skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Nobody understands quantum mechanics. Lots of people know how to apply it. I don't think quantum technology is going to go anywhere until physicists revamp the theory & the pedagogy in a way that makes it comprehensible.

I say this as someone who passed 2 semesters of graduate QM.
you use snapcraft https://snapcraft.io/
If you're interested Adam Savage was allowed to use a 'Spot' robot for several months and shares some observations and information on actual usage on his youtube channel.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R-PdPtqw78k
Sounds a bit like the new Corona virus.
I think the analogy falls apart when you consider the movement/creation of singular objects (like your phone or your money) versus new/copied objects (a copy of his birthday on your singular piece of paper).

If you create a replica of a taxi you rode in, you own that copy.

If you take a photo of someone, you own that photo.

If you write that person's birthday down on a piece of paper, you don't own their birthday now. You own the piece of paper with their birthday written on it, and they have no claim to that paper or what's written on it.
The way to overcome the scarcity of back-end devs?
I guess the best thing to say for the aforementioned Union, post a Scottish exit, is that the flag would be cooler: https://www.reddit.com/r/vexillology/comments/23vhqp/the_fla...
I'm sure there are great explanations out there but I haven't had time to read up on them, but a few of the space things that always bother me when I watch pop-sci space tv:

- "as soon as iron starts to be produced in the core of a star it instantly collapses" - I get that fusing iron costs energy rather than produces it and this causes a collapse.. but can it really be that quick? There are other fusion reactions that are still producing energy, right?

- dark matter / energy - I understand we have observations that indicate there is some type of matter we can't see but it feels a lot like saying "magic" or "the ether".

- how different size stars form - if there is a critical mass where a star "ignites" and after igniting starts pushing away from itself with the energy being produced, how do we get stars of such varying masses? Like, why didn't this 100x solar mass star start fusing and pushing the gases away before they were caught in its gravity? Do the more massive stars ignite on the same schedule but continue to suck in additional matter anyway, gravity overcoming the solar wind?
It's "marketing/advertising content" - clearly distinct from the content anywhere it may be embedded.

"Creative" is more succinct, but I don't think it's clarifying anything.
I think the 'Armitage Shanks' Advertising principle applies here - I similarly drink a brand of Swedish Oat Milk - i even pay extra for the Barrista version (added chalk for whiteness) because i saw people in my hipster coffee house making it with that very brand so when I saw the brand in the local supermarket i swapped away from soya.

They did not need to 'advertise' in the traditional sense - they just needed to logo-ise their packaging in a recogniseable way.

Armitage Shanks for those not of a certain age in the UK is a brand of toilet bowl manufacturer - they simply put the name of their company visibly on the bowl of every toilet I used for probably 30 years. I doubt they ever spent a penny (!) on billboards.
Sounds interesting, how is this feature useful?
Well, no. "Creative" in this context is jargon and means the part that people would generally just refer to as "an ad": art, design, text, sound, video -- the combination.

What he is saying is that nailing the actual ad trumps everything else (targeting, keywords, platform, etc) when it comes to being effective in advertisement.
I guess one man's cruft is another man's crucial feature.
>> believes the crisis to be so all-encompassing and fully invalidating that...

That's the danger in publishing sloppy work across an entire field. In many peoples mind they lose all credibility. If the peer review can't separate the wheat from the chaf, why should anyone else?

No taking a stance on any particular findings, or field of study. Just pointing out that the posters response should not be unexpected. Nor should it be universal ;-)
> OTP doesn't give you _state of art_ distributed consensus algorithms out of the box.

Correct. Yet people love to think it does.
First of all, I'm not anti-vax. When there's an approved vaccine for coronavirus, I'll get it myself, and urge everyone I know to do the same.

Second, let's think for a few seconds how this technology would actually work in practice.

The technology is a method which allows you to put a few bits of information into the skin. Presumably it's permanent, non-user-visible and non-user-removable.

From there it's protocol design. Option (a), you could store the data of which vaccines directly on the person. Option (b), you could store some kind of ID number to an online database.

We can have a fine flamewar over the merits and drawbacks of Option (a) vs Option (b). But I think it's safe to assume there's maybe a 50% chance they'll end up going with Option (b).

This is pretty worrying. You state the fact it'll presumably only be deployed in Africa, but this is not reassuring. In African countries, it seems like it happens frequently that the government decides this week, it's your tribe's turn for genocide. In this case you'd want to make a run for it, escape your tribe's normal haunts where the death squads will be out in force.

Of course you could sneak across a border, or openly walk into a foreign customs post and ask for asylum, but changing countries has its own set of risks and problems.

