skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The 3-d space shown is just physical space.

n,l,m are the triplet of numbers you can select in the top right. They're called quantum numbers, and they describe the state of this particular system, in particular the state of the electron.

Basically: n is how much energy the electron has (the higher, the further from the nucleus). l and m further describe which orbital the electron is in; l is related to the electron's angular momentum, m is related to its angle to the x-y plane in this visualisation. Only certain combinations of these numbers are allowed by physics (angular momentum, l, has to be smaller than energy, n, for example). n,l,m together describe the state of the electron inside the hydrogen atom.

So what are the dots? Basically, they're meant to represent a cloud. Where the cloud is denser, the electron has more measure; the electron is more there than in other places. Practically speaking, if you made a measurement to see where the electron was, your results would probabilistically correlate with the density of the cloud. The process whereby the electron goes from being a probabilistic cloud to a point particle interacting with your test particle back to a probabilistic cloud is called 'wave function collapse' in the Copenhagen interpretation, or, more generally, 'magic'.

(Or it's just how the universal wavefunction's branches look from the inside.)

A volume integral would be unitless, by definition: the value of the square-absolute-value of the wavefunction at any point (what's represented by this graph) is the probability of finding the electron at that point per cubic metre. A volume integral from negative to positive infinity in x, y, and z gives 1 (no units).
New personalization, health, and fitness features in Apple Watch
That's the way I understand it as well. It may be worthwhile defending CDL (I don't know enough to have an informed opinion), but the NEL is indefensible, and it doesn't appear the EFF intends to defend it.
You are absolutely right: NIMBY.

Apparently due to some reasons local people do not want to live in a beehive.

Go and build somewhere else. California is a large state with lots of unoccupied land.
This article does a good job:
https://www.kguttag.com/2019/12/18/hololens-2-not-a-pretty-p...

Digilens is a company that's been around for 15 years doing all kinds of eye wear stuff.
If using TOR follow: https://web.archive.org/web/20200630183012/https://mathvault...
I'll say this from a consumer/product point of view and not a technical or engineering, but WOW! Assuming they could pull off a finished, high performance product, (big if) this could be the form factor that bring VR to dominance. The silly looking, awkward to wear headset is a big hindrance to adoption because it absolutely matters if you look silly or cool when it comes to consumer tech.
> And they have affirmed that you can always run whatever you like, as the switches to do so are there if you want them.

I've heard this repeated elsewhere as well, and I'm quite confused about it. Because, Apple also shared this weird screenshot:

https://images.macrumors.com/t/_vG0G6_BcznVoKBolteArd1wReM=/...

The most permissive option is "Reduced Security: Allows any version of signed operating system software ever trusted by Apple to run."

How do you run an OS that Apple never explicitly trusted?
No it's okay though because there's no more crack now. Crack addiction was solved.
YouTube TV sharply increases monthly subscription to $64.99
Let me ask the inevitable question: Electron?
> The x86_64 ISA is absolutely insane. The only way to implement it in hardware efficiently is to "compile" the super complicated instructions into micro-ops which can actually be decoded and executed on the CPU.

> Said another way, Intel has to implement a compiler in hardware which compiles the machine code before it gets executed. The extra complexity means more power and less performance.

This is a sadly prevalent misconception.

There is no "compiler in hardware". There are two kinds of instructions; the simpler ones (which are the most common) are expanded directly into a fixed sequence of micro-ops, while the more complicated ones act like a subroutine call to the microcode. The closest software analogue would be a macro assembler, not a compiler.

AFAIK, the extra complexity for efficiently decoding x86 instructions comes mostly from their variable length without an explicit length indication, and from the variable number of prefixes which can change the interpretation of the following byte, which makes decoding an instruction a serial task. IIRC, both Intel and AMD have a couple of tricks to reduce the impact this has on both power and performance: caching the already decoded micro-ops, and storing the instruction boundaries in the L1 instruction cache.
No guarantee this will work and I don’t have a machine to test in front of me but does that still occur if you add your script to either (in order of likelihood) the Automation, Developer Tools or Accessibility groups in the Security & Privacy -> Privacy preferences?
It is not a 6-parameter function, it is a family of 3d-functions each characterized by 3 parameters. Those parameters can be modified using the dropdown in the top-right corner of the page.

