skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Yes it's all the same thing. Your data is reactive and an be modularized. The renderer is reactive with the DOM basically being a side effect. There basically is no renderer just a reactive system with different types of data. It means there is an incredible amount of flexibility and raw performance.

The tradeoff is rendering isn't particularly special. So the systems consciousness of specific render specific concepts requires additional consideration. There is no "onMount". There are reactive lifecycles but they aren't particularly tied to DOM updates.
I wonder if something like an inverse Ishikawa ("fish bone") diagram could be used.
On Windows, MSVC does not provide guarantees that it will not keep the ABI on new releases. The drawback of using the Qt provided by the Linux distribution, is the reproducibility of the development environment as it is not possible to control the version of the Qt installed and also to have multiple Qt installations with different versions. As a result, the compilation of a Qt application may fail on different Linux distribution which uses a different and incompatible version of Qt. Docker can solve the reproduciblity of the development environment problem, but it still does not integrate well with development tools such as IDEs, building systems and so on.

The advantage of a package manager is the reuse of binary artifact on many projects and also the control over the library version. Conan package manager could be used for providing pre-compiled binary artifacts of Qt library. For instance, provides pre-compiled boost library and poco library for lots of different compilers, compiler versions and operating systems which saves one from building and installing those libraries.
Just so we know what we're talking about, here is a description of the 13 Qualified Immunity cases that may get to the Supreme Court soon.

https://www.cato.org/blog/may-15th-supreme-court-will-finall...

Sample:

Jessop v. City of Fresno. In this case, the Ninth Circuit granted immunity to police officers who stole over $225,000 in cash and rare coins in the course of executing a search warrant. The court noted that while “the theft [of] personal property by police officers sworn to uphold the law” may be “morally wrong,” the officers could not be sued for the theft because the Ninth Circuit had never issued a decision specifically involving the question of “whether the theft of property covered by the terms of a search warrant, and seized pursuant to that warrant, violates the Fourth Amendment.”
Oops, I did get you mixed up, my mistake. I don't think I can edit my post now, but my point largely still stands as a response to this comment that you did make
> ...isn't it clear that your approach has failed?
How has it not worked?
Because many of the businesses are profitable, but spend money to grow.

Uber, for example, could probably lay off 80% of its engineering staff and turn profitable if it was truly necessary. This would be stupid, because then they can't build new products (and thus compete) but they are default-alive [1].

The original author says that these companies "dump" stocks at IPO, but fails to recognize that (1) institutional investors who purchase most of the supply of stock at IPO are highly sophisticated and (2) there is a lot of regulation around proper disclosure of financials of public offerings.

Hell, the one recent tech company which tried to "dump" stock at IPO got laughed out of the public markets (WeWork).

I agree with the above poster that this article is nonsense and shows a complete misunderstanding of how markets and valuations work. Of course you would expect companies that are not profitable because they are investing in growth to lay off employees in tough times!

[1] http://paulgraham.com/aord.html
As a private citizen you’re acting on your own behalf and discretion?

Here I can’t sue mr Amash if I disagree with his bill, but I can sue him as a private citizen if he violates my civil rights as a person.
Are we going to analyze every tweet for its historical usages? If AOC or Bernie Sanders tweets again about "Revolution", should we censor them if they quote Che Guevara? Something tells me they won't do that.

...but more fundamentally, the question is who gets to decide? Corporations or elected officials? ...can't vote out a corporation if you make them arbiters of truth and don't like the choices they make.
Roberts seems to be taking his tie-breaker role very seriously, and aside from certain [censored]* dictators, politicians do seem to be taking the present situation seriously. Strengthening QI right now would be metaphorical gasoline for the literal fires burning in our cities.

I wouldn't make a bet in either direction right now.

*[edited for political correctness, I'm so sorry that people were offended by my low-brow swipe at the world's most influential racebaiter and / or I'm sorry to besmirch the good name of your favorite cheesy-corn snack]
The low hanging fruit is China taking Hong Kong and making threats of violence against Taiwan. Also: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/30/world/asia/india-china-bo...

It doesn't relate to the riots at all. My point is these things reasonably distract leadership from the riots if we're on the razor's edge away from global nuclear war.
SEEKING WORK

Location: SF (Remote OK)

Resume: https://www.crissyw.com/about

Email: crystal @ crystalwidjaja.com

Actual Skills: SQL, Python, GCP etc. I can work with things and figure it out.

---

I work on growth, data, and product for a few companies. Happy to do projects or 10 hours/month commitments.

