skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I don't think I agree. Mars has a lot of things going for it that Earth doesn't.

For one their are no explosions, or people with guns. On mars you don't have to worry about people trying to steal your shit because it's valuable (or "necessary for the national defense"), and you don't have to worry about being collateral damage during the war.

On mars there aren't earthquakes, hurricanes, tornadoes, mudslides, tsunamis, floods, volcanoes, lightning strikes, forest fires, and basically any other natural disaster that I missed except sandstorms. When you build a static structure on mars you can expect it to last basically forever, when you build one on earth it has a relatively short halflife. When your static structures become extremely valuable and difficult to replace because you need them to grow your food and you don't have the manufacturing capability to build more, I'd rather be one mars.

On mars you can reliably avoid radiation by putting enough "stuff" (water, soil, whatever) between you and the sun. On earth after a nuclear war it would be coming from everywhere exposed to the atmosphere (in the shortish term).

On mars you get to plan for the hardships while the pre-nuclear-war earth manufacturing base is still functioning. On earth you don't know when the nuclear war is going to happen, or what portions of the earth it's going to glass, so that becomes much more difficult.

On the downside, the martian atmosphere is actually deadly to humans (since it's nearly a vacuum), while the post nuclear war atmosphere is likely only ... very hazardous. Mars has no native plants so you have to be entirely self sufficient inside your colonies, while the post-nuclear war earth colonies could forage for (mildly radioactive) food in emergencies.
Check account recovery procedures, change password for that website, check login history and active sessions, see if anyone had done anything that could be done through that credentials, on top of using random generated passwords in the first place.

And I think you’re about to describe Sign In with Apple.
No, the data is always coupled to how it is intended to be processed and useless otherwise. Integration is always a giant headache on projects that don't capture intent clearly with a good API.
And you control health primarily by activity.
isnt it valid according to these rules?

1. is about wildcards in the domain part while having a hostname and 2. is in effect, which is why there are so many alternative subject names.

they just added 127 subject alternative names to adhere to these rules.
Denuvo Anticheat is a new service separate from their anti-tamper obfuscation service that games have historically used to prevent piracy.

This comes on the tail of Riot's Valorant [0] and League of Legends both implementing kernel-level anticheat.

[0] https://www.reddit.com/r/VALORANT/comments/fzxdl7/anticheat_...

[1] https://na.leagueoflegends.com/en-us/news/dev/dev-null-anti-...
Milan is also planning to work on bike lanes at this time (it's very bad for biking as of now)
If anyone else was curious like I was, it looks like yes, most people do write a custom bash script to wrap (or use before) SSH. The makers of knockd also make a `knock` util that serves as a client, but other people also do something like:

```
for x in 9000 8000 7000; do nmap -Pn --host_timeout 201 --max-retries 0 -p $x server_ip_address; done
```
If you're already overweight you should combine control of calorie intake with exercise. The only way fat leaves the body (besides surgery) is by exhaling it as CO2
Wonder what the net loss is though, considering the vast amounts of money the process of getting a nation so obese has put into the economy. I don't mean to be calloused though, this is truly a horrible situation, and I do feel empathic towards people that are unable to take care of their body.
Because that's what the data says when sorted by wealth?
Wealth is a primary driver of many / most aspects of society including covid mortality rate. To ignore this is to abandon valuable tools in both social sciences and medicine. While data can always be manipulated to drive an agenda, I don't see how just naming areas and making no deep dive into the readily available statistics on these areas is helpful.

Comments like yours, especially on a site like this really make me worry that people are ignoring science and data in this country because it does not support their preferred narrative and politics. Anti - vaxxers contributing to a resurgence of measles may have just been the beginning.

"The five ZIP codes with the highest rates of positive tests for the coronavirus — in Corona, Cambria Heights, East Elmhurst, Queens Village, and Jackson Heights — have an average per capita income of $26,708, while residents in the five with the lowest rates — in Lower Manhattan, Tribeca, Battery Park City, and the east side of Midtown — had an average income of $118,166, according to an analysis of New York City data by The Intercept."

...

"Diabetes, one of the conditions that appears to put people with Covid-19 at highest risk of becoming severely ill, is also more common both among black and Latino New Yorkers and in low-income neighborhoods throughout the city."

Is the above not useful information?

https://theintercept.com/2020/04/09/nyc-coronavirus-deaths-r...
> I tell people that if they would be considered brave for being without a shirt at the beach, then they are an at risk population.

Yet it affects males more than females. Hmmm. When you say "people" do you mean "male people"? Or when you say "beaches" do you mean "topless beaches"?
Pointing out disparities between groups can help us decide how to address them. But I don't see how this article helps much in that sense; it's pretty obvious it would happen and there's no palpable remedy. It's one of the thousand ways it helps to have more material resources, a fact nearly all are already aware of.
I guess that's so though it's interesting in the early days Github didn't:

>...a web startup like ours doesn’t need any outside money to succeed. I know this because we haven’t taken a single dime from investors. We bootstrapped the company on a few thousand dollars and became profitable the day we opened to the public and started charging for subscriptions.

