skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Yes.

I wanted to say that Bentham was JSM's godfather, though I'm finding no specific mention of this. He was, at the very least, a very close friend of JSM's father James Mill and an extraordinarily strong influence on John Stuart (middle name itself having an interesting story) in education and development.

JSM himself was godfather to the godless Bertrand Russell.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Stuart_Mill

https://www.winterwatch.net/2020/03/jeremy-bentham-british-e...

https://www.thoughtco.com/john-stuart-mill-male-feminist-353...
During first research I didn't find any other things that can be done.
Yes! It’s ridiculous how modern languages all try to do package management too, and how they’re all mutually incompatible.

I’m not so sure about language-specific build systems, though. Trying to set up a custom asset pipeline in most build systems is a pain, when they want you to shoehorn everything into a single language rather than just calling out to external tools and scripts (ideally including tools built as part of the same project!) Bazel gets this right.
Screen still works. I use it all the time.

Do you have decent examples of it failing to work? If so, then that sounds like a bug against screen. The link you provide is absolutely huge and from three years ago.

Please give me a simple "stages to reproduce ..." style report. Please keep it simple and short and I'll fill in the blanks if I can and only trouble you for stuff I'm too daft to work out.
Well, there is only one real "general purpose" OS that runs on supercomputers, mainframes, servers, laptops, tablets, mobile and embedded, and that's Linux. So it's also the most secure.
wake up early, like 4:30am and crank out 2 or 3 sprints(25 minute intense study sessions with 5 minute breaks between). Also helps to review before going to sleep so your mind processes the information in your sleep, you will also wake up ready to learn this way.
The Cold War was anything but “shoot first, ask questions later”... hence the “cold”.
I think there ought to be a distinction between explainable (what does this neuron activate most strongly on?) models and interpretable (what do the model's parameters tell me about the data?) models.

The distinction is this: explanations can only be made ex post facto, about why the model acted a certain way based on specific inputs; interpretations can be made based on the model's parameters themselves, i.e., "feature X is very important and feature Y is almost always ignored and I know this because my NN is one layer deep and all the weights for feature X are large in magnitude and all the weights for feature Y are small in magnitude." This does not require specific inputs to be fed, and specific outputs to be studied, so is a different concept and why I am suggesting we make the distinction explicit.
> But whenever a statement like this is made, the implication is that there is some alternative where we can solve the same problem but without priors.

I don't see the misunderstanding you mean. I said if you think a selection of the least-length or sparsest solution is ad hoc, then so is your choice of prior. Solving the same system without priors would be analogous (actually mathematical equivalent) to solving an inverse problem without regularization. Or failing to solve it in the ill-posed case.

As for deterministic, I mean not probabilistic. As in linear algebra and "curve fitting".

As for "nice-to-have", I mean you can do machine learning without having any of the statistical understanding we've talked about and instead making various choices simply "because they work".

As for statistics with out being a Bayesian, I did mean frequentist, though that may not cover everyone. You can even use a prior distribution that is estimated from data (people commonly do that with the naive Bayes method), whatever you want to call such a person. I wouldn't call them a Bayesian. You can simply view it as applying the chain rule of probability to get a more convenient form of your maximum likelihood equation.
Housing prices dropped 40%+ in SF itself according to the Case-Schiller index.
At the time, all the ones I could find were like $1/page or more like a $30/month subscription.

$0.05/page was well worth a cURL call, especially when the docs had great examples that just needed me to swap out the file name for mine.
So a nobel prize winning scientist giving his opinion is banned?
Keep bending over buddy..

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23062531
I'm not sure why you're getting downvoted when it's the stated position of the systemd developers that they default to breaking those things. They've acknowledged it publicly. Hell, there was even a thread on the exact issue with tmux 4 years ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11797075

Top comment on that link:

"""Salient comment: "Or somebody could go find the actual problem @keszybz saw
here - systemd/systemd#3005 - which is: In particular, for my gnome session,
if I log out, without KillUserProcesses=yes I get some processes which are
obviously mistakes. Even if I log in again, I'm much better starting those
again cleanly. fix that, and stop trying to make systemd break the world
because somebody's gnome session doesn't currently exit cleanly."""

