skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
While your first two statements are true, they are a textbook example of a straw man argument. I did not say they are marxist because they don't want people murdered by the police. I also didn't say they're marxist because they're against celebrating slavers.

If you're willing to learn, you may want to look up what Patrisse Cullors has to say about her own BLM movement. I feel sorry that you think this is comical.
what high bandwith requirements do exist for an infotainment system that you would want in a car?

Navigation and playing music? Both are done by other systems as CAN already.
Your not defining cleverness, without that piece your opinion can be meant to represent anything.
Show HN: “Watch” any subreddit. Fetches videos from any subreddit
Free Productivity Templates – by experienced project delivery manager
the reason for this is obvious.

Having a modular car with a high degree of customization would be a huge hassle in keeping cars safe.
Over the past couple of decades there have been recreations of various small cars from the 50s, 60s and 70s. Like the Mini, the Fiat 500, Volkswagen Beetle. Sadly these recreations do little more than borrow an aesthetic. They're often relatively big, heavy and, sadly, expensive.

In particular the Fiat 500 was a historically important car. It gave families of very modest means mobility. The modern Fiat 500 is nothing of the sort. It is a design icon built for the somewhat affluent. It isn't small. It isn't cheap. It isn't simple.

A friend of mine has a mechanical workshop. His shop is where all the weird cars get fixed. Alfa Romeos, Ferraris, Lamborghinis, old Fiat 500s and 600s. There's even a DeLorean that is there from time to time. It is hard to overstate just how small the original Fiat 500 is. Or even old Bertone-designed Alfa Romeos from the early 1970s.

Don't get me wrong, I like the modern Fiat 500 enough to own one. In fact, I own an electrical Fiat 500 that was imported from California (since, at the time, the electric Fiat 500 was sold only in California and Oregon). It is a really half assed car - built to allow FCA to sell cars at all in these states. Small battery, no supercharger, and the traction control is so useless that when I drive it (without my disapproving wife onboard) it spins the inner wheel madly through corners. The TC on/off switch only controls the light inside the switch itself. I can't imagine it is actually connected to anything but the battery.

It is a lot of fun, but it isn't in the spirit of the original.

What is needed is for car manufacturers and society to rediscover the purpose of small, light cars. Mobility without the resource drain. The joys of simplicity. You don't need power steering, electrical windows, electrical seats, a thousand dashboard controls.

We also don't want all this closed crap in our cars. In the golden age of cheap mobility, cars were more open ended (because they were simple). There were more aftermarket additions and mods. You could get parts for all common cars everywhere. It was uncomplicated. You could get your car repaired.

My ideal car for the future is little more than a carbon fiber tub with the minimum of bits attached to make it a car. A standardised, cheaply manufactured carbon monocoque around which you can have a cottage industry of bits for customization and extension. A car built to be worked on that is light, strong, cheap, and takes advantage of modern materials, tools and insights.
I'm one, and it hasn't worked out. Went back to school for a spell, futzed
with open source projects, but I lack the entrepreneurial gene, and it's a
daily existential struggle. First world problems, I know.
I use an app that tracks the active application and file on the computer, including URLs, open folders, open projects. (not affiliated with them, just a user) https://timingapp.com/

I save articles I find interesting to a personal knowledgebase and read them offline.

I read multiple books at once, sometimes on the same topics. This helps me by always having a book that matches my mood, by always having many books.
My god, people are morons.
Dynabook
Yep. JavaScript can also work as a formula language (per the Mesh JS prototype), but APL family languages such as k are much more ergonomic - and 'punchy' - in a spreadsheet context.
It’s also what large car companies already do. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Car_platform (has nice series of photos that show how different cars on a single platform can look.
Who is to say what the appropriate "normal" is? It seems to me that influencing a cultural norm is doing away with what the culture desires.
You want to change the culture, not the norms. That's my big problem with all this PC wrongspeak policing. MY normal was a world where we can use terms like "blacklisted" and it not carry a racist connotation, because we were treated as intelligent enough to understand that it wasn't intended to be a racial superlative. This sort of action is driven by people's desire to NOT be labeled a racist. To signal that they agree with the ideal of racial equality. But it just further draws a boundary around segments of our population, and says you're either with US or with THEM. If you don't outwardly signal that you too aren't a racist, then you are THEM - a racist.

I for one will not change my language. My words mean what they are intended to mean. I may be black-balled for doing so, but at least I'm not actually a racist.
Unfortunately for you I am exactly from southern Europe, from Rome in Italy to be precise.

I think you should visit here, I would show you how much noise people from other countries make, especially Americans.

I'm sure you made it as a joke and I don't mind it, but this stereotypes must stop, for a simple reason: there is more to Europe than jokes about southerners.

We simply spend more time outside in the open because the weather is usually better, but any country has its weirdos, sometimes public is a park or an open market, sometimes it's a pub.

