skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
How would your argument change in the event that this were the only such publication? How about if there were 1,000?

EDIT: I now realize that George effectively only published an annotated version of its laws, which can only be purchased (it seems) from LexisNexis. While a free version is available, this version appears to be prepared by LexisNexis (all of this is my understanding from ref 1)

1. https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2019/12/justices-debate-...
"Every time I submit some 1990s or 2000s era form that gives me an error because I typed some field wrong, but also wipes out half the other fields I spent 15 minutes typing..."

That's exactly why we put so much effort into making sure Django's forms framework didn't wipe out the values you had already filled in if there was a validation error.
Calling coffee a mind-altering substance is pretty rich. I've heard this sentiment before and it's so flippant in it's lack of perspective (intentionally so) that its not worth discussing further.

This is as far as I got because of the paywall anyway. I really wish HN would just outright reject submissions from domains known to have paywalls. Forget trying to fish it from Google or some archive/cache.
If I delete the tweet, that revokes permission. Right Disney?
It's not voodoo; the concept of "supertasters" and other supersensory traits in humans is well-documented. Most legitimate sommeliers are likely supertasters.

I'm a supertaster myself-- certain pungent/sour tastes will literally make me gag; I don't like foods with a million different components since I can taste all of them quite clearly. My wife on the other hand will smell things on the wind (like smoke) that I'll only notice 5-10 minutes later. I hear there are others who can see gradients of colors that others cannot.

> wetting the filter before you make your coffee

This isn't really voodoo, but it is debatable whether it matters for such a low volume. Since no filter fully expresses the fluid it absorbs, if you put exactly 4 cups of water through a dry filter, you're not getting exactly 4 cups of water out of it. The result might be a stronger cup of coffee (since there is less water to dilute it). Wetting the filter gives you a more "accurate" result, but you'll get a consistent cup of coffee either way if you commit to either always wetting it or not doing so.

This matters more for things like oil changes, which is why after changing your oil filter and refilling the oil, you're supposed to run the car for a few minutes to operating temperature and check the oil levels again-- the dry filter will have added to the total capacity of the engine block and soaked up some of what you thought you put in.
Correct.

Also, IANAL, but my understanding is the annotations are de facto required reading for practitioners of law. They give all the background and history of the law, without which, you would be at a severe disadvantage in the courtroom.
Teams on the Mac is a UX disaster. Start the application, you get a Teams logo. Then it switches to a large white window, that can persist for up to 40seconds (100 mb fibre). No indication of what the app is doing. Downloading a full app every time? In some meetings I have lost the ability to access the chat. When trying to access recorded videos that I get a shared link to I end up with a login window that refuses to acknowledge any account (maybe I have no access, but that isn’t what it tells me). The resources section, files etc, is confusing to the point of being useless and old videos just tell me a token has expired.
My old team pre-pandemic did two coffee runs a day. $2.10 per cup x2, x5 = $22 a week, and that is if you only get drip at SBUX.
Thank you very much for this detailed reply.

and yes, I absolutely was meaning to ask about options, not futures (I know so little, I used the wrong word!)

How do options get priced?

i.e. if I look in my online brokerage thing I can buy XYZ for $100 on Jan 1 2021, but what if I want to buy it for $125 on Jan 1 2025?

Who decides what dates and prices are set?

Can I just go insane and get options on AAPL for $3000 (or $2) in 2030?
How are the both of you not included all regulatory oversight in the same bucket?

