skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It seems possible to me that creatures that are denied their biological imperative can develop some very aggressive behaviours. If 80+% of men in society are angry, I'd be a bit scared.
The thing that primary predicts less teenage sex is sexual education. Which is better then used to be.

The conservativism of parents where you lived likely contributed to kids having sax in the park hoping nobody will arrest them and charge them with public sex.

And honestly, I never witnessed what you described here and I am kinda happy I did not.
What makes you think I am not interested in sleeping with an 18 year old blonde with huge breasts? That's EXACTLY who I am interested in sleeping with... personally, I am not interested in a relationship at all nor am I attacking women here so I am not sure where you are coming from.
Doesn't make a lot of sense. Unlike traditional blogs, Facebook isn't exactly a place that's creating rival news content. If anything, FB helps spread the news by being a platform for people to post articles and stories.
Sure, but what does it mean for someone to be "way below your league"? I take it to mean they're unattractive to you. Unless I'm misinterpreting that I just don't see the appeal of sleeping with someone who you're not attracted to.
I have one of those HP touchpads, and it is the best non-Apple/Android tablets I’ve seen. The webOS was so ahead of its time, and everyone generously borrowed its UI/UX. I can start it and it works flawlessly, an impressive feat For a 9 year old
device.
Ah but my question was specific to ladies. You didn't have enough information from my answer to conclude I only open the door for ladies. I open doors for men too.
> Aereo lost their case because they received a signal, decoded it, saved the video to a hard drive, and then streamed the video from the hard drive to the customer.

No they didn't! In fact the opinion specifically calls out that the technical details of how Aereo transmitted the work didn't matter one way or another.

> If they simply streamed the undecoded TV signals to their customers, they would have been fine.

It would not have. After the cable companies won their case about the antenna on a hill Congress amended the Copyright Act to make it illegal.
I'm on the left, and I'm not trying to deflect, engage in "whataboutism", or castigate unions in general. But all humans can succumb to perverse incentives: executives, stockholders, political representatives, and yes, even middle-class workers. The systemic corruption of police and prisons runs so deep, we need to be able to "walk and chew gum" in order to fix it, rather than assume that we can pull out a single thorn of bad policy.
The person I replied to was relaying their understanding of "enforced monogamy" as used by right-wing people. In that context, enforced monogamy is not being used to describe the things you are describing. Of course, you are right that what you described does occur in some places.
I think Senator Hawley addresses your criticism head-on. China and the United States both have requirements for domestic companies to be in alignment with certain domestic goals. The Chinese and United State domestic goals are absolutely incompatible. A lot of companies think they can find a balance between these two sets of requirements, but Hawley is pointing out that increasingly this is impossible.
What age range are you? I'm 36 and never really noticed this back in my younger years.
People in this thread are talking a lot about the availability of non-sex ways to spend attention (porn, social media, netflix), and of loosely power-law effects where a small number of men can have a lot of sex because of good looks and money.

What about the other economic factors?

- aren't more young people in living situations with greater sharing and less privacy than 20 years ago?

- given the relative stagnation of wage increases over those intervening years, aren't more young people having to work more hours to keep that room in a shared apartment?

- maybe the crushing stress of student debt is sometimes a turnoff?

(edited for spacing)
Ah, now I know why you hopped on IRC finally last week. :)
There is a difference though: Western societies don't strongly couple "allowing" young men to have a family to them having a job. Lots of unemployed, bored, frustrated single young men is different from having employed, frustrated young men.

I have no idea how class plays into this dynamic, but I assume it's not the poorest that aren't having sex, unlike in the societies where this dynamic works as a powder keg.
The 20th century was probably the most consequential one in terms of political extremism in the world and there wasn't a lot of polygamy or online dating happening in Europe at least.

Japan and South Korea, two of the most stable and conformist countries politically are notorious for their low rates of sex, particular among young men.

This sounds purely like folk psychology to be honest, people just love somehow attributing sexual motivations to just about everything. To me, this feels like plotting skyscraper construction against sex rates in Asia and then concluding that male architects are channelling their phallic energy into architecture, you can really apply this to everything
The US has its issues with food (in particular, lower class individuals have trouble finding cheap food that isn't junk food), but I'm surprised to read the rest of your comments.

I travel all around the US a lot for work (or did, pre-covid) and all the way down to your fast food restaurants all the way up to fancy $500/plate places, I've never once found it difficult to eat a "standard meat-with-vegetable-without-sugar-added". I would say that 80% of my meals are exactly that. I've never once been to a single non-fast-food restaurant where they didn't have multiple different kinds of vegetables on the menu.

There's certainly an issue with portion size at most US restaurants, but I've never found it difficult to get a plate of plain roasted vegetables with lightly seasoned fish, for example.

>It looks like this is hard to do in the USA: you don't easily find, for example, yogurt without sugar added.

