skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
You absolutely can, and I almost always do, styles things with native css (well, I use sass compiled to css) to style your react application (or widget!).

To my knowledge, React itself has no opinion on styling. It's more the ecosystem around React that's gone css-in-js.

But, yes, if you want to do your styling natively that's really not a problem.
For comparison China’s gdp fell by 6.8% in the same period.
What do you use all the VMs for, if you don't mind me asking?
What are the other pillars and what if one dissents against them? I'm not saying that's happening here, but not all dissent is tolerable, no?
Conflation of "resources" with supply-and-demand. Living near the ocean doesn't use more resources but it's priced higher more because people want to live there bidding up prices. Similarly living in cities cost more because people want to live there (in aggregate).
Properly understood economics and ecology should be the same science, or more precisely, economics = ecology + psychology.

There are a few schools of applied ecology (e.g. Permaculture) and the result is a new kind of basis for food production that allows us to meet our needs in harmony with Nature.

E. O. Wilson has proposed setting aside half of Earth for non-human nature: https://www.half-earthproject.org/

> Half-Earth is a call to protect half the land and sea in order to manage sufficient habitat to reverse the species extinction crisis and ensure the long-term health of our planet.

If we were to do this and also convert our food production system to be ecologically harmonious we could solve most of our problems.
And that's why there are products to insure you against this risk called payment protection insurance (PPI). It's a shame that in the UK, PPI is now synonymous with mis-selling. The true cost of debt should be the interest rate and the costs to insure the debt (buildings insurance, landlords insurance, car insurance, PPI...)
You were perhaps thinking of a bear market? (Different from a recession)
Show Your Patriotic Support For Our President! Get Your FREE Presidential Victory Coin : https://tinyurl.com/yd7c8hr9
> 1. People keep saying about the market being up recently

So, down 10% from the previous bubble.

> 2. S&P is heavily weighted towards the strongest companies

Good point. Dow is also up almost as much though.

> 3. The market is always very forward looking.

I may be cynical, but I see perhaps 2 to 3 years to regain the jobs we are losing, to see the employment rate return to earlier levels. That's years of depressed spending, and all the other woes of society from high unemployment.

So the market is looking to, what, 2025 or something?

Sorry to pick on you, I still just don't get it.
> So a well-designed interface or OpenAPI spec is worth its weight in gold.

When I worked on a SOA team, I tried to begin any new effort (whether a new API or modification to existing API) solely discussing the API contract. It was (ideally) high-level enough that business analysts and project managers would understand it, and it helped to guide us away from getting mired in implementation discussions too early.

At that organization, we rarely had the opportunity to involve multiple customers at the same time during design discussions (we were typically engaged to help a specific consumer implement a specific feature), but the institutional memory in the SOA team helped us to keep in mind existing/potential other users of each particular webservice.
Metrics like that would be a lot more directly meaningful, but the problem is they're impossible to measure. How would you find out what the average purchasing power is on a day-to-day basis?
It's an artifact of the unregulated credit system. Credit reporting agencies starting using SSN as an identifier for consumers, thus it gets pasted everywhere. Back before the financial crisis, there was little to no oversight. If someone got your SSN and some basic info, they could open up credit accounts in your name very easily. Most upstanding places like Banks would require some form of ID. But what about the cashier at K-Mart when you were filling out an in-store credit application? They were much less caring. Same with used car dealers, and tons of other places.
Ahhahahaha. I have a similar story to that, but I eventually realized what happened.

I forget which command it was exactly, but I rsync'd or something to get a new code directory, and with the backup options in use the directory I was in got renamed.

But I still had command prompts open in that directory. And all of the files were there. So I didn't realize that one directory was not equal to the others even though it had the same name (it was a subdirectory) and appeared to have the same files.
Concerning Youtube, you may be interested in https://www.invidio.us/ which is an alternative front end. There are also extensions for Firefox which will automatically redirect any Youtube links you happen to come across to open on Invidious.
I don't know - I think in 90% of cases I don't need software to be "smart", I want it to do exactly what I tell it and nothing else.

After using Linux more as a daily driver lately, all that "convenience" you get with macOS and Windows - the form of automatic updates and notifications - is incredibly distracting.
This is not a question of morals or guilt. Some species naturally harm and put other species at risk, bat colonies breed virus strains that can kill many mammals. Mosquitoes kill many people every year without "doing wrong". Should we preserve them at any cost?
It's a bear rally.

This is the most optimistic market participants (bulls) buying at low prices and creating momentum that others follow.

Waiting for them at higher prices are the pessimists (bears) ready to sell into the rally.

