skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
When I finally learned how to ride a bike, I was annoyed that nobody had told me "to keep the bike balanced, if you start to fall to one side, turn the steering wheel in that direction".

---

It's a good exercise to frequently try to verbalize your tacit knowledge. The alternative is to constantly be appealing to your own authority.

Lots of people have faulty tacit knowledge.
Still early stage, and any feedback will be appreciated!
The goal is to extract from newsletters the most important and most recommended stories. Kinda like the Michelin Guide, but for content
MetaMask for Bitcoin
By this definition, chess used to be an art, but is now the domain of science.
"In 2015, Google was able to steal over 550 million clicks from Wikipedia in six months"

As someone who has contributed content to Wikipedia and makes a (small) monthly donation this seems like a good thing. I support Wikipedia so that knowledge can be more easily and freely distributed and Wikipedia content is generally licensed under CC-BY-SA. Google following the license to make information sharing from Wikipedia more seamless (while reducing the load on Wikipedia servers) seems like a win for everyone.
Silicon Valley tech CEO charged in coronavirus test fraud case – Business Insid
I hope they fire fat bastard. Crap, he lost so many leads , during Stalin rule he would be executed for being traitor and spy.
There is post that at least describes in detail how to enable this beta feature: https://www.jeffgeerling.com/blog/2020/im-booting-my-raspber...
I've suspected for a while that this is how we unlock the next phase in theoretical physics, such as unifying QM and gravity. We may have hit some kind of human cognitive limit or blind region, so maybe we need to deploy some bigger (but more specialized) guns.
A protocol separate to UDP and TCP altogether would suffer from middlebox interference problems.
Bundestag to Vote Again on Unitary Software Patent Court
These are not necessarily mutually exclusive. A Coding Bootcamp will give you the main points about one area of coding (Inverted T shaped learning). Self-taught will give you in-depth knowledge but only about the areas you've studied and worked (pitchfork or Y shaped learning). College will give you a solid grounding in basic fundamentals and techniques to help you learn better. Less and less, but a college degree is still a gatekeeping criteria for some jobs.
So probably the only country that has very slight worse numbers in the entire world is North Korea, including all the other dictatorships and otherwise failed states. That's crazy.
Conversely, I've had a total of two employees request a one on one meeting with me directly, and it was always because they were about to resign :(
There's CoC - "conquer of completion" among others (sick name btw), a JS based language server for Vim that gives it VSCode like powers. I've seen a lot of code editor tooling from China (I like hover over GH user thumbnails of interesting tools).
I was not talking about me so your point makes no sense
You couldn't be more wrong about the ease of deployment.

PHP is one of the hardest things to deploy. You need at least a web server and a process manager. Most popular choices are nginx + PHP-FPM or Apache + libapache2-mod-php.

You also need to learn how to properly configure both of them, since both have like a million options, and default installation doesn't work in a lot of cases (e.g. uploading of files larger than a few MB).

If you don't want to use libapache2-mod-php, you will have to figure out how to deploy two different services, which makes things difficult in a Docker environment.

---

As opposite to that, deployment story with Go, Rust, and similar compiled-to-a-single-binary languages, is a lot easier. Just drop the binary to a server or add it to a Docker container.
Use duckduckgo and type "!w blah" to go straight to the article for blah.
Thanks for mentioning this. To be fair, locality of information is a pretty common assumption but I should definitely qualify this a bit more in the future.
wow how does this work? is there a public list of radio stations? or does this site maintain a scraper of sorts?
I hate the fact that Google tries to change itself every couple of years just to make more money. The initial company proposition of giving me search results quickly and getting out of the way was the best ever. Over time, they instead want to keep people for as long as possible so they can present more advertisement links.
Amazing post! I didn't know such type of knowledge existed. Eager to learn more.
Things like that https://gist.github.com/antirez/ae068f95c0d084891305. Usually more detailed with data structures, but this one was a very conceptual thing.
Yeah but panda also killed ehow which, despite also killing all my stock value, was a huge win for anyone that hated seeing seo spam in every search.

Unfortunately it seems the problem is back, especially with Pinterest, Sfgate, the spruce, etc.
Yes. You bury waste underground in an area with no groundwater. No geological event is going to bring a cask from 500 meters below ground to the surface, short of a meteor strike (which would make nuclear waste one of your smaller worries).
I don't know if that is true, but why does the weight of the rocket matter? A reusable rocket will be heavier as it has to be built to carry extra fuel for re-entry. I would still want a reusable Space X rocket even if it is heavier
Skip the Easy Wins
Many of them were arrested. The leader of LulzSec - Sabu - worked with the feds to capture several individuals. You can read about it on his wiki:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hector_Monsegur
It's been typical Russian tone for years now, starting well before the last U.S. presidential elections.
This is sound advice...almost to the point of staggeringly obvious.
As your circle expand, it is impossible not to notice the walls and blockers that are endemic. If one doesn't see this, it's often because that person is in their own little bubble, and not doing much to improve the organization either.

