skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
You can't rob a word of its meaning. If it encompass to much, you can create a new one or be more precise.

Anyway, i think the point of this article is that people that are not scientists themselves can debate with each other, but should avoid perturbing (i'd say polluting even) the scientific debate, whether its by disparaging an adversarial opinion or but elevating a scientits too high (see what has happened with the pr Raoult cult in France). This is too much noise and scientist are people too.
That only applies to short lived allocations in a garbage collected heap or allocation arenas that were specifically chosen on a case by case basis. Most memory allocations on the heap don't even happen in C or C++. Short lived objects exist on the stack and swapping your allocator with a different one won't change that.
> Algorithmic trading in the overnight market is rife with malicious tactics (bots try to discover and exploit stop orders, and in some cases bots are just trying to "trick" other bots).

What makes this malicious?

Stop orders are just another source of liquidity, and they aren’t required. Don’t place your stop order in an obvious location, like right outside the local minima/maxima.

Orders are allowed to be canceled or adjusted, I probably cancel 5-6 orders for every fill when I’m trading, algos are just faster.

Keep in mind that when price moves, it may not be obvious to you why it did because there are participants with much better info than you that are faster as well.
I've always wondered, are there bots that just post these interesting wikipedia articles periodically? It seems like twice a week or so a random wikipedia article is trending.
FYI: a lot of US supreme court opinions are not even written by justices, but by their law clerks and assistants. Similarly, judges deputise their legal research to them at rate that would be rather unsettling for most of us outside of US.

Anything like that would not be something expected from country's best laywers. A judge given a quarter million USD salary must be the best of the best in performance, and not to deputise his most important duties.

> it's clear that regardless of their backgrounds and circumstances of their appointment, each justice is incredibly intelligent and engaged.

I heard of much less charitable descriptions of the process, with the most frequent being about the well known mental decline of some judges.

> The problem is that when it comes to the really sticky, complex issues that affect huge swaths of human rights, it's very possible for justices, in your words, to "rely upon fact and logical argument," but base their end goal/optimization function on either "what did the founders of the country factually and logically intend" or "what do the norms and ideals of modern society suggest would be factually and logically sustainable" without regard to the opposite viewpoint.

This is one of very many problems. US court system has become too much more than just a legal institute it should be.

The point my law instructor told me was that a judge just a lawyer on the government payroll, and half of them should be sent back to the law school so bad their skill level was. Then, if you can not trust half of them with most basic judicial duties, why should you entrust them with the fate of society, moral guidance, and big matter topics?

Basically, the elites in the West tend to think too many things about lawyers, when they shouldn't.

He was a lawyer by trade, and he was not happy with society putting lawyers in charge of running itself at all.
If someone could interview them on the operational and regulatory logistics of that change, we could put that on github and build a playbook for other small businesses, sharing strategies across towns & states.
The low income / low schooled people I've worked with are actually the most knowledgeable about these scenarios for exactly this reason.
> producing things without economic incentive is essentially the argument for anarchosocialism.

Which could work if we were to implement something like universal basic income, or progress to an agalmic economic society. I'm not optimistic on either of those.
seriously what the fuck did I just read
Up to 90% of minority and women owners shut out of PPP, experts fear
The exact opposite would happen. No publisher would pay very much for rights to a book that they cannot defend. Once that book hits the shelves, everyone with a printing press will be copying it and selling it at cost, which will undercut the first publisher because they need to include royalties in the price. They certainly aren't going to print a million copies if they aren't sure that they can sell them before someone starts copying them, so that would naturally limit the size of launches, further driving down the value of a manuscript.

There'd be a small first-mover advantage for being the first to print a book and smaller operations not worth copying would still operate but J.K. Rowling wouldn't be a billionaire.
Frogpelt kinda touched this. You can take some creative licenses for example. Feel free to use "that photo" or "that sound" but not for profit. BBC let free their sound library, and you can use any clip you want, except not for profit.
It's not anymore. In the the early last century Vienna it was.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't unemployment benefits temporary? Are these any different? I was reading through the tangled web of information at the DOL[0] and did not come away feeling certain one way or another.