Or Nicholas Marriott's 9 year old as-yet unanswered questions to the systemd developers, that I copy from a post by hn user JdeBP:

> "Shouldn't this code be part of glibc instead of tmux?"
> -- Nicholas Marriott, 2011
> If you want to change how processes daemonize, why don't you change how
> daemon() is implemented [...] ?
> -- Nicholas Marriott, 2016
> * https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11798173
> * https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11798328

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11798515
This would be the CDC. They stopped doing those briefings at the, uh, request of the President.

https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/494187-trump-thr...
Yes, he called bullshit on it.. on his incorrect interpretation of the saying.

The saying is more along the lines of "An idea without action is worthless"

His rephrasing of it was either a 1) bad interpretation or 2) a purposeful one so he could disagree with it and appear 'edgy'.
> He is indeed an exceptional writer.

I almost choked on that one. He is exceptional good at coming up with ideas but writing wise he is absolutely terrible and gets worse over time. Way too verbose where it does not have to be.
Multiple world governments anticipated a novel respiratory virus. Especially post the first SARS.

For whatever reason, the US managed to take the idea seriously for decades and then not really be prepared once it actually happened.
The comment above lists many solutions that require compromises to work.

We can make compromises on a covid-tracking app. Worst case scenario: fewer people install it and it's less effective—still better than not having it in the first place.

We can't make compromises on a voting system—worst case scenario: democracy is overthrown forever.

There is a BIG difference in the threat models here. The prople objecting to electronic voting recognize that a major breakthrough in computing security is needed before we get there. OTOH we van probably design a _reasonable_ covid app with acceptable compromises.

If you think that having your position tracker is unacceptable: great for you, stand up for your rights. Most people do have google maps and its tracking installed, and don't give a crap _because it lets them see traffic_. I think the tradeoff here is definitely better.
Maybe you should offer to move this bug report conversation somewhere more appropriate? It seems that this is better suited to a github issues thread
Finding something enjoyable that also earns a living is not easy for everyone.
As I understand it they were stowaways on a container ship.
C️L️A️P: Add emojis 🅱️etween letters and words
There's a lot of complicated answers here, I'll try to keep mine simple. Like you, I have a lot of interests. Like you, I was also overwhelmed by the amount of information and how to learn it all. The first thing I did was to ask myself what I wanted to know and why. Then I asked myself which topics are related. I followed this up by asking what were the "basics" that I needed to learn these topics?

Nobody likes the basics, they're boring, that's why they're _the_ "basics", but they're important, so I had to figure out how to motivate myself. So I just considered it eating my vegetables for more interesting topics.

I started small, 20 mins a day, on the basics. Before long the basics empowered me to learning other topics I was more interested in. So soon I could keep going with my basics while adding another 30 minutes a day to studying another topic of interest.

Now I'm up to four topics of interest and am spending a couple of hours a day studying concepts I find to be very interesting. Not everyone has that kind of time, and some days I don't want to spend all that time on it, so I take a break. I've found it's important to not let the break last longer than three days though (unless it's a vacation) otherwise I start to lose where I was at in my progress and have to spend some time refreshing everything.

That's it, it's like the old adage. How do you eat an elephant? One bite at a time. You would be surprised at how quickly 20 mins per day adds up. That's ~121 hours a year or ~3 weeks of working on a specific topic non-stop.
ISS Crossing the Face of the Sun
So glad the people who a couple months ago were pushing "bro, don't wear a mask, just spit directly in your neighbor's mouth" as an epidemiological best practice are now in charge of evaluating not just the long term effects of every emerging technology, but the extent to which they can even be discussed.
Insurance doesn't work when everything breaks at the same time.
It looks like they focused more on a streamlined parts manager, which to be honest is a weak point with kicad. In kicad you need to manage the symbols, layout, and manufacturing info all separately.
Location: London UK/Central America (I spend more time in the latter so I only look for EST/PST time zone gigs).