Often, it takes both employees and managers to really make the shifts, over many many years. By the time it happens, the individual contributions are mostly forgotten or employee left long ago.
You realize that HTTP/2 is still nowhere near to being adopted by corporations? It's really far fetched to plan HTTP/3 and expect any adoption.
Software Development Outsourcing Industry in Trends
Most axiomatic system have an infinite number of theorems. I would say that a theory is "known" if there is an algorithm to decide which statements follow from the theory. An example is plane geometry, which has an algorithm due to Tarski. (The algorithm is pretty slow, though -- doubly exponential. Maybe a better criterion is a polynomial-time algorithm, though I don't know of a system that has such.)

Practically, questions about matrices are easy. (Matrices over the real and complex numbers can probably be reduced to the same Tarski algorithm, actually.) If you can reduce a question to a linear algebra question, you're probably going to solve it. There are open questions in linear algebra if you force the entries to be integers, for example, but odds are you don't have one of those.
Tesla (TSLA) becomes worlds most valuable automaker, hits $1k per share
Several astronauts intentionally 'floated away' using the Shuttle's Manned Maneuvering Unit [0]. I don't think anyone has done so accidentally.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manned_Maneuvering_Unit
They are literally closing bugs as won't fix if you report them against the built-in render pipeline. The reason is that they've been working on the other render pipelines for years and they plan to deprecate the old one soon. But as long as the community of users doesn't switch, they cannot.

And the plugin linked here only works with the old render pipeline. The one with known bugs. So there's no way for me to directly use this. I would have to fix and port it first, to make it compatible with Unity's new pipeline.

And that beaviour of Unity stopping to support the working old stuff as soon as a new technology grabs their fancy has been going on for long enough that by now they're famous for it. Plus since they don't give source code access to the C++ part, you have no chance of fixing it yourself.
The point is about refusal to take the threat seriously untill its too late.

The doomsayers were very nearly right, twice, once during kuban crisis, and once in 1983.

There is no afterall, we still have 100x more nukes than there are cities in the world. We are a buttonpress away from extinction.
This isn't satire. This is the tone Russia employs when talking about anything related to the US. I see this on Russian TV and news daily. It's quite hysterical if you're not used to this kind of "delivery." Russian leadership is very "butt-hurt" and they usually resort to demeaning behavior to feel better about themselves.
I think the idea of punishment is mostly preventative (because there will be consequences). However, harsher punishments don't necessarily increase this effect.
This is an example of my previous response on the matter: https://twitter.com/nycantifa/status/1270742009813352449?s=2...
"Even among American citizens, some tech workers are in the business simply to make money, gain power, and solve problems—even if they create just as many new ones in the process."

Even among, I don't know, bartenders and schoolteachers, some are in the business simply to make money.

Back in the day, one heard of students who went to law school to right wrongs, and came out to bill hours.
you could run plex and give me access.
Big fan of graphviz.

Lots of interesting tools that use it being posted here, so here's a toy of mine: https://github.com/alexbrasetvik/graphspec

I've used it mostly to mix edge+node definitions in comments in asciidoc or code, and the non-nested nature makes it easy to compose different sources of edges and nodes.

(It's just a POC. If you know of something similar that's more actively developed, I'd be very interested)
To mention, I think Nix or Guix are indeed good complements to things like redo! Guix System and NixOS are just geared to define the whole system, while make or redo build a single program or a set of artifacts.
Even easier, if Firefox is your browser, you can add a search keyword 'w' for Wikipedia and type:

w X

to directly search Wikipedia for X.
Amazing how in a supposedly litigious society like America it's possible to deploy a device which causes intentional, indiscriminate, permanent injury across a crowd and not get sued into oblivion. Bit like how tobacco, asbestos and Kinder eggs all incurred product liability because they weren't intending to be damaging to health, but gun manufacturers aren't liable because their products are supposed to be dangerous.
I've always had a really dry sense of humor. When I moved into a management role, my director took me aside and said something to the effect of, "I have a dry sense of humor too. When I started managing people I had to build a filter between the jokes that pop into my head and the words that escape my mouth."

This was from my first year of managing when I had one screw-up that led people who overheard the interaction to report it. The joke was something like, "Oh hey, the start time for our meeting has already passed, and here we are still working. Why do you hate meeting with me?" In hindsight, it's now obvious to me that when there's a power differential, the other person can easily be left wondering, "Does my boss really think I don't like him? Oh my god, I can't ever be late to another meeting with him again!"