Could the FDA process become weaker to the point of a problem, sure. Is there any evidence that it currently is? I haven't seen any. Is this something they (the FDA and similar) should keep an eye on, absolutely

Honestly, I don't see how you are drawing the parallel. In what wad do you think the FDA is making the "same" mistake as the FAA did?
Ha. The trick is that what's "logical" and what's "partisan" depend entirely on who is speaking, like how cries of "judicial activism" only ever arise when it's a ruling against a conservative position. If it's a ruling FOR the conservative position, it's obviously logical and sound, and possibly correcting previous evil irrational liberal decisions.
You might not realize just how expensive SMSes can be. Based on AWS SMS pricing, they cost 6/10ths of a cent to US destinations each, so each deal sent to 90,000 people in the article would cost twitter $540. That's not even getting into Europe that can cost over 10 cents per SMS, but I doubt twitter supported that.
I never tried it, but if I needed it, I would easier use sparse submodule checkout (if it’s possible - I don’t know if that’s true), or submodule the entire repo, and the symbolic link into the internal part I need.

If all else fails (e.g. you need 50 files out of a 100GB repo, which makes things too slow), I would set up a git subtree extract as a checkin hook, which would mean there exists another repo/branch automatically updated on checkin - and which you could use any way you want, e.g, simple submodule.

Do note that’s just what I said: the problem, “I only need a small part of the repo” is independent of it being a monorepo or multirepo.

You would only avoid this problem in a multirepo if you cut it to pieces in exactly the right places. it’s just a matter of whether the parts of the repo you don’t need are too large to make this comfortable — more likely in a monorepo as it is larger - but will happen in a big enough multirepo as well.
App owners who make money off serving ads are incentivized to do this (and have frequently been caught doing this).
Using Nginx and Lua and Redis to Build an Edge Computing Platform
Studying TikTok Algorithms / Shadow Bans. Being Yourself. Oil Painting Chat
The San Francisco Bay Area shelter-in-place order is being extended through May
seems like a More Women In Tech group, despite not being explicit. homepage is 26-3 images of women vs men, when an accurate representation would be something like 8-2 in "favor" of men.
Most of those applications don't need that though. Developers write hundreds of thousands of lines of code because that's what you have to do if you commit to a JavaScript-everything architecture.

If the thing you are building needs that then go ahead and build it like that. But SO MUCH of what I see built on the modern JavaScript didn't need to do that at all.
Unfortunately it seems like as long as the party that benefits from this is in power they will continue to be a feature and not a bug.
Two developers will do live streaming later: FreeBSD
My understanding is that compilers are allowed to treat malloc specially, i.e. they can assume that it returns non-aliasing memory, does not mutate other memory and can be elided if its result is unused.
It's literally other people's content copy-pasted in a "book". Even "free" (you still need to enter an e-mail address) that's not a great way of generating content (I guess you could argue there is some marginal value in selecting 50 "good" posts?), taking money for it is pretty slime-y.
I'm a coffee drinker who manages to get away spending almost no money on it because coffee's free at work and I'm not picky about the taste (I don't mind instant). :) (it's coffee connoisseurs who spend a lot)

I used to be a non-coffee drinker-- and I applaud coffee-teetotalers--but in my 2nd year of grad school I discovered that a small dose of coffee (1/2 cup) made so much more productive. Because I dosed it according to my body weight, I was able to get the benefits of coffee without its downsides. There were higher order benefits too. My moods improved because I felt productive, which helped me progress academically, and it all became a virtuous cycle.

My rule today is: drink coffee, but not too much, free is better.
I hope that someday cafe culture makes a comeback. As much as I love sitting in a cafe working on my laptop, the current iteration of cafes is but a pale imitation of what they were in the past.

Revolutions were plotted, art movements invented, and history made in places like Cafe Central in Vienna. I recommend reading literature from the 1880s-1930s to get a sense of how important they were for the time period. A Moveable Feast by Hemingway is a good start.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coffee_culture

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coffeehouse

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Café_Central
I don't drink coffee at home. I don't make it at work. I will get it sometimes at work from the barista bar.

But when I am working from home, I will _always_ go to a coffee house to work. It is difficult to state how important that the "third place" is. I focus far better there than at home. Try it out. Even if you don't drink coffee. Get a nice peppermint tea or something.
eBay is a mixed bag, you should review the seller accordingly. Some are good some are not. Items coming from independent sellers on Amazon could be the same.
Sadly, if you follow the link to the releases section, there is no release for macOS.
That's actually quite interesting, as IIRC jemalloc has much looser alignment than other allocators and thus can give "tighter" blocks for small allocations.
> In medical terms we're talking about ... trying to cause as much death and injury to each other ...

