skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The article notes that it is potentially an area of concern.

"The trend is concerning as sexual relationships are important for well-being and health, researchers note."
What exactly is the difference between pattern matching and reasoning?
> I tend to think the real problem is the overly strict conception of duplicate.

It's true, people are so damn trigger-happy marking questions as duplicates.

I've seen new, well-posed questions on up-to-date frameworks get marked as dupe because 10 years ago someone asked a related question on an obsolete tech. The reason it was marked as dupe was simply because someone took it upon themselves to write up a sprawling smug "canonical" answer to a shitty old question that happened to cover the new subject matter.

It's much better to keep the old questions and answers, to just answer each question (and no more), and to create new questions as needed. Why not? it's not like they're running out of disk space.

I think the solution here is to encourage specific answers to specific questions, let folks sort out the historical minutiae based on timestamps and subject. Anything more elaborate is asking for mix-ups and confusion.
He doesn't appear to be taking a position affirming or denying either the antecedent or consequent propositions in that tweet; he merely states a relationship between them.
I'm not sure what you mean by 'teach the basics'. Certainly, college can provide the texts and an environment where other people are interested in the same subjects. If that's all you mean I agree, though it's far from the only institution where that's possible.

The trouble, I think, is that making ethical judgements requires wrestling with ethical conundra oneself, and that is not something a professor with 300 undergrads to teach can provide any useful guidance to the majority of them for. The idea of accurately assessing performance is even more unrealistic. Maybe it's a function of the kind of university I attended, but the vast majority of my fellow students who were taking these 'subjective' courses were simply gaming a rubric in their writing. And this is true even of those who were genuinely interested in the subject matter, they saw it as a price of admission.

Which seems to me like an impediment to actually learning what was traditionally taught on more of an apprenticeship than an industrial model. If your own undergraduate experience was different, I'd be curious what your university did differently.
ROX-Filer is still my favorite file manager for lightweight desktops today.
I took my intro to databases course on a $160 (sale) Acer C670 in 2015. Fantastic battery life, Crouton was a breeze to get working, and was my first introduction to doing work in a unix environment. The only problem was that the larger tests would take more than 2GB of ram, and start swapping out to disk - so suites that took my classmates 5 minutes to run took me closer to an hour. I got very careful at thinking over the code in my head before hitting run.

Wonderful little system for a broke CS student, and nothing but fond memories.
This is a widespread societal change that I think most people are completely unaware of. The majority of women are sleeping with the top 10% of men, sometimes only the top 3-5%, with the rest barely getting any at all. the sexual revolution was never about free love or sexual freedom, it was about womens rights to sleep with the few men they are all attracted to. The lower 80% of men instead saw their sexual freedom diminish drastically.

Even the men not getting any do not realize how easily other guys are getting sex. Its like they live in separate universes. Whats more, eventually these women need to settle down, often with men who are their "equals". But they do not see them as equals, as they have been having casual sex with men way out of their league for years. This is a deep societal problem and one that surely adds to unrest among the population.

How do I know all of this? I lived in NYC for five years and ran in circles where we were usually the best looking guys at the bar. The ease with which some friends got women was shocking. Especially in contrast with other circles that I ran in, specifically nerdier programmers working at FAANG.

If I said the above out in the open I would lose my job. But its reality.

EDIT:

I agree that women should be free and any opinion other than that is heinous.

But I am going to add a bit about the sexual revolution part, because I think it is critical. Monogamy is about stability in society. Half of the reason for pushing for sexual restrictions and monogamy was because it stopped uprisings and stabilized relations. It has been a cornerstone of western society. All of these restrictions from the past had a purpose and stood the test of time, they were not random. When we remove those restrictions and societal opinions of sexual conservatism, we throw out thousands of years of hard learned rules across societies.
> Given the push to eliminate virtually all traditional norms associated with sexual activity

I wonder if this is actually true. I also wonder what your idea of being less 'traditional' means. Having multiple partners, but going from it being done in secret (i.e. cheating) to it being consensual (i.e. swinging)? Going from a president getting a blow job in office to a president who is on his third wife, embroiled in stripper lawsuits while in office? Gay relationships being legal?
> It'll be interesting to see what happens in 5-10 years

What is already happening in rich parts of Asia. Tons of pissed off women with no kids who want to raise your taxes.
I can’t speak specifically to Intel, but at most large private companies when you’re an employee you give up the rights to talk to media/press about your work without employer approval.

For the Fortune and Lex Fridman interviews, Keller would likely have had to get Intel PR’s approval to participate. In Lex’s interview, you can see him wearing an Intel guest badge, so I assume the interview took place on-site.
>If not, go visit a forum for incels and see how happy they are.