Tom Preston-Werner in 2008. I guess the thing is not how much the hosting costs in absolute terms but how much it costs relative to what customers are prepared to pay for the service.
Yeah, I don't get that at all. Especially if you can make the next page really fast.

I'm also kind of gawking at the screencast he uses as an example:

https://twitter.com/ryanflorence/status/1186675229621248000

Ryan Florence makes a fine point that his tool is being used to build things that don't benefit from it, but this isn't necessarily a good interface. It's pretty but it's just got way too much going on at once. How does anyone actually read in that context?
If the lyrics were all generated by a Markov chain from beginning to end, there's no way that it would have a repeating chorus.

Are all the 3-word tuples actually used in other AC/DC songs? (Output this grammatical could not be generated by a Markov chain that only looks at 2-word tuples.) If not, that also seriously calls their claim into question.

I think the maker would have done well to be more upfront: "AC/DC Song Co-authored by a Computer" or something like that.
Here's a nice (old) blog of someone in the industry:
https://mechanical-sympathy.blogspot.com/
All I really want from the web is to get text, images and data and submit form data. I don't really want interactive applications which are almost but not quite entirely unlike proper native apps. I just want to read interesting people and submit my own thoughts in return. I want to see pictures & text about things I want to buy, and submit my address & payment information to buy them.

The modern web delivers some of that, but only accidentally. The modern web is all about delivering potential malware to me and expecting me to run megabytes and gigabytes of this code, all in order to … display pictures and text, something the browser has been capable of for over twenty years.
Utility Monsters prove that utilitarianism is a bad model for reality.

I think it's a pretty big stretch to say that something that doesn't exist proves anything at all.

I've always felt utility monsters were just bad philosophy trying to throw a spanner in the works of a fairer society.
> "And by the way they are _not_ the leader in 5G."

You can argue that Ericsson and Nokia are equals to Huawei in 5G technology. But Huawei are by far the leaders in 5G equipment sales.
And, correct me if I'm wrong, but you're still largely allowed to leave your house to get physical activity. With the gym closed I've taken up jogging every morning before the streets get busy to try and keep myself healthy.
I'm not a doctor, but my understanding is that women have a different hormonal profile than men and thus having a lower absolute amount of testosterone is not necessarily a problem; the problem is when the balance is not right between testosterone, estrogen, and others.
I agree it's stupid. I think worrying about representing the length of 1 object filling the entire address space is stupid, wether the address space is 2^32 or 2^64
If you cut and paste the comment you are replying to into ddg/google you literally get hundreds of references. It’s a very well known phenomenon linked especially to increased obesity.
That's a suspicious timeline. 98 was the Russian financial crisis. Do you get the same number if you include the crisis?
I find it interesting that no scholars seem to entertain the idea that maybe Medieval graffiti artisans enjoyed painting dicks on things just like we do in the modern day.

Like, the way the phalluses (phalli? Huh, apparently "phalli" is the one Firefox's spellcheck recognizes) look like they're thinly painted on top of what look like normal fruit, with a different paint that appears to have faded faster than the original, strongly suggests the fresco was not originally painted with such phallic abundance. Seems like some prankster took some paint and "improved" it, possibly with his medieval buddies for a laugh.

Another tell-tale sign of this being ancient vandalism is the missing spots (both in the boughs and among the women on the ground), as if a caretaker desperately tried to scrub off the penises until, realizing such efforts were scrubbing away the original, gave up in frustration.
A bit late to the party but it might still be of help: @ruph123 I am a bit like you, and a few years ago -- after 30 or so years coping -- I started building a tool to study and keep track of what I get out of my texts and where I leave them. It's called Kjuicer, short for knowledge juicer.

The cool parts are that you'll be able to:
1. Learn faster. Students report they save from 30 to 50% of the time if they highlight with it (more when they collaborate & share 'juiced' material among them)
2. Recover what you learned in a snap, even much later.

I must be dyslexic, so certain topics were totally off for me, like CS. With it I could finally tackle it.

It's still a bit basic but it works on most web pages, or you can use the editor to paste stuff from other sources. It's free for personal use.

Hope it helps.

Please do let me know if you try or if you need support. Message from the website and I'll respond.
There's not many instructions but it should be easy to use.

