skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It more about how difficult Savannah is to use which is why people use alternatives. Though the GNU project does evaluate whether a code hosting service is suitable. [0] They were also looking into hosting their own alternative to Savannah. [1]

[0] https://www.fsf.org/news/gnu-releases-ethical-evaluations-of...

[1] https://www.fsf.org/blogs/sysadmin/coming-soon-a-new-site-fo...
> This seems like a quibble, but putting the emphasis on "using an appropriate engine" in parentheses at the end is burying the lede. Sticking to regular languages will not, in itself, help.

Yes. I attempted to make this point at the end of my article, while avoiding phrases like "regular languages".

> There are quite a number of backreferences out there that work this way

Yes, this appears to be a common usage of backreferences. In the regex corpus from the FSE'19 Lingua Franca paper, many backreference-using regexes are of this form.

I believe a loose bound on the worst-case time complexity for regexes with backreferences is n^{mX} where X is the number of backreferenced capture groups. The goal is to describe the number of distinct values the capture groups can take on. If a capture group can take on arbitrary sub-strings (e.g. .(.)\1) then m=2; if it is fixed but ambiguous (e.g. .*(')\1) then m=1; if it is unambiguous then m=0. Often still a polynomial though.

The exception proves the rule; I've seen regexes with 20 backreferences, many of them ambiguous, but the vast majority cover simple use cases and are quite sane.
I can, but colours never seem as vivid in my mind as when I look at them directly, like I can imagine a red apple but it's like a faded red. I've always found this mildly frustrating.
Firefox's tooling for CSS flexbox/grid has been much stronger than Chrome's for some time. I haven't noticed anything missing from the dev tools since they added proper websocket support a while back.
For a while, I was same, only I was on Firefox and wanted to switch the other way. Then Firebug withered away, and now I find it's awash.

But I've actually been running two browsers, one I keep clean for development and one for everything else. If you really want to switch, you could try that.
OP needs to read about Bitcoin, it solves most of the problems discussed in the article
Taking an educated guess here, that the miner of the block which moved that transaction must be related to the owner of that wallet. Nobody would otherwise accept such a low fee for a big transaction. Find the miner, you find the wallet owner.
I'm more of a backend person myself, and perkeep disappoints on that side too. See my other comment about how much time it took to ingest just one .iso. I don't think this system would handle a 5 TB video file as the authors claim, that's some false advertisement!

I considered it for my use case (archiving and deduping dozens of terabytes / millions of files on several personal NAS boxes), really wanted to use it - as I find some of its ideas pretty cool, but in the end decided it would be simpler to just write something from scratch instead. It took less time to write it than it would have taken perkeep to ingest my data.
I love to use Firefox and run away from Chrome but but but... Firefox never matches the perfomace with chrome in windows.

Although, in linux Firefox FTW.
That's an issue with the site that'll be fixed when Hyperapp is officially released.
If we both join the bitcoin network, we can exchange $1B for $0.48.

If we both join set up accounts at a regular bank like RBC, we can exchange $1B for free.

The point I'm making is that fees are not bitcoin's strong point. Any financial network can undercut it. What is unique about bitcoin is that not everyone can get an account at RBC, but anyone can join the more expensive bitcoin network.
Something being spyware and you embracing it seem orthogonal. Are you saying it is spyware (not an argument I've seen before) but you choose to use it anyway?
It is interesting you think that $1 billion could be transferred in that system (pseudo)anonymously, at any time of day or night, for 48 cents... if something that size could be done at all.
You already see this happening, on the IoT world there are plenty of competing FOSS OS clones, some of them POSIX based, common to all of them is the use of non-copyleft licenses.
I switched to Firefox a few years ago and it's great. Never looked back. I didn't even do it for ideological reasons like you and others, either, since I'm fine with Google.
Aren't password managers, especially cloud-based ones like LastPass, also the same thing: they hide all your passwords behind a single master password (and a MFA optionally).