The Hamiltonian is an operator that describes the energy of a system. Eigenfunctions of the Hamiltonian are quantum states, referred to as wave functions. The squared amplitude of a wave function is a probability distribution function. When discussing the wave functions of electrons, the probability amplitude is sometimes referred to as the electron density. You are looking at a sampling from the electron density of the wave functions of the 1-electron 1-nucleus Hamiltonian operator. There are different wave functions (different entries in the dropdown box at the top-right corner of the screen) because the Hamiltonian operator has more than one eigenfunction. Each eigenfunction is characterized by the 3 "quantum numbers": n, l, and m. "n" indicates the number of radial nodes -- areas of a given distance from the nucleus where the electron density is 0. "l" indicates the number of angular nodes -- areas arranged in a certain angular pattern around the nucleus where the electron density is 0.

> I think there is something that would truly help: if one would take a volume integral over a infinitesimal cube of the 3D interactive representation, what physical units would the result be in?

Number of electrons (possibly fractional, if you aren't sampling the whole space). For this particular Hamiltonian, the integral over all space should be numerically 1 for any given eigenfunction, since we are looking at the 1-electron Hamiltonian.
We've been using Linear for a couple months. It's kind of like Superhuman in that the primary benefit is hotkeys. Otherwise it is an issue tracker.

I think the reason we see a steady stream of new issue trackers is that teams are trying to fix with software what are people problems.

New issue trackers feel faster for the same reason switching browsers tends to feel faster—you're getting rid of all of the crap you piled up in the old one. Don't migrate your backlog, start with only a couple engineers in a new issue tracker, and suddenly, wow!, this new tool is so much better!

But I don't think it really solves the problem. For most organizations, tracking tickets is a solved (by many products) problem. Starting with a new tool has the appearance of making things better, but leads to the same place. The problem is not the tool, it's the structure of the organization.
Case studies on two leading synthetic biology companies
The "it is known" story i had was that fish eggs stick to the legs of wading brids; exterior transmission... It doesn't seem impossible but birds groom themselves too, so I dunno.
Interesting replies.

(1)I said avoid, not eliminate. The comments replying “no” are really saying, “yes“. Doesn’t ransomware typically install an executable on the victim’s machine? And won’t the mast majority of those payloads run only on Windows?

(2)Desktop Linux actually exists. I use it exclusively, every day.

(3)Security, obscurity. A proverb that is almost exclusively applied incorrectly. I’m not talking about cryptographic security. Just asking whether it would help to lock the door and take down the “please rob me” sign.
Flip side is there is something to be said for the Kernel not jumping on whatever platform is hot this month.

Plus I suspect the crowd capable of contributing meaningfully is quite comfortable with low level old school tech.
Not sure if this is relevant to this but I would like to remind you that a US judge can order to you be sterilized without your knowledge and you can do nothing about it nor can anything be done to the judge.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stump_v._Sparkman

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buck_v._Bell
CalFile – File directly with us for free
Guide on Using Python for Investors
> Building houses and maintaining them in livable condition is not that cheap

I don't really understand this. Building and maintaining houses (especially single-family houses) is really cheap. (We're talking like ~$600/month or so for a large 4-bedroom home).

The expense in housing is primarily financial shenanigans and land monopolization, with some property taxes on top. Actually building and maintaining a house (construction + maintenance costs) is way less than 50% of the total cost.
gotcha, thanks makes sense now.

> Q: Do you store my card?

> A: We do not store your credit card information. Payments are processed directly by Stripe, and we don't store your card details.

Thats exactly what we mean
The United States didn't face a mortgage crisis purely because of housing price collapse, it was a combination of the collapse with widespread use of subprime lending. Instead of having this argument with a random guy on the Internet I suggest you read the vast amount of documentation and analysis from people in the industry. Beyond that, the Canadian banking industry did not start up in 2008, even if that's only as far back as your memory goes.

If a Canadian bank runs off with your money you have an actual entity to pursue in court. With Bitcoin you're pretty much SOL.

The CDIC insured limit is not money to be reimbursed by the bank, it's by the CDIC in case of bank failure. There are other avenues to take first to recover your funds.

Canadian banks are stable because our regulators do not allow them to assume as much risk as banks in other jurisdictions.
Right before I was going to sign up to watch Hamilton... lol, Smart
Not knowing about the memory allocator in an upcoming release of an operating system used by over a billion people is a bit of a lapse on my part ;)
Intetest accumulates, if it takes you 2 years to pay, you owe 12k normally. Regardless of how long your payment plan is, how much you owe depends on the speculation date (the sooner it is, the more predictable and less risky). Bigger loans would be issued for less trustworthy customers if the speculation/first payment date is very soon. But let's say the first payment is a year away and the debtor speculates too high of an increase in currency value,then they would come off as bad debtors no one wants a loan from. But the more conservative their speculation on long term currency value, the more reasonable and appealing of a debtor they appear to be. So if you will start paying me back a year from now,I might speculate a 2% increase in value but if you will pay back in a few weeks I can more accurately predict and say a 5-10% increase. Since the worst outcome for the debtor if payment is made is "my cash is insured against loss" they have the incentive to make conservative speculations that lure debtees. If a well known and reputed person uses their valuable site/business for a $1M loan that will be paid in 5 years and you loan them with a 3% increase speculation you will get 30k for the risk you took on and guarantee that not only will you not lose money but will gain at least 3%,regardless of economic crashes or market volatility.
Most US cities have or at least used to have the same scenario of a few furniture stores in the same district where you can browse several selections. I remember Schenectady having several stores in one spot each dedicated to lighting (and exhaust fans and doorbells, because of NuTone's business).

