skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
For definitions of dabble that don't include transmitting, its most certainly not.

One of the best ways to get ready to take the Technician test is to buy a cheap handheld and figure out how to listen in on the local repeater. Being able to apply what you're reading in books to real world stuff is a fantastic learning opportunity.
Why would you need to (re)invent words if there is no problem anymore?
These monuments are called Stolpersteine ("Stumbling Stones"): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stolperstein

There are tens of thousands of them now, every one of them installed by the artist who originally came up with the idea.

They are installed in front of their last place of residence. So it's really decentralised, and the realisation that the Holocaust happened in your street (or even to people living in the house you now life in) is powerful.
The "AI" capabilities that are making headlines nowadays are mostly based on deep (multi-layer) neural networks with millions, or billions, or parameters. These nets do self-organize into a hierarchy of self-defined feature detectors followed by classifiers, but as you suggest for the most part they are best regarded as black boxes. You can do sensitivity analysis to determine what specific interval values are reacting to, and maybe glean some understanding that way, but by-nature the inner workings are not intended/expected to be meaningful - they are just a byproduct of the brute force output-error minimization process by which these nets are trained.

Neural nets are mostly dominant in perceptual domains such as image or speech recognition, where the raw inputs represent a uniform sampling of data values (pixels, audio samples) over space and/or time. For classical business problems where the inputs are much richer and more varied, and already have individual meaning, then decision tree techniques such as random forests may be more appropriate and do provide explainability.
“We are what we always were in Salem, but now the little crazy children are jangling the keys of the kingdom, and common vengeance writes the law!”

― Arthur Miller, The Crucible
Any damning enough leak can be declared to be a conspiracy theory with an accompanying half-assed debunking and the well-trained public will ignore it.
The case that could be made is that the energy, time, and attention of a movement are finite, and those resources can be allocated in a way that makes us /feel/ like change is happening while, in fact, no substantive change is occurring.

It can function like a pressure relief valve. An immediate example that comes to mind is the firing of 6 APD officers that discharged tasers at protestors. Subsequently, nothing structural in the police department changed, but protests dissipated because of the 'victory' and then an even worse botched arrest occured because nothing fundamental had changed.
As someone else pointed out, it's not ownership, it's a 10-year lease.

This all sounds pretty routine; "a feature, not a bug", designed to promote economic development and be accommodating in general.

If you don't like development in general, or Oil & Gas development in particular, you won't be happy with this arrangement. But I would think there would be more outrageous examples than this one.
Indeed, this is meaning of “real estate”.
The PSP had a very outdated version of Flash (for the time) that wasn't compatible with a lot of content.

It did work sometimes though, and it was great when it did. The Wii—while not portable—also supported an (outdated) version of Flash that I recall working quite well. There were even some Flash games explicitly designed to be used with the Wii Remote (although they couldn't really do anything special, they only had access to the IR pointer).
Environmentalists do things like this sometimes for specifically that reason.

Another way of simply buying more environmental protection from the federal government is to purchase SO2 allowances at auction. The US government runs a “cap and trade” system for sulphur dioxide emissions where prospective SO2 emitters have to buy allowances at auction for the tonnage of SO2 they will emit. Environmentalists frequently buy a chunk of allowances and refuse to resell them, reducing emissions even more while raising costs for polluters.
Interesting article thanks. A little constructive feedback on some language in the conclusion. "Football is a game of space. That's why parking the bus can actually allow to win a match." The second sentence doesn't make sense unfortunately. Worse, it's not really possible to work out what it means either. It sounds like you mean "That's why parking the bus can be a good strategy" (or something like that). But the first sentence sets up the exact opposite expectation, a sentence like "That's why parking the bus is never a good strategy" would be compatible with the first sentence. Sadly the reader is left not knowing whether you're saying one thing, or the complete opposite.

I understand English is unlikely to be your first language. Please read this as a genuine attempt to be helpful.
No one associates Fisher with iris, he is better known for maximum likelihood, ANOVA, design of experiments, and the idea of random sampling.

So here is a proposal: in protesting Fisher let's stop doing randomization.
Musk needs that latency below 100ms for phase 1 or he could get shut out of the rural auction. The auction is next month so the PR blitz is on. He's also running early trials so there's hard data to give to the skeptics at the FCC.

https://www.teslarati.com/spacex-starlink-user-terminal-beta...
Clusters are easily created as a custom notehead. This gives you full control over exact design and placement.

As for the rest, well, without knowing what your items are, I can't really respond - but Dorico is AMAZINGLY capable.

Irrational time signatures? Any crazy/arbitrary/arbitrarily nested tuplets you care to dream up? True open/unmearsured time signatures? Arbitrary microtonal systems? Multiple simultaneous time signatures? All out of the box.