An alternative survival strategy would be to simply destroy your identifying documents, if you ever had any, and try to blend in somewhere else. If your identifying document's a non-removable tattoo, you can't do this.
Asim Saleem Bajwa Appointed Special Assistant for Information (Inside Story)
Vaccine Could Potentially Be Available Later This Year, Coalition Says
The latter. rust-analyzer implements the language server protocol like RLS.

RLS was implemented using the compiler as a library, which meant it inherited the compilation model of the compiler, which isn't really well-suited for IDEs. That was done in full knowledge of that drawback.

The advantage for RLS is that it has perfect parity with the language.

This may be fixed by using rust-analyzers libraries within the compiler. RFC here: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/2912
Hawaii Arrival Procedures
It's nice to see an adwords article that finally embraces CPA bidding. It really is king. I've been doing this for over a decade and was very hesitant to use it but it really beats everything out there.

One thing he doesn't mention is the landing page experience. It affects both your quality score which can have big impacts on CPA as well as your conversion rate.

Not sure why people have issue with "creative" as a noun, this has been the standard in advertising for decades. Hell, it's in the dictionary: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/creative

Don't need to crap on Quantic and the like as much though, they do have some things that Google doesn't.

Some people are commenting on him not giving specific advice for making the creative. As some have pointed out, a whole article could be written about that, or more realistically, entire libraries of books. In short he is talking about ad copywriting, it's a whole discipline that takes years of experience and learning to get good at.
I get that this is new and in development, but I'd really like to see a more in-depth comparison to keybase than:

> This project borrows many ideas from Keybase, including sigchains and user (proofs), and uses Saltpack and keybase/go-keychain and other packages. However, this project only links a single key to a user.

I say this while noting I've seen that "Better documentation" is an item in the todo list. However, it just isn't clear - to me - where they plan to move or draw a finish line for features.

If you have a better comparison please post it, and I guess a PR for the project too ;)
It's stuck around for the last year. Pyproject.toml is standardised.
Sorry I am not sure I follow. This is for any developers or engineers.

What do you mean embedded postings?

We don't file any support tickets nor am I sure what you are talking about, can you please explain? Are you sure you have the right post?
https://www.forbes.com/sites/mattperez/2020/03/18/bill-gates...

https://www.mediamatters.org/coronavirus-covid-19/bill-gates...

https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-coronavirus-bil...

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/floating-conspira...

https://www.factcheck.org/2020/04/conspiracy-theory-misinter...

https://nypost.com/2020/04/17/bill-gates-becomes-top-target-...

https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2020/apr/09/instagram-...

Your response is pitiful at best and your logic is severely flawed. Please seek help.
Excellent to hear. This was not obvious from the blog post, and I should have done more digging before jumping to conclusions.
Are the ascii captchas still being used? It was a neat defense against the bots, but kind of killed the pacing of things.
Not usually Visa gift cards, but getting paid via debit card has become somewhat common for low-wage workers.

https://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/01/business/as-pay-cards-rep...
Same here - I glanced over the article and was confused why there was a part for Gmail. I thought to myself : "but gmail doesn't have ads?".
Which makes me wonder even more why 75%+ of the population doesn't have adblock themselves?
I think you’re looking for manifest annotations.

https://github.com/opencontainers/image-spec/blob/master/spe...

Docker considers it experimental but buildah doesn’t.

https://docs.docker.com/engine/reference/commandline/manifes...

https://github.com/containers/buildah/blob/master/docs/build...
Don't you need partial SHA anyway? This needs a variable.

And if you have a git checkout around, you can use git commit timestamp - time up to seconds and does not need anything except the source tree.
> This project is in development and has not been audited.

I love seeing notes like this. Everyone needs to start somewhere, and for security projects there is a danger of overselling initially, which undermines credibility. This sounds like someone who understands that theres a lot of complex challenges to get this to production level security.
Having a separate useEffect certainly scatters your code, but it helps prevents bugs that cause your states/effects to go out of sync.

If you use a callback on setState in order to listen for async state updates like

setState({ myState: 'newValue' }, () => { this.doSomething(); });

then a week later, when you add some different code calling setState({ myState: 'newValue' }) somewhere else without remembering to add the callback, your callback won't run! Callbacks kind of break the declarative/reactive model.
It's unreal that in React I have to deal with occasional infinite loops now because of hooks. Sure, React catches the loop cycle so things don't totally freeze but I don't recall ever having to deal with this before them. Weird, unexpected reference issues, missing dependency accidents requiring linters to prevent, strange programming patterns, a team member having to write a terrifying novel like https://overreacted.io/a-complete-guide-to-useeffect/ for something that was never really a problem before. The list goes on and on.
Learning-Based Bias Correction for Accurate UWB Localization of Tiny Drones
Not you fault, thanks for asking :).
Amperes, Voltage, Watts, without using a liquid analogy.
The ticket smash, raw metrics, and communication
4 important tips for leading agile teams remotely
The pendulum shows you the net rotation of the pendulum about the Earth's axis of rotation, the rotation of the Earth about the Sun, the Sun about the center of the Milky Way, the Milky Way about the gravitational center of our local cluster, etc., etc.

