skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
1981? The title of the article is "25 Years of PHP", which checks out because PHP appeared in 1995, and this is 2020, and 2020-1995=25, but 1981 was 39 years ago. The ARPANET was using NCP with 8 bit host IDs in 1981, and nobody was listening for the HTTP protocol on port 80 back then, and homosocketuality was still prohibited.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14178993

>The act of trying to connect an even socket to another even socket, or an odd socket to another odd socket, was considered a "peculiar error" called "homosocketuality", which was strictly forbidden by internet protocols, and mandatory "heterosocketuality" was called the "Anita Bryant feature" [2].

https://www.saildart.org/allow/IMPSER.DOC%5bSS,SYS%5d

>Illegal gender in RFC, host hhh/iii, link 0

>The host is trying to engage us in homosocketuality. Since this is against the laws of God and ARPA, we naturally refuse to consent to it.
as a general rule, all punching in the workplace is frowned upon
Interesting idea, could pair well with our "Little Free Library" in the front yard. Two concerns: Liability for use (as mentioned) and I also don't want to take away from subscribers to the city service by using our open WiFi. Perhaps a time-based limit?

Now, if I was taking away from the incumbents... :-)

I'd have to check into the terms of the service though.

Related: Anyone used those Ubituiti Mesh things? Not the Amplifi, the other mesh. I've toyed with the idea of putting some of those around the neighborhood to provide some sort of wide area wireless, but never pursued it.
My mistake, thanks for the correction.
Blog posts are like youtube videos, you have to skip the first 30% to see the "actual" start.
I actually did notice that issue, even with using a stateful client like mechanize. Sometimes I had to scrape > 5 times in order to get through the "anti robot" page.

Other times, I get no issue at all. It's weird - maybe they're doing some pattern matching on request metadata on their end?
> In this connection, I note another strange moment seen in not only the ‘expert’ statements, but also coming from the side of NASA officials — such as Stephanie Schierholz, who have already started making wreaths to bury the Russian Soyuz spacecraft alive.

I’m still trying to find evidence of this event ever happening.
If I shoot my neighbor, it’s not up to my neighbor to prove that they didn’t deserve to be shot. It’s up to me to prove that I was justified in shooting my neighbor.

But for some reason the moment the police are involved, that presumption is reversed. Why?
Does it run vscode?
I recently finished a 2.5 year stint in a UK prison and that was bad enough
Also related to the etymology of Massachusetts: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massachusetts#Etymology
Thanks for sharing this, heard my hometowns' radio station in Bolivia after 5 years of being away, nostalgia hit me hard. :)
Back when Nissan was doing their dog-and-pony show ("come take a test drive!" in a very controlled environment) for the Leaf (2009), that was their exact spiel for what would be done with the batteries when they were past their prime. Now that the early Leafs are at the point of needing new batteries, I'm curious if Nissan is following through (but not curious enough to go looking.)
This is done for a soccer stadium in Amsterdam.

https://www.johancruijffarena.nl/default-showon-page/amsterd...
>> less than lethal

And for anyone not familiar with it, there was an excellent documentary on Netflix about the use of the Taser. It argued (and it argued well - I agree with it) that the Taser was attractive because it was less lethal than a gun, but it largely did not replace the gun, it replaced other submission methods. And it ended up being MORE lethal than those submission methods. And that's a problem if you misrepresent that.

Now, I still think police should carry tasers because they're effective on a large spectrum of intermediate / gray area in the use of force continuum and it's much safer for police than many alternatives. But my point is that it's really bad to just think "less than lethal" is a cure-all. "Less lethal" can be lethal (or in this case, permanently disabling). There should still be a high threshold for deploying it.
Many corporate proxies are HTTP proxies (as opposed to SOCKS) as well, which are currently by definition TCP. Not sure if an QUIC proxy would be easy to implement at all.
I think it's good advice because the prediction of the social situation around becoming a manager is accurate (and often not discussed at all).