I'm now years down the road from that, and I cringe at some of the things I said when I was new to the role. I'm glad I've had time to learn some lessons in communication as a manager before COVID-19, because now that interactions have been scoped down to text chats, emails, and occasional video calls, people have to make inferences from a much smaller set of signals. I'm having to work twice as hard to be very direct and clear about what I want people to understand, and I have to go out of my way to deliberately ensure that interactions, both one-on-one and as a group, happen as frequently as is necessary to maintain the health of the individuals and of the team.
Google News is also pretty much totally broken for a while. You have to look very hard for a way to sort by date - by default it somehow thinks articles from 2018/2019 are what I'm after and it's often not returning articles that exist, are from normal newspapers and can be found by the same query in Google - there are also no useful facettes left and sometimes there is some sort of amnesia for everything older than 2017. Not sure why they are doing it (maybe it's only broken in Germany due to even more braindead "Leistungsschutzrecht" law but something really feels off.
I kinda think he's talking about intuition. It's the non-verbal understanding that underpins mastery in any domain. If deliberate practice is the means, then tacit knowledge is the end.
That would be false, otherwise we would not have retired the shuttle.
One of the few applications pinned to my browser in the past year.

It's a fantastic work companion.
I was curious what Palme did, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olof_Palme tells me he pursued a non-aligned politics, but also he notably supported Cuban revolutionaries and attacked right wing authoritarian leaders (Franco, Salazar, Pinochet).
> One (unproven) hypothesis I have is that it's possible that people who went to college and had their first decade's worth of jobs in a comfortable economic climate are more comfortable making these kind of jokes than others who were not so fortunate.

It's probably both that and how financially secure they are in general, whether that be via grunt work, inheritance, safety net, whatever.

I spent the first 5 years of my career spending the equivalent of minimum wage or less. Now I don't need to give a fuck. Realistically, on a starter dev salary, you can save >50% if that's your target.

As a result, it's a manual process for me to empathise with people who actually _need_ their job.

Don't get me wrong - I understand their predicament - it's just not an automatic impulse, because for me, work is like a side quest I do to keep myself ticking over in the long term, a bit like regular exercise or a good diet, it's never present constantly in my mind like I imagine it must be for a wage slave.
As a man who's been married for 15+ years, I would absolutely advise young couples to consider the disciplines and policies they expect their relationship to abide by in much the same way managers and employees discuss their policies and procedures. "Talk freely", yes, but also, as this article so correctly points out, understand the effect your language has on your relationships (direct reports, friends, spouses, family members) and make sure to not treat heavyweight issues with an air of flippancy or triviality.

My wife and I decided, before we got married, that divorce was off the table for us. Understanding that it is not even an option for me (and trusting/believing my spouse that it's not an option for her) gives us so much stability to launch into uncomfortable topics and conversations with each other. If we got into a habit of treating that topic lightly, I could easily see many instances over the past decade where life has gotten hard, we would be in the middle of a stressful situation, and we would have doubted each other's commitment.

There's a broad range of experience out there in marriages, so it's likely possible to have that same stability while regularly joking about divorce, it just seems like a foolish thing to risk so huge a downside (actual divorce) for so little an upside (getting to joke about divorce).

Bringing this back to the article, that's the same idea at play. For the manager to restrain themselves from a few key topics which are inappropriate for them to joke about, they avoid a huge minefield of stressful issues for them and their direct reports.
There are a ton of networks (think big corporate networks, schools, shared apartment wifi) that enforce too many weird port restrictions. Many of those places rarely get network or config updates. I don't think it's as bad as IPv6, but there are a lot of people for whom it isn't going to just work out of the box.
People may have compatibilist intuitions, but start digging into what they they think past their initial intuitions and you tend to get completely different responses. Most people never think about what free will implies, and so their intuitions are fairly uncorrelated with what they'll insist on if you start questioning them about details in my experience.
I think there's an intrinsic human drive to be useful. It makes sense evolutionarily: the tribe can't kick you out if they rely on you for something. It's no guarantee of safety or success, but it's a bargaining chip.

Kevin Simler (via Dennett) goes as far as modeling this phenomenon on the level of individual neurons [0]: that conditions like depression and grief can be thought of as neurons and their networks becoming suddenly obsolete, and casting about trying to find new ways to be useful.

The employment model is hardly perfect; if anything, it has an uncomfortably feudal flavor in practice, where one is a thrall/vassal for 40(+) hours/week, in exchange for autonomy the other 128(-); and where one has the option to seek a new lord if sufficiently dissatisfied. There are countless other ways to be/feel useful outside that model: entrepreneurship, non-profit/community work, raising children, passion projects.

There are also potential perverse incentives: in particular, to maximize the problem one purports to solve. The most obvious parallels are the military- and prison-industrial complexes; planned obsolescence is another milder example. It's easy for unions to tip from collective bargaining into protectionism of industries that we'd like to become obsolete (prison guards, coal miners), out of a very understandable desire for those individuals to not lose their social bargaining chips.