Granted, their only job is to secure your passwords, but it's effectively equivalent to a single SSO service from a protection standpoint (if all your accounts would accept that SSO login).
> For a number of important reasons, hosting GNU development on a proprietary Microsoft platform should be verboten.

What ridiculous hyperbole. Yeah, a "number of important reasons", yet they list none. I hate Microsoft as much as the next guy, but it's Github. It was fine to host open source software on them before, but now that they're bought my Microsoft, it's bad? Why? Because we're afraid Microsoft is going to steal our free open source code? I've mitigated some of my own projects to other git sites, like gitlab, just to get more experience and diversify my access, but it makes no sense to abandon Github.

This level of anti-Microsoft hysteria is a little over the top.

You want to know the real reason why GNU is hosting so many of their projects on Github? Because their interface is clean and it's free and the GNU developers want to spend their time writing GNU software, not maintaining websites.
> Depression is not something to be dominated and rushed away.

Agreed. That is how you end up with constantly escalating self-medication in my experience. When I realized all psychiatry had to offer me was drugs I was highly skeptical of (and yes, I did try a few), I decided to just switch to drugs I actually like. It does the trick, but it could be hurting my long term health more than it's worth. I certainly don't seem to be making any progress in my productivity or the quality of my choices, both of which could use a lot of improvement.
So what process are you advocating for over scrum, that would restore this control and autonomy to you?
If you use LuaJIT, you can generate bindings to C libraries, versus handwriting bindings for PUC Lua. The productivity difference is staggering. Additions to Lua since 5.1.5 have not helped me write more or better software, as much as I love Lua.
> And why does the article say "These Altra CPUs have no turbo mechanism" right below a graphic saying "3.0 Ghz Turbo"?

These chips obviously have variable clock speed, but apparently nothing like the complicated boost mechanisms on recent x86 processors. My guess is that Turbo speed here is simply full speed, and doesn't depend significantly on how many cores are active, and doesn't let the chip exceed its nominal TDP for short (or not so short) bursts the way x86 processors do.
Makes sense. I’d like to see an experiment done with reading comprehension as well as real memories. When I read something, I hear and see it. I’m reading it out loud in my mind and I either have instant visual associations with certain words (e.g. when I read the word aphantasia I think of the hippo from Fantasia, when I see the word tea I instantly ‘see’ a teacup) or I visualise the scene (like where they have the quote from the man who can’t imagine music, I ‘see’ and ‘hear’ it like it’s a TV interview). So I suspect I’m going to remember it better than someone who purely reads the text - but maybe not! Maybe people who don’t do all the ‘translation’ work to turn text into audio/visuals will in fact turn out to be MORE efficient at remembering.

I have no idea how reading would work without at least hearing it though. If you told me to read without doing this stuff it would be like telling me to think without having thoughts. Impossible.
"Every cell in your body explodes with ecstasy" is not a description of anything which has ever been seen in a human. I'm certain you would be dead if every cell in your body exploded - I know this because I have seen case studies where many fewer than "every" cell in a body exploded, and the people died. Can you please explain what you mean in, y'know, terms that are scientifically believable?

>> Yeah, the same is true for curing cancer by eating nothing but cucumbers for a year. Unless you try it, you can't know.

> That is, if you are interested in genuine knowledge.

So you would refuse cancer treatment that has been shown to work, and instead you would eat cucumbers for a year, because you refuse the evidence that this does not in fact treat cancer?
UK too. The BBC News site ran an article[0] back in April about this and that's how I picked up on it. Other US creators have mentioned in passing, but normally not very positively.

This article actually incorrectly suggests Quibi is only accessible in US and Canada...

> (Quibi is only available in the US and Canada)

...and no one I've spoken to has ever heard of it.