Remote: Yes

Availability: 15th of May

Willing to relocate: yes (US only)

Technologies: React, Angular, HTML5, CSS3, Javascript, Typescript, Node, Devops (Docker, Terraform + basic Kubernettes), AWS, MongoDB, NoSQL, Blockchain, Solidity, Ethereum

I am an engineer with 7 years of experience. Even though I am a a very well rounded full stack dev my bias is definitely in the front end. I have worked for both massive corporation (80k+ people) and small startup in the fintech and Blockchain space.

Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/umbertogarozzo/

Github: https://github.com/gtonizuka

Email: garozzo.u@gmail.com
Beyond the Information Revolution (1999)
Very strongly seconded.

Especially if you're fond of giraffes, almond croissants, nonexistent sisters, and twin brothers.
How did you manage to make the transition? I'm doing a PhD in music tech, lots of coding but not necessarily commercial applications. I'm not sure academia will work out for me as the jobs are so scarce and hard to get not to mention the insanity of things like impact and the REF (UK). Any insight would be great!
Not all ideas have the same value though. Like Kojima thinks that smartphones are like handcuffs for people so he turns the phone into actual handcuffs in the game. So poor.
I always thought that the post-WWII German government is federal because it was designed mainly by the US government, which is federal.
The federal government has been actively confiscating PPE shipments and doing who-knows-what with them. There were multiple stories about this, though they didn't grab many headlines. It's not even just competition, it's more like federal spite, with focus on blue states.
Even without tail recursion, conventional procedure calls are still just gotos plus an automatically-managed stack. Which fits the author's thesis that higher-level memory models are what distinguishes higher-level programming.

The aspect of this that bothers me is that automatically-managed stacks are not the only way to call procedures. Continuations for example are another way; actors yet another. But because automatically-managed stacks are present in virtually every CPU at the ISA level, many programmers never venture outside that model and have trouble understanding that others even exist, much less what advantages they might bring.
good. right wing conspiracy theorist nutjobs have no place at the table for rational discussion. and their channels should absolutely not be discoverable on the world's most used video streaming platform.
I admittedly don't have a Nest, but I've encountered extremely few limitations in my day-to-day usage of GSuite as my sole google account. The only one I can think of from the top of my head is, asking "ok google, when is my next meeting" gives me an error about gsuite not being supported (yet).
Its AWS. Isn't "obscure high costs" the name of the game? But now people have the time and incentive to dig into those costs more critically.
My reply is similar to other replies, but I think of it a little bit differently. Many times people mistake wanting to have done something with wanting to do something. They have a big list of things they wish they had already: some achievement, some knowledge, some social standing, etc. Then they make a plan for achieving those things. What they leave out is whether or not they actually want to do those things.

I think you may be suffering from this. You life becomes this treadmill of trying to prioritise what you want to have accomplished coupled with statuses of where you are now. You are always fighting against the clock because you are wondering if you are making "enough" progress and worrying if you might be missing out because you made the wrong priority call. In the end you basically chase your tail going from one thing that seems important to the next thing that seems important and eventually circling back to the original thing. (Note: many people have probably worked for companies that waste huge amounts of money doing this very same thing).

IMHO, the best thing to do is to throw away all of your "I want to have done" goals and replace them with "I want to do" goals. Then, don't prioritise by what's most important to have done. Instead prioritise by how much you are enjoying it. Don't mark the end point of the exercise by how useful it will be for the next thing, but by how much you want to continue.

Which is not to say that you should just do whatever you feel like every day: even in the most enjoyable of tasks there are things that you need to do when you don't feel like doing them. However, on average you should be asking yourself, "Do I want to continue with this? Am I enjoying it? Does it feel like a me thing to do?"

