skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Also makes it easier for a mechanic to trace and fix issues.

Imagine something more complicated where you need specialized knowledge to troubleshoot things.

It’s like they want to complicate things so the average person can’t fix things themselves. They look at John Deere not in askance but in admiration for making things irreparable by ordinary folks.
Good for people trolling. Bad for users trying to run a message board.
Seems to be some extra whitespace on the text of the example you provided.

http://bible-api.com/john%203:16?translation=kjv
> It has excellent propagation characteristics

2-meters FTW!

* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2-meter_band
Jeff Bezos being a billionaire doesn’t stop anyone else from buying the house in the burbs with 2.1 kids. Is the tech bubble distorting the real estate market on the west coast - yes. But there is an entire country outside of the west coast where two middle class jobs like a teacher and firefighter can live well.

The pie is not static. How many jobs have the five biggest tech companies created either directly or indirectly?

The average starting salary of a college grad is $51K (https://www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/hr-topics/compensatio...). Knowing that, the emphasis should be on teaching students not to get tens of thousands in debt to get a degree in Ancient Chinese Art History.
Rust has plenty of support for compile-time code generation of all kinds. It's generally viewed as something that should be done only as a last-resort, but it's there and fully supported.
The web already had solved that problem, even with bootstrap version 2. Surely apple provides primitives such as border-radius and gradients, which are enough to create an eye-catching button?
If your family uses your iPad, you can create a new Apple ID and then use the "Family Sharing" feature to get access to apps bought with your main account.
It's hard to reconcile the words in a textbook that says an authoritarian society is doomed to fail, then go home and watch rice paddies turn to skyscrapers in a generation. In a competition between academia and the real world, the real world always wins out.
You could, but I think it would be better to break the plastics into smaller not-fully-oxidized fragments, and rearrange those into desired chemicals. If the plastics have oxygen (as, for example, PET does) one could use hydrogen to pull that out, if needed.
Apparently, the Bible is the Word of God. I'm not sure if copyright applies.

Romans 13:1-2 says: "Obey the government, for God is the One who has put it there. There is no government anywhere that God has not placed in power. So those who refuse to obey the law of the land are refusing to obey God, and punishment will follow."

Acts 5:29 says: "Peter and the other apostles replied: “We must obey God rather than human beings!""

The US copyright act (chapter 3 section 302) states: "Copyright in a work created on or after January 1, 1978, subsists from its creation and, except as provided by the following subsections, endures for a term consisting of the life of the author and 70 years after the author’s death."

<confused face emoji>
If the telcos had their way, once your contract ended the phone would vaporise before your eyes.
Because they see things from a completely different angle, different cultural background, and obviously pre-seeded with what the CCP wants them to see as the truth.

Because really, consider in how many ways the west does not practice what it preaches. Look at how big corporations abuse capitalism, work against customer rights through lobbying. Look at the whole "right to repair" debate. There is plenty of stuff you can pick out and primarily report on on Chinese news. For example, every time there is even just a small protest of black people somewhere in the US, you can be sure it's on CCTV.

Then consider that most Chinese students going overseas are from the big cities, often from families doing well. There are government programs that sponsor studying abroad for students from rural areas, but they make up for only a small share. So you have students from the big cities, living a modern and happy life. And they get here and see that in some areas of everyday convenience, we've already fallen behind. They see China making progress every day, while the west is stagnating, having a lot of obvious internal and structural problems. They see the most powerful country in the world lead by a crazy orange clown being the main source of entertainment on Twitter. Not the prime example for the pros of a democracy.

And then you show them all the stuff that's censored in China, and how the CCP is evil, and how you got freedom of speech and they don't, and they look at how everything is going well back home and just shrug.

So you might conclude they are just brainwashed and don't realize it, but they pretty much think the same about you. The image of China we get presented in mainstream media is horribly biased as well.

In general you need to realize that most people from most countries are pretty content with how things are going. Even though it's not perfect, it's what you've accepted as being normal, since you grew up with it.
Does it? I think that could describe “associative” equally well as “commutative”.

Edit: “symmetric” might be an alternative for Abelian because the Cayley table (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cayley_table) of an Abelian group is symmetric. I’m not sure that’s immediately clear enough for laymen, though.
It's definitely fine to disagree, but it'll take more than something you read on a reddit thread; such glib articulations are probably better served on Twitter.

The API is pretty sweet, it's surprising we don't have a kind of standardised API for the entire Western Cannon and then some.
You’re 100% right about people not reading. I actually teach an adult Sunday School class in my spare time because it’s really fascinating to read and get into the history.

My slogan for the class is “You cannot be misled if you’ve read.”

We spend a lot of time talking about man made traditions that aren’t biblically supported as well as the cherry picking without context that often happens.

Christianity can withstand plenty of scrutiny and it does. It’s the man made rules that claim to be based on it that don’t hold up.

