skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Not necessarily, but at least for me, I've never needed to spend a dime of my stock to cover my living expenses (and them some). The salary cap is more than enough to live on for most people - and I count the Bay Area, too, where I live. I personally think that if you're already at the salary cap and are selling stock to cover basic living expenses, they are probably too high, and I suspected you thought the same.

I don't intend to sell my stock except to diversify my portfolio. I intend to live long beyond retirement, and I'll need it.
It's not really much of a comparison if you pick things like 'the security mechanism breaks in some way' and no similar failure modes of the 'no security' variant. It's a serious usability problem if an insecure interaction gives you bogus information or if all your accounts are compromised because you use the same password everywhere.
https://reposhub.com/0x742-noia-android-miscellaneous.html
You quoted his motivation, right at the end. Lots of people really hate jazz. Really!

It not racist just because jazz musicians, by random historical accident, happened to mostly be black.

It is unethical, without any racism, to go looking for excuses to arrest people who play jazz. The proper response is to leave the music venue. Jazz isn't awful enough to merit such heavy-handed tactics.
I don't think this is not mainly an issue of capitalism. The thing is that it is essentially impossible to solve democracy without also solving capitalism.

Capitalism's issues are not just the rich getting richer and the poor getting poorer. The main issue of capitalism is distribution of power. The only ways of fixing medical insurance, college loans, gun violence is to directly oppose the power structures created by capitalism. Capitalism is not to be understood as a purely economic system, it is also a political system, as it decides how power and decisions are used and taken. Politics is not just "what the government does" or "what parties do", the shareholders of your company deciding you should be fired is also politics.

In this optic, it is more easily understood why capitalism will and does frustrate any attempt of creating true democracy. Capitalism is directly opposed to true democracy, as capitalism relies on private ownership and thus private decision, which is opposed to democratic decision. This is why when trying to establish public healthcare or regulating medical insurance, you will be opposed by the system that is capitalism, either by crashing of the stock market, adverse action by drug companies, massive lobbying, peddling of lies via mass media, and so on. Same for college loans - in order to fix the root cause issue behind college loans you will need to reduce the cost of tuition massively through either socialization of education or direct opposition to the ability of the private owner to do as they fit with their investment in order to maximize their interests (capitalism).

Gun violence is really caused by underlying sociological issues which are caused by ideology (in the sociological sense of the word), and distribution of resources. Both of those are the way they are either largely or completely because of capitalism.

Police brutality is in no small part because the role of police is diametrically opposed to the interests of most. Indeed, police almost only enforces laws that maintain wealth concentration towards the rich and have very low efficacy when dealing with theft from the common man (wage theft is by far the majority of all theft in the US, and it's not even close, yet try to call the cops on your boss short-changing you), even cases of murder show incredibly high class bias. This leads to police and justice interactions being overwhelmingly negative towards people they are biased against, such as racial minorities and poor people in general.

As for global warming, this is an obvious issue of capitalism.

And, most of all, Democracy has always been biased for the owner class and against the worker class. Read the original US constitution, for an obvious proof.
I was expecting to read things like rounded edges and corners but the article seems to mostly discuss the configuration of numbers on opposite faces.

> When dice reappear around 1100 they are predominantly in the "primes" configuration, where opposite numbers tally to prime numbers (1-2; 3-4; 5-6)

Does this have really anything to do with primes? It looks like they simply chose sequential numbers.
The Bolivarian Revolution
Change would had an opportunity to happen if by far most people could think by themselves and not be easily manipulated. But both cognitive bias and bad education systems (sometimes intended that way) goes against that possibility.

The system is fragile, but shaking it won't lead to an stable state (not in the same conditions/number of participants that we are having now) but to an unstable and/or fragile one.

And we are running out of time to make the big changes in global culture needed to derive this into an antifragile state. The ball is already rolling toward climate change, mass extinctions, ecosystems destruction and the world becoming unsustainable for most of us, and we will not be able to stop it.
Irrelevant point? Could be accurate, but is all the more reason for them to merge if they think it improves the business. I didn't say "this will make them profitable", OP asked why they would do it and I answered. ¯\(°_o)/¯
> Fortunately things have slowed down considerably now,

I don't get that tho. Supposedly accordingly to all stats, its as bad as its been before. We have 800 to 1,000 death per day and are on record to hit 200k death by September. How come I heard that the pandemic has slowed down yet... according to numbers its been the same.
Level Up: Automated Subtitles with AI
https://techcrunch.com/2020/06/10/amazon-rekognition-morator...

> Amazon is known to have pitched its facial recognition technology, Rekognition, to federal agencies, like Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Last year, Amazon’s cloud chief Andy Jassy said in an interview the company would provide Rekognition to “any” government department.

