skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
... but you don't need a container.

My (linux) desktop has a macOS icon on it. I click on it. That starts a QEMU/KVM process which runs macOS. When I quit out of that, it is gone. When I click on it again, it runs again.

I suppose there are a few files floating around that persist between runs, and are not utterly trivial to manage. Just ... trivial to manage.
Perl 5 was more suitable for these particular use cases than perl 6 ever tried to be.
One person's legal technicality is another person's constitutional right.
Most would say an army isn't a weapon, it has weapons. (Edit: completely missed my chance for a composition-over-inheritance joke here!)

Given that mass destruction can be performed, the distinction to me is whether the "WMD" is a weapon (and not a collection of weapons). Like a MIRV with many warheads, we consider that one WMD don't we? If instead it had thousands of drones in it, what's the difference?
"Good effort"?
Superchargers charge idle fees if you leave the car there for more than 5 minutes after charging finishes.
What is controversial about Charas?
abinitio.com was borne from these principles.
Oh wow, I didn't realize that this bootstrap! Do you mind documenting your typesetting process? Would be a fun read!
AIs, being digital, have some clear advantages over people. Very rapid replication, enormous communication bandwidth, potential to expand capacity to global scale, for example. A human-level AI with these features common among ordinary software will already be super-human.

People have deep, often implicitly shared values. Most care for human and their own lives, for example. Given limited capacity of a person, they need to cooperate for major acts. It is thus quite hard to do something extraordinary and in conflict with the values held by most humans.

Side note: There are top AI researchers, including Yann Lecun, who argue our intelligence is not general. They made some good points. I think the generality of intelligence is a gradient. Ours is not at the very top end of possibilities, but clearly more general than other animals.
To be fair the swarms themselves without payload are also not weapons. It’s the capability to carry weapons autonomously in great swarms coupled with an inability to only target military installations/personnel.

Obviously depending on the type of drone traditional WMDs could be deployed with them.
Would "let's call it a day" come close?
You are totally correct, yet OP's point is still reasonable - this was written from the perspective of a petrol-car driver; moreover, it's a missed opportunity to think differently. Petrol stations require big tanks underground to store the petrol; we don't have pipelines through the city carrying petrol. On the other hand, we do have a massive network of wires carrying electricity. EV charging can so easily be distributed, that there is simply no need for 'petrol stations.' Put charging spots directly on the street and other parking places, with an app/API to show availability. Monitor demand, and add more in hotspots.
Live SpaceX Impersonating Bitcoin Scam on YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4tzVjDsY0Nc

Apparently someone has managed to make a spoof account that has gotten around YouTube's system and is impersonating SpaceX to scam people out of Bitcoin.
> For many, many repairs the Genius bar just tells you that it is not repairable even though it is. A 2000$ device that you just bought a couple of months ago.

If you bought your device a couple of months ago, wouldn't you still be covered by the warranty?
Apple, like Disney, are evil (geniuses?)
Pretty much the premise of Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon: Breakpoint:

Prior to the events of the game, Skell Technology comes under increasing public scrutiny when they are faced with mounting evidence that its products are falling into the hands of corrupt regimes, whilst its technology is implicated in an assassination of a political candidate by an armed drone.[c] The situation escalates further when the USS Seay, an American cargo ship sinks off the coast of the Auroa archipelago and all contact with both the island and its inhabitants are subsequently cut off from the outside world. Determined to investigate the cause, CIA Deputy Director Peter Miles initiates Operation Greenstone, deploying a Ghost Recon platoon from the USS Wasp to re-establish contact with Auroa and determine the circumstances of the Seay's sinking. The insertion ends in disaster when the helicopters carrying the platoon to the island are attacked by a swarm of drones. Nomad is the sole able-bodied survivor of his squadmates, whilst Holt is seriously injured in the crash, and Midas is missing in action.