Swedes scream from their windows at night

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flogsta

Finns sweat a lot

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finnish_profanity

Danish leave their kids outside in the strollers in the cold while they are inside a caffè or buying groceries

https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-21537988

Germans wear sandals with socks

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socks_and_sandals

English are dunk and violent

https://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/88/9/10-010910/en/

French are rude and the fact that they try to hide it behind "other people don't understand us" makes it even more obvious. Ironically they think the anglofones are the loud ones and I mostly agree on this with them.

And, of course, Americans are obese

https://ourworldindata.org/uploads/2019/11/share-of-adults-d...
Some people may need 16 hours of social interaction a day, so remote working can make them suffer even if their evenings are okay.
I recently looked into them and was put off by the price. So I bought a Cubii, which is an under desk elliptical. I’m only a few days in but so far it’s been solid.
> “functionality hinting” (I’m sure there’s an actual term for this, but I don’t know what it is)

“Affordance” is the term you’re looking for: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affordance#As_perceived_action...
Yes, the orange man hasn't helped the argument, and yes I've noticed a lot of the press (Murdoch in particular) is producing a continuous stream of anti china sentiment lately. To many oligarchs are controlling too many conversations I'm feeling lately. I can imagine many Chinese who grew up in the china of the 50's and 60's and find themselves in charge of the country now see only chaos when they look at us.
Haven't tried it on Mac. Again, GitHub Desktop is not meant to be a complete Git CLI as GUI. It's free too.

I haven't tried Fork. For my side projects I don't need to merge or anything often, and when I do I use Idea's three way merge tool anyway.
I also just started doing Android in my work (previously mainly doing backend development). I see that the best resource will be just the Android documentation itself [1]. I can't suggest any specific book, because book about Android get outdated very quickly. If you like an online course, Udacity offers some Android courses [2] that is made by Google. As an additional note, once you have passed the basic hello world application and understand the basic concept of simple activity, lifecycle and intent, you should explore Android Architecture Component [3] which is required if you want to write a bigger more complex application. Last, for youtube video just see Google I/O videos or any other Android conference video, once you want to dig deeper for more specific topics.

[1]: https://developer.android.com/docs

[2]: https://www.udacity.com/course/developing-android-apps-with-...

[3]: https://developer.android.com/topic/libraries/architecture
I like how you describe it as "the two-stage nature of embedded development" because that is what in reality it really is.
In my opinion replacing the preprocessor with another code generator wouldn't be the best path forward though. I have worked with a bunch of code generators and it has always been a crutch.

I think something that ties in with the target language and is aware of the syntax of the target language, like Rust macros, has many advantages. At the same time I do not know enough about Rust macros yet to tell if they are really powerful enough to help here.
Small vehicles have been killed by regulation. No chance to build a two-stroke engine anymore, at least for a car. Expensive crash test regs. Noise and pollution regs. And, if you do electric, heavy batteries.
> You think my uncle is going to do better?

Yes he will, because he has to only care about what he needs, and he is the best judge of that.
And then there are the Koch brothers:

* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koch_family

Who've probably got their hands in too many things:

* https://www.simonandschuster.com/books/Kochland/Christopher-...

* https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/dec/07/kochland-rev...

* https://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/kochland-examin...
FWIW, that is also a common children's game here in Austria (and many other countries in Europe, I believe).
Google Will Fab Open-Source Chips for Free
Thanks for pointing that out, now I want to read the rest of the comments to look for other gems but it's just too long.
Why should the global poor have any say in world affairs? I certainly wouldn't want them to in anything that matters to me. Just like I don't want anyone else. Enough with collectivism.
Looking for the best friend, life time partner
Hi.
I am looking for the best friend:
1. woman
2. single
3. from anywhere (I am in the US)
4. no kids, but want kids
5. education level does not matter, if you read this post, it means you have a good education (even if it is self education)
6. like books and reading
7. want to travel together
That's it. Thank you for your attention.
I expect your resume on my email: p3terwin@yandex.com
I will send my resume with pictures back to you.
Have a great Sunday!
Number 3 is unbelievably wrong. I think he got his ideas from 90s GM concept brochures and never bothered to dig deeper.

Yes, conceptually the "skateboard" makes sense, but you're not going to have actual snap-in components like that. By Tesla's own admission, thinking of the Model X as just another body on top of the Model S skateboard set them back a long time. Whether you choose to go the traditional unibody design, or a more unconventional exoskeleton design like the cybertruck, each body is specifically made for each model type. While the Model Y is a "jacked up" model 3, the body is a completely new and different thing.
Additional edit: removing somewhat off-topic discussion that was replying to an example in the above comment, and discussion of whether a controversial passage was censored.