Incels are a cult of hateful, misogynistic extremists who consider mass murderers like Eliot Rodger to be heroes. Simply not having as much sex as one would prefer, or any at all, does not make one an incel.
LAPD was handling the protests extremely badly to begin with as well. They may have calmed down sooner than SPD did. As far as major west-coast city police departments, both LAPD and SPD have handle things somewhat better than the Portland Police Bureau (PPB).
> Is it a problem?

I don't know. But its probably worth bringing up and thinking about it. Its certainly a problem in Japan, and a few other countries where birthrates have declined.

The USA is also a democracy, predicting future demographics is pretty important with regards to the future political will.

There's also the issues of global warming, over population, overfarming and overconsumption. So maybe a declining sex rate could be a good thing.

Either way, its worth thinking about the future and what these statistics could mean for the next generation of citizens.
I figure the author is here so 1. Maturity doesn't equal consent.
2. Even if legal, consent does not equal lack of manipulation 3. It's attacking a strawman, and is inherently provocative.
Provocative doesn't have to mean wrong, but in this case it fails on it's premise.

It's concerning to me the author doesn't have a basic understanding of why underage laws exist. It doesn't mean that anyone underage can't make mature decisions. It's there because it's a time ripe for abuse in a manner that's difficult to prove. Without getting very realistic, dark, and entirely off topic I can't go into details, but there are very good reasons why that exists. It doesn't mean they can't not be trusted to drive, or handle money, or whatever. There isn't a relation.
Hmm, to me the problem is the question of _why_ a man would do that "nice gesture" for the woman. To me, if you don't have reason to be doing it besides "she's a woman", it smacks that the gesture is being done because she's inferior based on her gender (or at least, that's what's being implied).
Interesting product! Have had to implement this before and certainly would check it out next time.

Have you thought about pricing based on performance?

At the low end, it could be "pays for itself": A monthly fee of max($79, mrr_preserved_that_month). When the fee cancels out the preserved mrr, the customer still gets data features of the product for free. Thinking mostly of the indiehacker crowd here.

At the high end, I suppose you could flex up to something like a percentage of mrr recovered with a cap.

(Always find subscription pricing economics interesting, especially to learn how others do it.)
Incels call this "hypergamy": https://incels.wiki/images/thumb/c/c8/C57f84720fff59cf295616...

Although misogynistic incels are obviously abhorrent, I believe that they're probably right in their assessment of their own social status. It just seems like rather than trying to better themselves, they turn it into outward hatred.

I've also seen calls by right-wing thought leaders for "enforced monogamy," which obviously seems authoritarian, rapey and wrong. However I do think monogamy and commitment a good moral values to cultivate. Even though there's a lot of "slut-positivity" now, the people I know who live that way seem much less happy, fulfilled and stable.
This article awkwardly dances around reasons why young men have less sex.

First it is "social media and electronic gaming", then the reasons "may also include stress of juggling work and intimate relationships, as well as the prevalence of other forms of solo entertainment."

But then, they notice that "[s]exual activity was largely unchanged among unmarried women, along with no notable decline among gay men, researchers reported." So everything said before seems kind of void anyway.

Obviously, the reasons must lie somewhere else. However, this is not explicitly stated.

Now they continue with huge jump: From sexual activities to relationships: "Given a preference for men of higher socioeconomic status and the larger number of college-educated women than men, some young men may find it difficult to form heterosexual relationships"

Well, maybe. But how does that connect to the first part?
I would like to see marriage rates by age over time. Overwhelming amount of sex happens in marriage. If people are marrying less or marrying later, then I think that will explain this trend almost completely.

If marriage rates are falling, I doubt it’s because of economic hardship (hundred years ago we had much worse financial outcome for people).
While it is know for being a restrictive culture, I suspect most of it is because the people making the decision is visible. If we compare the difficulty of getting an article accepted on Wikipedia with submitting an article here on HN and getting people to discuss it and making it visible on the first page, the later only has an invisible visibility score of upvotes and flags. If an article on HN get killed or buried you don't know why or who the people were that made the collective decision. On wikipedia the people responsible for the decision is right there, and it feel much more personal getting rejected by a person rather than by an invisible score. And yet, I would definitively claim that getting something accept on Wikipedia is much easier than getting something accepted by the HN community.