Since there really hasn't been a capitulation, where everyone who would ever sell actually sold, it's likely the bears are still in control. I think some people are mistaking the extreme volatility as capitulation.
Open source comments for static sites
==Money will become meaningless if you can't use to buy stuff.==

I don't follow this line of thought. We already give people money for not working (examples are social security and unemployment benefits). None of that has made money obsolete. Why would a temporary measure in the midst of a once-in-a-lifetime pandemic?

Why don't I see people make this same argument about businesses getting money from the government? Will money become meaningless for businesses? Do people stop trying to earn money once they reach a certain level? Elon Musk certainly hasn't.
You can include them based on your need instead of adding them because someone else likes to use them
Even if this is true, there's a significant difference in that Google would lose nearly every single one of GCP's customers if it was ever proven they were mining data of their customers' cloud services.

And at the very least, it is much harder for Google to correlate a competitors' account systems and user data with their own profiles they use for ad targeting.

And of course, most importantly: Apple collects a lot less data when you use their apps. For instance, Maps data is never associated with an Apple ID, and significant work is done to fuzz and scramble the anonymous data they store to avoid it being possible to turn it into data about a real person. In comparison, Google Maps logs your location to your Google account every five minutes.
It's studying for the test. It's too common to see a stock index as the stock market as the economy, buy they're all distinct things. Ideally an index _should_ represent that market, but when an economy becomes massively centrally planned by an overreaching fed, it's too easy to prop up those in the index to make the "economy" look strong. Ultimately, purchasing power, people's ability to save, liquidity of assets, etc were pretty bad before this recession. Those are the things we should actually care about - maximizing utility.

It's especially galling because the people pushing for these nigh-Stalinist levels of fed intervention and central planning (look how much support oddly favoured industries like manufacturing and coal get) are also posturing as champions of the Free Market. It's like we can't make any progress because nobody in charge is willing to argue in good faith.
"Don't shit where you eat."
I'm saying the analogy in this case, doesn't work. Hiring a plumber, carpenter, electrician on a per job basis is not the same as hiring an employee (hopefully for a long-term commitment).
I remember going in for an interview not knowing the salary range that would be on offer, but having at least an idea of my worth in the field. During the interview, right after explaining the benefit I could bring to the company, the most senior interviewer asked if I expect to be paid for that benefit. I said of course, but that the salary depended on my contribution, something best judged by the company. At the end of the interview, not pleased with not having a number, the same interviewer asked if I am not willing to give a number and I asked "would you want me to? I can" and that settled it. They came back and I got the job, with a sensible salary. Of course it is in the best interest of companies to have asymmetry of information, same as with car dealers, but two can play that game. An a priori number could end up limiting in both directions. Try to politely decline to give a number ahead of time and see how much your skills are needed. If the company takes the number in a form I try to write In Person or leave it blank. If the company does not contact me, I sometimes wonder whether it was as a result of that, and then remind myself that such inflexibility would not be a good trait for an employer to have, so we were both spared.
If one changes the title from "Economic Growth Is Incompatible with Biodiversity Conservation" to "Continual Growth Is Incompatible with Biodiversity Conservation" you get a much more interesting statement, to my mind.

You can either decide that the planet can support an infinite number of human beings or a finite number. I cannot have reasonable discussions with the former camp, so when it comes to the latter, it's all about that finite number as a function of lifestyle, healthcare, relative comfort, and so on. This many millions of people if we all live like Americans; that many billions of people if we are all miserable and flea-bitten.

Bringing the economy in it is at best a distraction, at worst it simply invites discussion from people who think their pet -ism economic theory will make the underlying problem go away.
1. P/e does not mean much without context. Certainly not what the value of a company should be.

2. Fed helped and did what they are supposed to, which is good for everyone.

3. Market is forward looking and it should be, otherwise it would be dumb. In other words corona will pass, it is not the end of the world and if stocks went too deep, potential earnings from stocks within 5-10 years down the line would be huge, so anyone looking at that timeframe would be buying at discount.

High p/e does not mean things are overvalued. It means whoever buys into market estimates strong future potential. Now knowing that you can start to argue whether they are over or under estimating.
I think all you're saying is that eventually sentiment bends toward economic reality.
That's cool! I looked at NiFi for a past company and it seemed pretty put together. IIRC, the UI felt a bit dated like Java Swing, but the capabilities were awesome.

That said, two worries:

* marketing this is going to be a bigger lift. Folks don't build data flows for fun, they use them to solve business problems. What business problems will this solve?

* "visual" programming claims always make me suspicious, because at some point you usually have to dive below the abstraction.

Anyway, best of luck!
I'm guessing you've already seen this, but in case you haven't:
https://newsroom.questdiagnostics.com/2020-04-28-Quest-Diagn...

Quest is now selling a consumer initiated antibody test. It's not at home, of course.
Remember looks great.