And no, it was not censoring it (thanks to all of you who replied below pointing this out!). The issue was my incorrect editing of the URL without accounting for the fact that the URL contained URL-encoded characters, namely + as %20.
And if you can't sing, you can dance:

https://www.sciencealert.com/snowball-the-dancing-cockatoo-h...
Not saying material design is great, but it's a great step up from Holo UI and anything before that in Android.

I just dislike that it became so ubiquitous now and it's a train wreck on desktop
yup, new innovation is needed in construction.
But wood is not gonna replace all cement-concrete use-cases.Cement-concrete has far more usecases from skyscrapers like bridges,Dams to road construction.
I think a translation is a derived work, thus coming under the copyright of the original owner, not the translator. Not sure how that applies to translations of public domain works. I can assure you though that I am not the copyright holder of a Mickey Mouse translation in French just because I've translated it from English to French.

Copyright is different from patents in this way: I can own a patent on an extension of an invention that you hold a patent on. I can't own the copyright to a derived work of a work you own the copyright to. In fact, you automatically own the copyright of the derived work that I produced (e.g. Fanfiction)
Indeed. The last good car they made was the E46 M3 anyway (2006!)
It is an attention to argue that the founding principles of this country are open to legitimate debate and that people who love America can hold that some of them were simply wrong without loving America any less.

What I don't get is this newfound attempt to argue that what we once called the Great Experiment is immune from criticism, to portray the success of America as an inevitable result of the holy prophets who gave us the Constitution on stone tablets and not the work of men who made mistakes and learned from them.
If The New York Times is unhappy with this use of their branding, it seems to me that they could easily claim trademark infringement.

They could argue that Google is using The New York Times's branding and domain name to make it look like this content is controlled and provided by The New York Times, when in fact it isn't, and that an average person (“idiot in a hurry”) could be deceived.

If The New York Times willingly gives Google permission (or The New York Times willingly abets Google's monopoly position), then I guess Google can do whatever they like.
Apple's 'walled garden' walls will get even higher
However certain I want to be that this would never happen, this is hilarious.
Opinions Making AI Implementable
Tweet memetic.
> We will be talking exclusively about electric cars.

he compared cost, performance, regulations, but I didn't see him tackle the issue of range and recharge times not even in passing.

> It is the only way forward.

with claims like these, skipping the two major drawbacks seems quite intellectually dishonest.
Expensive patents would price out hard tech startups
The problem is size and weight. To take a computer analogy, cars are smartphones, not desktop towers.
Should it just return a 400 if you don’t provide a translation?
Show HN: II need the motivation to continue open-source. give me a star
Edit: my bad, I literally clicked on an example link provided in the page, which clearly shows the same URL format I used in my post, and edited the URL to have the strings for the Luke passage. I see that's the wrong syntax. Safari must be doing something funny… nope, that wasn't it. It was me, not noticing that %20 was an encoded + since it was mashed together with another number which threw me off.

Earlier question was asking why a controversial passage was not found.

Corrected URL:
http://bible-api.com/luke+14:26
I skimmed the article and I think the author should have used CaCl2 to improve the gelling strenght. Ca-alginate which is comparable in structure forms gels in very low concentrations when Ca ions are present.
Maybe I’m weird but some songs sound better on FM. Eg Bruce Springsteen Born to Run. Maybe it’s nostalgia kicking in
Yep. Nearly every day. Have been lisping since lisp 1.5 in 1971. Lisp is "mental clay". It has the lowest "impedence mismatch" between your problem and your solution.
> And the only possible conclusion is that Apple and Linux are measured on widely different scales.)

+1

They are simply designed for different end users - and that is fine. I used macOS for ~5 years before getting fed up with the limited window management - but I understand why it is that way - most people don't care. So people who do, can just use KDE et al, peace.
This article feels like it’s months old or from an alternate universe. We “may” need masks indoors? I’m very confused what is being communicated here. It sounds like a bunch of experts fussing over the finer points of established theory without considering real data about this particular virus. Presumably because they don’t have enough data, but then the focus ought to be on collecting more, not arguing over theory.
Do you know good resources for learning about these options?
Apple doesn't just make things, they invent it. Reinvent just because its been done before.
The idea to make steering drive-by-wire is terrifying.

I had a truck with a hard to reproduce software bug where the electric steering assist would just turn off. Imagine going down a canyon road towing 5000 lbs and the steering suddenly gets extremely hard and the wheel rips from your hands. I had it happen. Luckily there is still a mechanical shaft going to the steering rack.
I'm guessing this will remain niche because not everyone cares about data collection. Maybe that's how it's meant to be. It's been interesting to hear about new startups testing replacing traditional models with subscription models.
Lets just get rid of social media and be done with it. The world was a much better place before.
I've got a 2012 two-dish model too, right now it's only used as home media server but for quite some time I was using it for work (NFS with users and all that, and iSCSI for occasional use). Setting it up was stupidly easy.
Exactly the same experience. I try DAB every few years while driving and the experience is just the same.
Isaiah 64:8

But now, O Lord, You are our Father,
We are the clay, and You our potter;
And all of us are the work of Your hand.
The Must Know 7 Traps That Make Your Software Useless
Only if you believe the entire Bible is false. And that is certainly a choice that anyone has the right to make.
Give us a better story then. Or point at one that produces Hope and Faith in you, when you have experienced suffering.