Between 2015 and 2020, I was one of the first 30 product/eng hires at gojek. (Gojek does more rides per day than Lyft, more food deliveries than GrubHub, Uber Eats, and DoorDash combined, and is the #1 mobile wallet in Indonesia & across South East Asia.

I built the data, fraud/risk, and product growth teams from 0 to 200 engineers/PMs/analysts that were responsible for growing Gojek from 30,000 transactions a day to more than 10 million transactions a day.

Email: crystal @ crystalwidjaja.com
Time will tell if this turns into full-blown "white flight" like we saw in the 50's and 60's or is just a blip. With an aging population beginning to die off, I think you'll see more luxury homes open up in the sunbelt, which might also act as a draw.

I'm 45 and definitely considering my options for getting out of the Bay Area. Then again, I really, really do not like it here. If nothing else I'll be looking into taking advantage of cheaper rents to move up the peninsula and away from SJ.
Framebridge | Dev Team Lead | Rails, VueJS | Full-Time | DC/KY | https://framebridge.com

Hello peeps!

I'm looking for a software product team lead here at Framebridge! We've modernized custom framing, designing frames online and in retail stores and building our frames in Richmond, KY. The team lead will report to me and will work on either eCommerce or Manufacturing tools -- both managing a small team and doing hands on architecture/implementation. Tech stack is Ruby/Rails (Spree), VueJS, on AWS/K8S.

Email me (brock@framebridge.com) for more details or an informational interview, and apply at https://bit.ly/framebridge-dev-lead-2020
People are moving out but not in. Move-ins set the rental rate. A lot of people are leaving for lower cost areas or to move in with family.
It isn't a question of defining that clear line. I think the parent poster is saying: why should only government employees get this special immunity? Why do government employees get to make reasonable mistakes and be protected, but no one else does?
Maybe it plays out like this. However I think it would be other way round. People who do routine work which are basically human version of API calls may go remote. As their input / output is predictable and measurable they do not need to show up and hog 30-60 sq ft of real estate.

In my experience of IT work for last 15 years if I exclude first few years where I needed some hand holding from senior folks, most work related discussions happen via conf calls and conclusions are shared via e-mail/chat. Conf calls are common because teams/clients are distributed across geographies. I also noticed a trend where folks in same campus but different building or even in same building but different floor demand a conf call be setup because they can't be bothered to show up for a face-to-face meeting in conf room.
Well, zero interest rates from federal reserve definitely allow such businesses to flourish. Where you try to corner a market with infinite money for a monopolistic position.
Animals? Lemme guess, thin blue line, thugs, etc?

How about credit where credit is due - systemic police racism, and when that was protested, insane amounts of police brutality.

All people had to do was not be racist.
Ha, that was my first thought too
I like this post because it avoids making provocative claims that are sometimes seen in the media, and I hope that this restores some of the lost trust between the people on two sides.

For example, unlike the media, Obama avoids saying that violence is partially justified, or claiming that some groups have a higher chance of being killed by police, and instead talks about the "recurrent problem of racial bias in our criminal justice system".

Indeed, people on the center and center right sometimes use the FBI crime stats to argue that there is no racial bias in police killings: since African Americans make up 27% of the arrests while constituting 13% of the population, it is consistent with the fact that they are twice as likely to get killed by police.

Much fewer people, however, would argue that there is no bias in the criminal justice system, given the evidence.

So I am hopeful that by making more moderate arguments, Democrats will be able to squeeze perhaps the extra 1-2% which is all is indeed to defeat Trump.
> for whatever reason, you are seen as "soft on crime" if you attempt to prosecute police for carrying out crimes.

I suspect that the reason is a very simple worldview that divides everything into good vs evil / us vs them, and therefore cops vs criminals.
>why did we allow so many unprofitable companies IPO?

the Amazon business model? VC/Public's money to gain market shares.
As others have said, it actually wasn't a law that was put in place -- it's court-created.

Qualified Immunity says that an officer can't be sued for violating civil rights (Section 1983) unless it was clear at the time of the action that it was in violation of the law. It has nothing to do with criminal liability in the event the officer commits a crime; it's a restriction on the civil side.

There is a grain of good policy here, becuase if there is a lawsuit which plantiff is inevitably going to lose, having a clear rule that stops the lawsuit before discovery saves serious time and money.

There are two independent problems with it, though:

1. A judge who just doesn't like 1983 lawsuits can always find a trivial manner to distinguish the case from existing precedent; e.g. distinctions-without-differences like "the court has ruled you can't detain someone for 72 hours without access to water but the plantiff was only detained for 70."

