skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
This is an excellent summary, and I fully agree with it. As a modest addition:
- In many important cases, there is no fact, just differing viewpoints and opinions. One man's terrorist is another one's freedom fighter. Violent insurgency for one, legitimate fight for liberty and justice for the other. In fact, reasonable people will even disagree on whether in some topic there are facts or only opinions, let alone about their truth value.
you cannot work it out from this form. it tells you what he’s selling and when it was acquired.

it does look bad though
It's a token, not ETH. Basically it's a made up ledger that is stored in the Ethereum blockchain. The only way money comes into the picture is that moving tokens around in the ledger costs Gas (think of Gas like mining fees for BTC), which is paid for with ETH. As the article says, Reddit is paying Gas costs for now.
Ah, definitely. I'm in a work-from-home situation right now, and have been trying to type things during video calls (being careful to mute my audio and not show the typing on video, of course). I can imagine that within two weeks, I'll be at least at my old speed, if not far faster.
Simple: "Ignorant" people make up a large percentage of their user base. They argue with "informed" people and it drives traffic and revenue.

Meanwhile the social fabric of the United States is being torn apart by political polarization.
I guess it depends on whether your problem is getting interviews or getting through interviews.

All the leetcode in the world doesn't make them call you in, but it certainly helps you pass.
I've always found this incentive structure perverse. Take Peter Norvig and place him in LA vs Louisville. In either case he's a remote employee working from a home office. <very profitable company> will want to pay him differently depending on where he lives and depending on where their HQ is. And yet his output is the same. Let's say he prefers less dense cities, maybe then his output is even higher in Louisville, as the lower cost of living affords him a better home setup and a social circle that all can afford to live nearby each other.

Society seems to want to cram people into as small a space as possible near work places, optimizing for business progress. Seems to me to make sense in the short term and fail in the long term. Here's to hoping a silver lining of the pandemic is better utilization of space towards human happiness and the health of the global ecology. :)
It has, in fact, been an issue, which is why epidemic laws have been drafted, in the past, to control that behaviour.
More like "There can't be a better stuff than what I'm accustomed to and like" feel.
Spammer. Nobody wants your software.
And if they don't strip it, you can add a unique identifier to your address for every site you use it on, and know who sold your address.
Commenting about voting is discouraged in the HN guidelines.

Also, questions that could be answered with a quick internet search don't make good discussion.
I think it would be good to learn what else your team lead is doing? Often team leads have more responsibilities than just technically leading a team. Such as

1) Working on budget and forecast

2) Developing project plans

3) Tracking milestones and project status

Of course it is more beneficial for the team lead to know what the team is doing, but it depends on how large your org is. I find that the larger the company, the less technical the lead usually is.
Agreed. I was concerned this had been signed by a CA via some zero-day exploit in their domain ownership validation process!
Yes, footnote 1 says the transactions were effected pursuant to a 10b5-1 plan.
The very last line item on Table 1 shows 0 shares owned after his final sale.
Shameless plug: https://github.com/gsliepen/packmsg. I tried to create a very fast C implementation (the C implementation of MessagePack is quite slow actually), but also one that is very safe to use, given the constraints of the language.
> Our minds are programmed to interpret looking down as gaze avoidance. Seeing someone look down makes them seem disinterested or even dishonest.

How about someone looking over your head? (I have my camera set up below my monitor.)
> It is a procedural programming abstraction layer.

Is it? When I looked at it, it just seemed to be a Ruby-ish syntax on top of Erlang. It still felt very functional.
Clickbait headline. Headline implies something that is trusted by the web pki, which this cleary isnt.
How do people behave when disasters strike? Media accounts depict panic, cruelty
No, this just seems to be selling two options.

Sec Form 4 - "C — Conversion of derivative security"
I've been terrified to even buy a house with prices the way they have been. It's been so obviously a house of cards for years.

Out of curiosity, I got a pre qualification for a mortgage. They wanted to give me about 4x what I was comfortable spending. I'd rather put 40% down and have a low payment than over leverage--even though my wife and I have had high incomes for the last five years. I always thought of it as years runway if things went really bad (FAANG and other tech salaries dry up, housing equity collapses). It's better to be sitting on cash than worrying about paper gains and if you're going to have a home year end.
I briefly looked over this project when this link first popped up and didnt think much of it, but then i was surprised to see this huge surge in votes. I dont do much in the javascript and related world - can someone explain what in particular about this project has generated such interest? Even after reading the top comments, I feel like im missing the bigger pitcure.
I think Table II seems to show he has a Trust which own another 18million shares?
Is it not possible to nest beyond 128 subdomains, then?
What are the main differences between this and Syncthing?
100% Guarantee that anything with any monetary value will skew user behavior in non benevolent ways.

