skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
OK, that's a reasonable hypothesis.

This presents a reasonable alternative hypothesis, by someone with some qualifications that bolster their claims.

Reasonable people can consider both without feeling like they have to pick either as certainty.
Bigoted parents challenging a book in a school library is not comparable to a state using law to intimidate public libraries into removing books.
From the reddit thread I linked elsewhere (https://www.reddit.com/r/netsec/comments/hkg8co/10_years_of_...):

> There is no restriction or prohibition, correct. In fact, we are far more lenient than other companies when it comes to our policies. We have in fact never had to terminate a relationship with any customer of ours.

> We're generally only concerned with fraudulent customers who would lie during the quoting process with the intent to cause damage to the business by intentionally reposting all updates received online. Obviously, they have the right under the GPL to do that (the fraudulent representation notwithstanding), but we also obviously have the right to refuse future business with them. As noted by the lawyer in the link above, that right has been repeatedly reaffirmed by the US Supreme Court. It's not controversial whatsoever.
Have you actually ready it?
> CAN bus is used in the automotive industry because of it reliability and low wire count. Why should it be changed?

I don't know this space, but depending it may be there are more messages going to and fro, and so perhaps more bandwidth is desired? IEEE 1394 ("FireWire") seems to have a bunch of 'industrial' uses:

* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_1394#Common_applications

The marine folks went from a CAN-like NMEA 0183, to a more bus-like NMEA 2000, and are not looking at an Ethernet-based system:

* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NMEA_2000

* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NMEA_OneNet

If all you're doing is getting sensor values at a few Hertz, then CANbus is probably fine, but if you need to distribute the images of a read-view camera, a bunch sonars, a bunch of radars, etc, then the 500 kbit/s in J1939/14 may not be enough.

Even the 'CAN folks' recognize this:

* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CAN_FD

* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CANopen
> Hybrid was interesting in its time (the Toyota Prius is a great car), but it is… well, hybrid, i.e. torn between the ancient and the new world, therefore a bad solution.

But can be refilled in 5 minutes and driven for 300 miles, which I don't see happening with electric cars any time soon.
It is only interesting that someone comes to comment about morals for a text written almost 3000 years ago..
Sometimes it feels as if politicians and lawmakers are drawing inspiration from the direst scenarios envisioned in the science fiction literature.

Do they really not understand the long-term consequences of preventing the kind of tinkering, exploration, repurposing, interconnecting, i.e., hacking, that leads to innovation?

Do they really not understand the long-term consequences of preventing new kinds of competition from "garage upstarts" that find new, better, cheaper ways of doing thins?

Do they really think this is beneficial for everyone in the long run?
Read up on the 4 freedoms: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Free_Software_Definition

A true free(libre) software license protects the _user's freedom._ Releasing under MIT License doesn't do this because of the problems raised in OP. If your MIT work is incorporated into another product and used (hypothetically) by a foreign government to spy on people, then you haven't protected users, you've protected _developers_ ability to benefit from your work for free.
To keep up with the current times, wouldn't it be better to call it a "meme" song?
Ancient map depicts Antarctica without ice
Correct, its very seldom indeed any other work - ancient or modern - is quoted in this way. You have entire generations of Christians thinking only in isolated "memory verses".

One wonders if this practice is connected to the degradation and commercialisation of worship and countless trivial splits. It just doesn't make for lucid thinking or deep understanding of any work.

It is worth noting that the chapter divisions came long before the verse divisions. For reading, the chapters are as helpful as they are in any other book. I recall the verses were introduced around the time of the Geneva Bible and were intended to cross-reference for the purpose of arguing doctrine. Perhaps useful for scholars - who'd already be deeply familiar with the text as a unit - but hardly a method for comprehension of the books as a whole.

Edit: This discussion reminds me of the so-called Reader's Bibles which were made a few years ago. They present the text as a flowing single-paragraph, with minimal distractions. One such example is the ESV Reader's Bible: https://www.bibledesignblog.com/2014/06/crossway-esv-readers...
Question to the people who disapprove of this but who endorse the top down language policing as endorsed by Twitter Eng.: Why does this bother you and not that?
So tell us about Jesus' 'atrocities'.

If you're reference them, surely you be able to at least give us some examples?
I’m not sure what the appeal is here?

We know what kind of responses are effective and limit economic damage and death (Taiwan, South Korea, and Vietnam) and those that do not (the US, Sweden, and Brazil). Again, the economic impact and failure to confront the disease are inextricably linked. If you’re argument is that “if we’re already doing poorly, why do anything?” then the answer is the depth of how poorly we’ll do depends on what steps we take to mitigate the damage, even assuming we’re already on a bad path. It’s the difference between causing hundreds of thousands of deaths because of our screw up vs millions.