You also get to see major themes in the Bible when you read the entire thing. Themes are reiterated over and over. That type of context is very important when you realize how much people may latch onto something mentioned once.
Yes. Slack is one, and it’s on the App Store.
Librem, Pine64, Fairphone.
for those who prefer text: https://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/document/what-to...

Although I largely concur with Douglass, he does seem a bit disingenuous about the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three-Fifths_Compromise in discussing the Constitution. Further reading indicates that's a deliberate stance: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frederick_Douglass#Return_to_t...

"To side with the right, against the wrong, with the weak against the strong, and with the oppressed against the oppressor! here lies the merit, and the one which, of all others, seems unfashionable in our day." (that day being 1852)
> bitter no-holds-barred us-against-them battle

Both sides, amiright? Just out of curiosity, you might try drawing up lists. Make a column for each party. And in each, list out the "barred holds" that they've employed in their pursuit of victory. Be specific, list the stuff that actually matters to you, and most importantly make it a list of actions taken and not just rhetoric.

I think you'll find that it's not as symmetric as that framing implies.
AM and FM broadcast radio are licensed in seperate spectrum in most of the world (AM on the medium wave band, FM in VHF). Broadcast FM didn't replace AM radio outright, and there are still loads of AM stations. In some very rural areas in North America, it's the only broadcast radio you can receive. There was also a significantly longer gap between the instruction of broadcast AM and FM and the gap between DAB and DAB+.
11 pro max is the only iPhone model that has it
I'm sure there are many passages that people can point to in the Bible that can be quite fairly charged with being unhelpful or morally objectionable - for example those that relate to what fathers should do to daughters who act out in particular ways, or about homosexuality.

Of course you can reasonably argue that it is not so much the words themselves that cause harm, but the way that they are wielded by people. You can say similar things about all sort of words or things people wield - from the US constitution through to assault rifles, and such assertions are to various degrees sensible or ridiculous.

Others might point out other important passages in the bible that encourage peace, or kindness, or other good virtue. Of course these passages might also be wielded in more or less virtuous ways - there are many acts done in kindness that are not kindly received for example.

Personally I'm not a big fan of the Bible, but I'm not sure it is intrinsically a bad object. I think that the claims of knowledge and systems of power created around it are highly concerning and that power in all forms provides the opportunity for abuse, the manifestations we are far too well acquainted with today.
> I never leave a job unless I have a job.

This is actually solved by this approach. Nobody needs to quit, a week's leave/vacation is good enough for the trial period. Or, am I missing anything?
Would this work with water flows?
Got an example of such a song?
DNS Resolution and Records for Developers
take Galileo Galilei as an example.
And all the people after him that were robbed of his potential further inventions.
Learn to read or google stuff like "spanish inquisition"
We also no longer use the word niggardly - even though its etymology is completely different from the other n-word that sounds similar. We somehow survived that.

Likewise we no longer use the word retard as in I need to retard this engine's timing so it runs richer.

Yet both of these are words I grew up with and guess what? We're still here and our engines are running just fine, thank you. I'm old enough to have heard with my own ears that language evolves. The set of words used today are a different set of words than were used when I was growing up and the set of words that were being used when I was growing up was a different set than were used when my grandparents were growing up. You'd think a bunch of technology people wanting to "change the world" would understand this better.

Anyway, to my ears griping about language changing is like griping about loud music: you're just getting old. As my father always said getting old stinks but it sure beats the alternative. Now get off my lawn!

P.S. - when I was growing up you heard the word stinks a lot for where you'd now use the word sucks. But sucks used in such a pejorative manner was considered a 4-letter word due to its reference to fellatio. Like I said, language changes and evolves.
> obviously the OP is asking a question that introverts don't care about so they shouldn't really be posting. "What problem? Things are fine for me; I've been training for this my whole life" is not helpful to those with this problem.

Well, we need to vent a bit. For the rest of our lives most of us will be forced to live by the rules defined by extraverts. This is our rare opportunity for schadenfreude. One year later, we will spend our days at pointless meetings and teambuilding activities, wishing we could be alone or with our families instead. Or we will sit in the open spaces which pointlessly violate our need for privacy for 8 hours a day, and we will pretend that it's okay because we need to pay our bills.

But of course there also should be a place for a serious debate of people who have the opposite problem.
CAN is great for real time control, and a huge number of embedded components support it. I don’t see it going away any time soon. That said, it does not have a lot of bandwidth. There will need to be something higher bandwidth to support modern info-tainment systems. A second, high-bandwidth network with less strict real-time requirements.
Some of the things you mentioned are pure aesthetics - and they change with time - forward and backward. Some others change with the advent of tools and other developments. Micro services are hard to do right and they have been hard. But people rushed into it. With better tools in the future that might change.