Shortly after obtaining a weapon and attempting to find a working radio to communicate with the Wasp, Nomad witnesses a firefight between several Ghosts led by Weaver and multiple unidentified individuals. The firefight abruptly ends when Weaver is executed by Cole Walker, a former member of the Ghosts who is now leading the assault force, known as the "Wolves." Additionally, Nomad discovers a private military company called Sentinel is also operating on the island alongside the Wolves. Eventually, Nomad manages to reach Erewhon, a secret mountain hideout that is kept hidden from both Sentinel as well as the Wolves. With the assistance of ex-U.S. Marine Mads Schulz, Erewhon's de facto leader and his wife Maria, Nomad learns that the drone swarms that ambushed the platoon have imposed a defensive perimeter around the island; preventing anyone from entering or leaving the Archipelago. To help bring down the drones protecting the island, Nomad works with another survivor, fellow Ghost Recon Sergeant Major Josiah Hill and is instructed to locate Maurice Fox, Skell Tech's chief mathematician, his daughter Harmony, and eventually Jace Skell himself.

Upon reaching Skell, Nomad discovers that Hill has been secretly working with Walker and the two offer Nomad a place by their side. Nomad refuses and manages to evacuate Skell to Erewhon.
Much, much less probable than catching it while awake, and a very large share of people either sleep alone or live alone.
That comes off as kind of dismissive of religion, but if what you say is true, then what I'd like to know is, what sort of techniques were discovered in step (3)? I mean, if ancient priests discovered esoteric methods of getting more and more high, that... sounds... actually kind of awesome and I'd like to read about those methods!
The former; I would guess most people can see the difference. If not most, then still a very large number, more than the statistically insignificant number that would be able to differentiate gold plated cables or whatever.
Imagine I said: "There would be no iPhone (at least as we know it) without the Blackberry". I guess that could sound like I was minimizing the iPhone. I didn't mean it that way, but if you don't want to give me the benefit of the doubt, ok.

I was only trying to talk about the marketplace, perhaps I should have used more generic terms.

As for the regulatory stuff, it is fair to judge a corporation by outcomes, just remember the employees have their own opinions and viewpoint.

As for what happens in 5 years, we'll see. If gas stays super cheap (it won't) and regulations are removed (they won't be) and EVs stop being more fun than ICE (they won't), then maybe GM will go back to ICE only.

Feel free to be skeptical, but I think a lot of people at GM are excited about EVs.

All of the above is my own opinion only.

---
Below is a statement from my company:

"As General Motors continues to drive toward an all-electric future, we’re also ensuring that the charging infrastructure can keep up. To that end, we recently announced a collaboration with EVgo, ChargePoint and Greenlots to establish the largest collective EV-charging network in the United States with access to more than 31,000 charging ports."

https://www.gm.com/our-stories/technology/gm-technology-pave...
I think a more difficult Italian one would be "proprio". It's sort of like "proper" but the exact meaning seems difficult to pin down and depends on the context.
Does that sound like normal grammar in this part of the US? It does not to me. They might have said "or we will drive over you", "or we will ram you". "You will be dead"? That just sounds silly. Why focus on this instance when there are other, much more obvious and clear instances of police abuse?

Here is the badge cam video and audio: https://twitter.com/jlwedel/status/1268355402384596992?s=21
Is there any statically-typed FP language with Lisp's parenthesized syntax?
I did the same thing, and it's obvious they know people are going to do it. So why make the rule? I suspect it is so that you can't argue about whether it is or isn't touched up too much if they don't happen to like it. If they can show any touching up at all, they can drop the hammer on you.
I was at Microsoft from 1985-1991, and this agrees with my experience. FYIFV was mostly something people said that other people could say. I never heard anyone express the sentiment directly and certainly never saw it on a button, pin or shirt.

However, it was possible to be "fully vested" in a practical sense. If you didn't review well, your initial option grants would dwarf your continuing grants. Even more so if you were an acqui-hire.