If the coin has no monetary value - then it could work, but then what’s the point?
oops... that's not good. Thanks for letting me know.
I started disabling some of the css, and I was able to get the projects to start to appear. I have no idea what the root issue is, but I think you could probably sort out which css is problematic on safari, and either render the page differently on safari or choose a different layout that is more cross-browser friendly?

Here's a screenshot to show what I started disabling: https://i.imgur.com/BinJqAD.png
This is a ludicrous headline. The CEO converted a tiny percentage of his class B shares to class A in order to sell them. There is nothing noteworthy here.
If someone thinks the question is stupid or not doesn't mean that a downvote is warranted. (nor an upvote, answer the question and move on.)

The type of questions being downvoted sometimes makes me question sanity. In general I believe that downvoting is probably one of the most poisonous thing invented in newsgroups.
> why don't we see it as a talent as we see "tech jobs" as talent?

Good damned question. Sex work is work.
How do you interpret this? The first row he acquired 70,143 at a cost of $0, and the amount he owns after that is 70,143? So he didn't have any before the 11th? Then he sells them all for $LOTS, and then acquires another 70,143 at a cost of $0, and sells them all again? Is this just him cashing out a bonus paid in class A when his actual holdings (assuming he held any before the 11th) are in some other class?
Doesn't even want his own company at these prices.
ZM has two classes of Common Stock - Class A & Class B.

Looks like Eric exited his Class A shares but he still holds over $4B+ USD in Class B.

source: https://docoh.com/company/1773298/yuan-eric-s/insider-owners...
Hey everyone, this guy worked hard too, thinking that meant something while headlines like “inequality is up, so are profits!” were the norm for the last 30 years!

I cannot feel very bad for Americans who at scale preferred a society that ignored the distress of their neighbors and communities all these years

“Please may I have another opportunity today, father?”

It’s not that hard: Take control of the political narrative from elites.

Varoufakis revealed there’s nothing but made up political equivocation behind their decisions

Physics has yet to define the causative mechanism aside from violence that has economically lifted aristocrats, despite all the hullabaloo about them being intertwined

Switch off the computers and say no more until they they capitulate

We don’t have to honor arrangements negotiated in bad faith

Greenspan testified to Congress in 1997 part of their philosophy was fostering economic anxiety in workers to keep them in the same job

Steve Jobs worked with other companies to depress wages

It’s all over government record, obfuscated by jargon and noise

But grandma or something might be disappointed I guess. No more Apple phones, Johnny!

Enjoy homelessness then
It should be somewhere in the SEC filings, but a company like Morningstar (and probably many brokerages) should have this information as part of a standard stock research report.
I found this https://jodie.ai/shareholder/1773298 but it still looks like random noise to me :-/
You cant really blame him.

Zoom is currently valued at around 60 times its annual recurring revenues. Their share price has tripled since January.

The whole crisis was a fantastic opportunity for them, but it also means that it is going to become critical for microsoft, google and all to offer a competitive product sooner rather than later, considering how many companies are going remote.

The competitive advantage of zoom is real, but how long can it last if that becomes a priority for these players. I am not saying that zoom is going to become worthless any time soon but that it's going to be very high to maintain that kind of multiple for a long period of time, especially after covid times.
I usually work many years at the same job. I think its worth talking to agents and applying for jobs each year even if you wont move, its a good way to keep track of the market and realize where you're behind, before you need to look.
Tl;dr: I built an app called Supplies (https://apps.apple.com/ee/app/supplies-home-inventory-app/id...) to help me track and plan my food and other supplies.

When the lockdown started, I noticed I had a two food-related problems:
1) I was used to stopping by the grocery store more or less every day on my way home from work so I had no habit of planning ahead for more than a few days at a time.
2) In order to fit a week+ worth of food in my apartment, I had to distribute it between a few nooks and crannies which made it difficult to track what items I had where.

To help transition to my new once-a-week shopping schedule, I used Trello at first but that quickly grew unmanageable. So I decided to spend some time to build myself the right tool for the job. I realized other people may have run into the same issues I had so I tought I’d release it to the App Store.
I've sent a message to my district representative, encouraging a change to the law:

> In Green v. AOL (2003), the court established:

> There is no real dispute that Green's fundamental tort claim is that AOL was negligent in promulgating harmful content and in failing to address certain harmful content on its network. Green thus attempts to hold AOL liable for decisions relating to the monitoring, screening, and deletion of content from its network — actions quintessentially related to a publisher's role. Section 230 "specifically proscribes liability" in such circumstances. Zeran, 129 F.3d at 332-33.

> There is immediately a question why this "quintessential relation" only works in one direction, i.e. why even when "monitoring, screening, and [deleting content]", a provider should not be considered a publisher, and thus ineligible for immunity under Section 230. The courts may not agree with that argument, but I would say that it highlights a serious deficiency, and the law needs to be changed in a similar manner as Josh Hawley's bill: https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/senate-bill/191...

