skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Hemp Oil Tincture Canada:{99% Result}#N-Hemp Oil Tincture Special Offer
What is Hemp Oil Tincture?

Wellbeing Hemp Oil Tincture is an oil supplement that ought to be taken orally through the mouth. This is a CBD recipe so; the primary fixings are self-evident. This is an unadulterated homegrown oil which is comprised of regular components. It gives comfort from strain, cerebral torment, and nervousness. The Hemp Oil Tincture Oil has no terrible ramifications for the body.

https://buddysupplement.com/hemp-oil-tincture-ca/

https://sites.google.com/site/hempoiltincturecanada/

https://givebutter.com/hemp-oil-tincture

https://mndepted.instructure.com/eportfolios/389/Home/Hemp_Oil_Tincture_Canada__Price_to_Buy_Is_it_Scam_Benefits

https://givebutter.com/epic-keto-reviews

https://www.justgiving.com/fundraising/hemp-oil-tincture

https://publons.com/researcher/3766688/hemp-oil-tincture-relief-joint-pain-check-bio/

https://publons.com/researcher/3766688/hemp-oil-tincture-relief-joint-pain-check-bio/

https://www.smore.com/kfw23-hemp-oil-tincture-ca-click-offer

https://www.facebook.com/Hemp-Oil-Tincture-Canada-109904757460677/

https://gumroad.com/hempoiltincture/p/hemp-oil-tincture-canada-scam-or-legit-free-trial-benefits

https://canvas.pbsteacherline.org/eportfolios/2580/Home/Is_Hemp_Oil_Tincture_Canada_Safe_Work_Free_Trial_Benefits__more

https://k12.instructure.com/eportfolios/1257/Home/Is_Hemp_Oil_Tincture_Canada_Safe_WorkRelief_Joint_Pain_Price_to_Buy

https://youtu.be/Lr7igeniEv0
> The 66-year-old from Dartmouth, Mass., credits his career in electrical and computer engineering to an early interest in amateur radio.

I initially studied electronic systems before later studying computer science, which I credit to my dad's interest in ham radio.
This is just an engineering issue. Build a camera cover which acts as a latch when you close your laptop. Problem solved.
You'd be surprised how effective "just putting one in the room" is. You can build a fairly effective cleanroom that way, and cleanrooms are a lot "cleaner" than is required for effectively reducing the viral load for things like COVID19
It's not different. Such courts exist in many countries.
I'm struggling to understand HN these days. This is being downvoted, and IMHO is the key question to ask the folk putting in the effort.

Would love a downvoter to give a hint...
In case you were wondering (as I was), what kind of fart joke could make someone angry enough to write a programming language, HN has discussed it before: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1543428

Direct link: http://futureboy.homeip.net/frinkdocs/#FartJokes
I just made this decision for my own project. After a lot of hand-wringing I decided that the name of the project doesn't matter very much compared to the ease of having a .com domain name, so I picked a project name based on availability of the .com domain instead of the other way around.
Your comment seems to be unnecessarily sweeping - in the sense that Africa is not a single country, but a continent with more countries than there are US states.

As such there is an enormous range to all of your points, which, with few exceptions, are sufficiently local to make your comment meaningless.

It would be the same as sweeping generalisations about the USA that equated new York, ohio, texas and Montana as all being the same place.
Yup, image versioning was a big deal. No one else had it at the time. Graphics people were indeed happy. I wonder if they tried to strike a deal with Adobe to back lightroom or photoshop with Dropbox.
I don't think the argument I'd that stopping using Lena is a silver bullet. The argument is that the image reflects a particular culture, one that not only women, but women in particular on average find uninviting. Personally I have similar feelings about the sexy calenders in some car workshops. It's just a bit too much irrelevant display of ones preferences.
I worked in South Africa for 7 years. A large amount of those observations (about workers) were true in RSA too.