[0] https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-52193311
Hack Fb
Pls give me best free
software for hack fb password
I always imagined that Satoshi probably lost the private keys to those early wallets.
Sounds like a bit of Italian culture leaking into that phrase

But don't worry Antirez, Redis is far from a bad work of art, quite the contrary.
> reason that DevTools are better in Chrome still doesn't stop one from using Firefox for all other general browsing

It doesn't even stop you from developing with FF. DevTools were completely usable for years and unless you need very specific functionality, FF is just fine.
"After adjustment for age, sex, and chronic treatment with corticosteroids and/or immunosuppressants, the odds ratio of SARS-CoV-2 infection for chronic treatment with HCQ has been 0.51 (0.37-0.70). Conclusions: Our data suggest that chronic treatment with HCQ confer protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection."

Assuming this really does help protect against one virus, I wondered does that mean it would help protect against ALL or ANY other virus as well? There's no small number of people that have been taking this for a long time already, do they tend to catch colds or the flu or other virus caused illness less than other folks?
Cloud Business Management Platform Prepares to Launch New Mailing Module
I've also heard people discuss a convention where do end is used for side affecting code and {} is used for pure blocks.... but I've never seen anyone really stick to it so single-line vs multi-line is as good as anything.
I would/do have a problem with that idea being supressed. The path to defeating a truly bad idea is to publicly flog it, not pretend it doesn't exist.
When did you last try Firefox? Chrome may still be better sometimes but Firefox improved a _lot_ recently.
As complete as it needs to be. I can see and hear my imaginings quite clearly, and often use mechanical analogues to test non-directly visualisable abstract ideas and logical flows.

In more general terms, I can see and explore real and imagined environments, and listen to music with perfect fidelity - although doing the hearing bit only works well with considerable focus, and peace and quiet - visual I find easy enough to just ignore what my eyes are seeing, leave walking or whatever on autopilot. To be clear, it’s not like just imagining a thing, it’s more like overriding a sense. When I visualise, I am literally looking at something that isn’t there, when I listen, I hear as though it’s real - although any real noise immediately breaks it.
Mirror to video shared in post: https://youtu.be/I_fyz5rOwFc
I'd love to know more, f.ex. you could download and compile the top 100 downloaded Rust crates, demonstrating compiled times with and without Crave.
Can I ask why it's considered "ugly" now but wasn't before? Isn't it just a few pixels bigger?
I use a mixture of both. My meds are definitely the key but I do feel better mentally and physically when I eat low carb. The combination is working great for my bi-polar depression.
> - Can't mark notifications as done

What kind of notifications?

> - Can't edit the title or description of an issue or PR

You can if you disable CSS. (Admittedly that's not very convenient…)

> - Can't dismiss banners or most modals/popups

Any examples? This has (almost?) always worked for me.
GitLab is free software though, so you won't be running non-free JavaScript.

It having poor noscript support is a shame though.
this is slightly different from the problem of not seeing someone, but the fact that video chat software demands a walkie-talkie style "you talk, then I talk, then you talk" style of conversation is very difficult. Normal human conversation includes a lot of natural (and sometimes productive) cross-talk.
It has worked for you - which doesn't necessarily mean it works for everybody - and in fact exercise and group activity are things which are encouraged by doctors in order to treat depression, along with medicine where it would help.

People are really, really good at believing that mystical things help them, when in fact they are no better than placebo. Placebo, by the way, is an incredibly strong effect which has helped some people tackle illnesses of all sorts. However, it's not replicable enough that we suggest everybody suffering from depression be treated with placebo and only placebo, and any medication is unhelpful.
I haven't done a great job at explaining why the current Hyperapp is superior than its previous incarnation, but V2 isn't officially out yet, so I encourage you circle back to it when it is.
It's worth noting that this is based on ARM's Neoverse N1 IP, which is also used in the AWS Graviton2. The Graviton2 benchmarks damn close to the best AMD and Intel stuff, so this chip looks very promising [1]. It's really looking to be a breakthrough year for ARM outside of the mobile market.