It is awkward for people to go from not being a manager to being a manager among their peers. In new social situations I think that 'awkwardness' is actually uncertainty about how to behave because you haven't been in that position before. A lot of social skills seem to be based on accurate models/predictions of what to do in certain situations in order to bond with people.

When you're suddenly a manager the old tools don't work as well and people try to generate that camaraderie with humor, but for the reasons listed in the article this can be particularly bad if done poorly.

Other jokes I've noticed in addition to the firing thing, are annoying humble brag comments like, "Can you believe X important person wanted to talk to me about this thing?". I think they're trying to signal that they don't think they're important, but the obvious context just comes across as bragging. I think people get more respect when they just recognize the role they're in and are more confident about it (but that probably comes with experience of navigating that social situation).

A good lead will explain these things directly to a new manager because the social bits are not obvious and are uncomfortable. This is even more important in fields where the baseline social skills may be not quite at par anyway.

One advantage is that if you have knowledge of this, and you can model the way others think about it - you can actually be a force to make people more comfortable than they'd otherwise be. Encouraging them to ask questions by asking yourself in front of them when you don't know something. Suggesting they go home early if something is bothering them and that you do it too. Reassuring them if they're doing a good job or if something they're working on is particularly tricky etc.

A good manager can do a lot to make someone feel safe/secure and make them happy, which is often a prerequisite for them to be a strong member of the team and stay for a long time.
The F-16's engine alone, is 70% heavier than the VK1 on the MIG-17.

(edited for engine typo)
Javascript has made progress too. While far from perfect and I think PHP's journey started at a worse point has has gone further JS certainly is a lot better now and the major failings of JS are of it's ecosystem and not the language itself.

I also think that both JS and PHP get a lot of flak for maintaining backwards compat as far back as they do. You can run a lot of webapps (frontend and backend) from 10-20 years back in modern PHP and browsers which is pretty amazing. I'd like them to have a modern mode (like the proposed p++/<?php2020 and modules for JS) we should still acknowledge that maintaining compat that far back is not easy.
Why don't you just shut down this site and turn Hacker News into a subreddit if every other conversation is going to be about that shitty website.
You probably haven't heard, but recently mr. Rogozin's personal twitter turned into official Roskosmos one overnight. Utterly incompetent as they are, nobody bothered to read or clean up previous tweets after doing this, so for some time you could see some instant classics like "we are russian! god is with us" or a collage of Putin with a tiger and Obama with a puppy with description "we have different values and comrades"[0], all by Roskosmos with the blue checkmark. Hysterical shit if you ask me.

[0] https://leonardo.osnova.io/7764cddc-938a-b05f-ca43-b131fcbcd...
> I personally love it when my search results just give me the answer I'm looking for

This is one of the things I love about google as a user. Googling "what is my ip" or "how many inches in a meter" used to require you to visit some random website filled to the brim with ads.
I approve this message
> The past week has shown that cops are absolutely willing to use injurious force without even the slightest shred of justification, and then lie badly about it.

But you just said you couldn't prove this above... Which is it?
That'd be the "Banded Kestrel" processors.

Wiki: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_AMD_accelerated_proces...

CPU-World: http://www.cpu-world.com/CPUs/Zen/AMD-Ryzen%20Embedded%20R10...

However those are Zen+ fabricated on 14nm, so not really the best that AMD could do in this area. They could fight either with a slowed down Renoir (that could meet the TDP requirements while not requiring any development) or a specific processor based on Zen2.
> rather expensive editions that are rarely discounted substantially, such as the Criterion Collection

Criterion's web store (https://www.criterion.com/shop) has sales all the time. There's one on right now through June 15 that gives you 30% off all titles. I picked up two titles through a 50% off sale last month. Subscribe to their email list or follow them on social media and they'll give you a heads up when the next one is coming.
https://designblog.rietveldacademie.nl/wp-content/uploads/20...

