using the pry a pain.

One thing I really like about Phoenix development is that I don't have to change my flow to use a REPL while still being able to run background jobs.
timeo Danaos et dona ferentes [1]

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeo_Danaos_et_dona_ferentes
Sure.

Charter schools: They work great with proper checks-and-balances. They should be not-for-profits, follow extensive transparency laws, have salary caps, and strong civil rights protections. They should compete with public schools without restrictions beyond that. If public schools go under because of better competitors, more power to them!

Medicine: Works great pure free market. Works great purely nationalized. What we don't want is a complex network of regulations from lobbyists combined with mandatory insurance (whether by government regulation or by practicality). Both the far-right and the far-left solutions would work great! We've landed in a no-man's land in between.

Gun control: It's a reasonable policy, but rule-of-law should prevail. We've got a Constitution for a reason, and we should follow it, even if it feels unreasonable. If we disagree, we should amend it.

Race: The left is correct about most of the problems, and bonkers about most of the solutions. We need to have an open national discourse about changes, and to do that, we need free speech and to get rid of cancel culture. The left's oppression of free speech contributes to the systemic oppression they're trying to eliminate.

... and so on.

You don't need to agree with the above, but they're strong, principled stances, agreeing with neither side.
Politics is war by other means (Clausewitz), then that would mean everything in life is warfare too.
It is most certainly a coded message for “you have to believe in what I believe.” Being apolitical is not a political stance.
I think my discomfort with the idea comes from my inability to know where to draw the line. If I think a person should be fired for a 2020 Trump donation in 2020, why would I think that person shouldn't be fired for a 2019 donation or a 2018 one? I don't think a donation should make someone completely unemployable, so I have trouble reconciling "should be fired from whatever their current job is for a thing they did in the last few years" with "shouldn't be excluded for a few years from the job market."

That and imagining it the other way around. I'm adamantly pro-choice and have donated to orgs supporting this. From the right wing perspective, I support literal murder. What better justification than that to fire me? The only reason I can think that I shouldn't be fired for being pro-choice is that, well, my worldview is the right one.
If AZ = Astra Zeneca then drug research is not something you can easily do at home!
then there are those of us with kids and so's around. i can barely get a bloody thing done and for one can't wait to go back!
And right here, you've exposed yourself as a racist.

Are you a 'person of color'? You're presuming to speak for all of them and can't imagine anyone would not share your same political views. Worse, that based on their skin color they must act as some homogeneous group.
Meanwhile Grey Goose is made from soft winter wheat while Smirnoff is made from corn. Flavor preferences are just that... preferences.
HN could also offer you the option to hide the automatic "Google will shut this down" post, and all its replies.
Independents are all over the map ideologically: https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-moderate-middle-is-...

People over-estimate the degree to which our political parties represent an inherently consistent set of policy ideas. For example, social liberalism and being pro-immigration are intertwined in the US. But the socially liberal women prime ministers of Denmark and New Zealand are also anti-immigration. About 1 in 6 Democrats believe abortion should nearly always be illegal. African Americans, who overwhelmingly vote Democrat, have a similar split to Republicans when it comes to same-sex marriage and whether belief in God is a necessary prerequisite to morality.

The political parties are a compromise amongst groups of people with heterodox views. They’re not something that ideologically must be bundled together.
We were very reliant on consumer credit, while selling services almost twice the going price,which has now gone,so the sales won't be anywhere near of what it used to be.
Its enlightened centrism and a place of profound privilege to be comfortable in the world as it exists thinking all of those "extremists" advocating for change are just being too emotional and partisan.

Centrism is de-facto the status quo. Which, in current times, means support for the police as it exists, supports for business regulation as it exists, supports greenhouse gases and military conduct as it exists, supports the behavior and election processes of politicians as they exist, etc.

Its simply the privilege of the majority to be the "moderate" ones. To be radical is not to be good or bad, it just to be outside the norm. And it makes sense that those in the norm find those outside it dangerous and threatening, because... they want to be. Thats the whole point. Their time is wasted if the goal is not to become the new moderate, the new normal, the new center.
Intel has fallen behind again on its next big chip manufacturing improvement
> Debate only works when both sides have an interest in finding some mutual agreement that works for them, not when resources are in conflict.

I'm aware of two main reasons for engaging in debate:

(1) So the participants can come to an agreement, or at least truly understand each other's reasons.

