skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Remember "Cool URIs Don't Change"? I think about it a lot.

It was written toward the end of the BOHF's reign, when a technical specialist of the web had quite a lot of sway, when their decisions about a site's information architecture and how it was run was, if not the law, at least a very heavy hand on the till.

Those days are long past. Now Ted in Marketing wants a URL and who are you not to give it to him? I remember the pain of creating vanity top-level URLs in SharePoint 2003 because some functionary wanted them, and then they would promptly forget what they demanded. Yes, I used to use 410 Gones where appropriate.

That sort of thing has not been in our hands for quite a white, even if it is probably the best thing to do. After all, has the product URL changed? Or will it be back? Or has it been discontinued? The correct HTTP response, properly and widely used, would be very helpful in moving so much of the web forward but that is not under our control. Hasn't been for a while.
Collecting taxes is generally considered a sign of sovereignty.
Here I was thinking police not enforcing pedestrian safety rules and not even moving a finger to find my lost bike was a big deal. I feel you. I have dealt with police in two countries and it’s the same story. There are very few service minded individuals in the department.
Section 230 lets providers like social media companies publish user-generated content without having to review the content first. For example, if you libel someone on Twitter, that is your problem, not Twitter's problem. If you take away Section 230 protections, social media as we know it probably dies. Instead of a real-time pulse on what people are thinking, you'll just get what looks like the letters to the editor section of a newspaper. People who are already celebrities will not be censored, but you will be because you're too small to be worth the risk of being liable for. That means any grassroots political movement, no matter what side of the ideology spectrum it falls on, has no place to start. Be careful what you wish for.

I'll also point out that if Section 230 protections are removed, Donald Trump loses more than anyone. Nobody is going to carry his messages if they can be sued for their content. He'll have to make his own Twitter. His press conferences won't be broadcast live because the liability is too high. It is hilarious to me that Donald Trump is probably the largest beneficiary of Section 230 and he's the one that wants to remove it.

Section 230 is what lets the little guy exercise his or her right to free expression. It gives them a platform where they have an opportunity to let their opinion rise to the top. It saves them from having to buy their own printing press and build their own audience. Nobody is going to buy you a printing press if they're liable for everything you say. So what happens is you don't get to talk anymore.
That's clear now. Maybe add this explanation somewhere and link to it from your terms-of-evaluation.
My understanding was in many states, the guideline for holding someone without a charge was generally 72 hours (where weekends and holidays can extend that period; prosecutors' right to not work weekends is more important than any of your rights ...), with a range of exceptions open for abuse (e.g. hold you for 48 hours, decide you're acting strangely and need a psychiatric hold, etc).
The problem with the drug war is imprisoning dealers, not addicts - and if we released them it would get us much closer to those other countries.
I gotta say, my heart sunk when I saw the headline. I totally thought ddg finally needed income and were advertising with generic non-targeted ads at the top of their page!
How Shopify Uses Nix
This is not quite true, losing property can cause real material harm to someone. If my house burns down and I'm on the streets, there is a real chance of harm to my person. Also now apparently words can be violence and cause the cancellation of someone..pretty sure it's all up for grabs now.
Fair point. ‘Looting inevitably leads to innocent people getting shot’ is probably not what Trump meant.
Can you cite an alternative platform similar to twitter?
Okay, so voting like that won't lead to friendly patrols. That doesn't mean friendly patrols are a bad idea.
You may be interested in https://crank.js.org/blog/introducing-crank which essentially works as you propose.
The entropic brain hypothesis reminds me of the Mandukya Upanishad. I or Ego is neither the waking state, neither the sleep state and nor the dream state, but the one from all these states emanate from.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eGKFTUuJppU
Do you believe it’s more dangerous to:
A: Remove a post encouraging violence with the risk it’ll anger a group of people?
Or...
B: Keep it and let it reach 80 million followers?

There’s plenty of evidence that many sites (twitter included) allow violent speech from specific groups because they’re worried of the political backlash. These groups still complain about being silenced just the same, despite blatantly violating the TOS.

It doesn’t work. You’re just giving dangerous and violent people a platform to organize, encourage and enable violence. As a platform owner, you can’t just hope they’ll behave if you treat them nicely.
> Trump is intentionally or inadvertently quoting former Miami Police Chief Walter Headley. In December 1967, months before riots broke out during the (Nixon) Republican National Convention, Headley said “when the looting starts, the shooting starts” at the announcement of a new “get tough” policy for policing black neighborhoods. Headley promised to use shotguns, dogs, and aggressive “stop and frisk” tactics in a bid to reduce crime. “We don’t mind being accused of police brutality,” the New York Times reported him saying at the time. “They haven’t seen anything yet.”
That’s fair and I’d agree it could be a useful property for scripts and even small apps if all code was trusted and all networks had perfectly availability.

