skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
On average, the Western diet contains far more processed carbohydrates and far less uncooked fiber than traditional diets. Were you really not aware of that?
More to the point, it's so common that it ought to be supported out of the box by any decent programming language, the same way you'd expect any language to support IEEE floats. That doesn't mean the mechanism for it shouldn't be (effectively) textfile(file("foo.txt")), though.
With dd you can specify the block size with bs=1M or so. Sometimes you do need this capacity for performance reasons.
Very interesting. Do you have any sources for people targeting Android with Rust?
Did you checked your logs in the web server and have seen how many exploits and malicious scans are daily coming? When by any chance you are hit with one of those it might be useful to have not hashed IP in logs.
That's a thing you can also do in Python:

class MyObject:
def doThing(self, value: str) -> None:
# whatever
pass

obj = MyObject()
obj.doThing("value!")
MyObject.doThing(obj, "a different value!")

The only difference is that doThing is namespaced to the MyObject class.
No, this EO is so the Pres can say whatever, on Social and not have his "free speech" checked.

Both parties still have free speech w/o this EO.

Pres can say whatever (free speech) and Twitter can attach a flag (free-speech).

A challenge to your speech is not restricting your speech.
https://www.eff.org/issues/cda230/legislative-history

> The Cox-Wyden Amendment: Section 230

> Worried about the future of free speech online and responding directly to Stratton Oakmont, Representatives Chris Cox (R-CA) and Ron Wyden (D-OR) introduced an amendment to the Communications Decency Act that would end up becoming Section 230. The amendment specifically made sure that "providers of an interactive computer service" would not be treated as publishers of third-party content. Unlike publications like newspapers that are accountable for the content they print, online services would be relieved of this liability. Section 230 had two purposes: the first was to "encourage the unfettered and unregulated development of free speech on the Internet," as one judge put it; the other was to allow online services to implement their own standards for policing content and provide for child safety. Seeing the crucial importance of the amendment, the House passed it 420-4.

"encourage the unfettered and unregulated development of free speech on the Internet," as one judge put it" is being forgotten by a lot of comments here.

EDIT: I seem to get downvoted on anything remotely political on HN. So I am glad this EO was passed and hoping it gets enforced.
I regularly see completely misinformed statements about C on this site and none of them have ever been flagged.
>if you're not physically present near them, they will forget that you really exist as a human and a social peer.

Great insight. Depressing AF but good anyway
This was about Kotlin and Java, so of course Kotlin has all of that as it's using the Java ecosystem.
https://github.com/mozilla/application-services/blob/master/...

They include debug info in release builds in their configuration.

If you run `strip` on the resulting binary, it will likely drop to like 5 MB.
I was in same boat. Looking for easy vector animation tool without subscription. https://www.svgator.com/ was closest I found in terms of ease of use but is subscription based. Open Toons supports what I need but is too complex. Ended up using Google Web Designer and recording HTML playback to video. Still not what I wanted but best I could come up with. Blender is probably the best option now I reckon.
Think it tends to be mostly a personal preference thing.

I use both, but do rather like hierarchies - they just seem like a natural way of grokking things. I also tend to just naturally outline a lot, whether writing, taking notes or coding.

Another reason I find them useful is that the act of organizing them is also a form of learning for me - not just the information, but the context and relations.

A third reason I like hierarchies is probably a result of a mental flaw. I've always had an issue with "missing words" - where a particular noun just doesn't come to me when I need it. Definitely worse with proper names for some reason. When I'm missing a word, context works much better for finding something.
Price observed the traditional cultures he had access to at the time, you can read the details for yourself here: http://www.journeytoforever.org/farm_library/price/pricetoc....
That's not at all what Packingham says. That ruling was about a sex offender's right to access a website on which he could engage in first amendment activities without government restriction. It was not about whether a social media website was a public platform or whether the websites had to allow the appellant access. Moreover, many of the activities identified in the ruling also apply to private malls...which the courts have already ruled several times are not public forums for first amendment purposes (Lloyd and Pruneyard).

Being open to the public does change how a business is regulated (see the ADA and Civil Rights Act among others) even if it doesn't make it a "public platform" specifically

This is true. A statute of Congress can place restrictions on businesses. Last I checked, the President is not a member of Congress, and cannot unilaterally override congressional laws.

Moreover, SCOTUS cases have ruled that privately owned facilities are not subject to the "limited purpose" test. It doesn't matter that they've held themselves open to the public, it matters that they're privately owned. (See Lloyd and Pruneyard, explicitly addressing this point.)
> String.upper(msg)

That was the original syntax [0], before the string functions became methods. I agree that a method more strongly implies mutation than a function does.

Also, for consistency with list methods like `reverse` (which acts in place) and `reversed` (which makes a copy), shouldn’t the method be called `uppered`?!

