skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Is the only evidence that this has anything to do with Huawei is that the github account has listed Huawei somewhere on its profile?
That would grant that the virus is spread to all the family unit, all for a benefit of 8 working days a month. A benefit that probably wouldn't be enough to sustain their families (or pay the additional healthcare bills) in any case.
Brand recognition
I don't think he has to be lying. I think we've only heard one side of the story.

It's the job of employees to manage their own behavior. It's HR's job to do their best to contain the problems when employees fail to do that.

The dude created a go link, the purpose of which is to make something available to the entire company. Publishing it into an open internal group fits my definition of "broadly". It's not like he handed it to his manager or a couple colleagues and said "I'd like your feedback on this." He intentionally put it out to a wide audience.

If you don't see it as an attack, I guess that's your prerogative. That's certainly how it was received. And given that the go link was titled pc-considered-harmful, it's clear that Damore saw it as a shot in the broader culture war. Something confirmed by his post-firing behavior, where the first people he talked to were strident antifeminists: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/aug/09/james-dam...
> ...there’s no official tutorial for Wireguard

To run a split wireguard-tunnel to a DNS server, add its IP to the allowed-IPs list: https://www.reddit.com/r/WireGuard/comments/bqccdz/split_tun...

If you're on an Android phone, apps like Blokada (plain old DNS), Nebulo (DoH and DoT), Intra (DoH) can split tunnel traffic to a DNS server of your choice. Note that, Android 9+ supports DoT, out of the box. Look for the Private DNS setting.
I think you would benefit from a course in how capital markets work.
That was a lot of fun! I was very bad at it. The map was slow to load for me, but I think the fuel continuously ran out even when the game was stopped to load? I'm not sure if I would have made it even if I was on the right track
The amount of opportunity available to a given person can vary greatly. For example, one person could have college paid for by parents, another could work to pay for college, and another could not have the opportunity to work to pay for college (e.g. perhaps they are taking care of younger siblings or sick family members).

Available effort could likewise vary. For example, someone with a disability might have much less effort available or their effort may be significantly less efficient. Someone who has to expend a great deal of effort on other matters (e.g. providing for basic needs, self protection, caring for others, etc.) may have less effort to expend towards things like career advancement or education.

The argument as I see it is that a person expending a roughly average amount of effort should be able to achieve a reasonable quality of life with the luck and opportunities that are available to them. (There will of course always be some variance in the effort required and the outcome received, but that's fine as long as it stays within a reasonable distance of this goal.)

The increasing anger over inequality seems to me to be because people are being asked to give above average effort (e.g. working multiple or demeaning jobs) in exchange for a low quality of life (e.g. difficulty affording healthcare, housing, retirement, raising a family, etc.).
Wikipedia has

>Elon Reeve Musk FRS (/ˈiːlɒn/; born June 28, 1971) is an engineer, industrial designer, technology entrepreneur, scientist and philanthropist

Still haters gonna hate.
Because as I said, we would do science and end up rejecting all claims requiring causal regularities. That we might observe something that seems like a causal regularity is irrelevant, because it wouldn't be repeatable, so we'd end up rejecting it. If you want to invent some case where "well, what if scientists measuring something makes it seem regular?" then you've created a causal regularity where we're not supposed to have any (i.e. scientists measuring causing regular behavior)

I'm also going to take issue with Feser using the concept of causation in the first place. While physicists certainly still use the language of cause and effect, I don't think they need the concept metaphysically in the way theists do.

Its like how biologists might say something like "this species of butterfly evolved a longer proboscis in order to drink from this kind of flower" but metaphysically they would understand that the butterfly species never actually had the intent to make their noses longer (neither did evolution, nor mother nature.) So biologists might use teleological terms as a useful shorthand, while understanding that there is no actual teleology metaphysically speaking.

I think physics is in the same place with respect to causality. They may speak that way, but at the end of the day they just need the data to fit their models. So we could have acausal regularities, and science would work completely fine.
I’m not sure what point you’re trying to disagree / take issue with- I thought it was the point about Gnome developers and their heads for which I gave plenty of backing information - there was no technical reason not to continue to use Freetype hinting until Harfbuzz supported it or give distros option to choose. But instead in both cases they just said screw your users who need that. Nothing you have said so far refutes my point that Gnome developers don’t care about their users.
It's not just a title, it's what the article is about, making llvm fast again is the whole point of author's effort. He presents reason for regression in this area throughout the time (regressions on compile time are not captured vs ie. regressions on produced binary performance are). This is a problem ie. julia is heavily dependant on llvm compile times and julia authors mention that every time they're bumping llvm version they're scared about how much performance will degrade.
That's how Microsoft Teams accidentally gave away their customers' credentials to hackers, right?
Have any of the relevant issues changed since 2016?
> So this means that the ad blocker will query "definitely-not-an-ad-subdomain.dastx.me" and realize that it actually points to "terribleads.adgiant.com", right?