A more common expression, in my circle at least, was "I would shovel shit for what they're paying me now," in reference to the fact that the closer you get to your next six-month option vesting date, the more you're getting "paid" for each day of work. A reminder to balance your frustrations against the fact that you'll be collecting $50K, $100K, $200K a day to just shut up and keep your head down for a few more days.
I'm no expert myself and wasn't trying to call you out or anything. (I've only read that paper once or twice before a Papers We Love event I attended.) I think it's a common misconception, though, and thought people might find the history interesting.
Using chargers that don't exist?
To your point, 7/11 actually bought Mobil's retail petrol franchise business so now most of the 7/11s you see in the eastern states are 7/11 branded petrol stations (really convenience stores with petrol as a loss-leader to bring you in the door).
That is absolutely, 100%, not true. Barbra Bodine stated in "Iraq: No End in Sight," Baghdad had ~11 murders in their morgue each year. It was safe for foreigners to have coffee and walk out on the street. In the opening weeks of the invasion, there were over 30 murders per day.

It was under an autocratic fist. Speak against Saddam and go to jail .. but it was safe.
I run macOS (currently Mojave) on a 8 core, 16GB KVM on top of Debian on a 16 core 64GB Ryzen. It's faster than the (older) Mac Mini I used to use for everything I've tried on it. I don't know how it compares to current apple hardware, but for my purposes (doing the bits of macOS-specific code development in a large native cross-platform application), it's about as perfect as it gets.
According to Wikipedia, the original author does not consider COVID-19 a black swan event, so I think you must be right. However, while we know a pandemic will occur, we don't know when. Neither do we necessarily know ahead of time what measures are appropriate to take to mitigate the risk.

The aspect of the Black Swan theory where you point to the data after the fact and say, "We should have known" is very similar. For example, countries that experienced SARS and MERS where very much more prepared for COVID-19. Other countries which didn't have many problems did not prepare. This is because they didn't realise that they should prepare. For them COVID-19 was out of the blue -- a complete shock. Of course, we should have looked at the original data and if we had, we could have improved the outcomes. But we didn't have that experience and we didn't know when to expect a large problem.

The Tohoku earthquake in Japan in 2011 was similar. Earthquakes of that size hit Japan about once in 1000 years. We know it will happen. We don't know when. We don't know if it will happen in our generation. Should we prepare for it. In hindsight, yes, of course. At the time, it was a shock.

Is that a black swan event? I don't know. However, I don't think we need to have much of a distinction. Even if we should know, the fact that we don't know is all that matters. It is still a surprise.
I use org-mode in emacs:

* For scratch notes I have a little bit of elisp I wrote to take a note title and file it into a year/month folder with day prefix

* For permanent notes I use org-roam with a zettelkasten-like method. I do one idea per note and link each new note into a couple other notes that seem relevant.

* todo.org for concrete tasks

* inbox.org for anything of interest to process later. I use beorg on my phone to add to this.

* contacts.org for birthdays

I also use SuperMemo 18 for incremental reading, a general deck for facts I deem important, and a deck for my Russian learning. I haven’t totally figured out this piece yet though, and there’s a nuance to what goes into my zettelkasten and what goes into my spaced repetition decks.
Selective enforcement. If everything is illegal then you can enforce the laws however you like.
Yes, the next administration could do that. But permits that have already been granted under the old rules usually remain valid. If not, possible lawsuits and damages awarded.
It's not just lexicon, but sometimes also syntax which doesn't translate cleanly.

Japanese has a really interesting piece of syntax in the ditransitive adversative passive, which is similar to the English passive construction but with a second object which can be used to denote that someone was adversely impacted by it.

There is an example on Wikipedia[1], it's definitely a difficult thing for native English speakers to get used to.

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Passive_voice#Adversative_pass...
My brain.

