skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Your stock plan should have the data of the valuation when you signed on, and the most recent valuation. If you use something like Carta, that should all be available to you in the app. Even if you don't use an app, whomever own the stock plan should be able to give you that information.

Your compensation and retention is between you and your boss, whoever that is. You are unlikely to get good results by skipping the management chain and asking the acquirer for special treatment. But you should be able to have professional discussions with your boss about your value, and negotiate from there.

There is little chance that you can get a seat at the table for the actual acquisition. That simply isn't how acquisitions work, not unless you already hold a role where the leadership includes you in strategic discussions.

In short, talk to your boss about all your concerns.
Thank you!

You can go to the "Visitors" list and from there you can see a summary of each visit and also view the recording.
I've seen fastmail pop up a lot, I should definitely give it a shot. I have to look up that subdomain forwarding, it sounds neat.
> Just spoke to Governor Tim Walz and told him that the Military is with him all the way. Any difficulty and we [The Military] will assume control but, when the looting starts, the shooting starts.

Who would he be implying is doing the shooting other than the Military that will assume control?
Keto (and to a degree, paleo) is a balanced diet. These diets, or something very much like them, were what humans were eating when we evolved into our present state.

The Western diet is highly unbalanced in favor of carbohydrates and sugar because these are easy to farm, store, transport, and sell. The food pyramid we all know and love is a product of over two centuries of industrial agriculture.
The linked video and description are from The Independent reposting CNN's feed. The CNN video has no such description:

https://youtu.be/ftLzQefpBvM
The enforcement of rules in rarely applied with 100% accuracy in any realm. Not because the rule enforcers support some infractions, but because they have limited manpower and must prioritize their tasks.
The point of scripts is to easily automate tasks without the need for a heavy infrastructure behind them in the target.

If you have to install/run a pipeline every time you modify them (like C or Rust or Go or TypeScript), or you need to sort out distribution (if you use binaries compiled in another machine), or it takes a long time to compile & run (like Rust or C++), or you need to install a heavy runtime (like a JVM or .NET or v8), it defeats the purpose.
There are also no laws that an at-will employee must give two weeks notice- it is a courtesy at best.
Yes, but GP was asking about consequences of clicking the spam button vs just unsubscribing. Sure if you start getting unsolicited emails, by all means click that Spam button. However, if you're just tired of getting delivery updates just unsubscribe.
Psycho-Cybernetics (Dan Kennedy's version)
How on earth did this post reach #1?
No, it isn't one of several reasonable interpretations, it's what he quite plainly wrote.

What else could 'shooting' possibly refer to, if not the shooting of looters?
Looting should be prevented regardless of protest. The punishment for looting should not be death.
Which is something both Google Cloud Composer and Astronomer.io are trying to do.
>The police system as a whole is racist. Anybody who chooses to participate in and support that system everyday of their lives is racist.

What about all the Democrats and Republicans who are ultimately responsible for the laws governing the police system and who have for years tacitly or explicitly supported the war on drugs?
As I said, it doesn't really matter, if they defend a good argument for the wrong reasons.

It's quite possible that some people who want free speech now might be against free speech for others, but that's hardly an argument against having free speech in the first place.

It's an interesting thought experiment: under free speech you should be free to advocate for a restriction of free speech.
Or Taiwan!
Add a "." after the ".com", like this:

https://www.bloomberg.com./news/articles/2020-05-28/g-7-ai-g...
It's a canary in the coal mine. Presumably they still checked other critical things but based on the canary could determine how closely they needed to check everything.
The position is disposable, not the person.
Sure, that makes sense to me. I will certainly avoid moving to cities where people are okay with crimes, so I won't have an opportunity to vote in their elections.
That's the whole point. You can't test outcomes if they are dependent on internal hidden state as that affects the outcome.

Whether you make it private or not hidden state leaks into the output since the output is dependent on it.
The bit at the bottom about the unsubscribe button appearing or not might be based on sender reputation?
> That's because according to the tax code, businesses can claim depreciation of all capital property.

Food isn't "capital property" in general, so it's a different deduction, but in the end it comes out much the same. Which is what I said. The price they paid for it is already a deduction, so there is generally no further deduction from donating it vs. throwing it away and writing it off.

> This is even easier for businesses, since for things like bikes that strictly decrease in value, the donation value is probably just the purchased price - accrued depreciation (which itself was modeled using methods similar to FMV).

But that's the problem. They buy something, use it (or intend to use it but don't), and then throw it away. One way or another that allows them to write off the entire cost.