Yeah, uBlock Origin recently added a new permission request just to allow that.
Huawei has a history of stealing from other companies, regardless of it being a Chinese company.
> I can't even get the Jack server to start on my Ubuntu machine.

Interesting. Recently I've tried JACK to play with Jamulus - and having used it the last time around 10 years ago, I expected a long configuration battle to make it work.

But... it just worked. PulseAudio automatically suspended itself and JACK simply started and worked fine. I could even make PA output to JACK with a single command, so all the other apps continued to work simultaneously without any wrappers or other tricks to route them to JACK.

It was almost disappointing :P
$699 Apple Pro Wheels
Is your website colour palette inspired by Cividis?
I had occasion to write a chat server for a small gaming service once. The way I came up with to do the profanity filter ended up working a lot better than I expected it to, and avoided the problem you describe.

It worked like this.

1. Make a copy of the text to be filtered, modified as follows.

-- change upper case letters to lower case

-- change 0 to o, 1 to i, 3 to e, 5 to s, and vowels with various accent marks to the corresponding unaccented lower case vowel

-- discard anything else

For example, if the input was "Start the assault. let's f-u-c-k them" it would become "starttheassaultletsfuckthem".

2. Scan this for any substrings that are on the bad word list. In this case it would find "ass" and "fuck" [1].

3. If no bad words are found, the original string is returned and we are done.

4. For each word in the original string, look it up in the dictionary (I believe I used /usr/dict/words). Note the ranges of character positions in the original string of the words that are spelled correctly.

5. For each bad word found in the filtered string, if all of its characters came from positions in the original string that were part of correctly spelled words, leave it alone. Otherwise, asterisk out its characters in the original string.

In the above example, "ass" would be left alone because all of its characters came from "assualt" which is recognized as a correctly spelled word. None of "fuck" came from correctly spelled words, so it would get zapped. The final result would be

start the assault. let's *-*-*-* them.

[1] Well...actually not. I just checked my archives and found the chat server bad word list. It did not include "ass".
I like it. If it’s intentional and kind of cheeky the way I interpreted it then I see no issue. It’s funnier and less bland than some strictly technical alternative. If it’s just an innocent call to action and just coincidentally happened to be a nod to the campaign slogan then that’s fine, too. There’s really nothing worth pointing out here.
Show HN: a dev portfolio (not for hire)
I'm inviting feedback on my ongoing side project, rdv.to, want to promote some previous accomplishments, and show some of who I am. What do you think?
Find out where the knowledge sources are (intranet, share drives, etc). Read all you can. Do research on the technologies used. This can keep you from asking questions that are seen as slowing down the team. If you can't find the answer yourself, then just ask!
Just chiming in to say this is an absolutely viable approach. I just built a project, over about six weeks, using mostly vanilla js and some jquery (the heaviest widget I have is tinymce, which is a necessity unfortunately), and started selling it about two weeks in. I'm up to $650 mrr and the sky's the limit (really, the market is huge and desperately underserved), and not one person has complained about it acting like an old style website. People are just happy it works. And mobile testing was a breeze.

If I tried to build this on a "modern" stack I cannot imagine any benefit, only drawbacks.
Tutorial: Migrate MESG applications to the super-easy Liteflow framework
For the website - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23137309
I think that's likely untrue if you include connections, training, and education in your definition of wealth.
The 1% earn 36% of the income[1] as of 2016, and pay 37% of the taxes[2]. Everyone happy now?

[1] https://www.cbpp.org/research/poverty-and-inequality/a-guide...

[2] https://taxfoundation.org/summary-latest-federal-income-tax-...
At this point, most people seem to know that their mobile data is being used. And, interestingly enough, they don’t seem to care.
You can try this site: https://sheety.co

(it's not mine just found it on PH long time ago and the name stuck in my head)
Ok, I give, what is a "gravity database"?
It’s not like police haven’t resorted to bombing its own citizens before.

https://www.vox.com/the-highlight/2019/8/8/20747198/philadel...

The entire Civil Rights movement is littered with examples of a police state and civilian mobs shooting, lynching, using dogs, water hoses, etc against its own citizens. It doesn’t take much to rile people up against “them” and get people to look the other way or even participate.
For some weird reason, I've always had the most fun playing Turkey. I've never played a game where you weren't allowed to discuss things with other players so maybe that would change things, but it just seems, well, undiplomatic and frankly I want the interaction if I'm going to play this type of game.

I am curious about the whole psychology of going for a draw, but I guess I've just played with people who I or they will curse the sudden but inevitable betrayal.