2. There is no incentive for anyone to be the first mover to file a lawsuit against any particular practice since the first mover will lose on qualified immunity grounds.
Yes !! I just create a Makefile target and pip-tools is all I need. I create a requirements.in and that is all. So far never feel that has to be more complicated than that. And when I want to upgrade a package I update the requirements.in if I need to and run `make -B` for this:

default: requirements-develop.txt
pip install -r requirements-develop.txt

requirements.txt:
pip-compile -v requirements.in

requirements-develop.txt: requirements.txt
pip-compile -v requirements-develop.in

I so nice to just write `make` than doing all the Poetry, Pipenv stuff, that honestly I feel is not adding nothing really really useful to the workflow.
But with a 2-party system, how do you do that? As a Canadian, I've seen disaffected factions of our major parties splinter off and create viable alternatives. Often they don't get elected, but they attract enough votes to make the mainstream left/right party take notice and move in their direction.
The concept of "looters will be shot" has been used outside race related riots.

Are we going to debate every tweet's historical usage?

Should we start looking at AOC's or Bernie Sanders' uses of the word "revolution" in their tweets too?
Manufacturing fuel in orbit requires sending the plant in orbit, extracting the raw materials, packaging them then bringing them up there and also involves sending a ship every time a maintenance is needed, unlike Mars where the raw material (water, CO2) are already nearby. ISRU (in situ resource utilization) is the best way to go, i.e. you bring the plant to Mars but at least you use the local raw materials.
Congratulations. You just reinvented subset of Backbone.js
Sodium chloride of course, how economically can they be split?
It's important to clarify. "Qualified Immunity" is NOT a law. It is judicial precedent. That means the Supreme Court made this up and courts don't go against prior rulings except in rare cases. Sometimes Congress creates laws to confirm judicial rulings or go against them and clarify their intentions.

The Supreme Court has ruled a lot of things that we would not allow to stand today. For instance, the Dred Scott Case [1] "In a landmark case, the United States Supreme Court decided 7–2 against Scott, finding that neither he nor any other person of African ancestry could claim citizenship in the United States, and therefore Scott could not bring suit in federal court under diversity of citizenship rules. Moreover, Scott's temporary residence outside Missouri did not bring about his emancipation under the Missouri Compromise, as the court ruled this to have been unconstitutional, as it would "improperly deprive Scott's owner of his legal property".

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dred_Scott
Then move elsewhere nearby and lock in a rent controlled lower value.
The British model - and i know we have a much lower level of gun ownership than the US, but hear me out! - is to have bobbies on the beat not be armed, but to have rapid response units available which are very heavily armed indeed [1] [2]. So, if police on the street encounter an armed criminal, they fall back, radio for support, and wait for a group of colleagues with assault rifles, sub-machine guns, and proper training in using them, to arrive.

I wonder if a similar model, with different details, could work in the US? In the limit, that could involve police cars or foot patrols working in pairs, one unarmed and doing the actual policing, and another one following some way behind, but not getting involved unless a gun was spotted. Put body cameras on the unarmed unit, with the armed officers watching a live feed, so they don't even have to wait for a call.

That said, as the wikipedia article points out, the British model does not extend to the whole of the UK - police in Northern Ireland routinely carry guns, which in 2020 is rather depressing.

[1] https://www.eliteukforces.info/police/CO19/weapons/

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_police_firearms_in_the...
Serious question: What is the difference between virtual environments and just having several Python installs like:

/home/foo/a/usr/bin/python3
/home/foo/b/usr/bin/python2

Python is so fast to compile and install that I just install as many throwaway Pythons as needed.

I do not recall any isolation issues between those installs, unlike with conda or venv, which are both subtly broken on occasion.

But I dislike opaque automation in general.
“To make a shitload of money” doesn’t quite have the same ring.
This is like saying most people who died are old.
This is the theory that airline companies have followed since forever. Cliff notes version, thanks to chapter 11 bankruptcies, the competitors never will go out of business.

For another counter-example, take any business with low barriers to entry. Sure, one set of competitors go out of business, but you have new ones. Retail outlets tend to be a good example. Top retail brands change regularly as new ones come in and push old ones out. This has been going for as far back as I have looked. Therefore any retail brand should operate as if it will happen in the future as well.
I try to balance both out having a day job and having stuff that motivates me for learning and or Side projects. Even though I take breaks on my side projects I think you can be an OK hacker but, if you are able to get a large amount of free time making around ~$50 then I would agree with you.
To be blunt, maybe you just don't know what you're missing out on? Of course, Python's package management system works and is merely an annoyance to those of us who are used to more modern package managers. By the way, your comment reminded me a of this classic: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9224 :)
Many politicians have suggested that the government SHOULD be involved in cracking down on social media speech.