[0] https://docs.python.org/2/library/string.html#deprecated-str...
> You clearly are willing to put the man power and technology into it, shouldn't you then be liable for content posted on your site?

Power and technology can't curate content to the level where you are safe from lawsuits. What you're saying is that if they are willing to do a bit of moderation they should do total moderation.
> more experience than any of us.

I have been developing for 54 years. I have been through all manner of design philosophies, from Structured Programming, to Object Oriented Programming, to Agile, to TDD along with hack-it-till-it-works.

If you don't do the engineering, which he does not teach, you are going to struggle.

I believe this is a harmful post.
Staying focused on the actual details of the tweet that spurred this order, Twitter's response highlights the problems inherent with content moderation.

There are hundreds of documented cases of people being convicted of mail in ballot voter fraud. In Paterson NJ there was an all mail election recently that is causing significant problems. I shudder at the thought of that playing out on a national scale.

Yet in spite of those facts, Twitter feels that Trump's warnings are somehow wrong. In light of the facts I think his fear is justified.

Twitter is a private company but we restrict the activities of private companies all the time. I see no reason why we shouldn't have a serious conversation about placing special restrictions on internet platforms' ability to censor users.
Just in case you weren't around in the early 1990s, what happened to you was practically identical to what happened to Stac Electronics. They had a hard-drive compression program, got into 'negotiations' with Microsoft, then nothing. A little while later, Microsoft incorporated their DoubleSpace into MSDOS.

plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose
If an immoral actor reaches a certain size and dominance over enough people's lives don't we generally encourage taking action against that actor?
If they're all paying the same, I'll take the million thanks.

Obviously 'love' implies more attachment and longevity of subscription, but a million x even just once is still 10,000 hundred xs.

But maybe that's just my 'if I started a company I wouldn't be thrilled at the thought of taking VC money' perspective talking.
They could sell the bikes dirt cheap, and make up the losses selling the proprietary tools.
So by your understanding of the First Amendment, if you had a blog with a comment section, I could come by and post spam, or troll and harass other users and you have no right to stop me?

Are you required to let me organize a protest in your front yard? Do property rights not matter anymore?
Recently I was wondering why we have so many mouth problems. Teeth are often misaligned, wisdom teeth need to be removed, TMJ (clicking / popping jaw) is extremely common. After researching, I came to the same conclusion that this article mentions at the end. Essentially we need to eat harder foods while developing in order to increase jaw size and strength.

The article touches on sleep apnoea as well. Apparently this can become a huge problem for developing children if their pallet is under-formed.

I think this is a big public health issue, and I think it makes sense to start some kind of large scale public health campaign to inform the public and avoid all of these dental issues.

There's a book about this, the introduction is online here https://www.sup.org/books/extra/?id=29626&i=Introduction.htm...
Org-mode is extensive, but each constituent part is not necessarily complex. You can also use use emacs to edit markdown in a quasi-org-mode style. Meaning you can collapse headings globally with shift-tab (which cycles through all hidden, outline visible, all visible), or locally with tab (which similarly cycles through all hidden, outline, all visible).

Edit: looks like markdown-mode also supports wiki-links between files. That should give you more or less what you want.
> problems with a couple of people's background

What kind of problems with people's backgrounds did you find relevant to doing a developer job?
Fact checkers are necessary because otherwise people will believe a bad thing and commit crimes? Committing crimes like threatening people is not the natural outcome of the freedom to decide for yourself what you believe.
Well, hopefully you can come to some resolution about what it all means. I went through something similar after a bad trip and it made me focus on what’s important to be doing in life with the time I have left.
Have you looked at the circus going on with the General Flynn's case Judge?
The article gives us yet another set of reasons for avoiding the modern processed diet and sticking with unprocessed foods.
I like your work too!
They're not the same, that's true. What drew him to twitter was exactly what you describe: people get notified 2 seconds after he sends something out. The whole use-case of following public figures. That wasn't a thing (as far as I know) on Facebook back then. You had to have a 2-way connection ("be friends") with each person you followed. (I think? I may be misremembering.)

It's how he won the presidency.

But now the power structure is different. The President and his followers can turn Facebook into something akin to twitter just by using it that way. The mechanics of any given service aren't written in stone. Facebook could easily ping your phone whenever someone you follow posts something new. Or Instagram, Snapchat, etc.
> Xylitol has almost definite benefits but most dentists have never heard of it.

I mean, it's in a lot of toothpastes and mouthwashes. Certainly it could be in more things, but dentists do recommend those things it's in (without understanding exactly what makes one better than another, instead going on dentistry-association studies of the observed effects of various products. Presumably the scientists doing said studies know what xylitol is.)

It's hard to just put xylitol in regular foods, though, because people feed random foods to their pets all the time, and xylitol kills dogs. So it only ends up marketed in the form of things you would never think to allow your pets to have in the first place. (Like mouthwash, or gum, or mints.)