(2) If an audience can observe the debate, use the debate as a kind of form of theater, to present each side's most compelling arguments in an engaging manner.

IMHO a site like Ceasefire could be useful for either of those goals, assuming other issues don't bog it down.
So What Stops Apple from hiring the ARM Team and design the next generation of big.LITTLE independent of ARM, without actually purchasing ARM the company?
But usually a van physically transports the book to the lendee...

I think the debate will be if making a digital copy and locking the original book in a safe is equivalent, and if I were a judge, I would say "no", because to say otherwise significantly weakens copyright in so many other ways.
Apple is searching for its identity
Yeah I dont think it's anything new, just that the opiniond that are taboo are held by a larger chunk of the population
The poll is a bit flawed. What exactly are people afraid to share? If it's "black people don't deserve rights," that's a good thing.
The flip side to that is with the UK leaving the EU will there be legal and taxation hurdles. Also, sometimes having local context, and the ability to meet locally at short notice is an important requirement. I don't think it's as clear cut in all cases.
It's overkill as an anti-sat sat. It'd be much cheaper to put up tons of anti-sat sats meant only for that purpose -- no need to reenter and land, no need for reusability, etc.

The X-37 is obviously a military device, since they're the ones using it, and it may well be meant for servicing U.S. military sats, spying on others' sats, jamming them perhaps, or outright stealing them, and, yes, maybe destroying them, but again: there's no point using the X-37 for anti-sat purposes as it's too expensive for that.
The country agreed to that. One day the country may decide against it. No-Fly Zones can be created.

A US company airplane passing over my house doesn't impact people in India, for example.

Airplanes have proven utility. Airplanes proved their utility before bothering people worldwide.
Intel is behind, but not actually that behind. Spinning off their fab business at this point in time is throwing money in to the sea. TSMC doesn't have the capacity to handle the volume of Intel orders anyway.
There are a lot of very fringe political parties; getting on the ballot in at least a few states isn't that big a hurdle. Without necessarily agreeing or disagreeing, if you're a CEO (and the context of the question was around business executives) is it necessarily unreasonable if a board decides that their CEO's support for some controversial fringe presidential candidate is a distraction? (This seems less clear with a rank and file worker but they're also more expendable if something is becoming an internal controversy.)
Exactly, and you're not allowed to have a nuanced view on controversial issues.
counterpoint https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aYT2se94eU0
Hi, I have not shipped Core support for formula yet. Working on it actively

In the demo you see, I am using hot-formula-parser to parse formula during render. This won't scale for large applications, cos any parent render will re-render the grid and trigger a recalc

Am working on adding a Directed Acyclic Graph to manage cell dependencies, so that Grid knows which cells needs to be re-rendered.
I've been explicitly told by the HN moderators that my opinions on policing - which are well within the American mainstream and probably a touch left of center - are so controversial they constitute flamebait and I shouldn't discuss them here.
I really hope this trend sticks so that we can decentralize away from big urban centers. It would really allow us to free ourselves from crowded spaces/amenities, painful commutes, and high prices, as well as letting us seek out the community/culture that fits us best.
KVM = Keyboard, Video and Mouse

For those, like me, who were ignorant of this particular use of KVM, and couldn't find it in the article or comments.
Apple's timing here is spot on. If Intel was firing on all cylinders, it would be a lot harder for them to pull off a processor change.
And I tire of Twitter - the agent of that chaos - insisting I must always be "on," having a political position on everything all the time, and always ready to rally around wrong-doing.

This is inhuman. I cannot always be on - I am not a machine. I cannot be useful to anyone when I am torn into anxious shreds by knowing about everything that is wrong in the world all at once. Our brains were built for knowing what's "bad" on a local level - not on a global, ~7.8 billion people level. It is inhuman for you to insist that I jump at the bit every time "bad things happen."

I can only choose to pick certain hills which are most important to me, and I will die on them. You choose your things - you are welcome to die on them, too. Do not shame people for trying to survive this chaos that is bad enough with the world's population's problems, and amplified through social network's outrage machines that benefit from any (but especially psychologically traumatic) "engagement."
>I don't understand this, why?

My sentiments are similar to OP's, and for me a large part of my job satisfaction was getting to hang out with really incredible people all day, getting lunch with those people, getting afterwork drinks with them, etc. Hanging out on video chat just isn't the same.