Yogurt in particular is not really popular in the US, so you will not find it in many restaurants. You can, however, find packaged sugarfree yogurt in most convenience stores and certainly every grocery store if that's your thing. Other than yogurt, there are plenty of sugarfree snacks widely available. Starbucks is on every corner and sells plain vegetables, plain fruit, plain eggs, etc, for example.

I suspect your complaints are mostly rooted in simply not being aware of certain brand names or which stores are known for what type of food, because all of the things you mentioned definitely are available as long as you aren't going to McDonald's or Five Guys for every meal.
So, "give us families, or we'll do crime and destabilize society"?

Sounds like mental health problems are even more rampant than we guessed. We should probably handle that.
App dating doesn’t work well for a whole lot of people — it‘s really bad if you’re fat, trans, disabled, or even just socially awkward. App culture is about looking for a reason to swipe left rather than finding someone you like and accepting their flaws. It sucks for everyone, it’s just easier for straight cis women under 35 who are able-bodied and of a certain size to get laid.
Its really this simple. Its the two universe thing, if you haven't experienced how easy it is for some men to get women, then you cant understand it. I spent my whole 20s doing this, this was my identity. I'm not even proud of it, its just what it is
The goal of the protesters is not to have more protests. I'm pretty sure they'd rather stay at home and do something fun. The goal of the protesters is to stop police violence. So the police using force is the exact opposite of what the protesters want.
Doesn’t the compiler already do optimizations like that?
Men don't receive a constant barrage of sexual misconduct. Where did you get this idea?

There's countless data and evidence showing instutionalozed sexual discrimination from men against women. If you want an enlighting read as it pertains to tech, read Brotopia. Or read about how Uber only bought leather jackets for it's men SREs and explicitly chose to not buy the same jacket for their women SREs.

Or simply ask any woman about an instance where a man pressured her for some sexual act. Or made them feel unsafe or uncomfortable. Or where a male boss of theirs made sexually discriminatory or otherwise hostile remarks against them in a workplace (dismissing a woman's perspective on a topic definitely counts here).

And really - where is your perspective that "women only want exceedingly wealthy, attractive, muscular men" come from? Listen to straight women when you ask them or read what they wrote on what they want in a romantic partner. I am pretty sure this idea you have isn't actually reflective of what women want, at all. This really reads as what a straight man thinks a woman wants.
Echoing what bobthepanda also replied - I hold the door open for _everyone_ when it makes sense for me to do so. It becomes weird when you specifically do it for women, or say words indicating that you're doing it because she's a woman - it comes across as patronizing, in my opinion.
One thing that seems clear is that the hyper-connected world makes the minority look like the majority, and vice versa.

In all aspects of society.
> any relationship they find will be tainted by knowing they weren't good enough to party with but good enough to marry.

I am confused by this.... I would feel much better about myself knowing I was the one good enough to marry rather than the one who was only good enough to party with.
Bizarre as it seems, this has already been a topic of political discussion:

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/02/opinion/incels-sex-robots...

http://www.overcomingbias.com/2018/04/two-types-of-envy.html

https://www.cosmopolitan.com/politics/a20138446/redistributi...

It has become a genuine struggle to separate reality and parody.
I think it was this Freakonomics episode:
https://freakonomics.com/podcast/in-praise-of-incrementalism...
I took a closer look at the FAQ and it doesn't sound like Graphviz can do exactly what I'd like it to do.

"It is essential that a font which has the glyphs for your specified characters is available at final rendering time."

It sounds to me like UTF-8 encoded characters won't show if the font isn't available on the machine, in which case we'd have to either somehow force a font install or ideally just package the font with the application. The latter would require rebuilding Graphviz without fontconfig enabled, I think?
The person who holds the door is the one that arrives first, or has a more convenient angle on holding the door open.
As politicized as unions can get, to engage in union busting isn't just picking a political side, it's unethical. But yeah, your point still holds.
> The survey found that from 2000 to 2018, nearly one in three U.S. men aged 18 to 24 reported no sexual activity in the past year.

> Sexual activity was largely unchanged among unmarried women

The first reason that occurs to me is that women are showing more of preference for monogamous relationships. Perhaps the 'hookup' culture is starting to lose it's appeal. I find it a bit stomach-churning that we are presented below with

> Given a preference for men of higher socioeconomic status

Which has no references and feeds into a very unpleasant stereotype. Particularly with the followup

> larger number of college-educated women than men

Why not say that women prefer men with a matching socioeconomic status? It moves the implication from "gold-digger" to "seeking equal partner".

> The trend is concerning as sexual relationships are important for well-being and health, researchers note.