[1]: https://www.anandtech.com/show/15578/cloud-clash-amazon-grav...
Pkgsrc-2020Q2 released
Hack
Pls give me best free hacking password fb for free
Show HN: Dashboard to Manage and Monitor AWS SES Bounces/Deliveries/Complaints
Activating large number of employees when licensing software to larger clients
Great article, but it does not mention management attitude. If upper management does not have the right attitude towards Scrum, Scrum will fail. If upper management does not guard the role of the Scrum masters, select capable Scrum master and allow them to function correctly, Scrum will crumble into another tool for micro-management which frustrates developers and destroys productivity.

BINGO. The "problem with scrum" isn't usually scrum itself, but the management and culture of the company. And bad management and toxic culture will, in my experience, lead to the same results no matter what process / methodology you nominally employ.

To me, most criticisms of scrum reduce to a (legitimate) claim that "scrum isn't a magic bullet that will fix the fucked up management and toxic culture at this shitty company."
"Unless we support alternatives we really shouldn't complain when they gradually die off in a space that is increasingly coming under the control of giant corporations with bottomless pockets."
Exactly this. Sure Firefox sometimes isn't the absolute best in a given characteristic, but it's still a damn good browser overall, and the concern over the encroaching Chromium monoculture is more than enough to keep me using it.
Interview with Bobby Royale
Sounds like a Pyramid scam
GP commenter said (note the typo):

> exmaple.com was explicitly reserved for scenarios like this
Drug cartel or proxy controlled by an exchange.
I think this happens every release, although I don't know why. Probably just different teams pushing the button at different times.
If you been in an enterprise RFP process, you will understand "Picking products based on feature checklists" is commonly being done to compare software products because if you don't provide the feature that your competitors provide, you are pretty much out of the competition.
So, good reason to have a more clinical trial for testing HCQ + ZINC + Azitromycin vs HCQ alone (vs NO Medicine). But that's something I'm not seeing at the moment, which is a shame.

230 studies looking at Hydroxychloroquine [1]

Only 10 studies looking into HCQ and Zinc [2]

[1]:https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?cond=Covid-19&term=hy...

[2]:https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?cond=Covid-19&term=hy...
You need a lot of memory bandwidth and large caches, or else the cores will starve. That's also why IBM mainframes have up to 4.5 GB of L4 cache.
I can only see a very limited amount of stuff in my head. My best visualizations are routes in 2D from above. Anything beyond that is really hard to do.

Funny thing is, when I dream I can see anything.
Yep it's the open source, and in general the "spontaneous" development world, that happens without big money, just for hacking. This "place" once was kinda free and not observed much. Now you can't say anything, if you don't respect a good practice (LOL) people yell at you on Twitter. Even saying that commenting is a good idea is a problem. Not cool.
> Because the MacBook trackpads are so precise

But you to have to know where to click. And that's the biggest problem with so-called "modern" UIs - it lacks discoverability. Either you memorize all menus and dialogs, or you have to seek out the functionality you need each time you can't remember anything. And sometimes these dialogs change, so you have to rediscover everything once again.

In Emacs, it's enough only to remember basic movement shortcuts. The rest of commands could be discovered easily with M-x and which-keys.

> You don't need emacs for that - just find a scheme interpreter in a web browser [0] and start reading SICP [1] until you get bored. That's all the effort you need to get the mind-expanding effect.

One of the main reasons I moved to Emacs (11 years ago) was Common Lisp and SLIME.

> If you really like it, move on to a "real" Lisp.

A real(world) Lisp is Clojure these days
> What is "underground programming world"?

The programming world that nobody else sees.

Everybody uses shiny FOSS tools, and some even make big $ using them, but nobody wonders where they come from and how much pain went into building them.
Yeah, the site is a WIP, but that should be fixed soon when V2 is officially out.
They certainly are, just not for 1b.
I recently tried to move to Firefox (again). I try to to this every couple years. I run into the same three blockers every time.

1. The omnibar completion isn't as good. Chrome figures out where I go pretty regularly, and autocompletes extremely well based upon habits.
2. The dev tools aren't as good. I mostly work in the frontend, and simple things like how you write css overwrites with tab completion is just not as good in Firefox.
3. I often run with lots of tabs. Although firefox lets you make tabs smaller, it's default method of "scrolling" tabs isn't as nice as chrome infinite method.