All of this bad response spectrum will also have varying degrees of terrible knock-on effects, but those also exist because of the failure to intervene early and effectively, and put the US on a good path.
The difference is that it's quite hard to accidently make a mechanical device dangerous for the most part. You can ruin your brakes for example, but you get mechanical feedback of that happening and you know when to be careful.

If you write your own DIY electric power steering firmware, and it crashes or gets stuck it can just suddenly fail on the road and you're dead.
Remote working and elastic hours will hopefully decrease that peak considerably. Especially now with coronavirus proving that it's not that scary.
It’s the phrasing of the notes. The “triplet” ending song goes da, da, da da da, da da da. The “doublet” ending song goes da, da, da da, da da, da da.

Disclaimer: I am not a music theory wizard, but I do play drums.
It's odd that you include Spanish since until recently the same argument was made about half the books in the library being in Spanish instead of English.
In addition, the idea that manufacturers can just plop any old body on top of the skateboard is a bit of a pipe dream. Crash safety is hugely important, and it isn't the skateboard that hits other cars/people/objects. So the integration will need to be very tight and engineered as a whole. Just like it is today, even if we call it a chassis.
This is missing something on the larger dynamics at play to reinvent the car. It’s one of the biggest addictions inherited from the 20th century (with disposable plastics and cigarettes).

This is not only about engineering and sales. Current car culture is rooted in post-WW2 values: masculinity, personal freedom, power and control. Even Tesla plays that book with the SpaceX halo and the insistance on performance.

I wonder how Apple will approach this change of “soul” in car culture. It’s a shift not unlike what they brought to computing in the 80s, though they transformed the design then. Can Apple build a personal, shareable, fully automated electric pod? I can’t imagine them selling a vehicle with a wheel for instance.

All in all, doubtful we ever see the outcome of the Titan project.
The British and German elite also intermingled because the world wars, it's not enough.

Basically, if the masses don't know about the either country, and the elites are tempted by power (it's nicer to make the propaganda than receive it, plus their economic prospects are better in China) and knowing they don't have to fight in wars themselves, it's not good enough.

Also, as much as I truly believe in the west's values of free speech and democracy, one needs to understand the fundamental pessimism and decline of the US vs the optimism and ascension of China. Oh, and the use US absolutely could not win a non-nuclear war against China, for example.
It's a tradeoff between weight and strength etc.

High end cars (and most/all race cars) use carbon fibre for both bodywork and structural components.
It's Airborne
Tell HN: I am ressurecting my 25 year old MUD to learn more life lessons
The relationship isn't linear, it's logerithmic, just as the us volumetric measures are.

There are more steps in the power-of-two measures, but hardly anything unreasonable.

The real usability of the metric system, which I think you're getting at is that those prefixes are reüsable between all units, whereas in the us customary system it's no holds barred and everything outside the volumetric is arbitrary.

That said, with length, it is nice having units that break apart evenly at 2, 3, 4, and 6; but I don't think that's quite enough to redeem it.
This nlpword handle shared this 2 days ago https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23723834
It costs 3 orders of magnitude less and you put it in your mouth. Not a great analogy.

My car sits idle for 99.9% of the time (I make less than 2000 km per year, and vast majority of that in a few long trips each year). It would probably be cheaper for me to rent a car for vacation trip and go by taxi the other 10 times a year I need it for city driving. But we already have a car and it's been in the family since 1997 and it doesn't break so we keep it.

I would love to have a way to pay a reasonable yearly fee and have a good car available when I need it without paying for the parking space, insurance, maintanance, etc. But as it is renting a car is too much hassle.
OK so yours is a bit of a troll, and at some risk of feeding, I'll offer that Pontypool is such a conceptually amazing film, exploring as it does the intersection of language, media, and mortality.
> I think the author is pointing at that concept, with the idea that CAN hasn't evolved over time in the same way as HTTP.

If he works in this space, I would think he'd know that there are new things being worked on:

* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CAN_FD

* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FlexRay

Not that these seem to work differently at the OSI Layer 1/2 layer, so while older messages can be sent over the newer transport, it is not wire compatible.
Yeah I was referring to the posterior - eg if your project could be rewritten by one person in a month (unbeknownst to you beforehand) then the advice is irrelevant. Hence it’s worth attempting a re-write in some cases to determine that, and failing fast.
If that's the case, wouldn't we have had herd immunity in Belarus by now? Unlike even Sweden, Belarus has taken very few official mitigation measures against COVID-19.

We just had large gatherings for July 3 Independence Day, and previously for parades on May 9 as well.

If anybody's going to demonstrate herd immunity first, I'd guess it would be Belarus. But I haven't seen that in practice yet among people I know here.
You’re asking them to support “cafeteria capitalism”

Supporting BLM or LGBTQ+ Equality costs them nothing, even if you go beyond a PR gesture. You can put Black and LGBTQ people on your board and in corporate leadership positions and it will not have it negatively impact your bottom line in any measurable way. Maybe equalizing salaries would impact the bottom line but not by a significant amount.