All religious text give us story, imagery and ritual.

Why?

Because they are the tools available to produce Faith.

Faith in those suffering, that tomorrow will be a better day.

The tools evolve and change. New tools are discovered. Yet with all the tooling and knowledge we still have, producing Faith and Hope in those suffering still is very much a non-trivial problem. We fuck it up all the time because of how hard the problem is.

To not look at religious text, all religious text, is to not look deeply at what attempts people have made - with the tools of story, imagery and ritual - to produce Faith in those who need it.

I was no big fan of religion growing up. But the older you get the more ppl who stumble, will knock at your door looking for hope/energy/faith etc. And no one taught me how to generate it in others.

So I did the usual stuff of giving them cash, shelter, listening, sending them to a shrink etc etc. And where that doesn't work out or fails in spectacular ways, thats when a good story is all you have left.

So keep looking for a good one.
I'll never buy another one again after this.
Their is no source code there. Decompress wont bring it back to soirce code state
The idea that others are to blame for one’s suffering is maybe the most potent and toxic of all political ideas, and it has thrived like a mind-virus for thousands of years. The truth is that people of all races in the USA are _not_ blocked by racism from living a good live, but certain political forces sell this story (the victim identity) in order to control certain groups of voters, and play shallow ego-gratifying mind games in academia.
Would be nice if The Skeptic's Annotated Bible could be added to the API. Doubt that though.

http://skepticsannotatedbible.com/
But they already do through third party modifications.
https://www.reddit.com/r/netsec/comments/hkg8co/10_years_of_...

Brad goes into this here. Grsecurity has written extensively about this.

Read the links to their site where they go even further into detail.

Grsecurity is not violating any license. There are multiple quotes from authorities on the matter in that link. If they were, so would Redhat, Canonical, etc.
I am unclear on what is meant by ROM. Don't most smartphones store their operating system on the same flash memory as user data? If it is all on one writable device, then ROM chips don't enter into this discussion.
"Hacking" of cars has been always extremely popular, and you share the roads with people who modify their cars every time you drive. Why should that change now?
also urkel https://youtu.be/1hcvhXup2k8
Isn't transmission through objects completely irrelevant anyways? Also, microwaves don't heat very small dry objects such as viruses, so it is pointless to microwave books.
Some are. On the other hand, whether it makes you roll your eyes or not, some people are extremely paranoid about anything entering their house that hasn't been sterilized in some form. And, given that, zapping a book in a microwave is not an obviously stupid way to accomplish said sterilization for a random non-technical person.
car safety come mostly from the chassis, an engine swap shouldn't really impact safety, unless it goes to fill crumple zones, but then it's not swapping engines per se that impact safety, the issue comes from putting too big of an engine.

the real issue would be making the thing actually reliable. matings and fittings off the production line aren't the same you can get post assembly on a workshop, and that will affect component durability big time
There is another reason that the auto industry is on a whole slow to change. Suppliers. With the exception of the ICE most other major systems in vehicles today comes from a handful of suppliers. To make electric vehicles, you have to take on much more of the manufacturing process yourself or subcontract it out. You lose economy of scale when that happens to some degree. Sure the suppliers could start making the parts for evs, and they are starting to but there is a lot of standardization that needs to happen as well.
Ownership of the car won’t be necessary. As a passenger car sits idle 95 percent of the time, there are plenty of alternative options.

Every time I see someone say "all cars will be rentals in the future" I think if all the people I know who have stuff kicking around in the trunk that they use occasionally but rarely. The automotive version of "every-day carry". Some of it's basic car maintenance stuff. Some of it's not.

And then I also think about the people I know whose passenger or back seat is a giant pile of trash because there's no easy-to-empty integrated place for trash and it all just ends up on the floor...

Also to quote this incredibly relevant point from fartaspoobutt [dead]: [1]

The car I really want is a network of fast, affordable, widely available public transit.

1: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23738780
Yang Shupin is a good example of this happening.

https://www.rfa.org/english/news/china/chinese-student-apolo...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shuping_Yang_commencement_spee...
I'd suggest making it part of the path. A translation is parent to a verse.

For example

http://bible-api.com/kjv/john 3:16
Yes, exactly. Here’s what BibleGateway says about it: https://support.biblegateway.com/hc/en-us/articles/360001403...
Zondervan owns and strongly protects the copyright they own on the most recent English translations