Do you really think not enough people working belongs near the top of our list of concerns at the moment? I have heard this line from every conservative I've talked to about this, and it just seems like missing the forest for the trees. On the long list of systemic problems this period and our response to it is in danger of creating, this seems like it belongs on the list, but not close enough to the top to be worth the time discussing it. I'm a lot more worried about the incentives we're manipulating for businesses and investors than for unemployed people.

[0]: https://www.dol.gov/coronavirus/unemployment-insurance
Sounds like rosy retrospection[0] to me.

[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rosy_retrospection
Nice, I'll have to follow up on it.
I managed to get myself hooked on some of our local small-batch roasters. I've specifically been buying Trifecta beans lately, and while the price of $10-15/lb isn't too bad, the need to purchase pastries and one of their unique espresso drinks every time I stop by for a pound of beans certainly isn't doing my wallet any favors.

I've been debating picking up some Piñon from Costco sometime soon to save a few bucks, but have a question about that - do you find that whatever they add to the beans can gum up your grinder?
On the flip side, NYC just showed us they can suffer through 20% of the population becoming infected at about the same time without their hospitals utterly collapsing.

There is probably some happy medium somewhere. For certain, flattening the curve so much that there are just a few new infections every week is not how we end the lock down.
70% plunge in viral forwarded messages globally: WhatsApp to govt
Or you can SSH to the server and read it from http://localhost (if you have access). But there can still be malicious software running, intercepting syscalls or your localhost domain can point to a malicious IP. :/ Software can't be trusted. Period.
What evidence is there that the SIP is limited in effectiveness? The existing evidence I am aware of is starkly contra that assertion. Anecdotes of seeing people too close together in the park are not evidence of an ineffective SIP.
Wait Namecheap has dyndns service as well? Nice, I shall check into this! I have a few domains with them. Thanks :)
Also, I believe the secondary form required is Form 27B/6
I got mine last week and have been using it for light editing of word docs. It's works pretty well, the only thing I don't like is,
1) Not much (no) protection on the edges
2) No positive retention of the $100 pencil, you are stuck relying on the magnet to keep it in place during transport.

For the price, it should have included both of those.
That's fairly self-pitying and simple. Is it impossible that your post, intrinsically, had enough recklessness and/or low enough value that meeting the flagging threshold was within the realm of reasonableness? It can happen even when the thought in your head is more rational, since expressing subtlety in the fast-and-short forum context is difficult.
His net worth went up because investors bid his stock up because he was able to sell a lot of stuff that brick and mortars couldn't. There's no proof of profiteering.

I think the worker safety issues are completely orthogonal and shouldn't have anything to do with how profitable you are. In fact, you'll like find far worse conditions (and more tax evasion) in small local businesses than Amazon.
Does it make any difference if they have "plateaued" if there are more active cases today than yesterday?

Does it make any difference that the US has not "plateaued" if the number of active cases is rising slower than in Sweden, and the death rate is lower?