We'd usually hire someone that meets the various quota laws then a foreign contractor to do that full time persons job. This was not the original intention and we often reviewed hiring practices etc to ensure the local person was good enough but God damn.... What an 'interesting' labour market.
That looks interesting as well, but it’s not the talk I was thinking of.
> open-source means literally the source code is open to anyone to view

You mean the term "source available", which has been a well-defined term for years as well.
They could have turned it into a platform. Provide APIs to back any number of applications.
"You know the camera was on" is not the same as "the camera can't see anything because the cover was on", the same way as notifying the user of a security failure is not the same as preventing it in the first place.
A bigger issue is probably that HEPA filters are made of the same melt-blown fiber needed for n95 masks.
You could, in theory, build a system like what they use in datacenters. Drill holes in the floor and ceiling and create enough vertical airflow that any particles you expel will be sucked either up or down before they reach the next person.

That would make a very uncomfortable church to sit in, though.
Democract v. Republican governor. Duh.
The problem with all those things are: bandwidth. Storage is cheap, bandwidth is expensive. Dropbox wants you to stick stuff with them and then never touch it. Then they would only need slow disks and slow networks.

Once Dropbox tries to become Flickr/Soundcloud/Youtube, they have the same problem those services have: massive money loss. Playing media at scale is hard and expensive. Especially when Dropbox's niche is easily mutable data. Dropbox doesn't exactly have a massive advertising empire that could subsidize and take advantage of Youtube.

So the one place they did expand into is productivity tools. No one's going to massively share a text document/slideshow/spreadsheet, nor do those things eat very much bandwidth, and it plays into their mutability advantage very well.
I've very rarely seen a website block a user because of their browser in the last 10 years.

If a website doesn't work in Safari, it just doesn't work. That's it. I do know that devs have to work A LOT harder to get things to work in Safari when compared to Chrome or Firefox. It's like Safari is the new Internet explorer.
COBOL is really, really bad from the point of view of a developer. It's frustrating, verbose, and tends to produce huge spaghetti code.

Good developers - those who like what they do - won't touch it with a stick. People do OCaml, Haskell, Clojure in their spare time and C# and Java at work - but nobody codes COBOL in their spare time. People code in Assembly, sometimes in hand-assembled hexadecimal format, but not COBOL.

It's a job, usually a boring one.
Frink the language looks fantastic for all sorts of casual and even some advanced use cases. How cool would it be if it would be possible to embed Frink in, say, any markdown document, and render and solve it from any host language? (specially JavaScript). I think the fact that the language is proprietary and closed source is holding it back.
If the display is so fragile that a little piece of tape or plastic can harm it, then maybe they should rethink their product design.
Brit, <2GB/month. How do you get to 300GB?
> Beyond that, there’s some very serious privacy concerns as well with PWAs, especially with developers abusing APIs for fingerprinting

If TikTok was a PWA it couldn't have done a fraction of the tracking it was doing. The irony is that apple is forcing you to use a much more privacy-invasive alternative to PWAs.
Monopoly is clearly an important, natural and desirable objective for capitalists, see Peter Thiel's Competition is for Losers:

https://www.wsj.com/articles/peter-thiel-competition-is-for-...

Note that Thiel is describing the inevitable goal of capitalists, because in the long run of perfect competition, all profits tend to zero. Technology and innovation are certainly one way of ensuring that the ceteris do not remain paribus.

However, Thiel is not recommending monopoly as a policy for society. Only the most ardent libertarians argue for pure laissez-faire anything-goes capitalism that results in lazy extractive rent-seeking monopolies.

The best balance for society seems to be free markets, which are as free as possible, but no freer.

A free market needs rules against: monopoly and oligopoly; price gouging but also dumping below cost; predatory acquisitions that concentrate markets; monopsony in the supply chain and the labor force; collusion, corruption and insider trading.

It also probably requires positive requirements for truth in advertising, verifiable product standards, open data, published product specs (like food contents), health & safety in the workplace, and protection of the commons, in the form of environmental rules against dumping toxic waste and pollution of air, water and soil.