Sadly, that is not the case, which is why I don’t see the advantage of going "the browser way" for local scripts.
I took piano lessons at age 9 for about a 6 months but it never really took and I didn't practice. I played trombone for 3 years junior high, but didn't really practice then, either. Then I took music theory and composition classes in college, which revealed to me that thinking in intervals and scale degrees made way more sense to me than staves and note names. At that point bass and guitar clicked and really complemented that way of thinking.

I should also add I'm really only competent at one instrument which is bass guitar, probably because I played in a church praise band for a bit which made me actually have a reason to practice.
he said confidently and incorrectly

https://studentloanhero.com/featured/coding-boot-camps-defer...
Oh, that is entirely possible! Even worse is that in the future there's a chance video encoding will become complex enough that it'll be difficult to reverse engineer. If the algorithms get lost to time then even if you have the video itself it's meaningless.
Skin shade, location, time of year, and atmospheric conditions are other huge variables.

My pale skin in the midday desert sun for fifteen minutes in July? I'd have a pretty serious burn.
It didn't say that. At all. That's just a connection you made up. It made the point that outside of technology, in the real world women traditionally do the unpaid labour - housekeeping, raising children, caring for elderly family members, and because of this, they come in with a perspective that's primed to notice that open source work is often unpaid and has a similar dynamic of value accruing to people who aren't responsible for the work.
I suspect it's because it works for enough people that it pays off.

Every now and then I forget how annoying it was last time, and I think it would be nice to donate money to some sort of charity, and then they proceed to spam me for the following year. A couple years later I forget about he experience, and the cycle begins again.
non-paywall link: https://beta.trimread.com/articles/18758
lol, you're clearly a concern troll.

https://www.cnn.com/2020/05/29/us/minneapolis-cnn-crew-arres...

not fascist enough for you? For me that's plenty.
Only if they applied the rules equally to all politicians, and only if the process were transparent.

There's a lot of danger in allowing corporations to control the political conversation globally.
Bloomberg has a great article explaining this in more detail and the history of the UFC: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2020-05-08/as-ufc-pu...
> utilities

It's natural monopoly and highly regulated.

> online hosting

There was several hoster that ban pornography and white supremacist hosting content.

> financial providers

Templeton fired the lady that was choking her dog while calling the police because an African American man was bird watching. He also asked her to leash her dog.

It's a private company. I don't believe Trump is under a protected class to get special perks.
Yeah, I'm not sure how "deplatforming" the US President is even going to work...
dminder is a great app to estimate Vitamin D "intake"/production through sun exposure (and also food, albeit this won't matter much for most people):

http://dminder.ontometrics.com/

I only wish the algorithm used to derive the estimates was public/documented somewhere ...

http://dminder.ontometrics.com/Estimation.html
Erm, what? This is just not true, and is a false dichotomy. Moderation is hard. Always has been. Stuff will slip through the cracks.

POTUS has the most popular (and currently most controversial - note, that's _controversial_ not _extreme_ or some other morph) so it's easy to see why Twitter are on top of it. Other blue-checked accounts, whilst more "important" than unverified, just simply don't compare to the importance and prevalance of POTUS' account.
Active Thinking and Decision Making
Because people like the GP and the GGP click "Spam" instead of the unsubscribe link/process for these services. (I do the same if I can't unsubscribe easily.) Any service that requires me to login to unsubscribe, rather than provide a tokenized unsubscribe link in the email, can suck it.
If you read the replies to Trump's tweet on Twitter, half of them are whining about Kathy Griffin. She's their favorite example of how Twitter has a liberal bias today. Maybe you coincidentally picked the same example as them.
For us aphantasiacs, VR is the closest we'll ever come to daydreaming.

(I'm not invested in it myself, just making the point.)
Alternative title: Rust for C++ Template Lords.
Do you have any proof to support your "obvious" claim? They were arrested live on air- early in the morning- I saw the 2 minutes or so leading up to their arrest, but not anything before.
It would require massive fundamental change to society, but one idea is eventually citizens could "police" themselves. The majority of people could go through training and work together to provide security and protection in their own communities when need be.
This answer is ridiculous. They got world level mathematicians in their team, what more do you want? Who are those "cryptographers"? And why those cryptographers don't break Telegram if they think that their crypto is broken?