For those that think diplomacy is a bit slow but still like the idea, Colonial Diplomacy is a bit faster and pretty fun.
You are the first person in the thread to bring up the fact that they are Chinese.
The Majorana fermion was just observed and reported this past year. Fundamental physics. Foundational physics.

No accelerators needed.

Bose-Einstein condensates have been observed and used in a variety of situations.

No accelerators needed.

And I could go on.

The point is though, fundamental foundational physics is available and accessible in all the various sub-fields.
Got a link? I'm curious what your end product looks like.
They'd have to eat the cost of the more expensive plastic BEFORE their bills would go down, which means it is a decision most consumers will never know to make.
Cruising Van Nuys Boulevard in the Summer of 1972
"React is bad in your case, drop it." I know it's far out idea in tech, to flat out tell someone "you don't need this, you just save time and money and get a better result of you don't use what we made", but it shouldn't be.

React is fine per se, the problem is throwing these "simple, magic" solutions onto everything, without even caring what mountains of code end up running as a result. The minimum for a Discourse installation is 10 GB, for example, but PHP is the weird ecosystem, because reasons. I don't mean to pick on Discourse, but that's still crazy to me.
Anonymization in the data reselling industry is often some form of md5(lower($email)). It's a joke. They even do that for extremely small search spaces like phone numbers. It's still provided at the individual user-level and even if the anonymization is done in a way that's irreversible, you only need to know a single event for a given person and you now have their entire history.

For example, there's a popular email client that scrapes people's inboxes and sells their purchase history to anyone willing to pay. That purchase history is provided on an individual email level and is "anonymized". But if you know your target has this email client installed and you know a single purchase (e.g. a coworker saying "Oh, I bought this awesome coffee maker on Amazon last night!") you can now access their entire individual purchase history backward and forward.
I mean, the name of the economic system is pretty blatant. "Capitalism" is exactly what it says on the tin, and it's pretty unbridled in the US, to its own detriment (long-term), IMO.
Ah. In that case the PowerPC 620 was a 64 bit design from the late nineties.
Ok so look at Brazil, 11k dead out of 212M = .005%
> if 0.1% of your savings is in the market

That means you chose not to participate in the market, not that you were prevented. In which case I can't accept grousing about not getting the gains from investing in the market.

> retirement-calculator

Use it. It'll show how much you need to invest monthly to retire a millionaire. Your money will do a lot better than double.
I set up a pihole and literally forgot about it. Like I was cleaning out a closet on moving day and found it plugged in. Took a moment to even realise what it was doing there.
Human Echolocation
You get no more talent than you pay for.
What does self made mean to you?

I read that book when I was in my early 20's. I followed all of its advice, which basically comes down to "live below your means, save, and invest." The truth is I was already following it anyway. My parents lived below their means, and my dad taught me about investing when I was a teenager.

Every generation has recessions to deal with. By the time I was in my mid 30's, I was, indeed, the millionaire next door, though just barely. This was despite the dot-com crash and the great recession...
That's called a joke.
Build and ship applications much faster
Oh no, that's terrible and idiotic behavior as well. A lot of dumb decisions are made on both the backend and the frontend at many companies; one does not preclude the other.
> I would bet that the majority of Americans

No need to guess. Google is just a quick click away!
https://github.com/Geequlim/ECMAScript
You read it despite this sensitivity. What audience are you describing that won't read this based on the title? What is the net loss to the author and to them of them missing out on the content because of their decision? What is the long term implication of developing a social contract that requires you avoid any speech that is similar to any speech of political platforms that some portion, potentially a majority, of your audience opposes?

It sounds like a linguistic death spiral to me. Good luck.
The focus groups seem to love those things.
45% of households have a pension plan.
>Sure you can watch video without color, sure you can watch film without sound, but why would you?

>By the same sense, for most cases watching video/film/TV with 3D depth is going to be superior to watching without.

I think what you're overlooking here is that this type of content is largely desirable because the "limitations" are actually an integral part of the narrative. It is possible that directors of 3d content simply don't understand yet how to frame the flow of information in 3D media compared to traditional direction, but it's equally likely that this sort of "you get to choose what you see all the time" is actually detrimental to good story-telling.

There's a laziness aspect too, in that oftentimes people want to consume content as an exercise in turning their brain "off", rather than engaging more actively. If the content takes more mental energy to consume, people might not prefer that.
I personally liked how easy it was to install Discourse thanks to Dockerization, and don't care one whit about requiring 10GB of space (cheapest DigitalOcean droplet comes with 25GB).
> I could really do with the better double precision float support

Are you sure this is happening? Pretty sure I heard this wasnt happening.
I have to admit that is pretty cool in a sick and twisted kind of way.
This was just the result of a quick Google search so perhaps the numbers aren't accurate, but this website suggests that you need a net worth of 1.5 million to open a Taco Bell franchise.

https://www.lendingtree.com/business/small/how-to-finance-a-...

