skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
You should understand when those tests are low effort: Look for other frameworks that help you to develop those tests easier or frameworks that remove that requirement for you. I.e. Lambok for generation of getters/setters. You only have to unit test code that you wrote.

High test coverage comes from a history of writting tests there. Sadly people include feature and functional tests in the coverage.
I've heard this described as why would they have stopped exploring and colonizing. So it makes a lot of sense that they would have continued looking for any habitable island or land.

On the other side of the pacific, Hawaiian oral stories have some indication that they reached Central America from the islands. Referring to the place they found as a land of frogs.
Right, that's why he's trying to stop the NYT from publishing his name. The game isn't that he thinks that by deleting the blog he'll prevent people from finding him even if he's mentioned in the NYT, it's that by deleting the blog it'll make it untenable for the NYT to publish his name. He's gamblng that the NYT will blink.

He might at some later date decide that he needs to erase his iInternet presence entirely, but I don't think that's his current game.
You can uninstall the snap package for gnome-calculator and install the apt package instead.

I just did it and it's quick to boot up again as it should :)
> You're attempting to use the clinical definition of an overreaction

Someone can 'overreact when driving' and flip the car on a turn. I regularly over react when playing video games and miss a jump. Companies over react to data and make bad choices.

So not just in a 'clinical definition'. I've given you plenty of examples of over reacting being non-emotional. Even your definition, the one you quote, says that over reactions can be non emotional. An over reaction can be, by the very definition of the word, a reasonable miscalculation of risk/reward without having to imply emotion.

> This would be an emotional reaction to me defining the term overreaction correctly.

Actually, it's quite reasonable that if someone says demonstrably false statements, the next thing they say is put into question. If you choose to see this reasoning as inherently emotional, that's your prerogative, but it seems quite baseless.
Are you saying Epstein wasn't in the business of pedophilic exploitation involving a number of the global'elite', and that his island wasn't a resort for said activities?

It doesn't seem right to conflate that with Qanon or Pizzagate. It's like comparing critics of a particular Covid-19 policy to flat-earthers.
Healthcare premiums were steadily marching higher from the 1970s onwards, and continued to do so post-ACA at about the same annual growth rate.
Most programmers are arrogant and that's why they write terrible code full of bugs. I posted elsewhere that if your code isn't tested then it's broken. It was sitting at negative four when I last looked. That comment should be in the hundreds. If folk don't understand that then they need to look into their software development practices.
We are all entitled to our beliefs. I merely outlined an argument for why I think how I do. Maybe Scott is a perfectly nice person but his writing is full of associations that say otherwise. I did not know anything about SSC when someone first introduced me to the blog, I did not even know who Scott was or what the blog was about but the more I read the more I noticed certain patterns. I did not start with a specific conclusion, I reasoned my way to one.

I already stated several times that if my intent was for civil discourse then I would not have used the language that was used in the letter because it is full of contradictions. It outlines victimhood and becomes a rallying cry for those that identify with Scott and that's exactly what has happened. Everyone discussing the post assumes the position of a victim. I think this is odd because if Scott is so smart then why is everyone making him out to be the victim? Even the logic used to justify Scott as a persona is contradictory, he's a victim and yet he's not a victim.

The letter is deceptive and that's why I attribute malice to it. It's intention and the words used are misaligned.
Congress created the reservation situation in Oklahoma many, many, many years ago. Not the Supreme Court.

If respondents want to undo that promise, they need to take the matter up with congress. That's what the court is saying. You can't short circuit the constitutional order. The court is right to drop this right back in the lap of congress.
If you look at the our American history, you will find that changes in party power happen much more frequently than it had in the first two centuries of the U.S. For many epochs of a decade or more, one party tended to hold sway in both houses of congress and the presidency, allowing much to get accomplished. Switches in party control of government usually followed rises in corruption/ineffectiveness that can happen to those who remain in power too long. In the last several decades, party control switches back and forth rapidly.
He's not charging more, GrubHub pads the price and charges a delivery fee.
Do you scrape using web requests? Or do you use headless browsing to load the page and extract the contents out of the DOM?
I absolutely love this.
You cannot adversely possess a US government's land. Tribes have similar sovereign rights.
You'll see the term "well rounded" thrown around a lot in discussions like this. The idea is that elite schools (or even just good ones) can take their pick of academic high-performers, so they seek out students who are more than just academic high performers.

They become very interested in questions like "does this person have volunteer experience that might have exposed them to a worldview larger than themselves?", "do they have a sport or hobby they enjoy which might provide them a boon in mental health?", "have they done anything which would require practical application of skills or collaboration beyond raw book learning?"

