The US was a minor force in WWI. Serfdom was long gone from anywhere the US forces conquered in either war, so it's very likely you have misremembered that quote. Assuming it's at all true.

In any case, history teaches us that the US were less hospitable to non-Europeans. Quoting https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philippine%E2%80%93American_Wa... :

> In response to the Balangiga massacre, which wiped out a U.S. company garrisoning that Samar town, U.S. Brigadier General Jacob H. Smith launched a retaliatory march across Samar with the instructions:

>> I want no prisoners. I wish you to kill and burn, the more you kill and burn the better it will please me. I want all persons killed who are capable of bearing arms in actual hostilities against the United States,

We Americans learned that approach from decade of fighting Native Americans using similar methods.

Now with that established .. was that covered in your history books?

Or the US Army involvement in the California Genocide?

You write:

> In the original ideals of THIS COUNTRY our state's rules, laws, and representation, superseded the federal government

The original ideals of THIS COUNTRY include slavery. Through and through. You can't pick and choose only those ideals you sympathize with.

The "states rights" argument you echo is a myth, perpetrated by the Lost Cause movement, embedded in 'state supplied history books'. Eg, see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dOkFXPblLpU .

The South did not want states rights as an abstract concept. The South wanted the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 - a law which forced people in states which prohibited slavery to return those people who escaped slavery back to the slave states. That's so anti-state's rights that it makes the Lost Cause propaganda laughably unsupportable.

And the US didn't want your vision of state's rights because we tried it with the Articles of Confederation and it failed.

> To be free from oppression... all forms

Odd then that the most oppressed people in the US - the Black and Native American populations - don't much identify with that symbolism.

Odd also that those symbols become popular at a time when oppression against blacks was increasing. Almost as if the heritage is actually the heritage of racial control.

> I don't see these special interest groups protesting injustice in say, tel aviv for the african migrants there.. or over in juadong province against xi jinping and his tyranny.

And I don't see MADD protesting against animal cruelty, so I guess MDD members are just fine with vivisection. Wait - I don't see you protesting against vivisection either!

> Only here in america where we are the ONLY country not under some form of serfdom already.

Umm, Iceland? Your statements mostly just shows that you don't know what serfdom means.

And, to quote a Paul Krugman piece widely published, eg, at https://www.irishtimes.com/business/economy/paul-krugman-eco... :

"Beware those who cry freedom the loudest, for they are not on the side of the employee ... You might say, with only a bit of hyperbole, that workers in America, supposedly the land of the free, are actually creeping along the road to serfdom, yoked to corporate employers the way Russian peasants were once tied to their masters’ land. And the people pushing them down that road are the very people who cry “freedom” the loudest."

I believe Krugman is talking about people like you.