skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Thanks for mentioning this, since it caused me to go check metrics and find they weren't coming in... Luckily only a couple of my alarms come from metrics via the agent itself.
The “correct notice” being the original BSD license.
Do you have a good tutorial for doing Django or a standard 3 tier web app on Kubernetes? We are using kubernetes at my workspace, but it seems way too complicated to consider for something like that. Maybe if I can bridge the gap between architectures it will help.
There is an eerie echo of history here. The late 60's were the height of civil unrest in modern America. Robert Kennedy and Martin Luther King Jr. were assassinated as Apollo astronauts were preparing to land on the moon.
They produce about as good code as can be produced for any 8-bit (accumulator size) processor (there are some 16-bit instructions for some registers). The PDP-11, for which C was designed, has a 16-bit register architecture for all registers.
I'm a bit confused by the ambiguity: is this a local JS browser client-side scan or a remote server-side scan?
Avoiding leaks is not optimisation, it's a matter of correctness - not freeing memory is an optimisation based on a very shortsighted assumption that is not practical for any new language (modern languages are expected to come with language server support)
Considering the rate at which the general aviation fleet turns over (~none in ~forever), and that the typical Cessna is flying around with a World War 2 engine or its closely related descendant, I predict that it will be roughly infinity years before people who live at the ends of airports stop cursing the noises.

Of course, if they just outlaw 100LL avgas and pass some noise regulations the problem will solve itself.
Isn't that essentially a tautology? Manual memory management and threading in such languages lacks safety guarantees to begin with.
The java equivalent to the Go case would simply be adjusting the -Xms flag. The Go approach is a needlessly convoluted because the runtime doesn't offer any tuning knobs.

As for the rust case, if you squint then it's similar to a concurrent collector.
Right, the bias towards distro needs is why packaging so hard to do internally, I'm just surprised at how little effort has gone into adapting it.

You need some system mediating between people doing deployments and actual root access in both cases. The "docker" command is just as privileged as "apt-get install." I have always been behind some kind of API or web UI even in docker environments.
As a pilot, I fly full power at takeoff, of course. In my usual piston plane, I fly at 75% power until it cannot maintain that power (due to normal aspiration and no boost from, eg, a turbocharger), and then "flat out" beyond that.

I do not think I have ever flown at 35% power except in the short time between final and touchdown.
I met my wife in college where we were to only ones that taught ourselves 'C' from K&R. (Mid 80’s)
If the bug is as simple as everyone is saying, why hasn’t it been discovered until now?
during pre launch in-cabin video, one crew member appeared to be "signing" (spelling out stuff) with his left hand (?)

Does anyone have a back story on that?
Fairly certain this affected Kroger. My sister called me this morning asking to troubleshoot why her laptop was warning of an unsecured connection.

Perhaps a coincidence, but also likely that their cert expired.
Yes, the government paid to develop crew dragon. And they buy launch services which is another source of revenue.

The government paid for Apollo. And once they decided they no longer wanted it, it became impossible to use Apollo parts, technology, or any of the engineers or technicians to put people into orbit. The capability "vanished."

If the government never bought another ticket to space, Crew Dragon could be made available to people who want to go into space and are willing to pay for a ticket. So even if NASA got defunded completely tomorrow, the ability to go into space would still be there. Because the market for space, when served in an economic way, is self sustaining.

This has never been true before, and now it is. That is my definition of sustainable.
Data point of 1 - we use Oracle in our greenfield platform (in 2018). My reasoning:

- our engineers already know Oracle (this is absolutely reason #1). We don't need to get into religious wars about software, just to write good code quickly.

- Oracle is cheap enough for our needs. The price of an oracle RDS instance is immaterial in the grand scheme of things. We are saas so our customers will never be installing our software.

- noone ever got fired for buying Oracle. When our customers security teams grill us, running on Oracle and Java ticks one box on their spreadsheet. Same is true if we get acquired.