> Amazon spokesperson Kristin Brown declined to comment further or say if the moratorium applies to federal law enforcement.
You should be able to reset your account to negate all your keys and set things back up if you lost access to all previous devices.

I ended up doing this anyway in the end, after deleting everything I could before I stopped using it.

They do make you wait seven days before you can do it after you make the request.

I still have the account because I don't want to lose access to my username (didn't delete it), but it's otherwise empty and unused with fresh keys that have no history with anything.
> so I ended up handing it to the police for destruction

That's pretty sad. Why not sell it or donate to a museum?

I can't think of a country on earth in which you can't sell a bolt action that is legally owned. Even just for a token amount if you wanted it gone.
https://reposhub.com/nitnelave-lru_cache-cpp-miscellaneous.h...
by "as they currently exist" I mean achieving parity. You might not like it, but YouTube as it exists currently is a complex web app. I think it's hyperbole to say it could be implemented with static HTML.
I made my shed using his design and techniques. Every fall, when we stow away backyard furnitures, the umbrella, and Cycles into the shed with ease. I thank him.

https://woodgears.ca/shed/shed1.html
Referral Programs: Are they an effective way to acquire customers?
Because they neither know nor care about security and customer service?
Hey there, i do a lot of work with wood and material suppliers who may be interested in this as you develop further. How can i contact you?
Google has a mercurial front-end to their "Perforce-ish" like server
Right now my biggest gripe is I can't tell clusters to go to a specific rank. Although enabling "newrank" helped a lot, clusters I want to be the first, or last of the whole graph, still end in the middle for whatever reason, resulting in lots of edges that curve backwards, so the graph overall shape instead of looking like a diamond or a wrapped candy, instead looks like a big mess with lots of U shaped edges that go all over each other resulting in something completely impossible to read.

EDIT: also, being able to create "venn diagrams" of sorts with subgraphs would be awesome, basically allowing a node to be in several clusters, and have the clusters borders cross each other so that the item is inside all of them.
Do you have a link to "The First Question" by Andrew Bodnar? Can't find a source online.
Who needs more than full belly and a roof over their heads?

It's weird to want to cap somebodies worth. We need to limit how people and companies can use their wealth to exert power or make more money.

How about a rule where you can't charge more rent that what it costs to maintain the property.

How about a rule where you can't sell drugs after you have recouped the cost to develop them.

How about a rule where you can't donate money to a politician or political party.

How about a rule where employees of a company automatically paid dividends before shareholders are.
Yep - this is why I was so disappointed: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23105031
Do they have any recommendations on at what size to enable that?
Someone needs to make this for DTV...
This is the most Seattle thing to happen in the last 10 years lol
I can't tell if you're trolling, but in case you're not, QI doesn't prevent the victim from seeking restitution, it just puts an umbrella over the officer's personal wealth by protecting it with the department/municipality's wealth.

It's the worst part of what we complained about banks and bailouts in 2008+: it socializes the costs and privatizes the profits/impunity.
China does not have market socialism, sadly. Market socialism directly prevents wealth accumulation. Indeed, the idea of market socialism is that we keep the free market and low government control over industrial matters, and instead make all companies owned by their employees. This would slow down accumulation of wealth substantially, as I don't know of any company you could work at that would make you accumulate more than 100 million dollars as a lowly worker, without any investment.

The closest thing we have to market socialism right now would be worker co-ops, which do not allow massive wealth accumulation, as all wealth created would be shared equally among employees of a given firm.

(Investment would also largely be impossible, because you would not be able to own stocks in such a system. Instead, interest would have to be accumulated via financing, which is much fairer to distribution of power and prevents accumulation of wealth.)
I can do the first part but I don’t think I can come up with the $7.3B
That sounds like double work.
https://reposhub.com/sashabaranov-pike--go-network.html
While you're certainly not wrong, the phrasing of the question suggests that the asker didn't know the history of the final dot, and was asking the way they did only because they didn't know what to ask, thinking its purpose was to provide some effect rather than being historically (and currently) the correct FQDM.
88% is definitely not true. That paper retracted that claim.
A Deadly Mosquito-Borne Illness Is Brewing in the Northeast
Educational Distribution Escuelas Linux Releases 6.9. What's New
What's the purpose of intermediate packages if you're already using containers?
I agree, SketchUp (and woodgears) was a big part of how I was able to pick up woodworking as a kid.

I don’t have much love for the product as it is now however. I would prefer the free SketchUp from 10 years ago to the current free tier (web app).

Does anyone know if any good open source SketchUp-like tools?
But that’s the point. Security introduces new failure modes that make usability worse.

Again I’m not saying it’s bad, quite the opposite. I’m just saying we have to acknowledge it’s always a trade off.
Slowed down in his region? It certainly has slowed down considerably in NYC.
And it's been almost 100 years since the first patent (1934) on maglev trains, as built in 2002 in Shangai.

