skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
You should realize those restrictions you suggest are regulated and enforced by the government and are applied inconsistently all the fucking time. Just look at how various different demonstrations in the last 5 years have been treated, and how some of them have ended in violence.

I really don't think you, or Trump, understand the ramifications of what you're asking for. You have this ideal, naive view of what's allowed in "public squares" that doesn't seem to match what happens.

See: Trumps belief he was persecuted by other government agencies. Which he complains about on Twitter. Which would now be answering to a... government agency...
According to Twitter, the reasons they added the warning to Trump's tweet as as follows:

- Trump claimed that mail-in ballots would lead to "a Rigged Election." However, fact-checkers say there is no evidence that mail-in ballots are linked to voter fraud.

- Trump falsely claimed that California will send mail-in ballots to "anyone living in the state, no matter who they are or how they got there." In fact, only registered voters will receive ballots.

- Five states already vote entirely by mail and all states offer some form of mail-in absentee voting, according to NBC News.

Also, keep in mind that Twitter did not add the warning just because they thought the information was incorrect. They added the warning because they believe it was incorrect AND because they felt it's purpose was "manipulating or interfering in elections or other civic processes" (https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/election-inte...).

I'm not sure how I feel about points 1 and 3, but point number 2 seems like a pretty fair reason to label the tweet with the warning, IMO. Trump provided factually incorrect information about voter registration to his millions of followers.

I agree I don't want them to decided what is right and wrong, but if they hold themselves to the rules of only labeling confirmed incorrect information about civic processes. I have no problem with what they are doing.

> The people made the platform successful, let the people decide what is wrong and what is right, what is true and what is false, what is fact is and what is fiction.

That's not what is happening anymore though. Large chunks of Twitter are not run by "the people" anymore. Twitter is in an endless battle with large groups of bots designed to present carefully curated misinformation as organic.

It's easy to say Twitter should just be hands-off and let the people decide, but that isn't an option unless your definition of "the people" is small special interest groups who have paid bot farms to push their message.
Anbox with libhoudini might work for you.
I sort of agree, but also think you're handwaving away some actual pain points. pyenv makes it really easy to manage multiple Python installations on the same system. Also, while I prefer pip-tools over poetry for its simplicity and the fact that it has stood the test of time, both accomplish the goal of pinning all direct and transitive pip dependencies.
Your car is now built and labeled with an international audience in mind and is no longer USA centric.
I disagree wholeheartedly with this mindset.

It comes back to the question of whether a company should be able to deny the service of a customer based on its own internal decision making. So lets use a real world example, how about a baker denying service to a person based on sexual orientation. Should the company be forced to provide a service if it goes against their conscience? I believe the answer should and always will be: No.
However, the economic and social ramifications of that company denying service is at their own risk and demise. Furthermore, any company should be allowed to modify, terminate, and/or otherwise control whatever service they provide. Which is the agreed upon User Agreement Terms that all people must agree to when they sign up for a social media service. This agreement means that you acknowledge that you will play by their rules, and that you forego your First Amendment rights absolutely, at the mercy and whims of the social media company.

That is the fucking point.

Whatever users write on social media is at the complete control via the User Agreement Terms unless otherwise stated. So yes, users have full control of what they write on social media and a company has zero reason to maintain, distribute, or display any information that users create for any reason whatsoever.

Social media companies CAN ban/shadow ban anyone for anything that they don't like. You are forever at the mercy of a private company and you did so freely by agreeing to their terms. If you don't like this approach, don't use social media. Economics. I do not want an internet where a private company is forced to be the voice box of any particular political philosophy that they did not choose, let alone ANY agenda that they do not choose or agree with.

That is the danger of insisting that social media should be at the behest of the First Amendment. If a person is ignorant of this fact, they need a REAL reality check.
I guess that goes back to the implementation. How is it possible to mandate universal coverage without some sort of state-provided funding? Nothing in life is universal without government support. And with that funding comes control and regulation. Things that fierce individualists fear the most.

Sure, the day-to-day administration of such a system could be in a single agency, or distributed among private providers, or some blend. But the core thing that opponents fight is still there.
Tangential: the opposite of that sub is r/ATBGE which is about things that aren't well thought out (i.e. too dumb, offensive, trashy etc) but executed really well.
It's sad but the internet has a lot to answer for, the ability for us to access unfiltered and blatantly false information and for it to appear no different to peer reviewed and true information is leading humanity to disaster. Ideally we'd be able to have a chain of trust of information, the same way we have a chain of trust for certificates, with peer reviews from experts giving credence to articles and statements.