> This application is not Open Source. I'm providing the source code here because I want users to be able to see the code they're running and even change and build it for themselves if they want to. In that vein, you're free to read, build and run the application yourself, on your own devices, but please don't share any built artifacts with others.

Minor bit of feedback, it would be great to add a licence file to GitHub to expose this a bit more clearly and in a more standard way. I have no problem with this choice, but I can see some users missing this licence-esque bit of the README.
You don't teach someone how to play baseball by forcing them to practice wrong technique for several years.

It's not just easing them in to socialization... it's giving them wrong socialization. We're all hot-to-trot about how important teachers are for all sorts of other skills both soft & hard, but it's apparently OK for kindergarteners to teach other kindergarteners how to socialize and it'll all be just the same as if they get good socialization the historically-normal way.
You are wrong.

The NBER Business Cycle Dating committee explains their criteria and explains why "the two quarter rule" the financial press always talks about is not what they use.

https://www.nber.org/cycles/recessions.html

"The committee's procedure for identifying turning points differs from the two-quarter rule in a number of ways. First, we do not identify economic activity solely with real GDP and real GDI, but use a range of other indicators as well. Second, we place considerable emphasis on monthly indicators in arriving at a monthly chronology. Third, we consider the depth of the decline in economic activity. Recall that our definition includes the phrase, "a significant decline in activity." Fourth, in examining the behavior of domestic production, we consider not only the conventional product-side GDP estimates, but also the conceptually equivalent income-side GDI estimates. The differences between these two sets of estimates were particularly evident in the recessions of 2001 and 2007-2009."

The NBER definition is what gets used in the US by every single government department and academic.
Incredible. What led your company to divulge this valuable data?
FWIW, you don’t have to use payment terms as financial leverage. You can just use them as a way to give your balance sheet more capacity to absorb problems, should they arise. In my opinion, that’s a good thing. Also, your suppliers will be more committed to you and they’ll respect you more if they’re extending you terms. Anyway, if you want a playbook for negotiating terms, feel free to reach out via email (address is in my profile).
There is nothing wrong with most developers working on and communicating about the entire code base. Having teams work in silos is not a benefit. You're touting as a benefit what is one of microservices' gravest issues - teams stop communicating beyond the surface level of their respective APIs.
Volunteering or getting involved in some other NPO can also get at this.
Differential privacy anonymizes data sets with deliberately noisy data
Connecting to RabbitMQ in Golang
You are right about those packages. I removed them, I will try to make better packaging system for diffrent usage
>dangerous disinformation

What does this even mean?? Have we forgotten the importance of free speech?
This. What you're seeing is the beginning of a massive currency inflation.
I think it is because you don't know what you're going to get / and honestly a lot of places don't know the actual market until they start making offers.

Maybe you're looking for a $100k type guy... but all you get are $70k applicants so you decide to hire one of them.

You don't want to pay dramatically more than you should, or insult them by offering less than the job listed or set them up for thinking they're getting a raise shortly after or something.

There are a lot of theories about negotiation and gamification and I think plenty of that is true, but I also think that for most places looking for a specific role, they're not 100% sure what they're going to get and thus can't say exactly what they'll pay.

As much as I loath job hunting, trying to get through the hiring industrial complex before I get to talk to the technical guy... I also don't think every job offer thing is a sort of dark pattern. I think folks hiring are flying blind too to some extent and thus not willing to commit to a number until they know the person they want.
You can still see their video. It's on plenty of other sites and there are copies of it on Youtube.
Using BEM in components: a thing of the past?
That doesn't explain foreign markets
Oh...the stories I could tell...

But I have made it a point of personal ethos not to post criticism or polemics, denigrating/excoriating the work of others.

I know that could buy me a lot of clicks (and probably some considerable HN Above The Fold time), but I think we have enough negativity and finger-pointing on the Internet.

If you read my stuff, you won't see much of that. I may, in a rather vague way, allude to something that gives me a frowny-face, but I don't want that to be part of my "personal brand," so to speak.

I do take tremendous personal pride in my work; both coding and writing, and hold myself to a high bar. I may even project that bar onto others (only in some circumstances), but I don't think it's helpful to do so in public.

I find it most gratifying to write a "This is how I do this..." post, as opposed to a "This isn't how you should do it..." post.
The market ostensibly has a much longer view of things.

The word 'recession' is essentially meaningless without knowing the impetus for it.

The 'outsourcing of Jobs to China' is a huge, permanent, secular shift that may affect stocks one way or another, but the 'coronavirus' is something I think business believes we will recover from quickly - for the most part.

Tim Cooke told Trump he thinks it will be a 'v-shaped recovery'.