+-------------+--------------+-----------+--------+-------+
| Country, | Active Cases | Yesterday | Chg | % chg |
+-------------+--------------+-----------+--------+-------+
| Sweden | 15,647 | 15,441 | 206 | 1.33% |
+-------------+--------------+-----------+--------+-------+
| Belgium | 28,602 | 28,255 | 347 | 1.23% |
+-------------+--------------+-----------+--------+-------+
| Oman | 1,675 | 1,655 | 20 | 1.21% |
+-------------+--------------+-----------+--------+-------+
| Georgia | 335 | 331 | 4 | 1.21% |
+-------------+--------------+-----------+--------+-------+
| Ecuador | 21,020 | 20,777 | 243 | 1.17% |
+-------------+--------------+-----------+--------+-------+
| Netherlands | 33,477 | 33,120 | 357 | 1.08% |
+-------------+--------------+-----------+--------+-------+
| World | 1,928,133 | 1,908,936 | 19,197 | 1.01% |
+-------------+--------------+-----------+--------+-------+
| Latvia | 538 | 533 | 5 | 0.94% |
+-------------+--------------+-----------+--------+-------+
| Greece | 1,821 | 1,806 | 15 | 0.83% |
+-------------+--------------+-----------+--------+-------+
| Poland | 8,874 | 8,817 | 57 | 0.65% |
+-------------+--------------+-----------+--------+-------+
| Iraq | 473 | 470 | 3 | 0.64% |
+-------------+--------------+-----------+--------+-------+
| Cyprus | 659 | 655 | 4 | 0.61% |
+-------------+--------------+-----------+--------+-------+
| Lebanon | 541 | 538 | 3 | 0.56% |
+-------------+--------------+-----------+--------+-------+
| Portugal | 21,742 | 21,632 | 110 | 0.51% |
+-------------+--------------+-----------+--------+-------+
| Slovenia | 1,098 | 1,093 | 5 | 0.46% |
+-------------+--------------+-----------+--------+-------+
| Lithuania | 934 | 930 | 4 | 0.43% |
+-------------+--------------+-----------+--------+-------+
| Norway | 7,317 | 7,294 | 23 | 0.32% |
+-------------+--------------+-----------+--------+-------+
| Kuwait | 2,254 | 2,249 | 5 | 0.22% |
+-------------+--------------+-----------+--------+-------+
| Estonia | 1,364 | 1,361 | 3 | 0.22% |
+-------------+--------------+-----------+--------+-------+
| USA | 813,655 | 812,966 | 689 | 0.08% |
+-------------+--------------+-----------+--------+-------+
| Japan | 11,260 | 11,260 | 0 | 0.00% |
+-------------+--------------+-----------+--------+-------+
I just checked a very old account and the theory that old accounts don't display ads is false. The account I looked at is older than the year 2007.
I came to the same conclusion after seeing all my family drinking at least 3 cups daily. Then all my friend, then me being 15 years old started.

About 13 years later I’ve quit cold turkey after having some anxiety problems and headaches. I did some research and read a book which is from the nineties and a bit outdated but holds up pretty good. It basically cured both problems (but withdrawal symptoms the first days were tough, I admit).

For many people it’s ok to drink coffee I guess, but consider that it can affect you and almost no doctor will look into coffee consumption when you pay them a visit to see what could be the reason of some of those ailments. Also I saved a good chunk of money.

So no, you don’t need coffee. You need to give your brain a break (sleep properly) if it asks for it, and you don’t need to drug yourself with substances to “focus” and go on with your life. If life isn’t exciting then you may want to change it.

I recommend reading r/decaf for some interesting testimonies.
Did Twitter put them back to their place or they don't want to lose the ad revenue and let the muggles fight them off?
US states set to reopen as coronavirus could push jobless rate to 16%
Donated. Cute doggies. Hope your friend and her coworkers are safe.
Now we should be slightly reopening and targeting an Rt near 1, and driving towards population-based immunity.

We had looser controls from mid-March to the beginning of April. They were evidently effective. Why do we need to stay in a regime of stricter controls-- mayhaps we can loosen a little from ehre and see what happens?

Plenty of jurisdictions have less restrictive orders than the SF Bay Area, and are showing declining case counts.
Not that I disagree with you, but 2-6 basically come down to "it lacks a Lisp-like REPL."

I do think that the REPL workflow is way underappreciated and missing in Intellij. What I like about it is that it still focuses on working on semantic intent rather than editing text. In this way, it's similar in some sense to the idea of working on S-expressions rather than text.
"just convert" is in itself a huge departure from plain Javascript (in the sense that you now need a whole transpiler to get anything running at all, vs just running the source code as is)
Your video gets deleted, your channel gets a warning or a ban. Seems equivalent to what YouTube is doing to youtubers that posts information inconsistent with WHO.
Japan’s Coronavirus Cases Fall Sharply Without Compulsory Measures
>Important point many are missing: Folktales were not originally for children.

How does this apply? What is this in response to?

Tolstoy's stories weren't based on folk tales, and were specifically meant for children.

