skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
You've got it completely backwards. Strong government leads to the corruption of society and a reduction in freedom. If you have weaker government then there is more freedom for everyone and greater economic prosperity.
Just replace your shelves with a couple of desktop dishwashers. The water use isn't great but soap and food waste isn't a heavy chemical. The obstacles to home ownership are problematic, however.

https://www.reviewed.com/dishwashers/best-right-now/the-best...
If you envalue by 100:1 you could probably start making silver dimes, quarters and dollars again.
You're not alone! I found your description really relatable. I find that I can only truly understand something when I know all the details, and why things are the way they are. That means in the beginning, when learning something new, I'm overwhelmed and not really confident in my knowledge.
Almost nobody does Javascript without a build step these days, unfortunately. I miss those simpler days.
Ludum Dare in 48 hours with Rust and WebAssembly
The poster you commented said a true fact (Elon bought a company and calls himself founder). There is no facts across your rambling response, and you say others do doublespeak?
> The people who have spent decades trying to keep the airwaves "clean," "family friendly," "anti-communist," etc, are suddenly shocked that they don't get to set the rules anymore, and that they're on the wrong side of some of them.

Or, to frame it another way, the people who spent decades saying "We should be allowed to broadcast whatever we want, because we support equality and liberty", and "If you don't like what we broadcast then you can just avoid it", are now suddenly finding themselves drunk on the power that they have gained, and are abusing it in much the same way as the people they were complaining about before.
Because there's a difference between having "a head for physics and numbers" and "working with physics and numbers for your career". Fundamentally, he is a CEO, who's job is not to work on any of the underlying technology. His job grow the company.
I have worked with (and under) big names in system software and so many of them think saying "terrible", "garbage", and "trash" will motivate people to do productive corrections or improvements. Nope.

Times have changed and the very people he criticizes are infinitely better at branding and inspiration. There's a reason they're the ones gaining traction.

Like you, I want to be constructive, and I do agree with the author's core complaints. He just doesn't realize he's actively self-sabotaging and harming his own reputation.
So your answer is yes? Under your understanding of harassment, someone can relentlessly bully and insult their co-worker all day long and it isn't workplace harassment so long as it doesn't refer to protected class?
Lucid dream?
Lessons from Month One of a Shopify Apps SaaS Business
SIGRed: A 17 Year-Old Bug in Windows DNS Servers
FWIW your friend must have a very heavy foot. My brother-in-law has a Tesla and goes from SJ to LA a few times a year. They make one stop in the middle to supercharge, and use the time to go to the bathroom and have lunch. The car is usually charged before they are done eating.

When we caravan, the Tesla is never holding us up.
In my opinion, it is unreasonable. If somebody comes out and says "I am being constantly harassed by my colleagues, this makes my life hell and I think it's also illegal" and you respond with "well, according to the legal precedent from 1925, Snowflake et al. vs Ontinence, Inc., making your life hell is not illegal unless they put a live rat into your drawer and it bit you, and since no evidence of rat bite has been presented, clearly the whole complaint is invalid" - that's not a reasonable way to treat this complaint. If you're a judge considering a motion to dismiss, sure, that's exactly what you'd do. But if you're a reasonable person reacting to a complaint that somebody's life is made hell, then no, the legal precedent of the Snowflake case is not the main thing you should reasonably discuss. You may be more worried about the "hell" part.
Unfortunately, working in a big enterprise world, I've seen both sides of this. After a while it becomes somewhat obvious if someone is legitimately asking for more info, or if they are just punting the ticket down the queue. (The former is when you can tell they are becoming focused whereas the latter seems to be more general, swirling questions.)
> All Tesla vehicles produced in our factory, including Model 3, have the hardware needed for full self-driving capability at a safety level substantially greater than that of a human driver.