The same kind of thing comes up in job interviews all the time. As a hiring manager, I'm of course most interested in whether the candidate can perform the hard requirements of the job as described. But I'd also like signals about whether you're at risk for burnout, whether you might have empathy for differing points of view, or whether you can think on your feet in non-ideal scenarios or whether you'll crumble if a plan changes or a compromise must be found.

People are complex, and well-roundedness is a worthwhile goal on its own for a complex world. There are relatively few scenarios outside of standardized testing where raw academic or technical ability is the exclusive measure of a person.
Binary states aren't super rare in biological processes. All the causes the doctor outlines are plausible. My first thought was orthostatic hypotension (it's not at all uncommon for people to pass out almost instantly when they go from supine to standing), or some sort of obstructive shock (with cardiac tamponade being the most likely). Both of those conditions are massively more likely than the pacemaker being intermittently connected, so it make sense to rule out the higher probability options first.

What I'm not sure about is why they started doing diagnostic tests (especially ones where the patient was quite clear on what the outcome was going to be) without an IV in place...
Bump, it is a shame that this article didn't get enough attention from our community....
The reality is more complicated.

Supreme Court decisions may be explained by (1) partisan views; (2) differences in judicial philosophy; and even (3) pragmatic views (e.g. 'what can the country handle right now?').

As to learning what specifically motivates the justices, this is a lengthy topic. There is a lot to chew on.

Actors outside the Supreme Court regularly try to influence it in many ways. Some want it to be more partisan, for example. Some want to make the court more insulated from elections of the president and senators. Some want to modify the structure of the Court itself.
Exactly. It's absolutely more than a stunt, despite it drawing its own kind of Barbara attention. Dedicated people will still be able to find it, but the lowest effort attackers wont put in the work to dig. It silences a chunk of outrage culture who will just move on to the next target, rather than investigate broken links.
It's not that black people believe every single cop is bad, it's that they MUST assume that a cop can do bad things to them. America is truly a police state for Black people. It doesn't matter if 90% of cops are good, if 10% can get away with brutalizing you and worse, all cops are suspect.

It's the old dilemma: There's 1% chance this beer can kill you: Do you want to try your chance and drink it? Of course not. But you can't not interact with the police. Just being black is enough to get bad cops' negative attention.
Tim Alberta's excellent book "American Carnage" covers this period in detail— the closest thing to a short answer on it is that the Freedom Caucus is essentially a second party inside the Republican party, and are hardwired into a scorched earth mode where they vote no to anything that has even a whiff of compromise to it.

This time was an extraordinary humiliation for Paul Ryan in particular because it should have been an opportunity to get lots of ideologically-motivated things done really quickly, and yet they failed to achieve even incremental progress on Trump's top legislative priorities, like repealing the ACA and securing funding for the wall.
Yeah, /frontpage was mostly added for completeness but you can toss filters like `?points=50` or `?q=javascript` onto it which might be helpful.
The 114th congress served entirely under Obama. Please read the comment I responded to.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/114th_United_States_Congress
>It has been tried but the laws protecting police were broadly written before the supreme court invented qualified immunity.

qualified immunity isn't the issue here. qualified immunity only protects against civil lawsuits. While it would be great if victims of police brutality can go after their attackers in civil court, the bigger issue is that prosecutors/police are refusing to go after the attackers in criminal court. Having to pay 500k in damages because you shot some unarmed black guy in the back sucks, but getting locked up for 10+ years sucks more.
The performance specified in the article lists only its sustained transfer rate, with no mention of sustained read speed, sustained write speed, random 4k reads, random 4k writes, or any other useful performance metric. The caches are freaking enormous- 512MB.

Am I to understand that these are SMB disks? The article does not mention SMB at all, which is surprising to me given WD's recent history.
You aim for maximizing code paths in the minimum test cases. Test cases written correctly can be quickly reused with different input values. Design to test. Prove your code through automated unit testing. Skipping proper test development leads to terrible tech debt when you try to maintain the code. Error paths are generally the place that doesn't get most coverage and those are where you crash a lot of programs. This stuff is elementary.
It is, of course, not any kind of substitute for critical thought. But the GP referenced dialectic by way of arguing for contrary materials to be presented in class: my point was that a living argument among the students is better for teaching dialectic than a curated selection of contrary views. The responsibility of the instructor goes beyond this elementary requirement for ensuring multiple viewpoints are presented.
> The practical lesson that I'd take here is that semi-anonymity doesn't exist. Alexander should either have written under his own name, or taken sufficient technical precautions to make doxxing by the NYT impossible.

He shows up in person to meetups and things like that, so that doesn't really work.

Semi-anonymity works fine as long as there are cultural norms toward respecting it. Nothing really works if people with resources acting in bad faith decide they want to make your life hard.
Is Technology Making Us More Productive? A Macroeconomic Look
> If anything, the exploit writer should get the credit.