Yet they are, at times, pretty grim, and often lack a punchline or a clear point, other than "such is life".

Which might have been the point anyway.
> there’s zero evidence for this kind of intervention.

Citation absolutely required. While there is definitely a ton of uncertainty around what causes spread, the one thing that there seems to be broad agreement on is that sustained time in a shared pocket of air with an infected person is the most likely transmission vector.
I am confused by this - how do I know what I'm buying if there's not a single article available? Or is it one of those things where if you have to ask what it is, it's not for you?
So, things made about 100 years ago are finally making it into the public domain..

I don't know.. I mean yeah, but something strikes me as really wrong about that.
I like visual issue management so I signed up to see this one.

I'm not really understanding how it should be used. I don't see any connection to GitHub (which already has a Project board).

The board I created doesn't have any columns and just displays cards in a flowed grid. What's the target use case?
If we intend to keep the lockdown going until we reach herd immunity, then Congress needs to open the taps and let the basic income flow. Trillions upon trillions of dollars, for as long as it takes. And they might want to get medicaid eligibility ramped up as well. We don't have to call it single payer.
If your wife is working and has health insurance, you probably both qualify for special enrollment onto hers. And as a neighbor said, Covered California (ie CA's Obamacare) will enroll you. The other thing that may help is you have 60 days to enroll into cobra. You can wait until eg day 55 before seeing if you used it, as long as you have the cash to float if something happens and you end up needing to enroll.

FWIW, SF Fire CU in the bay area has credit cards that charge 7.5% rather than the 25%-ish at Capital One or Citi.

Hope this helps in some tiny way.
True, but nixtamilization isn't used at the scales needed for this, we'd need to build new processing plants. That'd probably take about as long as just growing new sweet corn instead.
it would be an invalid patent (or at least should be), because
1. There is prior art
2. it is obvious to a domain expert
But given the US patent office's track record, I wouldn't be too surprised if you were able to get a patent. Just don't expect it to hold up in court.
The supreme court agreeing on something is a solid piece of evidence that something is correct, but it's very far from ironclad. Especially when it's not unanimous.
Simplify embedding a YouTube video into GitHub
You are assuming that a particular course of action: (1) is guaranteed to be the best way to save lives and (2) only has ramifications which we have the ability to ‘adjust’. Many scientists may disagree with you on both accounts. I don’t see why they are not holding themselves to the highest ethical standards.
Unnecessary work - and in my opinion that includes most corporate iOS apps - is exactly what's going to be severely cut due to corona.
Or that lockdowns are free of political calculus.
The entire point of the Kickstarter model is to solve collective action problems of that kind. It's in the individual's interest to contribute, because otherwise the project might not reach its funding threshold, or might have trouble reaching the 'stretch' goal that some care about. This ensures that the 'funding' issue is solved, at least.
The patent would get thrown out on review
I have none. Enjoyed all of the videos so far - keep them coming!
Laws, and their official (albeit non-binding) interpretations should not be under copyright. This has struck me as an absurd assertion from the very beginning: We're supposed to live in a nation of laws: how could that ever be the case if the laws themselves are kept from the people?
Tough advice for some people considering the current climate - but otherwise I very much agree.
No, that’s not the way it works. If you want to take people’s livelihoods away from them, you have to justify the seizure, not the other way around.

Hypotheses don’t count. Provide actual scientific proof. You’re ruining people’s lives.
I agree... so much of this requires persistence. You have to become an expert in the system. Sometimes you can find an or otherwise hire an advocate as well.
How to avoid Amazon: Try shopping for anything and you will find it's all sold out or delayed by a month.
Coffee, and its associated caffeine effects, has an interesting history in the battle theater. These comments regarding coffee are from the American Civil War:

"Perhaps the North's access to caffeine gave its soldiers a strategic advantage. At least that's what one Union officer, Gen. Benjamin Butler, thought. He ordered his men to carry coffee in their canteens and planned attacks based on when his men would be most wired. His advice to other generals was: 'If your men get their coffee early in the morning, you can hold.'" [1]