Of course, an argument can (and maybe should) be made that it's smarter to to keep your work focused on the work, and find your social outlets elsewhere. However, the unfortunate reality is that for those of us far removed from school and our home towns, work is where we tend to make our friends.

On top of that, I just enjoyed the change of scenery in leaving my apartment in the burbs to go into a nice office space in the city. Feeling restricted to the same space for 24 hours a day is driving an unhealthy level of cabin fever and boredom. For the first time in my life, I envy those with the big house and a yard.

Of course that later point would be somewhat mitigated in a world where I could work out of shared space or the local coffee shop, so I'm not sure if that's an indictment of remote work in general for my purposes.
GoodJob author here. Excellent observation.

It should work if PgBouncer is using session-level pooling, but not transaction-level pooling. I made a ticket to document this: https://github.com/bensheldon/good_job/issues/52

I don't have much experience with PgBouncer. What's the scale/need when a team would use PgBouncer? That would help me prioritize supporting it better.
How to Build a Better MILF in the Era of MeToo?
The idea that "everything is getting politicized" is more often an expression of the loss of normative dominance: ideas that you used to enjoy free of criticism and pushback are now subject to challenge. They haven't become politicized, they were always political. You just didn't have to justify them versus criticism.

The only sense in which horseshoe theory is real is that the rejection of the status quo tends to split someone in one direction or the other, and occasionally those new to alternative political ideologies will waffle or get shunted down different pipelines. Example: younger people going down the IDW pipeline who end up socialist once they realize the error. They don't return to dominant liberal narratives because they already figured out the ways in which they are toxic and false, and they also reject their previous pathway.

I can't imagine thinking that "bizarro world" is one in which people hold a larger diversity of opinion and criticize within a party.
Maybe, oh goodness please, the return of actual OFFICES. With DOORS. Thats the only way you're getting me to come back into a work office, barring a rediculous raise.
Here is more, I am a Democrat but:

- Not all problems require more/bigger Government, and sometimes makes the problems worse.

- I am pro 2nd amendment and don't think most gun laws are actually legal.

- Actual Socialism is bad, even immoral imo but I do support socialized healthcare and a few other things (see below)

- Capitalism is pretty great most of the time, except when it comes to externalities, transactions under duress (like healthcare often is) and tragedy of the commons scenarios.

- Democrats have been swayed by extreme leftists lately and they are trying to use any tragedy to push a socialist addenda.

Probably many more. If there was a pro capitalism party that supported moderate government intervention (when needed) and stood up for all of our constitutional rights, I would jump ship in a second.
> Doesn't work well when time zone difference is too large, though.

That is true. Although I've noticed that some outsourcing companies are comfortable working to the office hours of the headquarters.
Well since the discussion is about what it will take to convince people it's safe to go back to work, any proposed strategy will have to deal with that tendency.
Nintendo's CEO's last name is Bowser.

Our AG is named "Barr" (Pun on a Bar association)

Is there a cool collection of these somewhere? These are the only evidence I feel that we're in a simulation and the engineer is fucking with us.
Conversely, I can see models not being eliminated. Because the people in power with money and choosing where to spend it would rather spend it on pretty women they can creep on than throwing it at a few nerds and a supercomputer.
Is video actually better for them?

Ten hand-picked photographs will probably look better than the whole video they were picked from.
> or because you just don't know what's going on.

Exactly. Anybody who earnestly tries to be informed will realize that there are limits to what they know and subjects for which they are not [yet] informed. There needs to be room for people to say "I'm not informed on that issue, so I don't have an opinion."
I don’t tell my coworkers when I do this but at Apple we are adults and can go to the bathroom without permission. You can come and go as you wish, that notwithstanding the waste of colocating with and/or commuting to an office. I want virtual reality so I can be in shared spaces for impromptu conversation and coworking.

(Edit: I really don’t miss my boomer/genx coworkers jamming out to hair metal)
Fair points.

But I’ll believe they are sincere when they decommission or fully convert the bulk of their ICE car factories.
I don’t know why the Tor browser allows JavaScript to be enabled by default to begin with.

I don’t allow JavaScript to run on my mobile browser because of the disturbing crash logs in WebKit in the few times I have enabled JS.
Each chapter is extensively and exhaustively referenced with the source papers. How about reading them?