Which is true :-) ... but maybe more what you are asking: a todo.txt file, as well as my personal website with my public writing -- that's as much for my memory/knowledge as anyone else's.
> clearly that is an impossible standard for a website where users are able to post content

I'm able to post comments on many websites that are counted as publishers - try any online newspaper. I was able to post on countless forums long before Twitter appeared and still can.

> it seems you're suggesting Twitter must choose between moderating their platform and being shut down

That is technically known as a false dilemma.

- They can remove shadowbanning
- They can remove algorithmic manipulation, of all and any kinds not instituted by the user
- They can adhere to the rules they've set up, no retroactive action, no action for things off of the "platform", no new rules that just happen to affect their political opponents
- They can refrain from reframing content
- They can decide to become a smaller company (maybe more profitable (at last;), focus can help, niches help, size isn't everything)
- They can hire more moderators
- They can make the algorithmic tools they use available to users, if you don't want to read "deplorable" content then why not give you they power to make the choice and others the power to continue to read it?
- They can make the rules clearer, tighter, more accessible.

My Lord, there are so many choices available and they're not all mutually exclusive, and this isn't even an exhaustive list.
Just use a better shell. rc handles this wonderfully, $? is actually called $status, and it's an array, depending on the number of pipes.
Would anyone be able to approach this, without knowledge of /proc/cpuinfo, and understand what `$2` refers to?

> Regex should not be the first hammer you reach for, because it's a scalpel.

You used a regex tool: grep.
Furstly, gas stations are a massive safety risk and they were always strictly regulated at least for thay.

Secondly, we can't deliberate for another 15 years for every scepting to come round and for the market to sort itself out. Every year of setback in climate change mitigation will incur massive financial damange in the future.
>When contacted not a single hospital in Australia knew of Surgisphere or the study, and none of them had any commercial relationship with Surgisphere.

To be fair, I wouldn't expect any individual hospital (or individual at the hospital) to be aware of this. Australia has public healthcare and therefore data is stored centrally. There's likely a government department dedicated to data and they would likely be the ones to provide the data, not someone at the hospital.
I think the suggestion is that rather than build them at gas stations build them where people park their cars at night.
Here's a JS script [1] I wrote a little while ago just for my own use that queries the CDC for the latest virus numbers, then calcs the average, formats the data and prints to the command line. You can pass in a number of days, otherwise it pulls the last 14 days.

$ node query-cdc.js 7

It's nothing special, but I wouldn't want to try to do this with command line utilities. (And yes, it was a bit uglier, but I cleaned it up of random crap I had thrown in before posting it.)

1. https://gist.github.com/russellbeattie/f9edf91115b43d6d7ca3c...
Yeah good point! I mean you probably wouldn't use it as a greeting first thing in the morning, but it's great for acknowledging that they've just finished whatever else they were doing before you met up with them. I really like it.
Why your previous developer was terrible
> inability to only target military installations/personnel.

I think that's a good point that I missed. The "mass" part of it. But even if we coded drones to only target military, this could be turned off or changed.

Maybe we need code signing and weapons inspectors before determining if a swarm is a WMD or not.
fast flyby with a sharp edged surface perhaps two passes per second per drone
I've kinda given up, and use Route53 for everything, on the grounds that if I managed to piss AWS off enough for them too take my domain names down, all my infrastructure will probably vanish to, so having someone else manage to keep my zone files up will not be of any use anyway...

It's got all my eggs in one basket - but solving that problem is a much bigger task that just picking a different domain registrar... (And I sometimes wonder if my blue-sky cloud-agnostic dreams would all come crumbling down if I even managed to implement then anyway - if whatever went wrong that pissed AWS off enough for them to shut me down got shared with and/or triggered the same reaction at Azure/Google/DO/whoever...)
If you know the exact position and direction of a photon coming out of the accretion disk, you could theoretically reverse out a trajectory and calculate what direction it approached the black hole from at what time.