But of course it supports the ultimate escape hatch... you can import SVG or export the entire score as SVG.
Over $1000 per square mile per year is a lot of money if there aren't any minerals worth exploiting on that square mile.
I think your parent comment is neither here nor there on actually leaving, but rather just using hyperbole to demonstrate that this isn't a problem easily fixed with laws.

A food establishment forced to serve you might serve you food that's gone bad, a mechanic might not fully tighten the nuts on your brake pads, or any other variety of horrible things that people could do to harm you while leaving room for plausible deniability.

At least if they can legally deny service to you, you know that the ones serving you aren't a risk to your wellbeing. And to that end, I think it's a bit unfair to suggest that less money means there would be no businesses to serve that group of people. If every restaurant is discriminating, the singular restuarant that serves the less wealthy group would have plenty of business, simply due to the lack of competition.

The "pro-regulation" argument is valid with regard to a less commoditized market though, which is interesting. For example, I wouldn't want the only company that makes a life-saving drug to be able to legally discrimate who they sell it to.

It's a challenging problem and I certainly see both sides. My gut goes to regulations affecting large businesses but not smaller ones. It feels like there are probably some difficult edge-cases within there though.
> Is die space really a plausible answer as to why Intel would bother to put in a second AGU, but cripple it so that it can only work on "simple" addresses that even their own compiler is not "smart" enough to generate?

Maybe, it's possible whoever was responsible for handling this part of the core was given a strict area budget and adding in the full set of addressing modes pushed them over. In retrospect increasing that area budget to allow it could have been the smart move but not all decisions in CPU microarchitecture are necessarily well informed! Perhaps in this case they did in investigate and with the benchmark set they were using decided simple addressing modes only didn't have a large performance impact.

Another possibility is they wanted to add the full set of addressing modes and did so, then found this caused a timing issue (as in it produced a critical path that would reduce maximum frequency too much) or power issue and the way around the timing/power issue involved a large amount of work they didn't have time to do and/or the issue was discovered late in the day and the timing fix would have introduced some interesting new corner cases they felt increased verification risk too much. Given it's persisted over a few generations this is maybe less likely but perhaps the timing issue was so severe they couldn't work around it over multiple micro-architectures (or simply can not be fixed). Intel may simply care less about the restriction than the author (i.e. no-one who spends lots of money with them has kicked up a fuss about it, nor do they think the performance restriction is causing them a large issue which is costing them sales).

(I used to work at arm designing A-class CPUs. Finding your new microarchitecture that could execute X things at once had some annoying timing issue when doing so, often related to exception handling or something else rare, that required you to add odd restrictions to work around and then trying to understand how much the odd restrictions impacted performance and whether you should go a different way to avoid the restrictions was a common part of the job)

Edit: Oh and another reason you may point to die space is whilst the feature itself may not add much extra area it can push other things apart, making for longer wires, meaning larger buffers to drive them to make timing (or they're simply too far part to meet timing) so more area and power for those buffers.
Cars have master and slave cylinders. I never liked the terms because I don’t think the terms a very descriptive. Pedal cylinder and wheel cylinder describe the devices better.
No one is arguing take the word slave out of the dictionary or history books.

We can call these things whatever we want. It's a name for an abstract concept.

Why not change it to something that does not refer to one of the most barbaric, nightmarish relationships between people?

For me personally it makes we wince whenever someone uses "master/slave."

We don't need to be casually throwing around "master and slave" in a professional setting
The article missed the best part, you could install Windows 2000 from 4 floppy disks!

I've used it a lot in my younger years, it only was manageable after SP4. God those updates took forever
Same here. I don't remember where I got it from, I think I had a license from MSDN AA when I went to university. It was hands down my favorite Windows ever. 2000 was the second most-favorite, and 7 was the third.
It's a mineral right, not a surface right. They can't do anything on the surface (including building the well) unless they obtain surface rights (a separate process). Mineral rights are there so they can investigate if there is oil and if they find it they can claim it without having to worry about other people claiming it. If you only lease when you know there is oil then this disincetivises prospecting, this way you lease first then prospect. If there is nothing underground then the lease is useless to you (you can't do anything with the surface and there is nothing underground).

https://bwab.com/surface-rights-vs-mineral-rights-whats-the-...
Alternative? No. It's a component of the full RISC-V operating system.
I hoped to live to the day when Flash is dead, so at least something good has happened in my life (a few years ago already).