Cheers, Giampaolo
This makes me ponder how fortunate I am (or dumb I am) to have eaten in a restaurant twice in the past week.
Personally, my suggestion is that federal elected officials be required to put all their assets into a blind trust managed by some common third party (e.g., the CBO or a non-for-profit money manager). If public service is truly important to them, that shouldn't be a big barrier. We don't need people with a conflict of interest leading the nation.
The average CSV use is as an export/import from excel and most of those users don't have specialised developer editors.
What I dislike most is the unlimited extra icing. The first part with the cap is nice because the return is measurable. The unlimited extra icing required to be given on the tail end (based on negotiated %, whatever that range may be) is however not measurable, nor is what value the network may actually bring even at a basic level - and assumption is generally bad. If it was a % up until a cap of $ then arguably that's more digestible, more tangible, because it allows weighing of a reciprocal relationship within a best or worse case scenario; and of course you think that extra payout on selling company is nice but that is weighted towards the investors. A different mechanism does introduce an issue with figuring out how to implement follow-on investment agreement if future funding is a loan with 2-5x return with % equity until a $ cap; not explaining myself so well here.

I just don't like uncertainty and I like measured fairness. I understand the excitement of getting an extra payout if there's a big exit but I feel 2-5x return on investment is already a great payout - and I don't like the VC justification that a higher return is aimed for to diversify risk because that's just an excuse for VCs that are making bad investments in an unskilled, inexperienced way, hoping for a few unicorns of 100x+ return that cover the losses of bad investments + that provide all their profits.

Ultimately my goal, if I ever raise any outside money, is to retain as much equity as possible, for myself and for the team - especially early on so then later at higher sums of money are necessary for expansion then equity is more likely to be necessary to be part of the equation but the company being in a better position allows better leveraging.

I'm not trying to disparage, this is much better than traditional VC already and I also like what Indie.VC is doing - the flaming unicorn in the hero of their landing page is a nice Minimum Viable Personality touch too. Just used this opportunity as a thought exercise, I appreciate your responses. Maybe the timing just isn't right for me to be able to as reasonably consider this model until I am certain I would continue on the external fundraising path.
I definitely could have handled the designer better, but what happened was that she as a consultant was put on two different projects at the same time, 50% time was to be allocated for each... Let's just say she cut some corners at our. At the time I gave her the benefit of the doubt, maybe she just didn't have talent? Who am I to say what looks great or not, I can't even draw a stick figure. Couple that with that I was the technical project manager and we had another non-tech project manager so she fell through the cracks so to speak. But hindsight is 20/20.

My last Sony would take around half a minute from power-saving mode to allowing me to use the remote. A popup box would come up telling me to wait if I tried, the thing is that I just wanted to switch channel and drop the remote, but instead I'd take the remote and click on the "On"-button, drop it and look at my phone and try to count to 30 sec in my head (there was no indication on when I was allowed to use it, you just had to know by experience) before I take the remote again and click on the channel switch button, and then wait for the UI to popup...

Samsung recently tweeted that users should check their TV with their antivirus software from time to time by going into a menu...

It's just those small annoyances that grows over time that no reviewer is going to catch, because it's never an annoyance the first time you use it.
>Would you pay $390k for a PhD?

Yes, of course, even if you increased it to $800k.

Several thousand brilliant people make this decision every year.
Think of it as paying $390k to buy 5-6 years of time, and it starts to sound very different.

5-6 years of time at the prime of your life where your basic needs are taken care of without any enforceable expectations from you.

You can go sit in any of the hundreds of interesting things being taught around you.
You can pursue hobbies, go camping in the middle of the week.

If you are lucky, you get to work on interesting bleeding edge projects which may or may not make business sense.
For this you get nearly any resource you ask for.
Labs in good universities are rather well funded.
Supercomputer time to run a random program, easy!
Also, most companies are happy to hand out huge amounts of cloud credit, reference hardware.

Compared to making 390k, are you surprised that at least some people would make this decision?
Also, 35K per year + well paid internships (~40$k for a summer) is a rather comfortable amount of money for a 25 year old person in most situations.
That was in fact the original idea, though generally pitched as equating utility preferences between social classes -- the utility of a nobel and commoner were considered equivalent, a radical idea at the time.

Clearly there are difficulties with the notion, and direct comparisons between. individuals' peferences or utility functions are at best difficult if not impossible to measure. But the matter of unequal treatment by social class was the specific error Bentham was attempting to correct.

This aspect of Bentham's philosophy is specifically mentioned in Nigel Warburton's A Little History of Philosophy (2011), chapter 21.

https://www.worldcat.org/title/little-history-of-philosophy/...
That article starts off with interesting science (T dropping 50% in a century, T possibly boosted for a generation by cigarettes, etc) and then takes a weird turn at Tyler Cowen and meanders into speculative woods.
No, free/open-source semiconductor design software and equipment is non-existent, especially for modern nodes.
Many Many Moons ago I implemented an OS version of this for windows. It was taken over a few years back and is released as KnockKnock. https://sourceforge.net/projects/knockknock/

We are now using the same technique in a network security product at AppGate which is used to protect highly sensitive workloads around the world. https://www.appgate.com/blog/dont-be-fooled-by-lowercase-sdp...