- Oracle is hugely scalable. Even if/when we get super big and successful, we won't need to change our database - there's always a bigger Oracle instance.

- Oracle is insanely reliable. In my career I've never seen data loss on Oracle that was not caused by human error. I totally trust that that will be the case going forward as well.

- as a company, oracle's not going away.

I'm sure some of these apply to postgres as well - but your question wasn't "which is better", which is a much harder question to answer.
They didn't have to buy a full rocket! It's a huge cost reduction when you can reuse the expensive part and pay for fuel+maintenance.
The more you understand the system, the more you can influence it. Donella Meadows proposed Twelve Leverage Points to Intervene in a System: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twelve_leverage_points
Takes a couple of minutes at most for an average application upgrade / deployment, a lot of places can deal with that. Reddit is less reliable than what I used to manage as a one man team.
This is the equivalent library for PHP https://github.com/fzaninotto/Faker
Props still make significant noise, especially at takeoff RPM.

A friend of mine owned a house under the approach path to a medium-volume reliever airport (KBED). All of the piston airplanes that flew overhead were perfectly pleasant (at least to me), but the jets were notably more annoying.

Carrying more power/noise, more speed, and more disturbance to stay flying while dirtied up, the difference was night and day. I suspect the PT-6 powered C208 would already fall on the “not so annoying” side of that spectrum (closer to the piston props than the turbojets’ noise profile), so changing fuel might not provide that much relief to those who bought houses near airports.
It's does a deorbit burn to actively fall back to Earth.
But you want to share state and only update state incrementally on edit to get any reasonable level of performance for stuff like language server code analysis.
>> they could have anything that doesn't create crumbs

Would you get a reference to M&Ms? I know SpaceShip1 was 16 years ago now. How time flies.
A pool can invoke destructors when it is cleared. Might take a bit of overhead (if the pool is to support arbitrary classes), but you could retain the fast pointer-bump allocation.
well, if adapted for Mars conditions that dropped Cybetruck would be very useful for the landed crew of the next mission. The Mars trucks are going to be electric, not ICE :)
Semantically it is a bitwise copy.

In the example from the article it is probably actually a copy because the value was originally on the parent thread's stack, which will be reused after the function returns, so the value will need to be copied to the new thread's stack.

However it is important to not that it isn't a deep/recursive bitwise copy. It just needs to copy the HashMap itself (which is probably a handful of words).

So yes, it is doing a bitwise copy, but this is also very cheap. It will be much, much cheaper than spawning the thread.
I don't think it's fair to say that people who make a different assessment of risks and/or have different risk tolerance than you are "incredibly selfish". Lockdown, social distancing, mask-wearing, and other related changes in behavior are all about trade-offs in the face of uncertainty.

Maybe you're right - but maybe you're wrong.
sometimes the domain plays a role, is jet engines as critical for normal growth (surely jet engines are key in war) as electronics ?
Sure, but neither side is presuming that emergency orders are (un)constitutional.

Both opinions do ultimately agree that emergency orders are, in general, constitutional during a pandemic. And not by presumption, but by an examination of the laws and facts.

That is why neither position makes this a central question: not because it's presumed, but because they both ultimately agree it's not a point of contention.

The point of contention is whether this particular order's treatment of churches is constitutional. Not whether the orders in general are constitutional.

Once both sides agree that the orders are in general constitutional, the argument that churches should be allowed to stay open while some other similar things stay closed now does require an argument.
How does something being paid for by the government relate to it being sustainable? Our roads are paid for by the government too - and those are sustainable. So are lots of other things, like basic science research, healthcare in most countries, etc, all of which is sustainable in being paid by government.
Even if they're sold, they're not going to go to poor people. If poor people could improve their lives with a scooter that requires money, skills and effort to charge and maintain it, they wouldn't be poor. The whole reason they're poor is they don't do useful things, not because they can't afford useful stuff. This is developed country poor people I'm talking about. If they were concerned about waste, they wouldn't spend so much of their little money on drugs, alcohol, and McDonalds.