Now, looking forward to PDF being abandoned for scientific publication and ‘white papers’.
Just replied to parent, but you don't actually own the land. You are given certain mineral lights. You actually, explicitly, can't block the public from accessing the land. There are a lot of rules and regulations. You don't own the land in any real sense, just certain mineral rights.
Sure you can argue things however you want, if you also decide to ignore hundreds of years of mathematical terminology.
No, not at all. Read my other comment below.
And Verizon's reason?
> The COVID-19 pandemic has underscored the critical need for robust scientific evidence to support policy decisions, such as around the effectiveness of various social distancing measures and the safety of drug therapies. Yet this need arises at a time of growing misinformation and poorly vetted facts repeated by influential sources. To address this gap, a group of scientists led by Kai Ruggeri, a professor at Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, and James Green, chief scientist at NASA, has introduced a new framework to help set standards for the quality of evidence used in policymaking.

------------
Standards for evidence in policy decision-making

- Kai Ruggeri,
Assistant Professor, Columbia University

https://socialsciences.nature.com/users/399005-kai-ruggeri/p...
Aaand that is exactly what GP is talking about: Massive assumptions about what people believe, without even an attempt to understand.
If you were a laptop used then you hated flash. Except for a few times where the heat in the building was down and playing a flash video will transform your laptop to a desk space heater.
Given how messed up I think that whole system is, having to send kids to segregated schools instead of integrated ones would rank pretty low on my list of things to complain about. I'd be far more worried about how the school was trying to indoctrinate kids than what the demographics of the student body were.

You really don’t know much about how bad that whole “separate but equal” thing worked out in practice? I bet a years salary that your parents never told you how bad Jim Crow laws were for minorities. Nor did they have to grow up under them.

This is what happens when courts try to make policy: you get a symbolic victory without the substance. I think most people, if they thought about it, would prefer the substance; but the only way to get that in a democracy is by doing the hard work of changing how citizens are willing to vote.

It’s easy to argue theory when you aren’t personally effected. No matter how much money I made, I wouldn’t have been allowed to buy a house in the area that I now live because of racial covenants 50 years ago. I wouldn’t have been able to move into the “good neighborhoods” where I could send my son to the “good schools”.

Sorry, I’m not fond with waiting for the “democratic process” and beg racists (speaking hypothetically if the court hadn’t overturned the laws) to vote to outlaw Jim Crow laws.
He forgot about stricter identifier rules, almost no product got right. Normalization.
And the complete lack of unicode support in the most basic libraries or programs, like the libc, stdlibc++ or coreutils.

As long as you cannot compare strings, you cannot search for them.

As long as identifiers are treated as binary (e.g filesystem paths, names, ...), there are tons of security holes in the most basic things, like kernel drivers. Adding unicode support to any product does not make much sense then. Rather restrict it to Latin-1 or the current locale to be on the safe side. Nobody knows the security recommendation for identifiers.
+1000 Postgres. This is exactly why we chose to build TimescaleDB on top of PostgreSQL. Reliability, JSON, mature tooling, tons of connectors.
Can it connect to Amazon and extract my purchases and classify them? Almost all of our purchases are from Amazon these days and categorizing them as "Shopping" or "General Merchandise" is almost useless. Someone please let me know if this exists somewhere.

Aside from that I'd also love the ability to amortize some of these yearly payments I have. When you're trying to answer "How much money am I putting away each month" all of these random yearly, quarterly, one-time expenses end up ruining that.
FWIW, I think you're being needlessly antagonistic. I'm trying to help the misunderstanding between Europeans and Americans on this issue (and leveling criticism against people using the term in a certain way in the American context—ICE is an American government agency, after all). Different cultures use words to mean different things. And I can tell you that, in the American context, concentration camp = Nazis killing Jews and internment camp = Americans putting Japanese Americans in camps. However you think it should be, that's the way things are on the ground here.

As a result, calling whatever ICE is doing "concentration camps" doesn't make sense in the American context, unless maybe you're an academic or specialist speaking to there academics or specialists. And it's actually worse than "doesn't make sense in the American context", since it makes people who are only familiar with the American understanding of the term think that you are a deranged ideologue. And that's bad for discourse and finding a shared understanding, which I think we can all agree is a good thing.
Yah 95-Me era ran pretty slow and horrible.

Though 95 was pretty revolutionary when it came out.
I was curious if anyone could speak to the toilet design they have on their product page. Does it work so simply?
I find this form of argument extremely exhausting as well.

I don't think many people would argue that we need a forum where people can advocate for pedophilia and child porn. We've clearly decided that sort of thing is bad. But saying we're going to ban child porn is not the same thing as saying we're going to ban vegetarians.

Certainly reasonable people can disagree on what types ideas deserve platforms. I imagine some (misguided but well-intentioned) people might think that providing neo-Nazis a platform to advocate for their position is a good and fair thing to do, even if they disagree with the neo-Nazi message. But it doesn't mean that people who don't think that's ok are somehow anti-free-speech fascist dictators who want to have control over every kind of speech.