Having not known, I think I would have strongly guessed that the rotation of the Earth about its own axis would be by far the dominant factor, but it's still good to measure.
Bill Gates is the chief science officer of the new world order
What SDR uses +6ghz? I heard HackRF only goes to 6ghz but not over?
What Happened to IPv5? Why There Is IPv4, IPv6 but No IPv5?
Also missing is: what is a "color"?

It might sound like a stupid question, but once you start thinking about it, it's not so simple. For example if you take a color and change the intensity of the light by a factor 2, is it the same color? Also due to overlapping spectra of cones in the human retina, different spectra can generate the same perception of color. Et cetera.
I see this from a lot of people and I'm puzzled, can you not just avoid using the features you don't like? I don't see anyone going "I used to use VS Code but they added a database viewer so I stopped".
Except "marketing content" is a whole other discipline, around things such as blog posts and the like. Not to mention "creative" has been used by advertising agencies for decades now...
It is easier and cheaper to use 50ohm compatible WiFi when dealing with situations like trying to communicate with equipment inside an enclosure through a slip ring.
What makes these arguments lame is that they are _extremely unimportant_ in the grand scheme of things. People take up sides on trivial topics as a hobby or escape. This article is an excellent summation of how silly and petty people get when arguing over minutia online.

> I'm worried that next time someone tries to take a more nuanced, more informed approach to editing they will stop themselves in the fear of being included in a piece like this.

Good! That's exactly why this article exists. Because for every person who _doesn't_ come across this article and draws a conclusion based on a nuanced, informed approach, another person will disagree with them because they drew the _exact opposite_ conclusion based on their own nuanced, informed approach. And then the debate will devolve into an entry on Lamest Edit Wars.
Wasn’t WhatsApp also compromised via gif? Gif is a really remarkable format that seems so simple but it’s much more. It’s just a series of images with timings but then you realize that the first few bits of the gif can be written with arbitrary code.

A somewhat deep dive into the format https://enthusiasms.org/post/16976438906
This struck me when I was reading up on SIDS and wondering how people could go so long without realizing that, if you put your babies down to sleep wrong, something like 1 in 1000 of them will die.

And then you look at the historical statistics and realize that, depending on your time and place, something like 250-400 in 1000 infants died. And aside from how viscerally terrifying that thought is, it's no wonder you couldn't notice that extra 1 in 1000 until you fixed childhood plagues and nutrition. It was the terrifying scourge of the 80's, but just a drop in the bucket historically.
San Francisco Covid-19 Data and Reports
The best way to install it is by installing the VSCode plugin, it will download the binary for you. rustup may arrive in the future and make things better for other plugins.
> The GDPR is a small step.

Some people wish it to be, but it isn't just because they do.

In order to be a small step forward rather than backwards, it would have to show actual positive results. It doesn't, all major data leeches claim to comply with it while retaining more data than ever before, all small companies struggle with it without bad intentions. Don't be deluded by idealism, look at the facts. It's about as effective at keeping your data safe as cookie banners are in preventing cookies, while having similar adverse effects on everyone.
I personally was able to finish a side project in reasonable time working only with react docs.
I think that year comparison doesn't work super well; some of the work done in the compiler over the past 2-3 years contributed here. rust-analyzer (in my mind) would not have been possible in the same way at the time the rls was built. It would have needed to do a lot of the work that's been ongoing in the background since.
Wired wireless ... what are you confused about? :-P

Combine this with power over IP and you're SET!
> Plus, left wing is by definition a movement that opposes the current power hierarchies in society. Look it up on Wikipedia.

A foolish movement that doesn't recognize that power and competency hierarchies are endemic to nature and are a part of any human organization. The moment the current system is torn down, the rhetoric of the Left fails as it offers no actual method towards constructing anything meaningful - this is left to men who actually build and maintain things, who all recognize the fundamental nature of the hierarchy if anything is to actually be accomplished. A few years after every leftist revolution, there's a shittier version of the same basic hierarchy in place, equality is never achieved, and as many people starve as before.

> none of the people you would call totalitarian liberals are left wing at all

Agreed, they're just the left-side position in the false dichotomy. And probably none of the people you'd consider "right wing" are at all right wing by the standards of the real right, they're just the right-side of the same dichotomy, established to prevent anyone from actually upsetting the applecart in the name of real change.

> They would absolutely support a fascist coup if it was their only way to keep their money, power and influence.