Are you sure about this? What do you base your statement on? I remember having read as a child an article in a science magazine claming that war in ancient times was far less deadly than war today; If I remember correctly, one of the reasons stated was that the participants were not intent on actually killing every soldier on the other side but rather on overpowering them or on making them surrender.

(Also: "trying to cause as much death and injury to each other" is not a medical term.)
Some would argue that the undefined duration does not match “limited times” and that the copyright is no longer “promoting useful arts”. While some of these questions have been answered in Disney’s favour in recent times, it is clear that the “matter of law” is anything but clear.
If I don’t get my coffee I shall shrivel up like a piece of roast goat.
It could be!
Yes, but I think I have clicked on at least 10 accept/close/ignore/okay buttons today. As I have almost every day, it's a never ending battle. Multiple machines, mobile devices, cookies do sometimes expire (ironically), I might clear my cookies etc.

Further, the cost of one paragraph in flowing text is quite different to blocking modals or boxes going along with your scrolling blocking large portions of the screen.

Why not toss in a 100 page EULA on every page while we're at it?

I strongly believe that the effective outcome (i.e how "much" people are tracked on the web) would be identical if GDPR had a provision that allowed sites to a) track as before by default and b) provide opt-out and transparency via a footer link, similar to German laws about Impressum.

Most people won't opt-out, nor read details, but all people have to click accept all the damn time.
Fishing Hook v2.3.4 (Mod) hack
Yes. I think that's the point. No-one commented on it, because no-one considered themselves traumatised. It was normal.
Indeed, in a perfect UX you'd never manipulate keys, always identities; that gives keys less importance and allow them to be rotated in a period that's closer to 10 weeks than 10 years. Also, exchanges are done with identities, not keys.
I appreciate you looking at the other side. To explain my view point, in this system it seems like all of the risk is put on the infected party who reports themselves. By decreasing the level of control they have, I believe you will see a decrease in the number of adoptions. It is valid to think about the non-infected user wanting to have this information, but today they don't even have this information so to even know they were exposed on their commute is above and beyond what is in place today.

I guess my original comment is a bit vague. When I look at these protocols I am interested in how large scale adversaries (Nation State) would use this technology, but also small scale adversaries (day-to-day person you are not friendly with). I think its also important to note as others have, that being outed as having the virus does put people at risk of violence in some places.
They added a clarification tweet that it does indeed only apply to the replies to the original tweet.
That's false. The one area where I'm sure google doesn't mess around is with their ads division. They spend a proportionately large amount of money combating fraud to prevent erosion of confidence and most importantly accuracy in their main money maker.

If you've ever taken a look at the number of conversions fb ads provides vs google ads, you'd know this.
Can not fill the Captcha showed because it is embedded in a too small frame.
Hm. The burning, raping and pillaging afterward (e.g. 'sacking') might have seemed pretty rough to the people back then.
I think I have to at least somewhat agree with GP here. Obviously you need to come to terms with the relationship ending and move on in general, but I think there's some truth to making new memories in these places being beneficial. I would argue it isn't necessarily specific to a partner, however.

I don't frequently meet up with my ex's, but have caught up with them for lunch or other things from time to time. I don't really have any sort of emotional reaction to those - the relationship is over, I've got no desire to get back together with them, etc. And it's easy for me, because I know and accept that who we are now wouldn't work out, and that's why we broke up.

But memories don't always have that same perspective. They're a crystallized point in time, and maybe that point in time is before whatever happened or changed that resulted in the relationship not working out. To me those "ghosts" can be significantly tougher to deal with than interacting with the person in present day. Making more memories in those places doesn't make me forget, but it does help redefine it as just another memory in a long list of them. It gives me options of other things to remember.
Don’t be snarky.