I also get exhausted when people trot out the slippery-slope argument at every opportunity in order to shut down discussion. Not everything has to be a slippery slope! People are actually capable of making decisions in a nuanced, fine-grained way!
This feels like something Cards Against Humanity would do. I would definitely buy a deck of cards that comes with an acre of land that can’t be touched for ten years.
No, you also need to be able to MITM. Snooping the traffic is not enough to do harm.
Problem is, the actual work we used to do locally and now do over webapps has to pay the performance price of browsing the web - resulting in severe UX degradation for anything but the most casual of uses.
> How is buying insurance on things you expect to fail any different than, say, buying options on the stock market, or some other form of intelligent betting?

Insurance, unlike options on equity stock or indexes, require an insurable interest. The pricing of insurance assumes that the buyer of insurance would rather not use the insurance policy; the options contract on stock makes no such stipulation. They are a bit similar in practice but both are structured, regulated contracts and are defined differently.

This lady did not have an "insurable interest" in the flights she was purchasing insurance on, since she did not actually intend to go on on the flight (she bought the insurance to profit from the insurance). Had she bought an "option" and not "insurance" on the flight, fraud maybe would not be in play. However, expect an "option" to be priced differently.
We've phasing out using btrfs for RAID at work. It has been just a lot more straight-forward and easier to manage MD for the RAID-1 on our servers. We still use btrfs for container filesystems, subvolume snapshots are so handy. But that is btrfs on top of a MD RAID array.
i read a there was groups working on this with a strategy to buy the cheap plots making it more difficult to access and mine on other plots.
DDOS is trending on Twitter now. Could it be an attack?
In practice it is about phrasing "expert said that, so it must be true" is a fallacy, reaching a consensus via a relevant authority is not.
Then what is the goal? That's my question.
Is this one of the strategies used by the Nature Conservancy?
The article explicitly says that Master on its own is not a problem.

So, for example, creating a CD master, or remastering, is fine.

The issue is with the master/slave pairing.
> There's a zero percent chance the people putting in the effort to promote this don't realize that 'Master' is an industry term of art meaning original or reference copy.

True, although in the case of this article it's talking more about music technology like MIDI, where rather than "original" or "reference" it usually means something closer to "leader" or "commander".

But this misses the point of the article. The suggestion isn't that we should drop the historic terms to improve the precision of tech communication. Rather, the worry is that habitualizing the terms "master" and "slave" in technology desensitizes us to concept. If we accept that one device is naturally the "master" of other devices, perhaps we are more willing to accept that one human can be the master of other humans. If we accept that the role of one device is to be merely a "slave", perhaps we won't recoil sufficiently at the notion that one human might be enslave another.

Certainly, one can disagree with this premise. Why should using the same language to describe one concept influence attitudes toward another? But rather than suggesting that author is pretending not to understand a standard industry term, you'd do much better to argue about the point the article is actually making.
Would that the line were as clear as you make it out to be. There were a metric craptonne of essentially all-document sites - the only "interactivity" being links - that were encased in inaccessible SWFs for (a) "pixel-perfect" rendering or (b) someone's idea of copy protection.
> Is it within their moral rights for backhoe operators demand manual ditch digging too because that will benefit their friends who lost jobs to powered equipment?

This seems like an unfruitful digression.

OP already agreed that the actions of ICE are immoral and that this action is within the moral rights of the workers.

The main question is about efficacy. That isn't elucidated by introducing a thought experiment where you believe the moral rights of developers are not as clear cut.
That’s what I meant. The youtube poster is responsible for the copyright. I don’t think it’s possible for me to check beyond the legal copyright.

Disney, and random youtuber, does have to check everything, not me if I’m legally using it. However, if the copyright if wrong, I’m not sure what the liability is.
From the article: "...the LEGO MINDSTORMS Robot Inventor will be available in Autumn 2020 from LEGO.com, LEGO Retail Stores and retailers globally."
Hooboy let me tell you what it’s like to try to collect your gains from puts on a worthless stock when it’s halted.
pointless arm flappery. how many people when configuring a piece of music software or hardware to be a slave get themselves a jolly thinking about how they're putting one over the downtrodden.

flag me, reid. you know you want to.
Same for apartments if you want any hope of fighting bogus claims on security deposits.

For some reason all the contracts I've seen want a written description of damage. That just isn't enough. Take photos of everything you find before you move in and include them in the statement of the state of the house.
What is that make people react to events that happen in the US differently than those outside of the US? I mean there are people who die and people who protest about a variety of different issues outside of the US (just recently protests in Hong Kong, Iraq, and Lebanon). However, it never causes this magnitude of response, from media platforms and tech companies, to music production terminology.