skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
You can configure tmux to synchronize with the X clipboard, although it is somewhat fiddly because of how terminal emulators work. See this page: https://github.com/tmux/tmux/wiki/Clipboard

In most terminal emulators you can also use Shift (or sometimes a different modifier) to bypass application mouse mode and have the terminal emulator handle the mouse event. Of course you can't copy out of the history with this, but that is another limitation of terminal emulators.
The point really isn't to solve my personal inconvenience of a problem that should not exist.

It's to point out the problem that shouldn't exist, its root cause, and only one very minor, mundane, and utterly ridiculous consequence. Of a problem that should not exist.

At all.

For any reason.

But thank you regardless, your heart at least is in the right place.
Back in 2004-ish when I was having a lot of success with Google ads, it was display ads across their partner network as well as search ads. Recently only text ads on Google.com for search, PC desktop only.

It's the same big giant list of keywords I used to use, something like 200 long, which I optimized a lot at the time. Not a lot of negatives, though.

USA and UK only this go around.

I don't think they are pushy. Yes, I noticed in the past that honest, informative ads seem to work the best, especially since I used to do CPC, so no reason to trick people into clicking who really aren't interested.

I'm sort of in a weird position where some of my metrics seem really good, monthly ARPU of $9.86 and churn 1.5%, I just can't figure out how to get people in the front door any more.
An interesting consequence of this in proofs.

You’ll see various proofs involving real numbers that must account for the fact that 0.999…=1.0. There are, of course, many different ways to construct real numbers, and often it’s very convenient to construct them as infinite sequences of digits after the decimal. For example, this construction makes the diagonalization argument easier. However, you must take care in your diagonalization argument not to construct a different decimal representation of a number already in your list!
The sarscov2 covid19 coronavirus seems to be a plague with blood infection
I don't really agree with the author at all. His examples all seem like meaningful stories.

The lion in the zoo? He lives off other animals, but when he stops to get to know one he becomes so attached he can't live without it. Could be a simple message about animal cruelty (IIRC, Tolstoy was vegetarian?). Could be a parable about aristocrats & peasants, or capitalists and workers.

Escape of the Dancing Bear? The bear was recaptured because he fell into old habits. Be careful not to do the same.

Death of the Cherry Tree? Could just be a message that all things are living, stop and consider the damage you're causing. The blasé attitude of the woodcutter is shocking: people can get used to anything. Possibly an analogy for war or other cruelty which we casually accept.

The King and the Shirt: money doesn't buy happiness. It's not sad, the poor man is legitimately happy. Possessions and worldly ties can bring unhappiness. And it's ironic and thought-provoking, for kids.

The Old Poplar: obvious lessons about family ties. Don't send grandpa to a home. And a neat lesson on systems: the obvious, common sense approach backfired because things were more complex and interdependent than they looked at first sight.

The Little Bird: some things are meant to be wild. Some things, when done, can't be undone.

I honestly kinda like these stories. Not sure I'd read them to my 4-year-old, though.
The "how many time the flu is this" misses how damaging this is beyond it's potential casualties, how damaging to the health care system this is and so-forth.

The thing is, I also don't think you can get away from the way that those pushing for lower-end estimates aren't arguing from pure, selfless virology. They're arguing from a "this is uncertain, so should we really risk our economy to avoid potential lives lost?" position. I can see that if you could translate the lost money directly to other lives lost. But you can't. The various state could just support people for the period of the lockdown - all the advanced nations besides the Dysfunctional US are essentially doing this. So if you phrase things in terms of just paying lives for money, I would disagree with the article, that is evil. People who actively enable that are evil. Sweden's policy looks to be baring bitter fruit and I wouldn't forgive Dr. Giesecke any blame for that if it matures. I could be wrong and I'm OK risking money on that, it's a better choice imo.
Thanks for hunting down the details.

And it seem that I should double check which comment I'm editing before submitting :)
I can't say the use case for Optional is even well defined https://stackoverflow.com/questions/26327957/should-java-8-g... . I'm no good in java, this is just what I find on the web.
IBM S/370 Macro Assembler also was very feature-rich. I needed to have modules be loaded into the kernel in a certain order, so I implemented sorting of symbolic names in macro-asm (had to use loops at the macro level if I recall), and then assembly code would be emitted clean, already in the right sequence.

DCB was the same magic incantation as #include <stdio.h>
Most orgs at that scale build their own tooling to make working with monorepos more ergonomic, in my experience. They're based on git (or other DVCS tools like Mercurial) but they allow you to easily do things like partial clones and company specific workflow tasks like submitting patches for review or tagging in weird and arcane ways.

A small, illustrative example of this is the tooling that's built for Chrome's source code[0] with the depot_tools project [1].

[0]: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs...