So I do think we should celebrate the idea of "employment", as such, becoming optional; I strongly favor UBI. But at the same time, we need to be thinking about new institutions and proactive strategies for people to be, and feel, useful. I dare say, in some cases we want to be spending the economic surplus from the efficiency of automation, on intentionally inefficient pro-social economic activity. One example might be a community garden: it's a safe bet that industrial agriculture will always be an order of magnitude more efficient at producing food; but the community garden has other benefits, of connecting humans to nature and to each other (and perhaps a bit of resilience against supply chain disruption).

[0] https://meltingasphalt.com/neurons-gone-wild/
It would have been great if they would have used the opportunity to leverage SCTP instead of building it into QUIC. They could have defaulted to plain jane SCTP on IPv6 and tunnel it in UDP for IPv4. That would have been the perfect opportunity to drive adoption of SCTP while implementations of all sorts of middleboxes are still young enough to be swayed into supporting it. We could have all of the benefits of QUIC but with proper layer separation and multi-homing, and the ability to build future applications on it.
Same here. Although I wish it would show the song names.
"I am interested in instrumental outcomes. The discovery of tacit knowledge and the methods found in NDM have been incredibly useful to me in the pursuit of skill acquisition. This was mostly what I was getting at in the post."

Yup, no worries, I think it's a fine post in that regard. Just trying to separate your genuine insights into the practical problems faced by individuals with a certain social position (knowledge workers, aspiring entrepreneurs), and more general theories about the evolution of labor markets, technological change, and the political consequences thereof.

"NDM is a field of research that focuses on taking expert intuition (which I refer to as tacit knowledge in this piece), extracting it out of the heads of professionals and then creating training methods to enable less skilled operators to learn these tacit skills on their own. The methods are primarily associated with and deployed in the military."

I am only glancingly familiar with this work, but I think you've summarized it well. This basic project - of formalizing work procedures to allow for a shift in the relative amount of skilled versus unskilled labor input to a process - can be traced back to the dawn of the industrial revolution. Gaspard de Prony, Charles Babbage, F.W. Taylor (of "Taylorism" fame), and Herbert Simon (cited in the Klein/Kahneman paper) were all essentially concerned with this question. Harry Braverman and David Noble wrote interesting social histories on this theme, describing how this problem came to be seen as important, and how structuring work in this way - though it was eminently reasonable in the sort term for individual technical decision makers - might have deleterious effects in the long term for society as a whole.

In a way, your recommendations give voice to the desire of many knowledge workers to return to a model of skill acquisition that would have been familiar to the members of pre- and early- modern guilds. Apprenticeship and on-the-job experience was valorized over the "book learning" of "schoolmen".
Anger, what's wrong with people? For the record, I love graphviz. Thanks!
That's because some managers do express their instructions like this, by dropping "hints".
How many actually have TFO enabled?
I guess I should amend the last part of what I said with, "[is not useful] ...when considering my own behavior."

With regard to evaluating others, I agree that this mindset can definitely help foster increased kindness, which in many circumstances is one of the most useful outcomes you can hope for. For example, it does seem fairly clear at this point that the retribution/punishment model of treating lawbreakers causes more problems than it solves.
Run full blockchain nodes, a bittorrent client, Tor relay (not exit node, so less door knocks)...
I understand why they're doing this and I think it's a good idea, but I'm annoyed that it has to be done.

I doubt that this will catch on with any other companies that use facial recognition, and to be honest the technology is too simple to possibly regulate, but at the moment I think I'd prefer a world without facial recognition to a world with it. I just wish that we could fully explore the uses of cool technology without having to worry about its misuse.
What Are Fintechs and How Can They Help Small Business?
It doesn't need to last a billion years. Within 10-50 thousand years the uranium is no more radioactive that uranium that was never used in fuel. Sure, uranium is still a toxic heavy metal. But you do understand where this uranium came from before it was used as fuel?
He also mentions the new Vostochny Cosmodrome which has been in construction forever. In 2015 the construction personnel(500 people) didn't receive a salary for 5 months and had to write pleads to Putin on the rooftops of their barracks. That's Roscosmos, you can't build anything while people are starving.
Until middleboxes support SCTP, UDP encapsulation
is a possible solution
That would mean that HTTP3 enable HTTP4 towards STCP
If it’s replacing manual labor with something automated, then it’s almost certainly automation.
It probably starts with corporal punishment of children. That gives society a baseline predisposition towards violence and doled our suffering in order to enforce conduct. Adults who were beaten as children or felt that they suffered for their transgressions may feel that it’s unfair for someone to avoid suffering for transgressions, when they had to suffer in the past for theirs.
Earlier you said copyright is unethical and also why should you be paid extra for work you did in the past.

Architects have copyright to their work. They do sell the same plans over and over. No one can just copy their work without paying royalties or at least getting permission.