Free markets also need low barriers to entry, which are in tension with some of these protections. The guide should be as free as possible to allow competition. Many regulatory measures, such as professional licensing, put up barriers to entry that enable rent-seeking behavior for those behind the credentials & licensing walls. Obviously brain surgeons and nuclear power plants need some regulation, but perhaps real estate agents or hairdressers do not. The requirement for open data should make both brain surgeons and nuclear power plants publish their track record.

There may also need to be long-term strategic regulation for the climate. Again, it is best to leverage the power of free markets to achieve that goal. Some form of carbon/methane hydrocarbon tax seems worthwhile, as it will create incentives for new businesses and technologies. Also note that the free market will take care of other effects naturally: we will see falls in property prices for the eventually-to-be-inundated suburbs of Shanghai and condos of Miami (hint - don't park in the basement :)

It is counter-productive to tax things that are desirable, like income and employment, when what should be taxed are undesirable activities, like greenhouse gas emissions. So tax carbon, maybe keep some of the vice taxes on alcohol and drugs, but remove all income and payroll taxes. The Gulf states tax oil production and do not have income taxes. Let us tax oil consumption and also not have no income taxes.

I would go as far as to say, only tax carbon if all income taxes are removed.
I am a happy user of paid Dropbox, and I think many person are the same as me.

For me, OneDrive and Google Drive are not enough simply because of their terrible sync system. Back then when OneDrive was just launched the speed for me was absolutely horrible (like <100KB/s). Sure, I'd like if I could just buy space as I grow, as I remembered it was a hard decision to buy 1TB (back then) when I only needed 50GB.

I currently have >600,000 files in my Dropbox. I don't know if other system can reliably deal with this many files, Dropbox has proved it to me that it can deal with my files on Windows, Linux, and macOS.
Holdout or simply holding back?
Send me an email sometime (talktohosh at gmail). This stuff I am deep diving —- permaculture design —- is still fairly new to me. But I had started to reevaluate the existing tech in my life in the context of the main ethical principles of permaculture (care of earth, care of people, fair share).
How could a complicated mechanism compared to no mechanism be a step in the wrong direction?
(I've read the whole article.)

I don't think the author makes a strong argument, and I disagree with their conclusion.

But the author's argument actually appears to be mostly that science itself is insufficient to understand the world. This argument is outlined in the section starting "But the replacement of our everyday world by the world of science is based on a fundamental misunderstanding. Edmund Husserl was one of the first who pointed this out, and attributed this misunderstanding to Galileo."

I think it's a pretty weak argument and I'm surprised Nature published it - the author wouldn't last 2 minutes trying to defend it on HN.

I do think that a better articulated version of his argument would be something like this (which attempts to capture what he means by "not in the world"): "despite all the advances in neural networks encoding tacit knowledge, it still takes a deeper human-level set of tacit knowledge in a wider context to make these neural networks useful. While we have surpassed human skills in-the-small, science based benchmarks, we seem no closer to achieving embodied human-level intelligence from machines in-the-large."

But tacit still doesn't mean what you claimed.
Perhaps if you package your code for MacPorts.
This review by C-trix is also very cool:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lzrX72aB7zg
I'm not sure a human can explain how they know a chair is a chair, either. They can come up with a post-hoc rationalisation, but that's not guaranteed to really represent the decision-making process they went through.

At best you get an answer that describes one or more conscious decisions and leaves the unconscious decisions out, such as "it looks a lot like a stool because it's low to the ground and has three legs, but it has a back, so I think it's a chair"; when the real answer is that they have a bunch of pattern-matching visual neurons, and those neurons feed into other neurons that detect more complicated patterns, and the concept of a chair eventually emerges.
The simplicity is amazing, and why i always come back. Links do not always need to be new. There are good things, which are not new.

Like this one!
You can add coffee stains to your LaTeX document
Can you not flag people for criticism of China?
From iPhone to Android. The software works. But shortly afterwards, WhatsApp threw up some kind of "timeout" screen twice, where I couldn't use the app for a hour. I don't need that uncertainty.
Great to hear I didn't put you into too much difficulty!