However, by (rightly) calling out Chinas numerous human rights abuses you risk being shut out from China. That directly impacts your bottom line the way putting a Black Ivy League grad rather than a White Ivy League grad on your board does not.

Same logic applies regarding ICE contracts. Talking about how great immigrants are costs you nothing. But refusing to do business with alphabet agencies that terrorize and inhumanely interns them impacts your bottom line.

People love to harp about how corporations are amoral and are only obligated to follow the law and create value for their shareholders. If you adopt this worldview then don’t be surprised if companies start doing business with tyrants.
Incorporation, insurance, and staff focused on strategy help companies avoid responsibility too.
While I'm not them and can't answer for them, I wonder if they see a qualitative difference between a government who will come round to your house and vanish you from the face of the earth for saying things in private to your friends, and a private corporation not letting you use their tools.
I argue that in some cases the "units of thoughts" are verses (proverbs, laws), in other cases they are longer like psalms, sermons, chapters, letters or books. I totally agree taking a single verse out of a longer narrative rarely makes sense. But the bible is not like a novel or a collection of novels, although some of the books (like Job) is kind of like a novel.
At least in the old testament verses range from sentences to paragraphs, have any interesting examples of a non-sentence verse ?
Thanks for pointing out. Fixed :)
You really need to frame the speech with some understanding of the electoral breakdown of the election. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1860_United_States_presidentia...
AFAIK (haven't kicked the wheels on macOS 11 beta yet) you can still manually change all the default icons? I do anyway, I always hated Apple's new ones and found a perfect set I liked instead. All default system icons are still just icns bundles at

/System/Library/CoreServices/CoreTypes.bundle/Contents/Resources

And could always just be swapped with whatever you want. With the advent of SIP it's now somewhat more involved since SIP needs to be turned off, icons changed, then back on, or else a specific exclusion done just for that directory. So it's harder now to just have an application or scripts to manage it all automatically and make it trivial to swap sets around at will. But if you're just interested in changing things once in a while (or merely after system updates) it's not a huge lift even now. And applications themselves as well as disk icons, specific folders and so on can all have their icons changed same as always.
That's a good article about the ongoing RHDV2 virus outbreak.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rabbit_hemorrhagic_disease
This will last. Similar legislation like the DMCA has lasted for 20 years now.
If jalopnik maintainers see this, please disable the sticky video overlay that presents the latest video from the site, at least for the mobile version of the site. It uses almost 50% of the screen real estate on my smartphone, seriously degrading the experience on moble devices. Sometimes I can barely read an entire frase without having to scroll.
There is a theory that much of what we think are universal human values such as morality or justice or democracy comes from the book. Indeed many would support the idea that all utopian movements such as the The French Revolution or Communism have their philosophical roots in the book and Christianity.

Humanism and the notion of Progress, could be based on the Christian idea that we are morally autonomous beings and completely different from other animals and that the idea that progress is towards something better is fundamentally Christian. Ironically, much of modern atheism has assumptions about human beings which base themselves on Christian philosophy.

Many would say that you do take advice from such a book even if you don't know that's where the advice you value originates.
How does this compare to something like https://github.com/valyala/fastjson ?
Crash testing isn't the be all and end all. If you put a new engine in and it cuts out on the motorway, for example. The verification process takes a lot of time, even for a racing car let alone a road car that has to pass crash tests as well.
No, the "malice towards none" is an appeal to the better angels of humanity. Frankly, if more people lived by that last paragraph of the speech, the world would be a considerably better place. He was looking forward, not back.
A car platform is a set of shared components and design concepts, but not an actual physical thing (a "skateboard"). Same platform cars can have different engines, wheelbases, suspension types and setup, transmission types and so on.

Most modern cars use the monocoque/unibody type of body, where the body and frame ("skateboard") are combined into one, because of weight and safety (it can be made to bend in a more controlled manner, usually with different type of materials bonded/welded together). The frame+body is better because it's easier to repair (many unibody crashes are not economical to repair because a proper repair to the same strength as the initial car would need dismantling half the car).
60s Mustang's are unibody construction - there is no frame. I've restored 3 of them.
I agree with everything but swipe-up for home being bad. I find it to be a much faster way to navigate apps over the home button.
From my POV facebook is not a app on my devices but access via the web, meaning html, https, a ton of java and whatever adopted php facebook uses today. What i don't get about this project is why it should need it's own browser beside for the user adaptability that you could technically do via a browser plugin, not to reinvent the wheel all together. Coming from the BBS world i like this idea however, but will miss the illustrations (read pictures). Will however give it a go.
This! I knew I'd heard of this issue before, just couldn't recall the term. I think leaky abstraction fits the bill.
This was the point I started to lose interest.