Which means there isn't any additional deduction available for donating it to a charity instead of wasting it at the end, so there is nothing there to offset their cost/risk of making a donation instead of throwing it in a dumpster, and that causes tons more stuff to end up in the dumpster.
> I have no issue looking around in any of the games I use trackIR with

So you have screens behind you? And above you? And to either side of you? And at other odd angles? Suddenly your $200 is looking a lot more expensive, otherwise you're comparing apples to plastic oranges. Screen coverage for _actual_ free look would cost many times more than an HMD, take up many times more space, and it will _still_ be feeding the same image to both eyes unless you use 3D goggles which is yet another expense (a very significant one if you don't want your framerate to crater because you've just cut your display Hz in half).

> It gives you the exact same freedom of input

This is blatantly false. Freedom offered by motion tracking is restricted to screen space. A VR HMD integrates a full sphere of stereoptic screen space, something that you're deliberately ignoring.
Wait a few days and someone else will probably make a YouTube video about using your service; then use that either direct or to inform your own video production ...
Interesting, I've always heard of the calcium absorption effect as a negative aspect of D over-supplementation — I guess the theory is that it raises your blood calcium level too high, leading to arterial calcification? Is that effect overblown in your opinion?
Again - you're discounting the negative secondary effects of the policy when the police start harassing people who "look" like pickpockets.

Reminder - more total money is stolen from workers in the form of wage theft than is robbed by a factor of ~3 [0], why don't we focus on policing that?

[0]: https://www.epi.org/publication/wage-theft-bigger-problem-fo...
It's long past time to regulate social media like a phone company, natural monopoly, or common carrier. The DOJ needs to break them up for violating the public trust, then limit their ability to refuse service to law abiding citizens moving into the future. Government has every right to force companies to be neutral platforms through regulation. It's time to revoke/enforce section 230, especially the "good faith" clause.

Anyone who says that "Twitter is a private company that can refuse anyone" has never ran an actual company. There are plenty of rules against companies discriminating. That argument is the same argument used by Democrats against the landmark Civil Rights Act of 1964 which a Republican majority congress passed (82% of republicans voted yes).

Remember when this forum was up in arms about NET NEUTRALITY? Remember when the big bad ISP was going to censor you? Remember when all the sites went black because thats what the ISPs would do? Now the sites that went black are all committing the censoring. All the sites that went black track every movement you make online. Who needs DNS when you have outgoing link tracking and like buttons on every page.

Social media is about to be regulated. Its about time.
Trump says right-wing voices are being censored. The data says something else
Let me ask you this:

With that logic, how exactly is the president(or anyone in authority whether it be a governor, police chief, etc.) supposed to threaten use of force on any communication platform? It seems like mass communication is needed, which inevitably involves advertisers and investors, thus an exception should be made for situations like this where the president's message goes against the interest of Twitter.

What you are saying about Twitter could be applied to TV networks, radio stations, and just about any other medium or platform that people use. They are all funded by advertisers, investors, etc. Should we really be entrusting billionaires in determining which messages from the government we should and shouldn't be hearing?

> Using Namepcheap/AWS/Intel/Whatever for the same purpose

My analogies might not be totally applicable(though all analogies fall apart to some extent), but that doesn't necessarily mean that they aren't applicable at all. A web host like AWS, for instance, could conceivably receive enough flack from investors and segments of the public for hosting undesirable content, in which case it might be their interest to let go a customer publishing that content using their services. Of course, that is far less likely than with something like Twitter.

More accurately, the alternatives would be something like CNN or iHeartRadio, or possible alternatives to Twitter.
On my mother's side of the family they were practically vegetarian or normal as it was called back then. Vegetables all week and maybe on Sunday a roast probably fowl of some sort.

This was during the 1940s. There were nine children and the parents on a farm in a small rural area. So no extravagant purchases no pop, candy, etc. My mom told me one Christmas her present was an apple and she was excited! The apple came from the tree out back.

Sounds good? But all the women (grandmother and aunts) in the family developed diabetes, one male (uncle) too.

Type 2 diabetes isn't always due to a poor diet.
Q1 only covers through the end of March which would have only seen a few weeks of social distancing in some regions. Budgets take time to slash, and ripples take time to spread. The lean times could last for years and the common advice for surviving recessions is to cut as deeply and quickly as you can to preserve cash. That's why many companies are doing layoffs before they actually see a quarterly revenue performance hit. Organizations take time to move so decision makers need to lead the target.
I found the same - I was starting to get anxiety first thing in the morning - started taking Vitamin D and it simply stopped. At the time I had no idea that Vitamin D could have that effect.
That's not a violation of the ToS.
Thank you!