Anyways, this is from Twitters TOS[0 §5]:

> You retain your rights to any Content you submit, post or display on or through the Services. By submitting, posting or displaying Content on or through the Services, you grant us a worldwide, non­exclusive, royalty­free license (with the right to sublicense) to use, copy, reproduce, process, adapt, modify, publish, transmit, display and distribute such Content in any and all media or distribution methods (now known or later developed).

Basically, they don’t take copyright of what you post (in contrast to what OP said), but it doesn’t matter because they can do what they want with it.

[0]: https://cdn.cms-twdigitalassets.com/content/dam/legal-twitte...
lockdowncount.co.uk
2-3 cups a day, unless it's crunch time.
Yup. He is an inspiration.
What are the top things you wish your APM tool did better?
> Walt Disney is often criticized in this context

Disney hired Pixar to put out Tolstoy 1 and 2, then they acquired Pixar and have since released Tolstoy 3 and 4.
> Spending $5 on a blended pseudo coffee drink at Starbucks is not the only option.

That's only a fashion statement, which, like all other fashion statements, don't go for any quality or smart/educated choice but pure social signaling.

Nobody with any functional taste buds in places like Italy goes to Starbucks. Only those desperately lost and having herd mentality, similar to folks in France eating in McDonald (and there are tons of those).

/rant

Btw if kitchen hob is available, I consider Italian press (aka Moka pot) superior to French press, and more efficient in extracting flavors and potency (so also more economical in long run). Prices tend to be similar.
The C++ allocator interface really needs to support realloc. Vector, in many cases, could avoid copying elements, particularly in cases where the move constructor is trivial --- e.g., vector<int>.
I am 100% on board with Google Maps and Trello being built using JavaScript-everything.

Most of the things I've seen built using the modern JavaScript stack don't warrant working and feeling like desktop apps. They should work like fast-loading websites - especially on mobile phones, which is the source of most traffic these days.
Caffeine in pill form is fairly cheap since it's a byproduct of the decaffeination process.
This wouldn't fall under contract law - it's more like an implicit license grant.
That’s a method on how to get off caffeine. Staying off caffeine is something different.

The phenomenon of returning to an addictive substance is known colloquially as “relapse”
I can't respond for the OP of course, but I can tell you this: he put work in it.

He did the job of two fine respectable professions: the editor and the designer. That's worth something, even when he didn't write the content.
Fair point right now, but that's not going to be the case forever. And once things start to open up again and cases are less common, this kind of contact tracing will become even more important to track down new outbreaks.
On the other hand I haven't seen red black tree implementation that isn't based on Cormen (in most cases quoted).
Except that tweets aren't sent to Disney. They're sent to all Twitter users.
> Revolutions were plotted, art movements invented, and history made in places like Cafe Central in Vienna.

What makes you think people aren't doing this on their laptops? The person you think is doing corporate work on their MacBook could be changing the world.
why not go nuclear?

"Walt Disney World was awesome! Thanks to all the hard workers who made that day special.

By replying or retweeting this Tweet, Walt Disney Corp. hereby agrees in perpetuity to sell to the owner of this twitter account for $1, per motion picture, an unlimited, license for any purpose."
Has per-thread arenas made locking less of an issues these days?
you do. what you don't have is a license to attach the words "Mickey Mouse" to your product.
I call black coffee my table rental fee.
I drink up to 4 cups a day or zero per day. I might be a daily drinker for 2 months and then go a month or two without a cup or any caffeine source at all. I've never had a problem with caffeine withdrawal headache which is interesting. 23andme says I'm 'likely to slightly more coffee than average' and I am a slow caffeine metabolizer based on my genetics.