That's why lay people wonder about not seeing scientific progress since the 70s or 80s - it seems like decades since giant steps were made.

But incremental progress adds up, too.

One day we'll merge all those low-temperature superconductor or graphene experiments into something bigger.

And there's been a bunch of nice proofs coming from random places annually.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maglev#First_maglev_patent
At the very least, for those on their 1st rodeo (who missed the 2008 burp), they get to see the anatomy of a sh!t sh0w in vivid detail.

The current display has a little bit of everything (pandemic, social unrest, narcissistic depravity, a few Trillion of deficit and China being China.

Hollywood can do dumpster fires, but this is way out of their league. Its about the same on bad actors though.
It's a touch under 6,000lbs, so yes, heavier it is!
> how can recording something be considered speech

You have to go back and understand the jurisprudence of US courts a long time to understand it. Basically you can't take the word "speech" too literally; it could be literal speech or the ability to assemble/protest, or the ability write a book, or the ability to spend money on a political election (what the sane world calls bribery far more than the USA does).
I think QUIC-the-transport is potentially an interesting transport for storage, but the data there is often already encrypted, so the double encryption is a waste.

Is it possible to only encrypt the QUIC headers but leave the data unmodified? That idea just popped into my head and I'm not sure it makes any sense, but maybe that would provide the best of both worlds.
This stop occurred in NC and we don’t have all the facts about the stop...but NC is 1 of 6 states to have laws on driving to slowly. While it is true most states might have a minimum sign posted and 65 in a 70 would be unusual, some of the statutes are unfortunately subjective...for example I think in NC they prohibit “driving to slowly in the passing lane on a highway” so potentially an officer might pull someone over for going the Actual speed limit in the passing lane (presuming they weren’t passing).

Anyway I think you might be missing the point where the poster stated:

>”under is suspicious according to your thinking...”

I never said driving under the speed limit is suspicious, and I specifically said I think this stop was ridiculous...still I don’t think we can say he was stopped for being black (it’s possible) but more likely due to being a rental car driving under the speed limit.
The problem with apps is that they don't have tabs. I can only view one thing at a time, and the way I use Reddit (open a bunch of links in new tabs to read one at a time, or to refer to two things at a time) doesn't work without tabs.

It's the same with the Amazon app. The website is atrocious because pressing back after viewing anything shoots you back to the top of the page, but the app only lets you see one thing at a time.
Matthias is one of the all time greats of YouTube woodworking. I’ve been following his channel for probably close to 10 years.

He does have an HN account and may show up here if he notices enough inbound traffic from this submission.
Spread the $150k across a basket of FANG stocks and hold that for 5-10yrs. Those companies will continue winning and you can afford to take this relatively minor risk at such a young age.
I was thinking that the oldest stuff I have that I use (aside from furniture I inherited from my grandfather which I have no idea how old it is) are musical instruments. I have a ca 1969 Gibson EB-3 bass which is my oldest instrument. Of the stuff I've bought new it'd be my first guitar, a cheap classical guitar I bought for around $100 in 1986. The oldest electronic item is probably the Roland D-110 module I bought used and likely was made in 1990–91 and the oldest electronic item I bought new would be my Roland A90EX keyboard which I bought in 1999. I don't think I have anything musical less than 19 years old.
So... you just like to be disagreeable.
I happen to be a member of a subreddit you'd probably describe as "racism and hate speech." Obviously I find some redeeming value there.

IMO the direction you're describing seems...reactive? I mean, sure, if you don't like racism and hate speech, work to get rid of them, but there's a lot more to social good than that.

Frankly I think Reddit should actively try and fragment itself a bit---give mods more power, let communities become more distinct. Maybe allow mods to add js, or let subreddits host SPA's, etc. Don't encourage subreddit enmity, but tolerate it.

Reddit has a lot of users, but they don't really do much except talk and provide ad impressions. This feels like a waste, considering they're on a compute platform.
GNU TeXmacs v1.99.13 is released
> You watch out for your own, no matter race or creed.

That is the complete opposite of being a racist.
> Oh and nice job implying that Chinese dissidents have the duty of "proving" to the world that the Chinese government surveils them.

Chinese dissidents didn't make the claim that the Chinese government is surveilling Zoom, you are. They're not your rhetorical shield.

> I only said that it is safer to assume surveillance.

This thread was started by:

> Is there any reason not to assume that the Chinese government is surveilling Zoom calls en masse?

You seem to be taking all of this very personally for some reason.
> Despite what many people believe, shareholders don’t actually work like that.

Shareholders do determine whether a company does something ethical or something profitable. And by the numbers, they choose profit unless it would cause public outcry (and sometimes despite that).

Last year, only 2% of Amazon stockholders voted to ban the sale of facial recognition software to the government, and only 28% even wanted a report on possible threats to civil liberties.

https://www.geekwire.com/2019/amazon-shareholders-proposals-...