[1]: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/tools/depot_tools
What's up with google and their inability to:

A. Launch products, both software and hardware, worldwide (or at least majority of countries).

B. Launch products with clear dates and not just "Join a waiting list". At least in German store that's the only option.
Yeah, I really don't get why they don't just release them everywhere. The same for all their products btw. In the Netherlands they still sell the old Google Wifi (1st gen), which is apparently their main product as it is the first thing you see when you go to the store site here.
Hasn't been that way for years: https://fortune.com/2018/10/03/amazon-warehouse-workers-mini...
> It could be argued that the value of the REST backend is lower than the value of the stupid buttons: since the backend is so simple, everybody can do it, while the stupid button takes a wizard to get right.

Yeah, or the first piece of sushi that a classically-trained French chef makes should probably go in the dog’s bowl.
The current version is here https://composingprograms.com/
Under the name Composing Programs. It is the textbook for CS61A.
Yes, the input I'd provide is that the writer doesn't have a particularly good grasp of virology, but people in this community are upvoting as if this is authoritative. People who write authoritative blog posts without expertise right now should consider themselves part of the disinfo problem.

I'll be concrete: the expected correlation between the cited deletions and pathogencity should be considered to approach zero. No evidence supports the hypothesis that single codon or single nucleotide deletions correlate with attenuation of strains. Furthermore, a basic understanding of molecular biology is all that's needed to dismiss the notion of a generalized correlation between observing deletions (or even insertions! or any general mutation!) and the pathologic outcome of infection with a virus. Biology doesn't support general claims of this nature. This is not a well-informed line of reasoning.

Even the title of the post is wrong! These are not "gene deletions." These are single codon deletions or deletions of a few nucleotides. No genes have been deleted!!
VS Code's JS support is actually still powered by TypeScript. I'm not 100% sure exactly what you were experiencing, but it's intentional that VS and VS Code automatically download types when powering JavaScript contexts because we try to make things "just work" for JS users.
That was just an example of a place where fast path performance defined the runtime performance, as that’s how they become optimized. You can see a similar pattern when inserting keys into a hashmap, for example.
Whose coronavirus strategy worked best? Scientists hunt most effective policies
The connecting cord is my favorite part of my Pixel Buds (1).
Got it, my assumption for Step 3 existing is wrong. It simply doesn't!

Thanks for this explanation and the series of blog posts.
Probably the only way for young bloods to get tenure. Kidding.
I suppose you haven't rented an apartment in a major city...
Living in a country led by a Chemistry PhD who lets Dr. Drosten and his colleagues do most of the talking about Covid-19, and has long had some pretty sturdy expectant mother protections in place has been about as good a pandemic experience as I can imagine having as a relatively old pregnant woman. My company medical office called my boss to order me to work from home two days after I decided I'd prefer to - unnecessary, because my boss agreed to let me as soon as I started worrying about it. The next week, we were all ordered to work from home.

I'm flabbergasted every time I see a news story from the US about a pregnant woman worried about having to keep working in a public-contact job with inadequate protection. Here right now, it's completely out of the question; if her employer can't find her a role that doesn't require public contact, she's on medical leave at most of her pay. This is usually the case for preschool workers and some medical professionals, as well as women in jobs that involve exposure to harmful chemicals or biologic agents.
Even if the allocation is large?
> Writing statically typed code will always be slower than writing dynamically typed code.

Only in the beginning / short-term when the project is new, small, and fits in your head.

IMO doesn't take much more code and complexity for it to switch over to statically-typed code being faster to write.

As an extreme example, I run an online strategy game implemented in Elm. The game only supported three melee classes but the community made really good points about how ranged classes should work.

I came back to a codebase I hadn't touched in over a year, picked a spot in the code where I knew my physics would have to be updated to handle projectiles, started implementing it, and I basically followed the compile errors until my physics system supported projectiles.

Had it been dynamically-typed, this kind of refactor/overhaul would have required me to recredentialize in much more code and either rewrite tests and/or manually test my code branches at runtime to track down errors. It would have taken much much longer.
What you copy is not what you get
> There is obviously a market for annotations, what stopped LexisNexis from just doing the annotations on it's own initiative and selling the result itself?

Because the annotations angle is a red herring? In the Oyez transcript of oral argument[1], Citron (for the respondent) made what I believe to be a relevant remark disputing the petitioners' assertion that legal annotations would be more expensive:

> One is the actual useful versions of these codes are already plenty expensive. There's a lot of discussion of the cost for a printed volume, but online access, which is what really most practitioners need to use, most people want to use, it's much more expensive than the $400. But, even accepting that the price is lower, I think that favors us, because what's going on there is an exchange of -- you're going to accept a price cap in exchange for the right to publish this officially, not for publishing the annotations, because Westlaw makes the annotations and is allowed to charge six times as much. Lexis isn't going to agree to do the annotation work in exchange for a price cap. What it wants for the price cap is the right to publish it officially.