Anyway, the blog was about "bad circuit design", not "bad design".
Plots – Lmfao Shots Parody
if you want to specifically have google find you a wiki article why not just go to wiki directly, or bookmark it on your phone and create an app, or use any of the many apps that go to wiki directly.

i don't like google but this practice seems 100% legit, someone looking for a broad answer finds an answer immediately outside of wiki and they're happy with it.

i personally don't want -- ever -- wiki to be #1 on my search results, if i want a wiki answer i'll go there directly, i use search engines to find variety of answers.
See the end of this post: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23479194

Nothing published yet but I have many smaller academic writings that are building the pieces of this, and currently have a master outline that basically looks like this:

(1) Hard Determinism

(2) Ethics/Morality under (1)

(3) Social/Political Organization under (2)

(4) Personal/Useful/Practical/Life Philosophy under (1)/(2)/(3)

I started (1) when I was 18 and have many different forms at this point. Recently I have spent a good deal of time on (2) in the past couple years. (3) I have worked on independent of these ideas and am still linking up once I sure up and reflect on (2) more. (4) I'd argue is basically a WIP experiment of my own life since I was 17/18 and will be the last to be completed, probably not for a good deal of time.

Basically if this is a checklist representative of how developed/ready these ideas are, (1) is done, (2) is 75% of the way there and my main focus currently, (3) is up next, and 4 requires all the others and of course much lived experience.

As to when/how I want to publish, right now my plan is to have three forms for each - an accessible article (think 10-30 minute read), a short accessible book form that elaborates, and the formal philosophy for the academic/formal community to pick apart. Right now I essentially am working on the articles and planning to expand out. I'm not sure if I want to publish the articles without the books though, so it could be a long time.

However, given that philosophy benefits from discussion and debate, I think there seems to be a good case for publishing the articles. I might try to stand up my website/blog I've been putting off forever once I finish two and start making progress on three. I'd really love to have all four articles published at the same time as a set though, so I might have to figure out a compromise there.
Was going to suggest this.

Another project to look into is Arweave, they've developed a really nice solution to make data permanent and censorship-resistant. Great small dev community, looking for more to join in and build with them.
It offers some variety when so many of us are working from home?

Also, just because it isn't new doesn't mean it isn't interesting.
It does seem they are.. the obvious reason for having one on both wings would be redundancy, pitot tubes are not that reliable.. You need to check & inspect & cover/uncover them in preflight/postflight cause bugs & dirt and such can easily clog them.

AFAICT they're so huge to get them out of the pressure effects on the wing from supersonic/transonic flight.

The Mig-21 giant spike over the nose is the same thing apparently.

Pretty interesting. It seems like a lot of US jets just have/had a different solution to this problem.
If I’m understanding you correctly, for purposes of free will and moral responsibility, the details underlying the ‘control’ people have don’t matter—all that matters is that they change their behavior in response to feedback that what they did was wrong. In order to give that feedback, we need to take for granted the ‘they did’ part of the sentence. Is that a fair summary?

If so, I think I agree. But it makes me feel like we’re talking about different things. I think we may just have a namespace collision over the phrase “free will” (which I think is part of your whole point).

I guess my question is, if your main concern is being able to assign moral blame, defined as saying someone did something and that thing was right or wrong, why does that require free will? Without it you can still say people do things (in the car sense) and make value judgments about them. Why define free will this way, instead of in the straightforward sense of choice?
"estimates that seem too high, and then don't even meet those"

