skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Does that work with data science work, though? Along the way you build many models and many kinds of ad hoc analyses that can build up. I’ve yet to see someone write tests. For the most part, I’ve only seen people write big long scripts that they call, setting some global constants at the top. I’m aspiring to be better than that, but it seems counter to the goal of getting results quickly.
They say you can keep your current pricing forever:

> Finally, if you’re a current Algolia customer and are happy with your plan, that’s great! You can remain on your existing plan indefinitely.
Kissinger is polarizing, but it’s hard to claim that he should be on a list of worst advisers. Half of the USA (well, half of those that know who he is) think he’s the greatest statesman who ever lived. He wasn’t perfect, but he probably kept the USA and Soviet Union from nuking each other, and Walmart might not exist without him because trade between the USA and China wouldn’t be the same without him.
I'll give a similar reply as I did to your other comment: the most popular platform for interacting with low-trust applications, the web, sanely does not allow apps to access your whole filesystem. It would have never thrived as it did if users had to limit themselves to a small selection of vendors they can thrust with their whole system.

There's a huge difference in usage between apps on desktop OSs, which are often of less commercial nature, open-source, and more carefully vetted by centralized gatekeepers, and the mobile app ecosystem, where any random fast food chain will entice you to install their app to make an online order. The smartphone app ecosystem has to be low trust, like the web.
That's not what a reasonable objection is about, and you're being intellectually dishonest when you attack this, the weakest argument. Here is a stronger argument, for your benefit:

Working requires us to form social relationships with our coworkers to get work done. Oftentimes, we're establishing shared language, and working tempo with coworkers through "inside" jokes, and other human forms of camaraderie. Not only would it be unethical to stamp the social aspect out of our working lives–which make up the majority of our waking hours, and a gross majority of our social ties–but it would also be imprudent, since removing social elements from working relationships would cripple them. It is necessary, and desirable, that we socialize with our coworkers to some extent.

The firm pits individuals–and groups–against one another in competition. Even in an ostensibly friendly, collegial workplace, the zero-sum reality of budgets and headcount encourage workers to jockey for position and push difficult, or unprofitable work onto others. Surveillance like this enables the most manipulative to exploit secret knowledge of the social relationships that are, again, necessary throughout the firm. A secondary effect of surveillance is the chilling effect: trust and camaraderie are hampered by the knowledge that one's every word can be used against them without recourse.

Firms regularly use information freely given to prioritize workers for layoffs. Decades of "employee satisfaction" surveys have facilitated the efficient firing of dissatisfied, burnt-out or mistreated workers. Surveillance offers the same facility, at higher fidelity.

If you are an executive, and you want to maintain dehumanizing working conditions, surveillance is a necessity and a boon. As surveillance increases, our working life becomes more prison-like, and our society progresses towards private autocracy. What astonishes me is how giddily those who profess to love Liberty readily shed it at work.
Is there a single word for "it's more profitable to do this thing, rather than the other thing, or nothing"? I think that's what this counts as.

I think this is in the same category of decision as retailers selling old stock at a loss, because that's better than not selling it.

A large portion of the modern economy is run by spreadsheets, and crunching the numbers on what the "most-profitable" thing to do often leads to companies doing what seems insane to the average person. P.S.: only the first 2/3rds of that was directed at your comment specifically.
People did similar things with land plants https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_gardening
Hey, thanks!

I can't really comment, but it is a common request... I'm curious, are you using Chromecast via TV or Chromecast Audio (or something else)?
Yes, this feels very much like a weekend hackathon project rather than a finished product, even for its intended use case.
> Except on the most popular application platform available of today: the web.

The web is not an operating system, for goodness' sake. A browser is itself an application no different from a terminal emulator + shell (which also is capable of running arbitrary other applications within its context).

> I'm honestly amazed and horrified to learn that smartphone apps on the 2 OSes have this capability.

Prepare to be even more "amazed" and "horrified": I am willing to bet that whatever desktop OS/distro you use does the same damn thing (providing apps with programmatic access to the clipboard or clipboards).

If you don't want other applications to access some data, for heaven's sake don't put it in what is literally a shared buffer between applications.
Got a source on that? - I can only find the following:

- Display name is the display name of the user. You can click the display name to go to the user's setting page in the Microsoft Teams admin center.

- 1:1 calls is the number of 1:1 calls that the user participated in during the specified time period.

- Channel messages is the number of unique messages that the user posted in a team chat during the specified time period.

- Reply messages is the number of unique reply messages that the user posted in a team channel during the specified time period.

- Post messages is the number of unique post messages that the user posted in a team channel during the specified time period.

- Meetings organized is the number of scheduled meetings a user organized during the specified time period.