It doesn't help that I pair this yearly experiment with DDG as my search. With that pairing I often run into autocompletion / omnibar issues and find myself just banging !g to get myself out of it.

I really would like to switch, but the gap is too much for my daily tooling. I say this as someone who recently switched to Linux from OSX and really ran into no issues outside of having to spend a week setting thing up how I liked.
Hmm, I went to get you an example and I found they seem to dismiss if you click elsewhere on the page. I think I was clicking on the close button (the "x" in the title bar) - which won't work without JavaScript.
I want to use Git, I have that on my offline machine. But offline means github isn't an option. However, this indirectly answers my question, so thanks.
> To most Chinese citizens, a travel to HK, or Taiwan is a giant cultural shock. It is because them suddenly realising themselves being so much less Chinese than they though they were.

Given that I know a lot of both Hong Kong people and mainland Chinese people, I am really not sure from where you're getting this idea.
Oh, I didn't know transaction value was known to transaction block-miners; that seems like a flaw. Assuming there's a bidding system, wouldn't transaction cost tend to zero?

(Seems I need to review bitcoin transaction mining. Suggestions for a good resource on that?)
Curious to hear what boilerplate you think Vue or Preact already handles for you.
Agreed, Firefox's dev tools have been really good for over 5 years now.
> It is a 27 FO4 implementation,

Am I out of touch, or is that an extremely long cycle? I thought CPUs were generally something like 14-15 FO4.
I am fortunate that my enjoyment of the hobby of photography wasn't discovered until I was employed with a good paycheck coming in. If I had found I enjoyed photography in high school or college I may have been tempted to pursue it professionally. The thing is... I hate the business of photography.

Yes, programming jobs tend to pay well. So do medicine, law, and various other white collar jobs... for that matter, so do many trades.

Its not a question of "does it pay well" but rather "are you willing to do the hard work that it entails and not burn out after a year." That question isn't one that many college students or bootcamp grads have considered.

If you only enjoy creating new apps and not debugging them when something breaks - being a professional programmer may not be the proper role to be in. Not all things that are written are new apps (brownfield is much more common than greenfield) and debugging is an essential part of writing software.

This is what is meant by willing to endure the hard work. One may have a passion for computers ("I love playing games and building new computers from parts") but not enjoy programming.
I hope this will have bigger impact on the industry with faster Windows and Linux adoption of ARM.
We don't own the digital possessions that we buy online
What's the cost if I'm with HSBC in Hong-Kong and you're with Chase in USA, say?
It depends a bit on how you utilize these CPUs. A lot of server software is optimized for just a few cores. Even products optimized for using more than 1 thread tend to be tested and used mostly with 4/8 core configurations. And then of course there are a few popular server-side languages that are effectively single threaded typically (e.g. python) and use multiple processes to leverage multiple cores. Launching 80 python processes on an 80 core machine may not be the best way to utilize available resources compared to e.g. a Java process with a few hundred threads.

With non blocking IO and async processing that can be good enough but to fully utilize dozens/hundreds of CPU cores from a single process, you basically want something that can do both threading and async. But assuming each core performs at a reasonable percentage of e.g. a Xeon core (lets say 40%) and doesn't slow down when all cores are fully loaded, you would expect a CPU with 80 cores to more than keep up with a 16 or even 32 core Xeon. Of course the picture gets murkier if you throw in specialized instructions for vector processing, GPUs, etc.
Transaction fees are based on digital storage requirements. This transaction was 404 bytes, which is small. It doesn't matter the value exchanged, only the number of inputs and outputs and how much space they take.

Yes, miners can read the metadata of a transaction, in transfers that includes the amount being moved, miners do not care about that.

It is important to understand that "transactions" in this context is the same as a database transaction. There are many kind of transactions, some of which include the movement of bitcoin from one address to another.
Yeah, looks exactly like some of the Prism filtering I've toyed with.
Should API-restricting licenses qualify as open source?