Sexual relationships also have a lot of downsides and negative impacts on well-being and health. If this outcome of this study was "men are having fewer healthy relationships" it might be more useful. Without that distinction, you could conclude men need more one night stands. That may be true - but if ( many ) women aren't interested then it is what it is.
There are studies out showing that pervasive pornography usage by young males is causing impotence at an incredible rate for their age cohort (teens through 20s). It's literally rewiring their brains to want false stimulation more than the real thing.
Sure, but we have always had those avenues, and the bookstore example is quite outdated as well. The fact remains that if you remove a significant portion of the places where couples used to meet (work), you will see less romance happening. So far we haven’t created any new revolutionary third place to go meet each other, so this will be unlikely to change without a reversal of the attitude, which I suspect we’ll see within 20 years when people realize it’s not working.
This week we have launched Vitri, a nonprofit project. Any feedback will help
This is assuming no vaccine, no precautions possible, no improved treatment. This is an incorrect model.

We can stop it now--masks are required in public unless you have a doctor-diagnosed breathing disorder. Put some real teeth in the laws. That will drive R0 to below 1 and the virus will go away.
If utilitarianism optimises for local travel, the biggest difference I've seen is a curved top-tube on omafiets. If it optimises for moving rider and luggage from A-to-B, touring bikes are pretty standard.
Obesity kills sex drive for both sexes, in many different ways. Most people don't like snoring whales in their bedroom with heart problems.

I also suspect the typical advice of hitting the gym, for men, results in bulking, and is not that attractive to women either. Since it doesn't result in tall and slender, a typical preference, most of the time.

What does work, just from comparing to Europe, is consistently walking everyday for long distances and dressing nice.
The four biggest expenses for childcare are medical care, daycare, university, and housing.

It's harder to compare housing but fertility rates are declining even in countries with free/cheap healthcare, daycare, and university.
This is a pretty superficial treatment of Forth. It's more of a simple RPN calculator than a Forth.
I have about 500 hours of high quality, channel isolated (separate from the person I was speaking to) audio. It comes from my podcast that I have done for many years. It's probably closer to 75-100 hours audio of me actually speaking, since I am more the interviewer.

Is that something that would be useful to a researcher in any context? I am intrigued by the idea of having my voice preserved (you know, ego), but also am happy to donate the sound files if they would help researchers in any way for datasets.

If so: chris@theamphour.com
The trained model doesn't seem to be available? Does anyone know if this or a similar model is available somewhere?
Indeed. This pattern though is often the point at which an intervention is possible. Almost like it has to happen repeatedly before you can get consensus to stop it.
Evidently, a lot of people care about a dead body, whether for grieving or religious reasons. Your opinion is not the only valid opinion.
Read my edit. There were reasons for societies to be sexually conservative. It wasnt random and it wasnt just on the whim of oppressive men.
The most useful values at compile time are types, so straight-up interpreting the core language at compile time is not enough. You need meta-typed named values to transport types in, and meta-functions to pass them to.

Fortraith cleverly re-purposes existing features, doing some violence to language usage conventions to achieve it.
As a Chinese person born in America, you're absolutely right. If you don't cook, it's difficult to eat reasonably / "normally" in this country, even if you have money. You kind of have to pick your poison: salt, sugar, unnatural fats, etc.

At least I grew up on the east coast and my parents cooked. Anecdotally, I'm shocked by what my acquaintances from the midwest eat, and the consequences really start to show up when people reach their 30's (although there are signs earlier)

I read Michael Pollan's books (Omnivore's Dilemma, etc.) 10-15 years ago and they opened my eyes to how broken this country is in terms of food.

https://michaelpollan.com/books/

It's funny he is considered "liberal" here but it's just common sense in the rest of the world. The thesis is actually "conservative": eat things that your grandmother would consider food. If your grandmother wouldn't recognize it, don't eat it. Did your grandmother (or great grandmother) cook with high-fructose corn syrup? Or processed oils / margarine?
I’d even argue it goes in the other direction to a degree. I’ve witnessed many relationships where the woman makes more money and it creates tension. Obviously, not in all cases but It does happen.
If you have other devices though, you may perceive it as getting slower. An older laptop with an HDD absolutely chugs compared to an SSD. That's been my experience with older devices, my newer ones spoil me on any OS
It was always easily accessible and downloaded fast enough. But ok, let's say it took a minute to download a 150kb image of porn. Did that stop anyone? No. But I do think a comment you made above is correct -- people are more sedentary. Especially young men. So they possibly seek porn out more often just out of boredom.
I'm 30, and I only know one person in my peer group whom owns a home, and he can only afford it because it's way out in the boonies. If people my age find things like home ownership out of reach, having children becomes a roadblock and therefore becomes undesirable.
Buy H&P
I think the ubuquity in porn is a big one here. If men got horny and didn’t have a way to get off they’d quicly find a partner, even if that means lowering of the perceived standard in a potential sex partner.

Also, the fact that we’re communicating less in person may have some impact as well.