But remember that this recession was 'self imposed' in the sense that we ordered businesses to shut down. We can open them again just as quickly. Obviously that won't the entirely the case but I think this is the sentiment.

When a new CEO takes over a business, he might 'write off' a bunch of crap. Even though the company loses money that quarter, analysts see it as a 'positive sign' because the company is getting rid of dead weight on their balance sheet.
So like a 'one time charge' type thing.

I think markets are seeing corona as a 'one time charge'.
I’ve had that anger before. It even extends to ruminating about the events - I assume that’s protective too, as maybe I think that if I think about things long enough it cant happen to me again?

I'm prone to rumination and at some point I learned to turn that into a positive. When I was younger, I would get stuck in mental loops of imagining some negative outcome, but I started asking myself "What outcome do you want?" and trying to use rumination as a problem-solving tool to try to imagine how you get there from here.

So I imagine X social problem -- argument with a friend, for example -- and instead of getting into a ball of fury about how I'm sure this will go badly, stop at that point where I am imagining it going south and ask "What reply would move it in a better direction?" basically. Then iterate from there until it goes from reliving some nightmare scenario over and over to imagining various potential solutions.

It's been wonderfully life changing.

More recently, I’ve had some success with magnesium l-threonate

Working on my health has been enormously helpful in improving my ability to manage my mood. When I'm under the weather, I'm much more prone to stewing for various reasons. Magnesium deficiency is one of the things I'm prone to and have to work at combating.
Might be a stupid question, it wasn’t clear to me in the article.

Did they go back to a monolith service or a monolith repo? It really just sounded like monorepo
Also people who didn't lose their jobs but are now spooked and are going into save mode.
Everything that is worth knowing was written in English or has been translated to it.
Well, not quite, but it's a good rule of thumb. So, immerse yourself in books written in English. Get audiobooks if you can. If you go far enough, you will be exposed to new concepts and ideas in English first, before they percolate to your native language. After a time, you will find yourself struggling to put into your mother tongue concepts which are, for you, effortless in English.

English is a beautiful language, because it lets you reach people. Honor it by always doing your very best when writing and speaking it. Pay attention to your pronunciation, and challenge yourself by writing more, if you can, and editing and sharing your work.

Other than that, perfect native pitch is over-rated, and it may take away confidence dearly needed to talk and practice more.
Exactly. This process needs to stop. I have never applied for a job where the salary (or hourly) price wasn't listed up front. Why waste my time and why should I waste yours?
Donated. Good luck to the doggies.
Paying a premium for junk...
Mostly because it's a large bloated whale compared to NetBSD.
Previous discussion from her blog post on the same topic: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17499137
Secure development when working from home – tips and tricks
By co-workers do you mean people in your same position or you mean you also walk in to your bosses office or your bosses bosses offie and ask them how much they make? Other than companies with unique cultures, I would imagine very few would do that (or get a pleasant response), but if amounts are listed on job descriptions you would know how much everyone above you is making. Even asking 'co-workers' how much they make would vary greatly based on the type of company and job you work in, where that would be deemed acceptable behavior, or result in the person happily telling you. As would also depend on if the person you are asking makes more than you or less, if more they would presumably be less likely to tell you or tell your as honestly.
You can do it in Haskell with Template Haskell. You can also lift some computation to the type level with means they will run at compile time during type checking.
AI Cannot Be Inventors, US Patent Office Rules
Android has this concept of Work Profiles, where your work account apps are isolated from your personal apps. It works well with Meet and you have a single button to immediately disable all the Work apps (including their notifications).

It gives you way better separation than anything on iOS.
Why are we continually saying Recession when we know it will be a Depression?
My favourite crazy bug was during a university course on autonomous robotics. One of the other groups was using a a metal castor at the back of the robot along with 2 driven wheels. After a little while their robot would completely crash and stop responding.

I'd previously encountered a similar issue which was due to the library code we'd been given which opened a new /dev/i2c file for each motor command, eventually exceeding the max file handles and killing the program. So I assumed it was something sensible like that.

Some time later they got all excited and called us over to explain the real reason it was crashing. Their robot would initially work fine for a reasonable period of time. Then when the robot drove over the metallic tape on the floor of the arena it would die. The robot must have been building up a static charge while moving around which would eventually be dissipated when the metal touched the tape.

I wouldn't have believed it had they not setup two tests, one outside the normal arena and one inside. Changing the metal castor for a bit of lego fixed the problem.
Very cool. Just a suggestion for the demos in the README though. Maybe have the code shown statically, then a gif of the GUI. Watching all the typing gets long when I just want to see the resulting GUI.
.o file stamp newer than .c timestamp. Make figures out file can be skipped. Run recursive touch on these problematic files and headers.