From Tesla.com/autopilot in February of 2017. Absolutely shameful.
Threadripper was a halo product and does not use the same socket the Ryzen processors use. To give it its own series name was necessary, otherwise it would have lead to a lot of confusion. People would have bought Ryzen 11 expecting to run those processors on AM4 boards.
Read more to me like

1. the complainant told google to delete some things

2. google says no, some things include invalid request for political official

3. oh, it did include an invalid request, but the other part was valid, here is a fine

One thing I would like to know is who will be getting fined for submitting an invalid request? I am also curious if anyone more familiar with the case knows whether a totally-valid request was submitted in whole and was similarly rejected. I admit not being familiar with the details beyond what I read in the link.

On a general note, I completely agree with your concerns about the right to be forgotten and the unbalanced incentives. I applaud Google for pushing back.
Hurling diseased bodies over the walls was another.
“I’m sorry for the long letter, but I didn’t have the time to write a shorter one.”
To be clear: being an idiot and being a genius aren't mutually exclusive. Elon Musk is in many ways a genius business executive, and in many more ways a huge friggin' idiot.

The idea that he's a "polymath"[1] completely whitewashes the actual scientists and engineers who did the actual work behind SpaceX and Tesla and SolarCity. I have seen literally zero evidence that Musk understands the physics and mathematics required to actually engineer a rocket or electronic car. For that matter, while SpaceX has made admirable technical contributions to economic spaceflight, they are not innovating new technologies in the way that government space agencies are (especially NASA).

He seems like a decent programmer and, when he's not high on Twitter, a very good tech CEO. It seems like he has a rare "spark of vision." But translating these admirable qualities into universal genius is just worshipping the Cult of the CEO. Musk is, first and foremost, a celebrity venture capitalist.

[1] Edit - I know you didn't say "polymath," I was responding to another rant from a few days ago. I do hear the term tossed around a lot and it drives me up a wall.
> However, because trans rights, LGBT, race, etc. has been so profusely politicized, it's become a third rail. Making fun of a trans person and an Irish person are, for whatever reason, not on the same playing field any more. I'm not sure what the solution is, but let's not pretend there's no problem.

No, you're right, they're not on the same playing field, though saying that they are because one issue is "politicized" is, apologies, somewhat laughable. Do you know many people (and for clarification, this is from an American perspective) who have, in recent history, been assaulted out of the blue, pushed out of their homes or jobs, or bullied to the point of self-harm because they're of Irish ancestry? How long ago was it that being of Irish ancestry meant that your employer could come out and say "sorry, no fucken micks in my shop, gtfo" or that the state could deny you basic rights afforded to most citizens with the full force of the law on their side, and how long ago was that the case for the LGBTQ community?

These things are different playing fields because they're literally different playing fields: the actual broader issues at hand, in the present, are very different. Losing sight of history isn't the goal here--it's stupid and dangerous to ignore history, full stop--but it's doubly stupid to blind oneself to present.
One thing podman is used for is bootstrapping environments for package building under mock, which at least affects people doing Fedora maintenance.
Force = mass × acceleration.
The larger size of the tablet means that if it fails at an angle where the glass is subject to the impact, the force will be greater. It's possible that tablet glass is designed to withstand a larger force to compensate. I don't have any info on that, anyone has any insight into this?
I always find it funny when I see a claim that blue LEDs were invented in the 1990s. My 1985 VW Golf used one for the high beam indicator.
They already had the Roadster, Musk just funded it.
How to install Docker on Linux – Pixelbook oriented
She would probably be fine if she wasn't publicly bad mouthing her co workers on company time, during an all-hands meeting. She's injecting a politically convenient narrative to protect herself from the consequences of her own actions.
This sort of false equivalence is so maddening.

Even if I concede that there are some on the left who fit your description, the whole point is that left/progressive political philosophy is fundamentally aspirational towards tolerance and inclusivity. Right/conservative political philosophy is fundamentally not.