- Meetings participated is the number of scheduled meetings a user participated in during the specified time period.

- Chat messages is the number of unique messages that the user posted in a private chat during the specified time period.

- Urgent messages is the number of urgent messages that the user posted in a chat during the specified time period.

- Group Calls is the number of group calls that the user participated in during the specified time period.

- Audio time is the total audio time that the user participated in during the specified time period.

- Video time is the total video time that the user participated in during the specified time period.

- Screen Share time is the total screen share time that the user participated in during the specified time period.

- Last activity is the last date (UTC) that the user participated in a Teams activity.

From https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoftteams/teams-analyt...
Why would any SANE programmer put business logic into the model layer?
After reading Walter Issacson's Einstein biography, I read Six Easy Pieces, which is were taken from 6 of Richard Feynman's lectures. The intended audience is for Freshmen Physics students. Having never taken any Physics courses in college, I've only read a few books on the subject. I was pleasantly surprised at how Feynman made the material so understandable. Now I'm very interested in Physics.
Yup.

Though I'm not sure Boeing really would take your order, given that the 747 line is running at a loss.
hmm. you’re renting my brain. you also don’t get to control how i process the info and what i get to remember.
what a one-sided POV. I kept "in touch" with multiple recruiters who "discovered" me via the Linkedin and when the time came I leveraged these connections to land multiple interview loop invites.

It also is a great place to add the colleagues when they or you depart with the same idea to "keep in touch".
If I could bet large sums of money on a jury not knowing anything about how companies handle internal data, I absolutely would.
Hard to catch? It is very clearly stated at 1:25.
Unit pricing seems complicated and arbitrary.
Other thing is that 787 and A320 can reliably fill up on "thinner" routes, which siphons off people who would otherwise change at a hub airport onto a jumbo, and filling jumbos was already tricky.

There is a reason the largest operators of A380s and 747s are the ones with absolutely massive hubs; either a legacy European flag carrier, a Middle Eastern mega-hub airline, or an airline handling large amounts of transfer volume from an out-of-the-way place like Australia.
> presumably leaving the incumbent in office in the interim

An alternative for many posts would be to have no one in the office once the incumbent's term expires. For example, suppose no one wins a race for a seat in the House of Representatives: when the incumbent's term expires, that seat could simply be vacant, and could be deemed to have voted "abstain" for all votes during the term in which it is empty (or until a new special election is held to hopefully fill the seat).

(For an office like the President, there might have to be some other provision made.)

This would also handle the other case you mention:

> For more local elections, where running unopposed is not uncommon, there's also an interesting conundrum: should that candidate be rejected if they only receive a plurality, ie under 50%?

I would say yes: that counts as no one winning the election, so the seat remains vacant until a new special election is held (assuming someone does win that).

> What if literally no one else wants the job?

Then I would say the will of the people is that they prefer to have no one doing it, if they do not approve of anyone who wants it.
Walmart was around long before China was the biggest US trade partner.
This is assuming that the internal policy is "we ban any symbol thought to be racist", vs. ""we ban symbols clearly established over years to be racist".

That is, swastikas and the confederate flag have an established history of their meaning, whereas the 4chan sign does not.
Even legalizing some drugs would reduce organized crime. Would it completely destroy it? Probably not, but it would mean that there's less money to be made in it, and that means fewer people involved, less violence, less corruption.
This is, quite frankly, ridiculous. Yes, computational models do have a place in science and drug discovery, but I don't know anyone in the field who seriously thinks they will reduce the number of animals used in medical research.

If anything, you may see something like the Jevons paradox, where when you increase the efficiency of something (in this case, animals used in medical research), usage actually goes up.
> “people who say it is a symbol of heritage and/or display it” and “people who are not white” is virtually nonexistant.

This isn’t surprising. An heritage is well, an heritage, which is coming from ancestors. Only very few people get to aquire culture heritage accross race boundaries (for example by adoption). It’s like saying the overlap of "people who celebrate Chinese new year" and "people who are not asian" is virtually non-existent to shame them; this make no sense.
Does typesense have any ecom features or is it just a full text index?
How to display today items in Django template?
Bottom of the barrel performance for bottom of the barrel organizations like yours seems an appropriate response
Correct. Twitter is a bubble that magnifies the angriest opinions and makes them look more popular than they are. Outside of that bubble, most of these controversies don’t even exist.
Paul Graham, Ben Horowitz, Balaji Srinivasan, and Jason Calacanis have proven to the world how sexist and misogynistic they all are and many others(Naval, Marc Andressen) like them with in Silicon Valley.
This explanation really creeps me out, if major corps can just do about anything, based on any arbitrary rule ie. RND() or even own biases and legal discrimination.