> They care about making money, but no one is going to sell Amazon because they’re not continuing a single low profit line item.

This is true, but I don't understand how it's relevant.

> No shareholder is condemning Apple for not making Rekognition

Nobody is condemning Apple because it would be more of a risk for them to develop it, since they would have to do a larger pivot from their current core product. Amazon in contrast is already in the business of selling cloud services, so it's a product with a straightforward path to profitability.

> and Amazon wouldn’t be killed for dropping it.

My point is that Amazon won't drop it in the long term. The 1-year moratorium is to cover their butt until they can figure out how to sell the technology to the police without becoming the scapegoat for the recently news-blasted civil liberties movements. If I were in their position I'd do the same.
This site really needs to make downvotes and flags public so the brigades can't hide anymore. Someone flag killed your post, for what reason I can't even begin to understand.

The moderation here is fucked beyond repair or recovery.
I still don't see what's different. I can configure pip to look at my git server, so that all I have to do is `pip install my_thing` and it will automatically download all public and private deps. I don't know what you mean by "workflow" in this context but this is just about as simple as can be.
I thought Keith Rabois was on the board too.
http://ge.tt/2jncAa43
Pakistan requiring registering VPNs with the Government
I mean, that's the abolition of capitalism, though. You are literally describing market socialism. The only thing left is to automatically make workers the main shareholders, and making shareholders nothing more than financiers that must be repaid their interest.
I wonder if yours is more successful because the domain is firstlast.com , not just lastname.com. I've run into it most often with checkout systems that have separate fields for first and last name, it appears that some systems are matching for the field for last name cannot be exactly the same as the part of the email address after the @ symbol.
That's an interesting view.

How can tacit knowledge be learned without being in the same room with someone ?
Oh man, I used to use my grandfather's Leica M-series camera when I was in high school. That was some seriously good glass that he had. It was really great for doing sports shots since looking through the rangefinder, I could see what was outside the frame of the telephoto lens to catch the full action.
>I don’t think it’s costing them anything.

It's almost certainly costing them LESS, since there'd be less of a focus on development AND it'll use less bandwidth due to smaller preview thumbnails and no preview video... that's probably outsourced to a different cdn but whatever.
What subreddit would that be, if you don't mind me asking?
Show HN: Daily Fortune Cookies
nice!https://reposhub.com/bawaviki-youtube-dl-android-android-med...
I recently switched insurance and was surprised to find that a generic drug I take cost me $500 for 30 tablets. Another generic I take is $10 for a hundred fifty tablets.

Pretty sure these ratios have nothing to do with the cost of production.
What "facilities"? We're talking about changing clothes. Shower curtain ought to be enough! And the point about going to work in scrubs is also bad: scrubs should be as much about keeping stuff out of the hospital as in.

If a neighborhood yoga studio can provide a place to change, pretty sure any healthcare facility can too.
> Now it's the email spam problem - every site gets to rip you off $0.03, you add them to your blocklist, but there are so many you never hear of that site again anyway.

We already have this problem with clickbait. They get the $0.03 from filling their site with spamvertisements and then waste your time getting you to click on it. Whether the $0.03 is from you or advertisers is irrelevant.

Though you could add a "screw those guys" button where you don't get your money back but they don't get it either. That might even allow there to be no transaction costs, by using that money to fund the system.
It's not a $7.3 billion acquisition. It's roughly a $6b to $6.1b acquisition (and Just Eat's market cap is now around $7.75 billion USD). The value of the acquisition has changed.

Just Eat Takeaway is an NV / Dutch firm (also mentioned on their Wikipedia page [1]), here's their listing:

https://www.cnbc.com/quotes/?symbol=TKWY-NL

I believe they're legally based in the Netherlands after the combination between Just Eat and Takeaway, and trade on both the Euronext exchange in Amsterdam and London Stock Exchange.

Here is how it's structured (from the Wall Street Journal):

"Grubhub shareholders would receive 0.6710 Just Eat share for each Grubhub share, now worth just over $65 / share after a decline in Just Eat shares Wednesday"

Here's what Business Insider quoted previously:

"Under the terms of the stock-swap deal, Just Eat is offering roughly 0.67 of its shares for every Grubhub share for an implied value of $75.15 per share, or $7.3 billion based on Tuesday's closing price, according to the statement."

Notice that $75 / share figure, at $7.3 billion, is prior to the drop in Just Eat's stock. The new $65 / share figure quoted by the Wall Street Journal is based on the change in the stock price of Just Eat, which plunged from roughly €100 to €85.

If Just Eat's shares continue to decline in value, GrubHub shareholders still receive the same share ratio (valuing the deal at a lower figure accordingly).

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Just_Eat_Takeaway