Same with beginner/new projects embracing dynamic programming. It’s perfect for a new code add. It bites only later; when the enthusiasm has died off and you got to keep the codebase and tests up to date and things start slipping here and there.

Go is a darling now because it’s constraining. It skipped passed the last three decades of advancement in languages like they never happened. And then as it becomes way more popular people will ask for the same set of features that other languages have had forever.
But it's the elite that is educated in the West. Much like Saudi Arabia's elite that spends time in Europe as diplomats (aka "party without needing to obey laws"), they are not the ones who suffer under the system, the elite usually is just fine with authoritarian systems, they stand to profit.
Yup. I don't get why people love to berate older tech.

I mean, HTTP is quite old.

and CAN is a solid piece of tech. Ultra reliable, fast and low wire count. It's controllers are cheap and reliable.
Machine learning and DNA-encoded libraries
I find it strange that you have a default translation. I expect the sort of crowd who would most likely use this will also be very particular about which translation is being served.
I did all this years ago, but it doesn’t matter much because I’ll just turn off screen time if I really want to use the apps.

My new solution works better: put reasonable limits in place (like 15 mins per day for time waster apps), and have someone else come up with the code so I don’t even know it. There’s a code recovery process I could use in an emergency but I’ve never bothered.
I've never driven a quadricycle, but I have heard from someone that they are actually harder to drive than an actual car. I think it was mostly due to its transmission.

Then there's the fact that they offer pretty much no crash protection and they can be legally operated starting at the age of 15. They are definitely dangerous.

There was an incident where an older Mercedes-Benz minivan [1] crashed into a quadricycle [2] in 2017. The 34-year-old man driving the minivan was drunk and suicidal and attempted to kill himself by crashing himself to an oncoming car. The result was that the two 17-year-olds in the quadricycle died immediately and the man got minor injuries.

[1] https://is.mediadelivery.fi/img/1920/a659907378c54818bbc915e...

[2] https://is.mediadelivery.fi/img/1920/2965ca321c7a47758ca5a81...
I suggest that you read that account's post history before you believe their claims.
It seems so, although it's not like the world paid much attention to the mass imprisonment and "reeducation" of Kazakhs and Uyghurs for the crime of speaking a wrong language, praying to the wrong god or wearing the wrong style of beards.

Fuck those beard-wearing Xinjiang hipsters anyway, am I right guys?
From my own experience, if you are just getting started, I found "Computer Networking: A Top-down Approach by Kurose is a good introduction. It is top down, started from application layer and going down to link layer. That approach make an easier learning process because we can make sense different kind of application such as web/http, email, DNS, etc leverage the lower network layers to deliver its functionality.
I think the general pattern here is "mission creep"[0] of which [1] is a classic example.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mission_creep

[1] https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2008/11/anti-terror_l...
I wonder how much dogs would benefit from intermittent fasting considering their ancestors only ate a few times a week. (Assuming what I know about wolves from cartoons is correct.)
I expect that translating a work gives you a claim on the translation, which is a creative work. (Mechanical translation doesn't have this effect)
Also read: "Can an artificial intelligence machine be conscious, part II?"

http://www.dam.brown.edu/people/mumford/blog/2019/conscious2...
We need to take back the rights
I'm a designer. Just came here to say, this is so much inline with the "right level of abstraction" in graphic design:

https://computersciencewiki.org/index.php/File:Abstract_hear...
Prepare Emacs to Code in Rust
You'll only appreciate PG's fanaticism for Lisp if you've programmed in it
exclusively for about a year. Common tasks flow effortlessly from the Lisp
mind-meld with short-and-sweet potency. Haskell is fun, yes, but
rather sententious in its purity whereas Lisp is both elegant and "scrappy"
(thus the term "Lisp hacker"). Neither is commonplace in scientific
computing, however.
The extreme waste of energy, space and other resources when we use a vehicle weighting 1.5 metric tons with space for five people plus luggage and often with off road capacity to transport one person a few kilometres along a good road.
Humans can have empathy. Publicly-traded corporations cannot.
Here is a post to refute another similar set of anecdata.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23738242
> Chinese students spend years at overseas uni's, you'd think some of it would seep in. If not I'm very disappointed with the universities.

Don't you think that a big number of them go to the West with full knowledge of that?

Western education is still only affordable to a fraction of 1% of Chinese population, with many of them being CPC members themselves.

I had a curious case when I was studying in Canada: one very quiet girl, always wearing a tracksuit, always telling everybody her being a daughter of ordinary daylaborers who saved all their life to send her to the West.

She was one of few Chinese students we actually believed being who she claimed she was, and not a son/daughter of some elite, concealing family background. Then, by an accident, some son of a Chinese military officer outed her as a daughter of a 2 star general when he made advances on her.
> That actually wasn’t why the civil war was started.