The only coffee rules I really follow are 1) don't drink it if I'm tired - for whatever reason I feel nauseous if I drink it when I am actually tired, and 2) don't drink any after 3PM or else I probably won't go to sleep until 1-2AM.
The cost in a coffee shop is the labor, not the coffee. It takes a long time to make an espresso-based drink.
Buy High, Sell Low

Do you need epub or pdf?
https://youtu.be/B3B5qt6gsxY
I disagree. If you run your social media this ineptly that you become a laughing stock of the platform you are spending millions on to be "cool" and "native", then you have failed. Period.
If you want your mom n' pop shops to survive this thing consider them first. You'd be surprised how many are probably doing deliveries.

It's awfully low tech, but the local indie book shop here in Vancouver will order any book you ask for and deliver it throughout Metro Vancouver. All you need to do is call them and ask.
Yeah. I guess most of that "information" aspect is now being done by t'intertubes.

Maybe I should rephrase my original to be "the important point of journalism is speaking truth to power".

Seeing what a farce the UK media is making of Assange's trial (sorry, extradition hearing), it seems we're nowhere near that at the moment.
If you don't think so, try quitting caffeine use for a few weeks and then jump back to your regular dose.

I find that stimulants in general are subtle drugs in the sense that it's not obvious to inexperienced users how affected they are by them.
You've taken a bunch of other people's copyrighted work, formatted it as a PDF, and then ask for money for it... on your company's website? That's so weird. I get maybe dipping into Reddit to have a couple of blog posts that show up in search results, with the goal of getting people to click through to your products or whatever, but actually asking for money for the e-book is a new one.

My main takeaway is that if I walked into a Juno Bank branch, the teller would be happy to give me a pen to fill out the application, but would first ask "need a pen? name your price." The pen would then have a Chase logo on it, since they got it from the bank across the street.
There are various kinds of coffee. I'm using moka pot and I'm buying grinded coffee. Those are cheap enough, moka pot is around $50 and lasts few years (forever if you're careful), grinded coffee is something like $10 in my country and enough for a 2-3 weeks for me. I'm living in a third-world country but that's not my biggest spendings my a large margin. Preparing 4 cups of coffee takes around 3 minutes. That's enough for me to sustain for a half of day.

There are some people who are spending unhealthy amount of money, true, but they chose to do so. There are various options and if someone wants to spend 10x money to get 10% better taste (and even that is subjective), that's his choice, not something unavoidable.
Being on the internet does not make something public domain or free to use. A screenshot of a Twitter feed includes many copyrighted things: Twitter’s web layout, the tweets themselves, etc.
Fraud is a hard problem. It's fairly easy to find individual examples of malfeasance, the relevant question is what percentage of online ads are scams, compared to ads in other media.

I'll also note that you're now no longer arguing that advertisements are unethical, but that online advertisements are unethical, and not because they're "an attempt to psychologically manipulate the public" as was originally stated, or even because, as you originally claimed "Advertising doesn’t give you a choice on whether you want to see it."

We've moved the goalposts quite a bit. And I'm not interested in an in the weeds argument about the challenges of online fraud prevention. It won't be fruitful for anyone. I've proven my original point: you don't line online advertisements (and that's OK!), but you also don't have a clear reason that they're uniquely different than any other form of advertising, and you don't believe that advertising, in general, is unethical.
Then don't buy or exchange your email for it? I'm not sure why you feel the need to tell the rest of us how to morally evaluate this optional e-book. I traded my email for it and my morals weren't violated in the slightest.

Are you planning on competing with the product or do you just want to see that person fail for no particular reason?
What would it take to get this social aspect of cafes back? Exclusivity? No-smartphone rule? Dedicated discussion times? How do you envision us bringing this back while adapting to modern social norms?
Don't many of those sites also receive an affiliate commission?
how is it? <seeking peer review information>
Under what circumstances do you think it would be okay for an infected person to hide their contacts? Surely you’re not valuing your marriage over the lives that will be lost in the resulting spread?
What are you more scared of, especially when your brand is more or less bulletproof? Some kind of lawsuit, or briefly looking ridiculous on Twitter?
He also skips over the fact that 2FA means second factor. Even if insecure it's still better than nothing.
Small talk should be banned