Some stuff is plausible but wrong, like taking certain antiviral drugs to combat Covid. Others completely defy everything we know about physics, like 5G spreading Covid. And some stuff is true, like staying at home breaking the chain of transmission. But people believe all of the above and none of the above appear different or are treated differently on social media sites.

Some of the opinions and statements that influential people say are dangerous and either harm directly or cause others to harm and a lot of them build on existing divisions further breaking apart our communities.

A few days ago we had an earthquake in my home city, our liberal prime minister was having a live interview when it happened. On news sites when they played the interview the comments were full of people saying it was Trump blowing up tunnels which were being used to traffic children as sex slaves by the liberal government.

That's obviously insane, not least because I live on a group of islands 3,000 kilometres away from the next country and that's one hell of a tunnel, but also because that's not a thing that governments do in transparent and well run democracies.

Unfortunately there's a subset of the population who are unstable and prone to believe anything, and the fact that it's discredited probably drives them to believe it more. But there's a much larger subset who are susceptible to arguments but not critical of them and may be more inclined to see reason if given information backing that up.

So, the question is how do you debunk blatant falsehoods while still balancing peoples freedom to believe what they want.
> Can't you simply download Python 2.7, 3.6 and 3.7+ to separate folders, and use those in your different projects?

Yep, most people can just do this. Then, they want a little script over the top that downloads the different versions of Python for them -- just to make life easier for them. Wouldn't it be handy to also script the installation? It'd also probably be useful to automatically setup the version of Python I want to use when I switch folders, so I'm not constantly running the wrong version when I change projects.

... et voila, we've reinvented pyenv :).
Awesome thank you for posting these. Any shots of the engine room?
That’s pretty crazy re outlook. Takes about half a second on my 11. Clearly mine is newer, but over an order of magnitude is a lot.
Every major public figure is on Twitter. That is the difference. Reddit is still small fry.
Right now no, but it would be very useful so i 'd like to add this, since you can use the keyboard to control the menu... (except well... opening it!). Any preferred key you 'd like this assigned to?
Libertarianism != conservatism.

Libertarians are concerned with making the government as small as possible.

Conservatives are concerned with conserving culture, government can be an object or a tool depending on the situation.
I missed that. Explicit SameSite: None is still possible though, and no more broken than it is now.
Aren't you just talking about the volume then? You could be screaming the most wholesome things about unicorns and rainbows and still be loud enough to be a public nuisance, and loud enough that authorities will have the right to ask you to pipe down.

In America, no matter how big of a community mall, management can always remove you for good reasons (using racial slurs, even at normal volume), silly reasons (they didn't like the color of your hat), or no reason at all, as long as it's not for a prohibited reason (because of your race). Whereas authorities cannot remove you from a public square for no reason or silly reasons, only for good reasons specifically identified by law (like public nuisance).
Both right and left adhere to the constitution and law. The difference is that each side interprets the constitution and the law differently.
If you're intellectually honest and advocate for a system that controls people, turn over the keys to your enemies for a dry run.
A student don't know anything about mutability, and since Python signatures are not explicit, there is no way to know they have to do that.

It's just something to be told. A design decision, like there are thousands to learn in IT, that you just can't guess.
Activities and Fragments, whatever one finds to be the problem with them, are an SDK thing, not an IDE thing.
This, for better or worse, drives me to work harder. I have anxiety around being perceived as not working hard enough. I have been full time remote at the same position for around 8 years with a large timezone difference.

I have a small part of my day when I report to my team what I have done the previous day. I always want to make sure it seems like I have a few significant tasks that I completed. Sometimes, when things are going well, it does not take much time to achieve this and I feel good with 5 hours of work. Sometimes I get stuck on a tricky problem and work 9 or 10 hours.

My co-workers (who are not work from home) all seem to think I am very productive, so I guess it works!
Amalgam also requires larger fillings, meaning they remove more healthy tooth to fit it in. And the tooth has to be undercut a bit, since it doesn't bond like composite does. So amalgam also increases the chances of a tooth cracking later on and having to be replaced with a crown.

But! Composite also contains BPA or similar. So there's that.
> Humans don't have emotional object permanence.

Given that, I don't want to be in the room with my coworkers. There's more to life than work.
How exactly does 1000 cases of fraud over 40 years back up his tweets in any way? The voter fraud argument is a political weapon for voter suppression. Not to mention that mail in ballots are already in existence. Heck, I've used them the past 5 years myself.
There are many people who are new on the Internet, or simply doesn't know much about politics, etc.

I think adding context, trying to be more rational (even and especially with using tools/technology) is something everyone, who isn't so lucky as to have been born into a life of careless dumbness, values.
It sounds like you are pushing commits and not shuffling tickets around a system of black holes.
You may be confusing Java language specification with the Java Platform programming API.