The big box thing is, in my opinion, relatively recent, and I felt like it started with Home Depot. That was the cause of the closing of the independent hardware stores in Schenectady, such as the venerable Wallace Armer. In other places they attribute it to Walmart's but that came late to the Northeast.

Now, small stores tend to carry boutique items and everything costs a lot more than the big box stores. On the one hand we have a very efficient furniture-making-selling system in the big boxes, that produces stuff that can be set up once but usually does not survive a move well. On the other we have expensive, one-of-a-kind type crafts that are able to become heirlooms but are out of the price range for most people who just want a coffee table or a couch.
The Essence of Meta-Tracing JIT Compilers [pdf]
Their guide (https://hyperapp.dev/guides) page is also filled with Lorem Ipsum.
Short of finding a way to see your opponents cards, I wouldn't really say it was possible to cheat at poker. This service is just one step beyond the many odds calculator apps that are available already - would you consider those cheating, too?
In my area (urban, educated south) we moved from a the "busing model" for integration, into a "magnet school" model. If a school is failing, reboot it as a "charter-like" school, with some attractive theme. It is still a public school, but now offers something unique the community (like robotics programs or mandarin immersion, arts programs in partners with the opera or state symphony, IB schools etc). Then it "attracts" interested parents across the district and becomes self-sustaining. The local population gets access to the improved school, and others have a lottery (or by other means with special rules for siblings and more).

It isn't perfect, but it seems like attracting interest via magnet programs works a lot better than throwing more money at failing schools or unequal access to charter schools.
They are vivisecting political prisoners in concentration camps. If we can't be bothered to spend our blood stopping them can we at least stop spending our money supporting them.

It's time for a complete cessation of trade with this generations nazi party.

We were ashamed by how many corporations dealt with nazi Germany after the rise of hitler but before the war.

Let us not be shamed again.
> You're nitpicking the language in a hypothetical here.

That is exactly what you are doing by picking a bone with the phrase wrong side of the law
There is no need to "normalized as 'opinions'" because these are opinions already. People have them about everything and whether wrong or right doesn't matter it's their opinions and they have (should have) the right to express them as long as they do that in a manner that makes listening voluntary. The concept applies to people who think the earth is flat and the concept applies to people who think trans people have a medical condition. There can't be a reason why it would not. The whole idea is that all opinions must be allowed to make sure there is none who can abuse any power by deciding whats allowed and what not. There is no other way. You can't every draw a line and say everything but X is allowed. Because if you do that you indirectly hinder people from questioning/understanding why X is banned. And you removed any resource about X so there will be people who never heard of X and cant find anything about X because its banned. Now how likely are they going to support that ban if they don't understand X and aren't allowed to talk about it.
Not banning X so the majority can see X is "wrong" resolves that problem way better.

Also "hate speech" is a made up nonsense term. Telegram only prohibits "call for violence". Which is kinda where free speech ends. It of course can be tricked by clever use of language. Instead of "Go out and destroy statues and the people who protect them!" which would be a call for violence. one could says "I think everyone should go one and destroy statues and the people who protect them." now it would be an opinion.
The good thing is, the people who actually call for violence like terrorists usually don't bother with such trickery.

Also just for clarification I listened/watched none of the people that got banned I don't care what their opinions are. I care about the right to express them. It absolutely doesn't matter whether I agree with what they say or not. I agree with free speech because any alternative is worse.
Thank you so much for all that you have done. Redis is a fantastic piece of work. It is everything software is supposed to be: it's simple and it just works :)

Good luck exploring your other options
I just did the recommendations, and use distilled water in the water tank.

I was lots more successful with humidified air. If you have a raw throat, or if you have a stuffed up nose, humidity will take care of it. Another way to help is to drink enough fluids.

Note that I turned down the default temperature and humidity.

As to the cleaning - you need to clean it anyway. Your exhalations do go down the tube backwards. When I first started using it I would get tired of cleaning and put it off and got a really bad head cold.
Jokes aren't fully shunned, we're just picky :-)
Cloud Custodian [1] is a good option for this.