"Let's completely reimagine from scratch. But we all know there's really only one option so let's ignore any other ideas."
Rhythm is not these birds strong point, but I can sort of make out a barely-articulated 3rd in not the first one?
As oppose to your very well vetted citations?
"Pendulum swings" are going to shake off everyone else at different rates and we're going to be stuck with an eclectic mix of designs. This already plagues Windows (Ribbon, legacy settings) and Android (square, squircle, circle, triangle icons).

I don't think people are able to distinguish between what's new and old anymore. Aesthetics will finally be free from corporate trend setting and maybe we'll feel comfortable doing our own thing.
> McKinsey started as a business that sold candid, dispassionate advice to corporate managers, but selling advice and building a brand around it also sets up a mechanism for diffusing responsibility.

> The managers can say they’re just following the best available advice, and the consultants can say they’re just trying to help their clients boost profits and efficiency.
Probably one should also see this less one-sided, de-escalation is not the answer to everything and escalation is not bad in every single case. Without ever escalating anything, everything that is hard to change is likely to stay the same. Too much escalation is of course a toxic thing but in moderation it's actually very useful and it wouldn't be so entangled in everyday lives if there was no use.

That said, admitting guilt does not work when the other person is actually hostile since it can be used against oneself. (Just imagine what would happen if the current protest movement in the US would apologize to Donald Trump...) Apart from that, there are still online forums which work very well and don't turn toxic despite occasional rants. Twitter should take that as an example...
The remote village that built one of the fastest internet networks in the UK
Does it let you compare against different revisions of the bible?
A course to build the SQL layer of a distributed database
The Last of Us: Part II
Proverbs is certainly the book most amenable to division into verses.
This really isn't why I come to Hacker News, and I imagine if you weren't single this isn't why you'd be coming to Hacker News either.

This post is the equivalent of walking into a crowded theatre and yelling "I'm looking for a date!". And it's just as likely to work out for you as that scenario.
If you don't need or even want a new house then what good does it do you or society to buy a new house? Consumption for the sake of consumption is not a good thing.

If you're buying houses solely as an investment then you get situations like Vancouver. How is that a good thing?
Perpetual payments are interesting, but not something I want in a vehicle. There are lots of reasons to own, but I don't want a perpetual payment. If the car is more reliable and needs less maintenance then I can expect it to last longer and be a better value to own.
it ignores that there are pretty solid researches into biofuels which are reaching high yield, low pollutant emissions[1], would reuse most of the existing infrastructure and all without sacrificing range and versatility.

[1] note that it's misguided to claim you have to reach zero emission to compete with batteries, because batteries chemicals pollutes both during extraction, transformation and disposal.
Worked for Mormons.
blah - that was supposed to be "I've never heard.."

Basically, I was questioning how people banding together 'to get nicer things', would result in people having more children. Having children is generally not a profitable venture..
I agree that it is a very interesting topic. Even the chapter breaks can be a real issue for a theologian. I believe there are some stories in the gospels which are consecutive in multiple books, but split by a chapter break in others. There are arguments in the epistles which span multiple chapters. But to the modern reader a chapter break implies a stopping point. Which might lead you to misunderstand the author’s intent.
Another great book that's worth a read is "Things to make and do in the 4th dimension" by Matt Parker.

It is a really interesting book as it covers multiple topics from mathematics and being that you are a young reader you might benefit from that exposure to topic.

From there on you can fine the topics that interest and dive deeper and learn the nitty gritty!

Thats how I personally found my passion in topology.
This is on the commercial website of a company that wants me to buy their non-HA containing $150/bottle eye serum.
Well, In Somalia we do read the Quran. In fact, virtually every child memorizes it from cover to cover before starting school. But if you mean understanding what it says, then you have a point.
This immediately reminds me of the Top Gear feature on the smallest car in the world: the Peel P50 - the relatively behemoth-like Bubble Car (Isetta) makes a fleeting appearance in the introduction.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dJfSS0ZXYdo

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peel_P50
Sure, a whole record: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joshua_Judges_Ruth

C.f. any other record with good dynamic range and interesting stuff below 80Hz.
tldr; Why not both?

I agree that it's odd that we have atomized the writings in the scriptures. You can find reader's editions if you want to remove the verses structure.

However, I don't agree that the verses are "diametrically opposed to a Christian reading of the Scriptures". I believe that there is room for both reading whole books and reading short quotes.

For instance, I don't think there's anything wrong with taking John 3:16 out of context because it is a very straightforward verse. It's really nice to be able to share verses easily by giving a <Book> <Chapter>:<Verse>. There is danger though when we do that with all verses of scripture, and we should be careful to study the context for verses before coming to any conclusion.

The key is to actually study the scriptures, and not just take the easy route and find verses that make you feel good about yourself. But that's easier said than done.