"In 1859 Sharps Rifle Co. began to manufacture a carbine with a hand-cranked grinder built into the butt stock — or handle — of the rifle. Union soldiers would fill the stock with beans, grind them up, dump them out and use the grounds to cook the coffee. As the morning began, one Civil War diarist described a scene of 'little campfires rapidly increasing to hundreds in numbers that would shoot up along the hills and plains.' The encampment would buzz with the sound of thousands of grinders simultaneously crushing beans. Soon, tens of thousands of muckets (coffee pots) gurgled with fresh brew." [2]

[1][2] https://www.npr.org/sections/thesalt/2016/07/25/485227943/if...
This problem generalizes to state-lines as well.

Moreover, restrictions are not uniform. For example, San Mateo county restricts movement to within 5 miles of one's residence. Other bay area counties like Santa Clara do not. So legally somebody from Santa Clara county can visit San Mateo county (for exercise), but not the other way around.

A well-managed response would include curbs on movement, be it at the state or county level.
> This is not universally agreed

Well, what is? I mean flat-earthers don't agree the world is round, should we take their objections seriously?

> sounds a bit like a modernized version of "let them eat cake."

Except how am I Marie Antoinette?

I'm just trying to look on the bright side.

It sucks that those birds are going to live and die and go to waste. It sucks that the people working there are out of work. It sucks that the company is losing money. All of that sucks.

The best you can say is, well, it's a good excuse to try to eat healthier.

FWIW, my sister roasted two chickens just the other day and they were delicious. So don't think I'm not feeling the pain here. (Is little joke. Trying to end on upbeat note here. Work with me.)
This sounds sentimental, I can’t think of anything worse than being stuck in a coffee shop talking to people all day.
> flat out nonsensical e.g. The Story of a Boy Who Went Forth to Learn Fear

That reminded me of GOT... the ending was a disappointment to an otherwise interesting tale.
Which state, what are some acceptable excuses?
State and local governments have far greater abilities to issue orders like this than the federal government. What, exactly, is unconstitutional about a city issuing an order that revokes the ability of a business to operate due to a health emergency?
Hooks allow for declarative behaviour that’s harder to model other ways. With hooks, something like declaring when an event listener should be in play becomes much cleaner. The alternatives with class components are messy.

The above criticism that you don’t get to have pure functional components anymore doesn’t really make sense to me - either you have some lingering state to deal with, or you write a pure function. Your hand is forced by the problem. You could switch over to class components but they’re really not much clearer to read.

Most of the bugs I’ve seen have been around JavaScript’s crummy equality checks and the need for more memoisation.
Senior, Software Engineer
> Most houses build in the last decade or two use at least cat5 for phone lines. Just refit the outlet, plug in a switch where they all connect and, boom, wired network. Place a few strategically located wireless APs, adjust the signal strenght, and you have great coverage all over.

My parents' previous house was 2011-ish had the phone lines run over Cat5, but they still daisy chained jacks so it wasn't easy to convert to ethernet use.

That's not the only place I've seen that stupidity too.

> Edit: An alternative is to get a wifi extender that supports 5Ghz and 2.4Ghz and (this is the important part) allows you to use one of those as the back haul. You give up one of the frequencies, but you don't halve your bandwidth.

The nicer "mesh" kits in some cases even have three radios per base where the third is dedicated to backhaul.
It's weird from the standpoint of justice for all and citizen society. It makes perfect sense for morally corrupt powerful entities.
I would not agree with your assessment. The legislature wrote the laws, which are not copyrighted. But they went a step further in this case to add that the ACTUAL law to be applied in the State is the Annotated version, not the original unannotated version. Or in other words, the only way to obtain the actual law is through the version that was copyrighted. (See the Ars Technica article that has some good background on the history of the case).

I still see the case as being about the legislature creating law but then assigning the copyright to that law to someone else. That was decided long ago in the government edicts precedents. Without this overturned decision, this leaves you in the position that you cannot access the Official Laws without being forced to go to the owner of the copyright for access.