As someone suggested that affluent men get everything and the rest don’t get anything has some truth to it but it doesn’t explain the whole picture. There are women who are not attracted to wealth and who seek a genuine connection - a connection they refuse to have to someone playing video games for 8 hours a day. No disrespect for avid gamers but i think they’re missing a big part of life
Sort of, arithmetic is implemented (through the trait-eval crate) from the Peano axioms. Probably it is not very fast, even in comparison to C++ standards.
tldr;

Increasing throughput doesn't mean faster, it means more efficient use of your resources.

Asynchronous and parallelizing workloads only increases throughput not speed. You get more done faster, you don't get each thing produced faster..er.

---

Async is only faster if you're not CPU constrained. I don't think anyone is surprised.

The following is really simplified; but, hopefully this makes things more clear for folks...

Assuming ONE cpu, with ONE thread

Synchronous call:

[A: Start]---------------->[B: Finish]

Asynchronous call:

[A: Start]-------->[B: Pause]...(sleep)...[C: Resume]----->[D: Finish]

There is no way to make the async call faster than the synchronous call, period. By simply having the operation pause/wait/resume (context switch) it has introduced overhead that is not present in the synchronous operation.

So WTF async?

Async is only useful when the context switching overhead is less than the time the I/O operation takes. That's it... So when you have I/O bound tasks, that take more time than it does to switch contexts (and carefully manage how many context you have), you can have increased _throughput_.
Well, I guess they theorize that in stable relationships, men are more likely to have sex. If forming relationships gets more difficult, the majority of men have less sex. I'm not sure if the argument is actually valid but from a historical perspective I can understand the thought process.
Its a zero sum game. When one side wins, the other side loses. Sexual freedom for women means essentially no sex for alot of men.
Precisely illustrates my point: most men are still operating under an outdated expectation of sex and romance. That merely existing suffices for being a good partner. When in reality, standards have been vastly increased any only a few men have gotten with the times.
What you need is gprof2dot. It will chew up your pstats file and spit out a dot file. Enjoy!
From the view of the gene, no compromise should be made when facing the prospect of extinction.
I’m a young US man and I find sex (and close human contact in general) mildly disgusting. Yet, I also feel so much pressure from my peers to be dating and having sex. The culture basically says sex and drugs are the only things worth doing.

I spend my time on dating apps going on dates I don’t enjoy in the hopes of having sex that I don’t enjoy. Don’t get me wrong, I’m attracted to women and enjoy spending time with them. I just don’t like sex. I like the idea of sex but my desire to have sex with someone decreases significantly the closer they are to me (disgust is inverse-square with proximity). At least I can find humor in the absurdity.

It feels like I can trace all the problems in my life back to my uncomfortableness with sex. Why am I so uncomfortable? That might take another long unpleasant post.

Its tempting to think that I should find some peace in not having sex or find a partner who doesn’t like sex either. That’s a good suggestion. Its really a war in my mind between feelings of disgust from having sex and feelings of disgust from not having sex. My therapist and I agree that its best for me to “get out there” and date.
The amount of men in your position is much lower than you are thinking. You're in a bubble.

The US male populace has maybe 10% of people in similar roles such as yourself. Not many men earn $100k+/yr - period. Most who do are well past 30. If you're in FAANG making $300k+, then you're part of the 1% of /all/ men (not just men at your age). Are you going to say that the top 10% of earners overrepresent the amount of people who aren't having sex? Seems far fetched to me. Having a high income is a marker that many people look for and prioritize.

Being a high income earner doesn't mean you're busier than other people either. I see many people making $250k+/yr and have regular 40 hour work weeks where I see people below $100k/yr pushing 60+ hours frequently.
> Instead, video games and pot.

If their free time is about video games and pot, I would say they only have themselves to blame.
When I saw this here again I so wished it was because it now had more content.

It’s such a great intro to shaders. Please finish it!!!!
I'm in my early 30s and am trying to move away from this type of thing. But it was my life for all of my 20s
Two implications:

1. We have many maps, models, or concepts - different ways of viewing the same situation. How we choose which map is often more important than the overall accuracy of our maps. Changing perspective often beats getting more accurate data.

2. There is no reason to have any emotional or sentimental attachment to one’s knowledge. Think of “your knowledge” the same way you would think of “your map collection”. Edit (or discard) them with extreme prejudice!
YYYY-MM-NN, or ISO-8601, is objectively the best date format[1].

1. https://xkcd.com/1179/
It could also imply she’s thought superior based on gender and the man is showing submission. The problem is the interpretation of an action to automatically imply a certain mode of thought.

None of us have access to the thoughts of others and holding a door open or saying “ladies first” is not ipso facto indicative of a misogynist view; especially among people who were taught it is good manners.
Why not? I’d like to eat steak every night for dinner but I can’t have that and I’m still happy. Sex is just one aspect of life, not it’s totality