Well, it was in my interest to share it, but I do think it's one of the best ways to improve user privacy while still being able to get valuable insights.
Depending on the algorithm, you might be able to skip from GPGPU straight to ASIC.
Of course I agree, but it reminds me of a situation many years back where I live.

There was a big protest and people started throwing rocks at the police, and the media were in the middle of the police at that moment. It actually made the police's response much slower and dangerous because they first protected the media and escorted them out from the protesters range, before charging and arresting people.

I'm sure they have trained some protocol to how to control mobs, and throwing innocent civilians in the mix wrecks the whole thing.
I would love the option to be able to skip a semester or two of college, but unfortunately if I made that choice I'd lose all of my scholarships and it would end up costing me more than whatever I'd make in the meantime :(
Just because the original policing tactic that spawned this thread is abhorrent doesn't mean we can't discuss other possibilities here.

More on-foot friendly patrols (which should be perfectly doable given much higher density in cities), for example. Or maybe police actually trying to catch actual criminals instead of just acting like insurance agents.
What is your definition of broken windows policing? When I google it, it says:

"The broken windows theory is a criminological theory that states that visible signs of crime, anti-social behavior, and civil disorder create an urban environment that encourages further crime and disorder, including serious crimes."

Now when you look at a riot such as the one in Minneapolis and in in prior cases such as California 92, how do you not see a further increase in crime and disorder once a subset of the population realizes that something seems to have gone unpunished? Even in smaller cases such as graffiti, an area tends to have a higher rate of graffiti the more graffiti there is in the area. The reason is simple, others came before and managed to do, opportunistic individuals with broken morals will abuse it.
Damaging property is not violence.
It will absolutely backfire. Twitter is now going to editorialize re: their users' content. It's impossible to do this without being perceived as being biased, and twitter is already a partisan hellscape, it will only exacerbate the situation.
Similar to many of the other 'machines' that exist in our society. You can only be a cog in it serving its greater will or you are cast out.
The problem with your response if you've fundementally divided the world into the fearless, social justice serving left and the corrupt, evil, fascist, right. It can be assumed that the far right is not going to change their mind at any point; however the majority of the world isn't far right or far left. Many people are moderates that could go one way or the other.

By designating everyone who doesn't agree with you as "the right" that can't every act in good faith and is irredeemable you galvanize the more moderates. This incident won't have a substantive impact on the far right, but it may cause a change in opinion in more moderate voices.

Essentially be advocating this black and white extremism you hurt your cause and play into the very narrative that those on the other side are saying.
Whatever tweet he retweeted, it's now unavailable. Looks like Twitter's moderation policies are working as expected.
I'm guessing that you learned guitar before piano? My first instrument was piano and I don't really think about hand shape when I play chords on it. My internal visualization of music is primarily founded on a piano keyboard with musical staves as secondary.

I will say that playing multiple musical instruments gives the same kind of multiple ways of looking at a thing that multiple programming languages does. One of the things that was a little strange for me when I first picked up the flute was the idea that lower notes were further away from me as opposed to being closer the way that I was used to thinking of them with bass (particularly double bass which was my first stringed instrument). Meanwhile, on brass instruments, different pitches don't really have any spatial location at all.
Your answers were expected, but I mentioned Zoom for a specific reason...

Currently, many judicial hearings are being conducted using Zoom. You can literally be ORDERED to appear for a hearing using Zoom.

In this situation, what would you make of Zoom inserting that tag line? Does it change your analysis?

If yes, why? It's still a private company. Does the fact that the government is requiring you to use is restrict what the private company may or may not do?

There are two sides to the "if you don't like it, don't use it" argument. You are focusing only on one side; namely, if the consumer doesn't like it, he need not use it.

The Zoom example might open your eyes to the other side; namely, if a private company chooses to offer a service to the government, it needs to abide by certain restrictions... and, if it doesn't like it, it need not provide that service.

In the Zoom example, if Zoom insists on putting the tag on your video during hearings, a reasonable response would be to turn to Zoom -- and not you -- and say, "If you aren't willing to curtail your 1st Am. rights a bit, Zoom, then don't provide the service to the Court... the choice is yours."