As I understand the game being played prior to this decision (to be sure, IANAL): although annotations undoubtedly have market value, the market (for liability and other reasons) will nevertheless tend towards official sources, and if you're the official publisher granted monopoly, who cares if the thing being sold has a price cap ($?) when the subscription to the service that provides access to said official thing won't ($$!)...and even if said subscription cost was pragmatically constrained by market forces, the dragnet scales from typical legal/government/academic players in the arena to capturing a proverbial crap ton of otherwise unmarketable endusers on the receiving end of the law ($$$!) while taking share away from direct competitors ($$$$!!). Then make a free, unofficial version available in an attempt to pacify public dissent, but seed a mandatory disclaimer that it may contain errors, so anyone with skin in the game who can pony up will be compelled to do so.

[1] https://www.oyez.org/cases/2019/18-1150
Antibody therapies and perhaps decent antiviral treatments could come before a vaccine.
As an 18-year-old, exactly this. Even with the lackluster online classes I am getting, sitting at home is unproductive, uninteresting, and just mentally exhausting. The primary thing I looked forward to in college is independence. Even if my parents completely laid off for the year, I would still feel judged for every decision I made.
The article alludes to something I've noticed since upgrading from the 5c to an 11 pro last year - The computational aspect and/or current hardware limitations mean these phones can shoot images that look great on the phone.

I mean, you scroll past images on Instagram, look at your own photos on the phone you took them with, look at your images on your Instagram feed on other people's phones or on the Instagram web app, and yeah they look pretty good.

Get them on something bigger though? Look a little closer? Use decent resolution monitor? A reasonable sized print? They look bad. I'm not even talking about pixel peeping here, which is bullshit. I mean they look overprocessed. Like the machine took a course in photoshop on YouTube and didn't finish it.

The examples in the article show this, they're full of little mistakes that don't happen when you have proper hardware - larger aperture lenses on larger sensors. Proper graduated neutral density filters to prevent halos. Sensors with large enough area/photosites to give better dynamic range or better high ISO performance. Real camera movements to tilt/shift/rise/fall/swing.

I mean, most of this is boring technicality stuff that doesn't really matter in the grand scheme of "is this an interesting photo" type considerations. It's more a case of computational photography is currently trying to climb out of its uncanny valley. It'll get there eventually.

For now we're still at the point of "Eventually, anyone that values photos will carry a standalone camera." I say this as someone who shoots mostly with an iPhone, but still carries around a 4x5 camera when it matters.

Edit: to expand on this a bit I've just uploaded some images I shot with the 11 pro a couple of weeks after I bought it back in October: https://leejo.github.io/2020/04/28/off_season_ibiza/ # the caveat is that I was still figuring the phone/camera out but wanted to see "what it could do out of the box" - and yeah, the images look good on the screen with very minor lens corrections and levels in lightroom, but look overprocessed even with my attempts to pull that back: the sky in the photos looks added in, there are halos around parts of the images where HDR is trying and failing, the sharpening is too aggresive (real life doesn't have "sharp" edges), and so on. When you view these at larger sizes than seen in the blog post they look much worse.
Easy and Simple Ways to Be Frugal
This is probably a better (location independent) link:

https://blog.google/products/pixel-buds/pixel-buds-now-avail...
I recommend people try out byobu from here: https://www.byobu.org/

Provides a nice user friendly layer on top of tmux, much recommended.
You can do this. Turn on pane status lines (set `pane-border-status` option to `top` or `bottom`). You can then change `pane-border-format` to contain the text you want. It can show the application-set pane title (`#{pane_title}`, also settable with `selectp -T`) or anything else really.

There are no builtin pane names but if you are running tmux 3.0a or later you can just set a pane user option like `set -p @myname name1` then use it in `pane-border-format` with `#{@myname}`.
In Sweden there's not even that. I just get redirected to a list of other products.
So I predominantly use Macs. The one and only reason why I personally use tmux is because of tmux -CC. I never bothered with screen/tmux simply because I didn't want to learn another whole new set of keybinds (let alone reconfigure them). tmux -CC largely behaves as a native app. Want a new tab? CMD+T. New window? CMD+N. Scrollback with the trackpad. That sort of thing.

The complete system is iterm2 + tmux -CC + et (EternalTerminal) for persistent ssh connections.
Dude, chill, it's a mild stimulant.
I have confidence in the leadership of California. They have shown intelligence and restraint in the midst of this crisis, saving perhaps thousands of lives in the process. The federal government? Pure drivel, 24/7. The only policy they have is wishful thinking with a side of word salad.
How is Giesecke's approach of "so we should do what we can to slow it so the health service can cope, but let it pass" different than what is currently happening?