I agree with the shameful thing. But a lot of older people do have enough yet they carry the emotional baggage of their poor younger selves. I know people who save old broken appliances with the aim of repairing or selling them oneday but eventually realized nobody wants a box of old electrical plugs or a broken washing machine from the 1970's when even the poorest people are given free money to buy a washing machine by social welfare and used electrical cables are practically free.
What is strange about it? The male only canon is result of morality that mandated sexism. If that was not strange, adding some women into mix is not strange and existence of some (apparently minority) people who prefer women should not be strange either.
How Lego moved from engineering-led to customer-first approach
For this case, in tiny arrays, something like timsort would be a bad idea -- the basic idea of the article is that it takes so little work to sort tiny arrays that you want to run the simplest algorithm possible.
Honestly, there is already too damn much stuff to learn to get into the software industry.

One can make a point in that senior developers could use different tools than juniors. That happens on other industries, and development avoids it like the plague, with clearly bad consequences. But the industry will never standardize on high-knowledge tools.
Ssssh. Don’t tell the Japanese whaling ships, they’ll find a way to justify killing them for science (sic).
Considering that writing files can also block the process you probably don't want to have that in your latency-sensitive parts either, so you'll have to optimize that one way or another anyway.

For the more general problem you have can also dedicate more threads to the task or apply backpressure.
One thing I just noticed is that the example doesn't make sure to actually run the new thread to completion before the main thread exists.

This means that if you do a "drop in other thread" and then main exists, the drop might never run. Which is often fine as the exit of main causes process termination and as such will free the memory normally anyway.

But it would be a problem one some systems where memory cleanup on process exit is less reliable. Through such systems are more rare by now I think.
I'd imagine they'd probably send a modified cybertruck with some non-perishable supplies of some kind in the hope that there'll be some useful supplies on the planet for future missions even if stuff doesn't go smoothly.
A Train Where the Passengers Are Doctors and Patients
Meh, the marketing team might have editor access the the website contents.

That would make sense.

It might just be a mistake done in "good faith". Maybe somebody fron marketing could have just thought "this is ten years old, I think it's okay to archive it"
Wow, do you reasonably believe OpenAI people are not contributing?...

I thought HN visitors are not capable of that level of naive thinking.
It is common to have significant logic and complexity in the configuration management manifests, but I'd argue that it's possible to move most of that to packaging and have your configuration management just be "package state latest, service state restarted."
A plain non-technical reading of the email from Twitter doesn't describe the structure you're suggesting - so it's possible that Twitter's email template is not properly rendering the structure of the tweets.
Hi, I'm the author.

> Nothing in the README seems to tell me how this operates.

Not directly. I didn't even really think about writing about how it works so much as about how to get it work.

> I'm never told what the scope or method of operation is: what can this monitor? how is it monitored?

It is not something made for monitoring, it's for posting issues. You can add 3rd party automation if you wish (and yes the illustration is misleading and yes I'm thinking of how to fix it).

> what I can use this for [...] I still don't understand what this is doing: is it essentially a special theme for Hugo, or is there some frontend JavaScript magic going on?

There's little JavaScript since theoretically it should work on IE8 and is designed to be as 'foolproof' as I could think of (no external assets, all information on one lightweight page).

It's a special glorified theme for Hugo, if you want to put it that way, yes.
USA can bully many countries, but NL is part of the EU so sit back, shut up, and play nice. To make this even more political, UK is (finally) leaving the EU, and as they have been USA's little bitch/snitch for the past few decades that makes many Europeans happy.

EU is not the enemy of USA. If anything we are trying to create a peaceful union based on collaboration and respect. And we want to form a unified culture of respect and peace with freedom and progress. And on the EU side we are making it happen slow and steady.