So I am not sure that the guards of wikipedia is that bad. A lot of information does not make it past the guards, but it is also something which communities desire. If you don't have moderators you have upvote system. If you don't have upvote system you have algorithmic models of suggestions and recommendations. If you don't have that you have a search function that order by some kind of ranking.
Self-publishing is a very underrated way of exchanging knowledge for money with high ROI. I'm approaching $200K in 6 months from 2 self-published info products: one is a short ebook on AWS (160 hours to produce), and the other is a video presentation about building an audience (16 hours to produce).

https://twitter.com/dvassallo/status/1268622381964095488
Outside of an extremely small minority, dating and sex are intrinsically linked.
I would agree that most people seek companiship, but in a modern climate I think the number of people who want children is diminishing.
Wait until you see ptrace(2), for which the man page on my machine contains choice quotes such as "the following is believed to work correctly" and "the following system calls are affected (this list is likely incomplete)". I have used the ptrace API from userspace and worked on reimplementing it kernel-side and it's pretty horrible either way. If you ever look into the code of GDB, you'll see it performs a bunch of checks to make sure that your ptrace conforms to the things that the man page says it should (because it's been buggy in many kernel versions) and even then has like a dozen fallbacks so that it can still be useful when pretty much nothing works.
We built ironhide https://github.com/IronCoreLabs/ironhide to help developers share secrets with each other and with CI.
Here is pretty much the most detailed post about how it works you'll be able to find in public: https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/database/amazon-rds-under-the-h...

They basically do replication at the storage layer. Each write has to be acknowledged by both the primary and secondary EBS volume.
Small group video calls led by brands + influencers! Built this as a side project, people ended up really liking it.

The magic happens when it turns from "ooo this is a mini-masterclass with my favorite influencer!" to "ooo the people in here are pretty cool, am I becoming friends with them now?"
> Rust's trait system is Turing complete

has anyone tried implementing rust in rust's trait system
I don't think the commenter you're replying to was correlating to wealth directly. Rather they were drawing a comparison to wealth: Just like a few people control most wealth, a small number of males have the majority of sexual interactions.
Why beyond Discord?
We use Discord extensively, have a lot of bots built for it.
Works great!
it was not the work place. it was in a hospital waitibg room. and i meant it as a kind gesture.

the world is crazy
If your indulging hurts others, then it is something worth complaining about.
I'm curious as to how it works to develop on it locally vs a stage server & vs prod? I.e. how to make sure the workflows are synched and are easy to reason about?
For cases when you sign a noncompete when you leave, that's going to be in the case if a layoff or soft firing where they've got leverage over you. Otherwise fron what I've seen on NY where noncompete can be enforced, the noncompete is signed when you get the job. For the case where you're signing things when you leave though, that's when they've got a severance to hold over your head.
Many of the options suggested (Rocket.Chat, Matrix, IRC, ...) work well, and some even have mobile notifications if you use the master server (e.g. matrix.org) - but not if you run your own server (which I want to do for privacy reasons)

Is there any solution for this that doesn't kill battery for Android, and one that works at all for iOS?
Is there a link to the study? I'm curious if there was some sort of selection bias.
> Are they compiling these shaders locally in the browser?

Yes, shader compilation has always been a part of the OpenGL API itself. A conforming implementation must include a compiler.
Some citations for your thesis below. To your last point, IMHO, you're going to continue to see a decline in the total fertility rate (US is roughly ~1.77 this year, lowest on record) as women shift from casual seeking in their 20s to relationship/nesting in their 30s and find the market for partners to be much smaller than they would've anticipated, while also nearing the end of natural fertility (fertility rates start to drop ~35 years old) [1].

> As I stated previously the average female “likes” 12% of men on Tinder. This doesn't mean though that most males will get “liked” back by 12% of all the women they “like” on Tinder. This would only be the case if “likes” were equally distributed. In reality, the bottom 80% of men are fighting over the bottom 22% of women and the top 78% of women are fighting over the top 20% of men. We can see this trend in Figure 1. The area in blue represents the situations where women are more likely to “like” the men. The area in pink represents the situations where men are more likely to “like” women. The curve doesn’t go down linearly, but instead drops quickly after the top 20% of men. Comparing the blue area and the pink area we can see that for a random female/male Tinder interaction the male is likely to “like” the female 6.2 times more often than the female “likes” the male. [2]

> The researchers determined that while men’s sexual desirability peaks at age 50, women’s starts high at 18 and falls from there. [3]

> “The age gradient for women definitely surprised us — both in terms of the fact that it steadily declined from the time women were 18 to the time they were 65, and also how steep it was,” said Elizabeth Bruch, an associate professor of sociology at the University of Michigan and an author of the study. [3]

[1] https://www.acog.org/patient-resources/faqs/pregnancy/having...

[2] https://medium.com/@worstonlinedater/tinder-experiments-ii-g...

[3] https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/15/style/dating-apps-online-...
Particularly, most kinds of inequality tend to follow a Pareto distribution.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pareto_distribution
Casual sex is quite different thing to having a relationships. I dont believe the group who has a lot of casual sex with different partners settle for polygamy typically - relationships are about a lot of other things than sex, while hookups are mostly only aboit sex.
But this isn't useful to this discussion.

In aggregate, less sex may be a bad thing. In aggregate, more sex may be a good thing. That's what's being discussed.