Of course, that relies on incredibly high resolution images and knowledge of the black hole, but it's not impossible.
One of these "studies" is a 2-page Google Doc with no real data. Another is the discredited Raoult study, which is under investigation by the journal [1]. Another study cited is also by Raoult's team. The Brazil study (ref. 29) doesn't seem to have passed peer review (yet?) and has severe methodological flaws. Like the Raoult studies, the Brazil study was not randomized, but makes no attempt to control for confounding by indication or self-selection, such as with propensity score matching or similar methods commonly used in observational studies. The last study cited isn't a study, but an article from a local news station.

[1] https://retractionwatch.com/2020/04/06/hydroxychlorine-covid...
If you want to work with Dan Abramov, now's your chance
Google Shakes Up Top Search, Advertising Leadership
A more accurate description is: politician with financial stake in HCQ and no medical background cherry picks the one study claiming HCQ can be used to treat COVID-19, but the study is a third-party review of unverifiable and highly questionable reports.

There is no conspiracy here. The extraordinary claims regarding HCQ need extraordinary evidence, and that evidence is not available.
When I read that I assumed they also have "50" words for coconut
An Article Rewriter API
I'm saying that the US invading turned it into a warzone, not the removal of police.

They created a civil war where the only thing that nearly everyone agreed with was that the Americans should leave.
We should be thinking about all sorts of ways in which autonomous systems can create a whole new style of warfare. The combination of deep learning and targetted weaponry create extremely efficient killing machines. "Off the shelf" lasers combined with facial recognition, actuators and cameras could permanently blind a battalion in seconds, before anyone even had time to know what was going on. I think it's only a matter of time before we see 'dazzlers' used both on and off the battlefield.
A gun is just a cylinder where a projectile comes from.
It's safe for people with those conditions, we don't know if it's safe for people in respiratory distress.

Take thalidomide for example. Great drug for treating nausea, but not great when that person is also pregnant. By not studying it in this group, it resulted in many people born with birth defects.
$50/GB is less than some cellular overage fees.
That works well for some uses, but you sort of both have to be colleagues, and finishing up at the same time to use that. You can say "otsukaresama" to your colleague who is leaving before you to pick up their kids, or to your spouse when they get home from a long day, so it's a bit more flexible. It's just a nice, non-judgemental way to acknowledge someone's efforts.
The Cato Institute has a blog on abolishing qualified immunity:

https://www.unlawfulshield.com/
The media really went to town on this one, the reports that you might die using it lacked some real common sense, all of a sudden a drug that was approved in 1955, considered extremely safe (listed as an essential medicine by WHO) , and used on millions of people... is suddenly not safe.
True. I think the workflow will continue to be fragmented even with richer email content.
Of course light carries information about its past. Else you would not be able to tell information about the room you are in from the light that has been there.

As for how we tell how it traveled, light that is bent around the black hole and does not go into orbit makes a ring. Light that is bent around, loops once, then comes out makes a second ring. It is very hard for any light to come out between these rings. Ditto for 3x. And 4x. In theory, if we could see enough rings, we can look back as far as we want. In practice we can only make out so many. But comparing one ring with the next we can see back in the past. Finding out the delay tells us things about the black hole.

(It gets complicated, because it depends on the mass, the spin, and angle of the spin.)
That policy is completely absurd on its face.

>YouTube doesn't allow content that spreads medical misinformation that contradicts the World Health Organization (WHO) or local health authorities’ medical information about COVID-19

What if local health authorities contradict WHO medical information?

Google's mission used to be to organize the world's information. Now they seem to be want to go way beyond that.
A new tax on users of ICE cars.

Just keep increasing those taxes, morons....
Ok I am confused - I am a network engineer, but I could not find anything network related. Is it for software engineers only?
Any public open source blockchain. Whichever one the market rallies around, probably Ethereum. Because it's a consistent point of reference. The apps / phones could sign using zero knowledge proofs, so you don't have to give away personal details to verify.

At the very least this needs to be done with public figures in particular, since a convincing fake video could invoke a riot or cause a war.