Again, crypto is either broken or not. Telegram crypto is not broken. It's fine. Not everyone might like it, but that does not matter. I don't know story about CIA (although I wouldn't be surprised to find out that Signal is honeypot), so can't comment about that.
And cops know this and will verbally threaten you with it. I've had it happen to me. The cop actually said to me during a traffic stop he could arrest me for resisting arrest. I don't know why he said that. I guess I was not showing sufficient gratitude for the ticket he was writing me. I was being respectful, even though I knew of no law requiring me to be respectful to cops. That was over 20 years ago. It's nothing new.
If you have/can use external speakers, there's devices to put in the audio line to do this if your devices can't do it.
As someone from the Twin Cities, the opportunists here include white supremacists and outside agitators as well as local folks who took advantage of this loss of control. We had hockey riots too, & burned cars, in 2003 and 2014; no one made your argument there. We have a strong civic community here, and there are many more protestors taking care of each other, taking care of small businesses, and trying to keep the peace here.

Yes, sh*& is going down here. We need change. The arrest of Omar Jimenez of CNN on camera accurately represents the situation for black men in Minneapolis. This is not about broken windows or graffiti. This is about George Floyd, Philando Castile, Jamar Clark, the fact that Devin Chauvin who killed George Floyd has been involved in multiple shootings and has never been prosecuted -- even after killing other people. That's your broken window, hah.
If they can't see, and do shoot, no one is safe.
So... as a kid when you see a broken window as opposed to a pristine one, which one do kids try to break? Do kids break into abandoned warehouses or occupied warehouses?
I think it's becoming pretty clear that they don't. First, scientists uncovered many additional ways neurons interact with one another[1]. Second, it seems that individual neurons do way more computing than in the simplistic ANN models [2].

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ephaptic_coupling

[2]: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5740076/l
To be fair, the judges asked to resign (really retire) are conservatives. It's the same reason Ginsburg hasn't retired despite her health issues -- everything to do with which party would be nominating her replacement.

The next time the Democrats control the Senate and the Republicans the whitehouse, I wouldn't expect them be interested in confirming any judges right before a Presidential election either.
Diabetes is likely a factor: https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/931132

And obesity is strongly correlated with diabetes: https://www.diabetes.co.uk/diabetes-and-obesity.html

There is a distinction to be drawn between obesity rates in the US and Japan and that might be part of the answer to your question.
You are technically correct, however the same logic applies to every type of enforcement.

Ideally the enforcement of every rule should apply to everyone equally, but in practice we see the police behave differently towards different people, we see tax audits and penalties applied mostly to people without the means to defend themselves and we see how apparently the law and government rules don't even apply to Trump. The world still goes on and we somehow deal with all of this.

Twitter enforcing their own rules is just going to be more of the same.
Vitamin D seems like a special case in the whack-a-mole though, since health authorities have been heavily pushing behavior that leads to getting less of this for a generation now. The message to never go outside without wearing sunscreen has probably killed way more people than it has saved.
but "jihad" and "martyrdom" are the same things we talk about when we pump up our soldiers to fight in our wars. what's the difference between that and how we talk in the US about what an honor it is to lay one's life down for his country?

every country and every army in the world tells it's soldiers that sacrificing their lives for the sake of the war they are fighting is honorable and noble and that their families, friends, and nations are proud of them for doing so. how is that so much different than telling soldiers they will be rewarded in heaven for being martyrs? For those who are religious, if you sacrifice your life for the greater good (for the good side in a war between good and evil), isn't that a good deed? and don't good deeds get you into heaven?
Who's in charge of Twitter? I'm going to go with Twitter.
Twitter has never been a "Utility" in the way that you may be imagining it to be.
Mass Screening Technology for Spinal Muscular Atrophy for $ 2
Spinal muscular atrophy is a dangerous genetic disease that affects the motor neurons of the spinal cord. It is characterized by a progressive disruption of the muscles of the legs, neck and head. Over time, it can reach the muscles responsible for swallowing and breathing. The patient's chances of recovery are significantly increased with early diagnosis of the disease. However, this procedure is not widely distributed today, primarily due to the high cost. The project of the GenomeX team is aimed at solving this problem.
Spinal muscular atrophy is called "the most common rare genetic disease." On average, spinal muscular atrophy is diagnosed in one of 6–11 thousand infants. At the same time, one of 40–70 people is carriers of the gene mutation that leads to the disease.
Today, there are effective ways to combat the disease. However, they will prove to be powerless if they are not applied on time.
The disease must be detected immediately, which means that it is necessary to test as many newborns as possible. To do this, the test must be affordable. In addition, it is impossible for it to give false positive or false negative results - accuracy is very important. The genetic spinal muscle atrophy screening method developed by our team meets both requirements.
The spinal muscle atrophy genetic screening kit will include a 96-well plate for mixing reagents, filter paper for taking newborn blood samples, a reagent for isolating DNA from dry blood stains, and a reagent for determining spinal muscular atrophy carriage. Application of the method is possible only in medical institutions.
The implementation of this technology in the United States will reduce the cost of a screening program for spinal muscular aphthrophy by 100% or 8 million dollars. The test is able to detect the carriage of a mutant gene. When conducting mass neonatal screening, storing information about carriers of the disease can help eradicate the disease as a result of smart family planning.
Target is minor, they blew up a police station. That’s terrorism level attack. Police should have had control of the situation, they allowed it to happen
You can be an advertising company and also make some contributions to tech at the same time
I want a button that says "ghost this mailing list" when I click it, their mail server gets a standard message like "user no longer exists at this address", or "user reached quota", whatever makes me get pruned from their database instead of having my email address validated and the "last_seen" column updated.
By choosing what to fact-check you can make any agenda. In practical terms there really isn't an "objective truth discoverable by journalism".