"You Americans" go and clean up the shitshows you have caused in your backyard and then come talk to us.

And with that said, I have really enjoyed every of my visits to the USA, vast majority of the people are friendly and open hearted. It is the stupid politics and the lobbying politicians I can't stand. I strongly believe that once USA stops the race to "global domination" (that MAGA stuff) and starts on global unification we will succeed to have a better life all over the planet. And even those who disagree with our way of life will sooner or later join us or wither and die (and I don't mean we bomb them).
Like the others, I’m also a pilot and confirm that we cruise in the 65-75% of rated power range in piston ops. Turboprops do have a larger power reserve / larger spread between rated and cruise power, but it’s nowhere near 25% in cruise.
>...immediately reach...

One would have to ignore a large part of history in addition to events over the last 20 years to make the claim that this was a knee-jerk reaction.
Sounds like a good test case for exercising those otherwise useless "million dollar insurances" that some certificate vendors flash in their sales materials?
You want to be able to incrementally update state to get performance out of incremental code analysis (eg. language server implemention for IDE)
Very cool. I wish it existed earlier when I was looking for solutions.

Shameless plug: Ended up creating an open source CLI for AWS cloudwatch[0] that works pretty well for us, but it’s less slick obviously.

[0] https://github.com/cronyo/cronyo
I really like the "git diff" example. Almost wants me to throw Git Tower after that! Nice job.
Predictions? https://github.com/search?o=desc&q=SSL+verify&s=committer-da...

:)
If you're into space science and technology and want to see where we're going next, check out https://orbitalindex.com, a weekly space science & technology newsletter that I co-write.
Those abstractions are like the steering wheels and pedals for Haskell, not like the car's engine.
The title is slightly wrong: it's not going to make your code faster, it's going to reduce latency on the given thread.

It maybe a net win if this is the UI thread of a desktop app, but overall, it will come at a performance cost: because modern allocators have thread-local memory pools, and now you're moving away from it. And if you're running you code on a NUMA system (most server nowadays), when moving from one thread to another, you can end up freeing non-local memory instead of local one. Also, you won't have any backpressure on your allocations, and you are susceptible to run out of memory (especially because your deallocations now occur more slowly than they should)

Main takeaway: if you use it blindly it's an anti-pattern, but it can be a good idea in its niche: the UI thread of a GUI.
If you're rotating a self-signed certificate, then how do you suppose that clients securely trust it? Or if you just mean replacing it when it expires, then this could instead be tied to the underlying public key alone, which can be reused.
The US also upset the Tokugawa Shogunate, the isolationist military-fuelaistic government which had ruled Japan for more than two hundred years. I don't think any of this is so clear cut.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asemic_writing

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artist%27s_book
Ansible is a little special in how imperative it is, a better comparison is Puppet which is intended to do periodic "convergence" runs, although these are more typically hourly or daily than continuous.
Too funny. In other related SV parody news to give you a great big laugh: [0]

[0] https://www.theolognion.com/vc-hospitalized-for-overexciteme...
The Resolved Date in that case could have been omitted because it's not checked if the issue is still considered active.

I added all the required frontmatter you would need as an example of what could be changed.
Just want to mention something about the id_token provided. I'm on my phone, so I don't have apples implementation handy, but in OIDC, the relying party (Spotify for example) is supposed to use the id_token to verify the user that is authenticated, specifically the sub claim in the jwt id_token.

https://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-core-1_0-final.html#...

It's likely (although like others have noted, this is scant on details), that this value was correct and represented the authenticated user.

A relying party should not use the email value to authenticate the user.

Not contesting that this is a bug that should be fixed and a potential security issue, but perhaps not as bad.

Anyone else? Am I reading this right?
I personally love Laxygit https://github.com/jesseduffield/lazygit. It makes sure I don't have to think.
Sure, but the Netherlands is not as interdependent with China as it is with the US. The point is that the US is not convincing the Netherlands that blocking China is a smart move (because it isn't), it's forcing it with threats.
I agree, especially given how many developer “eyes” were on this from having to integrate the log in with Apple flow into their apps.