Last, but not least I will also leave you with my "Rule of 3". You can do 3 things in your life well, give or take. One should probably be your day job. One should probably be your relationships. That leaves you with one thing left. You can dabble with things here and there, but if you want to really make an achievement, you really only have room for that one thing.
The website that accounts for a huge chunk of global internet traffic censoring 5G videos feels a little too on the nose to me.
I mean, sure, they've made nominal efforts. I hope they succeed. But the fact is, here's the current breakdown of exports: https://oec.world/en/profile/country/sau/
To answer your question:

remote login, start screen, ctl-A d (detach), log out, log back in, screen -r (resume) - there is no screen session because it was killed by systemd immediately after log out.

(syslog entry: May 3 09:01:25 $HOSTNAME systemd[1]: session-6.scope: Killing process 3290 (screen) with signal SIGTERM. )

But that's hardly the point, the point is the toxic "you're doing it wrong" mentality that infests the systemd project and its adherents. I've run into this in so many ways since ceding defeat and allowing it onto my systems. This is just the latest in a long line of examples.
IMO, there are two main factors are important for good learning:
a) Motivation - This is different from enthusiasm about a given subject. It is about the drive to put in the yards for learning. Enthusiasm doesn't always translate to motivation (perhaps there is a better word for it).
b) Engagement - Without engagement, hours of watching or reading will still leave you dissatisfied that you haven't learnt anything at all. Being engaged with a topic flexes the brain muscle and allows you to internalize the concept.

I use different techniques to maximize the two factors. For motivation, nothing fuels it better than achievement. This achievement can be something big like a complicated project or something simple like crossing of a chapter in a book. The key thing is to have a scorecard, minor or major goals. It is a bit like Gamification for self. It motivates people to no end.

For engagement, I mix and match learning mediums according to the environment. It is easy to despair waiting for the best setup, where you can spend your undivided attention. The smarter thing is to engineer your study plan for a realistic environment. I find that practice, books and videos engages you in descending order. OTOH if you have a busy schedule, focus level and time available may have a reverse distribution. The key is to pair each environment with corresponding learning mode. I watch videos while on commute or in in crowded places, read books while on couch or with family and do hands-on practice during my lone time. Videos and books complements practice nicely. It is not possible to pick up everything by practice alone. Likewise after practice, you can take more context and subtleties out of a book or video.

When it comes to practice, doing the prescribed exercises or tutorials is helpful but you get maximum return by deviating from the script such as writing your own scenarios or doing a project. Even blogging or making a learning video will help to engage you more with the topic. This works by tuning your engagement to the maximum.

With books and videos, it also helps to find ways to engage with the medium. It may be via discussion boards, taking notes, writing commentaries or doing a blog. Without engagement, very little sticks.
It might be a good investment for anyone to stockpile some of these things, assuming you can sell them for 100x what you paid when The Event happens.

Which, if my made up math is correct, means several entities probably already have done so.
More than just fun. EC's "freedom monster" is at least one original contribution. And topical to utilitarianism. and ethics.

http://existentialcomics.com/comic/259
The Mel Lyman Personality Cult Revisited (2011)
I think it’s in our interest to have some kind of political Readiness Act that assesses events like this (Pandemic being in the list, along with this). Spending a few billion on it is pennies compared 2 trillion that we thus far have spent, not including the widespread economic cost.

Might be worth jamming into the Green New deal.
Definitely recommend it, I can't think of any downsides for doing it.
The time commitment is quite low, you just update your progress and if you'd like, vote for other players. Voting exposes you to what other players are doing. At the bare minimal, Pioneer is a great way for you to track and reflect upon your progress.

Once you become a Pioneer, the Pioneer community allows you to meet a lot of other creators who are like minded.
I see no way that this power, first applied to uncontroversially-bad information, will ever be misused.