Sure, you can find some on the left whose speech, writing and behavior don't really align with this analysis. But they are in opposition to the broader political idea(l) they connect with. This is utterly different than the right, where being inclusive and tolerant of difference, out-groups and so forth is fundamentlly at odds with the basic philosophy. Conservatives belive in tribalism. Conservatives believe that even if we are all human, we do not all have enough in common to be able to form a cohesive, coherent society. Conservatives believe that there are good and bad people and that they can identify and assign people to each group.
Community owned ISPs seem to outperform privatized providers in terms of customer value, even if achieving sustainable cash flow can prove challenging.

-- https://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:34623859

-- https://www.law.upenn.edu/live/files/6611-report-municipal-f...
"Because I had to spend a lot of time to compile this long list of things that I also did while fixing the problem which are essential for a good solution but aren't immediately visible from the two lines I actually added so I would have something in hand to rebut this stupid question of yours!"
If that's the case then you want as many providers as possible so no one has enough information to de-anonymize the traffic?
> Now imagine a society where every dissident is treated like Assange, and every poor nobody is treated like the Grenfell tower residents

The British colonies over the years? Possibly Britain itself as far as the treatment of poor nobodies.

Look, China's a repressive regime, but: (1.) A bit less so than it's described by Western media, and (2.) Britain and the US are not categorically different, they're just, well, different in the contexts and degrees in which they oppress more and less.
Bug Out Bag Essentials for Reasonably Rational People
You hit the nail right on the head here.

I too am sick of people telling me to accept ubiquitous containerisation (snapd), locking down of filesystems (macOS), overly complex init systems (systemd (1)), lack of server access (manage it via ansible/k8s, not ssh). Usually the arguments given are "it's necessary 'for security'", "this is where everything is going", "you have to trust the vendor". This is not the spirit of Linux or open source. I totally see the effect you mention of paid maintainers forcing projects into their employer's direction. As such I found it sad when even Arch fell to the systemd camp. And it's one of the few things it really enforces, it supports 6 different network initialisation methods for example, where all other distributions just pick one and go with it.

(1) I'm not all anti-systemd by the way. I agree init was bad. But I think other systems like OpenRC are way easier to work with.
Our federal leaders are clearly trying to pretend as hard as possible that the virus is a hoax (and failing).
It’s common to make allowances when watching cinema from previous eras to make allowances for the times. With Safety Last, though, it is hard to see how one could possibly make a better version today. The restrictions such as the lack of sound, the black and white and the utter lack of post-production are completely embraced to make something you couldn’t make another way, and the pacing is razor-tight even by modern standards.
That is the legal definition, yes. I'm not making any statement about how I think things should be. I'm making commentary only on the current legal definitions in the US.

To elaborate, a workplace certainly could take action on such harassment, as they have the right to associate how they please. But they are also free to not do that. And in fact many people face workplace harassment every day, but have no recourse except to suck it up.

Personally, I absolutely support stronger protections for workers, but they don't exist today.
Erm, math/bits package OnesCount() family of functions?

https://golang.org/pkg/math/bits/#OnesCount

go compiler output...

0x0020 00032 ($GOROOT/src/math/bits/bits.go:115) FMOVD R0, F0

0x0024 00036 ($GOROOT/src/math/bits/bits.go:115) VCNT V0.B8, V0.B8

0x0028 00040 ($GOROOT/src/math/bits/bits.go:115) VUADDLV V0.B8, V0
End of the office: the quiet, grinding loneliness of working from home
My first boss and my boss two positions ago both thought that way. It was incredibly frustrating. Along with: If only you programmers would stop putting in bugs we'd ship perfect software every time. (When most of the "bugs" were specification errors and not program logic errors.)
There is a difference between "funding a Roadster" and "designing and fully understanding the physics and mechanics of the Roadster".
For those still confused about Assets, Liabilities, Equity, Credits, and Debits, let me see if I can give you a more intuitive primer:

Assets = Money you have.
Liabilities = Money you borrowed from someone else.
Equity = Money you earned.