You can certainly take your consumption into your own hands, though, and just buy a bag of xylitol to use in place of sucrose for cooking/baking/putting in your coffee/etc. (That is, if you don't have a dog.)
That was a dramatic failure of TDD, contrasted with Peter's enlightened solution.
Yes and no.

Granted, I'm a little bit of a newbie; but there seems to be a fervent use of the 'nightly' compiler, which obviously changes frequently.

Stuff that targeted stable seems to still work. But a frightening number of crates will only work on nightly.

And I'm not sure if there was a "version" that ever worked on stable, as that information isn't immediately visible on crates.io.
I'm not presenting this as a one-size-fits-all prescription for estimating individual risk. There are certainly some people who are more risk averse or more likely to die than average, and they'll surely want to take more precautions than the average Joe.

What I see people saying is that the average Joe, even the 35 year old peak of his health Joe, is at extreme risk. That every single person in the country should live a life of isolation for the next year to minimize the chances they get the coronavirus. I don't think there's any plausible risk weighting where that's true.
P.S.: I did tell the staff what it was, but they just shrugged their shoulders. So I paid $40.
Turn off the Api Or limit it in a certain way and kill or limit the bot? Let us be human first.

Regards the debate of flagging or counter fact stating, it is hard question. Debate on
My understanding is that he supported the concerns about fraud with a specific lie (maybe more than one) about how the state authorities are sending out ballots to everyone, whereas they are only sending them to registered voters.

This could, and presumably is intended to, mislead people on both sides of the political spectrum.

Assuming for the sake of argument that someone could be trying to promote a fundamental truth using lies, it doesn't make it sane to trust or acquiesce as a result of lies.

Maybe in our brave new world, disbelieving in something because it is supported with lies is an example of an ad hominem fallacy?
I don't understand your point.

When you send your data to Google or Facebook by explicitly providing that data, you are giving them permission to use that data for purposes of providing the service for which the data is granted. This is true everywhere, even in the EU.

If you're asking whether that upload would grant Googlebook broader rights to use your data, then the answer is yes in the US because there are no laws currently restricting such use, but no in Europe because EU law says permission must be explicitly granted for other uses.
Can you update the title? The vital parts are being recycled (battery, motor).
The Cox-Wyden Amendment: Section 230 specifically stated:

"encourage the unfettered and unregulated development of free speech on the Internet," as one judge put it;".

https://www.eff.org/issues/cda230/legislative-history
I would replace "conservatives" with "people in general" and remind everyone that this is why protecting personal freedoms, even ones you don't like, is of the utmost importance.
Couldn't that be achieved with gradients?
I did not mention Twitter's actions. They are not relevant for my analysis.

Having said that, the comparative fairness argument supports a status quo that rewards bombastic discourse, at the expense of truthfulness. We now know it is socially pernicious.
If I worked at Twitter, I’d write this below his tweet on the subject:

Fact check: As a member of the executive, not legislative branch, Trump does not have the authority to modify existing legislation.
I personally prefer a choice.

e.g. currently I've got a fixed desk at the office. But if I decide to work from home nobody is going to ask questions.

Given 5 min commute I'll probably go in most of the time, but the ability to decide is almost more valuable than either on it's own
What was the result of your benchmark – just a ballpark number would be great on what to expect from the async version.
Wow this is the first time I've heard this. Anecdotally, I have poor dental hygiene habits compared to my wife and family, but despite consuming the same diet as them, I have had no dental trouble and only one cavity in my life, which was back in my teens. We often joke about how unfair this is.

My tongue naturally rests on the roof of my mouth.
If you quit before your home office is amortised, would you have to ship it back to google? :)
While most of us used to (some level of) WFH and already have monitors, printers, etc, $1k doesn’t sound as a lot to someone furnishing the whole home office.
The legislation (Communications Decency Act of 1996) under discussion flows from EFFECTIVE lobbying by telecom monopolies seeking a liability shield [0].

Monopoly power and market manipulation is a second order issue.

[0]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communications_Decency_Act
Even if we stipulate that's true[], saying you could do it in non-Lisps doesn't detract from the observation that virtually nobody actually does it, while both groups still call it "REPL".

[] I really don't think it is: reload(mod) comes with way more caveats than C-c C-k in CIDER.
A rule like that would effectively ensured Trump won't have an internet platform. No company wants to be liable for the content he posts.
The whole discussion was about how 'expensive' this particular software was, at $4/mo. $4 is the price of a cup of coffee. If the software makes you more productive than one cup of coffee per month would, then it seems like $4 is not expensive at all.

Of those 2286 packages on your PC, how many of them are written by individual software engineers who are trying to make a living by writing software? And how many of them contribute to your overall wellbeing? I'm guessing that 99% of those packages are used by programs that you yourself don't use, that just come packaged with your OS or some other product. The other 1%, yes, I think you should think about paying for.