On the other hand, too many on gaming platforms are engaging in clearly racist behaviour, ie. choosing offensive nicks, spamming chat, and need correction.
> the most popular platform for interacting with low-trust applications, the web, sanely does not allow apps to access your whole filesystem.

Yes, obviously, arbitrary code that is executed from over the network at a time you can't fully control and programs that you install and run on the device that you own have different levels of trust. Are you seriously making the argument that code from https://facebook.com running within your browser cannot access your filesystem then that means every single executable on your machine should be incapable of doing that as well? Wasn't this the same site that complained to high heavens about the constant permission prompts in macOS Catalina?

> which are often of less commercial nature, open-source, and more carefully vetted by centralized gatekeepers

I'm sorry, this is just blatantly false (as literally decades of malware on the desktop can attest).
Hi, I'm one of the creators of this extension.
This chrome/firefox extension automatically finds and links code for ML papers anywhere on the web (Google, Arxiv, Twitter, Scholar, and more). The general hope is to start bridging the gap between academia/research and builders & makers with code.

Open to all feedback and requests here, and would love to hear from you, cheers!
I honestly thought that nominating that song was because they were too cowardly to nominate Uncle Fucka.
You bring up a lot of important points and I do agree with you on many. I’d love to hear your perspective when sensitive data is involved, what takes priority? Is it the privacy of the employee, or the customer? Can there be a balance that respects both?
Is the data local to the browser? Or does it get uploaded to some server?
Thus LineageOS (for those who want droid), or in the future postmarketOS (for those who don't care about app support).

No, neither of these support all android phones, but they each support several.
For threaded political discussion from a progressive side I very much recommend

https://unstuckpolitics.com/
Seeing Paradise from Behind a Dashboard
Legacy systems in Go and Rust.
One of the first things I've recommended with systems that deal with PII or secret data is to see if the vulnerability being reported or discovered has been exploited in the past.

Many different hops will log things like HTTP paths, which include GET information - or DB audit logging which can easily be traced with message ID's or timestamp comparisons. It's surprising how easy it is to trace issues, debug logging is often left on in Production systems..

I wouldn't take that risk.
They elected to bomb bits of Australia instead because nobody of any importance lived there.
What is the performance of reformer or linformer or any of these other new models in practical applications (not the benchmarks that researchers game)? Is it better than BERT?
So did the Kansas governor, despite the obvious health impact of reduced oxygen intake.
Consuming Too Much Caffeine? Read This
I always thought that song got the nomination as a proxy for the much catchier Uncle Fucker, which would have been a bit... problematic to nominate.
> Not watching them involves waiting a few seconds for the skip ad button to appear.

You're hallucinating. Just read the sidethread comment from tpm:

> I have never seen an ad on Youtube, much less an unskippable one.
This is precisely how Chinese authorities track down activists using apps without Location data, it was disclosured few weeks ago.

They patiently read user's clipboard data and wait for a picture taken and copied to clipboard, then extract its EXIF geoloc tags and send the coordinates to the police.
pastebin your results
Ah, ok, I was attempting a different thought. "Teaching the tapestry" seems to require atypically few misconceptions and high degree of insight. But chemistry content for example, is so bad, that teachers are steeped in misconceptions and lack insight. So not only is there, as you say, inertia, but we seemingly lack both content and staffing at present to pull off a tapestry approach. Maybe. There are bits of scattered evidence that with really good content, you can address both students and their teachers at the same time. Maybe...
What is your preferred pricing model and why?
Every morning I rebase my local changes from the previous day and push them at roughly the same time. I suggest everyone do the same!

I might switch to doing it once a sprint :)
They didn't. They chose the battle flag of the Army of Northern Virginia because of widespread admiration of Lee, who, while no abolitionist, called slavery a political and moral evil; who insisted on reconciliation after the war and rejected Lost Cause mythology; and who called upon Southerners to vow loyalty to the United States.

There's a reason they chose Lee's flag and not a CSA flag associated directly with a rabid slaver like Jefferson Davis. Indeed, the Army of Northern Virginia flag used to be a symbol of progressive racial integration, at a time when poor white southern migrant workers and poor African Americans found common cause against unfair wages and unsafe working conditions.

https://consortiumnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/8gvw5g...

https://images-theconversation-com.cdn.ampproject.org/i/s/im...

History is nuanced. Insisting that your view of what a symbol means should control others is toxic and Orwellian. Our society should be better than that.
Okay, Walmart might not exist as we know it because their main business model is to sell products at the lowest prices possible, which has caused most of their suppliers to manufacture in China. If it weren’t for Kissinger opening up relations with China then Walmart might not have become as huge as they are today or they would look very different.
Global trade was a thing back then. It collapsed around 1200 BC, but before it did, there was a lot of knowledge (and probably cultural phenomena) spreading around amongst much of humanity.