What happened to "organise _the world's_ information, and make it _accessible_ and useful"?
Uber is developing tech to ensure drivers wear face masks
Don't be discouraged at the moment. A lot of places aren't hiring. That being said, i myself don't have a formal comp sci education either, but I haven't let that stop me from being a dev. Comp sci is the one field where regardless of your former education, you can still make it based on your own merit. Plus the way i look at it if you have an undergrad is engineering i am sure you can learn comp sci. Keep on learning and don't give up.
For future reference, I saw "OpenDog" and thought we were discussing James Bruton's (XRobots) OpenDog/Mini-Dog, which is where the firmware I linked above comes from.

NanoDog is something different, apparently! Sorry for any confusion I might've caused there.
"Old newspapers could only dream of the kind of advertising revenue that sites like this probably have."

Actually they are struggling for ad revenue hence all the third party crud in their web pages.

Many of them allege that companies like Facebook and Google have "stolen" their ad revenue. Some complained of Craigslist taking away their classified ads business.

Old newspapers, particularly local ones, are going out of business thanks to competition from ad-supported websites that operate as middlemen for news delivered via internet, not to mention the impact of Covid-19.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decline_of_newspapers

https://www.poynter.org/business-work/2020/here-are-the-news...
Sounds like at least 4-5 years.
Agreed on the overall narrative and lack of David Hayter. However, the core game mechanics in MGS5 were beautifully refined and IMO are the most fun of the series. The open-world approach really paid off in terms of giving the player a lot of creative freedom in devising successful strategies for infiltrating a particular compound. Also, the fight with Quiet was classic Kojima epic. MGS3 is still the GOAT but, MGS5 is absolutely worth playing for any fan of the series.
I have never done PCB design, but my projects are taking me that direction.

Why should I learn Horizon vs Kicad first, or vise versa?
Windows 10 has “python” command that redirects to the Windows Store
As written in https://horizon-eda.readthedocs.io/en/latest/why-another-eda... changing the way how a PCB design tool handles libraries would certainly require a complete rewrite as the library structure permeates the entire codebase.

Starting from scratch also allowed me to trivially implement features that KiCad is missing, such as proper panelisation: https://blog.horizon-eda.org/progress/2020/04/05/progress-20...
They can not care about more than one thing.
https://news.ycombinator.com/bookmarklet.html

(Linked at the bottom of every HN page.)
found the project manager!
>If we had extra transformers on hand, how would you protect them from also being damaged?

Transmission cables are very very big antennas. Don't connect your spare transformer to that big antenna and it is perfectly safe.
I think I sussed out the secret sauce from that Benq website. They're using the experimental getCoalescedEvents [1] function to uncollapse the mouse events!

[1] https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/PointerEven...
Google -schmoogle.

What if you lost your 'XXXXX' account? In my very humble opinion, anything stored on the 'cloud' is lost already.

I got burned very early on, back in 2011, with 'cloud storage' while using a DropBox account. I then proceeded to be my own on-line storage server. I use my server (that's already running 24/7 anyway) to serve SSHFS, SSH, SHTML and FTP to myself and just SHTML to anybody else who may chance along. The server is UPS-protected.

And I don't have to pay out those everlasting monthly fees to some faceless company who doesn't care at all whether or not they happen to lose my stuff.
Try configuring Asterisk.
See:

https://www.pcworld.com/article/3078732/debian-and-fedora-us...

https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/420594/why-process-...

https://askubuntu.com/questions/1169211/how-can-i-fix-nohup-...
A sign that a business will fail: you worship tech heroes instead of being willing to forge your own path and go against the grain (see #3)
what happened is the trolls and insane people got all the clicks and it made the public dumber.
Ion-convert: Convert data to the Amazon Ion format
I have a hard time seeing what these pacts accomplish.

What's gained by coordinating Covid response in Spokane and Fresno?
As someone who is only vaguely aware of AC, this reads like you're insane.