They did: https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT211214
i use templates to create a "quick save" backup of a database quickly during development:

createdb -T old_db new_db
History of Trusted Extensions Desktop (TED)
Because they want to make a bet on the future being different. Or they just want to pump up the company's value enough that the initial investors can get out with their cash and leave the shareholders/acquirer holding the bag.

If the delivery companies start shifting the burden to consumers, or if they start forcing bicycle couriers to comply with the rule, or if they can successfully contest it in court, then it makes sense to some degree to stay in the fight.
I thank you for your honesty. At least your being open about your position. Too many times people argue against rationality in disguise, acting like they like it but secretly hating it.
When I take a flight, I don't demand to know how much the airline is paying the pilots and flight attendants. When I buy food from a restaurant, I don't demand to know how much the restaurant is paying the waiters and cashiers. I also don't know how much the restaurant paid for the food they cooked.

That's true of any company/workers/suppliers. People only know and care about how much they end up paying. As long as there's a minimum wage, people don't know, and usually don't care how much a company pays their workers/suppliers.
I don't think anyone is getting a bug bounty, especially from this one.
I would be very surprised if a ML pipeline didn't benefit from some GPU acceleration. What kind of algorithms are you using?
Interestingly, shrinking the government doesn't seem to affect the military...
Battle of the Interface Design Tools
Show HN: Justice in July – Anti-racism and habit app collaboration
I don't see that this some sign of systemic dysfunction. Given the significant amount of time and effort that is expended before a legal dispute is considered by SCOTUS, it stands to reason that the arguments would be sufficiently nuanced at that stage.

If the highest court of the land doesn't sweat the details, why would lower courts or any other aspect of our legal system be reasonably expected to do so? In any reasonably complex system (legal or otherwise), it should make sense that the technicalities do matter, and that the supreme decision making body in that system should consider those carefully due to the outsized influence it holds.
This is very much needed. I started to create something similar a few years back in case it's helpful. https://github.com/crizCraig/benjamin/blob/master/benjamin.p... Mostly it dealt with recommending reservations.
Good catch. It seems to be coming out valid now but maybe there was something invalid in the feed earlier. I'll keep an eye on it and see if it pops up again.

Thanks for the report!
In case you missed it, tptacek tackled this point:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23781397
Moore's law might be dead but the deeper law is still alive.

Moore's law is technically "the number of transistors per unit area doubles every 24 months" [1]. The more important law is that the cost of transistors halves every 18-24 months.

That is, Moore's law talks about how many transistors we can pack into a unit area. The deeper issue is how much it costs. If we can only pack in a certain amount transistors per area but the cost drops exponentially, we still see massive gains.

There's also Wright's law that comes into play [3] that talks about dropping exponential costs just from institutional knowledge (2x in production leads to (.75-.9)x in cost).

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moore%27s_law

[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nb2tebYAaOA

[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Experience_curve_effects
Maybe have the winners announced @ noon or something similar. I’m usually not as engaged with friends/family at 9pm on a weeknight. I’d have the biggest prize set for Friday. Why 9pm?
> It doesn't seem right to conflate that with Qanon or Pizzagate. It's like comparing critics of a particular Covid-19 policy to flat-earthers.

Yes, but the point is that the two cases can be indistinguishable at a distance. We'll probably never know what stories about Roman emperors were at least somewhat factual, and what were just propaganda.
Yep, but it also doesn't change that this particular person might be let free. I think it's OK to feel a little ambivalent about this ruling.
Sometimes Supreme Court justices will surprise you. Justice Gorsuch is from the American West, and has proven to be a strong and consistent advocate for Native American rights in the Supreme Court, just as Justice Scalia was for the Fourth Amendment.
Please tell me it's GallowBoob
It's not an artifact of division necessarily -- it's that the US government, structurally, has an extraordinarily high number of veto points.

eg in federal legislation: the House (majority); the Senate, representing increasingly tiny numbers of Americans (supermajority, often: cloture); the president, and the supreme court.

Ezra Klein wrote a book about it. https://simonandschusterpublishing.com/why-were-polarized/
> Well, if you're building a thing that's doing hundreds of millions in revenue, that might be a big deal. But you? You're a team of one! You rollback that bad deploy and basically no one cares!

Human lives, customer faith in product, GDPR violations, HPPA violations, data, time/resources in space missions

https://medium.com/@ryancohane/financial-cost-of-software-bu...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mars_Climate_Orbiter
Filibuster is almost never used. It's occasionally threatened, frequently used as an excuse for not even trying, but rarely used. If it were used more often, it would elevate the debate around the bills under consideration. Congress doesn't even try.
How to ship machine learning projects
My company makes you preapprove any outside business activities (including freeware/opensource). They ask you stuff like if you are working in the same domain as the company, if you work with any company competitors or clients, etc.