All the money you have you either (i) borrowed from someone else or (ii) earned. In other words:

Assets (money you have) = Liabilities (money you borrowed) + Equity (money you earned).

When recording a transaction all you have to do is ask yourself two questions:

1. Where did the money come from? (what is the Source)
2. Where did the money go? (what is the Use)

Suppose you borrow $100 from a bank:

1. Where did the money come from? -> you borrowed it from someone else, so increase Liabilities by $100.
2. Where did the money go? -> to your checking account (money you have), so increase Assets by $100.

Adjustments to Source accounts (where money comes from) are Credits, adjustments to Use accounts (where money goes) are Debits, so we could revise the above statement to:

1. Credit Liabilities $100
2. Debit Assets $100

That's basically it. The rest is just breaking things down into sub accounts (e.g. Assets:Checking or Equity:Income).

Hope that helps.
> Meanwhile Teslas still drive straight into overturned trucks.

To be fair, so do people.
Softmax goes out the other side. Naively tossing around exponentials is so bad that it can easily explode any float, even 128 bit. It only adds another 4 bits to the exponent, after all. Even a 256 bit float has less than 20 bits of exponent! So that's an example where floats in general can go wrong, but it's not an example of where using larger floats is a meaningful help.
Threadripper is a different socket, calling it the same as Ryzen would be confusing.
It's insisted upon by anti-tax advocates, so that Americans always get reminded about exactly how much the government is adding onto the price. Otherwise, the theory goes, we would get too happy about taxes.
I had a recent similar problem. Multiple levels of support were clueless. Ended up being due to an iCloud outage that resolved itself.

Horrific developer experience over there at Apple.
This scenario seems like something that's more common in freelance work where the client has access to the code for whatever reason.
So I should start collecting pennies then, yes? 500% returns you say?
Even in the US false advertising like OP suggests is considered fraudulent and against the law. There are just too many Musk fanboys around here that don't seem to know how the law works.
You can already buy workstations with Epyc CPUs and have been able to for a while. ECC memory and more of it, plus extra PCI-E lanes.
The difference is that the Canadian Federal government is extremely powerful and the provinces have very little power.

In the US, the States are very powerful and the Federal government is much weaker comparatively. For anything to be done collectively across the entire US, it requires cooperation from all states, otherwise one of them can screw everything up. That inherently means more talking, more coordination, more meetings, etc.

It's the fundamental difference in how each country was forme and the system that they pursued. In some ways it's better and in some ways its worse. That's why you can have very powerful states like California dictate a lot of their own destiny, but then when it comes time for a national crisis like a pandemic, everything is fucked because the US Federal government doesn't have the same level of control and power as in Canada. In Canada you didn't get the inane policy of each province buying its own PPE like in the States, driving up prices because they are all fighting each other.
That demo from 1968 ruins everything (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yJDv-zdhzMY), like the illusion of progress.
I bet it's cheaper than their legal fees.
What? I was implying punitive measures in general, but the logic on COVID in jail seems to be a bad one. If you can't be in public and respect the spread of the virus, at what point do we take you out of circulation until the danger has passed?

The same argument can be made about violence. If you commit violence against another human you go to prison, but violence rates are significantly higer in prison, so are you implying we dont send them there?

Also, my topline comment is getting CRUSHED. Very surprising.
What sort of monster would call the police on a fellow person for passing a damaged penny?

These types:

https://www.cnn.com/2020/05/26/us/central-park-video-dog-vid...

https://www.dailydot.com/irl/black-man-police-comcast/

https://www.jsonline.com/story/news/2020/06/03/cops-draw-gun...

https://www.tmz.com/2020/06/23/ohio-cops-called-black-kids-p...
I know someone that worked at some skeezy company in Menlo Park that got passed up for a raise after spending months navigating the bureaucracy to save the company millions on their operating costs because they didn't write enough code. This was in the last four years.