Port Knocking is great, another layer of defense.
Ah, the computer from "Wargames".

https://www.imsai.net/movies/wargames.htm
What we have today is a POST modernism web. Nothing about it is modern.
The way this effect works, however, is dependent on a Coriolis-force-induced veer in the atmospheric boundary layer, something that is not an issue in contra-rotating propellers. Unless one understands the mechanism, one will be unaware that, for any given location, it matters which way the first turbine rotates. At best, an arrangement based on an analogy to contra-rotating propellers would be a lucky guess, right for the wrong reasons.
I've got those scars but I still find erlang refreshing when working with it. Unfortunately, as software engineers, we work in groups and there are many people having these scars. However, the erlang experience changes one forever.
A lot of those students are probably CUNY ones which don't live in dorms, and would have no place to "return" to.
I'd even go so far as to say a hot war is inevitable. Not because of any particular reason, but because the US and China are the only superpowers left. And if there's one thing power doesn't like, it's sharing. My very simplified view is that war happens when more than one 'power' axis vies for control of some sort of a geographic area. We're at a point in history where the last remaining relevant geographic area is the whole world, and the primary axis of power are China and the US. I don't think humanity has the capability of avoiding war in such a situation.

I'll even venture into complete speculation, and posit that WWIII will be fought over, and largely in, Africa. In many ways Africa represents the last frontier on earth, with great natural resources but largely behind in many areas of development and not 'controlled' by either China or the US. South America would also be a potential hot zone, but it's too close to the US. China has realized this already and is investing heavily in Africa, while the US just in the last decade established Africom. Once the US' focus on the middle easy wanes a bit with oil decreasing in relevance, they'll turn their focus to somewhere else. The only reason the middle easy didn't turn into WWIII is because of the relatively powerful players in the area, including Israel, Saudi, Iran, and formerly Iraq. Large enough to hold their own, but not so large that they individually pose a threat to the US hegemony. That, and china wasn't really a relevant player in the world-war starting game until the 80's or 90's or so, and kind of missed the whole middle east war phase. But they're ahead of the game in Africa, and are establishing control there already. And as China transitions from developing country to rich country, they will, in turn, need overseas territories to vassalize themselves. So, there's my wild prediction, that WWIII will happen between the US and China as primary axis of power, sparked over something to do with Africa, right around the time when oil is no longer the US' middle-eastern siren song that it is today. Maybe in 20-30 years or so. Also around the time that millennials will be in the 'old guard', and have no living memory (on a broad, population-scale level) of how horrific war really is. Boomers had the WWII generation still hanging around to warn them off of WWIII, and they still nearly got us there.
Android Open Source Project ported to Orange Pi
IMO this is UX fail. If the question starts with "Do you...", only reasonable button choices should be "Yes" and "No", not "Save", "Quit" and "Cancel".
The sad reality is that there just isn't enough awareness or understanding of technology within Government to make it onto the agenda. The exceptions of this are little pockets of like-minded individuals such as GDS [1] who have done some exemplary work on open sourcing tech.

The downside is that much of the 'trunk' of IT (workstations, Business Software, internal systems) are still contracted out to monolithic, old-school contractors who have no incentive to innovate by non-technical procurement teams. This leads to a culture of proprietary software where the established/expensive solutions are seen as the most trustworthy and there isn't any cost to vendor lock-in or non-interoperability of systems until the next tranche of officials have taken over and all of those issues can be written off as 'legacy' and as a sunk cost.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government_Digital_Service
Whatever the reason, people shouldn't be propagating the incorrect information, especially if they're in research, and if they're interested in performance, which requires measurements. The same thing needs saying over and over here and elsewhere.

I don't remember figures and dates, but g77's performance was at least reasonably competitive with proprietary Unix compilers once GCC's backend was sorted out for the architecture (scheduling in particular). It was also mostly more correct. Observationally, researchers could do without ifort, especially on non-x86 hardware -- although ifort morphed from the DEC^WCompaq compiler which was used on our Alphas. (A good deal of work was done for g77 specifically because of problems at the time with portability and availability of compilers for a high profile computational project.)
Hmm, is the OpenCL situation really that fringe on android? Eg this OpenCL info app[1] description says "Even though OpenCL™ isn't part of the Android platform, it's available on many recent devices.
On Android it's usually used as a back-end for other frameworks like Renderscript.
Some manufacturers are providing SDKs for developers to use OpenCL™ on Android.
"

I addition to the mentioned PowerVR and Intel platforms there seems to be Android OpenCL also for Mali and Adreno GPUs.

[1] https://apkpure.com/opencl%E2%84%A2-info/com.xh.openclinfo
Zillow survey forecasts suburban boom as remote workers flee pricey cities
you don't know what a disengagement is.