That's misleading. The war was about slavery, period. Secession was the end result of a long train of conflict over slavery going back to the founding of the republic. A quick google pulled up this pretty well curated list (it's literally high school history material, surely you learned this stuff in school?) of "compromises" over the issues that were attempts at holding the republic together:

https://herb.ashp.cuny.edu/items/show/1286

Well, obviously it failed. In 1861 the slave states collectively decided to take their toys and go home.

Now, at this point, it's true that, for political reasons, Union rhetoric was about "preserving the union" and not "emancipating slaves". They didn't immediately announce that now that the compromise had failed that's where they were going. And that's frankly a little shameful.

But no one thinks this war was about anything other than the practice of slavery.
Thanks, let me rephrase: what are the systemic issues in American prison system that make solitary confinement such a common practice? What are the drivers behind this?

My understanding is that some of the reasons might include:

- a privatised prison system
- systemic racism
- the % of US citizens in prisons being relatively high compared to the rest of what we call developed countries

Obv. all of these are intertwined and it’s a very complex issue.

I’m still struggling to understand how people in an advanced democracy like the US would allow for these things to happen. It seems like it’s considered the norm.
Location: Lisbon

Remote: Yes (20h/week)

Willing to relocate: No

email: dpereira718@me.com

Resume: by request

Hello! I'm Daniel, software engineer with 9 years of experience working with both frontend (React/Redux/GraphQL) and backend (Node, Go, RDBMS and No/NewSQL: MongoDB/DynamoDB/Cassandra, Kafka, Redis, RocksDB, Docker, K8s, Istio, etc..) in Cloud Native/Scrum/Agile/TDD/CICD projects.

I'm looking for a 20hours/week project (I'm mostly interested in Go projects, but I can do a bit of frontend).
Since I'm a programmer I'd make the car-o-future modular. A kernel and different replaceable hardware and software modules. It bugs me how hard it is to customize a car now and the high cost of it.
Here is an extensive list of frequently challenged and banned books

http://www.ala.org/advocacy/bbooks/frequentlychallengedbooks...

Some school libraries appear to be being very active on banning certain books.
Oh, not just students. Most of my colleagues are ethnic Chinese folks who were born or raised in the West, schooled there and then they returned to China.

On a few occasions that I have a chance to talk politics with them, they says that democracy to them means gridlock, racism, Trump, Brexit, white supremacy.

They support the Singapore / China model because of the apparent stability, wealth, getting things done quickly, and various other reasons, such as feeling more "at home" among the Chinese community.

They still keep a UK/US passport though, just in case.
I definitely don't want people to "hack" their cars and drive on the same road as me.
Christianity is also man made.
Thank you for these excellent links. This debate often takes the concrete form of “one large imperative function with 100 lines” vs “5 functions with 20 lines”. Many people who separate out logic for the sake of minimizing lines-per-function unfortunately do so by introducing indirection, rather than abstractions, and thereby make the program more challenging to reason about and test. But, the reason the debate is never-ending is because the question isn’t sufficiently defined! :)

I like to think of a program like a tree (main is root, each function is a node, calls are edges). Each sub tree should be a bounded context, in that (ideally) you only have to think about parameters defined in that sub-tree. Leaves implement the “nitty-gritty” (mainly I/O, number-crunching, and complex transformations), and are heavily tested. Each node that isn’t a leaf is either an abstraction composing leaves, or an abstraction composing abstractions. Unit tests for leaves test the nitty gritty, unit tests for non-leaves must only test composition.

I find that human-readable modules have some limits (number of children, height of the tree). You can violate those limits sometimes, but only if you provide some assistance in the form of comments.

Sometimes, a 100-line function is not composing many distinct nitty-gritty ideas. It just really takes 100 lines to express “write this model to the database”.
And the solution is that people buy a second car that is capable of only hauling one, max two people in it?

And how does it even solve the space issue? You're not going to be making narrower lanes to fit more of these side by side.
I'm an emergency physician and I think what you have proposed is unethical and immoral. Good luck getting any type of experimentation through the Institutional Review Boards(IRB), bioethicists, and scientists.

Call us Luddites but this type of science is not looked at kindly. There's no argument or debate to be had when what you are proposing is a red line for many and a non-starter.
An isetta would never pass current safety tests. Crash tests have to be passed with a certain investment in weight, and nothing smaller than maybe a smart or twizy can anymore.
Well, fuck BMW then.
“it is my sincerely held religious belief that no translations in fact happened...”
There’s unfortunately not a lot of public translations available outside of KJV.
Eh, I think it's fine as it reduces friction to getting the data. People particular about using KJV or whatever can easily switch. I'm more surprised Cherokee is one of the supported languages!
It's Time to Ban Chess:
https://www.accredited-times.com/2020/05/15/its-time-to-ban-...