AOC (a US congresswoman) specifically suggested that legislation be written to curb free speech on Facebook.
That use of @dang doesn't trigger anything — there's no notification email or highlight that'll get his attention. Still, if dang happens to see it, you might get a reply. For certainty, email the mods using the footer Contact link.
I'd follow up with the letter that you are moving out immediately. Let's see who'll be laughing last.
You get those very same cost overruns and huge delays in smaller reactors (at least, as long as you're building on the same fundamental technologies.) You can build cheaper by building e.g. a Thorium breeder reactor, but that just defers the problem of project management—building a thousand Thorium plants, like building a wind-farm with 1000 windmills, is still fraught with bureaucratic principal-agent problems.

Really, the problem isn't any specific technology, but rather the fact that any industry where projects cost a billion dollars apiece, is going to result in a natural monopoly/oligopoly, which creates perverse incentives.

The renewable energy sources you think of when you think of "renewable energy", aren't lower-overhead because of what's required to build them. They're lower-overhead because they're often built/sold as individual interchangable units that can be purchased on the open market at different times from many different companies; which creates an efficient, liquid market for such devices.

Contrast with e.g. a hydro dam. Hydro power is also renewable energy! But a dam is just as large an infrastructure project as a nuclear plant; and so dam-builders and dam-buyers form just as small a market; and so said market is just as fraught with cronyist back-room dealings; and so the market ends up just as inefficient as nuclear, or coal, or oil-and-gas, or any other cartel-driven business.
> This was no regular interview, it’s quite dishonest of you to say that.

How so? It was an interview for him to bring AppGet in-house to Microsoft. That's normal software business.

Honestly, based on what this Keivan said - I think he scared Microsoft away with his demands that they take the project only in a direction that he approves of.

And when they went away, they took some of the most banal ideas, ideas that have been done a thousand times in other projects and used them in their own - which they built in a completely different programming language with exception to the very, very common YAML configuration.

> Second, be honest; do you have any stake in the game yourself? Do you work for microsoft?

Nope. People who disagree are simply wrong and I'm attempting to correct their ill-formed point of view.

Meanwhile, you're shitting up the comments with this trashy ad hominem insinuation of shilling. It's against the rules and you should stop doing it - https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
There is a difference between law and legislation; qualified immunity is law, but not legislation (that I know of).
Location: Romania

Remote: Yes

Willing to relocate: No

Technologies: C#, SQL, Azure, Node, Typescript, Angular

Email: razvanbp@yahoo.com
80-characters-per-line limits should be terminal, says Linux chief Torvalds
Ages ago my dad pointed out to me that spaceships will be spherical. ;-)
My understanding of the Constitution is that it sets limits on government power, e.g. it can't pass a law that restricts free speech. It does not enumerate all the things the federal government may do.
Nobody said that. They probably keep it in the US, so most of their employees are working at the same time and u don't have someone working when the rest of your team is sleeping.
> but that they have some ability to weed out bad administrators

Hum... How would that work on the real world? It would carry some merit if people could have a vote of non-confidence and put politicians out of their positions, but it is very rare to see anything like this around the world.

The fact that delegating things right is way harder than doing it oneself is well accept on management. People still delegate because doing does not scale. There is no argument against direct democracy there.
The Supreme Backdoor Factory: JXplorer Clones
That's pretty clearly exactly what they're arguing.
The debt probably has seniority over other obligation and can be recovered from the remaining assets.
So the Internet Archive believes that copyright protection for creative works should extend no more than five years past the date of publication?

I'm all for copyright reform, but that's a preposterously short period. One hundred years ago, copyright lasted for 28 years, with the potential to renew for another 28 years.

Even if you went back to that copyright term WITHOUT the renewal, five years is still less than 20 percent of that.
It is important to emphasize that there are no actual laws behind Qualified Immunity. It is a doctrine that was "invented by the Court out of whole cloth".

See: https://www.cato.org/blog/qualified-immunity-supreme-courts-...
Hmm interesting write up. Taken at face value, it would appear he was a capable bureaucrat (could get things fine within a system), but as a politician he was lacking. Which I guess makes sense.

Politicians have to compromise and made deals with the devil and other things which require good rapport even with those you disagree with. They also need to sell their ideas to people and have them accept those ideas. Bureaucrats on the other hand just have to work well within a system. There are similarities of course, but I think one of them requires more agreeability and charisma than the other where procedure and connections are more important.
It's almost unbelievable that people are suggesting we take the power away from elected officials and hand it over to corporations.

It's like the sky isn't even blue anymore...