We live in a world where a certain kind of extractive personality--Zuckerberg, Gates, Ellison--makes billions from their software, because they are willing to be an asshole-to-the-hilt with their anti-competitive, unethical, and often downright illegal behavior. The 'nice guys' who write and maintain your compiler (if gcc) or editor (if vim or emacs) or scripting language (virtually all of them) and any number of other tools that we use daily, will struggle to pay their hospital bills in retirement. And yet people balk at $4/mo for software that they might use for years. And even if they only used it for 1 month, that $4 is inconsequential compared to the other factors (like learning curve, time investment, etc).

I do think people should be spending some money on their software tools each year. Maybe 1% of their income? That's around $100/mo, which seems like an awful lot, but only in comparison to the current price they're paying of $0. But think of how much better your tools would be, if the developer who makes them could earn a living wage from them, without having to embrace the capitalistic ideals that make us hate computers and software in the firstplace.
CDC Suggests Avoiding Open Plan Offices
@closeparen is not saying "because" they were just explaining the legacy scenario that got us to the classifications used today
> But the moment they use their platform to modify and censor what people publish, then they should probably be liable, right?

There are degrees to moderation, but not to liability. This black or white approach doesn't seem appropriate. They should be liable in a degree proportional to the moderation they introduce.
- https://github.com/cloudflare/boringtun

- https://blog.cloudflare.com/warp-technical-challenges/

- https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/8ygbvy/state_of_rust_...

- https://medium.com/visly/rust-on-android-19f34a2fb43

- https://medium.com/visly/rust-on-ios-39f799b3c1dd
These don't seem like vast criminal conspiracies. Also, if they can successfully prosecute little cases like these....what's the problem?

"Carlos Lopez and his wife, Luz Lopez, registered to vote and voted on three separate occasions (2004, 2006, and 2007) in Hartford, where they own a furniture store, while actually living in Farmington." (Fittingly, this story is included twice: once with each spouse first).

"In 2009, Lillian Cummings Stevenson agreed to a consent order after the State Elections Enforcement Commission found her guilty of illegally signing and submitting two absentee ballot request forms on behalf of her sons, who were living in Europe. She was given a $200 fine."

"James Bryant, Jr. admitted to improperly assisting voters in completing their absentee ballots in the 2005 Americus mayoral election...."
Hmmm, it looks like the new site's disclaimer is copied directly from this page, even including the same capitalization!
Algolia’s Next Wave of Growth
Your tone is as if they were editing his message. I don't believe they were doing that in a way that would create any confusion as to what he wrote, were they?
> The previous administration became the arbiter of truth as to gender and race.

What do you mean when you say this?
Diamantes infinitos en Free Fire última versión
If you want to apply a rule like "speech must be a net positive for society according to me" in the general case, the rule you need to update is the first amendment. It's specifically because of that spectrum gift that the government can be so aggressive about public good with OTA broadcasters. Speech doesn't come under government control just because it has a large audience or is culturally important.
Here is a trove of similar thinking tools to generate ideas, for those interested: http://creatingminds.org/tools/tools_ideation.htm
These exist. Mostly for autism and anxiety after teething.
Then you’re saying that some speech is more free than others.

And they won’t pick c, at least not after the first round of lawsuits.

As far as highways go, I don’t follow the analogy. The government has to pay me for any land they take. Do you think that they’ll buy twitter just so conservative bigots can have somewhere to go and be bigoted?
Not federal law enforcement, but government and major corporations generally have preferred vendors who can help sell the product for some percentage off the top. In my experience this is a much less time consuming process than going through the process of getting set up as an official vendor.
Might it also be the destructive nature of writing directly to a device might warrant a more explicit syntax, as-to avoid potential errors? There's no confirmation about copying a iso to a device directly or anything.
Legally I see that you make a good point but morally I do not support such behavior by any corporation, specially as large and dominant as Twitter and FB.

Baker analogy doesn't quite cut it as there are many other bakers in town, give me 5 other alternatives to Twitter?
The system fonts are legible. With web fonts... sometimes they are and sometimes they aren't. And web fonts have that re-flow during page load, which is super annoying when you're reading the first paragraph and lose your place because the web font finally loads and it's a different width than the system font. If that's not an instance of illegibility, I don't know what is.
They don't have to win the case, just the power of fear.
Isn’t postmates, or like uber eats an example of that though... you care where you’re getting your food.
Wow this is the first time I've heard this. Anecdotally, I have relatively less than perfect dental hygiene habits compared to my wife and family, but despite consuming the same diet as them, I have had no dental trouble and only one cavity in my life, which was back in my teens. We often joke about how unfair this is.

My tongue naturally rests on the roof of my mouth.