I think that would be out of reach for many if not most Taco Bell managers. Presumably it would be even harder in parts of the United States with higher costs of living.
https://www.backstabbr.com/
Somewhat off-topic, but if like you these sorts of views and have some spare money, I recommend trying a drone with goggles. When it comes to safety, some new drones already have ADS-B receivers and hopefully remote ID transponders will come soon.
I really like it. I like the annotations feature. And I like how the items are isolated.

Pretty much all you need. Would love to see it augmented with rich text. :)

Good work!
The reason for its random behavior is not Monte Carlo, it's because of bugs in the program. Please read the article.
its bing maps data, is my understanding.
I had occasion to write a chat server for a small gaming service once. The way I came up with to do the profanity filter ended up working a lot better than I expected it to, and avoided the problem you describe.

It worked like this.

1. Make a copy of the text to be filtered, modified as follows.

-- change upper case letters to lower case

-- change 0 to o, 1 to i, 3 to e, 5 to s, and vowels with various accent marks to the corresponding unaccented lower case vowel

-- discard anything else

For example, if the input was

start the assault. let's f-u-c-k them

it would become

starttheassaultletsfuckthem

2. Scan this for any substrings that are on the bad word list. In this case it would find "ass" and "fuck" [1].

3. If no bad words are found, the original string is returned and we are done.

4. For each word in the original string, look it up in the dictionary (I believe I used /usr/dict/words). Note the ranges of character positions in the original string of the words that are spelled correctly.

5. For each bad word found in the filtered string, if all of its characters came from positions in the original string that were part of correctly spelled words, leave it alone. Otherwise, asterisk out its characters in the original string.

In the above example, "ass" would be left alone because all of its characters came from "assualt" which is recognized as a correctly spelled word. None of "fuck" came from correctly spelled words, so it would get zapped. The final result would be

start the assault. let's *-*-*-* them

[1] Well...actually not. I just checked my archives and found the chat server bad word list. It did not include "ass".
I am 100% dialing it back in good-faith to explain why I just framed it as you put it.

1. I read tinco's comment to state (paraphrasing): "it is difficult to start a business, and for the common person it is a game of chance." Which, I absolutely agree with when I measure it against my life experiences/knowledge.

2. You replied with two questions, also paraphrasing: "It's a lottery to work at Taco Bell?", and, "And assuming you do work at Taco Bell, that you would become a manager who could save up to own their own store?"

---

Given that scope of the conversation, I assumed you were positing that someone could seriously start working at a Taco Bell, start saving their money, and then some day afford their own franchise location.

The first question of 2 is an absolute possibility, ie: it is not a lottery to work at Taco Bell and it would be silly to assume otherwise. That may have confused me leading into the second question, asked rhetorically, as something that you deemed possible. This is to say, "A person could absolutely work at Taco Bell, and they could also save to own their own some day."

The "Gimme a break man" in reply to someone saying something that I deem 100% rational (#1) with two rhetorical questions that seem to paint the situations that they posit as rational possibilities confuses the crap out of me.

Simply put: You submitted two arguments, seemingly painted as possible realities, in an adversarial way to something I saw as a rational and relevant statement. I fired back thinking you thought that was possible because there's not much context to figure otherwise.

If I confused your comment I apologize.

Quick Edit: When I posted this reply I saw another person, harimau777, answering similar to myself with another credible source (also with a much higher caliber quality of language - I'm goof sometimes). What I'm trying to say is I'm not the only one who took your statements this way.
If you're selective about who you help vote vs who you don't, it biases the result.
SPA is a poor approximation of a native client with a hugely bloated browser stuck in some level of the abstraction, bypassing native app libraries, design sensibilities, typography guidelines and accessibility by implementing some UI framework that was developed by people that are entirely unqualified for it. Have you looked it the guidelines for UI development, say for MacOS? Here you go: https://developer.apple.com/design/human-interface-guideline...

PWAs, browser apps - they bypass all this work from professionals and give it in the hands of an unequiped developer. Oh god.

A browser is a window, an area of the screen that is allowed to do whatever it wants in a sandbox mode. This is a terrible idea. It becomes complete wild-wild-west.
Cold starts are only a problem if you’re latency sensitive; I forgot to specify that.

I’m speaking from the context of a large company that’s well beyond the free tier, for whom AWS bills matter. If you’re down in the free tier, setup time dominates all other concerns.
United Airlines has a $700 million exposure to this through a loan they provided.
I’m reminded almost every day that I have a pi-hole since it is not my dns provider when on my company’s vpn. It’s absolutely night and day on so much of the web. Some sites have so many ads now it’s just shocking to be frank.
The dream is to network boot the thing, so you literally plug a new pi in to network+power and it automatically boots and starts running stuff:) (Well, a Pi also needs a 1-time step to enable network boot, but still)