On reading my comment back it seemed a bit snarky - just want to be clear to all it was nothing Maciej said in his emails around the refund that made me think it was a pain to do - he was perfectly accommodating - I just personally assumed that it would have been annoying admin to issue the refund.

Thanks for making Pinboard Maciej.
There's little evidence of warfare in the sense where large groups of warriors gather to attack each other. But Pinker estimates, I think pretty non-controversially, that around 15% of Paleolithic people died to interpersonal violence.
> respect the conventions of the platform they're building for

Do you mean UI conventions, or the "30% revenue cut and a gag order on even mentioning non-appstore signups" convention?

Justifying blatant anticompetitive and user-hostile practices by native UI holyness is getting kinda old.
Newer Macs will also require the light to come on for a lot least a few seconds when the camera activates.
Maybe but surely you don't believe someone couldn't come up with a reasonable solution to that problem, right?
So it’s a new name for a website?
First of all it would only apply within Japan law, it would need to take into account how Apple market practices relate to other players on the Japanese market and only the opinion of a judge actually matters.

Secondly, it doesn't scale, because Android and Windows own the worldwide market share of consumer platforms.
I think the point c3534l was making is that open source should be considered a generic term and should not have its meaning conflated with Open Source™ which is just one group with one opinion.

And I agree, at least in part. I think the agonising over a precise definition of open source is as futile as the attempts to distinguish "hacker" from "cracker" twenty years ago. At the same time I also agree that proprietary software that has available source but no rights to do anything with it is most definitely not open source by any rational definition.

So whether or not OpenDarwin is Open Source™, it's still open source.
This used to be a thing, where you’d flash the LED briefly and hope the user didn’t notice. But new Macs prevent this by having a minimum duration the light will remain on.
There are nine photos in this article yet none of them features a Yaqui catfish. The closest one contains what “researchers thought was a Yaqui catfish”, but turned out to be a hybrid. You gotta be kidding me.
That's an interesting story of the 6522 VIA for sure :) I don't think it is what I was hitting though, for a few reasons:

1) "The 6522 has a bug in mode 011, shifting synchronous serial data in under control of external CB1 clock" -- this is not the mode I tried.

2) The bug appears to be intermittent data loss. What I had trouble with seemed deterministic, the chip is just too slow to respond.

3) I wonder if this hardware bug was ever fixed? The BBC Micro doesn't use the MOS 6522 VIA. It tends to use Synertek or Rockwell. It's unclear if those companies were just using the buggy MOS mask under licence, or something else.
Were Office toolbars customizable to that extent ? Also I don't think it applies to most users .. they were rote learners (because never had the time or context to learn to use the computer as an aid but as a protocol to respect)
Yeah, given the dips corresponding to tech crash and financial crisis, it could be more an effect of underemployment, rather than more leisure time, or less overwork. Given the relatively weak social welfare policy in the US (amongst developed nations), that would match with the narrative of social unrest in lower income brackets in recent years.
It’s much better to have a natural environment from a biodiversity perspective
> is there anything that cannot be ran in algorithms? The way I see it the only thing stopping me from simulating every atom in a brain is computational power.

I am not for sure I understand the specifics of what you mean by "is there anything that cannot be ran in algorithms?", but there are plenty of things that are not computable or decidable in computation. These are theoretical constraints. There are also practical constraints that effectively increase the list of these things.
I cannot think of a single action that will promote the adoption of Hauwei's app store more than banning TikTok.
What’s the actual point of having to learn all that for the license? What’s the actual point for the license in the first place?
We've managed to reduce our spends by almost 50-60%. Some pointers:
1. Comb through your bill. Inspect every charge and ask "Why do we need this?" for every line item.

2. If user latency is not a problem, choose the cheapest regions available and host systems there.

3. Identify low usage hours (usually twilight hours) and shut systems off.

4. Transition one-off tasks (cron, scheduling etc.) to lambda. We were using entire servers for this one thing that would run once a day. Now we dont.

5. Centralize permissions to launch instances etc. within a few people. Make everyone go through these 'choke-points'. You might see reduced instances. Often engineers launch instances to work on something and then 'forget' to shut them off.