I doubt we'll ever know half of it.
Typesense supports a lot of features needed for e-commerce including complex ones like filtering on facet values.
Follow-up: why the down-votes in response? I'm very confused given that my prior comment wasn't.
> a high-flyer who had enjoyed several brushes with scandal in the past, mainly for rubbing people up the wrong way. Nevertheless, he had his admirers (snip) who thought he was ‘generous and very clever’, ‘an extremely reasonable man’ – just what the stuffy civil service needed at a time of change and rising pressure from Byzantium’s neighbours. Few others saw it that way. Many bristled at Nikephoros’ tactless and aggressive behaviour, at the way he locked others out of important decisions and limited access to the ruler. He was accused, too, of giving his friends a leg up and showing them favours they had not earned and did not deserve. He was arrogant, clumsy and scorned those who criticised him.

Oh man! I was unsure if I was reading about long gone Roman advisor or one of our contemporary ;)
I think right now it's just optimal to have a duopoly because it protects the bigger guy from getting in trouble for being a monopoly, and secures the little guy all the leftovers. like Microsoft saving Apple from bankruptcy or Google paying firefoxs bills.
Large scale meat farming practices.
Not just things like sexual harassment issues, there are plenty of reasons why internal communications and activity might not look great for the company if it came to a lawsuit. Just ask Cox Communications about how their abuse team's talk about the DMCA went for them. Now it won't just be overly candid email being scrutinized, but what websites the employees visit, what posts they liked, their chats, even their workflow. Why keep all that ammo around to be used against you?
Brilliant business idea, IMO. Do you work in their marketing team? Round wheels, brakes, windshield wipers, window transparency - those could also easily become options costing hundreds of dollars each month.
For a superbly witty satire of academic "cancel culture", give a listen to Zadie Smith's short story "Now More Than Ever":

https://www.newyorker.com/podcast/the-authors-voice/zadie-sm...
I think the answer is be as clear as possible in the interface, but also accept mistakes will be made. People make grammar mistakes in (normal) wikipedia all the time, then other people come along and fix them. I expect the same will occur here.
I feel the muckraking media lit this candle by starting a generational war between millennials and boomers in Great Recession, Occupy Wall Street days. IMHO, this is when the "destroy the other side at all costs" really took off.
I'm just waiting for everyone to realize that the immensely popular Texas "lone star flag" was also associated with the CSA.
Has anyone used Eclipse recently? How does it compare to the Jetbrains stuff? How about for languages like C++ and Go?
>But nobody should be able to coerce you to support any particular party or candidate.

well, nobody is able to coerce you for not doing anything, but people can still judge you for it, and that may be perfectly reasonable.

Inaction can be as devastating as action. Withdrawing in the face of some injustice is as much of a choice as participating on either front.

It's an overused quote but really all that is necessary for evil to triumph is good people doing nothing. Of course today sometimes the causes are hyperbolic, but nothing is wrong with the principle. If someone is the victim of racism say, and people look away rather than stepping up, that's a failure.
> I know the economies have not recovered anywhere where lockdown has ended.

On the other hand, we do know that the economies of countries that never locked down (Japan, South Korea, Singapore, Sweden) are doing better than economies in countries that did.

If countries that locked down are not recovering, that is likely a consequence of the lockdowns themselves. It's not a surprise that ordering everyone to stay at home would tank an economy.
Free Speech - of the general variety - has long been considered an American value. Idiomatically it has been broader than protection from government censorship.

If your rebuttal to someone is to ignore widely-known idiom to focus on a particular detail that does nothing to undermine their actual point, please reconsider whether that was really a contribution worth making.
The 1950's were an interesting time for grand "mad science" engineering projects. Anyone in the Bay area should make an effort to see the Bay Model museum in Sausalito. It contains a huge model of the SF Bay and the local watershed. While this is interesting, it is more interesting to hear the story of why it was made. It was intended to vet a plan to dam the bay to turn it from salt water to a huge freshwater lake. Fortunately they decided it wasn't feasible.
> Ignoring 20-30 years of programming languge theory advancements. Yet everyone laps it up.

I’d argue Go didn’t ignore those things, it just made a different set of trade-offs than most people are used to or expect from a modern programming language. The rationale for this is is well explained in https://youtube.com/watch?v=rFejpH_tAHM&t=306.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Big_Bus

Movie about a nuclear powered bus.
>To this day I still cannot understand why they didn't just buy bitcoin over the counter over time

VCs aren't allowed to invest in currencies.