This is pretty much the definition of an estimate in software.
One project I use on a daily basis that isn't well known (and is by a Chinese developer) is Vimium C (https://github.com/gdh1995/vimium-c). It has similar functionality to Vimium, cVim, Vimperator, Pentadactyl and the like—browser navigation using vim-like shortcuts. Vimium C is quite customizable, offers great functionality, and the developer seems quite responsive to issues. The code is written in TypeScript and I found it easy to read. Highly recommended.
I've always used WinAeroTweaker. I like it more than all these other ones because for each tweak it does it also gives you a way to manually enable or disable the tweak in the registry or in the group policy editor. Windows 10 2004 seems to have disabled the ability to disable web search on anything other than windows 10 enterprise though sadly. Apparently it was always supposed to be that way: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/client-management/g...
I'd argue it hasn't changed much for technology people. I had an iPhone in 10 and used it constantly for the same thing I do today: news, web browsing when away, and chatting with friends. My google history confirms this. I still use the same gmail address, reddit, social media, Steam, bank, etc accounts.

I think the biggest difference for me is that I use spotify now for music, rather than downloading it. And streaming video is now legit, so there's less need for torrents and newsgroups.
As a Russian citizen, all I can say is that Rogozin is tiresome. Instead of trolling SpaceX, I'd rather see him address criticisms like this one [0], where Russian engineers talk about the sorry state of our space industry.

Although ultimately there is no mystery here.

The Soviets had a real commitment to science and technology. It was one of the few silver linings of the communist regime. Present day Russia is devoid of that commitment. You can say that lack of funding is the problem (and there is that), but even more troublesome is the apparent lack of leadership. There are no driven, fanatical figures out there trying to set up a vision for the industry. Absent drive from the top, the industry is at best in maintenance mode, trying to keep Soviet heritage pieces flying.

Case in point, Roscosmos hasn't had a space engineer for a director since the early 2000s. Rogozin is a career politician, educated as a journalist. Before Rogozin, Roscosmos was ran by an automaker named Igor Komarov who came from Avtovaz. Before Komarov, there was a string of Army Generals during the 2000s (Gen. Nikolai Ostapenko, Vladimir Popovkin, Anatoly Perminov). Car manufacturers and ICBM generals are not the people who will lobby the political leadership for a basic space program.

Oh well. Whether things will change, I dunno. I think before they do, there has to be a realization at the top that education and science are important. Right now they are playing third fiddle to guns and butter, and all we get are Rogozins whose solution to everything is to put lipstick on a pig.

[0] https://varlamov.ru/3912524.html
> that has outlawed private business.

From my original comment: "the majority".

The examples you have given, have indeed outlawed many private businesses, in the past. Although, I agree that those countries have become significantly more capitalistic over the years.

You also skipped the most famous example of socialism, which was the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union absolutely banned almost all forms of private enterprise.

But sure, socialism has significantly decreased in relevancy over the last few decades, to the point where basically all old socialist countries are becoming more and more capitalistic. Socialism is dying, all throughout the world.
And the problem here is that I trust my network and I trust my operating system both significantly more than I trust my applications, especially as browsers have transitioned largely to being user-hostile by design.

The primary benefactor of your end-to-end argument is ad networks that also own web browsers.

Hence why this is political, it's about shifting network traffic outside of places users have control.
Personally, I use it for counting concurrent users.
As far as "neighborhood full of Linux enthusiasts", the service area is the whole city, though buildout is still in its infancy. Population is ~170K.

Netflix does have a program where you can submit to get them to ship you a CDN box. I might submit that if I do this, but I doubt they want those in a residence, even if it is 10gig connected. Maybe for a year or two until the municipal provider gets their "data center" space up.
Having read the paper, it is based on expert classifications and summaries of job titles...it is like a game of telephone, where

real world -> noisy data collection -> noisy data classification -> noisy expert analysis -> specific study -> paper

leads to something where the paper is just too disconnected from the real world.
Couldn't it be said Wikipedia is basically complete? Which would explain the declining number of edits
How can someone _subscribe_ to a hosted (by you or someone else) instance for a smallish (~20 participants max) class?
> I suppose there are lots of people in their early 30's having a dilemma

I'm approaching my 40s and I've had this dilemma since I was 25. I used to strive for being a top performer despite my hatred for working in this industry. I accelerated through the lower ranks and significantly increased my salary, but my happiness plateaued very early on. Over the last few years I've learned to lay low and give just enough to not get fired. I couldn't care less about the company or my work, I just want to clock out at the 8 hour mark - and not a minute later - then go work in my garden. I found this to be the optimal balance between financial security and my happiness.