As I understand it, that is what most countries do and achieve with various success. And as soon as there is any respite in the load of the hospitals, people are already pushing for a easing of restrictions in place.
Thanks for the information :)

Slight misunderstanding, my apologies for being unclear.

I was trying to suggest greenhouses for staple crops like rice or wheat, so that the overproduction margin for famine years could be significantly reduced rather than totally eliminated.

I didn’t make that at all clear, sorry.

Do any greenhouses grow meaningful quantities of staple crops? This is far outside my area.
Apologies, I didn't realize this would be an issue :( Yes, this was the announcement; thanks for including the link!
Show HN: Aggregated sales reports for app makers
It's more like HN is in permanent denial about the quality of its own discussions. The parent comment is gold.
The Android patch ecosystem – Still fragmented, but improving
"Get real-time translations right in your ear". This immediately made me think of the babelfish from Hitchhiker's Guide. Looking forward to reading some reviews of these.
What is the best software to analyze conversion funnel?
Google analytics doesn`t provide full picture of users` activity. Does someone have experience with software to analyze it more deeply?
There are those that argue even without a safer strain it is ethical under certain circumstances to still perform that sort of "challenge trial" though, where people are deliberately exposed. A number of conditions would have to be met, such as all volunteer participation of course, very clear explanation and demonstration of understanding, no financial incentive, etc. But a faster vaccine could save many more lives than would be risked in the trial, and the risk itself could be very low, given the trial participants would be monitored closely and would get excellent medical care. Also obviously it would be restricted to young, healthy people without pre-existing conditions.

To me it seems like a solid argument that given all those conditions (and possibly others I haven't thought of or mentioned), such a trial should be allowed. My understanding is that there are many people preemptively volunteering to participate.
Incentives can be changed. The economy is all just conventions and pretty arbitrary rules.
Sort of.

If you enable the framework but never test positive (and thus never publish any of your keys), it's no different than if you had just kept Bluetooth on all the time.

If you enable the framework, later test positive, and choose to publish your diagnosis keys, each key can be used to link all your rolling identifiers together for the corresponding time period (nominally 24 hours). Contrast this with a randomizing Bluetooth implementation, which never intentionally reveals anything that would allow the different MAC addresses to be linked.

Of course, Bluetooth MAC address randomization itself is trivial to defeat for a reasonably capable and motivated adversary. If they can plant a bunch of radios for the purpose of tracking you, why can't they also use cameras?
Yes; but the explanation is unfortunately modern medical ethics is misnamed. The focus isn't on ethics, but on protecting the ethics board from accusations that they directly allowed someone to die or suffer.

The process is similar for most forms of regulation. The equilibrium is where no accident can be pinned on the regulators rather than on any sort of system-wide optimum. It can be very frustrating to deal with.
most western countries
Glad to see you back!
Was it again adam's complaints getting you blocked?

BB is not as intuitive for me as github,
I couldn't find where do you search in all their repositories not only in your own.
And their sourcetree thing doesn't want to install by me for some reason.
Ultimately this is more the definition of R than that it is a theorem. One can also work with sets of numbers in which the completeness axiom does not hold. E.g., sets of numbers in which one also has infinitesimals.
I'm actually curious what impact it would have on various proofs if 0.999... wasn't accepted as 1.

What gets broken? What consequences do we hit?
It doesn't poll all the time. The context parameter contains a walker, and you have to tell the executor to wake you up using that waker when you are ready to continue.
Not unless the product evolves to be more than a Slack + Dropbox + GitHub clone with E2EE as the only differentiator, or they convince people that E2EE is worth trading for a weaker UX and feature set.
Or if you're feeling risque, two connections to the same tmux session.
No, I’m negative because it’s somewhere you have to drive to and once you’re there you’re surrounded by hundreds of other people as well as busy roads. It’s not somewhere you can spend a lot of time and you can’t even get that close to the stones themselves because it’s cordoned off (that last part i can forgive).

There’s thousands of parks and other beauty spots in the U.K. which are far more memorable and to which you can spend hours strolling around, take kids of all ages to, and generally enjoy a day out at. The Stonehenge, while historically significant, is an anticlimactic tourist attraction and an even worse beauty spot.

But maybe if/when they build a tunnel for the A303 they might then do more with the available space and so it becomes more of a family attraction rather “just” a monument.
But it's never what you'd expect. The stuff that bothers parents skips right past the kids a lot of the time, but strange little things will freak a kid right out. My son refuses to read some books (going so far as to hide one of them), but I have no idea why; at the same time there are stories I find downright creepy that he'll request over and over.
Eric Weinstein: Geometric Unity and Call for New Ideas, Leaders and Inst [video]