Just as a first-hand anecdote to back this up, a dev at my former company which did a mix of software dev and security consulting found a much more complex security issue with Apple Pay within the first hour of starting to implement the feature for a client and engaging with the relevant docs.

How did no one else notice this? The only thing I can think of is the “hidden in plain sight” thing? Or maybe the redacted URL endpoint here was not obvious?
I didn't say it was unbelievable, it's just ... very interesting, compared to all of the other space opera business. It implies that passing through this empty surface, this topological construct which itself need not have particles nearby (depending on how close you feel the singularity is to "nearby") makes this (and other typically conserved numbers) no longer all that important ... but only from the vantage point of an outside observer.

In other words, relativity is intertwined with this conservation, as it is observer dependent.
>> A welcoming and friendly community

O yeah, I totally forgot that. There is a very senior guy on SO who literally helped to fix all our non-trivial problems. I still need to investigate if we could move from Elm to Elmish (or more like SAFE).
That is ridiculous - you wouldn't carry the weight around for that power level for such a short flight segment need. If you are averaging 35% power you have WAY to big an engine in your plane!!
Some of these things matter; they are not the main factor, but it something you take in consideration in the bigger picture.
here is the article about fauci endorsing and funding such research

https://www.newsweek.com/dr-fauci-backed-controversial-wuhan...
This just hit me via Debian's 'apt-get update': I'm using jitsi's package repository which is hosted via HTTPS and seems to rely on the expired root-CA. Certificate checks started failing for everybody a few hours ago [1].

That's quite bad, as I tried to do a clean re-install of jitsi-meet, and now I have no installation at all any more.

[1] https://github.com/jitsi/jitsi-meet/issues/6918
It would have to be a non-desktop system.

I'm pretty sure Linux will always free process-private memory, and threads, and file descriptors when a process exits.

The only things that can leak in typical cases are some kinds of shared memory and maybe child processes?
IMHO, alert() should be called at a higher level by something that calls check().
> I kinda get this, the "framework maintainers are superhumans who write amazing code and nothing I could write could get close to that" attitude.

As had been pointed out before: they don't have to be much smarter, they just have to have more time at hand or be more people, get more bug reports, get more improvement ideas etc.

> But the framework maintainers aren't looking at your specific situation. I mean sure, if you're writing yet another CRUD system for yet another SaaS product, then fine, use Rails, that's what it was designed for.

Let me assure you that I am not using Rails for my hypothetical real time radar tracking system and I'm not recommending anyone else using it for anything either except what it is made for ;-)

That said I think many people will find that their use cases aren't that special.

> But if you're not building Basecamp, then your application is eventually going to want to do something that Rails wasn't intended to do. And then you're going to have to write your own code.

Did you ever try Rails?

> And if you're not confident that you can write that code, because you don't think you can write good enough code for this... then... why are you doing this?

This is a very uncharitable interpretation IMO.

Maybe we just have better things to do than reinventing the wheel again right now..?

(To be clear: sometimes the wheel needs to be reinvented, but every single time.)
Book a Ride-Share Mission
Jets typically can’t make 90% power in cruise and are often flying at 50% or lower fuel flows than takeoff. (You might be setting almost 100% N1 speed as your power setting, but that’s not the same as setting 100% actual power in a jet in high-altitude cruise.)

Fuel flow is a good proxy for power. From the Citation II flight manual: max cruise thrust settings (104% N1 over 25K feet) have a peak fuel flow of 1716 lb/hr at 15K feet vs 1083 lb/hr at 35K vs 721 lb/hr at 43K ft. Sea-level takeoff fuel flows are not given in the manual, but are around 2000 lb/hr, so typical low 30s cruise flight is 55-65% power.