So would just about every normal working class citizen, if they had the opportunity and if the populist values were sufficiently representative of their own. The problem is that fascism has been grossly misrepresented as simply being totalitarianism, when it is actually an ethos and aesthetic towards the upward construction of a nation in the interest of its families that is (obviously) considered undesirable by globalists.
J.T. Hiskey is dropping more new music soon and the world is ready to hear it
Standing wave ratio would be 1.5. Peak powers under 1 watt (and probably under 600mW). The transmitter is going to be fine.
Fair but I think my other points still stand
There are some mirrors linked on the site, some of which have https

Eg https://textfiles.meulie.net/
>But then, if every woman has gone through multiple stillbirths, child deaths, and so on, then everyone is going to be messed up. What they'd consider "normal" is what we'd consider as "struggling with deep trauma".

>I think you're right - everyone would be traumatised by modern standards.

But if everybody is traumatized then nobody is, it's the local normal. Sure we can say they were "wrong" but that's just a reflection of our current cultural norms. What is right and wrong or traumatic or not is a matter of cultural norms and social consensus. The reason we give a crap over whether or not people are traumatized is because it makes them "messed up" and affects their ability to function normally in society. If people are able to function normally in society, are not "messed up" according to the people around them and don't consider themselves traumatized are they really traumatized?

It's really easy to sit in an air conditioned office and say the past was horrible but it's only horrible because we have a different frame of reference. For the people who lived it it was just how things are. I think it's kind of paternalistic to say the people of the past were all/mostly traumatized because it's not like they had any other options, the things they had to experience were unavoidable facts of life.
It would be off to not be in historical humans but in animals:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28070873/
It's not just entering common use. The specific case you're referring to has been used since the 1930s, and "creative" has been used more broadly as a noun for centuries.

Source:
https://www.merriam-webster.com/words-at-play/can-creative-b...
I tried Adwords for search again recently after several years. There was a decent number of clicks, and the cost per "action" seemed very reasonable, where for me, the action is clicking on the download link from the landing page to download the installer for our game. The only problem is that tracking the IP's, 90% of the traffic from Adwords that downloaded the installer never actually ran the installer. Organic traffic usually has much more than 50% of the people who download it, run it. Is it a bunch of robots driving clicks and then clicking randomly on links on the landing page? Seems really suspicious.
I did, but if I use an extremely thin wing with zero aerofoil (a wing made out of credit-cards or flat balsa wood for example), one "way" around the wing is not longer. Why would pressure be different on the top vs. bottom of this flat wing?
... buried the lede

it's subdomain takeover
Use https://archive.org/ ?
> this is for services

"applications and services"
This is kind of different. It’s more like, “I used this database viewer and suddenly it became VS Code”. It used to be something lean and simple, but now you’re simply not the target audience anymore at all.
I initially had a few, but after making sure they weren't just learning curve exasperations in disguise, I realized they all boil down to that they should've just started out with this and never had any class components.

I often see developers mix up classes and functional components with hooks in abominable ways, and every pitfall to hooks I can find just boils down to improperly brackish OO class model polluted thinking.
The answer is wrong more because it relies on padding bytes having consistent values than a lack of templating.
Their E-series, normally targeted at budget buyers, still retains a fair bit of repairability. I have a recent E-series as well as a P-series from a few years ago, and there isn't really any difference in build quality between the two.
Are you actually willing to learn, to at least consider whether a statement is true based on the merit of the facts presented, or will you categorically deny any source that isn't directly connected to legacy media?

If the latter, look into the 'right wing conspiracy theories' and discard what you see as weak evidence and disinformation. Build a case from the point of view opposite of your own, then compare this to the point of view you hold now. Ask yourself which one is more convincing, and why.
That's also how you get mobile phones working in elevators
But focusing in on the ‘this’ criticisms highlights the general criticisms. They think ‘this’, or the Class model is a barrier to entry for React.

React is a great framework, and super intuitive on so many fronts, but where it misses, it misses big. To come to the conclusion that the Class model, a pretty predictable pattern, is more a barrier to entry, or a conduit for confusion, is really misguided.

Just take a look how simple functional components can take on a quasi Class-like form with lookup maps for hooks in this particular article. When you advocate for stuff like this, you are injecting the community with effectively bad practices.

The React dev team can not resort to the ‘You probably don’t need ________’ article in perpetuity. At some point, they have to say to themselves - ‘We probably don’t need to add this to the API’.
That is the wrong assumption. They don't need to compete with anyone. As a commercial software they only need to make enough money to survive for their own good. As a non-commercial software they don't even need money, just enough attention to stay useable. And in both those camps there are still many members alive.
Much of the risk in implants is not tied to concept or design, but rather execution. The final product has been distorted to some degree by market forces (cost/profitability, application domains, viable hosts), and this reflects, I believe, in the majority of harmful use cases that we observe.