[1] https://cloudcustodian.io/
> Making kernel development and maintaining more accesible to younger people would increase the pool of potential maintainers.

Is there an established open source project out there that originally used a mailing list or some other review software like gerrit, reviewboard, or phabricator, that transitioned to Github or Gitlab and actually increased the number of contributors and maintainers?
I've used Firefox since it was called NCSA Mosaic and later Netscape Navigator. We had to push the browser uphill, both ways. :D
This doesn't seem like a fair comparison. Based on the table provided, 2010 retail is 1.6 TB, 2020 retail is 24 TB, and 2030 retail is 384 TB. That's a 15x improvement last decade, and a projected 16x improvement next decade.

Whether they're fudging the numbers for the current year to make that math work is up for debate, as it's 2020 and they aren't yet on LTO-9, with 24 TB drives
I think you're on to something.

First: there's vehicle-to-barrier crashes (think trees, etc):

Having a vehicle with a large well-designed crumple zone seems obviously good from a survivability POV.

Second: there's vehicle-to-vehicle crashes:

Is it really a zero-sum game? If a small car crashes head on with a large car, will the people in the small car suffer worse than if they crashed into another small car? To what degree?
I think the mixed historical record of consul republics might be relevant to why a single leader is often a better idea than 2-3.
I guess I should clarify that I don't think you were arguing in bad-faith ("moving the goalposts" is a bit a of a charged phrase in the current political climate). I appreciate the conversation!
I've been playing around with this casually for a few weeks and am quite impressed. It's a definite improvement over Jira in simplicity and performance, but is missing quite a few features still. But still, it's my preference. I have started to appreciate light, fast, minimalist interfaces much more over time.
> n is how much energy the electron has (the higher, the further from the nucleus)

I disagree with this description. It is true that higher values of n correspond to wave functions with higher energy, but higher values of l also correspond to wave functions with higher energy. n indicates the number of radial nodes.

> A volume integral would be unitless

The volume integral has units of "number of electrons". Calling this unitless is unnecessarily misleading I feel, even if it is technically correct, since in physics we tend not to give units to quantities like this.
There are many low cost bitcoin mixers/tumblers out there.
It adds no information or value to the discussion by giving the hackers a nationality. If there was a statistic that the majority of hackers wore hoodies, would we be calling that out and saying "Attacked by hackers in hoodies?" Obviously not because their clothing has nothing to do with the fact that they're malicious. What's happening here is profiling and it doesn't work.

Add that to the fact that there are of course bad actors in countries including the US who happen to have proxies in other countries. Geolocating the IP address tells us nothing.

The largest botnets came from a variety of nationalities and are rarely Chinese. Conficker was allegedly from the Ukraine, and a Swede plead guilty. Alureon came from Estonia. Mariposa from spain.

Stop with the emotionally-charged flame baiting based on shallow data and anecdotal information.
instead of asking each question, just ask 'is some activity deceiving a persons perceptions to 'artificially' extract value?

It is .. i hate to disclose this not totally productive statement .. but i am 'floored' to see how 5050 of a split there is on HN. This concept in my worldview/local culture is like year 5 childhood values/dishonesty stuff.

i hate to give a shoutout to history but .. im winking and smiling at you Google culture 2010.
It's probably not fair to blame Microsoft for the performance of a chip developed by Qualcomm.

At one point Qualcomm developed it's own high performance custom ARM cores, but after a huge fumble on their transition to 64 bit, they just gave up and started licensing stock ARM cores.

ARM is getting ready to license a higher performance extra-big core to anyone interested, so there should be some movement there in the not too distant future.

However, you can definitely blame Microsoft for making a bad call on emulating legacy Win32 software.

They tried to transition to ARM based WindowsRT without supporting legacy x86 software at all. Even today, Windows on ARM doesn't support legacy x86 64 bit programs.
Automation and Accessibility, no. Automation is indeed the relevant panel, but the white-list is per-app being controlled. There's no way I can tell macOS to let my script control any app in the automation panel, nor can I even approve apps ahead of time.

Is Developer Tools new in Catalina, or do I need to install XCode or some such in order for it to appear? Never saw it in Mojave.

Fwiw, at one point I had a 250 rep bounty on this StackExchange question, and got nothing. :(

https://apple.stackexchange.com/questions/339509/edit-tcc-db...
I’m saying the problem needs to be addressed in good faith, because NIMBY people will put up nonsensical arguments like other people living in small apartments or needing to build new schools (to support an expanding tax base...) as problems rather than the actual problems they have motivating them to politically oppose urbanization