Edit: And they quit right afterwards.
FreeTaxUSA, Free Tax Software | Alternative to TurboTax, H&R Block, and TaxAct
I’m not a journalist, never have been. But I did grow up loving the news and ended up in the leadership team of a small newspaper publishing company in Oregon and Northern Cali for a period of years.

I left the entire industry after my time working in that leadership group. As far as I can tell all news organizations today are chasing money and tribes over objective facts and truth.

It concerned me 10 years ago, and I can only imagine it’s gotten worse.
> I expect ridicule and opposition

This is exactly why victims would choose to conceal abuse, thus enabling more of it and making public figures sometimes effectively above the law.

As a result of recent developments, knowing that they will receive support and compassion helps people who suffered through this in silence come out, raise public awareness and prevent a powerful person from perpetuating abuse.

I agree with the poster upthread that society is probably fairer and playing field is more level this way.
You could have made that point if they had not just purged the leadership of the opinion section because they dared to publish some republicans opinion piece. When even international press criticise what they did at NY Times it you know you have a problem.
Short circuit to most contact center retention flowcharts:

"I'm moving overseas for an extended period of time." (Implication: to somewhere you don't offer service)

"Where are you moving?"

"I can't really say."

Turns out, most service providers have an exclusion to their retention metrics, where "customer moving to location we don't offer service" is one of the few reasons to just process their cancellation request.
> I think you'd be surprised how efficient video codecs with regards to bandwidth used, nobody sends raw pixels at all. Also with HLS latency can be very short with the right settings.

We've all had enough experience with Zoom, Google Meet, Skype for Business, etc. in recent months to know that this is not something that works well out of the box. And that's before we get into issues like the fact that I'm using a 34" ultrawide monitor, and most streaming systems will have to downscale my desktop before encoding it, and the result won't look at all good for a viewer trying to watch on a 1080p laptop.
> towards unecessarily complicated development processes and architectures

please note that what's "unnecessary" for you is not necessarily unnecessary for others.

this is an important point.

i guess what these projects need is a way to communicate explicitly the costs of maintenance and developer mind-share when adding more complex features to their product.

Because especially as small dev team it is difficult to figure out these costs during a short evaluation of the software, is not easy to pick the best tool for the job unless some members have got experience in some previous job with these tools.
Exactly the same is happening in Brazil. There are websites like these related to both extremes of the political spectrum, but the vast majority is tied to the far right-wing.

And in our case, I believe the situation is even more "interesting": there are a variety of mainstream parties, not only two like in USA. Even though, it's the far right that operate most of such disguised local news websites.

They are invariably full of ads and, not by coincidence, I become aware of such sites mostly by Google suggested content.
CNN, NBC and Fox also masquerade as news.
This summarizes the argument pretty well and should suffice as a tl;dr.
> Once you nail down your Math 101 lectures, do you really need to change them?

This is one of the cases where you could (assuming the students don't change much). I teach macroeconomics. So far in my career some of the bigger events have included the bursting of the 90s tech bubble, 9/11, the Great Recession/financial crisis, the Greek debt crisis, Brexit, the election of Trump, and the pandemic. When I started teaching 20 years ago, the profession had settled on talking about managing long-term economic growth and viewed business cycles as being of secondary importance.
> Not really sure what the last part of your comment even means.

I said "A" you said "But it's A. Do you dispute that?" as if I hadn't just literally said A. That's very low, and really not something I'd like to see more of on this site.
Or maybe you can stop bootlicking corporations for half a second and think that they should be held responsible for literally lying lmao.
Raising the price and adding options are both perceived as frustrating experiences. Requesting donations (raising the price) on top of adding two negative choices (do I ignore donating and therefore spark feelings of being cheap, or do I donate and lose more money than I anticipated).

AirBnB is in a tough spot right now but this is a good reminder for product makers that people generally do not respond well to the above.