I'm pro slander tho, twitter should be able to pin a tweet in every account saying trump has small hands. Americans in general don't see how great chicanery is for a country.
>The people being censored here can't even themselves go to any alternative platform, because there's really no other platform at that scale for that content format.

What about setting up a blog on whitehouse.com? Most normal people can't get the same audience, but Trump's not normal.

>If they only selective moderate accounts, then that protection may not survive in court.

Even assuming there was a service moderating by purely political guidelines, I don't see how 230 would stop applying. Otherwise, a lot of websites will be screwed. For instance, any website run by a political party that allows comments.

>that's a bigger problem, because it gives Twitter the power to shape global communications unilaterally. Something no corporation should have the power to do.

The solution to a monopoly abusing its power isn't to write piecemeal law curtailing things as they come up. The solution is to get rid of the monopoly (breaking it up, making it so competitors join the market, etc).

But this order isn't about monopolies. It's a party plank and rallying cry.
There's an enormous echo chamber of ignorance centered around Trump's Twitter account. That's a lot of ad impressions.
Not exactly, I'm saying OO still makes it hard to test because it is an opaque blob of state. It would be really hard to use/test the LUA API for example without knowing it is using a stack underneath the hood. That detail leaks through the API whether you want it to or not. If it was switched to a FIFO queue that would completely change the behavior.

Since using this API makes an implicit constraint that it is using a stack underneath the hood, why not just expose the stack for inspection? What advantage does keeping it an opaque blob have? I agree you don't want code manipulating this stack (although if it is immutable as in FP this isn't an issue), but since the external code already knows it is a stack and relies on that fact then it is part of the public API already.
By the numbers, our best bet is probably revamping the prison system to focus on rehabilitation instead of punishment, and then drastically reducing the length of sentences.

Our goal should be to get someone as close as possible to 0 chance of recidivism in as short a time as possible.
agreed, im not saying this is equal to trump, but i don't think anyone here downvoting me would want to be doxed by someone with 2.1 million followers, regardless of if she is a comedian or not.
"why hasn't it happened?"

Who says it hasn't? To some extent, it has. Interest groups and clubs of all sorts already exist, and non-university-affiliated sports are already pervasive.

But the rest of the answer is why I was talking about "what would exist if the universities didn't". Right now, the unis are sucking up a lot of the oxygen in that space. But it's a mistake to think that if they stop doing it, it will all disappear. It may partially disappear, but it will most assuredly not all disappear. There will be places where young people congregate. There will be roommates. There will be interests that emerge and get organized. Existing sports leagues can expand.

If the demand exists, supply will appear. It doesn't even have to start from scratch, there's plenty of non-University resources that could simply expand to meet the demand.

And the resulting system probably won't put you into decades of crippling debt.

For that matter, have a chat with some of your school acquaintances that didn't go to university. You may find their lives aren't as horribly impoverished as you thought. There's also a bit of a false mental image that the choice is either the shining lawn and conspicuously happy people in the university or the darkness where lightning flashes and a grim factory job from which there is no respite, and in reality the choices are not even remotely that stark. In both cases, a lot of it is what you make of it. And, you know, you'd best hope universities aren't some sort of unique fount of such activities and joys, because you will be joining the rest of us in the non-university world after graduation, you know. It isn't actually that horrid or bereft of opportunities.
> The calculation of TyG is ln (fasting blood sugar) x triglycerides/2).

You have a extra right parenthesis, which makes it ambiguous. Do you mean

ln (FBS) x triglycerides/2

Or

ln (FBS x triglycerides/2)

?
Why are they even allowed to make you type your email address? I used different email addresses for everything I sign up for so I have to go back to the email to see what I used. Very inconvenient.
Will your body make vitamin d from sunlight if you already have a enough from a supplement?

I’m worried about overdosing if I take 5000 UI and get a lot of sun.