> In fact I would argue that his bill does not go far enough. Getting an FTC rubber-stamp certifying "no political bias" seems like a vague and squishy system that will be easy to game. Perhaps the law should state that any provider above a certain size which takes action to "monitor, screen, or delete content" that is not illegal, and does not respond to an appropriate claim by reversing this decision, should forfeit immunity under Section 230. This would be very controversial, because it effectively bans e.g. YouTube from having their own "code of conduct" independent of US law. But I think that is exactly what needs to happen - YouTube is far too big for a "community standard" to make sense, and any attempt to do this will be abused for censorship. These companies should be forced to engage with all of us in the making of laws about free speech, they should not effectively be able to declare what free speech is by fiat.
It's hidden behind the timestamp. Click the timestamp, get to the post information page, and finally click the flag link at the top.
From my perspective as a person who's career has been in manufacturing, from the factory floor to supply chain consultant to factory owner who lived in China for 10-years, there is a distinct difference between definitions here of substandard quality and fake. If some company is trying to sell a non-3M designed and manufactured mask as a real 3M mask, that's the definition of "fake". If a company has poor manufacturing practices but is using materials which would otherwise be acceptable industry materials to make a mask to KN95 standards, but for some reason, a random sample of the lot is proven to be "Substandard" to the KN95 standards, that is the definition of "substandard".
So the only problem with a plutocratic system is that in real life the wrong people happen to be richest?
The comment you're replying to stated it wrong. It's not that

> Fannie & Freddie are fine with tacking all deferred payments to the end of the loans

F&F require no balloon payment. Deferred payments must be tacked on to the end, not as a balloon payment, extending the term.
+1 to this. There was a study IIRC that insider buys in open market were the only reliable signal from insider buys and sells -- especially if the insiders had been officers (directors/executives) for a while.
The first line implies 0 owned before, because he acquired X and now owns X afterward.
Is there any way to edit the HN post title to be more accurate?

"Zoom CEO sold $24m worth of stock" is still a pretty compelling headline.
If you scroll down in the sheet, you can see that he also disposed of the same number of class B shares. He is simply converting a small number of his class B shares (not publicly traded, 10X voting rights) to class A so he can sell them.
> Sure, if you cherry-pick a few countries (your list is basically the most impacted countries in Europe).

And yet we’re constantly compared against these countries and told they’re doing things “right” and the US is a disaster.

> If you include all European countries you get a different story.

You mean a bunch of Eastern European countries that basically aren’t doing any testing?

> And Europe has roughly double the population of the US, it's not surprising that it has more cases in absolute numbers.

EU 446M versus US 330M...
Perhaps this isn’t the best thing for the company, but personally, I can’t imagine having even ten million dollars in stocks (what seems to be the value of the stocks sold per my calculation) and wanting to just keep them there, especially in a single stock. Sell it all, and donate all but three or four million. That’s more enough money to live the rest of your life in a very comfortable way. What’s the point of having more? It’s just a rat race to show off to the people around you.

That said, he’s already a billionaire, so it’s not like this is actually a significant change in value for him.
Pedantic, but electromagnetic radiation's "founding" precedes Mr. Maxwell. :)
This reminds me of how someone tried to reduce Linux kernel size with removing spaces from sources :)
Hah! I was just showing that video to a friend last night.

I used to have myself@iwenttodefcon7.andalligotwas.thislousyemailaddress.com and I used it for quite a bit of testing too. Broke all sorts of things, either because of length or multiple levels of subdomain or who knows what.

I'd love a service that gives you all sorts of peculiar-but-valid addresses for testing... hmm. Is there a market here?
Similar idea, early stage, but already a working concept:
We are working on
https://laptopsinspace.neesh.de

Edit: no mobile support yet
He is entitled to options and stock during the whole period of his tenure. So he is buying all the time.
Mssql-CLI is now generally available on macOS and Linux – SQL Server Blog
>A free person does not take orders from the state, nor from anyone. A free person has a right to weigh advice and conscience on his own terms, and negotiate his externalities with society.

This hypothetical "free person" is then also responsible for the results of their actions and for any oversights or vulnerabilities caused by their "free" status.

There are very good reasons we allow ourselves to be part of a society or country - people are always better equipped to survive in groups.

The problem with positioning one's self as a "free person" is that most people advocating this don't comprehend how they benefit from being part of a country or people. Because they don't understand or identify those benefits, they are entirely unwilling to accept the lack of them which is the case if they're entirely "free".

Essentially, they want to have their cake and eat it too - all the benefits of belonging to a modern civilization with no sacrifice of freedom, possessions, or possibilities.