I can't say the name because I am critical of them and need to stay employed.
Hey ya'll! If you have any questions, let us know! We're really excited to help making developing on AWS delightful so any feedback is much appreciated!

Docs are here: https://aws.github.io/copilot-cli/

To install via brew: brew install aws/tap/copilot-cli
GP wasn't talking about the Oklahoma decision, they were talking about DACA.
Micro USB is great. My first smartphone had Mini USB which was way worse.
Well, PDFs are yet another issue. It's preformatted documents made specifically for a certain size paper.

This is not optimal for documents to be read on screen/mobile devices since they handle zooming, changing text sizes etc poorly.

In a way I can agree with you that application delivery would allow document distribution as well, but I think the benefits of a unified standard for this that focuses on content rather than presentation is a key feature of the web that we should not loose.
That's where I heard it, yeah.
> Apple's probably not going to let an app exploiting this zeroday into its App Store...

Are you sure about this?

I'm far removed from the app store development world, but a cursory glance at the description and the original lightspeed bug seem to indicate this is a problem within the kernel interface, and as such I assume callable by any application??

Sorry, I could be missing something, just curious why this couldn't occur in the app store.
I'm just getting ready to push instant search as a major feature on a client's web application, as both public-facing & admin-side. The MeiliSearch team has been great in terms of communication regarding issues, new features, the roadmap, etc. They're also moving quickly, constantly adding new functionality that has been useful as I've been working on the integration.

Depending on what you're planning on using it for, make sure to review the documentation, and check the GitHub issues/discussions. For example, I've had to use workarounds to handle some lacking auth/permissions support, but they're currently working on improving it.

Best part by far is the performance. And memory requirements is completely reasonable, depending on the size of the database.
You can try to argue that certain things aren't "hate speech" but I don't understand how you can claim it to be a made up term. Hate is a real thing and if you channel that into certain language you get hate speech, plain and simple.

Germany has an interesting history with regards to what various constituents view as protected speech. As someone who hasn't lived in Germany I freely admit that I have a limited view of such things, but as the other poster mentioned these issues precede the internet.
That was not my intention. Could you clarify how your statement:

> If congress doesn't change something, then that means they have determined no change is necessary.

Is not accurately reworded as:

>this lack of specific consensus on action is actually a form of broad consensus on inaction
Thanks for the feedback. We chose 9pm thinking it would be a time when people are less busy. HQ Trivia picked it and we thought it worked for them in terms of getting engagement.

But to be fair, we didn't think too deeply about the exact time and probably should have, so we will think about this some more.
But that happened in the 18th century though, by then of course, empirical observation had played its role and a few people tried to weaponize it. I'm pretty sure accidental contamination during the 2 preceding centuries had already caused a massive decline in population.
Toward a Psychology of Being by Abraham H. Maslow
Python: Web Applications and Frameworks
it's a r/tech and r/worldnews mod named MaxwellHill.

the proof is paper thin IMO.
Back in the day, enrolled members of some tribes could sell land to non-members. I think most tribes prevent that now. Land sold to non-members became Fee property that can be owned by non-members or sold to non-members.

Depending on the reservation, you will find plenty of non-members that own property within the reservation.
Well, that's exceptionally well hidden. Thank you for the tip.
> I tend to mentally divide code into roughly two types: "computational" and "plumbing".

I agree with this and would go even further. Divide your code into "stateless" functional code and "stateful" objects code.

Original OO was encapsulating things like device drivers that did I/O--it didn't represent data.

If you don't interleave your stateless business logic with your stateful persistence, it's easy to mock "objects" that do the plumbing, and all the meat of the program is unit tests.

Fwiw, the DI model (Guice, Spring, etc.) in modern Java/Scala shops closely hews to this, even if people don't mentally categorize it as such.
If you read the article, there is not much lithography inside. It's mostly piezoceramics
No thank you. As someone who lives in one of those states this is a worrying precedent.

Maybe if their laws didn't apply to me as a non citizen I would be ok with this. As it is, I can be arrested for stopping at the wrong gas station with a firearm in my car.

I have no choice but to pass through reservations on a regular basis. And I have no input in the government that makes their laws. Nor any hope of ever being heard. Yet those laws apply to me just the same.
Uh, surely it doesn't mean the the people residing in the area in question can go on committing what would be a crime under Oklahoma law... right ?
With larger drive sizes and failures tending to follow a rather normal distribution w.r.t. mtbf, raid is becoming less of a safeguard these days. There are some good calculators online that will do the math for you, but at these sizes, you're very likely to see the second and even third redundant drive fail before the rebuild is complete.