6. Get AWS support involved. I'm pretty sure with the bills you are racking up you must have some AWS support. Get some of their architects etc. to check out your architecture and advise.

7. Consider Savings Plans and Reserved Instances. Often you get massive cost savings.

8. Consider moving some of the intensive number crunching to some of AWS' data crunching services. We moved a high-powered ELK stack for analyzing server logs to CloudWatch. A little more expensive in the short term, but we are now looking to optimize it.

In my experience, AWS has been very supportive of our efforts at reducing costs. Even after a 50-60% reduction I still feel there is scope for another round of 50-60% reduction from the new baseline. All the best!
Really nice explanation! I'd also add that it's not enough that p is continuous (only looks at a finite number of bits for each input) -- it must also be uniformly continuous (the number of bits it looks at can't become arbitrarily high for arbitrary inputs). For example, if you exclude the sequence of all ones 111111... from the Cantor set, you can write this function p which always returns false:

function p(bits) {
n = 0
while bits(n) == 1 {
n++
}
return false
}

This function would loop forever on the all-ones sequence. But since that sequence was excluded, p is a total function which looks at more and more bits depending on how many leading ones there are. While each particular input only demands a finite number of bits, there's no finite number of bits which lets you search the entire space. The compactness of the Cantor set ensures that all continuous functions are also uniformly continuous, but if you remove points from the set, it can stop being compact, and the magic spell can be broken!
> Now if apple were to release an os Level protection that automatically pulls up a screen showing what is shared from the view of the camera and asks for that approval, that would improve this situation.

That doesn’t help for the attack that many people are using here, which is if the software on your machine is compromised.
Just sticking a tape over the camera works really well
"Genocide" is a very serious term, and throwing it around lightly, as people are doing in this case, trivializes it.
What’s wrong with Spotify?
They modeled the scores because they couldn’t hold the exams this year due to the virus. As for your description, that’s a gross oversimplification. What they’ve actually done is predicted people’s test scores based on their performance in coursework relative to their peers.

A person in the 10th percentile in coursework is already worse than 90% of their peers and is unlikely to go to university no matter what school they attend. On the other hand, a student in the 90th percentile of a low performing school is going to be fine. Their predicted score is going to be well above their peers.
I've actually learned quite a lot just by listening into my local VHF/UHF repeaters with a USB-connected Software-Defined Radio (SDR). Very easy to set up and you can pick up lots of neat stuff other than voice (like weather satellites and image transmissions (SSTV)). If you use Twitter or the like there are lots of people regularly posting about neat stuff as well (look for hashtags like #amateurradio, #vhf, #hamradio etc.) ...

Thing is, amateur radio is a really deep universe and there's almost no end to how much stuff you can learn or experiment with or try, so it takes a while to get a feel for things and know what you want out of it. You say you have a lot of hobbies - this can so easily be another one, a potentially massively-time-consuming one hahaha :)

Since you're probably intending just fairly short-range group<->group communication you probably want a typical handheld VHF radio. An "HT" as it's often called, or "handie-talkie". You can get cheap ones as low as like $50 but more often around $100. Baofeng makes the cheapest ones (I got one for $20), but they may not be legal to transmit with in your region, depends on where you're located. I only use one to listen for trucks on logging roads, or as a backup emergency radio. You won't really need digital modes like DMR or D-Star, in my opinion. In terms of how to use, the radios always come with comprehensive manuals that explain all the functions and how to use them. I learned everything I need to know to use my radio from the manual. You can probably buy one used, or scour some forums to know what the most reputable radio equipment vendors are. It's definitely a lot easier to get into this stuff if you know someone who's already into it, as everyone is into radio for different things. That said, ARRL has a decent "Get on the Air" site which you might find useful! Check it: http://www.arrl.org/get-on-the-air

Hope this helps a bit, even if it's just some general info... Can answer other questions if you have some. :)
iCloud’s $3 for 200GB hit the sweet spot for me.
2fa will authenticate from your phone number, so you only need a replacement sim card from your telco.