If Twitter is hosting government officials and agencies -- in their official capacity -- there are certain restrictions it muse abide by; namely, not modifying, editorializing, or shadow-banning their posts. If Twitter doesn't like this restriction, it can choose not to host that government official or agency.
Faster/cheaper hardware probably
There are many metabolic disorders - some due to specific genetic issues, and some severely life-limiting (eg children unlikely to reach adulthood). And as per the Wikipedia page for metabolic disorders, not to be confused with Metabolic syndrome or Diabetes.
He was asked about this in a podcast. Episode 148 of Making Sense. The relevant discussion starts at 56:30 and runs for 15 minutes. Unfortunately the episode is not freely available.

Dorsey talks about the 'public interest' of retaining Trump's rule-breaking tweets, how people can add their opinions, how it's expected that our leaders be 'extremely expressive', how it's a 'direct line to the people', how we can 'have a conversation about it'.

I consider his response to be extremely weak sauce. All he's doing is giving excuses for his failure to consistently enforce Twitter's rules. It's difficult to avoid your conclusion that it's motivated by traffic.
On the contrary, the way the US constitution works is the government has no power at all, except granted by the constitution or laws passed by congress that are constitutional. The question is - which law empowers him to do so?
There's also the delicious notion of Google noticing thousands of people around the world suddenly using Google to search for "Duck Duck Go."

Google's search volume is probably such that it wouldn't even be a blip on the radar, but it's fun to think about.
I've been doing a lot with Home Assistant lately, and lots of things that play nicely like node-red.

Does anyone have a set up to manage music service playback to media players like Google Home (or I guess it's Nest now) speakers?

It would be fantastic to start playing music via Spotify from the dashboard, or based on events and node-red flows. Not sure if the new forked-daapd integration will help me out here, but last time I tried to work with MPD specifically (unrelated project) I ran into walls left and right trying to get something working.
Radicalism and inciting to violence should be bubbled not amplified.
Yes, it was not clear which representatives you were talking about.
(I'd also add that while I can play multiple instruments, I don't necessarily play most of them well).
Small editing issue:

I think the author missed adding a hyperlink in the summary at "You can check the source of an email to do this - here's a guide on how to do that. "
Most (if not all) motivations for slavery, colonization and resource extraction have been economically related, but that's not to say that all economic decisions are based in racism.

Generally the answer to every problem in every other Country isn't to just ship them to your Country, that's an unsustainable model. Typically the people who migrate are either young, well educated or wealthy - which in the grand scheme of things does nothing to fix the problems in their originating Countries.
i bet if police stop responding to 911 calls altogether then crime complaints will drop to zero
No TLS?
Police can break the law too. An officer's actions may or may not be legal and that's determined after the fact in a court of law.

This doesn't happen all the time, but when police do break the law, or don't follow it correctly their actions come under scrutiny, data collected can be discarded from court, and even suffer personal blowback.

What you're asking is how did it happen? That's because it's illegal for a citizen to resist arrest (even unlawful arrest), so in the USA if you are being arrested, SAY you do not willingly submit, but DO whatever the officer tells you.

The thing many people forget is that the law doesn't happen just on the street in the US. It is a slow and flawed process, but police are just the front line of it, not the whole thing.

As someone else said, this will probably cost the police and city in a settlement.

Edit: Cops CANNOT just hold you for 24 hours. They have to have something to charge you with even if it's disorderly conduct. And you can then sue the local police if you have evidence that you were wrongly imprisoned. It is easy for cops to get cause so your chances of this are low, but it does happen. Once detained (with cause) I believe the 24 hour bit is true.

IANAL, this is based on my unprofessional research. I'd suggest you (everyone) do the same.
Cheaper/faster hardware probably
> Of all the horrific thing people post to Twitter all day long, a vague statement about Palestinian independence is the "best" whataboutist comparison Trump could find

You're thinking the best example is the one that should obviously be removed. But that's not what he's after, because then they'd just remove it. What he wants is something it would be maximally contentious for them to remove.
> What could be done is to have the component function return a closure that returns the VDOM nodes instead of the VDOM nodes themselves, and then the hooks would be run only once, since rerendering would only run the returned closure and not the whole component function, and there would be no need for the magic or rules.

what could be done is actually using a proper reactive language where things look like this, instead of hacking HTML, JS and whatnot in an unholy mess of syntax:

Button {
text: "Show menu"
onClicked: menu.visible = !menu.visible
}
Menu {
id: menu
}

e.g. a bit like this: https://tinyurl.com/yaawdomh
You should read up on the history of the phrase "when looting starts, shooting starts"