They usually have an ego that allows them to believe they're special for being a person that recognizes the desire to be "free" when the truth is that other people do recognize that desire but also that it's not possible to be entirely free without giving up the benefits of belonging to a group.

Thus,they view themselves as exceptional because they understand that they should be free, when in truth they're exceptional because they're ignorant.
In practice, regardless of what that law says, you can't get an abortion in the deep south. There are fewer licensed clinics than there are letters 'i' in Mississippi.

Despite what you've listed, there are other laws on the books that make operating one nearly impossible - they can't be located within a mile of a school, they need to have admission powers at a hospital, etc, etc.
This sometimes gives you special/admin access. Good if you are security testing something, bad if you accidentally hack a site.
Just come up with a convention like host a file called version.ts that lists all available versions. Brute forcing for available versions sounds dumb.
I don't believe so, at least not according to this: https://stackoverflow.com/a/13155066/3474615
Using ML.NET for deep learning on images in Azure – .NET Blog
I started finally spending time building my personal brand. I am writing twice a week about content strategy and hosting a weekly video podcast.

https://www.arilewis.com/
It looks like this is part of a normal "exercise and sell all your options as soon as you receive them" plan. Notice that on 5/11, he goes from 70,143 shares to 0 over the course of the day. And then again on 5/12, he goes from 70,143 shares to 0 over the course of the day. It wouldn't have gone back up to 70,143 the next day if he'd just sold his lump sum of founder shares.
Musk successfully achieved his three quarter of a bilion paycheck by keeping Tesla's stock price up during the biggest global depression in a hundred years. This is the sign of an insider financial genius.
https://www.bloombergquint.com/technology/tesla-s-musk-clear...
This is concerning...

https://www.reddit.com/r/SubSimulatorGPT2/comments/gh0nwk/la...
JetBrains .NET Days Online
Post title is false. Form shows that all of his remaining shares (>100x the amount sold) are Class B common shares, which has 10x voting rights.
Sure, modus operandi to get any company to do good these days is to make a public post about it. Spin up that medium blog! I'm not even joking is the sadder bit here.
Python Developers Survey 2019 Results
What about user@[127.0.0.1] (with the brackets)
>Facebook is a toy.

A toy, is that so? I know quite a number of people (engineers, marketers, companies) that exist solely due to Facebook advertising. You should let them know their livelihood rests on a toy.

>...and you go to Facebook for your scientific and world news?

Why do you frame it as some ludicrous idea? Is this more preposterous than getting your science and world news from an email chain, or from Fox/CNN, or your wonky neighbor next door?

I happen to have some intelligent friends who share thoughtful, measured news articles on Facebook. Perhaps these complaints of junk science and tabloids being passed around is actually a problem of an individual's circle and who they actively follow.

This post seems more about personal dislike of Facebook rather than the parent commenter's point about the dangers of appointing Facebook as a Ministry of Truth.
It would probably increase warranty replacement and be bad PR for Tesla batteries when capacity takes a hit. But yeah, it would be great.
The claim that it was patents that prevented it from seeing widespread use doesn’t seem legitimate, especially as the list of cons doesn’t mention the high production and component costs of such a mechanism. The reason why crappy dome switches won out despite their really long list of cons is extreme price superiority. The linked design is simply far too expensive and complicated by comparison.
It wasn't my intent to imply that. However, it would be possible for a trusted CA to issue a certificate like this, which would allow anyone holding it to intercept any SSL traffic without raising alarms.
Maybe he wanted a boat. Or a moat. Or maybe he wanted to buy some distressed assets. Or thought now is the right time to setup a trust for his loved ones.

Point being, people sell for so many reasons but they only buy for one reason: they think it will make them money.

It’s interesting when insiders buy big. Selling has too much noise.
Ambient Noise for Ubuntu
From the form, he has many many more class B shares that he didn’t sell. This was only a small proportion - maybe he’s buying a yacht?
Yes. From the looks of it, the CEO is just selling a previously-negotiated award on the date of acquisition. He has been awarded, then immediately sells roughly 70,000 shares a day over two days, along with exercising some options.

Table II shows that he still (indirectly) owns around 24 million shares of Class B stock and 130k options.

This is a nothingburger.
As much as your boss might want it, your coworkers don't have to be your friends if you don't want to. The greatest advantage of working remotely is that you can choose who you want to spend your working time, lunches, etc, with. Maybe it's just yourself.
Nvidia’s first Ampere GPU is designed for data centers and AI, not your PC
5 males aged 13-15 with basic self-taught networking skillz could wreak a huge amount of havoc such that it would throw off observations that are based on web activity. It is one of the reasons that anecdotal observations of online behaviors I consider to approach zero value, with some exceptions.

And, obviously, a lot of those kids are older and still engaging the same juvenile behaviors.