Language spec has very limited set of packages generally in java.lang. https://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/jls/se14/html/index.htm...

Platform API is here https://docs.oracle.com/javase/10/docs/api/overview-summary....
What Is SpaceX? Elon Musk's Company Aims to Go Where No Man Has Gone Before
This is not true. There was a whole institute doing industrial design: the Soviet Scientific Research Institute of Industrial Aesthetics [1].
That institute was also publishing a monthly "Technical Aesthetics" magazine from 1964 to 1992.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VNIITE
Can you recommend a good article that gives an overview of the issue? I'm not really familiar with how SSO is implemented and why SameSite breaks it.
You can twist the Constitution in both directions.

You could say that the value of free speech is so important to society that it is codified on the Constitution. These companies that become big enough platforms should respect that value.

You could also say that the Constitution provides free speech protections to everyone. These companies should benefit from those same protections, thus the government shouldn't be able to interfere what these companies publish.
Sectigo AddTrust External CA Root Expiring May 30, 2020
Most of it can be tweaked with appliances, but the length of the lower jaw is important and I don't think we have an appliance for that yet.

An aligned bite helps keep your teeth straight, but you'll have trouble getting one if your lower jaw is too short.
unrelated, but what do you use 5 sound cards for?
I don't think that section 230 is about First Amendment. I thought it was about whether a company can be shielded from law suit on the content published on the company's website. That is, how to classify a company as a platform or as a publisher.
3D layout reminds me of Firefox's 3D view, which I sorely miss. Wish they brought it back, but it seems unlikely.
I am not buying that. Smaller scale, less working hours and "green economy" equals more work to be done
(less efficient) by more people and would lead to more jobs, right?

E.g. buying small farm ecological fruits need more work by the farmer and you to pay for it -> higher gdp.
Probably only about 20-25%, I still use and Prefer Java
The ipaddress library doesn’t do link-local IPv6 addresses either.
I think you're confused: pyenv is not a replacement for venv. It's just a tool for installing Python itself. It never occurred to me until just now that the name is confusing and makes it seem like it's related to venv.
I think the guy with 5 sound cards might be the exception that proves the rule - the conversation was about playing back audio from the browser not which OS starts to fall apart when you need a DAW for your band.
But then what's stopping you from picking up the phone and giving him a call? What I noticed was the opposite: instead of having some rare encounters with our CEO( I report directly to him but we are in different buildings so we mainly meet in meetings only) and ending up doing something 'urgent' or distracting, I now have less of these. However, having said that, it's harder to pull out the information I want when on the phone versus when face to face.
Smarter Redux with Redux Toolkit
The point is that containers are actually just running PIDS, if you were to escape the process, you would have access to the host without security measures like selinux. You can also use selinux stop things like interprocess communication.

Something I notice in regards to selinux, is many people don't understand that you are not just applying context to files, but also PID's. You can see the context of a PID by doing 'ps -eZ', similar to how you would with files. This allows you to create a finer degree of process seperation.

You are right though, RedHat has been doing this with OpenShift since 2011, and it is a major part of their security model. RedHat's current push is the deployment of rootless containers, which addresses similar concerncs.
Fascinating - but was I the only one who had to go brush their teeth half way through reading?
It was a 0day in a popular open source package. They didn't do anything wrong. Presumably they use stronger defense in depth, as required by the CA guidelines, to prevent software compromises to the actual CA signing machines. There's no need to go through that level of paranoia for CT log machines.
And how did you get to that conclusion? I mean the "right" has been failing to adhere to the Constitution since like forever. The Constitution does not allow restrictions on abortion, but it was affirmed by Supreme Court by Republican majority. The Constitution does not allow warrantless spying on American citizens, but it was affirmed by Supreme Court under a Republican majority. The Constitution does not say that I am free to pollute your lands with my toxic coal smoke spewing smoke stacks without paying for the damage caused, yet our Supreme Court under a Republican majority has decided it does.

From my perspective, left-meaning means having a close association with reality and pragmatism, and right-leaning means do and say anything to make the rich richer.
I wanted to share a debate on topic "Constitutional Free Speech Principles Can Save Social Media Companies from Themselves".

https://www.intelligencesquaredus.org/debates/constitutional....

Main Points from the page.

- The First Amendment is content-neutral and provides a nonpolitical framework for regulating speech. It would behoove social media companies to abide by it.

- Rather than resort to censorship, social media companies can offer users tools that block unwanted content, including content that could be hurtful or offensive.

- Facebook, Twitter, and other social media platforms have become the new public square. Rather than resorting to corporate speech policies, these companies should promote free speech principles in the U.S. and abroad.