If you've ever read "The Gervais Principle" - https://www.ribbonfarm.com/2009/10/07/the-gervais-principle-... - you can classify me as a "Loser" on that spectrum.
With SpaceX delivering astronauts to the ISS this year, Rogozin lost the last mission type where it was a monopoly. If anybody had hopes that the taxi service would keep them alive even as SpaceX undercut them on delivering mass to orbit those hopes were dashed.
This aligns with my experience. We haven't picked the date for our marriage yet (covid), but we've learned if a modicum of pretty dark humor isn't present, something is in fact wrong and we worry about the other party.
And that is why I want a union or professional organization. That level of nonsense needs a mechanism to resist with. How many lives and marriages, families suffered for political moves mostly for nothing by some lunatic.
> I'm pretty sure Obama's administration pioneered the double-tap

I am pretty sure it is not a new technique - it was famously featured in the 2010 children's book Mockingjay, and I am sure Suzanne Collins didn't make it up either.

Double-tap bombing are a staple of the asymmetric warfare arsenals of spec-ops forces/guerilla/terrorists since at least the second world war, probably much longer.

(Also, it is rather unlikely that Obama ordered the airforce to start double-tapping, or even that he knew ahead of the fact, given the amount of extrajudicial killing/assassination the US forces do every month...)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thalassophobia
I'm assuming the difference in supported instructions will have to be very minimal.

OSs will need to be careful not to move a process from one core to another that supports a subset of the instruction set it was expecting.
ehy, leave comic sans alone!
The complaint is not that content is being mediated, but that it is one company or cartel that is doing the mediating.
Holding on to equity grants after they vest is probably a bad idea. It's precisely equivalent to using a larger salary to buy stock in your company. Is that what you'd do if you got a raise?

You should evaluate what your ideal investment mix is (keeping in mind that you already have a lot of exposure to the company where you work and have unvested equity) and always rebalance towards that. The source of income is immaterial.
FYI - the "Review URL" links at the bottom don't seem to be working properly.

e.g. for "Moonstruck", the link leads to:

"www.linisnil.com/articles/scraping-roger-ebert-reviews-and-amazon/www.rogerebert.com/reviews/great-movie-moonstruck-1987"

instead of:

"www.rogerebert.com/reviews/great-movie-moonstruck-1987"
Deliberate practice builds tacit knowledge. Uninformative article.
Not to justify wasting money, but the questionable UX features are a relatively small part of the massive cash fire that is the WMF.
Also, while there have been some large and costly failures (Visual Editor), UX features are one of the few areas where I think that the WMF could realistically advance their purpose: increasing engagement with the encyclopedia. Features like Page Previews can be very helpful. There are a number of possible UX tweaks to improve reading and editing the encyclopedia, and these could all be helpful to the long term health of the encyclopedia (assuming they don't cut into the budget for servers).
Probably because they understand the value of labor.
Been super interested to write my own layout engine. Does anyone have resources, tutorials, etc. that I should look into if someone wants to write the layout engine that powers something like GraphViz?
Senior Data Architect
Senior level role designing and architecting our enterprise wide data systems. Newly created role, sits at head of table with Head of Architecture. Redshift, ML/AI, and AWS skills needed.
General Dynamics bought OK Labs.
The "annotation syntax" is becoming a language feature with PHP8 attributes.
My recent preferred workflow is to automate commits for docs + commits inside feature branches with a tool I wrote (https://github.com/nikitavoloboev/gitupdate). It creates commits with the files changed as commit messages.

The branches ideally gets squashed with proper commit message when merging so git history is clean. And no time is wasted writing commit messages that often say whatever the code should already say.