Individuals and anecdotes just distract from the discussion.
Good to remember blog posts like this for all those who claim Google isn't innovating or investing in search. This is the type of infrastructure that goes in to extracting useful information from the web.
> "I willingly give up those rights. No, really."

And by so doing, you give them up for others too.

> "the collective in this case has already agreed that I should be paid the market rate that I successfully negotiate."

Is there any reason to think you + (more resources, more experienced people, more leverage) could NOT negotiate a higher rate? That you are the best imaginable negotiator, despite having no specific training and only practising once every few years?

> "I don't really care, because I know they won't do that as long as I continue to deliver value"

/r/LeopardsAteMyFace will be there for when the company decides it's in their interest to eat your face.

> "In reality, it's less "David vs Goliath" and more like "Goliath vs Goliath vs Goliath"."

It's more like (Goliath + Goliath + Goliath) vs you; remember when "the Department of Justice alleged that Adobe, Apple, Google, Intel, Intuit, and Pixar had violated Section 1 of the Sherman Act by entering into a series of bilateral "No Cold Call" Agreements to prevent the recruitment of their employees [...] The alleged intent of this conspiracy was "to reduce employee compensation and mobility through eliminating competition for skilled labor.""? - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-Tech_Employee_Antitrust_L...

> "I pushed the issue as high as it would go in the chain of command and left when it was clear they refused to do anything."

I refer back to your claimed excellent negotiating skills, and suggest that a better negotiator - or a large percentage of the employees "united" in some way - would have much more chance at effecting change, and that this is evidence that individual action is weaker than you wish/imply it is. To be clear, when the employer had the power to ignore you until you quit, leaving the injustice to be perpetuated against the customers, you didn't win.

> But you seem to gloss over the inconvenient facts about police and teachers unions.

I think this is an irrelevant diversion; that the courts sometimes lets guilty people go free is not a reason to ditch the legal system, that unions have people who do bad things in them, or that some unions are bad, is not a reason to reject the principal of uniting to make larger negotiating blocks to balance power dynamics which are almost entirely on the employer's side, with tactics like dividing and conquering - setting all employees on individual permanent competition with other employees.
'Superforecasters' Are Making Eerily Accurate Predictions About Covid-19
interesting point. I fully agree with that. Every answer is a wiki page. However I strong believe that if the question isn't specific about versions, an answer to an old version of code (gem/pip/etc version X, instead of master) still right.

Example if for the question "How to print to stdout with python", the answer " print 'foo'" is right, you just have to use python2.. it is maybe staled, outdated, but not wrong.
Not sure this is about libido so much as about access to another partner.
> Seaborn is essentially dead as far as I can tell with few changes in the last 2-3 years. There are even parameters that continue to be non-functional

https://seaborn.pydata.org/whatsnew.html

Seaborn has received a couple updates this year. Not sure what you mean by can't control figure size either. The ways to do so are inconsistent, but they're there.

> I'd love to get feedback and happy to take detailed criticism.

I like your syntax a lot. This page isn't a good way to show it. Seaborn's gallery page is excellent, even if redundant at times. I would dedicate more time to creating more easily useable docs like that. Docs are almost everything when it comes to charting.

Also need to see stuff on how to control aesthetic things like color, outlines, style, etc.
My PinePhone was lost in shipping during the start of the pandemic like you mentioned. They happily sent me another a few short weeks later, no complaints! Awesome customer service
In common parlance "Linux (Phone|Tablet)" does not include android because the userspace is usually very different than what most people running linux think as linux.
How to add Google Tag Manager code to your Hugo website
> Simply not having as much sex as one would prefer, or any at all, does not make one an incel.

It literally does though. You can't change definitions because someone gave the name a bad rep.
Yes! RegExp Tree, by Dmitry Soshnikov (who is extremely awesome).

https://github.com/DmitrySoshnikov/regexp-tree

A fun bug I found in it: https://github.com/DmitrySoshnikov/regexp-tree/issues/69
You still have a point, but isn't what you declaim precisely what companies like RedHat, Canonical, etc., do. Mozilla, and Google too, to some extent.
Yes natural sugar is just barely better than added sugar (due to the fiber it's typically mixed in with). The apples we eat today are candy bars, they just happen to grow on trees. Trees shaped extensively via artificial selection for thousands of years to pack in more glucose, trees that are nowhere near to what our ancestors have encountered for millions of years.
Only if the software in question has not been updated much since the question was asked, or your answer specifically includes version numbers or is specific enough that it can be easily deduced that the answer only applies to a specific version. Otherwise, the answer is wrong, because it doesn't make sense to expect someone asking such a generic question to be running a decade old version of the stack and in almost every case they'd be worse off if they opted to use the decade old version of the stack just to make use of your answer.
You would lose your job because that is some serious incel shit.
I admit much of it's over my head, but that's exactly the kind of books I like. I keep coming back to chew on different parts.