- Social media companies are global. The U.S. Constitution is based on American values and, therefore, should not be used to regulate international platforms.

- The spread of hateful digital content dilutes meaningful discourse and, in some cases, causes emotional and physical harm. Social media companies have a duty to offer safe, welcoming platforms for users.

From election interference to “fake news,” nefarious actors are using social media to undermine democracies and deepen partisan divides. Social media companies must act to prevent this type of conduct.

The Debaters

David French - Senior Writer, National Review

Corynne McSherry - Legal Director, Electronic Frontier Foundation

Nathaniel Persily - Professor, Stanford Law

Marietje Schaake - International Policy Director, Stanford's Cyber Policy Center & Fmr. Member, European Parliament
It would be as simple as you write if social media companies would take responsibility for the publishing rights for what they publish, but they don't. For a long time they are picking and choosing the laws they want to abide by.
The code it generates leaves a lot to be desired. It's highly non-idiomatic, and has the marks of a computer-generated structure all over it. This being said, it certainly facilitates the transition from Java to Kotlin as it makes for a convenient learning tool (used on small portions of code).
Twitter is essentially a big public square the results of which end up getting printed by mainstream press. Publishers are also under more legal restrictions than Twitter is.
From my somewhat limited experience, working as a consultant (management, etc.) is great for identifying problems, and subsequently coming up with ideas (solutions).

Reason is that you work very closely with companies, often many different in the same sector, and get to see all the various aspects, quirks, and flaws at nearly every level of operation. Just the act of getting exposed to all this, can work as a great catalyst for ideas and brainstorming - much better (imo) than just sitting around and trying to think up something, where one can easily fall for the "solution looking for a problem" trap.

Now, unfortunately, most people can't just walk into those jobs - and you're not there to brainstorm solutions for every flaw you see. But if you ever get the chance to be in such a position, do try it out.

A lot of profitable entrepreneurship revolves around "boring" business problems.
Kloudless Crawler Helps Cloud App Security Vendors Accelerate SaaS Integrations
There is a great movie about a guy that drunkenly gets deposited in the wrong city, which has the same street names, apartments and so on. Hilarity ensues when he's dropped off in front of what he thinks is his house on his street:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Irony_of_Fate

Well worth watching in my opinion. Best sentence in the movie: "These are MY 32 square meters!".
If I were buying SSDs, HP is not at the top of my list of well known SSD vendors that have an excellent data integrity record, probably owing to an experience many years ago with HP branded MegaRAIDs that only had a known data corruptor in the HP "blessed" firmware.

My personal theory is that consumer gear tends to get better tested over the long run since millions of units out in the field will result in a lot of weird corner cases actually happening. The electrical engineers I know love it when their products are in high volume production, as it makes it a lot easier to find patterns and the underlying causes of failures. In contrast, low volume niche products will always have lurking bugs deep in obscure corners that haven't been exercised.
> Buttons break.

So does software :(
Because Donald Trump has repeatedly demonstrated his willingness to use his power as head of the executive branch to retaliate against his political opponents.

Remember how he got impeached for doing exactly this?
Is USB not sufficient?
I think some of the replies to your comment and surrounding comments are missing an important point, which I'm going to assume you were making. In a remote work situation, managers need to check in for more than just directly work related conversations.

The comment that started this thread was making the claim that people have difficulty comprehending others as people that they don't directly see in person. So managers (everyone really) should be checking in at least once a day, even if it's just to ask "how's it going" (generally, not a work status report), have a conversation about something non-work related, crack some jokes, whatever. Basically, maintaining that human connection sometimes needs to be forced a little bit, because it's so important and leads to a tighter knit team.
Some malls have "free speech areas" (possibly mandated by local ordinance) and occasionally some groups and individuals do exactly that.
It's the proportion. A significant amount of the fraud is in mail-in voting, which means it's significantly less resistant to fraud. Shifting everyone from the more-resistant in-person voting to the less-resistant mail-in voting will result in a sharp uptick in voting fraud.

This is exactly what Trump said in the tweet.
Spanish schedules are downright weird (2016)
> Boss forces you to take a photo of your ballot as you vote in the booth, etc.

You can take a picture of the ballot with your boss's choice but then spoil it and get another one.

> several states have had mail voting for years without coercion being a problem

How do you know this? How could anyone know if a wife voted the same way as her husband because she wanted to or because he just filled out both mail-in ballots himself?

There are differences in scale too; It's hard to steal a ballot, for example, when only 1% of the population is voting by mail. It's easy when 60% of mailboxes have a ballot in them on the same day.

Finally even if it hasn't been a problem so far, it is not a "fact" that it cannot and will not be a problem in the future.